CP 2010-02-23
NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING AND AGENDA
FEBRUARY 23, 2010
JAYNE PETERS, KAREN HUNT, Place 7
Mayor Mayor Pro Tem
TIM BRANCHEAU, Place 1 MARSHA TUNNELL, Place 4
BOB MAHALIK, Place 2 BILLY FAUGHT, Place 5
BRIANNA HINOJOSA-FLORES, Place 3 MARVIN FRANKLIN, Place 6
CLAY PHILLIPS, City Manager
MEETING TIME AND PLACE:
Call to Order 5:30 p.m. Council Chambers (Open to the Public)
Executive Session Immediately Following 1st Fl. Conf. Room (Closed to the Public)
Work Session Immediately Following 1st Fl. Conf. Room (Open to the Public)
Regular Session 7:30 p.m. Council Chambers (Open to the Public)
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas will
meet in Regular Called Session on Tuesday, February 23, 2010, at 5:30 p.m. for
Executive Session, Work Session will follow immediately thereafter, and Regular
Session will begin at 7:30 p.m., to be held at Town Center, 255 Parkway
Boulevard, Coppell, Texas.
As authorized by Section 551.071(2) of the Texas Government Code, this
meeting may be convened into closed Executive Session for the purpose of
seeking confidential legal advice from the City Attorney on any agenda item
listed herein.
The City of Coppell reserves the right to reconvene, recess or realign the Work
Session or called Executive Session or order of business at any time prior to
adjournment.
The purpose of the meeting is to consider the following items:
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
1. Call to order.
ag022310
Page 1 of 4
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
EXECUTIVE SESSION (Closed to the Public)
2. Convene Executive Session
A. Section 551.072, Texas Government Code – Deliberation regarding
Real Property.
1. Discussion regarding Northlake Property.
B. Section 551.087, Texas Government Code – Economic
Development Negotiations.
1. South of W. Bethel Road and west of S. Coppell Road.
2. South of W. Bethel and west of Royal.
WORK SESSION (Open to the Public)
3. Convene Work Session
A. Kirkland House Update.
B. Discussion regarding Small Wind Energy Systems.
C. Discussion regarding the Trail Implementation Plan.
D. Discussion regarding Video Productions.
E. Discussion regarding Historic Cemetery Maintenance.
F. Discussion of Agenda Items.
REGULAR SESSION (Open to the Public)
4. Convene Regular Session.
5. Invocation.
6. Pledge of Allegiance.
7. Consider approval of a proclamation naming February 21 - February 27,
2010 as Severe Weather Awareness Week, and authorizing Mayor to sign.
8. Report by Library Board.
9. Citizens' Appearances
10. Consider approval of minutes: February 9, 2010.
11. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of text amendments to the Code of Ordinances –
Chapter 12-Zoning, to add Section 12-32B, “Small Wind Energy Systems”,
to establish regulations for small scale wind turbines within the City of
ag022310
Page 2 of 4
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
Coppell and to amend Section 12-30 to permit this use by Special Use
Permit.
12. Consider approval of the final Coppell Community-Wide Trails
Implementation Plan.
13. Presentation regarding City Ordinance Nos. 2006-1142 and 2007-1175
which pertain to automated red light enforcement as requested by
citizen, Venky Venkatraman.
14. Presentation and update of current and proposed construction projects in
the City of Coppell, Texas,
15. City Manager's Report.
A. Project Update and Future Agendas.
16. Public Service Announcements concerning items of community interest
and no Council action or deliberation is permitted.
17. Council Committee Reports.
A. Carrollton/Farmers Branch ISD/Lewisville ISD – Tunnell.
B. Coppell ISD – Mahalik and Hinojosa-Flores.
C. Coppell Seniors – Brancheau and Faught.
D. Dallas Regional Mobility Coalition – Peters and Hunt.
E. International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) –
Brancheau.
F. Metrocrest Hospital Authority – Tunnell.
G. Metrocrest Medical Foundation – Mahalik.
H. Metrocrest Medical Services – Hinojosa-Flores.
I. Metrocrest Social Services – Franklin.
J. North Texas Council of Governments – Tunnell.
K. NTCOG/Regional Emergency Management – Faught.
L. North Texas Commission – Hunt.
M. Senior Adult Services – Franklin.
18. Necessary action resulting from Executive Session.
Adjournment.
____________________________________
Jayne Peters, Mayor
ag022310
Page 3 of 4
CERTIFICATE
I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the bulletin board at
the City Hall of the City of Coppell, Texas on this 19th day of February, 2010, at
__________________.
____________________________________
Libby Ball, City Secretary
DETAILED INFORMATION REGARDING THIS AGENDA IS AVAILABLE ON
THE CITY'S WEBSITE (www.coppelltx.gov) UNDER PUBLIC DOCUMENTS,
COUNCIL PACKETS.
PUBLIC NOTICES
STATEMENT FOR ADA COMPLIANCE
The City of Coppell acknowledges its responsibility to comply with the Americans With
Disabilities Act of 1990. Thus, in order to assist individuals with disabilities who require
special services (i.e. sign interpretative services, alternative audio/visual devices, and
amanuenses) for participation in or access to the City of Coppell sponsored public
programs, services and/or meetings, the City requests that individuals make requests for
these services forty-eight (48) hours ahead of the scheduled program, service and/or
meeting. To make arrangements, contact Vivyon V. Bowman, ADA Coordinator or
other designated official at (972) 462-0022, or (TDD 1-800-RELAY, TX 1-800-735-2989).
ag022310
Page 4 of 4
KEY TO COUNCIL GOALS ICONS
COPPELL VISION 2030
Sustainable City Government
• Excellent City Services with high level of Customer Satisfaction
• “Green” City Operations and Facilities
• Excellent and Well-maintained City Infrastructure and Facilities
• Top Quality City Workforce
• Financial Resources to Support City Services
Business Prosperity
• Retention and Attraction of Businesses that generate revenues for the City
• Major Retail and Top Quality Business Office Park along I-635 and SH 121
• Old Coppell as a Small Town Village
• Community Commercial Centers
• House Offices and Home-Based Businesses
Community Wellness and Enrichment
• Community Gathering Places
• Recreation Programs and Services for all Generations
• Expand Cultural Arts Amenities and Opportunities
• Residents’ Wellness and Longevity
• Community Education Programs and Support of Top Quality Schools
• Multi-Use Trail Systems Connecting the City
Sense of Community
• Residents and Businesses Engaging and Contributing to the Coppell Community
• Strong Community Events and Festivals
• New Residents Welcome and Involved
• Effective Community Partnerships
• Future Civic Community Leaders’ Development
Special Place to Live
• Quality Housing for Family Generations
• Beautiful Green City
• Revitalizing Neighborhoods
• Mobility within Coppell
• Easy Access to Dallas-Fort Worth Regions
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
DATE: February 23, 2010
ITEM #: ES-2
EXECUTIVE SESSION
A. Section 551.072, Texas Government Code – Deliberation regarding Real
Property.
1. Discussion regarding Northlake Property.
B. Section 551.087, Texas Government Code – Economic Development
Negotiations.
1. South of W. Bethel Road and west of S. Coppell Road.
2. South of W. Bethel and west of Royal.
Agenda Request Form - Revised 02/04 Document Name: %exsessn
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
DATE: February 23, 2010
ITEM #: WS-3
WORK SESSION
A. Kirkland House Update.
B. Discussion regarding Small Wind Energy Systems.
C. Discussion regarding the Trail Implementation Plan.
D. Discussion regarding Video Productions.
E. Discussion regarding Historic Cemetery Maintenance.
F. Discussion of Agenda Items.
Agenda Request Form - Revised 02/07 Document Name: %wksessn
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
Fire
February 23, 2010
7
✔
PROCLAMATION
Consider approval of a proclamation naming February 21 - February 27, 2010 as Severe Weather Awareness Week,
and authorizing Mayor to sign.
Staff recommends approval.
(Severe Weather - 1 AR
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, Severe Weather Awareness Week is February 21 – February 27, 2010; and
WHEREAS, each year brings the potential for violent weather to Texas; and
WHEREAS, large portions of our state, including Coppell, can be devastated by
flooding, tornadoes, wind, hail, windstorms, and other emergencies; and
WHEREAS, The Texas Division of Emergency Management, the National Weather
Service and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) have joined together in
urging all citizens to prepare for severe weather events and to educate themselves on safety
strategies; and
WHEREAS, Governor Rick Perry has declared the week of February 21 – February 27,
2010 as Severe Weather Awareness Week in Texas, now therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Council of the City of Coppell urge
everyone in our community to learn more about and to participate in severe weather
preparedness activities available in the City of Coppell.
NOW, THEREFORE I, Jayne Peters, Mayor of the City of Coppell, in official
recognition of this statewide event, do hereby proclaim February 21 – February 27, 2010 as
SEVERE WEATHER AWARENESS WEEK
IN WITNESS THEREOF, I have set my hand and caused the seal of the city of Coppell
to be affixed this day of February 2010
Jayne Peters, Mayor
ATTEST:
Libby Ball, City Secretary
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
City Secretary
February 23, 2010
8
✔
REPORT
Report by the Library Board.
The semi-annual report will be made by a member of the Library Board.
No action necessary on this item.
%boardreport
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
DATE: February 23, 2010
ITEM #: 9
CITIZENS' APPEARANCES
ORDINANCE NO. 2001-964
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, ESTABLISHING RULES, TIMES AND
PROCEDURES FOR CONDUCTING CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, THE
FOLLOWING ARE HEREBY ADOPTED AS THE RULES, TIMES AND PROCEDURES FOR
CONDUCTING COUNCIL MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COPPELL,
TEXAS:
The City of Coppell Code of Ordinances, Article 1-10 "Rules, Times and Procedures for Conducting
City Council Meetings," be, and the same is hereby, amended to read as follows:
"ARTICLE 1-10
RULES, TIMES AND PROCEDURES FOR CONDUCTING
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
". . .
1-10-6.2.1 CITIZENS APPEARANCE
Persons wishing to speak on any matter other than an item scheduled for a public hearing on the agenda, must
sign a register and list their residence address, provided by the City Secretary on a table outside the Council
Chambers, and such persons may be heard only at the "Citizens Appearance" portion of a regular meeting or
special meeting. Each speaker must state his or her name and address of residence. Presentations by individuals
during the "Citizens Appearance" shall be limited to two (2) minutes each. An individual speaker's time may be
extended for an additional two (2) minutes with the approval of a majority of the Council members present.
There shall be a cumulative limit of twenty (20) minutes allotted of any regular or special Council meeting.
Those persons who signed up to speak at the "Citizens Appearance" shall be called upon in the order that they
have signed the provided register. No personal attacks by any speaker shall be made against any member of the
Council, Mayor, individual, group or corporation (Charter Article 3, Section 3.12).
Agenda Request Form - Revised 09/02 Document Name: %citapp.doc
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
City Secretary
February 23, 2010
10
✔
PROCEDURAL
Consider approval of minutes: February 9, 2010.
Minutes of the City Council meetings held on February 9, 2010.
Staff recommends approval.
%minutes
Cm020910
Page 1 of 10
MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 9, 2010
The City Council of the City of Coppell met in Regular Called Session on Tuesday,
February 9, 2010, at 5:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of Town Center,
255 Parkway Boulevard, Coppell, Texas. The following members were present:
Jayne Peters, Mayor
Karen Hunt, Mayor Pro Tem
Tim Brancheau, Councilmember
Bob Mahalik, Councilmember
Brianna Hinojosa-Flores, Councilmember
Marsha Tunnell, Councilmember (late arrival)
Billy Faught, Councilmember
Marvin Franklin, Councilmember (late arrival)
Also present were City Manager Clay Phillips, City Secretary Libby Ball and City
Attorney David Dodd.
1. Call to order.
Mayor Peters called the meeting to order, determined that a quorum was
present and convened into Executive Session.
EXECUTIVE SESSION (Closed to the Public)
2. Convene Executive Session
A. Section 551.072, Texas Government Code – Deliberation
regarding Real Property.
1. Discussion regarding Northlake Property.
B. Section 551.087, Texas Government Code – Economic
Development Negotiations.
1. ED Prospect west of Beltline and north of Dividend.
2. ED Prospect west of South Coppell Road and south of
Bethel.
Councilmembers Franklin and Tunnell arrived prior to convening Executive
Session.
Mayor Peters convened into Executive Session at 5:46 p.m. Mayor Peters
adjourned the Executive Session at 6:53 p.m. and opened Work Session.
Cm020910
Page 2 of 10
WORK SESSION (Open to the Public)
3. Convene Work Session
A. Discussion regarding Small Wind Energy Systems.
B. Council Goals and Objectives Update.
C. Discussion of Agenda Items.
REGULAR SESSION (Open to the Public)
4. Convene Regular Session.
5. Invocation.
Pastor Jason Graves of Riverside Church of Christ led those present in the
Invocation.
6. Pledge of Allegiance.
Mayor Peters led those present in the Pledge of Allegiance.
7. Citizens' Appearances.
Mayor Peters advised no one signed up to speak.
CONSENT AGENDA
8. Consider approval of the following consent agenda items:
A. Consider approval of minutes: January 26, 2010.
B. Consider approval of Bid # Q-0110-01 to BMW Motorcycles
of Fort Worth for the purchase of three (3) BMW
motorcycles at a total cost of $62,743.20, as approved in
the FY 09/10 budget, for use by the Coppell Police Traffic
Division; and authorizing the City Manager to sign the
necessary documents.
Cm020910
Page 3 of 10
Action:
Councilmember Tunnell moved to approve Consent Agenda Items A and B.
Councilmember Mahalik seconded the motion; the motion carried 7-0 with
Mayor Pro Tem Hunt and Councilmembers Brancheau, Mahalik, Hinojosa-
Flores, Tunnell, Faught and Franklin voting in favor of the motion.
9. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of an ordinance of the City of Coppell, Texas,
readopting, ratifying, republishing and extending Ordinance No.
2003-1030, providing for curfew hours for minors in the City of
Coppell, Texas, for a period of three (3) years; and authorizing
the Mayor to sign.
Presentation:
Roy Osborne, Chief of Police, made a presentation to Council.
Public Hearing:
Mayor Peters opened the Public Hearing and advised no one signed up to
speak.
Action:
Councilmember Tunnell moved to close the Public Hearing and approve
Ordinance No. 2010-1247 readopting, ratifying, republishing and extending
Ordinance No. 2003-1030, providing for curfew hours for minors in the City
of Coppell, Texas, for a period of three (3) years; and authorizing the Mayor
to sign. Councilmember Hinojosa-Flores seconded the motion; the motion
carried 7-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Hunt and Councilmembers Brancheau,
Mahalik, Hinojosa-Flores, Tunnell, Faught and Franklin voting in favor of
the motion.
10. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of Case No. S-1250-PD-228-HC, Subway, a
zoning change request from PD-228-HC (Planned Development-
228-Highway Commercial) to S-1250-PD-228-HC (Special Use
Permit-1250-Planned Development-228-Highway Commercial), to
allow a 1,805-square-foot restaurant with drive-thru, to be
located at 760 N. Denton Tap Road, Suite #100.
Cm020910
Page 4 of 10
Presentation:
Matt Steer, Planner, made a presentation to Council.
Tom Chapman, Applicant, addressed Council.
Public Hearing:
Mayor Peters opened the Public Hearing and advised no one signed up to
speak.
Action:
Councilmember Franklin moved to close the Public Hearing and approve
Case No. S-1250-PD-228-HC, Subway, a zoning change request from PD-
228-HC (Planned Development-228-Highway Commercial) to S-1250-PD-
228-HC (Special Use Permit-1250-Planned Development-228-Highway
Commercial), to allow a 1,805-square-foot restaurant with drive-thru, to be
located at 760 N. Denton Tap Road, Suite #100, subject to the following
conditions:
1) The development shall be in accordance with the Floor Plan, Site
Plan, Elevations, Sign Plan, Menu Board Plan, and Vehicular Control
Plan; and
2) The hours of operation shall not exceed 6:30 a.m. to 10 p.m., seven
days a week.
Councilmember Brancheau seconded the motion; the motion carried 7-0
with Mayor Pro Tem Hunt and Councilmembers Brancheau, Mahalik,
Hinojosa-Flores, Tunnell, Faught and Franklin voting in favor of the
motion.
11. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of Case No. S-1033R3-SF-12, Manara Academy,
a zoning change request from S-1033R2-SF-12 (Special Use
Permit-1033 Revision 2-Single Family-12) to S-1033R3-SF-12
(Special Use Permit-1033 Revision 3-Single Family-12), to allow a
Charter School for Grades K-8, with a enrollment capacity of
500, to continue to occupy this building through the 2014 school
year, on 4.85 acres of property located at 140 S. Heartz Road.
Cm020910
Page 5 of 10
Presentation:
Marcie Diamond, Assistant Director of Planning, made a presentation to
Council.
Larry Bess, representing the property owner, addressed Council.
Sadak Shaik, applicant, addressed Council.
Public Hearing:
Mayor Peters opened the Public Hearing and advised the following signed
up to speak:
1) Andy Hebert, 142 London Way, spoke against the proposal;
2) Wes Mays, 114 London Way, spoke against the proposal; and
3) Patricia Powell, 150 London Way, spoke against the proposal.
Action:
Councilmember Tunnell moved to close the Public Hearing and approve
Case No. S-1033R3-SF-12, Manara Academy, a zoning change request from
S-1033R2-SF-12 (Special Use Permit-1033 Revision 2-Single Family-12) to
S-1033R3-SF-12 (Special Use Permit-1033 Revision 3-Single Family-12), to
allow a Charter School for Grades K-8, with a enrollment capacity of 500, to
continue to occupy this building through the 2014 school year, on 4.85
acres of property located at 140 S. Heartz Road, subject to the following
conditions:
1) This charter school shall be licensed and maintained in accordance
with state law and may provide instruction for Kindergarten through
Eighth (8th) grade;
2) The student enrollment capacity under this Special Use Permit shall
not exceed five hundred (500) students;
3) Religious services and related activities shall be permitted to remain
as an ancillary use;
4) This Special Use Permit shall expire on June 30, 2014; and
5) Screening gates to be installed on dumpster.
Councilmember Faught seconded the motion; the motion carried 6-1 with
Mayor Pro Tem Hunt and Councilmembers Brancheau, Mahalik, Hinojosa-
Flores, Tunnell, and Faught voting in favor of the motion and
Councilmember Franklin voting against the motion.
Cm020910
Page 6 of 10
12. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of an application by Chesapeake Energy to
expand the current pad site from 2.152 acres to 3.013 acres to
allow the drilling and operation of up to four (4) additional gas
wells on the site located north of Bethel Road, west of Creekview
Drive, known as the Fellowship Property.
Presentation:
Marcie Diamond, Assistant Director of Planning, made a presentation to
Council.
Mercedes Bolen, representing the applicant, addressed Council.
Public Hearing:
Mayor Peters opened the Public Hearing and advised no one signed up to
speak.
Action:
Councilmember Faught moved to close the Public Hearing and approve the
application by Chesapeake Energy to expand the current pad site from
2.152 acres to 3.013 acres to allow the drilling and operation of up to four
(4) additional gas wells on the site located north of Bethel Road, west of
Creekview Drive, known as the Fellowship Property, subject to the following
conditions:
1) Issuance of separate permits by the city of Coppell prior to the
drilling activities of additional wells on this site;
2) The Erosion Control Plan for the site needs to be revisited. All erosion
protection needs to be in compliance with the Erosion Control Plan
and city ordinances. Operators shall clean any debris or dirt tracked
onto city streets;
3) A Tree Removal permit will be required and a contribution to the City
of Coppell Reforestation and Natural Areas Fund in the amount of
$78,700.00 will be assessed;
4) Staff administratively reviewing and approving the final elevations of
the screening wall prior to construction;
5) The construction of the west and north walls along the perimeter of
the site being delayed until all drilling activities are complete, or
December 2011, which ever occurs first;
6) If Fellowship Church removes trees from the abutting property, then
the Tree Removal Permit would be conditioned upon planting a
Cm020910
Page 7 of 10
minimum of 33 replacement trees adjacent to this pad site as
originally required; and
7) Third parties observation of testing by TCEQ as recommended by the
City Manager and the Oil and Gas Consultant.
Mayor Pro Tem Hunt seconded the motion; the motion carried 6-1 with
Mayor Pro Tem Hunt and Councilmembers Brancheau, Mahalik, Hinojosa-
Flores, Faught and Franklin voting in favor of the motion and
Councilmember Tunnell voting against the motion.
13. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of text amendments to the Code of Ordinances
– Chapter 12-Zoning, to add Section 12-32B, “Small Wind Energy
Systems”, to establish regulations for small scale wind turbines
within the City of Coppell and to amend Section 12-30 to permit
this use by Special Use Permit.
Public Hearing:
Mayor Peters opened the Public Hearing.
Action:
Councilmember Tunnell moved to continue the Public Hearing to
February 23, 2010. Mayor Pro Tem Hunt seconded the motion; the motion
carried 7-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Hunt and Councilmembers Brancheau,
Mahalik, Hinojosa-Flores, Tunnell, Faught and Franklin voting in favor of
the motion.
14. Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. PD-245-R, Barnes
at Riverview, a zoning change request from R (Retail) to PD-245-
R(Planned Development-245-Retail) to attach a Detail Site Plan
allowing two office/ medical office/retail buildings (totaling
9,175 square feet) with a 300-square-foot restaurant, on
approximately one acre of property located at the southeast
corner of Sandy Lake Road and Riverview Drive and authorizing
the Mayor to sign.
Presentation:
Matt Steer, Planner, made a presentation to Council.
Cm020910
Page 8 of 10
Action:
Mayor Pro Tem Hunt moved to approve Ordinance No. 91500-A-541 for
Case No. PD-245-R, Barnes at Riverview, a zoning change request from R
(Retail) to PD-245-R(Planned Development-245-Retail) to attach a Detail
Site Plan allowing two office/ medical office/retail buildings (totaling 9,175
square feet) with a 300-square-foot restaurant, on approximately one acre
of property located at the southeast corner of Sandy Lake Road and
Riverview Drive and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Councilmember Mahalik
seconded the motion; the motion carried 6-1 with Mayor Pro Tem Hunt and
Councilmembers Brancheau, Mahalik, Hinojosa-Flores, Faught and
Franklin voting in favor of the motion and Councilmember Tunnell voting
against the motion.
15. Consider approval of an Agreement with Freese and Nichols, Inc.
for the design of improvements to Old Town Coppell/Main Street
Infrastructure including mass grading, paving, drainage and
utilities of the site in the amount of $207,100 and authorizing
the Mayor to sign.
Presentation:
Ken Griffin, Director of Engineering, made a presentation to Council.
Action:
Councilmember Tunnell moved to approve an Agreement with Freese and
Nichols, Inc. for the design of improvements to Old Town Coppell/Main
Street Infrastructure including mass grading, paving, drainage and utilities
of the site in the amount of $207,100 and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
Councilmember Brancheau seconded the motion; the motion carried 7-0
with Mayor Pro Tem Hunt and Councilmembers Brancheau, Mahalik,
Hinojosa-Flores, Tunnell, Faught and Franklin voting in favor of the
motion.
16. City Manager's Report.
A. Project Update and Future Agendas.
A. City Manager Clay Phillips reported that a Joint Meeting between City
Council, Park Board and the Library Board will be held in April.
Items for discussion will include the space needs analysis for the
Library and the Park Master Plan. City Manager Phillips mentioned
Cm020910
Page 9 of 10
the occupancy of the Senior Center is a few weeks away. The first
event after the Grand Opening will be specifically for the seniors and
their patience with this project. Mr. Phillips also requested
information from Ken Griffin, Director of Engineering, regarding the
reconstruction of the intersection at Sandy Lake and Denton Tap.
The project will be timed for the summer in an effort to eliminate
additional troubles for the regular flow of traffic during the school
year. Finally, Mr. Phillips reported the next meeting will discuss the
Kirkland House Update, the DFW Development Update, the Trail
Master Plan adoption and Wind Turbines. A Town Hall will be hosted
on March 2nd regarding the continuation of the Northlake Project.
17. Mayor and Council Reports.
A. Report by Mayor Peters regarding the Metroplex Mayors’
Meeting.
A. Mayor Peters, City Manager Clay Phillips and Deputy City Manager
Mario Canizares attended the Metroplex Mayors’ Meeting. The
keynote speaker was Mike Eastland, Executive Director of NCTCOG.
Mr. Eastland spoke of the regional focuses for next year with the
upcoming Super Bowl 45. He spoke of the challenges the region
faces with air quality and the need for transportation funding. Mayor
Peters also mentioned that Dan Petty, President of the North Texas
Commission, announced he will be stepping down, but will remain an
advisor during 2011 for the Super Bowl preparation.
18. Public Service Announcements concerning items of community
interest and no Council action or deliberation is permitted.
Nothing to report.
19. Necessary action resulting from Executive Session.
There was no action necessary under this item.
Cm020910
Page 10 of 10
There being no further business to come before the City Council, the
meeting was adjourned.
____________________________________
Jayne Peters, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Libby Ball, City Secretary
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
PLANNING
February 23, 2010
11
✔
PUBLIC HEARING
Consider approval of text amendments to the Code of Ordinances – Chapter 12-Zoning, to add Section 12-32B, “Small
Wind Energy Systems”, to establish regulations for small scale wind turbines within the City of Coppell and to amend
Section 12-30 to permit this use by Special Use Permit.
Per the discussion at the February 9, 2010, Council Work Session, the following Exhibits have added to the information
previously provided: Pictures of existing turbines in the Metroplex, and a City of Coppell map with potential turbine
locations in residential areas shown.
On February 9, 2010, Council opened and continued the public
hearing to the February 23, Council meeting.
On January 21, 2010 the Planning Commission unanimously
recommended approval.
On December 17, 2009 the Planning Commission held this text
amendment under advisement.
Staff recommends APPROVAL.
@01 SWES Text Amendment - 1 AR
ITEM # 6
Page 1 of 8
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
CASE: CODE AMENDMENT – Small Wind Energy Systems
P&Z HEARING DATE: December 17, 2009 (Continued to January 21, 2010)*
C.C. HEARING DATE: February 9, 2010
STAFF REP.: Matt Steer, City Planner
REQUEST: To amend the Code of Ordinances – Chapter 12- Zoning, to
add Section 12-32B., “Small Wind Energy Systems” to
establish regulations for small scale wind turbines within the
City of Coppell and to amend Section 12-30 to permit this
use by special use permit.
HISTORY: In September 2007, the former City Manager, Jim Witt,
formed the “Coppell Sustainability Committee” to look at
ways we could, as a municipal government, become more
environmentally sustainable. Since that time, the committee
has grown and evolved to include virtually every department
of the city and is now known as the “Green Team”. Each
department was asked to contribute in achieving a more
sustainable city within their realm. Since the inception of the
Green Team, the City has initiated:
o An Environmental Management System (EMS)
program at the Service Center and Aquatics and
Recreation Center,
o Various facility retrofits,
o LEED certification for the Grapevine Springs
Community Center,
o A revised purchasing policy,
o Upgrades to energy efficient equipment,
o A no-idling policy,
o Electrification plug-ins at the fire training sites for
emergency vehicles,
o Purchasing hybrid vehicles for the city fleet (11% is
hybrid),
* Updates to original staff report are shown in bold.
ITEM # 6
Page 2 of 8
o 50% recycled paper to be used at City Hall,
o And the list goes on to include various education
programs, motion sensors being installed, recycling
program, etc…
At the beginning of this year, the Coppell 2030 Vision, was
adopted. It includes statements/strategies such as one
entitled “Special Place to Live”. The objective under this
strategy that related to alternative energy was to become a
model “green” community demonstrating best practices and
to adopt building standards to include green concepts and
methods for construction and development. The value to the
residents were: 1) Doing the right thing for the city and the
environment, and 2) Conserving natural resources. Of the
short term critical factors for success, defining “green”
concepts and their application to Coppell was included.
Also stated in Coppell 2030 Vision is a suggestion to
regulate developments, buildings, land uses and appearance
for community and residents’ benefit by developing “green”
standards and incentives for more energy conservative
buildings and homes. In summary, the Coppell 2030 Vision
coupled with the Green Team’s quest to update all
ordinances, regulations, policies, plans and procedures to
consider environmental factors and sustainable practices led
to staff’s briefing to the Planning and Zoning Commission at
the August 20, 2009 Work Session regarding alternative
energy sources (wind and solar).
After the briefing, the Planning and Zoning Commission
advised staff to research the possibility of incorporating
regulations for wind turbines and solar panels into the
Coppell Code of Ordinances. Staff conducted a general
review of the two technologies, performed a survey of
surrounding regulations, looked at return on investments
(ROIs) for both and came up with a framework for regulating
both. Since that time, staff has conducted more extensive
research on solar technology and found that solar panels are
already allowed by right within the Zoning Ordinance. Except
for standard permitting procedures to ensure structural
integrity, a proposal for solar panels attached to the roof of
the home are not required to obtain any zoning action.
Further research into wind technology pointed out that small
scale wind turbines and the large ones found on wind farms
are entirely different technologies with different scales,
different impacts on properties, adjacent property values, are
different markets and overall, have different policy needs.
Therefore, at the November 19, 2009, Planning and Zoning
ITEM # 6
Page 3 of 8
Commission Work Session, staff was directed to focus on
small wind turbine systems, and present a proposed Draft
Ordinance at the December 17, 2009 Planning and Zoning
Commission Meeting. The Draft Ordinance was
presented at that meeting. The case was held under
advisement until the January 21, 2010, meeting in order
for staff to address Planning Commission concerns.
These concerns and how they were addressed are found
in bold* within the Summary of the Draft Ordinance
below.
DISCUSSION: Overview:
According to an article entitled “Wind Generation in Texas” in
Popular Mechanics magazine, “If it were a country, Texas would
rank sixth in wind power, after Germany, the U.S. as a whole,
Spain, India and China. While U.S. wind-power capacity grew by 43
percent in 2007, in Texas it rose by 57 percent. All told, the state’s
turbines now produce more than 8,300 megawatts of electricity,
enough to power about 2 million homes; nearly 3,000 are produced
in Sweetwater’s Nolan County alone. In comparison, Vermont
produces 6 megawatts; Oregon, 1,408. Even California generates
just 2,781 megawatts from wind power, and it built its first wind
project nearly three decades ago.”
The Dallas area sits in a geographic location in which the threshold
of the minimum average wind speed (approximately 11 miles per
hour) makes wind energy effective. Currently, Dallas is not the
prime location for large scale wind turbines, as other cities in Texas
(Sweetwater, Corpus Christi, Lubbock, Amarillo) have a higher
average wind speed, and would be more appropriate for the siting
of this type turbine.
However, small scale wind energy systems are more likely to be
requested here, as they benefit the property on which they are
located. Small wind energy systems involve turbines which
typically have a rated capacity of not more than 10 kilowatts (kW),
and are intended to primarily reduce on-site consumption of utility
power. It is reasonable to assume that Coppell residents will be
more and more interested in this technology as it continues to
improve and becomes more practical as a cost efficient energy
source. Currently, the return on investment (ROI) for wind energy
is about 5-10 years; however, with the many tax credits, tax
exemptions and production incentives available on the state and
federal level, the ROI is increasing. On average, a home can be
* Updates to original staff report are shown in bold.
ITEM # 6
Page 4 of 8
powered with a 10 kilowatt system, and a system of this size would
cost about $40,000. Due to height restrictions and limited space, a
system of this size cannot usually be installed at the residential
level; however, there are still opportunities for smaller sized
systems. Small wind energy systems currently have a lifetime of
about 25 years. They can be roof mounted or free standing and
typically consist of a steel tower with steel or glass-reinforced
plastic rotors.
Municipal Research:
Attached is a summary of several Dallas area cities that have wind
energy ordinances. Of 10 area cities, only one, Lewisville,
specifically prohibits wind systems. Addison, Duncanville, Garland,
Grand Prairie, Oak Point, and Waxahachie require Special Use
Permits (SUP’s). Garland and Oak Point have height restrictions of
40 feet, while a less dense area, such as Wylie, has a restriction of
60 feet. Most of the cities allow roof-mounted systems to extend no
more than five feet above the roofline. Rowlett recently considered
an ordinance that would require a special use permit and would
limit the height to 40 feet. If the standard tower setbacks are
applied to Coppell (ranging from 1 to 1.25 times the height of the
tower), the majority of the sites would be unable to build up to the
120-foot maximum height being recommended in our ordinance
due to a number of constraints. Almost all the cities require that
wind energy systems comply with existing noise ordinances,
usually a maximum of 65 dBa in residential areas. Currently, most
small wind systems operate at 55 dBa and below. Almost all the
cities only permit a wind energy system as a secondary use,
require specific methods of removal and maintenance, and require
a neutral color, non-metallic finish on the system.
Attached is the proposed draft ordinance for your consideration. A
brief summary of what is covered within the ordinance is below.
Summary of Draft Ordinance:
Permissible Districts:
A Special Use Permit would be required for all districts within the
City of Coppell. An analysis of all the districts was performed and
staff did not want to limit the districts in which these energy systems
might be permitted. By requiring an SUP, each site can be
analyzed on a case by case basis, allowing adjacent property
owners an opportunity to offer comments regarding turbine
locations.
Height:
The maximum height recommended is 120 feet although reaching
this height would be possible in very few instances. This is based
ITEM # 6
Page 5 of 8
on greatest height desired for this type system even if all the
setback standards and FAA regulations are met. Only in the rarest
of cases will this be attainable in the city of Coppell. We wanted to
leave in the ability to achieve the maximum potential for the
majority of the sites in regard to height, as this is the most critical
factor in establishing wind energy production. The greater the
height, the greater the wind speed, and the greater the wind speed,
the greater the energy produced by the turbine. A graph and a chart
are depicted on the attached- Pages 6 and 7, of the “Guide for
State and Local Governments- In the Public Interest, How and Why
to Permit for Small Wind Systems”, published by the American
Wind Energy Association.
Planning and Zoning Commission Concern*: There are
differing heights of structures within each respective district
and rather than setting a maximum height for that district,
establish a maximum height above a ridgeline of a structure
within each district.
Previous Draft: There was a proposed 50-foot height limitation
on roof-mounted turbines in all districts except TC, HC and LI.
In those districts, a maximum of 15 feet above the maximum
height allowed within the district was proposed due to each of
those having special height limitations in certain situations.
The height was never to exceed 120 feet.
Revised Draft: A maximum of 60 feet in height is now
proposed on roof-mounted turbines in all single family and
two family residential districts with a limit of 20 feet from the
peak of the existing roof height. Within the townhouse and
multifamily districts the height is increased to a 70-foot
maximum for roof-mounted with a limit of 25 feet from the top
of the blade to the existing peak. The height for Office, Retail,
Commercial and Town Center Districts mimics this
requirement, as the scale of the buildings found within these
districts is similar to the scale of those found within the
multifamily and townhome districts. Within the LI and HC
Districts the height of roof-mounted turbines was changed to
not exceed 25 feet from the existing height and shall never
exceed 120 feet. Also, a section entitled Ground/Roof
Clearance was added. This states a 15-foot minimum height
for blades or other exposed moving components from grade
for freestanding turbines, and states a 10-foot minimum
clearance above the roof, if roof mounted.
* Updates to original staff report are shown in bold.
ITEM # 6
Page 6 of 8
Setbacks:
The recommended minimum setback is one foot away from the
property line for each foot in height; a one to one ratio, if a
freestanding structure. Special consideration can be given to
towers using a collapsible or other type of engineered system that
can fall onto itself rather than fall over onto something else, or
someone else’s property.
Previous Draft*: A provision allowed for lesser of a setback to
be provided as long as a written agreement between adjacent
affected properties was filed.
Planning and Zoning Commission Concern: There was some
concern related to the fall zone being on an adjacent property
even if an agreement was reached between property owners.
Revised Draft: After consultation with the City Attorney,
regarding the liability concerns, this provision allowing for a
written agreement between property owners was taken out.
Also, a provision related to liability insurance was added. This
states- “Owners of any Wind Energy System must provide a
minimum amount of $100,000 liability insurance that covers
the wind turbine and all other components, and proof of such
insurance coverage must be provided to the City prior to
permitting.” The provision allowing for a reduction in setback
distance if the freestanding turbine is self-collapsible was left
in the revised draft ordinance.
Aesthetics:
The recommendation is that the turbine shall be of Monopole
Construction, if freestanding, and neutral in color (grey, white, off-
white). This will create uniformity within the city and will be the
least obtrusive of the types of towers (others include guy wire and
lattice) which tend to be bulky and unsightly. No signs (other than
necessary emergency, warning, manufacturer or owner
information) will be permitted on a tower.
Planning and Zoning Commission Concern: Some concern
was expressed relating to color of the turbines and the number
of turbines allowed on site.
Previous Draft: No maximum number of turbines per site was
included. The turbines were to be limited to a neutral color and
* Updates to original staff report are shown in bold.
ITEM # 6
Page 7 of 8
subject to any applicable aesthetic standards of the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA).
Revised Draft*: No maximum number was included, as the
provisions requiring the turbine to be accessory to the
principal structure and to primarily reduce on-site
consumption of utility power prevents wind farms of small
scale wind energy systems from being attainable. Clarification
was added to state that they should be non-reflective and
maintain a neutral matte color.
Noise:
The recommendation is that a maximum of 60 dBa measured at the
property line be allowed. The higher the tower the greater the
distance from the property line and the lesser the noise.
Previous Draft:
60 dBa was the maximum allowed and it was to be measured
at the at property line.
Revised Draft:
After further consideration and a review of industry standards
for noise, this was reduced to 55 dBa maximum, measured at
the property line.
Construction Standards:
It is recommended that a turbine meet all State and Federal
requirements, specifically the FAA standards and conform to all
Coppell Building Codes and safety standards. Timelines for
maintenance and abandonment have been included within the
proposed ordinance.
