RE 07-28-97.4 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS
RESOLUTION NO. 072897.4
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COPPELL,
TEXAS, DESIGNATING THE SURVEY OF THE GENERAL PREVAILING RATE OF
PER DIEM WAGES OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AS APPLICABLE IN
THE CITY FOR BUILDING TRADES AND FOR PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS;
REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 020894.2; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, Government Code § 2258.022, requires the City to ascertain the general
prevailing rate of per diem wages in the City for work to be performed for each crait or type of
worker needed to execute City contracts; and
WHEREAS, the United States Department of Labor has prepared a survey of preva'ding
wage rates for public works project, conducted within the last three years;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the prevailing wage rate survey conducted by the Untied States
Department of Labor for public works projects, currently and as it may be amended or updated
from time-to-time, is hereby designated as the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for public
works projects in the City. A true and correct copy of the current United States Department of
Labor wage rate survey is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof for all purposes,
the same as if fully copied herein.
SECTION 2. That Resolution No. 020894.2 be, and it is hereby, repealed.
SECTION :}. This Resolution shall become effective immediately from and after its
passage, and it is, accordingly, so resolved.
1 SS9873
DULY PASSED and approved by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, on this
the ~3~7~b/ day of ,.~-c{ {~ , 1997.
APPROVED:
ATTEST:
KATI-ILEEN ROACH, CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
2 $S9873
JUL-15-1997 16:55 WAGE & HOUR REGION 6 214 767 2730 P.02×15
General Decision Number TX970060
Superseded General Decision No. TX960060
State: TEXAS
Construction Type:
BUILDING
County(les):
DALLAS KAUFMAN
ELLIS ROCKWALL
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS (does not include single family
homes and apartments up to and including 4 stories). Use current
~IGHWAY GENERAL WAGE DETERMINATION FOR PAVING AND UTILITIES
INCIDENTAL TO BUILDING CONSTRUCTION)
Modification Number Publication Date
.. 0 02/14/1997
1 05/09/1997
TX970060 - 1 05/09/1997
J~JL-15-1997 16:55 WAGE ~ HOUR REGION 6 21~
COUNTY(les):
DALLAS KAUFMAN
ELLIS ROCKWA~L
* BRTX0005A 05/01/1997
Rates Fringes
BRICKlAYeRS 15.42 2.80
CARP0198A 05/01/1996
Rates Fringes
CARPF~NTER$ 14.00 2.92
ELEC0059B 06/01/1996
Rates Fringes
ELECTRICIANS 18.04 2_20+10%
CABLE SPLICERS 19.84 2.20+10%
~NGI0714B 06/01/1991
Rates Fringes
DALLAS COUNTY
CRANES:
Heavy - hydraulic &
conventional cranes 50
tons and over 14.65 2.60
Light - hydraulic &
conventional cranes up to
50 tons 13.65 2.60
F. NGI0819B 06/01/1993
Rates Fringes
Heavy - hydraulic &
conventional cranes 50
tone and over 16.20 3.30
Light - hydraulic &
conventional cranes up to
50 tons 14.00 3.30
IRON0481G 06/01/1996
Rates Fringes
IRONWORKERS 14.46 3.75
P[~%S0061A 05/01/1993
TX970060 - 2 05/09/1997
JUL-15-199? 16:55 WAGE & HOUR REGION 6 21~ 767 2?50
Rates Fringes
PL~TERERS 15.06 2.94
SFTX0669A 01/01/1995
Ra~es Pringe~
SPRINKLER FITTERS 18.25 5.78
SUTX2051A 11/01/1989
Rates Fringes
ACOUSTICAJ~ INSTAlLeRS 12.16
BRICK T~NDERS 8.6O 1.30
CEN[~MASONS 11.38
DRYWALL HANGERS 11.71
GI~%ZIERS 12.26 1.10
IRONWORKERS, Reinforcing 10.33 2.94
LABOR~RS, UNSKILleD (Excluding
Landscape Laborers) 7.58 1.30
LATHERS 17.38 1.04
MECHANICAL INSULATORS 10.55 1.00
PAINTERS:
Br~/sh & Spray 10.76 2.20
Painters doing drywall
finishing only 10.42
PAPERHANGERS 11.30 2.20
PLASTER TENDERS 9.00
PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTER$ (Including
HVAC Work) 12.80 1.63
POWER EQUIPMENT OPERATORS:
Eackhoes 10.64 1.41
Front End Loaders 8.77
ROOFERS 9.45 1.04
SHEET METAL WORKERS (Including
HVAC Work) 12.80 2.05
SOFT FLOOR LAYERS 13.13
TILE SETTERS 13.75
Unlisted classifications needed for work not included within
the scope of the classifications listed may be added after
award only as provided in the labor standards contract clauses
(29 CFR 5.5(a) (1) (v)).
In the listing above, the "SU" designation means that rates
listed under that identifier do not reflect collectively
bargained wa~e and fringe benefit rates. Other designations
indicate unions whose rates have been determined to be
prevailing.
WAGE DETERMINATION APPEALS PROCESS
TX970060 - 3 05/09/1997
1.) Mas there been an initial decision in the matter? This can
be:
~ an existing published wage determination
* a survey underlying a wage determination
* a Wage and Hour Division letter setting ~orth a
position on a wage determine%ion matter
* a conformance (additional classification and rate)
ruling
On survey related matters, initial contact, including requests
for summaries of surveys, should be with the Wage and Hour
Regional Office for the area in which the survey was conducted
because those Regional Offices have responsibility for the
Davis-Bacon survey program. If the response from this initial
contact is not satisfactory, then the process described in 2.)
and 3.) should be followed.
with regard to any other matter not yet ripe for the formal
process described here, initial contact should be with the Branch
of Construction Wage Determinations. write
Branch of Construction Wage Determinations
Wage and Hour Division
U. $. Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue, N. W.
Washington, D. C. 20210
2.) If the answer to the question in 1.) is yes, then an
interested party (those affected by the action) can request
review and reconsideration from the Wage and Hour Administrator
(See 29 CFR Part 1.8 and 29 CFR Part ?). Write to:
Wage and Hour Administrator
U.S. Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue, N. W.
