Loading...
CISD Grant No. 2003-L02STATE OF TEXAS § COPPELL EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION COUNTY OF DALLAS § GRANT AGREEMENT This Educational Development Grant Agreement ( "AGREEMENT ") is made by and between the City of Coppell, Texas ( "CITY "), Coppell Education Development Corporation ( "CEDC ") and the Coppell Independent School District (the "CISD "), acting by and through their respective authorized officers. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the CITY is authorized by TEX. LOC. Gov'T CODE § 379A to provide educational development grants to publicly funded institutions through the CEDC for the promotion of literacy, foreign language and career technology for a skilled workforce; and WHEREAS, the CITY seeks to support programs for promoting literacy, foreign language and career technology for a skilled workforce; and WHEREAS, the CISD has submitted a grant application No. 2003 -L02 to provide funding for nine Literacy Intervention Support teachers, professional development for literacy teachers, staff development materials, and teaching materials for literacy teachers and campus literacy support (the PROJECT); and WHEREAS, the CISD has developed the PROJECT using trained, certified, effective elementary teachers; and WHEREAS, the PROJECT will provide additional classroom support in a small group setting that is taught by literacy specialists to help students maximize their potential, accelerate literacy skills and improve self - esteem and achievement; and WHEREAS, CISD is in need of funding the salaries of nine (9) Literacy Intervention Support Teachers, professional development for literacy teachers, staff development materials, teaching materials for literacy teachers and campus literacy support, and seeks the assistance of the CEDC for such assistance; and WHEREAS, the CITY has determined that making an education development grant to the CISD in accordance with this AGREEMENT will further the objectives of the CITY, will benefit the CITY and the CITY's inhabitants, and will promote literacy in the CITY. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and other valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: COPPELL EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT GRANT Page 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. Subject to availability of funds collected from the 379A sales tax, the CITY agrees to provide the CISD an education development grant (the "GRANT ") in an amount not to exceed Four Hundred Eighty -two Thousand Six Hundred Eleven Dollars and no cents ($482,611.00). 2. CISD agrees to utilize the GRANT to fund nine (9) Literacy Support Teachers, professional development for literacy teachers, staff development materials, and teaching materials for literacy teachers and campus literacy support. 3. CITY agrees to provide the GRANT of Four Hundred Eighty -two Thousand Six Hundred Eleven Dollars and no cents ($482,611.00) funds payable on a quarterly basis with the first payment to be made on or before November 1, 2003. Funds to be expended in accordance with the budget categories set forth in the GRANT application. 4. On a quarterly basis beginning no later than February 1, 2004 the CISD shall submit a detail list of expenditures for this GRANT to the CEDC. The detailed list of expenditures shall include all personnel costs and other financial documents, which address the GRANT expenditures by category as approved by the CEDC, and reflected in Item 3 of this AGREEMENT. CISD shall also provide documentation related to the number of students served, grade level served, and any changes in personnel during the period covered by this grant, as well as any other information that reflects the success of the Literacy Intervention Support Program. 5. In the event the CISD breaches any of the terms of this AGREEMENT or fails to use the GRANT for the purposes set forth herein, then the CISD, after expiration of the notice and cure period described herein, shall be in default of this AGREEMENT. As liquidated damages in the event of such default, the CISD shall, within thirty (30) days after demand, repay to the CITY, the GRANT with interest at the rate of eight percent (8 %) per annum from the date of receipt of the GRANT until paid. The parties acknowledge that actual damages in the event of default would be speculative and difficult to determine. Upon breach by CISD of any obligations under this AGREEMENT, the CITY shall notify the CISD in writing, who shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of the notice in which to cure such default. If CISD fails to cure the default within the time provided herein, or, as such time period may be extended, then the CITY at its sole option, shall have the right to terminate this AGREEMENT without further notice to the CISD. 6. The terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT are binding upon the successors and assigns of all parties hereto. This AGREEMENT may not be assigned without the express written consent of CITY and CEDC. 7. It is understood and agreed between the parties that CISD, in the use of the GRANT and in satisfying the conditions of this AGREEMENT, is acting independently, and that the CITY and/or the CEDC assumes no responsibilities or liabilities to third parties in connection with these actions. CISD agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the CITY and the CEDC from all COPPELL EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT GRANT Page 2 such claims, suits, and causes of action, liabilities and expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, of any nature whatsoever arising out of the CISD'S performance of the conditions under this AGREEMENT. 