CP 2006-11-14
NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING AND AGENDA
NOVEMBER 14, 2006
DOUG STOVER, BILLY FAUGHT, Place 5
Mayor Mayor Pro Tem
TIM BRANCHEAU, Place 1 MARSHA TUNNELL, Place 4
JAYNE PETERS, Place 2 MARVIN FRANKLIN, Place 6
BRIANNA HINOJOSA-FLORES, Place 3 BILL YORK, Place 7
JIM WITT, City Manager
MEETING TIME AND PLACE:
Call to Order 5:30 p.m. Council Chambers (Open to the Public)
Executive Session Immediately Following 1st Fl. Conf. Room (Closed to the Public)
Work Session Immediately Following 1st Fl. Conf. Room (Open to the Public)
Regular Session 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers (Open to the Public)
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas will
meet in Regular Called Session on Tuesday, November 14, 2006, at 5:30 p.m. for
Executive Session, Work Session will follow immediately thereafter, and Regular
Session will begin at 7:00 p.m., to be held at Town Center, 255 Parkway
Boulevard, Coppell, Texas.
As authorized by Section 551.071(2) of the Texas Government Code, this
meeting may be convened into closed Executive Session for the purpose of
seeking confidential legal advice from the City Attorney on any agenda item
listed herein.
The City of Coppell reserves the right to reconvene, recess or realign the Work
Session or called Executive Session or order of business at any time prior to
adjournment.
The purpose of the meeting is to consider the following items:
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
1. Call to order.
ag111406
Page 1 of 8
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
EXECUTIVE SESSION (Closed to the Public)
2. Convene Executive Session
A. Section 551.071, Texas Government Code - Consultation with City
Attorney.
1. The City of Coppell and Coppell Independent School District
opposition to a change of zoning request of the Billingsley
Corporation in the City of Dallas, Zoning Case Number Z045-
107; and City of Coppell vs. CB Parkway Business Center VI, et
al in the County Court at Law No. 3,; and CB Parkway Business
Center, et al vs. City of Coppell, et al.; and City of Dallas vs.
Douglas Stover, et al in the 191st District Court; and City of
Coppell, et al vs. City of Dallas, et al in the 101st District Court.
B. Section 551.072, Texas Government Code - Deliberation regarding
Real Property.
1. Acquisition of Real Property on West Sandy Lake for Traffic
Safety Improvements.
WORK SESSION (Open to the Public)
3. Convene Work Session
A. Discussion concerning enhanced safety improvements on Denton
Tap Road at Town Center Drive.
B. Discussion regarding Vision and Positioning Strategies for Coppell.
C. Discussion regarding the Task Force for Appraisal Reform hearing on
November 16.
D. Local Option Election Briefing.
E. Discussion of Agenda Items.
Adjourn Work Session.
PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS
Public Service Announcements concerning local civic events and no Council
action is required or permitted.
REGULAR SESSION (Open to the Public)
4. Convene Regular Session.
5. Invocation.
6. Pledge of Allegiance.
ag111406
Page 2 of 8
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
7. Citizens' Appearances.
CONSENT AGENDA
8. Consider approval of the following consent agenda items:
A. Consider approval of minutes: October 24, 2006
October 30, 2006.
B. Consider approval of a grant agreement between the city of
Coppell, the Coppell Education Development Corporation, and the
Coppell Independent School District for Spanish teachers in the
amount of $128,833.00 and authorizing the City Manager to sign.
C. Consider approval of a license agreement between the City of
Coppell and SCI-Wynnpage II L.P. to allow the construction of a six
foot high masonry screening wall within the 15-foot public alley
right-of-way easement in the Wynnpage Subdivision; and
authorizing the City Manager to sign.
D. Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. PD-195R-O,
Callahan Medical/Office Addition, zoning change request from PD-
195-O (Planned Development-195-Office) to PD-195R-O (Planned
Development–195 Revised-Office) to allow additional attached
signage and a revision to the monument sign to allow for a multi-
tenant sign on 1.95 acres of property located at 848 S. Denton Tap
Road, north of Belt Line Road, and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
E. Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. PD-199R4-HC-S-
1211R2 Service Star, zoning change request from PD-199-HC-S-1211R
(Planned Development-199-Highway Commercial-Special Use
Permit-1211 Revised) to PD-199R4-HC-S-1211R2 (Planned
Development 199-Highway Commercial-Special Use Permit-1211
Revision 2), to revise the detail site plan for Tract 4 to allow the
development of 9,310-square-foot retail building and to allow
revised signage for the previously approved auto repair garage on
2.24 acres of property located at the southwest corner of S.H. 121
and MacArthur Blvd., and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
F. Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. PD-200R-SF-12,
Petterson Addition, Lots 1-4, Block A, zoning change request from
2F-9 (Two Family-9) to PD-200-SF-12 (Planned Development Revised -
200, Single Family-12) to allow the construction of four single-family
ag111406
Page 3 of 8
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
homes on 2.27 acres of property located along the north side of
Sandy Lake Road, approximately 120 feet west of Summer Place
Drive, and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
G. Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. S-1236-A,
MetroPCS, zoning change request from A (Agriculture) to S-1236-A
(Special Use Permit-1236-Agriculture), to allow for a wireless
communication antenna to be mounted to an existing electric
transmission tower, with an accessory cabinet with enclosure at the
base of the tower, located approximately 1,700-feet southwest of
the intersection of MacArthur Boulevard and the transmission line
easement; north of Belt Line Road, and authorizing the Mayor to
sign.
END OF CONSENT
9. PUBLIC HEARING (continued):
Consider approval of Case No. PD-214-TH-1, TH-2, C and SF-9, The
Ellington, zoning change request from C (Commercial), R (Retail) and SF-9
(Single Family–9) to PD-214-TH-1, TH-2, C and SF-9 (Planned Development-
214-Townhouse-1, Townhouse-2, Commercial and Single-Family), with a
Concept Site Plan to allow the development of 125 townhouse units (67
TH-1 units on approximately 11.6 acres of Tract A.1 and 58 TH-2 units on
approximately 7.5 acres of Tract A.2); Commercial uses on Tract A.3
(approximately 2 acres) along Sandy Lake Road; and on Tracts A.4 and
A.5 (4.4 acres) along Denton Tap Road; SF-9 on 3.3 acres for park/open
space, on Tract B for a total of approximately 29.05 acres of property
located south of Sandy Lake Road, and west of Denton Tap Road.
10. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of Case No. PD-216-H, Robertson Pools, zoning change
request from H and SF-12 (Historic and Single Family-12) to PD-216-H
(Planned Development-216-Historic), to approve a detail site plan to allow
1,740-square-foot expansion to an existing 3,120-square-foot building,
construction of a 4,970-square-foot building, outside storage and
additional parking on approximately 2.65 acres of property located at 569
Coppell Road, north of Bethel Road.
11. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of Robertson Commercial Pools Addition, Replat and
Minor Plat, to expand the area of the existing plat and provide necessary
easements to allow for a building expansion and new construction on 2.65
ag111406
Page 4 of 8
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
acres of property acres of property located at 569 Coppell Road, north of
Bethel Road.
12. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of Case No. S-1170R2, Mariachi Grill, zoning change
request from S-1170R (Special Use Permit-1170 Revised) to S-1170R2
(Special Use Permit 1170 Revision 2), to allow an approximate 2,200-
square-foot restaurant with a private club to be located at 761 S.
MacArthur, Suite 101.
13. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of Case No. PD–217-C, Perky Poodle, zoning change
request from C (Commercial) to PD-217-C (Planned Development-217-
Commercial), to allow the reuse and renovation of the existing 4,940-
square-foot structure for a pet day care/boarding/spa on 0.637 acres of
property located on the north side of Bethel School Road, approximately
240 feet east of Denton Tap, property known as 120 East Bethel School
Road.
14. Consider approval of the Northlake Woodlands Center, Lot 4, Block A,
Minor Plat, to establish a building site, various easements and fire lane to
allow for the reuse and renovation of the existing 4940-square-foot
structure for a pet day care/boarding/spa on 0.637 acres of property
located on the north side of Bethel School Road, approximately 240 feet
east of Denton Tap, property known as 120 East Bethel School Road.
15. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of Case No. PD-106R-SF-9, Hidden Valley, Lot 6, Block
C, zoning change request from PD-106-SF-9 (Planned Development –106
Single Family-9) to PD-106R-SF-9 (Planned Development – 106 Revised-
Single Family-9), to allow for a pool and deck to be constructed along the
rear property line, providing a variance to the required 5-foot setback, at
479 Hidden Valley Drive.
16. Consider approval of the Sandy Lake Oaks Addition, Lot 1, Block A, Site
Plan, to allow for the development of a 13,110-square-foot retail/office
building on 1.543 acres of property located at the north east corner of
Sandy Lake and Moore Road, known as 632 Sandy Lake Road, at the
request of Chuck West, West and Associates.
17. Consider approval of the Sandy Lake Oaks Addition, Lot 1, Block A, Minor
Plat, to establish fire lanes and various easements to allow for the
development of a 13,110-square-foot retail/office building on 1.543 acres
ag111406
Page 5 of 8
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
of property located at the north east corner of Sandy Lake and Moore
Road, known as 632 Sandy Lake Road.
18. Consider approval of the Freeport North, Lot 4R, Block A, Site Plan, to allow
the development of a 51,360-square-foot, one-story office building on 6.4
acres of property located on Royal Lane, approximately 1,200 feet north
of Bethel Road.
19. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of the Freeport North, Lot 4R, Block A, Replat, to
establish a building site, various easements and fire lane to allow the
development of a 51,360-square-foot, one-story office building on 6.4
acres of property located on Royal Lane, approximately 1,200 feet north
of Bethel Road.
20. Consider approval of the Coppell Heights Addition, Lot 9B and Lot 9C, Site
Plan, to allow the construction of two retail buildings, totaling 17,000-
square feet, on 3.1 acres of property located south and east of the
intersection of S. Beltline Road and E. Beltline Road.
21. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of the Coppell Heights Addition, Lot 9B and Lot 9C,
Replat, to establish a building site, various easements and fire lane to
allow the construction of two retail buildings, totaling 17,000-square feet,
on 3.1 acres of property located south and east of the intersection of S.
Beltline Road and E. Beltline Road.
22. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of text amendments to Chapter 12 Zoning of the Code
of Ordinances, Sec. 12-42-1, revising the definitions of Convenience Store
and Retail Stores and Shops, Sec. 12-29-3, Sign Regulations, prohibiting
neon signs being visible from outside of the building, except for “open”
signs, and various revisions to Sec. 12-30-16, SUP regulations for
Restaurants.
23. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of text amendment to Chapter 12, Zoning of the Code
of Ordinances, amending Sec. 12-32A-3(K) deleting reference to
requiring the mailing of public notices for telecommunication facility
beyond the notification required for similar rezonings, as prescribed by
state law, reducing the notification area to 200 feet.
ag111406
Page 6 of 8
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
24. Consider approval of an ordinance amending Chapter 6 of the Code of
Ordinances by adding Article 6-16 regarding alcoholic beverages;
providing for prohibition of the sale of beer in residential zoning districts;
providing prohibition of the sale of alcoholic beverages within a specified
distance of churches, public or private schools, public hospital and other
uses; and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
25. Necessary action resulting from Work Session.
26. Mayor and Council Reports.
A. Report by Mayor Stover regarding Metroplex Mayors’ Meeting.
27. Necessary Action Resulting from Executive Session.
Adjournment.
____________________________________
Douglas N. Stover, Mayor
CERTIFICATE
I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the bulletin board at
the City Hall of the City of Coppell, Texas on this _________ day of
_________________, 2006, at __________________.
____________________________________
Libby Ball, City Secretary
DETAILED INFORMATION REGARDING THIS AGENDA IS AVAILABLE ON
THE CITY'S WEBSITE (www.ci.coppell.tx.us) UNDER PUBLIC
DOCUMENTS, COUNCIL PACKETS.
ag111406
Page 7 of 8
PUBLIC NOTICES
STATEMENT FOR ADA COMPLIANCE
The City of Coppell acknowledges its responsibility to comply with the Americans With
Disabilities Act of 1990. Thus, in order to assist individuals with disabilities who require
special services (i.e. sign interpretative services, alternative audio/visual devices, and
amanuenses) for participation in or access to the City of Coppell sponsored public
programs, services and/or meetings, the City requests that individuals make requests for
these services forty-eight (48) hours ahead of the scheduled program, service and/or
meeting. To make arrangements, contact Vivyon V. Bowman, ADA Coordinator or
other designated official at (972) 462-0022, or (TDD 1-800-RELAY, TX 1-800-735-2989).
ag111406
Page 8 of 8
KEY TO COUNCIL GOALS ICONS
2007
Economic Development
• Promote highest and best use of Lesley tract
• Continue to explore large tract development options
• Continue “hot spot” focus
• Refine “Old Coppell” vision
• Assess use/sale/acquisition of City property
• Develop strategy to attract and retain high value office/retail/development
Quality Public Facilities & Infrastructure
• Explore funding sources for IMF
• Implement ½-cent sales tax reallocation for parks
• Continue focus on local/regional transportation efforts
• Provide quality park and recreation facilities
Excellent City Services & High Citizen Satisfaction
• Continue strategic planning for future costs of service delivery
• Timely response with quality service delivery
• Optimize citizen communication efforts
• Promote citizen involvement
• Actively participate in the legislative process
Sense of Community
• Develop and support community special events
• Encourage and evaluate teen initiatives
• Reassess viability of City cemetery
• Evaluate services and programs for senior citizen community
• Continue support for social services benefiting Coppell citizens
• Continue partnership with public entities serving our community
Fiscal Stability
• Continue and refine financial planning and forecasting
• Continue systematic management of debt and expenditures
• Balance expenditures with ability to maintain over time
• Perform cost analysis on all approved projects and programs prior to implementation
• Minimize potential impact of external factors and developments
Neighborhood Integrity & Code Enforcement
• Maintain communication with neighborhoods and the community
• Update Master Plan and Zoning as required
• Continue proactive neighborhood integrity programs
Safe Community
• Maintain and improve existing excellent level of service
• Continue focus on Homeland Security
• Provide quality public education programs
• Continue traffic/speed control efforts
DATE: November 14, 2006
ITEM #: ES-2
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
EXECUTIVE SESSION
A. Section 551.071, Texas Government Code – Consultation with City Attorney.
1. The City of Coppell and Coppell Independent School District opposition to
a change of zoning request of the Billingsley Corporation in the City of
Dallas, Zoning Case Number Z045-107; and City of Coppell vs. CB Parkway
Business Center VI, et al in the County Court at Law No. 3,; and CB
Parkway Business Center, et al vs. City of Coppell, et al.; and City of Dallas
vs. Douglas Stover, et al in the 191st District Court; and City of Coppell, et
al vs. City of Dallas, et al in the 101st District Court
B. Section 551.072, Texas Government Code – Deliberation regarding Real Property.
1. Acquisition of Real Property on West Sandy Lake for Traffic Safety
Improvements.
%executivesession
DATE: November 14, 2006
ITEM #: WS-2
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
WORK SESSION
A. Discussion concerning enhanced safety improvements on Denton Tap Road
at Town Center Drive.
B. Discussion regarding Vision and Positioning Strategies for Coppell.
C. Discussion regarding the Task Force for Appraisal Reform hearing on
November 16
D. Local Option Election Briefing.
E. Discussion of Agenda Items.
%worksession
DATE: November 14, 2006
ITEM #: 7
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
CITIZENS' APPEARANCES
ORDINANCE NO. 2001-964
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, ESTABLISHING RULES, TIMES AND
PROCEDURES FOR CONDUCTING CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, THE FOLLOWING
ARE HEREBY ADOPTED AS THE RULES, TIMES AND PROCEDURES FOR CONDUCTING
COUNCIL MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS:
The City of Coppell Code of Ordinances, Article 1-10 "Rules, Times and Procedures for
Conducting City Council Meetings," be, and the same is hereby, amended to read as
follows:
"ARTICLE 1-10
RULES, TIMES AND PROCEDURES FOR CONDUCTING
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
". . .
1-10-6.2.1 CITIZENS APPEARANCE
Persons wishing to speak on any matter other than an item scheduled for a public hearing on
the agenda, must sign a register and list their residence address, provided by the City Secretary
on a table outside the Council Chambers, and such persons may be heard only at the "Citizens
Appearance" portion of a regular meeting or special meeting. Each speaker must state his or
her name and address of residence. Presentations by individuals during the "Citizens
Appearance" shall be limited to two (2) minutes each. An individual speaker's time may be
extended for an additional two (2) minutes with the approval of a majority of the Council
members present. There shall be a cumulative limit of twenty (20) minutes allotted of any
regular or special Council meeting. Those persons who signed up to speak at the "Citizens
Appearance" shall be called upon in the order that they have signed the provided register. No
personal attacks by any speaker shall be made against any member of the Council, Mayor,
individual, group or corporation (Charter Article 3, Section 3.12).
%citapp
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
City Secretary
November 14, 2006
8/A
✔
PROCEDURAL
Consider approval of minutes: October 24, 2006
October 30, 2006.
Minutes of the City Council meeting held on October 24, 2006 and the Special meeting of October 30, 2006.
Staff recommends approval.
%minutes
MINUTES OF OCTOBER 24, 2006
The City Council of the City of Coppell met in Regular Called Session on
Tuesday, October 24, 2006, at 5:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of Town
Center, 255 Parkway Boulevard, Coppell, Texas. The following members were
present:
Doug Stover, Mayor
Billy Faught, Mayor Pro Tem
Jayne Peters, Councilmember
Brianna Hinojosa-Flores, Councilmember (late arrival)
Marsha Tunnell, Councilmember
Marvin Franklin, Councilmember
Bill York, Councilmember
Councilmember Brancheau was absent from the meeting. Also present were
City Manager Jim Witt, City Secretary Libby Ball and City Attorney Robert
Hager.
1. Call to order.
EXECUTIVE SESSION (Closed to the Public)
2. Convene Executive Session
A. Section 551.071, Texas Government Code - Consultation
with City Attorney.
1. The City of Coppell and Coppell Independent School
District opposition to a change of zoning request of
the Billingsley Corporation in the City of Dallas,
Zoning Case Number Z045-107; and City of Coppell
vs. CB Parkway Business Center VI, et al in the
County Court at Law No. 3,; and CB Parkway
Business Center, et al vs. City of Coppell, et al.; and
City of Dallas vs. Douglas Stover, et al in the 191st
District Court; and City of Coppell, et al vs. City of
Dallas, et al in the 101st District Court.
B. Section 551.087, Texas Government Code – Economic
Development Negotiations.
1. Economic Development Prospects on the west side
of Coppell.
The Executive Session was held at the end of the meeting.
cm102406
Page 1 of 11
WORK SESSION (Open to the Public)
3. Convene Work Session
A. Discussion regarding upcoming Legislative Session.
B. Discussion regarding the Red Light Enforcement Program.
C. Discussion regarding Economic Development incentives.
D. Reporting of Election Results.
E. Discussion of Agenda Items.
Councilmember Hinojosa-Flores arrived prior to convening Work Session.
REGULAR SESSION (Open to the Public)
4. Convene Regular Session.
5. Invocation.
Councilmember Franklin led those present in the Invocation.
6. Pledge of Allegiance.
Mayor Stover led those present in the Pledge of Allegiance.
7. Consider approval of a proclamation naming November Coppell
ISD Education Foundation Month, and authorizing the Mayor
to sign.
Presentation:
Mayor Stover read the Proclamation for the record and presented the
same to Lester Bell, President of the Foundation.
Action:
Councilmember Peters moved to approve a proclamation naming
November Coppell ISD Education Foundation Month, and authorizing
the Mayor to sign. Councilmember York seconded the motion; the
motion carried 6-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Faught and Councilmembers
Peters, Hinojosa-Flores, Tunnell, Franklin and York voting in favor of the
motion.
ag102406
Page 2 of 11
8. Consider approval of a proclamation naming the week of
November 6 through 10, 2006 as Municipal Court Week, and
authorizing the Mayor to sign.
Presentation:
Mayor Stover read the proclamation for the record and presented the
same to Municipal Judge Marian Moseley and Alternate Judges Kim
Nesbitt and Teri Landwehr.
Action:
Mayor Pro Tem Faught moved to approve a proclamation naming the
week of November 6 through 10, 2006 as Municipal Court Week, and
authorizing the Mayor to sign. Councilmember Hinijosa-Flores seconded
the motion; the motion carried 6-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Faught and
Councilmembers Peters, Hinojosa-Flores, Tunnell, Franklin and York
voting in favor of the motion.
Item 13 was considered at this time. See Item 13 for minutes.
9. Report by Park Board.
Presentation:
Greg Garcia, Park Board Member, made a report to Council.
10. Citizens' Appearances.
There were no citizens signed up for this item.
CONSENT AGENDA
11. Consider approval of the following consent agenda items:
A. Consider approval of minutes: October 10, 2006.
B. Consider approval of canceling the Regular City Council
meeting scheduled for December 26, 2006.
ag102406
Page 3 of 11
C. Consider approval of a grant agreement between the city
of Coppell, the Coppell Education Development
Corporation, and the Coppell Independent School District
for ESL in the amount of $1,083,600.00 and authorizing
the City Manager to sign.
D. Consider approval of a grant agreement between the city
of Coppell, the Coppell Education Development
Corporation, and the Coppell Independent School District
for foreign language in the amount of $644,375.00 and
authorizing the City Manager to sign.
E. Consider approval of a grant agreement between the city
of Coppell, the Coppell Education Development
Corporation, and the Coppell Independent School District
for literacy in the amount of $804,917.00 and authorizing
the Mayor to sign.
F. Consider approval of a grant agreement between the city
of Coppell, the Coppell Education Development
Corporation, and The North Hills School for foreign
language in the amount of $21,746.40 and authorizing
the City Manager to sign.
G. Consider approval of a grant agreement between the city
of Coppell, the Coppell Education Development
Corporation, and The North Hills School for technology in
the amount of $16,311.53 and authorizing the City
Manager to sign.
H. Consider approval of an ordinance of the City of Coppell,
Texas, amending the code of ordinances by amending
article 6-8, Food Service sanitation, by repealing the
same in its entirety and replacing with a new article 6-8,
Food Service sanitation, sections 6-8-1 through 6-8-12,
providing for food service; providing for the adoption of
state rules; providing for amendments; providing for
seasonal food establishments; providing for temporary
food establishments; providing for mobile units; providing
for food service regulations, permits and pre-operational
inspections; providing for certified food manager;
providing for the suspension of a food permit; providing
ag102406
Page 4 of 11
for revocation of a food permit; providing for examination
and condemnation of food; and authorizing the Mayor to
sign.
I. Consider approval of renewing the annual Dallas County
Health Services Agreement, effective October 1, 2006
through September 30, 2007, in the amount of
$3,131.00, and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
Action:
Councilmember Peters moved to approve Consent Agenda Items A, B, C,
D, E, F, G, H carrying Ordinance No. 2006-1140 and I. Councilmember
Franklin seconded the motion; the motion carried 6-0 with Mayor Pro
Tem Faught and Councilmembers Peters, Hinojosa-Flores, Tunnell,
Franklin and York voting in favor of the motion.
12. Consider approval of an Ordinance appointing a presiding
municipal judge and alternate municipal judges of the Coppell
Municipal Court of Record No. 1 of the city of Coppell, Texas;
and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
Presentation:
City Manager Jim Witt made a presentation to the Council.
Action:
Mayor Pro Tem Faught moved to approve Ordinance No. 2006-1141
appointing a presiding municipal judge and alternate municipal judges of
the Coppell Municipal Court of Record No. 1 of the city of Coppell, Texas;
and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Councilmember Tunnell seconded
the motion; the motion carried 6-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Faught and
Councilmembers Peters, Hinojosa-Flores, Tunnell, Franklin and York
voting in favor of the motion.
Mayor Stover swore in Marian Moseley as Municipal Judge and Kim
Nesbitt and Teri Landwehr as Alternate Municipal Judges.
13. PUBLIC HEARING (Continued):
Consider approval of Case No. PD-214-TH-1, TH-2, C and SF-9,
The Ellington, zoning change request from C (Commercial), R
ag102406
Page 5 of 11
(Retail) and SF-9 (Single Family–9) to PD-214-TH-1, TH-2, C
and SF-9 (Planned Development-214-Townhouse-1, Townhouse-
2, Commercial and Single-Family), with a Concept Site Plan to
allow the development of 125 townhouse units (67 TH-1 units
on approximately 11.6 acres of Tract A.1 and 58 TH-2 units on
approximately 7.5 acres of Tract A.2); Commercial uses on
Tract A.3 (approximately 2 acres) along Sandy Lake Road; and
on Tracts A.4 and A.5 (4.4 acres) along Denton Tap Road; SF-9
on 3.3 acres for park/open space, on Tract B for a total of
approximately 29.05 acres of property located south of Sandy
Lake Road, and west of Denton Tap Road.
This item was considered prior to Item 9.
Presentation:
Mayor Stover advised that the Applicant has asked that this item be
continued until the next Council meeting.
Public Hearing:
Mayor Stover advised that the Public Hearing remains open from the
October 10 Council meeting. City Attorney Robert Hager advised that
the record should reflect that Petitions regarding this item were delivered
to the City Secretary.
Action:
Councilmember York moved to continue this item until November 14,
2006. Councilmember Franklin seconded the motion; the motion carried
6-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Faught and Councilmembers Peters, Hinojosa-
Flores, Tunnell, Franklin and York voting in favor of the motion.
14. Consider approval of an ordinance providing for the
implementation of an automated red light enforcement
program in the city of Coppell, Texas; imposing a civil penalty;
and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
Presentation:
City Manager Jim Witt made a presentation to the Council.
ag102406
Page 6 of 11
Action:
Councilmember Franklin moved to approve Ordinance No. 2006-1142
providing for the implementation of an automated red light enforcement
program in the city of Coppell, Texas; imposing a civil penalty; and
authorizing the Mayor to sign. Councilmember Peters seconded the
motion; the motion carried 6-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Faught and
Councilmembers Peters, Hinojosa-Flores, Tunnell, Franklin and York
voting in favor of the motion.
15. Consider approval of an agreement between the City of Coppell
and Redflex Traffic Systems, Inc. for Photo Red Light
Enforcement Program; and authorizing the City Manager to
sign and provide a letter of intent.
Presentation:
City Manager Jim Witt made a presentation to the Council.
