Loading...
CM 2007-02-13 MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 13, 2007 The City Council of the City of Coppell met in Regular Called Session on Tuesday, February 13, 2007, at 5:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of Town Center, 255 Parkway Boulevard, Coppell, Texas. The following members were present: Doug Stover, Mayor Billy Faught, Mayor Pro Tem Tim Brancheau, Councilmember Jayne Peters, Councilmember (late arrival) Brianna Hinojosa-Flores, Councilmember (late arrival) Marsha Tunnell, Councilmember Marvin Franklin, Councilmember Bill York, Councilmember Also present were City Manager Jim Witt, Interim Deputy City Secretary Allana Lamberth and City Attorney Robert Hager. 1. Call to order. Mayor Stover called the meeting to order, determined that a quorum was present and convened into Executive Session. EXECUTIVE SESSION (Closed to the Public) 2. Convene Executive Session A. Section 551.071, Texas Government Code - Consultation with City Attorney. 1. The City of Coppell and Coppell Independent School District opposition to a change of zoning request of the Billingsley Corporation in the City of Dallas, Zoning Case Number Z045-107; and City of Coppell vs. CB Parkway Business Center VI, et al in the County Court at Law No. 3,; and CB Parkway Business Center, et al vs. City of Coppell, et al.; and City of Dallas vs. Douglas Stover, et al in the 191st District Court; and City of Coppell, et al vs. City of Dallas, et al in the 101st District Court. 2. Discussion regarding release of information from the Police Department under the Open Records Act. 3. Legal responsibilities regarding DART property. cm021307 Page 1 of 17 B. Section 551.087, Texas Government Code – Economic Development Negotiations. 1. Economic Development prospects on the west side of Coppell. Mayor Stover convened into Executive Session at 5:43 p.m. as allowed under the above-stated article. Mayor Stover adjourned the Executive Session at 6:47 p.m. and opened the Work Session. WORK SESSION (Open to the Public) 3. Convene Work Session A. Discussion regarding the Board & Commission Interview Process. B. Discussion regarding 2030 Process. C. Discussion regarding the Old Coppell Incentive Policy. D. Update on Texas Clean Air Cities Coalition. E. Discussion regarding Council retreat dates. F. Discussion of Agenda Items. REGULAR SESSION (Open to the Public) 4. Convene Regular Session. 5. Invocation. Pastor Dale Patterson, Hackberry Creek Church, led those present in the Invocation. 6. Pledge of Allegiance. Mayor Stover led those present in the Pledge of Allegiance. 7. Consider approval of a proclamation naming February 19, 2007 as AMCAT DAY in the city of Coppell, and authorizing the Mayor to sign. ag021307 Page 2 of 17 Presentation: Mayor Stover read the Proclamation for the record and presented the same to Mr. Emmett Kennedy. Action: Councilmember Peters moved to approve a proclamation naming February 19, 2007 as AMCAT DAY in the city of Coppell, and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Councilmember Brancheau seconded the motion; the motion carried 7-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Faught and Councilmembers Brancheau, Peters, Hinojosa-Flores, Tunnell, Franklin and York voting in favor of the motion. 8. Presentation of the Coppell Police Department 2006 Narcotics and Alcohol Enforcement Report. Presentation: Roy Osborne, Police Chief, made a presentation to the Council concerning narcotics and alcohol. 9. Citizens' Appearances. A. Tom Burrows, 138 Wynnpage, addressed Council regarding recycling grass and limbs and high grass not being mowed. CONSENT AGENDA 10. Consider approval of the following consent agenda items: A. Consider approval of minutes: January 23, 2007. B. Consider approval of an ordinance amending Article 8-3. Parking, Section 8-3-1. B. of the Code of Ordinances for the City of Coppell by changing the times for no parking on certain streets in certain school zones; and authorizing the Mayor to sign. ag021307 Page 3 of 17 C. Consider approval of an ordinance amending Article 8-1. Speed of Vehicles, Section 8-1-3. Speed on specific streets. of the Code of Ordinances for the City of Coppell by establishing 40 miles per hour as the maximum prima facie speed limit on Sandy Lake Road, between MacArthur Blvd. and the east city limits; and authorizing the Mayor to sign. D. Consider approval of a revision to the Interlocal Purchasing Agreement between the City of Coppell and Texas Local Government Purchasing Cooperative and authorizing the Mayor to sign. E. Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. PD-218- LI, Shake and Shingle, allowing the recognition of the existing uses on the southern portion of the property and the construction of four 14,420-square-foot office/warehouse buildings on the northern portion of this 10.2 acre tract of land located on the north side of Beltline Road, approximately 350 feet east of North Lake Drive, and authorizing the Mayor to sign. F. Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. S-1234- SF-12, ARK Church, zoning change from SF-12 (Single Family-12) to S-1234-SF-12 (Special Use Permit-1234- Single Family-12), to allow the construction of a 4,255- square-foot church on approximately 0.6 acres of property located at 517 E. Sandy Lake Road, at the southwest corner of Holly Street, and authorizing the Mayor to sign. G. Consider approval of an Ordinance for a text amendment to the Code of Ordinances, Sec. 12-30-4.1 and 12-30-12.5 Gravel, Sand, Stone or Petroleum Extraction to delete the requirement for a Special Use Permit and further approve the incorporation of Article 9-26 of the Code of Ordinances "Oil and Gas Drilling and Production" regulating the drilling and production of oil and gas wells within the City, and authorizing the Mayor to sign. ag021307 Page 4 of 17 H. Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. ZC-621- H(CH) amending the Land Use Plan designation from Light Industrial/Showroom to Historic and zoning change from LI (Light Industrial) to H (Historic) on approximately 17.2 acres of property located along the east side of Hammond Street, north of Burns, being a portion of the property commonly referred to as the Carter Crowley Tract, and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Action: Mayor Pro Tem Faught moved to approve Consent Agenda Items A, B carrying Ordinance No. 2007-1151, C carrying Ordinance No. 2007- 1152, D, E carrying Ordinance No. 91500-A-449, F carrying Ordinance No. 91500-A-450, G carrying Ordinance No. 91500-A-451 and H carrying Ordinance No. 91500-A-452. Councilmember Franklin seconded the motion; the motion carried 7-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Faught and Councilmembers Brancheau, Peters, Hinojosa-Flores, Tunnell, Franklin and York voting in favor of the motion. 11. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD-221-HC, Duke Lesley Addition, zoning change request from HC (Highway Commercial) to PD-221-HC (Planned Development-221-Highway Commercial) to allow for tilt-wall construction and additional attached signage on the office buildings that are 50,000- square-feet or larger and to allow for the development of mixed uses, including retail, office, and hotel on a total of 78.5 acres of property located at the northwest corner of IH-635 and South Beltline Road. Presentation: Gary Sieb, Director of Planning, made a presentation to the Council. Alex Bennett, Applicant, addressed the Council. Public Hearing: Mayor Stover opened the Public Hearing and advised that no one had signed up to speak on this proposal. ag021307 Page 5 of 17 Action: Councilmember York moved to close the Public Hearing and approve Case No. PD-221-HC, Duke Lesley Addition, zoning change request from HC (Highway Commercial) to PD-221-HC (Planned Development-221- Highway Commercial) to allow for tilt-wall construction and additional attached signage on the office buildings that are 50,000-square-feet or larger and to allow for the development of mixed uses, including retail, office, and hotel on a total of 78.5 acres of property located at the northwest corner of IH-635 and South Beltline Road, subject to the following conditions: PD-221-HC General purpose and description. The PD-221-HC district is intended to alter the HC zoning to include concrete tilt wall construction for office buildings of at least 50,000 square feet in size. Additionally, the district serves to alter the signage restrictions for office buildings located in the described area. Sec. 1. Use regulations. A building or premise shall be used only for the following purposes: 1. Auto parts sales (new). 2. Barber and beauty shop. 3. Business or trade school. 4. Business support services. 5. College or university. 6. Communications services. 7. Community centers (public or private). 8. Consumer repair services. 9. Drug store or pharmacy. 10. Dry cleaning and laundry. 