8. Any notice required or permitted to be delivered hereunder shall be deemed received when sent by United States mail, postage pre -paid, certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to the party at the address set forth opposite the signature of the party. 9. This AGREEMENT shall be governed by the laws of the State of Texas; and venue for any action concerning this AGREEMENT shall be in the State District Court of Dallas County, Texas. 10. In the event any one or more of the provisions contained in this AGREEMENT shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability shall not effect the other provisions, and the AGREEMENT shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had never been contained in it. EXECUTED tlu day of EXECUTED this day of COPPELL EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT GRANT Page 3 CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS By: ATTEST: , 2003. 1 TT, CITY MANAGER T 5 Parkway Boulevard P.O. Box 9478 Coppell, Texas 75019 , 2003. COPPELL EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION By: Presiden 255 Parkway Boulevard P.O. Box 9478 Coppell, Texas 75019 SIGNED this 7L' day of STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DALLAS § My Commission Expires: ATTEST: By: ATTEST: By: This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of 2003, by Jim Witt, City Manager of the City of Coppell, Texas, a Texas municipality, on behalf of said municipality. COPPELL EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT GRANT Page 4 COPPELL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FF T R SUPERINTENDENT Coppell Independent School District 200 S. Denton Road Coppell, Texas 75019 CITY'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Public, State of Texas `,ti0111lless,,/ • fr B��V P Uc -1111-trotPIR;t■Itt% STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DALLAS My Commission expires: VO 6 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DALLAS My Commission expires: 45/01 COPPELL EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION This i trument w s acknowledged before me on the day of 2003, by •-� ` rek , Coppell Education Development Corporation, behalf of said corp cation. COPPELL EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT GRANT Page 5 o�e�. LISA A. GANZ ?* ` lam Notary Public, State of Texas My Commission Expires **41.40 June 25 ' 2007 Notary Public, State of Texas COPPELL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT on This instrument was acknowledged before me on the to day ? ,41 , 2003, by Dr. Jeff Turner, Superintendent of Coppell Independent School District, on behalf of said District. Notary Public, State o xas Project Title: CISD Literacy Intervention Support Program Principal Applicant Pamela Crites Title of Principal Applicant Coordinator of Language Arts, Reading Initiative, and Fine Arts ISD Representative in Application Coppell Project Period (Start & Finish of Entire Project) August 2003 -June 2004 Total Amount Requested $482,611 Printed Names & Title of Grant Approvers; Signatures; & Dates: Pamela Crites, Coordinator of Language Arts, Reading Initiative & Fine Arts Principal Applicant Title (Required) Team Member Title (Optional) Team Member Title (Optional) Principal of School Involved Title (Optional) Dr. Jeff Turner, CISD su +t. District Superintendent Title (Required) Coppell Education Development Corporation Grant Application Deena Reeve President, Board of Trustees * * School Board President President (Required) ( Signat re Signature * *Signifies approval by the School Board of Trustees Signature ignature OC Signature Date Date Signature Date Date ji /63 ate 0 : �O ate I. Abstract of Projram/Activity The Coppell ISD Literacy Intervention Support Program is designed to serve students who are identified by Early Reading Assessment in kindergarten, first, second and third grades at each of Coppell's nine elementary campuses located within the Coppell boundaries. Literacy Intervention support teachers, one teacher per campus, are needed to assist students in grades K -3 in developing literacy skills and providing literacy support to regular classroom teachers. Intensive ongoing staff development for literacy teachers as well as training of new primary teachers is also an integral part of the Literacy Support Program and an identified need. Staff development/study sessions will be facilitated by the CISD Language Arts/Reading Initiative Coordinator. Literacy Support Teachers support the state mandated Student Success Initiative by providing literacy leadership at each campus. Their responsibilities include the following: 1. Provide intensive, focused literacy instruction to identified students on a daily basis and constantly monitor students' literacy growth. 2. Assist regular classroom teachers in identifying students at -risk of reading failure based upon assessment results and work cooperatively with classroom teachers to plan effectively for these identified students. 3. Coordinate state mandated Early Reading Assessments in grades kindergarten, first and second grade three times a year —at the beginning of the school year, middle of year and end of year plus coordinating assessment as needed in third grade. 