CP 2010-01-26
NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING AND AGENDA
JANUARY 26, 2010
JAYNE PETERS, KAREN HUNT, Place 7
Mayor Mayor Pro Tem
TIM BRANCHEAU, Place 1 MARSHA TUNNELL, Place 4
BOB MAHALIK, Place 2 BILLY FAUGHT, Place 5
BRIANNA HINOJOSA-FLORES, Place 3 MARVIN FRANKLIN, Place 6
CLAY PHILLIPS, City Manager
MEETING TIME AND PLACE:
Call to Order 5:30 p.m. Council Chambers (Open to the Public)
Executive Session Immediately Following 1st Fl. Conf. Room (Closed to the Public)
Work Session Immediately Following 1st Fl. Conf. Room (Open to the Public)
Regular Session 7:30 p.m. Council Chambers (Open to the Public)
Executive Session Immediately Following 1st Fl. Conf. Room (Closed to the Public)
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas will
meet in Regular Called Session on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, at 5:30 p.m. for
Executive Session, Work Session will follow immediately thereafter, and Regular
Session will begin at 7:30 p.m., to be held at Town Center, 255 Parkway
Boulevard, Coppell, Texas.
As authorized by Section 551.071(2) of the Texas Government Code, this
meeting may be convened into closed Executive Session for the purpose of
seeking confidential legal advice from the City Attorney on any agenda item
listed herein.
The City of Coppell reserves the right to reconvene, recess or realign the Work
Session or called Executive Session or order of business at any time prior to
adjournment.
The purpose of the meeting is to consider the following items:
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
1. Call to order.
ag012610
Page 1 of 5
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
EXECUTIVE SESSION (Closed to the Public)
2. Convene Executive Session
A. Section 551.087, Texas Government Code – Economic
Development Negotiations.
1. ED Prospect South of West Bethel Road and West of South
Coppell Road.
2. ED Prospect North of I.H. 635E and West of Freeport Parkway.
3. ED Prospect North I.H. 635 and West of Belt Line Road.
WORK SESSION (Open to the Public)
3. Convene Work Session
A. Legislative Update.
B. Presentation on 2008-09 Audit results.
C. Presentation Regarding Incorporation of Xeriscape in City
Landscapes.
D. Council Goals and Objectives Update.
E. Web Page Preview
F. Discussion of Agenda Items.
REGULAR SESSION (Open to the Public)
4. Convene Regular Session.
5. Invocation.
6. Pledge of Allegiance.
7. Consider approval of a proclamation naming January 26, 2010 as JACK
BARKER’S SNUGGIE DAY IN THE CITY OF COPPELL and authorizing the
Mayor to sign.
8. Consider approval of a proclamation naming the month of February 2010
as AMERICAN HEART MONTH and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
9. Report by Economic Development Committee.
10. Citizens' Appearances.
CONSENT AGENDA
11. Consider approval of the following consent agenda items:
ag012610
Page 2 of 5
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
A. Consider approval of minutes: January 12, 2010.
B. Consider approval of a Resolution amending Resolution No.
010996.3 as heretofore amended, with regard to a reduction in
garbage collection fees and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
C. Consider canceling the General Electrical Services portion of Bid
No. 0909-03 to Pat Dillahey Electric, and awarding this portion to
Nema 3 Electric, Inc. for the remainder of the twelve month period
that began December 1, 2009, with options to renew an additional
four years as budgeted; and authorizing the City Manager to sign.
D. Consider approval of an ordinance of the City of Coppell, Texas,
readopting, ratifying, republishing and extending Ordinance
No. 2003-1030, providing for curfew hours for minors in the City of
Coppell, Texas, for a period of three (3) years; providing a repealing
clause; providing a severability clause; and providing an effective
date; and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
END OF CONSENT
12. Consider approval of the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the
Fiscal year ending September 30, 2009.
13. Consider appointments to the Coppell Economic Development
Foundation for a one year term.
14. Consider approval to accept Proposal #th71516c from Ford Audio-Video
to equip the Coppell Police Training Room with audio/video equipment in
the amount of $88,423.00; and authorizing the City Manager to sign all
necessary paperwork and documentation.
15. Consider approval of the final Coppell Community-Wide Trails
Implementation Plan.
16. Consider approval of Bid # Q-1109-01 to Dickerson Construction
Company, Inc., in the amount of $315,400.00, as provided for in the CRDC
fund, for the installation of an Irrigation Well at Wagon Wheel Park; and
authorizing the CRDC President and City Manager to sign the necessary
documents.
ag012610
Page 3 of 5
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
17. City Manager's Report.
A. Project Update and Future Agendas.
18. Mayor and Council Reports.
A. Report by Mayor Peters regarding Sweetheart Ball scheduled for
February 5th and 6th.
19. Council Committee Reports.
A. Carrollton/Farmers Branch ISD/Lewisville ISD – Tunnell.
B. Coppell ISD – Mahalik and Hinojosa-Flores.
C. Coppell Seniors – Brancheau and Faught.
D. Dallas Regional Mobility Coalition – Peters and Hunt.
E. International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) –
Brancheau.
F. Metrocrest Hospital Authority – Tunnell.
G. Metrocrest Medical Foundation – Mahalik.
H. Metrocrest Medical Services – Hinojosa-Flores.
I. Metrocrest Social Services – Franklin.
J. North Texas Council of Governments – Tunnell.
K. NTCOG/Regional Emergency Management – Faught.
L. North Texas Commission – Hunt.
M. Senior Adult Services – Franklin.
20. Public Service Announcements concerning items of community interest
and no Council action or deliberation is permitted.
21. Necessary action resulting from Work Session.
22. Necessary Action Resulting from Executive Session.
Adjournment.
____________________________________
Jayne Peters, Mayor
ag012610
Page 4 of 5
CERTIFICATE
I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the bulletin board at
the City Hall of the City of Coppell, Texas on this 22nd day of January, 2010, at
__________________.
____________________________________
Libby Ball, City Secretary
DETAILED INFORMATION REGARDING THIS AGENDA IS AVAILABLE ON
THE CITY'S WEBSITE (www.coppelltx.gov) UNDER PUBLIC DOCUMENTS,
COUNCIL PACKETS.
PUBLIC NOTICES
STATEMENT FOR ADA COMPLIANCE
The City of Coppell acknowledges its responsibility to comply with the Americans With
Disabilities Act of 1990. Thus, in order to assist individuals with disabilities who require
special services (i.e. sign interpretative services, alternative audio/visual devices, and
amanuenses) for participation in or access to the City of Coppell sponsored public
programs, services and/or meetings, the City requests that individuals make requests for
these services forty-eight (48) hours ahead of the scheduled program, service and/or
meeting. To make arrangements, contact Vivyon V. Bowman, ADA Coordinator or
other designated official at (972) 462-0022, or (TDD 1-800-RELAY, TX 1-800-735-2989).
ag012610
Page 5 of 5
KEY TO COUNCIL GOALS ICONS
COPPELL VISION 2030
Sustainable City Government
• Excellent City Services with high level of Customer Satisfaction
• “Green” City Operations and Facilities
• Excellent and Well-maintained City Infrastructure and Facilities
• Top Quality City Workforce
• Financial Resources to Support City Services
Business Prosperity
• Retention and Attraction of Businesses that generate revenues for the City
• Major Retail and Top Quality Business Office Park along I-635 and SH 121
• Old Coppell as a Small Town Village
• Community Commercial Centers
• House Offices and Home-Based Businesses
Community Wellness and Enrichment
• Community Gathering Places
• Recreation Programs and Services for all Generations
• Expand Cultural Arts Amenities and Opportunities
• Residents’ Wellness and Longevity
• Community Education Programs and Support of Top Quality Schools
• Multi-Use Trail Systems Connecting the City
Sense of Community
• Residents and Businesses Engaging and Contributing to the Coppell Community
• Strong Community Events and Festivals
• New Residents Welcome and Involved
• Effective Community Partnerships
• Future Civic Community Leaders’ Development
Special Place to Live
• Quality Housing for Family Generations
• Beautiful Green City
• Revitalizing Neighborhoods
• Mobility within Coppell
• Easy Access to Dallas-Fort Worth Regions
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
DATE: January 26, 2010
ITEM #: ES-2
EXECUTIVE SESSION
A. Section 551.087, Texas Government Code – Economic Development
Negotiations.
1. ED Prospects South of West Bethel Road and West of South Coppell Road.
2. ED Prospects North of I.H. 635E and West of Freeport Parkway.
3. ED Prospects North I.H. 635 and West of Belt Line Road.
Agenda Request Form - Revised 02/04 Document Name: %exsessn
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
DATE: January 26, 2010
ITEM #: WS-3
WORK SESSION
A. Legislative Update.
B. Presentation of 2008-09 Audit results.
C. Presentation Regarding Incorporation of Xeriscape in City Landscapes.
D. Council Goals and Objectives Update.
E. Web Page Preview.
F. Discussion of Agenda Items.
Agenda Request Form - Revised 02/07 Document Name: %wksessn
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
Date: January 26, 2010
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Brad Reid, Director of Parks and Recreation
Re: Incorporating Xeriscape Techniques into City Landscapes.
Background:
The initial discussions of incorporating innovative techniques into Coppell city
landscapes was the result of several back-to-back years of drought and high summer
temperatures during the late 1990’s. The availability of water for landscapes was of
particular concern during this time as the city was experiencing difficulty in supplying
sufficient water for domestic uses, much less for landscaping. The City Council
instructed staff to begin researching landscape alternatives that would require less water,
fewer chemicals and less man power to maintain. Recall that this was a fairly new
phenomenon in the North Texas area at the time. The initial effort was that of the median
beautification of the then newly improved Sandy Lake Road between MacArthur Blvd.
and Denton Tap Road. Since that time, the city has developed many other landscapes
utilizing techniques that are classified as Xeriscape or Texas SmartScape. Over this time
period the Parks and Recreation Department has learned a number of lessons regarding
the installation and maintenance of these landscapes.
The principles of Xeriscaping seem to be misunderstood at times, with some believing
the term indicates a “no-water” landscape of rocks and cactus. Of course, this is not the
case as has been shown in numerous examples on city projects over the past several
years. Xeriscaping, by definition, is utilizing smart techniques that will create a more
sustainable landscape that looks great and will thrive during stressful times. These
techniques include good planning of the landscaped area, taking advantage of good
drainage, water availability, plant selection and water holding capacity. It begins by
limiting traditional turf grass areas that require great amounts of water and maintenance,
the inclusion of efficient irrigation systems, soil improvements and mulching to increase
the water holding capacity of the soil and choosing the appropriate plant materials for the
specific situation.
The Parks and Recreation Department staff will present several examples of Xeriscaping
that has been accomplished in the city, discuss what has been discovered as a result of
working these landscapes, and finally get the Council’s impression of these innovative
designs and understand the willingness to continue with this effort on future city projects.
We anticipate that there will be several opportunities to utilize these innovative
techniques on future road median developments and potential redevelopments, areas such
as the front of Town Center and other city facilities that come due for renovations. The
city Green Team has reviewed this presentation and is supportive of continuing the
outlined concepts in efforts to minimize water and chemical usage, reduce staff time to
maintain these areas and reduce greenhouse gases in the maintenance operations.
City Council Action requested:
Direction regarding the future use of innovative landscaping techniques on city projects.
Staff Recommendation:
Continuation of the use of Xeriscaping on city projects.
09-10 Council Goal WorkplanRevised 01/08/1012345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334AB C DEFGoal Priority Work Plan Element Responsibility Projected Date StatusSpecial Place to LiveMgmt Priority Denton Tap sidewalk (SH 121 to Southwestern) Infill Eng February-10Special Place to LiveMgmt Priority Complete the design for Deforest Road (MacArthur to East) Eng March-10Special Place to LiveMgmt Priority Begin construction - Bethel Rd Phase A (Denton Tap to Penfolds) Eng December-09Sense of CommunityMgmt PriorityComprehensive Communication Plan for City - Evaluation of current methods and Plan DevelopmentCMO, IS March-10Sense of CommunityMgmt Priority New Resident Welcome Program (Communication Plan) CMO, IS March-10Sustainable City GovernmentMgmt Priority City use of Xeriscape - Evaluation and Direction Parks, Grn Team January-10Community WellnessMgmt Priority Community Health & Wellness: Assessment, Strategy, Funding Parks May-10Special Place to LiveMgmt Priority Eminent Domain - Sandy Lake (Denton Tap to N. Coppell Rd) Eng May-10Community WellnessPolicy Priority Library Expansion - Evaluation, Direction & Funding Library May-10Community WellnessPolicy Priority City Arts Advisory Committee - Evalution and Direction CMO, Parks, Lib April-10Community WellnessMgmt Priority Mature Citizens - Survey, Needs Assessment and Direction Parks April-10Community WellnessMgmt Priority Parks and Recreation Master Plan development Parks April-10Community WellnessMgmt Priority Recreation Programs and Services: Evaluation, Direction, Enhancements Parks April-10Special Place to LiveMgmt Priority Provide annual update to the Infrastructure Maintenance Plan Eng April-10Sustainable City GovernmentMgmt Priority 5-Year Financial Planning effort presenting update to City Council Finance April-10Sustainable City GovernmentMgmt Priority Conduct annual review of outstanding & proposed debt Finance CompleteBusiness ProsperityPolicy Priority "Coppell Brand" and Marketing Strategy - Evaluation & Development CMO June-10Community WellnessPolicy Priority Old Coppell Projects - Grant & Funding options (beyond façade grant) CMO June-10Special Place to LivePolicy PriorityEconomic Incentives for Neighborhood Commercial Properties - Evaluation, Direction and FundingCMO June-10Special Place to LiveMgmt PriorityComplete a comprehensive review of neighborhood integrity programs assessing their effectiveness and provide recommendations for improvement to the City CouncilFire June-10Sustainable City GovernmentMgmt Priority City Services Inventory - Use/Value Analysis, Revenue Sources CMO July-10Sustainable City GovernmentPolicy Priority Funding Sources for Infrastructure/Facilities - Eval & Direction Eng, Finance June-10Special Place to LiveMgmt PriorityExplore options available to conduct a fence condition inventory to assist the staff in neighborhood integrity code enforcement effortsFire June-10Sustainable City GovernmentMgmt Priority Performance Measures and Benchmarking of City Services All August-10Sustainable City GovernmentPolicy Priority Quality of Life - Bond Package and Election CMO July-10Community WellnessPolicy Priority Non Resident use of Parks & Facilities - Evaluation & Direction Parks September-10Policy Priority Center for the Arts Facility - Evaluation and Funding CMO September-10Sense of CommunityPolicy Priority Determine use of existing Senior Center. CMO September-10Sense of CommunityMgmt Priority Plan and coordinate Oak Fest for Oct 2010 Parks September-10Special Place to LiveMgmt PriorityNeighborhood Wellness Index: Best Practices, Models Development, Implementation Plan - SummitFire September-10Special Place to LivePolicy Priority Alternative Housing Model - Definition & Attracting Developers Planning Comp PlanSpecial Place to LivePolicy Priority Comprehensive Plan for I-635/SH121 Frontage Planning Comp PlanSpecial Place to LiveMgmt Priority Housing Inventory: Assessment, Strategy & Actions Planning Comp PlanPage 1 of 3
09-10 Council Goal WorkplanRevised 01/08/101AB C DEFGoal Priority Work Plan Element Responsibility Projected Date Status3536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657Special Place to LivePolicy PriorityProvide City Council with information regarding residential redevelopment to assist in determining desirability of “McMansions” and/or “empty nester” housing alternativesCMO/Planning Comp PlanSpecial Place to LivePolicy Priority Great Neighborhoods - Best Practice Evaluation and Recommendations Planning, Fire Comp PlanBusiness ProsperityPolicy Priority Targeted Businesses for Coppell - Definition & Guidelines CMO Comp PlanSpecial Place to LivePolicy Priority Redevelopment Policy (Residential/Commercial) - City Role and Toolkit Planning, Fire Comp PlanSpecial Place to LivePolicy PriorityXeriscape Regulations, Guidelines & Bldg Codes - Evaluation, Planning and FundingPlanning, Parks September-10Special Place to LivePolicy Priority Belt Line Revitalization Plan - Development Planning Comp PlanSense of CommunityPolicy Priority Develop policies for Use/Rental of city facilities Parks CompleteSense of CommunityPolicy PriorityImplement Coppell 2030 findings for Events and Community Activities; determine City's Role & Analysis of Best PracticeParks August-10Sense of CommunityPolicy PriorityImplement Coppell 2030 findings for Business Sponsorship Agreements for City Events; determine Direction & FundingParks August-10Sense of CommunityPolicy Priority Sponsorship for Community Organizations and Events - Policy Direction Parks August-10Sense of CommunityPolicy PriorityImplement Coppell 2030 findings incorporating needed service delivery changes to meet changes in demand and expectationsCMO On Going EffortsSense of CommunityMgmt PriorityEmploy Coppell 2030 recommendations regarding how to better communicate with an increasingly diverse populationCMO On Going EffortsBusiness ProsperityMgmt Priority Commercial/Retail Redevelopment Developers - Contact & Marketing CMO On Going EffortsBusiness ProsperityMgmt Priority Hot Spot Opportunities - Direction & City Actions CMO On Going EffortsBusiness ProsperityMgmt Priority Continue to facilitate the development of the Leslie tract CMO, Planning On Going EffortsSense of CommunityMgmt Priority Public Information on Code Enforcement - Actions Fire On Going EffortsSense of CommunityMgmt Priority Community Gardens - Refinements & Enhancements Parks On Going EffortsSense of CommunityPolicy Priority Service Plan for Northlake Eng On Going EffortsSense of CommunityMgmt PriorityCity staff will continue Citizen Emergency Response Teams (CERT) and RACES by providing continuing education opportunities for existing membersFire On Going EffortsSense of CommunityMgmt PriorityCity staff will utilize HOA’s to educate the public and provide information regarding emergency incidents in the community and how neighborhoods can better prepare for emergenciesFire On Going EffortsSense of CommunityMgmt PriorityCity staff will maintain information for the City’s website designed to assist citizens in making preparations to deal with an emergency or disasterFire On Going EffortsSense of CommunityMgmt PriorityContinue, and expand where needed, public safety education classes offered through the Police and Fire Departments including Self-Defense for Women, CPR, First Aid, and othersFire, Police On Going EffortsSense of CommunityMgmt PriorityEnhance library E-branch to increase flexibility for library patrons and streamlined operations for staffLibrary On Going EffortsPage 2 of 3
09-10 Council Goal WorkplanRevised 01/08/101AB C DEFGoal Priority Work Plan Element Responsibility Projected Date Status58596061626364656667686970717273747576777879808182Sense of CommunityMgmt PriorityContinue to develop and disseminate information to the community regarding the Connect-CTY system. QuarterlyFire On Going EffortsSense of CommunityMgmt PriorityTraffic Report - Activities of the Traffic and Patrol Units regarding citations, warnings, DWI/DUI arrests and education programs regarding traffic safety. QuarterlyPolice On Going EffortsSense of CommunityMgmt PriorityCommunity Services Report - Activities of the Community Services Unit regarding educational programs, National Night Out, Women's Self Defense, Women's Self Defense for High School Seniors, Citizens Police Academy, Drug & Alcohol Education in CISD. QuarterlyPolice On Going EffortsSense of CommunityMgmt PriorityOrganized Crime Unit Report - Activities of the Organized Crime Unit (OCU) regarding narcotic and alcohol violations in the Metroplex. QtrlyPolice On Going EffortsSense of CommunityMgmt Priority Monitor the progress of the Kolberg development CMO On Going EffortsSense of CommunityMgmt PriorityWork with Old Town interest groups to develop a clear understanding of City role and perspective on future of Old CoppellPlanning On Going EffortsSense of CommunityMgmt PriorityMaintain library programs including Volunteen, Summer Reading and HomeworkCenter programsLibrary On Going EffortsSense of CommunityMgmt PriorityDevelop methods to use various points of contact as a means to reach out to diverse populations, particularly the Library and the Aquatics & Recreation CenterParks/Library On Going EffortsSpecial Place to LiveMgmt Priority Code Enforcement - Evaluation/Improvements - Summit Fire On Going EffortsSpecial Place to LiveMgmt Priority Complete annual street, sidewalk, alley maintenance program Eng On Going EffortsSpecial Place to LiveMgmt Priority Initiate debris removal program to lessen creek flood potential Eng On Going EffortsSpecial Place to LiveMgmt PriorityContinue communication efforts with HOA’s and other neighborhoods to ensure HOA common area responsibilities are maintained per zoning requirementsFire On Going EffortsSustainable City GovernmentMgmt Priority Continue and expand city-wide & departmental satisfaction surveys All On Going EffortsSustainable City GovernmentMgmt Priority Continue organizational succession planning efforts CMO, HR On Going EffortsSustainable City GovernmentMgmt Priority Continue sales tax audit program Finance On Going EffortsSustainable City GovernmentMgmt Priority Evaluate various “green” & sustainability programs for implementation CMO On Going EffortsSustainable City GovernmentMgmt PriorityContinue use of Program/Policy financial impact analysis for new programs and servicesFinance On Going EffortsSustainable City GovernmentMgmt Priority Monitoring Legislative Process: Track State & Federal Legislation All On Going EffortsSustainable City GovernmentMgmt Priority Police Radio System Interoperability Police On Going EffortsMgmt Priority Work with Chamber on Identified Initiatives: CMO/ChamberBusiness ProsperityMgmt Priority Mentoring Home-Based Businesses CMO/ChamberBusiness ProsperityMgmt Priority Retail Association - Development and City's Role CMO/ChamberBusiness ProsperityMgmt Priority Co-op for Marketing Old Town Coppell Development CMO/ChamberBusiness ProsperityMgmt Priority Home-Based Business - Study and Analysis CMO/ChamberBusiness ProsperityMgmt Priority Home-Based Business Fair CMO/ChamberPage 3 of 3
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
City Manager
January 26, 2010
7
✔
PROCLAMATION
Consider approval of a proclamation naming January 26, 2010 as JACK BARKER’S SNUGGIE DAY IN THE CITY OF
COPPELL and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
Staff recommends approval
!Barker - 1 AR
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, Jack Barker is a courageous young man who is currently undergoing
chemotherapy treatments to combat Leukemia; and
WHEREAS, like many chemotherapy patients, Jack looked for a solution to the chills he
experienced while undergoing chemotherapy treatments; and
WHEREAS, Jack found a solution in the Snuggie blanket that allowed him to stay warm and
still have his hands free while undergoing chemo treatments; and
WHEREAS, after finding his Snuggie solution, Jack decided to share his discovery with other
patients at Children’s Hospital who were facing the same challenges; and
WHEREAS, Jack had a vision and a goal of providing every patient who was undergoing
chemo at Children’s with a Snuggie and contacted the company that manufactures Snuggies and
convinced them to donate 1000 Snuggies to his cause; and
WHEREAS, through the help and support of many in our community, Jack’s vision became a
reality and he has collected enough blankets for each chemotherapy patient at Children’s Medical
Center; and
WHEREAS, in addition to Snuggie donations, Jack’s foundation has collected more than
$15,000 in cash donations, and his continuing efforts have expanded to help patients at other area
hospitals.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Jayne Peters, Mayor of the city of Coppell, do hereby proclaim
January 26, 2010 as
"JACK BARKER’S SNUGGIE DAY IN THE CITY OF COPPELL"
as we recognize Jack for his caring and compassion for others while in the midst of fighting his own
illness.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, I have set my hand and caused the seal of the city of Coppell to be
affixed this _______ day of January 2010.
________________________________
ATTEST: Jayne Peters, Mayor
__________________________
Libby Ball, City Secretary
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
City Manager
January 26, 2010
8
✔
PROCLAMATION
Consider approval of a proclamation naming the month of February 2010 as AMERICAN HEART MONTH and
authorizing the Mayor to sign.
Staff recommends approval
!AHA - 1 AR
PROCLAMATION
Whereas, diseases of the heart are the nation’s leading cause of death, and;
Whereas, the risk factors for heart disease are smoking, high blood pressure, high
cholesterol, overweight/obesity, physical inactivity, diabetes, a family history of early heart
disease, age, and;
Whereas, individuals can promote their own health and prevent disease and illness by
practicing and following the “Big Four” habits, eating a heart healthy diet, getting regular
physical activity, maintaining a healthy weight, and avoiding tobacco, and;
Whereas, every year, the month of February is designated “American Heart Month” by
the American Heart Association, it is a time for citizens to raise their awareness about heart
disease, and;
Whereas, citizens need to take action to make heart health a priority for themselves and
their families, become aware of their heart disease risk, and take action to control their risk; and
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Jayne Peters, Mayor of the City of Coppell, Texas, do hereby
proclaim the month of February 2010 as
“AMERICAN HEART MONTH”
IN WITNESS THEREOF, I HAVE SET MY HAND AND CAUSED THE SEAL OF
THE CITY OF Coppell to be affixed this ______ day of ________________, 2010.
___________________________________
Jayne Peters, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Libby Ball, City Secretary
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
City Secretary
January 26, 2010
9
✔
REPORT
Report by the Economic Development Committee.
The semi-annual report will be made by a member of the Economic Development Committee.
No action necessary on this item.
%boardreport
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
DATE: January 26, 2010
ITEM #: 10
CITIZENS' APPEARANCES
ORDINANCE NO. 2001-964
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, ESTABLISHING RULES, TIMES AND
PROCEDURES FOR CONDUCTING CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, THE
FOLLOWING ARE HEREBY ADOPTED AS THE RULES, TIMES AND PROCEDURES FOR
CONDUCTING COUNCIL MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COPPELL,
TEXAS:
The City of Coppell Code of Ordinances, Article 1-10 "Rules, Times and Procedures for Conducting City
Council Meetings," be, and the same is hereby, amended to read as follows:
"ARTICLE 1-10
RULES, TIMES AND PROCEDURES FOR CONDUCTING
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
". . .
1-10-6.2.1 CITIZENS APPEARANCE
Persons wishing to speak on any matter other than an item scheduled for a public hearing on the agenda, must sign
a register and list their residence address, provided by the City Secretary on a table outside the Council Chambers,
and such persons may be heard only at the "Citizens Appearance" portion of a regular meeting or special meeting.