Frequently Asked Questions:
Attached are frequently asked questions and their responses for
your reference. These have been taken with permission from the
Wind Energy Systems, LLC website which proved very helpful
throughout the research and development of the draft ordinance for
this proposal.
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
Staff is recommending APPRVOAL of the proposed amendments to the Code of
Ordinances – Chapter 12- Zoning, to add Section 12-32B., “Small Wind Energy
Systems” to establish regulations for small scale wind turbines within the City of
Coppell and to amend Section 12-30 to permit this use by special use permit.
* Updates to original staff report are shown in bold.
ITEM # 6
Page 8 of 8
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Recommend approval of the request
2. Recommend disapproval of the request
3. Recommend modification of the request
4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Redlined Draft Small Wind Energy Ordinance (Section 12-32B, Small Wind
Energy Systems)
2. Summary of Nearby Cities’ Regulations related to Wind Energy Systems
3. Pages 6 and 7 of the American Wind Energy Association Publication
4. Wind Energy Frequently Asked Questions
Draft Ordinance – Small Wind Energy Systems
Section 12-30-4 to 12-30-13A.
S or SUP, Special Use Permit is required for “Small Wind Energy System/Small Scale
Wind Turbine” in each district.
12-32B-1 Purpose.
The purpose of this section is to establish regulations to site small wind energy systems.
The goals of this section are to:
1) Increase visible indicators of community support for clean energy,
2) Reduce pollutants from traditional forms of energy,
3) Promote alternative/renewable energy within the city,
4) Reduce pressure on the local electricity grid,
5) Increase local energy independence,
6) Enhance reliability and power quality of the power grid, and
7) Reduce peak power demands.
12-32B-2 General requirements:
(A) Definitions:
(1) Small Wind Energy System/Small Scale Wind Turbine: A wind
energy conversion system consisting of a wind turbine, a tower and
associated control or conversion electronics, which has a rated
capacity of not more than 100 kilowatts (kW) and which is intended to
primarily reduce on-site consumption of utility power.
(B) Special Use Permits shall be required for all Small Wind Energy System/Small
Scale Wind Turbines.
(C) Small wind energy systems are only allowed as accessory to the principal
structure, unless located within a designated common area (lot or easement)
within a subdivision. The deed restrictions and/or restrictive covenants shall be
required to be submitted to ensure turbines are allowed under their provisions and
to address the maintenance responsibility.
1. The responsibility of the common area is required to be an adjacent
property owner, the same homeowners association responsible for
maintenance of the area or the same property owner on which the
common area is located. The energy generated by the turbine must
supply electricity to an object or structure on the same site or in the
general vicinity of the wind turbine.
(D) Lot Size: There shall be no minimum lot size
(E) Standards of Construction/Aesthetics: Turbines shall meet the following
requirements:
(1) Turbines shall be either roof mounted, co-located on existing
towers/poles or be of monopole construction, if freestanding.
(2) All turbines shall only be installed under the seal of a professional
structural engineer registered by the State of Texas.
(3) All power lines associated with the wind energy system shall be
located underground.
(4) Turbines shall be non-reflective, maintain a neutral color so as to
reduce visual obtrusiveness and shall be subject to any applicable
aesthetic standards of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).
(F) Setbacks: the following setback requirements shall apply only to all freestanding
turbines and all roof-mounted turbines shall be the same as the main structure:
(1) Measurement: for purposes of measurement, turbine setbacks and
separation distances shall be calculated and applied to proposed
facilities located in the city irrespective of other city boundaries. No
part of any wind energy system shall encroach upon or extend into any
recorded easement.
(a) Side and rear yard setbacks in all permissible districts:
1. A freestanding turbine shall be setback a minimum distance
equal to the height of the tower plus the length of one blade
(the turbine’s total extended height) from adjacent property
lines, utility lines and/or road rights-of-way.
2. Special consideration may be given to freestanding turbines
using a self-collapsible system.
(b) Front yard and street side yard setbacks in all permissible districts:
1. A freestanding turbine shall be setback the same minimum
setback distance established by the main structure, and
2. Shall be setback a minimum distance equal to the height of
the tower plus the length of one blade (the turbine’s total
extended height) from adjacent property lines, utility lines
and/or road rights-of-way, whichever is greater.
(G) Height:
(1) Freestanding Small Scale Wind Turbine maximum height in no case
shall exceed 120 feet measured from grade to the tip of the highest
point (including blade).
(2) If attached to the roof of a structure located within a SF-ED, SF-12,
SF-9, SF-7, SF, 2F-9 or MH district, the height of the turbine shall not
exceed 20’ above the height of the existing structure and in no case
shall exceed 60’ from grade.
(3) If attached to the roof of a structure located within a TH-1, TH-2, MF-
1, or MF-2 district, then the height of the turbine shall not exceed 25’
above the height of the existing structure and in no case shall exceed
70’ from grade.
(4) If attached to the roof of a structure located within an Office, Retail,
Commercial, or Town Center district, the maximum height of the
turbine shall not exceed 25’ above the height of the existing structure
and in no case shall exceed 70’ from grade.
(5) If attached to the roof of a structure located within a Highway
Commercial or Light Industrial district, the maximum height of the
turbine shall not exceed 25’ above the height of the existing structure
and in no case shall exceed 120’ from grade.
(H) Ground/Roof Clearance:
(1) The lowest extension of any blade or other exposed moving
component shall be at least twenty (20) feet above grade, if
freestanding, and
(2) The lowest extension of any blade or other exposed moving
component shall have at least ten (10) feet clearance above the roof, if
roof-mounted.
(I) Sound: Under normal operating circumstances (excluding blackouts and full
battery banks) the sound shall be not exceed 55 dB measured at the property line.
(J) Landscaping/Tree Retribution: If existing landscaping is to be removed as a result
of the proposed wind turbine, it shall adhere to Article 34 Landscape Regulations.
(K) Access: Foot pegs or rungs below 12 feet of a freestanding tower are not allowed.
(L) Lighting: Turbines shall not be artificially lighted, unless required by the FAA or
other applicable authority.
(M) Signs: all signs, other than the manufacturer’s or installer’s identification,
appropriate warning signs, or owner identification on a wind generator, tower, or
other structure associated with a small wind energy system visible from any
public road or adjacent property shall be prohibited. The manufacturer’s or
installer’s identification, appropriate warning signs, or owner identification signs
shall comply with Section 12-29-3.
(N) State or federal requirements: All turbines must meet or exceed current standards
and regulations of the FAA, FCC, OSHA and any other agency of the state or
federal government with the authority to regulate turbines. If such standards and
regulations are changed, then the owners of the turbine(s) shall bring the
turbine(s) into compliance with such revised standards and regulations within 90
days of the effective date of such standards and regulations, unless a different
compliance schedule is mandated by the controlling state or federal agency.
Failure to bring turbine(s) into compliance with such revised standards and
regulations shall constitute grounds for the removal of the turbine(s) the owner’s
expense.
(O) Building codes; safety standards: To ensure the structural integrity of turbines,
the owner of a turbine shall ensure that it is maintained in compliance with
standards contained in applicable state or city building codes, as amended from
time to time. If, upon inspection, the city concludes that a turbine fails to comply,
then upon notice being provided to the owner of the turbine, the owner shall have
90 days to bring such turbine into compliance with such standards. Failure to
bring such turbine into compliance within said 90 days shall constitute grounds
for the removal of the turbines at the owner’s expense.
(P) Utility Notification: No small wind energy system shall be installed until
evidence has been given to the city at time of permitting that the utility company
has been informed of the customer’s intent to install an interconnected customer-
owned generator. Off-grid systems shall be exempt from this requirement.
(Q) Liability Insurance: Owners of any Wind Energy System must provide a
minimum amount of $100,000 liability insurance that covers the wind turbine and
all other components, and proof of such insurance coverage must be provided to
the City prior to permitting.
(R) Abandonment: If turbine has been inoperable for ninety days, a letter may be
issued and removal shall be required (at the owners expense) if operation has not
been restored within ninety days from the date of the letter.
12-32B-3 A Special Use Permit is required in all Zoning Districts for the installation
of a new wind energy system or the conversion of an existing tower to support a
turbine:
(A) General: the following provisions shall govern the granting of special use permits
for small scale turbines by the city council and the recommendations of the
planning and zoning commission:
(1) If administrative approval is not deemed appropriate by the Chief
Building Official, as outlined in Section 12-32B-4, then a special use
permit shall be required for the construction or the placement of a
turbine in all districts.
(2) Applications for special use permits under this article shall be subject
to the procedures and requirements of Article 30 of the Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance except as modified in this section.
(3) A special use permit may impose conditions to the extent the city
council and/or the planning and zoning commission conclude such
conditions are necessary to minimize any adverse effect of the
proposed turbine on adjoining properties.
(4) Any information of an engineering nature that the applicant submits,
whether civil, mechanical, structural, or electrical, shall be certified by
a licensed professional engineer in the state of Texas.
(5) An applicant for a special use permit shall submit the information
described in Section 12-32B-3(B) and the standard Special Use Permit
fee as established by the City Council.
(B) Small Scale Wind Energy Systems Special Use Permit Procedures.
(1) Information required: In addition to any information required for
applications for special use permits pursuant to Article 30 of the
comprehensive zoning ordinance, applicants for a special use permit
for a turbine shall submit the following information:
(a) A scaled site plan clearly indicating the location, type and height
of the proposed turbine, on-site land use and zoning, adjacent land
uses and zoning (including when adjacent to other municipalities),
adjacent roadways, proposed means of access, setbacks from
property lines and relevant setback dimensions as specified in
Section 12-32B-2(F), elevation drawings of the proposed turbine(s)
with color, dimensions and other information deemed by the City
Planning Director to be necessary to assess compliance with this
ordinance.
(b) A site wind study determining appropriate location based on wind
velocity and nearby obstructions shall be required to insure the
potential for electricity generation and to insure that there will be
no negative affect on existing nearby wind energy systems.
(c) Structural Plan sealed by a licensed engineer in the State of Texas.
(d) Legal description of the proposed property.
(e) The setback distance between the proposed turbine and the nearest
residential unit, platted residentially zoned properties, and
unplatted residentially zoned properties.
(f) A statement that the applicant is in compliance with subsections
12-32B-2 and all applicable federal, state or local laws.
(2) Factors considered in granting special use permits for turbines:
In addition to any standards for consideration of special use permit
applications pursuant to Article 30 of the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance, the City Council and the City Planning and Zoning
Commission shall consider the following factors in determining
whether to grant a special use permit; although, either body may
impose such reasonable conditions which shall include but not be
limited to:
(a) Proximity of the turbine to residential structures and residential
district boundaries;
(c) Nature of uses on adjacent and nearby properties;
(d) Surrounding topography;
(e) Potential impact on surrounding tree coverage and foliage;
(f) Design of the turbine, with particular reference to design
characteristics that have the effect of reducing or eliminating visual
obtrusiveness;
(g) Integration with surrounding architecture if roof-mounted;
(h) Compatibility with the surrounding area to avoid visual clutter;
(i) Access to and from the turbine; and
(j) Such other reasonable conditions that insure health, safety and
welfare of the community.
12-32B-4 Administrative approval may be considered appropriate for replacement
or repairs.
(A) General. The following provisions shall govern the issuance of administrative
approval for turbines.
(1) The Chief Building Official may administratively approve an
amendment to an existing SUP for a wind turbine.
(2) The application for administrative approval shall contain information
set forth in subsection 12-32B-3 and a nonrefundable fee as
established by resolution of the City Council to reimburse the city for
the costs of reviewing the application for all nonresidential projects.
(B) List of administratively approved uses. The following uses may be approved by
the Chief Building Official after conducting an administrative review:
(1) Replacement of existing turbines located on existing towers/poles or
replacing the small wind energy system in its entirety, provided that:
(a) The turbine does not increase the previously approved height of
the tower or pole by more than the length of the blade and in no
circumstance shall the extended height exceed 120’;
(b) The turbine complies with the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) regulations and all applicable federal and state regulations;
and
(c) The turbine complies with all applicable building codes.
Adjacent City Wind Energy
System Comparison Addison Duncanville Ft Worth Garland
Definitions
Wind energy system.
A wind energy
conversion system
consisting of a wind
turbine, a tower, and
associated control or
conversion
electronics, which has
a rated capacity of
not more than 10 kW
and is intended to
reduce on-site
consumption of
electricity.
Wind Energy System means a
wind-driven energy conversion
system that converts wind
energy into electricity through
the use of wind energy that
drives a wind turbine, that has a
rated capacity of not more than
10kw output at any given time,
and that is intended for on-site
production and consumption of
electricity. Roof Mounted
System refers to any system
designed to be mounted on the
roof of a structure that does not
extend more than sixty (60)
inches above the roof line.
Permitted/SUP SUP, any district SUP, any district
Permitted with
approval from Code
Official
SUP, SF-16, SF-7, SF-10, D, CA-
2
Minimum Lot Size
Maximum Tower Height
max. 40 ft. Additional
specifications for VAWTs
Set-Back
may not be located nearer to a
side or rear lot line than the
height
Other Placement Restrictions
rear yard only, prohibited in
easements
Noise
Compliance
FAA, any other applicable state
or federal standards
Other Requirements
permitted only as a secondary
use, no signs on system,
building permit, provide notice to
utility co., must be approved by a
plan commission after public
hearing, roof mounted systems
exempt from many
specifications, considered
abandoned if in disuse for 12
months - 90 days to remove
after notice, 60 days to repair or
remove after notice
Max kW 10 10
Adjacent City Wind Energy
System Comparison Grand Prairie Lewisville Oak Point
Definitions
Small Wind Energy System: A
wind energy conversion system
consisting of a wind turbine, a
tower, and associated control or
conversion electronics, which has
a rated capacity of not more than
100 kW and which is primarily
intended to reduce on-site
consumption of utility power.
Wind Energy System or System
shall mean a wind energy
conversion system that converts
wind energy into electricity through
the use and consisting of a wind
turbine, a tower, and associated
control or conversion electronics,
that has a rated capacity of not
more than 20kw for residential
systems and not more than 100 kw
for commercial systems and is
intended for on-site production and
consumption of electricity to serve
the needs of the consumer.
Permitted/SUP SUP, any district
Prohibited unless a variance is
granted by city council SUP, any district
Minimum Lot Size 2 acres
Maximum Tower Height
max. 80 ft if 3 acres or less, max.
150 ft otherwise max. 40 ft
Set-Back
1.25 times the tower height from
all property lines, public rights-of-
way, occupied buildings, and utility
lines. At least 15 ft.
may be no closer to the property
line than the highest point of the
system. At least 10 ft.
Other Placement Restrictions
must be 75 ft or 5 times diameter
of rotor from any other tower
40 feet from any primary structure,
prohibited in easements
Noise comply with city ordinances
50 dBa 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.;
35 dBa 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.
Compliance FAA
FAA, National Electric Code, any
other applicable state or federal
standards
Other Requirements
lowest part of rotor must be 30 ft
above highest allowed structure or
potential tree height if within 300 ft
of property line, redundant braking
system, posted warnings, climb
prevention measures, building
permit
permitted only as a secondary
use, no signs on system, 6 ft
screening, provide notice to utility
co., $300,000 liability insurance,
considered abandoned if in disuse
for 12 months - 90 days to remove
after notice, 60 days to repair or
remove after notice, building
permit
Max kW 100 residential: 20; commercial: 100
Adjacent City Wind Energy System
Comparison Rowlett Waxahachie Wylie
Definitions
“Wind Energy System” means a
wind-driven energy conversion
system that converts wind energy
into electricity though the use of
wind energy that drives a wind
turbine, that has a rated capacity
of not more than 10 kilowatt (kw)
output at any given time, and that
is intended for on-site production
and consumption of electricity.
Roof Mounted Systems. Any
system designed to be mounted
on the roof of a structure that does
not extend more than sixty (60)
inches above the roof line.
Small wind system - a wind-driven
energy system that converts wind
energy into electricity through the
use and consisting of a wind
turbine, a tower, and associated
control or conversion electronics.
These systems must not exceed
10 kW, per system, and their
primary use must be to reduce on-
site consumption of electric utility
power.
Wind Powered System means a
machine designed to convert
kinetic energy in the wind to
mechanical or electrical energy,
for the primary purpose of on-site
use and not for resale or
transmission off-site. Wind energy
conversion systems include a
tower and all directly connected
facilities and associated control
equipment, but not including any
wired connections stemming from
the tower.
Permitted/SUP SUP, any district SUP, SF-1, SF-2. SF-3. I, PD Building permit required
Minimum Lot Size 2 acres
Maximum Tower Height
max. 40 ft. Additional
specifications for VAWTs max. 60 ft (R or C); max. 100 ft (I)
Set-Back
may not be located nearer to a
side or rear lot line than the height
set back from all property lines a
distance equal to 1.1 times the
height of the tower and its
equipment
setback from all boundaries of any
lot or habitable structure by a
distance equal to at least one
hundred twenty-five percent
(125%) of the tower’s height
Other Placement Restrictions
rear yard only, prohibited in
easements
1.1 times the height from any
occupied buildings
systems must be separated by a
distance equal to at least the
height of the tallest such tower
Noise comply with city ordinances
Compliance
FAA, utility co., any other
applicable state or federal
standards
FAA, any small wind certification
program recognized by AWEA
Other Requirements
permitted only as a secondary
use, no signs or lighting, public
hearing notifying within 400 ft,
considered abandoned if in disuse
for 6 months - 90 days to remove
after notice, 60 days to repair or
remove after notice, building
permit, roof mounted systems
exempt from regulations
permitted only as a secondary
use, monopole, nonreflective, no
signs or lighting, manual and
automatic braking system, building
permit, provide notice to utility co.,
letter every other year from
engineer confirming compliance,
considered abandoned if in disuse
for 6 months - 90 days to remove
after notice, 60 days to repair or
remove after notice
Max kW 10 10
wet stamp required if greater than
20
Why Do They Need To Be Tall?
A tall tower is the single most important
factor in the economic viability of a
small wind system. Tall towers enable
turbines to access faster and better
quality winds, and even small increases
in wind speed translate to exponentially
more energy the turbine can generate.
In other words, a taller tower means
far more - and cheaper - energy.
The best sites for turbines are those
where the wind is least obstructed,
which is often the highest point on a
property. The bottom of the turbine
rotor should clear the highest wind
obstacle (rooftop, mature tree, etc.)
within a 500 foot radius by at least
30 feet. Doing so ensures the turbine
reaches consistent, fast wind speeds
and prolongs the life of the turbine by
avoiding stressful air turbulence.
T HE I MPORTANCE OF H EIGHT
6
Ventera 10kW turbine
Putting a turbine
on too short of a
tower is like placing
a solar panel in
the shade.
Restrictive Zoning
Rules Can Undermine
State Law
Several states offer
financial incentives to
promote small wind
turbines and clean
energy. But zoning
height limitations can
prevent turbines
from generating any
meaningful amount
of energy, thwarting
the intent of the
state incentive.
American Wind Energy Association
www.awea.org/smallwind
Overly conservative zoning height
restrictions therefore cost the owner
money - and a lot of it. They can also
mean more sound, since taller towers
raise the generator high above the
ground, diluting sound considerably.
Sound decreases four-fold with every
doubling of distance from the turbine
(including distance above the ground) so
taller towers are better for their owners as
well as neighbors. (See also “Sound” p. 11.)
For zoning officials, the importance
of strong winds also means that tower
height cannot be compromised as a
gesture to neighbors concerned about
the visibility of the turbine. "Hiding" a
turbine from neighbors using a shorter
tower almost always means hiding it
from the wind, too.
7
Bergey WindPower
10kW XLS turbine
Mariah Power Windspire
1kW turbine
Nor do two shorter installations make an
acceptable substitute for a single, taller
one. A tower alone can comprise 50% or
more of a system's total cost, so multiple,
shorter turbines (on multiple towers) cost
the owner far more than a single, taller
system. (See also "Multiple Turbines," p. 14.)
It is also important to keep in mind
that a turbine's generator size
(generating capacity, measured in
kilowatts or kW) has little, if anything,
to do with its tower height. Sometimes
zoning regulations mistakenly limit
tower heights based on the size of
the turbine's capacity, thinking that
a 2kW turbine, for example, always
corresponds to a 40 foot tower. This is
not the case. Appropriate tower height
is matched to a turbine depending on
surrounding terrain, trees and buildings,
and wind resource. Therefore, tower
height restrictions, if any, should only
reflect sound and safety concerns rather
than be designed to correspond to a
system's generating capacity. Most
often, in fact, established sound and
setback requirements negate the need
even to mention height in regulations
for small wind systems.
FAQAboutWind andSolarEnergy WindEnergySystems LLC Page1
wi
Energy
systems
Providinthe Enerof Tomorrow
Home
Grants Incentives
Manufacturers
WindEnergyFAQ
SolarEnergyFAQ
Upcoming Events
Careers
ContactUs
WhereAreWe
focuson energy
rpoker111yOM
Wind Energy FAQ
Whatarewindturbines madeofHow muchdoesawindsystem costIveheardabout anewsmallwind
turbinethat startsup andruns atverylowwind speeds Isthata newIdeaWhat isthe standardpayback
period Willithelpthe environment ifIinstall awindturbineat myhomeHowdo 1getapermit toinstall
a turbineDo windturbinesfrightenlivestockHow doresidential windturbines workWhy dont they
maketurbines thatlook likeoldfashionedwindmillsWhatsizeturbine doI needformyhomeWilla
smallwindturbine save memoneyAre there anyrebate orincentiveprograms availablewhereIlive
What about towersHow manyturbines are neededto powerahouseholdorfarm Isthere anythingI
should watchout forwhen buyinga smallwindturbineWhatisa VerticalAxiswindturbineor
VAWT How reliablearewindturbinesWillI havetoperformmuchmaintenanceWillmyutility allow
me tohookupawindgeneratorWill mylocalgovernmentallow meto install awindturbine CanIpower
mywholehousewithawindturbineHowdo smallwindturbinescomparewith otherrenewableenergy
technologiessuitablefordecentralized ruralelectrificationCan I mountthe turbineon myroofDowind
turbines makenoise orinterferewithTVreception How muchwindpotentialdoesmysite haveDosmall
wind turbines killbirds Aresmallwindturbinessafe Arentwindturbines toohightechfor regular
people
Whatarewindturbines made of
mra
The towersare mostlytubular and madeof steelgenerally painted light greyTheblades are made ofglass
fibre reinforcedpolyesterorwoodepoxyThey are light grey becausethisisthecolourwhich ismost
inconspicuous undermost lighting conditions Thefinishismatt toreducereflected lightCourtseyof
bweacom
http wwwwindenergysystemsllccomfaqaspx categoryWind 1242009
FAQ AboutWindandSolarEnergy WindEnergySystems LLC Page 2
How much doesawindsystemcost
Small windenergy systemscostfrom 3000to 6000foreverykilowatt of generatingcapacityorabout
40000fora system installed largeenough topowermostof ahome Thisismuchcheaperthan solar
systems butthepayback periodcan still be lengthy aslittleas6butup to30 yearsThatswhyits
important to takeadvantage ofrebates ortaxcreditsavailable forsmallwindsysteminstallations Wellsited
smallwindturbines canusuallypayforthemselves within15 yearsabout halftheir serviceable lifetimes if
theright incentivesare appliedCourtesyof AWEAcom
Iveheardabout anew smallwindturbinethat startsup andrunsat verylowwindspeeds Isthat a
newIdea
NoMany inventors havedeveloped turbines thatrun at low wind speedsBut becausetheenergyavailable
inthe wind isa functionof thecubeof itsspeedthere isverylittleenergyavailable tobeharvested at wind
speedsless than4 meterspersecond ms9 mphIf youareconsidering thepurchase of asmallwind
turbine theabilityto run atlow windspeedsshouldnotbe animportantfactor inselecting amachine
Courtesyof AWEAcom
What is thestandardpaybackperiod
Each installationsitewill beunique withvariables suchassite windprofilestopography type of storage
heightof thetowerandtypeandsize of windturbine installed Inaddition returnon investment
calculationsseldom figure inthe increasingcostof utility orfuelchargesover timeThereforeanystandard
paybackperiodwouldat bestbe only anestimate Soconsider more importantlythelife cycleof your
installationOnce installedyour utitlityorfuelcoststoruna turbineisZERO
Willithelptheenvironment ifIinstalla windturbineat myhome
YesWindturbines produceno airwaterorthermalpollutionandemitnogreenhouseorsmogcausing
gases Byusingwindpoweryouwillalso beoffsetting pollutionthatwouldhavebeengenerated byyour
utility company Overits lifea smallresidential windturbinecan offsetapproximately12tonsof air
pollutants and200 tonsof greenhouse gaspollutants carbondioxideandothergases which causeglobal
warmingCourtesyof AWEAcom
Howdo Iget a permit to installaturbine
A buildingpermit willberequired to install yourwind turbine systemYou willneedtocontact yourlocal
buildingdepartment to determineiftheyhaveestablished regulationsforwindturbines Manydepartments
do nothavewindturbineregulationsestablished this shouldchange intimeaswind turbinesbecome more
prevalent Therefore youmay needto apply forazoning varianceat apublic hearing withyour local
planning boardIt wouldbewise to seekthe supportofyour neighborsbeforethe hearingifyouare
installinginaresidential areaPermitting feescouldrange fromacouplehundreddollarsto overathousand
dollars depending on whereyouliveWe canprovidethe supporttohelpyouthroughthis process
Courtesy of Brightideascom
Dowindturbines frightenlivestock
Windfarming ispopular withfarmersbecausetheir landcan continuetobe usedfor growing cropsor
grazing livestock Sheepcowsand horsesare not disturbedbywindturbines CourtesyofBweacom
httpwwwwindenergysystemsllccomfaqaspxcategoryWind 1242009
FAQAbout WindandSolarEnergy WindEnergySystems LLC Page 3
How doresidential windturbines work
Awindturbine whichis installedontopof atalltower collects kineticmotionenergy from thewind and
converts itto electricitythatiscompatiblewith ahomeselectricalsystemIna normalresidential
applicationahome isserved simultaneouslybythewindturbineandalocalutilityIfthewindspeedsare
belowcutinspeed710 mph theminimumspeedtospinthe blades therewill beno outputfrom the
turbineandalloftheneeded poweris purchasedfrom theutilityAswindspeedsincreaseturbineoutput
increases andtheamount of powerpurchased from theutilityis proportionately decreasedWhen theturbine
produces morepowerthan thehouse needs manyutilitiesinstituteapolicycallednetmeteringwhereby
theextra electricityissoldbackto theutilityAllof this isdone automaticallyThereare nobatteriesina
moderngridconnected residential windsystem Smallwind systemsforremote offgridapplications
operatesomewhat differentlyandoftencharge batteriessoelectricityisavailablewhenthewindisnt
blowing Courtesyof AWEAcom
Why donttheymake turbines thatlooklikeold fashionedwindmills
Theoldfashionedwindmillisviewed withnostalgiaandsomepeople preferthe lookof themto thatof
theirmoderncounterparts Justbecausewindturbines aremodernitdoesntmean theywont lookjustas
goodover timeAmodernwind turbine issimplyan improved windmillEveryaspect oftheir designhas
beenoptimisedmaking them farmore efficientthan oldstylewindmillsat generatingelectricity Tomake
them look moreold fashionedwouldjustresult inmoreexpensive electricityCourtesy ofbweacom
What sizeturbinedo Ineedformyhome
Homesuse approximately10000kilowatthours kWhof electricity peryearabout 830 kWhpermonth
though thisamountcan varyconsiderablyAn air conditioned homeinArizonaforexamplewilluse more
electricity than anonair conditioned home inVermontDepending upontheaveragewindspeed inthe
area awind turbinerated inthe range of5 to 10kilowattswouldberequired tomakea significant
contribution to meetthisdemand Courtesyof AWEAcom
Will asmallwindturbinesave memoney
Awindturbinetypically lowersahouseholdelectricity billby50 to90 Itisnotuncommon forwind
turbineowners withtotalelectrichomes tohavemonthly utilitybills of only8to15 forninemonthsof
the yearDepending onthe turbinesize andthe installationsite aturbinecould supplymorethan 100of a
homesenergy needssometimesresultinginanegativeelectricutilitybillIn northern partsof theUS
wherelessair conditioningis usedelectricitybills canbe verylow yearroundThe amountof money a
small windturbinesavesyou inthelongrun willdependuponits cost theamountof electricityyouuse the
average wind speedat your siteand otherfactorsSince energyconservation isusuallyless expensivethan
energyproductionmakingyour houseorfarmmore energyefficientfirstwill likely reducethe amountof
investment in a windsystem to meetyourneedsMostwindsystem purchasershavedoneall the reasonable
efficiency measures firstCourtesy ofAWEAcom
Are there anyrebate orincentive programs available whereI live
For the mostuptodate listing ofincentivespoliciesand regulationsat thestateand federal levelsseethe
DatabaseofStateIncentivesforRenewables EfficiencyathttpdsireusaorgCourtesy ofAWEAcom
Whatabout towers
http wwwwindenergysystemsllc comfaqaspxcategoryWind 1242009
FAQAboutWindandSolarEnergy WindEnergySystemsLLC Page 4
ThetallerthetowerthebetterAn 80to 120foottower isusuallysupplied along withthewindturbine
Towers thistallarenecessaryto raisethewindturbine aboveturbulence generatedbyobstaclesonthe
groundandtrees Windspeed increases withheightabove groundandincreasingspeedincreaseswind
powerexponentially Thusrelativelysmallinvestments inincreasedtowerheightcan yieldveryhighrates
ofreturninpowerproduction Forinstanceinstallinga10 kWgeneratoron a100 foot towerratherthan a
60foottower involvesa10increaseinoverall systemcost butcan result in29morepowerTaller
towersalso raise bladesaboveair turbulenceallowingthe turbines to producemorepowerA ruleof thumb
forproperandefficientoperation of awindturbineisthatthebottomof theturbinesbladesshould heat
least 30 feetabovethetopof anythingwithin500feetAlso beaware ofany heightrestrictionsyourlocal
zoningrulesmayimpose Occasionally localrulesprohibitstructures higherthan30feetorsoSeveral
differenttypesof towersare available dependingupon whichmanufactureryou selectEachtypehasits
advantagesthe mosteconomicaltype of toweristhe guyedlatticetowerbut ahingedtowercanbe easier
foryoutoinstall yourselfand provideseasieraccess formaintenanceCourtesy ofAWEAcom
How manyturbines areneededto powerahouseholdorfarm
Fora home orfarm oneturbine with apowerrating of anywherefrom1 kWto25kW isnormallyinstalled
Theturbinessize ischosen tomeet theenergyrequirements giventhe availablewindresourceBuying
multipleturbines foroneapplicationrather thana singlelargerone isalmostalwaysless economical
becauseof thecost ofbuying twoseparate towersand installingtwo separatesystems Forvillage
electrificationapplications both singleandmultipleturbineinstallationsarecommon andturbines up to
100kW incapacity maybeusedCourtesy ofAWEAcom
IsthereanythingIshouldwatchoutforwhenbuyingasmall windturbine
If itseems toogood tobe trueitprobably isarewordsto keepinmindwhenshopping fora smallwind
turbineOvertheyearsasteady streamof breakthroughwindturbines has promisedexceptional
performanceat anincrediblylowprice Sometimestheclaimedperformanceviolatesthelawsof physics
promisingmorepowerthan thetotalkineticenergyavailableinthewindstream thatisinterceptedbythe
rotorssweptarea Theseoftenwellmeaning entrepreneursusually donothavetheengineering background
toperform propercalculationsand testsThere have alsobeen outandoutfrauds inthewindbusiness
wherethe entrepreneur setouttointentionally defraudthe publicparticularly fromoverseasmanufacturers
Thishas been possibleatleast inthe short term becausemostpeople arentexperts on thephysics of wind
energyandtheyhavea hard timesorting out reasonable claimsfromunreasonable onesWhowouldntbe
temptedto buy anew windturbinetwiceasefficient asanything onthemarket Mostofthepopular
models of smallwindturbines operate atabout thesameefficiencyTheenergyproduction youshould
expectwill beclosely related to the sweptareaoftherotorbladeswhichisbasedon the diameter ofthe
rotor Ifyouare offeredaproduct thatpromises torun your wholehouse with aturbinethatismuch smaller
thanconventionalproducts itstimeto start askinghardquestionsAnother way toprotectyourself isto
makesure thatthe dealerwho soldyouthe windturbinecanprovide referencesfrompriorsatisfied
customersCourtesy of AWEAcom
Whatis aVerticalAxiswindturbineorVAWT
Thevastmajorityof windturbinesare threebladed propellershapeddevicesthatspin aroundan axisthat
isparallel orhorizontal tothe groundThese arecalled horizontal axiswindturbinesorHAWTs