Action:
Councilmember Tunnell moved to approve an agreement between the
City of Coppell and Redflex Traffic Systems, Inc. for Photo Red Light
Enforcement Program with the correction that references to Collin
County should be changed to Dallas County and with the addition of a
non-appropriation clause; and authorizing the City Manager to sign and
provide a letter of intent. Councilmember York seconded the motion; the
motion carried 6-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Faught and Councilmembers
Peters, Hinojosa-Flores, Tunnell, Franklin and York voting in favor of the
motion.
16. Consider approval of sending a letter to Senator Chris Harris
regarding the city of Coppell adopting a sex offender residency
ordinance, and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
Action:
Councilmember Peters moved to approve sending a letter to Senator
Chris Harris regarding the city of Coppell adopting a sex offender
residency ordinance, and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Councilmember
Franklin seconded the motion; the motion carried 6-0 with Mayor Pro
Tem Faught and Councilmembers Peters, Hinojosa-Flores, Tunnell,
Franklin and York voting in favor of the motion.
ag102406
Page 7 of 11
At this time Council reconvened Work Session to complete items not discussed
prior to the Regular Session.
WORK SESSION (Open to the Public)
Convene Work Session
A. Discussion regarding upcoming Legislative Session.
B. Discussion regarding the Red Light Enforcement Program.
C. Discussion regarding Economic Development incentives.
D. Reporting of Election Results.
E. Discussion of Agenda Items.
Mayor Stover left the meeting during Work Session.
EXECUTIVE SESSION (Closed to the Public)
Convene Executive Session
A. Section 551.071, Texas Government Code - Consultation
with City Attorney.
1. The City of Coppell and Coppell Independent School
District opposition to a change of zoning request of
the Billingsley Corporation in the City of Dallas,
Zoning Case Number Z045-107; and City of Coppell
vs. CB Parkway Business Center VI, et al in the
County Court at Law No. 3,; and CB Parkway
Business Center, et al vs. City of Coppell, et al.; and
City of Dallas vs. Douglas Stover, et al in the 191st
District Court; and City of Coppell, et al vs. City of
Dallas, et al in the 101st District Court.
B. Section 551.087, Texas Government Code – Economic
Development Negotiations.
1. Economic Development Prospects on the west side
of Coppell.
Mayor Pro Tem Faught convened into Executive Session at 9:03 p.m. as
allowed under the above-stated article. Mayor Pro Tem Faught
adjourned the Executive Session at 9:52 p.m. and opened the Regular
Session.
ag102406
Page 8 of 11
REGULAR SESSION (Open to the Public)
Item 18 was considered at this time. See Item 18 for minutes.
17. Necessary action resulting from Work Session.
Action:
Councilmember Tunnell moved to direct City Staff to initiate zoning
change on the tract commonly known as Carter-Crowley to add it to the
historic overlay in Old Coppell. Councilmember Franklin seconded the
motion; the motion carried 6-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Faught and
Councilmembers Peters, Hinojosa-Flores, Tunnell, Franklin and York
voting in favor of the motion.
Action:
Councilmember Peters moved to authorize the City Manager to enter into
a contract with Mr. Dan Shelly to provide legislative assistance for a term
of 1 year for a retainer amount of $4,000 per month plus reasonable
expenses. Councilmember Tunnell seconded the motion; the motion
carried 6-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Faught and Councilmembers Peters,
Hinojosa-Flores, Tunnell, Franklin and York voting in favor of the
motion.
18. Council Committee Reports.
A. Carrollton/Farmers Branch ISD/Lewisville ISD –
Councilmember Tunnell.
B. Coppell ISD – Mayor Pro Tem Faught and Councilmember
York.
C. Coppell Seniors – Mayor Pro Tem Faught and
Councilmember Brancheau.
D. Dallas Regional Mobility Coalition - Councilmember
Peters.
E. Economic Development Committee - Councilmembers
Peters and Franklin.
F. Metrocrest Hospital Authority - Councilmember Tunnell.
G. Metrocrest Medical Foundation - Councilmember
Hinojosa-Flores.
H. Metrocrest Medical Services – Councilmember Hinojosa-
Flores.
I. Metrocrest Social Service Center – Councilmember York.
ag102406
Page 9 of 11
J. North Texas Council of Governments - Councilmember
Peters.
K. NTCOG/Regional Emergency Management -
Councilmember Franklin.
L. North Texas Commission - Councilmember Brancheau.
M. Senior Adult Services – Mayor Pro Tem Faught.
This item was considered prior to Item 17.
A. Councilmember Tunnell advised that the LISD would hold a
Veteran’s Day Breakfast on November 10th at 9:30 a.m. at
Timbercreek Elementary and they will hold a public Veteran’s Day
Ceremony at 10:30 a.m. at the LISD Administration Building.
B. Mayor Pro Tem Faught announced that CISD had made changes to
the early release days remaining for the current school year.
Mayor Stover stated that the Coppell High School Volley Ball team
is playing for the district championship. Mayor Stover advised that
he along with Councilmember Peters, City Manager Jim Witt,
Deputy City Manager Clay Phillips and numerous members of the
Coppell Police Department had attended the Red Ribbon Breakfast.
C. Mayor Pro Tem Faught reported he had been to the Senior Center
and spoken with Ester Moreno, the new Director, and she is quite
pleased with the reception she has gotten from the seniors.
D. Councilmember Peters advised that the region is being honored
this month as the Texas Transportation Commission would be
meeting in Denton and in January will return to Duncanville.
Texas has become the first state to receive federal approval to use
private activity bonds in connection with the CDA’s.
E. Councilmember Franklin announced that the Committee had
elected Bill Rohloff as Chair for the coming year and Gary Roden as
the Vice Chair. The committee approved a tax abatement package
for the northwest corner of Royal Lane and Bethel Road for a Duke
Realty project and a personal property tax abatement had been
approved for a computer science corporation.
F. There was nothing to report on this item.
G. There was nothing to report on this item.
H. There was nothing to report on this item.
ag102406
Page 10 of 11
I. There was nothing to report on this item.
J. There was nothing to report on this item.
K. There was nothing to report on this item.
L. Mayor Stover reported that the City was recognized for the National
Night Out Program as the best in the nation.
M. Mayor Pro Tem Faught advised that the Senior Adult Services Golf
Tournament was rained out and has been rescheduled for Monday,
October 30th.
Mayor Stover reminded the community that Saturday, October 28th,
would be the day for the Old Town Festival in Old Town.
19. Necessary Action Resulting from Executive Session.
There was no action necessary under this item.
There being no further business to come before the City Council, the meeting
was adjourned.
__________________________________
Douglas N. Stover, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________________
Libby Ball, City Secretary
ag102406
Page 11 of 11
MINUTES OF OCTOBER 30, 2006
The City Council of the City of Coppell met in Special Called Session on
Monday, October 30, 2006, at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of Town
Center, 255 Parkway Boulevard, Coppell, Texas. The following members were
present:
Doug Stover, Mayor
Billy Faught, Mayor Pro Tem
Tim Brancheau, Councilmember
Jayne Peters, Councilmember
Marsha Tunnell, Councilmember
Marvin Franklin, Councilmember
Bill York, Councilmember
Councilmember Hinojosa-Flores was absent from the meeting. Also present
were City Manager Jim Witt, Deputy City Manager Clay Phillips and City
Attorney Robert Hager.
SPECIAL SESSION (Open to the Public)
1. Call to order.
Mayor Stover called the meeting to order, determined that a quorum was
present and convened into Executive Session.
JOINT EXECUTIVE SESSION WITH (Closed to the Public)
COPPELL ISD SCHOOL BOARD TRUSTEES
2. Convene Joint Executive Session
A. Section 551.071, Texas Government Code – Consultation
with City Attorney and School Board Special Legal
Counsel.
1. The City of Coppell and Coppell Independent School
District opposition to a change of zoning request of
the Billingsley Corporation in the City of Dallas,
Zoning Case Number Z045-107; and City of Coppell
vs. CB Parkway Business Center VI, et al in the
County Court at Law No. 3,; and CB Parkway
cm103006
Page 1 of 3
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
Business Center, et al vs. City of Coppell, et al.; and
City of Coppell, et al vs. City of Dallas, et al.
Mayor Stover convened into the Joint Executive Session at 6:21 p.m. as
allowed under the above-stated article. Mayor Stover adjourned the
Executive Session at 8:06 p.m. and opened the Council Executive
Session.
EXECUTIVE SESSION (Closed to the Public)
B. Section 551.071, Texas Government Code – Deliberation
regarding Real Property.
1. Land acquisition.
Mayor Stover convened into Council Executive Session at 8:06 p.m. as
allowed under the above-stated article. Mayor Stover adjourned the
Executive Session at 9:06 p.m. and opened the Joint Executive Session.
JOINT EXECUTIVE SESSION WITH (Closed to the Public)
COPPELL ISD SCHOOL BOARD TRUSTEES
Mayor Stover convened into Joint Executive Session at 9:06 p.m. as
allowed under the above-stated article. Mayor Stover adjourned the
Executive Session at 9:17 p.m. and opened the Work Session.
WORK SESSION (Open to the Public)
3. Update on Denton Tap/Town Center Boulevard Traffic Safety
Enhancements.
SPECIAL SESSION (Open to the Public)
3. Necessary action resulting from Work Session.
There was no action necessary under this item.
ag103006
Page 2 of 3
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
4. Necessary action resulting from Executive Session.
There was no action necessary under this item.
____________________________________
Douglas N. Stover, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Libby Ball, City Secretary
ag103006
Page 3 of 3
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
City Manager
November 14, 2006
8/B
✔
CONTRACT/BID or PROPOSAL
Consider approval of a grant agreement between the city of Coppell, the Coppell Education Development
Corporation, and the Coppell Independent School District for Spanish teachers in the amount of $128,833.00 and
authorizing the City Manager to sign.
Funds for this grant are available from the 1/2 cent CEDC sales tax.
_______________________________________________
COPPELL EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Page 1
STATE OF TEXAS § COPPELL EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
§
COUNTY OF DALLAS § GRANT AGREEMENT
This Educational Development Grant Agreement (“AGREEMENT”) is made by and
between the City of Coppell, Texas (“CITY”), Coppell Education Development Corporation
(“CEDC”) and the Coppell Independent School District (the “CISD”), acting by and through
their respective authorized officers.
W I T N E S S E T H :
WHEREAS, the CITY is authorized by TEX. LOC. GOV’T CODE § 379A to provide
educational development grants to publicly funded institutions through the CEDC for the
promotion of literacy, foreign language and career technology for a skilled workforce; and
WHEREAS, the CITY seeks to support programs for promoting literacy, foreign
language and career technology for a skilled workforce; and
WHEREAS, the CISD has submitted a grant application No. 2006-S02 to provide
funding for hiring three (3) certified Spanish teachers, one at each Coppell middle school (the
PROJECT), to provide daily instruction to eighth grade students; and
WHEREAS, the CISD has developed the PROJECT using certified Spanish teachers
who specialize in such field; and
WHEREAS, CISD is in need of funding the salaries and benefits for three (3) certified
Spanish teachers, and seeks the assistance of the CEDC for such assistance; and
WHEREAS, the CITY has determined that making an education development grant to
the CISD in accordance with this AGREEMENT will further the objectives of the CITY, will
benefit the CITY and the CITY’s inhabitants and will promote foreign language in the CITY.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and other valuable
consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged on the terms and
conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows:
GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. Subject to availability of funds collected from the 379A sales tax, the CITY agrees to
provide the CISD an education development grant (the “GRANT”) in an amount not to exceed
One Hundred Twenty-eight Thousand Eight Hundred Thirty-three Dollars and No Cents
($128,833.00).
2. CISD agrees to utilize the GRANT to fund salaries and benefits for three (3) certified
Spanish teachers, one each at the three Coppell Middle Schools.
_______________________________________________
COPPELL EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Page 2
3. CITY agrees to provide the GRANT of One Hundred Twenty-eight Thousand Eight
Hundred Thirty-three Dollars and No Cents ($128,833.00), funds payable on a quarterly basis
with the first payment to be made in November 2006. Funds to be expended in accordance with
the budget categories set forth in the GRANT application.
4. No later than May 31, 2007 the CISD shall submit personnel costs for this GRANT to
the CEDC. The detailed expenditures shall include, but not limited to, salaries, number of
students served, grade levels actually served, copies of contracts, and any changes in personnel
during the period covered by this GRANT.
5. In the event the CISD breaches any of the terms of this AGREEMENT or fails to use
the GRANT for the purposes set forth herein, then the CISD, after expiration of the notice and
cure period described herein, shall be in default of this AGREEMENT. As liquidated damages
in the event of such default, the CISD shall, within thirty (30) days after demand, repay to the
CITY, the GRANT with interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum from the date of
receipt of the GRANT until paid. The parties acknowledge that actual damages in the event of
default would be speculative and difficult to determine. Upon breach by CISD of any
obligations under this AGREEMENT, the CITY shall notify the CISD in writing, who shall
have thirty (30) days from receipt of the notice in which to cure such default. If CISD fails to
cure the default within the time provided herein, or, as such time period may be extended, then
the CITY at its sole option, shall have the right to terminate this AGREEMENT without further
notice to the CISD.
6. The terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT are binding upon the successors and
assigns of all parties hereto. This AGREEMENT may not be assigned without the express
written consent of CITY and CEDC.
7. It is understood and agreed between the parties that CISD, in the use of the GRANT and
in satisfying the conditions of this AGREEMENT, is acting independently, and that the CITY
and/or the CEDC assumes no responsibilities or liabilities to third parties in connection with
these actions. CISD agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the CITY and the CEDC from all
such claims, suits, and causes of action, liabilities and expenses, including reasonable attorney’s
fees, of any nature whatsoever arising out of the CISD’S performance of the conditions under
this AGREEMENT.
8. Any notice required or permitted to be delivered hereunder shall be deemed received
when sent by United States mail, postage pre-paid, certified mail, return receipt requested,
addressed to the party at the address set forth opposite the signature of the party.
9. This AGREEMENT shall be governed by the laws of the State of Texas; and venue for
any action concerning this AGREEMENT shall be in the State District Court of Dallas County,
Texas.
10. In the event any one or more of the provisions contained in this AGREEMENT shall for
any reason be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity,
_______________________________________________
COPPELL EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Page 3
illegality, or unenforceability shall not effect the other provisions, and the AGREEMENT shall
be construed as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had never been contained in it.
EXECUTED this _______ day of _____________________, 2006.
CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS
By: ______________________________________
JIM WITT, CITY MANAGER
255 Parkway Boulevard
P.O. Box 9478
Coppell, Texas 75019
ATTEST:
By: ______________________________________
EXECUTED this _______ day of _____________________, 2006.
COPPELL EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
By: ______________________________________
Antonio Altemus, President
255 Parkway Boulevard
P.O. Box 9478
Coppell, Texas 75019
ATTEST:
By: ______________________________________
_______________________________________________
COPPELL EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Page 4
EXECUTED this ______ day of ________________, 2006.
COPPELL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
By: ______________________________________
DR. JEFF TURNER, SUPERINTENDENT
Coppell Independent School District
200 S. Denton Road
Coppell, Texas 75019
ATTEST:
By: ______________________________________
CITY’S ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OF TEXAS §
§
COUNTY OF DALLAS §
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the _____ day of _______________,
2006, by Jim Witt, City Manager of the City of Coppell, Texas, a Texas municipality, on behalf of
said municipality.
___________________________________
Notary Public, State of Texas
My Commission Expires:
_________________________
_______________________________________________
COPPELL EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Page 5
COPPELL EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
STATE OF TEXAS §
§
COUNTY OF DALLAS §
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the _______ day of ___________,
2006, by Antonio Altemus, President, Coppell Education Development Corporation, on behalf of
said Corporation.
Notary Public, State of Texas
My Commission expires:
________________________
COPPELL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
STATE OF TEXAS §
§
COUNTY OF DALLAS §
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the _______ day of ___________,
2006, by Dr. Jeff Turner, Superintendent of Coppell Independent School District, on behalf of
said District.
Notary Public, State of Texas
My Commission expires:
________________________
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
ȱ ȱ
Engineering
November 14, 2006
8/C
✔
CONTRACT/BID or PROPOSAL
Consider approval of a license agreement between the City of Coppell and SCI-Wynnpage II L.P. to allow the
construction of a six foot high masonry screening wall within the 15-foot public alley right-of-way easement in the
Wynnpage Subdivision; and authorizing the City Manager to sign.
Approval of this license agreement will allow the construction of a six foot high masonry screening wall within the
15-foot public alley right-of-way easement that was dedicated with the final plat of Wynnpage Subdivision, Volume
92001, page 2952.
Staff will be available to answer any questions at the council meeting.
Staff recommends approval of this license agreement to allow the
construction of the six foot screening wall.
#Wynnpage License Agmt
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Council
FROM:Kenneth M. Griffin, P.E., Director of Engineering and Public Works
DATE:November 14, 2006
REF: Consider approval of a license agreement between the City of Coppell and
SCI-Wynnpage II L.P. to allow the construction of a six foot high masonry
screening wall within the 15-foot public alley right-of-way easement in the
Wynnpage Subdivision; and authorizing the City Manager to sign.
The City of Coppell has been approached by the developer of the north section of Wynnpage
Plaza concerning the location of a brick screening wall within alley right-of-way of the
Wynnpage Subdivision. The property in question is west of Denton Tap Road and abuts the
north side of the Wynnpage Subdivision. Because the development of the north portion of
Wynnpage Plaza is non-residential and abuts a residential development, the developer is required
to build the brick screening wall.
The original intent was to work with Atmos Energy to locate the brick screening wall along the
southern edge of the existing 50-foot Lone Star Gas easement that run through this property.
The developer was unsuccessful in obtaining permission from Atmos Energy. Therefore, he
contacted the city about moving the screening wall slightly south of the existing 50-foot Lone
Star Gas easement and constructing it within the existing 15-foot alley right-of-way that was
dedicated with the Wynnpage Subdivision plat. It is not unusual to have a brick screening wall
on the far edge of the 15-foot alley right-of-way. To accomplish the placement of the brick
screening wall within the city's 15-foot alley right-of-way, a license agreement must be executed
between the developer and the City of Coppell.
The license agreement attached to this agenda item is a typical license agreement has been
utilized numerous times within the City of Coppell to allow for encroachments upon city
property by private improvements. It indemnifies the city from any claims brought by a third
party and provides the city the opportunity to terminate the license agreement if the licensee does
not live up to the requirements of the license agreement. If the licensee performs all requirements
within the license agreement, then the agreement itself is noted to be perpetual. Again, this is
typical of the license agreements that have been executed within the City of Coppell.
The City offers no objections to the approval of the license agreement to allow the encroachment
of a brick screening wall within the city's 15-foot alley right-of-way in the Wynnpage
Subdivision. Staff will be available to answer any questions at the council meeting.
1 INCH = FT.
0 100
100
50
Wynnpage Addition
Proposed Screening Wall
Location Exhibit
Created in LDDTS:\CAD\In_Design\MISC EXHIBITS\dwg\EXHIBITS.dwg\WYNNPAGE WALL
Created on: 11 August 2006 by Scott Latta
PROPOSED SCREENING WALL Exhibit 'A'
Exhibit 'B'
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
ȱ
Planning
November 14, 2006
8/D
✔
ORDINANCE
Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. PD-195R-O, Callahan Medical/Office Addition, zoning change
request from PD-195-O (Planned Development-195-Office) to PD-195R-O (Planned Development–195 Revised-Office)
to allow additional attached signage and a revision to the monument sign to allow for a multi-tenant sign on 1.95
acres of property located at 848 S. Denton Tap Road, north of Belt Line Road, and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
On September 21, 2006, the Planning Commission recommended
approval of this zoning request.
On October 10, 2006, Council unanimously approved this zoning
change (7-0).
Staff recommends approval.
@ PD-195R-O, (ORD) 1-AR (con)
1 70963
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. ________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS,
AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP
OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, AS HERETOFORE AMENDED, BY
GRANTING A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM PD-195-O (PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT-195-OFFICE) TO PD-195R-O (PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT–195 REVISED-OFFICE), TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL
ATTACHED SIGNAGE AND A REVISION TO THE MONUMENT SIGN
TO ALLOW FOR A MULTI-TENANT SIGN ON 1.95 ACRES OF
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 848 S. DENTON TAP ROAD, NORTH OF
BELTLINE ROAD AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN
EXHIBIT “A”, ATTACHED HERETO; PROVIDING FOR
DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS; PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF
THE ATTACHED SIGN EXHIBIT, ATTACHED TO AS EXHIBIT “B”,;
PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY
OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS
($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the governing body of the City of
Coppell, Texas, in compliance with the laws of the State of Texas and pursuant to the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, have given requisite notices by
publication and otherwise, and after holding due hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all
property owners generally, and to all persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the
vicinity thereof, the said governing body is of the opinion that Zoning Application No PD-195R-O
should be approved, and in the exercise of legislative discretion have concluded that the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map should be amended.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF COPPELL, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.That the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map of the City of Coppell,
Texas, duly passed by the governing body of the City of Coppell, Texas, as heretofore amended, be
and the same is hereby amended to grant a change in zoning from PD-195-O (Planned Development-
2 70963
195-Office) to PD-195R-O (Planned Development–195 Revised-Office), to allow additional
attached signage and a revision to the monument sign to allow for a multi-tenant sign on 1.95
acres of property located at 848 S. Denton Tap Road, north of Beltline Road and being more
particularly in Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes.
SECTION 2.That the property shall be developed and used only in accordance with the
following development conditions as set forth herein below:
A. Accept as amended herein, the property shall be developed in accordance with
Ordinance 91500-A-324, which is incorporated herein as set forth in full and hereby
republished.
B. Additional attached signs shall be in accordance with the following regulations:
1. Maximum total square footage of attached signage on all existing
structures shall not exceed 100 square feet;
2. All sign letters, exclusive of logos as permitted under the Coppell sign
regulations, shall be constructed and attached with the same or similar
font;
3. All letters shall be individually-mounted, channel letters;
4. Black letters on the cast stone portions of the façade and white letters on
the brick portion of the building are hereby permitted; however any one
sign must be consistent in use of black or white lettering.
5. All attached signs shall be constructed and attached to achieve balance and
spacing as to not create visual clutter or distract from the architect features
of the structure. Once all signs are installed there will be a balanced
appearance.
C. The multi-tenant monument sign shall adhere to all provisions of Section 12-29-
4.2(A)(iii) in the Code of Ordinances.
3 70963
SECTION 3.That the Attached Sign Exhibit, as provided in Exhibit “B”, which is
attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes, is hereby, approved.
SECTION 4. That the above property shall be used only in the manner and for the purpose
provided for by the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, as heretofore
amended, and as amended herein.
SECTION 5. That all provisions of the Ordinances of the City of Coppell, Texas, in
conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same are hereby, repealed, and all other
provisions not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 6. That should any sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section
of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, the same shall not
affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole, or any part or provision thereof other than the part so
decided to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, and shall not affect the validity of the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as a whole.
SECTION 7. An offense committed before the effective date of this ordinance is governed
by prior law and the provisions of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, as amended, in effect
when the offense was committed and the former law is continued in effect for this purpose.
SECTION 8.That any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions or terms
of this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Coppell, as heretofore amended, and upon conviction shall be punished by
4 70963
a fine not to exceed the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense; and each and
every day such violation shall continue shall be deemed to constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 9.That this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage
and the publication of its caption, as the law and charter in such cases provide.
DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, this the _______ day of
___________________, 2006.
APPROVED:
_____________________________________
DOUGLAS N. STOVER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
LIBBY BALL, CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________
CITY ATTORNEY
(REH/cdb 10/30/2006)
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
ȱ
Planning
November 14, 2006
8/E
✔
ORDINANCE
Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. PD-199R4-HC-S-1211R2 Service Star, zoning change request from
PD-199-HC-S-1211R (Planned Development-199-Highway Commercial-Special Use Permit-1211 Revised) to
PD-199R4-HC-S-1211R2 (Planned Development 199-Highway Commercial-Special Use Permit-1211 Revision 2), to revise
the detail site plan for Tract 4 to allow the development of 9,310-square-foot retail building and to allow revised
signage for the previously approved auto repair garage on 2.24 acres of property located at the southwest corner of
S.H. 121 and MacArthur Blvd., and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
On September 21, 2006, the Planning Commission recommended
approval of this zoning request.
On October 10, 2006, Council unanimously approved this zoning
change (7-0).
Staff recommends approval.
@ PD-199R4-HC-S- (ORD) 1-AR (con)
1 71432
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. ________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 91500, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE
AND MAP OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, AS HERETOFORE
AMENDED, BY GRANTING A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM PD-199-HC-S-
1211R (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT-199-HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL-
SPECIAL USE PERMIT-1211 REVISED) TO PD-199R4-HC-S-1211R2
(PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 199-HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL-SPECIAL
USE PERMIT-1211 REVISION 2), TO REVISE THE DETAIL SITE PLAN
FOR TRACT 4 TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF 9,310-SQUARE-
FOOT RETAIL BUILDING AND TO ALLOW REVISED SIGNAGE FOR
THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED AUTO REPAIR GARAGE ON 2.24 ACRES
OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF S.H. 121
AND MACARTHUR BLVD AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A", WHICH IS ATTACHED HERETO AND
INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE; PROVIDING FOR THE
APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN, EXISTING TREE
PLAN, ELEVATIONS, ELEVATIONS OF THE MONUMENT SIGN, AND
FIRESTONE ATTACHED SIGN EXHIBITS, ATTACHED HERETO AS
EXHIBITS “B,” “C,” “D,” “E,” “F,” AND “G,” RESPECTIVELY;
PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL CONDITIONS; PROVIDING A REPEALING
CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A
SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED
THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH
OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Commission and the governing body of the City of
Coppell, Texas, in compliance with the laws of the State of Texas and pursuant to the Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, have given requisite notices by publication and otherwise,
and after holding due hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property owners generally,
and to all persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, the said
governing body is of the opinion that Zoning Application No. PD-199-HC-S-1211R2 should be
approved, and in the exercise of legislative discretion have concluded that Ordinance No. 91500, the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map should be amended.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF COPPELL, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.That Ordinance No. 91500, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map of
the City of Coppell, Texas, duly passed by the governing body of the City of Coppell, Texas, as
heretofore amended, be and the same is hereby amended to grant a change in zoning from PD-199-
HC-S-1211R (Planned Development-199-Highway Commercial-Special Use Permit-1211 Revised)
2 71432
to PD-199R4-HC-S-1211R2 (Planned Development 199-Highway Commercial-Special Use Permit-
1211 Revision 2), to revise the detail site plan for Tract 4 to allow the development of 9,310-square-
foot retail building and to allow revised signage for the previously approved auto repair garage on
2.24 acres of property located at the southwest corner of S.H. 121 and MacArthur Blvd., described
in the attached Exhibit "A", subject to special conditions.