Each speaker must state his or her name and address of residence. Presentations by individuals during the
"Citizens Appearance" shall be limited to two (2) minutes each. An individual speaker's time may be extended for
an additional two (2) minutes with the approval of a majority of the Council members present. There shall be a
cumulative limit of twenty (20) minutes allotted of any regular or special Council meeting. Those persons who
signed up to speak at the "Citizens Appearance" shall be called upon in the order that they have signed the
provided register. No personal attacks by any speaker shall be made against any member of the Council, Mayor,
individual, group or corporation (Charter Article 3, Section 3.12).
Agenda Request Form - Revised 09/02 Document Name: %citapp.doc
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
City Secretary
January 26, 2010
11/A
✔
PROCEDURAL
Consider approval of minutes: January 12, 2010.
Minutes of the City Council meetings held on January 12, 2010.
Staff recommends approval.
%minutes
MINUTES OF JANUARY 12, 2010
The City Council of the City of Coppell met in Regular Called Session on Tuesday,
January 12, 2010, at 5:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of Town Center,
255 Parkway Boulevard, Coppell, Texas. The following members were present:
Jayne Peters, Mayor
Karen Hunt, Mayor Pro Tem
Tim Brancheau, Councilmember
Bob Mahalik, Councilmember
Brianna Hinojosa-Flores, Councilmember
Marsha Tunnell, Councilmember (late arrival)
Billy Faught, Councilmember
Marvin Franklin, Councilmember
Also present were City Manager Clay Phillips, City Secretary Libby Ball and City
Attorney Robert Hager.
1. Call to order.
Mayor Peters called the meeting to order, determined that a quorum was
present and convened into Executive Session.
EXECUTIVE SESSION (Closed to the Public)
2. Convene Executive Session
A. Section 551.071, Texas Government Code – Consultation
with City Attorney.
1. Discussion regarding Northlake Settlement.
B. Section 551.087, Texas Government Code – Economic
Development Negotiations.
1. ED Prospects South of Bethel and West of S. Coppell
Road.
2. ED Prospects South of Northpoint and West of Royal
Lane.
Councilmember Tunnell arrived prior to convening Executive Session.
Mayor Peters convened into Executive Session at 5:37 p.m. Mayor Peters
adjourned the Executive Session at 6:32 p.m. and opened Work Session.
Cm011210
Page 1 of 10
WORK SESSION (Open to the Public)
3. Convene Work Session
A. Briefing by Mr. Larry O. Hulsey on air quality issues relating
to drilling operations.
B. Demo of the new city website.
C. Discussion of Agenda Items.
REGULAR SESSION (Open to the Public)
4. Convene Regular Session.
5. Invocation.
Pastor Clayton Coates of First Baptist Church led those present in the
Invocation.
6. Pledge of Allegiance.
Mayor Peters led those present in the Pledge of Allegiance.
7. Consider approval of a proclamation naming January 12, 2010 as
Tom Thompson Appreciation Day and authorizing the Mayor to
sign.
Presentation:
Mayor Peters read the Proclamation for the record and presented the same
to Tom Thompson.
Action:
Councilmember Faught moved to approve a proclamation naming
January 12, 2010 as Tom Thompson Appreciation Day and authorizing the
Mayor to sign. Mayor Pro Tem Hunt seconded the motion; the motion
carried 7-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Hunt and Councilmembers Brancheau,
Mahalik, Hinojosa-Flores, Tunnell, Faught and Franklin voting in favor of
the motion.
Cm011210
Page 2 of 10
8. Citizens' Appearances.
1) Tom Garding, 927 Moonlight Cove, spoke regarding the Senior
Center.
CONSENT AGENDA
9. Consider approval of the following consent agenda items:
A. Consider approval of minutes: December 8, 2009.
B. Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. PD-236R-
SF-12, Bethel Road Manor, a zoning change from PD-236-
SF-12 (Planned Development-236-Single Family-12) to PD-
236R-SF-12 (Planned Development-236 Revised-Single
Family-12) amending the Detail Site Plan to allow the
construction of a 735-square-foot cabana (containing a 90-
square-foot air conditioned bathroom and outdoor living
and kitchen areas), an arbor structure, an in-ground pool in
the rear yard of the property; relocating a decorative
screening wall with gates along the front property line,
adding a guard rail to the culvert and construction of stone
veneer facing to the existing headwall and culverts on 2.78
acres of property located on the north side of Bethel Road,
known as 234 W. Bethel Road and authorizing the Mayor to
sign.
C. Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. PD-244-TH-
2, Willow Park, a zoning change from C (Commercial) to PD-
244-TH-2 (Planned Development-244-Townhouse-2) to allow
24 detached townhouse units and to amend the Land Use
Plan of the 1996 Comprehensive Plan from Freeway
Commercial and Light Industrial/Showroom to Residential –
Medium Density on 3.81 acres of property located
approximately 337 feet east of S.H. 121 along the north
side of Coppell Road and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
Cm011210
Page 3 of 10
Action:
Councilmember Tunnell moved to approve Consent Agenda Items A, B
carrying Ordinance No. 91500-A-539 and C carrying Ordinance
No. 91500-A-540. Councilmember Hinojosa-Flores seconded the motion;
the motion carried 7-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Hunt and Councilmembers
Brancheau, Mahalik, Hinojosa-Flores, Tunnell, Faught and Franklin voting
in favor of the motion.
10. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of a Resolution granting a variance of ninety
(90') feet to Maurizio's from the 300-foot prohibited requirement
under Ordinance No. 2006-1143, Article 6-16, Section 6-16-2 of
the Code of Ordinances, to a business selling or offering for sale
alcoholic beverages, with a business address being 110 West
Sandy Lake Road, #112; and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
Presentation:
Libby Ball, City Secretary, made a presentation to Council.
Maurizio Primo, applicant, addressed Council.
Public Hearing:
Mayor Peters opened the Public Hearing and advised the following signed
up to speak:
1) Tod Farrell, 127 Ridgewood Dr., spoke in favor.
2) Deena Clark, 937 Brentwood, spoke in favor.
3) Dale Clark, 706 Penfolds, spoke in favor.
Action:
Councilmember Franklin moved to close the Public Hearing and approve
Resolution No. 2010-0112.0 granting a variance of ninety (90') feet to
Maurizio's from the 300-foot prohibited requirement under Ordinance No.
2006-1143, Article 6-16, Section 6-16-2 of the Code of Ordinances, to a
business selling or offering for sale alcoholic beverages, with a business
address being 110 West Sandy Lake Road, #112; and authorizing the
Cm011210
Page 4 of 10
Mayor to sign. Councilmember Mahalik seconded the motion; the motion
carried 7-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Hunt and Councilmembers Brancheau,
Mahalik, Hinojosa-Flores, Tunnell, Faught and Franklin voting in favor of
the motion.
11. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of Case No. PD-245-R, Barnes at Riverview, a
zoning change request from R (Retail) to PD-245-R(Planned
Development-245-Retail) to attach a Detail Site Plan allowing two
office/ medical office/retail buildings (totaling 9,175 square feet)
with a 300-square-foot restaurant, on approximately one acre of
property located at the southeast corner of Sandy Lake Road and
Riverview Drive.
Presentation:
Gary Sieb, Director of Planning, made a presentation to Council.
Ray Barnes, Applicant, addressed Council.
Robert Schneeberg, representing the applicant, addressed Council.
Public Hearing:
Mayor Peters opened the Public Hearing and advised the following signed
up to speak:
1) Ronald Tolls, 1424 Grapevine Creek Dr., spoke against the proposal.
2) Todd Williams, 1434 Grapevine Creek Dr., spoke against the
proposal.
3) Henry Okoli, 1411 Grapevine Creek Dr., spoke against the proposal.
4) Suresh Shankar, 102 Elm Fork, spoke against the proposal.
EXECUTIVE SESSION (Closed to the Public)
A. Section 551.071, Texas Government Code - Consultation
with City Attorney.
Cm011210
Page 5 of 10
Mayor Peters convened into Executive Session at 8:20 p.m. Mayor Peters
adjourned the Executive Session at 8:31 p.m.
REGULAR SESSION (Open to the Public)
Action:
Councilmember Faught moved to close the Public Hearing and approve a
Case No. PD-245-R, Barnes at Riverview, a zoning change request from R
(Retail) to PD-245-R(Planned Development-245-Retail) to attach a Detail
Site Plan allowing two office/ medical office/retail buildings (totaling 9,175
square feet) with a 300-square-foot restaurant, on approximately one acre
of property located at the southeast corner of Sandy Lake Road and
Riverview Drive, subject to the following conditions:
1) Submission of minor site plan amendment and plat for Metrocrest
Community Church to establish the fire lane and mutual access
easement;
2) Submission of the shared dumpster agreement;
3) Approval of the restaurant (sno balls plus) subject to the floor plan,
sign plan and hours of operation as provided in the PD;
4) To include a 6-foot screening wall; and
5) No hot food on-site preparation.
Councilmember Franklin seconded the motion; the motion carried 6-1 with
Mayor Pro Tem Hunt and Councilmembers Brancheau, Mahalik, Hinojosa-
Flores, Faught and Franklin voting in favor of the motion and
Councilmember Tunnell voting against the motion.
12. Consider approval of the Barnes at Riverview Addition, Lot 1,
Block A, Minor Plat, being a minor plat to establish setbacks, fire
lanes and mutual access and utility easements to allow the
construction of two office/ medical office/retail buildings, with a
300-square-foot restaurant, on approximately one acre of
property located at the southeast corner of Sandy Lake Road and
Riverview Drive.
Cm011210
Page 6 of 10
Presentation:
Gary Sieb, Director of Planning, made a presentation to Council.
Action:
Councilmember Faught moved to approve the Barnes at Riverview Addition,
Lot 1, Block A, Minor Plat, being a minor plat to establish setbacks, fire
lanes and mutual access and utility easements to allow the construction of
two office/ medical office/retail buildings, with a 300-square-foot
restaurant, on approximately one acre of property located at the southeast
corner of Sandy Lake Road and Riverview Drive, subject to the following
condition:
1) Submission and approval of a minor site plan amendment and plat
for Metrocrest Community Church prior to the recordation of this
minor plat.
Councilmember Brancheau seconded the motion; the motion carried 6-1
with Mayor Pro Tem Hunt and Councilmembers Brancheau, Mahalik,
Hinojosa-Flores, Faught and Franklin voting in favor of the motion and
Councilmember Tunnell voting against the motion.
13. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of the Park West Commerce Center, Lot 1,
Block 3R, Replat, being a replat of Blocks 3 and 4, of the Park
West Commerce Addition into one lot to allow the abandonment
of various street rights-of-way, utility and railroad easements and
provide for the dedication of necessary easements onsite and
rights-of-way for Southwestern Boulevard and Freeport Parkway,
on 47.64 acres of property located at the southeast corner of
Southwestern Boulevard and Freeport Parkway.
Presentation:
Gary Sieb, Director of Planning, made a presentation to Council.
Dave Littleton, representing the applicant, addressed Council.
Cm011210
Page 7 of 10
Public Hearing:
Mayor Peters opened the Public Hearing and advised no one signed up to
speak.
Action:
Councilmember Tunnell moved to close the Public Hearing and approve the
Park West Commerce Center, Lot 1, Block 3R, Replat, being a replat of
Blocks 3 and 4, of the Park West Commerce Addition into one lot to allow
the abandonment of various street rights-of-way, utility and railroad
easements and provide for the dedication of necessary easements onsite
and rights-of-way for Southwestern Boulevard and Freeport Parkway, on
47.64 acres of property located at the southeast corner of Southwestern
Boulevard and Freeport Parkway. Mayor Pro Tem Hunt seconded the
motion; the motion carried 7-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Hunt and
Councilmembers Brancheau, Mahalik, Hinojosa-Flores, Tunnell, Faught
and Franklin voting in favor of the motion.
14. City Manager's Report.
A. Project Update and Future Agendas.
B. Directors’ Work Plan Development.
A. City Manager Clay Phillips reported that a consulting firm is working
with the Library staff on a needs and space analysis for a future
library expansion. It should be completed by February with a
presentation for Council shortly afterwards. Regarding CIP projects,
South Coppell Road is moving along well with a completion date
expected in 6-8 weeks, weather permitting. The Southwestern
Boulevard project should have a new bridge deck down soon with an
anticipated completion date of August 1, 2010. The Pavement
Replacement Program budgeted for this year will begin soon with the
intersection of Sandy Lake and Denton Tap Road. Various lanes of
traffic will have to be closed and will be unpleasant, but must be
done or the problem will worsen. City Manager Phillips also
announced he will return with future prospects for West Sandy Lake
improvements along the right of way. The expansion project design
work for the Aquatic Center is being done with the original architect.
A meeting with CRDC will be scheduled for February. The design
work for the Tennis Center expansion project is moving along and will
be ready for Planning & Zoning Commission in February and Council
in March. City Manager Phillips mentioned the revealing of the new
Cm011210
Page 8 of 10
webpage and email address, as discussed in Work Session, will be
ready by February. As for future agendas, Dan Shelly and Fred Hill
will be at the next meeting to talk about the next Legislative Session.
A quarterly update will also be presented at the next meeting on the
Work Plan Update.
B. City Manager Phillips gave an update on the Directors’ Work Plan
Development. Several items were discussed, including those from
employees at the Leadership Summit. Employees were asked what
works, what doesn’t work and how customer service initiatives can be
improved upon. City Manager Phillips said it had been a year since
employees had given feedback, so it was time again for a check up.
The Directors also talked about the Budget Plan and Council Goals.
15. Mayor and Council Reports.
A. Report by Mayor Peters regarding Metroplex Mayors’
Meeting.
B. Report by Mayor Peters regarding the Keep Coppell
Beautiful E-cycling Day on January 23rd.
A. Mayor Peters and City Manager Clay Phillips attended the Metroplex
Mayors’ Meeting. The guest speaker was Bill Hale, Dallas District
Engineer for TXDOT. Mr. Hale gave updates on TXDOT’s strategic
plan, allocation for Prop 12 funds and the top priority projects for the
Dallas District, which included the second phase of S.H. 121.
B. Mayor Peters announced that Saturday, January 23 from 9am-noon
will be KCB’s E-Cycling at the Town Center parking lot. Citizens can
drop off old electronics and cell phones for free. There will be a
charge of $7 for computer monitors and $12 for TVs.
16. Public Service Announcements concerning items of community
interest and no Council action or deliberation is permitted.
Mayor Peters spoke about Jack Barker, a 6th grader at CMS West who has
been diagnosed with Leukemia. Jack discovered the Snuggie for his
treatments and thought other children needed the same item. He has
raised over $15,000 in donations and has collected over 1000 Snuggies for
children undergoing cancer treatments. Mayor Peters wanted to commend
Jack Barker for his accomplishments and wishes him well.
Cm011210
Page 9 of 10
17. Necessary action resulting from Executive Session.
There was no action necessary under this item.
There being no further business to come before the City Council, the
meeting was adjourned.
____________________________________
Jayne Peters, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Libby Ball, City Secretary
Cm011210
Page 10 of 10
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
ȱ
Finance
January 26, 2010
11/B
✔
RESOLUTION
Consider approval of a Resolution amending Resolution No. 010996.3 as heretofore amended, with regard to a
reduction in garbage collection fees and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
Garbage collection fees are being amended to reflect adjustments to rates associated with the contract with Waste
Management. Residential rates are being decreased by five (5) percent and commercial rates are being decreased
by three (3) percent due to a diesel fuel adjustment clause in the solid waste contract. Residential rates are being
decreased from $15.63 per month to $14.85 per month, and the senior citizen rate will decrease from $14.07 to $13.37
monthly. Attached is a letter from Waste Management detailing the changes.
Staff recommends approval of the Resolution.
$MasterFee-1AR Consent
December 7, 2009
Carol Primeaux, R.S.
City of Coppell
P.O. Box 478
Coppell, Texas 75019
Dear Carol:
This letter provides information regarding rate changes for the coming year.
As you know, the contract does not provide for an adjustment based upon the
Consumer Price Index (CPI) until 2011, but does include an adjustment based
upon diesel fuel prices for the period of November 2008 through October 2009.
As the attached information shows, diesel prices for the aforementioned period
averaged $2.47 per gallon. Adjustments are to be made for fuel prices that are
outside a range of $3.75 per gallon to $4.25 per gallon. Further, rates are to be
adjusted by 1% for each $.25 change outside of this range. Thus, the fuel
variable would decrease the rate schedule by 5%.
However, the contract also provides for a 2% increase in rates for commercial
and industrial accounts. Therefore, the “net” change to rates for these lines of
service is a decrease of 3%.
For the residential side, rates will, in fact, drop by a total of 5%. Therefore, the
new residential rate will be $14.85 per month, while the senior rate will be $13.37
per month. These new rates will be reflected with the invoice we mail to the City
in February for the January service month.
Thanks for your continued confidence in Waste Management, and please contact
me with any questions or comments.
Sincerely,
John L. Klaiber
Manager – Public Sector Services
CITY OF COPPELL RATES
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2010
Garbage Collection Fees: (effective January 1, 2010)
Solid Waste and Recycling (Includes Yard Trimmings Fee)
1) Residential Garbage Customer $15.63 per month $14.85
Senior Citizen Residential Garbage Customer $14.07 per month $13.37
2) Commercial Garbage Collection Fees:
FREQUENCY 3 YD 4 YD 6 YD 8 YD
(Per week)
1 $85.67 $83.10 $105.17 $102.01 $127.86 $124.02 $161.98 $157.12
2 $142.62 $138.34 $204.85 $198.70 $218.70 $212.14 $276.24 $267.95
3 $189.24 $183.56 $280.86 $272.43 $315.10 $305.65 $389.37 $377.69
4 $236.20 $229.11 $355.59 $344.92 $401.36 $389.32 $485.17 $470.61
5 $288.77 $280.11 $431.23 $418.29 $483.65 $469.14 $594.68 $576.84
6 $342.01 $331.75 $517.52 $501.99 $571.00 $553.87 $704.46 $683.33
7 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extra Pickups $28.40 $27.55 $38.55 $37.39 $41.00 $39.77 $55.06 $53.41
Commercial Hand Pickups (1 to 5 Bags)$19.39 $18.81
Commercial Hand Pickups (6 to 10 Bags)$24.05 $23.33
Dumpster Locks $7.92 per month
Dumpster Casters $9.25 per month
Redelivery Fee for Non-payment of Account $42.92 $41.63
Compactors - Closed:
FREQUENCY 2 YD 3 YD 4 YD 6 YD 8 YD
(Per week)
1 $302.61 $293.53 $318.02 $308.48 $355.44 $344.78 $375.23 $363.97 $428.06 $415.22
2 $390.65 $378.93 $423.65 $410.94 $455.57 $441.90 $534.81 $518.77 $621.73 $603.08
3 $479.79 $465.40 $527.09 $511.28 $582.11 $564.65 $694.36 $673.53 $814.31 $789.88
4 $568.91 $551.84 $632.74 $613.76 $708.66 $687.40 $852.83 $827.25 $1,007.58 $977.35
5 $656.95 $637.24 $738.38 $716.23 $835.21 $810.15 $1,013.48 $983.08 $1,143.84 $1,109.52
6 $746.08 $723.70 $841.82 $816.57 $959.56 $930.77 $1,094.74 $1,061.90 $1,394.22 $1,352.39
7 $835.21 $810.15 $947.46 $919.04 $1,013.68 $983.27 $1,333.70 $1,293.69 $1,586.80 $1,539.20
Extra Pickups $99.04 $96.07 $110.04 $106.74 $132.05 $128.09 $143.06 $138.77 $154.05 $149.43
Residential Roll-Off Permit $20.00
Residential Roll-Off Pricing 10 YD 20 YD 30 YD 40 YD
Monthly Rental $ 151.96 $ 147.40 155.06$ 150.41$ 155.06$ 150.41$ 155.06$ 150.41$
Delivery Fee (Each) 56.51$ $ 54.81 57.66$ 55.93$ 57.66$ 55.93$ 57.66$ 55.93$
Haul Rate Per Pull 225.53$ $ 218.76 230.13$ 223.23$ 263.59$ 255.68$ 334.43$ 324.40$
Liner 48.22$ $ 46.77 48.22$ 46.77$ 48.22$ 46.77$ 48.22$ 46.77$
Residential Roll-Off Pricing 30 YD 35 YD 42 YD
Monthly Rental $ 390.08 $ 378.38 390.08$ 378.38$ 390.08$ 378.38$
Delivery Fee (Each) 80.19$ $ 77.78 80.19$ 77.78$ 80.19$ 77.78$
Haul Rate Per Pull 333.20$ $ 323.20 349.05$ 338.58$ 390.08$ 378.38$
20 YD, 25 YD and 40 YD Compactors are not available.
Open Top
1
RESOLUTION NO. __________________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, AMENDING
RESOLUTION NO. 010996.3, THE MASTER FEE SCHEDULE, AS
AMENDED, BY AMENDING THE GARBAGE COLLECTION FEES, IN
PART; AND PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE AND PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, previously adopted
Resolution No. 010996.3 to provide for general and special fees and charges to be assessed and
collected by the City, as authorized by the Code of Ordinances and other applicable codes,
ordinances, resolutions, and laws; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Coppell desires to amend certain fees as set
forth therein and delete others as authorized by law;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the Master Fee Schedule section entitled “Garbage Collection Fees”
be amended, in part to read as follows:
Garbage Collection Fees: (Effective January 1, 2010)
“…
1) Residential Garbage Customer $14.85 per month
Senior Citizen Residential Garbage Customer $13.37 per month
2) Commercial Garbage Collection Fees:
FREQUENCY 3 YD 4 YD 6 YD 8 YD
(Per week)
1 $ 83.10 $102.01 $124.02 $157.12
2 $138.34 $198.70 $212.14 $267.95
3 $183.56 $272.43 $305.65 $377.69
4 $229.11 $344.92 $389.32 $470.61
5 $280.11 $418.29 $469.14 $576.84
6 $331.75 $501.99 $553.87 $683.33
Extra Pickups $ 27.55 $ 37.39 $ 39.77 $ 53.41
2
Commercial Hand Pickups (1 to 5 Bags) $18.81
Commercial Hand Pickups (6 to 10 Bags) $23.33
Dumpster Locks $ 7.92 per month
Dumpster Casters $ 9.25 per month
Redelivery Fee for Non-payment of Account $41.63
Compactors - Closed:
FREQUENCY 2YD 3 YD 4 YD 6 YD 8YD
(Per week)
1 $293.53 $308.48 $ 344.78 $ 363.97 $ 415.22
2 $378.93 $410.94 $ 441.90 $ 518.77 $ 603.08
3 $465.40 $511.28 $ 564.65 $ 673.53 $ 789.88
4 $551.84 $613.76 $ 687.40 $ 827.25 $ 977.35
5 $637.24 $716.23 $ 810.15 $ 983.08 $1,109.52
6 $723.70 $816.57 $ 930.77 $1,061.90 $1,352.39
7 $810.15 $919.04 $ 983.27 $1,293.69 $1,539.20
Extra Pickups $ 96.07 $106.74 $ 128.09 $ 138.77 $ 149.43
Roll-Off Rates Haul Rate
Delivery Rate Rental Rate per Pull Liner
10 Yard (Open Top) $54.81 $147.40/Month $218.76 $46.77
20 Yard (Open Top) $55.93 $150.41/Month $223.23 $46.77
30 Yard (Open-Top) $55.93 $150.41/Month $255.68 $46.77
40 Yard (Open Top) $55.93 $150.41/Month $324.40 $46.77
30 Yard (Compactor) $77.78 $378.38/Month $323.20
35Yard (Compactor) $77.78 $378.38/Month $338.58
42 Yard (Compactor) $77.78 $378.38/Month $378.38
…”
SECTION 2. That all provisions of the resolutions of the City of Coppell, Texas, in
conflict with the provisions of this Resolution, except as noted herein, be, and the same are
hereby, repealed, and all other provisions not in conflict with the provisions of this Resolution
shall remain in full force and effect.
3
SECTION 3. That should any word, phrase, paragraph, or section of this Resolution be
held to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of this
Resolution as a whole, or any part or provision thereof other than the part so decided to be
unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, and shall not affect the validity of the Resolution as a whole.
SECTION 4. That this Resolution shall become effective immediately from and after its
passage as the law and charter in such cases provide.
DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, this the _______ day
of ______________________, 2010.
APPROVED:
__________________________________
JAYNE PETERS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
__________________________________
LIBBY BALL, CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________
CITY ATTORNEY
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
Engineering
January 26, 2010
11/C
✔
CONTRACT/BID or PROPOSAL
Consider canceling the General Electrical Services portion of Bid No. 0909-03 to Pat Dillahey Electric, and awarding this
portion to Nema 3 Electric, Inc. for the remainder of the twelve month period that began December 1, 2009, with
options to renew an additional four years as budgeted; and authorizing the City Manager to sign.
Bid No. 0909-03 for Electrical Services was awarded by City Council in two parts at the November 10, 2009 City
Council meeting; Part one for General Electric Services to Pat Dillahey Electric; Part two for Ballfield Lighting to Groves
Electric. Pat Dillahey Electric has requested to cancel the remainder of the General Electrical Services contract and
therefore the City is recommending awarding this portion to Nema 3 Electric who was the next lowest bidder (see
attached bid tabulation) for the remainder of this contract year, with options to renew an additional four years.
Staff will be available to answer any questions at the Council meeting.
Funds are budgeted in the Facilities Maintenance Budget for electrical services.
Staff recommends approval of this award.
#Electrical Services Contract
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
VIA: Kenneth M. Griffin, P.E., Director of Engineering/Public Works
FROM: Sheri Moino, Facilities Manager
DATE: January 26, 2010
REF: Consider canceling the General Electrical Services portion of Bid No.
0909-03 to Pat Dillahey Electric, and awarding this portion to Nema 3
Electric, Inc. for the remainder of the twelve month period that began
December 1, 2009, with options to renew an additional four years as
budgeted; and authorizing the City Manager to sign.