An alternativesystem configurationfeaturesa rotorthat revolvesaround anaxisthat isperpendicular or
vertical tothe groundsimilarto abarbershoppoleorcorkscrewCourtesyof AWEAcom
Howreliable arewindturbinesWill Ihaveto performmuch maintenance
httpwwwwindenergysystemsllccomfaqaspxcategory Wind 1242009
FAQAboutWindandSolar Energy WindEnergySystems LLC Page 5
Mostsmallturbines haveonly 23 movingpartsand aredesignedforalonglife20 30 yearsIlowever
aswithanyother hard workingmachine partsmustbemaintainedand occasionallyrepaired Theaverage
residentialsizedwindturbinewillputonasmany miles injustfour monthsastheaverage cardoesinits
100000milelifetimeNo responsibleautomobile ownerwouldexpect their car to performforsuchan
extendedperiodoftimewithno tuneups oroilchangesletalone withoutmaintenanceCourtesy of
AWEAcom
Willmyutilityallowmeto hookup awindgenerator
Federalregulationsspecifically thePublic UtilityRegulatory PoliciesActof 1978orPURPArequire
utilitiestoconnectwith and purchase powerfrom smallwindenergysystems A windturbinemanufacturer
shouldbe ableto help arrangethe requiredutility company approvals Courtesy ofAWEAcom
Will my localgovernmentallowmetoinstallawindturbine
A windturbineisatallstructurethatnormallyrequiresabuildingpermitZoningregulationsoften limitthe
heightplacementandother characteristicsof appurtenantstructures so aconditional specialusepermit
orvariancemaybenecessary Itsusuallybesttoletyour neighborsknow about yourinstallation aheadof
timeBepreparedtoanswer questions andclearup commonmisconceptions withwelldocumentedfacts
about smallwindturbinesCourtesy of AWEAcom
Can Ipowermy wholehouse withawindturbine
Manyfactors willdetermineyour abilitytopower yourwhole houseWhatis thewindresourceavailableat
the site Howmuchpowerdo you consumeDoyouutilize astoragemedium forlowconsumption
periods Doesyourutility allow forgridconnectednetmeteringAre youwillingto utilizelow power
consuming technologiessuch asLEDlightingWe allknowthe winddoesnot blow allthe timeIf your
goalistoreduceyourutilityconsumptionto near zerowetypicallyrecommend a hybridsystemcombining
windwithavailable solargeothermal orhydrocourtesyof Brightideascom
How do small windturbines comparewithotherrenewableenergy technologiessuitable for
decentralizedruralelectrification
Wind powerisverycompetitive withsolarphotovoltaics PVbiomassand dieselgenerators butis
usuallymore expensive than microhydro Wind isalso veryattractive fortheeasewithwhichthe
technologycanbetransferred to developingcountries Generallyspeaking windpowercomplements these
otherpowersources byproviding aleast costapproachundercertain conditions Thisexpandstherange of
potentialprojectspointing totheday whendecentralized electrificationprojects willbe implementedon the
same scale as currentutilityline extensionprojects Inmany situationsthelowest cost centralizedsystem
willbe ahybridsystem thatcombineswindphotovoltaics anddieselCourtesy of AWEAcom
CanImounttheturbineon myroof
TheGUSverticalaxis turbines byTangarie maybemounted onaroofwithsomestructural considerations
andpotentiallyadded costHowever thiswouldnotbe the bestoptionforsitingto producethe mostpower
from theavailableresourceItis bestto gettheturbine ashighaspossibleandinalocationwiththefewest
obstructionsto thewindto maximizepoweryieldAndmoreoften thannotthiswouldbe awayfrom the
rooftopandon a poleThehorizontal axisturbines byReDrivenarenotmountedon a roofand aretypically
mountedon ahydraulicconcrete poleTheReDriven hydraulic pole isunique inthatitallows theturbineto
belowered tothegroundforservicingortobetterprotecttheturbineinadvanceof extremeweather
httpwwwwindenergysystemsl lccomfaqaspxcategoryWind 1242009
FAQ AboutWindandSolarEnergy WindEnergy SystemsLLC Page 6
conditions CourtesyofBrightideascom
Dowindturbines make noiseorinterferewithTVreception
Smallwindturbines domake somenoisebutnotenough tobe found objectionablebymost peopleA
typical residential windsystem makes lessnoisethanthe averagewashingmachine Small windturbinesdo
notinterfere withTVreception Courtesyof AWEAcom
How muchwindpotentialdoesmy sitehave
General windclassificationsforyour areacanbe found atthe Department of Energywebsite Local
meterological stationscan alsoprovidewinddataforyourarea Duetosite conditions such aselevation
heightof surrounding treesand buildingsyoumay wanta specificwindstudyforyoursite Wecanprovide
you withmonitoringservices forafeeoryoumaypurchase yourown monitoringequipment Courtesyof
Brightideascom
Dosmall windturbineskill birds
While no suchstudies havebeen performedspecifically forsmall windturbinesanecdotal evidence
indicatesthatbirds occasionally collide withsmall windturbines astheydo withanyothertypeof structure
However such eventsare rare andveryunlikelyto have anyimpact onbird populationsLargeutility scale
wind turbinesaccountforless than0 003 ofall humancaused birddeathsand smallwindturbines have
evenless of an impactHouse cats inthe USbycontrast areestimated to killroughlyone billionbirds
eachyear Statistically a singlehousecatawindow paneoranautomobileisamuchgreaterthreatto birds
than awindturbineofany sizeCourtesy ofAWEAcom
Aresmallwindturbinessafe
YesHoweverneighbors whoareuneasy about anearbyhomeownerinstallinga smallwindturbinemay
raiseall sortsof questions aboutsafetyBriefanswers tosome ofthese concerns Falling towerThousands
of windturbinesareinstalled inthe USandtheirsafetytrackrecordisexcellentTrees aremuchmore
likely tofall than a properlyinstalledwindturbinebut no setbacksorminimumproperty sizesarerequired
fortreesSafety of utility repair personnelduring apoweroutageSmall windsystemsshutdown
automaticallyinthe eventof apoweroutageto protect utilityworkers andwill not energizea deadpower
line Icethrowfrom rotorblades Icebuildupmakes windturbineblades heavierandless aerodynamicand
therefore theyturnmore slowlyTypicallyicewill droptothe baseofthe turbinetowerinsteadof being
thrown Childrenclimbingthe towerandfallingPossible but windturbinesshould betreated nodifferently
than otherclimbablestructures such aswater towersoramateurradio antennas Courtesyof AWEAcom
Arentwindturbines toohightechforregular people
Thehightechnology of awindturbineisin justafew manufacturedcomponents such asthe bladesA wind
turbine canactuallybe muchsimplerthan a dieselengineandalso requiresubstantially lessattention and
maintenanceSometypes of smallturbines canoperate forextended periodsfive yearsormore without
any attentionWith training andsparepartslocaluserscan support thewindturbineequipment theyuse
Courtesy of AWEAcom
Copyright 2009Wind EnergySystems LLCAll rightsreserved
httpwwwwindenergysystemsllccomfaqaspxcategoryWind 1242009
400
500
240
777
951
980
944
600
200
611
500
4255
4250
306 204
346
650
185
301
660
450
945
600
770
1110
1111 1110
201
850
601
4265
488
800
4051
440
675
585
635
1461
100
955
820
840
800
555
925
625
1301
1441
117
404
508
1177
120
621
217
1025
850
860T
4155
1111
1075
425
1234
1151
700
586
875
106110
1150
120
1199
750
1221
560
815
801800
455
652
700
700
1333
511
615
603
1322
505
615
1303
101
1405
825
590
250
220
11221144
185
989
480
651
260
555
701
200
750
631
1421
777
101
132
1525
1111
680
1275
1225
296
440
150
234
420
1230
1203
146
1303
150
1201
510
751
177230
305
130
1080
601
580
197
450
220
635
441
300
760
4
1
3
1233
2
6
8
5
7
9
255
420T
171
500
816
413
651
240
465
130
200
200
688
313
268
893
133
129
136
265
849
290
145
870
751
878
680
1235
200
743
109
145
200-A
102
747
751
255
109
735
24 22
722
13
16
152
21
32
26
27
31
43
30
23 18
37
29
41
45
42
34
10
20
1211
19
38
15
128
25
33
275
35
44
509
40
739
370
39
14
654
28
36
702
26
17
687
424
848
520
215
148
731
556
100
252
125
121
115
118
598
17
601
105
501
300
201
525
409
513
157
524
924
18
821
136
550
413
1000
260
270
133
500
201
131
260
22
30
128
603
501
10
127
433
462
706
14
249
2560
13
149
115
235
133
132
684
526
125
250
620
115
123
125
117
501
120
722
259
701
522
487
96
524
411
275
253
256
261
101
718
417
528
721
714
541
118
606
714
3
751
117
212
104
114
137
611
504
140
526
541
516
715
620
417
236
616
262
602
207
612
413
524
476
509
608
105
260
732
763
101
116
717
125
772
145
128
532
628
240
614
405
354
208
469
631
639
216
611
152
124
505
605
769
572
608
307
715
610
514
123
466
465
121
473
140
148
577
604
275
573
509
702
451
257
618
619
254
138
141
141
120
257
517
202
407
101
80
740
204
478
482
546
207
475
477
331
224
116
561
733
487
133
256
545
615
507
711
133
485
706
121
505
467
616
308
702
602
495
511
183
125
500
747
101
225
620
235
483
635
117
729
137
716
500
118
569
315
128
119
530
800
417
713
627
716
707
484
743
540
134
324
266
118
728
766
466
121
118
100
520
276
508
340
549
114
731
121
481
500
149
610
110
130
501
117
118
503
334
329
261
260
464
301
453
105
313
559
413
604
2
500
190
108
114
304
307
117
307
405
115
723
111
142
126
717
145
233
253
744
144
88
137
184
283
540
130
609
726
704
144
702
316
709
115
251
218
148
312
267
748
735
133
506
421
724
720
132
113
5
105
508
740
107
112
111
331
132
110
118
142
146
311
717
750
470
710
115
255
336
713
113
137
742
105
719
221
226
607
331
408
510
705
255
495
517
102
717
119
632
548
328
178
500
500
140
4
227
139
350
120
125
770
205
116
142
749
117
330
553
102
149
318339
186
139145
84
116
311
129
312
313
496
320
746
411
401
500
147
261
705
737
715
403
7
603
153
122
279
309
521
358
135
719
703
623
366
101
137
200-B
197
106
309
229
140
616
513
433
252
139
349
314
124
581
500
768
323
113
244
513
533
256
153
143
615
460
767
521
348
438
101
543
129
7
209
329
569
334
195
801
109
301
436
261
288
244
434
148
101
130
182
764
126
217
254
408
101
765
110
429
157
114
173
219
701
251
121
203
109
131
258
128
518
111
613 134
134
136
236
220
319
601
730
342
215
142
401
114
741
246
452
169
619
228
189
755
312
520
150
421
108
101
110
445
106
530
121
606
362
141
304
630
141
321
411
718
332
253
200
529
118
131
604
316
206
557
144
325
323
243
309
110
308
112
314
731
345
248
732
334
326
139
343
336
208
144
408
245
413
234
329
745
330
127
303
320
92
137
339
728
401
264
226
316
540
437
300
204
330
342
143
128
305
221
509
569
527
205
111
113
126
233
189
721
118
316
211
520
342
216
124
261
120
246
254
312
107
487
130
121
129
327
262
300
437
723 712
114
335
214
225
237
307
164
326
524
308
533
132
145
223
131
104
217
161
149
255
444
111
322
140
239
258
405
130
121
617
250
263
222
253
424
402
313
121
538
243
522
112
123
123
509
757
109
441
400
437
601
181
334
131
122
245
344
111
627
110
404
427
321
740
502
605
131
126
320
111
304
123
141
130
313
537
407
370
211
513
706
736
430
115
300
462
200
110
267
114
123
124
456
327
739
143
147
309
622
157
113
146
433
416
115
513
403
305
197
180
193
411
126
721
408
310
533
162
276
313
486
513
722
106
229
199
479
119
707
248
576
406
122
133
332
505
738
150
111
179
332
147
331
735
145
758
157
108
205
210
544
154
432
701
533
410
481
211
743
137
414
339
193
123
313
550
314
616
217
250
504
311
867
185
310
421
200
105
406
449
237
502
338
138
426
572
537
301
251
404
442
123
334
112
306
726
404
138
133
120
100
431
310
161
184
516
508
203
320
136
616
126
181
266
3
126
323
512
117
537
227
635
410
135
212
718
196
326
605
136
102
427
242
202
238
312
109
148
201
148
245
317
177
136
137
349
310
235
242
284
333
425
423
134
116
493
305
108
343
1
353
722
302
108
170
145
112
143
525
260
409
128
103
604
623
433
311
754
513
201
324
122
118
403
108
141
125
322
129
494
602
106
109
174
127
136
105
333
404
191
132
306
537
223
267
344
228
116
271
304
112
108
251
276
330
96
535
492
144
150
348
448
197
553
204
316
114
225
537
134
524
119
325
185
100
103
246
252
320
431
208
327
112
635
621
248
252
332
711
400
268
266
232
211
325
612
205
153
210
316
335
307
110
153
301
125
128
345
326140
116
250
122
315
731
727 727
233
221
320
110
176
633
239
237
147
155
301
176
254
139
340
131
351
108
104
1688T
310
412
445
324
175
331
254
480
619
569
756
401
166
280
119
229
327
120
208
119
100
352
130
163
110
343
726
315
212
308
435
305
100
144
210
140
429
325
421
119
117
482
107
222
890
268
118
753
109
402
215
133
350
244
241
334
539
260
517
308
247
102
403
128
303
136
718
624
122
308
595
328
159
301
132
517
338
284
208
230
635
536
152
152
255
556
142
401
637
220
310
623
412
104
204
1201
416
217
631
327
613
624
119
323
125
248
135
150
222
112
188
134
221
275
145
126
266
748
150
471
526
621
193
124
312
200
8
642
314
338
517
184
405
257
107
532
103
521
541
509
415
328
112
113
129
319
482
123
346
133
127
331
409
113
103
333
233
109
226
520
321
343
205
407
111
100
434
324
324
250
241
141
141
505
322
143
414
146
719
130
114
501
302
512
369
318
108
302
125
235
312
709
237
606
402
306
712
525
145
735
154
173
134
349
319
304
217
507
225
238
417
308
127
257
140
109
407
305
121
548
346
620
181
308
201
320
618
135
129
160
320
136
211
309
339
429
213
109
322
202
228
302
117
255
479
505
164
630
304
272239
148
482
720
156
209
237
335
144
252
268
217
342
714
263
214
345
351
104
323
317
114
107
724
317
541
256
280
212
234
420
362
215
342
250
264
201
312
505
322
328
258
494
715
110
213
622
302
604
338
117
142
517
212
135
401
233
137
310
327
127
545
142
125
118
201
426
319
340
501
416
752
217
421
214
415
223
314
232
513
303
451
118
603
340
111
169
501
185
156
208
300
417
713
149
762
318
727
564
119
113
308
114
468
125
154
509
207
108
346
225
321
126
621
153
705
726
119
348
259
200
724
218
533
341
512
408
106
617
305
237
322
135
120
501
477
500
428
424
524
121
627
118
425
340
312
300
217
405
437
525
511
271
148
201
478
216
427
452
132
202
116
633
212
218
704
711
313
115
747
330
415
608
601
529
321
254
736
600
201
305
106
655
332
819
531
209
483
511 417
305
314
144
276
105
321
146
616
439
126
345
120
512
347
206
280
112
337
340
705
103
137
708
324
347
602
112
141
491
615
206
318
331
316
253
238
212
148
328
516
122
329
138
262
402
100
305
257
541
408
615
346
504
341
192
113
833
347
700
504
104
832
141
542
620
640
132
311
143
433
324
1
508
240
602
316
249
150
161
156
489
144
320
412
305528
122
247
407
516
724
700
324
201
421
140
300
513
647
325
415
126
440
212
141
352
136
216
121
443
502
428
613
261
328
135
265
531
723
201
605
468
253
624
125
525
185
504
118
108
132
365
513
238
244
262
113
639
210
321
400
240
430
115
603
336
643
326
209
412
119
338
269
123
352
639
702
343
110
516
124
212
109
265
154
505
331
240
206
414
607
623
317
634
102
708
403
436
137
409
330
129
520
373
448
322
259
126
134
204
155
148
193
192
928
820
404
516
168
108
317
475
509
453
413
421
264
404
104
607
606
425
336
213
253
548
317
717
730
324
646
545
202
532
109
225
304
625
164
351
252
309
456
142
626
320
511
529
412
123
327
526
317
632
506
124
602
440
712
441
404
301
300
612
257
121
333
636
101
306
336
122
110
202
181
322
216
73
304
111
122
335
308
102
126
315
324
448
241
200
157
614
220
138
528
213
233
508
118
546
189
300
214
258
519
221
196
383
441
122
626
252
323
245
131
432
309
614
245
248
209
326
423
716
435
424
183
205
233
137
414
289
402
474
122
465
101
350
107
128
325
506
137
322
297
145
525
725
215
610
316
416
106
370
249
400
161
329
497
612611
114
1000
314
112
316
227
473
189
536
134
528
321
511
135
525
492
252
133
231
111
301
548
331
545
324
129
326
201
617
398
631
492
205
646
140
418
103
108
213
143
212
204
444
508
157
117
189
421
722
313
734
470
205
136
525
260
241
310
607
302
524
353
152
360
744
624
213
473
168
244
237
619
232
428
638
187
116
703
120
140
528
210
435
120
467
237
626
159
523
338
147414
263
335
508
734
626
105
342
816
312
406
277
205
313
103
202
634
850
458
100
311
296
420
327
311
229
220
241
207
318
620
138
500
312
336
843
322
357
259
541
220
116
217
134
183
701
115
816
448
723
210
440
461
200
846
599
4
560
312
618
513
229
265
470
420
842
850
130
552
318
137
329
317
435
344
857
829
213
172
211
406
544
406
506
234
836
440
298
401
140
218
501
305
237
119
123
444
184
115
281
327
227
307
512
213
531
457
565
551
191
131
136
146
444
172
230
318
202
229
428
220
413
138
200
512
337
311
505
716
441
104
335
853
304
319
257
557
320
333
120
436
134
196
517
135
521
702
118
146
152
107
301
514
234
248
416
125
176
405
614
127
425
105
112
607
315
302
155
134
527
232
526
405
321
171
841
147
100
332
437
105
509
540
429
137
823
474
416
834
128
465
432
248
212
261
453
145
361
328
838
153
218
209
224
249
173
419
466
193
515
325
309
177
493
146
219
130
134
228
197
253
544
444
301
406
329
8
114
136
447
445
327
523
102
122
531
520
218
233
209
228
856
459
704
220
737
104
76
556
149
852
158
149
836
540
437
420
110
447
529
156
429
529
110
854
307
222
125
132
804
310
448
9
122
209
863
144
443
403
344
824
200
464
162
317
221
100
262
320
839
601
112
518
306
300
329
310
452
317
304
474
166
429
242
502
202
601
301
208
161
430
244
452
328
324
510
213
601
210
827
410
354
445
305
153
330
128
127
168
611
427
460
509
269
224
332
131
476
485
313
130
839
105
466
221
420
516
140
133
239
518
102
628
820
318
129
840
210
825
324
302
113
159
528
323
307
113
120
622
270
330
315
449
411
528
622
314
247
530
224
412
815
137
164
200
424
549
120
428
321
231
514
176
317
501
136
617
231
485
134
249
431
144
300
257
179
201
143
306
831
136
517
390
109
127
313
501
406
336
103
315
152
124
307
150
130
563
158
145
123
332
315
116
216
339
520
490
228
302
409
533
602
270
525
347
425
132
234
440
189
137
196
122
374
321
198
469
107
417
116
515
470
302
509
140
304
220
110
605
832
407
151
309
411
149
517
425
429
283
618
488
432
64
722
444
132
313
138
625
118
320
416
322
321
321
405
138
216
121
516
160
160
156
534
521
346
313
591
140
837
501
326
413
411
423
505
622
104
135
638
441
318
540
6
463
319
107
454
309
415
144
208
310
309
313
630
225
272
534
534
261
38
319
504
226
206
272
139
130
158
848
337
209
137
308
201
521
310
828
310
231
420
216
416
605
213
435
207
331
431
141
339
587
308
136
532
709
496
409
51
475
150
465
141
155
148
455
232
138
536
623 225
236
313
205
316
115
133
337
439
106
156
794
334
331
845
114
411
524
171
439
480
851
124
312
482
138
348
175
425
129
448
176
427
525
209
604
306
327
189
529
141
419
205
707
606
305
279
147
207
177
412
129
228
140
293
105
312
140
180
139
123
634
421
859
119
405
155
409
547
436
501
214
609
112
522
309
717
155
163
222
337
127
205
519
220
141
613
629
456
311
462
525
152
105
331
224
400
218
307
459
331
518
576
650
205
634
273
601
609
301
209
110
139
108
539
187
632
196
144
131
138
408
410
158
300
440
205
456
516
167
204
523
817
244
148
131
120
503
205
320
338
156
236
430
611
316
142
329
506
151
722
139
135
609
342
514
145
229
510
146
837
411
319
133
146
445
536
104
858
120
821
436
213
404
219
408
646
104
142
154
285
440
132
437
400
144
432
478
204
330
419
260
477
524
313
201
121
254
458
524
134
152
433
160
253
375
302
225
141
309
168
419
530
486
145
325
327
322
146
115
222
751
449
137
449
424
148
524
519
230
405
532
117509
320
325
528
485
486
136
407
318
184
449
520
419
326
716
265
522
413
125
449
312
440
101
415
481
134
502
327
154
503
111
459
181
476
410
509
139
241
221
309
537
410
403
424
211
710
126
484
833
433
416
520
429
444
309
163
427
523
256
125
221
124
309
245
439
438
534
168
153
216
414
400
720
232
105
628
843
518
139
310
422
402
512
323
175
230
510
221
433
236
453
404
152
600
329
133
141
128
443
603
527
305
430
305
134
151
526
211
206
311
152
128
454
474
122
156
848
133
512
251
416
269
526
188
316
325
233
334
867
199
436
409
233
407
105
112
338
519
503
428
600
180
464
125
115
830
480
319
209
413
324
844
147
205
321
117
406
641
849
545
468
319
160
142
324
408
322 448
304
838
200
125
154
829
134
301
519
412
308
407
105
208
512
353
116
243
447
413
311
249
846
416
122
259
314
314
411
414
342
221
623
404
317
429
419
454
535
555
301
866
116
382
485
851
352
216
303
625
207
276
470
118
265
229
213
529
735
217
105
491
319
325
461
415
409
119
462
419
322
303
193
137
855
5
706
531
137
101
342
131
302
527
302
238
525
304
424
435
229
168
559
321
401
526
402
486
436
739
420
453
415
192
328
663
209
165
405
527
217
153
428
426
532
126
188
179
306
310
135
238
330
633
229
412
447
140
308
224
642
317
444
108
345
107
612
309
114
386
442
510
114
200
301
138
316
351
521
334
157
424
609
520
112
515
314
847
261
490
482
232
523
216
129
224605
213
153
320
400
347
265
156
732
340
145
517
417445
515
847
844
439
845
437
615
525
400
600
326
138
209
129
409
246
130
221
221
420
157
871
408
532
125
215
337
129
148
116
463
300
524
209
463
146
439
161
159
513
521
417
217
2
236
133
303
522
152
261
267
167
725
124
236
204
440
400
142
144
855
243
306
106
129
221
518
215
378
316
418
116
127
460
414
529
233
315
221
455
311
406
458
403
403
318
318
144
764
603
617
642
228
225
862
247
249
430
229
212
412
455
527
304
851
241
217
175
323
330
432
160
501
212
403
203
508
136
127
237
425
407
248
859
409
529
524
62
413
840
841
316
154
421
438
630
153
514
863
422
712
473
158
402
709
315
140
469
407
316
516520
303
317
512
316
213
204
224
411
417
117 132
516
429
449
507
708
542
528
149
200
868
150
435
522
270
442
328
513
323
348
526
305
714
461
445
141
305
466
253
249
245
214
137
419
208
179
146
403
247
401
464
149
232
322 330
287
115
429
215
116
433
241
143
125
242
451
126
454
346
219
500
241
217
500
157
444
325
348
471
201
339
603
233
401
126
136
528
314
508
323
201
512
117
203
701
410
649
313
533
173
317
424
842
232
425
403
211
153
150
348
326
475
217
436
481
116
441
729
203
167
835
906
143
456
411
337
458
432
112
426
448
461
416
399
149
612
9
257
512
109
407
306
181
302
227
153
313
409
848
141
420
145
327
308
169
852
312
510
304
233
108
514
306
521
240
123
469
527
320
328
876
136
404
358
224
124
121
333
209
152
517
607
744
305
622
424
336
141
229
217
409
740
115
165
457
328
305
430
902
444
341
401
145
204
138
408
538
304
132
516
229
409
202
313
333
121
454
404
428
317
506
604
391
231
188
208
235
743
524
155
478
519
309
213
253
192
109
415
345
214
860
603
200
524
148
325
312
235
479
394
160
500
462
526
523
144
147
418
109
212
216
208
333
429
156
424
353
418
534
522318
303
330
922
156
313
401 424
450
516
610
144
203
227
218
344
171
407
606
307
106
140
504
321
420
615
438
808
301
225
190
452
206
192
216
856
143
234
204
204
506
412
123
210
148
533
872
200
228
470
253
717
135
305
112
206
471
854
411
752
103
142
503
143
154
185
560
229
400
522
518 514
104
604
218
100
344
475
339
305
133
144
105
218
132
760
525
128
245
440
412
526
226
517
153
406
326
217
339
436
104
755
422
106
736
420
145
517
335
153
601
343
828
338
304
257
151
158
329
824
410
202
210
203
142
305
161
157
419
411
180
124
401
481
509
427
639
314
132
313
413
505
914
166
256
400
864
166
412
309
405
130
413
407
444
540
160
140
163
205
513
482
844
138
523
446
265
521
202
479
107
116
431
309
328
730
530
145
150
329
209
121
134
141
308
407
459
414
142
329
337
395
542
478
918
530
403
530
348
332
510
236
402
338
207
637
327
310
703
139
867
489
119
441
520
402
323
309
316
408
147
602
425
149
326
419
629
343
328
247
152
316
212
450
603
140
604
316
520
334
130
100
305
406
579
415
329
521
401
6
248
322
213
100
237
224
209
205
1202
333
131
436
347
411
144
120
323
225
423
301
307
406
256
303
317
256
510
352
910
449
880
143
645
415
530
432
232
238
142
131
747
344
155
336
345
215
423
117
165
122
356
214
926
343
142
149
721
212
417
116
147
512
147
213
401
636
133
208
330
507
336
318
229
326
474
334
138
314
229
321
324
932
162
150
264
488
455
332
334
484
204
157
11
441
531
152
217
527
244
108
469
119
420
172
504
94
404
450
212
210
149
260
105
201
317
437
123
240
335
433
107
522
458
409
220
405
326
310
400
338
611
216
443
321
159
460
204
251
258
306
612
213
332
427
325
421
304
241
524
244
485
308
467
240
631
183
128
139
344
611
412
301
410
245
237
201
319
206
313
517
111
121
422
405
473
208
638
540
435
504
133
312
108
501
608
216
117
606
404
109
627
200
317
433
225
421
307
421
146
224
141
427
432
308
515
108
608
217
208
458
490
508
121
272
114
448
134
326
301
169
406
478
411
101
431
416
335
319
318
514
404
356
536
507
108
520
106
423
470
257
713
48
401
208
129
118
628
513
221
104
414
451
529
217
187
151
429
104
718
237
487
313
544
366
457
713
153
240
516
229
211
136
530
333
101
518
450
216
136
202
812
446
292
400
137
339
245
142
245
149
504
154
248
601
256
228
519
659
141
135
451
172
718
556
442
216
441
269
212
237
115
405
341
419
306
528
413
437
211
638
603
756
304
519
157
246
146
338
504
705
714
445
223
201
413
228
157
133
334
302
441
302
212
446
138
205
304
221
146
829
437
240
155
200
438
352
137
425
318
335
446
324
237
450
312
351
236
419
41
220
469
390
328
159
334
466
224
450
418
431
104
329
57
465
14
225
326
137
235
260
244
300
402
320
307
235
544
165
231
407
350
68
713
535
206
401
220
332
144
426
348
525
263
535
308
490
222
196
413
533
536
204
284
833
234
415
136
467
308
409
320
400
319
422
133
224
273
100
472 138
109
61
122
344
236
200
515
232
462
325
602
148
208
331
233
316
126
311
242
748
401
135
426
221
205
206
616
141
408
156
250
216
420
414
139
500
268
249
107
432
423
243
164
452
419
824
191
516
403
216
328
327
303
460
428
222
525
112
412
113
209
306
528
431
429
228
207
424
324
213
172
407
179
434
236
406
411
311
172
413
233
217
425
160
102
42
149
296
328
232
144
222
217
524
269
204
315
229
521
412
162
335
131
346
336
340
208
188
414
253
208
440
130
128
124
602
353
409
194
610
247
804
527
564
321
428
486
538
434
121
115
303
483
288
264
225
89
212
217
125
432
444
339
457
204
148
422
133
315
232
213
173
520
317
629
245
453
337
340
338
333
221
303
203
346
351
246
315
305
445
408
422
406
541
101
213
210
233
522
667
468
149150
331
606
206
300
220
129241
438
75
533
208
200
303
316
651
434
418
314
836
520
320
405
259
477
347
327
204
221
304
133
134
549
454
508
455
512
37
349
720
427
423
521
249
425
343
517
518
417
252
447
462
139
463
232
239
343
523
521
433
26
508
423
240
110
408
308
205
100
212
112
602
442
431
526
371
213
169
51
213
126
228
219
505
130
304
313
704
459
228
428
320
516
129
500
209
108
141
237
226
620
337
466
821
225
415
408
214
552
415
121
148
320
306
464
446
127
300
129
445
358
315608
427
627
401
18
612
340
437
323
417
410
448
828
466
156
342
816
15
461
322
103
400
532
133
252
237
543
220
17
56
244
442
205
357
409
347
113
131
449
120
205
329
134
330
549
200
336
437
426
324
509
277
323
214
534
217
503
804
532
316
325
404
410
440
203
132
207
213
522
225
505
568
514
615
564
636
521
410
223
164
141
100
252
125
213
712
241
230
102
349
35
315
332
432
583
334
351
105
317
304
402
141
408
417
125
201 201
548
185
304
417
421
261
153
537
430
108
423
332
91
324
161
325
5-1
410
45
715
208
159
156
145
504
320
343
236
144
454
709
840
205
34
817
112
413
529
249
441
12
221
332
243
209
601
55
508
60
150
708
140
240
96
256
355
462
293
312
324
387
125 129
408
452
303
550
414
120
448
610
120
8-2
339
420
129
84
113
404
350
340
128
133
233
301
341
603
313
133 201
225
321
319
534
140
504
132
146
209
407
429
318
443
152
312
800
149
412
120
139
150
405
52
204
130
801
456
309
416
137
148
236
136
143
309
145
16
138
605
349
624
183 207
63
513
306
423
249
537
215
151
100
40
403
233
813
109
541
124
236
244
606
108
559
405
301
269
317
255
250
135
25
93
415
300
97
346
133
65
433
809
312
619
50
140
706
152
616
626
627
300
465
151
53
801
433
323
325
104
24
300
808
151
132
214
428
832
253
23
200
309
105
547
615
209101
320
404
136
22
57
233
635
540
309
60
124
55
515
137
224
457
148
48
416
308
42
153
328
104
808
410
440
824
466
240
143
230
130
536
11
103
405
828
523
607
248
503
404
305
195
95A
513
20
101
554
9-1
27
448
47
330
477
289
12
829
321
83
109
322
405
805
420
144
121
145
257 350
812
340
821
505
117
125
632
508
121
23
409
728
63
146
208
62
533
538
20-1
575
412
516
20 13
461
18
518
604
820
224
504
90
79
69
113
252
249
82
7-1
800
228
528
336
281
216
406
314
404
631
813
453
307
526
432
47
228
101
541
363
514546
316
619
318
212
342
133
125
623
220
524
117
10
456
320
81
548
348
505
24
544
417
450
80
542
65
710
517
351
204
1512T
529
502
614
534
600
37
40
38
518
201
400
520
209
261
332
232
531
32
540
113
85
136
129
312
332
809
334
521
137
200
640
257
528
312
149
812
366
509
500
101
545
43
208
522
431
2-2
530
525
27
336
54
104
516
268
140
273
109
104
265
361
329
548
220
515
21
516
529
26
14
411
528
462
14-2
58
120
71
371
473
501
285
407
417
256
469
19
67
29-2
527
340
1-1
109
272
369
201
403
117
420
521
400
571
300
419
349
297
535
224507
148
70
353
192
13
356
519543
301
423
337
35-2
436
489
424
832
416
805
400
31
32
336
341
196
365
536
413
335
579
264
36
25
361
105
644
116
402
345
511
413
416
316344
329
506
44
92
28
509
405
28
420
357
510
511
415
100
820
317
64
563
421
347335
341
31
437
413
567
524
339
352
365
331
3-1
512
160
367
101
37-2
320
512
417
825
308
416
337
425
452
506
539
428
359
22-2
537
833
209
354
76A
33
34
528
708
816
200
401
124
507
32-1
525
66
1-2
520
436
53
132
46
39
7-2
558
300
345
41
128
412
17-1
329
616
532
54
461
409
14-1
46
77
501
336
404
30
333
325
341
272
35
6-1
508
412
252
59
300
45
502
58
129
352
362
465
364
49
408
457
456
401
31-2
512
353
401
33-2
17-2
56
572
212
615
600
409
333
9-2
332
360
36
8-1
605
701
333
260
308
328
348
321
23-1
11-1
4-1
25-2
501
36-223-2
344
22-1
424
78
31-1
30-2
510
15-1
312
340
417
10-1
3-2
19-2 32-2 6-2
5-2
27-14-2
416
30-1
520
28-1
26-2
810
24-1
2-1
517
12-2
24-2
27-2
95
29-1 34-1
545
950
116
272
18-2
21-1
36-1
19-1
18-1
500
10-2
1652T
16-2
20-2
192
446
28-2
25-1
A104 A103
L101
375
21-2
L102
26-1
B103
35-1
12-1
1622T
C103
K102
440
K104N104
E103
I102
D103
I101
A101
I10 3
O10 4
253T
13-2
M104
I10 4
E104 B101 A102C101
532
D101
G102
15-2
K101
34-2
M101 L104
J102
L103
G101
M1 02
351
201
N10 1O101
288
H10 3
215
O10 3
O102
817
400
H104
777
H10 2
1588T
508
304
425
500
584
474
512
440
521
706
500
509
710
531
102
144
176
501
172
88
30
44
17
49
29
10
43 50
16
61
420
33
19
421
52
59
39
239
29
86
16-1
33-1
11-2
3002
B104
N103
E102 D10 4 C104
E101
G10 4 J101
D10 2
523
J104
B102C102
F103F102
J103
G10 3
M103
N102 K103
F101
13-1
411
F104
311
460
1405
H10 1
445
740T
213T
600
689T
111
Sandy Lake Rd
Belt Line Rd
Bethel Rd
Parkway Blvd
Denton Tap RdRoyal LnInterstate 6
35
Freeport P
k
w
y
Bet hel School R dHeartz RdAir li n e Dr
Divi dend Dr
State HWY 121 Service R
State HWY 121 HwyLodge RdWr angle r Dr
Cr eekview D rPatriot Northp oint D r
Ruby Rd
S o u t h w e s t e r n B l v d
Fritz Rd
Park Valley Dr
County Line RdMinyard
Brooks Ln
Gateway
B u r n s S t Coppell RdCooper Ln
Canyon Dr
Kaye St Oak TrlBricknell LnP ar k v iew P l
L
a
k
eshore Dr
Natches Trace Dr
Hali fa x D r
L y n d s ie D rCozby Ave Whispering Hills DrOakbend DrCrestside DrHarris StDillard LnAce LnHackberry R d
Gateway Blvd Plaza BlvdExecutive DrTown Center BlvdSimmons DrOakcrest LnEnterprise DrSanders LoopTrade Center DrBranchwood TrlDickens DrCountry LnFore st Ri dge Dr
Be al L n
London Way Interstate 635 Service RPoint W
e
s
t
BlvdShadydale LnG a teview Hammond StWest minste r Way
Layton DrState HWY 121 RdTrailwood LnLoch StHali fa x Ln Allencrest LnTennyson PlRiver Rd
Dalmalley Ln
Anderson AveHunters Ridge RdPark LnFit ness Ct
North Lake DrOak Grove Ln
Clea r Creek Ln
Graywood Ln
Kingsridge Dr
Olympia Ln
Howell StP o s t O a k D r Gibson CtSandy Oak Ln
Arch er Dr
Hawke n D rManchester LnHigh land Dr
Suzanne Way
Greenw ich Ln
Penfolds LnState HWY 121 G r a p e v i n e M i l l s P k w y
Georgian DrTo w n Ce nt e r D r
Dobecka DrChaucer CtCowboy DrSouthern Belle DrClifton Ct
H e a t h L n Mossy Oaks DrWestbury D rBristol CtLynn CtMcN ear Dr
Willow Ln
T a r a C tMartel CtJeb CtNorthwestern DrState HWY 121 HwyInterstate 635 Service R Coppell RdState HWY 121 State HWY 121 S e rv i c e R
Interstate 635 Coppell RdInterstate 635 Service R
Interstate 635 Service R
Freeport Pkwy
State HWY 121 Service RState HWY 121 RdµFreestand ing Sm all Wi nd Systemsin Reside ntial Prepared in the Planning DepartmentDate: Feb. 17, 2010
0 1,000 2,000500 Feet
120' Turbine 30100' Turbine 1280' Turbine 2560' Turbine 81
Legend
Symbol Size Total
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
Parks and Recreation
February 23, 2010
12
✔✔
PROCEDURAL
Consider approval of the final Coppell Community-Wide Trails Implementation Plan.
See attached memo.
Staff recommends approval.
^Trail Implementation Plan-1 AR
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
Date: February 23, 2010
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Brad Reid, Director of Parks and Recreation
Re: Consider approval of the Coppell Community-Wide Trail Implementation Plan.
Background:
A new Trail System Master Plan has been a desire of the Coppell Recreation
Development Corporation for the past couple of years. They have desired to have a fresh
document to turn to when determining priorities for recommending development of new
trail sections. The Parks and Recreation staff and the CRDC have been working with the
consultant, TBG Partners, since January 2009, in an effort to finalize an updated City-
Wide Trail System Implementation Plan. The CRDC has reviewed the proposals
recommended in the plan over the past months, and now forward the plan to the City
Council for review.
The consultant was instructed to concentrate their efforts on a true implementation plan,
not simply a master plan that reflected a “dream” trail system. The CRDC wanted to
make the determination of what trail sections were realistic as relate to ownership and
accessibility questions, and develop realistic expectations as far as funding and possible
implementation timeframes are concerned. They had further goals to provide an avenue
for public input into the process, create a multi-use type trail system, improve linkages
throughout the city and throughout the region, and bring together various city
departments to review and recommend solutions and advise where appropriate.
The proposed Community-Wide Trail Implementation Plan accomplishes these goals and
sets the stage for years of implementation and creative solutions to bringing connectivity
to the citizens of Coppell.
The City Council reviewed, and approved the Final Draft of this Master Plan document at
the October 27, 2009 meeting. Some minor adjustments have been made to the document
for final review and consideration. These modifications primarily involve changes to the
text and grammar from that reflected in the Final Draft version. No trail sections have
been altered. The CRDC approved the final version of the plan at their January 4, 2010
meeting. The Board heard from several neighbors during this meeting who expressed the
desire to alter two sections of the proposed trail. The first was the Grapevine Creek Park
Trail that enters the park from Bethel School Road and travels south toward the Cotton
Belt Rail Line. The neighbors believe this section of trail is unnecessary and will cause
the adjacent homeowners hardship. The talking points received from this group are
enclosed with your agenda back-up. The second proposed trail section that received
some discussion was the Magnolia Park Trail, along the north side of Denton Creek,
connecting the trail at Magnolia Park with the section that will ultimately connect to the
city of Lewisville trail system. A couple of Magnolia neighbors spoke at the meeting
recommending that the proposed section of trail aligned through the park be eliminated in
favor of a bridge across Denton Creek to make a connection to the trail on the south side
of the creek, creating the only access to the west on the existing trail behind the
Copperstone subdivision. This will eliminate the possibility of connecting to the
Lewisville system unless another bridge is constructed across the creek near the western
end of the Denton Creek Trail.
Many of these same residents attended the January 26, 2010 meeting of the City Council,
at which TBG Partners presented the final recommended plan to the Council. The
Council instructed staff to remove a section of the trail at Grapevine Creek Park which
connects the park trail to Bethel School Road, along with changing the surfacing within
the park to a natural material in lieu of concrete. It was also relayed to staff to make the
change from concrete to a possible alternate natural material at the Denton Creek Trail
near Magnolia Park. Staff researched the North Central Texas Council of Governments
regional trail master plan, which reflects a portion of the Veloweb along the Denton
Creek in this area. This plan calls for a 10-12 foot wide concrete trail running from east
to west along Denton Creek. It does not indicate whether it should be on the north or
south side of the creek, only that it make the east-west connection. The revised Coppell
Trail Implementation Plan reflects trail sections on the north and south sides of the creek
so that this connection can be pursued as development occurs in the area and easements
can be secured. Trail connections on both sides of the creek may not be ultimately
installed, but the plan will offer some flexibility in obtaining this connectivity. The
change to a natural material will also offer some flexibility in developing certain sections
of the trail system in this area.
City Council Action requested:
Consider approval of the proposed Coppell Community-Wide Trail Implementation Plan.
Staff Recommendation:
Approval of this item.