SECTION 2.That the revised Special Use Permit to allowing for a revised the detail site plan
for Tract 4 to allow the development of 9,310-square-foot retail building and to allow revised
signage for the previously approved auto repair garage, is hereby approved subject to the following
special conditions:
A. The proposed Planned Development shall comply with the use regulations set forth in
Zoning Ordinance Numbers 95100-A-318 and 95100-A-410, except as amended
herein:
….
C. (2) Tract 4 (only)
i. Automobile Repair Garage (no outside storage of vehicles)
ii. Retail Uses
iii. Restaurant Use, which shall not exceed an aggregate total of 4,655
square feet, provided a Special Use Permit is granted and sufficient
parking exists for each restaurant tenant
iv. Grocery and Convenience Stores provided a Special Use Permit is
granted
v. Hours of Operation shall not exceed:
Automobile Retail Garage – 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM Mon-Fri
7:00 AM to 6:00 PM Sat
9:00 AM to 5:00 PM Sun
Retail – 24 hours/Day, 7 Days/Week
….
a. Signage regulations for this proposed Planned Development shall remain as
defined in Zoning Ordinance numbers 95100-A-318 and 95100-A-410, with the
following amendments:
i. Tract 4 shall be allowed two (2) monument signs, each of which will display
the name of both the retail center and automotive service center, the square
3 71432
footage of each above reference sign shall not exceed sixty (60) square-feet.
This multi-tenant monument sign shall adhere to all provisions of Section 12-
29-4.2(A)(iii) in the Code of Ordinances, except that the Firestone may be
larger than the other tenants. All letters shall be black.
ii. The attached Firestone sign shall be white channel letters with the logo not to
exceed 20 percent of the area of the sign.
SECTION 3.That The Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Existing Tree Plan, Elevations, Elevations
of the Monument Sign, and Firestone Attached Sign Exhibits, attached hereto as Exhibits “B,” “C,”
“D,” “E,” “F,” AND “G,” respectively, and made a part hereof for all purposes, are hereby approved.
SECTION 4.That the above property shall be used only in the manner and for the purpose
provided for by the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, as heretofore amended,
and as amended herein.
SECTION 5.That the development of the property herein shall be in accordance with
building regulations, zoning ordinances, and any applicable ordinances except as may be specifically
altered or amended herein.
SECTION 6. That all provisions of the Ordinances of the City of Coppell, Texas, in conflict
with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same are hereby, repealed, and all other provisions not
in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 7. That should any sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of
this ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, the same shall not affect the
validity of this ordinance as a whole, or any part or provision thereof other than the part so decided to
be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, and shall not affect the validity of the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance as a whole.
SECTION 8. An offense committed before the effective date of this ordinance is governed by
prior law and the provisions of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, as amended, in effect when the
offense was committed and the former law is continued in effect for this purpose.
4 71432
SECTION 9.That any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions or terms of
this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Coppell, as heretofore amended, and upon conviction shall be punished by a
fine not to exceed the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense; and each and every
day such violation shall continue shall be deemed to constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 10.That this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage and
the publication of its caption, as the law and charter in such cases provide.
DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, this the _______ day of
___________________, 2006.
APPROVED:
_____________________________________
DOUGLAS N. STOVER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
LIBBY BALL, CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________
ROBERT E. HAGER, CITY ATTORNEY
PROD. APPROVAL
CLIENT ORIG. DES.
SALES REVISIONS
SALESPERSON
FILE DESIGN NUMBER
W.O. NUMBER
NOTE: COST FOR PROVIDING NECESSARY
ELECTRICAL WIRING TO SIGN AREA IS NOT
INCLUDED IN SIGN PROPOSAL.
DESIGN
ESTIMATING
ENGINEERING
EXPEDITING
DATE BY DRAWINGS DESIGN NO.SHEET NO.SCALE DATE BY FIRM NAME/LOCATION ADDRESS
1148 So. 300 W., S.L.C., Utah 84101 (801) 487-8481R
THIS DRAWING WAS CREATED TO ASSIST YOU IN VISUALIZING OUR PROPOSAL. THE ORIGINAL IDEAS HEREIN ARE THE PROPERTY OF YOUNG ELECTRIC SIGN COMPANY. PERMISSION TO COPY OR REVISE THIS DRAWING CAN ONLY BE OBTAINED THRU A WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH YESCO. SEE YOUR SALES REPRESENTATIVE OR CALL THE NEAREST OFFICE OF YOUNG ELECTRIC SIGN COMPANY.
PATTY HALLPATTY HALL
FIRESTONE
SR 121 AND MACARTHUR
COPPELL, TX.
FIRESTONE
SR 121 AND MACARTHUR
COPPELL, TX.
25072 3 OF 3 NOTED 2/17/06 25072 3 OF 3 NOTED 2/17/06
25072-R2 3 OF 4 NOTED 9/15/06 25072-R2 3 OF 4 NOTED 9/15/06
25072-R3 3 OF 3 NOTED 9/27/06 25072-R3 3 OF 3 NOTED 9/27/06
25072-R4 3 OF 3 NOTED 10/18/06 25072-R4 3 OF 3 NOTED 10/18/06
GLERYGLERY
UTAH CONTRACTOR LICENSE NO. 22-225497-5501
CUSTOMER APPROVAL
I have studied the above design
drawing and find the following details
acceptable.
( ) Copy and Letter styles
( ) Materials ( ) Colors*
( ) Dimensions
Customers Signature / Date
CUSTOMER APPROVAL
I have studied the above design
drawing and find the following details
acceptable.
( ) Copy and Letter styles
( ) Materials ( ) Colors*
( ) Dimensions
Customers Signature / Date
-NTS
MONUMENT DISPLAYS LOCATIONSMONUMENT DISPLAYS LOCATIONS
R-4: Change letters to black.R-4: Change letters to black.
5'-0 "
8”
8”
8”
8”
8”5'-3 "11'-4 "
SCALE 1- ½” =1’-0”SCALE 1- ½” =1’-0”
8 "
2 ½"
5'-2 ½"
YESCO TO MANUFACTURE, CRATE & LOAD FOUR (4)
SETS OF CUT OUT ALUMINUM LETTERS PAINTED
MATTE BLACK.
SUB TO INSTALL W/1” NON CORROSIVE STAND-OFFS.
2 SETS FOR S.H. 121 MONUMENT SIGN.
2 SETS FOR MacARTHUR MONUMENT SIGN.
(C) CUT OUT ALUMINUM LETTERS(C) CUT OUT ALUMINUM LETTERS
LETTERS MOUNTED ON MONUMENT DONE BY OTHERS - SCALE 3/8”=1’-0”LETTERS MOUNTED ON MONUMENT DONE BY OTHERS - SCALE 3/8”=1’-0”
TENANT SIGN
TENANT SIGN
TENANT SIGN
TENANT SIGN
TENANT SIGN
25072-R425072-R4
YESCO TO MANUF., CRATE & LOAD ONE (1) PF/PC INT/ILLUM
LOGO. W/SET OF PF/PC INT/ILLUM FIRESTONE CAC LETTERS.
PF/PC LOGO ( 12.75 SQ/FT ):
TOP SECTION TO HAVE 5” RETURNS PAINTED OX BLOOD.
1” TRIM CAP TO BE OX BLOOD.
FACE TO BE RED ACRYLIC W/ RED L.E.D. ILLUM.
BOTTOM SECTION
TO HAVE 5” RETURNS PAINTED 300C BLUE.
1” TRIM CAP TO BE BLUE.
FACE TO BE WHITE ACRYLIC W/FIRST SURFACE VINYL
3630-97 BRISTOL BLUE W/WHITE SHOW THROUGH COPY.
ILLUMINATION TO BE WHITE L.E.D.
PF/PC LOGO ( 12.75 SQ/FT ):
(A- OPTION 2) INT/ILLUM PF/PC LOGO & LETTERS (A- OPTION 2) INT/ILLUM PF/PC LOGO & LETTERS
FIRESTONE: PF/PC INT/ILLUM LETTERS.
5” RETURNS & 1” TRIM CAPS TO BE WHITE.
FACES TO BE WHITE ACRYLIC.
ILLUMINATION TO BE WHITE L.E.D.
COMPLETE AUTO CARE:
TO BE PF/PC INT/ILLUM. LETTERS
FACES TO BE WHITE ACRYLIC.
5” RETURNS & 1” TRIM CAPS TO BE WHITE.
ILLUMINATION TO BE WHITE L.E.D.
TM:
TO BE NON/ILLUM. CUT OUT BLACK ACRYLIC LETTERS.
ALL INSTALLATION TO BE DONE BY SUB.
FIRESTONE:
COMPLETE AUTO CARE:
TM:2'-10”2'-1 ½" 21'-5 ½" 3'-0 "4'-6 "
SCALE 3/8”=1’-0” ( TOTAL SIGN AREA 64.37 SQ/FT )
9"
1'-5 ½"
5 "
PROD. APPROVAL
CLIENT ORIG. DES.
SALES REVISIONS
SALESPERSON
FILE DESIGN NUMBER
W.O. NUMBER
NOTE: COST FOR PROVIDING NECESSARY
ELECTRICAL WIRING TO SIGN AREA IS NOT
INCLUDED IN SIGN PROPOSAL.
DESIGN
ESTIMATING
ENGINEERING
EXPEDITING
DATE BY DRAWINGS DESIGN NO.SHEET NO.SCALE DATE BY FIRM NAME/LOCATION ADDRESS
1148 So. 300 W., S.L.C., Utah 84101 (801) 487-8481R
THIS DRAWING WAS CREATED TO ASSIST YOU IN VISUALIZING OUR PROPOSAL. THE ORIGINAL IDEAS HEREIN ARE THE PROPERTY OF YOUNG ELECTRIC SIGN COMPANY. PERMISSION TO COPY OR REVISE THIS DRAWING CAN ONLY BE OBTAINED THRU A WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH YESCO. SEE YOUR SALES REPRESENTATIVE OR CALL THE NEAREST OFFICE OF YOUNG ELECTRIC SIGN COMPANY.
UTAH CONTRACTOR LICENSE NO. 22-225497-5501
PATTY HALLPATTY HALL
25072-R325072-R3
FIRESTONE
SR 121 AND MACARTHUR
COPPELL, TX.
FIRESTONE
SR 121 AND MACARTHUR
COPPELL, TX.
25072-R2 4 OF 4 NOTED 9/15/06 25072-R2 4 OF 4 NOTED 9/15/06
25072-R3 1 OF 3 NOTED 9/27/06 25072-R3 1 OF 3 NOTED 9/27/06
GLERY
CUSTOMER APPROVAL
I have studied the above design
drawing and find the following details
acceptable.
( ) Copy and Letter styles
( ) Materials ( ) Colors*
( ) Dimensions
Customers Signature / Date
CUSTOMER APPROVAL
I have studied the above design
drawing and find the following details
acceptable.
( ) Copy and Letter styles
( ) Materials ( ) Colors*
( ) Dimensions
Customers Signature / Date
NOTE: PF/PC LOGO NTE 20% (12.875) OF TOTAL SIGN AREA.
YESCO TO MANUFACTURE, CRATE & LOAD THREE (3) SETS OF PC/PF BRIDGESTONE LETTERS.
2157 RED PLEX FACE W/RED L.E.D ILLUM. FOR TRIANGLE PORTION OF LETTER B ONLY.
ALL OTHER "BRIDGESTONE" COPY TO BE WHITE PLEX FACE W/FIRST SURFACE BLACK
PERFORATED VINYL.
ALL LETTERS TO HAVE 1" BLACK TRIM CAP, 5” ALUM. RETURNS PAINTED DS-001.
ILLUMINATION TO BE WHITE L.E.D.
SUB TO INSTALL FLUSH TO WALL ON EAST, NORTH & WEST ELEVATIONS.
(B)-PF/PC INT/ILLUM BRIDGESTONE LETTERS - SCALE: 3/4”=1’-0” (B)-PF/PC INT/ILLUM BRIDGESTONE LETTERS - SCALE: 3/4”=1’-0”
7'-10 "10 "1'-0 ½" 5 "R-3: A Option 1 deletedR-3: A Option 1 deleted
PROD. APPROVAL
CLIENT ORIG. DES.
SALES REVISIONS
SALESPERSON
FILE DESIGN NUMBER
W.O. NUMBER
NOTE: COST FOR PROVIDING NECESSARY
ELECTRICAL WIRING TO SIGN AREA IS NOT
INCLUDED IN SIGN PROPOSAL.
DESIGN
ESTIMATING
ENGINEERING
EXPEDITING
DATE BY DRAWINGS DESIGN NO.SHEET NO.SCALE DATE BY FIRM NAME/LOCATION ADDRESS
1148 So. 300 W., S.L.C., Utah 84101 (801) 487-8481R
THIS DRAWING WAS CREATED TO ASSIST YOU IN VISUALIZING OUR PROPOSAL. THE ORIGINAL IDEAS HEREIN ARE THE PROPERTY OF YOUNG ELECTRIC SIGN COMPANY. PERMISSION TO COPY OR REVISE THIS DRAWING CAN ONLY BE OBTAINED THRU A WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH YESCO. SEE YOUR SALES REPRESENTATIVE OR CALL THE NEAREST OFFICE OF YOUNG ELECTRIC SIGN COMPANY.
UTAH CONTRACTOR LICENSE NO. 22-225497-5501
PATTY HALLPATTY HALL
FIRESTONE
SR 121 AND MACARTHUR
COPPELL, TX.
FIRESTONE
SR 121 AND MACARTHUR
COPPELL, TX.
25072 1 OF 3 1/16”=1’-0” 2/17/06 25072 1 OF 3 1/16”=1’-0” 2/17/06
25072-R1 1 OF 4 1/16”=1’-0” 9/15/06 25072-R1 1 OF 4 1/16”=1’-0” 9/15/06
25072-R3 2 OF 3 1/16”=1’-0” 9/27/06 25072-R3 2 OF 3 1/16”=1’-0” 9/27/06
GLERYGLERY
CUSTOMER APPROVAL
I have studied the above design
drawing and find the following details
acceptable.
( ) Copy and Letter styles
( ) Materials ( ) Colors*
( ) Dimensions
Customers Signature / Date
CUSTOMER APPROVAL
I have studied the above design
drawing and find the following details
acceptable.
( ) Copy and Letter styles
( ) Materials ( ) Colors*
( ) Dimensions
Customers Signature / Date
EAST ELEVATION
WEST ELEVATION
SCALE 1/16”=1’-0”
SCALE 1/16”=1’-0”
B
B
S.H. 121 MONUMENT SIGN MacARTHUR MONUMENT SIGN
R-3: A Option 1 deletedR-3: A Option 1 deleted
25072-R325072-R3
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
ȱ
Planning
November 14, 2006
8/F
✔
ORDINANCE
Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. PD-200R-SF-12, Petterson Addition, Lots 1-4, Block A, zoning change
request from 2F-9 (Two Family-9) to PD-200-SF-12 (Planned Development Revised -200, Single Family-12) to allow the
construction of four single-family homes on 2.27 acres of property located along the north side of Sandy Lake Road,
approximately 120 feet west of Summer Place Drive, and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
On August 17, 2006, the Planning Commission recommended approval
of this zoning request.
On September 12, 2006, Council unanimously approved this zoning
change (7-0).
Staff recommends approval.
@ PD-200R-SF-12, (ORD) 1-AR (con)
1 70949
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. ________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS,
AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP
OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, AS HERETOFORE AMENDED, BY
GRANTING A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM 2F-9 (TWO FAMILY-9) TO
PD-200-SF-12 (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVISED-200, SINGLE
FAMILY-12) TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF FOUR SINGLE
FAMILY HOMES ON 2.27 ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED ALONG
THE NORTH SIDE OF SANDY LAKE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 120
FEET WEST OF SUMMER PLACE DRIVE AND BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A”, ATTACHED HERETO;
PROVIDING FOR DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS; PROVIDING FOR
THE APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN, TREE SURVEY, LANDSCAPE PLAN,
SCREENING WALL LAYOUT AND DETAILS, ATTACHED TO AS
EXHIBITS “B”, “C”, “D” AND “E”, RESPECTIVELY; PROVIDING A
REPEALING CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE
NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00)
FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the governing body of the City of
Coppell, Texas, in compliance with the laws of the State of Texas and pursuant to the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, have given requisite notices by
publication and otherwise, and after holding due hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all
property owners generally, and to all persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the
vicinity thereof, the said governing body is of the opinion that Zoning Application No. PD-200-SF-
12 should be approved, and in the exercise of legislative discretion have concluded that the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map should be amended.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF COPPELL, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.That the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map of the City of Coppell,
Texas, duly passed by the governing body of the City of Coppell, Texas, as heretofore amended, be
and the same is hereby amended to grant a change in zoning from 2F-9 (Two Family-9) to PD-
200-SF-12 (Planned Development Revised -200, Single Family-12) to allow the construction of
2 70949
four single-family homes on 2.27 acres of property located along the north side of Sandy Lake
Road, approximately 120 feet west of Summer Place Drive and being more particularly in Exhibit
“A”, attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes.
SECTION 2.That the property shall be developed and used only in accordance with the
following development conditions as set forth herein below:
A. Use regulations.
A building or premise shall be used only for the following purposes:
1. Any use permitted in the "SF-ED" and the "SF-18" district.
2. Home occupation.
B. Maximum height regulations.
The maximum height regulations will be 35 feet nor more than two and one-half
stories high.
C. Area regulations.
1. Minimum size of yards:
(A) Front yard shall be a minimum of 64 feet (30’ from the fire lane,
utility and access easement).
(B) Side yard: Ten percent of the lot width, but in no case shall the side
yard be less than eight feet. A side yard adjacent to a street shall
not be less than 15 feet.
(C) Rear yard: 20 feet.
2. Minimum size of lot:
(A) Lot area: 20,000 square feet.
(B) Lot width: 100 feet.
(C) Lot depth: 190 feet.
3 70949
3. Minimum dwelling size: 3,000 square feet, exclusive of garages,
breezeways and porches.
4. Maximum lot coverage: 35 percent of the total lot area may be covered by
the combined area of the main buildings and accessory buildings,
exclusive of driveways and/or sidewalks.
D. Parking/Driveway regulations.
1. Two enclosed parking spaces behind the front yard line, the enclosed parking
area (garage) must be accessed off of the alley only.
2. A minimum of three off-street parking spaces must be provided by each lot.
These parking spaces may not be located in the fire lane/access easement nor
shall they be permitted to block any mail delivery service but must be
accessible from the easement. The location of the parking spaces shall be
accommodated for within a circular drive and must be shown when applying
for a building permit.
3. Driveway access from Sandy Lake Road shall be limited to one driveway and
shall be located in the platted access easement. The easement shall be paved
with 24 feet of concrete to fire lane standards.
E. Type of exterior construction.
1. At least 80 percent of the exterior walls of the first floor of all structures shall
be of masonry construction exclusive of doors, windows, and the area above
the top plate line.
2. Each story above the first floor of a straight wall structure shall be at least 80
percent masonry exclusive of doors, windows and the area above the top plate
line.
F. Tree Retribution.
1. A Tree Removal Permit shall be required prior to the removal of any trees.
4 70949
G. Homeowners Association
1. The homeowner’s association shall maintain the utility, access and fire lane
easements.
2. Lot 1X is to be maintained by the HOA.
H. Variance to Subdivision Ordinance
1. Lots are not required to have public road frontage.
2. All lots shall front on a 24’ wide fire lane, utility and access easement.
SECTION 3.That the Site Plan, Tree Survey, Landscape Plan, Screening Wall Layout and
Details attached to as Exhibits “B”, “C”, “D” and “E”, respectively, and made a part hereof for all
purposes, are hereby, approved.
SECTION 4. That the above property shall be used and developed only in the manner and
for the purpose provided for by the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and other applicable
ordinances of the City of Coppell, as heretofore amended, and as amended herein.
SECTION 5. That all provisions of the Ordinances of the City of Coppell, Texas, in
conflict except as amended herein with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same are hereby,
repealed, and all other provisions not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in
full force and effect.
SECTION 6. That should any sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section
of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, the same shall not
affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole, or any part or provision thereof other than the part so
5 70949
decided to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, and shall not affect the validity of the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as a whole.
SECTION 7. An offense committed before the effective date of this ordinance is governed
by prior law and the provisions of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, as amended, in effect
when the offense was committed and the former law is continued in effect for this purpose.
SECTION 8.That any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions or terms
of this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Coppell, as heretofore amended, and upon conviction shall be punished by
a fine not to exceed the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense; and each and
every day such violation shall continue shall be deemed to constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 9.That this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage
and the publication of its caption, as the law and charter in such cases provide.
DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, this the _______ day of
___________________, 2006.
APPROVED:
_____________________________________
DOUGLAS N. STOVER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
LIBBY BALL, CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________
ROBERT E. HAGER, CITY ATTORNEY
(REH/cdb 10/30/2006)
X:\Projects LDD\06074\By Others\2006-07-14\4LOTREPLATTEMP.dwg, 9/8/2006 2:25:23 PM, pdfFactory
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
Planning
November 14, 2006
8/G
✔
ORDINANCE
Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. S-1236-A, MetroPCS, zoning change request from A (Agriculture) to
S-1236-A (Special Use Permit-1236-Agriculture), to allow for a wireless communication antenna to be mounted to an
existing electric transmission tower, with an accessory cabinet with enclosure at the base of the tower, located
approximately 1,700-feet southwest of the intersection of MacArthur Boulevard and the transmission line easement;
north of Belt Line Road, and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
On August 17, 2006, the Planning Commission recommended approval
of this zoning request.
On September 12, 2006, Council unanimously approved this zoning
change (7-0).
Staff recommends approval.
@ S-1236-A, Metro(ORD) 1-AR (con)
1 71433
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. ________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, AMENDING
THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE CITY
OF COPPELL, TEXAS, AS HERETOFORE AMENDED, BY GRANTING A
CHANGE IN ZONING FROM A (AGRICULTURE) TO S-1236-A (SPECIAL
USE PERMIT-1236-AGRICULTURE), TO ALLOW FOR A WIRELESS
COMMUNICATION ANTENNA TO BE MOUNTED TO AN EXISTING
ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION TOWER, WITH AN ACCESSORY CABINET
WITH ENCLOSURE AT THE BASE OF THE TOWER, LOCATED
APPROXIMATELY 1,700-FEET SOUTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION
OF MACARTHUR BOULEVARD AND THE TRANSMISSION LINE
EASEMENT, NORTH OF BELT LINE ROAD, AND BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A” ATTACHED HERETO AND
INCORPORATED HEREIN; PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE
DETAIL SITE PLAN, ELEVATIONS AND DETAILS, ANTENNA CUT SHEET
AND ACCESS EXHIBIT, ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBITS “B”, “C”, “D”
AND “E”; PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL CONDITIONS; PROVIDING A
REPEALING CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT
TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR
EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Commission and the governing body of the City of
Coppell, Texas, in compliance with the laws of the State of Texas and pursuant to the Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, have given requisite notices by publication and otherwise,
and after holding due hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property owners generally,
and to all persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, the said
governing body is of the opinion that Zoning Application No. S-1236-A should be approved, and in the
exercise of legislative discretion have concluded that the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map
should be amended.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF COPPELL, TEXAS:
2 71433
SECTION 1.That the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map of the City of Coppell,
Texas, duly passed by the governing body of the City of Coppell, Texas, as heretofore amended, be and
the same is hereby amended by granting a change in zoning from A (Agriculture) to S-1236-A
(Special Use Permit-1236-Agriculture), to allow for a wireless communication antenna to be
mounted to an existing electric transmission tower, with an accessory cabinet with enclosure at the
base of the tower, located approximately 1,700-feet southwest of the intersection of MacArthur
Boulevard and the transmission line easement, north of Belt Line Road for the property described in
Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes, subject to special conditions.
SECTION 2.That the Special Use Permit to allow for a wireless communication antenna to
be mounted to an existing electric transmission tower, with an accessory cabinet with enclosure at
the base of the tower, is hereby approved subject to the following special conditions:
(A) The development shall be in strict compliance and in accordance with the Detail Site
Plan, Elevations and Details, Antenna Cut Sheet and Access Exhibit, which shall be
attached to and made a part of this ordinance as provided in Section 3.
SECTION 3.That the Detail Site Plan, Elevations and Details, Antenna Cut Sheet and Access
Exhibit shall be attached hereto as Exhibits “B”, “C”, “D” and “E”; and made a part hereof for all
purposes, are hereby approved.
SECTION 4.That the above property shall be used only in the manner and for the purpose
provided for by the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, as heretofore amended,
and as amended herein.
3 71433
SECTION 5.That the development of the property herein shall be in accordance with
building regulations, zoning ordinances, and any applicable ordinances except as may be specifically
altered or amended herein.
SECTION 6. That all provisions of the Ordinances of the City of Coppell, Texas, in conflict
with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same are hereby, repealed, and all other provisions not
in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 7. That should any sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of
this ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, the same shall not affect the
validity of this ordinance as a whole, or any part or provision thereof other than the part so decided to
be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, and shall not affect the validity of the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance as a whole.
SECTION 8. An offense committed before the effective date of this ordinance is governed by
prior law and the provisions of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, as amended, in effect when the
offense was committed and the former law is continued in effect for this purpose.
SECTION 9.That any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions or terms of
this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Coppell, as heretofore amended, and upon conviction shall be punished by a
fine not to exceed the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense; and each and every
day such violation shall continue shall be deemed to constitute a separate offense.
4 71433
SECTION 10.That this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage and
the publication of its caption, as the law and charter in such cases provide.
DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, this the _______ day of
___________________, 2006.
APPROVED:
_____________________________________
DOUGLAS N. STOVER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
LIBBY BALL, CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________
ROBERT E. HAGER, CITY ATTORNEY
(REH/cdb) [JDD reviewed only 03/21/06]
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
ȱ
Planning
November 14, 2006
9
✔
PUBLIC HEARING
(CONTINUATION)
Consider approval of Case No. PD-214-TH-1, TH-2, C and SF-9, The Ellington, zoning change request from C
(Commercial), R (Retail) and SF-9 (Single Family–9) to PD-214-TH-1, TH-2, C and SF-9 (Planned
Development-214-Townhouse-1, Townhouse-2, Commercial and Single-Family), with a Concept Site Plan to allow the
development of 125 townhouse units (67 TH-1 units on approximately 11.6 acres of Tract A.1 and 58 TH-2 units on
approximately 7.5 acres of Tract A.2); Commercial uses on Tract A.3 (approximately 2 acres) along Sandy Lake Road;
and on Tracts A.4 and A.5 (4.4 acres) along Denton Tap Road; SF-9 on 3.3 acres for park/open space, on Tract B for a
total of approximately 29.05 acres of property located south of Sandy Lake Road, and west of Denton Tap Road.
Council directed staff to bring back a traffic impact analysis, financial impact analysis, physical impact analysis, cost
of service analysis & school impact analysis.
The following P&Z conditions remain outstanding:
1. Include concept plans for the proposed commercial tracts on Sandy Lake and Denton Tap.
2. Indicate maximum number of townhouses to be 122 units.
3. Directive to staff to not include the illustration indicating 57 single-family lots that could be constructed at this same
site.
4. Departmental comments.
Decision of the P&Z Commission at the August 17th meeting:
APPROVAL with 4-2 vote.
On September 12, 2006, Council TABLED consideration of this request
until the October 10th Council meeting.
On October 10, 2006, Council CONTINUED consideration of this request
until the October 24th meeting.
On October 24, 2006, Council CONTINUED consideration of this request
until the November 14th meeting.
See attachments for additional information.
@ 1PD-214-, EllingtonZC 1-AR
Item # 10 Page 1 of 6
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
Case No.: PD-214-TH-1, TH-2, C and SF-9,
“The Ellington”
NOTE: Comments in bold have been added since this case was taken under advisement on
July 20, 2006.
P&Z HEARING DATE: July 20, 2006 (Continued with the hearing left open to August 17)
C.C. HEARING DATE: August 8, 2006 (Estimated reschedule date of Sept. 12)
STAFF REP.: Gary L. Sieb, Planning Director
LOCATION: South of Sandy Lake Road, and West of Denton Tap Road
SIZE OF AREA: 29.05 acres
CURRENT ZONING: C (Commercial), R (Retail) and SF-9 (Single Family-9)
REQUEST: Zoning change request to PD-214-TH-1, TH-2, C and SF-9
(Planned Development-214-Townhouse-1, Townhouse-2,
Commercial and Single Family-9) with a Concept Site Plan to
allow the development of 128 townhouse units (67 TH-1 units on
approximately 11.6 acres of Tract A.1 and 61 TH-2 units on
approximately 7.5 acres of Tract A.2); Commercial uses on Tract
A.3 (approximately 2 acres) along Sandy Lake Road and along
Denton Tap Road (approximately 4.4 acres on Tracts A.4 and
A.5); SF-9 zoning on 3.6 acres for park/open space use on Tract B.
APPLICANT: JDB Real Estate Invest. Engineer: Dowdey, Anderson
Darron Ash Matt Alexander
832 DeForest Road 5225 Village Creek Dr.
Coppell, TX 75019 Suite 200
(214) 663-6878 Plano, TX 75093
FAX (972) 393-9292 (972) 931-0694
FAX (972) 931-9538
Item # 10 Page 2 of 6
HISTORY: There has been no recent zoning history on the subject tract
although there have been numerous past development proposals
that never resulted in a zoning application.
TRANSPORTATION: Denton Tap Road is a P6D, improved, concrete, six-lane, divided
thoroughfare contained within a 110-foot right-of-way; Sandy
Lake Road is an existing asphalt two-lane road to eventually be
improved to a C4D, 4-lane, divided thoroughfare contained within
a 110-foot right-of-way.
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North – retail uses; “C”, Commercial
South – single-family residential; PD-115 (SF-7)
East – retail uses; “C”, Commercial
West – residential/commercial uses; SF-12 and “R” Retail
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Coppell Comprehensive Plan of May 1966, as amended,
shows this property to be developed in medium (generally in the neighborhood of 4-dwelling
units per acre or less) density residential uses.
DISCUSSION: (Because the Planning Commission continued this case to the August 17th
hearing to give the applicant an opportunity to address staff concerns, the statements
depicted in bold are responses based on applicants re-submittals) Over the last few years,
staff has reviewed a number of land use proposals for this property, locally referred to as the
“Ardinger parcel.” Back in 2001-2, staff recommended the property be rezoned to low density
residential use of 3-4 dwelling units per acre, to be compatible with the surrounding residential
density. Mr. Ardinger vigorously opposed that recommendation and promised a plan that would
create an exciting mixed-use development of which the city would be proud. His representative
likened it to a smaller Southlake Town Center. That development never materialized. Roughly
three years ago, we were presented a plan for a townhouse project with density approaching 9-10
units per acre. That proposal was never formally submitted. In early 2006, staff informally
reviewed a development containing all single family detached residences at less than 3 dwelling
units per acre for a total of 57 homes which was enthusiastically received. We have attached a
copy of that plan for your information and possible comparison purposes with the request before
you. That plan did not proceed beyond casual discussion (for whatever reason—price,
communication with owner, pending contract, etc.) which brings us to the case before you this
evening. As you will recall, at the July 20th hearing a letter was submitted (attached)
requesting the Commission and Council to disregard a low-density residential proposal
submitted as a possible development scenario for the subject tract. Staff included that plan
only to show the subject tract could be developed with much lower residential density.
What is being proposed here is a mixed use Planned Development reflecting open space, 128
townhouses, commercial and retail uses. A number of exceptions have been taken with our
townhouse development requirements including setbacks, densities, alley widths, circulation
Item # 10 Page 3 of 6
patterns, lot coverage, among others. For instance, the northern parcel (Tract A.1) proposes 5-
foot rear yard setbacks from garages/structures where 20 feet is required by ordinance. We are
extremely concerned with this setback request, even with the 20-foot alleys the developer is
proposing. In addition, lot depths are less than code (95 feet rather than 100 feet), lot widths do
not comply (24 feet rather than 25 feet), front yard setbacks are less than code (10 feet vs. 20 to
25 feet). Also, the proposal allows 3-foot overhangs in the front yard resulting in only 7 feet of
space between a unit and the street R.O.W. Side yard spacing is less than code (10 feet rather
than the required 15 feet), and there are a number of “flag” lots that are discouraged from a
safety, aesthetic and utility provision perspective. Also of concern is the amount of guest
parking this plan proposes. Our ordinance states that .5 guest parking spaces must be provided
per unit with a development of this magnitude. Tract A.2 provides this minimum (31 spaces),
but Tract A.1 provides none. Following code would require 34 guest parking spaces being
provided on this tract. A statement on the Plan requests guest parking for Tract A.1 be provided
on street. This is totally unacceptable. Adequate guest parking can not be provided this way
what with the narrow lots, the “flag” properties that have only 10 feet of frontage, the minimal
front yards throughout the project, and the hazardous maneuvering which results if fire or
emergency services are required by residents.
The applicant has provided colored elevations of the townhouse product and, at first glance,
these are attractive units. The two-story units, if limited to typical 2-story heights (35 feet), is
appropriate for this area. We do, however, have concern with the three-story townhouses. When
visualized in its true form, these are sizeable buildings, towering above 46 feet in height, and
connected up to five in a row. To give a proper perspective to what the product would look like
at completion, visit the new Lewisville project at the northwest corner of MacArthur Boulevard
and Vista Ridge Mall Drive, Settlers Village. These are for sale townhouses--at a maximum of
six units attached--to get a feel for the bulk, height, and massiveness of these buildings. Settlers
Village building height (approximately 38 feet) is less than The Ellington’s by at least ten feet,
but their appearance conveys buildings that would be out-of-scale with our surrounding
residential community on both the south and west.
Tree mitigation is another area that warrants careful review. This property is full of trees.
Although the applicant has made some effort to recognize them, mitigation fees, reparation
plans, and close review by the Parks Department is mandatory if this project proceeds. We take
strong objection to the statement that the proposed open space areas of Tract B satisfy all tree
mitigation and associated fee payments. Please see an updated response from Parks attached
to this staff report dated August 10, 2006.
The written PD Regulations exhibit essentially requests the standards we have objected to in the
proceeding paragraphs. There are minor changes that need to be made to that document such as
this property is located in Dallas not Denton County. Detached garages are not allowed in
residential projects, the density figure for Tract A.1 needs to reflect 67 units, not 71. The same
holds true for Tract A.2, density should be 61, not 63. As mentioned above, we take objection to
the tree mitigation statements. Also, the statement referring to the Director of Development
needs to be revised to refer to the Director of Planning.
A final comment needs to be stated regarding circulation patterns proposed by this development.
The Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments strongly recommend extension of Tealwood
Drive into this property. This extension would do at least two things. It would give the
Item # 10 Page 4 of 6
Wynnpage residents an alternate way in and out of their subdivision, and it would greatly
enhance fire and emergency services access to both properties.
In all fairness, and recognizing the applicant’s attempts to address many of our concerns, we
have attached as an enclosure, his reply to our staff review labeled “Applicant’s Response
Memo.” In parentheses we have summarized the issue at hand with regard to each specific
rejoinder.
Planned Development districts were established over 40 years ago to provide a means of
developing land that could not conform to established building guidelines. It was initially
conceived to offer a variety of mixed land uses that, if developed together, could result in a
product from conventional standards just would not work; i.e., residential mixed with
commercial/office/retail uses in a pattern that blended together. Over the years, the original
concept has been modified to the point that today’s PD bears little resemblance to the initial
offering. That is the case with this proposal. What we have here is a request to modify our
residential guidelines to satisfy a particular land use proposal. There is no “blending” of a
variety of land uses, no uniform design statement to bring a variety of land uses into one
cohesive whole. The PD addresses only a residential component. As such, it takes a great deal
of license with our established development standards with little justification for it other than a
dwelling unit count needed to ensure an economic return. We cannot support this request in its
present form.
The revised plan makes the following changes:
Tract A.1 density is decreased by one unit (now 66 du’s).
Tract A.2 density is decreased by 5 units (now 56 du’s).
Tract A.2 3-story units reduced to 2-story, elevations also modified.
Commercial development has been reduced from 4.4 ac. to 3.6, eliminating possible
development behind the KFC building preserving .8 ac. of added open space.
A street connection has been made to Denton Tap on the south end of the project.
A 28-foot access and utility easement reservation has been made at Tealwood.
“Flag” or “dog leg” lots have been eliminated.
Number of units reduced from 128 to 122 (their density reduced from 5.7 to 5.4
du/ac.—our site density is calculated at 6.4 du/ac.). Also noted is a statement on the
Plan suggesting a possible dwelling unit count of 125 structures.
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
Staff is recommending DENIAL of this request, based upon the points stated above: It is
too dense; it ignores most of our development guidelines; it does not provide satisfactory
circulation; it creates serious health, safety and public welfare issues; it does not reflect
community life style values; and it disregards the adjacent residential development
patterns. A substantially lower density product, more closely aligned with our current
development standards and respectful of the adjacent residential communities is
encouraged for this site.
There are still a number of concerns with this case. Density is still problematic,
especially with the Plan note that states a possible 125 units. Development code
Item # 10 Page 5 of 6
guidelines have not been met (i.e., lot depth should be 100’, they show 95’; minimum
lot size should be 2500’, they show 2200’; lot width should be 25’, they show 24’;
minimum garage setback should be 20’, they show 5’). Guest parking requirements
have not been followed and they still show on-street parking as addressing this
concern. There are a number of inconsistencies between the plan and the proposed
PD regulations. A landscape plan must still be submitted before accurate tree
mitigation fees can be calculated (see attached Parks Department memo).
Given these concerns Staff still has serious reservations regarding this development.
To gain our support, the following changes must be accomplished:
• Reduce density to 5 du/ac.
• Abide by Development Code guidelines (lot size, depth, width, etc.)
• Specify maximum unit height of two stories or 35 feet
• State minimum rear yard setbacks of 20 feet
• Provide guest parking at code requirements
• Eliminate on-street parking calculations for required parking
• Correct tree mitigation calculations and pay fees
• Meet City Codes relative to Driveway and circulation plan
• Revise PD and Plan to be consistent with one another
• Address DRC concerns
• Reduce number of bedrooms to no more than two per unit
• Remove “…area regulations for Alley Access dwellings…” from PD
conditions
• Submit conceptual elevations of non-residential uses proposed in PD
• Provide color board showing building materials
• Abide by departmental comments (Parks, Fire, Engineering)
On Friday afternoon additional clarification regarding this case was submitted to
staff. It was in the form of e-mail correspondence and is attached under New
Attachment below. Because of the late time of submission, staff will be addressing
any outstanding issues related to this message at the public hearing.
ALTERNATIVES:
1) Recommend approval of the request
2) Recommend disapproval of the request
3) Recommend modification of the request
4) Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date.
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Departmental Comments (Fire, Engineering)
2) Applicant’s Response Memo
3) Suggested Planned Development Regulations
4) Zoning Exhibit (2 items)
5) Landscape Details (2 exhibits)
6) Full-colored Building Elevations (3 examples)
Item # 10 Page 6 of 6
7) Colored Concept Plan
8) Floor Plan Set (2 sheets)
9) 57 Single Family Unit Plan
NEW ATTACHMENTS:
1) Development package (zoning, concept plan, water/sewer, drainage.
landscape exhibits)
2) Proposed Planned Development regulations
3) 25’ and 30’ street access elevations (two sheets, one colored, one b/w)
4) 25’ and 30’ street access floor plan
5) Reduced, colored site plan
6) Tree Mitigation memo (Parks)
7) Departmental comments (Fire, Engineering)
8) Property owner letter dated July 20, 2006
9) E-mail correspondence from applicant dated 8/11/06
Exhibit “A”
Planned Development Regulations
Development Standards
Submitted: June 19, 2006
Revised: August 30, 2006
Owner:
H.T. Ardinger
1990 Lake Pointe Drive
Lewisville, Texas 75057
Developer/Applicant:
JDB Real Estate Investments, LLC or Assigns
832 De Forest Road
Coppell, Texas 75019
(214) 663-6878
(972) 393-9292 Fax
Planner/Engineer/Surveyor:
Dowdey, Anderson and Associates, Inc.
5225 Village Creek Drive
Suite 200
Plano, Texas 75093
(972) 931-0694
(972) 931-9538 Fax
Planned Development Regulations
For a 25.422 acre tract (Tract A) and a 3.633 acre tract (Tract B) out of the
Edward A. Crow Survey, Abstract No. 301 in the City of Coppell, Denton
Counties, Texas.
1.0 Purpose
The purpose of this PD is to create a neighborhood within a unique
wooded environment with a blend of residential townhouse products and
commercial/retail uses that are appealing and relevant to an exclusive and
low-maintenance type life style.
2.0 Definitions:
Definitions used herein shall be the same as those found in Article 42 of
the Chapter 12 Zoning of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Coppell,
Texas.
3.0 General Regulations
1. All regulations for Tracts A and B not redefined by this amendment
shall default to the existing regulations set forth in the Coppell Zoning
Ordinance, adopted by the City on April 4, 2002.
2. Any future modification to this adopted PD shall be limited to the
specific sub-tracts being modified.
3. Two-Family dwellings are permitted and shall conform to the same
area regulations described herein.
4. Detached garages are allowed by right and may or may not be
connected to the main structure. In addition, all detached garage units
may have a one (1) story habitable structure above them, provided it is
connected to the main structure.
5. A property owners association shall be established and shall be
responsible for the maintenance of all park/open space areas.
6. The building elevations provide in conjunction with this PD are
representative of the architectural style and quality of the proposed
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
Deleted: <#>For Tract A.1 and A.2,
flag lots shall be allowed and the
portion of the lot connecting to public
right-of-way shall not be less than ten
(10) feet.¶
townhome product. The final elevation of each independent townhome
building is dependent on the number of townhome units grouped together,
the number of stories (1, 2 & 3 stories) and the floor plan selected by the
future resident, thus the final location of windows, doors, and building
materials shown may vary, but the general quantity of materials grouped
together, the quality of the materials represented and the architectural
style (windows, doors, roof pitch, and building materials) of the building
shall remain the same.
4.0 Use Regulations
The permitted uses within Tract A and Tract B shall as follows:
Tract A.1 (+/- 12 ac.): The permitted uses shall be those uses
permitted by the Coppell Zoning District “TH-1” – Townhouse 1 as
described in Article 15 of the Section 12 of the Zoning Ordinances for the
City of Coppell, Texas.
Tract A.2 (+/- 8 ac.): The permitted uses shall be those uses permitted by
the Coppell Zoning Districts “TH-1 – Townhouse 1 or “TH-2” – Townhouse
2 as described in Article 16 of the Section 12 of the Zoning Ordinances for
the City of Coppell, Texas.
Tract A.3 (+/- 1.7 ac.): The permitted uses shall be those uses
permitted by the Coppell Zoning District “C” - Commercial as described in
Article 23 of the Section 12 of the Zoning Ordinances for the City of
Coppell, Texas.
Tract A.4 (+/- 0.8 ac): The permitted uses shall be those uses
permitted by the Coppell Zoning District “C” – Commercial as described in
Article 23 of the Section 12 of the Zoning Ordinances for the City of
Coppell, Texas.
Tract A.5 (+/-3.6 ac.): The permitted uses shall be those uses
permitted by the Coppell Zoning District “C” – Commercial District as
described in Article 24 of the Section 12 of the Zoning Ordinances for the
City of Coppell, Texas.
Tract B (+/- 3.3 ac.): The permitted uses shall be a private park. The
zoning classification shall be Coppell Zoning District “SF-9” – Single
Family 9 as described in Article 24 of the Section 12 of the Zoning
Ordinances for the City of Coppell, Texas.
For a visual illustration identifying the general location of the zoning
classifications outlined above, see Exhibit “B.”
5.0 Area Regulations
The following amended area regulations shall apply:
Tract A.1 (Alley Access):
Minimum Front Yard -
The minimum depth of the front yard shall be fifteen (15) feet for
rear-entry or alley served units.
Minimum Rear Yard -
The minimum depth of the rear yard shall be five (5) feet for
rear-entry or alley served units.
Maximum Lot Coverage -
The maximum lot coverage shall not be greater than eighty
(80) percent of the gross lot area.
Maximum number of Dwelling Units-
The maximum number of dwelling units shall be 67.
Maximum building height:
The maximum allowable building height shall not be greater than 41 feet,
measured at the ridge line.
For Tract A.2, brick ledges, 2nd and 3rd floor living areas, balcony’s,
chimneys, and other ornamental projections or architectural features may
project into the front yard a maximum of 3 feet, into the rear yard a
maximum of three (3) feet and/or into the side yard a maximum of three
(3) feet.
Tract A.2 (Street Access):
Minimum Lot Depth -
The minimum lot depth shall be ninety-five (95) feet.
Minimum Lot Area -
The minimum lot area shall be 2,200 square feet.
Maximum number of Dwelling Units-
The maximum number of dwelling units shall be 58.
Maximum building height:
The maximum allowable building height shall not be greater than 41 feet,
measured at the ridge line.
For Tract A.1b, brick ledges, 2nd and 3rd floor living areas, balcony’s,
chimneys, and other ornamental projections or architectural features may
project into the front yard a maximum of 3 feet, into the rear yard a
maximum of seven (7) feet and/or into the side yard a maximum of three
(3) feet.
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0", First
line: 0.5"
Deleted: ten (10) feet
Deleted: Minimum Corner Side Yard
-¶
The minimum side yard for a corner
lot shall be ten (10) feet.¶
Minimum Building Separation -¶
The minimum building separation
shall be ten (10) feet.¶
Minimum Lot Size-¶
The minimum Lot size shall be 2500
square feet.¶
Deleted: 71
Deleted: ¶
Deleted: Maximum Height
Regulations -¶
The maximum allowable height shall
not be greater than two¶
and a half stories of habitable
structure nor more than¶
forty-six (46) feet, measured at the
mid-point between the top¶
plate and the dominate roof ridge.¶
Deleted: ¶
Minimum Corner Side Yard -¶
The minimum side yard for a corner
lot shall be ten (10) feet.¶
Minimum Building Separation -¶
The minimum building separation
shall be ten (10) feet.¶
Minimum Lot Width -¶
The minimum lot width shall be
twenty-four (24) feet.¶
Deleted: 0
Deleted: 63
Deleted: ¶
Maximum Height Regulations -¶
The maximum allowable height shall
not be greater than three¶
stories of habitable structure nor more
than forty-six (46) feet, ¶
measured at the mid-point between
the top plate and the¶
dominate roof ridge.¶
The area regulations for “Alley Access” dwellings outlined above in Tract
A.1 are also allowable in Tract A.2, but the maximum number of dwelling
units shall not be greater than maximum allowed specified within Tract
A.2.
6.0 Landscape and Screening Regulations
The preservation of Tract B as a private park or open space, shall satisfy
all tree mitigation requirements or monetary penalties associated with the
future removal of any existing trees from Tract A.
The following landscaping regulations shall apply:
· There shall be a minimum of one shade tree for every four residential lots
to complement large number of existing and mature trees.
· There shall be one ornamental tree planted for every two residential lots.
The following screening regulations shall apply:
· Masonry screening fences shall be provided along all thoroughfares
designated as an arterial or collector street on the city’s master
thoroughfare plan. Such fences shall extend into and along the side lot
lines, where applicable, of lots abutting the residential entry street(s)
extending into the subject subdivision from the designated thoroughfare.
They shall also be required along alley right-of-ways or property lines that
separate residential from commercial, office or retail uses. All screening
walls shall be constructed in conjunction with residential phases.
· Screening fences shall be a minimum height of six feet and may be
comprised of any of the following:
1. Solid masonry (stone or brick/split-face cmu block) or thin wall
2. Masonry or ornamental metal or a combination thereof.
3. Plans for screening fences and entry monumentation shall be
submitted to the Director of Development for approval and for
determination of acceptable distance for fence extensions into side
lot lines as required in Section II.3.A. Such plans shall be included
with the engineering plans at time of final platting.
· Any use of metal shall be accompanied by shrubbery in front of such
metal. Shrubbery when planted shall be a minimum size of five gallons
placed on 36-inch centers.
· The rear yards of all Street Access units which back to an open space
shall have 4-foot ornamental metal fencing. The side Yard fencing shall be
a 6-foot board-on-board wooden fence with a unified stain throughout.
7.0 Subdivision Regulations
· Development shall meet the standards as required in the City of Coppell
Subdivision Ordinance.
8.0 Legal Description
See attached Exhibit “C”.
EXHIBIT “C”
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
TRACT A
25.422 ACRES
BEING a tract of land located in the EDWARD A. CROW SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO.
301, City of Coppell, Dallas County, Texas and being a part of those tracts of land
described in Deed to Horace Thompson Ardinger, Jr., recorded in Volume 95064, Page
4717 and Volume 95064, Page 4713, Deed Records, Dallas County, Texas and part of a
tract of land described in Deed to Horace Thompson Ardinger, Jr. by City of Coppell,
Texas Ordinance No. 87383, recorded in Volume 87133, Page 1529, Deed Records,
Dallas County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at a 1/2 inch iron rod found at the intersection of the West right-of-way
line of Denton Tap Road, a 120 foot right-of-way, with the South line of said Ardinger
tract recorded in Volume 95064, Page 4717;
THENCE South 88 degrees 50 minutes 25 seconds West, along said South line, a
distance of 442.21 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod with a yellow plastic cap stamped “DAA”
found at the Southeast corner of a tract of land described as Tract 2 in Deed to Lone Star
Gas Company, recorded in Volume 5493, Page 9, Deed Records, Dallas County, Texas;
THENCE North 58 degrees 50 minutes 33 seconds West, leaving said South line and
along the Northeasterly line of said Tract 2, a distance of 722.69 feet to a 1/2 inch iron
rod with a yellow plastic cap stamped “DAA” set for corner;
THENCE North 56 degrees 05 minutes 33 seconds West, continuing along said
Northeasterly line, a distance of 225.47 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod with a yellow plastic
cap stamped “DAA” set in the West line of said Ardinger tract recorded in Volume
95064, Page 4717, at the most Northerly Northwest corner of said Tract 2 ;
THENCE North 00 degrees 26 minutes 54 seconds West, along said West line, a
distance of 229.35 feet to a 1” iron rod found at the Northwest corner of said Ardinger
tract recorded in Volume 95064, Page 4717 and the Southwest corner of a tract of land
described in Deed to General Telephone Company of the Southwest, recorded in Volume
71011, Page 1961, Deed Records, Dallas County, Texas;
THENCE North 89 degrees 30 minutes 32 seconds East, along the common line of said
Ardinger tract and said General Telephone Company tract, a distance of 206.46 feet to a
1/2 inch iron rod with a yellow plastic cap stamped “DAA” set at the Southeast corner of
said General Telephone Company tract and at the Southwest corner of said Ardinger tract
recorded in Volume 95064, Page 4713;
THENCE North 00 degrees 23 minutes 17 seconds West, along the common line of said
Ardinger tract recorded and said General Telephone Company tract, a distance of 558.04
feet to a PK nail set in the South right-of-way line of Sandy Lake Road, a 110 foot right-
of-way, said point being at the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the left having a
central angle of 08 degrees 10 minutes 46 seconds, a radius of 2,923.94 feet and a chord
bearing and distance of South 86 degrees 24 minutes 06 seconds East, 417.07 feet;
THENCE Easterly, along said South right-of-way line and along said curve to the left, an
arc distance of 417.42 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod found;
THENCE North 89 degrees 30 minutes 31 seconds East, continuing along said South
right-of-way line, a distance of 203.18 feet to a 1” iron rod found at the Northwest corner
of Lot 2 of SANDY LAKE CROSSING ADDITION, an Addition to the City of Coppell,
according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 88037, Page 2602, Map Records, Dallas
County, Texas;
THENCE South 00 degrees 29 minutes 29 seconds East, leaving said South right-of-way
line, a distance of 175.00 feet to a 1” iron rod found at the Southwest corner of said Lot
2;
THENCE North 89 degrees 30 minutes 31 seconds East, a distance of 186.81 feet to an
X set in concrete in the West line of a tract of land described as Lot 3, Block 1 of
SANDY LAKE CROSSING, an Addition to the City of Coppell, according to the Plat
thereof recorded in Volume 90012, Page 3601, Map Records, Dallas County, Texas, at
the Southeast corner of said Lot 2;
THENCE South 02 degrees 43 minutes 14 seconds East, a distance of 224.48 feet to an
X set in concrete at the Southwest corner of a tract of land described as M.P.