Bid No. 0909-03 for Electrical Services was awarded by City Council in two parts on
November 10, 2009. Pat Dillahey, owner of Pat Dillahey Electric, passed away at the
end of December, 2009. The City of Coppell received notification from Mrs. Dillahey
requesting that we cancel their contract as his business can no longer operate. Since this
was a newly awarded contract, the City contacted the next lowest bidder, Nema 3
Electric, Inc., to see if they were interested in being awarded the General Electrical
Services portion with its remaining terms. Nema 3 Electric, Inc. has provided their
approval letter (see attached). Groves Electric will remain as the Ballfield Lighting
electrician for portion two of the contract as originally awarded.
Therefore, staff recommends canceling the General Electrical Services portion of the
City's Electrical Services Contract with Pat Dillahey Electric, and awarding this portion
to Nema 3 Electric, Inc. for the remainder of the twelve month period beginning
December 1, 2009, with options to renew an additional four years; and authorizing the
City Manager to sign all necessary documentation.
Staff recommends award of this bid and will be present to answer any questions at the
City Council meeting.
DESCRIPTION UNITSylvania Lighting ServicesHumphrey & Associates, IncNema 3 Electric, Inc.McBride ElectricPat Dillehay ElectricJah Electric GroupFacility Solutions Group - ElectricalGroves ElectricAngiel Electrical Constuction Corp.Ed's Electric Service, incPeak Electric Systems, IncMeet all mimimum labor specificationsyes yes No, #4 yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yesLabor Charge for licensed Master Electrician HR. $110.00 $86.50 $45.00 $64.00 $45.00 $75.00 $65.00 $60.00 $57.21 $85.00 $62.00Overtime Charge for Master Electrician HR. $165.00 $129.75 $67.50 $76.00 $45.00 $112.50 $97.50 $95.00 $81.18 $127.50 $93.00Weekend Charge for Master ElectricianHR. $165.00 $129.75 $67.50 $76.00 $45.00 $112.50 $97.50 $95.00 $105.18 $127.50 $93.00Holiday Charge for Master ElectricianHR. $200.00 $173.00 $67.50 $76.00 $45.00 $112.50 $97.50 $95.00 $105.18 $127.50 $124.00Labor Charge for licensed Journeyman Electrician HR. $85.00 $65.00 $45.00 $48.00 $31.00 $40.00 $48.00 $45.00 $48.81 $85.00 $52.00Overtime Charge for Journeyman Electrician HR. $127.50 $97.50 $67.50 $59.00 $31.00 $60.00 $72.00 $65.00 $68.82 $127.50 $78.00Weekend Charge for Journeyman ElectricianHR. $127.50 $97.50 $67.50 $59.00 $31.00 $60.00 $72.00 $65.00 $88.82 $127.50 $78.00Holiday Charge for Journeyman ElectricianHR. $170.00 $130.00 $67.50 $59.00 $31.00 $60.00 $72.00 $65.00 $88.82 $127.50 $104.00Labor Charge for Electricians Helper HR. $40.00 $35.00 $25.00 $42.00 $23.00 $20.00 $32.00 $30.00 $40.43 $50.00 $28.00Overtime Charge for Electricians Helper HR. $60.00 $52.50 $37.50 $54.00 $23.00 $30.00 $48.00 $45.00 $56.43 $75.00 $42.00Weekend Charge for Electricians HelperHR. $60.00 $52.50 $37.50 $54.00 $23.00 $30.00 $48.00 $45.00 $72.45 $75.00 $42.00Holiday Charge for Electricians HelperHR. $80.00 $70.00 $37.50 $54.00 $23.00 $30.00 $48.00 $45.00 $72.45 $75.00 $56.00Equipment Charge for 30 ft. Aerial Bucket Truck HR. $0.00 $96.00 $45.00 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 $65.00 $20.00 $75.00 $50.00 $50.00Equipment Charge for 50 ft. Aerial Bucket Truck HR. $0.00 $96.00 $45.00 $65.00 $70.00 $125.00 $70.00 $30.00 $75.00 $75.00 $50.00Equipment Charge for 90 ft. Aerial Bucket TruckHR. $100.00 $45.00 $75.00 $174.00 $150.00 $75.00 $50.00 $325.00 $75.00 $118.00Proposed Parts Discount Less 60% RetailLess 35% RetailN/Aless 20% Retailless 30% retailless 5% wholesale, 5% retailless 20% wholesaleless 10% wholesaleCost + 10% & 10%cost +20% wholesaleLess 10% wholesaleOther Charges ListedMisc. Material None1000MH lamp $30none none NoneThermal Imaging $100 per hrnone none None None1000W Ballast $135.Rapelling (2 men) $194.50 per hr1500W lamp = $57. 1500W MH Lamp $40.1500W Z Lamp $75.1500W Ballast $185.BALLFIELD LIGHTING:Lamp Replacement (minimum 15)$152.49 Special Net $59.99$142./Lamp does not include recycle$945.00 $2,016.00 $1,664.00 $3,660.00 $1,094.25 $100.00 each $4,370.00x15 = 855. + 4 hrs labor & truck = $1835.$2,330.00Estimated time of completion (Per 15 Lamps)HR. 1 day -10hrs 8 4 15 8 8 4 1/2 hour 3 days 4 8Ballast Replacement$246.19 Special Net $151.19$485. Ea. $242.50 $362.50 $271.00 $430.00 $195.10 $243.50 each $7,071.00 $335.00 $831.00Estimated time of completionHR. 30 min. 1.25 1/2 hour 2 1 30 min 30 min 1 4 days30 min 4Bid Tabulation- Electrical ServicesOctober 18, 2005 10:00 a.m.
______________________________________________________________________________________
BID Q-0909-03 ELECTRICAL SERVICES
______________________________________________________________________________________
_
CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CITY OF COPPELL * PURCHASING DEPARTMENT * 255 PARKWAY BOULEVARD * COPPELL, TEXAS 75019 Page 1
______________________________________________________________________________________
BID Q-0909-03 ELECTRICAL SERVICES
______________________________________________________________________________________
_
STATE OF TEXAS §
§ AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COUNTY OF DALLAS §
This agreement (“Agreement”) is made by and between the City of Coppell,
Texas (“City”) and Nema 3 Electric, Inc., (the “Professional”) acting by and through
their authorized representatives.
Recitals:
WHEREAS, the City desires to engage the services of Professional as an
independent contractor and not as an employee in accordance with the terms and
conditions set forth in this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Professional desires to render professional services for the City
in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement;
NOW THEREFORE, in exchange for the mutual covenants set forth herein and
other valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
Article I
Term
1.1 This term of this Agreement shall begin on the last date of execution hereof (the
“Effective Date”) and continue on as needed basis.
1.2 Either party may terminate this Agreement by giving thirty (30) days prior
written notice to the other party. In the event of such termination the Professional shall be
entitled to compensation for any services completed to the reasonable satisfaction of the
City in accordance with this Agreement prior to such termination.
Article II
Scope Of Services
2.1 The Professional shall provide the services specifically set out in Exhibit
“A”.
2.2 The parties acknowledge and agree that any and all opinions provided by
the Professional represent the best judgment of the Professional.
CITY OF COPPELL * PURCHASING DEPARTMENT * 255 PARKWAY BOULEVARD * COPPELL, TEXAS 75019 Page 2
______________________________________________________________________________________
BID Q-0909-03 ELECTRICAL SERVICES
______________________________________________________________________________________
_
2.3 All materials and reports prepared by the Professional in connection with
this Agreement are “works for hire” and shall be the property of the City. The City shall
have the right to publish, disclose, distribute and otherwise use such materials and reports
in accordance with the Engineering Practice Act of the State of Texas. Professional shall
upon completion of the services, or earlier termination, provide the City with
reproductions of all materials reports, and exhibits prepared by Professional pursuant to
this Agreement, and in electronic format if requested by the City.
Article III
Schedule Of Work
The Professional agrees to commence services upon written direction from the
City and to complete the required services in accordance with a work schedule
established by the City (the “Work Schedule”).
Article IV
Compensation And Method Of Payment
4.1 The City shall compensate the Professional for the services by payment of
a fee as set out in the schedule attached in Exhibit “A”.
4.2 The Professional shall be responsible for all expenses related to the
services provided pursuant to this Agreement including, but not limited to, travel,
copying and facsimile charges, telephone, internet and email charges.
Article V
Devotion Of Time; Personnel; And Equipment
5.1 The Professional shall devote such time as reasonably necessary for the
satisfactory performance of the work under this Agreement. Should the City require
additional services not included under this Agreement, the Professional shall make
reasonable effort to provide such additional services at mutually agreed charges or rates,
and within the time schedule prescribed by the City; and without decreasing the
effectiveness of the performance of services required under this Agreement.
5.2 To the extent reasonably necessary for the Professional to perform the
services under this Agreement, the Professional shall be authorized to engage the services
of any agents, assistants, persons, or corporations that the Professional may deem proper
to aid or assist in the performance of the services under this Agreement. The cost of such
personnel and assistance shall be borne exclusively by the Professional.
5.3 The Professional shall furnish the facilities, equipment, telephones,
facsimile machines, email facilities, and personnel necessary to perform the services
required under this Agreement unless otherwise provided herein.
CITY OF COPPELL * PURCHASING DEPARTMENT * 255 PARKWAY BOULEVARD * COPPELL, TEXAS 75019 Page 3
______________________________________________________________________________________
BID Q-0909-03 ELECTRICAL SERVICES
______________________________________________________________________________________
_
Article VI
Miscellaneous
6.1 Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the sole and only
agreement between the parties and supersedes any prior understandings written or oral
agreements between the parties with respect to this subject matter.
6.2 Assignment. The Professional may not assign this Agreement in whole or
in part without the prior written consent of City. In the event of an assignment by the
Professional to which the City has consented, the assignee shall agree in writing with the
City to personally assume, perform, and be bound by all the covenants, and obligations
contained in this Agreement.
6.3 Successors and Assigns. Subject to the provisions regarding assignment,
this Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the parties to it and their
respective heirs, executors, administrators, legal representatives, successors and assigns.
6.4 Governing Law. The laws of the State of Texas shall govern this
Agreement; and venue for any action concerning this Agreement shall be in Dallas
County, Texas.
6.5 Amendments. This Agreement may be amended by the mutual written
agreement of the parties.
6.6 Severability. In the event any one or more of the provisions contained in
this Agreement shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any
respect, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not effect any other
provisions, and the Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal, or
unenforceable provision had never been contained in it.
6.7 Independent Contractor. It is understood and agreed by and between the
parties that the Professional in satisfying the conditions of this Agreement, is acting
independently, and that the City assumes no responsibility or liabilities to any third party
in connection with these actions. All services to be performed by Professional pursuant
to this Agreement shall be in the capacity of an independent contractor, and not as an
agent or employee of the City. Professional shall supervise the performance of its
services and shall be entitled to control the manner and means by which its services are to
be performed, subject to the terms of this Agreement.
6.8 Notice. Any notice required or permitted to be delivered hereunder may
be sent by first class mail, overnight courier or by confirmed telefax or facsimile to the
address specified below, or to such other party or address as either party may designate in
writing, and shall be deemed received three (3) days after delivery set forth herein:
If intended for City, to: With copy to:
CITY OF COPPELL * PURCHASING DEPARTMENT * 255 PARKWAY BOULEVARD * COPPELL, TEXAS 75019 Page 4
______________________________________________________________________________________
BID Q-0909-03 ELECTRICAL SERVICES
______________________________________________________________________________________
_
City of Coppell, Texas J. David Dodd, III
Attn: City Manager Nichols, Jackson, Dillard, Hager &
Smith
255 Parkway Blvd. 1800 Lincoln Plaza
Coppell, Texas 75019 500 N. Akard
Facsimile No. (972) 304-3673 Dallas, Texas 75201
Facsimile No. (214) 965-0010
If intended for Professional:
____________
____________
____________
6.9 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed by the parties hereto in
separate counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be an original,
but all such counterparts shall together constitute one and the same instrument. Each
counterpart may consist of any number of copies hereof each signed by less than all, but
together signed by all of the parties hereto.
6.10 Exhibits. The exhibits attached hereto are incorporated herein and made a
part hereof for all purposes.
6.11 Indemnification. CITY SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY LOSS,
DAMAGE, OR INJURY OF ANY KIND OR CHARACTER TO ANY PERSON OR
PROPERTY ARISING FROM THE SERVICES OF THE PROFESSIONAL
PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT. PROFESSIONAL HEREBY WAIVES ALL
CLAIMS AGAINST CITY, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES
(COLLECTIVELY REFERRED TO IN THIS SECTION AS “CITY”) FOR DAMAGE
TO ANY PROPERTY OR INJURY TO, OR DEATH OF, ANY PERSON ARISING AT
ANY TIME AND FROM ANY CAUSE OTHER THAN THE NEGLIGENCE OR
WILLFUL MISCONDUCT OF CITY. PROFESSIONAL AGREES TO INDEMNIFY
AND SAVE HARMLESS CITY FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL
LIABILITIES, DAMAGES, CLAIMS, SUITS, COSTS (INCLUDING COURT COSTS,
ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS OF INVESTIGATION) AND ACTIONS BY
REASON OF INJURY TO OR DEATH OF ANY PERSON OR DAMAGE TO OR
LOSS OF PROPERTY TO THE EXTENT CAUSED BY THE PROFESSIONAL’S
NEGLIGENCE PERFORMANCE OF SERVICES UNDER THIS AGREEMENT OR
BY REASON OF ANY ACT OR OMISSION ON THE PART OF PROFESSIONAL,
ITS OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, SERVANTS, AGENTS, EMPLOYEES,
REPRESENTATIVES, CONTRACTORS, SUBCONTRACTORS, LICENSEES,
SUCCESSORS OR PERMITTED ASSIGNS (EXCEPT WHEN SUCH LIABILITY,
CLAIMS, SUITS, COSTS, INJURIES, DEATHS OR DAMAGES ARISE FROM OR
ARE ATTRIBUTED TO SOLE NEGILGENCE OF THE CITY). IF ANY ACTION OR
PROCEEDING SHALL BE BROUGHT BY OR AGAINST CITY IN CONNECTION
CITY OF COPPELL * PURCHASING DEPARTMENT * 255 PARKWAY BOULEVARD * COPPELL, TEXAS 75019 Page 5
______________________________________________________________________________________
BID Q-0909-03 ELECTRICAL SERVICES
______________________________________________________________________________________
_
WITH ANY SUCH LIABILITY OR CLAIM, THE PROFESSIONAL, ON NOTICE
FROM CITY, SHALL DEFEND SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDINGS AT
PROFESSIONAL’S EXPENSE, BY OR THROUGH ATTORNEYS REASONABLY
SATISFACTORY TO CITY. THE PROFESSIONAL’S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THIS
SECTION SHALL NOT BE LIMITED TO THE LIMITS OF COVERAGE OF
INSURANCE MAINTAINED OR REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED BY
PROFESSIONAL UNDER THIS AGREEMENT. THIS PROVISION SHALL
SURVIVE THE TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT
6.12 Audits and Records. The Professional agrees that during the term hereof
the City and its representatives may, during normal business hours and as often as
deemed necessary, inspect, audit, examine and reproduce any and all of the
Professional’s records relating to the services provided pursuant to this Agreement for a
period of one year following the date of completion of services as determined by the City
or date of termination if sooner.
6.13 Conflicts of Interests. The Professional represents that no official or
employee of
the City has any direct or indirect pecuniary interest in this Agreement.
6.14 Insurance.
(a) Professional shall during the term hereof maintain in full force and effect
the following insurance: (1) a policy of insurance for bodily injury, death
and property damage insuring against all claims, demands or actions
relating to the Professional’s performance of services pursuant to this
Agreement with a minimum combined single limit of not less than
$1,000,000 Dollars per occurrence for injury to persons (including death),
and for property damage; (2) policy of automobile liability insurance
covering any vehicles owned and/or operated by Professional, its officers,
agents, and employees, and used in the performance of this Agreement;
and (3) statutory Worker’s Compensation Insurance covering all of
Professional’s employees involved in the provision of services under this
Agreement.
(b) All insurance and certificate(s) of insurance shall contain the following
provisions: (1) name the City, its officers, agents and employees as additional
insureds as to all applicable coverage with the exception of Workers Compensation
Insurance; (2) provide for at least thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City for
cancellation, non-renewal, or material change of the insurance; (3) provide for a
waiver of subrogation against the City for injuries, including death, property damage,
or any other loss to the extent the same is covered by the proceeds of insurance.
(c) All insurance companies providing the required insurance shall either be
authorized to transact business in Texas and rated at least “B” by AM Best or other
CITY OF COPPELL * PURCHASING DEPARTMENT * 255 PARKWAY BOULEVARD * COPPELL, TEXAS 75019 Page 6
______________________________________________________________________________________
BID Q-0909-03 ELECTRICAL SERVICES
______________________________________________________________________________________
_
equivalent rating service, or approved by the City Risk Manager. (d) A certificate of
insurance evidencing the required insurance shall be submitted to the City prior to
commencement of services.
EXECUTED this _______ day of _____________________, 2010.
City of Coppell, Texas
By: _________________________________
Clay Phillips, City Manager
Approved as to form:
By: ___________________________________
J. David Dodd, III, City Attorney
EXECUTED this _______ day of _____________________, 2010.
Professional
By: _________________________________
Name:
Title:
CITY OF COPPELL * PURCHASING DEPARTMENT * 255 PARKWAY BOULEVARD * COPPELL, TEXAS 75019 Page 7
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
Police
January 26, 2010
11/D
✔
ORDINANCE
Consider approval of an ordinance of the City of Coppell, Texas, readopting, ratifying, republishing and extending
Ordinance No. 2003-1030, providing for curfew hours for minors in the City of Coppell, Texas, for a period of three (3)
years; providing a repealing clause; providing a severability clause; and providing an effective date; and authorizing
the Mayor to sign.
In March of 2000 the City Council passed and adopted Ordinance No. 2000-906, which provides for "Curfew Hours for
Minors" establishing such curfew hours and penalties for violations thereof. Chapter 370.002 of the Texas Local
Government Code provides that the City Council shall review the Article and conditions the ordinance was intended
to remedy three (3) years from its date of passage and every third year thereafter. In March 2003 and in February
2007 the City Council readopted and extended this Ordinance No. 2003-1030.
The City of Coppell Police Department desires to continue Ordinance No. 2003-1010 without any modifications, and
schedule the same for review in February 2013.
Staff recommends approval.
)Curfew Ordinance
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
Clay Phillips, City Manager
Mario Canizares, Deputy City Manager
XC: File
FROM: Roy L Osborne, Chief of Police
DATE: January 11, 2010
REF: Curfew Ordinance Extension
This memorandum is attached to an agenda item requesting to extend the Curfew
Ordinance for an additional three years as required by law. The Police Department has
found this ordinance to be a useful tool to help not only the department, but the parents of
Coppell. This ordinance allows our parents to provide a guideline for controlling the hours
kept by their children under the age of 17.
Over the last three years, our officers have issued ninety five (95) citations for violation of
this ordinance, but more importantly we have used this ordinance to bring parents into the
process to allow them an opportunity to work directly with the department and the
Municipal Court to make sure their children are not only in compliance with the law, but
in compliance with the rules of their home.
While this ordinance extension is considered somewhat routine, failing to extend the
ordinance may result in consequences that are less than routine.
Your consideration of the ordinance extension is appreciated.
Thank you.
Page 1 40893
ORDINANCE NO. ______________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS,
READOPTING, RATIFYING, REPUBLISHING AND EXTENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 2003-1030, CODIFIED AS CHAPTER 9 OF THE CODE
OF ORDINANCES, ARTICLE 9-17, CURFEW HOURS FOR MINORS,
FOR A PERIOD OF THREE (3) YEARS; PROVIDING A REPEALING
CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council has previously passed and adopted Ordinance No. 2003-
1030, which provides for “Curfew Hours for Minors” establishing such curfew hours and
penalties for violations thereof; and
WHEREAS, the “Curfew Hours for Minors” was readopted by Ordinance No. 2007-
1158 on February 27, 2007; and
WHEREAS, such Ordinance has been codified as Chapter 9, Article 9-17, Sections 9-
17-1 through 9-17-6, of the Code of Ordinances; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 370.002 of the TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE, as amended,
provides that the City Council shall review the Article and conditions the ordinance was intended
to remedy three (3) years from its date of passage and every third year thereafter and conduct
public hearings to determine the need to continue, modify or abolish the ordinance; and
WHEREAS, prior to the expiration of such three (3) year period, the Police Department
has furnished records and reports indicating the need for such ordinance to remain in effect; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to continue the provisions of the Code without any
modifications and schedule the same for review in February 2013.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 2003-1030, and Ordinance No. 2007-1158 codified as
Chapter 9, Article 9-17, Sections 9-17-1 through 9-17-6 of the Code of Ordinances is hereby
readopted, ratified, republished and extended from the date of its execution and shall remain in
effect through February 2013, unless otherwise terminated under the provisions of State law.
Page 2 40893
SECTION 2. That all provisions of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Coppell, Texas,
in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same are hereby, repealed, and all other
provisions not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 3. That should any word, phrase, paragraph, or section of this ordinance or of
the Code of Ordinances, as amended hereby, be held to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, the
same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole, or any part or provision thereof other
than the part so decided to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, and shall not affect the validity of
the Code of Ordinances as a whole.
SECTION 4. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its
passage and publication, as the law and charter in such cases provide.
DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, this ___ day of
_______________, 2010.
APPROVED:
By:
JAYNE PETERS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
By:
LIBBY BALL, CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
ROBERT E. HAGER, CITY ATTORNEY
(JDD/ajh 1/14/10)
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
Finance
January 26, 2010
12
✔
PROCEDURAL
Consider approval of the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009.
The audit firm of Grant Thornton will present the results of the financial audit.
Staff recommends acceptance of the Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report.
$CAFR-1AR
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
ȱ
City Manager's Office
January 26, 2010
13
✔
PROCEDURAL
Consider appointments to the Coppell Economic Development Foundation for a one year term.
Each year, City Council appoints four members from the Economic Development Committee to serve one-year terms
on the Coppell Economic Development Foundation. The nominees recommended by the Economic Development
Committee for 2010 are Bill Rohloff, Gary Roden, Bradley Snyder, Kenneth Luttmer and James Walker.
Consider appointments to the Coppell Economic Development
Foundation for a one year term.
!CEDF Appointments - 1AR
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
Police
January 26, 2010
14
✔
CONTRACT/BID or PROPOSAL
Consider approval to accept Proposal #th71516c from Ford Audio-Video to equip the Coppell Police Training Room
with audio/video equipment in the amount of $88,423.00; and authorizing the City Manager to sign all necessary
paperwork and documentation.
The Coppell Police Training Room is used for in-house training of law enforcement personnel as well as training for
other metroplex law enforcement agencies. It is necessary to equip this room with specific audio-video capabilities in
order to provide this type of training, most of which is mandated by the State of Texas, as well as other Police
Department meetings and functions. The City obtained proposals for this project in compliance with the Texas
Government Code, Section 2157.0611.
Funds are available in the Police Forfeiture/Seizure Fund for this purchase.
Staff recommends approval.
)Training Room
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
Clay Phillips, City Manager
Mario Canizares, Deputy City Manager
XC: File
FROM: Roy L Osborne, Chief of Police
DATE: January 11, 2010
REF: PD Training Room / Technology Equipment Purchase
The agenda item this memorandum is attached to is the culmination of a long term project to
purchase and install multi-media equipment for the Police Department Training Room. We have
worked diligently with our Information Systems Department and with the Purchasing
Department in finding the needed level of technology to provide an environment that will work
for our internal trainers as well as any guest instructors that may come to our facility to provide
local and regional law enforcement training.
All of the items needed to make this work well for all will be purchased from the Narcotics
Seizure Fund. As you know, these are funds that have been awarded to the Police Department
through the judicial system as a result of our investigative work in narcotics enforcement with
the department’s Organized Crime Unit (OCU). In essence, no tax payer dollars will be used in
the project and the “crooks” are footing the bill.
If I may answer any questions, please let me know.
Thank you for your consideration of this agenda item.
Memorandum
Date: 12/01/09
To: Roy L. Osborne, Chief of Police
From: Steve Thomas, Deputy Chief of Police
Reference: Training Room Upgrade
Over the past several months, members of our command staff and the city’s
Information Technology department have been working together to help design
a modern, integrated and user-friendly training room conducive to our unique
purposes. After determining our “wants and needs”, we sought out area
vendors and met with their representatives to help us address any logistical
concerns that had not yet been raised or considered. In addition to these
questions, we also discussed the functionality of the room and how each piece
of instructional media we selected for purchase needed to perform seamlessly
with, or sufficiently replace, products already being utilized by the department
(I.E. interview/interrogation rooms, vehicle recording systems, etc.).
We received four (4) proposals from area vendors for consideration. An
additional meeting was scheduled to look at each proposal and then select the
group best able to meet our needs. The entity and quotes from each are listed
below:
1. Insight Video $ 85,150
2. CCS $110,827
3. Videotex $ 67,890
4. Ford A/V $ 88,423
The decision was unanimous to accept Dallas-based Ford Audio/Video and
their quote of $88,423.00. Insight was unresponsive and difficult to work with
throughout the process. They were often unable to make meeting appointments,
provide specifics of equipment being proposed, or answer questions about the
functionality.
Videotex was able to put together a plan, but there was never a great deal of
comfort on our part that the components were known to be a good match with
each other. Questions asked in the meetings with Videotex often included plans
to get back to us with how one part or another would work. Their
representative was helpful, but not able to answer technical questions to the
extent we would have preferred.
Ford A/V has extensive experience with rooms such as this. We felt that the
quality of their work (as evidenced through their completion of prior city
contracts) and willingness to provide a comprehensive technical support plan
made them the best candidate. It should also be noted that Ford A/V was also
the only vendor that offered to take us to alternate locations and view similar
projects they had completed for other municipalities throughout the metroplex.
A Ford representative provided us with a guided tour of a recently completed
classroom at the FEMA offices in Dallas. This room provided the same level of
technology and functionality that we are looking for in our facility.
I look forward to answering any questions concerning this process or the
selection of Ford A/V as our preferred vendor.
Xc: File
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
Parks and Recreation
January 26, 2010
15
✔
PROCEDURAL
Consider approval of the final Coppell Community-Wide Trails Implementation Plan.
See attached memo.
Staff recommends approval.