Washington, D.. C. 20210
The request should be accompanied by a full statement of the
interested party's position and by any information (wage payment
data, project description, area practice material, etc.) that the
requestor considers relevant to the issue.
3.) If the decision of the Administrator is not favorable, an
interested party may appeal directly to the Administrative Review
Board (formerly the Wage A~eals Board). Write to:
~mlnistrative Review Board
U. $. Department of
200 Constitution Avenue, N. W.
washington, D. C. 20210
TX970060 - 4 05/09/1997
All decisions by the Administrative Review Board are final.
END OF GENERAL DECISION
TX970060 ~ 0~/09/1997
~l~ ?6?
JUL-15-19D? 16:56 WaGE ~ HOUR REGION
COUNTY(ies):
JOHNSON PARKER TARRANT
BRTX0006A 05/08/1992
Rat~s Fringes
BRICKLAYERS 14.00 2.50
CARP14~iA 05/01/1995
Rates Fringes
MILLWRIGHTS 16.49 3.92
ELECOll6C 06/01/1996
Rates Fringes
ELECTRICIANS 17.30 2.~0+10.5%
CABL~ SPLICERS 17.30 2.~0+10.~%
IRONO263B 06/01/1996
Rates Fringes
IRONWORKERS (Structural) 14.46 3.75
SFTX0669A 01/01/1995
Rates Fringes
SPRINKLER FITTERS 18.25 5.78
SUTXlO73A 11/01/1989
Rates Fringes
ACOUSTICAL INSTALLERS 11.23
CARPENTERS (Excluding drywall
hangers, acoustical installers &
bart insulators) 12.27 2.22
carpenters doing drywall hanging
only 10.00
CEMENT MASONS 10.16
DRYWALL FINISHERS 11.18
GLAZIERS 11.37 1.31
LABORERS (Includin~ Mason
Tenders & Pipelayer$) 7.46 1.00
LANDSCAPE LABORERS 5.00
MECHANICAL INSULATORS 10.92 1.00
PAINTERS, BRUSH & SPRAY
(excluding Drywall Finishing) 10.47 2.21
PLASTERERS 11.50
PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS (Including
HVAC work) 13.34 2.15
POWER EQUIPMENT OPERATORS:
Backhoes 12.30 1.82
Cranes 14.26 2.44
TX970061 - 2 02/14/1997
21d 767 273~
~UL-15-1Dg? 16;56 WAGE & HO~R ~EGION 6 214 767 2738 P.89/18
Foundation Drill Operators 8.54
Graders 11.69 1.80
ROOFERS 9.~0 .99
SHEET METAL WORKERs (iNCLUDING
h-~AC Duct Work) 12.63 2.10
WELDERs - Receive rate prescribed for craft performing operation
to which welding is incidental.
Unlimted classifications needed for work not included within
the ~cope of the classifications listed may be added after
award only as provide~ in the labor standards contract clauses
(29 CFR 5.5(a) (1) (v)).
In the listing above, the "SU" designation means that rates
listed under that identifier do not reflect collectively
bargained wage and fringe benefit rates. Other designations
indicate unions whose rates have been determined to he
prevailing.
WAGE DETERMINATION APPEALS PROCESS
1.) Has there been an initial decision in the matter? This can
be:
* an existing published wage determination
* a suruey underlying a wage determination
* a Wage and Hour Division letter setting forth a
position on a wage determination matter
* a conformance (additional classification and rate)
ruling
On survey related matters, initial contact, including requests
for summaries of sur~eys, should be with the Waga and Hour
Regional Office for the area in which the survey was conducted
because those Regional Offices have responsibility for the
Davis-Bacon survey program. If the response from this initial
contact is not satisfactory, then the process described in 2.)
and 3.) should be followed.
With regard to any other matter not yet ripe for the formal
process described here, initial contact should be with the Branch
of Construction Wage Determinations. Write to:
Branch of Construction Wage Determinations
Wage and Hour Division
U. S. Department of Labor
TX970061 3 02/14/1997
214 76? 275~
~UL-15-1997 16:57 WAGE'& HOUR REGION 6 214 ?67 2930 P.i~/10
200 Constitution Avenue, N. W.
Washington, D. C. 20210
2.) If the answer to the question in 1.) is yes, then an
interested party (those affected by the action) can request
review and reconsideration from the Wage and Hour Administrator
(See 29 CFR ~art 1.8 and 29 CFR Part 7). Write to:
Wage and Hour Administrator
U.S. Department of Labor
ZOO Constitution Avenue, N. W.
Washington, D. C. 20210
The request should be accompanied by a full statement of the
interested party's position and by any information (wagm payment
data, project description, area practice material, etc.) that the
requestor considers relevant to the issue.
3.) If the decision of the Administrator is not favorable, an
interested party may appeal directly to the Administrative Review
Board (formerly the Wage Appeals Board). Write to:
Administrative Review Board
U. $. Degartment of Labor
ZoO Constitution Avenue, N- W.
Washington, D. C. 20210
4.) All decisions by the Administrative Review Board are final.
END OF GENERAL DECISION
TX970061 - 4 02/14/1997
TOTIqL P. 10