11. Exhibition hall. 12. Film developing and printing. 13. Financial services. 14. Florist (no outside storage). 15. Furniture stores. 16. Hardware store. 17. Hospital. 18. Jeweler (retail). 19. Laboratory: Scientific, research, testing, medical, dental, or optical so long as all operations are conducted indoors. 20. Meat market (retail only). 21. Municipal buildings. 22. Other general retail sales of similar nature and character as provided in this section, subject to the following conditions: (A) that it be conducted wholly within an enclosed building; ag021307 Page 6 of 17 (B) that required yards not be used for display, sale or storage or merchandise, or for the storage of vehicles, equipment, containers or waste material; (C) that all merchandise be first-hand and be sold at retail on the premises; and (D) that such use does not promote objectionable odors, excessive light, smoke, dust, noise, vibration or similar type nuisance. 23. Office/Warehouse (warehouse being limited to a maximum of 20 percent of the gross floor area). 24. Personal services. 25. Pet services. 26. Photography studio. 27. Postal facilities. 28. Printing shop or company (retail only). 29. Professional and administrative offices where services are provided only and no chattels or goods are offered for sale on the premises, including but not limited to doctors, dentists, attorneys, architects, engineers, urban planners, insurance, real estate, banks and similar offices. 30. Radio, television or microwave receiving dish (subject to screening regulations; see section 12-33-1). 31. Temporary buildings for use incidental to construction work on the premises, which said building shall be removed. 32. Any use permitted by special use permit, as listed in section 12- 30-9, subject to the exceptions set forth in section 12-22-2. (Ord. No. 91500-A-30; Ord. No. 91500-A-129; Ord. No. 91500-A-275, § 1, 12-12-00; Ord. No. 91500-A-375, § 1, 5-11-04) Sec. 2. Non-permitted uses. For clarity, the following uses, though not limited to the following, are specifically not permitted uses within the "HC" district even with a special use permit. 1. Airport. 2. Crop production. 3. Kennels. 4. Any use requiring outside storage. 5. Pawn shops. 6. Seed store. 7. Used automobile sales or display, repair garages, tire and seat cover shops, or auto laundries unless incidental to a service station. 8. Self-storage or mini-warehouses. (Ord. No. 91500-A-30; Ord. No. 91500-A-129) ag021307 Page 7 of 17 Sec. 3. Area and height regulations. 1. Minimum size of yards: (A) Front yard: 60 feet. (B) Side yard: 30 feet. (C) Rear yard: 20 feet. 2. Minimum size of lot: (A) Lot area: 10,000 square feet (B) Lot width: No minimum. (C) Lot depth: No minimum. 3. Lot coverage: In no case shall more than 50 percent of the lot be covered by buildings. 4. Height restrictions: Maximum height of 20 stories, but limited to 70 feet on any portion of the site within 300 feet of property zoned or used for A, SF-ED, SF-18, SF-12, SF-9, SF-7, SF-0, 2F-9, TH-1, or TH-2. In addition, no structure may exceed the maximum height limitations as established by the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Board. (Ord. No. 91500-A-30; Ord. No. 91500-A-129) Sec. 4. Parking requirements . Required off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with the specific uses set forth in article 31. No more than 50 percent of the required parking shall be utilized in the front yard. No parking or loading shall be permitted within 20 feet of the front property line. (Ord. No. 91500-A-30; Ord. No. 91500-A-129) Sec. 5a. Type of exterior construction All structures shall be 80 percent masonry exterior exclusive of doors and windows. Stucco is permitted by special use permit only. 1. Masonry is further defined as brick and stone of earth tone colors, other brick colors shall be permitted as accent provided that, in combination, accent materials and non-masonry materials do not exceed the 20 percent non-masonry benchmark on any one facade. 