McDONALD’S ADDITION, an Addition to the City of Coppell, according to the Plat
thereof recorded in Volume 87233, Page 2925, Map Records, Dallas County, Texas;
THENCE North 87 degrees 16 minutes 46 seconds East, along the South line of said
M.P. McDONALD’S ADDITION, a distance of 199.96 feet to an X set in concrete in
said West right-of-way line of said Denton Tap Road;
THENCE South 02 degrees 40 minutes 21 seconds East, along said West right-of-way
line, a distance of 97.55 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod with a yellow plastic cap stamped
“DAA” set at the most Easterly Northeast corner of a tract of land described as Tract A in
Deed to KFC National Company, recorded in Volume 89121, Page 2082, Deed Records,
Dallas County, Texas;
THENCE along the line of said KFC National Company tract, the following seven (7)
courses and distances:
South 87 degrees 19 minutes 40 seconds West, a distance of 60.00 feet to a 1/2 inch
iron rod with a yellow plastic cap stamped “DAA” set for corner;
North 02 degrees 40 minutes 20 seconds West, a distance of 12.68 feet to a 1/2 inch
iron rod with a yellow plastic cap stamped “DAA” set for corner;
South 87 degrees 19 minutes 40 seconds West, a distance of 63.33 feet to a 1/2 inch
iron rod with a yellow plastic cap stamped “DAA” set for corner;
South 42 degrees 19 minutes 40 seconds West, a distance of 121.88 feet to a 1/2 inch
iron rod with a yellow plastic cap stamped “DAA” set for corner;
South 32 degrees 39 minutes 58 seconds East, a distance of 61.03 feet to a 1/2 inch
iron rod with a yellow plastic cap stamped “DAA” set for corner;
South 02 degrees 40 minutes 20 seconds East, a distance of 37.13 feet to a 1/2 inch
iron rod with a yellow plastic cap stamped “DAA” set for corner;
North 87 degrees 19 minutes 40 seconds East, a distance of 178.98 feet to an X set in
concrete in said West right-of-way line of Denton Tap Road at the Southeast corner
of said KFC National Company tract;
THENCE along said West right-of-way line, the following three (3) courses and
distances:
South 02 degrees 37 minutes 34 seconds East, a distance of 181.66 feet to a 1/2 inch
iron rod with a yellow plastic cap stamped “DAA” set for corner at the beginning of
a non-tangent curve to the right having a central angle of 02 degrees 14 minutes 55
seconds, a radius of 5,668.85 feet and a chord bearing and distance of South 01
degrees 38 minutes 43 seconds East, 222.46 feet;
Southerly, along said curve to the right, an arc distance of 222.48 feet to a 1/2 inch
iron rod with a yellow plastic cap stamped “DAA” set for corner;
South 00 degrees 31 minutes 15 seconds East, a distance of 202.73 feet to the
POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 25.422 acres of land, more or less.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
TRACT B
3.633 ACRES
BEING a tract of land located in the EDWARD A. CROW SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO.
301, City of Coppell, Dallas County, Texas and being a part of a tract of land described in
Deed to Horace Thompson Ardinger, Jr., recorded in Volume 95064, Page 4717 and
being more particularly described as follows:
COMMENCING at a 1/2 inch iron rod found at the intersection of the West right-of-
way line of Denton Tap Road, a 120 foot right-of-way, with the South line of said
Ardinger tract recorded in Volume 95064, Page 4717;
THENCE South 88 degrees 50 minutes 25 seconds West, along the South line of said
Ardinger tract, a distance of 535.74 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod with a yellow plastic cap
stamped “DAA” set for the POINT OF BEGINNING of the tract of land herein
described;
THENCE South 88 degrees 50 minutes 25 seconds West, continuing along the South
line of said Ardinger tract, a distance of 708.16 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod with a yellow
plastic cap stamped “DAA” set at the Southwest corner of said Ardinger tract and the
Southeast corner of WHISPERING HILLS Addition, an Addition to the City of Coppell,
according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 80016, Page 1736, Map Records, Dallas
County, Texas, and the Northeast corner of SHADOW RIDGE ESTATES, an Addition
to the City of Coppell, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 84110, Page
6743, Map Records, Dallas County, Texas;
THENCE North 00 degrees 26 minutes 54 seconds West, along the common line of said
Ardinger tract and said WHISPERING HILLS Addition, a distance of 455.37 feet to a
1/2 inch iron rod with a yellow plastic cap stamped “DAA” set at the most Southerly
Northwest corner of a tract of land described as Tract 2 in Deed to Lone Star Gas
Company, recorded in Volume 5493, Page 9, Deed Records, Dallas County, Texas;
THENCE South 56 degrees 05 minutes 33 seconds East, along the Southwesterly line of
said Tract 2, a distance of 192.49 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod with a yellow plastic cap
stamped “DAA” set for corner;
THENCE South 58 degrees 50 minutes 33 seconds East, continuing along said
Southwesterly line, a distance of 644.85 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and
containing 3.633 acres of land, more or less.
ENGINEER/PLANNER25' and 30' STREET ACCESS ELEVATION(2-STORY TOWNHOUSE)BRICKBRICKCULTURED STONECULTURED STONETOP OF PLATETOP OF PLATEBRICK ACCENTS BRICK ACCENTSARCHITECTURALCOMP. SHINGLEARCHITECTURALCOMP. SHINGLENOTE:THE EXTERIOR FRONT, SIDE AND REAR ELEVATIONSSHALL BE 80% MASONRY (EXCLUDING DOORS AND WINDOWS)TEXTUREDGARAGE DOORTEXTUREDGARAGE DOORBALCONYBALCONY
ENGINEER/PLANNER30' ALLEY ACCESS ELEVATION(COMBINATION 1 and 2-STORY TOWNHOUSE)BRICKBRICKCULTURED STONECULTURED STONETOP OF PLATETOP OF PLATEBRICK ACCENTS BRICK ACCENTSARCHITECTURALCOMP. SHINGLEARCHITECTURALCOMP. SHINGLENOTE:THE EXTERIOR FRONT, SIDE AND REAR ELEVATIONSSHALL BE 80% MASONRY (EXCLUDING DOORS AND WINDOWS)
ENGINEER/PLANNER
30' ALLEY ACCESS ELEVATION
(COMBINATION 1 and 2-STORY TOWNHOUSE)
NOTE:
THE EXTERIOR FRONT, SIDE AND REAR ELEVATIONS
SHALL BE 80% MASONRY (EXCLUDING DOORS
AND WINDOWS)
25' and 30' STREET ACCESS ELEVATION
(2-STORY TOWNHOUSE)
FLEX
BDRM.
BDRM.
BDRM.BDRM.
BDRM.
BDRM.
BDRM.
FLEX
MASTER
BDRM.
FLEX
MASTER
BDRM.
MASTER
BDRM.
MASTER
BDRM.
BDRM.DINING
DINING
DINING
KITCHEN KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
DINING
FAMILY
FAMILY
FAMILY
GARAGE GARAGE GARAGE GARAGE
FAMILY
LIVING
25' and 30' STREET ACCESS ELEVATION
(2-STORY TOWNHOUSE)
FIRST FLOOR PLAN
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
PROPOSED 20'PROPOSED 20'ACCESS & UTILITYACCESS & UTILITYEASEMENT RESERVATIONEASEMENT RESERVATIONSTREET G REMOVABLEDECORATIVE BOLLARDSREMOVABLEDECORATIVE BOLLARDSREMOVABLEDECORATIVE BOLLARDSREMOVABLEDECORATIVE BOLLARDSNOT TO SCALETEALWOOD DRIVE
12' TRAIL12' TRAIL8' FIRE TRUCK8' FIRE TRUCK8'-6" 8'-6" 16' HORIZONTAL CLEAR ZONE OF TREES16' HORIZONTAL CLEAR ZONE OF TREES3' LADDER 3' LADDER2.5'SAFETY ZONE 2.5'SAFETY ZONE **
11/9/2006NAME ADDRESSTREE MITIGATION DENSITY TRAFFICSCHOOL IMPACT USEFORM LETTER RENTAL UNITS OTHERA. VanRiper 345 Spyglass Drive 1 1S. Cravens11C. Raval11K. Monaghan 132 Hearthwood Drive 1B. Dobson 313 Charleston Drive 1 1R. Duhon11S. Adkins 713 Sparrow Lane 1 1D. Suges 145 Wrenwood Drive 1 1K. Carrell 141 Wrenwood Drive 1 1 1 1M. Hiller 139 Wynnpage Drive 1 1 1 1P. Mylar 101 Tanbark Circle 1 1L. Cornish 263 Kailey Way 1 1M. Buckley 333 Brock Street 1 1D. Aguirre 175 Georgian Drive 1 1R. Sanders 900 Cypress Court 1 1K. Johnson11R. VanAssche Bueter 520 Blackfield Drive 1 1S. Ross 232 Samuel Blvd.#08 1 1J. Walker400 Hawk Court 1 1111 11J. Hall11D. Summers11A. Weller-Carlsson 307 Spanish Moss Dr. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1M. Myers 319 Gifford Drive 1 1D. Raetzman11E. Woody 472 Halifax Drive 1 1N. Bartel 737 E. Peninsula Drive 1 1D. Prichard 414 Gifford Drive1S. McGraw 258 Winding Hollow Ln. 1 1 1W. Lambert 120 Shadydale 1M. Mathis11J. Mason 312 Meadowcreek Rd. 1 1 1J. Atkins11K. Spence 714 Graywood 1 1A. Anderson11ELLINGTON: AREAS OF CONCERN1
11/9/2006NAME ADDRESSTREE MITIGATION DENSITY TRAFFICSCHOOL IMPACT USEFORM LETTER RENTAL UNITS OTHERELLINGTON: AREAS OF CONCERN* T. Mulloy 577 Homewood 1 1* S. Taylor11* M. Williams11* C. Matthews 701 Waverly 1 1* C. Strauss11* D. Bauckman 110 Wynnpage 1 1* W. Haque11* W. Williams11* G. Buffington 130 Hartford 1 1* S. Lambert11* L. Simmons1* S. Hallon 657 Raven 1 1 1 1 1* S. Felton 649 Shadowcrest 1 1* R. Hair 11* K. Pearsall 325 Clear Haven 1* T. DiPalma 1* D. Johnston 344 Kyle 1* P. Martin 1* M. Hirshman11* P. Gallo-Stenman 136 Hearthstone 1 1 1 1* Won Shon 125 Hearthwood 1* S. Pilatzke 128 Fieldcrest Loop 1 1 1 1* R. Kirkelie 141 Hearthwood 1 1L. Fairchild 205 Chestnut Lane 1 1 1L. Elieson 700 Woodmoor 1 1 1 1 1D. Warren11S. Guess 400 Fieldcrest Circle 1 1A. Kogutt 795 Pelican Lane 1 1M. Kogutt11K. Mcbrayer11G. Peck 144 Georgian Drive 1 1 1 1 1 1 1R. McBrayer 259 Kailey Way 1 1 1 1C. Kaleri 137 Hearthwood Drive 1 1D. Hair 333 Meadowcreek Road 1 1 12
11/9/2006NAME ADDRESSTREE MITIGATION DENSITY TRAFFICSCHOOL IMPACT USEFORM LETTER RENTAL UNITS OTHERELLINGTON: AREAS OF CONCERNL. Tanner11B. Whitehill 747 Meadowlark 1 1S. Carrick 123 Lodge Road 1 1M. Leonard 1 1 1 1N Donoghue 312 Beechwood Lane 1 1D. Nicholson 143 Allencrest Lane 1 1 1A. Richardson 320 Waterview 1 1 1 1 1B. O'Shea 624 Deforest Road 1 1R. Hayes 259 Park Valley Drive 1 1 1 1 1J. Jordan 228 Beechwood Lane 1 1P. Leger-Nicholson 143 Allencrest Lane 1 1 1 1 1C. Hall 493 Forest Ridge Drive 1 1 1 1 1M. Helm 138 London Way 1 1S. Schweitzer 646 Graywood Lane 1 1L. Mayes11J. Stephens11L. Mark11 1B. Murphy11M. McGrady 623 Meadowview Lane 1 1E. Hall11M. Kirkham 432 Plantation 1 1W. Langley 287 Tealwood Drive 1 1J. Hewlett11C. Hermans 126 Carrington Drive 1 1M. Milby 1 1 1 1 1 1C. Tucker 1 1 1 1 1L. Vincenzo11D. Bonson 821 Woodmoor Drive 1 1S. Anderson11 1C. Collins11 1B. Morin 167 Georgian Drive 1 1 1 1 1C. Bliobenes 607 Levee Place 1 1 1 1 1S. Earnest11J. Miller113
11/9/2006NAME ADDRESSTREE MITIGATION DENSITY TRAFFICSCHOOL IMPACT USEFORM LETTER RENTAL UNITS OTHERELLINGTON: AREAS OF CONCERNM. Cage 894 Misty Harbor Court 1 1 1 1 1 1F. Smith 327 Shorewood Court 1 1T. McDonald 139 Allencrest Lane 1L. Home 1 1 1 1C. Miller 480 Grace Lane 1 1O. Domingo11R. Unger 534 Shadowcrest Lane 1 1D. Petersen 1 1 1 1N. Bliobenes 1 1 1 1 1M. Connell 1 1 1 1L. White 619 Oakbend 1 1 1 1P. Messimer 179 Chinaberry Way 1 1 1D. Ebner 1 1 1 1* Responses Received Prior to October 10thTOTALS - 114 Responses 17 29 15 18 98 86 7 344
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
ȱ ȱ
Planning
November 14, 2006
10
✔
PUBLIC HEARING
Consider approval of Case No. PD-216-H, Robertson Pools, zoning change request from H and SF-12 (Historic and
Single Family-12) to PD-216-H (Planned Development-216-Historic), to approve a detail site plan to allow
1,740-square-foot expansion to an existing 3,120-square-foot building, construction of a 4,970-square-foot building,
outside storage and additional parking on approximately 2.65 acres of property located at 569 Coppell Road, north of
Bethel Road.
The following P&Z conditions remain outstanding:
1. Contact Larry Redick at 972-323-8917 to discuss electric service requirements.
2. Include all existing and proposed lighting facilities and ensure they are in accordance with the H District regulations.
3. Add a note under south perimeter landscaping that trees are located elsewhere on site.
4. PD Conditions approved as attached.
Decision of the P&Z Commission at the October 19th meeting:
APPROVAL with 5-0 vote, subject to the conditions listed above.
Staff recommends approval.
@ 2PD-216-H, Robertson Pools, 1-AR
Agenda Narrative Form - Revised 1/99
PD conditions:
a. Front yard parking is permitted.
b. Nonvehicular and perimeter landscaping shortages are permitted as follows:
1. Nonvehicular – 14,583 square feet required; 7,773 square feet provided.
2. East Perimeter - Two planter boxes and existing streetscaping provided in lieu of 15'
landscape buffer.
3. South Perimeter – Required trees are provided elsewhere on site.
c. All uses (Retail, Office, Warehouse, and Outside Storage) permitted by right.
AGENDA REQUEST NARRATIVE
ITEM # 6 Page 1 of 6
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
Case No.: PD-216-H, Robertson Pools
NOTE: Comments in bold have been added since this case was taken under advisement on
September 21, 2006.
P&Z HEARING DATE: October 19, 2006 (Continued from the Commission’s September
21, 2006, meeting.)
C.C. HEARING DATE: November 14, 2006
STAFF REP.: Matt Steer, City Planner
LOCATION: 569 Coppell Road, north of Bethel Road
SIZE OF AREA: 2.65 acres
CURRENT ZONING: H and SF-12
REQUEST: Zoning change request to PD-216-H (Planned Development-216-Historic) to
approve a Detail Site Plan to allow a 1,740-square-foot expansion to an existing
3,120-square-foot building, construction of a 4,970-square-foot building, outside
storage and additional parking.
APPLICANT: Owner: Architect: Engineer/Surveyor:
Ron Roberston Bob Anderson Thomas Holland, RPLS
R.L. Robertson, L.L.C. Plan Solutions C-P Engineering, LTD.
569A S Coppell Rd 393 E Las Colinas Blvd, #169 1801 Gateway Blvd, #101
Coppell, TX 75019 Irving, TX 75039 Richardson, TX 75080
(972) 393-2152 (972) 373-9999 (972) 644-2800
Fax: (972) 393-6244 Fax: (972) 373-9001 Fax: (972) 644-2817
HISTORY: Lot 1, Block A, Robertson Commercial Pools Addition, a portion of this property,
was platted in November 1998. An application for a zone change was submitted
ITEM # 6 Page 2 of 6
in September 2001, but formally withdrawn October 4, 2001 (no reason was
given).
The Planning Commission reviewed a rezoning request to PD 216-H on
September 21, 2006, and continued the case to October 19, 2006, in order for
the applicant to address some of the concerns raised at that meeting.
TRANSPORTATION: Coppell Road is a two-lane, asphalt road contained within a 60’
right-of-way. Freese and Nichols has prepared the construction
plans, which are now 90% complete, showing variable right-of-
way widths and approximately 34’ of pavement with an 8’
sidewalk on the west and a 6’ sidewalk on the east. Construction is
scheduled to begin in the second quarter of 2008.
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North – Office/Warehouse; “PD-186-LI” Planned Development – 186 – Light
Industrial
South – Vacant; “H” Historic
East – Vacant; “H” Historic
West – Residential; “SF-12” Single Family - 12
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Coppell Comprehensive Plan shows the property as suitable
for appropriate uses within the Historic District.
DISCUSSION: Because the Planning Commission continued this case to the
September 21st hearing to give the applicant an opportunity to
address concerns raised, the statements depicted in bold are
responses based on applicants re-submittal.
The purpose of this Planned Development is to allow a 1,740-square-
foot addition on the west side of the existing 3,120-square-foot office
structure, construction of a 4,970-square-foot building, outside storage
and additional parking. Within the Historic District an office/warehouse
type use is allowed by a special use permit with less than 20% of the
structures used for warehousing. There are a variety of uses already on
site (office, warehouse, retail and outside storage). This proposal is to
add on to the existing office and warehouse space (greater than 20%)
and “clean up” the site, making this a prime candidate for a Planned
Development. An existing metal building will be removed from the
site to make room for the office expansion. The “outside storage”
consists of vehicle parking and stone storage all located behind solid
screening (either the existing or proposed masonry walls along the
north and west property lines, the existing wood fence and trees on the
southwest and south property lines, or the wood gate and fence on the
east, fronting Coppell Road).
ITEM # 6 Page 3 of 6
The applicant is proposing to asphalt pave the parking/storage area and
drives. This is a permissible material within the Historic District. A
total of 44 parking spaces are required for the assortment of land uses
(1 parking space is required per 200-square-foot retail area, 300-square-
foot office and 1,000-square-foot warehouse). There are a total of 45
proposed (23 new, 22 existing). Per the Historic District regulations, no
parking is allowed in the front yard. The parking area along Coppell
Road is partially within the subject property and partially within
Coppell Road right-of-way. A condition of the Planned Development
will allow for this parking to exist within the front yard, as this is
essentially “on-street parking.” This is included in the parking
calculations as permitted within the Historic District.
One of the objectives in establishing the Historic District was to ensure
that alterations to existing structures are compatible with the unique
character of the area. Construction standards of the district state that all
building additions shall be compatible with the main structure,
generally, secondary to the main structure, and shall be located in the
rear. The proposed office expansion meets these requirements with the
proposed Austin Stone being the same as the existing and its location
on the rear of the existing building. Accessory structures within the
district are required to conform to the same setback standards of the
main structure, are required to be smaller in scale than the primary
building, are to be compatible in design, shape, materials, and roof
shape and are to reflect the general character of the primary building.
The applicant is meeting these requirements, as the total area of the
buildings to the front comes to almost twice its size, the materials will
match the existing structure (Austin Stone) and the roof shape is
proposed to be flat (the same as the north building on Coppell Road).
Landscape areas within the Historic District shall be provided
according to the landscaping section of the Zoning Ordinance.
However, considerations for additional streetscaping/hardscaping in
lieu of the required “nonvehicular” and/or “perimeter” landscaping is
allowed. The Ordinance is specific that all of the “interior,” or parking
lot, landscaping requirements be met in all nonexempt parking/outside
storage areas. The entire parking/outside storage area behind the
buildings is exempt from these requirements, as it is screened from
view and access to the public is restricted; therefore, the “interior”
landscaping is a not an issue. The “nonvehicular” requirement of
14,583 square feet is not being met with the 7,553 square feet proposed.
The applicant has agreed to save Tree #7 on the west side of the
property which will require additional green space around the tree that
can be added to the “nonvehicular” landscape area (300 to 400-square-
feet area around the tree to be left unpaved). Staff recommends adding
eight planters along the front (one per 20’) to soften the front façade,
and to count towards the landscape deficiency.
ITEM # 6 Page 4 of 6
The applicant is proposing to add two long planter boxes to span
the entire front of the southernmost building, exceeding the staff’s
revised request asking for four small planter boxes at this location.
“Perimeter” landscaping is proposed along the north property line
(seven, 3” cal. trees proposed). Staff recommends adding six trees to
the west property line and six along the south to meet the perimeter
requirements along all interior property lines.
The applicant is proposing to add these 12 trees as requested by
staff; however, upon further review, staff is asking the applicant to
relocate the six proposed trees shown on the south property line,
elsewhere on site, so as not to encroach upon the flood plain or
sewer easement. In order to address some of the concerns related
to noise and dust between this site and the residences to the west,
the applicant is proposing to add 40 Wax Myrtles along the west
property line.
There are six existing overstory trees on site and a total of twelve, 3”
cal. trees are currently proposed (5 Live Oak and 7 Cedar Elm).
Lacebark Elms are recommended in place of the Cedar Elms, as these
will match the street trees proposed for the district. In sum, adding a
total of twelve, 3” cal. trees and eight planters would help compensate
for the “perimeter and nonvehicular” landscaping shortages.
In sum, the applicant proposed to plant the 12 trees (six on the west
property line and six on the south property line), replace the Cedar
Elms with Lacebark Elms, add planters along the front of the
southernmost building, as well as add 40 Wax Myrtles. As
mentioned above, the six proposed trees on the southern boundary
will be located elsewhere on the site.
A fire lane and private water line is proposed to encircle the building
with two fire hydrants placed within landscaped parking lot islands
adjacent to the fire lane.
The applicant has addressed the Fire Department’s concerns by
proposing to add an opticom (remote control) system for the gates.
In addition to the conditions previously recommended by staff, the
Planning and Zoning Commission requested that the following
issues be addressed (the proposed response is shown in italics):
• Hours of operation and noise,
No change is proposed regarding the hours of operation.
Noise levels may be reduced by the proposed 40 Wax Myrtles,
trees and screening wall.
• Flood plain/screening wall,
The masonry screening wall is proposed to be extended south
adjacent to the southern extent of the existing storage block
wall.
• 10’ landscape buffer/planting (additional living screen),
ITEM # 6 Page 5 of 6
Forty Wax Myrtles are proposed along the western property
line in addition to six proposed trees.
• 8’ fence (improvements to existing fence)
The existing fence is proposed to be repaired.
• Location of truck parking,
No change is proposed.
• Dust generated from the site.
Paving the area will eliminate the majority of the dust
generated from the vehicles. The discharge of dust from the
material storage will be reduced by the Wax Myrtle buffer.
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
Staff is recommending APPROVAL of this request, subject to the following conditions:
1) List all proposed PD conditions on Site Plan. These are as
follows:
a. Front yard parking is permitted.
b. Nonvehicular and perimeter landscaping shortages (Specify
areas once calculations are revised).
c. All uses (Retail, Office, Warehouse, and Outside Storage)
permitted by right.
Condition met. All proposed PD conditions have been noted
on the Site Plan.
2) Contact Larry Redick at 972-323-8917 to discuss electric
service requirements.
3) Include all existing and proposed lighting facilities and ensure
they are in accordance with the H District regulations.
4) Include 300 to 400-square-foot area around Tree #7 within
nonvehicular landscaping calculations.
Condition met. Area surrounding Tree #7 is shown.
5) Replace Cedar Elms with Lacebark Elms as these are more
appropriate for the district.
Condition met. Cedar Elms have been changed to Lacebark
Elms.
6) Include 12 additional perimeter trees (six on the west and six
on the south property lines) and planters on the Coppell
frontage.
Condition met. Twelve additional perimeter trees have been
added (six on the west and six on the south). The six shown
on the south property line are required to be shifted to
elsewhere on site, so as not to conflict with the sewer
easement or flood plain.
ITEM # 6 Page 6 of 6
7) Show adjacent zoning information.
Condition met. Adjacent zoning information is shown.
ALTERNATIVES:
1) Recommend approval of the request
2) Recommend disapproval of the request
3) Recommend modification of the request
4) Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date.
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Site Plan
2) Landscape Plan/Tree Survey
3) Elevations
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
ȱ
Planning
November 14, 2006
11
✔
PUBLIC HEARING
Consider approval of Robertson Commercial Pools Addition, Replat and Minor Plat, to expand the area of the existing
plat and provide necessary easements to allow for a building expansion and new construction on 2.65 acres of
property acres of property located at 569 Coppell Road, north of Bethel Road.
The following P&Z conditions remain outstanding:
1. Contact Larry Redick at 972-323-8917 to discuss electric easement requirements.
2. Comply with all Departmental Comments.
Decision of the P&Z Commission at the October 19th meeting:
APPROVAL with 5-0 vote, subject to the conditions listed above.
Staff recommends approval.
@ 3Robertson Pools-RP & MP 1-AR
ITEM # 7 Page 1 of 3
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
Case: Robertson Commercial Pools Addition,
Replat and Minor Plat
P&Z HEARING DATE: October 19, 2006 (Denied at September 21, 2006, P&Z Meeting)
C.C. HEARING DATE: November 14, 2006
STAFF REP.: Matt Steer, City Planner
LOCATION: 569 Coppell Road, north of Bethel Road
SIZE OF AREA: 2.65 acres
CURRENT ZONING: H and SF-12
REQUEST: To expand the area of the existing plat and provide necessary easements to allow
for a building expansion and new construction.
APPLICANT: Owner: Architect: Engineer/Surveyor:
Ron Roberston Bob Anderson Thomas Holland, RPLS
R.L. Robertson, L.L.C. Plan Solutions C-P Engineering, LTD.
