Loading...
CP 2011-03-08 NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING AND AGENDA MARCH 8, 2011 DOUG STOVER BOB MAHALIK, Place 2 Mayor Mayor Pro Tem TIM BRANCHEAU, Place 1 BILLY FAUGHT, Place 5 BRIANNA HINOJOSA-FLORES, Place 3 MARVIN FRANKLIN, Place 6 MARSHA TUNNELL, Place 4 KAREN HUNT Place 7 CLAY PHILLIPS, City Manager MEETING TIME AND PLACE: Call to Order 5:30 p.m. Council Chambers (Open to the Public) Executive Session Immediately Following 1st Fl. Conf. Room (Closed to the Public) Work Session Immediately Following 1st Fl. Conf. Room (Open to the Public) Regular Session 7:30 p.m. Council Chambers (Open to the Public) Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas will meet in Regular Called Session on Tuesday, March 8, 2011, at 5:30 p.m. for Executive Session, Work Session will follow immediately thereafter, and Regular Session will begin at 7:30 p.m., to be held at Town Center, 255 Parkway Boulevard, Coppell, Texas. As authorized by Section 551.071(2) of the Texas Government Code, this meeting may be convened into closed Executive Session for the purpose of seeking confidential legal advice from the City Attorney on any agenda item listed herein. The City of Coppell reserves the right to reconvene, recess or realign the Work Session or called Executive Session or order of business at any time prior to adjournment. The purpose of the meeting is to consider the following items: ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION 1. Call to order. ag030811 Page 1 of 6 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION EXECUTIVE SESSION (Closed to the Public) 2. Convene Executive Session A. Section 551.071, Texas Government Code - Consultation with City Attorney and Section 551.072 – Deliberation regarding Real Property. 1. Seek legal advice from the City Attorney concerning the settlement and land purchase agreements with the Billingsleys at Northlake. B. Section 551.087, Texas Government Code – Economic Development Negotiations. 1. Economic Development Prospects west of Belt Line Rd. and south of Wrangler Drive. WORK SESSION (Open to the Public) 3. Convene Work Session A. Discussion regarding City Council Retreat. B. Discussion regarding the Joint Meeting with the Library Board and Park Board. C. Discussion regarding dates for the Joint Meeting with the Economic Development Committee and the Planning and Zoning Commission. D. Discussion regarding the ¼ cent sales tax for the Crime Control District and the ¼ cent sales tax for Street Maintenance. E. Discussion of Agenda Items. REGULAR SESSION (Open to the Public) 4. Convene Regular Session. 5. Invocation. 6. Pledge of Allegiance. 7. Citizens' Appearances. CONSENT AGENDA 8. Consider approval of the following consent agenda items: ag030811 Page 2 of 6 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION A. Consider approval of minutes: February 22, 2011. B. Consider approval of an Ordinance of the City of Coppell, Dallas County, Texas, amending the Code of Ordinances by amending Section 9-18-1 by adding subsection "B" stating The Standards for Public interactive Water Features and Fountains adopted by the Texas Department of Health Services as Texas Administration Code §265.301 through 265.308, and as amended herein, are hereby adopted as the City of Coppell Public Interactive Water Features and Fountains Construction, Operation and Maintenance Regulations; and authorizing the Mayor to sign. END OF CONSENT 9. Consider approval of an Economic Development Agreement by and among the City of Coppell, Michaels Stores Procurement Company Inc. and Michaels Stores, Inc., and authorizing the Mayor to sign. 10. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of the Westfork Addition, Lot 2R2, Block A, Replat, being a replat of Lot 2R, Block A, to abandon an existing 15-foot wide utility easement on 1.069 acres of property located at 505 E. Bethel School Road with no conditions. 11. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. S-1173R, AT&T Mobility, a zoning change request from S-1173 (Special Use Permit-1173) to S-1173R (Special Use Permit Revised-1173), to allow the collocation of antenna on the existing monopole and additional cabinets at the base on 0.028 acres of property located at 1305 Wrangler Circle with no conditions. 12. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD-224R-HC, Northlake College, a zoning change request from PD-224-HC (Planned Development 224-Highway Commercial) to PD-224R-HC (Planned Development 224 Revised-Highway Commercial), to revise the Concept Plan and attach a Detail Site Plan to permit a Valve Site on 5,625 square feet of property of this 34.94 acre tract of land located on the southeast side of S.H. 121, south of Sandy Lake Road. 13. Consider approval of the Carter Addition PH III, Preliminary Plat, to subdivide 20.28 acres of property into 24 single-family residential lots and ag030811 Page 3 of 6 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION two (2) common area lots located on the south side of Carter Drive, approximately 925 feet west of Moore Road (441 Carter Drive). 14. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of the Carter Addition PH III, Replat/Final Plat, being a replat of Lot 1, Block 1 of the Carter Addition and a final plat of the remaining unplatted property to subdivide 20.28 acres of property into 24 single-family residential lots and two (2) common area lots located on the south side of Carter Drive, approximately 925 feet west of Moore Road (441 Carter Drive). 15. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD-249R-SF-7, Royal Oaks, a zoning change request from SF-12 and O (Single Family-12 and Office) to PD- 249R-SF-7 (Planned Development-249 Revised-Single Family-7), to allow the construction of 23 single-family homes and one (1) common area lot on 5.16 acres of property located on the south side of Sandy Lake Road, between Heartz Road and London Way. 16. Consider approval of the Royal Oaks, Preliminary Plat, to subdivide 5.16 acres of property into 23 single-family lots and one (1) common area lot on property located on the south side of Sandy Lake Road between Heartz Road and London Way. 17. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD-238R-HC, Coppell Office Village, a zoning change request from PD-238-HC (Planned Development-238- Highway Commercial) to PD-238R-HC (Planned Development-238 Revised-Highway Commercial), to revise the Detail Site Plan to allow a 40- square-foot internally illuminated acrylic monument sign with a stone base on 2.02 acres of property located at 225 East S.H. 121. 18. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of the proposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan and an Ordinance Amending the Code of Ordinances by adding Chapter 12A, Comprehensive Land Use Plan, providing for the adoption of the Coppell 2030 - Comprehensive Master Plan and the Land Use Map thereof by incorporating therein The Comprehensive Plan Update and the Intergovernmental Cooperation Element, and authorizing the Mayor to sign. 19. City Manager's Report. A. Project Update and Future Agendas. ag030811 Page 4 of 6 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION 20. Mayor and Council Reports. A. Report by Mayor Stover regarding the Metroplex Mayors’ Meeting. B. Report by Mayor Stover regarding the Movie Series in Town Center Plaza. C. Report by Mayor Stover regarding Recent Auto and Wheel Thefts. 21. Public Service Announcements concerning items of community interest and no Council action or deliberation is permitted. 22. Necessary action resulting from Executive Session. Adjournment. ____________________________________ Douglas N. Stover, Mayor CERTIFICATE I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Coppell, Texas on this 4th day of March, 2011, at __________________. ____________________________________ Christel Pettinos, City Secretary ag030811 Page 5 of 6 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION DETAILED INFORMATION REGARDING THIS AGENDA IS AVAILABLE ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE (www.coppelltx.gov) UNDER PUBLIC DOCUMENTS, COUNCIL PACKETS. PUBLIC NOTICES STATEMENT FOR ADA COMPLIANCE The City of Coppell acknowledges its responsibility to comply with the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990. Thus, in order to assist individuals with disabilities who require special services (i.e. sign interpretative services, alternative audio/visual devices, and amanuenses) for participation in or access to the City of Coppell sponsored public programs, services and/or meetings, the City requests that individuals make requests for these services forty-eight (48) hours ahead of the scheduled program, service and/or meeting. To make arrangements, contact Vivyon V. Bowman, ADA Coordinator or other designated official at (972) 462-0022, or (TDD 1-800-RELAY, TX 1-800-735-2989). ag030811 Page 6 of 6 KEY TO COUNCIL GOALS ICONS COPPELL VISION 2030 Sustainable City Government • Excellent City Services with high level of Customer Satisfaction • “Green” City Operations and Facilities • Excellent and Well-maintained City Infrastructure and Facilities • Top Quality City Workforce • Financial Resources to Support City Services Business Prosperity • Retention and Attraction of Businesses that generate revenues for the City • Major Retail and Top Quality Business Office Park along I-635 and SH 121 • Old Coppell as a Small Town Village • Community Commercial Centers • House Offices and Home-Based Businesses Community Wellness and Enrichment • Community Gathering Places • Recreation Programs and Services for all Generations • Expand Cultural Arts Amenities and Opportunities • Residents’ Wellness and Longevity • Community Education Programs and Support of Top Quality Schools • Multi-Use Trail Systems Connecting the City Sense of Community • Residents and Businesses Engaging and Contributing to the Coppell Community • Strong Community Events and Festivals • New Residents Welcome and Involved • Effective Community Partnerships • Future Civic Community Leaders’ Development Special Place to Live • Quality Housing for Family Generations • Beautiful Green City • Revitalizing Neighborhoods • Mobility within Coppell • Easy Access to Dallas-Fort Worth Regions AGENDA REQUEST FORM DATE: March 8, 2011 ITEM #: ES-2 EXECUTIVE SESSION A. Section 551.071, Texas Government Code - Consultation with City Attorney and Section 551.072 – Deliberation regarding Real Property. 1. Seek legal advice from the City Attorney concerning the settlement and land purchases agreements with the Billingsleys at Northlake. B. Section 551.087, Texas Government Code – Economic Development Negotiations. 1. Economic Development Prospects west of Belt Line Rd. and south of Wrangler Drive. Agenda Request Form - Revised 02/04 Document Name: %exsessn AGENDA REQUEST FORM DATE: March 8, 2011 ITEM #: ES-3 WORK SESSION A. Presentation Regarding Updated Regulations for Interactive Water Features and Fountains. B. Discussion regarding City Council Retreat. C. Discussion regarding the Joint Meeting with the Library Board and Park Board. D. Discussion regarding dates for the Joint Meeting with the Economic Development Committee and the Planning and Zoning Commission. E. Discussion regarding the ¼ cent sales tax for the Crime Control District and the ¼ cent sales tax for Street Maintenance. F. Discussion of Agenda Items. Agenda Request Form - Revised 02/07 %wksessn MEMORANDUM March 1, 2011 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Clay Phillips, City Manager SUBJECT: Mayor & Council Retreat Dates The time has come for us to make a firm decision regarding the dates for your upcoming Goal Setting and Planning Retreat. The calendar is filling up quickly with graduation dates, weddings, and other conflicts. In order for staff to be able to secure the site, we need to select the date. The Executive Staff Budget and Goal Setting Retreat will take place on Monday, June 6 - Wednesday, June 8. These dates are the latest we can conduct the Executive Staff Retreat as we will be moving into vacation travel time. We also need to complete our retreat work by this date in order to assimilate any Council direction into our budget process. Calendar conflicts for the council retreat include CHS graduation on Saturday, June 4 and New Tech graduation on Friday, June 3. May 26-27 is the Friday and Saturday prior to Memorial Day. May 19-20 is the weekend immediately following the municipal officers election and is prior to the date members will be sworn in. Please bring your calendars on Tuesday and we will attempt to select dates for your retreat. MEMORANDUM March 1, 2011 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Clay Phillips, City Manager SUBJECT: Joint Park & Library Board Meeting Below you will find a list of topics and questions that the Park Board and the Library Board want to discuss with the Council when we meet in a special joint session on April 4. The items cover a range of topics. Future capital expenditure items, project lists and other items are included. The subjects submitted by the Park & Recreation Board are as follows: 1. Renovation/Replacement of Kid Country 2. Park Project Priority List The subjects submitted by the Library Board are as follows: 1. Library expansion 2. City response to state budget cuts for library services The Park Board intends to finish up their list on March 10 at their next meeting. The Park Board may also add items at their March meeting. We will provide you an updated list once all topics for discussion have been itemized. During the Work Session on Tuesday, staff will be asking if you have any items or topics you want to add to the list of discussion topics for the special joint session. We look forward to helping you prepare for this annual meeting and we trust the outcome will meet the needs of the Council and both boards. MEMORANDUM March 1, 2011 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Clay Phillips, City Manager SUBJECT: ¼-cent Sales Tax Election The November 2011 election date is fast approaching. With it comes the need to discuss the re-authorization of the ¼-cent sales taxes for both the Crime Control District and Street Maintenance issues. Together, these sales tax initiatives provide over $5,000,000 in revenue on an annual basis. Collections for the Street Maintenance sales tax will cease on April 1, 2012. Assuming voters approve the measure the tax must be re-authorized at the November 2011 election to avoid losing three months of revenue. This will enable the tax to continue uninterrupted for another four-year period. The Council might also consider asking one of our elected representatives in Austin to introduce legislation that either removes the sunset provision altogether or extends the sunset period to a longer term similar to the term options available regarding the Crime Control District. The Crime Control District does not actually sunset until April 1, 2012. However, the City Attorney has determined that we can re-authorize this sales tax at the same election in November of 2011 when the Street Maintenance sales tax will be considered for re- authorization. This approach would save the City the expense of holding elections in back-to-back years. The Council could also consider asking the voters to re-authorize the Crime control district for a longer period of time eliminating the need to have the issue considered every five years. The term of the Crime Control district could be increased from the current five years to 10, 15, or 20 years. In any event, sales tax collections for the current in-force Crime Control District would not end until 2012 as described even if voters do not re-authorize the collection of the tax in November 2011. The merits and advantages of these sales tax revenues are well understood by the Council. Staff estimates that 65% of our total sales tax revenues are generated from our industrial businesses primarily on the west side of our community. This statistic suggests that someone other than our homeowners is paying this non-traditional sales tax. This exportation of the tax burden should be viewed by our residents as a very positive fact. The dedicated revenue streams for the Crime Control Districts and Street Maintenance alleviate pressure from the General Fund to provide the necessary funding to provide the ¼-cent Sales Tax Re-authorization March 1, 2011 Page 2 of 2 services associated with each issue. Property taxes would rise or services would be reduced should either sales tax fail to be re-authorized. Finally, the taxes are not new. They are currently being collected. These initiatives will not be raising taxes on any segment of our community. Attached is information concerning the items that have been or are planned to be funded to date by the ¼-cent sales taxes. Staff will be available to discuss both of these sales tax issues in your Work Session on Tuesday. City of Coppell 1/4 Percent Sales Tax Analysis As of February 28, 2011 Began collections in April 2008 Budget Crime Prevention 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 Totals Sales Tax Collections 1,024,640 2,559,820 2,614,700 2,586,472 8,785,631 Expenditures 0 1,646,549 1,998,959 1,994,496 5,640,004 Balance 1,024,640 1,937,911 2,553,651 3,145,627 3,145,627 07-08 - 4 months of Collections 08-09 - 9 Positions - School Resource Program, Community Services Program and 14 Vehicles 09-10 - 24 Positions - Added Communications Program and Patrol Prevention Program, Finish Vehicles 10-11 - YTD Collections $926,813 - 4 months, Continue funding 24 positions Amended Street Maintenance 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 Totals Sales Tax Collections 1,094,351 2,667,500 2,674,187 2,586,472 9,022,510 Expenditures 0 126,600 187,602 4,321,546 4,635,748 Balance 1,094,351 3,635,251 6,121,836 4,386,762 4,386,762 Dobecka Drive Clear Creek Lane Heartz Road AGENDA REQUEST FORM DATE: March 8, 2011 ITEM #: 7 CITIZENS' APPEARANCES ORDINANCE NO. 2001-964 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, ESTABLISHING RULES, TIMES AND PROCEDURES FOR CONDUCTING CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, THE FOLLOWING ARE HEREBY ADOPTED AS THE RULES, TIMES AND PROCEDURES FOR CONDUCTING COUNCIL MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS: The City of Coppell Code of Ordinances, Article 1-10 "Rules, Times and Procedures for Conducting City Council Meetings," be, and the same is hereby, amended to read as follows: "ARTICLE 1-10 RULES, TIMES AND PROCEDURES FOR CONDUCTING CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ". . . 1-10-6.2.1 CITIZENS APPEARANCE Persons wishing to speak on any matter other than an item scheduled for a public hearing on the agenda, must sign a register and list their residence address, provided by the City Secretary on a table outside the Council Chambers, and such persons may be heard only at the "Citizens Appearance" portion of a regular meeting or special meeting. Each speaker must state his or her name and address of residence. Presentations by individuals during the "Citizens Appearance" shall be limited to two (2) minutes each. An individual speaker's time may be extended for an additional two (2) minutes with the approval of a majority of the Council members present. There shall be a cumulative limit of twenty (20) minutes allotted of any regular or special Council meeting. Those persons who signed up to speak at the "Citizens Appearance" shall be called upon in the order that they have signed the provided register. No personal attacks by any speaker shall be made against any member of the Council, Mayor, individual, group or corporation (Charter Article 3, Section 3.12). Agenda Request Form - Revised 09/02 Document Name: %citapp.doc WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR DEPT: DATE: ITEM #: AGENDA REQUEST FORM ITEM TYPE: ITEM CAPTION: GOAL(S): EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: FINANCIAL COMMENTS: RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL: City Secretary March 8, 2011 8/A ✔✔ PROCEDURAL Consider approval of minutes: February 22, 2011. Minutes of the City Council meeting held on February 22, 2011. Staff recommends approval. %minutes MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 22, 2011 The City Council of the City of Coppell met in Regular Called Session on Tuesday, February 22, 2011, at 5:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of Town Center, 255 Parkway Boulevard, Coppell, Texas. The following members were present: Doug Stover, Mayor Bob Mahalik, Mayor Pro Tem Tim Brancheau, Councilmember Brianna Hinojosa-Flores, Councilmember Marsha Tunnell, Councilmember Billy Faught, Councilmember Marvin Franklin, Councilmember Karen Hunt, Councilmember Also present were City Manager Clay Phillips, City Secretary Christel Pettinos and City Attorney Robert Hager. 1. Call to order. Mayor Stover called the meeting to order, determined that a quorum was present and convened into Executive Session. EXECUTIVE SESSION (Closed to the Public) 2. Convene Executive Session A. Section 551.071, Texas Government Code - Consultation with City Attorney and Section 551.072 – Deliberation regarding Real Property. 1. Seek legal advice from the City Attorney concerning the settlement and land purchase agreements with the Billingsleys at Northlake. Mayor Stover convened into Executive Session at 6:10 p.m. Mayor Stover adjourned the Executive Session at 7:16 p.m. and opened the Work Session. cm022211 Page 1 of 8 WORK SESSION (Open to the Public) 3. Convene Work Session A. Presentation Regarding Updated Regulations for Interactive Water Features and Fountains. B. Discussion of Agenda Items. REGULAR SESSION (Open to the Public) 4. Convene Regular Session. 5. Invocation. Jarrod Robinson from Riverside Church of Christ led those present in the Invocation. 6. Pledge of Allegiance. Mayor Stover led those present in the Pledge of Allegiance. 7. Consider approval of a proclamation recognizing Mitu Bhattatiry, a senior at Coppell High School, as a recipient of the 2010 Siemens Awards for Advanced Placement, and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Mayor Stover read the proclamation for the record and presented the same to Mitu Bhattatiry. Action: Councilmember Franklin moved to approve the proclamation recognizing Mitu Bhattatiry, a senior at Coppell High School, as a recipient of the 2010 Siemens Awards for Advanced Placement, and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Councilmember Tunnell seconded the motion; the motion carried 7-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Mahalik and Councilmembers Brancheau, Hinojosa-Flores, Tunnell, Faught, Franklin and Hunt voting in favor of the motion. cm022211 Page 2 of 8 8. Citizens' Appearances. Mayor Stover advised that no one signed up to speak. 9. Consider approval of minutes: February 8, 2011. Action: Councilmember Tunnell moved to approve the minutes for February 8, 2011. Mayor Pro Tem Mahalik seconded the motion; the motion carried 7-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Mahalik and Councilmembers Brancheau, Hinojosa-Flores, Tunnell, Faught, Franklin and Hunt voting in favor of the motion. 10. Consider approval of an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 2010-1254, which established the City's participation in the Texas Enterprise Zone Program pursuant to the Texas Enterprise Zone Act, Chapter 2303, Texas Government Code, provided incentives, designated a liaison for communication with interested parties, and nominated The Container Store to the Office of the Governor Economic Development & Tourism (EDT) through an Economic Development Bank (Bank) as an enterprise project, by adding the date of the public hearing; providing for an effective date, and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Presentation: Mindi Hurley, Economic Development Coordinator, made a presentation to Council. Action: Councilmember Faught moved to approve Ordinance No. 2011-1272 amending Ordinance No. 2010-1254, which established the City's participation in the Texas Enterprise Zone Program pursuant to the Texas Enterprise Zone Act, Chapter 2303, Texas Government Code, provided incentives, designated a liaison for communication with interested parties, and nominated The Container Store to the Office of the Governor Economic Development & Tourism (EDT) through an Economic Development Bank (Bank) as an enterprise project, by adding cm022211 Page 3 of 8 the date of the public hearing; providing for an effective date, and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Councilmember Hinojosa-Flores seconded the motion; the motion carried 7-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Mahalik and Councilmembers Brancheau, Hinojosa-Flores, Tunnell, Faught, Franklin and Hunt voting in favor of the motion. 11. Consider approval of a Resolution requesting improvements to Interstate 35 East as designed by the Texas Department of Transportation to be fully funded and implemented for the full project length from Interstate Highway 635 in Dallas County to U.S. Highway 380 in Denton County; and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Presentation: Councilmember Hunt made a presentation to Council on behalf of her Council Committee, Dallas Regional Mobility Coalition. Action: Mayor Pro Tem Mahalik moved to approve Resolution No. 2011-0222.1 requesting improvements to Interstate 35 East as designed by the Texas Department of Transportation to be fully funded and implemented for the full project length from Interstate Highway 635 in Dallas County to U.S. Highway 380 in Denton County; and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Councilmember Hunt seconded the motion; the motion carried 7-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Mahalik and Councilmembers Brancheau, Hinojosa- Flores, Tunnell, Faught, Franklin and Hunt voting in favor of the motion. 12. Consider approval of a License Agreement between the City of Coppell and Luis and Michelle Pajares, owner of 256 Bethel Road to allow the property owner to construct a stone veneer on a city-owned barrier wall within the right of way of Bethel Road; and authorizing the City Manager to sign and execute any necessary documents. Presentation: Ken Griffin, Director of Engineering, made a presentation to Council. cm022211 Page 4 of 8 Action: Councilmember Hunt moved to approve a License Agreement between the City of Coppell and Luis and Michelle Pajares, owner of 256 Bethel Road to allow the property owner to construct a stone veneer on a city- owned barrier wall within the right of way of Bethel Road; and authorizing the City Manager to sign and execute any necessary documents. Councilmember Brancheau seconded the motion; the motion carried 7-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Mahalik and Councilmembers Brancheau, Hinojosa-Flores, Tunnell, Faught, Franklin and Hunt voting in favor of the motion. 13. Consider approval of renewing the existing contract for “Sidewalk Pavement Repairs” with California Construction LLC in the amount of $150,000.00, as provided for in the IMF; and authorizing the City Manager to sign and execute any necessary documents. Presentation: Ken Griffin, Director of Engineering, made a presentation to Council. Action: Councilmember Tunnell moved to approve the renewal of the existing contract for “Sidewalk Pavement Repairs” with California Construction LLC in the amount of $150,000.00, as provided for in the IMF; and authorizing the City Manager to sign and execute any necessary documents. Councilmember Hinojosa-Flores seconded the motion; the motion carried 7-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Mahalik and Councilmembers Brancheau, Hinojosa-Flores, Tunnell, Faught, Franklin and Hunt voting in favor of the motion. 14. Consider approval of an ordinance amending Ordinance 2010- 1251 of the Code of Ordinances Chapter 2, "Boards and Commissions", Article 2-1, "Library Board", Section 2-1-3, "Officers", and Article 2-2, "Parks and Recreation Board", Section 2-2-3, "Officers", by amending subsection A in each article by deleting the words “each October” and replacing with the word “annually;” providing for an effective date, and authorizing the Mayor to sign. cm022211 Page 5 of 8 Presentation: Christel Pettinos, City Secretary, made a presentation to Council. Action: Councilmember Tunnell moved to approve Ordinance No. 2011-1273 amending Ordinance 2010-1251 of the Code of Ordinances Chapter 2, "Boards and Commissions", Article 2-1, "Library Board", Section 2-1-3, "Officers", and Article 2-2, "Parks and Recreation Board", Section 2-2-3, "Officers", by amending subsection A in each article by deleting the words “each October” and replacing with the word “annually;” providing for an effective date, and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Mayor Pro Tem Mahalik seconded the motion; the motion carried 7-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Mahalik and Councilmembers Brancheau, Hinojosa-Flores, Tunnell, Faught, Franklin and Hunt voting in favor of the motion. 15. City Manager's Report. A. Project Update and Future Agendas. City Manager Clay Phillips reported that the March 8th agenda will include the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Carter Estates, and the development at Hertz and Sandy Lake Road. The Five Year Plan Budget Workshop is scheduled for March 29th. Mr. Phillips also informed the Council of the April 4th joint meeting with the Park Board and the Library Board. 16. Mayor and Council Reports. A. Discussion Regarding Recent Legislative Trip to Austin. Mayor Stover, Councilmembers Hinojosa-Flores and Hunt, City Manager Clay Phillips and Deputy City Manager Mario Carizares attended the TML Legislative Update and met with legislators on February 14th and 15th in Austin. 17. Public Service Announcements concerning items of community interest and no Council action or deliberation is permitted. cm022211 Page 6 of 8 Mayor Stover expressed his condolences to the family of John Burns, a long time resident of Coppell, who recently passed away. 18. Council Committee Reports. A. Carrollton/Farmers Branch ISD/Lewisville ISD – Tunnell. B. Coppell ISD – Mahalik and Hinojosa-Flores. C. Coppell Seniors – Brancheau and Faught. D. Dallas Regional Mobility Coalition –Hunt. E. International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) – Brancheau. F. Metrocrest Hospital Authority – Tunnell. G. Metrocrest Medical Foundation – Mahalik. H. Metrocrest Medical Services – Hinojosa-Flores. I. Metrocrest Social Services – Franklin. J. North Texas Council of Governments – Tunnell. K. North Texas Commission – Hunt. L. Senior Adult Services – Franklin. A. Councilmember Tunnell reported that Carrollton/Farmers Branch ISD will have its first bad weather make up day on March 11th. The district is also extending the school day by 15 minutes beginning on February 28th through the end of the year to make up instruction time lost due to bad weather days. A gently used book sale to benefit school programs is scheduled for February 24th-27th at the Trinity Valley Shopping Center. The new Superintendent for Lewisville ISD, Dr. Steve Waddell, has started. The district has scheduled March 21st and June 9th as their bad weather make up days. B. Councilmember Mahalik reported that the National Merit Finalists for CISD have been announced. There are 14 students from Coppell High School and 2 students from New Tech High School. Bad weather days for Coppell ISD will be April 22nd and June 3rd. They are seeking a waiver for the additional days missed. The Coppell HS basketball team has advanced to the playoffs. Congratulations to the Coppell High School Girls and Boys wrestling teams for advancing to the state finals. Open House for Coppell High School is scheduled for March 7th from 6:30-8:30p.m. C. Councilmember Faught reported that the Senior Center will have a Casino Night on March 5th. A tour of the Ballpark in Arlington is scheduled for March 15th and the Senior Spelling Bee is scheduled for March 30th. D. Councilmember Hunt reported that future agendas will be items related to the state legislative session. cm022211 Page 7 of 8 E. Councilmember Brancheau reported that there are many webinars being offered online through ICLEI. F. Councilmember Tunnell reported that Metrocrest Hospital Authority is looking to replace a board member. G. Nothing to report. H. Nothing to report. I. Councilmember Franklin reported that Metrocrest Social Services has moved to its new location at 13801 Hutton Drive in Farmers Branch. There is an Open House scheduled for March 3rd from 3:30-6:30p.m. This year is the agency’s 40th anniversary. J. Councilmember Tunnell reported that the Research and Information Services Department of NCTCOG has developed a Development Monitoring Tool that allows filtering of data for any building greater that 80,000 sq. ft., or employers with 80 or more employees. This tool is available on their website. They also have posted current census information. K. Councilmember Hunt reported that the North Texas Commission has a number of webinars available on their website. Leadership North Texas is taking applications for classes that begin in the Fall. L. Councilmember Franklin reported that Senior Adult Services is having a Strategic Planning Retreat on February 24th and 25th at Lakeview Josey Ranch. 19. Necessary action resulting from Executive Session. Nothing to report. Adjournment. There being no further business to come before the City Council, the meeting was adjourned. ____________________________________ Douglas N. Stover, Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ Christel Pettinos, City Secretary cm022211 Page 8 of 8 WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR DEPT: DATE: ITEM #: AGENDA REQUEST FORM ITEM TYPE: ITEM CAPTION: GOAL(S): EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: FINANCIAL COMMENTS: RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL: Parks and Recreation March 8, 2011 8/B ✔✔ ORDINANCE Consider approval of an Ordinance of the City of Coppell, Dallas County, Texas, amending the Code of Ordinances by amending Section 9-18-1 by adding subsection "B" stating The Standards for Public interactive Water Features and Fountains adopted by the Texas Department of Health Services as Texas Administration Code §265.301 through 265.308, and as amended herein, are hereby adopted as the City of Coppell Public Interactive Water Features and Fountains Construction, Operation and Maintenance Regulations; and authorizing the Mayor to sign. This memo was brought forth to you at the February 22, 2011 work session. See attached memo for further details. Staff recommends approval. ^Pool & Spa Ordinance - 1 AR PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION Interoffice Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Perri Kittles, Environmental Health Officer VIA: Brad Reid, Director of Parks and Recreation DATE: February 22, 2011 SUBJECT: Discussion regarding the proposed adoption of minimum standards for Public Interactive Water Features and Fountains Background: The Department of State Health Services has added a section under Chapter 265 General Sanitation to address minimum sanitation requirements for Public Interactive Water Features and Fountains. Therefore, staff is proposing to add Chapter 265 Subchapter M 265.301 – 265.308 to the existing Standards for Swimming pools and Spas by amending Section 9-18-1 of the Code of Ordinances. These standards address: Operation and Maintenance, Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal, Circulation and Disinfection Systems, Water Quality, Inspection and Permitting, and Closure. Major Differences in the existing Pool and Spa Standards and the Public Interactive Water Features (PIWF) and Fountain Standards are: Signage – Warning and notification signs shall be posted at the entrance of all PIWF, or where the signs are clearly visible to users entering the PIWF area before contact with water occurs. The signage shall provide the following notifications and warnings in letters at least 2 inches in height: (1) “Non-Service Animals prohibited”; (2) “Changing Diapers Within 6 Feet Of The Water Feature is Prohibited”; (3) “Use Of The Water Feature If Ill With A Contagious Disease is Prohibited”; (4) “Do Not Drink Water From The Water Feature”; and (5) “Use Of The Water Feature When Ill With Diarrhea is Prohibited.” Definition of Contagious Disease – a subset category of infectious (or communicable diseases), which are easily transmitted by physical contact with the person suffering the disease, or by their secretions or objects touched. (Measles, Mumps, Flu, Strep throat, Cryptosporidiosis, Giardiasis) Public Interactive Water Features and Fountains shall be equipped with a supplemental water treatment system that will protect the public against infection by the parasite, Cryptosporidium. (1) Supplemental water treatment systems for a PIWF include: (A) UV light disinfection installed after filtration; (B) Ozone; (C) A NSF/ANSI-50 product, combination of products, or process to control Cryptosporidium; or (D) Weekly hyperchlorination following the Center for Disease Control’s Recommendations; or (E) An equivalent product, process, or system approved by the department. One of the main concerns addressed in the new standards for PIWF is the constant threat of Cryptosporidium (or “Crypto”). Crypto is a chlorine resistant parasite, so even well- maintained Pools and PIWF can spread Crypto among swimmers. These new standards address putting equipment and sanitation practices in place to minimize the incidence of disease. Council Action requested There is no action requested at this time. A change to the ordinance regulating Standards for Swimming Pools and Spas will be forthcoming in the next few weeks. This presentation is for information purposes only. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS, AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES BY AMENDING ARTICLE 9-18, SECTION 9-18-1 BY ADDING SUBSECTION “B”; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Coppell, Texas strives to ensure safety and proper operation of swimming pools and spas, WHEREAS, the Coppell Code of Ordinances provides for the adoption of State Rules on Standards for Public Swimming Pools and Spas in Section 9-18-1; WHEREAS, the City desires to provide State Standards for Public Interactive Water Features and Fountains; WHEREAS, upon review and consideration the City Council finds that Section 9-18-1 of the Code of Ordinances shall be amended to provide Standards for Public Interactive Water Features and Fountains. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. That Section 9-18-1 of the Code of Ordinances shall be amended to read as follows: “ARTICLE 9-18. PUBLIC SWIMMING POOL, SPA, INTERACTIVE WATER FEATURES AND FOUNTAIN CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REGULATIONS Sec. 9-18-1. Adoption of state rules on standards for public swimming pools and spas, public interactive water features and fountains. A. . . . . . B. The Standards for Public Interactive Water Features and Fountains adopted by the Texas Department of Health Services as Texas Administration Code §265.301 through 265.308, as amended, and as amended herein, are hereby adopted as the City of Coppell Public Interactive Water Features and Fountains Construction, Operation and Maintenance Regulations, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes.” 1 TM 47091 SECTION 2. All ordinances of the City of Coppell in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall be, and the same are hereby, repealed; provided, however, that all other provisions of said ordinances not in conflict herewith shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 3. Should any word, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance or of the Code of Ordinances, as amended hereby, be adjudged or held to be void or unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of said ordinance or the Code of Ordinances, as amended hereby, which shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. An offense committed before the effective date of this ordinance is governed by prior law and the provisions of the Code of Ordinances, as amended, in effect when the offense was committed and the former law is continued in effect for this purpose. SECTION 5. This ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage and publication of the caption as required by law. DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, this the _______ day of ___________________, 2011. APPROVED: ___________________________________ DOUGLAS N. STOVER, MAYOR ATTEST: ___________________________________ CHRISTEL PETTINOS, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________________ ROBERT E. HAGER, CITY ATTORNEY (JDD/ajh) 2 TM 47091 WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR DEPT: DATE: ITEM #: AGENDA REQUEST FORM ITEM TYPE: ITEM CAPTION: GOAL(S): EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: FINANCIAL COMMENTS: RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL: ȱ City Manager's Office March 8, 2011 9 ✔ CONTRACT/BID or PROPOSAL Consider approval of an Economic Development Agreement by and among the City of Coppell, Michaels Stores Procurement Company Inc. and Michaels Stores, Inc., and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Michael's currently leases approximately 400,000 square feet of space and employees approximately 200 people in Coppell. This agreement would help expand Michael's current operations in Coppell through the addition of their procurement company, Michaels Stores Procurement, Inc. This Economic Development Agreement has a duration of 10 years with two automatic 10 year renewals. The agreement grants an 85% rebate of the City’s 1% of sales and use tax collected for the general fund. At their October 2010 meeting, the Coppell Economic Development Committee unanimously approved the request for a sales tax rebate for Michaels Stores Procurement, Inc. Staff recommends approval. !Michaels Eco Dev Agr - 1 AR MEMO Date: February 22, 2011 From: Mindi Hurley, Economic Development Coordinator RE: Economic Development Agreement – Michaels Stores Procurement, Inc. Inc. Michael's currently leases approximately 400,000 square feet of space and employees approximately 200 people in Coppell. This agreement would help expand Michael's current operations in Coppell through the addition of their procurement company, Michaels Stores Procurement, Inc. This Economic Development Agreement has a duration of 10 years with two automatic 10 year renewals. The agreement grants an 85% rebate of the City’s 1% of sales and use tax collected for the general fund. At their October 2010 meeting, the Coppell Economic Development Committee unanimously approved the request for a sales tax rebate for Michaels Stores Procurement, Inc. WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR DEPT: DATE: ITEM #: AGENDA REQUEST FORM ITEM TYPE: ITEM CAPTION: GOAL(S): EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: FINANCIAL COMMENTS: RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL: PLANNING March 8, 2011 10 ✔ PUBLIC HEARING Consider approval of the Westfork Addition, Lot 2R2, Block A, Replat, being a replat of Lot 2R, Block A, to abandon an existing 15-foot wide utility easement on 1.069 acres of property located at 505 E. Bethel School Road with no conditions. On February 17, 2011, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of this REPLAT (7-0), with no conditions. Commissioners Goodale, Tankersley, Haas, Frnka, Sangerhausen, Duncan and Kittrell voted in favor, none opposed. Staff recommends APPROVAL. @01 Westfork Add, L2R2, BA, RP-1 AR ITEM # 5  Page 1 of 2  CITY OF COPPELL  PLANNING DEPARTMENT    STAFF REPORT    Westfork Addition, Lot 2R2, Block A, Replat      P&Z HEARING DATE:  February 17, 2011  C.C. HEARING DATE: March 8, 2011      STAFF REP.:      Matt Steer, City Planner      LOCATION:  505 E. Bethel School Road      SIZE OF AREA:    1.069 acres of property      CURRENT ZONING:  SF‐12 (Single Family‐12)      REQUEST:  A replat of Lot 2R, Block A, to abandon an existing 15‐foot wide  utility  easement.      APPLICANT:   Owner:           Engineer:      Mark Fairchild          Dowdey, Anderson & Associates, Inc.      205 Chestnut Lane             Colin Helffrich      Coppell, TX 75019             5225 Village Creek Dr., Ste. 200   Phone: (972) 304‐5931           Plano, TX 75093      FAX: N/A           Phone: (972) 931‐0694      Email: Mark.Fairchild@BancTec.com    FAX: (972) 931‐9538         Email: chelffrich@daa‐civil.com      HISTORY:  This property was part of a 2.17 acre tract of land platted as a five lot  single  family subdivision with a cul‐de‐sac street (Doggett Cove) in 1988.  The 2.17  acres  were  replatted  in  April  2009  into  two  lots,  each  containing  approximately 1.1 acres of property fronting on Bethel School Road.      TRANSPORTATION:   Bethel School Road is a two‐lane collector street built within a 60‐foot right‐ of‐way.      ITEM # 5  Page 2 of 2  SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:  North  ‐ Northlake Woodlands 7; “SF‐12” Single Family‐12      South  ‐ Carter Addition;  “SF‐12” Single Family‐12      East  ‐ Carter Addition;  “SF‐12” Single Family‐12      West – Lot 1R, Block A, Westfork Addition; “SF‐12” Single Family‐12    COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:  The Comprehensive Plan of May 1996, as amended, shows the property as  suitable for low density residential.       DISCUSSION:     The purpose of this replat is to abandon the 15‐foot utility easement located  partially on the eastern property line (rear 150 feet) and along the south  property line.  The easement was originally dedicated and was g oing to be  used for sanitary sewer with the last replat of the property approved in April  2009.  The sewer service can now be obtained via a sewer line in the Bethel  School  Road  right‐of‐way,  eliminating  the  need  for  the  easement.  Staff  supports this residential replat request and recommends approva l.      RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:  Staff is recommending APPROVAL of Lot 2R2, Block A, Westfork Addition Replat with no outstanding  conditions.       ALTERNATIVES:   1. Recommend approval of the request  2. Recommend disapproval of the request      ATTACHMENTS:  1. Replat  REVISED:February 08, 2011STATE REGISTRATION NUMBER: F-399 “”X:\Projects LDD\08096\dwg\08096Rp-LOT2R.dwg, Sheet 1, 2/8/2011 7:37:11 AM, chelffrich, Dowdey, Anderson & Associates, Inc., CH WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR DEPT: DATE: ITEM #: AGENDA REQUEST FORM ITEM TYPE: ITEM CAPTION: GOAL(S): EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: FINANCIAL COMMENTS: RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL: PLANNING March 8, 2011 11 ✔ PUBLIC HEARING Consider approval of Case No. S-1173R, AT&T Mobility, a zoning change request from S-1173 (Special Use Permit-1173) to S-1173R (Special Use Permit Revised-1173), to allow the collocation of antenna on the existing monopole and additional cabinets at the base on 0.028 acres of property located at 1305 Wrangler Circle with no conditions. On February 17, 2011, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of this ZONING CHANGE (7-0), with no conditions. Commissioners Goodale, Tankersley, Haas, Frnka, Sangerhausen, Duncan and Kittrell voted in favor, none opposed. Staff recommends APPROVAL. @02 S-1173R, AT&T Mobility -1 AR ITEM # 6  Page 1 of 2  CITY OF COPPELL  PLANNING DEPARTMENT    STAFF REPORT    CASE NO.:  S­1173R, AT&T Mobility      P&Z HEARING DATE:  February 17, 2011  C.C. HEARING DATE: March 8, 2011      STAFF REP.:      Matt Steer, City Planner      LOCATION:  1305 Wrangler Circle      SIZE OF AREA:    0.028 acres of property      CURRENT ZONING:  S‐1173 (Special Use Permit‐1173)      REQUEST:  A zoning change to S‐1173R (Special Use Permit Revised‐1173), to allow the  co‐location of antenna on the existing monopole and additional cabinets at  the base.    APPLICANT:     Representative:      Becky Koehler & David Prejean  Crafton Communications, Inc.      1901 Royal Ln, Ste. 104  Dallas, TX 75229      Phone: (972) 910‐1100      FAX: (972) 961‐4424       Email: BKoehler@craftongroup.com                     DPrejean@craftongroup.com    HISTORY:  A preliminary plat was approved by City Council on May 9, 1995, and a final  plat was subsequently approved by City Council on October 19, 1995. The  final plat was never filed with Dallas County and therefore expired. On March  14, 2000, Council approved a zoning change request from C (Comm ercial) to  C‐S.U.P. (Commercial, Special Use Permit) to allow the construction of a 65'‐ high monopole to accommodate the Sprint PCS wireless communication  antenna and CISD two‐way radio antenna, as well as 4 equipment cabinets at  the base of the tower located on the southeast corner of the Coppell Middle  School West and Service Center Site. On June 12, 2001, the City Council  approved the Coppell Middle School West, Site Plan and Final Plat, to allow  ITEM # 6  Page 2 of 2  the construction of a service center with bus/maintenance vehicle parking,  several building additions, reconstruction of the concession building, and re‐ paving of the parking lot on approximately 51.7 acres of property.  However,  this plat was never filed with the county and has also expired.    TRANSPORTATION:   Wrangler Drive is a C4U – four‐lane undivided thoroughfare within a 65‐foot  right‐of‐way.    SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:        North – CISD Service Building; “C” Commercial  South  –  Office/Warehouse;  “PD‐222R‐LI”  Planned  Development‐222  Revised‐Light Industrial      East – Office/Warehouse; “LI” Light Industrial                 West – CISD Bus Parking Lot; “C” Commercial    COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:  The Comprehensive Plan of May 1996, as amended, shows the property as  suitable for freeway office uses.    DISCUSSION:     This is a fairly simple request.  AT&T proposes to add an antenna  to  an  existing 65‐foot monopole and additional cabinets at the base in a lease area  located on the southeast corner of the CISD Service Center site.   In March of  2000, the original Special Use Permit for the cell tower was approved with a  condition  that  co‐location  of  additional  antennas  be  made  possi ble.  All  proposed ground improvements are within the confines of the existing lease  area enclosed by a chain link fence with privacy slats.  The lease area is not  visible from any public right‐of‐way.  Staff is recommending approval of this  request with no outstanding conditions.    RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:  Staff is recommending APPROVAL of S‐1173R‐C, AT&T Mobility with no outstanding conditions.    ALTERNATIVES:   1. Recommend approval of the request  2. Recommend disapproval of the request  3. Recommend modification of the request   4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date    ATTACHMENTS:  1. Images  2. Title Page  3. Notes Page  4. Site Plan  5. Detail Site Plan  6. Elevation/Antenna Orientation  7. Details  WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR DEPT: DATE: ITEM #: AGENDA REQUEST FORM ITEM TYPE: ITEM CAPTION: GOAL(S): EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: FINANCIAL COMMENTS: RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL: PLANNING March 8, 2011 12 ✔ PUBLIC HEARING Consider approval of Case No. PD-224R-HC, Northlake College, a zoning change request from PD-224-HC (Planned Development 224-Highway Commercial) to PD-224R-HC (Planned Development 224 Revised-Highway Commercial), to revise the Concept Plan and attach a Detail Site Plan to permit a Valve Site on 5,625 square feet of property of this 34.94 acre tract of land located on the southeast side of S.H. 121, south of Sandy Lake Road. Subject to one condition: 1. A copy of TXDOT permit shall be submitted for a permanent driveway to the Engineering Department. On February 17, 2011, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of this ZONING CHANGE (6-0), with one above- stated condition. Commissioners Goodale, Tankersley, Haas, Frnka, Sangerhausen, and Duncan voted in favor, none opposed. Commissioner Kittrell recused herself due to a conflict of interest. Staff recommends APPROVAL. @03 PD-224R-HC, NL College -1 AR ITEM # 10  Page 1 of 3  CITY OF COPPELL  PLANNING DEPARTMENT    STAFF REPORT    CASE NO.: PD­224R­HC, Northlake College      P&Z HEARING DATE:  February 17, 2011  C.C. HEARING DATE: March 8, 2011      STAFF REP.:      Marcie Diamond, Assistant Director of Planning      LOCATION:  Southeast side of S.H. 121, south of Sandy Lake Road      SIZE OF AREA:    5,625 square feet of property      CURRENT ZONING:  PD‐224‐HC (Planned Development 224‐Highway Commercial)      REQUEST:  A zoning change to PD‐224R‐HC (Planned Development 224 Revised‐ Highway Commercial), to revise the Concept Plan and attach a Detail Site  Plan to permit a Valve Site.      APPLICANT: Owner:    Applicant:      Steve Park    Will E. Lee        DCCCD           Texas Midstream Gas Services      1601 S. Lamar Street     100 Energy Way       Dallas, Texas 75215      Fort Worth, Texas 76102      972‐860‐5130     817‐502‐4712           FAX: 817‐945‐4712    HISTORY:      This property was zoned a Light Industrial district in 1983. In April 2003,  the Planning and Zoning Commission called a public hearing for a  portion of this property to amend the designation on the Future  Land  Use  Map  from  Regional  Retail  and  Light  Industrial/Showroom  to  Freeway Commercial.  Also at that time, the zoning classification of Light  Industrial was recommended to be changed to Highway Commercial to  encourage the development of well‐designed retail, commercial and/or  office  development,  versus  big‐box  tilt‐wall  industrial  buildin gs  along  the frontages of S.H. 121 and Sandy Lake Road.  City Council approved  the rezoning and Land Use Map amendment in May of that year.     ITEM # 10  Page 2 of 3    In June of 2007, Council approved a change in zoning  to allow  college and ancillary uses on 37 acres of property and to attach a  Detail Site Plan for Phase 1 to allow the construction of a 37,000‐ square‐foot multi‐purpose building on approximately 10 acres of  property.  Since that time, phase one building and parking has  been constructed.          TRANSPORTATION:  State Highway 121 is designated as a freeway with 600’ right‐o f‐way.  When built to standard it will contain 10 main lanes and 6 service road  lanes.       Sandy Lake Road is a four‐lane divided thoroughfare within right‐of‐way  sufficient for a six‐lane road.       SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:      North‐ Light Industrial and undeveloped, LI     South ‐ Light Industrial and mini‐warehouses, LI and S‐1204‐C/LI     East  ‐   Light Industrial and undeveloped, LI     West  ‐  City of Grapevine, undeveloped         COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:  The Comprehensive Plan of May 1996, as amended, shows the prope rty  as suitable for light industrial/showroom uses.      DISCUSSION:     The applicant is requesting an amendment to the existing PD for the  North Campus of Northlake College to permit the construction of a valve  site to support the gas pipeline that has recently been installed parallel  to  SH  121.   As municipalities have limited review and approval  authority  over  underground  pipeline  locations,  zoning  and  site plan  regulations are applicable only when above ground facilities are  planned.    On December 15, 2010, the City of Coppell’s Engineering  Department issued a Right‐of‐Way Use Permit to allow the construction  of  this  8”  natural  gas  pipeline  under  the  right‐of‐way  of  Sandy Lake  Road.  This permit was issued subject to the following comment:        “Permit for pipeline only.  Any above ground improvements will  require separate zoning/council action.  Approval of this pipeline  installation  does  not  guarantee  future  approval  of  any  above  ground improvements”             Midstream Chesapeake is planning to construct this valve site,  with  screening and landscaping along the frontage road of SH 121, south of  Sandy Lake Road.  While staff would prefer this facility being relocated   internal to the site, the location of  this valve site and it’s proximity  to  SH  121  is  dictated  by  the  location  of  the  pipeline.    The  applicant  is  ITEM # 10  Page 3 of 3  providing a solid screening wall and landscaping to make this facility as  least visually obtrusive as possible.            As required by the property owner (DCCCD), the brick on the proposed  six‐foot tall brick wall will match the brick color of the college building  and this wall shall “completely hide the valve site from public  view”.    The landscape plan has be revised from it’s initial submittal to reflect the  landscape materials used in the remainder of the site.  Crape Myrtles are  planned adjacent to the frontage road of SH 121 and Cedar Elms facing  the existing campus buildings and parking.  Shrubs (mixture of Dwarf  Glossy Abelia and Indian Hawthorn) are planned along the perimeter of  the brick wall on all four sides.    Potential interference with above and  underground utilities limits the use of overstory trees on the north and  south sides of the site.  There is currently no irrigation (water lines)  serving this site.  The applicant is proposing a 5‐foot tall water storage  tank with solar panels to provide water for the proposed landsc aping.         Access for this site will be via a 20‐foot wide driveway from the service  road  of  SH  121.    As  of  this  date, TxDOT  has  permitted  a  temporary  driveway to serve this site.   It is anticipated that once zoni ng and site  plan approvals are granted for this use and it is constructed, TxDOT will  issue a permit for a permanent driveway.  The driveway will be concrete  and will meet Coppell’s construction standards.       RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:  Staff is recommending APPROVAL of PD‐224R‐HC, Northlake College, to  revise the Concept Plan and attach a Detail Site Plan to permit a Valve  Site, subject to the following condition:  1. A  copy  of  TxDOT  permit  for  a  permanent  driveway  shall  be  submitted to the Engineering Department.       ALTERNATIVES:     1. Recommend approval of the request  2. Recommend disapproval of the request  3. Recommend modification of the request   4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date      ATTACHMENTS:    1. Concept Site Plan  2. Detail Site and Landscape Plan  3. Screen Wall and Elevation Plan  4. Irrigation Plan   WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR DEPT: DATE: ITEM #: AGENDA REQUEST FORM ITEM TYPE: ITEM CAPTION: GOAL(S): EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: FINANCIAL COMMENTS: RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL: PLANNING March 8, 2011 13 ✔ PRESENTATION Consider approval of the Carter Addition PH III, Preliminary Plat, to subdivide 20.28 acres of property into 24 single-family residential lots and two (2) common area lots located on the south side of Carter Drive, approximately 925 feet west of Moore Road (441 Carter Drive). The following conditions remain outstanding: 1. Park Development Fees in the amount of $1,285 per unit will be assessed prior to filing of the Final Plat. 2. Tree Removal Permit will be required prior to the start of construction. Based on Tree Survey dated 1/18/11 a check in the amount of $303,900 made out to the City of Coppell Reforestation & Natural Areas Fund will be required to pull permit. 3. FEMA approval of the CLOMR (Conditional Letter of Map Revision) is required prior to the construction of Legacy Drive. 4. There will be additional comments during detailed engineering plan review. On February 17, 2011, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of this PRELIMINARY PLAT (7-0), subject to the above-stated conditions. Commissioners Goodale, Tankersley, Haas, Frnka, Sangerhausen, Duncan and Kittrell voted in favor, none opposed. Staff recommends APPROVAL. @04 Carter Add PH III, PP-1 AR ITEM # 11  Page 1 of 3  CITY OF COPPELL  PLANNING DEPARTMENT    STAFF REPORT    Carter Addition PH III, Preliminary Plat      P&Z HEARING DATE:  February 17, 2011  C.C. HEARING DATE: March 8, 2011      STAFF REP.:      Marcie Diamond, Assistant Director of Planning      LOCATION:  South side of Carter Drive, approximately 925 feet west of Moore Road   (441 Carter Drive)      SIZE OF AREA:    20.28 acres of property      CURRENT ZONING:  SF‐12 (Single Family‐12)      REQUEST:  A preliminary plat to subdivide property into 24 single‐family lots and  two (2) common area lots.      APPLICANT:     Owner:      Civil Engineer:      Walter Foss      Matt Alexander      441 Carter Drive    Dowdey, Anderson & Associates       Coppell, Texas  75019 5225 Village Creek Drive      214‐415‐7440    Plano, Texas  75093      FAX: 972‐304‐0890   972‐931‐0694  FAX: 972‐931‐9538      HISTORY:  The Carter Addition, a 30‐lot subdivision, was established in 1972 and  encircled an existing 0.5‐acre cemetery. Deed restrictions plac ed on the  property expired on January 1, 2001.  In 1990, a replat of Lots 3 and 4  was denied by Council. On June 17, 2010, the Planning and Zoning  Commission denied a requested replat of Lot 18, to reduce the front  building line from 50 to 30 feet, at 509 East Bethel School Road.       Lot 1 of the original Carter Estates subdivision is within the current  request area and contains 2.95 acres of the 20.3‐acre subject property.    ITEM # 11  Page 2 of 3    The Carter Addition, Phase II, which is a five‐lot subdivision has a long  replatting history.  The original Final Plat was approved by the Planning  Commission on November 21, 1996. That plat was not filed for re cord  prior to its expiration date, and therefore was deemed null and void.  In  1998,  a  Final  Plat  for  a  reconfigured  five‐lot  layout  was  approved,  but  again, never filed for record. In October of 1999, Council approved a five‐ lot Final  Plat which was filed with Dallas County in December of that year.   On August 8, 2000, City Council approved a replat for Lots 1 and 2 Carter  Addition, Phase II, however, it also expired. This replat of Lots 1 and 2 was  approved again in November 2001, and was filed within the statutory time  limit.  Since that time, all five homes have been constructed in Phase II of  this development.       On September 16, 2010, the Planning and Zoning Commission deni ed a  request for a preliminary plat, with variances, for 23 residential lots and  one area common lot on this 20.28 acres of property.     November  9,  2010  City  Council  followed  the  recommendation  of  the  Planning and Zoning Commission and approved a preliminary plat with  no variances for twenty‐seven (27) single‐family residential lots and two  (2) common area lots on this tract of land.    TRANSPORTATION:   Carter Drive and Christi Lane are two‐lane, asphalt streets, built within 50  feet of right‐of‐way. These streets do not have curbs or sidewalks.       SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:          North ‐ single‐family residences; Carter Addition, SF‐12 (SF‐12  Single  Family‐12)      South – DART R.O.W. and Belt Line Road; A (Agriculture)      East ‐ single‐family residences; Carter Addition, Phase II, SF‐12 (SF‐12  Single Family‐12) and A (Agriculture)      West ‐ single‐family residences; Northlake Woodlands, Lots 5‐10  SF‐12  (Single Family‐12)    COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:    The Comprehensive Plan of May 1996, as amended, shows the property  as suitable for Residential Low Density and Flood Plain.      DISCUSSION:  As discussed in the History Section if this report, a Preliminary Plat for  27 single family and two common area lots was recently approved for  this property.  Since that time the owner has reevaluated the design and  layout  of  the  proposed  subdivision,  and  reduced  the  number  of  residential  lots  from  27  to  24  and  doubled  the  acreage  devoted to  common area (open space) from 3.1 to 6.2 acres.     All of the proposed 24 single family lots exceed the minimum size as  required by the SF‐12 district zoning.  The lots generally range in size  from 12,000 to 18,000 square feet with an average lot size of 15,250  ITEM # 11  Page 3 of 3  square feet.  There is one oversize lot along the southwestern portion  which  incorporates  a  portion  of  the  flood  plain  area.  The  remaining  flood plain area is being preserved as open space (common area) to be  maintained by the HOA. It is intended that this lot remain in its natural  state, no hardscape or additional landscaping is planned.     As required by the Subdivision Ordinance, all lots will be alley served.   Adjacent  to  the  alley  along  the west  property  line  is  a  3‐foot wide  Common Area Lot (2X).  The purpose of this lot is to assure that the  retaining walls within this area will be maintained by the HOA.  This  common area lot also contains a utility and mutual access easement,  which would allow access  in the event that any of the abutting  lots along  Rolling Hills desire to utilize  this alley.     TREE PRESERVATION   The tree survey submitted with this Preliminary Plat indicates that there  are over 10,000 caliper inches of trees which includes protected trees  (oaks, elms, pecans)  6” caliper or greater and unprotected trees  (hackberry, bois d’ arc) 10” caliper or greater.  Given the number of trees  that are proposed to be removed, an estimated contribution in the  amount of $303,900 to the City of Coppell Reforestation & Natural Areas  fund will be required to pull a tree removal permit.    In  sum,  once  again,  there  are  no  variances  being  requesting  to the  Subdivision Ordinance and all lots are compliant with the regulations of  the Zoning Ordinance therefore the staff recommends approval.     RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:    Staff  is  recommending  APPROVAL  of  Carter  Addition  Phase  III,  Preliminary Plat, subject to:   1. Park  Development  Fees  in  the  amount  of  $1,285  per  unit  will  be  assessed prior to filing of the Final Plat.   2. Tree Removal Permit will be required prior to the start of  construction.  Based on Tree Survey dated 1/18/11 a check in the  amount of $303,900 made out to the City of Coppell Reforestation &  Natural Areas Fund will be required to pull permit.    3. FEMA approval of the CLOMR (Conditional Letter of Map Revision) is  required prior to the construction of Legacy Drive.   4. There will be additional comments during detailed engineering plan  review.  ALTERNATIVES:   1. Recommend approval of the request  2. Recommend disapproval of the request  3. Recommend modification of the request     ATTACHMENTS:  1. Preliminary Plat  2. Tree Survey   Y:\07111\07111-PP3.dwg, Layout1, 2/8/2011 1:08:02 PM, Dowdey, Anderson & Associates, Inc., JCRREVISED:0GRAPHIC SCALE( IN FEET )1 inch = ft.180606060REVISED:FEBRUARY 8, 2011STATE REGISTRATION NUMBER: F-399 WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR DEPT: DATE: ITEM #: AGENDA REQUEST FORM ITEM TYPE: ITEM CAPTION: GOAL(S): EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: FINANCIAL COMMENTS: RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL: PLANNING March 8, 2011 14 ✔ PUBLIC HEARING Consider approval of the Carter Addition PH III, Replat/Final Plat, being a replat of Lot 1, Block 1 of the Carter Addition and a final plat of the remaining unplatted property to subdivide 20.28 acres of property into 24 single-family residential lots and two (2) common area lots located on the south side of Carter Drive, approximately 925 feet west of Moore Road (441 Carter Drive). The following conditions remain outstanding: 1. Park Development Fees in the amount of $1,285 per unit will be assessed prior to filing of the Final Plat. 2. Tree Removal Permit will be required prior to the start of construction. Based on Tree Survey dated 1/18/11 a check in the amount of $303,900 made out to the City of Coppell Reforestation & Natural Areas Fund will be required to pull permit. 3. FEMA approval of the CLOMR (Conditional Letter of Map Revision) is required prior to the construction of Legacy Drive. 4. There will be additional comments during detailed engineering plan review. On February 17, 2011, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of this REPLAT/FINAL PLAT (7-0), subject to the above-stated conditions. Commissioners Goodale, Tankersley, Haas, Frnka, Sangerhausen, Duncan and Kittrell voted in favor, none opposed. Staff recommends APPROVAL. @05 Carter Add PH III, RPPF-1 AR ITEM # 12  Page 1 of 3  CITY OF COPPELL  PLANNING DEPARTMENT    STAFF REPORT    Carter Addition PH III, Replat­Final Plat      P&Z HEARING DATE:  February 17, 2011  C.C. HEARING DATE: March 8, 2011      STAFF REP.:      Marcie Diamond, Assistant Director of Planning      LOCATION:  South side of Carter Drive, approximately 925 feet west of Moore Road   (441 Carter Drive)      SIZE OF AREA:    20.28 acres of property      CURRENT ZONING:  SF‐12 (Single Family‐12)      REQUEST:  A replat of Lot 1, Block 1 and a final plat of the remaining unplatted  property  to  subdivide  20.28  acres  of  property  into  24  single‐fa mily  residential lots and two (2) common area lots.      APPLICANT:     Owner:      Civil Engineer:      Walter Foss      Matt Alexander      441 Carter Drive    Dowdey, Anderson & Associates       Coppell, Texas  75019 5225 Village Creek Drive      214‐415‐7440    Plano, Texas  75093      FAX: 972‐304‐0890   972‐931‐0694  FAX: 972‐931‐9538      HISTORY:  The Carter Addition, a 30‐lot subdivision, was established in  1972 and  encircled an existing 0.5‐acre cemetery. Deed restrictions placed on the  property expired on January 1, 2001.  In 1990, a replat of Lots 3 and 4  was denied by Council. On June 17, 2010, the Planning and Zoning  Commission denied a requested replat of Lot 18, to reduce the front  building line from 50 to 30 feet, at 509 East Bethel School Road.       Lot 1 of the original Carter Estates subdivision is within the current  request area and contains 2.95 acres of the 20.3‐acre subject p roperty.  ITEM # 12  Page 2 of 3      The Carter Addition, Phase II, which is a five‐lot subdivision has a long  replatting history.  The original Final Plat was approved by the Planning  Commission on November 21, 1996. That plat was not filed for re cord  prior to its expiration date, and therefore was deemed null and void.  In  1998, a Final Plat for a reconfigured five‐lot layout was approved, but  again, never filed for record. In October of 1999, Council approved a five‐ lot Final  Plat which was filed with Dallas County in December of that  year.  On August 8, 2000, City Council approved a replat for Lots 1 and 2  Carter Addition, Phase II, however, it also expired. This replat of Lots 1  and 2 was approved again in November 2001, and was filed within the  statutory time limit.  Since that time, all five homes have been  constructed in Phase II of this development.       On September 16, 2010, the Planning and Zoning Commission denied a  request for a preliminary plat, with variances, for 23 residential lots and  one area common lot on this 20.28 acres of property.     November 9, 2010 City Council followed the recommendation of the  Planning and Zoning Commission and approved a preliminary plat with  no variances for twenty‐seven (27) single‐family residential lots and  two (2) common area lots on this tract of land.    TRANSPORTATION:   Carter Drive and Christi Lane are two‐lane, asphalt streets, built within  50 feet of right‐of‐way. These streets do not have curbs or sidewalks.       SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:          North ‐ single‐family residences; Carter Addition, SF‐12 (SF‐12  Single  Family‐12)      South – DART R.O.W. and Belt Line Road; A (Agriculture)      East ‐ single‐family residences; Carter Addition, Phase II, SF‐12 (SF‐12  Single Family‐12) and A (Agriculture)      West ‐ single‐family residences; Northlake Woodlands, Lots 5‐10 SF‐12  (Single Family‐12)    COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:  The Comprehensive Plan of May 1996, as amended, shows the pro perty  as suitable for Residential Low Density and Flood Plain.      DISCUSSION:  Approximately two acres of this 20‐acre tract is Lot 1, Block 1 of the  original Carter Addition, therefore a Residential Replat is required with  this Final Plat for this property.  As governed by state law, Local  Government Code, Section  212.015  requires  the  notification  of  all  persons owning property within 200 feet and within the original  subdivision of the proposed residential replat.     Given that no variances are being requested, and this plat is in  conformance with the regulations of the Subdivision Ordinance, and all  ITEM # 12  Page 3 of 3  aspects of the Preliminary Plat, approval is ministerial, and an  affirmative vote of a simple majority of Council will be required  to  approve the final plat/replat.     RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:  Staff is  recommending  APPROVAL  of  Carter  Addition  PH  III,  Replat‐ Final Plat, subject to:   1. Park Development Fees in the amount of $1,285 per unit will be  assessed prior to filing of the Final Plat.   2. Tree  Removal  Permit  will  be  required  prior  to  the  start  of  construction.  Based on Tree Survey dated 1/18/11 a check in the  amount of $303,900 made out to the City of Coppell Reforestatio n &  Natural Areas Fund will be required to pull permit.    3. FEMA approval of the CLOMR (Conditional Letter of Map Revision)  is required prior to the construction of Legacy Drive.   4. There will be additional comments during detailed engineering plan  review.          ALTERNATIVES:     1. Recommend approval of the request  2. Recommend disapproval of the request  3. Recommend modification of the request       ATTACHMENTS:    1. Replat‐Final Plat   Y:\07111\07111-FP.dwg, Layout1, 2/8/2011 1:06:42 PM, Dowdey, Anderson & Associates, Inc., JCRREVISED:0GRAPHIC SCALE( IN FEET )1 inch = ft.150505050REVISED:FEBRUARY 8, 2011STATE REGISTRATION NUMBER: F-399 REVISED:REVISED:FEBRUARY 8, 2011“”STATE REGISTRATION NUMBER: F-399Y:\07111\07111-FP.dwg, Layout2, 2/8/2011 1:07:01 PM, Dowdey, Anderson & Associates, Inc., JCR WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR DEPT: DATE: ITEM #: AGENDA REQUEST FORM ITEM TYPE: ITEM CAPTION: GOAL(S): EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: FINANCIAL COMMENTS: RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL: PLANNING March 8, 2011 15 ✔ PUBLIC HEARING Consider approval of Case No. PD-249R-SF-7, Royal Oaks, a zoning change request from SF-12 and O (Single Family-12 and Office) to PD-249R-SF-7 (Planned Development-249 Revised-Single Family-7), to allow the construction of 23 single-family homes and one (1) common area lot on 5.16 acres of property located on the south side of Sandy Lake Road, between Heartz Road and London Way. The following conditions remain outstanding: 1. The open space lot is more centrally located to lot #11 or #12 which provides better access to all lots within this subdivision, and the cul-de-sac is slightly relocated. 2. Park development fees in the amount of $1,285 per lot assessed prior to Final Plat filing. 3. Tree mitigation fees of $119,700 to be paid before a tree removal permit is issued. 4. Additional comments will be generated during Engineering plan review. We would further recommend that the Comprehensive Master Plan reflect the approved use. On February 17, 2011, the Planning Commission recommended approval of this ZONING CHANGE (6-1), subject to the above-stated conditions. In addition, the Commission recommended an amendment to the Comprehensive Master Plan that reflected this land use change. Commissioners Goodale, Tankersley, Haas, Frnka, Sangerhausen, and Kittrell voted in favor, Commissioner Duncan voted in opposition. Staff recommends APPROVAL. @06 PD-249R-SF-7, Royal Oaks -1 AR ITEM # 8  Page 1 of 4  CITY OF COPPELL  PLANNING DEPARTMENT    STAFF REPORT    CASE NO.:  PD­249R­SF­7, Royal Oaks      P&Z HEARING DATE:  February 17, 2011  C.C. HEARING DATE: March 8, 2011      STAFF REP.:      Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning      LOCATION:  South side of Sandy Lake Road, between Heartz Road and London Way      SIZE OF AREA:    5.16 acres of property      CURRENT ZONING:  SF‐12 & O (Single Family‐12 & Office)      REQUEST:  A zoning change to PD‐249R‐SF‐7 (Planned Development‐249 Revis ed‐Single  Family‐7), to allow the construction of 23 single‐family homes and one (1)  common area lot.      APPLICANT:    Prospective Purchaser    Purchaser’s Representative:      Tom Whatley    Tommy N. Cansler      TFW Enterprises, Ltd.     Timberland Creek Cos., Inc.      P. O. Box 895    3340 Roy Orr Blvd.      Mabank, TX. 75147   Suite 208      (972) 350‐9800   Grand Prairie, TX. 75050      Fax:  (972) 421‐6073   (469) 688‐8224      Email:  tomfwatley@yahoo.com  Fax:  (972) 421‐6073                 Email:  timberlandcreek@flash.net        HISTORY:  A  similar  case  to  what  is  being  proposed  here  was  denied  by  Planning  Commission on December 16, 2010.  During that case hearing, the Planning  Commission  was  not  opposed  to  the  land  use  proposed,  but  asked the  applicant  to  reconsider  the  density  and  street  layout.    This  proposal  was  submitted in response to that request.      ITEM # 8  Page 2 of 4  TRANSPORTATION:   Sandy Lake Road is an improved, concrete, four‐lane divided thoroughfare  immediately to the north of the subject tract.  It is classified as a C4D on the  Thoroughfare Plan and contains 90 feet of right–of‐way.  Heartz Road, to the  west of this tract, has just been resurfaced with concrete and contains 50 feet of  right‐of‐way.  London Way is a standard residential street with 27 feet of  concrete paving in a 50‐foot right‐of‐way, and is immediately east of the subject  property.       SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:      North:  Sandy Lake Road and Ashton Ridge Planned Development (single‐ family homes on approximately 8,000 plus square‐foot lots); PD‐156‐SF‐9      South:  Christ Our Savior Lutheran Church (Manara Charter School); SF‐12      East:  existing single‐family subdivision; PD‐166‐SF‐7   West:  existing single‐family development; SF‐7       COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:  The Comprehensive Plan of May 1996, as amended, shows the property as  suitable for public/institutional development.      DISCUSSION:    As outlined in the HISTORY section of this report, a case very similar to the  one you are reviewing tonight was submitted in December.  That case was  denied for a variety of reasons including lot design and size, density, street  configuration, impact on adjacent properties, and neighborhood concerns.        The applicant has attempted to address those issues but only six of 23 lots  meet our 25‐foot front yard setback, and only ten meet the normally required  20‐foot rear yard—there is still too much density.  The street layout has been  vastly improved with no intersection with London Way; the screening wall  has been redesigned; most lot dimensions have been changed; density has  been  reduced.    Overall,  this  re‐submittal  has  addressed  some  of staff’s  concerns.        There are some continuing staff concerns:  the common space location, on‐ street parking, the density and lot setbacks/lot widths.  The location of the  open space area appears to benefit only the residential lot to the south.  By  relocating the open space more centrally (perhaps on Lot #11 or 12), the  majority of homeowners would have better access to the parcel, and the view  corridor when entering the subdivision would be enhanced.  