2. Flat roofs and parapet walls around flat roofs shall have a cornice, cap or other detail with a vertical dimension equal to at least three percent of the height of the building. Where as architectural feature extends above the roofline, and is visible from a public right-of-way, then the back side of this feature shall be finished of a material that is of the same or similar material as the front of this feature, i.e. brick. Pitched roofs shall have roofing material of a lusterless neutral/earth tone or green color. Green colors shall be limited to dark forest greens, gray greens, pale bluish-gray greens, slate greens and copper patina. Metal roofs may be standing seam either with a baked-on lusterless finish or made of copper. ag021307 Page 8 of 17 3. Exterior wall surfaces should consist of no more than three colors; a base color, and/or a trim color, and/or an accent color. The base color may be utilized on up to 100 percent of the surface area of any one facade of a building. Another color, other than a base color, shall be permitted on up to only five percent of the surface area of any one facade, and an accent color on up to only one percent of the surface area of any one facade. For calculation purposes, wall surfaces should include eaves, gables and parapets, but should exclude roofs, awnings, or signs. 4. Glass should not exceed 50 percent of the total area of any one facade of a building. 5. Awnings are limited to canvas, or a lusterless, non-metal material that closely resembles canvas, at least 98 percent of which is a single deep or neutral solid color. The remaining up to two percent, if different, shall be contrasting. Awnings shall not be backlit. Lettering and logos should be limited to a monogram, not exceeding 20 percent of the sign area. (Ord. No. 91500-A-30; Ord. No. 91500-A-129; Ord. No. 91500-A-319, §§ 1, 2, 3-19-02) Sec. 5b. Type of exterior construction- Office buildings greater than 50,000 SF . All structures shall be 80 percent masonry exterior exclusive of doors and windows. Stucco is permitted by special use permit only. 6. Masonry is further defined as concrete tilt wall, brick, stone and faux stone of earth tone colors, other brick colors shall be permitted as accent provided that, in combination, accent materials and non-masonry materials do not exceed the 20 percent non-masonry benchmark on any one facade. 7. Exterior wall surfaces should consist of no more than three colors; a base color, and/or a trim color, and/or an accent color. The base color may be utilized on up to 100 percent of the surface area of any one facade of a building. Another color, other than a base color, shall be permitted on up to only five percent of the surface area of any one facade, and an accent color on up to only one percent of the surface area of any one facade. For calculation purposes, wall surfaces should include eaves, gables and parapets, but should exclude roofs, awnings, or signs. 8. Glass should not exceed 50 percent of the total area of the building facade. 9. Awnings are limited to canvas, or a lusterless, non-metal material that closely resembles canvas, at least 98 percent of which is a single deep or neutral solid color. The remaining up to two percent, if different, shall be contrasting. Awnings shall not be backlit. Lettering and logos should be limited to a monogram, not ag021307 Page 9 of 17 exceeding 20 percent of the sign area. Entry canopies are not defined as awnings. (Ord. No. 91500-A-30; Ord. No. 91500-A-129; Ord. No. 91500-A-319, §§ 1, 2, 3-19-02) Sec. 6. Landscaping requirements . Landscape requirements shall be provided according to article 33. Additionally, those areas which are specified within the Coppell Streetscape Plan shall be adhered to. (Ord. No. 91500-A-30; Ord. No. 91500-A-129) Sec. 7. Reserved. Editor's note: Ord. No. 91500-A-318, § 3, adopted March 19, 2002, repealed § 12-22-7 in its entirety. Formerly, said section pertained to site plan review as adopted by Ord. No. 91500-A-30, as amended. See the Code Comparative Table. Sec. 8 Building Signage. For buildings in excess of 50,000-square feet, signage shall be limited to a maximum of 600-square-feet per building with no more than two signs on any one building facade. Councilmember Peters seconded the motion; the motion carried 7-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Faught and Councilmembers Brancheau, Peters, Hinojosa-Flores, Tunnell, Franklin and York voting in favor of the motion. 12. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD-220-SF-12, Alexander Court, to amend the land use designation on the Comprehensive Land Use Plan from Neighborhood Retail to Residential Low Density on approximately four acres of property along Denton Tap Road and a zoning change request from C (Commercial) to PD- 220-SF-12 (Planned Development-220 Single Family-12), with a Detail Site Plan, to allow the development of 26 single-family homes on approximately 18+ acres of property located at the northwest corner of Bethel and Denton Tap Roads. Presentation: Gary Sieb, Director of Planning, made a presentation to the Council. John Hawkins, Applicant, addressed the Council. ag021307 Page 10 of 17 Public Hearing: Mayor Stover opened the Public Hearing and advised that Mr. Burrows had signed up to speak on this proposal and Mr. Burrows indicated he did not wish to speak. Action: Councilmember York moved to close the Public Hearing and approve Case No. PD-220-SF-12, Alexander Court, to amend the land use designation on the Comprehensive Land Use Plan from Neighborhood Retail to Residential Low Density on approximately four acres of property along Denton Tap Road and a zoning change request from C (Commercial) to PD-220-SF-12 (Planned Development-220 Single Family- 12), with a Detail Site Plan, to allow the development of 26 single-family homes on approximately 18+ acres of property located at the northwest corner of Bethel and Denton Tap Roads, subject to the following conditions: 1) Establish all common areas as separately platted “X” lots of sufficient size to assure that all common area improvements (walls and landscaping) are within those lots, and adjust lot sizes accordingly. ?? These appear to be established; however, no two drawings match (Site Plan, Landscape Plan, hand drawn, “Rock Wall Center Line” plan and Screen Wall Entry Features Exhibit) in terms of location of wall, materials used and wall heights. 2) Relocate the proposed wall along Denton Tap Road to the west side of the existing sanitary sewer easements and revise Concept Landscape Plan and common area lot accordingly. ?? It appears conceptually to be O.K., except the north end of the fence needs to angle in towards property to provide access to existing manhole. The sidewalk needs to be revised from 4’ to 5’ in width. 3) Complete the Tree Survey/Mitigation Plan as required in Sec. 12- 34-2 of the Zoning Ordinance, and compare to the Bethel Road Improvement Plans. ?? Corrected retribution calculations are attached, per John Elias. Additional surveying of trees in the creek area that are to be preserved could potentially reduce the $18,700 fee. Also the Landscape Plan needs to be sealed by a Landscape Architect. 4) Submission of HOA documents to assure perpetual maintenance of all common areas. ?? No applicable documents submitted, and the notes on Plat/Site Plan need to be revised – including, but not limited to, deletion ag021307 Page 11 of 17 th of “homeowners will be assessed $500 on Jan 15,” easement wording needs to be added and spelling errors need to be corrected. 5) Resolve the conflicts with the size of the property and the boundary of proposed Lot 8. ?? Need to verify size of property. ?? Adding a PD condition which states “In the event that the Lot 8 property line is relocated, then this portion of the property shall be rezoned and replatted.” 6) Add notation to the areas outlined in the cul-de-sacs and at the entry drive that it is enhanced paving. ?? Note added, but due to it being in the street right-of-way, needs to be stamped concrete and approved by the Engineering Department. Enhanced paving will not be permitted at the intersection of Ruth Way and Bethel. 7) The preliminary construction plans for Bethel Road show a grade differential adjacent to Lots 21, 22, and 26. Please be advised that prior to the installation of the screening wall and the development of those lots, the correct grade that matches the Bethel Road plans will need to be established. 8) Park Development Fees in the amount of $1,285.00 per lot. 9) Retain on the Planned Development Site Plan the note reading: “The City of Coppell will not have responsibility for maintenance of the floodway/floodplain area as shown herein. The maintenance for these areas shall be the sole responsibility of the individual lot owners adjacent to said areas. These areas are to remain free of improvements that may obstruct the flow of storm water and protected from potential erosion by the owners. No fences will be allowed inn the floodplain or any other structures (pools, decks, gazebos, etc.) per the City’s Floodplain Ordinance. Councilmember Peters seconded the motion; the motion carried 7-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Faught and Councilmembers Brancheau, Peters, Hinojosa-Flores, Tunnell, Franklin and York voting in favor of the motion. 