^Trail Implementation Plan-1 AR
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
Date: January 26, 2010
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Brad Reid, Director of Parks and Recreation
Re: Consider approval of the Coppell Community-Wide Trail Implementation Plan.
Background:
A new Trail System Master Plan has been a desire of the Coppell Recreation
Development Corporation for the past couple of years. They have desired to have a fresh
document to turn to when determining priorities for recommending development of new
trail sections. The Parks and Recreation staff and the CRDC have been working with the
consultant, TBG Partners, since January 2009, in an effort to finalize an updated City-
Wide Trail System Implementation Plan. The CRDC has reviewed the proposals
recommended in the plan over the past months, and now forward the plan to the City
Council for review.
The consultant was instructed to concentrate their efforts on a true implementation plan,
not simply a master plan that reflected a “dream” trail system. The CRDC wanted to
make the determination of what trail sections were realistic as relate to ownership and
accessibility questions, and develop realistic expectations as far as funding and possible
implementation timeframes are concerned. They had further goals to provide an avenue
for public input into the process, create a multi-use type trail system, improve linkages
throughout the city and throughout the region, and bring together various city
departments to review and recommend solutions and advise where appropriate.
The proposed Community-Wide Trail Implementation Plan accomplishes these goals and
sets the stage for years of implementation and creative solutions to bringing connectivity
to the citizens of Coppell.
The City Council reviewed, and approved the Final Draft of this Master Plan document at
the October 27, 2009 meeting. Some minor adjustments have been made to the
document for final review and consideration. These modifications primarily involve
changes to the text and grammar from that reflected in the Final Draft version. No trail
sections have been altered. The CRDC approved the final version of the plan at their
January 4, 2010 meeting. The Board heard from several neighbors during this meeting
who expressed the desire to alter two sections of the proposed trail. The first was the
Grapevine Creek Park Trail that enters the park from Bethel School Road and travels
south toward the Cotton Belt Rail Line. The neighbors believe this section of trail is
unnecessary and will cause the adjacent homeowners hardship. The talking points
received from this group are enclosed with your agenda back-up. The second proposed
trail section that came under fire was the Magnolia Park Trail, along the north side of
Denton Creek, connecting the trail at Magnolia Park with the section that will ultimately
connect to the city of Lewisville trail system. A couple of Magnolia neighbors spoke at
the meeting recommending that the proposed section of trail aligned through the park be
eliminated in favor of a bridge across Denton Creek to make a connection to the trail on
the south side of the creek, creating the only access to the west on the existing trail
behind the Copperstone subdivision. This will eliminate the possibility of connecting to
the Lewisville system unless another bridge is constructed across the creek near the
western end of the Denton Creek Trail.
City Council Action requested:
Consider approval of the proposed Coppell Community-Wide Trail Implementation Plan.
Staff Recommendation:
Approval of this item.
Making Connections Reality...Community-Wide Trails Implementation Plan“This is the vision, to create a changed transportation system that offers not only choices among travel modes for specifi c trips, but more importantly presents these options so that they are real choices that meet the needs of individuals and society as a whole. Making this vision a reality must begin now.” - The National Bicycling and Walking Study December 2009
Making Connections RealityTable of ContentsAcknowledgments................................................................................................................................A. Introduction...................................................................................................................................... Why Should We Plan for a Trails System?....................................................................................... Purpose of the Community-Wide Trails Implementation Plan.......................................................... Promoting a Healthy Lifestyle........................................................................................................... Economic Benefi ts............................................................................................................................ Alternative Transportation................................................................................................................. Conserving and Appreciating the Environment................................................................................. Planning the Coppell of Today and Tomorrow................................................................................... Process............................................................................................................................................. Previous Trail Recommendations.....................................................................................................B. Community Involvement & Regional Coordination.......................................................... Community Input Meeting................................................................................................................ Community Input and Design Breakout Session.............................................................................. Community Survey and Input........................................................................................................... Community Input Summary.............................................................................................................. Regional Planning and Transportation Efforts.................................................................................. DART Meeting Summary...................................................................................................... NCTCOG Meeting Summary................................................................................................ NCTCOG Mobility 2030........................................................................................................ City of Carrollton................................................................................................................... City of Irving.......................................................................................................................... City of Lewisville................................................................................................................... City of Grapevine..................................................................................................................C. Goals................................................................................................................................................... Goals................................................................................................................................................D. Trail Design Standards & Guidelines..................................................................................... Users of the Trails............................................................................................................................ Types of Trails.................................................................................................................................. Trail Defi nitions................................................................................................................................. Trail Destinations.............................................................................................................................. Trail Features................................................................................................................................... Trail Design Standards.....................................................................................................................iii.A1A2A2A2A3A3A3A4A5A6B1B2B3B4B6B7B7B8B9B11B11B11B11C1C2D1D2D3D4D5D7D9-i-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanE. City of Coppell Trails Master Plan............................................................................................ General Overview............................................................................................................................. Trails Master Plan............................................................................................................................. Trail Connections with Adjacent Cities.............................................................................................. Community-Wide Spine Trails...........................................................................................................F. Priority Trail Implementation....................................................................................................... Prioritized Trails Overview................................................................................................................. Prioritized Trails Master Plan............................................................................................................. Denton Creek East Trail.................................................................................................................... OHP Utility Corridor Trail...................................................................................................................Irving Connector Trail........................................................................................................................ North Levee Trail............................................................................................................................... MacArthur Blvd. Trail......................................................................................................................... Grapevine Creek Park Trail...............................................................................................................Levee Bridge Connector Trail............................................................................................................Moore Road Trail...............................................................................................................................Denton Creek Park Trail.................................................................................................................... Cottonwood Creek Trail..................................................................................................................... Grapevine Springs Park Trail.............................................................................................................North Lake College Connector Trail................................................................................................... Wagon Wheel - Jr. College Connector Trail.......................................................................................G. Summary..........................................................................................................................................Summary............................................................................................................................................H. Appendix...........................................................................................................................................Inventory and Analysis Information..................................................................................................... Plats....................................................................................................................................... Aerials.................................................................................................................................... Photos................................................................................................................................... Cost & Available Funding................................................................................................................... Cost Estimates....................................................................................................................... Funding Sources....................................................................................................................E1E2E3E4E6F1F2F3F4F6F8F10F12F14F16F18F20F22F24F26F28G1G2H1H2CDCDCDCDCDCD-ii-
Making Connections RealityAcknowledgementsThe 2009 Community-Wide Trails Implementation Plan was an effort of many. The plan developed by the City of Coppell Parks and Recreation Department, with the technical and design assistance of TBG Part-ners, Inc., provides a trail implementation strategy for the City of Coppell for the next decade and beyond. Special thanks are merited by the general community and community leaders for their insight and support throughout this study’s duration.Mayor: Jayne PetersCity Council:Marsha TunnellTim BrancheauBob MahalikBrianna Hinojosa-FloresBilly FaughtMarvin FranklinKaren Hunt, Mayor Pro TemPark Board:Greg GarciaMark TepperJack ClarkLarry JonesDixon RichScott SumpterTerra TaylorBrian BrandstetterCarolyn HornerAlesa HillerTaylor MaysStaff:City Manager - Clay PhillipsDeputy City Manager - Mario Canizares*Director of Parks and Recreation - Brad Reid*Assistant Director of Parks and Recreation - Guy McLain*Park Operation’s Manager - John EliasCity Engineer - Ken Griffi nPlanning Director - Gary SiebTBG Partners Inc. (consultant):*Mark Meyer*James Knapp*Ken Howell* - Task Force team-iii-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanA. Introduction...Facilitated by the continuing efforts of the City of Coppell to provide an enhanced quality of life for all of its citizens, this planning effort studied the community’s short- and long-term trail opportunities. This plan is designed to formulate strategies, through the creation of a connected network of trails within the City and beyond, to manage future oppor-tunities and challenges, which are discussed further herein.-A1-
Making Connections RealityWhy Should We Plan for a Trails System?Trails play a vital role in our individual well-being, our local economy, the environment and traffi c congestion relief. Communities across America consistently cite trails as one of their most popular recreational activi-ties and they are often the single most-requested community amenity. Trails strengthen a community’s social fabric, and people of all income brackets, age groups and cultures will be able to travel throughout the City of Coppell and enjoy trail-based recreational experiences.Purpose of the Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanThe Coppell 2030 Vision Plan was established to ensure that a high quality of life will be maintained while allowing for growth in the City and region. The plan is designed to formulate strategies to manage future opportunities and challenges. It provides guidance on the preferred location for trail corridors as new devel-opment and redevelopment take place and will also help the City acquire greenbelt corridors for trail use.One of the 2030 Vision’s fi ve pillars focuses on Community Wellness and Enrichment and addresses the need and importance of a multi-use trail system connecting the City. While this is the primary objective, a Community-Wide Trails Implementation Plan will support and bring additional meaning to the other four pillars that address Business Prosperity, Sustainable City Government, Sense of Community and a Special Place to Live. To remain a viable tool for the City of Coppell, this implementation plan is intended to be fl exible and adapt to growth and changes occurring in the City. The plan is intended to provide guidance for many years; however it should be periodically updated. Each update should refl ect current conditions within the City, its neighboring communities, and the region as a whole. Promoting a Healthy LifestyleTrails can provide meaningful and satisfying out-door experiences for many users while providing accessible, widely available and low-cost oppor-tunities to meet most individuals’ physical activity needs. According to the Mayo Clinic, individuals need at least 30 minutes of daily physical activity to help live longer and healthier. Studies show that walking or hiking a few times per week can improve a person’s physical and mental health, reduce stress and lower health care costs. Anticipated community benefi ts of increased participation in physical fi tness include reductions in both the direct and indirect costs of illness and disease, improve-ment in lifestyle and a reduction in geriatric costs.IntroductionPurpThe Callowoppoopme“To walk; to see and to see what you see.” - Benton MacKaye-A2-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanEconomic Benefi tsAn organized, well-managed trail system is a desirable city amenity that can contribute to a community’s economic vitality. Trails can guide both visitors and residents through diverse neighborhoods, past interest-ing shops, enticing restaurants and many other community amenities. Revenue generated from trail-related recreation and sports activities provides substantial income and employment opportunities. Trails also typi-cally increase property values, and studies have shown that properties located near trails generally sell for 5 to 30 percent more than those farther away.Alternative TransportationAmericans continue to spend more and more time in traffi c congestion and spend millions of dollars purchas-ing, operating and maintaining their automobiles. Studies show that 50 percent of all car excursions are less than three miles, a distance that could easily be walked or biked. A network of trails can enhance Coppell’s transportation system by providing an alternative means of getting to places of employment, retail areas, and key city destinations such as schools, libraries, parks, amenity centers and City Hall.Conserving and Appreciating the EnvironmentTrails play an important role in supporting environmental education and building a public commitment to environmental conservation. Meaningful outdoor experiences can reaffi rm one’s sense of connection to and appreciation of the natural environment.Introduction (Cont.)Creating healthy habits by build-ing healthy communities.....-A3-
Making Connections RealityPlanning the Coppell of Today and TomorrowThe existing Coppell hike and bike trail system is designed to encompass the many different back-grounds, needs and wants of residents who share a common desire to live in a city providing facili-ties that foster a high quality of life. To keep the City moving forward with a more holistic and com-plete trails system, it is important to consider the context of the City both today and in the future, looking at the many key destinations and attractions planned within Coppell and beyond.Coppell has several existing trails throughout the City that are generally well conceived by the com-munity and typically well used by area residents. A multitude of trail surface types exist within these existent trail areas as well as a variety of different scenic vistas and unique adventures to experi-ence.TBG Partners’ analysis of existing Coppell trails resulted in two primary concerns. First, the current design width of some existing trails segments may not be able to support signifi cant numbers of users or the variety of trail users. Second, many gaps still exist in linking the existing trails together, as well as to City destinations and attractions. Establishing these connections will signifi cantly in-crease the number of trail users in Coppell.For the trails to achieve maximum effi cacy, this plan considers the context of the City today, look-ing at the many key destinations within and adjacent to the City that should be accessible from the trails system. The plan also considers regional planning efforts being made by the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) and the Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) authority, as well as efforts being made by cities surrounding Coppell’s municipal boundaries.Because Coppell is largely developed and landlocked by adjacent cities, population growth will be modest in ensuing years. According to NCTCOG data, the City has a population of approximately 40,000 residents, with growth projected to top out around 45,000 by 2020. Moreover, since Coppell is mostly developed, there are many opportunities and challenges for trail corridors. Such efforts will require working with and cooperation from residential property owners and commercial busi-nesses to make this trail system complete, and missing links in the system should be avoided to ensure a complete system with lasting impact for the City.An additional consideration is any future development planned around North Lake, which is not contained within City demographic numbers. This land is within the Dallas city limits, but the north-ern portion is owned by the City of Coppell. The most signifi cant area growth will most likely be around North Lake, and careful planning and studies should be done to incorporate a trail system around the lake that connects into the larger City trail system.Bemo40is mwilneenAncoernaroaro“Few actions can do more to make urban areas safer, healthier, prettier, and more environmentally balanced than setting aside corridors or trails for walking, biking, wildlife watching, and just plain breaking up the mo-notony of cars and concrete.” - James Snyder-A4-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanProcess- Establish Task Force- Defi ne Time Frame- Compile City Data- Review Previous Plans- Inventory Existing Trails- Identify Citywide Trail Opportunities- Identify Key City Desti-nations- Develop Guiding Princi-pals and Goals- Identify and Defi ne TrailOpportunities- Seek Input from Task Force- Seek Input from Citizens- Develop Trails Master Plan- Develop Design Stan-dards and Guideline- Identify Trail Prioritiza-tion- Defi ne Funding Sources- Place Before City Coun-cil for Approval- Implementation of Trails Plan by Parks DepartmentThe trail-planning process will need to include signifi cant input from community members, City staff, stakeholders and other entities in determining the best and highest use of a trail system connecting the City’s community.y-Wide Trails Implementation Plan“In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks.” - John Muir-A5-
Making Connections RealityIn July 1995 a Trail System Master Plan had been developed by Newman, Jackson, Bieberstein, Inc. and approved by the City. The plan’s purpose was to give long-range development direction to a trail system serving the needs of pedestrians and bicyclists. The system anticipated a trail net-work composed of a “dedicated off-road hike/bike system located in road right-of-ways, greenbelts and linear parks, and a system of bicycle routes utilizing the existing and proposed thoroughfares.”The Trail System Master Plan identifi ed the following general goals:- Encourage the creation of a linear park system- Utilize existing rail and utility corridors- Connect to recognized trail corridors and greenways- Encourage and promote pedestrian and bicycle access- Link existing parks, schools and public facilities- Promote bicycle use as a viable personal transportation mode- Increase safety for both pedestrians and bicyclists- Provide a barrier-free system offering accessibility to the physically impairedThe development of a community-wide trails system has been a goal of the City for many years. To remain a viable tool for the City of Coppell, this implementation plan is intended to be fl exible and adapt to growth and changes occurring in the City. The plan is intended to provide guidance for many years; however it should be periodically updated. Each update should refl ect current conditions within the City, its neighboring communities, and the region as a whole.Previous Trail RecommendationsExhibit 1 - Off-Road Trail SystemExhibit 2 - On-Road Bicycle Route System-A6-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanB. Community Involvement & Regional Coordination...Through meaningful public partici-pation and close coordination with other city and state entities, the con-sulting team and City staff learned a great deal about the community’s hopes and aspirations for future trails. Regional trails and commuter rail plans that affect Coppell were also carefully studied and incorpo-rated into this document. This sec-tion provides insight into communi-ty objectives and the future plans of adjacent cities and state agencies.-B1-
Making Connections RealityCommunity Input MeetingOn April 1, 2009, a community in-put and work session meeting was held at the Coppell City Hall. About 23 individuals from the community attended, offering their thoughts, concerns, input and opinions on how they would like to see trails laid out within their community and connected locally and regionally.The introduction to the project was made by Brad Reid, Director of Parks and Recreation, and then Mark Meyer, Principal at TBG Part-ners, presented TBG’s scope and role for the project to the community members in atten-dance. The presentation included short- and long-term goals and implementation strategies for the community-wide trails master plan, as well as City-to-City coordination efforts taking place to connect Coppell trails.For the next 30 to 40 minutes, participants formed three groups for the design breakout session to draw, discuss, and make note of what were seen as good opportunities for trails and trail connections within the local community and adjacent cities. Task Force members worked with each group as facilitators, providing answers to questions and making note of comments made by the participants.Each of the three groups then took a few minutes to share with everyone their ideas for a community-wide trail system. These ideas have become the inspiration for many of the recommendations con-tained within the implementation plan.-B2-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation Planmmunity-Wide Trails Implementation PlanCommunity Input and Design Breakout SessionsThe illustrations below represent some of the outcome of the work session from each of the three groups.“A well-maintained trail is fun to hike on. With a broad, well-marked path free of debris, hikers can concentrate more on their surroundings and less on the footpath.” - Victoria Logue-B3-
Making Connections Reality“In nature we never see anything iso-lated, but everything in connection with something else which is before it, beside it, under it and over it.” - Johann Wolfgang von GoetheSurvey Questions1. How long have you lived in the City of Coppell? 2. In the last 12 months, have you or your family utilized a hike and bike trail in the: (check all that apply)3. Based on your impressions in regards to the current City trails, how would you rate the City of Coppell in the terms of...a.) The number of hike and bike trails.................................................b.) The variety of amenities along trials...............................................c.) The convenience of access to the current hike and bike trails.......d.) Overall quality of the City hike and bike trails................................e.) Overall safety of the City hike and bike trails.................................4. What is your primary reason for using the City’s trail system?a.) Walking for leisure (circle WITH or WITHOUT a dog)....................b.) Walking for exercise (circle WITH or WITHOUT a dog).................c.) Jogging / Running...........................................................................d.) Cycling for leisure...........................................................................e.) Cycling for exercise........................................................................f. ) Cycling high-speed.........................................................................g.) Mountain biking..............................................................................h.) In-line skating, scooters, or other form...........................................i. ) __________________________________....................................5. In planning trails, what do you consider to be the most important characteristic for trails to include?a.) Connectivity to key destinations in the city....................................b.) Scenery / views..............................................................................c.) Natural areas / walking paths.........................................................d.) Trail amenities................................................................................e.) SQtiCommunity Survey & Input E G F P NO□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ < 1 year □ 2-4 years □ 5-7 years □ 8+ years□ City □ County □ Metro □ Elsewhere in TexasVO O S N NO□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □SF F A SA NO□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □E = ExcellentG = GoodF = FairP = PoorNO = No OpinionVO = Very OftenO = OftenS = SeldomN = NeverNO = No OpinionSF = Strongly ForF = ForA = AgainstSA = Strongly AgainstNO = No OpinionDuring the community input and work session held on April 1, 2009, there were 21 surveys turned in with the fol-lowing results...-B4-.□ □ □ □ □□□□□□□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□□□□□10% 52% 24% 14% 0%5% 43% 29% 14% 10%10% 19% 57% 14% 0%14% 57% 14% 14% 0%24% 52% 14% 10% 0% □□ □ □ □□ □□..□ □ □ □ □□□□□□□ □ □ □ □□□□□□□ □ □ □ □□□□□□□ □ □ □ □□□□□□□ □ □ □ □0% 43% 48% 0% 10%10% 48% 38% 5% 0%5% 14% 14% 29% 38%10% 29% 8% 10% 14%19% 38% 24% 5% 14% 10% 10% 5% 38% 38%5% 10% 10% 38% 38%0% 5% 14% 43% 38%□□□□□□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□□□□□52% 33% 5% 0% 10%24% 67% 5% 0% 5%24% 52% 24% 0% 0%14% 67% 14% 5% 0% 5% 10% 19% 67%100% 52% 48% 33%Avoid street crossings. Width for pedestrian & bike. Long uninterrupted stretches. Mile markers. Safety signs with instructions. Preservation of sensitive areas.(3)(8)(9)(3)
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanCommunity Survey & Input6. Of the following trail amenities, how strongly would you support or oppose each? a.) Directional signage and/or map............................................. b.) Mile markers.......................................................................... c.) Trailhead marker with informational kiosk.............................. d.) Lights along some primary trails............................................ e.) Bike racks.............................................................................. f. ) Fitness stations along trail..................................................... g.) Benches and/or picnic tables................................................. h.) Restrooms.............................................................................. i. ) Nature / scenic viewing areas................................................ j. ) Parking at major trail entrances.............................................7. The development of a community-wide trail system may require some trails to run adjacent to neigh-borhoods and in some cases, homes. If necessary, how strongly would you support or oppose a trail adjacent to your home?8. If a trail system were located close to your home or place of work, how likely or unlikely would you be to use it for:“One touch of nature makes the whole world kin.” - William ShakespeareSS S O SO NO□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ SS □ S □ O □ SO □ NOVL L U VU NO□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □SS S O SO NO□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ VL □ L □ U □ VL □ NOSS = Strongly SupportS = SupportO = OpposeSO = Strongly OpposeNO = No OpinionVL = Very LikelyL = LikelyU = UnlikelyVU = Very UnlikelyNO = No Opiniona.) Visit friends / relatives in other neighborhoods............................b.) Travel to nearby restaurant, retail, or grocery stores...................c.) Travel to and from work...............................................................d.) Explore other parts of the city......................................................e.) Connect to Park and Ride Facilities............................................9. What type of surface of trails do you prefer for your particular trail use?a.) Concrete path..............................................................................b.) Natural / Non-Paved path............................................................c.) On-street designated bike path....................................................10. If a street had a designated on-street bike lane, either as a system of on-street trails or a connector to other types of trail surfaces, how likely would you use it?11. Additional thoughts, input, or considerations....Sporting Events. Parks. Frisbee Golf-B5-...□□□□□□ □ □ □ □□□□□□□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□□□□□□ □ □ □ □□□□□□□ □ □ □ □□□□□□24% 57% 5% 0% 14%38% 52% 0% 0% 10%19% 52% 5% 0% 24%19% 52% 10% 0% 19%14% 52% 10% 0% 24% 14% 38% 24% 0% 24%10% 67% 5% 0% 19%24% 62% 5% 0% 10%19% 52% 5% 0% 24%29% 62% 0% 0% 10%□ □□ □ □ 43% 48% 5% 0% 5%□□□□□□ □ □ □ □□□□□□□ □ □ □ □□□□□□..48% 43% 5% 0% 5%43% 43% 10% 0% 5%19% 14% 24% 24% 19%52% 43% 0% 0% 5%48% 10% 24% 5% 14% □□□□□□ □ □ □ □□□□□□...52% 43% 0% 0% 5%38% 43% 5% 5% 10%48% 19% 10% 10% 14%□□□□□48% 29% 14% 5% 5%For on street bike lane, use “sharro” instead. Concern with to many street intersections make bike lanes unsafe (x2). Need more bike trails (x2). Need mile markers and fountains. Able to ride without fear of cars. Important to be able to ride to local stores. Model off of Portland OR. and Minneapolis MN trail systems...very natural, non-invasive, extensive. Less cement the better. Need bike lanes throughout city streets. Connectiv-ity, signage, and safety important. Need bike parking at destinations. Multi-use trails need to be plenty wide for multi use. More natural trails along paved trails. Keep it simple and low maintenance.