We also need  more information on what the opens space contains such as street furniture,  play equipment, landscaping, etc.  Also, by redesigning the cul‐de‐sac to the  east, the common lot would easily accommodate a residential structure with  no loss of unit count.         Guest parking for the three lots facing Heartz is problematic.    Because  parking is only allowed on the west side of Heartz Road, no parking will be  allowed  in  front  of  these  lots,  and  the  provision  of  circular  drives  as  a  ITEM # 8  Page 3 of 4  condition of PD approval is recommended.  In addition, front yard setbacks  should respect those across the street (25 feet) which would al low better  maneuvering on the recommended circular driveways.  The applicant has  agreed to the circular drive and setback recommendations, but not  the  common space concern.         Although the applicant makes an argument that the development with its  proposed density has funding, the important point to address he re is one of  neighborhood compatibility. The Royal Oaks proposal needs to “fit” into the  existing  neighborhood,  and although  density  was reduced  by  one lot,  our  original staff report suggested no more than three dwelling units per acre  (15‐16 lots total).  With the reduction of one additional lot, we could better  support the request.  We feel that the additional lot reduction should occur  along London Way.  Our concern is that the proposed east side Royal Oaks  lots need to have similar dimensions to the London Way homes they will  face, i.e., lot widths of at least 73 feet, and varied front yard setbacks from 20  to 25 feet.        With regard to screening, an eight foot masonry screening wall is proposed  with a fifteen‐foot landscaped area adjacent to Sandy Lake.  Church  ownership to the south has indicated that they are satisfied with  the  proposed eight‐foot tall wooden screening fence that separates the church  property from the proposed residential use.       RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:  Staff is recommending APPROVAL of PD‐249R‐SF‐7, Royal Oaks, if:   1. the lot count does not exceed 22 units,   2. lots adjacent to London Way are at least 73 feet wide and have varied front yard setbacks from  20 to 25 feet,   3. the open space lot is more centrally located to lot #11 or #12 which provides better access to  all lots within this subdivision, and the cul‐de‐sac is slightly relocated,  4. more detail is shown on the landscape plan north of the Sandy Lake Road screening wall (i.e.,  ground cover, grass, required street trees, or whatever landscaping is being provided from the  screening wall to Sandy Lake),   5. assurance that the screening wall along Sandy Lake Road is outside  the  15  foot  required  landscape buffer,   6. several  changes  to  the  PD  Conditions  sheet  (current  zoning  is  n ot PD, side and rear yard  setbacks need revision, etc.),  7. Park development fees in the amount of $1,285 per lot assessed prior to Final Plat filing,  8. tree mitigation fees of $119,700 to be paid before a tree removal permit is issued,  9. Indicate any improvements to the common open area—landscaping, street hardware, etc.,  10. additional comments will be generated during Engineering plan review.       If these conditions are met and Commission recommends approval of the proposal, we would further  suggest that the Comprehensive Master Plan be amended to reflect the approved use.      ITEM # 8  Page 4 of 4  ALTERNATIVES:     1. Recommend approval of the request  2. Recommend disapproval of the request  3. Recommend modification of the request   4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date      ATTACHMENTS:  1. PD conditions  2. Zoning Exhibit and Site Plan  3. Fencing Elevations (Sheet A1)  4. Tree Survey (Sheets L‐1, L‐2)  5. Landscape Plan (Sheets L‐3, L‐4)       Propose PD Conditions – Royal Oaks A 5.16 acre tract – Located on the Southeast corner of Sandy Lake Road and Hertz Present Zoning – SF-12 & Office Propose Zoning – PD–SF7 Propose Use Regulations Any use permitted in SF-7 with the following modifications: Area Regulations Front Yard –20 feet typical except 25 feet on lots 1, 2, 3, 17, 19, 21 & 15’ for lot 11 eyebrow portion. Per Zoning Exhibit/Site Plan (SF-7 - 25 feet) Side Yard - Minimum 7.5 feet except 10’ for lots 3, 4, 16, 22 and 15’ for lots 7 and 20’ for lots 1 & 17. Per Zoning Exhibit/Site Plan (SF-7 - 8 feet) Rear Yard - Minimum 20 feet , except 15 feet for Lots 1, 2, 3, 6, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 19, 21, & 22 Per Zoning Exhibit/Site Plan (SF-7 - 20 feet) Lot Area – Minimum 7,000 square feet (SF-7 - 7,000 s.f.) Lot Width – 65 feet (SF-7 - 65 feet) Lot Depth – 100 feet (SF-7 - 100 feet) Minimum Dwelling Size – 2,000 square feet, exclusive of garages, breezeways and porches. (SF-7 - 1,200 s.f.) Maximum Lot Coverage - 50 percent of the total lot area may be covered by the combined area of the main buildings and accessory buildings. (SF-7 - 40 percent) Maximum Height of Structure – 35 feet Parking/Driveway Regulations: Two enclosed parking spaces shall be provided behind the front yard setback line. Sidewalk shall be constructed on the both sides of the street. Type of Exterior Construction: At least 80 percent of the exterior walls of the first floor of all structures shall be of masonry construction exclusive of doors, windows, and the area above the top plate line. Each story above the first floor of a straight wall structure shall be at least 80 percent masonry exclusive of doors, windows, and the area above the top plate line. Tree Retribution: A tree removal permit shall be required prior to the removal of any trees. Homeowners Association: The homeowners association shall maintain the landscaped areas along the perimeter walls and entryways. The screening wall and entry features shall be maintained by the homeowners association. Homeowners Association documents shall be submitted, reviewed and approved to the City in accordance with the Code of Ordinances. Subdivision Regulation: Property shall be platted in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance, except as amended herein. The property shall be developed and used in accordance with the SF-7 development standards under the Coppell Zoning Ordinance, except as amended in the special conditions as indicated on the Zoning Exhibit/Site Plan, Landscaping Plan / Tree Survey, and Wall Details. WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR DEPT: DATE: ITEM #: AGENDA REQUEST FORM ITEM TYPE: ITEM CAPTION: GOAL(S): EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: FINANCIAL COMMENTS: RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL: PLANNING March 8, 2011 16 ✔ PRESENTATION Consider approval of the Royal Oaks, Preliminary Plat, to subdivide 5.16 acres of property into 23 single-family lots and one (1) common area lot on property located on the south side of Sandy Lake Road between Heartz Road and London Way. The following conditions remain outstanding: 1. The open space needs to be moved to Lot 11 or 12, making it more usable and convenient for all residents of the subdivision. 2. The cul-de-sac needs to be reconfigured so that the current open space lot can accommodate a building site. 3. Park development fees in the amount of $1,285 per lot assessed prior to Final Plat filing. 4. Tree mitigation fees of $119,700 to be paid before a tree removal permit is issued. 5. Additional comments will be generated during Engineering plan review. On February 17, 2011, the Planning Commission recommended approval of this PRELIMINARY PLAT (6-1), subject to the above-stated conditions. Commissioners Goodale, Tankersley, Haas, Frnka, Sangerhausen, and Kittrell voted in favor, Commissioner Duncan voted in opposition. Staff recommends APPROVAL. @07 Royal Oaks, PP-1 AR ITEM # 9  Page 1 of 3  CITY OF COPPELL  PLANNING DEPARTMENT    STAFF REPORT    Royal Oaks, Preliminary Plat      P&Z HEARING DATE:  February 17, 2011  C.C. HEARING DATE: March 8, 2011      STAFF REP.:      Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning      LOCATION:  South side of Sandy Lake Road, between Heartz Road and London Way      SIZE OF AREA:    5.16 acres of property      CURRENT ZONING:  SF‐12 & O (Single Family‐12 & Office)      REQUEST:  A preliminary plat to subdivide property into 23 single‐family lots and one  (1) common area lot.      APPLICANT:    Prospective Purchaser    Purchaser’s Representative       Tom Whatley    Tommy N. Cansler      TFW Enterprises, Ltd.    Timberland Creek Cos., Ltd.            P. O. Box 895        3340 Roy Orr Blvd.        Mabank, TX. 75147      Suite 208      (972) 350‐9800      Grand Prairie, TX. 75050      Fax: (972) 421‐6073     (469) 688‐8224      Email: tomfwatley@yahoo.com  Fax:  (972) 421‐6073           Email:  timberlandcreek@flash.net    HISTORY:  As specified in the zoning case that preceded this request, a subdivision plat  was submitted in conjunction with that zoning case in December.  Since the  Planning  Commission  denied  the  zoning  case,  the  subdivision  application  was denied also.  Because the Commission asked for a revised zoning case  reflecting  less  density  and  refined  street  layout,  the  applicant  has  also  resubmitted a revised subdivision plat.         TRANSPORTATION:   Sandy Lake Road is an improved, concrete, four‐lane divided thoroughfare  immediately to the north of the subject tract.  It is classifie d as a C4D on the  ITEM # 9  Page 2 of 3  Thoroughfare Plan and contains 90 feet of right‐of‐way.  Heartz Road, to the  west of this tract, has just been resurfaced with concrete and contains 50 feet of  right–of‐way.    London  Way  is  a  standard  residential  street  with 27 feet of  concrete paving in a 50‐foot right‐of‐way, and is immediately east of the subject  property.      SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:   North:  Sandy Lake Road and Ashton Ridge Planned Development (single‐ family homes on approximately 8,000 plus square foot lots); PD‐156‐SF‐9   South:  Manara Charter School; SF‐12   East:  existing single‐family subdivision; PD‐166‐SF‐7   West:  existing single‐family homes; SF‐7     COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:  The  Comprehensive  Plan  of  May  1996,  as  amended,  shows  the  prope rty  currently suitable for public institutional uses.      DISCUSSION:    As  indicated  in  the  HISTORY  section  of  this  review,  a  preliminary  plat  reflective of a denied zoning case was submitted in December.  Because the  zoning  case  was  denied,  the  preliminary  plat  was  denied  also.   With  the  revised  zoning  case,  this  revised  subdivision  plat  was  also  submitted.   Depending upon action of the Commission regarding the zoning case, this  plat could face a number of actions.  First, if staff recommendation is followed  regarding the zoning case, modifications would have to be made to this plat  involving density reduction, lot size revisions, open space relocation, cul‐de‐ sac  modification,  etc.    Based  upon staff recommended conditions of the  zoning case, the plat could be approved by reflecting those conditions.         On the other hand, if the zoning case were to be approved as submitted, then  this plat (which reflects the submitted zoning application) cou ld be approved  with minor changes typically resolved before the case would be forwarded to  Council.  Staff does not recommend that action.      RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:  Staff is recommending APPROVAL, of the Preliminary Plat for Royal Oaks provided the applicant agrees  to the conditions attached to the zoning case of which this is the plat.  For that approval, changes need to  be made.    1. Density needs to be reduced by one lot.    2. Lots fronting London Way need to be reduced by one and each have at least 73‐foot widths,  similar to the lots they face.    3. The open space needs to be moved to Lot 11 or 12, making it more usable and convenient for all  residents of the subdivision.    4. The cul‐de‐sac needs to be reconfigured so that the current open space lot can accommodate a  building site.     ITEM # 9  Page 3 of 3  In addition, Park development fees of $1,285 per lot and $119,700 for tree mitigation will be required  before a tree removal permit will be issued.  Also, Engineering requirements will be established prior to  construction.     These conditions ‐‐‐with the comments of other departments‐‐ would garner a staff recommendation for  approval.     ALTERNATIVES:   1. Recommend approval of the request  2. Recommend disapproval of the request      ATTACHMENTS:  1. Preliminary Plat Document  WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR DEPT: DATE: ITEM #: AGENDA REQUEST FORM ITEM TYPE: ITEM CAPTION: GOAL(S): EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: FINANCIAL COMMENTS: RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL: PLANNING March 8, 2011 17 ✔ PUBLIC HEARING Consider approval of Case No. PD-238R-HC, Coppell Office Village, a zoning change request from PD-238-HC (Planned Development-238-Highway Commercial) to PD-238R-HC (Planned Development-238 Revised-Highway Commercial), to revise the Detail Site Plan to allow a 40-square-foot internally illuminated acrylic monument sign with a stone base on 2.02 acres of property located at 225 East S.H. 121. See attached letter from Scott Abboud, Project Manager, dated February 23, 2011, appealing the Planning Commission's decision to Council. A 3/4 VOTE OF COUNCIL (6-7) IS NECESSARY TO OVERTURN THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF THIS ZONING CHANGE. On February 17, 2011, the Planning Commission unanimously denied this ZONING CHANGE (7-0), as submitted. Commissioners Goodale, Tankersley, Haas, Frnka, Sangerhausen, Duncan and Kittrell voted in favor of denial, none opposed. Staff recommends DENIAL. @08 PD-238R-HC, COV-1 AR ITEM # 7  Page 1 of 3  CITY OF COPPELL  PLANNING DEPARTMENT    STAFF REPORT    CASE NO.: PD­238R­HC, Coppell Office Village      P&Z HEARING DATE:  February 17, 2011  C.C. HEARING DATE: March 8, 2011      STAFF REP.:      Matt Steer, City Planner      LOCATION:  225 East S.H. 121      SIZE OF AREA:    2.02 acres of property      CURRENT ZONING:  PD‐238‐HC (Planned Development‐238‐Highway Commercial)      REQUEST:  A  zoning  change  to  PD‐238R‐HC  (Planned  Development‐238  Revised‐ Highway Commercial), to revise the Detail Site Plan to allow a 40‐square‐foot  internally illuminated acrylic monument sign with a stone base.      APPLICANT:     Terry Holmes  Holmes Commercial  1445 MacArthur Drive  Carrollton, Texas 75007  Phone: (972) 242‐1770      FAX: (972) 242‐2931      Email: office@theholmesbuilders.com      HISTORY:  On  July  10,  2001,  after  several  hearings  before  the  Planning and  Zoning  Commission, the City Council approved a site plan request for U‐Haul  International to construct a 72,000 square‐foot mini‐storage facility on the  subject 2.02 acres of property.  On January 8, 2002, Council approved a minor  Plat for this property. That site plan approval expired in July 2003. On  February  10,  2009,  Council  approved  a  replat  and  detailed  Planned  Development  (PD‐238‐HC)  consisting  of  a  one‐story,  23,200‐square‐foot  office building.  Subsequently, the replat was filed and construction of this  structure is nearing completion.  ITEM # 7  Page 2 of 3      TRANSPORTATION:  State Highway 121 is built as a six‐lane divided tollway. The  subject tract is  adjacent to the eastbound one‐way service road of this highway and consists  of three lanes of pavement.      SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:  North‐ S.H. 121; Market Street, Bank, Whataburger & retail uses;   “PD‐228‐HC” Planned Development‐228‐Highway Commercial  South ‐ Denton Creek Elementary & Middle School North; “SF‐7”  Single Family 7  East ‐ Denton Creek Elementary & Middle School North; “SF‐7”   Single Family‐7    West ‐ Jack‐in‐the‐Box restaurant; “HC” Highway Commercial       COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:  The Comprehensive Plan of May 1996, as amended, shows the property as  suitable for regional retail uses.      DISCUSSION:     This proposal to amend the detailed planned development was approved in  February  2009.    Specifically,  the  proposal  is  to  revise  the  des ign  of  the  approved monument sign with an internally illuminated ½‐inch thick 2.3‐ foot x 7.8‐foot plastic monument sign on a 26‐inch thick 1.8‐foot x 9.5‐foot  stone base.  The lighting is proposed to shine up from the bottom of the  plastic at the stone base, illuminating the plastic but not the letters.  This is a  unique design that would stand out to the motorist and might be deemed  appropriate in a more urban or modernistic setting that allows for a variety  of signage.          As stated in the Zoning Ordinance, the purpose of a monument sign is to  communicate information in a safe, efficient manner, to provide a reference  as to the name of the development.  It is not intended to adver tise or distract  the  motorist.    The  requirement  that  all  monument  signs  be  externally  illuminated  is  intended  to  provide  an  attractive,  softer,  more traditional  appearance in keeping with the “Old World” architecture of Coppell.  The size  of  the  monument  signs  on  lots  two  acres  or  more  in  size  are:  si x‐foot  maximum height by ten‐foot maximum width.  The materials permitted are  brick and stone.  A plastic can‐sign with internal illumination  is specifically  prohibited by the Zoning Ordinance.  All and all, this sign design, although  unique, is not appropriate in Coppell.          The monument sign that was originally approved for this site is attached for  your  reference.    This  utilizes  the  same  stone  and  brick  materia l  as  the  building,  has  black  pin  mounted  letters  and  references  the  name of the  development, not just one or two tenants.  Also, it is externally illuminated  ITEM # 7  Page 3 of 3  and fits in well with the site and surrounding sites, just as t he majority of  monument signs do in Coppell.      At the Development Review Committee meeting with the applicant, it was  suggested  that  they  submit  multiple  options  for  consideration, as  this  proposal would not be supported by staff.  At that meeting the applicant  informed  staff  that  the  proposed  sign  was  to  be  different  than the  one  submitted with the application.  It was to be a two‐tenant sign, not a single  tenant.  The applicant was asked to revise the plans to correctly represent  their exact proposal, to address some technical comments from staff and to  resubmit the following week.  The resubmittal still shows only a single tenant  (although they are still proposing two tenants) and no alternative  sign  proposals were given.  The Fire Department requested that the address be  added to the sign and that too had not been revised on the plans.              In summary, staff is recommending denial of this proposal based  on  the  plastic being internally illuminated and the design not being c ompatible with  the other retail/office monument signs found in Coppell.   Staff recommends  that the sign originally approved with the PD be constructed.  This showed  the address and “Coppell Office Village” in bronze pin‐mounted letters.        RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:  Staff is recommending DENIAL of PD‐238R‐HC as submitted.      ALTERNATIVES:   1. Recommend approval of the request  2. Recommend disapproval of the request  3. Recommend modification of the request   4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date      ATTACHMENTS:  1. PD‐238‐HC, Approved Monument Sign   2. Amendment to PD‐238‐HC, Proposed Monument Sign  3. Dimension Control Plan  WORK SESSION CONSENT REGULAR DEPT: DATE: ITEM #: AGENDA REQUEST FORM ITEM TYPE: ITEM CAPTION: GOAL(S): EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: FINANCIAL COMMENTS: RECOMMENDED ACTION: ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL: PLANNING March 8, 2011 18 ✔ PUBLIC HEARING Consider approval of the proposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan and an Ordinance Amending the Code of Ordinances by adding Chapter 12A, Comprehensive Land Use Plan, providing for the adoption of the Coppell 2030 - Comprehensive Master Plan and the Land Use Map thereof by incorporating therein The Comprehensive Plan Update and the Intergovernmental Cooperation Element, and authorizing the Mayor to sign. On January 25, 2011, Council postponed this item to the March 8, 2011 City Council meeting. A Special City Council meeting was held on January 18, 2011, to review and discuss the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. On November 18, 2010, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the proposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan (6-0). Commissioners Rios-Tankersley, Haas, Frnka, Sangerhausen, Duncan and Kittrell voted in favor, none opposed. Staff recommends APPROVAL. @09 Comp Plan ORD-1 AR Page 1 TM 47978.2.22311 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. ________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES BY ADDING CHAPTER 12A, COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN, PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE COPPELL 2030 - COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN AND THE LAND USE MAP THEREOF BY INCORPORATING THEREIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION ELEMENT; PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City staff, commissions, committees and outside consultants have worked together to establish the “Coppell 2030 – A Comprehensive Master Plan”, for the City of Coppell, Texas; and WHEREAS, said plan includes, but is not limited to, demographics, housing characteristics, strategic framework, 2030 Community Planning Goals and Objectives sustainability, land use, parks and open space, transportation and mobility, attractive and well maintained neighborhoods, safe and healthy neighborhoods, neighborhood planning, special area plans for districts such as Old Coppell Historic District, Transit Oriented Development, Denton Tap and Belt Line District, Belt Line and MacArthur District, approaches to support redevelopment, redevelopment area policies, and implementation of the such plan; and WHEREAS, on or about January 10, 2006, the City adopted Ordinance No. 2006-1119 which provided for the incorporation of a planning element entitled the Comprehensive Plan Update, Intergovernmental Cooperation Element, dated December 13, 2005; and WHEREAS, the City finds that adopting the Coppell 2030 - Comprehensive Master Plan and amending the code by adding Chapter 12A to provide for the adoption of said plan and the incorporation of the Comprehensive Plan Update, Intergovernmental Cooperation Element is in the best interest of the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Code of Ordinances be, and the same is, hereby amended by adding Chapter 12A, Comprehensive Land Use Plan, providing for the adoption of the Coppell 2030 - Comprehensive Master Plan and the land use map thereof, and by incorporating therein Page 2 TM 47978.2.22311 the Comprehensive Plan Update, Intergovernmental Cooperation Element, which shall read as follows: “Chapter 12A COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Sec. 12A-1-1. Adoption. A. There is hereby adopted the Coppell 2030 - Comprehensive Master Plan, and the land use map thereof, a copy of which shall be officially kept on file with the Office of the City Secretary, and may hereinafter be used for those purposes under state law. B. The Comprehensive Plan Update, Intergovernmental Cooperation Element and the map thereof, as adopted by Ordinance No. 2006-1119, is hereby readopted, except as amended by the Coppell 2030 - Comprehensive Master Plan. Sec. 12A-1-2. Amendments. The city council may, by ordinance, amend the Comprehensive Land Use Plan after providing public notice, hearing and upon recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission.” SECTION 2. That all provisions of the Ordinances of the City of Coppell, Texas, in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same are hereby, repealed, and all other provisions not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 3. That should any sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole, or any part or provision thereof other than the part so decided to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, and shall not affect the validity of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as a whole. SECTION 4. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage and the publication of its caption, as the law and charter in such cases provide. Page 3 TM 47978.2.22311 DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, this the _______ day of ___________________, 2011. APPROVED: _____________________________________ DOUGLAS N. STOVER, MAYOR ATTEST: _____________________________________ CHRISTEL PETTINOS, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___________________________________ ROBERT E. HAGER, CITY ATTORNEY (REH/cdb) A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN COPPELL 2030 A Family Community for a Lifetime City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Table of CONTENTS COPPELL 2030 A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Chapter 1: Policy Plan Introduction ..................................................................................................................................3 Demographics ...............................................................................................................................4 Housing Characteristics .................................................................................................................4 Purpose of the Plan .......................................................................................................................5 Relationship to Other Adopted Plans ............................................................................................5 Charter Provisions .........................................................................................................................5 Basis in State Law ..........................................................................................................................5 Strategic Framework ......................................................................................................................6 2030 Community Planning Goals and Objectives .......................................................................10 Chapter 2: Planning Framework Introduction ................................................................................................................................15 Sustainability ........................................................................................................................17 Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) ..................................................17 Local Sustainability Initiatives .............................................................................................24 Citywide Sustainability Plan ................................................................................................26 Measuring Success - STAR Community Index ....................................................................27 Sustainability Policies ..........................................................................................................28 Land Use ...............................................................................................................................29 Activity Centers ...................................................................................................................30 Linkages ..............................................................................................................................31 Organizing Principle ...........................................................................................................32 Future Land Use Plan ..........................................................................................................33 Land Use Policies ................................................................................................................50 Parks and Open Space...........................................................................................................51 Parks and Open Space Planning Context .............................................................................52 Parks and Open Space Policies .............................................................................................56 Transportation and Mobility ................................................................................................57 Transportation Planning Context ........................................................................................57 Coppell 2030 Transportation Plan .......................................................................................61 Key Transportation System Components .............................................................................64 Transportation and Mobility Policies ...................................................................................69 Chapter 3: Healthy Neighborhoods Introduction ................................................................................................................................73 Attractive and Well Maintained Neighborhoods ..........................................................................75 Safe Neighborhoods ....................................................................................................................77 Contribute to Community Health ..............................................................................................79 Multigenerational ........................................................................................................................82 Neighborhood Planning ..............................................................................................................83 Healthy Neighborhood Policies ...................................................................................................85 City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Chapter 4: Special Area Plans Introduction ................................................................................................................................89 Methodology and Overview of Area Plan Summaries ..................................................................90 Old Coppell Historic District ...............................................................................................93 Background and Existing Conditions ..................................................................................93 Current Value Per Square Foot ............................................................................................95 Economics Summary ...........................................................................................................96 Redevelopment Concept .....................................................................................................97 Denton Tap and Belt Line District ........................................................................................99 Background and Existing Conditions ..................................................................................99 Scenario 1- Current Value Per Square Foot ........................................................................101 Economics Summary .........................................................................................................102 Redevelopment Concept - Scenario 1 ................................................................................103 Scenario 2 - Current Value Per Square Foot .......................................................................104 Redevelopment Concept - Scenario 2 ................................................................................109 Future Planning Recommendations...................................................................................110 Belt Line and MacArthur District .......................................................................................111 Background and Existing Conditions ................................................................................111 Current Value Per Square Foot ..........................................................................................112 Economics Summary .........................................................................................................114 Redevelopment Concept ...................................................................................................115 Future Planning Recommendations...................................................................................116 Approaches to Support Redevelopment ..............................................................................117 Approach 1: Lead by Example ...........................................................................................117 Approach 2: Remove Barriers ............................................................................................117 Approach 3: Incentives ......................................................................................................117 Approach 4: Technical Assistance and Education ...............................................................117 Redevelopment Areas Policies .............................................................................................118 Chapter 5: Implementation Introduction ..............................................................................................................................121 Timeframe for Implementation .................................................................................................122 Annual Monitoring ...................................................................................................................122 Funding and Budget Process .....................................................................................................122 Implementation Priorities ..........................................................................................................122 Sustainability Implementation Actions ......................................................................................126 Land Use Implementation Actions ............................................................................................127 Parks and Open Space Implementation Actions ........................................................................128 Transportation and Mobility Implementation Actions ...............................................................129 Healthy Neighborhoods Implementation Actions .....................................................................130 Redevelopment Areas Implementation Actions ..........................................................................132 Appendix A: Community Profile City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS COPPELL 2030 A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN City Council Doug Stover, Mayor Bob Mahalik, Mayor Pro Tem, Place 2 Tim Brancheau, Place 1 Brianna Hinojosa-Flores, Place 3 Marsha Tunnell, Place 4 Billy Faught, Place 5 Marvin Franklin, Place 6 Karen Hunt, Place 7 Planning and Zoning Commission Gregory Frnka, Chairman Edmund Haas, Vice Chair Aaron Duncan Anna Kittrell Charles Sangerhausen Derek Jett Consuelo Rios-Tankersley 2030 Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee Clay Phillips, City Manager Edmund Haas, Planning Commissioner Charles Sangerhausen, Planning Commissioner Sid Grant, Asst. Superintendent, Coppell ISD Gary Roden, Co-Chair, 2030 Vision, Vice Chair, Economic Development Committee Mindi Hurley, Economic Development Coordinator John Elias, Park Operations Manager Michael Garza, Graduate Engineer Gary Sieb, Planning Director 2030 Comprehensive Plan Economic Analysis Interview Participants Alen Hinckley, CCIM, Yorkshire West Realty Mark Wolfe, Owner RE/MAX DFW Associates Mark Haas, Principal, Mark Haas Company Greg Yancey, Provident Company, Inc. Tom Holland, Project Manager, Billingsley Company Lucilo Pena, President-Development, Billingsley Company Gary Roden, Vice Chair, Economic Development Committee City of Coppell Planning Department Gary Sieb, AICP, Planning Director Marcy Diamond, AICP, Assistant Planning Director Matt Steer, AICP, City Planner Juanita Miles, Senior Administrative Technician Consultant team Tom Yantis, AICP, BWR, Project Manager Kevin Kokes, AICP, LEED AP, BWR, Senior Planner Shawn Strate, AICP, BWR, GIS Planner Ed Starkie, Urban Advisors, Economic Analysis Robin Frye, ASLA, ASAI, Frye Associates, Illustrations and Frye Associates City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN CHAPtER 1 Policy PLAN COPPELL 2030 PLAN Introduction Coppell Fast Facts Purpose of the Plan Relationship to other Adopted Plans Charter Provisions Basis in State Law Strategic Framework Vision 2030 Goals and Objectives 1 City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 3Chapter 1: Policy PlanCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Introduction The City of Coppell Comprehensive Plan was last updated in 1996 during a period of rapid growth for the community. Coppell is now almost fully developed and is at the point that citizens are focusing on preserving the integrity of what is good in the city, looking at innovative ways to complete remaining development areas, and addressing problematic elements within the community. The recently completed Coppell Vision 2030 (April 2009), the Old Coppell Master Plan (2002), and the City’s other past and current planning efforts serve as a framework and vision for updating the Comprehensive Plan. “While we are only stewards of this community for a short period of time, it is paramount that we establish a vision and roadmap for the future.” Mayor Doug Stover Coppell Vision 2030 City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 4 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLANChapter 1: Policy PlanCOPPELL FAST FACTS Coppell Housing Units by Value Source: 2009 Adjusted Claritas Only 14 percent of owner-occupied homes in Coppell are valued at less than $150,000. Housing Units by YearHousing Units by Type Housing Tenure More than 70 percent of housing units in Coppell are single units and are owner-occupied. 61 percent of housing units have been built since 1990.Owner Occupied (73.7%) Renter Occupied (26.3%) Owner Occupied (73.7%) Renter Occupied (26.3%) 1999-2007 (22.0%)1989 and older (38.8%) 1990-1998 (39.2%) 1999-2007 (22.0%)1989 and older (38.8%) 1990-1998 (39.2%) Single Unit (76.1%) 50+ Units (5.7%) 3 to 19 Units (14.3%)2 Units (0.4%) 20 to 49 Units (1.6%) Other Unit Type (1.9%) Single Unit (76.1%) 50+ Units (5.7%) 3 to 19 Units (14.3%)2 Units (0.4%) 20 to 49 Units (1.6%) Other Unit Type (1.9%) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1 Percent of Owner-occupied housing units Less than $100,000 $300,000 to $399,999 Over $500,000 $400,000 to $499,999 $100,000 to $149,999 $200,000 to $299,999 $150,000 to $199,999 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1 Percent of Owner-occupied housing units Less than $100,000 $300,000 to $399,999 Over $500,000 $400,000 to $499,999 $100,000 to $149,999 $200,000 to $299,999 $150,000 to $199,999 0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% Under 18 years 18-24 years 25-44 years 45-64 years Over 65 years Coppell Texas U.S. Coppell Total Population by Age Group Source: 2009 Adjusted Claritas (Coppell); U.S. Census 2008 Estimates (Texas and U.S.) Coppell has a much greater share of its population under the age of 18 than state and national averages. Coppell also has a much lower percentage of elderly residents. 