Making Connections Reality...Community-Wide Trails Implementation Plan“This is the vision, to create a changed transportation system that offers not only choices among travel modes for specifi c trips, but more importantly presents these options so that they are real choices that meet the needs of individuals and society as a whole. Making this vision a reality must begin now.” - The National Bicycling and Walking Study February 2010
Making Connections RealityTable of ContentsAcknowledgments................................................................................................................................A. Introduction...................................................................................................................................... Why Should We Plan for a Trails System?....................................................................................... Purpose of the Community-Wide Trails Implementation Plan.......................................................... Promoting a Healthy Lifestyle........................................................................................................... Economic Benefi ts............................................................................................................................ Alternative Transportation................................................................................................................. Conserving and Appreciating the Environment................................................................................. Planning the Coppell of Today and Tomorrow................................................................................... Process............................................................................................................................................. Previous Trail Recommendations.....................................................................................................B. Community Involvement & Regional Coordination.......................................................... Community Input Meeting................................................................................................................ Community Input and Design Breakout Session.............................................................................. Community Survey and Input........................................................................................................... Community Input Summary.............................................................................................................. Regional Planning and Transportation Efforts.................................................................................. DART Meeting Summary...................................................................................................... NCTCOG Meeting Summary................................................................................................ NCTCOG Mobility 2030........................................................................................................ City of Carrollton................................................................................................................... City of Irving.......................................................................................................................... City of Lewisville................................................................................................................... City of Grapevine..................................................................................................................C. Goals................................................................................................................................................... Goals................................................................................................................................................D. Trail Design Standards & Guidelines..................................................................................... Users of the Trails............................................................................................................................ Types of Trails.................................................................................................................................. Trail Defi nitions................................................................................................................................. Trail Destinations.............................................................................................................................. Trail Features................................................................................................................................... Trail Design Standards.....................................................................................................................iii.A1A2A2A2A3A3A3A4A5A6B1B2B3B4B6B7B7B8B9B11B11B11B11C1C2D1D2D3D4D5D7D9-i-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanE. City of Coppell Trails Master Plan............................................................................................ General Overview............................................................................................................................. Trails Master Plan............................................................................................................................. Trail Connections with Adjacent Cities.............................................................................................. Community-Wide Spine Trails...........................................................................................................F. Priority Trail Implementation....................................................................................................... Prioritized Trails Overview................................................................................................................. Prioritized Trails Master Plan............................................................................................................. Denton Creek East Trail.................................................................................................................... OHP Utility Corridor Trail...................................................................................................................Irving Connector Trail........................................................................................................................ North Levee Trail............................................................................................................................... MacArthur Blvd. Trail......................................................................................................................... Grapevine Creek Park Trail...............................................................................................................Levee Bridge Connector Trail............................................................................................................Moore Road Trail...............................................................................................................................Denton Creek Park Trail.................................................................................................................... Cottonwood Creek Trail..................................................................................................................... Grapevine Springs Park Trail.............................................................................................................North Lake College Connector Trail................................................................................................... Wagon Wheel - Jr. College Connector Trail.......................................................................................G. Summary..........................................................................................................................................Summary............................................................................................................................................H. Appendix...........................................................................................................................................Inventory and Analysis Information..................................................................................................... Plats....................................................................................................................................... Aerials.................................................................................................................................... Photos................................................................................................................................... Cost & Available Funding................................................................................................................... Cost Estimates....................................................................................................................... Funding Sources....................................................................................................................E1E2E3E4E6F1F2F3F4F6F8F10F12F14F16F18F20F22F24F26F28G1G2H1H2CDCDCDCDCDCD-ii-
Making Connections RealityAcknowledgementsThe 2009 Community-Wide Trails Implementation Plan was an effort of many. The plan developed by the City of Coppell Parks and Recreation Department, with the technical and design assistance of TBG Part-ners, Inc., provides a trail implementation strategy for the City of Coppell for the next decade and beyond. Special thanks are merited by the general community and community leaders for their insight and support throughout this study’s duration.Mayor: Jayne PetersCity Council:Marsha TunnellTim BrancheauBob MahalikBrianna Hinojosa-FloresBilly FaughtMarvin FranklinKaren Hunt, Mayor Pro TemPark Board:Greg GarciaMark TepperJack ClarkLarry JonesDixon RichScott SumpterTerra TaylorBrian BrandstetterCarolyn HornerAlesa HillerTaylor MaysStaff:City Manager - Clay PhillipsDeputy City Manager - Mario Canizares*Director of Parks and Recreation - Brad Reid*Assistant Director of Parks and Recreation - Guy McLain*Park Operation’s Manager - John EliasCity Engineer - Ken Griffi nPlanning Director - Gary SiebTBG Partners Inc. (consultant):*Mark Meyer*James Knapp*Ken Howell* - Task Force team-iii-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanA. Introduction...Facilitated by the continuing efforts of the City of Coppell to provide an enhanced quality of life for all of its citizens, this planning effort studied the community’s short- and long-term trail opportunities. This plan is designed to formulate strategies, through the creation of a connected network of trails within the City and beyond, to manage future oppor-tunities and challenges, which are discussed further herein.-A1-
Making Connections RealityWhy Should We Plan for a Trails System?Trails play a vital role in our individual well-being, our local economy, the environment and traffi c congestion relief. Communities across America consistently cite trails as one of their most popular recreational activi-ties and they are often the single most-requested community amenity. Trails strengthen a community’s social fabric, and people of all income brackets, age groups and cultures will be able to travel throughout the City of Coppell and enjoy trail-based recreational experiences.Purpose of the Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanThe Coppell 2030 Vision Plan was established to ensure that a high quality of life will be maintained while allowing for growth in the City and region. The plan is designed to formulate strategies to manage future opportunities and challenges. It provides guidance on the preferred location for trail corridors as new devel-opment and redevelopment take place and will also help the City acquire greenbelt corridors for trail use.One of the 2030 Vision’s fi ve pillars focuses on Community Wellness and Enrichment and addresses the need and importance of a multi-use trail system connecting the City. While this is the primary objective, a Community-Wide Trails Implementation Plan will support and bring additional meaning to the other four pillars that address Business Prosperity, Sustainable City Government, Sense of Community and a Special Place to Live. To remain a viable tool for the City of Coppell, this implementation plan is intended to be fl exible and adapt to growth and changes occurring in the City. The plan is intended to provide guidance for many years; however it should be periodically updated. Each update should refl ect current conditions within the City, its neighboring communities, and the region as a whole. Promoting a Healthy LifestyleTrails can provide meaningful and satisfying out-door experiences for many users while providing accessible, widely available and low-cost oppor-tunities to meet most individuals’ physical activity needs. According to the Mayo Clinic, individuals need at least 30 minutes of daily physical activity to help live longer and healthier. Studies show that walking or hiking a few times per week can improve a person’s physical and mental health, reduce stress and lower health care costs. Anticipated community benefi ts of increased participation in physical fi tness include reductions in both the direct and indirect costs of illness and disease, improve-ment in lifestyle and a reduction in geriatric costs.IntroductionPurpThe Callowoppoopme“To walk; to see and to see what you see.” - Benton MacKaye-A2-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanEconomic Benefi tsAn organized, well-managed trail system is a desirable city amenity that can contribute to a community’s economic vitality. Trails can guide both visitors and residents through diverse neighborhoods, past interest-ing shops, enticing restaurants and many other community amenities. Revenue generated from trail-related recreation and sports activities provides substantial income and employment opportunities. Trails also typi-cally increase property values, and studies have shown that properties located near trails generally sell for 5 to 30 percent more than those farther away.Alternative TransportationAmericans continue to spend more and more time in traffi c congestion and spend millions of dollars purchas-ing, operating and maintaining their automobiles. Studies show that 50 percent of all car excursions are less than three miles, a distance that could easily be walked or biked. A network of trails can enhance Coppell’s transportation system by providing an alternative means of getting to places of employment, retail areas, and key city destinations such as schools, libraries, parks, amenity centers and City Hall.Conserving and Appreciating the EnvironmentTrails play an important role in supporting environmental education and building a public commitment to environmental conservation. Meaningful outdoor experiences can reaffi rm one’s sense of connection to and appreciation of the natural environment.Introduction (Cont.)Creating healthy habits by build-ing healthy communities.....-A3-
Making Connections RealityPlanning the Coppell of Today and TomorrowThe existing Coppell hike and bike trail system is designed to encompass the many different back-grounds, needs and wants of residents who share a common desire to live in a city providing facili-ties that foster a high quality of life. To keep the City moving forward with a more holistic and com-plete trails system, it is important to consider the context of the City both today and in the future, looking at the many key destinations and attractions planned within Coppell and beyond.Coppell has several existing trails throughout the City that are generally well conceived by the com-munity and typically well used by area residents. A multitude of trail surface types exist within these existent trail areas as well as a variety of different scenic vistas and unique adventures to experi-ence.TBG Partners’ analysis of existing Coppell trails resulted in two primary concerns. First, the current design width of some existing trails segments may not be able to support signifi cant numbers of users or the variety of trail users. Second, many gaps still exist in linking the existing trails together, as well as to City destinations and attractions. Establishing these connections will signifi cantly in-crease the number of trail users in Coppell.For the trails to achieve maximum effi cacy, this plan considers the context of the City today, look-ing at the many key destinations within and adjacent to the City that should be accessible from the trails system. The plan also considers regional planning efforts being made by the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) and the Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) authority, as well as efforts being made by cities surrounding Coppell’s municipal boundaries.Because Coppell is largely developed and landlocked by adjacent cities, population growth will be modest in ensuing years. According to NCTCOG data, the City has a population of approximately 40,000 residents, with growth projected to top out around 45,000 by 2020. Moreover, since Coppell is mostly developed, there are many opportunities and challenges for trail corridors. Such efforts will require working with and cooperation from residential property owners and commercial busi-nesses to make this trail system complete, and missing links in the system should be avoided to ensure a complete system with lasting impact for the City.An additional consideration is any future development planned around North Lake, which is not contained within City demographic numbers. This land is within the Dallas city limits, but the north-ern portion is owned by the City of Coppell. The most signifi cant area growth will most likely be around North Lake, and careful planning and studies should be done to incorporate a trail system around the lake that connects into the larger City trail system.Bemo40is mwilneenAncoernaroaro“Few actions can do more to make urban areas safer, healthier, prettier, and more environmentally balanced than setting aside corridors or trails for walking, biking, wildlife watching, and just plain breaking up the mo-notony of cars and concrete.” - James Snyder-A4-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanProcess- Establish Task Force- Defi ne Time Frame- Compile City Data- Review Previous Plans- Inventory Existing Trails- Identify Citywide Trail Opportunities- Identify Key City Desti-nations- Develop Guiding Princi-pals and Goals- Identify and Defi ne TrailOpportunities- Seek Input from Task Force- Seek Input from Citizens- Develop Trails Master Plan- Develop Design Stan-dards and Guideline- Identify Trail Prioritiza-tion- Defi ne Funding Sources- Place Before City Coun-cil for Approval- Implementation of Trails Plan by Parks DepartmentThe trail-planning process will need to include signifi cant input from community members, City staff, stakeholders and other entities in determining the best and highest use of a trail system connecting the City’s community.y-Wide Trails Implementation Plan“In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks.” - John Muir-A5-
Making Connections RealityIn July 1995 a Trail System Master Plan had been developed by Newman, Jackson, Bieberstein, Inc. and approved by the City. The plan’s purpose was to give long-range development direction to a trail system serving the needs of pedestrians and bicyclists. The system anticipated a trail net-work composed of a “dedicated off-road hike/bike system located in road right-of-ways, greenbelts and linear parks, and a system of bicycle routes utilizing the existing and proposed thoroughfares.”The Trail System Master Plan identifi ed the following general goals:- Encourage the creation of a linear park system- Utilize existing rail and utility corridors- Connect to recognized trail corridors and greenways- Encourage and promote pedestrian and bicycle access- Link existing parks, schools and public facilities- Promote bicycle use as a viable personal transportation mode- Increase safety for both pedestrians and bicyclists- Provide a barrier-free system offering accessibility to the physically impairedThe development of a community-wide trails system has been a goal of the City for many years. To remain a viable tool for the City of Coppell, this implementation plan is intended to be fl exible and adapt to growth and changes occurring in the City. The plan is intended to provide guidance for many years; however it should be periodically updated. Each update should refl ect current conditions within the City, its neighboring communities, and the region as a whole.Previous Trail RecommendationsExhibit 1 - Off-Road Trail SystemExhibit 2 - On-Road Bicycle Route System-A6-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanB. Community Involvement & Regional Coordination...Through meaningful public partici-pation and close coordination with other city and state entities, the con-sulting team and City staff learned a great deal about the community’s hopes and aspirations for future trails. Regional trails and commuter rail plans that affect Coppell were also carefully studied and incorpo-rated into this document. This sec-tion provides insight into communi-ty objectives and the future plans of adjacent cities and state agencies.-B1-
Making Connections RealityCommunity Input MeetingOn April 1, 2009, a community in-put and work session meeting was held at the Coppell City Hall. About 23 individuals from the community attended, offering their thoughts, concerns, input and opinions on how they would like to see trails laid out within their community and connected locally and regionally.The introduction to the project was made by Brad Reid, Director of Parks and Recreation, and then Mark Meyer, Principal at TBG Part-ners, presented TBG’s scope and role for the project to the community members in atten-dance. The presentation included short- and long-term goals and implementation strategies for the community-wide trails master plan, as well as City-to-City coordination efforts taking place to connect Coppell trails.For the next 30 to 40 minutes, participants formed three groups for the design breakout session to draw, discuss, and make note of what were seen as good opportunities for trails and trail connections within the local community and adjacent cities. Task Force members worked with each group as facilitators, providing answers to questions and making note of comments made by the participants.Each of the three groups then took a few minutes to share with everyone their ideas for a community-wide trail system. These ideas have become the inspiration for many of the recommendations con-tained within the implementation plan.-B2-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation Planmmunity-Wide Trails Implementation PlanCommunity Input and Design Breakout SessionsThe illustrations below represent some of the outcome of the work session from each of the three groups.“A well-maintained trail is fun to hike on. With a broad, well-marked path free of debris, hikers can concentrate more on their surroundings and less on the footpath.” - Victoria Logue-B3-
Making Connections Reality“In nature we never see anything iso-lated, but everything in connection with something else which is before it, beside it, under it and over it.” - Johann Wolfgang von GoetheSurvey Questions1. How long have you lived in the City of Coppell? 2. In the last 12 months, have you or your family utilized a hike and bike trail in the: (check all that apply)3. Based on your impressions in regards to the current City trails, how would you rate the City of Coppell in the terms of...a.) The number of hike and bike trails.................................................b.) The variety of amenities along trials...............................................c.) The convenience of access to the current hike and bike trails.......d.) Overall quality of the City hike and bike trails................................e.) Overall safety of the City hike and bike trails.................................4. What is your primary reason for using the City’s trail system?a.) Walking for leisure (circle WITH or WITHOUT a dog)....................b.) Walking for exercise (circle WITH or WITHOUT a dog).................c.) Jogging / Running...........................................................................d.) Cycling for leisure...........................................................................e.) Cycling for exercise........................................................................f. ) Cycling high-speed.........................................................................g.) Mountain biking..............................................................................h.) In-line skating, scooters, or other form...........................................i. ) __________________________________....................................5. In planning trails, what do you consider to be the most important characteristic for trails to include?a.) Connectivity to key destinations in the city....................................b.) Scenery / views..............................................................................c.) Natural areas / walking paths.........................................................d.) Trail amenities................................................................................e.) SQtiCommunity Survey & Input E G F P NO□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ < 1 year □ 2-4 years □ 5-7 years □ 8+ years□ City □ County □ Metro □ Elsewhere in TexasVO O S N NO□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □SF F A SA NO□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □E = ExcellentG = GoodF = FairP = PoorNO = No OpinionVO = Very OftenO = OftenS = SeldomN = NeverNO = No OpinionSF = Strongly ForF = ForA = AgainstSA = Strongly AgainstNO = No OpinionDuring the community input and work session held on April 1, 2009, there were 21 surveys turned in with the fol-lowing results...-B4-.□ □ □ □ □□□□□□□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□□□□□10% 52% 24% 14% 0%5% 43% 29% 14% 10%10% 19% 57% 14% 0%14% 57% 14% 14% 0%24% 52% 14% 10% 0% □□ □ □ □□ □□..□ □ □ □ □□□□□□□ □ □ □ □□□□□□□ □ □ □ □□□□□□□ □ □ □ □□□□□□□ □ □ □ □0% 43% 48% 0% 10%10% 48% 38% 5% 0%5% 14% 14% 29% 38%10% 29% 8% 10% 14%19% 38% 24% 5% 14% 10% 10% 5% 38% 38%5% 10% 10% 38% 38%0% 5% 14% 43% 38%□□□□□□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□□□□□52% 33% 5% 0% 10%24% 67% 5% 0% 5%24% 52% 24% 0% 0%14% 67% 14% 5% 0% 5% 10% 19% 67%100% 52% 48% 33%Avoid street crossings. Width for pedestrian & bike. Long uninterrupted stretches. Mile markers. Safety signs with instructions. Preservation of sensitive areas.(3)(8)(9)(3)
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanCommunity Survey & Input6. Of the following trail amenities, how strongly would you support or oppose each? a.) Directional signage and/or map............................................. b.) Mile markers.......................................................................... c.) Trailhead marker with informational kiosk.............................. d.) Lights along some primary trails............................................ e.) Bike racks.............................................................................. f. ) Fitness stations along trail..................................................... g.) Benches and/or picnic tables................................................. h.) Restrooms.............................................................................. i. ) Nature / scenic viewing areas................................................ j. ) Parking at major trail entrances.............................................7. The development of a community-wide trail system may require some trails to run adjacent to neigh-borhoods and in some cases, homes. If necessary, how strongly would you support or oppose a trail adjacent to your home?8. If a trail system were located close to your home or place of work, how likely or unlikely would you be to use it for:“One touch of nature makes the whole world kin.” - William ShakespeareSS S O SO NO□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ SS □ S □ O □ SO □ NOVL L U VU NO□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □SS S O SO NO□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□ VL □ L □ U □ VL □ NOSS = Strongly SupportS = SupportO = OpposeSO = Strongly OpposeNO = No OpinionVL = Very LikelyL = LikelyU = UnlikelyVU = Very UnlikelyNO = No Opiniona.) Visit friends / relatives in other neighborhoods............................b.) Travel to nearby restaurant, retail, or grocery stores...................c.) Travel to and from work...............................................................d.) Explore other parts of the city......................................................e.) Connect to Park and Ride Facilities............................................9. What type of surface of trails do you prefer for your particular trail use?a.) Concrete path..............................................................................b.) Natural / Non-Paved path............................................................c.) On-street designated bike path....................................................10. If a street had a designated on-street bike lane, either as a system of on-street trails or a connector to other types of trail surfaces, how likely would you use it?11. Additional thoughts, input, or considerations....Sporting Events. Parks. Frisbee Golf-B5-...□□□□□□ □ □ □ □□□□□□□ □ □ □ □□ □ □ □ □□□□□□□ □ □ □ □□□□□□□ □ □ □ □□□□□□24% 57% 5% 0% 14%38% 52% 0% 0% 10%19% 52% 5% 0% 24%19% 52% 10% 0% 19%14% 52% 10% 0% 24% 14% 38% 24% 0% 24%10% 67% 5% 0% 19%24% 62% 5% 0% 10%19% 52% 5% 0% 24%29% 62% 0% 0% 10%□ □□ □ □ 43% 48% 5% 0% 5%□□□□□□ □ □ □ □□□□□□□ □ □ □ □□□□□□..48% 43% 5% 0% 5%43% 43% 10% 0% 5%19% 14% 24% 24% 19%52% 43% 0% 0% 5%48% 10% 24% 5% 14% □□□□□□ □ □ □ □□□□□□...52% 43% 0% 0% 5%38% 43% 5% 5% 10%48% 19% 10% 10% 14%□□□□□48% 29% 14% 5% 5%For on street bike lane, use “sharro” instead. Concern with to many street intersections make bike lanes unsafe (x2). Need more bike trails (x2). Need mile markers and fountains. Able to ride without fear of cars. Important to be able to ride to local stores. Model off of Portland OR. and Minneapolis MN trail systems...very natural, non-invasive, extensive. Less cement the better. Need bike lanes throughout city streets. Connectiv-ity, signage, and safety important. Need bike parking at destinations. Multi-use trails need to be plenty wide for multi use. More natural trails along paved trails. Keep it simple and low maintenance.
Making Connections RealityCommunity Input SummaryCommunity input is a critical part of the planning process. In order to develop a successful, com-prehensive and long-term plan, community needs and goals must be met. After all, citizens of the community are the ones that ultimately will fund, support and utilize the facilities being planned.Some of the key comments and input the community provided during the work session included: • Connect missing links between existing trail segments. • Look for opportunities to connect to trail systems in adjacent cities. • Provide strong connection to the retail north of Hwy. 121, east of Denton Tap Road. • Provide trails around North Lake in Dallas, and develop a plan with opportunities to connect into any potential future trails around North Lake. • Connect the two main City parks, Andrew Brown Community Park and Wagon Wheel Park. • Provide a bridge on the northeast portion of Andrew Brown Community Park to connect trails located on the north and south sides of Denton Creek. • Provide a stronger, more-defi ned connection between Coppell High School and Coppell Town Center. • Provide connection to key City destinations. • Provide for connection to future DART stations being developed to the east of the City. • Design the system to address personal safety concerns when users travel near moving vehicles. • Provide a variety of trail surfaces and trail amenities.Three primary objectives were derived from the comments and concerns expressed through the survey and during work sessions:• Connections: Not only is there a need for trails to connect to one another, but also to key City destinations, to adjacent City trail systems and to future DART stations.• Trail surface options: Provide a hierarchy of trail surface options ranging from concrete paths to natural/nature trails and on-street bike lanes. • Trail amenities: Provide a variety of trail amenities such as mile markers, parking, rest-rooms and directional signage.“Participation, I think, is one of the best methods of educating.” - Tom Glazer-B6-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanAs part of TBG’s efforts to coordinate future priority trail plans with various stakeholder agen-cies, TBG met with representatives of DART (Dallas Area Rapid Transit) to discuss its policy on trails establishment within the Cotton Belt Rail Line. This existing freight rail line runs east/west through the southern portion of the City and is currently owned by DART. The NCTCOG has identifi ed the Cotton Belt rail corridor as a part of its Mobility 2030 plan, which is described in more detail on page B9.Typically, such rail corridors were designed with a 100 foot right-of way (ROW) with existing tracks centered within the ROW. Any trail system developed within the ROW is required to have a license agreement approved by DART and must be designed with a minimum of 25 feet from the centerline of the tracks to the trail’s nearest edge. To allow future design fl exibility for rail service, DART prefers to have trails designed toward the edge of the ROW, so all trail crossings would be required to be located at existing at-grade intersections or grade-separated locations approved by DART.In May 2009, DART and the Fort Worth Trans-portation Authority (“The T”) released a Request for Information (RFI) to identify individuals and fi rms interested in a public/private partnership for the Cotton Belt Commuter Rail Line. Be-cause a partnership agreement has been es-tablished, engineering and design teams have been engaged and conceptual design work has begun within the corridor, it would be highly un-likely that DART would consider a license agree-ment for any trail system within this corridor. No hard timeframe has been established for such activities at present, but it is likely that concept planning for the corridor, which would address the number and location of tracks as well as station locations, is several years into the future. DART does not provide funding for any trail sys-tem development within its rail corridors.Regional Planning and Transportation EffortsDART Meeting Summary - July 23, 2009“There are many benefi ts of trails and greenways that planners, funders, and the public need to know about: they make our communities more liveable; improve the economy through tourism and civic improvement; preserve and restore open space; and provide opportunities for physical activity to improve fi tness and mental health.” - American Trails Organization“All truly great thoughts are conceived by walking.” - Friedrich Nietzsche-B7-
Making Connections RealityNCTCOG Meeting Summary - July 24, 2009Following TBG’s meeting with DART regarding opportunities for trail development along the Cotton Belt Rail Line, TBG met with an NCTCOG representative. The meeting’s purpose was for TBG to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of NCTCOG’s plans for the regional Veloweb and the agency’s involvement in trail sections that would become a part of the regional Veloweb system. NCTCOG is currently developing an update of the Veloweb plan, and the agency is conducting meetings throughout the Metroplex to integrate public input into the planning effort. As of late July 2009, the date of this meeting, there were no anticipated changes to the portion of the Veloweb system that fell within Coppell city limits. However, future meetings could be scheduled to allow for additional input, which could result in additional opportunities within the City.NCTCOG does provide funding for Veloweb sections running through a given city. The current ar-rangement requires a city to provide 80 percent of the needed funding while NCTCOG provides 20 percent. Funding for trail segments is based upon the proposed design and estimated cost of the individual trail segment, as well as associated landscape, lighting and site furnishing improvements. All trails must be “off-street trails,” and trail widths must be at least 12 feet, however, 10-foot-wide trail sections may be considered under special circumstances. NCTCOG will also consider partici-pating in funding for trails not shown as part of the Veloweb system but that provide “important con-nections” to desired facilities or areas within the jurisdiction. Ultimately, the City would provide the design documentation, cost estimate and implementation schedule and NCTCOG would review and allow trail segments into the regional Veloweb system while funding 20 percent of the costs.Regional Planning and Transportation Efforts“A trail is as serviceable as its poorest link.” - Benton MacKaye-B8-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanCity of Coppell, TXThe Mobility 2030 plan, developed by the NCTCOG, is an interregional system of bicycle trails in the Dallas-Fort Worth area referred to as the “Veloweb.” The original system planned for roughly 644 interconnected miles of off-street concrete trails connecting the region. The latest DRAFT plan, found on the next page, shows a greatly expanded regional Veloweb system for the area.Designed for use primarily by fast-moving bicyclists, the Veloweb is also designed to encourage concurrent pedestrian transportation use. The Cotton Belt Trail, a multi-phase, multi-jurisdictional trail that parallels the old Cotton Belt Railroad tracks currently owned by DART, is one component of the Veloweb trail system.October 30, 2007Regional Planning and Transportation EffortsNorth Central TexasCouncil of Governments-B9-
Making Connections RealityCoppell, TXNorthLakeGrapevineLakeHwy. 121I-35EI-635DFW AirportDraft - August 13, 2009Regional Planning and Transportation EffortsThe Metropolitan Transportation Plan, Mobility 2030, is in the process of undergoing revisions and is in DRAFT form at this time; it is scheduled for re-lease in summer 2010 once offi cially adopted by the Regional Transportation Council (RTC). The original plan dated October 2007, shown on the previous page, has two recommended Veloweb routes on the master plan through the Coppell area, the fi rst of which is the east/west connection along the Cotton Belt Trail in the southern portion of the City. The second route is a north/south connection on the City’s eastern limits, generally following the Denton Creek alignment to a point north of Sandy Lake Road, and then moving down the TXU overhead power utility easement south to the Cotton Belt Trail. Once at the Cotton Belt Trail, the north/south Veloweb will run to the east and then continue south into Irving. The DRAFT plan also connects to those off-street hike and bike trails in Andrew Brown Park from the planned trail along the north/south portion of Denton Creek, it also connects to the west into existing and proposed trails by Grapevine and Flower Mound.This is a DRAFT copy of the Mobility 2030 plan by NCTCOG, and is sub-ject to change. The proposed chang-es in this plan have greatly expanded the trail system from the current plan on the previous page. Offi cial adop-tion by the Regional Transportation Council is scheduled for summer 2010.-B10-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanCity of CarrolltonTBG met with City staff from the City of Carrollton to get an understanding of the City’s future trail planning. Carrollton is currently focused on connecting the City’s east side to the new DART rail lines planned along Interstate 35. The proposed regional trail on the City’s west side that runs through McInnish Park off of Sandy Lake Road, on the east side of the Elm Fork branch of the Trin-ity, is most likely fi ve to 10 years away from being constructed. This trail would parallel the Elm Fork branch, with the potential to one day cross the creek into Irving and tie into the Campion Trail in Sam Houston Park. See pages E3, E4, E5 and F10 for additional information.City of IrvingIn meeting with City of Irving staff members on their future trails plans, TBG was informed that Irving does not have plans to extend Campion Trail past Sam Houston Park at this time. The Parks De-partment is currently working on completing the last segments of the Campion Trail over the next few years.It is TBG’s recommendation for Coppell to continue to plan for a future trail connection to Irving as shown on the Mobility 2030 plan. The future development of the Cotton Belt rail line, the east/west regional Veloweb of the Cotton Belt Trail, and the north/south regional Veloweb through the over-head power utility easement will bring new possibilities, interest and needs for trail system connec-tivity. See pages E3, E5 and F8 for additional information.City of LewisvilleLewisville had been reexamining its proposed trail master plan at the same time as Coppell. Two opportunities exist for these Cities to connect their trail systems: one to the east, the other to the west. On the east side, Lewisville is making plans to connect its trail system to a trail the master plan has envisioned on top of the levee along Denton Creek, which provides a connection into Vista Ridge Park, connecting parks from both Cities. To the west, a north/south overhead power utility corridor runs behind a subdivision that will allow Lewisville to develop a trail to Denton Creek, at which point the two Cities can bridge Denton Creek to link the trails. See pages E3, E4, E5, F10 and F20 for additional information.City of GrapevineIn meeting with City of Grapevine staff, TBG learned that Grapevine currently does not see extend-ing the Grapevine Mills Trail as a priority due to environmental conditions and existing land uses. Efforts to extend this trail north to connect with Coppell will be development-driven and will be re-quired by future developers of the adjacent property. Grapevine currently has 2.5 miles of existing trail along the Cotton Belt to the south. City staff felt that connecting the trail with Coppell along this corridor would be a top priority. Establishing a part-nership between the Cities would improve opportunities for raising grant money for trail design and implementation. See pages E3, E5 and F20 for additional information.Regional Planning and Transportation EffortsCity of CarrolltonCity of CarrolltonCity of IrvingCCity of LewisvilleCity of LewisvilleCity of GrapevineCity of Grapevine“Concern for the environment and access to parks and open space is not frivolous or peripheral, rather, it is central to the welfare of people body, mind, and spirit.” - Laurance RockefellerCampion Trail - Irving, TX-B11-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanC. Goals...It was important to establish spe-cifi c goals in order to fully achieve the community’s vision for this Community-Wide Trails Implemen-tation Plan. These goals will ensure that the actions taken and priorities established will ensure that the City fully realizes the mutually estab-lished vision. Five specifi c goals were estab-lished through the master-planning process and will serve as a guide for the vision and objectives articu-lated by the plan. These goals will provide guidance on the alignment and layout of the proposed trails. -C1-
Making Connections RealityGoals“Passion and vision will build future trails, preserve green space, and cre-ate other community connections and enhancements in our area.” - A History of Portland TrailsGoal #1Community Vision and Participation - Create a strong vision for a community-wide trails system through equal opportunities and participation by the community. The vision should preserve and enhance the beauty of the City in a way that will foster pride and appeal to its citizens, corporate community and visitors. The vision will continue to be refi ned, expanding the vision of Coppell as an effective and revitalizing guide for the future.Goal #2Multi-modal Transportation System - Accommodate the convenient, effi cient and safe move-ment of people while working to maintain and enhance neighborhood integrity. Provide trails that meet Coppell’s complete recreational and leisure needs for a variety of activities such as running, walking, cycling and in-line skating. Nature trail opportunities, where feasible, should protect and preserve open spaces and critical natural areas.Goal #3Interconnected System - The primary goal is to create a system of trails allowing multiple con-nections to an overall system of continuous trails. This trail system should strengthen linkages between parks, neighborhoods, schools, neighborhood services, and key civic and community destinations.Goal #4City Coordination - Foster coordination of trail development with other City departments, especial-ly planning, engineering and transportation, so that all stakeholders work together to recognize and maximize trail opportunities.Goal #5Implementing - Develop a system that can be implemented in increments by both public and pri-vate entities. The system should work toward creating public/private partnerships that help build a more complete, regionally connected system in a shorter timeframe than otherwise possible. The plan needs to provide guidance in allocating resources and outside funding sources available to develop the City’s trail system. -C2-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanD. Trail Design Standards & Guidelines...Since all trail users have varying measures of confi dence and abil-ity, it is critical to understand the full range of user needs and capabili-ties, as well as the variety of reasons individuals use the trails system. This understanding is especially pertinent to the trail system’s de-sign in order to create appropriate spaces that are comfortable and usable for everyone. This section seeks to understand and defi ne the various types of trail system users, how they use the trails and the destinations to which they will travel. This knowledge is central to creating appropriately designed trails and amenities.-D1-
Making Connections RealityUsers of the TrailsWalkers(leisure, exercise, with dog)Joggers / RunnersCyclists(leisure, exercise, high-speed)Mountain BikingIn-Line Skaters & ScootersThe American Association of State Highway and Transportation Of-fi cials (AASHTO) designates riders in three different categories:Advanced (experienced and con-fi dent)Basic (less confi dent and ride for transportation purposes; avoid high-traffi c roads)Children (least confi dent; travel slowly and usually with parents in very low-traffi c areas). -D2-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanTypes of TrailsShared Roadwayno bikeway designationSigned Shared Roadwaydesignated by bike route signs,these roadways have been specifi callychosen as the best route for bikes toshare with vehiclesBicycle Lanesuited with the appropriate markingsand signage, along corridors that have a high demand for bike useShared Use Paththese serve corridors not served bystreets or where wide utility corridorsexistOff-Street Trailan upgraded walkway alongside aroad either in the right-of-way or reserveNatural Surface / Nature Traila more natural, primitive-feeling, soft-sur-face trailNeighborhood Sidewalkgenerally follows the system of local streets, ultimately connecting to a larger community/citywide trail systemTrail design standards should conform and be designed to stan-dards set forth in the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Offi cials (AASHTO) when feasible. The guide provides information to help accommodate bicycle traffi c in most riding envi-ronments.“Few actions can do more to make ur-ban areas safer, healthier, prettier, and more environmentally balanced than set-ting aside corridors or trails for walking, biking, wildlife watching, and just plain breaking up the monotony of cars and concrete.” - James Snyder-D3-
Making Connections RealityTrail DefinitionsRegional Veloweb:Defi ned and recognized by the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG), the pur-pose of this trail is to provide regional and interregional routes. The intention is to provide access throughout the City, to adjacent City destinations and communities, and ultimately connect to the D/FW metro area. Like a major thoroughfare being fed by all other trail types and walkways, this trail type will have the highest user capacity and the greatest range of user types, providing opportuni-ties to travel longer distances. Trails designated as part of the regional Veloweb should be concrete and 12 feet in width.Lake Trail:As development begins to happen around North Lake in the years to come, a 12-foot-wide concrete trail around the lake should be incorporated. This trail has one of the greatest opportunities for use by recreational users due to its scenic qualities, but will also serve to link the future uses planned on this large tract of land. Community-Wide Spine Trails:Community-wide spine trails, which build from and are composed of the regional Veloweb trails, can create a city trail system connecting many of the key city destinations while establishing longer distance loops. Trailheads will be located along these trails along with a variety of trail amenities. Community-wide spine trails should be constructed of concrete and typically are 10 feet in width to accommodate the higher user capacity. In some segments these trails may be up to 12 feet in width where a signifi cant volume of users is anticipated.Community Trails:Community trails will comprise the majority of the trails in Coppell. These trails will provide more local area connections between neighborhoods and key City destinations, while linking communi-ties to the larger trail system of the spine trails and regional Veloweb. Community trails should be concrete and 8 feet in width to accommodate the local user volume.Neighborhood Sidewalks:These local neighborhood walkways typically follow the system of adjacent neighborhood streets connecting into larger street networks. They connect neighborhood blocks and communities to-gether and ultimately provide connection into area trails. Neighborhood sidewalks typically range anywhere from 4 feet to 6 feet in width. At locations where sidewalk connections to the trail system are recommended in this plan, a 5-foot minimum walkway is recommended.Regional Veloweb:gLake Trail:Coppell is in a unique situation of be-ing a city that is essentially fully de-veloped. This makes for challenges in some cases and unique opportunities in others. Just as there is a hierarchy of levels in our roadway systems, spe-cifi c types of trails have been devel-oped to accommodate distinct user types and capacities.Deviations from AASHTO may be ac-ceptable in some cases to respect the character or special conditions pres-ent in an area.Community-Wide Spine Trails:ypCommunity Trails:CyNeighborhood Sidewalks:Ng-D4-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanC it Wid T il I l t ti PlTrails connect people with places. As part of the trail system planning process, key locations and facilities throughout the City have been identifi ed for potential trail destinations. These destinations give purpose and reason for residents to utilize the sys-tem, whether for short errands, visiting a friend’s home or even going to work or school. Of course, not all trails have or need a destination. Many trails simply provide residents an opportunity for physical activity, a means for enjoying the sur-rounding community and/or a chance to explore the city.Coppell Community GardensCoppell Farmers MarketOld Town CoppellCoppell Family YMCACoppell Town Center“Creating a system means learning where trails are and developing connections that link them together into networks and where desirable and necessary, building new trails that also connect.” - American Trails, Trails for All Americans report, 1990Trail Destinations-D5-
Making Connections RealityAquatic and Recreation CenterCoppell High SchoolConnecting trails to key city destinations can promote increased trail usage and foster a greater community need for the trail system. Some of the key destinations throughout Coppell and nearby in adjacent cities include:• Schools• Parks• Civic facilities• Community gardens• Farmers market• Recreation facilities• Key city facilities• Major employers• Major retail areasVista Ridge Amphitheater (Lewisville, TX)Wagon Wheel ParkTrail Destinations (Cont.)Andrew BrownCommunity Park Playground-D6-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanTrail FeaturesBike RacksParking for bicycles along the trail system and key destinations in the region was seen as an impor-tant trail amenity to participants in the community workshop. With the community-wide trail system providing connections to many key city destinations, providing parking for bikes allows trail users to safely park their bikes if they wish to stop along the way, particularly at parks and other desirable destinations.Directional Signage / Maps / KiosksTo assist users in navigating the trail system, directional signage, maps and/or kiosks should be provided that contain important trail information. Such items can inform trail users of their location on the map, how long the trail is, where certain trail amenities are located, and what to expect in general from the trail.Drinking FountainsWater fountains provide trail users and their pets with an opportunity to remain hydrated and/or fi ll up their water containers. Where feasible, drinking fountains should be located along trails, espe-cially higher-use trails.Fitness StationsFitness stations provide trail users with an opportunity to stretch and warm up and cool down at the beginning and end of their trail use. These fi tness stations also provide users an opportunity to get more out of their workout with muscular training.Informational SignageInformational signage can provide a variety of information types to the trail user. Information can range from historical and environmental, to facts about native plants and animals potentially en-countered. Informational signage enhances the user experience and provides interesting informa-tion for all.LightingPedestrian-scale lighting improves safety and enables the trail to be used year-round. It also en-hances the trail’s aesthetic beauty. Adding appropriate trail amenities to a local or regional trail system enhances the trail user’s experi-ence. As identifi ed during the community workshop, the public desires a variety of trail amenities at appropriate locations. The following is a summary of the trail amenities that should be considered along Coppell’s trail system. The Parks Department will have to consider construction and mainte-nance costs associated with each, and what the overall recreation and programming goals are of each trail.Bike RacksBDirectional Signage / Maps / KiosksDirectional Signage / Maps / KiosksDrinking FountainsDrinking FountainsFitness StationsFInformational SignageInformational SignageLightingLighting-D7-
Making Connections RealityMileage MarkersMileage markers inform trail users of their distance traveled. Bicyclists, joggers and others often utilize trails for many miles and like to know their distance traveled. Mileage markers allow users to determine whether their goals for the day have been reached and/or how much farther they must travel to obtain those goals.Multi-Use Trail StripingA centerline stripe approximately 4 inches wide should be painted on regional trails and 12-foot-wide trails designed for multi-use or that connect to regional trails.ParkingWhere parking is not already provided in the parks, areas should be provided at regional trail en-trances when appropriate. Parking at trail entrances is convenient for those living farther from the trail network and provides a place to park for those that transport their bicycle to a trail entrance with their car.Pet AmenitiesWhere appropriate, dog waste pickup bag dispensers should be placed at trailheads and key neigh-borhood access points along the route. Signs should be placed along the trail notifying dog owners to pick up after their dogs.Rest Area / Shade StructuresRest areas should be relaxing places containing shelter, shading, benches and other places to sit. These areas may also contain enhanced landscaping, drinking fountains, trash receptacles and even informational signage. Rest areas should be strategically located to make trails more usable for all user groups.TrailheadsTrailheads (for major trails) serve as primary access to the trail system. Trailhead stations should provide trail users with information and trail rules and regulations. Trailhead amenities should be considered such as parking areas, restrooms, drinking fountains, trash receptacles, information kiosks (maps and points of interest) and destination signage with mileage.Trash ReceptaclesTrash receptacles play an essential role in maintaining the cleanliness of a trail system. Trash receptacles allow trail users to dispose of any trash or other refuse generated while utilizing the trail system, and should be located at regular intervals, trail intersections, rest areas, fi tness stations, trailheads and parking.Mileage MarkersgMulti-Use Trail StripingParkingPet AmenitiesRest Area / Shade StructuresTrailheadsTrash ReceptaclespMilMkTrail Features (Cont.)-D8-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanTrail Design StandardsThe City of Coppell adopted the following Trail Amenity Guidelines to promote unity within the City’s park and recreation areas. The Appendix contains the complete trail amenities information.Secondary TrailheadPrimary Trailhead-D9-
Making Connections RealityCity Trail Marker / Mile MarkerPark SignageTrail Design Standards-D10-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanEducational Trail SignageWay-Finding SignageTrail Design Standards-D11-
Making Connections RealityPavilionRest AreasTrail Design Standards-D12-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanTrail SignsTrail Design Standards-D13-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanE. City of Coppell Trails Master Plan...The system of trails and pedestrian connections recommended in this section creates an opportunity to enhance recreational opportunities for the entire community. Moreover, the system will provide a choice of transportation options, including distinct routes for short-, medium- or long-distance trips, in a way that is readily accessible, wide, safe and attractive for a variety of user types.-E1-
Making Connections RealityGeneral OverviewCoppell has many opportunities for trails to connect communities, retail, schools, parks, and other key city destinations together. The Community-Wide Trails Master Plan identifi es a system of trail corridors totaling more than 50 miles of trail within the city limits. Many of the trails identifi ed can be provided in the near term, while others may be a long-term goal for the City to strive and plan for. The City’s efforts should foremost be focused on those corridors that provide the most signifi cant benefi ts and impact for the community, and establishing a major citywide trails network.This section presents the overall Community-Wide Trails Master Plan that addresses the different variety of trail types and the network they create. This section also addresses the major Commu-nity-Wide Spine Trail system and those points of connections to adjacent cities and their trail sys-tems. The following section will touch on the Prioritized Trails Master Plan, representing the most important trails to be built.Trail corridors identifi ed were selected to meet the goals established herein, set in place by the Task Force, refl ecting the comments and desires received during the community input process. Trails considered in this plan were intended to fi rst and foremost link destinations such as schools, nearby retail, civic uses, recreation facilities and parks, major places of employment and neighbor-hood communities. When possible, trail corridors should take advantage of access to the many scenic qualities Coppell has to offer, but must remain convenient and maintain a level of safety to support use by community residents.Some of the trails identifi ed reach beyond the city boundaries of Coppell, most of which are identi-fi ed as the continuation of the regional Veloweb system put in place by NCTCOG. The trails identi-fi ed either show the connection that needs to be made to existing or future proposed trails by adja-cent cities, or those that may need to be a joint venture between Coppell and the neighboring city.With Coppell mostly developed, the availability of corridors for trails is one of the biggest con-straints, and easements will have to be obtained from commercial and residential property owners for many of the trails identifi ed. The creation of partnerships may be possible for some trails or trail segments in existing developed conditions. In undeveloped areas, trail segments can be built by new developments. This will be particularly important for the North Lake area as it begins to devel-op with a mix of uses in the future.strafor segnewop “We also come out here to learn about our-selves. The biggest prize in long-distance hiking is the gift of time. Time to look. Time to think. Time to feel. All those hours you spend with your thoughts. You don’t solve all of your problems, but you come to understand and accept yourself.” - Cindy Ross“We celebrate not the trail, but the wild places it passes through.” – Ray Jardine-E2-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanCommunity-Wide Trails Master PlanSee Appendix for full size map.-E3-
Making Connections RealityTrail Connections with Adjacent CitiesAs a part of any comprehensive planning effort, it is important to look beyond the physical boundaries of the city limits to understand the potential for the local region and beyond. TBG Partners met with representatives from all adjacent cities and regional planning authorities to discuss what the opportunities may be to connect existing and future trail systems planned by each city. Completing these connections will create a far more meaningful and far-reach-ing trails system. The following aerial images show the proposed locations in which trails from one city could connect to another. These locations are fl exible and should be coordinated with the adjacent city’s trails planning authority.City of CarrolltonCity of CarrolltonMcInnish ParkMcInnish ParkPresident George Bush President George Bush TollwayTollway
Sandy Lake Rd.Sandy Lake Rd.Carrollton, TXCarrollton, TXCoppell, TXCoppell, TXCarrollton, TXCarrollton, TXLewisville, TXCoppell, TXCoppell, TXVista Ridge Denton CreekDenton CreekVista RidgeVista RidgeLake Vista Dr.Lake Vista Dr.LewisvLewisvSH 121SH 121Blvd.Blvd.