Making Connections RealityCommunity Input SummaryCommunity input is a critical part of the planning process. In order to develop a successful, com-prehensive and long-term plan, community needs and goals must be met. After all, citizens of the community are the ones that ultimately will fund, support and utilize the facilities being planned.Some of the key comments and input the community provided during the work session included: • Connect missing links between existing trail segments. • Look for opportunities to connect to trail systems in adjacent cities. • Provide strong connection to the retail north of Hwy. 121, east of Denton Tap Road. • Provide trails around North Lake in Dallas, and develop a plan with opportunities to connect into any potential future trails around North Lake. • Connect the two main City parks, Andrew Brown Community Park and Wagon Wheel Park. • Provide a bridge on the northeast portion of Andrew Brown Community Park to connect trails located on the north and south sides of Denton Creek. • Provide a stronger, more-defi ned connection between Coppell High School and Coppell Town Center. • Provide connection to key City destinations. • Provide for connection to future DART stations being developed to the east of the City. • Design the system to address personal safety concerns when users travel near moving vehicles. • Provide a variety of trail surfaces and trail amenities.Three primary objectives were derived from the comments and concerns expressed through the survey and during work sessions:• Connections: Not only is there a need for trails to connect to one another, but also to key City destinations, to adjacent City trail systems and to future DART stations.• Trail surface options: Provide a hierarchy of trail surface options ranging from concrete paths to natural/nature trails and on-street bike lanes. • Trail amenities: Provide a variety of trail amenities such as mile markers, parking, rest-rooms and directional signage.“Participation, I think, is one of the best methods of educating.” - Tom Glazer-B6-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanAs part of TBG’s efforts to coordinate future priority trail plans with various stakeholder agen-cies, TBG met with representatives of DART (Dallas Area Rapid Transit) to discuss its policy on trails establishment within the Cotton Belt Rail Line. This existing freight rail line runs east/west through the southern portion of the City and is currently owned by DART. The NCTCOG has identifi ed the Cotton Belt rail corridor as a part of its Mobility 2030 plan, which is described in more detail on page B9.Typically, such rail corridors were designed with a 100 foot right-of way (ROW) with existing tracks centered within the ROW. Any trail system developed within the ROW is required to have a license agreement approved by DART and must be designed with a minimum of 25 feet from the centerline of the tracks to the trail’s nearest edge. To allow future design fl exibility for rail service, DART prefers to have trails designed toward the edge of the ROW, so all trail crossings would be required to be located at existing at-grade intersections or grade-separated locations approved by DART.In May 2009, DART and the Fort Worth Trans-portation Authority (“The T”) released a Request for Information (RFI) to identify individuals and fi rms interested in a public/private partnership for the Cotton Belt Commuter Rail Line. Be-cause a partnership agreement has been es-tablished, engineering and design teams have been engaged and conceptual design work has begun within the corridor, it would be highly un-likely that DART would consider a license agree-ment for any trail system within this corridor. No hard timeframe has been established for such activities at present, but it is likely that concept planning for the corridor, which would address the number and location of tracks as well as station locations, is several years into the future. DART does not provide funding for any trail sys-tem development within its rail corridors.Regional Planning and Transportation EffortsDART Meeting Summary - July 23, 2009“There are many benefi ts of trails and greenways that planners, funders, and the public need to know about: they make our communities more liveable; improve the economy through tourism and civic improvement; preserve and restore open space; and provide opportunities for physical activity to improve fi tness and mental health.” - American Trails Organization“All truly great thoughts are conceived by walking.” - Friedrich Nietzsche-B7-
Making Connections RealityNCTCOG Meeting Summary - July 24, 2009Following TBG’s meeting with DART regarding opportunities for trail development along the Cotton Belt Rail Line, TBG met with an NCTCOG representative. The meeting’s purpose was for TBG to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of NCTCOG’s plans for the regional Veloweb and the agency’s involvement in trail sections that would become a part of the regional Veloweb system. NCTCOG is currently developing an update of the Veloweb plan, and the agency is conducting meetings throughout the Metroplex to integrate public input into the planning effort. As of late July 2009, the date of this meeting, there were no anticipated changes to the portion of the Veloweb system that fell within Coppell city limits. However, future meetings could be scheduled to allow for additional input, which could result in additional opportunities within the City.NCTCOG does provide funding for Veloweb sections running through a given city. The current ar-rangement requires a city to provide 80 percent of the needed funding while NCTCOG provides 20 percent. Funding for trail segments is based upon the proposed design and estimated cost of the individual trail segment, as well as associated landscape, lighting and site furnishing improvements. All trails must be “off-street trails,” and trail widths must be at least 12 feet, however, 10-foot-wide trail sections may be considered under special circumstances. NCTCOG will also consider partici-pating in funding for trails not shown as part of the Veloweb system but that provide “important con-nections” to desired facilities or areas within the jurisdiction. Ultimately, the City would provide the design documentation, cost estimate and implementation schedule and NCTCOG would review and allow trail segments into the regional Veloweb system while funding 20 percent of the costs.Regional Planning and Transportation Efforts“A trail is as serviceable as its poorest link.” - Benton MacKaye-B8-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanCity of Coppell, TXThe Mobility 2030 plan, developed by the NCTCOG, is an interregional system of bicycle trails in the Dallas-Fort Worth area referred to as the “Veloweb.” The original system planned for roughly 644 interconnected miles of off-street concrete trails connecting the region. The latest DRAFT plan, found on the next page, shows a greatly expanded regional Veloweb system for the area.Designed for use primarily by fast-moving bicyclists, the Veloweb is also designed to encourage concurrent pedestrian transportation use. The Cotton Belt Trail, a multi-phase, multi-jurisdictional trail that parallels the old Cotton Belt Railroad tracks currently owned by DART, is one component of the Veloweb trail system.October 30, 2007Regional Planning and Transportation EffortsNorth Central TexasCouncil of Governments-B9-
Making Connections RealityCoppell, TXNorthLakeGrapevineLakeHwy. 121I-35EI-635DFW AirportDraft - August 13, 2009Regional Planning and Transportation EffortsThe Metropolitan Transportation Plan, Mobility 2030, is in the process of undergoing revisions and is in DRAFT form at this time; it is scheduled for re-lease in summer 2010 once offi cially adopted by the Regional Transportation Council (RTC). The original plan dated October 2007, shown on the previous page, has two recommended Veloweb routes on the master plan through the Coppell area, the fi rst of which is the east/west connection along the Cotton Belt Trail in the southern portion of the City. The second route is a north/south connection on the City’s eastern limits, generally following the Denton Creek alignment to a point north of Sandy Lake Road, and then moving down the TXU overhead power utility easement south to the Cotton Belt Trail. Once at the Cotton Belt Trail, the north/south Veloweb will run to the east and then continue south into Irving. The DRAFT plan also connects to those off-street hike and bike trails in Andrew Brown Park from the planned trail along the north/south portion of Denton Creek, it also connects to the west into existing and proposed trails by Grapevine and Flower Mound.This is a DRAFT copy of the Mobility 2030 plan by NCTCOG, and is sub-ject to change. The proposed chang-es in this plan have greatly expanded the trail system from the current plan on the previous page. Offi cial adop-tion by the Regional Transportation Council is scheduled for summer 2010.-B10-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanCity of CarrolltonTBG met with City staff from the City of Carrollton to get an understanding of the City’s future trail planning. Carrollton is currently focused on connecting the City’s east side to the new DART rail lines planned along Interstate 35. The proposed regional trail on the City’s west side that runs through McInnish Park off of Sandy Lake Road, on the east side of the Elm Fork branch of the Trin-ity, is most likely fi ve to 10 years away from being constructed. This trail would parallel the Elm Fork branch, with the potential to one day cross the creek into Irving and tie into the Campion Trail in Sam Houston Park. See pages E3, E4, E5 and F10 for additional information.City of IrvingIn meeting with City of Irving staff members on their future trails plans, TBG was informed that Irving does not have plans to extend Campion Trail past Sam Houston Park at this time. The Parks De-partment is currently working on completing the last segments of the Campion Trail over the next few years.It is TBG’s recommendation for Coppell to continue to plan for a future trail connection to Irving as shown on the Mobility 2030 plan. The future development of the Cotton Belt rail line, the east/west regional Veloweb of the Cotton Belt Trail, and the north/south regional Veloweb through the over-head power utility easement will bring new possibilities, interest and needs for trail system connec-tivity. See pages E3, E5 and F8 for additional information.City of LewisvilleLewisville had been reexamining its proposed trail master plan at the same time as Coppell. Two opportunities exist for these Cities to connect their trail systems: one to the east, the other to the west. On the east side, Lewisville is making plans to connect its trail system to a trail the master plan has envisioned on top of the levee along Denton Creek, which provides a connection into Vista Ridge Park, connecting parks from both Cities. To the west, a north/south overhead power utility corridor runs behind a subdivision that will allow Lewisville to develop a trail to Denton Creek, at which point the two Cities can bridge Denton Creek to link the trails. See pages E3, E4, E5, F10 and F20 for additional information.City of GrapevineIn meeting with City of Grapevine staff, TBG learned that Grapevine currently does not see extend-ing the Grapevine Mills Trail as a priority due to environmental conditions and existing land uses. Efforts to extend this trail north to connect with Coppell will be development-driven and will be re-quired by future developers of the adjacent property. Grapevine currently has 2.5 miles of existing trail along the Cotton Belt to the south. City staff felt that connecting the trail with Coppell along this corridor would be a top priority. Establishing a part-nership between the Cities would improve opportunities for raising grant money for trail design and implementation. See pages E3, E5 and F20 for additional information.Regional Planning and Transportation EffortsCity of CarrolltonCity of CarrolltonCity of IrvingCCity of LewisvilleCity of LewisvilleCity of GrapevineCity of Grapevine“Concern for the environment and access to parks and open space is not frivolous or peripheral, rather, it is central to the welfare of people body, mind, and spirit.” - Laurance RockefellerCampion Trail - Irving, TX-B11-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanC. Goals...It was important to establish spe-cifi c goals in order to fully achieve the community’s vision for this Community-Wide Trails Implemen-tation Plan. These goals will ensure that the actions taken and priorities established will ensure that the City fully realizes the mutually estab-lished vision. Five specifi c goals were estab-lished through the master-planning process and will serve as a guide for the vision and objectives articu-lated by the plan. These goals will provide guidance on the alignment and layout of the proposed trails. -C1-
Making Connections RealityGoals“Passion and vision will build future trails, preserve green space, and cre-ate other community connections and enhancements in our area.” - A History of Portland TrailsGoal #1Community Vision and Participation - Create a strong vision for a community-wide trails system through equal opportunities and participation by the community. The vision should preserve and enhance the beauty of the City in a way that will foster pride and appeal to its citizens, corporate community and visitors. The vision will continue to be refi ned, expanding the vision of Coppell as an effective and revitalizing guide for the future.Goal #2Multi-modal Transportation System - Accommodate the convenient, effi cient and safe move-ment of people while working to maintain and enhance neighborhood integrity. Provide trails that meet Coppell’s complete recreational and leisure needs for a variety of activities such as running, walking, cycling and in-line skating. Nature trail opportunities, where feasible, should protect and preserve open spaces and critical natural areas.Goal #3Interconnected System - The primary goal is to create a system of trails allowing multiple con-nections to an overall system of continuous trails. This trail system should strengthen linkages between parks, neighborhoods, schools, neighborhood services, and key civic and community destinations.Goal #4City Coordination - Foster coordination of trail development with other City departments, especial-ly planning, engineering and transportation, so that all stakeholders work together to recognize and maximize trail opportunities.Goal #5Implementing - Develop a system that can be implemented in increments by both public and pri-vate entities. The system should work toward creating public/private partnerships that help build a more complete, regionally connected system in a shorter timeframe than otherwise possible. The plan needs to provide guidance in allocating resources and outside funding sources available to develop the City’s trail system. -C2-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanD. Trail Design Standards & Guidelines...Since all trail users have varying measures of confi dence and abil-ity, it is critical to understand the full range of user needs and capabili-ties, as well as the variety of reasons individuals use the trails system. This understanding is especially pertinent to the trail system’s de-sign in order to create appropriate spaces that are comfortable and usable for everyone. This section seeks to understand and defi ne the various types of trail system users, how they use the trails and the destinations to which they will travel. This knowledge is central to creating appropriately designed trails and amenities.-D1-
Making Connections RealityUsers of the TrailsWalkers(leisure, exercise, with dog)Joggers / RunnersCyclists(leisure, exercise, high-speed)Mountain BikingIn-Line Skaters & ScootersThe American Association of State Highway and Transportation Of-fi cials (AASHTO) designates riders in three different categories:Advanced (experienced and con-fi dent)Basic (less confi dent and ride for transportation purposes; avoid high-traffi c roads)Children (least confi dent; travel slowly and usually with parents in very low-traffi c areas). -D2-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanTypes of TrailsShared Roadwayno bikeway designationSigned Shared Roadwaydesignated by bike route signs,these roadways have been specifi callychosen as the best route for bikes toshare with vehiclesBicycle Lanesuited with the appropriate markingsand signage, along corridors that have a high demand for bike useShared Use Paththese serve corridors not served bystreets or where wide utility corridorsexistOff-Street Trailan upgraded walkway alongside aroad either in the right-of-way or reserveNatural Surface / Nature Traila more natural, primitive-feeling, soft-sur-face trailNeighborhood Sidewalkgenerally follows the system of local streets, ultimately connecting to a larger community/citywide trail systemTrail design standards should conform and be designed to stan-dards set forth in the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Offi cials (AASHTO) when feasible. The guide provides information to help accommodate bicycle traffi c in most riding envi-ronments.“Few actions can do more to make ur-ban areas safer, healthier, prettier, and more environmentally balanced than set-ting aside corridors or trails for walking, biking, wildlife watching, and just plain breaking up the monotony of cars and concrete.” - James Snyder-D3-
Making Connections RealityTrail DefinitionsRegional Veloweb:Defi ned and recognized by the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG), the pur-pose of this trail is to provide regional and interregional routes. The intention is to provide access throughout the City, to adjacent City destinations and communities, and ultimately connect to the D/FW metro area. Like a major thoroughfare being fed by all other trail types and walkways, this trail type will have the highest user capacity and the greatest range of user types, providing opportuni-ties to travel longer distances. Trails designated as part of the regional Veloweb should be concrete and 12 feet in width.Lake Trail:As development begins to happen around North Lake in the years to come, a 12-foot-wide concrete trail around the lake should be incorporated. This trail has one of the greatest opportunities for use by recreational users due to its scenic qualities, but will also serve to link the future uses planned on this large tract of land. Community-Wide Spine Trails:Community-wide spine trails, which build from and are composed of the regional Veloweb trails, can create a city trail system connecting many of the key city destinations while establishing longer distance loops. Trailheads will be located along these trails along with a variety of trail amenities. Community-wide spine trails should be constructed of concrete and typically are 10 feet in width to accommodate the higher user capacity. In some segments these trails may be up to 12 feet in width where a signifi cant volume of users is anticipated.Community Trails:Community trails will comprise the majority of the trails in Coppell. These trails will provide more local area connections between neighborhoods and key City destinations, while linking communi-ties to the larger trail system of the spine trails and regional Veloweb. Community trails should be concrete and 8 feet in width to accommodate the local user volume.Neighborhood Sidewalks:These local neighborhood walkways typically follow the system of adjacent neighborhood streets connecting into larger street networks. They connect neighborhood blocks and communities to-gether and ultimately provide connection into area trails. Neighborhood sidewalks typically range anywhere from 4 feet to 6 feet in width. At locations where sidewalk connections to the trail system are recommended in this plan, a 5-foot minimum walkway is recommended.Regional Veloweb:gLake Trail:Coppell is in a unique situation of be-ing a city that is essentially fully de-veloped. This makes for challenges in some cases and unique opportunities in others. Just as there is a hierarchy of levels in our roadway systems, spe-cifi c types of trails have been devel-oped to accommodate distinct user types and capacities.Deviations from AASHTO may be ac-ceptable in some cases to respect the character or special conditions pres-ent in an area.Community-Wide Spine Trails:ypCommunity Trails:CyNeighborhood Sidewalks:Ng-D4-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanC it Wid T il I l t ti PlTrails connect people with places. As part of the trail system planning process, key locations and facilities throughout the City have been identifi ed for potential trail destinations. These destinations give purpose and reason for residents to utilize the sys-tem, whether for short errands, visiting a friend’s home or even going to work or school. Of course, not all trails have or need a destination. Many trails simply provide residents an opportunity for physical activity, a means for enjoying the sur-rounding community and/or a chance to explore the city.Coppell Community GardensCoppell Farmers MarketOld Town CoppellCoppell Family YMCACoppell Town Center“Creating a system means learning where trails are and developing connections that link them together into networks and where desirable and necessary, building new trails that also connect.” - American Trails, Trails for All Americans report, 1990Trail Destinations-D5-
Making Connections RealityAquatic and Recreation CenterCoppell High SchoolConnecting trails to key city destinations can promote increased trail usage and foster a greater community need for the trail system. Some of the key destinations throughout Coppell and nearby in adjacent cities include:• Schools• Parks• Civic facilities• Community gardens• Farmers market• Recreation facilities• Key city facilities• Major employers• Major retail areasVista Ridge Amphitheater (Lewisville, TX)Wagon Wheel ParkTrail Destinations (Cont.)Andrew BrownCommunity Park Playground-D6-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanTrail FeaturesBike RacksParking for bicycles along the trail system and key destinations in the region was seen as an impor-tant trail amenity to participants in the community workshop. With the community-wide trail system providing connections to many key city destinations, providing parking for bikes allows trail users to safely park their bikes if they wish to stop along the way, particularly at parks and other desirable destinations.Directional Signage / Maps / KiosksTo assist users in navigating the trail system, directional signage, maps and/or kiosks should be provided that contain important trail information. Such items can inform trail users of their location on the map, how long the trail is, where certain trail amenities are located, and what to expect in general from the trail.Drinking FountainsWater fountains provide trail users and their pets with an opportunity to remain hydrated and/or fi ll up their water containers. Where feasible, drinking fountains should be located along trails, espe-cially higher-use trails.Fitness StationsFitness stations provide trail users with an opportunity to stretch and warm up and cool down at the beginning and end of their trail use. These fi tness stations also provide users an opportunity to get more out of their workout with muscular training.Informational SignageInformational signage can provide a variety of information types to the trail user. Information can range from historical and environmental, to facts about native plants and animals potentially en-countered. Informational signage enhances the user experience and provides interesting informa-tion for all.LightingPedestrian-scale lighting improves safety and enables the trail to be used year-round. It also en-hances the trail’s aesthetic beauty. Adding appropriate trail amenities to a local or regional trail system enhances the trail user’s experi-ence. As identifi ed during the community workshop, the public desires a variety of trail amenities at appropriate locations. The following is a summary of the trail amenities that should be considered along Coppell’s trail system. The Parks Department will have to consider construction and mainte-nance costs associated with each, and what the overall recreation and programming goals are of each trail.Bike RacksBDirectional Signage / Maps / KiosksDirectional Signage / Maps / KiosksDrinking FountainsDrinking FountainsFitness StationsFInformational SignageInformational SignageLightingLighting-D7-
Making Connections RealityMileage MarkersMileage markers inform trail users of their distance traveled. Bicyclists, joggers and others often utilize trails for many miles and like to know their distance traveled. Mileage markers allow users to determine whether their goals for the day have been reached and/or how much farther they must travel to obtain those goals.Multi-Use Trail StripingA centerline stripe approximately 4 inches wide should be painted on regional trails and 12-foot-wide trails designed for multi-use or that connect to regional trails.ParkingWhere parking is not already provided in the parks, areas should be provided at regional trail en-trances when appropriate. Parking at trail entrances is convenient for those living farther from the trail network and provides a place to park for those that transport their bicycle to a trail entrance with their car.Pet AmenitiesWhere appropriate, dog waste pickup bag dispensers should be placed at trailheads and key neigh-borhood access points along the route. Signs should be placed along the trail notifying dog owners to pick up after their dogs.Rest Area / Shade StructuresRest areas should be relaxing places containing shelter, shading, benches and other places to sit. These areas may also contain enhanced landscaping, drinking fountains, trash receptacles and even informational signage. Rest areas should be strategically located to make trails more usable for all user groups.TrailheadsTrailheads (for major trails) serve as primary access to the trail system. Trailhead stations should provide trail users with information and trail rules and regulations. Trailhead amenities should be considered such as parking areas, restrooms, drinking fountains, trash receptacles, information kiosks (maps and points of interest) and destination signage with mileage.Trash ReceptaclesTrash receptacles play an essential role in maintaining the cleanliness of a trail system. Trash receptacles allow trail users to dispose of any trash or other refuse generated while utilizing the trail system, and should be located at regular intervals, trail intersections, rest areas, fi tness stations, trailheads and parking.Mileage MarkersgMulti-Use Trail StripingParkingPet AmenitiesRest Area / Shade StructuresTrailheadsTrash ReceptaclespMilMkTrail Features (Cont.)-D8-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanTrail Design StandardsThe City of Coppell adopted the following Trail Amenity Guidelines to promote unity within the City’s park and recreation areas. The Appendix contains the complete trail amenities information.Secondary TrailheadPrimary Trailhead-D9-
Making Connections RealityCity Trail Marker / Mile MarkerPark SignageTrail Design Standards-D10-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanEducational Trail SignageWay-Finding SignageTrail Design Standards-D11-
Making Connections RealityPavilionRest AreasTrail Design Standards-D12-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanTrail SignsTrail Design Standards-D13-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanE. City of Coppell Trails Master Plan...The system of trails and pedestrian connections recommended in this section creates an opportunity to enhance recreational opportunities for the entire community. Moreover, the system will provide a choice of transportation options, including distinct routes for short-, medium- or long-distance trips, in a way that is readily accessible, wide, safe and attractive for a variety of user types.-E1-
Making Connections RealityGeneral OverviewCoppell has many opportunities for trails to connect communities, retail, schools, parks, and other key city destinations together. The Community-Wide Trails Master Plan identifi es a system of trail corridors totaling more than 50 miles of trail within the city limits. Many of the trails identifi ed can be provided in the near term, while others may be a long-term goal for the City to strive and plan for. The City’s efforts should foremost be focused on those corridors that provide the most signifi cant benefi ts and impact for the community, and establishing a major citywide trails network.This section presents the overall Community-Wide Trails Master Plan that addresses the different variety of trail types and the network they create. This section also addresses the major Commu-nity-Wide Spine Trail system and those points of connections to adjacent cities and their trail sys-tems. The following section will touch on the Prioritized Trails Master Plan, representing the most important trails to be built.Trail corridors identifi ed were selected to meet the goals established herein, set in place by the Task Force, refl ecting the comments and desires received during the community input process. Trails considered in this plan were intended to fi rst and foremost link destinations such as schools, nearby retail, civic uses, recreation facilities and parks, major places of employment and neighbor-hood communities. When possible, trail corridors should take advantage of access to the many scenic qualities Coppell has to offer, but must remain convenient and maintain a level of safety to support use by community residents.Some of the trails identifi ed reach beyond the city boundaries of Coppell, most of which are identi-fi ed as the continuation of the regional Veloweb system put in place by NCTCOG. The trails identi-fi ed either show the connection that needs to be made to existing or future proposed trails by adja-cent cities, or those that may need to be a joint venture between Coppell and the neighboring city.With Coppell mostly developed, the availability of corridors for trails is one of the biggest con-straints, and easements will have to be obtained from commercial and residential property owners for many of the trails identifi ed. The creation of partnerships may be possible for some trails or trail segments in existing developed conditions. In undeveloped areas, trail segments can be built by new developments. This will be particularly important for the North Lake area as it begins to devel-op with a mix of uses in the future.strafor segnewop “We also come out here to learn about our-selves. The biggest prize in long-distance hiking is the gift of time. Time to look. Time to think. Time to feel. All those hours you spend with your thoughts. You don’t solve all of your problems, but you come to understand and accept yourself.” - Cindy Ross“We celebrate not the trail, but the wild places it passes through.” – Ray Jardine-E2-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanCommunity-Wide Trails Master PlanSee Appendix for full size map.-E3-
Making Connections RealityTrail Connections with Adjacent CitiesAs a part of any comprehensive planning effort, it is important to look beyond the physical boundaries of the city limits to understand the potential for the local region and beyond. TBG Partners met with representatives from all adjacent cities and regional planning authorities to discuss what the opportunities may be to connect existing and future trail systems planned by each city. Completing these connections will create a far more meaningful and far-reach-ing trails system. The following aerial images show the proposed locations in which trails from one city could connect to another. These locations are fl exible and should be coordinated with the adjacent city’s trails planning authority.City of CarrolltonCity of CarrolltonMcInnish ParkMcInnish ParkPresident George Bush President George Bush TollwayTollway
Sandy Lake Rd.Sandy Lake Rd.Carrollton, TXCarrollton, TXCoppell, TXCoppell, TXCarrollton, TXCarrollton, TXLewisville, TXCoppell, TXCoppell, TXVista Ridge Denton CreekDenton CreekVista RidgeVista RidgeLake Vista Dr.Lake Vista Dr.LewisvLewisvSH 121SH 121Blvd.Blvd.
M acArthurMacArthur
-E4-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanTrail Connections with Adjacent CitiesCity of CarrolltonCity of CarrolltonMcInnish ParkMcInnish ParkSH 121SH 121Freeport ParkwayDenton CreekDenton CreekLewisville, TXLewisville, TXGrapevine, TXGrapevine, TXCoppell, TXCoppell, TXGrapevine, TXGrapevine, TXIrving, TXIrving, TXIrving, TXIrving, TXCoppell, TXCoppell, TXCoppell, TXCoppell, TXCotton BeltCotton BeltBelt Line Rd.Belt Line Rd.MacArthur Blvd.MacArthur Blvd.Carrollton, TXCarrollton, TXSH 121SH 121I-635 LBJ Frwy.I-635 LBJ Frwy.Royal Ln.Royal Ln.-E5-
Making Connections RealityCommunity-Wide Spine TrailsSee Appendix for full size map.-E6-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanF. Priority Trail Implementation...Trails identifi ed in this section as priority trails were selected for their distinct usefulness and desirable qualities. These trails provide ac-cess to distinct destinations, miss-ing trail segments, and/or connect into adjacent cities and their vari-ous amenities. The selected trails are designed to create a connected network of trails across the City, ac-cessible in as many areas as pos-sible. Trail segments not identifi ed on this priority trails plan may be initiated out of sequence if unique funding or acquisition opportunities arise.-F1-
Making Connections RealityPrioritized Trails OverviewThe trails identifi ed here are intended to be key pieces of the larger system that have the poten-tial to link all of Coppell together, as well as to the larger regional system, connecting adjacent city communities together. The City’s efforts should be focused on those trails that provide the most signifi cant benefi cial impact to the community and that truly begin to create a major community-wide network of trails.Trails identifi ed on the following master plan represent the most important trails to be developed or provided. No order has been assigned to the implementation of these trails; they should be imple-mented as funding becomes available, development or redevelopment occurs, road projects occur, or as citizen demand and needs warrant priorities.Preliminary research and study of the prioritized trails are discussed in more detail in the pages that follow. These trails have been given generic trail names for reference until permanent names are established. Each prioritized trail discussed provides general trail details, a description of the trail, the connectivity being made, and an evaluation of the opportunities and constraints present. A more in-depth analysis of each has been provided in the Appendix with an aerial photograph, cost esti-mate, adjacent plats, annotated site photos and funding sources available. This information will aid preliminary investigation into the implementation of a particular trail. Further study and analysis will need to be completed for actual design and detailed cost estimates.The trails described individually in the pages that follow utilize the following legend and correspond with those colors found on the Community-Wide Trails Master Plan:LegendPriority Trail (trail types and widths vary)Regional VelowebLake TrailCommunity-Wide Spine TrailCommunity TrailTrail by Adjacent CityBridge CrossingArea to be Studied for ImplementationdjTrail by Adodge CrodBridBrida to be aArea“Time and space—time to be alone, space to move about—these may well become the greatest scarcities of tomorrow.” - Edwin Way Teale-F2-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanPrioritized Trails Master PlanSee Appendix for full size map.F4F6F8F10F12F14F16F18F20F22F24F26F28F28TRAIL REFERENCE PAGE-F3-
Making Connections RealityDenton Creek East TrailTrail Description:The portion of Denton Creek running north/south on the eastern edge of Coppell’s city boundary has the potential to be one of the most scenic trails in Coppell and Carrollton. This trail is also part of the regional Veloweb system. The west side of Denton Creek was subdivided to the creek’s centerline during the plat-ting of communities along the creek, and is therefore not a viable option. The creek’s east side, however, is undeveloped and in a natural vegetative state. This corridor should be protected and surveyed carefully to save large trees during the implementation of this regional trail. A 12-foot-wide trail is recommended along this corridor to allow for both walking and cycling use. Additional information on this trail can be found in the Appendix.Connectivity:There are two main connections that trail completion would provide. These connections include the interre-gional Veloweb OHP Utility Corridor Trail on the south end at Sandy Lake Road, and on the north end to the North Levee Trail, which also provides direct connection into Andrew Brown Park. It is recommended that the Denton Creek East Trail be taken to at least a connection point of the North Levee Trail in Vista Ridge Park. If, during implementation of this trail, the City of Carrollton is working on or planning the implementation of its regional trail along I-35 and President George Bush Turnpike, then this trail should continue to the east, con-necting into Carrollton’s trail system. Ultimately, this system would provide connection to DART rail stations.An opportunity to provide connections from area neighborhoods within Coppell to the regional Veloweb exists in the Windsor Estates neighborhood (in an HOA-privately maintained park off of St. James). Another op-portunity exists to connect the area neighborhoods in Lakewood Estates at the knuckle on Hollywood Drive. Both instances would require a bridge across Denton Creek.Evaluation of Opportunities:An opportunity exists to build a great regional trail through a very scenic area on the city’s eastern edge. This is envisioned as a joint effort with the City of Carrollton and additional fi nancial support from NCTCOG. There is also the potential to provide four equally spaced connection points to this segment of the regional Veloweb. Evaluation of Constraints:Benefi tting both Coppell and Carrollton, as well as the region as a whole, this trail will require approval from the City of Carrollton to be built, as its location is on the east side of Denton Creek. Agreements with the property owner(s) of the undeveloped land will need to be obtained as well. Permission from the overhead power utility provider will need to be obtained for the southern segment of the trail contained within the OHP easement.Trail Type:Regional VelowebTrail Length:Approx. 15,000 feet (2.8 miles)Recommended Trail Width:12 feetType of Surface:ConcreteRecommended Features:Crosswalk striping or brick banding at intersection, locator maps, mile markers, benches, litter recep-tacles, dog waste pickup stationsResponsibility for Implementation:City of Coppell Parks & Recre-ation, Engineering, City of Carrollton, City of Lewisville, NCTCOGCost Estimate (see Appendix):Approx. Total = $1,640,600Funding Sources (see Appendix)Evaluation of Constraints:Trail Description:pConnectivity:Evaluation of Opportunities:-F4-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanVista Ridge ParkParkVista Ridge PRidge ParkVista Ri e PLake Vista Dr.Lake Vista Dr.Denton Creek East Trail (Cont.)Community-Wide Trails ImpNorthern SectionSouthern SectionDenton CreekDenton CreekDenton CreekDenton CreekCommunity-Wide Trails ImNorthern SectionNorthern SectionN. MacArthur Blvd.N. MacArthur Blvd.Denton CreekDenton CreekDenton CreekDetDentE. Sandy Lake Rd.E. Sandy Lake Rd.V illa g e P k w y .Village P
k
w
y.