13. Consider approval of the Alexander Court, Lots 1-26 Block A, Preliminary Plat, to allow the subdivision of 26 single-family lots on approximately 18+ acres of property located at the northwest corner of Bethel and Denton Tap Roads. ag021307 Page 12 of 17 Presentation: Gary Sieb, Director of Planning, made a presentation to the Council. Action: Councilmember Hinojosa-Flores moved to approve the Alexander Court, Lots 1-26 Block A, Preliminary Plat, to allow the subdivision of 26 single- family lots on approximately 18+ acres of property located at the northwest corner of Bethel and Denton Tap Roads, subject to the following conditions: 1) Establish all common areas as separately platted “X” lots of sufficient size to assure that all common area improvements (walls and landscaping) are within those lots, and adjust lot sizes accordingly. ?? These appear to be established; however, no two drawings match (Site Plan, Landscape Plan, hand drawn, “Rock Wall Center Line” plan and Screen Wall Entry Features Exhibit) in terms of location of wall, materials used, wall height, etc. 2) Submission of HOA documents to assure perpetual maintenance of all common areas. ?? No applicable documents submitted, and the notes on Plat/Site Plan need to be revised – including, but not limited to, deletion of “homeowners will be assessed $500 on Jan 15th”, easement wording needs to be added and spelling errors need to be corrected. 3) Resolve the conflicts with the size of the property and the boundary of proposed Lot 8. 4) Add PD Conditions to Preliminary Plat as revised on the PD Site Plan. 5) The preliminary construction plans for Bethel Road show a grade differential adjacent to Lots 21, 22, and 26. Please be advised that prior to the installation of the screening wall and the development of those lots, the correct grade that matches the Bethel Road plans will need to be established. 6) Add a note to the Plat that Lots 7-19 cannot be built on until a LOMA or LOMR has been obtained. 7) The plat shows that the existing 20-foot sanitary sewer easement will be abandoned. Additional comments will be generated during the plan review on the actual technique used to abandon the sanitary sewer after the easement has been abandoned. This will require removal of the existing manholes and plugging the ends of the existing sanitary sewer lines. 8. Retain on the Planned Development Site Plan the note reading: ag021307 Page 13 of 17 “The City of Coppell will not have responsibility for maintenance of the floodway/floodplain area as shown herein. The maintenance for these areas shall be the sole responsibility of the individual lot owners adjacent to said areas. These areas are to remain free of improvements that may obstruct the flow of storm water and protected from potential erosion by the owners. No fences will be allowed inn the floodplain or any other structures (pools, decks, gazebos, etc.) per the City’s Floodplain Ordinance Councilmember York seconded the motion; the motion carried 7-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Faught and Councilmembers Brancheau, Peters, Hinojosa-Flores, Tunnell, Franklin and York voting in favor of the motion. 14. Consider approval of the Coppell/121 Office Park, Lot 3, Block 1, Site Plan, to allow the development of an approximate 8,290-square-foot, one-story office building on 1.23 acres of property located along the north side of S.H. 121, approximately 1,400 feet west of Denton Tap Road. Presentation: Gary Sieb, Director of Planning, made a presentation to the Council. Tom Wouters, Applicant, addressed Council. Action: Councilmember Franklin moved to approve Coppell/121 Office Park, Lot 3, Block 1, Site Plan, to allow the development of an approximate 8,290- square-foot, one-story office building on 1.23 acres of property located along the north side of S.H. 121, approximately 1,400 feet west of Denton Tap Road, subject to the following condition: 1) Reduce the size of the proposed monument sign to 4’x10’. Councilmember Tunnell seconded the motion; the motion carried 7-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Faught and Councilmembers Brancheau, Peters, Hinojosa-Flores, Tunnell, Franklin and York voting in favor of the motion. ag021307 Page 14 of 17 15. Consider approval of the Coppell/121 Office Park, Lot 3, Block 1, Final Plat, to allow the development of an approximate 8,290-square-foot, one-story office building on 1.23 acres of property