4. Provide model teaching in the classroom in such areas as guided reading, interactive or guided writing, phonemic awareness or phonics lessons, especially for teachers new to CISD. 5. Work cooperatively with teachers and principals to promote literacy at each campus and participate in monthly literacy study sessions with other literacy support teachers and the district's language arts coordinator to keep current on reading and writing research and effective literacy program implementation. 6. Provide additional literacy resources for both students and teachers. Coppell ISD is applying under the literacy provision of the Coppell Education Development Corporation for a total of $ 482,611 to fund salaries, staff development, training supplies, and literacy instructional materials. "Literacy is both broader and more specific than reading. Literate behaviors include writing and other creative or analytical skills in specific subject matter domains," (Anderson and Pearson, 1984)., cited in Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children. In order to work toward the Coppell ISD Profile of the Graduate goals (see attachment) that, (I.) "A scholar of high reputation (b) transfers and applies knowledge and skills in meaningful ways that lead to further learning opportunities; (e) utilizes critical reading and thinking skills, and (g) seeks knowledge independently, responsibly and purposefully," students must achieve highly developed literacy and thinking skills. 2 II. Description of Proposal and Nature of Request In order to meet the reading goal by then Governor George W. Bush in 1996 stating that, "All students will read on or above level or higher by the end of third grade and continue reading on or above grade level throughout their schooling," literacy support is imperative in the early grades and is mandated in the Student Success Initiative (see attachment). This existing program has expanded to third grade in the 2002 -03 school year due to the "no- social promotion" legislation that became effective in the spring of 2003 with the third grade class. Due to the efforts of trained literacy teachers and regular classroom teachers in third grade during the 2002 -03 school year, 100% of CISD 3 grade students met the minimum standards on the TAKS reading assessment and 51% meet commended performance (answering all but two or fewer questions correctly). Additional funds are requested this year to include increases in salaries, ongoing professional staff development and required materials for both literacy teachers and new K -3 teachers. As a result of the reading goal set by then Governor Bush, guidelines were given to educators and legislation was passed which requires early reading assessment in kindergarten, first and second grade. Guidelines for the mandated Accelerated Instruction included the following: *Identify target students and instructional priorities based upon assessment results *Provide for at least 30 minutes a day of additional systematic and explicit literacy instruction 3 *Provide small group instruction in the areas of phonemic awareness, phonics, alphabetic principle, reading fluency, reading comprehension and writing *Use highly trained professionals to deliver instruction and provide interventions. Literacy teachers work both in the classroom alongside regular classroom teachers and/or in a small group session in the literacy teacher's room. CISD has developed a literacy support system using trained, certified, experienced elementary teachers who specialize in early literacy skills, supporting students needing additional literacy support, and serve as literacy role models in each of the elementary campuses. Additional literacy support in a small group setting that is taught by a literacy specialist helps students maximize their potential, accelerate literacy skills, improve self - esteem and achievement. According to research by Juel in 1994, "Children who fall behind in first grade reading have a one in eight chance of ever catching up to grade level." Therefore, the focus of the literacy support program is to serve any first grade student identified by the Early Reading Assessment as needing additional literacy support. Literacy intervention support teachers will also serve identified students in grades two, three and kindergarten based upon greatest need. Educational goals are based upon the Twelve Essential Components of Research -Based Programs for Beginning Readers from the Texas Education Agency. Essential components (goals) are as follows: Children will have the opportunities... 1. to expand their use and appreciation of oral language. 4 2. to expand their use and appreciation of printed language. 3. to hear good stories and informational books read aloud daily. 4. to understand and manipulate the building blocks of spoken language. 5. to learn about and manipulate the building blocks of written language. 6. to learn the relationship between the sounds of spoken language and the letters of written language. 7. to learn decoding strategies. 8. to write and relate their writing to spelling and reading. 9. to practice accurate and fluent reading in decodable stories and pattern -type readers. 10. to read and comprehend a wide assortment of books and other texts. 11. to develop and comprehend new vocabulary through wide reading and direct vocabulary instruction. 