A llen R d.Allen
Rd.Carrollton, TXCarrollton, TXCarrollton, TXCarrollton, TXLewisville, TXLewisville, TXCoppell, TXCoppell, TXCoppell, TXCoppell, TXMatchlineMatchlineMatchlineMatchlineLegendccouthern Seouthern SecShern SSSouthern SecSouthern SecSPriority Trail (trail types and widths vary)Regional VelowebCommunity TrailBridge CrossingArea to be Studied for Implementation-F5-
Making Connections RealityOHP Utility Corridor TrailTrail Description:Located in the eastern portion of the City, this trail is a part of the interregional trail system included in the Mobility 2030 plan put in place by NCTCOG. This existing overhead power utility easement follows the align-ment of the interregional trail while connecting Lewisville to the Cotton Belt Trail on the southern portion of the city and fi nally Irving to the north.This corridor currently presents both aesthetic and functional challenges to the City. It contains multiple large overhead power line structures, mosquitoes breeding in standing water, and abundant overgrown grasses, weeds and brush. In addition, the corridor creates a physical barrier between neighborhood communities. This interregional trail is one of the most important trail segment opportunities in the City, with potential to be a landmark feature for the City’s eastern sector, particularly, as well as Coppell as a whole. A 12-foot-wide concrete trail is recommended within the corridor to accommodate adequate user capacity of this interregion-al trail. This corridor is intended to primarily serve as a recreational use and is considered a high-priority trail. Additional information on this trail can be found in the Appendix.Connectivity:This trail is part of a larger system of trails connecting cities throughout the Metroplex, making a more com-plete system. It will also provide connections between local neighborhoods, open spaces, parks, schools and other City destinations. Connection to sidewalks and trails from local neighborhoods and other adjacent uses should be included. Ultimately, this trail will make connections to fi ve other trails, four of which are considered top-priority trails. The northern end will be at E. Sandy Lake Road, tying into the east/west-running, 6-foot-wide sidewalk sys-tem currently in place. This master plan recommends upgrading these walks to an 8-foot trail along the south side of E. Sandy Lake Road. The northern end will also connect into the interregional trail system coming from the north along Denton Creek. Along the north/east side of MacArthur Boulevard, the proposed 8-foot trail along MacArthur Park is recommended to tie into this trail. The southern end will link the Moore Road Trail and Grapevine Park to this interregional trail system, ultimately connecting into the Cotton Belt Trail.Evaluation of Opportunities:An opportunity exists for the City of Coppell to improve upon both aesthetic and functional challenges and create a linear park area with attractive landscaping, lighting, and other trail and park amenities. This trail section can become a key City destination for community residents.Evaluation of Constraints:Permission from the utility provider will be needed for any and all improvements to the easement. The cor-ridor is in a low-lying area and contains standing water after a storm event. In order to deal with this issue, a series of small detention or retention ponds could be designed to handle the drainage and provide fi ll material to raise the trail and form overlooks. This, in turn, would create a park-like setting with opportunities to pro-vide an educational component.Trail Type:Regional VelowebTrail Length:Approx. 6,600 feet (1.3 miles)Recommended Trail Width:12 feetType of Surface:ConcreteRecommended Features:Provide parking, trailhead, locator maps, mile markers, shade shelters, benches, bicycle racks, litter receptacles, dog waste pickup sta-tions, water fountains, lightingResponsibility for Implementation:City of Coppell Parks & Recre-ation, Engineering, NCTCOG Cost Estimate (see Appendix):Approx. Total = $763,000Funding Sources (see Appendix)Connectivity:yTrail Description:pEvaluation of Opportunities:pp-F6-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanE. Belt Line RoadMacArthurMacArthurParkParkM a c A r t h u rMacArthur
RiverchaseRiverchaseCountry ClubCountry ClubEEEEEEEE.BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBeeeeelelettttLine RBBBtEEEEEEEEEE.B BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBeleleleleleleltttt LineRRoCotton Belt RailCotton Belt RailE. Sandy Lake RoadE. Sandy Lake RoadB lvd.Blvd.OHP Utility Corridor Trail (Cont.)Proposed Proposed TrailheadTrailheadCurrently a boardwalk is used to elevate a trail connecting Currently a boardwalk is used to elevate a trail connecting the neighborhood residents to the school and City park. the neighborhood residents to the school and City park. Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanBeing in a low-lying area, much of the area is in standing Being in a low-lying area, much of the area is in standing water after a rain, contributing to the breeding of the mos-water after a rain, contributing to the breeding of the mos-quitoes.quitoes.The corridor is dominated by overgrown grasses, weeds, The corridor is dominated by overgrown grasses, weeds, and brush.and brush.Multiple runs of large overhead power lines exist in the Multiple runs of large overhead power lines exist in the corridor that is approximately 250 to 300 feet wide.corridor that is approximately 250 to 300 feet wide.LegendPriority Trail (trail types and widths vary)Regional VelowebCommunity TrailArea to be Studied for Implementation-F7-
Making Connections RealityIrving Connector TrailTrail Description:Located in the southeast portion of the city, this trail seeks to provide strong connections and improved ac-cess to community-wide facilities for both Coppell and Irving citizens. As with other segments of the regional Veloweb, this segment should include 12-foot-wide concrete trails allowing for both walking and cycling use. This trail corridor will provide a safe route to cross the major obstacles of MacArthur Boulevard and the rail tracks, East Belt Line Road and Grapevine Creek. Additional information on this trail can be found in the Appendix.Connectivity:A segment of the regional Veloweb, this trail will also improve access to nearby retail and civic destinations, a school and parks. It will link two adjacent cities together and all their amenities, thus providing a more complete system serving citizens of both cities. A portion of the Cotton Belt Trail will be a part of this seg-ment and will continue the regional Veloweb from north of the OHP Utility Corridor Trail toward the south into Irving. Connection to area sidewalks and trails within neighborhoods and retail areas should be included for accessibility.Evaluation of Opportunities:Several options exist to continue the regional Veloweb to the south, connecting to Irving from the OHP Utility Corridor Trail. The area highlighted in green on the following map should be studied in more detail for the best opportunity. The segment currently identifi ed heading south is in a large landscaped area between Val-ley Ranch Baptist Church and the adjacent storage units, but it is private land and an easement would have to be obtained. A hike and bike easement was held in some tracts farther east, but many obstructions cur-rently exist and should be studied further. In order to provide connections to Bush Middle School and Cham-pion Park, as well as to parks, trails and neighborhood sidewalks within Irving, coordination with the City of Irving Parks Department will be required.Evaluation of Constraints:With DART’s future plans for active rail along the Cotton Belt, the trail crossing from the north side of the rail corridor to the south across East Belt Line Road will have to be at a signalized street intersection. This can take place at either South MacArthur Boulevard or Fairway Drive.Referring back to the meeting notes from DART, regarding the timeframe for planning that must be done for the Cotton Belt rail corridor, the feasibility of implementing this trail may be longer term, and would be one of the lowest of the priority trails. Of the approximate 3,500-foot trail length, about 900 feet utilize the rail cor-ridor, and permission will have to be obtained from DART.If crossing Grapevine Creek is done anywhere other than at South MacArthur Boulevard, a pedestrian bridge will need to be installed and a fl ood study may be required.Trail Type:Regional VelowebTrail Length:Approx. 3,500 feetRecommended Trail Width:12 feetType of Surface:ConcreteRecommended Features:Signalized crossing and cross-walk brick banding or striping, locator map, mile markers, benches, bicycle racks, litter receptacles, dog waste pickup stations, lightingResponsibility for Implementation:City of Coppell Parks & Recre-ation, Engineering, NCTCOGCost Estimate (see Appendix):Approx. Total = $1,235,900Funding Sources (see Appendix)Connectivity:Trail Description:pEvaluation of Opportunities:Evaluation of Constraints:-F8-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanCity ofCity ofIrving, TXIrving, TXBush Middle SchoolBush Middle School(Irving, TX)Irving Connector Trail (Cont.)(Irving, TX)(Irving, TX)S. MacArthur Blvd.S. MacArthur Blvd.E. Belt Line RoadE. Belt Line RoadCity ofCity ofCoppell, TXCoppell, TXChampionMacArthurMacArthurParkParkRiverchase Country ClubRiverchase Country ClubnnGrapevine CreekGrapevine CreekCrossing of the Cotton Belt rail line with the trail Crossing of the Cotton Belt rail line with the trail system will have to happen at an intersection.system will have to happen at an intersection.A large landscape area between the church and A large landscape area between the church and storage units may be a great opportunity to con-storage units may be a great opportunity to con-nect south toward Irving.nect south toward Irving.This connection would put the trail in line with This connection would put the trail in line with the middle school in Irving on the south side of the middle school in Irving on the south side of Grapevine Creek.Grapevine Creek.LegendWCommunity-WCommunity-WPriority Trail (trail types and widths vary)Regional VelowebCommunity TrailBridge CrossingArea to be Studied for Implementation-F9-
Making Connections RealityNorth Levee TrailTrail Description:An existing levee along Denton Creek creates the key link needed between Andrew Brown Park and Vista Ridge Park in Lewisville. The North Levee Trail is intended to continue the east/west regional Veloweb from Andrew Brown Park to the north/south regional Veloweb Denton Creek East Trail. With some landscape improvements, this trail corridor could create a linear park-like setting that connects Coppell, Lewisville and Carrollton together, providing access to each city’s community-wide facilities. This trail’s development would be similar to one atop of the levee west of MacArthur Boulevard and, like other regional Veloweb segments, would need to be 12 feet wide to accommodate user capacity. Additional infor-mation on this trail can be found in the Appendix.Connectivity:The implementation of this trail would establish a much-needed link between Andrew Brown Park at one end and Vista Ridge Park in Lewisville at the other. This link would also provide connection to Vista Ridge Amphitheater and many employment opportunities in the area. Developing this trail segment will complete the missing regional Veloweb segment on the east side of the city, providing connection into the north/south regional Veloweb, Denton Creek East Trail.Continuing the trail atop the levee to MacArthur Boulevard allows this trail to connect to the MacArthur Bou-levard Trail on the east side of the road. This would provide connection to many of Coppell’s neighborhoods. The ability to connect trail system users from many of Coppell’s neighborhoods to Andrew Brown Park, Vista Ridge Amphitheater and Park, and the numerous area employment opportunities using MacArthur Boulevard Trail makes this trail a high priority.Evaluation of Opportunities:Denton Creek has been channelized in this segment with the construction of a levee. The top of the levee is fl at for maintenance vehicle access, providing a great opportunity for a 12-foot-wide concrete trail. Guardrails are currently located in the median of MacArthur Boulevard, deterring pedestrians from attempt-ing to cross MacArthur at a non-signalized intersection. With a pedestrian underpass already in place under MacArthur Boulevard, benching the trail into the levee down to the underpass will allow for east/west pedes-trian movement without vehicular confl ict. Providing a street-grade trail connection at MacArthur Boulevard, similar to the trail found on the west side of MacArthur Boulevard, is important to tie into the Community Trail alongside the road. Evaluation of Constraints:With the North Levee Trail tying into Vista Ridge Park in Lewisville, cooperative agreements for improve-ments will be needed with Lewisville. In order to tie into the pedestrian underpass already in place under MacArthur Boulevard, grade challenges will require the concrete trail to be benched into the side of the levee. This will require coordination with the levee district, which will also be required for obtaining approval for trail use and improvements. In order to provide trail connection to the Vista Ridge Amphitheater, an easement will need to be obtained between the levee and Lake Vista Drive. Providing this connection will again require the benching of the trail from the top of the levee down to natural grade. Trail Type:Regional VelowebTrail Length:Approx. 5,200 feetRecommended Trail Width:12 feetType of Surface:ConcreteRecommended Facilities:Locator maps, mile markers, benches, litter receptacles, dog waste pickup stations, water fountains, light-ingResponsibility for Implementation:City of Coppell Parks & Recre-ation, Engineering, City of Lewisville, NCTCOGCost Estimate (see Appendix):Approx. Total = $491,200Funding Sources (see Appendix)Evaluation of Constraints:Evaluation of Opportunities:ppConnectivity:yTrail Description:TilD itip-F10-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanM a c A r t h u r B l v d .MacArthur Blvd.Denton CreekDenton CreekCDenton CreekLake Vista DriveLake Vista DriveVista Ridge ParkVista Ridge Park(Lewisville, TX)(Lewisville, TX)Vista Ridge AmphitheaterAmphitheater(Lewisville, TX)(Lewisville, TX)E. SH 121North Levee Trail (Cont.)Lewisville, TXLewisville, TX2121A pedestrian underpass is already in place under A pedestrian underpass is already in place under MacArthur Blvd.MacArthur Blvd.The amphitheater in Lewisville is a key destina-The amphitheater in Lewisville is a key destina-tion for citizens of the area. tion for citizens of the area. A 12-foot regional Veloweb trail on top of the A 12-foot regional Veloweb trail on top of the levee will accommodate bicyclists and pedes-levee will accommodate bicyclists and pedes-trians.trians.Community Wide Trails Implementation PlanCommunity-Wide Trails Implementation PlanAn existing neighborhood sidewalk along Mac-An existing neighborhood sidewalk along Mac-Arthur Blvd. will provide connection into the Arthur Blvd. will provide connection into the regional Veloweb.regional Veloweb.Guardrails in the median of MacArthur Blvd. will Guardrails in the median of MacArthur Blvd. will help prevent pedestrian crossing at this point.help prevent pedestrian crossing at this point.To access the pedestrian underpass under Mac-To access the pedestrian underpass under Mac-Arthur Blvd. will require benching the trail into Arthur Blvd. will require benching the trail into the side of the levee.the side of the levee.LegendPriority Trail (trail types and widths vary)Regional VelowebCommunity TrailArea to be Studied for Implementation-F11-
Making Connections RealityMacArthur Boulevard TrailTrail Description:The MacArthur Boulevard Trail is seen as a north/south urban neighborhood connector serving residents of Coppell’s east side. The trail will become the central walking corridor for area neighbor-hoods, linking the many disconnected neighborhoods with a safe walking route that links to many key City destinations along MacArthur Boulevard. Much of MacArthur Boulevard features neighbor-hood communities backing to the road, with walls and landscape reserves running along it. This connection provides an opportunity for a scenic trail corridor with fewer driveway and street cross-ings, minimizing pedestrian and vehicular confl ict points. This trail is intended to serve primarily the local neighborhoods adjacent to MacArthur Boulevard. It should be 8 feet wide to accommodate user capacity. Additional information on this trail can be found in the Appendix.Connectivity:The number of households in the area makes the MacArthur Boulevard Trail a logical choice for providing connections to many parts of the City. Serving as a collector of trail users from the neigh-borhoods, this trail will provide area access to other neighborhoods, retail and civic entities, schools, open space and park areas. It will also provide connection to the regional Veloweb located either on the north end at the North Levee Trail or the OHP Utility Corridor Trail on the south. Local neigh-borhood sidewalks should connect to the main trail for accessibility.Evaluation of Opportunities:The development of this corridor can provide signifi cant enhancements for both individual property owners and each neighborhood as a whole. Currently there are 4- to 5-foot walks on both sides of the road. The east side of the road has a few relatively minor constraints: the landscape reserves are wider in areas with key City destinations located on the east side. Walks should be upgraded to an 8–foot-wide Community-Wide Trail.Evaluation of Constraints:The west side of MacArthur Boulevard has a number of different constraints including grading and existing retaining walls, utilities and residential houses fronting the road. There were few issues found on the road’s east side and they are relatively minor. Easements will have to be obtained from property owners along MacArthur Boulevard in those areas where the public right-of-way is narrower than the area required to provide the Community-Wide Trail.Trail Type:Community TrailTrail Length:Approx. 14,000 feet (2.7 miles)Recommended Trail Width:8 feetType of Surface:ConcreteRecommended Facilities:Locator maps, mile markers, benches, bicycle racks, litter recep-tacles, dog waste pickup stationsResponsibility for Implementation:City of Coppell Parks & Recre-ation, EngineeringCost Estimate (see Appendix):Approx. Total = $919,000Funding Sources (see Appendix)Connectivity:yTrail Description:pEvaluation of Opportunities:ppEvaluation of Constraints:-F12-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanCommmunity Wide Trails Implementation PlanAllen RoadParkSamuel Blvd.Samuel Blvd.Allen Allen PaParN. MacArthur Blvd.N. MacArthur Blvd.ParkwayParkwayBlvd.Blvd.E. Belt Line Rd.E. Belt Line Rd.Vista Dr.Denton CreekDenton CreekLakesideLakeside
Elem.Elem.MacArthurMacArthurParkParkS. MacArthur Blvd.AAE. SandyLake Rd.Lake Rd.RiverchaseRiverchaseElementaryElementaryMatchlineMatchlineE. SandyE. SandyMatchlineMatchlineNorthern SectionNorthern SectionSouthern SectionSouthern SectionMacArthur Boulevard Trail (Cont.)The west side of the road has many constraints such The west side of the road has many constraints such as grading issues, fronting homes, and utilities.as grading issues, fronting homes, and utilities.The east side of the road has many of the key city The east side of the road has many of the key city destinations along this trail corridor with few con-destinations along this trail corridor with few con-straints.straints.Large reserves and mature landscaping on the east Large reserves and mature landscaping on the east side create a great opportunity for a trail to link the side create a great opportunity for a trail to link the many disconnected neighborhoods and city destina-many disconnected neighborhoods and city destina-tions.tions.LegendPriority Trail (trail types and widths vary)Regional VelowebCommunity TrailArea to be Studied for ImplementationLakeLake-F13-
Making Connections RealityGrapevine Creek Park TrailTrail Description:Grapevine Creek Park currently is an undeveloped park in a natural setting at the crossroads of two major trails, the Cotton Belt Trail and the Moore Road Trail. East of Mockingbird Lane, a large overhead power line (OHP) easement cuts between two neighborhoods toward the larger north/south OHP easement where a segment of the regional Veloweb is planned. Each half of this trail has its own unique character, opportuni-ties and constraints. The development of Grapevine Creek Park Trail serves two main purposes. The fi rst is to provide east/west movement for the local community as a complement to the regional draw of the Cotton Belt Trail. With the timeframe of the Cotton Belt rail line undetermined and more likely long term, this con-nection would facilitate east/west movement and could be implemented more quickly. Secondly, this trail provides a great opportunity for citizens to enjoy the scenic characteristics of Grapevine Creek Park, while also visually enhancing the OHP easement. To connect the two halves together, it will be necessary to utilize a 400- to 500-foot length of the Cotton Belt easement. This segment should be 12 feet in width, as it is a segment of the future Cotton Belt Trail. Additional information on this trail can be found in the Appendix.Connectivity:This trail will collect trail users from neighborhood communities, providing access to other neighborhoods and linking to the larger trail system being created. This east/west trail will link the MacArthur Boulevard Trail and OHP Utility Corridor Trail to the Moore Road Trail, and eventually to the North Lake Trail. With this trail fun-neling pedestrians from area neighborhoods into regional Veloweb trails, a community-spine trail and future connections into North Lake, this trail is a high priority and one of the more important trail segments within the City. Connection to neighborhood sidewalks and trails should be included at as many points as possible. Great opportunity currently exists for this at the open-ended cul-de-sacs within the Hollows at Northlake Woodlands community.Evaluation of Opportunities:A great opportunity exists to provide access to Grapevine Creek Park, one of the most scenic areas in Cop-pell. The Grapevine Creek Park Trail provides access to an undeveloped city park and also utilizes the open space of an overhead power line easement. With three trails coming together in Grapevine Creek Park near Belt Line Road and Moore Road, a trailhead with parking should be included to facilitate trail access to any one of the three trails. Ample room exists in the park for the trail and spur, yet efforts should be made to avoid developing them too close to residents whenever possible.Evaluation of Constraints:Grapevine Creek snakes its way through the park with a tributary fi nger extending south from the Northlake Woodlands community. In order to provide suffi cient access to the park area and its scenic qualities, approxi-mately four bridges will be needed. A topographic survey will be needed to understand any topographic con-straints of the area and creek-crossing locations. Because the western half of this trail is in a natural setting, some brush and trees will need to be cleared. A tree survey should be completed prior to detailed design, to avoid and protect any signifi cant trees.The eastern half of this trail will require an agreement with the utility company to allow public access and nec-essary landscape improvements. Crossing a drainage corridor on the eastern end will require a small bridge in order to make the connection to the OHP Utility Corridor Trail.Trail Type:Community TrailTrail Length:Approx. 7,300 feet (1.4 miles)Recommended Trail Width:8-10 feet, with 12-foot segmentType of Surface:ConcreteRecommended Features:Crossing at Mockingbird Ln. striping or brick banding, parking, trailhead, locator maps, mile mark-ers, shade shelters, benches, bicycle racks, litter receptacles, dog waste pickup stations, lightingResponsibility for Implementation:City of Coppell Parks & Recre-ation, EngineeringCost Estimate (see Appendix):Approx. Total = $884,400Funding Sources (see Appendix)Evaluation of Constraints:Trail Description:TilD itiConnectivity:yEvaluation of Opportunities:pp-F14-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanE. Belt Line RoadNorth LakeNorth LakeGrapevine Creek Park Trail (Cont.)M ockingbird Ln.Mockingbird Ln.