569A S Coppell Rd 393 E Las Colinas Blvd, #169 1801 Gateway Blvd, #101
Coppell, TX 75019 Irving, TX 75039 Richardson, TX 75080
(972) 393-2152 (972) 373-9999 (972) 644-2800
Fax: (972) 393-6244 Fax: (972) 373-9001 Fax: (972) 644-2817
HISTORY: Lot 1, Block A, Robertson Commercial Pools Addition, a portion of this property,
was platted in November 1998. An application for a zone change was submitted
in September 2001, but formally withdrawn October 4, 2001 (no reason was
given).
ITEM # 7 Page 2 of 3
The Planning and Zoning Commission denied the replat for this property on
September 21, 2006, in order for the applicant to address some of the
concerns raised at that meeting related to the rezoning request.
TRANSPORTATION: Coppell Road is a two-lane, asphalt road contained within a 60’
right-of-way. Freese and Nichols has prepared the construction
plans, which are now 90% complete, showing variable right-of-
way widths and approximately 34’ of pavement with an 8’
sidewalk on the west and a 6’ sidewalk on the east. Construction is
scheduled to begin in the second quarter of 2008.
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North – Office/Warehouse; “PD-186-LI” Planned Development – 186 – Light
Industrial
South – Vacant; “H” Historic
East – Vacant; “H” Historic
West – Residential; “SF-12” Single Family - 12
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Coppell Comprehensive Plan shows the property as suitable
for appropriate uses within the Historic District.
DISCUSSION: This is the companion case to the proposed Planned Development that shows a
1,740-square-foot addition to the existing Robertson Pools office, a 4,970-
square-foot storage building, 23 new parking spaces, and paved outside storage
which is being tracked concurrently through the planning process. The purpose
of this Replat is to extend the 24’ fire lane easement to the west encircling the
building and back east to Coppell Road. Staff is comfortable recommending
approval of this request and only the standard conditions of approval remain.
As described in the HISTORY section of this report, the Planning
Commission denied this plat in September. It was denied because of
concerns raised during the Planned Development zoning change case. If
the zoning change is approved, staff recommends approval of the replat
subject to the standard conditions, as was recommended with the original
proposal.
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
Staff is recommending APPROVAL of this request, subject to the following conditions:
1) Contact Larry Redick at 972-323-8917 to discuss electric easement
requirements.
2) Comply with the attached Departmental Comment Sheet.
ITEM # 7 Page 3 of 3
ALTERNATIVES:
1) Recommend approval of the request
2) Recommend disapproval of the request
3) Recommend modification of the request
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Departmental Comment Sheet
2) Plat
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
ȱ
Planning
November 14, 2006
12
✔
PUBLIC HEARING
Consider approval of Case No. S-1170R2, Mariachi Grill, zoning change request from S-1170R (Special Use Permit-1170
Revised) to S-1170R2 (Special Use Permit 1170 Revision 2), to allow an approximate 2,200-square-foot restaurant with a
private club to be located at 761 S. MacArthur, Suite 101.
The following P&Z conditions remain outstanding:
1. The property shall be developed in accordance with the floor plan and sign plan.
2. Hours of operation shall not exceed Sunday through Thursday 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. and Friday and Saturday 7:00
a.m. to 11:00 p.m.
3. The operation of the private club shall be in compliance with all applicable provisions of the Texas Alcoholic
Beverage Code and other state regulations.
Decision of the P&Z Commission at the October 19th meeting:
APPROVAL with 5-0 vote, subject to the conditions listed above.
Staff recommends approval.
@ 4S-1170R2, Mariachi Grill, 1-AR
ITEM # 8 Page 1 of 3
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
S-1170R2, Mariachi Grill with Private Club
P&Z HEARING DATE: October 19, 2006
C.C. HEARING DATE: November 14, 2006
STAFF REP.: Marcie Diamond, Assistant Planning Director
LOCATION: 761 S. MacArthur, Suite 101
SIZE OF AREA: 2,200 square feet
CURRENT ZONING: S-1170R (Special Use Permit-1170 Revised)
REQUEST: To allow an approximate 2,200-square-foot private club within a
restaurant.
APPLICANT: Robert Montemayor
Mariachi Grill
761 S. MacArthur, Suite 101
Coppell, Texas 75019
972-462-7001
FAX: 972-462-7002
HISTORY: In February 1998, Council approved a preliminary plat and a concept
plan for Coppell Crossing retail center to allow for a five lot, six-
building retail development to accommodate a mixture of retail,
office and restaurant uses. The first phase of this development (Lot
1) contained two retail buildings with a total of 21,000-square feet.
There have been numerous restaurants in and out of business in this
shopping center since construction; Sushi Kyoto is now Café Miso,
Kolache Depot is now Great Day Bakery, Fresh Wok is still in
business and Dinner Station is now closed. This particular lease
space (Suite 101) was originally a Great Outdoors, then Southwest
Deli.
ITEM # 8 Page 2 of 3
TRANSPORTATION: MacArthur Blvd. is designated as a P6D, six-lane, divided
thoroughfare, with 110 feet of right-of-way. This road is currently
built as a 4-lane, divided thoroughfare, with sufficient right-of-way
to accommodate widening to a 6-lane, divided thoroughfare.
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North - Retail; C (Commercial)
South - Retail; C (Commercial)
East - Retail; R (Retail)
West - Retail; C (Commercial)
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The 1996 Comprehensive Master Plan shows the property as
suitable for regional retail uses.
DISCUSSION: A new Mexican restaurant, Marachi Grill, has recently opened in this
approximate 2,200-square-foot lease space at the southern end of this
building within Coppell Crossing shopping center. While a restaurant may
re-occupy a lease space that has previously been a restaurant through
administrative approval, per Section of Sec. 12-30-16.5 of the Zoning
Ordinance, none of the previous tenants had a private club designation.
Therefore, this restaurant is required to go through the public hearing
process. Soon this additional public hearing process may no longer be
necessary in the event the election/charter amendment, allowing mixed
beverage service with out a private club designation, passes in November.
The applicant desires to sell alcoholic beverages for on-premise
consumption and does not want to wait until the election and related
processes.
The floor plan includes minimal changes from the previous tenants. The
most substantial change is the erection of a wall to enclose the kitchen to
allow for a full-service, versus self-serve concept. The interior has also
been painted and updated.
The hours of operation are proposed not to exceed Sunday through
Thursday 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. and Friday and Saturday 7:00 a.m. to
11:00 p.m. The seating capacity is 68.
The existing 28-square-foot attached sign consists of white, individually
mounted channel letters with a 4-square-foot black and red logo in the
shape of a sombrero. This sign is compliant with the Sign Ordinance and
consistent with the other signs in this shopping center.
ITEM # 8 Page 3 of 3
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
Staff is recommending APPROVAL of S-1170R2, Mariachi Grill with
Private Club, subject to the following conditions:
1) The property shall be developed in accordance with the floor plan and
sign plan.
2) Hours of operation shall not to exceed Sunday through Thursday 7:00
a.m. to 9:00 p.m. and Friday and Saturday 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.
3) The operation of the private club shall be in compliance with all
applicable provisions of the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code and other
state regulations.
ALTERNATIVES:
1) Recommend approval of the request
2) Recommend disapproval of the request
3) Recommend modification of the request
4) Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date.
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Site plan
2) Floor plans
3) Sign plan
4) Picture of sign
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
ȱ
Planning
November 14, 2006
13
✔
PUBLIC HEARING
Consider approval of Case No. PD–217-C, Perky Poodle, zoning change request from C (Commercial) to PD-217-C
(Planned Development-217-Commercial), to allow the reuse and renovation of the existing 4,940-square-foot structure
for a pet day care/boarding/spa on 0.637 acres of property located on the north side of Bethel School Road,
approximately 240 feet east of Denton Tap, property known as 120 East Bethel School Road.
SEE ATTACHED AGENDA REQUEST NARRATIVE
Decision of the P&Z Commission at the October 19th meeting:
APPROVAL with 3-2 vote, subject to the conditions listed on the
attached Agenda Request Narrative.
Staff recommends approval.
@ 5PD-217C, Perky Poodle, 1-AR
Agenda Narrative Form - Revised 1/99
1. Approval of the variances as listed on the Site Plan, as herein revised:
a) Provision of a 10’ off-site landscape easement along the west property line, subject to submission of a
legal instrument defining the perpetual maintenance of this easement.
b) Side yard setback along the east property line being permitted to be approximately 14’-6” vs. a 30’
setback which would typically be required.
c) Approval of 16, 8’-6” x 18’ parking spaces.
d) No perimeter landscape buffer being provided along a portion of the north property line (approximately
45 feet in length).
e) Monument sign permitted to be 60 feet (vs. 75 feet) from the west property line.
AGENDA REQUEST NARRATIVE
ITEM # 9 Page 1 of 5
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
PD – 217-C, Perky Poodle
P&Z HEARING DATE: October 19, 2006
C.C. HEARING DATE: November 14, 2006
STAFF REP.: Marcie Diamond, Assistant Planning Director
LOCATION: 120 East Bethel School Road
SIZE OF AREA: 0.637 acres
CURRENT ZONING: C (Commercial)
REQUEST: To allow the reuse and renovation of the existing 4,940-square-foot
structure for a pet day care/boarding/spa.
APPLICANT: Architect: Prospective Purchasers:
Mark Wainscott Terry and Cindy Henrie
Mark Wainscott Architect 9301 CR7100
3030 LBJ Frwy, Ste. 700 Wolfforth, Texas 79382
Dallas, Texas 75234 806-866-9598
214-722-7535
FAX: 214-722-7635
HISTORY: This property was originally opened as La Petite Daycare in
August 1984. In January 1999, the ownership changed to the
Sterling Academy Daycare. On July 22, 2004, this daycare
closed and has remained vacant.
TRANSPORTATION: Bethel School Road is designated on the Thoroughfare Plan as a
two-lane collector street, built within 60 feet of right-of-way.
ITEM # 9 Page 2 of 5
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North – self-service car wash and vacant property – C (Commercial)
South – U.S. Post Office – C (Commercial)
East – vacant property (First United Methodist Church) – SF-7 (Single Family-7)
West –vacant property – C (Commercial)
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:The Coppell Comprehensive Plan shows the property as suitable
for mixed uses.
DISCUSSION: As discussed in detail in the History Section of this report, this
building was originally occupied for a daycare center over 22 years
ago, and has remained vacant for the past two years. The re-
occupancy and renovation of the exterior of this building will be a
welcome sight to those in the community. The applicant proposes
to utilize this building for a pet daycare/spa/grooming/boarding
facility. All activities will take place indoors, except for
supervised outdoor exercise time for the dogs. There will be no
dogs left outside overnight.
The renovation to the exterior of the building includes the removal
of the existing yellow and blue painted wood “entry feature” and
“architectural accents” being replaced with a stone façade. Two
windows will be added to the west façade, further enhancing it’s
retail appearance. The blue roof will be replaced with a
champagne color, standing seam metal roof. This upgraded
appearance is fully supported by staff. The monument sign is
proposed to be a 40-square-foot, brick and cast stone, externally lit
sign. However, the applicant is requesting one variance on the
interpretation of a monument sign. Instead of the standard double-
faced sign, they are proposing a brick sign in a V configuration to
provide maximum visibility. The sign is to be located 60’ feet from
the west property line, versus 75’ as required by the Sign
Ordinance. While staff can support the sign being 15’ closer to the
west property line, we can not support with the V configuration.
Given the location across from the Post Office driveways, this sign
will appear to be a 20-foot wide sign.
Several technical issues arise when attempting to reuse a site that
was developed under standards of previous Zoning Ordinances.
Via this Planned Development zoning, variances are being
requested to setbacks, parking and landscaping. Specifically, in
terms of setbacks, the existing building is located 14.5 feet from
the east property line. Per the “C” district regulations, this side
ITEM # 9 Page 3 of 5
yard is required to be 30 feet, thus necessitating a 15.5-foot
variance.
There are 19 existing parking spaces on this property. Classifying
this use as retail, 25 parking spaces would be required at a ratio of
one space per 200 square feet of gross floor area. To
accommodate revisions to the site, including two handicapped
parking spaces and the applicant’s proposed mutual access
easement to Denton Tap Road, the parking has been reduced to 16
spaces. The applicant has stated that the maximum number of
employees at any one time would be 6-8, and that 8 to 10 spaces
would be sufficient to accommodate customer drop-off and pick
up. The existing parking spaces are 8’-6” x 18’, which is smaller
than the standard 9’ by 19’. The additional variance will be
needed to address this deficiency.
Landscaping
The property will generally be brought up to current landscape
standards except for minor variances. Fourteen, 3-inch caliper
overstory trees will be planted along the perimeter of the site, and
four trees will be added to the parking lot islands. However, the
applicant and the seller have agreed to allow the required 10- foot
perimeter landscape buffer along the west property line (containing
the required three overstory trees and screening hedge) to be
provided within a landscape easement on the seller’s property.
The seller understands that an additional 10-foot buffer will be
required when the adjacent lot develops. A condition of approval is
the submission of the separate instrument that will define the
perpetual maintenance responsibility of the landscaping and
irrigation of this buffer easement. There is also a small section
(45-foot long) of the perimeter landscape area missing where the
existing dumpster and the proposed mutual access easement are
located. These variances have also been enumerated on the site
plan.
Screening Walls
There is an existing six-foot concrete screening wall along the
north and east property lines. The applicant will repair those
sections in disrepair, and further, will add a two-foot iron railing
above the wall. An eight-foot iron fence will also be erected at the
northwest and southeast corners of the building to fully enclose the
outdoor exercise area. The “colorful”, blue and yellow wood
fence along the south side of the building will be removed.
Access
Currently, there is a single driveway on Bethel School Road to
serve this facility. The applicant desires to allow a second access
point to Denton Tap Road via the existing driveway on the south
ITEM # 9 Page 4 of 5
side of the convenience store/gas station. As designed, this will
also allow for a third point of access through the car wash property
out to Vanbebber Road. During the a.m. peak hours, Bethel
School Road tends to back up beyond the existing driveway. The
misalignment of the driveways on the south side of Bethel School
Road, serving the Post Office, further compounds this problem.
Given the existing congestion, staff is concerned that by opening
up these access points, there will be a significant amount of cut-
through traffic, which may be more detrimental to the functioning
of this business than limiting access on to Bethel School Road.
Further, by eliminating this mutual access to Denton Tap,
additional parking spaces can be provided, reducing that requested
variance.
There is currently no sidewalk serving this site. Similar to when
the gas station to the northwest of this site was renovated and re-
occupied, the construction of a sidewalk was required. Therefore,
as part of the site work, and prior to the Certificate of Occupancy
for this use, the construction of a 4’ sidewalk, adjacent to Bethel
School Road will be required.
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
Staff is recommending APPROVAL of PD-217-C Perky Poodle,
subject to the following conditions:
1. Revision to the Site Plan eliminating the proposed mutual
access to Denton Tap Road, to allow the inclusion of three
additional parking spaces.
2. Construction of a 4’ sidewalk parallel to Bethel School Road.
3. Approval of the variances as listed on the Site Plan, as herein
revised:
a) Provision of a 10’ off-site landscape easement along the
west property line, subject to submission of a legal
instrument defining the perpetual maintenance of this
easement.
b) Side yard setback along the east property line being
permitted to be approximately 14’-6” vs. a 30’ setback -
c) Approval of 16 (19 if the mutual access easement to
Denton Tap is deleted), 8’-6” x 18’ parking spaces.
d) No perimeter landscape buffer being provided along a
portion of the north property line (approximately 45 feet in
length).
e) Monument sign permitted to be 60 feet (vs. 75 feet) from
the west property line, subject to the structure being
revised to be a typical, double-faced sign.
ITEM # 9 Page 5 of 5
ALTERNATIVES:
1) Recommend approval of the request
2) Recommend disapproval of the request
3) Recommend modification of the request
4) Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date.
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Existing Conditions Exhibit
2) Site Plan
3) Landscape Plan
4) Elevations
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
ȱ
Planning
November 14, 2006
14
✔
PRESENTATION
Consider approval of the Northlake Woodlands Center, Lot 4, Block A, Minor Plat, to establish a building site, various
easements and fire lane to allow for the reuse and renovation of the existing 4940-square-foot structure for a pet day
care/boarding/spa on 0.637 acres of property located on the north side of Bethel School Road, approximately 240
feet east of Denton Tap, property known as 120 East Bethel School Road.
The following P&Z conditions remain outstanding:
1. Submission of a legal instrument defining the perpetual maintenance of the landscape easement.
Decision of the P&Z Commission at the October 19th meeting:
APPROVAL with 3-2 vote, subject to the condition listed above.
Staff recommends approval.
@ 6NL Woodlands, L4, BA, MP 1-AR
ITEM # 10 Page 1 of 2
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
Northlake Woodlands Center, Lot 4, Block A, Minor Plat
P&Z HEARING DATE: October 19, 2006
C.C. HEARING DATE: November 14, 2006
STAFF REP.: Marcie Diamond, Assistant Planning Director
LOCATION: 120 East Bethel School Road
SIZE OF AREA: 0.637 acres
CURRENT ZONING: C (Commercial)
REQUEST: To establish a building site, various easements and fire lane to
allow for the reuse and renovation of the existing 4,940-square-
foot structure for a pet day care/boarding/spa.
APPLICANT: Architect: Prospective Purchasers:
Mark Wainscott Terry and Cindy Henrie
Mark Wainscott Architect 9301 CR7100
3030 LBJ Frwy, Ste 700 Wolfforth, Texas 79382
Dallas, Texas 75234 806-866-9598
214-722-7535
FAX: 214-722-7635
HISTORY: This property has never been platted. This structure was originally
opened as a La Petite Daycare in August 1984. In January 1999
the ownership changed to the Sterling Academy Daycare. On July
22, 2004 this day care closed, and this building has remained
vacant since that time.
TRANSPORTATION: Bethel School Road is designated on the Thoroughfare Plan as a
two-lane collector street, built within 60 feet of right-of-way.
ITEM # 10 Page 2 of 2
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North – self-service car wash and vacant property – C (Commercial)
South – U.S. Post Office – C (Commercial)
East – vacant property (First United Methodist Church) – SF-7 (Single Family-7)
West –vacant property – C (Commercial)
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:The Coppell Comprehensive Plan shows the property as suitable
mixed uses.
DISCUSSION: This is the companion request to the PD for Perky Poodle. This
property has never been platted, and therefore, a plat is required to
establish a building site as well as to provide easements for a fire
lane, sidewalk and utilities. As discussed in the PD request, staff
does not support the provision of a mutual access easement to
Denton Tap Road, and therefore it should be removed from the
plat. A sidewalk is required along Bethel School Road, staff is
recommending that this 4’ sidewalk be placed within a 5’ easement
to align with the easement on the church property to the east.
Finally, there are several typos and minor drafting issues that are
enumerated below, which need to be corrected.
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
Staff is recommending APPROVAL of Northlake Woodlands Center, Lot 4,
Block A, Minor Plat, subject to the following conditions:
1. Removal of the mutual access easement to Denton Tap Road.
2. Inclusion of a 5’ sidewalk easement parallel to Bethel School Road within
the 15’ sanitary sewer easement.
3. Add filing information of the existing 15’ sanitary sewer easement.
4. Correct the name of the property owner to the northwest of this property
from Eaton to Eason.
5. Correct the spelling of Addition in the City Secretary’s signature block.
6. Change Comcast to Time Warner.
7. Remove the phone numbers under the franchise utility signature line.
8. Submission of a legal instrument defining the perpetual maintenance of
the landscape easement.
ALTERNATIVES:
1) Recommend approval of the request
2) Recommend disapproval of the request
3) Recommend modification of the request
4) Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date.
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Minor Plat
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
Planning
November 14, 2006
15
✔
PUBLIC HEARING
Consider approval of Case No. PD-106R-SF-9, Hidden Valley, Lot 6, Block C, zoning change request from PD-106-SF-9
(Planned Development –106 Single Family-9) to PD-106R-SF-9 (Planned Development – 106 Revised-Single Family-9), to
allow for a pool and deck to be constructed along the rear property line, providing a variance to the required 5-foot
setback, at 479 Hidden Valley Drive.
The following P&Z conditions remain outstanding:
1. Acknowledgement that proposed fencing across easements is subject to removal at discretion of easement entity.
2. Contact Greg Johnson at (972) 216-8926 to discuss proximity of proposed pool to existing TXU facilities.
Decision of the P&Z Commission at the October 19th meeting:
APPROVAL with 5-0 vote, subject to the conditions listed above.
Staff recommends approval.
@ 7PD-106R-SF-9, Hidden Valley 1-AR
ITEM # 11 Page 1 of 3
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
Case No. PD-106R-SF-9, Hidden Valley, Lot 6, Block C
P&Z HEARING DATE: October 19, 2006
C.C. HEARING DATE: November 14, 2006
STAFF REP.: Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning
LOCATION: 479 Hidden Valley Drive
SIZE OF AREA: One single-family lot of approximately 17,878 square feet
CURRENT ZONING: PD-106-SF-9 (Planned Development-106 Single Family-9)
REQUEST: To allow a pool and deck to be constructed along the rear property
line, providing a variance to the required 5-foot setback.
APPLICANT: J. Tobin and L. Ashley Cupstid
479 Hidden Valley Drive
Coppell, Texas 75019
(972) 462-8588
Fax: (972) 401-5624
HISTORY: There has been no recent development history on the subject tract
other than a final subdivision plat, which was approved in the
spring of 2004. That plat reflected a total of 16 single-family lots
ranging in size from 12,000 to over 20,000 square feet.
TRANSPORTATION: Hidden Valley Drive is a local, 27 foot wide, concrete-paved street
contained within a 50-foot right-of-way.
ITEM # 11 Page 2 of 3
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North – Developing single family lots; PD-109 (SF9)
South – Single family development; SF-12
East – Developed single family residences; SF-12
West – Vacant single family lots; PD-109 (SF-9)
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Coppell Comprehensive Plan shows the property as suitable
for single family residences.
DISCUSSION: A large, two-story single-family residence has recently been constructed on a lot
of approximately 17,000 square feet in the Hidden Valley subdivision. The
footprint of the house basically used up the majority of the buildable site. After
completion, the owners desired to construct a swimming pool on the remainder
of the lot, but found less than adequate space with which to build the pool
envisioned, and provide the required setbacks. To gain enough space to
construct a pool and an attendant deck area, an application has been filed to
modify the required setback and amend the PD to allow construction.
Specifically, the applicant wishes to amend the side yard setback restriction of
five feet, and construct a swimming pool and deck on the property line. At first
blush, this request appears to be excessive. However, because of an existing
sewer/drainage easement (allowing no permanent structures) that separates this
property from its southern neighbor by 20 feet, there is adequate open area
between the two properties to negate this concern. In addition, with the
cooperation of the southern neighbor, this applicant has agreed to plant heavy
landscaping on that owner’s land to screen pool activities from the neighbor.
That 20-foot open area coupled with the desire to landscape the easement
warrants staff support. Staff recommends this applicant submit a landscape plan
for the easement area to insure adequate screening would be provided as part of
this development.
Included with this staff report is an e-mail from the property owner to the south
(who is most affected by this development) stating agreement with the request.
That support is conditioned upon adequate landscaping being provided within
the easement area, maximum slopes, suggests certain plant materials that might
be included in the open space to adequately screen the pool area, and the
assurance of proper drainage of the development.
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
Staff is recommending APPROVAL of this request, subject to the following
conditions:
1. Provision of a landscape plan that complies with the Plant Palette prior
to Council deliberation.
2. Insure pool and any decking is at least one foot off the rear property line.
3. Clarification of fencing across easement (wood, iron, or combination).
4. Acknowledgement that proposed fencing across easements is subject to
removal at discretion of easement entity.
ITEM # 11 Page 3 of 3
5. Contact Greg Johnson at (972) 216-8926 to discuss proximity of
proposed pool to existing TXU facilities.
ALTERNATIVES:
1) Recommend approval of the request
2) Recommend disapproval of the request
3) Recommend modification of the request
4) Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date.
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Letter from applicant dated Sept. 18, 2006, explaining reason for request
2) Site plan and photos of surrounding environment
3) Pool plan
4) Drawing of proposed wood deck
5) E-mail from adjacent neighbor dated Oct. 10, 2006, in support of request
6) Departmental comments (Building Inspection, Engineering)
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
ȱ
Planning
November 14, 2006
16
✔
PRESENTATION
Consider approval of the Sandy Lake Oaks Addition, Lot 1, Block A, Site Plan, to allow for the development of a
13,110-square-foot retail/office building on 1.543 acres of property located at the northeast corner of Sandy Lake and
Moore Road, known as 632 Sandy Lake Road, at the request of Chuck West, West and Associates.
The following P&Z conditions remain outstanding:
1. Consider a darker brick for the “B-1” specified on the color board.
2. Contact Larry Redick at (972) 323-8917 to discuss electric easement requirements.
3. Compliance with the Department Comment Sheet.
Decision of the P&Z Commission at the October 19th meeting:
APPROVAL with 6-0 vote, subject to the conditions listed above.
Staff recommends approval.
@ 8Sandy Lake Oaks, L1, BA, SP 1-AR
ITEM # 12 Page 1 of 3
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
Sandy Lake Oaks Addition, Lot 1, Block A, Site Plan
P&Z HEARING DATE: October 19, 2006
C.C. HEARING DATE: November 14, 2006
STAFF REP.: Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning
LOCATION: 632 Sandy Lake Road; north east corner of Sandy Lake and Moore
Road
SIZE OF AREA: 1.543 acres
CURRENT ZONING: C, Commercial
REQUEST: To allow the development of a 13,110-square-foot retail/office
building.
APPLICANT: Sandy Lake Oaks, L.P.
Mr. Chuck West
17430 Campbell Road, #110
Dallas, TX. 75252
(972) 713-8111
Fax: (972) 733-3078
HISTORY: There has been no recent development history on the subject parcel
although the property to the east was planned and developed with a
6,500-square-foot dental office building in 2004-05.
TRANSPORTATION: Sandy Lake Road is a C4D, four-lane, concrete, divided
thoroughfare built to standard within a 100 foot right-of-way.
ITEM # 12 Page 2 of 3
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North –Single-family residential; Austin Place Addition (PD-130-SF-7)
South –Sandy Lake Plaza Retail Center; R (Retail)
East – Dental office; C (Commercial)
West – Two story medical office building; C (Commercial)
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Coppell Comprehensive Plan shows the property as suitable
for neighborhood retail uses.