12. to learn and apply comprehension strategies as they reflect upon and think critically about what they read. As a result of the "Ending Social Promotion" legislation (Texas Education Code, Section 28.0211), which went into effect in the 2002 -03 school year, third grade students who do not meet the minimum standard on the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) assessment will not be promoted to fourth grade. The third grade class of 2002 -03 and subsequent students in earlier grades will also be required to meet the minimum standard on the 5 grade TAKS reading and math assessments, and the 8th 5 grade reading and math TAKS assessments in order to be promoted to the next grade level. Thus, the importance of reading acquisition and comprehension is even more imperative. Beginning in kindergarten, students must be making significant literacy progress at each grade level in order to be successful not only on the 3 grade reading TAKS assessment, but to be successful in reading and comprehending new information in all content areas. Outcomes of literacy success will be met through solid classroom literacy instruction by trained educators who have access to effective literacy instruction materials, and through literacy support for identified, targeted students through literacy assessment. If students are not receiving supportive classroom instruction and intensive focused instruction for identified students, then the consequences are reduced numbers of students meeting the TAKS standards and achieving literacy success. If CEDC does not support this proposal, then funds may not be available to support literacy training and literacy teacher salaries, thus causing lack of small group focused instruction which has proven to be successful in CISD as evidenced in 2003 TAKS reading results. Lack of funding could cause cutbacks in this program or other important curricular programs which impact student lives. This project is imperative for the continued literacy development of CISD primary students. Literacy teachers must continually study effective research and upgrade literacy skills in order to lead their respective campuses, thus ongoing monthly study groups, attending literacy conferences, and the training of new K -3 teachers is essential to the continual growth and development of educators. 6 Four factors , according to Dr. Reid Lyons, hinder reading development among children irrespective of their socioeconomic level and ethnicity. "Factors include deficits in phoneme awareness and the development of the alphabetic principle (and the accurate and fluent application of these skills to textual reading), deficits in acquiring reading comprehension strategies and applying them to the reading of text, the development and maintenance of motivation to learn to read, and the inadequate preparation of teachers," (Dr. G. Reid Lyons, presentation to committee on Labor and Human Resources, April 28, 1998). Thus the need to focus upon these four factors and also adequately prepare primary teachers through staff development and adequate classroom teaching materials is imperative to literacy success of CISD students. Classroom instruction can be hindered without appropriate, updated classroom instructional materials that are part of this grant. Yearly staffing needs include literacy teachers who are contracted to teach from August of 2003 through June of 2004. Literacy teachers will attend literacy conferences to update professional skills as well as attend study sessions on new reading research texts during the 2003 -04 school year. New K -3 teachers will receive literacy staff development facilitated by the language arts /reading initiative coordinator in the areas of reading, writing and phonics effective instruction and also receive classroom instructional materials to assist their teaching in the areas of guided reading, teaching of phonics and writing instruction aligned with new TAKS writing expectations. Using funds from this grant will enable Literacy teachers to obtain updated literacy materials 7 such as guided reading books, hands -on phonics materials, fluency materials, comprehension strategies and writing improvement materials. Funding from the state Accelerated Reading Instruction will most likely be reduced this next school year due to legislative changes; CISD has depended on these funds to supplement materials, training and other literacy efforts. Lack of ARI funds increases the need for outside funding for literacy materials and intervention. Projected numbers of students to be served are based upon the figures of students being served during the 2002 -03 school year. It is anticipated that at least an equal, if not greater, number of CISD students, will be served during the 2003 -04 school year. Numbers of students served in 2002 -03 literacy program were as follows: Kindergarten---135 First grade - -- 224 Second grade - - -116 Third grade— 132 Total K -3 607 III. Budget A. Salaries and benefits for nine literacy intervention teachers = $453, 327 B. Professional development for literacy teachers (including early literacy conferences and meetings) = $3150 C. Staff development materials (training and teaching resources) 1. Literacy teachers = $719 8 2. New K -3 teachers= $7415 (based upon 10 new teachers per grade level such teacher materials as guided reading books, phonics resources, writing resources) D. Teaching materials for literacy teachers and campus literacy support = $18,000 (approximately $2,000 per campus to purchase guided reading books, hands -on phonics and writing materials) IV. Project Measurement and Evaluation Projections of 607 or more students in grades K -3 will be served by the literacy intervention teachers which accounts for an average of 21.6 percent of students in the following grades: Kindergarten - -- 20.8 % First grade - - -- 32.4% Second grade -- -16.7% Third grade - -- 18.5% Projected dollars per student served by the literacy teachers (salaries, professional development, training resources and campus literacy support materials) will be $782.86 Projected dollars per student served by trained new K -3 teachers (approximately 10 new teachers per grade times four grade levels @22 students per classroom with cost of $7415) will be $8. 