M acArthurMacArthur
-E4-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanTrail Connections with Adjacent CitiesCity of CarrolltonCity of CarrolltonMcInnish ParkMcInnish ParkSH 121SH 121Freeport ParkwayDenton CreekDenton CreekLewisville, TXLewisville, TXGrapevine, TXGrapevine, TXCoppell, TXCoppell, TXGrapevine, TXGrapevine, TXIrving, TXIrving, TXIrving, TXIrving, TXCoppell, TXCoppell, TXCoppell, TXCoppell, TXCotton BeltCotton BeltBelt Line Rd.Belt Line Rd.MacArthur Blvd.MacArthur Blvd.Carrollton, TXCarrollton, TXSH 121SH 121I-635 LBJ Frwy.I-635 LBJ Frwy.Royal Ln.Royal Ln.-E5-
Making Connections RealityCommunity-Wide Spine TrailsSee Appendix for full size map.-E6-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanF. Priority Trail Implementation...Trails identifi ed in this section as priority trails were selected for their distinct usefulness and desirable qualities. These trails provide ac-cess to distinct destinations, miss-ing trail segments, and/or connect into adjacent cities and their vari-ous amenities. The selected trails are designed to create a connected network of trails across the City, ac-cessible in as many areas as pos-sible. Trail segments not identifi ed on this priority trails plan may be initiated out of sequence if unique funding or acquisition opportunities arise.-F1-
Making Connections RealityPrioritized Trails OverviewThe trails identifi ed here are intended to be key pieces of the larger system that have the poten-tial to link all of Coppell together, as well as to the larger regional system, connecting adjacent city communities together. The City’s efforts should be focused on those trails that provide the most signifi cant benefi cial impact to the community and that truly begin to create a major community-wide network of trails.Trails identifi ed on the following master plan represent the most important trails to be developed or provided. No order has been assigned to the implementation of these trails; they should be imple-mented as funding becomes available, development or redevelopment occurs, road projects occur, or as citizen demand and needs warrant priorities.Preliminary research and study of the prioritized trails are discussed in more detail in the pages that follow. These trails have been given generic trail names for reference until permanent names are established. Each prioritized trail discussed provides general trail details, a description of the trail, the connectivity being made, and an evaluation of the opportunities and constraints present. A more in-depth analysis of each has been provided in the Appendix with an aerial photograph, cost esti-mate, adjacent plats, annotated site photos and funding sources available. This information will aid preliminary investigation into the implementation of a particular trail. Further study and analysis will need to be completed for actual design and detailed cost estimates.The trails described individually in the pages that follow utilize the following legend and correspond with those colors found on the Community-Wide Trails Master Plan:LegendPriority Trail (trail types and widths vary)Regional VelowebLake TrailCommunity-Wide Spine TrailCommunity TrailTrail by Adjacent CityBridge CrossingArea to be Studied for ImplementationdjTrail by Adodge CrodBridBrida to be aArea“Time and space—time to be alone, space to move about—these may well become the greatest scarcities of tomorrow.” - Edwin Way Teale-F2-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanPrioritized Trails Master PlanSee Appendix for full size map.F4F6F8F10F12F14F16F18F20F22F24F26F28F28TRAIL REFERENCE PAGE-F3-
Making Connections RealityDenton Creek East TrailTrail Description:The portion of Denton Creek running north/south on the eastern edge of Coppell’s city boundary has the potential to be one of the most scenic trails in Coppell and Carrollton. This trail is also part of the regional Veloweb system. The west side of Denton Creek was subdivided to the creek’s centerline during the plat-ting of communities along the creek, and is therefore not a viable option. The creek’s east side, however, is undeveloped and in a natural vegetative state. This corridor should be protected and surveyed carefully to save large trees during the implementation of this regional trail. A 12-foot-wide trail is recommended along this corridor to allow for both walking and cycling use. Additional information on this trail can be found in the Appendix.Connectivity:There are two main connections that trail completion would provide. These connections include the interre-gional Veloweb OHP Utility Corridor Trail on the south end at Sandy Lake Road, and on the north end to the North Levee Trail, which also provides direct connection into Andrew Brown Park. It is recommended that the Denton Creek East Trail be taken to at least a connection point of the North Levee Trail in Vista Ridge Park. If, during implementation of this trail, the City of Carrollton is working on or planning the implementation of its regional trail along I-35 and President George Bush Turnpike, then this trail should continue to the east, con-necting into Carrollton’s trail system. Ultimately, this system would provide connection to DART rail stations.An opportunity to provide connections from area neighborhoods within Coppell to the regional Veloweb exists in the Windsor Estates neighborhood (in an HOA-privately maintained park off of St. James). Another op-portunity exists to connect the area neighborhoods in Lakewood Estates at the knuckle on Hollywood Drive. Both instances would require a bridge across Denton Creek.Evaluation of Opportunities:An opportunity exists to build a great regional trail through a very scenic area on the city’s eastern edge. This is envisioned as a joint effort with the City of Carrollton and additional fi nancial support from NCTCOG. There is also the potential to provide four equally spaced connection points to this segment of the regional Veloweb. Evaluation of Constraints:Benefi tting both Coppell and Carrollton, as well as the region as a whole, this trail will require approval from the City of Carrollton to be built, as its location is on the east side of Denton Creek. Agreements with the property owner(s) of the undeveloped land will need to be obtained as well. Permission from the overhead power utility provider will need to be obtained for the southern segment of the trail contained within the OHP easement.Trail Type:Regional VelowebTrail Length:Approx. 15,000 feet (2.8 miles)Recommended Trail Width:12 feetType of Surface:ConcreteRecommended Features:Crosswalk striping or brick banding at intersection, locator maps, mile markers, benches, litter recep-tacles, dog waste pickup stationsResponsibility for Implementation:City of Coppell Parks & Recre-ation, Engineering, City of Carrollton, City of Lewisville, NCTCOGCost Estimate (see Appendix):Approx. Total = $1,640,600Funding Sources (see Appendix)Evaluation of Constraints:Trail Description:pConnectivity:Evaluation of Opportunities:-F4-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanVista Ridge ParkParkVista Ridge PRidge ParkVista Ri e PLake Vista Dr.Lake Vista Dr.Denton Creek East Trail (Cont.)Community-Wide Trails ImpNorthern SectionSouthern SectionDenton CreekDenton CreekDenton CreekDenton CreekCommunity-Wide Trails ImNorthern SectionNorthern SectionN. MacArthur Blvd.N. MacArthur Blvd.Denton CreekDenton CreekDenton CreekDetDentE. Sandy Lake Rd.E. Sandy Lake Rd.V illa g e P k w y .Village P
k
w
y.
A llen R d.Allen
Rd.Carrollton, TXCarrollton, TXCarrollton, TXCarrollton, TXLewisville, TXLewisville, TXCoppell, TXCoppell, TXCoppell, TXCoppell, TXMatchlineMatchlineMatchlineMatchlineLegendccouthern Seouthern SecShern SSSouthern SecSouthern SecSPriority Trail (trail types and widths vary)Regional VelowebCommunity TrailBridge CrossingArea to be Studied for Implementation-F5-
Making Connections RealityOHP Utility Corridor TrailTrail Description:Located in the eastern portion of the City, this trail is a part of the interregional trail system included in the Mobility 2030 plan put in place by NCTCOG. This existing overhead power utility easement follows the align-ment of the interregional trail while connecting Lewisville to the Cotton Belt Trail on the southern portion of the city and fi nally Irving to the north.This corridor currently presents both aesthetic and functional challenges to the City. It contains multiple large overhead power line structures, mosquitoes breeding in standing water, and abundant overgrown grasses, weeds and brush. In addition, the corridor creates a physical barrier between neighborhood communities. This interregional trail is one of the most important trail segment opportunities in the City, with potential to be a landmark feature for the City’s eastern sector, particularly, as well as Coppell as a whole. A 12-foot-wide concrete trail is recommended within the corridor to accommodate adequate user capacity of this interregion-al trail. This corridor is intended to primarily serve as a recreational use and is considered a high-priority trail. Additional information on this trail can be found in the Appendix.Connectivity:This trail is part of a larger system of trails connecting cities throughout the Metroplex, making a more com-plete system. It will also provide connections between local neighborhoods, open spaces, parks, schools and other City destinations. Connection to sidewalks and trails from local neighborhoods and other adjacent uses should be included. Ultimately, this trail will make connections to fi ve other trails, four of which are considered top-priority trails. The northern end will be at E. Sandy Lake Road, tying into the east/west-running, 6-foot-wide sidewalk sys-tem currently in place. This master plan recommends upgrading these walks to an 8-foot trail along the south side of E. Sandy Lake Road. The northern end will also connect into the interregional trail system coming from the north along Denton Creek. Along the north/east side of MacArthur Boulevard, the proposed 8-foot trail along MacArthur Park is recommended to tie into this trail. The southern end will link the Moore Road Trail and Grapevine Park to this interregional trail system, ultimately connecting into the Cotton Belt Trail.Evaluation of Opportunities:An opportunity exists for the City of Coppell to improve upon both aesthetic and functional challenges and create a linear park area with attractive landscaping, lighting, and other trail and park amenities. This trail section can become a key City destination for community residents.Evaluation of Constraints:Permission from the utility provider will be needed for any and all improvements to the easement. The cor-ridor is in a low-lying area and contains standing water after a storm event. In order to deal with this issue, a series of small detention or retention ponds could be designed to handle the drainage and provide fi ll material to raise the trail and form overlooks. This, in turn, would create a park-like setting with opportunities to pro-vide an educational component.Trail Type:Regional VelowebTrail Length:Approx. 6,600 feet (1.3 miles)Recommended Trail Width:12 feetType of Surface:ConcreteRecommended Features:Provide parking, trailhead, locator maps, mile markers, shade shelters, benches, bicycle racks, litter receptacles, dog waste pickup sta-tions, water fountains, lightingResponsibility for Implementation:City of Coppell Parks & Recre-ation, Engineering, NCTCOG Cost Estimate (see Appendix):Approx. Total = $763,000Funding Sources (see Appendix)Connectivity:yTrail Description:pEvaluation of Opportunities:pp-F6-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanE. Belt Line RoadMacArthurMacArthurParkParkM a c A r t h u rMacArthur
RiverchaseRiverchaseCountry ClubCountry ClubEEEEEEEE.BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBeeeeelelettttLine RBBBtEEEEEEEEEE.B BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBeleleleleleleltttt LineRRoCotton Belt RailCotton Belt RailE. Sandy Lake RoadE. Sandy Lake RoadB lvd.Blvd.OHP Utility Corridor Trail (Cont.)Proposed Proposed TrailheadTrailheadCurrently a boardwalk is used to elevate a trail connecting Currently a boardwalk is used to elevate a trail connecting the neighborhood residents to the school and City park. the neighborhood residents to the school and City park. Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanBeing in a low-lying area, much of the area is in standing Being in a low-lying area, much of the area is in standing water after a rain, contributing to the breeding of the mos-water after a rain, contributing to the breeding of the mos-quitoes.quitoes.The corridor is dominated by overgrown grasses, weeds, The corridor is dominated by overgrown grasses, weeds, and brush.and brush.Multiple runs of large overhead power lines exist in the Multiple runs of large overhead power lines exist in the corridor that is approximately 250 to 300 feet wide.corridor that is approximately 250 to 300 feet wide.LegendPriority Trail (trail types and widths vary)Regional VelowebCommunity TrailArea to be Studied for Implementation-F7-
Making Connections RealityIrving Connector TrailTrail Description:Located in the southeast portion of the city, this trail seeks to provide strong connections and improved ac-cess to community-wide facilities for both Coppell and Irving citizens. As with other segments of the regional Veloweb, this segment should include 12-foot-wide concrete trails allowing for both walking and cycling use. This trail corridor will provide a safe route to cross the major obstacles of MacArthur Boulevard and the rail tracks, East Belt Line Road and Grapevine Creek. Additional information on this trail can be found in the Appendix.Connectivity:A segment of the regional Veloweb, this trail will also improve access to nearby retail and civic destinations, a school and parks. It will link two adjacent cities together and all their amenities, thus providing a more complete system serving citizens of both cities. A portion of the Cotton Belt Trail will be a part of this seg-ment and will continue the regional Veloweb from north of the OHP Utility Corridor Trail toward the south into Irving. Connection to area sidewalks and trails within neighborhoods and retail areas should be included for accessibility.Evaluation of Opportunities:Several options exist to continue the regional Veloweb to the south, connecting to Irving from the OHP Utility Corridor Trail. The area highlighted in green on the following map should be studied in more detail for the best opportunity. The segment currently identifi ed heading south is in a large landscaped area between Val-ley Ranch Baptist Church and the adjacent storage units, but it is private land and an easement would have to be obtained. A hike and bike easement was held in some tracts farther east, but many obstructions cur-rently exist and should be studied further. In order to provide connections to Bush Middle School and Cham-pion Park, as well as to parks, trails and neighborhood sidewalks within Irving, coordination with the City of Irving Parks Department will be required.Evaluation of Constraints:With DART’s future plans for active rail along the Cotton Belt, the trail crossing from the north side of the rail corridor to the south across East Belt Line Road will have to be at a signalized street intersection. This can take place at either South MacArthur Boulevard or Fairway Drive.Referring back to the meeting notes from DART, regarding the timeframe for planning that must be done for the Cotton Belt rail corridor, the feasibility of implementing this trail may be longer term, and would be one of the lowest of the priority trails. Of the approximate 3,500-foot trail length, about 900 feet utilize the rail cor-ridor, and permission will have to be obtained from DART.If crossing Grapevine Creek is done anywhere other than at South MacArthur Boulevard, a pedestrian bridge will need to be installed and a fl ood study may be required.Trail Type:Regional VelowebTrail Length:Approx. 3,500 feetRecommended Trail Width:12 feetType of Surface:ConcreteRecommended Features:Signalized crossing and cross-walk brick banding or striping, locator map, mile markers, benches, bicycle racks, litter receptacles, dog waste pickup stations, lightingResponsibility for Implementation:City of Coppell Parks & Recre-ation, Engineering, NCTCOGCost Estimate (see Appendix):Approx. Total = $1,235,900Funding Sources (see Appendix)Connectivity:Trail Description:pEvaluation of Opportunities:Evaluation of Constraints:-F8-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanCity ofCity ofIrving, TXIrving, TXBush Middle SchoolBush Middle School(Irving, TX)Irving Connector Trail (Cont.)(Irving, TX)(Irving, TX)S. MacArthur Blvd.S. MacArthur Blvd.E. Belt Line RoadE. Belt Line RoadCity ofCity ofCoppell, TXCoppell, TXChampionMacArthurMacArthurParkParkRiverchase Country ClubRiverchase Country ClubnnGrapevine CreekGrapevine CreekCrossing of the Cotton Belt rail line with the trail Crossing of the Cotton Belt rail line with the trail system will have to happen at an intersection.system will have to happen at an intersection.A large landscape area between the church and A large landscape area between the church and storage units may be a great opportunity to con-storage units may be a great opportunity to con-nect south toward Irving.nect south toward Irving.This connection would put the trail in line with This connection would put the trail in line with the middle school in Irving on the south side of the middle school in Irving on the south side of Grapevine Creek.Grapevine Creek.LegendWCommunity-WCommunity-WPriority Trail (trail types and widths vary)Regional VelowebCommunity TrailBridge CrossingArea to be Studied for Implementation-F9-
Making Connections RealityNorth Levee TrailTrail Description:An existing levee along Denton Creek creates the key link needed between Andrew Brown Park and Vista Ridge Park in Lewisville. The North Levee Trail is intended to continue the east/west regional Veloweb from Andrew Brown Park to the north/south regional Veloweb Denton Creek East Trail. With some landscape improvements, this trail corridor could create a linear park-like setting that connects Coppell, Lewisville and Carrollton together, providing access to each city’s community-wide facilities. This trail’s development would be similar to one atop of the levee west of MacArthur Boulevard and, like other regional Veloweb segments, would need to be 12 feet wide to accommodate user capacity. Additional infor-mation on this trail can be found in the Appendix.Connectivity:The implementation of this trail would establish a much-needed link between Andrew Brown Park at one end and Vista Ridge Park in Lewisville at the other. This link would also provide connection to Vista Ridge Amphitheater and many employment opportunities in the area. Developing this trail segment will complete the missing regional Veloweb segment on the east side of the city, providing connection into the north/south regional Veloweb, Denton Creek East Trail.Continuing the trail atop the levee to MacArthur Boulevard allows this trail to connect to the MacArthur Bou-levard Trail on the east side of the road. This would provide connection to many of Coppell’s neighborhoods. The ability to connect trail system users from many of Coppell’s neighborhoods to Andrew Brown Park, Vista Ridge Amphitheater and Park, and the numerous area employment opportunities using MacArthur Boulevard Trail makes this trail a high priority.Evaluation of Opportunities:Denton Creek has been channelized in this segment with the construction of a levee. The top of the levee is fl at for maintenance vehicle access, providing a great opportunity for a 12-foot-wide concrete trail. Guardrails are currently located in the median of MacArthur Boulevard, deterring pedestrians from attempt-ing to cross MacArthur at a non-signalized intersection. With a pedestrian underpass already in place under MacArthur Boulevard, benching the trail into the levee down to the underpass will allow for east/west pedes-trian movement without vehicular confl ict. Providing a street-grade trail connection at MacArthur Boulevard, similar to the trail found on the west side of MacArthur Boulevard, is important to tie into the Community Trail alongside the road. Evaluation of Constraints:With the North Levee Trail tying into Vista Ridge Park in Lewisville, cooperative agreements for improve-ments will be needed with Lewisville. In order to tie into the pedestrian underpass already in place under MacArthur Boulevard, grade challenges will require the concrete trail to be benched into the side of the levee. This will require coordination with the levee district, which will also be required for obtaining approval for trail use and improvements. In order to provide trail connection to the Vista Ridge Amphitheater, an easement will need to be obtained between the levee and Lake Vista Drive. Providing this connection will again require the benching of the trail from the top of the levee down to natural grade. Trail Type:Regional VelowebTrail Length:Approx. 5,200 feetRecommended Trail Width:12 feetType of Surface:ConcreteRecommended Facilities:Locator maps, mile markers, benches, litter receptacles, dog waste pickup stations, water fountains, light-ingResponsibility for Implementation:City of Coppell Parks & Recre-ation, Engineering, City of Lewisville, NCTCOGCost Estimate (see Appendix):Approx. Total = $491,200Funding Sources (see Appendix)Evaluation of Constraints:Evaluation of Opportunities:ppConnectivity:yTrail Description:TilD itip-F10-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanM a c A r t h u r B l v d .MacArthur Blvd.Denton CreekDenton CreekCDenton CreekLake Vista DriveLake Vista DriveVista Ridge ParkVista Ridge Park(Lewisville, TX)(Lewisville, TX)Vista Ridge AmphitheaterAmphitheater(Lewisville, TX)(Lewisville, TX)E. SH 121North Levee Trail (Cont.)Lewisville, TXLewisville, TX2121A pedestrian underpass is already in place under A pedestrian underpass is already in place under MacArthur Blvd.MacArthur Blvd.The amphitheater in Lewisville is a key destina-The amphitheater in Lewisville is a key destina-tion for citizens of the area. tion for citizens of the area. A 12-foot regional Veloweb trail on top of the A 12-foot regional Veloweb trail on top of the levee will accommodate bicyclists and pedes-levee will accommodate bicyclists and pedes-trians.trians.Community Wide Trails Implementation PlanCommunity-Wide Trails Implementation PlanAn existing neighborhood sidewalk along Mac-An existing neighborhood sidewalk along Mac-Arthur Blvd. will provide connection into the Arthur Blvd. will provide connection into the regional Veloweb.regional Veloweb.Guardrails in the median of MacArthur Blvd. will Guardrails in the median of MacArthur Blvd. will help prevent pedestrian crossing at this point.help prevent pedestrian crossing at this point.To access the pedestrian underpass under Mac-To access the pedestrian underpass under Mac-Arthur Blvd. will require benching the trail into Arthur Blvd. will require benching the trail into the side of the levee.the side of the levee.LegendPriority Trail (trail types and widths vary)Regional VelowebCommunity TrailArea to be Studied for Implementation-F11-
Making Connections RealityMacArthur Boulevard TrailTrail Description:The MacArthur Boulevard Trail is seen as a north/south urban neighborhood connector serving residents of Coppell’s east side. The trail will become the central walking corridor for area neighbor-hoods, linking the many disconnected neighborhoods with a safe walking route that links to many key City destinations along MacArthur Boulevard. Much of MacArthur Boulevard features neighbor-hood communities backing to the road, with walls and landscape reserves running along it. This connection provides an opportunity for a scenic trail corridor with fewer driveway and street cross-ings, minimizing pedestrian and vehicular confl ict points. This trail is intended to serve primarily the local neighborhoods adjacent to MacArthur Boulevard. It should be 8 feet wide to accommodate user capacity. Additional information on this trail can be found in the Appendix.Connectivity:The number of households in the area makes the MacArthur Boulevard Trail a logical choice for providing connections to many parts of the City. Serving as a collector of trail users from the neigh-borhoods, this trail will provide area access to other neighborhoods, retail and civic entities, schools, open space and park areas. It will also provide connection to the regional Veloweb located either on the north end at the North Levee Trail or the OHP Utility Corridor Trail on the south. Local neigh-borhood sidewalks should connect to the main trail for accessibility.Evaluation of Opportunities:The development of this corridor can provide signifi cant enhancements for both individual property owners and each neighborhood as a whole. Currently there are 4- to 5-foot walks on both sides of the road. The east side of the road has a few relatively minor constraints: the landscape reserves are wider in areas with key City destinations located on the east side. Walks should be upgraded to an 8–foot-wide Community-Wide Trail.Evaluation of Constraints:The west side of MacArthur Boulevard has a number of different constraints including grading and existing retaining walls, utilities and residential houses fronting the road. There were few issues found on the road’s east side and they are relatively minor. Easements will have to be obtained from property owners along MacArthur Boulevard in those areas where the public right-of-way is narrower than the area required to provide the Community-Wide Trail.Trail Type:Community TrailTrail Length:Approx. 14,000 feet (2.7 miles)Recommended Trail Width:8 feetType of Surface:ConcreteRecommended Facilities:Locator maps, mile markers, benches, bicycle racks, litter recep-tacles, dog waste pickup stationsResponsibility for Implementation:City of Coppell Parks & Recre-ation, EngineeringCost Estimate (see Appendix):Approx. Total = $919,000Funding Sources (see Appendix)Connectivity:yTrail Description:pEvaluation of Opportunities:ppEvaluation of Constraints:-F12-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanCommmunity Wide Trails Implementation PlanAllen RoadParkSamuel Blvd.Samuel Blvd.Allen Allen PaParN. MacArthur Blvd.N. MacArthur Blvd.ParkwayParkwayBlvd.Blvd.E. Belt Line Rd.E. Belt Line Rd.Vista Dr.Denton CreekDenton CreekLakesideLakeside
Elem.Elem.MacArthurMacArthurParkParkS. MacArthur Blvd.AAE. SandyLake Rd.Lake Rd.RiverchaseRiverchaseElementaryElementaryMatchlineMatchlineE. SandyE. SandyMatchlineMatchlineNorthern SectionNorthern SectionSouthern SectionSouthern SectionMacArthur Boulevard Trail (Cont.)The west side of the road has many constraints such The west side of the road has many constraints such as grading issues, fronting homes, and utilities.as grading issues, fronting homes, and utilities.The east side of the road has many of the key city The east side of the road has many of the key city destinations along this trail corridor with few con-destinations along this trail corridor with few con-straints.straints.Large reserves and mature landscaping on the east Large reserves and mature landscaping on the east side create a great opportunity for a trail to link the side create a great opportunity for a trail to link the many disconnected neighborhoods and city destina-many disconnected neighborhoods and city destina-tions.tions.LegendPriority Trail (trail types and widths vary)Regional VelowebCommunity TrailArea to be Studied for ImplementationLakeLake-F13-
Making Connections RealityGrapevine Creek Park TrailTrail Description:Grapevine Creek Park currently is an undeveloped park in a natural setting at the crossroads of two major trails, the Cotton Belt Trail and the Moore Road Trail. East of Mockingbird Lane, a large overhead power line (OHP) easement cuts between two neighborhoods toward the larger north/south OHP easement where a segment of the regional Veloweb is planned. Each half of this trail has its own unique character, opportuni-ties and constraints. The development of Grapevine Creek Park Trail serves two main purposes. The fi rst is to provide east/west movement for the local community as a complement to the regional draw of the Cotton Belt Trail. With the timeframe of the Cotton Belt rail line undetermined and more likely long-term, this con-nection would facilitate east/west movement and could be implemented more quickly. Secondly, this trail pro-vides a great opportunity for citizens to enjoy the scenic characteristics of Grapevine Creek Park, while also visually enhancing the OHP easement. To connect the two halves together, it will be necessary to utilize a 400- to 500-foot length of the Cotton Belt easement. This segment should be 12 feet in width and concrete, as it is a segment of the future Cotton Belt Trail. Additional information on this trail can be found in the Appendix.Connectivity:This trail will collect trail users from neighborhood communities, providing access to other neighborhoods and linking to the larger trail system being created. This east/west trail will link the MacArthur Boulevard Trail and OHP Utility Corridor Trail to the Moore Road Trail, and eventually to the North Lake Trail. With this trail fun-neling pedestrians from area neighborhoods into regional Veloweb trails, a community-spine trail and future connections into North Lake, this trail is a high priority and one of the more important trail segments within the City. Connection to neighborhood sidewalks and trails should be included at as many points as possible. Great opportunity currently exists for this at the open-ended cul-de-sacs within the Hollows at Northlake Woodlands community.Evaluation of Opportunities:A great opportunity exists to provide access to Grapevine Creek Park, one of the most scenic areas in Cop-pell. The Grapevine Creek Park Trail provides access to an undeveloped city park and also utilizes the open space of an overhead power line easement. With three trails coming together in Grapevine Creek Park near Belt Line Road and Moore Road, a trailhead with minimal parking should be included to facilitate trail access to any one of the three trails. Ample room exists in the park for the trail and spur, yet efforts should be made to avoid developing them too close to residents whenever possible. Trails within Grapevine Creek Park should be composed of decomposed granite or other less harsh material that complements the beauty and natural character of the park.Evaluation of Constraints:Grapevine Creek snakes its way through the park with a tributary fi nger extending south from the Northlake Woodlands community. In order to provide suffi cient access to the park area and its scenic qualities, approx-imately four bridges will be needed, but will be dependent on the exact trail layout. A topographic survey will be needed to understand any topographic constraints of the area and creek-crossing locations. Because the western half of this trail is in a natural setting, some brush and trees will need to be cleared, but shall be kept to a minimum in order to preserve the corridor’s natural character. A tree survey should be completed prior to detailed design, to avoid and protect any signifi cant trees.The eastern half of this trail will require an agreement with the utility company to allow public access and nec-essary landscape improvements. Crossing a drainage corridor on the eastern end will require a small bridge in order to make the connection to the OHP Utility Corridor Trail.Trail Type:Community TrailTrail Length:Approx. 7,000 feet (1.3 miles)Recommended Trail Width:8-10 feet, with 12-foot segmentType of Surface:Decomposed Granite (DG) Recommended Features:Crossing at Mockingbird Ln. striping or brick banding, parking, trailhead, locator maps, mile mark-ers, shade shelters, benches, bicycle racks, litter receptacles, dog waste pickup stations, lightingResponsibility for Implementation:City of Coppell Parks & Recre-ation, EngineeringCost Estimate (see Appendix):Approx. Total = $884,400Funding Sources (see Appendix)Evaluation of Constraints:Trail Description:TilD itipConnectivity:Evaluation of Opportunities:-F14-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanE. Belt Line RoadNorth LakeNorth LakeGrapevine Creek Park Trail (Cont.)M ockingbird Ln.Mockingbird Ln.