DISCUSSION: This is a request to develop a vacant parcel of retail/commercial land at
the northeast corner of Sandy Lake and Moore Roads. The proposal
reflects a one-story 13,000-square-foot building that could accommodate a
variety of office and retail uses. These uses would require 66 parking
spaces and that number is shown on the site plan. The property shares a
mutual access/fire lane easement to the east that was partially provided by
the dental office building on the adjacent lot. When the proposed project
is completed, a looped easement will extend from the current one on the
dental lot over to Moore Road on the north side of the proposed building.
This easement is necessary and has been endorsed by the Fire Department.
The landscaping plan complies with our Plant Palette listing and the
interior, perimeter, and non-vehicular landscaping calculations exceed our
minimum requirements. Although we had some initial concerns regarding
the size of tenant signs, that concern has been rectified with the applicant
stating on the face of the elevations maximum signage in accordance with
our sign standards. The monument sign meets code and overall this
project can be a positive addition to the area.
The elevations initially submitted had flat roofs, and the profile coupled
with the light colored brick accents gave the project a Santa Fe look. A
darker brick for the tenant entrances would reduce that perception of the
building. In addition, both office buildings to the east have significant
gabled roofs, and are of similar scale to this proposal. We asked the
applicant (who is also an architect) to re-think his elevations and he has
resubmitted drawings that give the building more interest with the raised
parapet on the west side. The applicant needs to verify that each elevation
of this building contains no more than 20% non-masonry materials (absent
windows and doors), being reminded that CMU is not considered a true
masonry material in Coppell.
There are additional requirements of other city departments including tree
survey information and easement information. These requirements are
reflected in the attached departmental comments’ report.
ITEM # 12 Page 3 of 3
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
Staff is recommending APPROVAL of this request, subject to the following conditions:
1. Show 80% masonry calculations for each elevation
2. Remove “canvas awning” note from west elevation parapet.
3. Consider a darker brick for the “B-1” specified on the color board.
4. Contact Larry Redick at (972) 323-8917 to discuss electric easement
requirements.
5. Departmental comments (Engineering, Parks).
ALTERNATIVES:
1) Recommend approval of the request
2) Recommend disapproval of the request
3) Recommend modification of the request
4) Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date.
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Submittal package (site plan, elevations, landscape plan/details, tree survey).
2) Departmental comments (Engineering, Parks).
12
10 10
9
7 9
24' FIRE LANE AND ACCESS EASEMENT ACCESS EASEMENT & FIRE LANEONE STORY
13110 SF
BUILDING
EXISTING
DENTAL
OFFICE
MONUMENT
SIGN
Power
Pole
490.91 T/C
FOUND
ELEV.
ANDER
EX. FH
F.H.
F.D.C.
EX. DRIVEWAY
EX. DRIVEWAY
9
WEST & ASSOCIATES
DATE
PROJECT NO
PRINTED
SHEET NUMBER
06006
09-15-2006632 SANDY LAKE ROADSANDY LAKE OAKSCOPPELL, TEXASRETAIL AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICE SPACECE-1
SITE PLAN
FAR: .20
SITE AREA: 67,213 SF
BUILDING HEIGHT: 25 FEET
BUILDING AREA: 13,110 SF
SITE DATA TABLE
PARKING PROVIDED: 66 SPACES
REQUIRED PARKING: 66 SPACES
EXISTING ZONING: COMMERCIAL
PROPOSED USE: RETAIL AND OFFICE
ZONING: RETAIL
ZONING: COMMERCIAL
ZONING: PD 130
SF-7
SCALE: 1"=20'ZONING: COMMERCIAL
TENANT SIGN
632
TENANT SIGN
TENANT SIGN4'-0"10'-0"
B2
B3
PAINTED METAL PANEL
WITH TENANT NAME IN 6"
WHITE RAISED
METAL LETTERS8"B1 ACME BRICK BLEND 105
B2 ACME BRICK BLEND 100
B3 ACME BRICK BLEND 155
CMU1 FEATHERLITE WHITE SPLIT FACE CMU
MATERIAL LEGEND
TENANT SIGNS
ALL BUILDING MOUNTED TENANT SIGNS SHALL
BE INTERNALLY LIGHTED INDIVIDUAL METAL
CHANNEL LETTERS WITH WHITE FACES
THE MAXIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE OF SIGNAGE
TO BE 200 SQUARE FEET ON SANDY LAKE ROAD (SOUTH ELEVATION)
AND 70 SQUARE FEET ON MOORE ROAD (WEST ELEVATION)
MASONRY PERCENTAGE
NORTH ELEVATION: 4058 SF BRICK, 100% BRICK
SOUTH ELEVATION: 3390 SF BRICK, 96%, 163 SF CMU, 4%
EAST ELEVATION: 1171 SF BRICK, 97%, 40 SF CMU, 3%
WEST ELEVATION: 1372 SF BRICK, 97%, 40 SF CMU, 3%25'-0"1" INSULATED GLASS
& ALUM. STORERONT
SYSTEM (TYP.)
CMU1
B1
CMU1
B3
B222'-0"20'-0"1" INSULATED GLASS
& ALUM. STORERONT
SYSTEM (TYP.)
FACE BRICK VENEER
H.M. DOOR &
FRAME (TYP.)
PREFINISHED MTL.
SCUPPER &
DOWNSPOUT (TYP.)
AC EQUIPMENT ON ROOF
SCREENED BY PARAPET
LIGHT FIXTURE
FIRE CONTROL &
ELECTRICAL ROOM
B2
B3
B1
CMU1
TENANT SIGN
20'-0"25'-0"1" INSULATED GLASS
& ALUM. STORERONT
SYSTEM (TYP.)CANVAS AWNINGS
CMU1
B1
B1
B3
B2
CMU1
TENANT SIGN TENANT SIGN TENANT SIGN
25'-0"20'-0"1" INSULATED GLASS
& ALUM. STORERONT
SYSTEM (TYP.)
LIGHT FIXTURE
CANVAS AWNINGS
TENANT SIGNS
CMU1
B1 B1
CMU1
CMU1
B1
CMU1
B2
B3
B1
CMU1
THE BACK SIDE OF EXPOSED
PARAPET WALLS SHALL BE
BRICK TO MATCH THE FACE
SIDE OF THE WALL
35'-2"WEST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
SOUTH ELEVATION
NORTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
EAST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
WEST & ASSOCIATES
DATE
PROJECT NO
PRINTED
SHEET NUMBER
06006RETAIL AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICE SPACECOPPELL, TEXAS09/15/06SANDY LAKE OAKS632 SANDY LAKE ROADA1MONUMENT SIGN
SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0"
REVISED 10/4/06
REVISED 10/30/06
Power
Pole
M
W
W
T
I
I I
L
LMT T I
490.91 T/C
M
12
10 10
9
7 9
ACCESS EASEMENT AND FIRE LANE
ACCESSACCESS EASEMENT & FIRE LANEONE STORY
13110 SF
BUILDING
MONUMENT SIGN
9
WEST & ASSOCIATES
DATE
PROJECT NO
PRINTED
SHEET NUMBER
06006
09-15-2006632 SANDY LAKE ROADSANDY LAKE OAKSCOPPELL, TEXASRETAIL AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICE SPACELS-1
Common name Scientific Name Size Quantity Description
Annual Color 4"Fully Rooted
Asian Jasmine Trachleospermum asiaticum 1 gallon 1375 s.f.Fully Rooted, min. 5 runners
Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum 3" B&B 6 Nursery Grown 12' min. ht. 6' spread
Bermudagrass Cynodon dactylon sod
Carolina Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 'Bright 'N Tight'10 gallon 11 Full plants, min. 30" ht.
Cedar Elm Ulmus crassifolia 3" B&B 5 Nursery Grown 12' min. ht. 6' spread
Chinese Fringe Flower Loropetalum chinense var. rubrum 2 gallon 27 Full plants, min. 15" ht.
Chinese Pistache Pistachia chinensis 3" B&B 2 Nursery Grown 12' min. ht. 6' spread
Crape Myrtle Lagerstroemia indica 'Hopi'6' - 8' ht. B&B 3 Min. 3 trunks Max. 5 trunks
Crape Myrtle 'Miniature Weeping'Lagerstroemia sp.3 gallon 6 Nursery Grown
Decomposed Granite
Desert Willow Chilopsis linearis 15 gallon 3 Well shaped, full branching
St. Augustine grass Stenotaphrum secundatum sod
Indian hawthorne Raphiolepsis indica 'Jack Evans'3 gallon 13 Fully rooted
Liriope 'Big Blue'Liriope muscari 'Big Blue'1 gallon 40 Fully rooted
Live Oak Quercus virginiana 3" B&B 4 Nursery Grown 12' min. ht. 6' spread
Lovegrass Eragrostis sp.1 gallon 235 s.f.Fully rooted
Nandina 'Harbour Dwarf'Nandina domestica 'Harbour Dwarf'2 gallon 110 Nursery Grown, fully rooted
Pampas Grass Cortaderia selloana 5 gallon 5 Fully rooted
Purple Wintercreeper Euonymus fortunei 'Colorata'1 gallon 900 s.f.Fully rooted, min. 5 runners
Redbud "Oklahoma"Cercis yexensis 15 gallon 3 Well shaped, full branching
Wax Myrtle 'Dwarf'Myrica pusilla 'dwarf'5 gallon 96 Full plants, min. 30 ht.
SCALE: 1"=20'
-PERIMETER LANDSCAPING: 5426 SQ.FT. REQUIRED 5426 SQ.FT. PROVIDED.
TREES 11 REQUIRED 11 PROVIDED.
-INTERIOR LANDSCAPING: 3200 SQ.FT. REQUIRED 6710 SQ.FT. PROVIDED.
TREES 8 REQUIRED 8 PROVIDED.
-NON-VEHICULAR LANDSCAPING: 8115 SQ.FT. REQUIRED 8836 SQ.FT. PROVIDED.
TREES 7 REQUIRED 5 + 12 EX. TREE CREDITS (6 x 2=12) PROVIDED.
-PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL SITE AREA DEVOTED TO LANDSCAPING:31%
LANDSCAPE
PLAN
LOT 1, BLOCK A
SANDY LAKE OAKS ADDITION
1.543 ACRES
SITUATED IN THE
S. M. HIATT SURVEY, ABST. 638
CITY OF COPPELL
DALLAS COUNTY,TEXAS
10-04-2006CITY COMMENT REV.
WEST & ASSOCIATES
DATE
PROJECT NO
PRINTED
SHEET NUMBER
06006
09-15-2006632 SANDY LAKE ROADSANDY LAKE OAKSCOPPELL, TEXASRETAIL AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICE SPACECommon name Scientific Name Size Quantity Description
Annual Color 4"Fully Rooted
Asian Jasmine Trachleospermum asiaticum 1 gallon 1375 s.f.Fully Rooted, min. 5 runners
Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum 3" B&B 6 Nursery Grown 12' min. ht. 6' spread
Bermudagrass Cynodon dactylon sod
Carolina Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 'Bright 'N Tight'10 gallon 11 Full plants, min. 30" ht.
Cedar Elm Ulmus crassifolia 3" B&B 5 Nursery Grown 12' min. ht. 6' spread
Chinese Fringe Flower Loropetalum chinense var. rubrum 2 gallon 27 Full plants, min. 15" ht.
Chinese Pistache Pistachia chinensis 3" B&B 2 Nursery Grown 12' min. ht. 6' spread
Crape Myrtle Lagerstroemia indica 'Hopi'6' - 8' ht. B&B 3 Min. 3 trunks Max. 5 trunks
Crape Myrtle 'Miniature Weeping'Lagerstroemia sp.3 gallon 6 Nursery Grown
Decomposed Granite
Desert Willow Chilopsis linearis 15 gallon 3 Well shaped, full branching
St. Augustine grass Stenotaphrum secundatum sod
Indian hawthorne Raphiolepsis indica 'Jack Evans'3 gallon 13 Fully rooted
Liriope 'Big Blue'Liriope muscari 'Big Blue'1 gallon 40 Fully rooted
Live Oak Quercus virginiana 3" B&B 4 Nursery Grown 12' min. ht. 6' spread
Lovegrass Eragrostis sp.1 gallon 235 s.f.Fully rooted
Nandina 'Harbour Dwarf'Nandina domestica 'Harbour Dwarf'2 gallon 110 Nursery Grown, fully rooted
Pampas Grass Cortaderia selloana 5 gallon 5 Fully rooted
Purple Wintercreeper Euonymus fortunei 'Colorata'1 gallon 900 s.f.Fully rooted, min. 5 runners
Redbud "Oklahoma"Cercis yexensis 15 gallon 3 Well shaped, full branching
Wax Myrtle 'Dwarf'Myrica pusilla 'dwarf'5 gallon 96 Full plants, min. 30 ht.
LS-2
LANDSCAPE
PLAN
DETAILS
LOT 1, BLOCK A
SANDY LAKE OAKS ADDITION
1.543 ACRES
SITUATED IN THE
S. M. HIATT SURVEY, ABST. 638
CITY OF COPPELL
DALLAS COUNTY,TEXAS
SANDY LAKE ROADMOORE ROADACCESS EASEMENT & FIRE LANE632 SANDY LAKE ROADSANDY LAKE OAKSCOPPELL, TEXASRETAIL AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICE SPACESHEET NUMBER
09/15/06
06006
PRINTED
PROJECT NO
DATE
WEST & ASSOCIATES
TREE SURVEY
SCALE: 1" = 20'A
TREE SURVEY
No.Diameter Inches Species Canopy Points Crown Class % Live Crown Notes
30'
1 32 Post Oak 15'33'CO 50 Preserved
10'
10'
2 24 Post Oak 27'30'CO 30 Preserved
27'
25'
3 28 Post Oak 9'25'CO 50 Preserved
12'
25'
4 27 Post Oak 30'9'CO 30 Preserved
12'
5'
5 19 Post Oak 12'15'SU 15 Preserved
9'
9'
6 28 Post Oak 25'12'CO 30 Preserved
21'
9'
7 12 Pecan 6'15'CO 30 To be removed
15'
9'
8 12 Pecan 15'6'CO 30 To be removed
15'
15'
9 15 Pecan 6'21'D 50 To be removed
12'
12'
10 18 Cedar 12'12'D 80 To be removed
12'
24'
11 9 Hackberry 18'18'CO 30 Not Protected
18'To be removed
24'
12 9 Hackberry 18'18'CO 30 Not Protected
18'To be removed
24'
13 9 Hackberry 18'18'CO 30 Not Protected
18'To be removed
24'
14 9 Hackberry 18'18'CO 30 Not Protected
18'To be removed
24'5 trunck tree split at base.
15 36 Bois D' Arc 18'24'CO 50 Trunks almost on ground
24'To be removed
12'
16 8 Elm 15'5'CO 30 To be removed
15'
12'
17 9 Cottonwood 9'3'CO 30 Not Protected
12'Conflict with existing brick wall
12'
18 8 Cottonwood 3'9'CO 30 Not Protected
12'Conflict with existing brick wall
6'
19 5 Cottonwood 6'6'D 30 Not Protected
6'Conflict with existing brick wall
15'
20 24 Cottonwood 21'9'D 50 To be removed
21'Conflicts with traffic signal
REVISED 10/3/06
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
ȱ
Planning
November 14, 2006
17
✔
PRESENTATION
Consider approval of the Sandy Lake Oaks Addition, Lot 1, Block A, Minor Plat, to establish fire lanes and various
easements to allow for the development of a 13,110-square-foot retail/office building on 1.543 acres of property
located at the northeast corner of Sandy Lake and Moore Road, known as 632 Sandy Lake Road.
All P&Z conditions have been met.
Decision of the P&Z Commission at the October 19th meeting:
APPROVAL with 6-0 vote, subject to the condition listed above.
Staff recommends approval.
@ 9Sandy Lake Oaks, L1, BA, MP 1-AR
ITEM # 13 Page 1 of 2
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
Sandy Lake Oaks Addition, Lot 1, Block A, Minor Plat
P&Z HEARING DATE: October 19, 2006
C.C. HEARING DATE: November 14, 2006
STAFF REP.: Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning
LOCATION: 632 Sandy Lake Road, northeast corner of Sandy Lake and Moore
Road
SIZE OF AREA: 1.543 acres
CURRENT ZONING: C, Commercial
REQUEST: To allow for the development of a 13,110-square-foot retail/office
building.
APPLICANT: Sandy Lake Oaks, L.P. Peeples Engineers
Mr. Chuck West Michael Peeples
17430 Campbell Road, #110 1930 Rosemeade, #207
Dallas, TX. 75252 Carrollton, TX. 75007
(972) 713-8111 (972) 416-1968
Fax: (972) 733-3078 Fax: (214) 731-9949
HISTORY: There has been no recent development history on the subject parcel
although the property to the east was planned and developed with a
6,500 square foot dental office building in 2004-2005.
TRANSPORTATION: Sandy lake Road is a C4D, four-lane, concrete, divided
thoroughfare build to standard within a 100 foot right of way.
ITEM # 13 Page 2 of 2
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North –Single-family residential; Austin Place Addition (PD-130-SF-7)
South –Sandy Lake Plaza Retail Center; R (Retail)
East – Dental office; C (Commercial)
West – Two story medical office building; C (Commercial)
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Coppell Comprehensive Plan shows the property as suitable
for neighborhood retail uses.
DISCUSSION: This is the companion piece to the Site Plan request just discussed.
Approval of this application would allow the property to be legally platted,
resulting in eventual construction of the retail/office building. For the
most part, staff concerns have been addressed. However, we need the
filing information regarding mutual access easement at the southeast
corner of this property specifically shown on this plat.
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
Staff is recommending APPROVAL of this request, subject to the following conditions:
1. Provide filing information for southeast easement.
ALTERNATIVES:
1) Recommend approval of the request
2) Recommend disapproval of the request
3) Recommend modification of the request
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Minor Plat document
M
W
W
T
I
I I
L
LMT T I
T L
T
M
FLOOD PLAIN NOTES
(1) Subject tract lies within a Zone 'X’, area determined to be outside 500 year flood plain.
(2) All flood plain Information was provided by F.E.M.A. Flood Insurance Rate Map,
Community Panel No. 480170-0010E, revised date April 15, 1994
"Floodplain Development Permit Application No. __________ has been filed with the City of
Coppell floodplain Administrator on _________, 2006.
___________________________, Floodplain Administrator
___________
Date
The undersigned, the City Secretary of the City of Coppell, Texas, hereby certifies that the
foregoing Replat of the
___________________________________________________________________
Subdivision or Addition to the City of Coppell was submitted to the City Council on the day of
__________, 2006, and the Council, by formal action, then and there accepted the dedication of
streets, alleys, parks, easements, public places, and water and sewer lines, as shown and set forth in
and upon said plat, and said Council further authorized Mayor to note the acceptance thereof by
signing his name as herein above subscribed.
Witness my hand this ___ day of ________, 2006.
______________________
City Secretary
Recommended for Approvals
__________________________________________________
Chairman Date
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of Coppell, Texas
__________________________________________________
Mayor Date
City of Coppell, Texas
_________________________________________
_________________________________________
_________________________________________
_________________________________________
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
ȱ
Planning
November 14, 2006
18
✔
PRESENTATION
Consider approval of the Freeport North, Lot 4R, Block A, Site Plan, to allow the development of a 51,360-square-foot,
one-story office building on 6.4 acres of property located on Royal Lane, approximately 1,200 feet north of Bethel
Road.
The following P&Z conditions remain outstanding:
1. Correct discrepancies between the tree calculations and those shown on the plant list & plan (107 overstory trees
shown within calculations, 108 on list & plan). Note that perimeter trees on south end shall be planted and maintained
in accordance with the landscape section of the zoning ordinance if and when the existing trees die.
2. Contact Jeff Curry at 972-888-1330 to discuss easement requirements.
Decision of the P&Z Commission at the October 19th meeting:
APPROVAL with 6-0 vote, subject to the conditions listed above.
Staff recommends approval.
@10Freeport N, L4R, BA, SP 1-AR
ITEM # 14 Page 1 of 3
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
Freeport North, Lot 4R, Block A, Site Plan
P&Z HEARING DATE: October 19, 2006
C.C. HEARING DATE: November 14, 2006
STAFF REP.: Matt Steer, City Planner
LOCATION: On Royal Lane, approximately 1,200 feet north of Bethel Road.
SIZE OF AREA: 6.4 acres
CURRENT ZONING: LI (Light Industrial)
REQUEST: To allow the development of a 51,360-square-foot, one-story office
building.
APPLICANT: Owner: Engineer/Surveyor:
Jeff Turner Jack Evans
Duke Realty Pacheco Koch
5495 Beltline Rd, Ste. 360 8350 N. Central Expwy, Ste. 1000
Dallas, Texas 75240 Dallas, Texas 75206
972-361-6704 972-235-3031
FAX: 972-361-6800 FAX: 972-235-9544
HISTORY: There has been no development activity on the subject property.
TRANSPORTATION: Royal Lane is designated as a C4D/6 four-lane, divided collector
built to standard in a 100’ right-of-way capable of accommodating a
six-lane, divided thoroughfare.
ITEM # 14 Page 2 of 3
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North –vacant, LI “Light Industrial”
South – Cici’s Distribution Center; LI “Light Industrial”
East – Gulf Bearing Distribution Center; LI “Light Industrial”
West – Superior Air, Thyssen Rrupp Elevator & Welton USA Office/Warehouse;
LI “Light Industrial”
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:The Coppell Comprehensive Plan of May 1996 shows the property
as suitable for light industrial/showroom uses.
DISCUSSION: The applicant is proposing to build a 51,360-square-foot office/warehouse
on a 6.4-acre site fronting South Royal Lane. There are 172 parking spaces
required at a ratio of one space per 300 square feet for office use; 358
spaces are proposed, significantly exceeding the parking required. This is
a build-to-suit with CSC (Computer Sciences Corporation) as the tenant.
They are proposing to operate a call center with 200 projected employees.
The 358 proposed parking spaces will accommodate this number of
employees with room for growth.
Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure the landscaping area
calculations are in accordance with the requirements of the Zoning
Ordinance. The area calculations are correct; however, there are still
some discrepancies between the tree calculations and those shown on the
plant list & plan (122 shown within calculations, 112 on list & plan). On
the plant list, there are 49 Bur Oaks and 35 Cedar Elms, 21 Pond Cypress
and 21 Crape Myrtles proposed. The 21 Crape Myrtles are equivalent to 7
overstory trees. Along Royal Lane there are four 3’ berms with 3’ high
shrubs in between to screen the parking area. A roundabout with seasonal
flowers is proposed at the main entry of the building to further enhance the
site.
The building is L-shaped with a fire lane encircling the building and
connecting with the properties to the east, west and Royal Lane to the
north. The building elevations show a grayish-white and gray color
painted tilt-wall structure. Glass with an aqua tint spans each elevation.
“Metallic color prefinished horizontal ribbed panels” with metal canopies
are proposed at the entries. The look of the building will be compatible
with the industrial character of the surrounding structures. There are four
6’ X 3’ sign areas shown. A 60-square-foot maximum monument sign
(similar to those in the area) is shown at the entry off Royal. This is
required to be shifted to a minimum distance of 15’ from the right-of-way;
a minor change from what is shown.
ITEM # 14 Page 3 of 3
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
Staff is recommending APPROVAL of this request, subject to the following conditions:
1. Monument sign should be setback a minimum of 15’ from the Royal
Lane right-of-way.
2. Correct discrepancies between the tree calculations and those shown
on the plant list & plan (122 shown within calculations, 112 on list &
plan).
3. Contact Jeff Curry at 972-888-1330 to discuss easement requirements.
ALTERNATIVES:
1) Recommend approval of the request
2) Recommend disapproval of the request
3) Recommend modification of the request
4) Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date.
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Site Plan
2) Landscape Plan/Tree Survey
3) Elevations
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
ȱ
Planning
November 14, 2006
19
✔
PUBLIC HEARING
Consider approval of the Freeport North, Lot 4R, Block A, Replat, to establish a building site, various easements and fire
lane to allow the development of a 51,360-square-foot, one-story office building on 6.4 acres of property located on
Royal Lane, approximately 1,200 feet north of Bethel Road.
The following P&Z conditions remain outstanding:
1. Remove the line that previously indicated a 30’ front yard building setback.
2. Contact Jeff Curry at 972-888-1330 to discuss easement requirements.
3. Comply with the attached Engineering Comment Sheet.
Decision of the P&Z Commission at the October 19th meeting:
APPROVAL with 6-0 vote, subject to the conditions listed above.
Staff recommends approval.
@11Freeport N, L4R, BA, R 1-AR
ITEM # 15 Page 1 of 2
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
Freeport North, Lot 4R, Block A, Replat
P&Z HEARING DATE: October 19, 2006
C.C. HEARING DATE: November 14, 2006
STAFF REP.: Matt Steer, City Planner
LOCATION: On Royal Lane, approximately 1,200 feet north of Bethel Road.
SIZE OF AREA: 6.4 acres
CURRENT ZONING: LI (Light Industrial)
REQUEST: To establish a building site, various easements and fire lane to
allow the development of a 51,360-square-foot, one-story office
building.
APPLICANT: Owner: Engineer/Surveyor:
Jeff Turner Jack Evans
Duke Realty Pacheco Koch
5495 Beltline Rd, Ste 360 8350 N. Central Expwy, Ste. 1000
Dallas, Texas 75240 Dallas, Texas 75206
972-361-6704 972-235-3031
FAX: 972-361-6800 FAX: 972-235-9544
HISTORY: There has been no development activity on the subject property.
TRANSPORTATION: Royal Lane is designated as a C4D/6 four-lane, divided collector
built to standard in a 100’ right-of-way capable of accommodating a
six-lane, divided thoroughfare.
ITEM # 15 Page 2 of 2
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North –vacant, LI “Light Industrial”
South – Cici’s Distribution Center; LI “Light Industrial”
East – Gulf Bearing Distribution Center; LI “Light Industrial”
West – Superior Air, Thyssen Rrupp Elevator & Welton USA Office/Warehouse;
LI “Light Industrial”
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:The Coppell Comprehensive Plan of May 1996 shows the property
as suitable for light industrial/showroom uses.