Moore RoadMoore Road GrapevineProposed Proposed TrailheadTrailheadProposed Proposed TrailheadTrailheadE. Bethel School Rd.E. Bethel School Rd.elt Line E. Belt LRoadBRRoadLineLelt BeltE. Cotton BeltCotton BeltGrGrGrapevine CreekGrapevine CreekA drainage easement between homes off E. Bethel A drainage easement between homes off E. Bethel School Rd. will provide community access to Grapevine School Rd. will provide community access to Grapevine Creek Park and trails.Creek Park and trails.The trail corridor takes advantage of a large utility The trail corridor takes advantage of a large utility easement that has community access from adjacent easement that has community access from adjacent streets and open-ended cul-de-sac’s.streets and open-ended cul-de-sac’s.A drainage easement with overgrown brush that will A drainage easement with overgrown brush that will require a small bridge crossing and brush clearing.require a small bridge crossing and brush clearing.LegendPriority Trail (trail types and widths vary)Regional VelowebLake TrailCommunity-Wide Spine TrailBridge CrossingArea to be Studied for ImplementationLake TrailCommunity-WidyBridge CrossingBridge CrossingArea to be Stud-F15-
Making Connections RealityLevee Bridge Connector TrailTrail Description:Andrew Brown Park and Moore Road Park contain a network of trails and amenities that serve the citizens of Coppell. Currently this network of trails, found south of Denton Creek, does not connect to the regional Veloweb hike and bike trail north of Denton Creek, except at Denton Tap Road. The trail’s purpose is to provide passage across Denton Creek and link these two trail systems together on the park’s east side. Additional information on this trail can be found in the Appendix.Connectivity:Bridging across Denton Creek will link neighborhood communities together that are currently discon-nected. The connection will provide access to Moore Road Park and Andrew Brown Park as well as other City facilities for those communities to the north. It will also provide access to the regional Veloweb and employment opportunities for those communities to the south.Evaluation of Opportunities:When trail segments are built that do not connect to a destination or to one another, the trail’s user potential is not achieved until the missing links are put in place. The implementation of this bridge crossing at Denton Creek is one of the most important trail segments in the City, as it completes the missing link between two trails and is one of the segments making up the Community-Wide Spine Trail system. The connection’s creation of an additional loop for recreational users would be an-other benefi t. Consideration of current and future maintenance needs and requirements of the creek, parks and levees should be considered when designing the bridge crossing if maintenance vehicle access will be needed. It is recommended that the bridge width be no less than 12 feet to accommodate both walking and cycling use. The bridge may also need to accommodate vehicular weight and traffi c.This trail, being a connector to the regional Veloweb system, makes it eligible for matching funding from NCTCOG. Evaluation of Constraints:Some minimal brush clearing will be needed between the existing trail in Moore Road Park and Denton Creek. Removing trees in the area should be avoided. The length of the bridge crossing will not allow for a free-span bridge and will require it to have piers. A fl ood study evaluation and permit may be required prior to design and implementation. Improvements should be coordinated with the levee district.Trail Type:Community-Wide Spine TrailTrail Length:Approx. 300 feetRecommended Trail Width:12 feetType of Surface:ConcreteRecommended Features:Locator map, mile marker, litter receptacles, dog waste pickup station, lightingResponsibility for Implementation:City of Coppell Parks & Recre-ation, Engineering, NCTCOGCost Estimate (see Appendix):Approx. Total = $715,700Funding Sources (see Appendix)Connectivity:yTrail Description:pEvaluation of Opportunities:Evaluation of Constraints:-F16-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanS.H. 121S.H. 121Moore Road ParkMoore Road ParkLevee Bridge Connector Trail (Cont.)Forest Hill Dr.Forest Hill Dr.M a c A r t h u r B l v d .MacArthur Blvd.Glen Lakes Dr.Glen Lakes Dr.Denton CreekDenton CreekBridging Denton Creek will connect trail users Bridging Denton Creek will connect trail users from the north side into Andrew Brown Park and from the north side into Andrew Brown Park and users from the south into the regional Veloweb.users from the south into the regional Veloweb.A piered bridge will be needed to cross Denton A piered bridge will be needed to cross Denton Creek, and can serve as a icon for the area.Creek, and can serve as a icon for the area.A fl ood study evaluation may be required prior A fl ood study evaluation may be required prior to design and implementation.to design and implementation.LegendPriority Trail (trail types and widths vary)Regional VelowebCommunity TrailBridge CrossingArea to be Studied for Implementation-F17-
Making Connections RealityMoore Road TrailTrail Description:The Moore Road Trail is seen as one of the strongest links between the greatest number of neighborhoods and two key city destinations anchoring each end of the trail. Moore Road currently has a large expanse of pavement approximately 42 feet to 44 feet in width. This provides a great opportunity to create on-street bicycle lanes in both directions, with a separate walk for pedestrians and joggers. Sidewalk widening and the striping/signing of the bicycle lane can take place separately, if need be, in order to separate bicyclists from pedestrians. Additional information on this trail can be found in the Appendix.Connectivity:Implementing this trail is seen as highly advantageous for the City. It will directly link many neighborhood communities together and will connect to Andrew Brown Park to the north, as well as a future mix of uses and recreational opportu-nities to the south around North Lake. The Moore Road Trail will serve as the north/south link between the east/west regional Veloweb trails located on the City’s north and south ends, linking several parks, schools and retail destinations together. This trail will also provide access to the community trails along Sandy Lake Road in the middle of the City, and Grapevine Creek Park Trail on the City’s south end. It is recommended that trailheads be provided on both the north and south ends of this trail.Evaluation of Opportunities:There is a possibility to create 5- to 6-foot-wide striped bike lanes on both sides of the road, but these bike lanes should not be any less than 4 feet in width and should follow AASHTO design standards. South of Sandy Lake Road, the roadway width narrows down to a point where no parking should be allowed on either side of the roadway. With Moore Road Trail providing a direct connection from the City’s north and south sides and connecting to major east/west region-al Veloweb routes, matching funding from NCTCOG may be available. Evaluation of Constraints:Moore Road currently has one traffi c lane, in both directions, with areas of on-street parking. The roadway width ap-pears able to accommodate on-street bike lanes, but a study may need to be completed by the engineering department. Four-foot sidewalks exist on both sides of the road in most areas. The east side should be replaced with a concrete walk, preferably 6 feet in width, because it has far-fewer constraints and limitations with grading, utilities, fronting homes and number of property owners. Easements will have to be obtained from property owners if the walk cannot fi t within the current public right-of-way. There should be few constraints with grading or utilities.Trail Type:Community-Wide Spine TrailTrail Length:Approx. 9,700 feet (1.8 miles)Recommended Trail Width:4-6 foot bike lane 5-6 foot walkType of Surface:ConcreteRecommended Features:Crosswalk striping or brick banding at intersections, locator maps, mile markers, bicycle racks, litter re-ceptacles, dog waste pickup stationsResponsibility for Implementation:City of Coppell Parks & Recre-ation, Engineering, NCTCOGCost Estimate (see Appendix):Approx. Total = $581,300Funding Sources (see Appendix)Trail Description:TilD itiShared Roadway Section:Connectivity:yEvaluation of Opportunities:Evaluation of Constraints:-F18-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanBelt Line RoadE. Sandy Lake Rd.E. Sandy Lake Rd.Moore Road Trail (Cont.)Southern SectionNorthern SectionNorthern SectionMoore RoadMoore Road
AustinAustinElementaryElementarytiontionNorth LakeNorth LakeMatchlineMatchlineE. Sandy Lake Rd.ddd.d.Moore RoadMoore Road
Moore RoadMoore RoadAndrewBrownParkParkwAndrewAndrewwBProposed Proposed TrailheadTrailheadProposed Proposed TrailheadsRoadRoadA concrete walk is not continuous on the A concrete walk is not continuous on the east side, but has wider corridors available east side, but has wider corridors available for the implementation of a pedestrian walk.for the implementation of a pedestrian walk.The width of Moore Rd. could accommo-The width of Moore Rd. could accommo-date bike lanes on both sides of the road date bike lanes on both sides of the road plus parking north of Sandy Lake Rd.plus parking north of Sandy Lake Rd.Upgrading the current 4-foot walk to a 6-foot Upgrading the current 4-foot walk to a 6-foot pedestrian walk should avoid mature trees.pedestrian walk should avoid mature trees.The west side of Moore Rd. has more The west side of Moore Rd. has more constraints than the east side, including constraints than the east side, including residents fronting Moore Rd.residents fronting Moore Rd.Minor crossing of drainage corridors like Minor crossing of drainage corridors like this one will require the walk to go from this one will require the walk to go from back of curb to bridge wall.back of curb to bridge wall.The east side has residents siding to the The east side has residents siding to the trail corridor and will require an easement trail corridor and will require an easement if the right-of-way is not wide enough.if the right-of-way is not wide enough.LeeLeeElem.Elem.LegendPriority Trail (trail types and widths vary)Regional VelowebLake TrailCommunity-Wide Spine TrailCommunity TrailArea to be Studied for Implementation-F19-
Making Connections RealityDenton Creek Park TrailTrail Description:The ability to link to other trail systems either already in place or being planned by surrounding cities makes for a more complete regional trail system that benefi ts residents of all cities and contributes to higher trail system use. The multiple trails making up Denton Creek Park Trail connect to several area trails while also continuing the regional Veloweb west to Lewisville and Grapevine. Additional information on this trail can be found in the Appendix.Connectivity:The current western extent of this trail is intended to meet up with a trail planned by the City of Lewisville. Con-tinuing this regional Veloweb trail to the west will link to Grapevine’s existing Grapevine Mills Run Trail. At the southern end of Denton Creek Park, an existing segment of the Community-Wide Spine Trial will connect to the regional Veloweb. Another connection that will be provided includes approximately 200 feet of Community-Wide Spine Trail needed along Westminster Way to North Coppell Road, which is currently a missing link. Extending the Community Trail north along North Coppell Road will provide a more direct route to the regional Veloweb for those north/south-traveling trail users. Lastly, the eastern segment of this trail on the north side of Denton Creek will link to an ex-isting trail in Magnolia Park that extends east into Andrew Brown Park under Denton Tap Road. Neighborhood sidewalk connections should be included and connect into this system of trails at as many points as possible.Evaluation of Opportunities:Much of Denton Creek in this area is very beautiful and still in its natural state, allowing for an exceptionally sce-nic segment of the regional Veloweb. Land on Denton Creek’s north side is currently undeveloped and should be planned for developing trails along the northern bank, leaving a tree buffer to preserve the rich character and protect the bank from erosion when this area begins to develop. This trail will collect trail users from those communities north of Denton Creek and should be 8 feet wide. This segment will link users to the 12-foot-wide, east/west regional Veloweb extending to Lewisville and Grapevine.A joint effort between Coppell, Lewisville and Grapevine should be considered to continue this trail connection from its current end point, south of Denton Creek Park in Coppell, to the Grapevine Mills Run Trail west of State Highway 121 in Grapevine. The opportunity to bring trails together from all three cities would open up a much more-extensive and far-reaching network of trails available to these communities.Providing trail access to the undeveloped Denton Creek Park will help support future park activities and uses and will also link this park to Andrew Brown Park. The trail segment on the north side of Denton Creek could be a developer-implemented endeavor separate from the rest of the Denton Creek Park Trails.Evaluation of Constraints:This trail segment’s western end is intended to meet up with a planned City of Lewisville trail coming from the north. The bridging of Denton Creek and the exact location where this will happen should be a joint effort and coordinated by Coppell and Lewisville. The bridge may be eligible for matching funding by NCTCOG for its con-nection into this regional Veloweb trail. The trail segment north of Denton Creek will require easements from the property owners and should be imple-mented when any development takes place on these tracts. This trail segment could be completed by the developer and could be completed separately from the regional Veloweb and N. Coppell Road trail connection. Easements from property owners will be needed for all trail segments except the portion running through Denton Creek Park. Coordination with TxDOT will be needed to cross under N. State Highway 121 on the south side of Denton Creek. Some topographic constraints exist just east of N. State Highway 121 and may require retaining walls or re-grading some areas.Trail Type:Regional Veloweb, Community Trail, & Community-Wide SpineTrail Length:Regional Veloweb: Approx. 3,500 feet Community Trail: Approx. 5,400 feet Community-Wide Spine Trail: Approx. 200 feet Total: Approx. 9,100 feet (1.7 mi.)Recommended Trail Width:Regional Veloweb: 12 feet Community Trail: 8 feet Community-Wide Spine: 10 feetType of Surface:ConcreteRecommended Features:Locator maps, mile markers,shade shelters, benches, bicycle rack, litter receptacles, dog waste pickup stations, water fountains, lightingResponsibility for Implementation:City of Coppell Parks & Rec., Engineering, NCTCOG, City’s of Lewis-ville & Grapevine , future developerCost Estimate (see Appendix):Approx. Total = $1,155,200Funding Sources (see Appendix)Trail Description:TrailDescription:pConnectivity:yEvaluation of Opportunities:ppEvaluation of Constraints:-F20-
Parkway Blvd.Parkway Blvd.Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanN. StateN. StateHighway 121Highway 121City ofCity ofLewisville, TXLewisville, TXDenton Creek Denton Creek ParkParkDenton Creek Park Trail (Cont.)N. Coppell Rd.Canyon Dr.Canyon Dr.Andrew Andrew Brown ParkBrown ParkMagnolia ParkMagnolia ParkDenton Creek Denton Creek Denton Creek Denton Creek Screening the junk yard will help trail Screening the junk yard will help trail users feel safer.users feel safer.The park like setting behind the apartments The park like setting behind the apartments provides a great place for area residents to provides a great place for area residents to access the regional Veloweb trail.access the regional Veloweb trail.Currently the trail reduces from 8-ft. Currently the trail reduces from 8-ft. to 4-ft. along Westminster Way, to to 4-ft. along Westminster Way, to 12- ft. down the drainage corridor.12- ft. down the drainage corridor.Trail connections to the future Denton Trail connections to the future Denton Creek Park will connect area residents.Creek Park will connect area residents.The trail along the scenic Denton Creek The trail along the scenic Denton Creek should avoid and protect mature trees.should avoid and protect mature trees.LegendPriority Trail (trail types and widths vary)Regional VelowebCommunity-Wide Spine TrailCommunity TrailTrail by Adjacent CityBridge CrossingArea to be Studied for ImplementationnTrail by AdjacenyjggBridge CrossingBridge CrossingArea to be StudA tbStd-F21-
Making Connections RealityCottonwood Creek TrailTrail Description:The Cottonwood Creek Trail will allow improved access to Coppell High School and Andrew Brown Park, as well as providing links between neighborhoods, schools and the City park system. The trail will provide much-needed area connectivity while avoiding pedestrian and vehicular confl icts.Neighborhood sidewalks located on both sides of Parkway Boulevard currently do not connect to the trail system in Andrew Brown Park or Coppell High School. The neighborhood sidewalk located on the south side of Parkway Boulevard splits west of the bridge crossing at Cottonwood Creek, providing access to the pedestrian underpass under the road, which currently doesn’t tie into any other trails or sidewalks. Since the pedestrian underpass is already in place, the neighborhood sidewalks on Parkway Boulevard’s north side can be connected to the south by benching a trail in the hillside just like one found on the south side of the road. Providing a trail connection to the high school will require a bridge across Cottonwood Creek. As with other future segments of this trail connection, an 8-foot wide trail is recommended. Additional information on this trail can be found in the Appendix.Connectivity:The Cottonwood Creek Trail provides one of the best opportunities for movement from one key city destina-tion to another in a confl ict-free pedestrian/vehicular environment. The trail would allow a safer route for chil-dren and adults from area neighborhoods and community parks to move between schools and the sporting events held at the high school. Local neighborhood walks should connect to the main trail for accessibility.First and foremost, this trail segment will link together Andrew Brown Park, two schools and multiple area neighborhoods. Longer term, this trail will provide additional connection to the east, down Parkway Bou-levard and to the west, down Cottonwood Creek to Wagon Wheel Park. The full length of the trail has the po-tential to link more key city destinations together than any other trail planned. The trail will link Wagon Wheel Park, Andrew Brown Park, the Town Center, community gardens, offi ces, retail, three schools and numerous disconnected neighborhoods.Evaluation of Opportunities:The key link needed to mitigate pedestrian and vehicular confl ict between the high school and Andrew Brown Park is the pedestrian underpass already in place under Parkway Boulevard along Cottonwood Creek. Along the north side of the high school, a wide cleared area along Cottonwood Creek provides a great opportunity for the community trail. The cul-de-sac located at the end of Winding Hollow Lane opens to the creek, where a bridge would be needed to connect the trail from the east side of the creek to the west.Evaluation of Constraints:Easements will need to be obtained from the Copperstone HOA for connections south of the creek, as well as from two landowners in Cottonwood Estates. The open space located in the open-ended cul-de-sac on Winding Hollow Lane has a shared property boundary with the two adjacent land owners. A fl oodway and a drainage easement exist over the open space as well as a 15-foot utility easement connection to the street right-of-way. The trail spur to the front of the high school will require an easement from the Coppell Indepen-dent School District (CISD).At the high school’s northwest corner, the fence line comes very close to the high bank of a bend in Cotton-wood Creek. A cantilevered boardwalk could be used to make the short connection needed.Trail Type:Community TrailTrail Length:Main Trail: Approx. 3,100 feet Spur: Approx. 700 feet Total = Approx. 3,800 feetRecommended Trail Width:8-10 feetType of Surface:ConcreteRecommended Features:Locator maps, mile markers, benches, bicycle racks, litter recep-tacles, dog waste pickup stations, lightingResponsibility for Implementation:City of Coppell Parks & Recre-ation, EngineeringCost Estimate (see Appendix):Approx. Total = $387,300Funding Sources (see Appendix)Connectivity:yTrail Description:Trail DescriptionpEvaluation of Constraints:Evaluation of Opportunities:pp-F22-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanCoppell High Coppell High SchoolSchoolW. Parkway Blvd.Andrew Brown Andrew Brown ParkParkElementaryCottonwood Creek Trail (Cont.)W. Parkway Blvd.W. Parkway Blvd.Minyard Dr.Minyard Dr.Winding Hollow Ln.Winding Hollow Ln.kway Blvd.ay Blkway Blvd.Martel Ln.Martel Ln.Cottonwood CreekCottonwood CreekCommunity-Wide Trails Implementation PlanC it Wid T il I l t ti PlOpen-ended cul-de-sac on Winding Hollow Ln. Open-ended cul-de-sac on Winding Hollow Ln. will connect neighborhood walks to the trail.will connect neighborhood walks to the trail.Cottonwood Estate residents own to the centerline Cottonwood Estate residents own to the centerline of the creek, and some have horses fenced in . of the creek, and some have horses fenced in . Wide unobstructed open space between the Wide unobstructed open space between the high school and Cottonwood Creek.high school and Cottonwood Creek.The northwest corner of the high school prop-The northwest corner of the high school prop-erty comes close to the high bank of the creek.erty comes close to the high bank of the creek.WWWSouth side of Parkway Blvd. already has con-South side of Parkway Blvd. already has con-nection to the pedestrian underpass.nection to the pedestrian underpass.Pedestrian underpass under Parkway Blvd.Pedestrian underpass under Parkway Blvd.LegendPriority Trail (trail types and widths vary)Community TrailBridge CrossingArea to be Studied for Implementation-F23-
Making Connections RealityGrapevine Springs Park TrailTrail Description:The scenic Grapevine Creek snakes its way through most of this trail corridor. With dense vegetation and large mature trees, this very scenic trail corridor provides a great opportunity to develop a trail system benefi t-ing the whole community. The redevelopment of Old Town Coppell, the Coppell Farmers Market and the re-cently completed senior center adjacent to the park will all benefi t from connections being made to W. Bethel Road. The segment of the Grapevine Spring Park Trail that is located along Freeport Parkway and Wrangler Drive are part of the Community-Wide Spine Trail system and should be 10 feet in width. The other trail seg-ments along Grapevine Creek are Community Trails and only need to be 8 feet wide. Additional information on this trail can be found in the Appendix.Connectivity:The priority of this trail is to provide linkage along West Bethel Road, which is under design/construction. The trail will also connect to the key City destinations and neighborhoods along Grapevine Springs Park, Pinkerton Elementary and Coppell Middle School West, as well as to the many employment centers in the area. The Grapevine Springs Park Trail connects to many pertinent City destinations, and at the same time provides connections to many destinations from other Community Trails, Community-Wide Spine Trail and regional Veloweb trails. All neighborhood sidewalks should connect into this trail at as many points as possible.Evaluation of Opportunities:A network of decomposed granite (DG) walking paths currently makes its way around Grapevine Springs Park. For the segment of Grapevine Springs Park Trail traversing the park area, several different options should be considered. A new concrete trail could be put in place, the existing DG trail could be widened and new DG trail put in place, or the east trail fork could be comprised of concrete with the west fork employing the existing DG. Whichever option is chosen, measures should be taken to protect the character, history and feel of Grapevine Springs Park.Evaluation of Constraints:The boundaries for Grapevine Springs Park do not extend to W. Bethel Road for the western fork, but begin at the cul-de-sac head of Park Street. A couple of pedestrian bridges will be needed to cross Grapevine Creek as it snakes its way through the park, as well as at Southwestern Boulevard to provide access to Pinkerton Elementary. Even though planning for the future DART line along the Cotton Belt has not taken place, coordination with DART will be needed for the pedestrian underpass along Grapevine Creek. This connection is needed to con-tinue this trail south under the Cotton Belt rail line. Access from the future Cotton Belt Trail to the Grapevine Springs Park Trail should be considered and planned for concurrently. A topographic survey of the trail corridor will be needed to understand and address any topographic con-straints along the creek bank’s edge. The creek’s north side appears to provide the best opportunity due to its gentler slopes and minimal need for bridge crossings. Larger trees should be avoided and clearing should be kept to a minimum in order to preserve the corridor’s natural character. Although a scenic creek corridor, this trail has some areas retained by individual property owners, and ease-ments will have to be obtained from those property owners between the Cotton Belt and Southwestern Blvd., and along Freeport Parkway and Wrangler Drive. When obtaining easements along these two roads, it is recommended to obtain enough to allow for trees to be planted on both sides of the trail.Trail Type:Community Trail & Community-Wide Spine TrailTrail Length:Community Trail: Approx. 9,900 feetCommunity-Wide Spine Trail: Approx. 3,100 feet Total: Approx. 13,000 ft. (2.5 mi.)Recommended Trail Width:8 feet and 10 feetType of Surface:Concrete (optional decom-posed granite)Recommended Features:Locator maps, mile mark-ers, shade shelters, benches, bicycle racks, litter receptacles, dog waste pickup stationsResponsibility for Implementation:City of Coppell Parks & Recre-ation, EngineeringCost Estimate (see Appendix):Approx. Total = $1,046,000Funding Sources (see Appendix)Trail Description:TilD itipConnectivity:yEvaluation of Opportunities:ppEvaluation of Constraints:-F24-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanFreeport Parkw ayFreeport ParkwayGrapevine CreekGrapevine CreekS. Denton Tap Rd.S. Denton Tap Rd.Grapevine Springs ParkGrapevine Springs Park Trail (Cont.)S. Coppell Rd.Airline Dr.Airline Dr.S. Belt Line Rd.S. Belt Line Rd.
North LakeNorth Lake
Wrangler Dr.Southwestern Blvd.owwuthwestern Blvdohwestern Blvd.uthwestern ouBlvd.Cotton Belt LineCotton Belt LinePinkertonPinkertonElementaryElementaryCoppell Middle Coppell Middle School West & School West & Service CenterService CenterW. Bethel Rd.S. S. CoppellCoppellFarmersFarmersMarketMarketSeniorSeniorCenterCenterprie SSSpriSpinggs gse kkkkkkkrkkPark St.Park St.Special care and attention should be taken to Special care and attention should be taken to preserve the unique character of the park.preserve the unique character of the park.The crossing of and future trail connection to the The crossing of and future trail connection to the Cotton Belt should be coordinated with DART.Cotton Belt should be coordinated with DART.The Grapevine Creek trail corridor will need The Grapevine Creek trail corridor will need some brush clearing, but should avoid mature some brush clearing, but should avoid mature tress as much as possible.tress as much as possible.Wrangler Dr. and Freeport Ave. have large Wrangler Dr. and Freeport Ave. have large landscape reserves ideal for a trail system .landscape reserves ideal for a trail system .LegendPriority Trail (trail types and widths vary)Regional VelowebLake TrailCommunity-Wide Spine TrailCommunity TrailBridge CrossingArea to be Studied for Implementation-F25-
Making Connections RealityNorth Lake College Connector TrailTrail Description:An addition to the newly built North Lake College in the western part of the City, this trail provides a logical means for connections from many parts of the City. No walks from the east currently connect to the college, so providing a trail connection to the college would also unite several major employment destinations, all benefi tting from trails. Additional information on this trail can be found in the Appendix.Connectivity:A Community Trail located on the south side of West Sandy Lake Road creates an opportunity to provide a direct connection between the college and the Community-Wide Spine Trail system at West Sandy Lake Road and Freeport Parkway. This trail will provide a more complete system, linking it to many key City destinations. Serving as an east/west connection between Royal Lane and Freeport Parkway, two important north/south trails, this trail provides the opportunity for a future connection to Grapevine, however no trail connection is currently planned for by Grapevine at this time. Evaluation of Opportunities:An existing 8-foot-wide trail coming from the east is located on the south side of the road, however it currently ends at the intersection of West Sandy Lake Road and Freeport Parkway. Since there are large landscaped reserves along the road, an 8-foot concrete trail should extend and continue along the road’s south side. This will serve to improve access to the college for both walking and cycling use.Evaluation of Constraints:The landscaped reserve area along West Sandy Lake Road currently contains obstacles such as power poles, fi re hydrants, street signs and, occasionally, minor grading issues. Many trees have been planted in these reserves. Because this corridor includes predominantly industrial-use buildings that are in good shape but lacking architectural character, the preservation of trees planted in the reserve should be a priority. Such landscape amenities will visually screen portions of the buildings and help soften the scale of the long facades. When trail alignment presents unavoidable confl icts with existing trees, care should be taken to relocate them to other locations within the corridor.In order to avoid obstacles and make for the best use and location of the trail in the landscaped reserve, an easement will need to be obtained from the businesses and the college.Trail Type:Community TrailTrail Length:Approx. 3,700 feetRecommended Trail Width:8 feetType of Surface:ConcreteRecommended Features:Signalized crossing at Freeport Parkway and S. Royal Lane. Cross-walk striping or brick banding at all other intersectionsResponsibility for Implementation:City of Coppell Parks & Recre-ation, EngineeringCost Estimate (see Appendix):Approx. Total = $254,200Funding Sources (see Appendix)Connectivity:yTrail Description:pEvaluation of Opportunities:ppEvaluation of Constraints:-F26-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanS. State Highway 121ghway 121ay 12ghway 121City ofCity ofGrapevine, TXGrapevine, TXW. Sandy Lake Rd.W. Sandy Lake Rd.North Lake CollegeNorth Lake CollegeThe existing 8-ft. trail coming from the east The existing 8-ft. trail coming from the east ending at Freeport Parkway.ending at Freeport Parkway.North Lake College Connector Trail (Cont.)N. Coppell Rd.N. Coppell Rd.S. Royal Ln.S. Royal Ln.
Northpoint Dr.Northpoint Dr.