Moore RoadMoore Road GrapevineProposed Proposed TrailheadTrailheadProposed Proposed TrailheadTrailheadE. Bethel School Rd.E. Bethel School Rd.elt Line E. Belt LRoadBRRoadLineLelt BeltE. Cotton BeltCotton BeltGrGrGrapevine CreekGrapevine CreekTrails within Grapevine Creek Park will provide the Trails within Grapevine Creek Park will provide the community a great opportunity to enjoy and appreciate community a great opportunity to enjoy and appreciate one of Coppell’s few natural areas. one of Coppell’s few natural areas. The trail corridor takes advantage of a large utility The trail corridor takes advantage of a large utility easement that has community access from adjacent easement that has community access from adjacent streets and open-ended cul-de-sac’s.streets and open-ended cul-de-sac’s.A drainage easement with overgrown brush that will A drainage easement with overgrown brush that will require a small bridge crossing and brush clearing.require a small bridge crossing and brush clearing.LegendPriority Trail (trail types and widths vary)Regional VelowebLake TrailCommunity-Wide Spine TrailBridge CrossingArea to be Studied for ImplementationLake TrailCommunity-WidyBridge CrossingBridge CrossingArea to be Stud-F15-
Making Connections RealityLevee Bridge Connector TrailTrail Description:Andrew Brown Park and Moore Road Park contain a network of trails and amenities that serve the citizens of Coppell. Currently this network of trails, found south of Denton Creek, does not connect to the regional Veloweb hike and bike trail north of Denton Creek, except at Denton Tap Road. The trail’s purpose is to provide passage across Denton Creek and link these two trail systems together on the park’s east side. Additional information on this trail can be found in the Appendix.Connectivity:Bridging across Denton Creek will link neighborhood communities together that are currently discon-nected. The connection will provide access to Moore Road Park and Andrew Brown Park as well as other City facilities for those communities to the north. It will also provide access to the regional Veloweb and employment opportunities for those communities to the south.Evaluation of Opportunities:When trail segments are built that do not connect to a destination or to one another, the trail’s user potential is not achieved until the missing links are put in place. The implementation of this bridge crossing at Denton Creek is one of the most important trail segments in the City, as it completes the missing link between two trails and is one of the segments making up the Community-Wide Spine Trail system. The connection’s creation of an additional loop for recreational users would be an-other benefi t. Consideration of current and future maintenance needs and requirements of the creek, parks and levees should be considered when designing the bridge crossing if maintenance vehicle access will be needed. It is recommended that the bridge width be no less than 12 feet to accommodate both walking and cycling use. The bridge may also need to accommodate vehicular weight and traffi c.This trail, being a connector to the regional Veloweb system, makes it eligible for matching funding from NCTCOG. Evaluation of Constraints:Some minimal brush clearing will be needed between the existing trail in Moore Road Park and Denton Creek. Removing trees in the area should be avoided. The length of the bridge crossing will not allow for a free-span bridge and will require it to have piers. A fl ood study evaluation and permit may be required prior to design and implementation. Improvements should be coordinated with the levee district.Trail Type:Community-Wide Spine TrailTrail Length:Approx. 300 feetRecommended Trail Width:12 feetType of Surface:ConcreteRecommended Features:Locator map, mile marker, litter receptacles, dog waste pickup station, lightingResponsibility for Implementation:City of Coppell Parks & Recre-ation, Engineering, NCTCOGCost Estimate (see Appendix):Approx. Total = $715,700Funding Sources (see Appendix)Connectivity:yTrail Description:pEvaluation of Opportunities:Evaluation of Constraints:-F16-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanS.H. 121S.H. 121Moore Road ParkMoore Road ParkLevee Bridge Connector Trail (Cont.)Forest Hill Dr.Forest Hill Dr.M a c A r t h u r B l v d .MacArthur Blvd.Glen Lakes Dr.Glen Lakes Dr.Denton CreekDenton CreekBridging Denton Creek will connect trail users Bridging Denton Creek will connect trail users from the north side into Andrew Brown Park and from the north side into Andrew Brown Park and users from the south into the regional Veloweb.users from the south into the regional Veloweb.A piered bridge will be needed to cross Denton A piered bridge will be needed to cross Denton Creek, and can serve as a icon for the area.Creek, and can serve as a icon for the area.A fl ood study evaluation may be required prior A fl ood study evaluation may be required prior to design and implementation.to design and implementation.LegendPriority Trail (trail types and widths vary)Regional VelowebCommunity TrailBridge CrossingArea to be Studied for Implementation-F17-
Making Connections RealityMoore Road TrailTrail Description:The Moore Road Trail is seen as one of the strongest links between the greatest number of neighborhoods and two key city destinations anchoring each end of the trail. Moore Road currently has a large expanse of pavement approximately 42 feet to 44 feet in width. This provides a great opportunity to create on-street bicycle lanes in both directions, with a separate walk for pedestrians and joggers. Sidewalk widening and the striping/signing of the bicycle lane can take place separately, if need be, in order to separate bicyclists from pedestrians. Additional information on this trail can be found in the Appendix.Connectivity:Implementing this trail is seen as highly advantageous for the City. It will directly link many neighborhood communities together and will connect to Andrew Brown Park to the north, as well as a future mix of uses and recreational opportu-nities to the south around North Lake. The Moore Road Trail will serve as the north/south link between the east/west regional Veloweb trails located on the City’s north and south ends, linking several parks, schools and retail destinations together. This trail will also provide access to the community trails along Sandy Lake Road in the middle of the City, and Grapevine Creek Park Trail on the City’s south end. It is recommended that trailheads be provided on both the north and south ends of this trail.Evaluation of Opportunities:There is a possibility to create 5- to 6-foot-wide striped bike lanes on both sides of the road, but these bike lanes should not be any less than 4 feet in width and should follow AASHTO design standards. South of Sandy Lake Road, the roadway width narrows down to a point where no parking should be allowed on either side of the roadway. With Moore Road Trail providing a direct connection from the City’s north and south sides and connecting to major east/west region-al Veloweb routes, matching funding from NCTCOG may be available. Evaluation of Constraints:Moore Road currently has one traffi c lane, in both directions, with areas of on-street parking. The roadway width ap-pears able to accommodate on-street bike lanes, but a study may need to be completed by the engineering department. Four-foot sidewalks exist on both sides of the road in most areas. The east side should be replaced with a concrete walk, preferably 6 feet in width, because it has far-fewer constraints and limitations with grading, utilities, fronting homes and number of property owners. Easements will have to be obtained from property owners if the walk cannot fi t within the current public right-of-way. There should be few constraints with grading or utilities.Trail Type:Community-Wide Spine TrailTrail Length:Approx. 9,700 feet (1.8 miles)Recommended Trail Width:4-6 foot bike lane 5-6 foot walkType of Surface:ConcreteRecommended Features:Crosswalk striping or brick banding at intersections, locator maps, mile markers, bicycle racks, litter re-ceptacles, dog waste pickup stationsResponsibility for Implementation:City of Coppell Parks & Recre-ation, Engineering, NCTCOGCost Estimate (see Appendix):Approx. Total = $581,300Funding Sources (see Appendix)Trail Description:TilD itiShared Roadway Section:Connectivity:yEvaluation of Opportunities:Evaluation of Constraints:-F18-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanBelt Line RoadE. Sandy Lake Rd.E. Sandy Lake Rd.Moore Road Trail (Cont.)Southern SectionNorthern SectionNorthern SectionMoore RoadMoore Road
AustinAustinElementaryElementarytiontionNorth LakeNorth LakeMatchlineMatchlineE. Sandy Lake Rd.ddd.d.Moore RoadMoore Road
Moore RoadMoore RoadAndrewBrownParkParkwAndrewAndrewwBProposed Proposed TrailheadTrailheadProposed Proposed TrailheadsRoadRoadA concrete walk is not continuous on the A concrete walk is not continuous on the east side, but has wider corridors available east side, but has wider corridors available for the implementation of a pedestrian walk.for the implementation of a pedestrian walk.The width of Moore Rd. could accommo-The width of Moore Rd. could accommo-date bike lanes on both sides of the road date bike lanes on both sides of the road plus parking north of Sandy Lake Rd.plus parking north of Sandy Lake Rd.Upgrading the current 4-foot walk to a 6-foot Upgrading the current 4-foot walk to a 6-foot pedestrian walk should avoid mature trees.pedestrian walk should avoid mature trees.The west side of Moore Rd. has more The west side of Moore Rd. has more constraints than the east side, including constraints than the east side, including residents fronting Moore Rd.residents fronting Moore Rd.Minor crossing of drainage corridors like Minor crossing of drainage corridors like this one will require the walk to go from this one will require the walk to go from back of curb to bridge wall.back of curb to bridge wall.The east side has residents siding to the The east side has residents siding to the trail corridor and will require an easement trail corridor and will require an easement if the right-of-way is not wide enough.if the right-of-way is not wide enough.LeeLeeElem.Elem.LegendPriority Trail (trail types and widths vary)Regional VelowebLake TrailCommunity-Wide Spine TrailCommunity TrailArea to be Studied for Implementation-F19-
Making Connections RealityDenton Creek Park TrailTrail Description:The ability to link to other trail systems either already in place or being planned by surrounding cities makes for a more complete regional trail system that benefi ts residents of all cities and contributes to higher trail system use. The multiple trails making up Denton Creek Park Trail connect to several area trails while also continuing the regional Veloweb west to Lewisville and Grapevine. Additional information on this trail can be found in the Appendix.Connectivity:The current western extent of this trail is intended to meet up with a trail planned by the City of Lewisville. Con-tinuing this regional Veloweb trail to the west will link to Grapevine’s existing Grapevine Mills Run Trail. At the southern end of Denton Creek Park, an existing segment of the Community-Wide Spine Trial will connect to the regional Veloweb. Another connection that will be provided includes approximately 200 feet of Community-Wide Spine Trail needed along Westminster Way to North Coppell Road, which is currently a missing link. Extending the Community Trail north along North Coppell Road will provide a more direct route to the regional Veloweb for those north/south-traveling trail users. Lastly, the eastern segment of this trail on the north side of Denton Creek will link to an ex-isting trail in Magnolia Park that extends east into Andrew Brown Park under Denton Tap Road. Neighborhood sidewalk connections should be included and connect into this system of trails at as many points as possible.Evaluation of Opportunities:Much of Denton Creek in this area is very beautiful and still in its natural state, allowing for an exceptionally sce-nic segment of the regional Veloweb. Land on Denton Creek’s north side is currently undeveloped and should be planned for developing trails along the northern bank, leaving a tree buffer to preserve the rich character and protect the bank from erosion when this area begins to develop. This trail will collect trail users from those communities north of Denton Creek and should be 8 feet wide. This segment will link users to the 12-foot-wide, east/west regional Veloweb extending to Lewisville and Grapevine.A joint effort between Coppell, Lewisville and Grapevine should be considered to continue this trail connection from its current end point, south of Denton Creek Park in Coppell, to the Grapevine Mills Run Trail west of State Highway 121 in Grapevine. The opportunity to bring trails together from all three cities would open up a much more-extensive and far-reaching network of trails available to these communities.Providing trail access to the undeveloped Denton Creek Park will help support future park activities and uses and will also link this park to Andrew Brown Park. The trail segment on the north side of Denton Creek could be a developer-implemented endeavor separate from the rest of the Denton Creek Park Trails.Evaluation of Constraints:This trail segment’s western end is intended to meet up with a planned City of Lewisville trail coming from the north. The bridging of Denton Creek and the exact location where this will happen should be a joint effort and coordinated by Coppell and Lewisville. The bridge may be eligible for matching funding by NCTCOG for its con-nection into this regional Veloweb trail. The trail segment north of Denton Creek will require easements from the property owners and should be imple-mented when any development takes place on these tracts. This trail segment could be completed by the developer and could be completed separately from the regional Veloweb and N. Coppell Road trail connection. Easements from property owners will be needed for all trail segments except the portion running through Denton Creek Park. Coordination with TxDOT will be needed to cross under N. State Highway 121 on the south side of Denton Creek. Some topographic constraints exist just east of N. State Highway 121 and may require retaining walls or re-grading some areas.Trail Type:Regional Veloweb, Community Trail, & Community-Wide SpineTrail Length:Regional Veloweb: Approx. 3,500 feet Community-Wide Spine Trail: Approx. 200 feet Community Trail: Approx. 7,800 feet Total: Approx. 11,500 feet (2.2 mi.)Recommended Trail Width:Regional Veloweb: 12 feet Community Trail: 8 feet Community-Wide Spine: 10 feetType of Surface:Concrete (optional decomposed granite)Recommended Features:Locator maps, mile markers,shade shelters, benches, bicycle rack, litter receptacles, dog waste pickup stations, water fountains, lightingResponsibility for Implementation:City of Coppell Parks & Rec., Engineering, NCTCOG, City’s of Lewis-ville & Grapevine , future developerCost Estimate (see Appendix):Approx. Total = $1,284,800Funding Sources (see Appendix)Trail Description:TrailDescription:pConnectivity:yEvaluation of Opportunities:ppEvaluation of Constraints:-F20-
Parkway Blvd.Parkway Blvd.Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanN. StateN. StateHighway 121Highway 121City ofCity ofLewisville, TXLewisville, TXDenton Creek ParkDenton Creek Park Trail (Cont.)N. Coppell Rd.Canyon Dr.Canyon Dr.Andrew Andrew Brown ParkBrown ParkMagnolia ParkMagnolia ParkDenton Creek Denton Creek Denton Creek Denton Creek Screening the junk yard will help trail Screening the junk yard will help trail users feel safer.users feel safer.The park like setting behind the apartments The park like setting behind the apartments provides a great place for area residents to provides a great place for area residents to access the regional Veloweb trail.access the regional Veloweb trail.Currently the trail reduces from 8-ft. Currently the trail reduces from 8-ft. to 4-ft. along Westminster Way, to to 4-ft. along Westminster Way, to 12- ft. down the drainage corridor.12- ft. down the drainage corridor.Trail connections to the future Denton Trail connections to the future Denton Creek Park will connect area residents.Creek Park will connect area residents.The trail along the scenic Denton Creek The trail along the scenic Denton Creek should avoid and protect mature trees.should avoid and protect mature trees.LegendPriority Trail (trail types and widths vary)Regional VelowebCommunity-Wide Spine TrailCommunity TrailTrail by Adjacent CityBridge CrossingArea to be Studied for ImplementationnTrail by AdjacenyjggBridge CrossingBridge CrossingArea to be StudA tbStdreDenton kreetkCCrreek rDenton ParkPark-F21-
Making Connections RealityCottonwood Creek TrailTrail Description:The Cottonwood Creek Trail will allow improved access to Coppell High School and Andrew Brown Park, as well as providing links between neighborhoods, schools and the City park system. The trail will provide much-needed area connectivity while avoiding pedestrian and vehicular confl icts.Neighborhood sidewalks located on both sides of Parkway Boulevard currently do not connect to the trail system in Andrew Brown Park or Coppell High School. The neighborhood sidewalk located on the south side of Parkway Boulevard splits west of the bridge crossing at Cottonwood Creek, providing access to the pedestrian underpass under the road, which currently doesn’t tie into any other trails or sidewalks. Since the pedestrian underpass is already in place, the neighborhood sidewalks on Parkway Boulevard’s north side can be connected to the south by benching a trail in the hillside just like one found on the south side of the road. Providing a trail connection to the high school will require a bridge across Cottonwood Creek. As with other future segments of this trail connection, an 8-foot wide trail is recommended. Additional information on this trail can be found in the Appendix.Connectivity:The Cottonwood Creek Trail provides one of the best opportunities for movement from one key city destina-tion to another in a confl ict-free pedestrian/vehicular environment. The trail would allow a safer route for chil-dren and adults from area neighborhoods and community parks to move between schools and the sporting events held at the high school. Local neighborhood walks should connect to the main trail for accessibility.First and foremost, this trail segment will link together Andrew Brown Park, two schools and multiple area neighborhoods. Longer term, this trail will provide additional connection to the east, down Parkway Bou-levard and to the west, down Cottonwood Creek to Wagon Wheel Park. The full length of the trail has the po-tential to link more key city destinations together than any other trail planned. The trail will link Wagon Wheel Park, Andrew Brown Park, the Town Center, community gardens, offi ces, retail, three schools and numerous disconnected neighborhoods.Evaluation of Opportunities:The key link needed to mitigate pedestrian and vehicular confl ict between the high school and Andrew Brown Park is the pedestrian underpass already in place under Parkway Boulevard along Cottonwood Creek. Along the north side of the high school, a wide cleared area along Cottonwood Creek provides a great opportunity for the community trail. The cul-de-sac located at the end of Winding Hollow Lane opens to the creek, where a bridge would be needed to connect the trail from the east side of the creek to the west.Evaluation of Constraints:Easements will need to be obtained from the Copperstone HOA for connections south of the creek, as well as from two landowners in Cottonwood Estates. The open space located in the open-ended cul-de-sac on Winding Hollow Lane has a shared property boundary with the two adjacent land owners. A fl oodway and a drainage easement exist over the open space as well as a 15-foot utility easement connection to the street right-of-way. The trail spur to the front of the high school will require an easement from the Coppell Indepen-dent School District (CISD).At the high school’s northwest corner, the fence line comes very close to the high bank of a bend in Cotton-wood Creek. A cantilevered boardwalk could be used to make the short connection needed.Trail Type:Community TrailTrail Length:Main Trail: Approx. 3,100 feet Spur: Approx. 700 feet Total = Approx. 3,800 feetRecommended Trail Width:8-10 feetType of Surface:ConcreteRecommended Features:Locator maps, mile markers, benches, bicycle racks, litter recep-tacles, dog waste pickup stations, lightingResponsibility for Implementation:City of Coppell Parks & Recre-ation, EngineeringCost Estimate (see Appendix):Approx. Total = $387,300Funding Sources (see Appendix)Connectivity:yTrail Description:Trail DescriptionpEvaluation of Constraints:Evaluation of Opportunities:pp-F22-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanCoppell High Coppell High SchoolSchoolW. Parkway Blvd.Andrew Brown Andrew Brown ParkParkElementaryCottonwood Creek Trail (Cont.)W. Parkway Blvd.W. Parkway Blvd.Minyard Dr.Minyard Dr.Winding Hollow Ln.Winding Hollow Ln.kway Blvd.ay Blkway Blvd.Martel Ln.Martel Ln.Cottonwood CreekCottonwood CreekCommunity-Wide Trails Implementation PlanC it Wid T il I l t ti PlOpen-ended cul-de-sac on Winding Hollow Ln. Open-ended cul-de-sac on Winding Hollow Ln. will connect neighborhood walks to the trail.will connect neighborhood walks to the trail.Cottonwood Estate residents own to the centerline Cottonwood Estate residents own to the centerline of the creek, and some have horses fenced in . of the creek, and some have horses fenced in . Wide unobstructed open space between the Wide unobstructed open space between the high school and Cottonwood Creek.high school and Cottonwood Creek.The northwest corner of the high school prop-The northwest corner of the high school prop-erty comes close to the high bank of the creek.erty comes close to the high bank of the creek.WWWSouth side of Parkway Blvd. already has con-South side of Parkway Blvd. already has con-nection to the pedestrian underpass.nection to the pedestrian underpass.Pedestrian underpass under Parkway Blvd.Pedestrian underpass under Parkway Blvd.LegendPriority Trail (trail types and widths vary)Community TrailBridge CrossingArea to be Studied for Implementation-F23-
Making Connections RealityGrapevine Springs Park TrailTrail Description:The scenic Grapevine Creek snakes its way through most of this trail corridor. With dense vegetation and large mature trees, this very scenic trail corridor provides a great opportunity to develop a trail system benefi t-ing the whole community. The redevelopment of Old Town Coppell, the Coppell Farmers Market and the re-cently completed senior center adjacent to the park will all benefi t from connections being made to W. Bethel Road. The segment of Grapevine Spring Park Trail that is located along Freeport Parkway and Wrangler Drive is part of the Community-Wide Spine Trail system and should be 10 feet in width. The other trail seg-ments along Grapevine Creek are Community Trails and only need to be 8 feet wide. Additional information on this trail can be found in the Appendix.Connectivity:The priority of this trail is to provide linkage along West Bethel Road, which is under design/construction. The trail will also connect to the key City destinations and neighborhoods along Grapevine Springs Park, Pinkerton Elementary and Coppell Middle School West, as well as to the many employment centers in the area. The Grapevine Springs Park Trail connects to many pertinent City destinations, and at the same time provides connections to many destinations from other Community Trails, Community-Wide Spine Trail and regional Veloweb trails. All neighborhood sidewalks should connect into this trail at as many points as possible.Evaluation of Opportunities:A network of decomposed granite (DG) walking paths currently makes its way around the historic Grapevine Springs Park for the western fork of this trail system. Great measures should be taken to protect the char-acter, history and feel of this park. For this reason, the eastern fork of this trail system is intended to be the main connection between W. Bethel Road and the Cotton Belt Line. This segment can be concrete or DG and should be 8 feet in width. Connections made from the existing DG trails within the park to the eastern fork should respect the park character and continue in DG material.Evaluation of Constraints:The boundaries for Grapevine Springs Park do not extend to W. Bethel Road for the western fork, but begin at the cul-de-sac head of Park Street. A couple of pedestrian bridges will be needed to cross Grapevine Creek as it snakes its way through the park, as well as at Southwestern Boulevard to provide access to Pinkerton Elementary. Even though planning for the future DART line along the Cotton Belt has not taken place, coordination with DART will be needed for the pedestrian underpass along Grapevine Creek. This connection is needed to con-tinue this trail south under the Cotton Belt rail line. Access from the future Cotton Belt Trail to the Grapevine Springs Park Trail should be considered and planned for concurrently. A topographic survey of the trail corridor will be needed to understand and address any topographic con-straints along the creek bank’s edge. The creek’s north side appears to provide the best opportunity due to its gentler slopes and minimal need for bridge crossings. Larger trees should be avoided and clearing should be kept to a minimum in order to preserve the corridor’s natural character. Although a scenic creek corridor, this trail has some areas retained by individual property owners, and ease-ments will have to be obtained from those property owners between the Cotton Belt and Southwestern Blvd., and along Freeport Parkway and Wrangler Drive. When obtaining easements along these two roads, it is recommended to obtain enough to allow for trees to be planted on both sides of the trail.Trail Type:Community Trail & Community-Wide Spine TrailTrail Length:Community Trail: Approx. 9,900 feetCommunity-Wide Spine Trail: Approx. 3,100 feet Total: Approx. 13,000 ft. (2.5 mi.)Recommended Trail Width:8 feet and 10 feetType of Surface:Decomposed Granite (DG) within historic Grapevine Springs Park, Concrete elsewhereRecommended Features:Locator maps, mile mark-ers, shade shelters, benches, bicycle racks, litter receptacles, dog waste pickup stationsResponsibility for Implementation:City of Coppell Parks & Recre-ation, EngineeringCost Estimate (see Appendix):Approx. Total = $1,046,000Funding Sources (see Appendix)Trail Description:TilD itipConnectivity:yEvaluation of Opportunities:ppEvaluation of Constraints:-F24-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanFreeport Parkw ayFreeport ParkwayGrapevine CreekGrapevine CreekS. Denton Tap Rd.S. Denton Tap Rd.GrapevineSprings ParkGrapevine Springs Park Trail (Cont.)S. Coppell Rd.Airline Dr.Airline Dr.S. Belt Line Rd.S. Belt Line Rd.
North LakeNorth Lake
Wrangler Dr.Southwestern Blvd.owwuthwestern Blvdohwestern Blvd.uthwestern ouBlvd.Cotton Belt LineCotton Belt LinePinkertonPinkertonElementaryElementaryCoppell Middle Coppell Middle School West & School West & Service CenterService CenterW. Bethel Rd.S. S. CoppellCoppellFarmersFarmersMarketMarketSeniorSeniorCenterCenterkkPark St.Park St.Special care and attention should be taken to Special care and attention should be taken to preserve the unique character of the park.preserve the unique character of the park.The crossing of and future trail connection to the The crossing of and future trail connection to the Cotton Belt should be coordinated with DART.Cotton Belt should be coordinated with DART.The Grapevine Creek trail corridor will need The Grapevine Creek trail corridor will need some brush clearing, but should avoid mature some brush clearing, but should avoid mature tress as much as possible.tress as much as possible.Wrangler Dr. and Freeport Ave. have large Wrangler Dr. and Freeport Ave. have large landscape reserves ideal for a trail system .landscape reserves ideal for a trail system .LegendPriority Trail (trail types and widths vary)Regional VelowebLake TrailCommunity-Wide Spine TrailCommunity TrailBridge CrossingArea to be Studied for Implementation-F25-
Making Connections RealityNorth Lake College Connector TrailTrail Description:An addition to the newly built North Lake College in the western part of the City, this trail provides a logical means for connections from many parts of the City. No walks from the east currently connect to the college, so providing a trail connection to the college would also unite several major employment destinations, all benefi tting from trails. Additional information on this trail can be found in the Appendix.Connectivity:A Community Trail located on the south side of West Sandy Lake Road creates an opportunity to provide a direct connection between the college and the Community-Wide Spine Trail system at West Sandy Lake Road and Freeport Parkway. This trail will provide a more complete system, linking it to many key City destinations. Serving as an east/west connection between Royal Lane and Freeport Parkway, two important north/south trails, this trail provides the opportunity for a future connection to Grapevine, however no trail connection is currently planned for by Grapevine at this time. Evaluation of Opportunities:An existing 8-foot-wide trail coming from the east is located on the south side of the road, however it currently ends at the intersection of West Sandy Lake Road and Freeport Parkway. Since there are large landscaped reserves along the road, an 8-foot concrete trail should extend and continue along the road’s south side. This will serve to improve access to the college for both walking and cycling use.Evaluation of Constraints:The landscaped reserve area along West Sandy Lake Road currently contains obstacles such as power poles, fi re hydrants, street signs and, occasionally, minor grading issues. Many trees have been planted in these reserves. Because this corridor includes predominantly industrial-use buildings that are in good shape but lacking architectural character, the preservation of trees planted in the reserve should be a priority. Such landscape amenities will visually screen portions of the buildings and help soften the scale of the long facades. When trail alignment presents unavoidable confl icts with existing trees, care should be taken to relocate them to other locations within the corridor.In order to avoid obstacles and make for the best use and location of the trail in the landscaped reserve, an easement will need to be obtained from the businesses and the college.Trail Type:Community TrailTrail Length:Approx. 3,700 feetRecommended Trail Width:8 feetType of Surface:ConcreteRecommended Features:Signalized crossing at Freeport Parkway and S. Royal Lane. Cross-walk striping or brick banding at all other intersectionsResponsibility for Implementation:City of Coppell Parks & Recre-ation, EngineeringCost Estimate (see Appendix):Approx. Total = $254,200Funding Sources (see Appendix)Connectivity:yTrail Description:pEvaluation of Opportunities:ppEvaluation of Constraints:-F26-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanS. State Highway 121ghway 121ay 12ghway 121City ofCity ofGrapevine, TXGrapevine, TXW. Sandy Lake Rd.W. Sandy Lake Rd.North Lake CollegeNorth Lake CollegeThe existing 8-ft. trail coming from the east The existing 8-ft. trail coming from the east ending at Freeport Parkway.ending at Freeport Parkway.North Lake College Connector Trail (Cont.)N. Coppell Rd.N. Coppell Rd.S. Royal Ln.S. Royal Ln.
Northpoint Dr.Northpoint Dr.
Freeport Pkwy.Freeport Pkwy.The recently completed North Lake College is The recently completed North Lake College is one of the key city destinations.one of the key city destinations.Typical obstacles found in the landscaped Typical obstacles found in the landscaped reserves include power poles, fi re hydrants, reserves include power poles, fi re hydrants, trees, and road signs.trees, and road signs.Currently, no walk exists along W. Sandy Lake Currently, no walk exists along W. Sandy Lake Road connecting the rest of the city to the North Road connecting the rest of the city to the North Lake College. This location presents a potential Lake College. This location presents a potential connection point for Grapevine in the future.connection point for Grapevine in the future.Some of the landscaped reserves have been Some of the landscaped reserves have been graded to convey water, and will have to be graded to convey water, and will have to be addressed when constructing the trail.addressed when constructing the trail.LegendPriority Trail (trail types and widths vary)Community-Wide Spine TrailCommunity TrailArea to be Studied for ImplementationCommunity-WidCitTCommunity TraArea to be Stud-F27-
Making Connections RealityWagon Wheel - Jr. College Connector TrailTrail Description:Wagon Wheel Park currently has a 12-foot-hike and bike trail that connects the park’s eastern and western portions. Recreational opportunities exist on both sides of the park, with the existing hike and bike trail traveling through a scenic and natural area where Cottonwood Creek meanders. Wagon Wheel Park is one of the key destinations for Coppell residents. This is a logical choice for the Community-Wide Trails to tie into the existing trail, providing a more complete and contiguous trail system. These trails are intended to serve a primarily recreational use, but will also serve as a connector to the junior college. The eastern trail segment should be 10 feet to 12 feet in width to accommodate both walking and cycling use. This width will also allow for expected capacity needed for its connection into the Community-Wide Spine Trail system. The western trail segment will only require 8 feet width to accommodate user capacity to the junior college while still allowing walking and cycling use. Additional information on this trail can be found in the Appendix.Connectivity:Of the two trail segments, the eastern segment is intended to continue the existing 12-foot trail out to Freeport Parkway. At this point, the trail will tie into the 10-foot-wide Community-Wide Spine Trail along Freeport Parkway that is currently under design as of Fall 2009. This portion of the trail will complete a critical link of the Community-Wide Spine Trail system and provide the missing link to a proposed trailhead located on the park’s western side. The western segment of trail will provide connectivity to North Lake College and the North Lake College Connector Trail at West Sandy Lake Road. The western trail segment will also provide con-nections into the trail continuation along Royal Lane, ultimately tying into the Cotton Belt Trail to the south.Evaluation of Opportunities:Wagon Wheel Park is the second-largest park in the City and a key City destination for a multitude of different recreational activities and events. This trail segment presents a grand opportunity to connect the community to the park through the Community-Wide Trails. The completion of these two trail segments will serve both to improve park access and provide a link between area neighbor-hoods, employment centers and educational opportunities located on the western edge of the city.Lighting for the trail should complement the character found on the existing trail. A trailhead is recommended to be placed within Wagon Wheel Park. Parking is available on both the eastern and western portions of the park, but with closer proximity to employment and greater trail direction op-portunities, the western part of the park is recommended.Evaluation of Constraints:The western trail segment will require working with the junior college to expand the existing 4-foot walk along South Royal Lane. An easement will also be required from the businesses along the rest of this trail. At the entry to the park, there is an opportunity to take the trail in through the trees, but large trees should be avoided.Trail Type:East: Community-Wide Spine West: Community TrailTrail Length: East: Approx. 2,000 feet West: Approx. 3,500 feet Total: Approx. 5,500 feetRecommended Trail Width:East: 10-12 feet West: 8 feetType of Surface:ConcreteRecommended Features:Crosswalk striping or brick banding at intersections, trailhead, locator maps, mile markers, benches, bicycle racks, litter receptacles, dog waste pickup stations, water fountains, lightingResponsibility for Implementation:City of Coppell Parks & Recre-ation, EngineeringCost Estimate (see Appendix):Approx. Total = $437,000Funding Sources (see Appendix)Connectivity:yTrail Description:pEvaluation of Opportunities:ppEvaluation of Constraints:-F28-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation Planmentation PlanWagon Wheel Park cur-Wagon Wheel Park cur-rently has a 12-foot hike rently has a 12-foot hike and bike trail that con-and bike trail that con-nects the east and west nects the east and west sides of the park together sides of the park together through a scenic natural through a scenic natural area crossing Cottonwood area crossing Cottonwood Creek. Connecting this Creek. Connecting this trail segment to the rest of trail segment to the rest of the community-wide trails the community-wide trails is of high priority.is of high priority.Creekview DriveCreekview DriveWagon Wheel ParkWagon Wheel ParkFreeport ParkwayFreeport Parkway
Future Creekview-Future Creekview-Bethel TrailBethel TrailCoppell Nature Coppell Nature Park TrailPark TrailWagon Wheel - Jr. College Connector Trail - East (Cont.)One of the key destinations One of the key destinations within the park off the Cop-within the park off the Cop-pell Natural Park Trail is a pell Natural Park Trail is a boardwalk and overlook of boardwalk and overlook of the creek in a very scenic the creek in a very scenic setting.setting.Besides the many recre-Besides the many recre-ational opportunities that ational opportunities that Wagon Wheel Park offers, Wagon Wheel Park offers, many events also take many events also take place that range from small place that range from small to large gatherings.to large gatherings.Cottonwood CreekCottonwood CreekLegendPriority Trail (trail types and widths vary)Community-Wide Spine TrailCommunity TrailArea to be Studied for ImplementationCommunity-WidCitTCommunity TraArea to be Stud-F29-
Making Connections RealityS. Royal Ln.S. Royal Ln.Wagon Wheel ParkWagon Wheel ParkWagon Wheel - Jr. College Connector Trail - West (Cont.)W. Sandy Lake Rd.W. Sandy Lake Rd.Northpoint Dr.Northpoint Dr.North LakeNorth LakeCollegeCollegeProposed Proposed TrailheadTrailheadThe 4-foot walk along the east side of North Lake College The 4-foot walk along the east side of North Lake College needs to be upgraded to an 8-foot walk to accommodate needs to be upgraded to an 8-foot walk to accommodate both bicyclists and pedestrians.both bicyclists and pedestrians.The east and west sides of Royal Lane have minor con-The east and west sides of Royal Lane have minor con-straints that generally have to do with grade change, sig-straints that generally have to do with grade change, sig-nage, and existing landscaping.nage, and existing landscaping.Particular attention to pedestrian safety at street intersec-Particular attention to pedestrian safety at street intersec-tions should be taken to make vehicles aware and cau-tions should be taken to make vehicles aware and cau-tious of trail users.tious of trail users.LegendPriority Trail (trail types and widths vary)Community-Wide Spine TrailCommunity TrailArea to be Studied for ImplementationCommunity-WidCitTCommunity TraArea to be Stud-F30-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanG. Summary...-G1-
Making Connections RealitySummaryCREATING HEALTHY HABITS BY BUILDING HEALTHY COMMUNITIES“With the emphasis on health and fi t-ness in today's society, trails are be-coming just as important as streets and sidewalks in our communities. Offering people a place to walk, run or ride that encourages them to con-nect with nature is a valuable benefi t that is relatively inexpensive to pro-vide.” - American Trails OrganizationIt is not a niche market that desires trails but, rather, an under-tapped mass market, according to a 2005 survey of potential home buyers by Brook Warrick of American Lives.• 92% want low-traffi c areas • 79% want walking and biking paths• 78% want natural open space• Only 22% want a golf course within the community.The development of the Community-Wide Trails Implementation Plan was set in motion by The 2030 Vision for Coppell. Its purpose is to ensure that Coppell’s high quality of life will be maintained while still allowing for growth in the City and the region, as well as to formulate strategies to manage future opportunities and challenges. If done correctly, the implementation of a city-wide trail system can play a vital role in Coppell residents’ individual well-being, local economy and environment while also providing traffi c congestion relief.The Community-Wide Trails Implementation Plan is the culmination of a long planning process that has included an in-depth analysis of trail routes, public workshop and survey, Park Board presentations and guid-ance, and coordination with the Parks and Recreation and Engineering Services Departments. Goals were established and modifi ed based on community input received, and this input formed the framework under which the trails’ master plan was prepared. Safe, convenient and well-designed facilities are essential to encouraging trail use, and, just as important, to creating a complete and connected system of on-street, off-street and end-of-trip facilities. Trail design should be a thoughtful process that studies user types, trail use purpose, environmental conditions, and con-siderations of grade, interesting features, gentle trail meandering and privacy issues.When completed, the Coppell trails system will link many neighborhood communities and provide connec-tions to many key City destinations. By providing access to a wide array of retail, parks, schools, neighbor-hoods and other key City destinations, the trail system will establish a network of connections useful to many Coppell citizens. The system will enable outdoor enthusiasts to appreciate all that Coppell has to offer. Con-nections to existing and planned trails will encourage recreational use as well as bicycle commuting, as safer bicycle networks are established and expanded.Implementation of the Coppell trails network will rely on cooperation among property owners as well as continued cooperation from local, regional, state and federal agencies with jurisdiction over planned trail cor-ridors.The appendices contain additional information on those trails deemed priority as well as more detail on the funding sources available and cost estimates of what each trail may cost to implement. Full-size trails maps and aerials have also been included. This information has been provided in electronic format on a compact disc for easy duplication, storage and access.-G2-
Community-Wide Trails Implementation PlanH. Appendix...-H1-
Making Connections RealityAppendix ContentAerial Photographs - full sizePhotos of Opportunities and ConstraintsAdjacent Recorded PlatsPlats• Aerials• Site Photos• General Cost Estimates• Funding Sources Available• Trail Master Plan Maps• Trail Amenities• The compact disc included with this report contains additional information and details obtained during the investigating of top-priority trails. This information is in addition to that in section F. Priority Trail Implementa-tion and will aid in the preliminary investigation of trail implementation, but further study and analysis will be needed for actual design and detailed cost estimates.“Nature makes nothing in vain.” - Aristotle-H2-
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
City Secretary
February 23, 2010
13
✔
PRESENTATION
Presentation regarding City Ordinance Nos. 2006-1142 and 2007-1175 which pertain to automated red light
enforcement as requested by citizen, Venky Venkatraman.
This item has been placed on the agenda pursuant to Section 3.12 of the Home Rule Charter. All backup items
attached to this item have been submitted by Mr. Venkatraman except Ordinance Nos. 2006-1142 and 2997-1175
which have been included by the City Secretary for the convenience of Council.
%venky
CITIZEN'S REQUEST FOR A CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PRESENTATION
Please be advised that this form must be completed and received in the City
Secretary's office in order to be scheduled on an upcoming regular City Council
Agenda. Council Meetings are held the second and fourth Tuesday of each month.
1. Citizen NamelAddressPTelephone #: \/EN KY ~JKAT~?
kt ~Gl+he~ DUIVG rbfisi-c r~ 75311 f4~7)766*6-1'f~~
Date of Council Meeting Desired: FF~ 23. 204 o
Topic of Presentation: r- A hn I N wCliJ flo: z007-)17r
N o 2004- f142
4. Copies of ALL documents relative to the topic to be presented must be attached.
Please indicate the number of pages attached hereto:
5. Objective: What are you requesting of the Council at this time? This should
include an answer to the question: Why do you want to address Council at this
time?
Note: There is no guarantee that a request for a specific Council Meeting agenda
can be met as the city of Coppen Home Rule Charter allows the discretion of the
City Manager to postpone up to one meeting depending on the amount of necessary
business already on the Council's agenda.
The City Council determines the length of time allotted for each citizen agenda
presentation.
This form, completed in full, a copy of the presentation or a presentation outline and
all backup documentation must be in the City Secretary's office no later than 10:OO
a.m. on the Monday of the preceding week before the scheduled Council Meeting (8
days). Documents will be included in Council packets, which are distributed prior
to the meeting.
If you have any questions regarding this form, please contact the City Secretary at
(972) 304-3670.
RED LIGHT APPEALS IN COPPELL MUNICIPAL COURT
Appeal - Red Light Photo Enforcement Program
The imposition of a civil penalty for violation of Proceeding into Intersection on Red
Light (photographic traff~c signal enforcement system) is not a conviction and may not be
considered a conviction for any purpose.
The ordinauce allows a person found liable and assessed a civil penalty after an
administrative adjudication hearing may contest or appeal a finding of civil liability.
A Notice of Appeal Petition must be filed with the clerk of the Coppell Municipal Court
No.1 not later than the thirty-fist (31") day after an administrative adjudication hearing
officer enters a finding of liability for a civil penalty. Payment of the Appellate filing fee
of $50 required by law for the court must be filed with the clerk of the court.
To postpone (stay) enforcement and collection of a civil penalty during an appeal, a
notarized Statement of Personal Financial Obligation Bond in the amount of the civil
penalty and administrative hearing costs [and any late fees] must be filed with your
Notice of Appeal Petition.
The clerk will set your case for a trial de novo before the municipal judge. The municipal
court has exclusive appellate jurisdiction.
If you fail to timely pay a civil penalty imposed after an appeal, an arrest warrant may not
be issued, and the imposition of a civil penalty may not be recorded on your driving
record. The county assessor-collector or the Texas Department of Transportation may
refuse to register the motor vehicle alleged to have been involved in the violation or the
city attorney may file suit to enforce collection of the civil penalty.
If you require additional information, you may seek advice from an attorney.
Red Light Appeal Infonation
wnSm7rc
SafeUG
Coppell
Administrative ~djudicatwn Hearing
ORDER
DATE OF HEARING: 1/12/2010 DATE OF VIOLATION: 11/10/2009
NOTICE OF VIOLATION NUMBER: CPR0026485
NAME ON VIOLATION NOTICE (L/F/M): VENKATRAMAN, VENKY
NAME(S) APPEARING AT HEARING: Same as person named on violation notice
EVIDENCE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW: Redflex digital images and video
DETERMINATION:
signed administrative adjudication hearing officer hereby finds the
in the notice of violation:
ULIABLE in violation of City of Coppell Ordinance No. 20061142, for a civil
penalty in the amount of $75.00 plus administrative adjudication hearing costs in the
amount of $25.00, for a TOTAL DUE OF $100.00. The civil venaltv and the
administrative adiudication he& fee are due within 35 days &om the hearing. The
above-named person also has 3 days to file an appeal with the Clerk of the Coppell
Municipal Court. If payment is not received within 31 days after the status has been
updated to found liable, a $25.00 late penalty fee will be assessed and the person will be
subject to collections (for the civil penalty, administrative adjudication hearing fee and
late payment penalty) 90 days &om the date of issue of the original notice of the above-
referenced date, unless proper appeal is made as provided by ordinance.