43. Effectiveness of this program will be measured quantitatively through both the results of the early reading assessments and the 3rd grade TAKS reading assessment. Improvement of skills and individual growth of students from the beginning of the year to the end of the year, especially reading level, will indicate 9 effectiveness of this program. Percentages of students meeting benchmark scores in grades K -2 and meeting minimum standards on 3 grade TAKS assessment will also indicate effectiveness of program. Parental questionnaires and principal written feedback will also qualitatively measure program effectiveness. The CISD Literacy Support program has demonstrated effectiveness (100% of 2003 third grade students meeting minimum standard on TAKS reading assessment) due to literacy support efforts of literacy teachers and K -3 staff and needs continued funding in order to continue to adjust instruction to changing needs of student, to continue to successfully meet increasingly difficult TAKS standards, and to positively impact student lives. 10 References Anderson, R.C. and P.D. Pearson (1984). A schema of thematic view of basic processes Reading comprehension, pp. 255 -291 in Handbook of Reading Research P.D. Pearson, R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, and P. Mosenthal, eds. New York: Longman. Coppell Portrait of a Graduate, Coppell ISD, 2003 Juel, C. (1994). Learning to read and write in one elementary school. New York: Springer, Verlag. Lyon, Dr. G. Reid, Overview of Reading and Literacy Initiatives, presentation to Committee on Labor and Human Resources, Washington, DC, April 28, 1998. National Research Council (1998). Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children. 42, National Academy Press. Texas Education Agency, (2003), Austin, Texas. Retrieved June 10, 2003 from www.tea.state.tx.us 11 Attachments Prepare for Success: A Parent Guide to the Student Success Initiative Texas Education Code 28.0211 re: Accelerated Instruction and "no- social" promotion CISD Graduate Profile Twelve Essential Components of Research -Based Programs for Beginning Reading Instruction CISD 2003 TAKS Score Summary 14 NEW PROMOTION REQUIREMENTS 2002 -2003 3RD GRADE: Students must pass the Reading TAKS test to be promoted to the fourth grader 2003 -2004 11TH GRADE Exit- level: Students must pass the Exit -level TAKS test in order to graduate. 5111 GRADE: Students must pass the Reading and Math TAKS to be promoted to the sixth grade. 2007 8TH GRADE: Students must pass the Reading and Math TAKS to be promoted to the ninth grade. To obtain more information about helping your child learn to read, you may order the booklet Beginning Reading Instruction: Practical Ideas for Parents, or other reading resources by calling the Texas Education Agency Publications Distribution Office at (512) 463 -9744. If you have any questions about the new state requirements for grade advancement, contact your school's principal or go to the state's website at http://www.tea.state. tx.us /student.assessment / Additional copies of this brochure may be ordered at (512) 463 -9744. 1701 North Congress Ave. Austin, TX 78701 Phone: (512) 463 -9734 Fax (512) 463 -9838 Bxo2 13009 A Parent Guide to the Student Success Initiative Beginning with the 2002 -2003 school year, new student promotion requirements will go into effect. Information is provided inside to help parents prepare their children for a successful school year. TEXAS EDUCATION CODE SUBTITLE F. CURRICULUM, PROGRAMS, AND SERVICES CHAPTER 28. COURSES OF STUDY; ADVANCEMENT SUBCHAPTER B. ADVANCEMENT, PLACEMENT, CREDIT, AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT RECORD § 28.0211. Satisfactory Performance on Assessment Instruments Required; Accelerated Instruction (a) Except as provided by Subsection (b) or (e), a student may not be promoted to: (1) the fourth grade program to which the student would otherwise be assigned if the student does not perform satisfactorily on the third grade reading assessment instrument under Section 39.023; (2) the sixth grade program to which the student would otherwise be assigned if the student does not perform satisfactorily on the fifth grade mathematics and reading assessment instruments under Section 39.023; or (3) the ninth grade program to which the student would otherwise be assigned if the student does not perform satisfactorily on the eighth grade mathematics and reading assessment instruments under Section 39.023. (b) A school district shall provide to a student who initially fails to perform satisfactorily on an assessment instrument specified under Subsection (a) at least two additional opportunities to take the assessment instrument. A school district may administer an alternate assessment instrument to a student who has failed an assessment instrument specified under Subsection (a) on the previous two opportunities. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, a student may be promoted if the student performs at grade level on an alternate assessment instrument under this subsection that is appropriate for the student's grade level and approved by the commissioner. (c) Each time a student fails to perform satisfactorily on an assessment instrument specified under Subsection (a), the school district in which the student attends school shall provide to the student accelerated instruction in the applicable subject area, including reading instruction for a student who fails to perform satisfactorily on a reading assessment instrument. After a student fails to perform satisfactorily on an assessment instrument a second time, a grade placement committee shall be established to prescribe the accelerated instruction the district shall provide to the student before the student is administered the assessment instrument the third time. The grade placement committee shall be composed of the principal or the principal's designee, the student's parent or guardian, and the teacher of the subject of an assessment instrument on which the student failed to perform satisfactorily. The district shall notify the parent or guardian of the time and place for convening the grade placement committee and the purpose of the committee. An accelerated instruction group administered by a school district under this section may not have a ratio of more than 10 students for each teacher. (d) In addition to providing accelerated instruction to a student under Subsection (c), the district shall notify the student's parent or guardian of: (1) the student's failure to perform satisfactorily on the assessment instrument; 1 (2) the accelerated instruction program to which the student is assigned; and (3) the possibility that the student might be retained at the same grade level for the next school year. (e) A student who, after at least three attempts, fails to perform satisfactorily on an assessment instrument specified under Subsection (a) shall be retained at the same grade level for the next school year in accordance with Subsection (a). The student's parent or guardian may appeal the student's retention by submitting a request to the grade placement committee established under Subsection (c). The school district shall give the parent or guardian written notice of the opportunity to appeal. The grade placement committee may decide in favor of a student's promotion only if the committee concludes, using standards adopted by the board of trustees, that if promoted and given accelerated instruction, the student is likely to perform at grade level. A student may not be promoted on the basis of the grade placement committee's decision unless that decision is unanimous. The commissioner by rule shall establish a time line for making the placement determination. This subsection does not create a property interest in promotion. The decision of the grade placement committee is final and may not be appealed. (f) A school district shall provide to a student who, after three attempts, has failed to perform satisfactorily on an assessment instrument specified under Subsection (a) accelerated instruction during the next school year as prescribed by an educational plan developed for the student by the student's grade placement committee established under Subsection (c). The district shall provide that accelerated instruction regardless of whether the student has been promoted or retained. The educational plan must be designed to enable the student to perform at the appropriate grade level by the conclusion of the school year. During the school year, the student shall be monitored to ensure that the student is progressing in accordance with the plan. The district shall administer to the student the assessment instrument for the grade level in which the student is placed at the time the district regularly administers the assessment instruments for that school year. (g) This section does not preclude the retention at a grade level, in accordance with state law or school district policy, of a student who performs satisfactorily on an assessment instrument specified under Subsection (a). (h) In each instance under this section in which a school district is specifically required to provide notice to a parent or guardian of a student, the district shall make a good faith effort to ensure that such notice is provided either in person or by regular mail and that the notice is clear and easy to understand and is written in English or the parent or guardian's native language. (i) The admission, review, and dismissal committee of a student who participates in a district's special education program under Subchapter B, Chapter 29, and who does not perform satisfactorily on an assessment instrument specified under Subsection (a) and administered under Section 39.023(a) or (b) shall determine: (1) the manner in which the student will participate in an accelerated instruction program under this section; and (2) whether the student will be promoted or retained under this section. 