Freeport Pkwy.Freeport Pkwy.The recently completed North Lake College is The recently completed North Lake College is one of the key city destinations.one of the key city destinations.Typical obstacles found in the landscaped Typical obstacles found in the landscaped reserves include power poles, fi re hydrants, reserves include power poles, fi re hydrants, trees, and road signs.trees, and road signs.Currently, no walk exists along W. Sandy Lake Currently, no walk exists along W. Sandy Lake Road connecting the rest of the city to the North Road connecting the rest of the city to the North Lake College. This location presents a potential Lake College. This location presents a potential connection point for Grapevine in the future.connection point for Grapevine in the future.Some of the landscaped reserves have been Some of the landscaped reserves have been graded to convey water, and will have to be graded to convey water, and will have to be addressed when constructing the trail.addressed when constructing the trail.LegendPriority Trail (trail types and widths vary)Community-Wide Spine TrailCommunity TrailArea to be Studied for ImplementationCommunity-WidCitTCommunity TraArea to be Stud-F27-
Making Connections RealityWagon Wheel - Jr. College Connector TrailTrail Description:Wagon Wheel Park currently has a 12-foot-hike and bike trail that connects the park’s eastern and western portions. Recreational opportunities exist on both sides of the park, with the existing hike and bike trail traveling through a scenic and natural area where Cottonwood Creek meanders. Wagon Wheel Park is one of the key destinations for Coppell residents. This is a logical choice for the Community-Wide Trails to tie into the existing trail, providing a more complete and contiguous trail system. These trails are intended to serve a primarily recreational use, but will also serve as a connector to the junior college. The eastern trail segment should be 10 feet to 12 feet in width to accommodate both walking and cycling use. This width will also allow for expected capacity needed for its connection into the Community-Wide Spine Trail system. The western trail segment will only require 8 feet width to accommodate user capacity to the junior college while still allowing walking and cycling use. Additional information on this trail can be found in the Appendix.Connectivity:Of the two trail segments, the eastern segment is intended to continue the existing 12-foot trail out to Freeport Parkway. At this point, the trail will tie into the 10-foot-wide Community-Wide Spine Trail along Freeport Parkway that is currently under design as of Fall 2009. This portion of the trail will complete a critical link of the Community-Wide Spine Trail system and provide the missing link to a proposed trailhead located on the park’s western side. The western segment of trail will provide connectivity to North Lake College and the North Lake College Connector Trail at West Sandy Lake Road. The western trail segment will also provide con-nections into the trail continuation along Royal Lane, ultimately tying into the Cotton Belt Trail to the south.Evaluation of Opportunities:Wagon Wheel Park is the second-largest park in the City and a key City destination for a multitude of different recreational activities and events. This trail segment presents a grand opportunity to connect the community to the park through the Community-Wide Trails. The completion of these two trail segments will serve both to improve park access and provide a link between area neighbor-hoods, employment centers and educational opportunities located on the western edge of the city.Lighting for the trail should complement the character found on the existing trail. A trailhead is recommended to be placed within Wagon Wheel Park. Parking is available on both the eastern and western portions of the park, but with closer proximity to employment and greater trail direction op-portunities, the western part of the park is recommended.Evaluation of Constraints:The western trail segment will require working with the junior college to expand the existing 4-foot walk along South Royal Lane. An easement will also be required from the businesses along the rest of this trail. At the entry to the park, there is an opportunity to take the trail in through the trees, but large trees should be avoided.Trail Type:East: Community-Wide Spine West: Community TrailTrail Length: East: Approx. 2,000 feet West: Approx. 3,500 feet Total: Approx. 5,500 feetRecommended Trail Width:East: 10-12 feet West: 8 feetType of Surface:ConcreteRecommended Features:Crosswalk striping or brick banding at intersections, trailhead, locator maps, mile markers, benches, bicycle racks, litter receptacles, dog waste pickup stations, water fountains, lightingResponsibility for Implementation:City of Coppell Parks & Recre-ation, EngineeringCost Estimate (see Appendix):Approx. Total = $437,000Funding Sources (see Appendix)Connectivity:yTrail Description:pEvaluation of Opportunities:ppEvaluation of Constraints:-F28-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation Planmentation PlanWagon Wheel Park cur-Wagon Wheel Park cur-rently has a 12-foot hike rently has a 12-foot hike and bike trail that con-and bike trail that con-nects the east and west nects the east and west sides of the park together sides of the park together through a scenic natural through a scenic natural area crossing Cottonwood area crossing Cottonwood Creek. Connecting this Creek. Connecting this trail segment to the rest of trail segment to the rest of the community-wide trails the community-wide trails is of high priority.is of high priority.Creekview DriveCreekview DriveWagon Wheel ParkWagon Wheel ParkFreeport ParkwayFreeport Parkway
Future Creekview-Future Creekview-Bethel TrailBethel TrailCoppell Nature Coppell Nature Park TrailPark TrailWagon Wheel - Jr. College Connector Trail - East (Cont.)One of the key destinations One of the key destinations within the park off the Cop-within the park off the Cop-pell Natural Park Trail is a pell Natural Park Trail is a boardwalk and overlook of boardwalk and overlook of the creek in a very scenic the creek in a very scenic setting.setting.Besides the many recre-Besides the many recre-ational opportunities that ational opportunities that Wagon Wheel Park offers, Wagon Wheel Park offers, many events also take many events also take place that range from small place that range from small to large gatherings.to large gatherings.Cottonwood CreekCottonwood CreekLegendPriority Trail (trail types and widths vary)Community-Wide Spine TrailCommunity TrailArea to be Studied for ImplementationCommunity-WidCitTCommunity TraArea to be Stud-F29-
Making Connections RealityS. Royal Ln.S. Royal Ln.Wagon Wheel ParkWagon Wheel ParkWagon Wheel - Jr. College Connector Trail - West (Cont.)W. Sandy Lake Rd.W. Sandy Lake Rd.Northpoint Dr.Northpoint Dr.North LakeNorth LakeCollegeCollegeProposed Proposed TrailheadTrailheadThe 4-foot walk along the east side of North Lake College The 4-foot walk along the east side of North Lake College needs to be upgraded to an 8-foot walk to accommodate needs to be upgraded to an 8-foot walk to accommodate both bicyclists and pedestrians.both bicyclists and pedestrians.The east and west sides of Royal Lane have minor con-The east and west sides of Royal Lane have minor con-straints that generally have to do with grade change, sig-straints that generally have to do with grade change, sig-nage, and existing landscaping.nage, and existing landscaping.Particular attention to pedestrian safety at street intersec-Particular attention to pedestrian safety at street intersec-tions should be taken to make vehicles aware and cau-tions should be taken to make vehicles aware and cau-tious of trail users.tious of trail users.LegendPriority Trail (trail types and widths vary)Community-Wide Spine TrailCommunity TrailArea to be Studied for ImplementationCommunity-WidCitTCommunity TraArea to be Stud-F30-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanG. Summary...-G1-
Making Connections RealitySummaryCREATING HEALTHY HABITS BY BUILDING HEALTHY COMMUNITIES“With the emphasis on health and fi t-ness in today's society, trails are be-coming just as important as streets and sidewalks in our communities. Offering people a place to walk, run or ride that encourages them to con-nect with nature is a valuable benefi t that is relatively inexpensive to pro-vide.” - American Trails OrganizationIt is not a niche market that desires trails but, rather, an under-tapped mass market, according to a 2005 survey of potential home buyers by Brook Warrick of American Lives.• 92% want low-traffi c areas • 79% want walking and biking paths• 78% want natural open space• Only 22% want a golf course within the community.The development of the Community-Wide Trails Implementation Plan was set in motion by The 2030 Vision for Coppell. Its purpose is to ensure that Coppell’s high quality of life will be maintained while still allowing for growth in the City and the region, as well as to formulate strategies to manage future opportunities and challenges. If done correctly, the implementation of a city-wide trail system can play a vital role in Coppell residents’ individual well-being, local economy and environment while also providing traffi c congestion relief.The Community-Wide Trails Implementation Plan is the culmination of a long planning process that has included an in-depth analysis of trail routes, public workshop and survey, Park Board presentations and guid-ance, and coordination with the Parks and Recreation and Engineering Services Departments. Goals were established and modifi ed based on community input received, and this input formed the framework under which the trails’ master plan was prepared. Safe, convenient and well-designed facilities are essential to encouraging trail use, and, just as important, to creating a complete and connected system of on-street, off-street and end-of-trip facilities. Trail design should be a thoughtful process that studies user types, trail use purpose, environmental conditions, and con-siderations of grade, interesting features, gentle trail meandering and privacy issues.When completed, the Coppell trails system will link many neighborhood communities and provide connec-tions to many key City destinations. By providing access to a wide array of retail, parks, schools, neighbor-hoods and other key City destinations, the trail system will establish a network of connections useful to many Coppell citizens. The system will enable outdoor enthusiasts to appreciate all that Coppell has to offer. Con-nections to existing and planned trails will encourage recreational use as well as bicycle commuting, as safer bicycle networks are established and expanded.Implementation of the Coppell trails network will rely on cooperation among property owners as well as continued cooperation from local, regional, state and federal agencies with jurisdiction over planned trail cor-ridors.The appendices contain additional information on those trails deemed priority as well as more detail on the funding sources available and cost estimates of what each trail may cost to implement. Full-size trails maps and aerials have also been included. This information has been provided in electronic format on a compact disc for easy duplication, storage and access.-G2-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanH. Appendix...-H1-
Making Connections RealityAppendix ContentAerial Photographs - full sizePhotos of Opportunities and ConstraintsAdjacent Recorded PlatsPlats• Aerials• Site Photos• General Cost Estimates• Funding Sources Available• Trail Master Plan Maps• Trail Amenities• The compact disc included with this report contains additional information and details obtained during the investigating of top-priority trails. This information is in addition to that in section F. Priority Trail Implementa-tion and will aid in the preliminary investigation of trail implementation, but further study and analysis will be needed for actual design and detailed cost estimates.“Nature makes nothing in vain.” - Aristotle-H2-
Mr. Greg Garcia Via Email and Hand Delivery
Chairman, Parks and Recreation Board
816 S. Coppell Road
Coppell, TX 75019
Mr. Brad Reid Via Email and Hand Delivery
Director of Parks and Recreation
816 S. Coppell Road
Coppell, TX 75019
Re: Neighborhood concerns with Community Wide Trails Implementation Plan,
specifically Grapevine Creek Park Trail (pages F14 and F15 of Community Wide Trails
Implementation Plan, attached with hand-delivered originals)
Dear Brad and Greg:
I am writing on behalf of myself and my neighbors regarding our concerns over the
proposed Grapevine Creek Park Trail, one of several trails set forth in the Community
Wide Trails Implementation Plan (the “Plan”), a final draft of which the City Council
approved on October 27, 2009. As shown on attached page F15, Grapevine Creek Park is
a semi-circle shaped, undeveloped park area bordered on its south side by Beltline Road,
and to the west, north, and east by Swan, Bethel School and Pelican roads, respectively.
My neighbors and I represent more than twenty Northlake Woodlands homeowners along
these three roads; most of us own homes which border Grapevine Creek Park.
On Monday, January 4, 2010, we had the opportunity to express our concerns before the
Coppell Parks and Recreation Board. Although the Board voted to recommend the Plan in
whole, it did state that it would include notes addressing our concerns for subsequent
discussion at an as-yet-unscheduled City Council work session regarding implementation
of the Plan. Greg had asked if I would furnish him with a copy of the notes from which I
was speaking, and I agreed to do so after I had put them in more legible form. This letter
therefore provides a summary of our concerns, as well as a brief background of the issues
and a proposal for their mitigation.
Background: As stated above, City Council approved a final draft of the Plan on October
27th, 2009. Although work on this Plan apparently began in early 2009, I was, as were my
neighbors, completely unaware of it until the events of the October 27th council meeting
were reported in the local newspaper. After immediately going to the City’s website to
find and read the Plan, I become concerned about the scope and nature of the Plan
regarding Grapevine Creek Park. After I expressed my concerns to several of my
neighbors, we met with Brad in order to determine how best to proceed. He notified us of
the January 4th Park Board meeting at which we voiced our concerns. It is my
understanding that the City Council is the entity that will next consider these issues.
As set forth in the Plan, the Grapevine Creek Park Trail (hereinafter the “Trail”) is
designated as one of several “prioritized trails” which “are intended to be key pieces of the
larger system that have the potential to link all of Coppell together . . .” (Plan, page F2)
The Plan notes that development of the Trail serves two main purposes, that of “east-west
movement for the local community (and of the) . . . opportunity to give citizens access to
the scenic aspects of Grapevine Creek Park.” (Plan, page F14)
The specifics of the proposed Trail are located on pages F14-15 of the Plan. The proposed
Trail is to be concrete, 8-10 feet wide with a 12 foot segment, with parking, locator maps,
mile markers, shade shelter, benches, bicycle racks, litter receptacles, dog waste pick up
stations and lighting. Clearly, this is planned as a high use trail; the Plan envisions it as
“funneling pedestrians” from area to regional trails. (Plan, page F14)
The design of the trail is shown on page F15 of the Plan (outlined in orange). The lower
portion of the trail begins at Moore Road, and roughly parallels that of the east-west
Cotton Belt trail (outlined in pink) directly below it, until it reaches Mockingbird Road
and diverges to run along a utility easement. Between Moore and Mockingbird Roads, the
trail also has a northward reaching “loop”segment which goes deep into Grapevine Creek
Park and nearby homes in the Northlake Woodlands neighborhood. The loop is to be
accessed from Bethel School Road by an 8-10 foot cement trail that would run along the
side and back yards of two homes fronting Bethel School Road and Swan Road.
The report acknowledges that construction of this loop will require the building of three
bridges, a topographic survey and the removal of brush and trees in this area; any trees “of
size” (an undefined term) are to be protected. (Plan, page F14)
Concerns: As residents of the neighborhood most immediately impacted by the proposed
Trail, we have several concerns:
Safety: By far, our most immediate concern is safety, both for the potential users
of this Trail, as well as the current residents of this neighborhood. As stated previously,
the Plan envisions that this will be a high usage trail “funneling pedestrians” through
various areas. Access to the “loop” of the Trail will be by a trail between homes on
Bethel School and Swan, at the curve on Bethel School between its bisection by Swan on
the south and by Hawk on the north. The curve at Bethel School at this point is not only
quite pronounced, it is also blind; anyone looking to cross the street cannot see cars
coming east on this curve. Further, cars coming east on this curve are also traveling
downhill, and rarely following the thirty mile per hour speed limit. The danger of this
crossing is well-known to everyone in the neighborhood; most of us do not allow our kids
to cross the street at that point because of it.
In addition to the blind curve at the Trail’s proposed point of loop access, Swan Road also
feeds into Bethel School from the South on one side, and Hawk Road from the North on
the other side of the access point. Even without pedestrians crossing, the street can be
quite difficult to navigate, especially if one is not familiar with the area. Additional, if any
cars are parked on this curved portion of Bethel School (as they most certainly will be if
this is a Trail access point), it is virtually impossible to see other cars rounding the curve
or pedestrians crossing on foot.
From the Plan consultant’s perspective (probably an aerial photograph of the site coupled
with a quick drive by) this area probably looked like a good point to access the Trail’s
loop, as there is a drainage easement/creek between the two homes. However, those of us
who have lived in the neighborhood for any length of time can attest to the potential
problems with this Plan. I have lived on Bethel School for fourteen years, and have
witnessed several accidents, and numerous near accidents, on this portion of Bethel
School Road. It is badly designed and dangerous even when used only by motor
vehicles. To actively encourage pedestrians to cross and cars to park at this point is
to invite disaster and is, quite simply, unconscionable. We urge the City and its
consultants to seriously reconsider the ramifications of encouraging pedestrians and
parking on Bethel School Road at this point.
In addition to safety concerns for the proposed users of this Trail, there are also safety
concerns for the residents of this neighborhood. Many of us with homes bordering
Grapevine Creek Park do not have fences; our back yards are open to the woods.
However, the proposed “loop” of the Plan’s trail comes quite close to many of our homes.
The construction of the loop’s eight to ten foot concrete trails, shade shelters, three
bridges, lighting, and other structures will necessarily entail the bringing in of heavy
equipment, substantial grading of the entire area and the removal of virtually all the brush
and trees which could screen our homes from these trails. Further, due to the fact that this
entire area is in a floodplain, we are also restricted from erecting privacy fences which
might impede the flow of water; we can only erect “open” (wrought iron, wire, etc)
fences. Thus, while the public is virtually being invited into our back yards at any time of
the day or night, as homeowners, we can do nothing to protect or screen ourselves.
I am aware that the argument will be made that Coppell is a safe city, and trails have been
put behind homes in other parts of the city with no apparent ill effects. However, this
situation is not an instance of connecting one residential neighborhood to another or to a
park in the center of Coppell. Grapevine Creek Park borders Beltline Road, which
borders Irving. Beltline Road is a major intercity thoroughfare, not a quiet residential
street. Neither is the Irving property just south of Beltline Road a quiet residential
neighborhood; indeed, its current planned usage is, at best, multifamily housing. Thus,
while the argument can be made that Coppell is a safe city, this argument is somewhat
disingenuous in this situation. Realistically, it is not the overall safety of Coppell that
matters in this instance; it is the potential safety of this proposed park.
Necessity: In reading the Plan, it is clear that connectivity—the ability to get from one
point in the City to another—is the overriding focus of the entire trail implementation.
Indeed, its ability “to provide east-west movement for the local community” is what
makes the Grapevine Creek Park Trail a high priority trail, according to the Plan
consultants. (Plan, page F14, paragraph 1)
However, it should be noted that while the lower (non-loop) part of the Trail does
appear to provide somewhat linear east-west movement, the loop portion of the Trail
provides no east-west connectivity whatsoever. The only function of the loop portion
of the trail is to provide access to the “undeveloped . . . natural setting” and “scenic
qualities” of the park. It seems ironic that in order to do so, eight to ten foot concrete
trails, four bridges and major brush and tree clearing will be necessary, thereby in the
process destroying any undeveloped, natural areas and scenic qualities which the park
may currently possess.
It is the loop portion of the Trail which our neighborhood group finds most problematic.
The lower portion of the Trail—that portion of the Trail which actually advances the
Plan’s objective—is not a current source of great concern. It is the loop portion of the
Trail which causes our safety concerns; it is the loop portion of the Trail which
approaches our homes and encroaches on our privacy.
Further, it is the loop portion of the Trail which would seem to be most problematic to
build and fund. The lower portion of the Trail appears to require one bridge along
Beltline; the loop portion of the Trail requires three that must be placed in the middle of
the woods. It is the loop portion of the Trail that will require extensive grading and
clearing. It is the loop portion of the Trail which will require topographic surveys and
floodplain surveys, as Grapevine Creek Park and all the yards and homes which border
Grapevine Creek Park lie in a floodplain. It is the loop portion of the Trail which would
appear to be the most disruptive, expensive and controversial.
Interestingly, we know of no Coppell resident who actually requested or wants the
proposed “loop” portion of this Trail.
Destruction of natural habitat: Almost as distressing to many of us as the
aforementioned safety concerns, construction of the “loop” portion of the Trail will also
destroy the thriving ecosystem that currently exists in the park. As my neighbors can
attest, there is an amazing variety of wildlife in this relatively small area. We have seen
bobcats, opossums, raccoons, foxes, beavers, deer, coyotes, wild turkeys—none of which
likely survive the anticipated construction. If construction is limited to the lower portion
of the Trail, the creek will not be substantially disturbed and the major grading, tree and
brush clearing will be avoided, thus preserving the habitat of these animals.
.
Mitigation: Please note that all of the aforementioned concerns are alleviated if the upper
“loop” portion of the Trail is eliminated. The problem of dangerous access from Bethel
School Road is eliminated, as the remaining portion of the Trail can be accessed from
either Moore or Mockingbird. The issue of neighborhood safety is lessened, as the lower
portion of the Trail does not approach neighborhood homes, and does not require the
substantial clearing of trees and brush that is required to build the “loop” portion. The
expense related to building the Trail is greatly decreased, as there is no longer the need for
substantial surveys, studies, grading and clearing if construction is limited to the
Trail’s lower portion. Eliminating the upper portion of the trail also helps preserve the
ecosystem of these woods. Leaving the creek, trees and brush intact and undisturbed will
ensure that the majority of the wildlife will remain in its current habitat.
The lower half of the Trail still provides the east-west connectivity that the Plan indicates
is the major goal of trail implementation. Indeed, the “loop” portion does not add any
east-west connectivity whatsoever. Further, constructing only the lower portion of the
Trail does not impede citizens’ access to the more scenic aspects of Grapevine Creek
Park. Citizens are free to remain on the wooded lower trail, or can venture into the woods
on their own--there are already a few rudimentary footpaths. However, it does ensure that
the scenic aspects of the park in its undeveloped, unspoiled, natural state remain intact.
Coppell does not currently lack paved trails. To the extent it lacks connectivity of
these trails, only the lower portion of the Grapevine Creek Park Trail remedies this.
What Coppell currently lacks is undeveloped, unspoiled, natural areas. Let Coppell
citizens have the opportunity to venture into nature without paved trails, waste
receptacles, shade shelters and mile markers—nature that doesn’t seem like some kind of
Disney theme park. Let Grapevine Creek Park remain undisturbed.
In closing, thank you both for your consideration and attention to the matter. We
appreciate the manner in which you have handled this to date, and look forward to
working toward a mutual resolution of these concerns.
Sincerely,
Mary Ritter
701 E. Bethel School Rd
Coppell, TX 75019
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
Parks and Recreation
January 26, 2010
16
✔
CONTRACT/BID or PROPOSAL
Consider approval of Bid # Q-1109-01 to Dickerson Construction Company, Inc., in the amount of $315,400.00, as
provided for in the CRDC fund, for the installation of an Irrigation Well at Wagon Wheel Park; and authorizing the CRDC
President and City Manager to sign the necessary documents.
See attached memo.
Funds have been budgeted in the CRDC Fund for this project.
Staff recommends approval.
^Irrigation Well- 1 AR
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
DATE: January 26, 2010
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Brad Reid, Director of Parks and Recreation
RE: Consider approval of awarding a bid from Dickerson Construction
Company, Inc. for the installation of an Irrigation Well at Wagon Wheel
Park, in the amount of $315,400.00, and authorizing the President of the
CRDC and the City Manager to sign the resulting documents.
Background:
The Coppell Recreational Development Corporation Project Priority List for 2008-2009
included adding a second irrigation well at Wagon Wheel Park to keep up with the
increased demand for water brought on by the addition of practice fields and Rolling
Oaks Memorial Center. The Parks & Recreation Department proceeded to commission an
engineering firm to design the well and associated systems and prepare construction &
bid documents related to the additional irrigation well. The project was formally bid in
order to obtain pricing from qualified bidders.
Bid # Q-1109-01 for the installation of the Irrigation Well at Wagon Wheel Park, closed
on Tuesday, December 8, 2009, at which time the City of Coppell Purchasing
Department opened five bids. The base bids ranged from a net low of $315,400.00
(Dickerson Construction), to a net high of $438,074.00 (Jackson Drilling Services). This
bid includes the drilling, piping, electrical and pumping systems and all necessary hook-
ups for a complete operational water well. The water will come from the Paluxy strata,
approximately 1,200 feet below the surface. The water will be pumped into the existing
irrigation pond located on the north-east end of the park. The contract period for the
project is 150 days, and includes liquidated damages of $250.00 per day for each day that
substantial completion extends beyond the contract period.
The CRDC approved award of this bid at their January 4, 2010 meeting.
City Council Action requested:
Consider approval of award of the bid from Dickerson Construction Company, Inc. in the
amount of $ 315,400.00, and authorize the President of the CRDC and the City Manager
to sign the resulting documents.
Staff Recommendation:
Approval of this item.
Bid Tabulation Q-1109-01 IRRIGATION WELL @ WAGON WHEEL PARK
Dickerson
Construction Earth Tech C. Miller Drilling
Andrews &
Foster
Jackson Drilling
Services, L.P.
Total Base Bid $315,400.00 $338,652.00 $342,827.00 $437,950.00 $438,074.00
Total Material Cost $186,250.00 $188,400.00 $262,770.00 $262,844.00
Total Services Cost $152,402.00 $154,427.00 $175,180.00 $175,230
Calendar Days 150 days 45 days 190 days 90 days 120 days
Bid Bond yes yes yes yes yes
AGENDA REQUEST FORM DATE: January 26, 2010
ITEM #: 17
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
A. Project Update and Future Agendas.
Agenda Request Form - Revised 09/027 Document Name: %manrep
AGENDA REQUEST FORM DATE: January 26, 2010
ITEM #: 18
MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS
A. Report by Mayor Peters regarding Sweetheart Ball scheduled for February 5th
and 6th.
Agenda Request Form - Revised 09/02 Document Name: %mayorreport
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
DATE: January 26, 2010
ITEM #: 19
COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
A. Carrollton/Farmers Branch ISD/Lewisville ISD – Tunnell.
B. Coppell ISD – Mahalik and Hinojosa-Flores.
C. Coppell Seniors – Brancheau and Faught.
D. Dallas Regional Mobility Coalition – Peters and Hunt.
E. International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) –Brancheau
F. Metrocrest Hospital Authority – Councilmember Tunnell.
G. Metrocrest Medical Foundation – Mahalik.
H. Metrocrest Medical Services – Hinojosa-Flores.
I. Metrocrest Social Services – Franklin.
J. North Texas Council of Governments – Tunnell.
K. NTCOG/Regional Emergency Management – Faught.
L. North Texas Commission – Hunt.
M. Senior Adult Services – Franklin.
Agenda Request Form - Revised 11/09 Document Name: %ccommreport
AGENDA REQUEST FORM DATE: January 26, 2010
ITEM #: 20
PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENTS CONCERNING ITEMS OF
COMMUNITY INTEREST AND NO COUNCIL ACTION OR
DELIBERATION IS PERMITTED
Agenda Request Form - Revised 09/02 Document Name: %mayorreport
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
DATE: January 26, 2010
ITEM #: 21
NECESSARY ACTION RESULTING FROM WORK SESSION
Agenda Request Form - Revised 02/04 Document Name: %necessaryactionwork
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
DATE: January 26, 2010
ITEM #: 22
NECESSARY ACTION RESULTING FROM EXECUTIVE SESSION
Agenda Request Form - Revised 09/02 Document Name: %necessaryactionexec
CERTIFICATE OF AGENDA ITEM SUBMISSION
Council Meeting Date: January 26, 2010
Department Submissions:
Item No. 11/C was placed on the Agenda for the above-referenced City
Council meeting by the Engineering Department. I have reviewed the
Agenda Request (and any backup if applicable) and hereby submit this item
to the City Council for consideration.
____________________
Engineering Department
Item Nos. 11/D and 14 were placed on the Agenda for the above-
referenced City Council meeting by the Police Department. I have
reviewed the Agenda Requests (and any backup if applicable) and hereby
submit these items to the City Council for consideration.
____________________
Police Department
Item Nos. 15 and 16 were placed on the Agenda for the above-referenced
City Council meeting by the Parks Department. I have reviewed the
Agenda Requests (and any backup if applicable) and hereby submit these
items to the City Council for consideration.
____________________
Parks Department
Financial Review:
I certify that I have reviewed all the items submitted for consideration on
the Agenda for the above-referenced City Council Meeting and have inserted
any financial comments where appropriate.
____________________
Finance Department
City Manager Review:
I certify that I have reviewed the complete Agenda and Packet for the
above-referenced City Council Meeting and hereby submit the same to the
City Council for consideration.
____________________
City Manager
(or Deputy City Manager)