--------------
LIABLE (FAILED TO APPEAR) -
- NOT LIABLE
Administrative Adjudication Hearing Officer
City of Coppell
Post 09/01/2007
SafeUGHP
Coppell
Administrative ~djudication Hearing
RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS
You have been found liable in violation of City of Coppell Ordinance No. 2006-
1142 by the administrative adjudication hearing officer. You have the following rights
and obligations at this point:
Payment
You shall pay the total civil penalty and administrative adjudication hearing costs
of $100.00 within 31 days of the administrative adjudication hearing. To make proper
payment, you must follow the instructions included with your Notice of Violation on how
and where to make payment.
OR
' Appeal
You have the right to appeal the finding of civil liability made in the
administrative adjudication hearing to the municipal court of the City of Coppell by filing
a notice of appeal with the clerk of the municipal court at 130 Town Center Blvd.,
Coppell, Texas, 75019. The notice of appeal must be filed not later than the 3 1" day after
the date on which the administrative adjudication hearing officer entered the finding of
civil liability and must be accompanied by the appellant fiimg fee required by the court.
- Late Fee and Collections
Please note, if you do not make timely payment or perfect a proper appeal within
3 1 days after the date on which the administrative adjudication hearing officer entered the
fmding of civil liability, you shall be subject to a lak payment penal& in the amount of
$25.00. Furthermore, you will be subject to collections 90 days from the date your
Notice of Violation was issued to you. The City of Coppell also has the option to notify
the county assessor-collector or the Texas Department of Transportation if the owner of a
motor vehicle is delinquent in the payment of a civil penalty assessed for violation of a
photo red light enforcement ordinance. The county assessor-collector or the Texas
Department of Transportation may refuse to register a motor vehicle alleged to have been
involved in the violation.
Post 09/01/2007
CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS
NOTICE OF VIOLATI~N
REDFLEX CUSTOMER SERVICE INFORMATION
,Customer Service Center For Citizens
Main: 1-866-527-9470
Fax: 972-422-7917
To Dav a violation bv mail. the address is:
Customer Service Center
P.O. Box 850837 I
Richardson, TX 75085-0837
or
SafeLight Coppell Payme t Center
P.O. Box 76898 1
Cleveland, OH 44101-65010
To Dav a violation in ~hrson:
Dallas / Collin County Area:
1721 W. Plano Parkway 1
STE# 105
Plano, TX 75075 I
(W. Plano Parkway between Custer and US 75lCentral Expressway)
Tarrant County Area: 1
7018 Baker Boulevard
Richland Hills, Texas 76118
The Customer Service center hours are from 8am to 5pm Monday through
Friday. They are closed n normal holidays. i'
To view vour violaban or to make an * I on-line Davment the website
--
address IS;
w~~.photornc~rn - - - -
----
The City Code is: COPPEL (six characters only)
I
If you have a violation, the video is available on-line for 60 days from the date of
the violation. I
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CI
ORDINANCE NO. 2007-1175 1
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CIV OF COPPELL, TEXAS.
AMENDING ARTICLE 8-8, SEFTION 8-8-2, SUBSECTION C,
REGARDING THE MAXIMUM CIVIL PENALTY FOR THE
ClVlL INFRACTION FOR AN UTOMATED RED LIGHT 4 ENFORCEMENT VIOLATION, BY AMENDING SECTION 8-8-4,
SUBSECTION A, TO ADD A PROVISION FOR THE HEARING
OFFICER TO BE ABLE TO ADMINISTER OATHS AND ISSUE
ORDERS; BY AMENDING SEFTION 8-85 REGARDING THE
USE OF ClVlL PENALTY FUWDS FOR SUCH VIOLATION, BY
ADDING A NEW SECTION -7 PROVIDING FOR THE USE OF
PHOTOGRAPHIC TRAFFIC IGNAL ENFORCEMENT IMAGES;
PROVlDlNGA REPEALING '7 LAUSE, PROVIDING A
SEVERABlLlN CLAUSE; PRDVIDING A SJ\LLNGS CLAUSE.
I WHEREAS
the City has duly adopted an automated red light enforcement
ordinance; and I
th 1
WHEREAS,
the 80 le~islature of the Stateof Texas has ~rovided for an
amendment to the TranspoT Code regarding photographic trafk signal enforcement
systems concerning the maxi urn c~vil penalty which may be charged and the use of
such funds and photographicimages; and
WHEREAS, i
the City Council is of the opinion that it should amend its ord~nance
to reflect the changes in the qtate law
NOW THEREFORE BE IT 0 DAlNED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
COPPELL, TEXAS. THAT:
SECTION 1. 1
That Article 8-8, Section 8-89, subsection C, of the Code of
Ordinances be, and the Sam is, hereby amended to read as follows:
"ARTICLE 8-8. AUTOMATE8 RED LIGHT ENFORCEMENT
Page I
TM 18325.2.000
' PiR1.iCLE 8-8. AUTOMATED RE4 LIGHT ENFORCEMENT Page I of 4
ARTICLE 8-8. AUTOMATED REb LIGHT ENFORCEMENT
Sec. 8-8-1. Definitions. 1
In this article:
Department of the City of Coppell, Texas.
Owner means the owner of a as shown on the motor vehicle registration records of the
Texas Department of the analogous department or agency of another state or country.
The term "owner" a motor vehicle under a lease of six months or more, or (ii) the
lessee of a motor vehicle rented or lkased from a motor vehicle rental or leasing company, but does not
include the motor vehicle rental or leasing company itself.
Photographic traflc monitoring syytem means a system that:
(1) Consists of a camera and vehi sensor installed to work in conjunction with an electrically
operated traffic control signal; and
(2) Is capable of producing at recorded images that depict the license plate attached to the rear
of a motor vehicle that is not opera ed in compliance with the instructions of the traffic control signal. t Recorded image means an image r corded by a photographic traffic monitoring system that depicts the
rear of a motor vehicle and is autoqatically recorded on a photograph or digital image.
System locafion means the approaffih to an intersection toward which a photographic traffic monitoring
system is chrected an in operation. I
Traffic control signal means a tra$lc control device that displays alternating red, amber and green lights
that directs traffic when to stop at or proceed through an intersection.
(Ord. No. 2006-1 142,s 1,lO-24-0 ) P
Sec. 6-8-2. Imposition of civil perlaity for creating dangerous intersections.
A. The city council finds and de nnines that a vehicle that proceeds into an intersection when the
traffic control signal for that vehic e's direction of travel is emitting a steady red signal damages the 1 public endangering vehicle operat rs and pedestrians alike, by decreasing the efficiency of traffic
control and traffic flow efforts, an by increasing the number of serious accidents to which public safety
agencies must respond at the expe se of the taxpayers.
B. The owner of a motor vehicle s liable for a civil penalty if the vehicle proceeds into an intersection
al a system location when the ic control signal for that vehicle's direction of travel is emitting a
steady red signal. 1
C. A civil or administrative pen ty for violation of this article shall be $75.00.
(Ord. No. 2006-1 142,g I, 10-24- 6; Ord. No. 2007-1175,g 1,7-24-07) d I
Sec. 8-8-3.
A. The department is the enforcement and administration of this article.
B. In order to impose this article, the department, or its designee, shall mail or
cause to be mailed a owner of the motor vehicle liable for the civil penalty not
later than the 30th day after the d te the violation is alleged to have occurred to:
(1) The owner's address as sho on the registration records of the Texas Department of
'Transportation; or
1
(2) If the vehicle is registered in another state or country, the owner's address as shown on the motor
behcie registration records of td department or agency of the other state or country analogous to the
Texas Department of ~rans~ortatkon.
C. A notice of violation issued this article shall contain the following:
(1) A description of the
(2) The location of the intersection where the violation occurred;
(3) The date and time of the vio/ation;
(4) The name and address of th owner of the vehicle involved in the violation; 'i
:~RTICLE 8-8. AUTOMATED 4 LIGHT ENFORCEMENT Page 2 of 4
(5) 'fie registration number d on the license plate of the vehicle involved in the violation;
(4) A copy of a recorded e vehicle involved in the violation that depicts the registration
number displayed on the license platb of that vehicle.
(7) The amount of the civil penalty /to be imposed for the violation;
(8) The date by which the civil penalty must be paid;
(9) A statement that a recorded in&e is evidence in a proceeding for the imposition of a civil penalty;
(10) Information that informs the pkrson named in the notice of violation;
(a) Of the person's right to contest e imposition of the civil penalty against the person in an
administrative adjudication; ?
(b) Of the manner and time in whi4h imposition of the civil penalty may be contested;
(c) Thar failure to pay the civil peyty or contest liability in a timely manner is an admission of
liability and that failure to appear at an admiistrative adjudication hearing after having requested a
hearing is an admission of liability; , I
(d) That failure to pay the civil peqalty within the time allowed shall result in the imposition of a late-
paynent fee of $25.00; and
(1 1) A statement, if at the time place of the violation the vehicle was being operated by a person
other than the owner; if the a natural person, the owner may transfer liability for the violation to
the person who was operating the vthicle at that time and place if the owner submits to the City by
affidavit, on a form provided by thd city, or under oath at an administrative adjudication hearing the
name and current address of the pejson:
(a) Operating the vehicle at the *e and place of the violation;
{b) Who was the lessee of the at the time of the violation, if the vehicle was rented or leased
from a person in the business or leasing motor vehicles at that time; or
(c) Who was the subsequent owdr of the motor vehicle, if ownership of the vehicle was transferred by
the owner before the time of the vi4lation.
D. .4 notice of violation under article is presumed to have been received on the 5th day after the
date the notice of violation is
E. In lieu of issuing a notice the department may mail a warning notice to the owner, that,
in addition to any other in the warning notice, must contain the Information
required by subsection
t Ord. No. 2006-1
Sec. 8-8-4. Administrative adjudiiation hearing
A. A person who received a notide of violation under this article may contest the imposition of the civil
penalty by requesting in writing aq administrative adjudication of the civil penalty withiin the time
provided in the notice (which period shall not be less than 15 days following the mailing of the notice).
Uvon receivt of the reauest. the ddvartment shall notifv the Derson of the date and time of the hearing: on
the adrmnistrative adjldication. de admiistrative adjudicAion hearing shall be held before a hearing
officer appointed by the city mandeer. Such hearing officer shall have the authority to administer oaths
and to issue witnesses and production of documents.
to contest liability within 15 days following the date of the notice is
in the notice of violation and
having requested a hearing is an
in the notice of violation and
D. A person who fails to pay a civil penalty withii the time allowed under this article shall be
additionally liable for a late payqent penalty in the amount of $25 00.
E. The civil penalty shall not be assessed if:
(1) After a hearing, the hearing 4fficer enters a finding of no liability; or
(7) Within the time prescribed the notice of violation, the person against whom the civil penalty is to
I
'6 orlr-r c a-a AI TTOMATFS WD LIGHJ ENFORCEMEKT Page 3 of 4 evidence of the facts contamed ereln, an 1s ~nma facle evlaence 01 urc: vlulartvl~ uclrsbu ... -- ..---.
1 -
of violation.
H. It shafl be an affirmative defenge to liability under this article, to be proven by apreponderance of
the evidence, that;
(1) The iraffic-control signal was ot in proper position and sufficiently legible to an ordinarily
observant person; I
(2) The operator of the motor was acting in compliance with the lawful order or direction of a
police officer;
(3) he operator of the motor violated the instructions of the traffi~-control signal so as to yield
the right-of-way to an authorized emergency vehicle;
(4) The motor authorized emergency vehicle under Chapter 546 of the
Texas was acting in compliance with that chapter;
operated by aperson other than the owner of the
the violation was a stolen plate and being
for which the plate had been issued,
than the owner of the vehicle; or
was being operated by a person other
unusually hazardous road conditions
under the circumstances than non-
I. To demonstrate that at the time of & violation the motar vehicle was a stolen vehicle or the license
piate displayed on the motor vehide was a stolen plate, the owner must submit proof acceptable to the
hearing officer that the theft of tN vehicle or license plate had been timely reported to the appropriate
law enforcement agency.
J. Notwithstanding to the contrary, a person who fails to pay the amount of a
civil penalty or to contest manner is entitled to an administrative adjudication
hearing on the violation if;
(1) The person files an affidavit 'th the hearing officer stating the date on which the person received
the notice of violation that was qed to the pemn; and
(2) Within the same period requikd by section 8-8-4(A) for a hearing to be timely requested but
measured from the date the mail4 notice was received as stated in the affidavit fired under subdivision
(1) of this subsection, the person &quests an administrative adjudication hearing.
K. A person who is found liable her an admhistrative adjudication hearing may appeal that finding of
liability to the municipal court by fling a notice of appeal with the clerk of the municipal court. The
notice of appeal must be filed not larer than the 31st day afler the d& on which the administrative
adjudication hearing officer enter 1 d the findings of liability and shall be accompanied by the payment of
I
II
'.ARTICLE 8-8. AUTOMATED RED LIGHT ENFORCEMENT Page 4 of 4
an appellate filing fee of $50.00. Unless the person, on or before the filing of the notice of appeal, posts
a bond in the amount of the civil pedalty and any late fees, an appeal does not stay the enforcement of
the civil penalty. An appeal shall be determined by the municipal court by trial de novo. The affidavits
submitted under section 8-8-3(11) shll be admitted by the municipal judge in the trial de novo, and the
issues must be proved by a preponderance of the evidence.
(Ord. No. 2006-1142, $ l,10-24-06; Ord. No. 2007-1175, § 2,7-24-07)
Sec. 8-8-5. Effect of liability; exclu~ion of civil remedy; enforcement.
A. The imposition of a civil under this article is not a conviction and may not be considered a
conviction for any purpose.
B. The department may not impos$ a civil penalty under this article on the owner of a motor vehicle if
ihe operator of the vehicle was mfed or was issued a citation and notice to appear by a peace officer
for a violation of Section 544.007(d) of the Texas Transportation Code recorded by the traff~c control
monitoring system.
C. The city attorney is authorized tb file suit to enforce collection of a civil penalty assessed under this
article.
(Ord. NO. 2006-1 142, 5 1, 10-24-061
Sec. 8-8-6. Use of civil penalty funds.
To pay for the enforcement of the automated red light enforcement program, including but not limited to
operation, maintenance, improvement, personnel and program management, fund traff~c safety
programs, including pedestrian safety programs, public safety programs, intersection improvement and
traffic enforcement.
(Ord. No. 2006-1 142, 1,lO-24-06; Ord. No. 2007-1 175,s 3,7-24-07)
Sec. 8-8-7. Use of photographic traffic signal enforcement images.
No person may utilize a photographic signal enforcement system recorded image for any purpose
except in accordance with this article.
(Ord. No. 2007-1 175, 5 4,7-24-07)
Texas, Ohio: Voters Reject Photo Enforcement
By The Newspaper on November 4,2009
Voters in three cities sent a clear message to local lawmakers yesterday by adopting charter amendments
that ban photo enforcement. In aqdition to kicking two camera supportersfrom the city council, 72
percent of those voting in Chillicothe, Ohio approved a total prohibition on the use of red light mnemE;i
and speed cameras. In College Station, Texas the vote was much closer, but at the end of the night 52
percent wanted the red light cameras to come down. In Heath, Ohio 51 percent voted against the
cameras. A total of nine cities nationwide have used the lnltiative praess to ban camera enforcement
since 1991, with camera proponents never having won a public vote.
The triple defeat for the photo enforcement industry came despite a weii-funded public relations effort in
each of the cities. In Chillicothe, Redflex Trafflc Systems sent a aiossv mailer to everv voter while the
rnayor demanded that the Ohio $upreme Court ban the public from even voting on the inue - a move
high court justices swiftlv reiected. Citizens Aaainst Photo Enforcement (CAPE), the group responsible for
the ballot measure, claimed an additional victory as voters elected -€%I opponent Bruce Arnold, who
won the seat of council president, Jeremy Slberell, who won the fifth ward and Dustln Proehl, the only
incumbent to have voted against cameras. CAPE leader Rebecca Valentich told TheNewspaper that she
was thrilled with the outcome.
"We came together as individuals, and we united as a community,"Vaientich said. "The people have
spoken, and very Clearly. Our voices have been heard and thanks to the people and their strong voices,
the cameras will be coming down. It is a huge victory, and one that we can all be proud of. And although
our mayor has gone on remrd spying that he will fight the will of the people, his fight against the rlghts of
the people will only bring a stronger united front from the community.."
In Colieae Station, Texas the city's automated ticketing vendor American Traffic Solutions (ATS)
bankrolled a front arouo to conduct mass mailings and push poiling in an effort to the program that
wGS~avmm?&thcomwwfme%!+$iidkwmt the X€e &tkwntract. The ATS-funded
group reported raising $71,240 in contributions, but not one dollar came from anyone living in the local
community. TO supplement thevendor's effort, the city allocated taxpayer money to send red lioht camera
promotional material to every voter. Station activist Iim Ash, who led the fight to put the issue on
the baiiot, watched the results with a large group of supporters,
'It has been nothing but celebration here," Ash told TheNewspaper minutes atter the results became final.
In Heath, voters were bombarded with the same advertisements From Redflex, but they failed to persuade
a majority. Voters also defeated Mayor Rlchard Waugh who had intmduced photo enforcement as the
signature issue of his administration.
*YOU can fight clty hall and win, when you have a passion for what you believe in," We Demand a Vote
spokesman Lori Lyons said in a statement.
[courtesy thenewsoaoer.wm]
: ÿÿ ex as-^^^ and Allies Behind Anti Referendum Group Page 1 of 1
Article tiom: www.thenewspaper.com/news/2912923.asp
101812009
Texas: ATS and Allies Behind Anti Referendum Group
ANies of the photo enforcement industry bankroll front group to fight referendum on red light camera use in . .
College Station, Texas.
.
Insiders are bankrolling the lone group that supports red light cameras in
College Station, Texas. Last month, the Keep College Station Safe Political
Action Committee (PAC) formed "to give a voice to local residents who support
the significant safety benefits of the city's red-light camera program." Financial
disclosure reports filed on Monday show that no College Station resident has
actually supported the effort.
The PAC reported collecting $19,000 in political donations, of which $10,000 was provided by ATS. Another
$6,500 was provided as an in-kind donation from Questmark Information Management Inc, a company that holds
a contract for printing toll road statemerrts and tickets for Harris County ATS happens to run the cameras that
generate the citations for Harris County toll roads. The only other contribution listed was a $2500 contribution from
a Houston firm, REM Services. Inc
On the other side of the issue, College Station resident Jim Ash led the effort to gather the voter signatures
required to place the referendum on the November 3 ballot. He told TheNewspaper that he was proud that h~s
$4300 in donations came from College Stabon residents, with the exception of support from Houston attorney
Paul Kubosh -a high-profile opponent of automated enforcement in Texas
Accordma to Ash's disclosure form. the monev raised so far has been soent on reauests for oublic records from
the city, ign-making materials, bumperstickek and a radio commer~ial'advertisin~ a public event in July (listen to
commerc~al, 500k MP3). In contrast to Ash's grassroots activism, the ATS PAC spent nearly ail of its money on
insider consultants.
The pro-camera PAC paid Jessica Colon $8817 to represent photo enforcement on television. Hill Research
Consultants were paid $8389 to conduct a push poll survey of residents with questions specially designed to elicit
a response favorable to the cameras. the same flrm has wnducted other surveys on behalf of ATS in the past.
Another $4994 went to FLS Connect, a Minnesota-based political telemarketing firm. A Houston company was
paid $2000 to create a website that has not been updated in the past two weeks, even though the election is less
than a month away.
ATS is wncerned about the ~ossible outcome of the vote. as ohoto enforcement has never survived a test at he
ballot box In April, a stunning 86 percent of voters ordered the camera program in Sulphur, Louisiana to be shut
down
View the ATS PAC's financial disclosure in a 1.5mb PDF file at the source link below
Source: Specific Purpose Committee Campaign Finance Report (Keep College Station Safe PAC, 101512009)
Permanent Link for this item
Return to Front Page
i
~enky Venkatraman 11
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
C& of Coppell [donotreply@ci.coppdl.b.us]
Wednesday, January 13,2010 8:05 PM
venky@att.net
Your Request For Public Information Has Been Received
Thank you for using the City of Coppell's On-line Service. Your request has
been logged as ticket # VEAN-012705 and has been forwarded to the City
Secretary's Department for processing.
You will be notified if any additional information or clarification is
required.
This shall serve to notify the general public that this office will recelve
and comply with its statutory obligations under the Texas Public
Information Act, Section Section 552.001 et seq. Texas Government Code.
Under the expressed provisions of the Public Information Act, records of
judiciary (municipal court) are not included in a request for public
infcrmation. Sections 552.003 and 552.0035, Texas Government Code. All
requests for information or documents concerning the judicial records
and/or court proceedings are governed by Supreme Court Administrative Rule
12 and Article I, Section 13 Texas Constitution. All requests for such
records should be specifically made to the Presiding Judge, Coppell
Municipal Court, 130 Town Center Boulevard, Coppell, Texas Monday-Friday,
8:OO o'clock a.m. through 4:30 o'clock p.m.
You will receive written notification after your request has been
processed.
When your documents are ready they must be picked up by you. If you w~sh
for someone else to pick up your documents, you must provide us with
written authorization.
January 22,201 0
Venky Venkatraman
41 5 Gifford Drive
Coppell, TX 75019
RE: RPI # 9922
Deq Mr. Venkatraman:
In response to the above noted request for Public Information:
The City has concluded its searc went to fdl your request. Your documents
are ready to pick up. The chas ase pay this amount at the Water Utility
window, First Floor, Town Ce e cashier that you are paying charges for an
open record request. Bring your receipt to the City Secretary Department, Second Floor,
Town Center.
Please Note: The referenced Request for Public Information will be held open by the
City for twelve (12) business days.
For further assistance, please contact the City Secretary Department at 972-304-701 6, e-
mail RPI@ci.coppelLtx.us or fax us at 972-304-3673, A m Chiquita Taylor.
Sincerely,
Libby Ball'
City Secretary
Date:
To:
From: Capt. J. Cook
Subject: Request for Public Information #9922
Time Spent: 15 minutes
I reviewed the doannentshion requested in RPI #9922. I can provide the following
information pertaining to the request:
1. The number of notices issued since August 10,2007 is 26,349. We do not have the capability
to differentiate. how many notices were for arming right on red as opposed to turning left or
going straight through the intemection.
2. Any questions pertaining to revenue will have to be addressed to someone else since I an not
involved in the financial aspects of the program.
Slriving for ExExZence
CITY OF COPPELL 1 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS
EXHIBIT ''Dm
COMPENSATION & PRICING
Commencing on the expiration of the Warning Period for each Designated Intersection
Approach, Customer shall be obligated to pay Redflex a fixed fee of $4,870 per month
for each Designated Intersection Approach ("Fixed Fee'') as full remuneration for
performing all of the services contemplated in this Agreement.
As a beta-testing and feasibility study, Redflex will provide a mobile photo red
light system unit for a period of 90 days at no charge to the Customer; upon
completion of feasibility study; Redflex and the Customer will have the option to
extend this contract and negotiate terms for mobile photo enforcement.
Cost Neutralitv
Cost neutrality is assured to Customer. The maximum compensation that Customer shall
be obligated to pay to Redflex each month is the Fixed ~ee. Each month, Customer and
Redfiex shall compare the aggregate revenue received &om all Notice of Violations
("Revenue") to the total amount invoiced by Redflex for the Fixed Fee ("Amount
Invoiced") during the previous month ("Cost Neutrality Review"). If the Amount
Invoiced exceeds t& Revenue, then City shall only be obligated to pay the Revenue to
Redfiex and the difference between the Revenue and the Amount Invoiced for that month
will carry over to the next month as a deficit ("Deficit Amount"). If, in the next
following month, the Revenue exceeds the Amount Invoiced, Customer shall pay the
Amount Invoiced plus all or any portion of the accumulated Deficit Amount to the extent
that there is sufficient Revenue to pay all or any portion of the Deficit Amount. Upon
contract expiration any such outstanding deficits will be forfeited by Redflex.
BUSINESS ASSUMPTIONS FOR ALL PRICING OPTIONS:
1. Redflex construction will be able to utilize existing conduit for installation
where space is available.
2. The Customer agrees to pay Redflex within thirty (30) days after the invoice
is received. A monthly late fee of 1.5% is payable for amounts remaining
-- uiaysfromdate&btv&e;----- -----------
3. Each year, beginning with the second year of the Initial Term, the pricing will
be adjusted by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the Dallas Metroplex as
published by the U.S. Department of Labor.
Sec. 707.008. DEPOSIT OF REVENUE FROM CERTAIN TRAFFIC
PENALTIES. (a) Not later than the 60th day after the end
of a local authority's fiscal year, after deducting amounts
the local authority is authorized by Subsection (b) to
retain, the local authority shall:
(1) send 50 percent of the revenue derived from
civil or administrative penalties collected by the local
authority under this section to the comptroller for deposit
to the credit of the regional trauma account established
under Section 782.002, Health and Safety Code; and
(2) deposit the remainder of the revenue in a
special account in the local authority's treasury that may
be used only to fund traffic safety programs, including
pedestrian safety programs, public safety programs,
intersection improvements, and traffic enforcement.
(b) A local authority may retain an amount necessary
to cover the costs of:
(1) purchasing or leasing equipment that is part
of or used in connection with the photographic traffic
signal enforcement system in the local authority;
12) installing the photographic traffic signal
enforcement system at sites in the local authority,
including the costs of installing cameras, flashes,
computer equipment, loop sensors, detectors, utility lines,
data lines, poles and mounts, networking equipment, and
associated labor costs;
(3) operating the photographic traffic signal
enforcement system in the local authority, including the
costs of creating, distributing, and delivering violation
notices, review of violations conducted by employees of the
local authority, the processing of fine payments and
collections, and the costs associated with administrative
adjudications and appeals; and
(4 ) maintaining the general upkeep and
functioning of the photographic traffic signal enforcement
system.
(c) Chapter 133, Local Government Code, applies to
fee revenue described by Subsection (a) (1) .
(d) If under Sectlon 133.059, Local Government Code,
the comptroller conducts an audit of a local authority and
determines that the local authority retained more than the
amounts authorized by this section or failed to deposit
amounts as required by this section, the comptroller may
impose a penalty on the local authority equal to twice the
amount the local authority:
(1) retained in excess of the amount authorized
by this section; or
(2) failed to deposit as required by this
section.
Added by Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1149, Sec. 1, eff.
September 1, 2007.
~
PHOTOGRAPHIC ENFORCEMENT SYSTEMS -
REGIONAL TRAUMA ACCOUNT
rn 1751 1832077 I 11 RSIZ007 1
h IMPORTANT
JENNIFER MILLER meken(~~bmuy0~sdmsor
CITY OF COPPELL hs.rhrqedSbo*.=--Q=by
*~l--t
I J
Transportation Code, Section 707.008
Not later than the 60th day after the end of the local authority's fiscal year, after deductbg amounts the local authority is - anhorized by Subsection @)to retain, the local authodly shall:
(1) send 50 peccent of Ule revenue derived fmm civil w adminidrative penalties collected by the local authority as authorized
under this section to the CompVoller for deposit to the credit of the regional trauma account.
(2) deposit the remainder of the revenue in a special account in the local authority treasury that may be used only to fund
trafiic safety programs.
I I I. Total amount of dM and administrative penalties ~,,,a[Rwnuc '/8{)7 1.. $ 37,681.25 I
2. Less allowable expenses (Twns. Code Sec. 707.088@)(1-4):
a) costs of purchasing or leasing equipment - 2a$24.507.30
b) installation of equipment and network 2b-2 77
C) operating enforcement system (iiludii administrative cost)- 2c.' - %a sa
d) system maintenance and upkeep 22 4-
Total allowable ex~enses Crcfalofamwns h ms za, a, ZcandM 2.. $52,450.60
3. Net revenue from photographic baffic enforcement systems (kern r minusltam2) 3.. $(14.769.35)
X .50
40148 I_ '" DOiWT DETACH"'
I 5. TOTAL AMOUNT OF PAYMENT (Same as #em 4) 5 . I
Man to: COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOVNTS
111 E.17mh
huh Texas 787740100
Faasshurtwe cal(800) 531-5441, en 3-4276, toY tee nattordde.
The Ausdn number is (51P 4634276. 444
.rr 011 = (Rwr-Rl a- b. m
PHOTOGRAPHIC ENFORCEMENT SYSTEMS -
REGIONAL TRAUMA ACCOUNT
r TW~ 32240
E ~~~N M b o r
1-75- 1183207-7
ouylCau*n-dnuYq).ddrrs
I,~I~,~~~,~~~~,~~~~IIIIIIIIIIIIIII Moh*bmdyollr.ddru
JENNIFER MILLER hr hnd 8hwduno.l bv I n L CITY OF COPPELL
PO BOX 7-78
COPPELL TX 75039-9q78
Transportation Code, Section 707.008
Not later than the 60th day after the end of the local aumocity's Rscal year, after deducting amounts the local authority is
authorized by Subsection (b) to retain. the local authority shall:
(1) send 50 percent of Me revenue dermed from dvil or administrative penalhes collected by the local authority as authorized
under this section to the CornptroUer for deposit to the credit of the regional trauma account.
(2) deposit the remainder of the revenue in a specla1 account in the local authority treasury that may be used only to fund
traflic safety programs.
1. TotaiamntofdviImdadmin~epenalUes ---....-T&L-~<%Gc!~PPI~~
2. Less allowable expenses (Trans. Code Sec. 707.088@)(1-4):
a) casts of purchasing or leqing equipment - - - .. - - - - - - - - pa$ 176.702. 5%
$ -0- b) installaton of equipment and network - - - - - - - _ - _ _ _ - .2b
C) operating enforcement system (including administrative cost) - 2c $ 16.80'3- Olr
0 -0- . d) system maintenance and upkeep - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - zd
TOM allowable expewxis flotal dunwrrls h mnns ad a) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . 2. $ 1q?.505 .a
3. Net revenue lrom photographic traffic enforcement systems (item r m1nusftem2) - - - .. - - . s. -555.7k9 .57
X .50
4. TOTAL AMOUNT DUE THE STATE WMp'ysmounth ltun s by 50 %) - - - - - - .. - - - - - . 4. $ 277.624.77
M-11 "*M) NOTmAcH**'
*ram
5. TOTAL AMOUNT OF PAYMENT @ma ae h 4) - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - -. 6. rn $
wad -~
r.wapillnnrJ ~ennif er Y3.11.er o*tly.mha 32070 27512032077 08 8 ~.banbh*ndcmrcr*lanhL.nmdsofher@pofb.of~e
dlyawmtynn*d
D.L.
Msil to: COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
P.O. Box 149561
Awfin, TeXeu 7871CgaB1
Forassislance call (800)531-6441, ext 34278. Mlh Mlbnwids.
The AWh number is (512) -78. 'I Y 9
!~~~~~~_~~-~-.
c
PHOTOGRAPHIC ENFORCEMENT SYSTEMS -
REGIONAL. TRWMA ACCOUNT
s~cde rn 32240
.......... .. L -
PO BOX 9976
COPPELL TX 75033-3478
Un&M559.Oarm*nlcod.,~~~~~,~nd~~1.d!fumWh ~rakol&dam')cu,ulM
~~"~~M65?,~~R~ilsnndbnkrovin'vbrsqusr(nor
~,mrr.du~6n.dbu~~nmbr~rnhb~ changed trOm pnvious wport
Transportation Code, Section 707.008
cal"m--
m 1-75-1 183207-7
Not later than the 80th day after the end of the local authority's fiscal year, e.fter deducting amounts the local authority is
authorized by Subsection (b) to retain. the local authority sha!i:
(1) send 50 percent of the revenue derived from civl or adminimtrative penalties collected by tb local auUmW as authwized
11 -30-2009
underthis section to the Comptroller for depasi to me ordi of the regional treuma account.
(2) deposit the remainder of the revenue in a special account in the local authority treaty that may be used only to fund
~/Coun~nanodnuh~ .ddlLP.
,,,,,,~~~,~,,~~~O,,~,,III#IIII*III ekkmhkbadyarIdd.as
JENNIFER MILLER hu chm& 8hw chmwr by
CTTY OF COPPELL thsppthlad-. A : 0
traffic safely programs.
~.~o ~m ~o ~c ~~m d ~m i n ~~p e ~e s ~h !~~1,. $ ' : 713,020 .40
2. Less aHowable expenses (Trans. Code Sec. 707.086@)(14):
a) costs of purchasing or leasing equipment - - - .. - - - - - - - zaS 282=399 - l9
b) installation of quipmemand network - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2b 0 -0-.
c) operating enforcement system (including administrative cost) - 2c$ 61 .ass - 61
d) system malntenan~ and upkeep - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 26 $ -0- .
TotslaYowableexpense~fldorunav~h~a2b~~lvwlad) 2.. $<. ,343;854 .a
3. Net re-e fmn photographic traffic enforcement systems pm r mturhg - - - - - - . a. 1 $ 369,165 -80
X .so
4. TOTAL AMOUNT DUETHE STATE ~amMtirlarn9by 50 9h) - - - - - - - - - - - - . 4. $ 184,582 -90
....... .- ........
014 "'DO NOTDETACH***
mMV4
5. TOTAL AMOUHT OF PAYMENT (su~ ~Ibm41 - - - - -,- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . 5. I $ 184,582 .90
.... -- ..
ah,&-& n-
CITY OF COPPELL
1TC0d. .bMmlka)l~ Fwud
32070 &7511&320?7 09 b
STATE COMPTROUER
M.~I to: rnwmwm OFPUBUC ACCOUNTS
P.O. Box 149361
hetin. TQN 787149961
City of Coppall, TX
DATE 1/15/10
TIUB 15t16i54
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
BUOGBT PERFORmAucB RBWRT
Month Bnd Date: 11/31/1009
PAGE
cu,aiia
F.TIEHsn
CXlRRmT mENDW LAST
ADOEl'ED BUDOBT AMXmICD EdOWIW Y-?-D BUCQET LBSS % YBAW Y-T-D
BDDOBT UmnmEbnS BODCBT TRAwAmIW RBVBlDWS YTD BBVBIVW8 USgD BBVBIDWS
Fund 18 - Red Light Enforcement
.............................
Department 00 - 1Ym-Departmental
ACCOUNT CLASSIPI~TIOW 530 - Fines and Forfeitures
6208 kd Lght CP 475000.00 .OO 475000.00 / 36429.10 75863.45 399136.55 16% 141777.67
I -
Fines TOTALS . : 475000.00 .OO 475000.00 75863.45 399136.55 16% 141777.67
-
Division TOTALS . : 475000.00 .OO 475000.00 429.10 t 75863.45 399136.55 16% 141777.67
.OO 475000.00 136439.10 75863.45
-
Fund TCTALS . . . . : 475000.00 399136.55 16% 141777.67
----= -- .= =XI==_x= L-==I-E =-=a- -=========== ==ls,,C==-=S -=== ,,EE-.=====L
GRAND TOTAL . . . . t 475000.00 .OO 475000.00 36429.10 75863.45 399136.55 16% 141777.61
PROGRAM . . : AP0663
REPORT . . : PAID INVOICE REPORT
USER . I KTIENEN
DATE ... r 1/15/10
TIME ... : 15:26 ... I HOLD : YES
COPIES . . : 1
I OUTPUT QUEUE: %DEFAULT
I DISTRIBUTION: +NONE
SELECTION OPTIONS
..... BANK ACCOUNT r *ALL .... VENDOR NUMBER : 8423 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS .... PAYMENT NUMBER : *ALL ...... FROM DATE i 8/31/2007 ...... THRU DATE : 12/31/2009 ....... DATE TYPE Payment ..... PAYMENT TYPE : All
INCLUDE 6/L INFORMATION: YES ... REPORT SEQUENCE : PAYMENT NUMBER
City of Coppell. TX
DATE 1/15/10
TIME 15:26:51
FINANCIAL MANAGENENT
PAID INVOICE REPORT
PAGE 1
AP0663
KTIEHEN
VENDOR INVOICE # INVOICE DESCRIPTION INV DATE DUE DATE G/L DATE INV NET AHT ----- -----------PI=====~========m.mm.-====m================.==-==-=-.----.----.---=-m==============-===============================
BANK ACCOUNT: 2 CHECK NUMBER: 163783
. 8423 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEHS 13152 AUG RED LIGHT FEE 8/31/2007 9/30/2007 11/02/2007 9,897.30
co T T I T V U/H AMT/UNIT TOTAL ANT WORK ORDER
1 AUG RED. LIGHT FEE 1.0000 91897.30 9,897.30
Invoice 18-8011 PCT: 1.0000 AMT 9.897.30
TOTAL INVOICE ITEMS ......... : 1
8423 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 13292 SEPT RED LIGHT FEE 9/30/2007 10/30/2007 11/02/2007 14r610.00
LTEMI P.O. X CONTRACT Y DESCRIPTION OUANTITY U/M AMT/UNIT TOTAL ANT WORK ORDER
1 SEPT RED LIGHT FEE 1.0000 14,610.00 14,610.00
Invoice 18-8011 PCT: 1.0000 AHT 14.610.00
TOTAL INVOICE ITEMS ......... : 1
TOTAL INVOICES FOR CHECK 0163783 ... : 2
BANK ACCOUNT: 2 CHECK NUMBER: 165568
8423 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 13552 OCT 07 RED LIGHT FEE 10/31/2007 11/30/2007 1/04/2008 14.610.00
JTEMI) P.O. # CWRACT # DESCRIPTION OUANTITY U/M ANT/UNIT TOTAL AMT WORK ORDER
1 OCT 07 RED LIGHT FEE 1.0000 14,610.00 141610.00
Invoice 18-10-00-4220 PCT: 1.0000 ANT 14.610.00
TOTAL INVOICE ITEMS .:.....,. :
8423 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 13553 NOV 07 RED LIGHT FEE 11/30/2007 12/30/2007 1/04/2008 14.610.00
DM* P.O. r CONTRACT x DESCRIPTION QUANTITY u/n AHT/UNIT TOTAL AMT WORK ORDER
1 NOV 07 RED LIGHT FEE 1.0800 14,610.00 16.610.00
Invoice 18-10-00-4220 PCT: 1.0000 ANT 14.610.00
TOTAL INVOICE ITEMS ....... : 1
TOTAL INVOICES FOR CHECK 0165568 ... : 2
BANK ACCOUNT: 2 CHECK NUMBER: 166152
8423 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 13554 RED LIGHT FEE 12/31/2007 1/30/2008 1/25/2008 159382.90
.ITEM# P.O. # CONTRACT t DESCRIPTION ITY U/M ANT/UNIT TOTAL AMT WORK ORDER
1 RED LIGHT FEE 1.0000 772.90 772.90
Invoice 18-00-00-6208 PCT: 1.0000 AMT 772.90
2 RED LIGHT FEE 1:OOOO 14~610.00 14.610.00
Invoice 18-10-00-4220 PCT: 1.0000 ANT 14.610.00
TOTAL INVOICE ITEMS ......... : 2
TOTAL INVOICES FOR CHECK 0166152 ... : 1 --------me-----
15,382.90
BANK ACCOUNT: 2 CHECK NUMBER: 167305
8423 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 14263 REDLIGHT FEE/JANO8 1/31/2008 2/29/2008 2/22/2008 153276.70
I) P. p /U T A 0 0 R
City of Coopell, TX
DATE 1/15/10
TINE 15:26:51
FINANCIAL' MANAGEMENT
PAID INVOICE REPORT
PAGE 2
AP0663
KTIEHEN
VENDOR INVOICE # INVOICE DESCRIPTION INV DATE DUE DATE G/L DATE INV NET AMT
..............................................................................................................................