DISCUSSION: This is the companion request to the Site Plan approval. A mutual access
easement along the northwest ingress/egress point, a 24’ fire lane
easement encircling the proposed structure, a 20’ X 20’ water easement
and a drainage easement triangle at the southeast property corner are
proposed to be dedicated by this plat. The Replat is in good order and
provided the conditions enumerated below are followed, staff recommends
approval.
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
Staff is recommending APPROVAL of this request, subject to the following conditions:
1. Remove the line that previously indicated a 30’ front yard building
setback.
2. Contact Jeff Curry at 972-888-1330 to discuss easement requirements.
3. Comply with the attached Engineering Comment Sheet.
ALTERNATIVES:
1) Recommend approval of the request
2) Recommend disapproval of the request
3) Recommend modification of the request
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Engineering Comments
2) Replat
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
ȱ
Planning
November 14, 2006
20
✔
PRESENTATION
Consider approval of the Coppell Heights Addition, Lot 9B and Lot 9C, Site Plan, to allow the construction of two retail
buildings, totaling 17,000-square feet, on 3.1 acres of property located south and east of the intersection of S. Beltline
Road and E. Beltline Road.
The following P&Z conditions remain outstanding:
1. Contact Larry Redick at 972-323-8917 to discuss electric easement requirements.
2. FDC required to be detached from the building within 50' of a fire hydrant on the same side of the fire lanes.
3. Comply with the Departmental Comment Sheet.
Decision of the P&Z Commission at the October 19th meeting:
APPROVAL with 6-0 vote, subject to the conditions listed above.
Staff recommends approval.
@12Coppell Heights, L9B&C, SP 1-AR
ITEM # 16 Page 1 of 3
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
Coppell Heights Addition, Lot 9B and Lot 9C, Site Plan
P&Z HEARING DATE: October 19, 2006
C.C. HEARING DATE: November 14, 2006
STAFF REP.: Matt Steer, City Planner
LOCATION: South and East of the intersection of S. Beltline Road and E.
Beltline Road.
SIZE OF AREA: 3.1 acres
CURRENT ZONING: R (Retail)
REQUEST: To allow the construction of two retail buildings, totaling 17,000
square feet.
APPLICANT: Architect: Owner:
Calvert & Co/Architects, Inc. Rathee Investment
Richard Calvert Jugat Rathee
1001 W Main St 1044 Lady Lore Ln
Carrollton, TX 75006 Lewisville, TX 75056
Phone: (972) 446-0493 Phone: (972) 899-1087
FAX: (972) 242-9252 FAX: (972) 899-1641
HISTORY: In October 1985, a portion of “Lot 9, Coppell Heights” was replatted into “Lot
9A” and developed as a Chevron Gas Station. This request is to plat the
remainder into two retail lots, “Lots 9B & 9C.” According to a letter issued by
TNRCC (now TCEQ) in 2001, soil contamination from a leaking subsurface
hydrocarbon storage tank was found at these two sites, corrective action was
taken and the case has been closed.
ITEM # 16 Page 2 of 3
TRANSPORTATION: East Beltline & South Beltline Roads are both P6Ds, six-lane, divided
thoroughfares built to standard within 120-foot rights-of-way.
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North – vacant and Riverside Church of Christ; C (Commercial)
South – vacant and NAPA Auto Parts; C (Commercial)
East – North Lake; City of Dallas
West – vacant; LI (Light Industrial)
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Coppell Comprehensive Plan of May 1996 shows the property
as suitable for Neighborhood Retail use.
DISCUSSION: The applicant is requesting Site Plan approval for the development of two
one-story retail buildings on 2.6 acres of property, leaving a vacant pad
site (0.5 acres) for future development. The subject site is located just east
and south of the Chevron Station at the southeast corner of South Beltline
and East Beltline Roads, directly north of the NAPA Auto Parts store. The
proposal of 107 parking spaces meets the 105 parking spaces required
with the 9,400-square-foot southern building having 2,000 square feet
devoted to restaurant use (1 parking space per 100 square feet) and the
7,600-square-foot northeastern building also having 2,000 square feet
devoted to restaurant use. The remaining space in both buildings is
planned for retail use (1 parking space per 200 square feet).
A fire lane is proposed to run in front of the two buildings from South
Beltline to East Beltline and behind the buildings connecting with Sanders
Loop. The applicant has stubbed-out the fire lane/mutual access drive to
the property to the west, providing for a future connection. Two 40-
square-foot monument signs are proposed, one along East Beltline and
another along South Beltline Roads. The signs will be constructed of
brick to match the building with a cast stone cap and cast iron letters. The
sign is proposed to read “Coppell Crossroads” with one address number
and the future tenant names.
Architecture
The proposed buildings will be one-story, measuring approximately 32’ to
the peaks of the architectural features located at the end of each building
and approximately 20’ to the height of the parapet. The primary building
material will be a “Boral Oxford Red” brick, with 4’ wide vertical
“Granbury Chop” stone columns located approximately every 25’. The
roof material of the architectural features at the ends of the buildings
(small hip structures) will be gray composition shingles. Attached signage
areas are shown above potential lease spaces to indicate how the center
will look, but ultimately the signage will be regulated by the Zoning
Ordinance per the request of the architect. There are forest green canvas
awnings proposed above each window and each storefront except for the
ITEM # 16 Page 3 of 3
corner storefronts of each structure which have metal canopies. The scale
and style of the building remains similar to other retail centers in Coppell.
Landscaping
The proposed Landscape Plan fully provides the required interior,
perimeter and non-vehicular landscape area, including the required
number of trees. There are a total of 65 overstory trees proposed (7 Red
Oak, 15 Chinkapin Oak, 11 Chinese Pistachio, 19 Bald Cypress & 13 Live
Oak) and 10 Crape Myrtles.
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
Staff is recommending APPROVAL of this request, subject to the following conditions:
1. Show parking space dimensions (9’ X 19’ minimum, unless abutting extra
landscaping, then 9’ X 17’ minimum).
2. Contact Larry Redick at 972-323-8917 to discuss electric easement
requirements.
3. Show location of fire hydrants and FDCs on Site Plan.
4. Refer to the attached Departmental Comment Sheet.
ALTERNATIVES:
1) Recommend approval of the request
2) Recommend disapproval of the request
3) Recommend modification of the request
4) Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date.
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Departmental Comment Sheet
2) Site Plan
3) Circulation Plan
4) Elevations (2 Sheets)
5) Landscape Plan/Tree Survey
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
ȱ
Planning
November 14, 2006
21
✔
PUBLIC HEARING
Consider approval of the Coppell Heights Addition, Lot 9B and Lot 9C, Replat, to establish a building site, various
easements and fire lane to allow the construction of two retail buildings, totaling 17,000-square feet, on 3.1 acres of
property located south and east of the intersection of S. Beltline Road and E. Beltline Road.
The following P&Z conditions remain outstanding:
1. Rename access drive to mutual access easement and delete "Block A" from lot names.
2. Contact Larry Redick at 972-323-8917 to discuss electric easement requirements.
3. Comply with the Departmental Comment Sheet.
Decision of the P&Z Commission at the October 19th meeting:
APPROVAL with 6-0 vote, subject to the conditions listed above.
Staff recommends approval.
@13Coppell Heights, L9B&C, R 1-AR
ITEM # 17 Page 1 of 2
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
Coppell Heights Addition, Lot 9B and Lot 9C, Replat
P&Z HEARING DATE: October 19, 2006
C.C. HEARING DATE: November 14, 2006
STAFF REP.: Matt Steer, City Planner
LOCATION: South and East of the intersection of S. Beltline Road and E.
Beltline Road.
SIZE OF AREA: 3.1 acres
CURRENT ZONING: R (Retail)
REQUEST: To establish a building site, various easements and fire lane to
allow the construction of two retail buildings, totaling 17,000
square feet.
APPLICANT: Architect: Owner:
Calvert & Co/Architects, Inc. Rathee Investment
Richard Calvert Jugat Rathee
1001 W Main St 1044 Lady Lore Ln
Carrollton, TX 75006 Lewisville, TX 75056
Phone: (972) 446-0493 Phone: (972) 899-1087
FAX: (972) 242-9252 FAX: (972) 899-1641
HISTORY: In October 1985, a portion of “Lot 9, Coppell Heights” was replatted into “Lot
9A” and developed as a Chevron Gas Station. This request is to plat the
remainder into two retail lots, “Lots 9B & 9C.” According to a letter issued by
TNRCC (now TCEQ) in 2001, soil contamination from a leaking subsurface
hydrocarbon storage tank was found at these two sites, corrective action was
taken and the case has been closed.
ITEM # 17 Page 2 of 2
TRANSPORTATION: East Beltline & South Beltline Roads are both P6Ds, six-lane divided
thoroughfares built to standard within 120-foot rights-of-way.
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North – vacant and Riverside Church of Christ; C (Commercial)
South – vacant and NAPA Auto Parts; C (Commercial)
East – North Lake; City of Dallas
West – vacant; LI (Light Industrial)
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Coppell Comprehensive Plan of May 1996 shows the property
as suitable for Neighborhood Retail use.
DISCUSSION: This is the companion request to the Site Plan. There is a 15’ water line
easement proposed abutting East Beltline and a 15’ sewer line easement
abutting the south property line of the Chevron and Lot 9B. There are two
proposed 25’ X 25’ water line easements shown abutting Sanders Loop. A
24’ fire lane easement is proposed to connect South Beltline with East
Beltline, to connect with Sanders Loop and to encircle the proposed
buildings. The northernmost east/west fire lane is required to be extended
west through Lot 9B to connect with the gas station, and renamed fire lane
and mutual access easement to provide greater connectivity between sites.
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
Staff is recommending APPROVAL of this request, subject to the following conditions:
1. Extend a mutual access easement through Lot 9B and connect with the
proposed fire lane.
2. Contact Larry Redick at 972-323-8917 to discuss electric easement
requirements.
3. Comply with the attached Departmental Comment Sheet.
ALTERNATIVES:
1) Recommend approval of the request
2) Recommend disapproval of the request
3) Recommend modification of the request
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Departmental Comments
2) Replat
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
ȱ
Planning
November 14, 2006
22
✔
PUBLIC HEARING
Consider approval of text amendments to Chapter 12 Zoning of the Code of Ordinances, Sec. 12-42-1, revising the
definitions of Convenience Store and Retail Stores and Shops, Sec. 12-29-3, Sign Regulations, prohibiting neon signs
being visible from outside of the building, except for “open” signs, and various revisions to Sec. 12-30-16, SUP
regulations for Restaurants.
Decision of the P&Z Commission at the September 21st meeting:
APPROVAL with 7-0 vote.
Staff recommends approval.
@14Text Admt., Conv-Retail 1-AR
ITEM # 9 Page 1 of 6
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
CASE: Text Amendments
P&Z HEARING DATE: September 21, 2006
C.C. HEARING DATE: October 10, 2006
STAFF REP.: Marcie Diamond, Assistant Planning Director
PURPOSE: Consider approval of text amendments to the Coppell Zoning
Ordinance including; Sec. 12-42-1, revising the definitions of
Convenience Store, and Retail Stores and Shops, Sec. 12-29-3,
Sign Regulations, prohibiting neon signs being visible from
outside of the building, except for “open” signs, and various
revisions to Sec. 12-30-16, SUP regulations for Restaurants.
HISTORY: On November 7, 2006, the voters of the city of Coppell will
consider a Charter Amendment and a referendum to allow the sales
of beer and wine for off-premise consumption and further allowing
for the sale of beer, wine and mixed drinks for on-premise
consumption in restaurants and similar establishments without a
private club designation. Various provisions of Chapter 12,
Zoning of the Code of Ordinances needs to be amended to provide
adequate safeguards for the community to allow for these new uses
and related activities.
DISCUSSION: Texas state law prohibits municipalities from treating the sale of
beer and wine for off-premise consumption different than any
other retail sales; however, the city of Coppell can be proactive in
monitoring retail establishments which sell alcoholic beverages for
both on and off-premise consumption due to our existing
ordinances that require all restaurants, grocery stores and
convenience stores to obtain SUPs. Existing convenience stores,
grocery stores and restaurants that are eligible to add beer and wine
sales and mixed beverages for on-premise consumption, per TABC
regulations (distance requirements, etc), will be permitted to do so
without amending their existing SUPs. Any new convenience
stores, grocery stores and restaurants will be required to obtain an
ITEM # 9 Page 2 of 6
SUP, so these land uses will continue to be regulated. The City’s
involvement in TABC permitting will be limited to the provision
of the “Certificate of City Secretary” (TABC Form L-101CTY)
which certifies that the city is “wet.”
It is assumed that most (if not all) beer and wine sales for off-
premise consumption will either be ancillary to other food sales or
have ancillary retail food sales; therefore, will be classified as a
convenience store and requiring a SUP.
In terms of mixed beverage sales for on-premise consumption, all
restaurants require SUPs and will continue to do so; however, the
references to private clubs in the Zoning Ordinance will need to be
revised to be in accordance with state law. The existing private
clubs will continue to be regulated by Texas Alcoholic Beverage
Commission (TABC) rules and regulations.
The following are the proposed text amendments to add and revise
various definitions and regulations allowing for the sale of beer
and wine for off-premise consumption and the on-premise
consumption of alcoholic beverages without a private club
membership, while providing adequate safeguards.
PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTS
12-42-1. Definitions
Revised Definitions:
Convenience Store
Existing Definition:
“Convenience store: A small, drive-up-type store which usually sells
groceries.”
Proposed Definition:
Convenience store: A small, drive-up type store which usually typically
sells groceries and retail sales of convenience non-food items, prepared
foods, hot and cold beverages and packaged beverages. The display and
sale in the open, outside the building of groceries, packaged beverages and
consumer goods and drive-through service is prohibited.
Outside Storage and Display – retail stores
Existing Definition:
Retail stores and shops: Facilities which offer all types of consumer goods
for sale, but excluding the display and sale in the open, outside a building,
ITEM # 9 Page 3 of 6
of new or used automobiles, heavy machinery, building materials, used
appliances, furniture or salvage materials.
Proposed Definition:
Retail stores and shops: Facilities which offer all types of consumer goods
for sale, but excluding the display and sale in the open, outside a building,
of groceries, packaged beverages, consumer goods, new or used
automobiles, heavy machinery, building materials, used appliances,
furniture or salvage materials.
Sign Regulations
Sec. 12-29-3. Provisions for all zoning districts.
3. Prohibited signs: The following types of signs are specifically
prohibited.
….
Existing Regulation:
(L) Luminous gaseous tubing, except that within an enclosed building,
behind glass and visible from outside only through a window.
Proposed Regulation:
(L) Luminous gaseous tubing, except that including within an enclosed
building, behind glass and visible from outside only through a
window, except “open” signs shall be permitted. “Open” signs
shall not include any other wording or advertising and shall not
flash, blink, or contain any movement.
Revisions to references to restaurants and private clubs by Special Use
Permits.
Proposed deletions are noted in strike-out and additions with a double
underline. The entire section is included for clarity.
Sec. 12-30-16. Restaurant.
A restaurant, as that term is used in this section, shall mean any
establishment or club that provides regular food service to the general
public or to club members and their guests. A restaurant shall be permitted
only by special use permit in the "O" office, "R" retail, “H” Historic, "HC"
highway commercial, "C" commercial, "TC" town center, or "LI" light
industrial districts, or by special use permit within such districts which are
a part of a planned development district. Provided, however, this provision
notwithstanding, a special use permit for a restaurant may be permitted on
property zoned single family residential with a special use permit for a
golf course and clubhouse.
ITEM # 9 Page 4 of 6
1. Special conditions. A special use permit for a restaurant, if granted,
shall be subject to the following special conditions and such other
conditions as may be incorporated in the ordinance granting the
special use permit.
A. A restaurant shall not be located within 300 feet of a
church, public school, or hospital. This provision shall not
apply to a restaurant located in a strip shopping center.
The measurement of the distance between a church or
hospital and a restaurant shall be along the property lines of
the street fronts and from front door to front door, and in
direct line across intersections. The measurement of the
distance between public schools and a restaurant shall be
from the nearest property line of the public school to the
nearest doorway where the public may enter the restaurant,
along street lines and n direct line across intersections.
This These provisions does not apply to a "restaurant"
located within a church, public or private school, or public
hospital; or to convenience stores, golf courses, hotels,
motels or grocery stores, where the sale of food is for the
convenience of the patrons of that establishment and is
incidental to the primary source of revenue.
B. A restaurant with private club shall adhere to the following
additional conditions:
1. A restaurant with private club shall derive at least 60
percent of its revenue from regular food service to the
general public or club members or their guests. The 60
percent requirement must be met on a quarterly
calendar basis. This provision does not apply to a
"restaurant" located within a church, public school, or
public hospital; or to convenience stores, golf courses,
hotels, motels or grocery stores, where the sale of food
is for the convenience of the patrons of that
establishment and is incidental to the primary source of
revenue.
2. The City of Coppell shall retain the right to audit the
books and records of the restaurant at any time to verify
that the 60 percent food provision is met. Failure to
comply with the 60 percent requirement may result in
the loss of the restaurant's special use permit.
3. It will be the applicant’s responsibility to comply with
all applicable provisions of the Texas Alcoholic
Beverage Code, including, but not limited to the
submission of Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission
Form L-101CTY “Certificate of City Secretary” and
other applicable forms and state regulations.
2. Time limit. In the event an application for a building permit for a
restaurant is not made and secured within six months from the granting of
ITEM # 9 Page 5 of 6
the special use permit for the restaurant, the SUP will become null and
void unless the owner/operator of the restaurant is granted an extension
by the city council. may direct the planning and zoning commission to call
a public hearing for the purpose of considering the cancellation of the
special use permit by changing the zoning back to its original
classification without the special use permit.
In the event the owner or operator of a property having a zoning
classification of special use permit for a restaurant, ceases to operate the
restaurant business use for a period in excess of 90 days, the planning and
zoning commission or the city council may initiate a zoning change to
consider changing the zoning classification to such other classification as
may be appropriate for the property. Each applicant for a special use
permit for a restaurant shall be advised of this condition which shall be
noted in the ordinance granting the zoning classification.
3. Signs. Exterior signs, other than established trade names, located on the
outside of the building or premises of a restaurant, shall not advertise or
refer to the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages by words or
symbols.
4. Submission requirements. The following shall be required at the time of an
application for special use permit for a restaurant:
A. A proximity map or plat showing the zoning classification of
adjacent property and the location and use of any structures on all
properties within 300 feet of the restaurants, lots, or tract measured
from the nearest property line of such lot or tract.
B. Adequate copies of floor plans for the restaurant shall be submitted
showing the dimensions of the following floor areas:
1. Eating areas;
2. Kitchen and food preparation area;
3. Waiting area;
4. Area of all other proposed uses within the restaurant;
5. All combined air-conditioned areas.
6. Proposed signs(s).
7. Hours of Operation.
C. Site Plan of the entire shopping center/retail building indicating:
1. Lease space of the proposed restaurant with square footage
and dimension of frontage(s).
2. Parking analysis to assure that adequate parking exists to
accommodate restaurant.
3. Proposed hours of operation.
D. Elevation(s) of the building, indicating the lease space with
dimensions and all proposed signage.
5. New restaurant in a lease space/building with an existing SUP for a
restaurant. In the event that another restaurant occupies the same
building/lease space, a new or revised special use permit is not required
unless:
A. The building or lease space is expanded or enlarged;
B. Inclusion of a private club, where previously there was not a
private club in compliance with state law;
C.B. The effective area of the sign is enlarged from the previous sign;
ITEM # 9 Page 6 of 6
D. C. Any other alteration that could increase intensity of the use.
The director of planning or designee may administratively approve a
minor amendment to the existing SUP for the establishment of a new
restaurant, subject to the following process:
A. Submission of an application accompanied by; the appropriate fee
for administrative site plan approval, the revised floor plan, sign
plan, hours of operation and/or other pertinent information to the
planning department for review. No fee will be assessed.
B. The director will update the special use permit file to reflect the
new restaurant.
C. The director will issue a letter of approval, approval with
conditions or denial. In the event of a denial, or conditions that are
contested by the applicant, a public hearing process will be
required with payment of appropriate fee.
D. Once the new restaurant occupies the building, the Building
Official or his designee shall provide the Planning Department an
official copy of the certificate of occupancy.
6. Remodeling and alterations. Any proposed remodeling or changes to the approved floor
plan-shall be reviewed and approved by the planning and zoning commission and the city
council prior to issuance of a building permit. Provided, however, such review and
approval shall not require new public hearings.
6. Each application for a special use permit for a restaurant must be made by the property
owner or the tenant with the written permission of the property owner. The planning and
zoning commission and the city council may consider any relevant matter pertaining to
the applicant or application which might affect the health, safety, and welfare of the
community.
7. Existing uses. Any restaurant in operation or which has been granted a special use permit
for a restaurant at the time of the adoption of this ordinance shall be considered as a
conforming use.
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
Staff is recommending APPROVAL of the amendments to Sec. 12-42-1, Sec.
12-29-3, Sec. 12-30-16 of the Code of Ordinances as specified herein.
ALTERNATIVES:
1) Recommend approval of the request
2) Recommend disapproval of the request
3) Recommend modification of the request
4) Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date.
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
ȱ
Planning
November 14, 2006
23
✔
PUBLIC HEARING
Consider approval of text amendment to Chapter 12, Zoning of the Code of Ordinances, amending Sec. 12-32A-3(K)
deleting reference to requiring the mailing of public notices for telecommunication facility beyond the notification
required for similar rezonings, as prescribed by state law, reducing the notification area to 200 feet.
Decision of the P&Z Commission at the September 21st meeting:
APPROVAL with 7-0 vote.
Staff recommends approval.
@15Text Admt., Teleco notices 1-AR
ITEM #10 Page 1 of 2
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
CASE: Text Amendment
Sec. 12-32A-3(K) Notification Requirements
for Telecommunication Facilities
P&Z HEARING DATE: September 21, 2006
C.C. HEARING DATE: October 10, 2006
STAFF REP.: Marcie Diamond, Assistant Planning Director
REQUEST: To amend Sec. 12-32A-3(K) to delete reference to requiring the
mailing of public notices beyond the notification required for
similar rezonings, as prescribed by state law.
HISTORY: When the regulations for telecommunication facilities were
adopted in March 25, 1997, there was a special provision which
required extraordinary notification of property owners prior to the
erection of a new telecommunication facility. In some cases the
ordinance requires notification up to 5,000 feet, depending on type
and height of the facility.
DISCUSSION: As discussed in the HISTORY section above, the current ordinance
requires from 750 to 5,000-foot notification area depending on the
type of facility. Sec. 12-32A-3(K) specifically reads as follows:
“(K) Public notice: For purposes of article 32A, any special use
permit request, variance request, or appeal of an
administratively approved use or special use permit shall
require public notice to all abutting property owners and all
property owners of properties that are located within the
corresponding separation distance listed in subsection 12-
32A-6(B)(5)(b), Table 2, in addition to any notice
otherwise required by the zoning ordinance.”
ITEM #10 Page 2 of 2
Table 2
Lattice Guyed Monopole 75
Ft in Height
or Greater
Monopole
Less Than 75
Ft in Height
Lattice 5,000 5,000 1,500 750
Guyed 5,000 5,000 1,500 750
Monopole 75 Ft
in Height or
Greater
1,500 1,500 1,500 750
Monopole Less
Than 75 Ft in
Height
750 750 750 750
Per this regulation, notices were sent to property owners within 1,500 feet (167
notices) regarding the most recent SUP request to place antennas on an existing
electrical transmission tower. This appears to be excessive, given that historically,
SUP notices for telecommunication facility generate minimal responses from
property owners.
Staff is recommending that notification for SUPs for telecommunication facilities
be the same as other SUPs and this regulation should be amended as follows:
“Sec. 12-32A-3. General requirements. (K) Public notice: For purposes
of article 32A, any special use permit request, variance request, or appeal
of an administratively-approved use or special use permit shall require
public notice to all abutting property owners within 200 feet as and all
property owners of properties that are located within the corresponding
separation distance listed in subsection 12-32A-6(B)(5)(b), Table 2, in
addition to any notice otherwise required by the zoning ordinance.”
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
Staff is recommending APPROVAL of this the amendment to Sec. 12-32A-3 to
reduce the notification area for SUPs for telecommunication facilities to 200 feet.
ALTERNATIVES:
1) Recommend approval of the request
2) Recommend disapproval of the request
3) Recommend modification of the request
4) Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date.
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
City Secretary
November 14, 2006
24
✔
ORDINANCE
Consider approval of an ordinance amending Chapter 16 of the Code of Ordinances by adding Article 16-16
regarding alcoholic beverages; providing for prohibition of the sale of beer in residential zoning districts; providing
prohibition of the sale of alcoholic beverages within a specified distance of churches, public or private schools, public
hospital and other uses; and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
This ordinance is required in order for the City of Coppell to regulate the location of establishments serving or selling
alcoholic beverages as authorized in the recent local option election. The charter amendment passed by the voters
provides this opportunity as required by State law.
Staff recommends approval.
%alcohol
DATE: November 14, 2006
ITEM #: 25
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
NECESSARY ACTION RESULTING FROM WORK SESSION
%necessaryactionwork
DATE: November 14, 2006
ITEM #: 26
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS
A. Report by Mayor Stover regarding Metroplex Mayors’ Meeting.
%mayorreport
DATE: November 14, 2006
ITEM #: 27
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
NECESSARY ACTION RESULTING FROM EXECUTIVE SESSION
%necessaryactionexec
CERTIFICATE OF AGENDA ITEM SUBMISSION
Council Meeting Date: NOVEMBER 14, 2006
Department Submissions:
Item No. 8/C was placed on the Agenda for the above-referenced City
Council meeting by the Engineering Department. I have reviewed the
Agenda Request (and any backup if applicable) and hereby submit this item
to the City Council for consideration.
____________________
Engineering Department
Item Nos. 8/D, 8/E, 8F, 8/G, 9, 10 , 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18,
19, 20, 21, 22 and 23 were placed on the Agenda for the above-
referenced City Council meeting by the Planning Department. I have
reviewed the Agenda Requests (and any backup if applicable) and hereby
submit these items to the City Council for consideration.
____________________
Planning Department
Financial Review:
I certify that I have reviewed all the items submitted for consideration on
the Agenda for the above-referenced City Council Meeting and have inserted
any financial comments where appropriate.
____________________
Finance Department
City Manager Review:
I certify that I have reviewed the complete Agenda and Packet for the
above-referenced City Council Meeting and hereby submit the same to the
City Council for consideration.
____________________
City Manager
(or Deputy City Manager)