2 (j) A school district or open - enrollment charter school shall provide students required to attend accelerated programs under this section with transportation to those programs if the programs occur outside of regular school hours. (k) The commissioner shall adopt rules as necessary to implement this section, including rules concerning when school districts shall administer assessment instruments required under this section and which administration of the assessment instruments will be used for purposes of Section 39.051. (1) The commissioner shall issue a report to the legislature not later than December 1, 2000, that reviews the enrollment of students in accelerated instruction and the quality and availability of accelerated instruction programs, including accelerated instruction- related teacher professional development programs. (m) The commissioner shall certify, not later than July 1 of each school year or as soon as practicable thereafter, whether sufficient funds have been appropriated statewide for the purposes of this section. A determination by the commissioner is final and may not be appealed. For purposes of certification, the commissioner may not consider Foundation School Program funds. This section may be implemented only if the commissioner certifies that sufficient funds have been appropriated during a school year for administering the accelerated instruction programs specified under this section. Text of subsection (n) effective until January 1, 2008 (n) This section applies to the assessment instrument administered to students in: (1) the third grade beginning with the 2002 -2003 school year; (2) the fifth grade beginning with the 2004 -2005 school year; and (3) the eighth grade beginning with the 2007 -2008 school year. Text of subsection (o) effective until January 1, 2008 (o) Subsection (n) and this subsection expire January 1, 2008. 3 Who is the Coppell ISD Graduate? A scholar of high reputation... ...prioritizes to achieve personal academic goals. ...transfers and applies knowledge and skills in meaningful ways that lead to further learning opportunities. ...understands and appreciates the arts and their impact on the other disciplines and life. ...discriminates in the use of consumer information. ...utilizes critical reading and thinking skills. ...practices non - traditional and original problem - solving skills. ...seeks knowledge independently, responsibly, and purposefully. ...practices self- advocacy and self- determination. An articulate communicator... ...possesses multilingual skills. ...effectively conveys information in written, oral and visual forms. ...learns through listening. ... improves through self - reflection. ...expresses ideas in ways that inspire progress toward the shared resolution of a problem. A person of strong, moral character... ...values humanity, oneself, and one's environment. ...models healthy life choices. ...abstains from inappropriate social behavior. ...balances personal and professional pursuits. A dynamic citizen... ...practices informed patriotism. ...participates and contributes actively in the local and global community. ...possesses an understanding of international relations and the impact of global dynamics. ...collaborates proficiently. ...contributes to a sense of unity within a community. ...strives toward specific goals that lead to personal success. A flexible, resilient pacesetter... ...maximizes rapidly- changing technologies. ...adapts to shifting paradigms. ...leads in a bold and daring manner. ...shows courage while using good judgment in decision - making. The Coppell ISD Graduate is marketable to global interests. Coppell ISD Graduate Profile June, 2003 1. Children have opportunities to expand their use and appreciation of oral language. K.1 -K.4 K.5 -K.5B Twelve Essential Components of Research -Based Programs for Beginning Reading Instruction With TEKS and TAKS Correlations TEKS: Listening/Speaking 1.1 -1.4 2.1 -2.4 TEKS: Print Awareness 1.5 -1.5B 3.1 -3.4 2. Children have opportunities to expand their use and appreciation of printed language. 3. Children have opportunities to hear good stories and informational books read aloud daily. K.10 K.1 K.14 1.3 TEKS: Literary Response TEKS: Composition 2.9 TEKS: Listening/Speaking /Purpose 4. Children have opportunities to understand and manipulate the building blocks of spoken language. TEKS: Phonological Awareness K.6 1.6 TEKS: Word Identification 2.5 5. Children have opportunities to learn about and manipulate the building blocks of written language. TEKS: Reading: Letter -Sound Relationship K.7 1.7 T EKS : Word Identification 2.5 TEKS: Writing/Penmanship 1.17 2.15 3.9 3.5 3.15 6. Children have opportunities to learn the relationship between the sounds of spoken language and the letters of written language. TEKS: Reading: Letter -Sound Relationships K.7 1.7 TEKS: Word Identification 2.5 TEKS: Writing/Spelling 1.20 2.16 7. Children have opportunities to learn decoding strategies. TEKS: Letter -Sound Relationship K.7 1.7 TEKS: Word Identification 2.5 8. Children have opportunities to write and relate their writing to spelling and reading. K.14 TEKS: Writing/Spelling 1.20 2.16 TEKS: Writing Processes/Editing 2.18 9. Children have opportunities to practice accurate and fluent reading in decodable stories. TEKS: Reading Fluency 1.9 2.6 10. Children have opportunities to read and comprehend a wide assortment of books and other texts. TEKS: Reading: Variety of Texts 1.10 2.7 11. Children have opportunities to develop and comprehend new vocabulary through wide reading and direct vocabulary instruction. TEKS: Reading: Vocabulary Development K.8 1.11 2.8 TEKS: Reading Comprehension K.9 1.12 2.9 3.5 3.16 3.5 3.16 3.18 3.6 3.7 3.8 12. Children have opportunities to learn and apply comprehension strategies as they reflect upon and think critically about what they read. 3.9 Grade 4 Readinq Math Writing Science All Tests Number Tested 719 723 712 656 708 Met Standard 98% 98% 98% 88% 96% Commended 41% 38% 31% 5% 15% Grade 5 Reading Math Science Science All Tests Number Tested 751 748 762 656 687 Met Standard 94% 96% 93% 88% 90% Commended 40% 45% 13% 5% 9% Grade 6 Reading Math Writing Science All Tests Number Tested 738 738 765 656 695 Met Standard 97% 95% 97% 88% 93% Commended 44% 40% 34% 5% 28% Grade 7 Reading Math