1 REDLIGHT FEE/JANO8 1.0000 149610.00 14~610.00
Invoice 18-10-00-4220 PCT: 1.0000 AMT 14.610.00
2 REDLIGHT FEE/JANO8 1.0000 666.70 666.70
Invoice 18-00-00-6208 PCTI 1.0000 ANT 666.70
TOTAL INVOICE ITEMS ... : 2
TOTAL INVOICES FOR CHECK 0167305 ... : 1
BANK ACCOUNT: 2 CHECK NUMBERS 168443
8423 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 14753 REDLIGHT-FEE08 2/29/2008 3/29/2008 3/28/2008 15.306.20
JTEMZ P.O. X C-RACT X DESCRIPTION 0 T ORDER
1 REDLIGHT-FEB 08 1.0000 696.20 696.20
Invoice 18-00-00-6208
2 REDLIGHT - FEB 08
Invoice 1B-10-00-4220
TOTAL INVOICE ITEMS .... : 2
TOTAL INVOICES FOR CHECK 0168443 ... : 1
BANK ACCOUNT: 2 CHECK NUMBER: 169473
PCT: 1.0000 AIT 696.20
14r610.00 14.610.00
PCT: 1.0000 AIT 14.610.00
8423 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 15195 RED LIGHT-MARCH'O8 3/31/2008 4/30/2008 5/02/2008 15,748.70 0 / OT E
1 RED LIGNT-MAR 08 1.0000 14.610.00 14.610.00 - ..................
Invoice 18-10-00-4220
2 RED LIGHT-MAR 08
Invoice 18-00-00-6208
TOTAL INVOICE ITEMS .......... : 2
TOTAL INVOICES FOR CHECK 0169473 ... : 1
BANK ACCOUNT: 2 CHECK NUMBER: 170437
-..--- ......... .........
PCT: 1.0000 AMT 14.610.00
1.0000 1.138.70 1r138.70
PCT: 1.0000 ANT 1,138.70
8423 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 15829 RED LIGHT-APRIL'OI 4/30/2008 5/30/2008 6/06/2008 15,728.05
ITEM% P.O. X C ON*RBCT # DE SC RIPTION OWTITV U/M ANT/UNIT TOTAL ANT WORK ORDER
1 RED LIGHT-APRIL'O8 1.0000 14,610.00 14t610.00
Invoice 18-10-00-4220 PCT: 1.0000 ANT 14,610.00
2 RED LIGHT-APRIL108 1.0000 lrll8.05 18118.05
Invoice 18-00-00-6208 PCT: 1.0000 ANT 1,118.05
TOTAL INVOICE ITENS ......... : 2
... TOTAL INVOICES FOR CHECK 0170437 : 1
BANK ACCOUNT: 2 CHECK NUMBER: 171086
8423 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 16239 MAY'OB REDLIGHT FEE 5/31/2008 6/30/2008 6/27/2008 14,610.00
STEM* P.O. X CONTRACT X DESCRIPTION -U/II ANT WORK ORDER
1 MAY'O8 RED LIGHT FEE 1.0000 14r610.00 14,610.00
City of Covvellt TX
DATE 1/15/10
TIME 15:26:51
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
PAID INVOICE REPORT
PAGE 3
AP0663
KTIEMEN
VENDOR INVOICE Y INVOICE DESCRIPTION INV DATE DUE DATE 6/L DATE IMV NET AMT
=PIP==DI=_-L=-I-------==-==s===================-===.*=m==~==============--=*===-===-==-======--===-==~======m===~==*-===============
Invoice 18-10-00-4220 PCT: 1.0000 AMT 14,610.00
......... TOTAL INVOICE ITEMS r
TOTAL INVOICES FOR CHECK 0171086 ... : 1
BANK ACCOUNT: 2 CHECK NUNBER: 171990
8423 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 16564 RED LIGHT-JUNE 08 6/30/200B 7/30/2008 7/25/2008 14.610.00
ITEM# P.O. U WW.RUT * DESCRIPTION OUANTITY U/M AMT/UNIT TOTAL ANT WORK ORDER
1 RED LIGHT-JUNE 08 1.0000 14r610.00 14,610.00
Invoice 38-10-00-4220 PCT: 1.0000 AHT 14,610.00
TOTAL INVOICE ITENS ......... : 1
TOTAL INVOICES FOR CHECK 0171990 . : 1
BANK ACCOUNT: 2 CHECK NUMBER: 172952
8423 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTENS 16951 RED LIGHT-JULY.08 8/25/2008 9/25/2008 8/29/2008 14.610.00
ITEMC P.O. C AMTlUNIT TOTAL AMT WORK ORDER
1 RED LIGHT-JULY'O8 1.0000 14,610.00 14.610.00
Invoice 18-10-00-4220 PCT: 1.0000 AMT 14.610.00
TOTAL INVOICE .ITEMS ......... : 1
TOTAL INVOICES FOR CHECK 0172952 ... : 1
BANK ACCOUNT: 2 CHECK NUMBER: 173692
8423 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 17379 RED LIGHT AUQ.08 8/31/2008 9/3W2008 9/26/2008 15,301.53
>TEN# P.O. U CONTRACT # DESCRIPTION QUANTITY U/M AMT/UNIT TOTAL AMT WORK ORDER
1 RED LIGHT-AUG'O8 1.8000 15.301.53 .15.301.53
Invoice 18-10-00-4220 PCT: 1.0000 AMT 15,301.53
TOTAL INVOICE ITEMS ......... : 1
TOTAL INVOICES FOR CHECK 0173692 . : 1
BANK ACCOUNT: 2 CHECK NUMBER: 174469
8423 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 17819 RED LIGHT - SEPT 08 9/30/2008 10/30/2008 9/30/2008
15,301.05 15.301.05
Invoice 18-10-00-4220 PCT: 1.0000 AMT 15,301.05
TOTAL INVOICE ITEMS .......... : 1
TOTAL INVOICES FOR CHECK 0174469 ... : 1
BANK ACCOUNT: 2 CHECK NUMBER: 175565
8423 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 18285 RED LIGHT-OCT 08
City of Co~pell. TX
DATE 1/15/10
TIME 15:26151
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
PAID INVOICE REPORT
PAGE 4
AP0663
KTIEHEN
VENDOR INVOICE # INVOICE DESCRIPTION INV DATE DUE DATE G/L DATE INV NET ANT -
..............................................................................................................................
XIEM P.0. u CONmCT # DESGRIPTION OUANTITY U/M AIIT/UMIT TOTAL AMT WORK ORDER
1 RED LIGHT-OCT 08 1.0000 15,301 -53 15,301.53
Invoice 18-10-00-4220 PCT: 1.0000 ART 15.301.53
TOTAL INVOICE ITEMS ......... :
TOTAL INVOICES FOR CHECK 0175565 . . : 1
BANK ACCOUNT: 2 CHECK NUMBER: 176214
8423 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 18714 RED LIGNT-NOV 2008 ll/30/2008 12/30/2008 1/02/2009 15.301.53
CT # DESCRIPTION QUANTITY U/M AHT/UNIT TOTAL ANT WORK ORDER
1 RED LIGHT-NOV 08 1.0000 159301.53 15.301.53
Invoice 18-10-00-4220 PCT: 1.0000 AHT 15,301.53
TOTAL INVOICE ITENS ......... :
TOTAL INVOICES FOR CHECK 0176214 ... : 1
BANK ACCOUNT: 2 CHECK NUMBER: 176848
8423 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 19214. RED LIGHT - DEC 08 12/31/2008 1/31/2009 1/23/2009 151301.53
ITEM# P.O. Y CONTRACT Y DESCRIPTION OUANTITY U/M AMT/UNIT TOTAL ANT WORK ORDER
1 RED LIGHT - DEC 08 1.0000 15,301.53 15,301.53
Invoice 18-10-00-4220 PCT: 1.0000 AMT 15.301.53
TOTAL INVOICE ITENS ......... : 1
TOTAL INVOICES FOR CHECK 0176848 ... : 1
BANK ACCOUNT: 2 CHECK NUMBER: 177799
8423 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 19730 RED LIGHT-JAW 09 1/31/2009 2/28/2009 2/27/2009 15,301.13
ITEMX P.O. W CONTRACT # DESCRIPTION QUANTITY U/M AHT/UNITTOTAL ORDER
1 RED LIGHT-JAN 09 1.0001 159301.53 15,301.53
Invoice 18-10-00-4220 PCT: 1.0000 ANT 15,301.53
TOTAL INVOICE ITEMS ......... : 1
TOTAL INVOICES FOR CHECK 0177799 ... : 1
15.301.53
BANK ACCOUNT: 2 CHECK NUMBER: 178465
8423 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 19731 RED LIGHT-FEB 09 2/28/2009 3/28/2009 3/20/2009 m P.0. fi
15.301.53
CONTRACT # DESCRIPTION QUANTITY U/M ANT/UMIT TOTAL AMT WORK ORDER
1 RED LIGHT-FEB 09 1.0000 15,301.53 15,301.53
Invoice 18-10-00-4220 PCT: 1.0000 ANT 15.301.53
TOTAL INVOICE ITEMS ........ I 1
... TOTAL INVOICES FOR CHECK 0178465 : 1
BANK ACCOUNT: 2 CHECK NUNBER: 179719
city of coppell. TX
DATE 1/15/10
TIME 15:26:51
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
PAID INVOICE REPORT
VENDOR INVOICE Y INVOICE DESCRIPTION INV DATE DUE DA1
===16===DPs.I===sII.==~~~========D-===-~=m====I=~~=========-D~=m======-.===~~~========*=====.-==========
8423 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 19732 RED LIGHT-MARCH 09 3/31/2009 4/30/20(
.LTHB P.0. # CWBACT 8 DESCRIPTION OUANTITY U/N ANT/UNIT '
1 RED LIGHT-MAR 09 1.0000 15,301.53
Invoice 18-10-00-4220 PC1
......... TOTAL INVOICE ITEMS :
... TOTAL INVOICES FOR CHECK 0179719 :
BANK ACCOUNT: 2 CHECK NUMBER: 181223
8423 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 21454 RED LIGHT-MAY 5/31/2009 6/30/20
JTEHX P.O. Y CWACT # nESCRIPTION OUANTITY U/N AMT/UNIT
1 RED LIGHT-MAY 1.0000 15,301.53
Invoice 18-10-00-4220 PC
TOTAL INVOICE ITEMS ... r
... TOTAL INVOICES FOR CHECK 0181223 :
BANK ACCOUNT: 2 CHECK NUMBER: 181391
8423 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 21453 RED LIGHT-APRIL 09 4/30/2009 5/30/20
.ITEM# P.O. # CONTRACT # D E S C R I P T L R t d M N T I T Y U/H AIIT/UNIT
1 RED LIGHT-APRIL 09 1.0000 15,301.53
Invoice 18-10-00-4220 PC
TOTAL IUVOICE ITEMS ........ I
TOTAL INVOICES FOR CHECK 0181391 ... :
BANK ACCOUNT: 2 CHECK NUHBER: 181938
8423 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 21455 RED LIGHT-JUNE 09 6/30/2009 7/30/2l
IIEIW P.0. * CONTRACT Y DESCRIPTION QUANTITY U/M AMT/U
1 RED LIGHT-JUNE 09 1.0000 15.301.5s
Invoice 18-10-00-4220 P(
TOTAL INVOICE ITEMS ......... :
TOTAL INVOICES FOR CHECK 0181938 ... :
BANK ACCOUNT: 2 CHECK NUHBER: 183157
8423 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 22425 SERVICES 7/31/2009 8/28/2
ITEM# P.O. Y CONTBACT C DESCRIPTION OUANTITY U/M AMT/UNU
1 REDLIGHT-JULY 09 1.0000 15,301.53
Invoice 18-10-00-4220 P
TOTAL INVOICE ITEMS ...... r
TOTAL INVOICES FOR CHECK 0183157 ... :
Christel Pettinos - Re: Coppell City Ordinance No. 2006-1142 (email address)
I have this on all outgoing emails as we have changed addresses.
We do not have any report that provides the information on the red light issue as you have requested. However, I know we reviewed the citations
for a one month period some time ago and it indicated that the majority of citations were for right on red violation. If memory serves, I think it
was in excess of 75% were for that. Thanks.
Clay
-----Original Message-----
From: "Venky Venkatraman" <venky@att.net>
To: <venky@att.net>
To: Clay Phillips <CPHILLIPS@coppelltx.gov>
Sent: 2/4/2010 12:09:46 PM
Subject: FW: Coppell City Ordinance No. 2006-1142 (email address)
Not sure why I got this since I just sent an Email to that address.
-----Original Message-----
From: Postmaster@ci.coppell.tx.us [mailto:Postmaster@ci.coppell.tx.us] On
Behalf Of Clay Phillips
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 11:56 AM
To: Venky Venkatraman
Subject: RE: Coppell City Ordinance No. 2006-1142 (email address)
Please make a note of my new email address:
cphillips@coppelltx.gov
From: "Clay Phillips" <CPHILLIPS@coppelltx.gov>
To: <venky@att.net>
Date: 2/4/2010 1:33 PM
Subject: Re: Coppell City Ordinance No. 2006-1142 (email address)
Page 1 of 1Re: Coppell City Ordinance No. 2006-1142 (email address)
2/16/2010file://C:\Documents and Settings\cpettinos\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4B7A8020City_of_CoppellTow...
AN ORDINANCEOFTHE CITYOFCOPPELL
ORDINANCENO
2006 1142 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL
TEXAS AMENDING THE CODE OFORDINANCES BY AMENDING
CHAPTER 8TRAFFIC REGULATIONS BYADDING ARTICLE
8 8AUTOMATED RED LIGHT ENFORCEMENT TOPROVIDE
FOR THEIMPLEMENTATION OF ANAUTOMATED RED LIGHT
ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM IN THE CITYOFCOPPELL TEXAS PROVIDING
FORTHE IMPOSITION OFA CIVIL
PENALTY PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT AND
PROCEDURES PROVIDING FORAN ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION
HEARING PROVIDING FOREFFECT OF LIABILITY EXCLUSION
OF CIVIL REMEDY AND ENFORCEMENT PROVIDING FORTHE USE
OF CIVIL PENALTY FUNDSPROVIDING AREPEALING
CLAUSE PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE PROVIDING ASAVINGS
CLAUSE
AND PROVIDING ANEFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS theCity Council of the City ofCoppell
Texas City Council under the authority of Article XI Section 5of the Texas
constitution investigated and determined thatit would beadvantageous and beneficial to the City
of Coppell Texas Coppell andits inhabitants to implement an
automated red light enforcementprogram and WHEREAS uponinvestigation it hasbeen determined that
red light running is thecause ofapproximately 280 000 collisions and
240 000 injuries each year inthe United States andWHEREAS uponinvestigation
it has been determined thatred light running causesthe death of
approximately 100 people intheState ofTexas each yearand WHEREAS red
lightenforcement programs have proven toreduce thenumber of red lightrunners in that
Washington D Chas reducedred light running by68 andWilmington Delaware has
reduced redlight running by62with theirredlight enforcement programs and WHEREAS
the localcommunity of the CityofGarland began itsautomated
red light
enforcement program in September2003 andhas already experienceda 13reduction inviolations and
WHEREAS it is inthe
interest of thepublic health safety andwelfare to implement traffic
regulation andsafety programsNOWTHEREFOREBEITORDAINEDBYTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFCOPPELLTEXAS170221
SECTION 1That Chapter 8 Traffic Regulations of the Code of Ordinances of
the City of Coppell Texas be andthe sameisherebyamended byadding a new
Article 8 8 Automated Red LightEnforcement which
shall
read as
follows Chapter
8 TRAFFIC REGULATIONS
Sec 88 1Definitions In thisarticle Department means the
Police Department oftheCity of Coppell Texas Owner means the ownerof a
motor vehicle as shown on the motorvehicle registration records of
theTexas Department ofTransportation orthe analogous department or agency of another state
or country The term owner includes ia lessee ofa motor vehicle under alease of 6
monthsor more oriithe lessee ofa motor vehiclerented or
leased from a motorvehicle rental or leasingcompany but doesnot
include themotor vehicle rentalor leasing company
itself Photographic Traffic Monitoring Systemmeansa system that 1 consists
of a camera and vehicle sensorinstalled to work
inconjunction with anelectrically operated trafficcontrolsignal and2is
capableof producing atleast two recordedimages that depict the licenseplate
attached totherear ofa motorvehicle thatis
not
operated in compliance withthe instructions ofthetrafficcontrol
signal Recorded Imagemeans an imagerecorded by aphotographic trafficmonitoring system
that depictstherearofamotor
vehicle and isautomatically recorded on a photograph ordigital image
System Location means theapproach to an intersection toward
which a photographic trafficmonitoring system is directed anin
operation Traffic ControlSignal means a traffic control device that displays alternating redamber
andgreenlightsthatdirectstrafficwhentostopatorproceedthroughanintersection270221
Sec 8 82Imposition ofcivilpenalty for
creating dangerous intersectionsA The CityCouncilfinds anddetermines thata vehicle that
proceeds into anintersection when thetrafficcontrol signal for that vehicles direction
of travelisemitting a steadyred signaldamagesthepublic endangering
vehicle operators andpedestrians alike bydecreasing theefficiency of trafficcontrol
and traffic flowefforts and byincreasingthenumber of serious accidents to
which publicsafetyagencies mustrespondat the expense
of thetaxpayers BThe owner of amotor vehicle isliable for acivil penalty
if thevehicle proceeds into anintersectionata systemlocation whenthe
traffic controlsignal for that vehicle s direction oftravel is emitting a
steady red signal CThe civilpenaltyfor whichtheowner isliable is
75 00provided thatfora third or subsequent offense inany12 month
period the
amount of the
penalty shall be 20000 Sec883 Enforcement procedures
A The
Department is responsible fortheenforcement andadministration ofthisOrdinance BIn order
to impose acivil penaltyunderthisOrdinance the Department or itsdesignee shallmailor cause
tobemailedanoticeofviolationtotheownerofththe motorvehicle liable
for the civil penalty notlater thanthe 30
day after the date the violationis alleged to haveoccurred to
1 theowner s address
as shown on theregistration records ofthe TexasDepartment of Transportation or
2if the vehicle isregisteredin another stateor country
theowner saddress asshown onthe motor vehicle registration records
ofthedepartment or
agency ofthe otherstate orcountry analogous tothe TexasDepartment
of
Transportation CA notice ofviolation
issued underthisOrdinance shall containthe following 1
a description of the violation alleged 2
the location oftheintersection where theviolation occurred3 the dateand
timeoftheviolation4thenameandaddressoftheownerofthevehicleinvolvedintheviolation370221
5the registration number displayed onthe license plate of
the vehicle involved inthe
violation 6a copyof a recordedimage ofthe vehicle involvedin
the violation that depicts the registrationnumberdisplayed onthe
license plateof
that vehicle 7 the amount ofthe civil penalty tobe imposed
for theviolation 8thedate by which thecivil
penalty mustbe paid9a statement that a recorded image is
evidenceina proceeding for the
imposition of a civilpenalty 10 information that informs the
person
named in the notice of violation a of thepersons right to
contest the imposition of the civil penalty
against
the personinan administrative adjudication b of themannerandtime
in whichimposition of
the civil penalty may be contestedcthat failure to paythecivil
penaltyor tocontest liability in a timelymanner isan
admission ofliability and that failureto appear
at anadministrative adjudicationhearingafter having requesteda
hearing is an admission ofliability d that failuretopay the
civil penalty within thetimeallowed shall result in theimposition
of
a late payment feeof 25 00 and11a statement ifat the
time and placeof theviolation thevehicle was being operated byaperson
otherthan theowner if theowneris anatural person
theowner maytransfer liability fortheviolation tothe person who was
operating the vehicle at that timeandplace if theowner submits to
theCity byaffidavit ona formprovided by the
City orunder oathat anadministrative adjudication
hearing the name and current address ofthe person aoperating the
vehicle at thetime andplace ofthe violationb who wasthe
lessee of the vehicleatthe timeofthe violation if
the vehicle was rented or leased from apersonin the
business ofrentingorleasingmotorvehiclesatthattimeor470221
c who wasthe subsequent owner of the motorvehicle if
ownership of thevehicle wastransferred bytheowner
before the time of theviolation
D A notice ofviolation under thisarticleis presumed tohave been received
thonthefifth 5 dayafter thedate thenotice ofviolation is
mailed E In lieuof issuinga notice of violation the Department maymaila
warning notice to the owner thatin addition toany otherinformationcontainedin
thewarning notice must contain theInformation required by subsection Cof
this
Article Sec 8 8
4 Administrative adjudication hearing AA personwho received a noticeof violation
under this Ordinance maycontest the imposition of the civil penalty by
requesting in writing an administrative adjudication ofthe civilpenalty withinthe
time provided in thenotice which periodshall not be lessthan fifteen
15 days following themailing of the notice Upon receiptof therequest the
Department shall notify the person of thedate andtime ofthe hearing
on theadministrative adjudication The administrative adjudication hearingshall be
held before a hearing officer
appointed by theCity Manager B Failure to paya civil penalty orto
contest liabilitywithinfifteendays 15following thedate of thenotice is anadmission of
liability inthe full amount ofthecivil penaltyassessed in the notice of violation
andconstitutes awaiverof the
right toappeal under Section8 8 4 K CFailure
toappear at anadministrative adjudication hearing afterhaving requested a hearingis anadmission
of liabilityforthe fullamount ofthe civilpenaltyassessed in thenotice of
violation and constitutes a
waiver of theright to appeal under Section 8 8 4 KD Aperson
who failsto paya civil penalty within the time allowed under thisArticle shall
be additionally liable
for alate paymentpenalty in theamountof
twenty fivedollars 25 00 EThe civilpenalty shall not be
assessed
if 1After ahearing the hearing officerenters a finding
of noliability or 2 Within the time prescribedin thenotice
ofviolation the personagainstwhomthecivilpenaltyistobeassessedsubmitstheproofdescribedinSection883C11570221
F A personwho isfound liableafter anadministrative adjudication hearing
orwho requests an administrative adjudication hearingandthereafter failsto
appearatthe timeand place of the hearingis liable for administrative hearing
costs intheamount offifty dollars 50 00in additionto the amount of
the civilpenalty assessed for the violation Aperson who isfound liablefora
civil penalty afteran administrative adjudication hearing shallpaythe civilpenalty
and costs withinten10 days
of thehearing GInan administrativeadjudication hearingthe issues must be
provedat thehearing byapreponderance oftheevidenceThe reliability
of thephotographictraffic control signal monitoring systemusedto producetherecorded
image of theviolation originals or copies of the recorded image
and other documentary evidence relating to the violation alleged in anotice of violation
may beattestedtoin an administrativeadjudication hearingbyaffidavitof an
officer or employee ofthe City orthe entity withwhich theCitycontracts toinstall
or operate the system and whois responsible for inspecting and maintaining
thesystem A certification ofan officeror employee of theCity thatalleges a
violation based onaninspection ofthe pertinent recorded imageis admissiblein
a proceeding under this Ordinanceisevidenceof the factscontainedtherein and
isprima facie evidenceofthe violationallegedin the
notice of violation H It shallbe an affirmative defense to liability underthis
Article to beproven bya preponderance of
the evidence that 1the trafficcontrol signalwas notin
proper position and sufficiently legibleto
anordinarilyobservant person 2the operator ofthe motor vehicle
was acting incompliance with thelawful orderor
direction of a policeofficer 3the operator of the motor
vehicle violatedthe instructions of the traffic control signal so as toyield
the right of way to
an immediately approaching authorizedemergency vehicle 4themotor vehicle
wasbeing operated asan authorizedemergency vehicle under
Chapter 546of theTexas TransportationCode andthat the
operator wasacting in compliance withthat chapter 5the motorvehicle
was a stolenvehicle andbeingoperated bya person other
thantheownerof
the vehicle without the effectiveconsent ofthe owner6 the
license platedepicted inthe recorded image of the violationwas a
stolen plateand being displayedon a motor vehicle other thanthemotorvehicleforwhichtheplatehadbeenissued670221
7 if theowner of the vehicleis a natural person the vehicle
was being operatedby aperson other thanthe ownerofthe vehicle
or8 the presence of ice snow unusual amounts of rain
or otherunusually hazardous roadconditions existed that
would make compliance with thisOrdinancemore dangerous
under thecircumstances than
non compliance ITo demonstratethat atthetime oftheviolation themotor vehicle
was astolen vehicle or the license platedisplayedonthe motorvehiclewas
a stolen plate the ownermustsubmit proof acceptable tothe hearing officer that
the theftof thevehicle or licenseplate had beentimely reported to the
appropriate law
enforcement agency J Notwithstanding anything inthis Article to thecontrary a
person whofails to paythe amount ofacivil penaltyortocontest liability in a
timely manner isentitled to an administrative adjudication hearing onthe
violation if1 the personfiles an affidavit with thehearingofficer
stating thedate on whichthe personreceived the notice of
violation that wasmailed to
the personand 2 withinthe same period required bySection
88 4 Afor ahearing tobe timely requested
but measured from thedate the mailednotice was received
as stated in the affidavit filed under Subdivision
1 ofthis
subsection the personrequests anadministrative adjudication hearing KAperson who
isfound liable after anadministrative adjudication hearing may appealthat finding ofliability to
the Municipal Court byfiling anotice of appealwith the clerk oftheMunicipal
CourtThenoticeofappealmustbe filed stnotlater thanthe thirtyfirst
31day afterthedate onwhich the administrative adjudication hearing
officer entered the findings ofliability andshall beaccompanied bythe
payment of an appellate filing feeof fifty dollars 5000 Unless the person onor before
thefiling of the noticeof appeal postsa bond inthe amountofthe civil
penalty and any late fees an appeal doesnot stay theenforcement
of thecivil penalty An appeal shall bedetermined bythe
Municipal Courtbytrial de novoThe affidavits submittedunder Section8 8 3 11
shall be admitted by themunicipal judgein the
trial de novo and theissues must be proved
by a preponderanceof theevidence Sec 88 5 Effectof liabilityexclusion
of civil remedy enforcement ATheimpositionof a civilpenaltyunderthisOrdinanceisnotaconvictionandmaynotbeconsideredaconvictionforanypurpose770221
B The Departmentmay notimpose acivil penalty underthisOrdinance on
the owner ofa motor vehicleif the operator of the vehiclewas arrested or was
issued a citationandnotice toappear byapeace officerfor a violation ofSection
544 007 dofthe Texas Transportation Code recorded bythe
traffic control
monitoring system C TheCityAttorneyis authorized tofile suitto enforcecollection of
a civilpenalty assessed under
this Ordinance Sec886
Use of civil penaltyfunds Civilpenalties received by Coppell or the Department
may
only beused asfollowsA topay for the expensesof
the automated redlightenforcement program including but
not limited to operations maintenance improvements
personnel and
program management OperationalExpenses and Ballfunds remaining after
the payment ofOperationalExpenses shall beplaced in anaccount tobe
used solely for expenses and items thatarerelated orcan be used
in the furtherance oftrafficsafety including but not
limited to cameras traffic control devices enforcement equipment
such as radars and police vehicles
communication equipmenteducational or
awareness programs personnel and training SECTION 2That allprovisions ofthe ordinancesof
theCity of Coppell inconflict with the provisionsof this ordinance be and thesame
are herebyrepealed andall other provisionsof theordinances ofthe Cityof Coppell notin
conflict withthe provisionsof this ordinance shall
remain in full force and effect SECTION 3 That should
anysentence paragraph subdivisionclause phrase orsection ofthis ordinance be adjudge or heldto
be unconstitutionalillegal orinvalid thesame shall notaffect the validity of this ordinance asa whole
or anypartor provision thereofother than the part so decided tobe invalid illegal or
unconstitutional andshall notaffectthe validityoftheCodeofOrdinancesasawhole870221
SECTION 4 An offense committed before the effective date of this ordinance
is governed by the prior law and the provisions of the Code of Ordinances as amended in
effect when the offense was committed and the former law is continued in effect for this
purpose SECTION 5 This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage
and the publication of the caption as the law and
charter provide DUL y PASSED by the City Council of the City of Coppell Texas
on the
2dayof2006ATTEST970221
AN ORDINANCEOFTHE CITYOFCOPPELL
ORDINANCENO
2007 1175 ANORDINANCEOF THECITY OF
COPPELL TEXAS AMENDING ARTICLE8
8SECTION 8 8 2 SUBSECTION C
REGARDING THEMAXIMUM CIVIL PENALTY FOR THE
CIVILINFRACTION FORANAUTOMATED
RED LIGHT ENFORCEMENT VIOLATION BYAMENDING SECTION 88
4SUBSECTION ATO ADD A PROVISION FOR THE
HEARING OFFICER TOBE ABLE TO
ADMINISTER OATHS AND ISSUE ORDERS BY AMENDING SECTION 8
8 6 REGARDING THE USEOF CIVILPENALTY FUNDS
FOR SUCH VIOLATION BYADDING
A NEW SECTION 8 8 7
PROVIDING FOR THE USE OFPHOTOGRAPHIC
TRAFFIC SIGNAL ENFORCEMENT IMAGES PROVIDING AREPEALING CLAUSE PROVIDING ASEVERABILITY
CLAUSE PROVIDING
ASAVINGSCLAUSE WHEREAS the Cityhas duly adopted anautomated redlight
enforcement ordinance andth WHEREAS the80 legislatureof the
Stateof Texas hasprovided foran amendment tothe TransportationCoderegarding photographic
traffic signalenforcement systems concerning the
maximum civil penalty whichmay becharged andtheuse of such fundsand
photographic images and WHEREAS theCity Councilis
of the opinion that it should amend its ordinance to
reflect the changes
in the state law NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY
THE CITY COUNCIL OF COPPELL TEXAS THAT SECTION1 That Article8
8 Section8 8 2
subsection Cof theCodeof Ordinancesbe
and
the
sameisherebyamendedtoreadasfollowsARTICLE88AUTOMATEDREDLIGHTENFORCEMENTSec882ImpositionofcivilpenaltyforcreatingdangerousintersectionsPage1TM183252000
CAciviloradministrativepenaltyforviolationofthisarticleshallbe7500SECTION2ThatArticle88Section884oftheCodeofOrdinancesbeandthesameisherebyamendedbyamendingsubsectionAwhichshallreadasfollowsARTICLE88AUTOMATEDREDLIGHTENFORCEMENTSec884AdministrativeadjudicationhearingASuchhearingofficershallhavetheauthoritytoadministeroathsandtoissueorderscompellingtheattendanceofwitnessesandproductionofdocumentsSECTION3ThatArticle88Section886oftheCodeofOrdinancesbeandthesameisherebyamendedtoreadasfollowsARTICLE88AUTOMATEDREDLIGHTENFORCEMENTSec886UseofcivilpenaltyfundsTopayfortheenforcementoftheautomatedredlightenforcementprogramincludingbutnotlimitedtooperationmaintenanceimprovementpersonnelandprogrammanagementfundtrafficsafetyprogramsincludingpedestriansafetyprogramspublicsafetyprogramsintersectionimprovementandtrafficenforcementSECTION4ThattheCodeofOrdinancesbeandsameisherebyamendedbyamendingArticle88toaddSection887toprovidefortheuseofphotographictrafficsignalenforcementimageswhichshallreadasfollowsARTICLE88AUTOMATEDREDLIGHTENFORCEMENTSec887UseofphotographictrafficsignalenforcementimagesPage2TM183252000
Sec887UseofphotographictrafficsignalenforcementimagesNopersonmayutilizeaphotographictrafficsignalenforcementsystemrecordedimageforanypurposeexceptinaccordancewiththisarticleSECTION5ThatallprovisionsoftheOrdinancesoftheCityofCoppellTexasinconflictwiththeprovisionsofthisordinancebeandthesameareherebyrepealedandallotherprovisionsoftheOrdinancesoftheCitynotinconflictwiththeprovisionsofthisordinanceshallremaininfullforceandeffectSECTION6ThatshouldanywordsentenceparagraphsubdivisionclausephraseorsectionofthisordinanceoroftheCodeofOrdinancesasamendedherebybeadjudgedorheldtobevoidorunconstitutionalthesameshallnotaffectthevalidityoftheremainingportionsofsaidordinanceortheCodeofOrdinancesasamendedherebywhichshallremaininfullforceandeffectSECTION7ThatthisordinanceshalltakeeffectimmediatelyfromandafteritspassageasthelawandcharterinsuchcasesprovideDULYPASSEDbytheCityCounciloftheCityofCoppellTexasthisthe24yjJATTESTjIBYiAffCITYSECRETARYPage3TM183252000
WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR
DEPT:
DATE:
ITEM #:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM TYPE:
ITEM CAPTION:
GOAL(S):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
Engineering
February 23, 2010
14
✔
PRESENTATION
Presentation and update of current and proposed construction projects in the City of Coppell, Texas,
A Power Point presentation will provide information on various upcoming construction projects.
#Construction Projects
AGENDA REQUEST FORM DATE: February 23, 2010
ITEM #: 15
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
A. Project Update and Future Agendas.
Agenda Request Form - Revised 09/027 Document Name: %manrep
AGENDA REQUEST FORM DATE: February 23, 2010
ITEM #: 16
PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENTS CONCERNING ITEMS OF
COMMUNITY INTEREST AND NO COUNCIL ACTION OR
DELIBERATION IS PERMITTED
Agenda Request Form - Revised 09/02 Document Name: %mayorreport
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
DATE: February 23, 2010
ITEM #: 17
COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
A. Carrollton/Farmers Branch ISD/Lewisville ISD – Tunnell.
B. Coppell ISD – Mahalik and Hinojosa-Flores.
C. Coppell Seniors – Brancheau and Faught.
D. Dallas Regional Mobility Coalition – Peters and Hunt.
E. International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) –Brancheau
F. Metrocrest Hospital Authority – Councilmember Tunnell.
G. Metrocrest Medical Foundation – Mahalik.
H. Metrocrest Medical Services – Hinojosa-Flores.
I. Metrocrest Social Services – Franklin.
J. North Texas Council of Governments – Tunnell.
K. NTCOG/Regional Emergency Management – Faught.
L. North Texas Commission – Hunt.
M. Senior Adult Services – Franklin.
Agenda Request Form - Revised 11/09 Document Name: %ccommreport
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
DATE: February 23, 2010
ITEM #: 18
NECESSARY ACTION RESULTING FROM EXECUTIVE SESSION
Agenda Request Form - Revised 09/02 Document Name: %necessaryactionexec
CERTIFICATE OF AGENDA ITEM SUBMISSION
Council Meeting Date: February 23, 2010
Department Submissions:
Item No. 7 was placed on the Agenda for the above-referenced City Council
meeting by the Fire Department. I have reviewed the Agenda Request
(and any backup if applicable) and hereby submit this item to the City
Council for consideration.
____________________
Fire Department
Item No. 11 was placed on the Agenda for the above-referenced City
Council meeting by the Planning Department. I have reviewed the
Agenda Request (and any backup if applicable) and hereby submit this item
to the City Council for consideration.
____________________
Planning Department
Item No. 12 was placed on the Agenda for the above-referenced City
Council meeting by the Parks Department. I have reviewed the Agenda
Request (and any backup if applicable) and hereby submit this item to the
City Council for consideration.
____________________
Parks Department
Item No. 14 was placed on the Agenda for the above-referenced City
Council meeting by the Engineering Department. I have reviewed the
Agenda Request (and any backup if applicable) and hereby submit this item
to the City Council for consideration.
____________________
Engineering Department
Financial Review:
I certify that I have reviewed all the items submitted for consideration on
the Agenda for the above-referenced City Council Meeting and have inserted
any financial comments where appropriate.
____________________
Finance Department
City Manager Review:
I certify that I have reviewed the complete Agenda and Packet for the
above-referenced City Council Meeting and hereby submit the same to the
City Council for consideration.
____________________
City Manager
(or Deputy City Manager)