located along the north side of S.H. 121, approximately 1,400 feet west of Denton Tap Road. Presentation: Gary Sieb, Director of Planning, made a presentation to the Council. Action: Councilmember Franklin moved to approve Coppell/121 Office Park, Lot 3, Block 1, Final Plat, to allow the development of an approximate 8,290- square-foot, one-story office building on 1.23 acres of property located along the north side of S.H. 121, approximately 1,400 feet west of Denton Tap Road, subject to the following conditions: 1) Include recording information for both counties when existing easements span the County line. 2) Compliance with the following Fire Department comment: A) Fire hydrant shall be private. Therefore, the double detector check valve will be required to be 8” to accommodate both the fire hydrant and automatic fire sprinkler system. Councilmember Tunnell seconded the motion; the motion carried 7-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Faught and Councilmembers Brancheau, Peters, Hinojosa-Flores, Tunnell, Franklin and York voting in favor of the motion. 16. Consider approval of awarding bid No. Q-0107-01, for the installation of West and East Sandy Lake Road landscaping & irrigation, to A&A Landscape & Irrigations LP, in the amount of $637,442.51, and authorizing the City Manager to sign the resulting contract. Presentation: Brad Reid, Director of Parks, made a presentation to the Council. ag021307 Page 15 of 17 Action: Councilmember Tunnell moved to award bid No. Q-0107-01, for the installation of West and East Sandy Lake Road landscaping & irrigation, to A&A Landscape & Irrigations LP, in the amount of $637,442.51, and authorizing the City Manager to sign the resulting contract. Councilmember Franklin seconded the motion; the motion carried 7-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Faught and Councilmembers Brancheau, Peters, Hinojosa-Flores, Tunnell, Franklin and York voting in favor of the motion. 17. Consider approval of a Resolution to support legislation in the Texas Legislature requiring mandatory disclosure of real property sales prices to appraisal districts to ensure the fair and equitable valuation and taxation of all real property in the State of Texas and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Presentation: City Manager Jim Witt made a presentation to the Council. Action: Councilmember Peters moved to approve Resolution No. 2007-0213.1 to support legislation in the Texas Legislature requiring mandatory disclosure of real property sales prices to appraisal districts to ensure the fair and equitable valuation and taxation of all real property in the State of Texas and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Councilmember Brancheau seconded the motion; the motion carried 7-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Faught and Councilmembers Brancheau, Peters, Hinojosa-Flores, Tunnell, Franklin and York voting in favor of the motion. 18. Mayor and Council Reports. A. Report by Mayor Stover regarding Metroplex Mayors’ Meeting. B. Report by Mayor Stover regarding Sweetheart Ball. C. Report by Mayor Stover regarding Chamber Gala. A. City Manager Jim Witt reported that the a gentleman from HUD was the speaker at Metroplex Mayors’ and discussed HUD foreclosures. Coppell has the third lowest foreclosure rate in the metroplex. ag021307 Page 16 of 17 B. Mayor Stover advised that Friday had been the mother/son sweetheart ball and Saturday had been the father / daughter sweetheart ball. Mayor Stover congratulated Stacey McCarthy and Jane Ann Sellars for their work in coordinating the events. C. Mayor Stover announced that the Chamber Gala would be held on Saturday where he and his wife would participate in the "Dancing with the Stars" competition. WORK SESSION (Open to the Public) Convene Work Session D. Discussion regarding the Board & Commission Interview Process. E. Discussion regarding 2030 Process. F. Discussion regarding the Old Coppelllncentive Policy. G. Update on Texas Clean Air Cities Coalition. H. Discussion regarding Councll retreat dates. I. Discussion of Agenda Items. REGULAR SESSION (Open to the Public) 19. Necessary action resulting from Work Session. There was no action necessary under this item. 20. Necessary Action Resulting from Executive Session. There was no action necessary under this item. There being no further business t meeting was adjourned. e City Council, the ATTEST: og021307 Page 17 of 17