Writing Science All Tests Number Tested 780 777 765 656 706 Met Standard 96% 91 % 97% 88% 89% Commended 29% 20% 34% 5% 10% Grade 8 Reading Math Soc Stud Science All Tests Number Tested 747 738 748 656 695 Met Standard 97% 94% 99% 88% 92% Commended 52% 25% 29% 5% 14% Grade 9 Reading Math Soc Stud Science All Tests Number Tested 733 724 673 656 644 Met Standard 95% 87% 94% 88% 86% Commended 13% 27% 32% 5% 8% Grade 10 Eng LA Math Soc Stud Science All Tests Number Tested 659 667 673 656 531 Met Standard 83% 89% 94% 88% 75% Commended 11% 19% 32% 5% 1% Grade 11 Eng LA Math Soc Stud Science All Tests Number Tested 538 545 529 488 378 Met Standard 80% 79% 94% 77% 63% Commended 8% 14% 19% 3% 1% Grade 3 Reading Math Number Tested 762 764 Met Standard 100% 98% Commended 51% 43% 2003 TAKS Results: Coppell ISD All Students Students in Special Education 2 Math 74 95% Readin * 38% Reading Math Writing All Tests 51 52 49 94% 94% 96% 37% 37% 16% Reading 42 71% 12% Reading 30 87% 13% Readinq 36 69% 6% Reading 32 78% 28% Reading 37 51% 0% Eng LA 29 34% 0% Eng LA 15 47% 0% Math 42 90% 12% Math 32 69% 6% Math 34 53% 3% Math 26 73% 4% Math 34 38% 3% Math 29 34% 7% Math 17 35% 0% Science 53 79% 2% Writing 34 79% 6% Writing 33 91% 9% Soc Stud 29 55% 10% Soc Stud 15 100% 7% Science 27 44% 7% Science 15 40% 0% 52 95% 9% All Tests 35 66% 2% All Tests 22 67% 3% All Tests 20 50% 0% All Tests 20 57% 0% All Tests 12 32% 0% All Tests 8 25% 0% All Tests 21% 0% * TEA will not report this statistic until mid -June. MET STANDARD: Met passing standard Commended: Considerably higher than state passing standard. Indicates at least 90% of the items were answered correctly. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL — ESTABLISH QUORUM Announcement by the President whether a quorum is present, that the meeting has been duly called, and that notice of the meeting has been posted in the manner and for the time required by law. 111. CLOSED SESSION Adjourn into closed session to discuss the following items according to the Texas Govemment Code, Section 551.074, Personnel Matters: A. Personnel Employment B. Personnel Resignations IV. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION V. INVOCATION — Bruce Jensen VI. AWARDS • Outstanding Soloists • Action's Lone Star Leadership Academy • Global Young Leaders Conference VII. OPEN FORUM A. Announcement by the President that individuals not listed on the agenda but who wish to address the Board of Trustees should see the Board Secretary, Usa Ganz, to complete an information card and return the completed card to the Board Secretary prior to 7:30 p.m. VIII. PUBLIC HEARING X. ACTION ITEMS AGENDA COPPELL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES REGULAR MEETING AT THE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, BOARD ROOM JUNE 16, 2003 6:30 P.M. A. Public Hearing with Opportunity for Public Input Regarding Applications for Grants from the Coppell Education Development Corporation • ESL • Spanish • Literacy IX. DISCUSSION AND REPORT ITEMS A. Board Members • Kathie Gautille — Substance Abuse Commission • Cindy Warner — City Summit B. Superintendent • Strategic Plan • Hosting Solution for CISD Technology A. Consent 1. Approve 2002-2003 Budget Amendments 2. Approve Region 18 Interlocal Agreement Resolution 3. Approve Expedited Waiver for Textbooks 4. Approve Financial Report for May 31, 2003 5. Approve Minutes of the May 19, 2003 Meeting { Agenda Page Two June 16, 2003 B. Discussion and Approval of the CISD ESL Program Grant Application to the Coppell Education Development Corporation C. Discussion and Approval of the CISD Spanish Program Grant Application to the Coppell Education Development Corporation D. Discussion and Approval of the CISD Literacy Program Grant Application to the Coppell Education Development Corporation E. Discussion and Possible Adoption of the Novell exteNd Product Suite and Akuratus Consulting Services F. Discussion and Possible Adoption of Proposal for the New High School Stadium Sound System XI. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON MATTERS DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION XII. ADJOURNMENT • Page CLS4 - The Leader, The Colony Courier - Leader, Coppell Gazette, Carrollton Leader - Wednesday, June 4, 2003 Notice of Public Hearing The Coppell Independent School District is holding a public hearing including opportu- nity for public input regarding. pplications for grants from the Coppell ducation De- velopment Corporation on June 16, 2003 at 7:30pm at the Coppell Independent School District Administration Offices located at 200 South Denton Tap Road. Coppell, Texas. Any citizen interested in obtaining or reviewing copies of the grant applications prior to the hearing may do so at 200 South Denton Tap Road, Coppell, Texas from 8:OOam to 4:OOpm, Monday through Friday beginning June 4, 2003. Wednesday, June 11, 2003 - The Leader, The Colony Courier - Leader, Coppell Gazette, Carrollton Leader - Page CLS5 Notice of Public Hearing The Coppell Independent School District is holding a public hearing including opportu- nity for public input regarding pplications for grants from the Coppell Education De- velopment Corporation on June 16, 2003 at 7:30pm at the Coppell Independent School District Administration Offices located at 200 South Denton Tap Road, Coppell, Texas. Any citizen interested in obtaining or reviewing copies of the grant applications prior to the hearing may do so at 200 South Denton Tap Road, Coppell, Texas from 8:OOam to 4:OOpm, Monday through Friday beginning June 4, 2003.