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 35,958 42,05741,30139,84338,051 42,442 42,636 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 35,958 42,05741,30139,84338,051 42,442 42,636 The graph above shows population forecasts for Coppell for every five years until 2030. Using ESRI 2009-2014 forecast data as a base, the 2030 forecast assumes that Coppell will continue to grow but at a lower rate in each successive five-year increment after 2010. This is due to the fact that the amount of available land for development will continue to decline. These assumptions are based on prior trends of land use density and may change based upon recommendations in this plan. Coppell Population Forecasts Source: U.S. Census estimates; BWR projections based on ESRI BIS 2009-2014 data. Note: Updated population forecasts from NCTCOG will be added when they become available. Demographics Housing Characteristics City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework5Chapter 1: Policy PlanCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Purpose of the Plan The Coppell 2030 Plan is intended to serve as the policy guide and “vision” for the future of Coppell and long- term community planning activities. This Plan officially updates and replaces the previous Comprehensive Plan adopted in 1996. This Plan builds on Coppell Vision 2030 and its recommendations for: quality future programs and services, ensuring financial stability, sustaining the city’s infrastructure, maintaining our neighborhoods, supporting our business community and promoting all of the other elements that make up a desirable community. The Coppell 2030 Plan: • Establishes the community’s vision for the future development of the City; • Provides a framework for allocating City resources through the budgeting process and for providing municipal services; • Provides a basis for considering and evaluating land use decisions, and planning for future development and redevelopment projects; • Integrates other City plans and policies in a cohesive manner; and • Provides implementation strategies. Relationship to Other Adopted Plans Coppell 2030 Plan integrates the policies and recommendations of various community initiatives and plans. While Coppell Vision 2030 provides the community’s overall vision and goals, various other plans’ recommendations provide a framework for this Plan. These plans include the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, Coppell Trails Master Plan, Old Coppell Master Plan, Major Thoroughfare Plan, Streetscape Plan, 1997 C.I.V.I.C. Report, and regional plans such as Mobility 2030. As indicated in the Implementation chapter of this Plan, updates to some of these plans may be necessary to achieve the vision of the community and the policies adopted with this Plan. Charter Provisions The City of Coppell’s home rule charter provides a basis for comprehensive planning. This charter provision provides broad authority to the City Council to include within the comprehensive plan policies that guide all municipal ordinances related to the physical development of the community. Basis in State Law Chapter 213 of the Texas Local Government Code provides the basis for comprehensive planning in Texas. This chapter reads in part: Sec. 213.002. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. (a) The governing body of a municipality may adopt a comprehensive plan for the long-range development of the municipality. A municipality may define the content and design of a comprehensive plan. (b) A comprehensive plan may: (1) include but is not limited to provisions on land use, transportation, and public facilities; (2) consist of a single plan or a coordinated set of plans organized by subject and geographic area; and (3) be used to coordinate and guide the establishment of development regulations. (c) A municipality may define, in its charter or by ordinance, the relationship between a comprehensive plan and development regulations and may provide standards for determining the consistency required between a plan and development regulations. (d) Land use assumptions adopted in a manner that complies with Subchapter C, Chapter 395, may be incorporated in a comprehensive plan. One of the primary ways in which a municipality regulates the development of land within its jurisdiction is through the implementation of a zoning ordinance. Here again, the Comprehensive Plan serves as the basis upon which all zoning decisions must be made. Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code requires that all zoning decisions must be consistent with a municipal Comprehensive Plan. That chapter reads in part: Sec. 211.004. COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. (a) Zoning regulations must be adopted in accordance with a comprehensive plan and must be designed to: (1) lessen congestion in the streets; (2) secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers; (3) promote health and the general welfare; (4) provide adequate light and air; (5) prevent the overcrowding of land; (6) avoid undue concentration of population; or (7) facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewers, schools, parks, and other public requirements. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 6 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLANChapter 1: Policy PlanStrategic Framework Vision 2030 provides the community’s overall vision, as well as recommended Strategies, Goals, and Objectives for achieving the community vision. Vision 2030 was developed to ensure that the high standard of living present in Coppell today will be maintained tomorrow in this growing community in a changing world. This unique plan provides strategies to manage future opportunities and challenges for Coppell for the next twenty years. Coppell 2030 – A Family Community for a Lifetime 3 PASSION FOR COPPELL A FAMILY COMMUNITY FOR A LIFETIME Coppell 2030 - Our Vision Coppell is A Family Community for a Lifetime Coppell residents choose to make Coppell their hometown because of our Small Town Feel, our Inviting Community Gathering Places, our Active, Healthy Lifestyle for All, our Top Quality Schools, and our Diverse Faith-Based Values. Coppell is our Special Place to Live because of our Beautiful Green City, our Great Livable Neighborhoods, our Viable Community Commercial Centers, our Prosperous Business Center and our Convenient Access and Effective Mobility. We have a PASSION FOR COPPELL The Coppell 2030 Vision was established through a collaborative effort led by residents, business members, and civic leaders who generously volunteered their time, and dedicated their efforts. Community input is valuable to successful planning and is a sound way to guarantee that Coppell’s diverse population and communities are represented. These dynamic individuals helped solidify their vision: Coppell is a Family Community for a Lifetime. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework7Chapter 1: Policy PlanCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Sustainable Community Planning for a sustainable community is the overarching theme of Coppell 2030 Plan. Through long range planning actions, the City of Coppell will lead by example to align the community’s built environment and socioeconomic activities with the natural systems that support life. The first step in planning a sustainable community is to prepare and adopt a Community Sustainability Policy and Sustainability Action Plan. The sustainable community strategy is designed to address the long- term economic, environmental, and social health of Coppell and its many neighborhoods. Sustainability topics will be defined by the community and may range from employment and business prosperity, community programs and services, education, mobility, housing, energy and natural resource conservation, and climate change. These efforts are intended to provide a detailed roadmap of actions to implement many of the recommendations of Coppell 2030 Plan intended to achieve a diverse, vibrant economy with a strong tax base, thus reducing the future fiscal burden on residents to provide city amenities and services. While Vision 2030 established the community’s aspirations for the future, the 2030 Plan defines the road map to achieve the vision. The basic philosophy of the Plan is to preserve the character and quality of Coppell’s existing neighborhoods while creating new community activity centers that provide a variety of higher density housing options along side vibrant retail and commercial uses. Several core pillars support this philosophy and are further described on the following pages and include: • Sustainable Community • Placemaking • Mixed Use Activity Centers • Land Use and Mobility • Healthy Neighborhoods Coppell 2030 Plan Core Pillars Sustainable CommunityPlacemakingMixed Use Activity CentersHealthy NeighborhoodsLand Use and MobilityCity Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 8Chapter 1: Policy PlanCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Mixed Use Activity Centers As Coppell approaches build out, future growth will be focused on retrofitting and redevelopment opportunities of underutilized areas. This will lead to long-term sustainability and value by creating vibrant community places out of older commercial centers that are underutilized, vacant, functionally obsolete, or in need of significant renovation as they age. It will integrate retail trends emphasizing mixed-use developments with retail, offices and residential units in a walkable urban environment with a sense of place. The strategy directs redevelopment, infill, and new growth into compact, mixed-use, and pedestrian- friendly centers that are well connected to surrounding neighborhoods and have access to multi-modal transportation options. These areas have attractive streetscapes and public spaces that bring people together. These centers also provide a variety of quality urban housing types affordable to residents of all stages of life. Over time, these centers will connect to each other through an expanded local and regional transit system. Placemaking Placemaking emphasizes creating and transforming public spaces into vibrant community places, whether they are parks, plazas, public squares, streets, sidewalks or the myriad other outdoor and indoor spaces with public activities. These areas have amenities for all family generations - children, young adults, young professionals, empty nesters and seniors. A vibrant Coppell community in 2030 will be achieved by reorienting planning and design to focus on both people and places. These efforts will promote multiple focal points and places for residents to gather, to socialize, to meet each other and to enjoy. Each focal point will have its own unique venues serving different purposes. Placemaking will create unique places with lasting value that are compact, mixed use, and pedestrian and transit-oriented with a strong civic character. This includes providing convenient and attractive mixed use destinations for shopping and daily necessities that are located in close proximity to neighborhoods and add value, while blending seamlessly with the character of the area. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework9Chapter 1: Policy PlanCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Land Use and Mobility Implementation of the mixed use activity centers concept is dependent upon close coordination of land use and transportation planning. These centers will improve mobility choices and also reduce vehicular transportation impacts through urban design and form focusing on the needs of people traveling by foot, bicycle, and transit, as well as the automobile. There is a need for effective public transit within the city and to the region, and residents have expressed a desire for a more walkable community and multi-use trails linking neighborhoods to various community destinations. Focused development and density in mixed use centers will provide linkages between where people live and to where they work, shop, and gather socially. Higher intensity development in corridors such as Belt Line Rd. and Denton Tap Rd. allows for a more cost-effective expansion of transit service linkages to Coppell, thus making transit accessibility more convenient for more people. Integrating new housing in mixed-use areas will provide opportunities for people to live near their place of work, and help support the use of neighborhood shops and services. As such, the development pattern of mixed use activity centers will address land use and transportation strategies for increased mobility and long term economic and fiscal stability. Healthy Neighborhoods Coppell has a variety of livable neighborhoods making Coppell a “Special Place to Live.” Maintaining healthy residential neighborhoods is critical to ensuring a long- term sustainable community. As neighborhoods mature, the community will rise to the challenge of keeping them sustainable. This includes providing state of the art technology throughout the city and maintaining high-quality infrastructure such as sidewalks, streets, alleys, utilities and fences in all neighborhoods. It also means providing a range of diverse housing choices (types, sizes and price points) for all generations in our city. Strategic neighborhood level planning will proactively identify and target challenges of mature neighborhoods. The implementation of specific recommendations from neighborhood plans will help stabilize these areas and ensure a sustainable future. These efforts will also foster the ability of neighborhoods to inspire residents with the ambition, interest and ability to work collaboratively with the City to implement the plan’s goals and recommendations. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 10Chapter 1: Policy PlanCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN 2030 Community Planning Goals and Objectives The following goals and objectives from Vision 2030 provide the community planning framework for the Coppell 2030 Plan. Additional community planning policies are provided in the various chapters and sections throughout the Plan. • Upgrade neighborhood infrastructure, including streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks • Ensure that homeowners take responsibility for maintaining their homes and yards • Develop attractive, well-designed, mixed-use developments that integrate professional offices, small scale retail, public space and residential in areas such as Old Coppell, Sandy Lake / MacArthur, Sandy Lake / Denton Tap, and Belt Line / Belt Line • Upgrade appearance and quality of neighborhood commercial properties • Develop and support strong neighborhood associations with active resident involvement Goal: Effective Mobility Within Coppell • Provide efficient local traffic flow • Expand safe and usable sidewalks and trails connecting the community gathering places, parks, neighborhoods and other destinations of interest • Provide well-maintained streets and sidewalks • Develop effective alternative public transportation options to take residents to desired destinations within Coppell • Comply with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessibility: sidewalks, trails, public transportation • Increase safety for automobiles, bikes and pedestrians Goal: Easy Access to Dallas-Fort Worth Region • Participate in regional rail service to Dallas - Fort Worth region • Maintain and enhance accessibility to DFW Airport • Determine level of participation in a regional transportation authority • Maintain and enhance convenient access to all major thoroughfares • Develop regional connections for Coppell residents and employees of Coppell businesses Special Place to Live Goal: Quality Housing for Family Generations • Support housing for all stages of life available in Coppell • Maintain high percentage of home ownership • Ensure attractive, well-maintained homes (single- family and multi-family) • Assure that all homes (owner-occupied and rental) meet current City codes and ordinances • Promote new urban housing with density in selected locations, such as zero lot line homes, townhouses, condos and mixed-use development Goal: Beautiful Green City • Become the model “Green” community demonstrating best practices • Provide incentives for beautification and “Greening” • Ensure well-maintained neighborhood, public infrastructure including streets, alleys, utilities and fences • Ensure well-maintained private infrastructure including entrances, fences and common areas • Incorporate xeriscape concepts in landscape design • Adapt building standards to include “Green” concepts and methods for construction and developments Goal: Revitalizing Neighborhoods • Develop and enhance an effective code compliance for assuring that homes, both owner-occupied and rental, meet codes City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework11Chapter 1: Policy PlanCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Community Wellness and Enrichment Goal: Community Gathering Places • Develop Old Coppell as a mixed-use development with retail, restaurants, entertainment, professional offices, Farmers’ Market, living opportunities around a square • Enhance parks as destinations for sports • Enhance Town Center area as Coppell’s civic center: City Hall, Library, Municipal Justice Center, Fire Station and Plaza Goal: Multi-Use Trail System Connecting the City • Complete and maintain multi-use trail system that links city parks and other communities’ trails such as soft surfaces • Ensure sidewalk connectivity throughout the city • Create safe routes for bicycles • Maintain a well-marked trail system • Provide Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) access to trail system Business Prosperity Goal: Retention and Attraction of Businesses that Generate Revenues for the City • Create incentives for business retention and redevelopment • Attract the “right” businesses to Coppell in the “right” locations and expand support and auxiliary businesses to help existing businesses Goal: Major Retail and Top Quality Business Office Park along I-635 and SH 121 • Develop a “gateway” at the corner of I-635 and Belt Line - Point West with a high-quality hotel, offices, warehouses retail and restaurants • Differentiate Coppell from other communities along major highways • Develop State Highway 121 with infill retail and professional offices • Attract high-quality hotels with dining opportunities nearby • Increase visibility of commercial corridors Goal: Old Coppell as a Small Town Village • Develop Old Coppell that is pedestrian-friendly • Develop an Old Town Square framed by small niche retail businesses, commercial businesses, restaurants, professional offices, townhouses and condos • Provide improved accessibility with convenient parking in Old Coppell • Make Old Coppell as an attractive destination for shopping, eating and entertainment • Increase opportunities for living in Old Coppell Goal: Community Commercial Centers • Promote redevelopment of shopping centers to improve business vitality and appearance • Promote redevelopment retail center at Denton Tap / East Belt Line • Match retail businesses with current and future resident base • Promote redevelopment of MacArthur / Sandy Lake into an attractive, well-designed, mixed-use development with public spaces • Recognize Coppell’s niche retail businesses - unique stores that draw residents and non- residents • Goal: Home Offices and Home Based Businesses • Provide opportunities for executive suites or small offices with ownership opportunities • Support mixed-use developments such as options for work-life space • Provide services in Library for local home-based offices • Provide a “mail/delivery drop” business in retail centers to cut down on neighborhood nuisance • Ensure that home-based businesses comply with city ordinances and regulations City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 12Chapter 1: Policy PlanCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Sustainable City Government Goal: “Green” City Operations and Facilities • Incorporate “Green” concepts where economically feasible in new City facilities • Use more fuel-efficient City vehicles • Explore alternative water sources for irrigation purposes • Develop or redevelop all City properties with xeriscape techniques where appropriate • Convert to alternative energy sources where economically feasible • Goal: Excellent and Well Maintained City Infrastructure and Facilities • Maintain and fund preventative maintenance plans for City infrastructure and facilities • Ensure facilities have capacity to support future growth • Reduce maintenance costs of City infrastructure maintenance • Build new City facilities only if the City has the financial resources to maintain Goal: Financial Resources to Support City Services • Implement plans to maximize revenue on undeveloped and redeveloped property • Ensure that city incentives, economic development maximize financial impact to the city City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN CHAPtER 2 Planning FRAMEWORK COPPELL 2030 PLAN Sustainability Land Use Parks and Open Space transportation & Mobility 13 City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework15COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Chapter 2: Planning FrameworkUnderstanding the link between land use, transportation and open space is the key to a sustainable Coppell in 2030. Introduction The Planning Framework Element of Coppell 2030 Plan focuses on investments, redevelopment opportunities, strategies and recommendations to accommodate future growth and implement Coppell Vision 2030. The vision expressed by residents in Coppell Vision 2030 is for a sustainable community with: • A Small Town Feel • Inviting Community Gathering Places • Active, Healthy Lifestyle For All • Top Quality Schools • Diverse Faith-Based Values • Beautiful, Green City • Great Livable Neighborhoods • Viable Community Commercial Centers • Prosperous Business Center • Convenient Access and Effective Mobility this chapter includes the following sections: • Sustainability • Land Use • Parks and Open Space • transportation & Mobility City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework16 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Guiding Principles: • Promote a sustainable community • Accommodate population growth and economic development in new denser, walkable mixed-use activity centers • Connect activity centers with transportation corridors that accommodate automobiles, pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit • Provide transportation choices that improve the community’s connectivity to the region • Provide distinct community character • Provide quality complete neighborhoods with diverse housing options • Concentrate commercial uses in economically viable activity centers Caption here Caption here Caption here This chapter addresses the topics of Sustainability, Land Use, Parks and Open Space, and Transportation and Mobility. The core pillar of Healthy Neighborhoods is detailed in Chapter 3. The basic philosophy of the Coppell 2030 Plan is to preserve the character and quality of Coppell’s existing neighborhoods while creating new community activity centers that provide a variety of higher density housing options along side vibrant retail and commercial uses. The Planning Framework provided in this Chapter is based on the following guiding principles which support the Vision of the community and are the core components of the plan. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework17COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Sustainability • Beautiful Green City • “Green” City Operations • Excellent and Well Maintained City Infrastructure and Facilities • “Old Coppell” as a Small Town Village • Community Commercial Centers • Revitalizing Neighborhoods • Community Gathering Places • Excellent and Well-Maintained City Infrastructure and Facilities • Quality Mobility Within Coppell • Multi-Use Trail System Connecting the City VISION 2030 GOALS Planning for a sustainable community is the overarching theme of Vision 2030. Sustainability can mean many things to members of the community. However for the purpose of long range planning, sustainability is defined as aligning our built environment and socioeconomic activities with the natural systems that support life. Inherent in sustainability is the concept of providing for today without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs. Actions today affect what future generations have to admire or regret. The City of Coppell is committed to lead by example, promote public participation, and work in community partnerships to protect the natural systems that support life and improve our quality of life. The City of Coppell’s commitment to sustainability is supported by the Coppell 2030 Plan. Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) The Coppell 2030 Plan integrates sustainability planning for individual developments and neighborhoods using the principles of the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) for Neighborhood Development rating system. LEED for Neighborhood Development (LEED-ND) was developed by the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC), the Congress for the New Urbanism (CNU), and the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). The 2009 LEED-ND rating system is a set of performance standards for the planning and development of neighborhoods. The intent is to promote healthful, durable, affordable, and environmentally sound practices in building design and construction. LEED-ND creates a label, as well as guidelines for both decision making and development, to provide an incentive for better location, design, and construction of new residential, commercial, and mixed- use developments. Building on the principles of LEED-ND, sustainable community planning in Coppell is organized around three basic components, which are further described on the following pages: • Smart Location and Linkage • Neighborhood Pattern and Design • Green Infrastructure and Buildings Green Building– the movement strives to create a permanent shift in prevailing design, planning, construction, and operational practices toward lower- impact, more sustainable, and ultimately regenerative built environments. This transformation will never be complete, since green building is fundamentally a process of continual improvement. In this process, today’s “best practices” become tomorrow’s standard practices and the foundation for ever- higher leveles of performance. – Source: Green Building and LEED Core Concepts Guide, U.S. Green Building Council, Inc. LEED for Neighborhood Development – the rating system is designed primarily for the planning and development of new green neighborhoods, whether infill sites or new developments proximate to diverse uses or adjacent to connected and previously developed land. – Source: U.S. Green Building Council, Inc. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework18 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Smart Location and Linkage Development and infrastructure designed and constructed with sustainable practices are beneficial to the community and the individual as well as the environment. A sustainable community emphasizes the location of development, transportation alternatives, and preservation of sensitive lands while discouraging sprawl. It enables a wide variety of residents to be part of the community by including housing of varying types and price ranges. Green development respects historical resources and the existing community fabric; preserves open space and provides access to parks. Green buildings, community gardens, and streets and public spaces encourage physical activity and are beneficial for public health. The PRIMARY PRINCIPLES are: • Encourage development within and near existing public transportation infrastructure to reduce vehicle trips • Encourage reuse of land and redevelopment of previously developed sites • Encourage a balanced community with a diversity of uses and employment opportunities • Conserve natural and financial resources associated with the construction and maintenance of infrastructure • Protect imperiled species and ecologies • Promote habitat conservation, enhanced water quality and natural hydrological systems City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework19COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Smart Location and Linkage Principles The primary principles of sustainable land development and community growth encourage the considerations of location, transportation alternatives, and preservation of sensitive lands. Brownfield Redevelop- ment Reduce Automobile Dependence Create walking and biking networks which provide connectivity to destinations such as schools and employment centers. Also provide users with secure, enclosed bicycle storage and on-site shower and changing facilities for nonresidential developments. Encourage a balanced community with a diversity of uses and employment opportunities within a reasonable walking distance of each other. Conservation of native plants, wildlife habitat, wetland, and water bodies. Also restoring such elements that have been harmed by previous human activities. Bicycle Network and Storage Habitat or Wetland, Water Body Conservation Housing and Jobs Proximity Preferred Location Reduce Automobile Dependence Brownfield Redevelopment Encourage development in locations with multi- modal transportation choices or otherwise reduced motor vehicle use, thereby reducing greenhouse gas emissions, air pollution, and other adverse environmental and public health issues associated with motor vehicle use. Encourage the reuse of land by developing sites that are complicated by environmental contamination. Previously developed infill sites and sites surrounded by developed areas are preferred since they take advantage of existing infrastructure. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework20 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Neighborhood Pattern and Design There are tremendous opportunities to retrofit under- utilized areas of Coppell and to promote economic development and support new growth by 2030. These efforts emphasize creating vibrant, equitable neighborhoods that are healthy, walkable, and mixed- use. In Coppell this may involve reviving old shopping centers and their surrounding parking lots or adding new units and vibrant walkable mixed-use centers to support existing neighborhoods. Increasingly, as transit options become more available in Coppell there will be candidates for creating mixed-use, walkable developments with the potential to decrease residents’ and workers’ dependence on personal automobiles. The PRIMARY PRINCIPLES are: • Foster “connectedness” • Promote livability, transportation efficiency and walkability • Encourage compact development with diverse uses and the preservation of open space • Promote diversity of housing types • Reduce parking footprints • Encourage the use of multi-modal travel • Provide access to civic and public spaces and recreation facilities • Encourage community outreach and involvement • Promote local food production • Provide tree-lined and shaded streets City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework21COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Bicycle Network and Storage Access to Civic & Public Spaces, and Recreational Facilities Tree-Lined and Shaded Streets Local Food Production Transit Facilities and Transportation Demand Management Street Network Encourage walking, bicycling, and transit use, while reducing urban heat island effects, improving air quality, and reduce cooling loads in buildings. Provide a variety of open spaces close to work and home to facilitate social networking, civic engagement, physical activity, and time spent outdoors. Promote community- based food production and access to fresh produce by dedicating permanent and viable growing space and related facilities, such as community gardens. Provide high levels of internal development connectivity as well as connectivity to the community at large. Connectivity addresses the number of publicly accessible street intersections per square mile. Encourage the use of multi-modal transportation through the provision of safe, convenient, and comfortable transit waiting areas and safe and secure bicycle storage facilities for transit users. Also encourage transportation demand management programs, support low-cost transit passes, or vehicle sharing. Preferred Location Brownfield Redevelop- ment Reduce Automobile Dependence Mixed-Use Neighborhood Centers Reduced Parking Footprint Mixed-Income Diverse Community Compact Development Walkable Streets Design parking to increase the pedestrian orientation and minimize the adverse environmental effects of parking facilities. Off- street surface parking lots are limited in area and are located at the side or rear of buildings. Promote social equity by enabling residents from a wide range of economic levels, household sizes, and age groups to live in the community by providing a sufficient variety of housing sizes and types. Cluster diverse land uses in accessible neighborhood and community centers allowing residents to meet their daily needs within close proximity to home and reduce their automobile dependence. Encourage development in existing areas to conserve land by promoting livability, walkability and transportation efficiency through an increased density in both residential and non-residential areas. Promote walking by providing safe, appealing, and comfortable street environments that support public health by reducing pedestrian injuries and encouraging daily physical activities. Neighborhood Pattern and Design Principles The primary principles of this category emphasize vibrant, equitable communities that are healthy, walkable, ‘connected’ and mixed use. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework22 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN The natural and built environments are precious resources that should be preserved, protected and enhanced. The manner in which the built environment is designed, constructed, and operated has a significant impact on the natural environment, energy use, and resource consumption. Built environment design decisions of every scale — region, city, neighborhood, block, street, and building — determine the rate at which people use energy and resources in their daily lives. These practices promote the design and construction of buildings and infrastructure that reduce energy and water use, while promoting more sustainable use of materials, reuse of existing and historic structures, and other sustainable best practices. The PRIMARY PRINCIPLES are: • Promote green building practices • Increase energy efficiency • Encourage renewable energy sources • Increase water efficiency and water reuse • Reduce pollution from construction activities • Minimize storm water impacts and improve water quality • Reduce heat island effects • Increase the use of recycled and reclaimed materials • Reduce the volume of solid waste • Minimize light pollution Green Infrastructure and Buildings City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework23COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Wastewater Management Light Pollution Reduction Solid Waste Management Heat Island Reduction, Solar Orientation, On-Site Renewable Energy, Infrastructure Energy Efficiency Storm Water Management Reduce heat islands, encourage energy efficiency, encourage on-site renewable energy production, and reduce environmental effects from energy use. Minimize light trespass and reduce sky-glow, improve nighttime visibility through glare reduction. Reduce pollution from wastewater and encourage the reuse of treated wastewater for irrigation and other purposes. Reduce the volume of waste deposited in landfills and promote the proper disposal of hazardous wastes. Reduce pollution and hydrologic instability from storm water, reduce flooding, promote aquifer recharge, and improve water quality by emulating natural hydrologic conditions. Preferred Location Brownfield Redevelop- ment Reduce Automobile Dependence Building Water Efficiency Building & Adaptive Reuse, and Reuse of Historic Buildings Water Efficient Landscaping Building Energy Efficiency Green Buildings Extend the life cycle of existing building stock to conserve resources, reduce waste, and reduce adverse environmental effects of new building material manufacturing and transport. Limit or eliminate the use of potable water and other natural surface or subsurface water resources for landscape irrigation. Reduce effects on natural water resources and reduce burdens on community water supply and wastewater systems. Encourage the design and construction of energy- efficient buildings that reduce air, water, and land pollution and adverse environmental effects from energy production and consumption. Encourage the design, construction, and retrofit of buildings that utilize green building practices. Green Infrastructure and Buildings Principles The primary principles of this category promote the design and construction of buildings and infrastructure that reduce energy and water use, while promoting more sustainable use of materials, reuse of existing and historic structures, and other sustainable best practices. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework24 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN The City of Coppell actively engages in a variety of community sustainability efforts at both the local and regional level. These existing efforts are highlighted by the following. City of ecoCoppell In 2007, the City of Coppell initiated ecoCoppell with a commitment to focus on sustainability. The initiative includes a wide range of efforts related to community education, programs, and citizen involvement activities. Largely through efforts by the City’s interdepartmental “Green Team,” staff members are involved in sustainability initiatives pertaining to: • air quality • storm water pollution prevention • community gardens and urban agriculture • farmers market and local economy • litter prevention • recycling and waste reduction • public infrastructure and facilities retrofits for energy efficiency • education and recognition of positive environmental practices • City purchasing policies City of Coppell Environmental Management Systems (EMS) Program The ecoCoppell includes an Environmental Management System (EMS) developed by the EMS “Core” Team, a subgroup of the City’s Green Team. The City’s EMS provides a set of practices enabling the city to reduce environmental impacts and increase operating efficiency of various municipal facilities and sites. The City of Coppell Service Center was chosen by the Green Team as the first of several municipal facilities to target and address the aspects of work and activities that impact the environment. Environmental performance goals for Clean Texas were set to reduce annual energy use by 6 percent and fuel usage by 3 percent. Throughout the implementation process, audits were conducted with internal auditors and a third party auditor in preparation for a Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) certified EMS. As a result of these efforts in August 2010, TCEQ approved the Service Center as a new Gold-Level Clean Texas member, which is a first for a city in Texas. These efforts are recognized as a “how to” model for smaller cities in the state. Currently, staff is developing an EMS for the Aquatic and Recreation Center and the W.T. Cozby Public Library, and evaluating the city’s three fire stations. Local Sustainability Iniatives City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework25COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN The Triple Bottom Line – LEED measures and enhances the design and sustainability of buildings based on a “triple bottom line” approach. The three dimensions are often likened to the three legs of a stool. If the legs are not all equal, the stool will wobble and be unable to perform its function. Projects certified under the LEED rating systems demonstrate, through compliance with a range of requirements, that they have addressed elements that balance and enhance all three areas of the triple bottom line, all three dimensions of sustainability. – Source: U.S. Green Building Council, Inc. North Texas Regional Environmental Management Systems Partnership (N-TREMS) The City of Coppell is a member of N-TREMS, which is a partnership consisting of public/private organizations to collaborate and address regional community and environmental issues throughout the North Texas Region. The partnership promotes environmental sustainability, reduced environmental impacts, and formal public/private relationships through the use of Environmental Management Systems (EMS). The N-TREMS partnership provides specific benefits to each of its partnering organizations by helping them to improve local and regional environmental quality; build communication and trust between partners and the community; and cost-effectively manage their environmental impacts to improve environmental management. ICLEI-Local Governments for Sustainability The City of Coppell is a member of ICLEI -Local Governments for Sustainability (ICLEI). ICLEI is an international association of local, regional, and national government organizations that have made a commitment to sustainable development. The basic premise is that locally designed initiatives can provide an effective and cost-efficient way to achieve local, national, and global sustainability ICLEI provides technical consulting, training, and information services to build capacity, share knowledge, and support local government in the implementation of sustainable development at the local level. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework26 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Public and private sustainability efforts currently underway in Coppell are generally focused on community education, involvement, programs and initiatives, and recognizing successes. These efforts are primarily managed by the City of Coppell Green Team and ecoCoppell, staff and City Council involvement in ICLEI and N-TREMS, and through community partners such as the similarly named Coppell Green Team organized by the Coppell Chamber of Commerce. Today, these existing sustainability planning efforts, while successful, lack a common framework to guide their efforts citywide and to measure the impact of their programs. Developing a citywide sustainability plan will provide a means of bringing everything together under a set of goals and metrics and provide a vision for the sustainable future of Coppell. The sustainability plan should define and clearly explain the community’s key sustainability challenges, high-level sustainability goals, and the smaller measures and strategies to meet each goal. This framework should include “indicators” allowing for measured outcomes. Such indicators may be a statistic or trend allowing the community to evaluate where the community is and the positive or negative success in meeting the goals. A sustainability plan differs from a climate action plan it that it takes a broader, more holistic view on community sustainability. A climate action plan typically focuses on reducing greenhouse gas emissions, including emissions resulting from both the local government’s operations and from the community as a whole. This may include opportunities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions resulting from energy use in transportation, solid waste disposal, buildings, lighting, and waste water treatment and water delivery. Sustainability Planning Process ICLEI recommends the following for successfully completing a sustainability plan and the City’s journey towards a sustainable future: • hire a sustainability coordinator • obtain buy-in from elected officials • form teams that build bridges across city departments—and beyond city government • conduct a sustainability assessment • define clear, relevant, and measurable goals • include the public throughout the planning process to help identify and prioritize sustainability goals • develop implementation plans for strategies to achieve the goals of the sustainability plan • solicit community feedback before completing the plan • track the implementation status of the sustainability measures, and • evaluate progress and report results to the community. Citywide Sustainability Plan City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework27COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Measuring Success - STAR Community Index The STAR Community Index is a national, consensus- based framework for gauging the sustainability and livability of U.S. communities. STAR is being developed through a partnership between ICLEI, the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC), and the Center for American Progress (CAP). Being developed for release in 2010, STAR is a voluntary rating system for sustainable communities modeled after the LEEDTM green building program. STAR identifies key components of urban sustainability, thus providing a way to measure the community’s progress in those areas. For future sustainability planning efforts in Coppell, the STAR Community Index may assist with guiding and measuring local successes, as well as serving as a guide for local policies and plans. The STAR indicators and metrics are expected to include the following categories of sustainability. Environment • Natural Systems (ecosystems and habitat, water and stormwater, air quality, waste, and resource conservation) • Planning and Design (land use, transportation and mobility, and parks, open space and recreation) • Energy and Climate (energy, emissions, renewable energy, and green building) Economy • Economic Development (clean technologies and green jobs, local commerce, tourism, and local food system) • Employment and Workforce Training (green job training, employment and workforce wages, and youth skills) Society • Education, Arts and Community (education excellence, arts and culture, and civic engagement and vitality) • Children, Health and Safety (community health and wellness, access to health care, and public safety) • Affordability and Social Equity (affordable and workforce housing, poverty, human services and race and social equity) City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework28 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Coppell Environmental Policy To ensure a desirable community, the City of Coppell will: Commit to evaluate, comply and improve environmental standards; Outline strategies to minimize impact on the environment; Protect natural resources by managing our activities; Promote and continually improve the efficient use of resources; Educate others; Look for ways to live in a healthy and safe community; and Lead as a proactive model within the region. Sustainability Policies • S-1 Create efficiencies, synergies, and consistencies among city policies, plans, and programs. • S-2 Pursue the development of “clean” or “green” sector industries that benefit Coppell’s environment and economy. • S-3 Promote land use patterns that increase energy efficiency in buildings and transportation systems by making energy efficiency a critical element when developing new development regulations and modifying old regulations and policies. • S-4 Promote sustainable or “green building” practices for the construction and operation of buildings. • S-5 Design new and major remodels to public buildings, and where feasible, long term building leases for facilities, to achieve certification by the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED®) Green Building Rating System to conserve resources, including but not limited to energy and renewable resources. • S-6 Incorporate sustainable “green design” solutions for streets, storm water, and other infrastructure projects. • S-7 Support increased recycling and composting throughout the community, and reduce the amount of solid waste disposal. • S-8 Maintain and improve the water quality of significant wetlands and water bodies through design of storm water drainage facilities on both public and private property. • S-9 Explore opportunities for promoting “green” renewable energy use and alternative fuels. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework29COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Land Use • Community Commercial Centers • “Old Coppell” as a Small Town Village • Major Retail and Top Quality Business Office Park Along I-635 and SH 121 • Home Offices and Home Based Businesses VISION 2030 GOALS Coppell is prepared to embrace its share of the Dallas- Forth Worth region’s growth. To ensure that it remains a vibrant and healthy place to live, Coppell has planned for the future of the city as a whole and for targeted areas expected to grow and change by 2030. The City is committed to growing wisely, to growing in ways that ensure a livable future, and to growing sustainably. Growing sustainably also means building on the city’s successes and the foundation of existing neighborhoods. By 2030, Coppell will have a large number of new, diverse, mixed-use urban neighborhoods in activity centers, which serve as the core for supporting housing options for all stages of life in Coppell. Coppell’s strategy for accommodating future growth and creating a sustainable community is focused on creating new mixed-use neighborhood and community activity centers. These are areas where conditions can best support increased density needed to house and employ the community’s newest residents while providing more housing options for existing residents. By concentrating growth in these urban centers, Coppell will build on the special aspects of the city’s existing character, creating concentrated, pedestrian-oriented, mixed use neighborhoods of varied intensities at appropriate locations throughout the city. Land Use Principles • Preserve the quality of existing neighborhoods • Increase housing choices in new, higher-density urban neighborhoods • Create vibrant, mixed-use neighborhood and community activity centers • Expand the tax base by accommodating regional commercial uses along the freeways and industrial uses in established industrial areas “Placemaking” – is a holistic and community-based approach to the development and revitalization of neighborhoods and cities. Placemaking creates unique places with lasting value that are compact, mixed-use, and pedestrian and transit-oriented development and have a strong civic character. – Source: Placemaking.com Walkable Communities – are desirable places to live, work, learn and play, and therefore a key component of smart growth. Their desirability comes from two factors. First, locating diverse uses within an easy and safe walk provides access to goods (such as housing, offices and retail) and services (such as transportation, schools, libraries) that a community resident or employee needs on a regular basis. Second, by definition, walkable communities make pedestrian activity possible, thus expanding transportation options and creating a streetscape that better serves a range of users – pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders and automobiles. To foster walkability, communities must mix land uses and build compactly, and ensure safe and inviting pedestrian corridors. – Source: smartgrowth.org City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework30 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN The qualities and characteristics of neighborhood and community activity centers and the TOD area include: • a diverse mix of uses with a variety of housing types; • a diverse mix of people of varied ages, incomes, cultures, employment, and interests; • vibrant, pedestrian-oriented commercial areas with stores, offices, and services; • a strong cohesive relationship between residential and commercial areas and adjacent established neighborhoods; • community facilities, including education, libraries, civic space, and human services; • transit, bicycle and pedestrian facilities with good circulation within the center and between the center and surrounding neighborhoods; • well-integrated public civic space for area residents and workers; • a unique identity with public art and architecture reflecting local history, culture and other sources of community pride. The goal that unifies all the elements of the Coppell 2030 Plan is to preserve the best qualities of the city’s distinct neighborhoods while responding positively and creatively to the pressures of change and growth. A key component to achieve this goal is to focus future growth and community “placemaking” in activity centers. Targeting future growth, urban redevelopment and economic development at several key nodes in the community will provide citizens with access to a variety of goods and services in a relatively small geographic area. This will create synergy and a concentrated business environment. Focusing future development in compact higher density, mixed-use activity centers represents a change in the city’s growth pattern from low-density single-use developments. Since some of the existing centers are already developed, any increase in the density must be made through redeveloping existing land and buildings. This process will require public-private partnerships, proactive public leadership, and neighborhood-based decisions built upon local citizens’ expressed priorities. Coppell in 2030 will include three types of activity centers: • Neighborhood and Community Activity Centers - will accommodate new mixed-use development and housing opportunities in close proximity to existing established neighborhoods. These activity centers will also provide social gathering places for nearby neighborhoods, where people would find the civic activities and “small-town atmosphere” they cherish. • Regional / Freeway Centers - will provide goods and services needed by the region including adjoining communities, typically consisting of large format buildings dependent upon high volumes of automobile traffic. • Transit Oriented Development (TOD) provides the highest density nodes of development centered around a station for the DART fixed rail transit network. This area will serve as a significant new housing and employment center and the primary point of access for Coppell residents to the region. Activity Centers Plano Station functions as a diverse Transit Oriented Development activity center. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework31COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Linkages provide connectivity corridors between activity centers in Coppell. These corridors are not as dense as activity centers, but provide a place for increased densities in a high-quality pedestrian environment with convenient access to multi-modal transportation options. In many cases, Residential Neighborhoods may abut corridors and are located between the activity centers. Linkages While some linkages may be continuous, narrow bands of higher intensity development along thoroughfares such as the Belt Line Rd. and Denton Tap Rd. corridors, others may be more nodal such as a series of smaller neighborhood mixed-use centers at key intersections, such as Sandy Lake Rd. and Moore Rd. Activity Centers and Corridors City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework32 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN A wide variety of factors create context in the urban environment. A continuum of contexts range from varying intensities of urbanism (suburban to urban core) to natural or open spaces (parks, civic spaces). This range of contexts is organized and depicted by the urban-rural transect. The transect serves as the basis for land use, parks and open space, transportation, and the overall framework to promote quality growth in Coppell by 2030. The transect defines a series of six zones transitioning from natural open space to dense urban core areas of the community. Each zone is fractal in that it contains a similar transition from the edge to the center of the neighborhood. Organizing Principle The importance of transect planning for Coppell in the future is a contrast to previous “Euclidean” zoning and suburban development planning. Past development patterns dedicated large areas to a single purpose, such as housing, offices, shopping, and primarily accessed via major roads. The Transect, by contrast, is a framework for more human-scale built environments built around walkable neighborhoods and multi-modal transportation while decreasing the reliance on the automobile. It creates the framework for growth, it promotes increased pedestrian life, safety, community identity, and protects natural environments. The Transect of Coppell Park & Open Space N/A Residential Neighborhood Industrial Urban Residential Neighborhood Mixed- Use Neighborhood Center Mixed-Use Community Center Freeway Transit Oriented Development District City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework33COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Future Land Use Plan The Coppell 2030 Future Land Use Plan is based on the principles of the transect, with each land use category corresponding with a transect zone. The Future Land Use Plan serves as the framework for future development and redevelopment decisions in Coppell. It is intended to guide appropriate land use, character, scale and intensity of future development. The land use designations are for planning purposes and do not represent a change to existing zoning or development regulations. Efforts to implement the principles of the transect in Coppell must be accompanied by development code revisions. The following pages describe each transect zone and the corresponding land use categories. A comprehensive plan shall not constitute zoning regulations or establish zoning district boundaries. Future Land Use City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework34 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN To provide areas for active and passive recreation, resource conservation and preservation and flood control. Uses: Parks, civic spaces, greenbelts, recreation facilities, golf courses, environmentally sensitive and natural resource areas, and any other lands reserved for permanent open space purposes. Compatible Zoning Districts: A, FP Parks and Open Space (T-1 Natural Zone) Purpose: City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework35COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Transect Framework of Public and Private Open Space Existing and future parks and open spaces in Coppell are organized across transect zones reflected by the Future Land Use Plan, ranging from naturalistic corridors to formal civic spaces. Park: A natural preserve available for unstructured recreation or structured recreation activities such as playgrounds, sports fields, and sports courts. A park may be independent of surrounding building frontages. Its landscape typically consists of paths and trails, meadows, water bodies, woodland and open shelters, all naturalistically disposed. Parks may be lineal, following the trajectories of natural corridors. Green: An open space available for unstructured recreation. A green may be spatially defined by landscaping rather than building frontages. Its land- scape typically consists of lawn and trees, naturalistically disposed. The minimum size is typically 1/2 acre and usually does not exceed 8 acres. Square: An open space available for unstructured recreation and civic purposes. A square is spatially defined by building frontages. Its landscape consists of paths, lawns and trees, formally disposed. Squares are typically located at the intersection of important thoroughfares. The minimum size is typically 1/2 acre and usually does not exceed 5 acres. Plaza: An open space available for civic purposes and commercial activities. A plaza is spatially defined by building frontages. Its landscape consists primarily of pavement. Trees are optional. Plazas should be located at the intersection of important streets. The minimum size is typically 1/2 acre and usually does not exceed 2 acres. T1 T3 T3 T4 T5 T4 T5 T6 T1 T3 T4 T5 T6 Appropriate Transect Zones City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework36 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Purpose: To provide areas of low and medium density single- family neighborhoods (typically 1 to 4 dwelling units per acre) including appropriately scaled civic and institutional uses that function as an integrated neighborhood. These neighborhoods form the backbone of Coppell and provide the primary housing stock for families with children. Uses: Single-family detached, clustered single-family dwellings, low to medium density attached single-family dwellings, and accessory residential units (attached or detached to the single-family dwelling on the same lot). This category is also appropriate for planned public and semi-public uses designed to be compatible with residential uses, such as schools, religious institutions, and civic uses. Uses other than single-family detached dwellings should be permitted and encouraged only to the degree that the scale, specific location, and design does not significantly impact or impair the residential character of the area. A neighborhood plan should be conducted and adopted for each area in which proposed new housing types, civic, or institutional uses differ from the established density or character of the neighborhood. Compatible Zoning Districts: SF-ED, SF-18, SF-12, SF-9, SF-7, PD, (2F-9, TH-1)* *Special site design standards are required prior to approval of these zoning districts within the Residential Neighborhood category. Residential Neighborhood (T-3 Sub-Urban Zone) City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework37COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Residential, public, and semi-public buildings should be oriented toward the street and define the street edge. Surface parking lots (when necessary) should be located between or behind buildings. Neighborhoods should have convenient access to public and private open space. Residential Neighborhood Guidelines Neighborhoods include a well integrated mix of housing choices and support uses: single-family, multifamily, civic, and limited neighborhood-oriented retail uses. Neighborhoods are connected to one another by sidewalks and trails, and provide convenient access to neighborhood schools, parks, businesses, and employment. When neighborhoods include a mix of detached and attached structures, careful design and review will ensure these structures are functionally and aesthetically integrated. Architectural character and site design of infill development is compatible with the character of existing structures in the immediate vicinity. Flexibility in regulation is encouraged to accommodate appropriate infill, and redevelopment where appropriate. Connectivity Thoroughfares consist mostly of residential streets, generally with minimum 5-foot wide sidewalks located on both sides of streets. Pedestrian, bicycle, and auto access is provided between neighborhoods. Rear alleys are the typical form of access to residential parking/garages. Open Space Typically takes the form of parks and greens. Setbacks A continuous, defined street edge with setbacks generally 15-30 feet. Building Character (Compatibility with Surrounding Development) New structures are compatible and complement the established proportions and building height, mass, and form of nearby structures. Street Edge Orientation Entry facades are oriented towards the primary street. The building wall creates an inviting image and defines the street edge. Residential Compatibility For attached residential dwellings and public and semi- public uses, the structures include massing and materials compatible with nearby single-family dwellings. Parking The location of garages is consistent with surrounding residential structures, whenever possible accessed from a rear alley. Surface parking lots (when necessary) are located between or behind buildings. Neighborhood sidewalks along local streets connect to the community trail system and destinations. Structures should be architecturally compatible with nearby residential dwellings. Parking for public and semi-public uses should be located behind or between buildings. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework38 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Purpose: To provide areas for a wide variety of higher density residential uses (typically greater than 4 dwelling units per acre) that serve the needs of residents seeking alternatives to low and medium density single-family detached housing. These areas may serve the needs of first-time home owners, empty nesters, and other residents seeking to downsize or maintenance provided dwellings in urban living environments. Typically these areas provide owner-occupied housing stock for smaller households with or without children. New developments within these areas should have a substantial component of owner-occupied housing units, but may include a mix of well integrated owner- occupied and rental properties. New developments consisting of only rental housing communities are not appropriate. Uses: Townhomes, apartment / condominium buildings, small-lot single-family attached and detached dwellings and ancillary, small-scale commercial uses that serve the residents of the neighborhood. This category is also appropriate for planned public and semi-public uses designed to be compatible with residential uses, such as schools, religious institutions, and civic uses. However such uses should be permitted and encouraged only to the degree that the scale, specific location, and design does not significantly impact or impair the residential character of the area. Compatible Zoning Districts: (TH-1, TH-2, MF-1, MF-2)*, PD *Modifications to these districts are required to incorporate appropriate site design standards as described in the guidelines section. Urban Residential Neighborhood (T-4 General Urban Zone) City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework39COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Outdoor gathering places may include a Green, Square, or Plaza. Attached dwellings include materials compatible with nearby neighborhoods. Setbacks are typically closer to the street, with a defined street edge. Parking is typically provided in garages accessed from rear alleys. Sidewalks are comfortable for pedestrians and include attractive streetscaping. Urban Residential Neighborhood Guidelines Urban Residential Neighborhoods are denser than Residential Neighborhoods, typically with attached housing types and multi-story structures. These areas are located and designed in a manner to provide residents nearby access to neighborhood retail, services, and transit facilities within convenient walking and biking distance. Connectivity Such areas have a system of interconnected streets with pedestrian and bicycle facilities and streetscape amenities. Sidewalks a minimum of 5 feet in width are located on both sides of streets. Thoroughfares consist mostly of residential streets and avenues. Pedestrian, bicycle, and auto access are provided between neighborhoods. Civic and Gathering Spaces Formal and informal areas for outdoor gatherings and recreation with pocket parks and neighborhood greens. Setbacks Continuous, defined street edge with building frontages typically closer to the street, ranging from 5 to 25-feet. Compatibility with Surrounding Development Architectural character is compatible with the style, scale, proportions, period, materials, and colors of adjacent single-family neighborhoods, but may vary to a greater degree in proximity to higher intensity development areas. Street Edge Orientation Entry facades are oriented towards the primary street within a shallow setback from the sidewalk along the street. The building wall creates an inviting image and defines the street edge. Residential Compatibility For attached residential dwellings and public or semi- public uses, the structures include massing and materials compatible with nearby single-family dwellings. Parking Parking is provided to the rear of buildings in surface lots or in parking structures. Rear alleys are the typical form of access to residential parking/garages. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework40 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Purpose: To provide areas for neighborhood serving retail, restaurant and service uses, as well as upper story residential units above commercial uses and high density attached residential uses (typically greater than 8 dwelling units per acre). Such areas are compatible with and serve the daily shopping, dining and service needs of nearby lower density residential neighborhoods. Uses: Retail, restaurant, office, residential dwellings (attached and upper story), civic, and institutional uses primarily intended to serve nearby neighborhoods. This zone is not intended for conventional commercial strip centers, freestanding pad sites, and high traffic generating regional uses. Nonresidential uses are limited to compact, neighborhood-serving uses rather than large-scale or regional-serving uses. Residential uses are encouraged on the upper floors of mixed-use buildings. Residential uses may also include attached or multi-unit residences, apartment/condo, and live-work unit buildings integrated into the overall site design of the neighborhood center in order to allow residents to access the commercial uses primarily by walking. The Old Coppell Master Plan adopted in May 2002 identifies specific physical improvements and design guidelines that due to the historic nature of the area may differ somewhat from other mixed-use centers in Coppell. The Old Coppell area may also integrate small-lot single-family detatched dwellings and have exterior building materials and architectural design intended to capture the rural style representative of North Texas in the first half of the twentieth century. The Master Plan serves as the guiding document for the district. Additional detail is also provided in Chapter 4. Compatible Zoning Districts: (TC, H)*, PD * Modifications to these districts are required to incorporate appropriate site design standards as described in the guidelines section. This land use category is appropriate for mixed-use development regulations organized with a form-based code. Mixed-Use Neighborhood Center (T-5 Urban Center Zone) © 2002 Looney Ricks Kiss, Inc. The portion of this copyright pertaining to images is as photographic works only and excludes any copyright for any portion of the graphic, architectural, landscape and site designs contained within the work designed by others.Sheet 10 of 25Old Coppell Master Plan Concept Plan The Concept Plan was formulated during the planning and design “charrette,” which occurred between November 12th and 14th, 2001. The Concept Plan provides a general overview of the key planning ideas, and it serves essentially as a table of contents for the more detailed Master Plan document to follow. The key ideas are summa- rized below. Streetscape Improvements Bethel and Coppell Roads currently lack a strong visual definition, and they are not pedestrian friendly. Although both roads should continue to function with two travel lanes, future streetscape improvements should include: on-street parking, generous side- walks, paved cross-walks at intersections, pedestrian-scaled streetlights, and shade trees. A long-term goal, if funds become available, should be the removal of utility poles and burying of overhead wiring. Also, in order to provide a sense of arrival for visitors to Old Coppell, high-quality, pedestrian-scaled signage designating the “Old Coppell” district should be considered for key entry points into the district where the character of Old Coppell becomes clearly evident. Renovations & Infill Development The study area includes several older buildings that contribute to the historic character of Old Coppell. These buildings are typically one -story vernacular frame buildings dating from the early-1900s. Their preservation and adaptive reuse should be encouraged so they can serve as the framework in which new development is integrated. Infill development should occur on undeveloped or underdeveloped properties, and it should fit the general design character of the older “character-defining” buildings. Commercial structures should dominate the core of the study area, while residential development should occur on peripheral sites east of Coppell Road. Also, there are some instances in which existing character defining buildings are on sites that are underdeveloped and call for additional infill development that would not accommo- date their retention. In such cases, it is recommended that the existing older buildings be relocated to other vacant lots within the study area. The southern end of Coppell Road is expected to develop primarily as office with residential above. Grapevine Springs Park The park is both historically significant and an important commu- nity resource for passive recreation. The park’s WPA improvements from the 1930s should be carefully restored and existing paths should be improved. It is recommended that new paths also be created, and a narrow winding road should be developed that connects the southerly leg of Coppell Road with the existing Park Road entrance off of Bethel Road. This road might be bisected by a parking area in a manner that discourages through traffic. Picnic areas with pavilions and small parking areas should also be provided at certain points along the new park road. Farmers Market It is recommended that a farmers market be established for Old Coppell. It can initially be very small and located in a temporary location. An example of one potential location would be the gravel parking lot for the Art Annex on Bethel Road. As the farmers market grows in scale, it might move to a larger site, and it would be an excellent interim use for existing vacant lots prior to their development. Ultimately, the farmers market might move to the proposed village green, described below. Village Green As a long-term objective, a village green should be developed at the southeast corner of Bethel Road and the southerly leg of Coppell Road. This formal green space could be anchored by a central gazebo, and include paved paths and seating. The perimeter should have shade trees and buildings facing the green to define the edges. The park should also be equipped with utility connections to accommodate special events, as well as the farmers market addressed above. In the near term, it is anticipated that the existing two homes on this site would remain, but they might be relocated to other sites in the long- term when the green is developed. Old Coppell Inn and Bed & Breakfast There appears to be significant market demand for overnight accomodations in Coppell. An inn should include approximately 40 to 50 rooms, meeting space, and a restaurant. It is proposed that an inn be located on Bethel Road to the immediate east of the proposed village green (See Sheets 12, 20 and Appendix A for additional information). Interest in a possible bed & break- fast has also been expressed. If this is to be developed, an appropriate location would be at the end of Mitchell Street in place of, or along with, the townhomes that are proposed in the concept plan at the far left. Senior Center & Community Center The City is planning a new Senior Center to replace the existing facility on the north leg of Coppell Road. It is proposed that this center be located on the south side of Bethel Road immediately east of the proposed Old Coppell Inn. The new Senior Center would back up to the park, and a rear parking lot would be located southwest of the center and be shared with a new Community Center. The Community Center should be located on the east side of Coppell Road immediately south of the village green. In addition to serving as a community center, it could serve as a visitors center and a local history museum. Greenway System Old Coppell is fortunate to have two features lending them- selves to the development of a greenway system: the St. Louis & Southwestern Railroad and Grapevine Springs Creek. Another feature is Hunterwood Park, immediately north of the study area. The “Cottonbelt Trail” is already proposed in the City’s 1996 Comprehensive Plan to parallel the north side of the railroad. That concept should continue to be pursued. Likewise, the creek system that meanders throughout the study area should be developed with a paved greenway linking to the Cottonbelt Trail. Key Commercial/Mixed-Use Infill Existing Buildings Single-Family Civic Infill Park/Open Space Greenway Intersection Improvements Gateways Senior CenterVillageGreen CommunityCenter GrapevineSprings Park Old Coppell Inn City of CoppellService Center Restaurant Future Infill Study Area Boundary Streetscape Improvements Townhouses City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework41COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Outdoor gathering places may include a Green, Square, or Plaza. Attached residential dwellings allow residents nearby access to retail and employment. Buildings are compatible with surrounding neighborhoods. Garages are accessed from a rear alley. Building setbacks define the street edge and allow for wide sidewalks with pedestrian amenities. Parking is provided both on-street and in shared parking facilities to the rear of buildings. The street facade and sidewalks are comfortable for pedestrians. Mixed-Use Neighborhood Center Guidelines The neighborhood center has a unique character and “sense of place” with an identifiable center and defined “people places” for residents, shoppers, workers and visitors to gather and interact. These areas provide opportunities for higher density attached housing options. Connectivity Such areas have a system of interconnected streets with pedestrian and bicycle facilities and streetscape amenities. Thoroughfares are typically boulevards, avenues, and residential streets with wide sidewalks and an urban character. Civic and Gathering Spaces Formal and informal areas for outdoor gatherings such as pocket parks and plazas. The sidewalk width is increased when adjacent to on-street parking to create a “transition zone” of pedestrian amenities including street trees, pedestrian lighting, and outdoor seating. Setbacks Continuous, defined street edge is maintained, with building frontages placed at or in close proximity to the sidewalk. Building Form Most buildings are attached, with their front facades aligned, and generally 1-3 stories in height. Buildings may be taller in close proximity to major street intersections, or when upper floors include a “stepback” from the ground plane of lower floors. Prominent intersections serve as focal points with buildings distinguished from others by enhanced architectural design features. Building heights, intensity of use and densities decrease as development moves closer to adjacent established residential neighborhoods. Compatibility with Surrounding Development Architectural character is compatible with the style, scale, proportions, materials, and colors of surrounding neighborhoods, but may vary to a greater degree in proximity to major intersections. Street Edge Orientation Building walls and entries are oriented towards the primary street. The street level has a transparent quality, with passing pedestrians and vehicles able to see activity within the building. Parking Public parking is provided on-street. Off-street parking is provided in shared parking facilities to the rear of buildings in surface lots or in parking structures. Surface parking is typically enclosed on at least three sides. Residential garages are accessed from a rear alley. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework42 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Purpose: To provide areas of high intensity mixed-use development consisting of both neighborhood and community serving commercial, retail and office uses, and medium to high density urban residential dwellings (typically greater than 8 dwelling units per acre). Such areas are typically located within close proximity to major transportation corridors and transit stops. These areas provide opportunities for regional destinations offering unique retail, restaurant and cultural destinations with a more urban lifestyle than available in other areas of the community. Uses: Retail, restaurant, office, entertainment, civic and institutional uses, and medium to high density urban residential dwellings (attached) typically in multi-story structures. Non-residential multi-story buildings may include large office and workplace components. Due to the nature of development within this category as a community or regional destination, high volumes of pedestrians, transit riders, and vehicles must be accommodated. This zone is not intended for single-story conventional commercial strip centers, freestanding pad sites, and intensive uses requiring outdoor display or sales yards. Compatible Zoning Districts: PD* *This land use category is appropriate for mixed-use development regulations organized with a form-based code. Mixed-Use Community Center (T-6 Urban Core Zone) City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework43COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Building setbacks define the street edge and allow for wide sidewalks with pedestrian amenities. Due to the urban character of this district, outdoor gathering places typically consist of Squares and Plazas. Buildings at prominent intersections may be taller, and also are distinguished with enhance architectural design. The street level of buildings have a transparent quality for pedestrians and vehicles. Parking is provided both on- street and to the rear of buildings. Mixed-Use Community Center Guidelines The development area is larger and denser than a Neighborhood Center and serves as a focal point of activity and energy, benefiting from substantial traffic – pedestrian, automobile, and transit. Connectivity Commercial uses and transit services are accessible to residents within a short walking distance, typically ¼-mile, but no more than ½-mile. Circulation is provided by a system of interconnected streets with pedestrian and bicycle facilities and streetscape amenities. Thoroughfares are typically boulevards, avenues, and residential streets with an urban character. Sidewalks are wide, generally 6 to 20 feet (the more urban the environment, the wider the sidewalk). Civic and Gathering Spaces Open space takes the form of Squares and Plazas, providing a variety of places for outdoor gatherings. Wide sidewalks provide for outdoor seating, lighting, trees and other pedestrian facilities. Setbacks A continuous, defined street edge is maintained with building frontages placed close to the sidewalk. Building Form Most buildings are attached, with their front facades aligned, and generally 2-4 stories in height but may be taller at major activity centers when compatible with surrounding neighborhoods. Buildings may be taller in close proximity to major street intersections, or when upper floors include a “stepback” from the ground plane of lower floors. Building heights, intensity of use and densities decrease as development moves closer to adjacent established residential neighborhoods. Compatibility with Surrounding Development Architectural character may be diverse, but when adjacent to established neighborhoods should be compatible with the style, scale, proportions, materials, and colors. Street edge orientation Building walls and entries are oriented towards the primary street. The street level has a transparent quality, with passing pedestrians and vehicles able to see activity within the building. Parking Public parking is provided on-street. Off-street parking is provided in shared parking facilities to the rear of buildings typically in parking structures. Surface parking areas are limited, but when provided are enclosed on at least three sides. Residential parking is typically provided in structured facilities. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework44 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Purpose: To provide mixed-use development of the highest intensity in proximity to transit facilities consisting of community and regional serving commercial, retail and office uses, and high density urban residential dwellings (typically greater than 24 dwelling units per acre). These areas provide an urban lifestyle with easy access to regional employment centers, but with the quality of life advantages offered in Coppell. These areas may also accommodate major offices, employers, and residents benefiting from good transportation access offered by the transit facility. Uses: Retail, restaurant, office, entertainment, civic and institutional uses, and high density urban residential dwellings (attached) typically in multi-story structures. High density residential dwellings are encouraged in this district to provide significant on-site demand for commercial uses and transit facilities. Compatible Zoning Districts: PD* *This land use category is appropriate for mixed-use development regulations organized with a form-based code geared toward development in proximity to transit facilities. Transit Oriented Development District (T-6 Urban Core Zone) City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework45COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN A transit station is supported by higher density development within walking distance. Sidewalks and gathering places are highly interactive. High density housing should be compatible with the materi- als and architectural character of Coppell neighborhoods. The tallest and most intensely developed structures are located close to the transit station. These areas also often include civic space as a focal point for the development. Transit Oriented Development District Guidelines Transit supportive development is similar to a Mixed-Use Community Center, but includes the highest intensity mix of uses. A transit station is centrally located within the district to provide pedestrian access within 1/2-mile for the majority of residents and business employees. Mobility Circulation is provided by a system of interconnected streets with pedestrian and bicycle facilities and streetscape amenities. Community bicycle routes and trails connect to the district and to the transit station. Thoroughfares are typically boulevards, avenues, and residential streets with an urban character. Sidewalks are wide, generally 6 to 20 feet (the more urban the environment, the wider the sidewalk). Civic and Gathering Spaces Open space takes the form of Squares and Plazas, serving as focal points around transit stations and providing a variety of places for outdoor gatherings. Wide sidewalks accommodate large groups of pedestrians and provide for outdoor seating, lighting, trees and other pedestrian facilities. Setbacks A continuous, defined street edge is maintained, with building frontages built to the sidewalk, or in close proximity to the sidewalk. Building Form Most buildings are attached, with their front facades aligned, and generally 2-4 stories in height. Taller and more intensely developed structures may be located in close proximity to a transit station. Prominent intersections serve as focal points with buildings distinguished from others by enhanced architectural design features. Buildings are highly flexible in their uses – commonly mixing uses with shops and businesses on the first floor, and office or residential units above. Compatibility with Surrounding Development Architectural character may be diverse. Development intensity appropriately transitions to low rise structures when adjacent to a Residential Neighborhood. Street Edge Orientation Building walls and entries are oriented towards the primary street. The street level has a transparent quality, with passing pedestrians and vehicles able to see activity within the building. Parking Public parking is provided on-street. Off-street parking is provided in shared parking facilities to the rear of buildings typically in parking structures. Due to development density, surface parking areas are limited within 1/4-mile of the station. Residential parking is typically provided in structured facilities. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework46 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Purpose: To provide areas within the community for conventional high intensity regional commercial uses and office developments dependent upon good transportation access to highway interchanges and frontage roads. These areas are primarily intended for medium-to-large scale developments serving travelers and clientele from the region, and typically experience high volumes of ingress and egress by auto traffic. Uses: Hotels, multi-story office buildings, medium-to-large scale regional commercial uses, restaurants, and other uses dependent upon high volumes of vehicular traffic. Compatible Zoning Districts: HC, PD Freeway Special District (SD Special District) City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework47COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Freeway Special District Guidelines The development form typically contains large format buildings with surface parking lots. Where possible, development within this district mixes compatible uses such as hotels, offices and restaurants within a single development to facilitate walking between uses and reduce automobile trips. Development within 400 feet of a freeway/highway is considered highly visible, thus requiring special review to ensure compatible building style and character in Coppell. Building form, materials, and landscaping should be consistent with adopted design standards and policies. Focal Points Corners of major intersections should include a “focal point” near major intersections and around “gateway” areas. Focal points should include vertical architectural features, fountains, public art, and/or public plazas. Setbacks A minimum of 50-ft of privately owned land along the freeway/highway right-of-way should be free of buildings and parking, with a total of 80-ft in width landscaped, including privately owned land and available public highway right-of-way. Parking Off-street parking is typically provided in surface parking lots; though parking structures and shared parking among uses are encouraged. Parking areas should not be located within a 200-ft radius of the center point of a major street intersection or gateway, unless located behind a building. The visual impact of parking is mitigated through the use of landscaping, and building orientation. Large expanses of parking should not be directly visible from the freeway/ highway. Building Form and Character Buildings within a development should have a coherent architectural theme in terms of mass, height, rooflines, and materials. Large buildings should be located and designed to minimize windowless walls and service areas visible from the freeway/highway. Architectural unity should be accomplished through the use of coordinated building materials and colors. Building exteriors should be completed with high quality sustainable architectural materials that are not resource intensive, and consist of post-consumer use recycled materials whenever possible. Generous landscaped setbacks along freeway frontages are important for establishing a quality image for Coppell. Major intersections should be highlighted by enhanced building architectural features and streetscaping. Buildings should embrace nearby roadways, with parking screened from view along major streets and from the freeway. The architectural design and materials of large buildings should be consistent with the Coppell character. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework48 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Purpose: To provide areas for employment and light industrial activities typically dependent upon good transportation access to highways, rail lines, and/or airports. Uses: Medium to large scale warehousing, light manufacturing, wholesale storage and distribution, showrooms, office/warehouses, research and development, technology centers, and ancillary retail, service and restaurant uses that serve the employees within the district. Compatible Zoning Districts: LI, PD Industrial Special District (SD Special District) City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework49COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Buildings at focal point intersections should include enhanced design to create a gateway focal point. Landscape setbacks are provided along freeway frontages. Parking and loading areas are screened from view along major streets. Large buildings are designed to minimize windowless walls visible from streets and highways. Industrial Special District Guidelines Development in this zone generally has a different character from the remainder of Coppell, largely due to the types of land use activities and the use of tilt-wall concrete construction for most buildings. Site design mitigates the impacts of noise and visually unappealing areas from surrounding uses and from freeway/highway visibility. Building form, materials, and landscaping should be consistent with adopted design standards and policies. Focal Points Corners of major intersections should include a “focal point” within a 200-ft radius of the center of the intersection and around “gateway” areas. Focal points should include vertical architectural features, fountains, public art, and/or public plazas. Setbacks Where adjacent to freeway/highway right-of-way a minimum of 50-ft of privately owned land along the right- of-way should be free of buildings and parking, with a total of 80-ft in width landscaped (including privately owned land and available public highway right-of-way). Parking Off-street parking is typically provided in surface parking lots; though parking structures and shared parking among uses are encouraged. Parking areas should not be located within a 200-ft radius of the center point of a major street intersection or gateway, unless located behind a building. The visual impact of parking is mitigated through the use of landscaping, and building orientation. Large expanses of parking should not be directly visible from the freeway/ highway. Connectivity Streets within the district include landscaping and sidewalks. Supporting uses such as retail, restaurant and service uses are centrally located to provide convenient access to the majority of employees within the area. Connections to public parks and trails are provided for the benefit of employees. Building Form and Character Large buildings should be located and designed to minimize windowless walls and services areas visible from the freeway/highway. Orientation of structures and landscaping generally provide screening of docks and trucks from public view. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework50 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Land Use Policies • LU-1 Balance future growth by preserving existing stable neighborhoods and focusing commercial and residential growth in mixed- use centers and corridors at a pedestrian scale. • LU-2 Encourage the redevelopment and reuse of lands used in the past or already used for linear “strip commercial” development to uses compatible with adjoining neighborhoods and focus more compact “nodal” pattern of higher intensity development to mixed-use activity centers. Include densities in these areas that support transit use. • LU-3 Include a variety of housing types with varying levels of affordability as part of the mix of activities accommodated in the redevelopment of the mixed-use activity centers. • LU-4 Proactively facilitate infill development for private developers through active land assembly, land reclamation and street and utility system improvements. • LU-5 Direct large-scale commercial and auto- oriented uses dependent upon high traffic volumes to freeway interchange activity centers. • LU-6 For industrial activities which tend to have substantial off-site impacts or demands on public services, limit the zones where they are permitted outright, and require additional reviews where they may be appropriate. • LU-7 Establish a unique architectural theme and sense of place in new developments that differentiate Coppell from other communities. • LU-8 Encourage the use of materials, architectural design, and a quality of finish work which reinforce the sense of Coppell as one that is built for beauty and to last. Reflect this quality in both public and private development projects. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework51COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Great parks and open space networks consist of more than trails, ballfields and recreational facilities, but also of neighborhoods, schools, civic institutions, neighborhood centers, streetscapes and people. Their components are woven into the fabric of Coppell and enrich the activities of everyday life. Public and private spaces play a strong aesthetic role in Coppell. These spaces function primarily as ornaments, enhancing the appeal and value of the community’s streets, buildings, drainage and utility corridors, and everything around them. One of the 2030 Vision’s five pillars focuses on Community Wellness and Enrichment and addresses the importance of community gathering places, a multi- use trail system connecting the City, recreation and programs and services, cultural arts and amenities, and personal wellness and fitness. Parks and open spaces also play a key role for strategies in other pillars of the 2030 Vision including a Sense of Community, a Special Place to Live, Business Prosperity, and a Sustainable Community. This section of the Coppell 2030 Plan provides an overview of the community’s Vision 2030 for its Parks and Open Space system. Parks and Open Space • Community Gathering Places • Recreational Programs and Services for All Generations • Expand Cultural Arts Amenities and Opportunities • Residents Wellness and Longevity • Community Education Programs and Support of Top Quality Schools VISION 2030 GOALS City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework52 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN The 2030 Plan serves as the vision and the framework for long-range public policy decisions. The parks and open space planning framework is further supplemented by the Parks and Recreation Master Plan and the City-Wide Trails Implementation Plan (summarized in the Transportation and Mobility Section) which provide a detailed guide for implementing the vision and primary objectives identified by the community. These supplemental Master Plans are intended to provide guidance for many years; however they are expected to be periodically updated. Each update should reflect the current conditions within the City, neighboring communities, and the region as a whole while remaining true to the 2030 Vision reflected by the Comprehensive Plan. Parks and Open Space Planning Context Parks and Recreation Master Plan The 2007 Parks and Recreation Master Plan serves as the City’s guiding Plan focused on facility and programming needs. Implementation strategies of the Master Plan are intended to achieve the following: • Ensure public safety and well maintained facilities expected by the community. • Increase customer service offerings. • Ensure longevity and sustainability of resources and facilities. • Provide a variety of recreational opportunities and program offerings that meet the various existing and changing needs of the community. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework53COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN City of Coppell Parks “Leave all the afternoon for exercise and recreation, which are as necessary as reading. I will rather say more necessary because health is worth more than learning.” - Thomas Jefferson City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework54 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLANChapter 2: Planning FrameworkExisting and future parks and open spaces in Coppell are organized across transect zones reflected by the Future Land Use Plan, ranging from naturalistic corridors to formal civic spaces. Public and Private Open Space Characteristics Park: A natural preserve available for unstructured recreation or structured recreation activities such as playgrounds, sports fields, and sports courts typically independent of surrounding building frontages and streets. • Often irregularly shaped but may be linear in order to parallel creeks and other natural or utility corridors. • Bounded by streets on a minimum of one side. • Landscaping consists of informally arranged trees and shrubs. The topography may be irregular. • Impervious surfaces typically less than 15 percent. • May include tot lot play areas for children as well as open shelter and benches. • May include a community garden with a grouping of garden plots available to nearby residents for small-scale cultivation, including storage facilities for necessary equipment. Green: An open space available for unstructured recreation spacially defined by abutting streets. • Landscape typically consists of lawn and trees, naturalistically disposed. • Generally contains a minimum 60 percent turf, ground cover, soil, or mulch, with the balance of the area containing a paved surface. • Bounded by streets on a minimum of two sides. • Typically furnished with paths, benches, and open shelters. • Buildings that share an adjacent common boundary with a green must orient front facades toward the green as though it were a primary street. T1 T3 T3 T4 T5 Appropriate Transect Zones City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework55COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Public and Private Open Space Characteristics Square: A formal open space available for unstructured recreation and civic purposes, spatially defined by building frontages and streets. • Typically located at the intersection of important thoroughfares. • Bounded by streets on a minimum of three sides. • Landscape consists of paths, lawns and trees, formally disposed. • Generally contains a minimum 30 percent turf, ground cover, soil, or mulch, with the balance of the area containing a paved surface. • May be level, stepped, or gently sloping. • Typically furnished with paths, benches, and open shelters • Buildings that share an adjacent common boundary with a square must orient front facades toward the square as though it were a primary street. Plaza: A formal open space available for civic purposes and commercial activities spatially defined by building frontages and streets. • Typically located at the intersection of important streets. • Bounded by a street on at least one side. • Landscape consists primarily of paved surface, but may include trees and shrubs planted in formal patterns. • May be level, stepped, or gently sloping. • Typically furnished with paths, benches, and open shelters. • Buildings that share an adjacent common boundary with a plaza must orient front facades toward the plaza as though it were a primary street. T4 T5 T6 T1 T3 T4 T5 T6 Appropriate Transect Zones City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework56 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Parks and Open Space Policies • P-1 Maintain master development plans for city parks that address user group needs, development priorities, development and maintenance costs, program opportunities, financing strategies and citizen involvement. • P-2 Base priorities for improving and developing parklands on documented needs and criteria including long-term maintenance costs, location in deficient areas, broad community support, location adjacent to schools and other public facilities, support of neighborhood stabilization and community development projects and policies, and consistency with park master development plans. • P-3 Create neighborhood or community gathering spaces in each activity center. • P-4 Encourage the beautification of Coppell by incorporating appropriate streetscape elements along thoroughfares and at major intersections. • P-5 Provide a part of the construction cost of public projects for the purchase and installation of art. • P-6 Create incentives for the provision of public art as part of private development projects. • P-7 Emphasize important places, transitions and gateways within Coppell by celebrating them with works of public art. • P-8 Coordinate parks planning with the school district and develop joint-use agreements. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework57COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Transportation & Mobility • Quality Mobility Within Coppell • Easy Access to the Dallas-Fort Worth Region • Multi-Use Trail System Connecting the City VISION 2030 GOALS Since first preparing a Transportation Plan to support the growth and build out of Coppell the local street and highway system has been the primary means of travel between neighborhoods, to community destinations and areas of employment, and to link with the greater metropolitan area. Through the Vision 2030 process, the community outlined the desire to significantly enhance mobility and the diversity of available transportation options within Coppell and connections to the region. This includes a desire for a more walkable community, multi-use trails, and effective public transit linking neighborhoods to various community destinations. Transportation System Principles • Connect community activity centers • Complete bicycle and pedestrian corridors • Create human-scale walkable streets in neighborhood and community activity centers • Plan for transit service both intra-city and inter-city Transportation Planning Context The Coppell 2030 Transportation Plan builds on past and current plans and policies in Coppell, and the region. These include the City’s existing Thoroughfare Plan, City-Wide Trails Implementation Plan, DART 2030 Transit System Plan, and Mobility 2030: The Metropolitan Transportation Plan for the Dallas-Fort Worth area. 1996 Thoroughfare Plan Using the framework of two adjacent freeways – IH- 635 and SH 121 – the Thoroughfare Plan adopted with the 1996 Comprehensive Plan identified a network of 2-lane, 4-lane, and 6-lane roadways distinguishing streets based on their ability to support automobile travel. The Plan used a functional class for determining right-of-way requirements and the number of vehicle lanes. The hierarchical system of streets had four functional classifications – Freeways, Principal Arterials, Collector Streets, and Residential Streets. This system significantly focused on facilitating high speed automobile travel and reduced travel time, but often did not adequately integrate Context Senstive Solutions (CSS) for the safety and mobility needs of other users such as pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit riders. “This is the vision, to create a changed transportation system that offers not only choices among travel modes for specific trips, but more importantly presents these options so that they are real choices that meet the needs of individuals and society as a whole. Making this vision a reality must begin now.” – Source: The National Bicycle and Walking Study Photo: Dan BurdenCity Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework58 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Mobility 2030 Mobility 2030: The Metropolitan Transportation Plan for the Dallas-Fort Worth Area, 2009 Amendment is the defining vision for transportation systems and services in the Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW) Metropolitan Area. This plan was approved in April 2009 by the Regional Transportation Council (RTC), serving as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the DFW Metropolitan Area. The Metropolitan Transportation Plan guides the implementation of multi-modal transportation improvements, policies, and programs in the DFW Metropolitan Area through the year 2030. The Coppell 2030 Transportation Plan acknowledges the recommendations and policies of Mobility 2030 by providing the framework for implementation at the local level. Key elements of Mobility 2030 integrated into the Coppell 2030 Transportation Plan include, but are not limited to: • Sustainable Development Practices • Intelligent Transportation Systems • Pedestrian / Bicycle Systems • Regional Rail and Bus Transit Systems • Roadway Systems and Regionally Significant Arterials City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework59COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN DART 2030 Transit System Plan Convenient access to transit service is an important component of an effective multi-modal transportation system for Coppell in 2030. Because a large percentage of local residents work outside of Coppell and many local employers rely on employees who reside outside the city, it is important to plan for alternative transportation modes to get them to and from their destinations within the region as traffic congestion will continue to worsen as the region’s population grows. The existing Cotton Belt rail line along Belt Line Rd. at the City’s southern boundary is slated for future express rail service in DART’s 2030 Plan. The DART Plan identifies a future DART rail station to be located within this corridor either on the City-owned North Lake property or in the vicinity of the MacArthur Blvd. intersection. Due to the regional transportation significance of the Belt Line Rd. corridor, it is designated for the highest intensity development within and adjacent to Coppell and also offers significant opportunities for future economic development. The Belt Line Corridor is designated for a mix of Transit Oriented Development (TOD), Community Mixed- Use Centers, and Urban Residential Neighborhoods. In order to support future development, as well as connectivity of riders to the transit station, multi-modal accommodations are essential throughout the corridor and the thoroughfares linking to this area. More detailed development concepts for this corridor are provided in Chapter 4. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework60 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Context Sensitive Solutions (CSS) The Coppell 2030 Plan transportation system applies the concepts and principles of context sensitive solutions in the planning and design of thoroughfares for walkable communities. Recommended practices for these concepts and principles are described by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in the 2010 manual Designing Walkable Urban Thoroughfares: A Context Sensitive Approach. Transportation systems in Coppell should be designed and constructed according to standards sensitive to the context of the neighborhoods and districts through which they pass. Thoroughfares play a key role in creating urban form. Designing thoroughfares to enhance community design and character requires understanding the ingredients of creating great places. One of the key considerations in creating human scale, walkable places is the ratio of the height of buildings to the width between building facades on each side of the thoroughfare. To create human scale environments, this ratio should be between 1:2 and 1:3 as depicted in the figure from the ITE manual. Future thoroughfares in Coppell will: • Balance safety, mobility, community, and environmental goals in all projects; • Address all modes of travel; • Use the context of adjacent buildings and land uses to define the character of the roadway; • Apply flexibility in street design standards; • Incorporate aesthetics as an integral part of good design; and • Involve the public, stakeholders, and an interdisciplinary team of professionals early and continuously throughout the planning and project development process. The ITE Context Sensitive Approach design manual describes the features that create urban context: Land Use Variations in land use have a fundamental impact on automobile travel demand and affect the width and design of the streetside (area between the curb and the edge of right-of-way including sidewalks). For example, residential uses typically have less need for sidewalk space than similarly scaled mixed-use blocks with ground floor commercial retail uses, where space for window shopping, outdoor dining, newspaper racks and other street appurtenances add to the sidewalk width. Site Design and Urban Form The ways in which buildings, circulation, parking and landscape are arranged on a site has an effect on where a thoroughfare and its context fall in the continuum of walkability. The specific elements of site design that contribute to defining urban context include: • Building orientation and setbacks • Parking type and orientation • Block length Building Design The design of buildings is a significant contributor to context and the priority that the context gives to walking. Some aspects of how building design helps define urban context include: • Building height and thoroughfare enclosure • Building width • Building scale and variety • Building entries Urban Form Context City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework61COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN The Coppell 2030 Plan transportation system balances the regional, community, and neighborhood functions to achieve the desired community form and character These functions include roadways, trails, pedestrian systems, and transit. Since it will be necessary to transition the design and function of existing streets over time, the 2030 Transportation Plan outlines a framework for context sensitive street types which should be used as a guide to update the City’s existing street design manuals with integrated standards for Context Sensitive Solutions. The context sensitive street types are defined on the following page, and designated on the Coppell 2030 Transportation Plan map below. The map also identifies areas where on-street parking should be integrated with future redevelopment of the neighborhood and community mixed-use activity centers designated by the Future Land Use Plan. The form and character of each street type is recommended with the understanding that the final design may vary based on further study and determinations of the city, transportation planners and engineers, key stakeholders, and citizens-at-large. Coppell 2030 Transportation Plan City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework62 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Thoroughfare Type Functional Classification and Definition FreewaysPrincipal ArterialHigh speed, controlled access thoroughfares with grade-separated interchanges and no pedestrian or bicycle access. They carry regional and interstate traffic and include a parallel frontage road system to access freeway commercial and industrial land uses.Boulevard (High Speed)Principal or Minor ArterialDivided arterial thoroughfare designed to primarily carry higher speed (40 mph or more), long distance traffic and serve large tracts of separated single land uses (e.g. freeway commercial shopping centers, industrial areas and business parks). These boulevards emphasize traffic movement, and signalized pedestrian crossings and cross streets may be widely spaced. Pedestrian accommodations typically consist of sidewalks or trails set back from the street with a landscape buffer. Bicycles may be accommodated with bike lanes or on separate trails. Buildings or parking lots adjacent to boulevards typically have large landscape setbacks. No on-street parking is provided.Boulevard (with Parking)Principal or Minor ArterialWalkable, low speed (35 mph or less) divided arterial thoroughfare in urban environments designed to carry both through and local traffic, pedestrians and bicyclists. These boulevards are typically 4 lanes or wider and typically accommodate curb parking. They may be designed as multi-way boulevards to provide local access to retail and commercial uses. Pedestrian accommodations may include wide sidewalks adjacent to the street curb with streetscaping for the pedestrian realm.AvenuePrincipal or Minor Arterial / CollectorWalkable, low speed (35 mph or less) urban arterial or collector thoroughfare typically serving mixed use centers and neighborhoods. Avenues serve as primary pedestrian and bicycle routes and may also serve as local transit routes. Avenues are typically 2 lanes, but may be up to 4 lanes. Some avenues may feature a raised landscape median and also accommodate on-street parking in mixed use centers and higher density residential areas. These higher intensity areas have wider sidewalks and more streetscape amenities lining the sidewalk edge.Local StreetLocalWalkable, low speed (25 mph) thoroughfare in urban areas and neighborhoods primarily serving abutting properties. Local streets are designed to connect residential neighborhoods with each other, connect neighborhoods with neighborhood and community centers, and connect to arterial streets. These streets are 2 lanes and may serve local travel through mixed-use centers, commercial and industrial districts. On-street curb parking is provided.Alley / Rear LaneLocalVery low-speed (5-10 mph) vehicular driveway located to the rear of properties, providing access to parking, service areas and rear uses such as secondary units, as well as an easement for utilities. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework63COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Thoroughfare Assembly Concepts Design Parameters Freeways• Controlled access • No pedestrian or bicycle provisions Boulevard (High Speed) • 4-6 lanes • Turn lanes at intersections • Landscape median • 6-foot sidewalks setback from curb • Bicycle provisions where possible Boulevard (with Parking)• 3-5 lanes (1 turn lane) • 2 one-way slip roads (in some instances) • 6-20 foot wide sidewalks in mixed-use districts • Bicycle provisions Avenue• 2-4 lanes • Undivided or divided with landscape median • Parking lanes in mixed-use districts • 6-20 foot wide sidewalk in mixed-use districts Local Street• 2 lanes • Low design speed • Unmarked on-street parking • 5 foot sidewalks • Bicycle on-street Alley / Rear Lane• No parking • No sidewalks • Wider pavement provided in Urban Residential and Mixed- Use Districts City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework64 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Key Transportation System Components This section describes other key components of the transportation system which include: • Vehicle Lanes and Storm Water Management • The Pedestrian Realm • Trails • Bicycle Routes • Transit • Sustainable Transportation Options Vehicle Lanes and Storm Water Management Most area within a thoroughfare is dedicated to moving and parking vehicles. This area consists of the main travel lanes and medians, and on-street parking where appropriate. As described in the Thoroughfare Assembly table, the vehicle lane configuration, width and parking type will vary depending upon the context in which the thoroughfare exists. While travel lanes are primarily utilitarian, the design of the main travel zone offers opportunities to create community identity. Coppell has good existing standards for roadway median landscaping outlined by the City’s streetscape standards and should continue implementing these improvements. The main travel lanes also serve as conveyors of storm water to the community’s storm water drainage system. This function offers opportunities to implement more sustainable storm water management techniques in new or redesigned thoroughfares by allowing storm water to be captured and filtered in natural drainage areas within the street right-of-way. This “green” street in Seattle has a vegetated swale between the street edge and the sidewalk, providing natural drainage and filtering of storm water in a residential area. Credit: NY Street Design Manual, Abby Hall This multi-way boulevard concept in a mixed-use urban environment provides on-street parking and a sidewalk with “green” solutions within the median. Credit: NY Street Design Manual , NY DOT This “green” solution is located along the side of a boulevard in a pedestrian-oriented environment. Credit: NY Street Design Manual , NY DOT Median landscape treatment along Sandy Lake Rd. which is a high speed boulevard. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework65COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN The Pedestrian Realm Another key component of the transportation system is the pedestrian realm, which is a three and four- dimensional experience. The first two dimensions of the pedestrian realm are depicted on engineering drawings and consist of the width and length of the ground plane. The third dimension of the pedestrian realm contains the vertical elements: building wall or building activity edge, building signing, the street furniture, parkway, trees, tree wells, planters, lights, and the curb edge to the street which may or may not have parking. The fourth dimension is the experiential aspect gained from moving along the sidewalk over time. Mixed-use centers should have wide sidewalks with interesting texture. Material changes help define pedestrian crossings through streets and driveways, and also help slow vehicular speeds. A comfortable pedestrian realm includes a curb edge, street trees, pedestrian-scale lighting and street furniture such as this example in Southlake. Residential neighborhood streets should include a street tree canopy to provide shade for the pedestrian zone. • Sidewalks sufficiently wide to accommodate pedestrian flow, particularly in higher intensity mixed-use centers and urban residential areas. • Sidewalks of interesting texture and color in mixed-use centers. Texture does not necessarily mean brick, but can be created by scored concrete, changes in materials and shadowing. • Sidewalks are carried across the street through well-defined pedestrian crosswalks. Material changes can act as traffic calming devices. • Lighting poles and illumination are well designed, attractive at the base and provide adequate lighting of the pedestrian realm. The fixtures should be used as a single lower pole height on narrow streets and with higher pole heights on the wider streets. • Street trees of proper type, height, foliage, trunk sizes, planting location along retail, office, residential, civic and institutional streets. • The curb edge should buffer the pedestrian from traffic. In mixed-use centers parallel or head-in parking should be present whenever possible. Where parking cannot be provided, bollards, street trees, or other decorative features may be used. • Street furniture in mixed-use centers may include benches, planters, trash containers, and public art. The design location and grouping of these elements is dependent on the function, size, building type and edge activities. In front of retail and office uses, civic, and institutional uses the pedestrian realm should have benches, planters, trash receptacles, kiosks, street art, and transit shelters where service is available. Pedestrian Realm Guidelines City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework66 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Trails The Coppell 2030 transportation system includes an extensive network of regional and community trails and neighborhood sidewalks to link people to places. Shared use trails are typically used by walkers, joggers/runners, cyclists (typically children and recreational adult riders), mountain biking, and in-line skaters and scooters. Regional Veloweb trails and community-wide spine trails provide linkages from Coppell to adjacent communities and the DFW metropolitan region. The Veloweb is primarily a series of 12-foot wide off- road trails designed for use by fast-moving bicyclists. Community trails are minimum 8-feet wide and provide local area connections between neighborhoods and key destinations including parks and recreation facilities, schools, mixed-use centers, and employment centers. Local neighborhood sidewalks connect neighborhood blocks together and provide direct linkages to the broader trail network. City of Coppell Trails Plan City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework67COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Bicycle Routes A key recommendation of Mobility 2030 is the importance of improving bicycle mobility throughout the DFW region, for both off-street and on-street cyclists. The regional Veloweb trail network and local community trails provide facilities for children and less experienced adult cyclists. However Mobility 2030 also provides recommended policies to establish a systematic method of improving on-street bicycle mobility for experienced bicyclists. • Adopt local street and right-of-way standards that accommodate extra widths or lanes needed for bicycle traffic. In order to provide the minimum level of safety to bicyclists, arterials should provide a 15-foot wide outside lane and collectors should provide a 14-foot wide outside lane for bicyclists and motorists to share the road more safely. • Provide dedicated bicycle lanes along appropriate corridors to safely accommodate bicyclists on some collector and arterial roadways in urban areas. Bicycle lanes should have a minimum width of 4-feet from gutter seam to lane stripe, with 5-feet preferred or 6-feet when adjacent to on- street parking. Bicycle lanes must be designed in conformance with the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials’ guidelines. Moore Rd. in Coppell north of Belt Line Rd. is identified for 4-6 foot on-street bike lanes in addition to 5-6 foot off-street sidewalks. The Coppell 2030 Transportation Plan recommends a larger network of on-street cycling facilities, including shared roadways (no bikeway designations), signed shared roadways (designated by bike route signs as the best route for bikes to share with vehicles), and bicycle lanes (suited with the appropriate markings and signage for corridors with high demand for bike use by advanced cyclists). City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework68 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Transit Convenient access to transit service is an important component of an effective multi-modal transportation system for Coppell in 2030. Vision 2030 identified easy access to the Dallas-Fort Worth Region as an important mobility goal. With roadway capacities unable to keep pace with population growth in the region, transit is a key component to providing regional access for the citizens of Coppell. The Coppell 2030 Plan addresses transit at two levels, intra-city and inter-city. Intra- city transit will serve the local transit needs of Coppell residents and will connect activity centers. Inter-city transit will connect Coppell residents to the greater Dallas-Fort Worth Region and will provide improved access to DFW Airport. Intra-City Coppell 2030 Plan envisions the creation of numerous neighborhood and community activity centers that will be hubs of activity that provide retail, restaurant, service, civic and residential uses all within compact, mixed-use developments. An intra-city circulator transit system is one way to provide connectivity between these activity centers while reducing congestion on local roadways. Because transit requires higher densities of residential development within compact areas to be an effective alternative to automobile transportation, Coppell will not be ready to implement a circulator bus or trolley system until significant redevelopment occurs within the planned activity centers. Once the neighborhood and community activity centers have redeveloped to include higher density residential housing products, ridership potential may justify the introduction of local transit service. Once potential ridership exists to justify local transit, a detailed transit system study is needed to identify appropriate routes and system characteristics. As Coppell’s thoroughfares are modified over time to implement the recommendations in this plan, accommodation of local transit service will play an integral part of the thoroughfare design process. Inter-City The primary provider of inter-city transit services that will serve Coppell is Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART), which provides bus and rail transit service to participating regional cities. The City of Coppell is not a member of the DART system. However, DART controls the Cotton Belt rail corridor which parallels Belt Line Rd. on the southern boundary of the City. This rail corridor is planned for future passenger train service linking into the rest of DART and the region’s rail transit system. While the City is not a member of the DART system, it does own property south of Belt Line Rd., the North Lake property, which is a potential location for a future DART rail station on the Cotton Belt line. The Coppell 2030 Plan identifies this area for transit oriented development and Chapter 4 of the Plan discusses in further detail the development opportunities for areas in proximation to a future DART transit station. The City will continue its work with DART and other regional transportation organizations to determine the most cost-effective means of providing its residents with access to regional transit service. As the City plans for rail transit it must ensure compatibility with adjacent neighborhoods by implementing mitigation techniques including buffering (noise and visual impacts). The City should ensure it is involved and its interests are represented during the environmental review process. Sustainable Transportation Options Conventional transportation technologies involve the use of fossil fuels for vehicle propulsion. However rising fuel prices and significant air quality and environmental impacts are causing awareness and interest in alternative transportation technology. Coppell 2030 Plan recommends exploring a range of options and technologies for environmentally friendly transportation circulation within the community and connections to the region. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 2: Planning Framework69COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Transportation & Mobility Policies • TM-1 Provide a balanced transportation system, less dependent on the private automobile, supported by both the use of emerging technology and the location of jobs, housing, commercial activity, parks and open space. • TM-2 Improve mobility options and accessibility for the non-driving elderly, children, disabled, low- income and other members of the population. • TM-3 Provide a safe and interconnected network of pedestrian and bicycle routes throughout the city, with connections to regional transit services, that provides linkages among employment sites, housing, and mixed-use centers. • TM-4 Provide walking and biking corridors linking neighborhoods and other destinations in Coppell to the future DART station in the Belt Line corridor. • TM-5 Provide short-term and/or long-term bicycle parking in commercial and mixed- use districts, in employment centers and multifamily developments, at educational facilities, in parks and recreational areas, at special events, and at transit facilities. • TM-6 Provide an adequate supply of on-street parking to support land uses in existing and emerging mixed-use activity centers. • TM-7 Implement traffic calming measures to minimize the impact of regional trips through Coppell, while supporting the travel needs of the community. • TM-8 Participate in regional transportation planning activities and pursue opportunities to improve connectivity with the regional transportation system. • TM-9 Work with the Coppell Independent School District to increase walking and biking to school by improving routes from neighborhoods to schools. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 70 City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN CHAPtER 3 Healthy NEIGHBORHOODS COPPELL 2030 PLAN Attractive and Well Maintained Neighborhoods Safe Neighborhoods Neighborhoods Contribute to Community Health Multi-Generational Neighborhoods Neighborhood Planning Healthy Neighborhood Policies 71 City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 3: Healthy NeighborhoodsCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Introduction Neighborhoods are the building blocks of a community. Coppell is fortunate to have a community of great neighborhoods. Over time, as the community ages, ensuring the long term health and value of its neighborhoods is a high priority of the citizens of Coppell. This chapter identifies strategies that will be employed to ensure the health of the city’s family neighborhoods. The chapter is divided into sections that address neighborhood attractiveness, completeness, health, resident mix, safety, and sustainability. Residents expressed priorities for their neighborhoods throughout Coppell Vision 2030. The Vision identifies the following priorities related to neighborhoods: • High-quality, well-maintained neighborhood infrastructure • State of the art technology infrastructure serving every neighborhood • A range of diverse housing choices for all generations • Homes and landscaping are attractive and well maintained • Homes and buildings meet current codes and community standards • A high percentage of occupant ownership • Neighbors are involved, know each other and help each other • Residents have opportunities to live where they work and work where they live 73 “The neighborhood is the basic building block of human society, and successful efforts to make the world a better place often start right there.” -Jay Walljasper City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 3: Healthy NeighborhoodsCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Guiding Principles: • Attractive and well maintained neighborhoods • Safe neighborhoods • Neighborhoods contribute to community health • Multi-generational neighborhoods Complete neighborhoods include quality housing for family generations. Neighborhoods include gathering places and are connected with pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Neighborhoods have convenient access to mixed-use centers with civic spaces and opportunities for social interaction. This chapter of the Coppell 2030 Plan provides the means through which Coppell will achieve the vision for its neighborhoods. This element is based upon the following guiding principles: VISION 2030 GOALS Special Place to Live • Quality Housing for Family Generations • Revitalizing Neighborhoods Community Wellness and Enrichment • Community Gathering Places • Multi-use Trail System Business Prosperity • Community Commercial Centers • Home Offices and Home-based Businesses 74 City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 3: Healthy NeighborhoodsCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Attractive and Well Maintained Neighborhoods Coppell’s neighborhoods are attractive and well maintained and this instills pride and a sense of ownership among residents. Some of the key aspects of neighborhood attractiveness include: identity signage, landscaping, fencing, home maintenance, architectural cohesiveness, vehicle parking, street conditions and a system of neighborhood governance that helps maintain standards for each of these characteristics. Neighborhood attractiveness requires cooperation between the individual homeowners, the neighborhood or homeowners’ association and the City of Coppell. 75 Coppell’s neighborhoods are attractive and well maintained. Public Infrastructure The primary principles of this category emphasize infrastructure provided by the City of Coppell. Neighborhood infrastructure maintained by the City such as streetscape enhancements helps establish the aesthetic image of the community. Sidewalks UtilitiesParks and Playgrounds Neighborhood parks and playgrounds are designed to complement the neighborhood aesthetic by incorporating a similar palette of landscape materials, fencing, lighting and architectural styles for any structures. Utilities are placed underground and above ground elements are placed in rear or side easements or are screened with landscaping, fencing or berms. Sidewalks are well maintained and of adequate size. Sidewalks are separated from the curb wherever possible with a planting strip large enough to support street trees or landscaping. Street Lights Street lights match the architectural character of the neighborhood and are maintained on a regular basis Drainage Storm water drainage areas are designed as neighborhood amenities where feasible and provide potential trail linkage opportunities. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 3: Healthy NeighborhoodsCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Private Infrastructure The primary principles of this category emphasize improvements constructed and maintained by developers and property owners, including homeowners associations. Landscaping and Trees FencesHome Maintenance Homes are constructed of durable, sustainable materials that minimize maintenance requirements. Routine maintenance including paint, roofing materials, windows and doors is handled promptly to ensure every home in the neighborhood is attractive. Fences and walls on individual lots complement the architectural style of the house and that of neighborhood walls and fences. Materials are durable and routine maintenance ensures fences and walls remain attractive. Individual lawns are primarily landscaped with native and drought tolerant plants. Shade trees in front yards are oriented to create shade for sidewalks. Routine maintenance ensures that landscape materials add to neighborhood character. Parking Cars are primarily parked inside garages and on- street parking is reserved for visitors. Rear and side entry access to garages is preferred. Common open space maintained by homeowners is important to Coppell’s image. 76 Neighborhood Landscaping Architectural Design Standards Boundary Walls Entry Features Neighborhood landscaping areas, medians and amenity areas follow a consistent landscape design with materials that are native and require less frequent irrigation. Where appropriate, neighborhood boundary walls and fences are constructed of durable, attractive materials that require low maintenance. Fences and walls are architecturally integrated with the neighborhood design standards. Neighborhood identity is established by well designed and landscaped entry features. Regular maintenance of entry features is the primary responsibility of the HOA or neighborhood association. Neighborhoods maintain their identity through the use of architectural design standards that ensure that new construction, additions and redevelopment are architecturally compatible with other structures within the neighborhood. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 3: Healthy NeighborhoodsCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN 77 Safe Streets Principles The primary principles of this category emphasize safety in the public street right-of-way. Safe Neighborhoods Coppell’s neighborhoods are safe places for residents of all ages. Traffic on neighborhood streets is slow, sidewalk systems are complete, off-street trails and sidewalks connect neighborhoods to community parks, and parks and other community gathering places are designed to be highly visible while being separated from high speed traffic. Neighborhood safety is improved when neighbors know each other and can watch out for each others safety. Residents encourage interaction among neighbors through regular neighborhood events, by including gathering places that are well designed and highly utilized. Residents also help implement programs that provide safe pedestrian and bicycle routes to school and safe places for children after school. Healthy neighborhoods have safe streets for residents of all ages and physical abilities. Landscaping and Fencing Landscaping and fencing adjacent to parks, trails and gathering places is permeable to allow greater visibility of activity in those areas. Street Lighting Adequate street lighting is provided to increase neighborhood safety after dark. Reduced Speed Rear Loaded Garages Primary residential parking is off-street. On- street parking is located so as to reduce potential blind spots and conflicts between pedestrians, cyclists and automobiles. Rear loaded garage are preferred, because they reduce conflicts between pedestrians, cyclists and automobiles. Where alleys are not feasible, front loading driveways are long enough to allow vehicles not to block sidewalks. The maximum speed on neighborhood streets is 25 mph. Wider streets or long blocks include traffic calming devices. Parking City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 3: Healthy NeighborhoodsCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Off-Street Walking and Biking Paths to Schools Sidewalks Separated from Curb Signalized Crossings at Major Intersections Elementary Schools Integrated within Neighborhoods Sidewalks and trails connect neighborhoods to each other and to schools and provide safe routes for school children. Where school walking and biking routes must cross major streets, signalized crossings are provided with visible crosswalks of different color and texture from the primary paved road surface. Elementary schools are provided with access from surrounding neighborhoods by walking and biking paths on residential streets. Sidewalks are set back from the curb to provide a safety zone between pedestrians and passing automobiles. Walking School Bus Program The School District and neighborhood organizations encourage the formation of walking school buses to provide a safer walk to school. Safe Routes to School Principles The primary principles of this category emphasize creating a safe environment for school children to walk or bike to school. 78 Neighborliness Principles The primary principles of this category emphasize activities which can be organized and accomplished by residents. Citizen involvement plays a significant role in maintaining strong neighborhoods and an attractive community. Active Neighborhood Organization Neighborhood Gardens and Tool Co-ops Regular Neighborhood Functions Neighborhood associations organize regular neighborhood events to provide opportunities for neighbors to meet each other. Neighborhood associations encourage the development of neighborhood gardens and tool sharing arrangements. Neighborhoods have active associations that provide opportunities for neighbors to meet each other and to participate in the governance of the neighborhood. Neighborhood Beautification Committee Neighborhood associations encourage the creation of beautification committees to assist with upgrading neighborhood landscaping, coordinating maintenance issues with the City and working with homeowners to encourage property improvements. Gathering Spaces Inviting gathering places including parks, plazas and neighborhood commercial areas. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 3: Healthy NeighborhoodsCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN 79 Contribute to Community Health Neighborhood design plays a key role in determining community health. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have established clear links between community design and individual health. The CDC’s guidelines for healthy community designs are the basis for recommendations in this section. Coppell’s neighborhoods contribute to community health and well being by: • Promoting physical activity among residents of all ages. • Improving mental health by increasing social connections and a sense of community. • Encouraging healthy eating by increasing opportunities for local food production. • Improving air quality by reducing automobile dependence. • Improving water quality and reducing water use through water conservation and natural storm water filtration. Neighborhood design plays a role in community health and a healthy environment. Physical Activity Moderate physical activity on a regular basis can significantly improve individual health and well-being according to the U.S. Surgeon General’s 1996 Report on Physical Activity and Health. Neighborhood design offers one of the best ways to increase regular physical activity for residents of all ages. Some techniques offer significant opportunities to increase both physical activity and community social connections. Neighborhoods in Coppell are linked by trails. Walk/Bike to School Neighborhoods Connected by Trails Access to Neighborhood Services Neighborhood retail and service uses are within easy walking or biking distance of all neighborhoods. Neighborhoods are connected to each other by a community-wide trail system. School children walk or bike to school. Bicycle Routes Bicycle routes are coordinated and well- marked to encourage biking as an alternative transportation mode within and between neighborhoods. Encourage Walking Sidewalks and shade trees are provided on all streets to encourage walking. Sidewalk connections are made to shorten walking distances and do not always follow roadways. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 3: Healthy NeighborhoodsCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN80 Mental Health Social isolation can have a negative impact on mental health. Good neighborhood design offers opportunities to increase social connections by providing gathering places where neighbors can meet and socialize on a regular basis. Public and private gathering places increase social connections. The Coppell Community Garden and the Coppell Farmers Market are excellent examples of organizations providing healthy eating choices within the City. Healthy Eating Our busy lifestyles sometimes prevent us from making healthy eating choices. Providing areas for local food production within neighborhoods and creating networks of gardeners can improve opportunities for healthy eating. Gathering Places Neighborhood Activities Neighborhood Commercial Areas Neighborhood mixed-use centers provide opportu- nities for social interaction. Neighborhood activities such as block parties bring neighbors together on a regular basis. Neighborhoods include well-integrated parks, plazas and other gathering places. Civic Uses Civic uses within neighborhoods such as schools and religious institutions provide places for neighbors to congregate. Connecting Generations Neighborhood watch and safe home programs connect younger and older generations. Community Gardens Master Gardeners School Children Garden Elementary schools partner with neighborhood associations to maintain neighborhood gardens and incorporate organic gardening in the curriculum. Experienced gardeners mentor novices through neighborhood gardening programs. Areas are set aside within neighborhoods for neighborhood gardens. Tool Sharing Neighborhood tool sharing arrangements lower the cost of participation and encourage new gardeners. Photo: Lewis Ginter Botanical Garden Photo: Oregon State University – Extension Service Photo: Vicki Moore - SimpleOrganic.net City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 3: Healthy NeighborhoodsCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN 81 Neighborhoods have private sidewalks and trails that connect to the citywide network. Environmental Health Most of our time is spent within our homes and neighborhoods. We can have some of the most significant positive impacts on the environment by changing our habits at home and within our neighborhoods. An example of environmental stewardship in Coppell is the Friends of Coppell Nature Park (FCNP) which promotes the preservation of our natural environment through conservation and education. Development of the 66-acre nature park, located within Wagon Wheel Park, has been fostered by citizen and youth participation. The park represents a learning experience for students and a peaceful retreat for all citizens. Numerous types of native vegetation may be found within the park, and it serves as a natural habitat for hawks, coyotes, bobcats, and other animals. Daily needs can be provided within walking and biking distance. Daily Needs Within Walking Distance CompostingNatural Filtration of Storm Water Storm water is treated through natural filtration wherever feasible. Organic materials including yard waste are composted in conjunction with neighborhood gardens. Automobile trips are reduced by locating daily needs within walking and biking distance of most neighborhoods. Native Plants Water consumption is reduced by planting native and drought tolerant plants and turf grasses and rainwater collection for irrigation. Energy Efficient Homes Houses are updated with energy efficient materials and systems. Photo: Solarenergyfact.org Photo: Dan BurdenCity Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 3: Healthy NeighborhoodsCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN82 Multigenerational Neighborhoods Neighborhoods that provide housing opportunities for multiple generations have advantages over those that do not. These neighborhoods often have residents at home throughout more hours of the day due to varying work schedules and those who are retired or are working less. This increase in the number of hours in the day when residents are at home provides for greater neighborhood safety, can help provide neighborhood eyes on the street for crime prevention, and as extra supervision for children coming and going from school. By facilitating multigenerational neighborhoods, Coppell will provide options for its aging residents who want to stay within their hometown, but who require a smaller or less maintenance intensive housing type. When Coppell’s seniors and empty nesters are able to move from a larger house to a smaller house or condo, the larger house will become available for households that may have a greater need for the housing type including families with children. Multiple Product Types Universal Design Flexible Zoning Provide flexibility within the zoning code to allow multi-generational households including allowing accessory units. Encourage universal design practices in residential construction so housing is flexible for multiple generations. Provide housing choices that suit the needs of multiple generations in one neighborhood. Public Services and Transportation Ensure public services are available within walking distance or that transit is available for non-driving residents. Engage Seniors Engage seniors in neighborhood service such as volunteering at local schools or at community gardens. From 2000 to 2008, multigenerational households in the U.S. grew from 5 million to 6.2 million, a 24 percent increase. -AARP A variety of housing choices will help create multigenerational neighborhoods. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 3: Healthy NeighborhoodsCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN Civic gathering places in close proximity to housing provide places to socialize. 83 Neighborhood Planning Maintaining healthy neighborhoods is a key recommendation of the Coppell 2030 Plan to ensure a long-term sustainable community. Neighborhood planning is a way to tailor the recommendations of Coppell 2030 Plan and develop strategies at the neighborhood level that address the challenges of aging neighborhoods in Coppell. It is also a means by which residents may directly participate in planning for the future of their area within the context of the vision established by the Coppell 2030 Plan. Most neighborhoods in Coppell are considered healthy and are anticipated to maintain their vitality and economic value for the foreseeable future. Thus, planning at the neighborhood level is recommended initially for “stabilization” areas in order to proactively address the challenges of aging neighborhoods in Coppell and provide strategies to address their needs. “Conservation” Neighborhoods These neighborhoods have quality housing and economic indicators comparing favorable to or exceeding those of the DFW metroplex. In general these areas have few infrastructure improvement needs and have well-maintained housing stock, landscaping, and other physical improvements. “Stabilization” Neighborhoods These neighborhoods generally have housing or economic indicators comparing less favorably to the city as a whole. Certain blocks or clusters of blocks in a neighborhood may have declining housing conditions, the lowest home values, the lowest percentage of owner- occupied single-family dwellings, and may have the greatest need for physical infrastructure improvements. Such areas may also experience the highest levels of property maintenance challenges and have the greatest need for reinvestment. Long term health issues may range from relatively minor to serious. Two phases of neighborhood planning are recommended. These phases consist of the interactive planning process and subsequent plan implementation. Phase 1: Preparation of Neighborhood Plans Precise boundaries of neighborhood planning areas will be determined through additional community involvement and dialogue with residents prior to initiating the planning efforts. The 2030 Plan recommends these efforts use a variety of “indicators” economic, demographic, code enforcement statistics, housing physical conditions “windshield” surveys, and infrastructure condition “indicators” to proactively identify targeted areas for neighborhood planning efforts. These neighborhood plans will include extensive resident involvement to prepare a framework addressing issues such as: • land use, • housing revitalization, • appropriate infill character and density, • urban design, • transportation and mobility, • essential public infrastructure and services, • economic development, • opportunities to leverage other resources, or partnerships, • implementation plan, and • capital improvement and funding plan. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 3: Healthy NeighborhoodsCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN84 Phase 2: Neighborhood Plan Implementation The implementation of specific recommendations from each neighborhood plan is critical for stabilizing these areas and ensuring a sustainable future. These efforts should be directed toward not only accomplishing specific projects, but also toward fostering the ability of neighborhoods to inspire residents with the ambition, interest and ability to work collaboratively with the City to implement the plan’s goals and recommendations. To help realize the intent of neighborhood plans the following should be considered: • Monitor progress toward implementing adopted neighborhood plans and communicate results to City officials, neighborhood planning participants and interested citizens. • Assess as part of the City’s budget process, neighborhood plan implementation needs and resources taking into consideration the implementation activities for each area and public input into the budget process. • Use adopted neighborhood plan goals and policies and the neighborhood implementation plans to help balance between competing goals in City decision making and the allocation of budget resources. • Consider recommendations from neighborhood plans in the context of Coppell as a whole. Incorporate these recommendations into City prioritization processes as appropriate for capital expenditures and other decision making recognizing the City’s legal, administrative and fiscal constraints. • Allocate resources to considering areas of greatest need and where resources would help spur revitalization and growth. Use of native and drought tolerant plants reduce potable water consumption. Safe sidewalks provide access to a range of users. Composted yard waste benefits community gardens. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Chapter 3: Healthy NeighborhoodsCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MAStER PLAN 85 Healthy Neighborhoods Policies • HN-1 Preserve a balance in the city’s population by attracting families with children to maintain stable established residential neighborhoods and a vital public school system. • HN-2 Provide a diverse range of housing types and mixed-income housing, particularly in new mixed-use activity centers, which are attractive and affordable to potential home buyers at all income levels. • HN-3 Encourage new higher density housing in urban residential neighborhoods and mixed use activity centers with convenient access to transit, services, parks, schools and community facilities. • HN-4 Support homeownership opportunities in new multi-dwelling housing by encouraging the creation of condominiums, cooperatives, mutual housing associations, and limited equity cooperatives. • HN-5 Ensure compatible infill residential development design that supports the conservation, character and fabric of existing neighborhoods. • HN-6 Make community services accessible to residents of neighborhoods by walking, bicycle and transit, where possible. • HN-7 Protect established neighborhoods from excessive off-site impacts including pollution, noise, vibration, odors, and glare. • HN-8 Encourage healthy and safe housing through such means as maintenance, repair and renovation, increased home ownership opportunities, and neighborhood preservation and revitalization efforts. • HN-9 Encourage the active involvement of neighborhood residents and businesses in decisions affecting their neighborhood through active neighborhood and business associations. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 86 City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN CHAPTER 4 Special Area PLANS COPPELL 2030 PLAN Old Coppell Historic District Denton Tap & Belt Line District Belt Line & MacArthur District 87 City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 88 City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 89Chapter 4: Special Area PlansCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Introduction The Coppell 2030 Land Use Plan identifies seven areas for higher intensity mixed-use activity centers, as well as a future transit-oriented development on the land at North Lake. With few remaining undeveloped parcels in Coppell, the concept of sustainability has changed how the community approaches future growth and development. Sustainability is defined generally as aligning our built environment and socioeconomic activities to provide for today without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs. For Coppell to continue to be a thriving community in 2030 the community must effectively manage the development of the few remaining undeveloped areas and focus on strategic redevelopment opportunities that will provide the tax base necessary to support the community’s desired quality of life. A central component of sustainability, and the basis for encouraging infill development, is maintaining the long-term viability and health of Coppell’s economy so residents continue to enjoy a high quality of life at an affordable cost. Retrofitting existing low intensity and underperforming suburban commercial areas will support a strong economy in the future by increasing the property and sales tax base, accommodating additional population, providing areas for new employment For Coppell to continue to be a thriving community in 2030 the community must effectively manage the development of the few remaining undeveloped areas and prioritize strategic redevelopment. opportunities and providing additional housing options for all generations within the community. Additionally, retrofitting these centers will benefit the environment by reducing automobile dependence and encourage walking and biking in compact developments which will help reduce air pollution and other negative effects of vehicular traffic. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 90Chapter 4: Special Area PlansCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Methodology and Overview of Area Plan Summaries This chapter is organized to provide a summary of three targeted areas based on the priorities identified by the Coppell 2030 Plan Steering Committee. These targeted areas are recommended for comprehensive area plans and revitalization activities to be conducted in the future. The overview and vision provided in this chapter serves as a guide for future detailed planning and implementation efforts for each of the mixed-use activity centers. The three targeted areas that were analyzed for redevelopment include: • Old Coppell District • Belt Line and MacArthur Blvd. District • Belt Line and Denton Tap District Each area was analyzed by examining the existing development pattern, the current uses and property values, and the proposed future use objectives outlined in Chapter 2. The analysis for each area is organized in the following general categories: • Background and Existing Conditions • Economics Summary and Potential Redevelopment Program • Conceptual Rendering of Redevelopment Character • Planning Recommendations While the analysis of potential redevelopment opportunities is based upon sound market economics, these redevelopment scenarios are conceptual in nature and represent a means of understanding how the area could evolve over time. For each of the targeted areas, a graphic representation of the potential development character of the redeveloped area is also presented. These graphics are conceptual in nature and are only intended to provide a visualization of the proposed development character. As each area is further studied through an area planning process, the analysis provided in this chapter will be further refined based upon detailed site planning and economic opportunities that present themselves through private investment and through public/private partnerships. Data in this chapter indicates there is ample opportunity to increase density and tax base in each of the targeted areas, however market economics and the level of public involvement will dictate the timing of redevelopment. Market conditions in 2010 currently favors new single- family housing development in Coppell. However, remaining land areas for new single-family housing are limited, thus in the future new housing development will need to be focused on infill and redevelopment areas. Such areas will in most cases be within the seven mixed-use activity centers which will be most suitable for new “urban” housing choices. Market Fundamentals In order to identify future redevelopment opportunities for the three targeted areas it is necessary to understand the basic market dynamics that factor into the feasibility of developing the appropriate mix of land uses and increased development density within each area. The primary land uses anticipated in these mixed use redevelopment areas are retail, office/employment, and urban residential housing. Each use has its own set of market criteria that determine the feasibility of new development. Property Values One market fundamental that affects the development feasibility of all of the projected uses is the underlying cost of the land upon which new construction will occur. In the case of a redevelopment area, it is important to consider not only the value of the land itself, but also any buildings or physical improvements currently on the land. In many cases, the existing buildings and improvements must ultimately be redeveloped in order to achieve the desired land use mix, increased density, and urban form. Because of this, the actual cost of the land for redevelopment purposes is calculated as the land value plus the value of any improvements on the land. Since redevelopment projects will be competing with projects on vacant or “green field” sites in other parts of Coppell, adjoining communities and the surrounding region the presumption in these redevelopment scenarios is that, in the near term, the most viable new construction in the three targeted areas will be on existing vacant land or land with improvements where the value is near that of vacant land (currently approximately $5 per square foot). The economics summary for each of the targeted areas includes a map showing combined land and improvement values per square foot for each land parcel. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 91Chapter 4: Special Area PlansCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Retail In 2010, there is a high retail vacancy rate in Coppell and retail space is renting for as low as $8 per square foot per year. New retail development typically requires leasing rates over $16 net per square foot per year to justify the cost of construction. Office/Employment Average current rents for office space in Coppell are in the range of $18 per square foot, which is below the level needed to support new construction. Further, the DFW metro area market is currently experiencing increases in vacancy rates with the first quarter of 2010 vacancy rate at 23 percent. To support new office construction, vacancy rates will need to drop below 10 percent and leasing rates will need to rise above $19 on a net basis. Residential A bright spot in the 2010 market for new construction is related to for-sale residential units. Coppell has an adopted vision to provide housing for residents of all ages, including young families as well as seniors who wish to remain in the community but need to downsize to smaller units. Currently there is a need to create more housing options than are currently offered in the local market. The targeted mixed use activity centers attempt to address this need with housing options that will be accompanied by services and retail uses, while remaining within a reasonable price range for local service and professional workers such as teachers, fire and police personnel, government employees and new household-forming young residents. The redevelopment programs also provide for upscale urban housing opportunities for small families and down-sizing empty nesters who wish to remain in Coppell. The housing component of the mixed-use activity centers is feasible in the for-sale unit market in a five-year time horizon. Construction costs currently make rental units difficult, except for upscale and very small segment of renters, as new construction costs in the DFW metro area have remained higher than the market pricing of units will support. In 2010 rents have fallen to around $1 per month per square foot while construction pricing is in the range of $100,000 per unit, which requires rental rates in the range of $1.20 per square foot. Summary The economic conditions in the short term present a challenge for new development. Currently there is an economic disconnection between the costs of new construction and the ability and willingness to pay on the part of tenants and buyers of commercial and retail space. The competition to lease current retail offerings in Coppell is fierce and there is an oversupply of retail space. With this in mind, the redevelopment programs presented for the targeted mixed-use activity centers are potential opportunities for higher intensity use that could occur in the next seven to ten years. The underlying long-term market outlook for Coppell and its position in the DFW metro marketplace is strong. This is reflected by strong demand for housing in the community as well as long-term employment projections. The programs suggested for the targeted mixed-use activity centers use a different formula for retail than auto-oriented development. They are formulated on a retail base that is supported by a robust higher density housing component that will increase local capture through proximity and walkability from urban density neighborhoods. Because of the current slowed economy, the increase in support for retail space city-wide is projected to be approximately 90,000 square feet between 2010-2015 based on current population trends. However, Coppell’s median household income is well above average in the DFW metro area and therefore, by increasing the number of households in Coppell faster than the current growth trends predict additional demand for retail and office/employment space can be created. At current spending levels one thousand new households at the future projected median income for Coppell can stimulate demand for about 160,000 square feet of retail uses if the capture includes both local and non-local patrons. That is why these redevelopment programs recommend new housing in mixed use activity centers as a primary strategy to provide on-site market demand for both retail and office/employment uses. In order to achieve the 2030 vision, it is necessary to plan and be ready for opportunities when the economy strengthens. These programs are aimed at assisting in that process. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 93Chapter 4: Special Area PlansCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Background and Existing Conditions The Old Coppell Historic District encompasses most of the original town site, including the original location of Coppell City Hall. The area was first settled in the mid-1800s by James Parish. The Cotton Belt Railroad established a station in the community in 1888, and rail was the primary long-distance mode of transportation until the 1920s. Grapevine Springs Park, located on the eastern side of the district has great historical significance for the City of Coppell. Sam Houston, during his second term as President of the Republic of Texas, came to the area to work out a treaty with several of the local Indian tribes in 1843. He set up camp at Grapevine Springs and this campsite later served as the basis for naming the farming community of “Grapevine Springs,” which Old Coppell Historic District Bethel FreeportBrooks Burns Cozby CoppellHarrisDillard Brock ParkLexingtonCountryLochHammondAndersonParishArmstrongMobleyPenfoldsHeath LynnBenson McNear Bethel SchoolScott MelindaHearthstoneMitchellStant o n OlympiaRosemountHunterwoodCoppell OLD COPPELL REVITALIZATION AREA later evolved into Coppell. In 1936, the Works Progress Administration (WPA) built a park on Grapevine Springs. The Old Coppell area was once the community’s hub for activity including business, shopping, and to catch the train. Such activities largely disappeared with the outward growth of Coppell and the development of new suburban oriented commercial districts. Today the Old Coppell area is targeted for revitalization and new infill development to create a unique mixed-use community destination. Numerous “character defining” buildings remain in the area. Although none of the original buildings constructed in Old Coppell during the late-1800s are known to exist today, the existing character defining buildings represent Old Coppell’s “second generation” of buildings, and they embody an overall historic character. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 94Chapter 4: Special Area PlansCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Existing “character defining” non-residential buildings are located near the street right-of-way, and typically are one-story in height and small in scale and massing. Most buildings feature either a front porch or a canopy of some type. While there are exceptions, most exterior cladding consists of horizontal clapboards. The predominant roof form is the gable, with some buildings including a parapet wall that masks the roof as viewed from the street. Bethel Rd. and Coppell Rd. are both two-lanes and currently lack sidewalks, streetscape amenities, and defined on-street parking areas. The two Bethel Rd. intersections at Coppell Rd. (north leg) shown above and at Mitchell St./ Coppell Rd. (south leg) are opportunities for character defining intersection improvements. In recent years the City of Coppell has adopted the Old Coppell Master Plan, Old Coppell Design Guidelines, established historic district zoning regulations (Article 28A “H” Historic District), and invested in street improvements to Coppell Rd. (south leg) including new on-street parking. In addition, the city has completed plans for improvements to Bethel Rd. that include streetscaping, on-street parking, and enhanced paving at key intersections. These efforts provide the framework for future revitalization efforts and new development projects. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 95Chapter 4: Special Area PlansCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Current Value Per Square Foot There is abundant vacant land allowing a lower cost of acquisition than in other areas of the city. The map illustrates the value per square foot of land including the value of any improvements. This mapping shows that large areas of the study area are valued at a price similar to vacant land. The land other than residential in the area is either vacant or commercial and its value and extent are shown in the table below. Because of site constraints and location, not all of the inventory is expected to be redeveloped. Land Use Approx. Area SF Approx. Acres Total Value Average Value/SF City Owned Vacant Land 2,208,436 51 $3,894,040 $1.76 City Maintenance Yard 472,964 11 $1,550,910 $3.28 Very Low Value Commercial 188,195 4 $781,020 $4.15 Low Value Commercial 254,120 6 $1,546,580 $6.09 Vacant Land 797,556 18 $2,385,810 $2.99 Parkland 1,916,640 44 N/A N/A Totals 5,837,910 134 $10,158,360 $2.59 Source: City of Coppell Geographic Information System and the Dallas Central Appraisal District Land Area and Value Total Value Per Square Foot City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 96Chapter 4: Special Area PlansCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Economics Summary To begin the process of planning for this study area, a program has been formulated to correspond to the future land use objectives for Old Coppell as described in Chapter 2 of this Plan. This program is preliminary, a first step prior to conceptual design, and will be adjusted as design progresses to achieve a workable solution for phased development over time. The program was formed to mix residential, employment, and retail and services to be as self- supporting as possible. A conservative estimate was made of potential land for development or redevelopment, with the assumption that the existing commercial land in the Land Area and Value table is too costly compared to the vacant or underused parcels to make it feasible in the near term for redevelopment of new uses. An iterative process was undertaken to balance housing units, retail and employment uses. Employment is calculated for this plan by looking at the number of people employed per household expected in the residential component assuming one person per household is employed and then assuming that 55 percent of those are actually employed (the workforce engagement ratio). This is a conservative approach and may underestimate the potential number of employed, but is reasonable in determining the amount of office/ employment space that could be supported in the redevelopment area. While it is true that not all who live in the area would work here, maintaining a balance will provide more opportunities for Coppell residents to live where they work. The modest amount of retail in the program was calculated by using consumer spending of an average Coppell household and calculating a capture based on the number of households to be placed in the area. The reason for a modest amount is that even though capture increases in relation to proximity, the site area does not have the higher vehicular traffic volumes to support a larger retail development. The idea of the program is to create a local destination with a local character. The results of this process are shown in the land use mix table below. The amount of available land for development and/or redevelopment within Old Coppell is approximately 74 acres. The proposed redevelopment scenario includes 7.4 acres of open space that could be in plazas and green spaces to manage storm drainage, and two acres of civic / institutional space. The total floor area ratio (the building square feet divided by the land square feet) remains below 0.4, and thus allows for relatively economical solutions to parking including a combination of surface parking and some amount of open-air parking decks over asphalt surface parking (a more economical solution than parking garages). The amount of housing square feet proposed could accommodate around 450 to 600 units at an average unit size of between 1,500 and 2,000 square feet. While the amount of employment square footage proposed could accommodate 300 to 400 employees with an average allocation of between 250 and 350 square feet per employee. Based upon current assessed values, this land use program would create a new total assessed value in the range of $90 to $110 million depending on the mix of housing unit types. The current assessed value is approximately $6.8 million. The retail component of the program could generate sales in the range of $24 million annually based upon an average of $300 in sales per square foot per year in addition to any sales currently being generated in the area. Land Use Approx. Acres % of Total Vacant Land 70.0 - Underused Commercial 4.0 - Total Land Available for Redevelopment 74.0 -Public and Semi-Public landOpen Space 7.4 10.0% Roads/Circulation 14.8 20.0% Parking (surface and deck)6.4 8.6% Institutional Use 2.0 2.7% Remainder left for Development 43.4 58.6%Proposed Land Use MixMixed Use Residential/Retail 1.8 4.1% Mixed Use Residential/Employment 0.4 0.9% Residential Only 38.3 89.2% Employment Only (at .75 FAR)2.4 5.6% Approximate Households (.50 FAR) = 500 Land Use Floor Area Sq. Ft.% of Total Housing Floor Area Created 937,500 84% Local Retail Services Floor Area in Mixed Use 80,000 7% Employment Floor Area Created 96,500 9% Total 1,114,000 100% Old Coppell Program Land Use Mix City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 97Chapter 4: Special Area PlansCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Redevelopment Concept The adopted Old Coppell Master Plan provides recommendations related to the following for future revitalization and redevelopment in the district: • Adaptive reuse and infill development • Streetscapes and gateways • Public spaces • Urban design and architecture • Access and parking • Public policy recommendations • Strategic redevelopment initiatives • Business development • Marketing and promotion • Funding and incentives and fiscal implementations • Implementation strategies Given the adopted plans, policies, and regulations for the area, the Coppell 2030 Plan provides a vision concept for the 17-acre Carter/Crowley parcel that was not originally included in the Old Coppell Master Plan. This area with the addition of existing properties in the Master Plan area is bounded by Bethel Rd. on the north, Coppell Rd. on the east, Burns St on the south, and Hammond St on the west. The area is envision as a mixed-use infill area consisting of the following: • formal village green civic space with amenities for the farmers market • restaurant, retail, and cottage office spaces • service / office space • townhomes The concept includes a “main street” extension of Coppell Rd. south of Bethel Rd. On-street parking and streetscape enhancements with wide sidewalks are envisioned along all internal roadways. Outdoor dining for restaurant spaces is expected to occur with sidewalk seating as well as strategically located outdoor patios adjacent to restaurant building sites. Buildings should be flexible in design allowing for active retail uses to be located on the first floor and office or residential uses to occupy the upper floor. Old Coppell Redevelopment Concept - south of Bethel Rd. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 98Chapter 4: Special Area PlansCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Buildings should utilize a varied pattern of segments, porch canopy and storefront designs to break up the massing. Adaptive reuse of existing buildings such as the Senior Center offer opportunities to create “character defining” enhancements. Buildings should be located in close proximity to the sidewalk and should not exceed 2.5 stories or 35 feet. All buildings should have a main entrance fronting the primary adjacent street. The Old Coppell formal civic space should serve as a focal point and a ceremonial location for civic events. In addition to accommodating the farmers market, the area should include an open lawn, shade trees around the perimeter, pedestrian amenities, and adjacent on-street parking. Design Components The Old Coppell Design Guidelines apply to new construction and site improvements in the district. In addition the following is recommend for the area. Streetscape Improvements In order to maintain the character of the area both Bethel and Coppell Roads should continue to function with two travel lanes. Future streetscape improvements should: •include on-street parking, generous sidewalk widths, designated cross-walks at intersections, pedestrian scale streetlights, and shade trees. •relocate power poles or bury overhead power lines. •include wayfinding signage for the Old Coppell district. •provide convenient sidewalk and trail connections to Grapevine Springs Park and surrounding neighborhoods. Renovations and Infill Development Several older buildings contribute to the historic character of the area and their adaptive reuse should be used as the framework for new development. Infill development should: •locate commercial structures at the core of the district. •create “building enclosure” along Coppell and Bethel Roads and at the proposed village green to provide a more comfortable feel for pedestrians. •be compatible with the massing and architectural design of older “character defining” buildings. •comply with the Old Coppell Design Guidelines. Village Green Civic Space A formal civic space should be located south of Bethal Rd. to serve as a community gathering space and for the enjoyment of future “urban” residential dwellings in the district. The civic space should: •include a pavilion, utility connections, and other accommodations for special events as well as the farmers market. •be spacially defined by landscaping and formally disposed street trees with adjacent on-street parking. •have surrounding buildings facing the space. Parking Parking should be provided on-street and within shared parking areas to the sides and rear of buildings. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 99Chapter 4: Special Area PlansCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Background and Existing Conditions The planning area consists of a mixture of vacant parcels, single-family housing, older or underutilized commercial properties, newer office and retail / restaurant pad sites, mini-storage, a religious facility, and industrial warehouses. The existing city owned North Lake property is located to the immediate east on the south side of Belt Line Rd. The existing arrangement and placement of buildings throughout the planning area is largely oriented toward the automobile and has limited function for pedestrian or bicycle activities. The residential area on the north side of Southwestern Blvd. has no connectivity to surrounding neighborhoods and is generally isolated from surrounding uses. The existing Cotton Belt rail line abuts the north side of the planning area and crosses Denton Tap Rd. Denton Tap and Belt Line District Belt Line Airline SandersDenton TapBullockChateausSouthwesternHowell North LakeArmstrongGlendale ChalaisVers a i l l e s Belt LineBELT LINE & DENTON TAP REVITALIZATION AREA Existing Co t t o n B el t R ail C o r ri d o r Proposed DART R a i l C o r r i d o r Proposed DART Transit StationCoppell City Limit SCENARIO 1 SCENARIO 2 approximately one-quarter mile north of Belt Line Rd. The future regional veloweb trail is also planned to be constructed in the same corridor. Existing industrial warehouses are located to the southwest on the south side of Southwestern Blvd. and also on the north side of Belt Line Rd. approximately one-quarter mile east of Denton Tap Rd. Existing undeveloped land at the southwest corner of Belt Line Rd. and Southwestern Blvd. is zoned and approved for additional industrial / warehouse development. Two redevelopment scenarios are identified for future study, depending on the future location of the proposed DART transit station. If a DART station and a relocated rail corridor occur in close proximity to the planning area then the infill and redevelopment potential is expected to be significantly enhanced. The existing industrial area along Belt Line Rd. identified in Scenario 2 is expected to be a prime candidate for redevelopment if a DART station is located to the immediate south. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 100Chapter 4: Special Area PlansCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN The area includes several underutilized parking lots and commercial buildings with lower property values. The area includes a number of newer well maintained commercial properties with high property values. While increased density on these parcels would enhance their long-term value, their existing high values makes their redevelopment unlikely in the short term. Denton Tap and Belt Line Rd. are both improved as 6-lane divided roadways. Currently landscaping in the public right-of-way is limited and the existing overhead powerlines have a significant visual impact on the area. Several existing vacant, aging, or underutilized parcels are located in the area. Consolidation of these parcels would help facilitate new development opportunities. Currently some newer commercial buildings in the area have significant vacant space available for lease. An existing low density single-family neighborhood is located on the north side of Southwestern Blvd. and is generally isolated from surrounding uses. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 101Chapter 4: Special Area PlansCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Scenario 1 - Current Value Per Square Foot The scenario 1 study area has both vacant and underutilized land. Most of the area consists of low intensity commercial use. Currently there are a variety of properties with low property values. However the location of these parcels is fragmented, with some high value parcels along Denton Tap Rd. Some consolidation of parcels will be necessary if future development or redevelopment is to take place in accordance with the vision of the Coppell 2030 Plan. An issue for this area is that several recently constructed developments have high property values. Parcels that are between $5 and $10 per square foot along Denton Tap Rd., if consolidated with parcels below $5 per square foot could be feasible for densification or redevelopment, but some consolidation will likely be necessary for this to be feasible in the short term. The 2010 land area and values are shown in the tables below. Land Area and Value Total Value Per Square Foot Land Use Area SF Acres Imp. Value Land Value Total Value Value/SF Commercial 1,159,132 26.6 $13,620,680 $4,486,250 $18,106,930 $15.68 Residential 298,337 6.8 $2,128,670 $952,330 $3,081,000 $10.43 Vacant 413,384 9.5 $0 $1,525,430 $1,525,430 $3.69 Source: City of Coppell Geographic Information System and the Dallas Central Appraisal District Land Area for Potential New Development Land Use Area SF Acres Imp. Value Land Value Total Value Value/SF Land Below $6/SF 457,380 10.5 $111,840 $1,594,490 $1,706,330 $3.73 Land Between $6-$10/SF 230,432 5.3 $804,690 $976,600 $1,781,560 $7.73 Source: City of Coppell Geographic Information System and the Dallas Central Appraisal District City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 102Chapter 4: Special Area PlansCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Economics Summary This area is designated as a mixed-use neighborhood center by the future land use plan. The long-term program for this area recommends a mix of housing, retail and employment including restaurants, coffee shops, business services such as copy centers, convenience retail, etc. Employment and retail uses have been programmed for an overall floor area ratio of 0.45, low enough to permit mostly surface parking with some amount of parking decks. Similar to the Old Coppell district, retail and employment uses for this area have been calculated to match the base of support and employment needs of the new households created. Short-term densification and redevelopment of the currently vacant and underutilized tracts create a new value in the range of $28 million as opposed to the current assessed value of $2.4 million. The retail could generate as much as $9.6 million in annual sales (2010 dollars). Short-Term Program - Scenario 1 Short-Term Land Use Mix - Scenario 1 Land Use Approx. Acres % of Total Vacant Land 10.5 - Underused Commercial 5.3 - Total Land Available for Redevelopment 15.8 -Public and Semi-Public landOpen Space 1.6 10.0% Roads/Circulation*1.6 10.0% Parking (surface and deck)2.8 17.7% Institutional Use - - Remainder left for Development 9.9 62.7%Proposed Land Use MixMixed Use Residential/Retail 0.7 6.7% Mixed Use Residential/Employment 0.4 3.8% Residential Only 7.9 80.1% Employment Only (at 0.45 FAR) 0.9 9.4% Approximate Households: 180 (.50 FAR) *Roads and Circulation are a smaller percentage because of the existing road network. Land Use Floor Area Sq. Ft.% of Total Housing Floor Area Created 225,000 78% Local Mixed Use Retail Services Floor Area 28,800 10% Employment Floor Area Created 34,650 12% Total 288,450 100% City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 103Chapter 4: Special Area PlansCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Scenario 1 - Redevelopment Concept The Scenario 1 redevelopment concept illustration for the Denton Tap and Belt Line district shows the potential long-term redevelopment character assuming that the proposed DART rail does not have an impact on this area. This redevelopment concept calls for transitioning the area from an automobile oriented development pattern to a higher intensity, pedestrian oriented development pattern. Because the intersection of Denton Tap and Belt Line Rd. is a key entryway into Coppell, special attention is paid to the architectural character of the buildings at the intersection to create an inviting gateway that portrays the high level of development quality exemplified in other areas of the community. Some of the key concepts envisioned for this redevelopment area include: • Creation of a slip street on the east side of Denton Tap and Belt Line Rd. to provide separation between through traffic and local traffic. This design is similar to the proposed multi-way boulevard with on-street parking proposal for MacArthur Blvd. • Relocating off-street parking to the rear of buildings in surface lots and parking decks. • Creation of a pedestrian friendly street edges by bringing buildings up to or near the sidewalk edge and providing wide sidewalks with landscaping and street furnishings. • Creation of an internal grid of streets to provide circulation throughout the development area and to create a consistent design for the pedestrian realm. • Conversion of existing low density residential development within the study area to higher density attached townhouses or condominiums. • Creation of live/work spaces to provide Coppell residents the opportunity to live and work in the same place. • Recruitment of specialty retail and restaurant users that help create a destination for residents and visitors. • Integration of the proposed regional veloweb along the Cotton Belt rail corridor to provide pedestrian and bicycle connectivity to the rest of the community. While the economics summary identifies the short-term potential redevelopment opportunities based upon the 2010 land and improvement values, the redevelopment concept illustration demonstrates the long term redevelopment potential and conveys the overall land use pattern and development character envisioned for this area. Denton Tap and Belt Line Redevelopment Concept - Scenario 1 City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 104Chapter 4: Special Area PlansCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Belt Line Airline SandersDenton TapBullockChateausSouthwesternHowell North LakeArmstrongGlendale ChalaisVersa i l l e s Belt LineBELT LINE & DENTON TAP REVITALIZATION AREA Existing Co t t o n B el t R ail C o r ri d o r Proposed DART Rai l C o r r i d o r Proposed DART Transit StationCoppell City Limit SCENARIO 1 SCENARIO 2 Scenario 2 - Current Value Per Square Foot Scenario 2 assumes a DART commuter rail station is constructed in approximately the location shown on the map below (this is one of the potential station locations being studied by DART). To accommodate the rail station, this scenario assumes the relocation of the Cotton Belt rail line to the south through the study area and the realignment of Belt Line Rd. to the south to align with the existing intersection of Belt Line Rd. and Wrangler. Because of the impact that passenger rail stations have on land use, this scenario anticipates significant redevelopment opportunities for the land in close proximity to the station. The primary land use demand that will be created by the station is high density residential. However, there is an opportunity for some amount of primary employment office space as well as local retail, restaurant and service uses primarily serving the residential and employment population within the study area. Scenario 2 adds five parcels to those included in the Scenario 1 study. Four of the parcels, those on the north side of Belt Line Rd., are within the city limits of Coppell while the fifth parcel is outside the city limits, but owned by the Coppell ISD. These five tracts total approximately 80-acres and include both developed and undeveloped acreage. The table and map below identify the parcels and summarize their current valuation. Denton Tap and Belt Line Redevelopment Concept - Scenario 2 1 5 2 3 4 Land Area for Scenario 2 Parcels Parcel Area SF Acres Imp. Value Land Value Total Value Value/SF 1 491,357 11.3 $4,862,960 $737,040 $5,600,000 $11.40 2 444,312 10.2 $1,071,600 $666,610 $1,738,210 $3.91 3 457,380 10.5 $0 $688,060 $688,060 $1.50 4 1,179,169 27.1 $8,731,120 $1,768,880 $10,500,000 $8.90 5 871,200 20.0 $0 $1,089,000 $1,089,000 $1.25 Total 3,443,418 79.1 $14,665,680 $4,949,590 $19,615,270 $5.70 Source: City of Coppell Geographic Information System and the Dallas Central Appraisal District City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 105Chapter 4: Special Area PlansCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Density Scenarios One of the key planning considerations for transit station areas is the provision of significant residential density within a comfortable walking distance of the station. This helps provide the ridership critical mass necessary to facilitate the effective implementation of rail transit. DART’s Transit-Oriented Development Guidelines provide some benchmarks related to development intensity. Intensity of Development Guidelines • For commercial, retail, and institutional development, provide a minimum development density of 0.8 to 1.0 floor area ratio average over the designated station area at final build-out. This allows flexibility in locating greater and lesser density at different locations within the station area. • For residential development, provide a minimum of 24 dwelling units per acre average over the designated station area at final build-out. This allows greater density near the station and less density at the periphery, near existing neighborhoods. While intensity of development is certainly necessary to make a transit station area successful, it has to also be balanced with the character of the surrounding community and should not detract from other community planning goals. For this scenario, three different density options have been analyzed so the community has a range of options as it works to develop more detailed plans when and if a rail transit station is determined to be located near the study area. The following tables summarize the potential transit-oriented development (TOD) that could occur for the three density options. TOD - Scenario 2 Low Density 20 dwelling units / acre TOD Land Use Mix - Low Density 20 du/acre Land Use Approx. Acres % of Total Total Land Available for Redevelopment 80 -Public and Semi-Public landOpen Space (1-acre per 10-acres of use)8.0 10.0% Roads/Circulation 20.0 25.0% Parking (structured)8.3 Institutional Use - - Remainder left for Development 43.7 54.6%Proposed Land Use MixMixed Use Residential/Retail 2.4 5.6% Mixed Use Residential/Employment 0.9 2.0% Residential Only 35.3 80.8% Employment Only (at 0.5 FAR)5.1 11.6% Approximate Households: 775 (20 du/acre) Land Use Floor Area Sq. Ft.% of Total Housing Floor Area Created 968,664 79% Local Mixed Use Retail Services Floor Area 106,276 9% Employment Floor Area Created 149,174 12% Total 1,224,114 100% The TOD low density scenario would create a new value in the range of $120 million as opposed to the current assessed value of $9.98 million. The retail could generate as much as $31.8 million in annual sales (2010 dollars). City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 106Chapter 4: Special Area PlansCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN TOD - Scenario 2 Medium Density 35 dwelling units/acre TOD Land Use Mix - Medium Density 35 du/acre Land Use Approx. Acres % of Total Total Land Available for Redevelopment 80 -Public and Semi-Public landOpen Space (1-acre per 10-acres of use)8.0 10.0% Roads/Circulation 20.0 25.0% Parking (structured)10.9 13.6% Institutional Use - - Remainder left for Development 41.1 51.4%Proposed Land Use MixMixed Use Residential/Retail 4.3 10.4% Mixed Use Residential/Employment 1.6 3.8% Residential Only 33.0 80.4% Employment Only (at 0.7 FAR)2.2 5.4% Approximate Households: 1,362 (35 du/acre) Land Use Floor Area Sq. Ft.% of Total Housing Floor Area Created 1,702,490 79% Local Mixed Use Retail Services Floor Area 186,787 9% Employment Floor Area Created 262,183 12% Total 2,151,460 100% TOD - Scenario 2 Higher Density 55 dwelling units/acre TOD Land Use Mix - High Density 55 du/acre Land Use Approx. Acres % of Total Total Land Available for Redevelopment 80 -Public and Semi-Public landOpen Space (1-acre per 10-acres of use)8.0 10.0% Roads/Circulation 20.0 25.0% Parking (structured)11.0 13.7% Institutional Use - - Remainder left for Development 41.0 51.3%Proposed Land Use MixMixed Use Residential/Retail 6.5 15.9% Mixed Use Residential/Employment 2.4 5.8% Residential Only 28.7 70.1% Employment Only (at 2.0 FAR)3.4 8.3% Approximate Households: 2,068 (55 du/acre) Land Use Floor Area Sq. Ft.% of Total Housing Floor Area Created 2,585,559 79% Local Mixed Use Retail Services Floor Area 283,673 9% Employment Floor Area Created 398,176 12% Total 3,267,408 100% The TOD medium density scenario would create a new value in the range of $152 million as opposed to the current assessed value of $9.98 million. The retail could generate as much as $40.3 million in annual sales (2010 dollars). The TOD high density scenario would create a new value in the range of $258 million as opposed to the current assessed value of $9.98 million. The retail could generate as much as $85 million in annual sales (2010 dollars). City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 107Chapter 4: Special Area PlansCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN TOD - Combined Area Scenario Low Density 20 dwelling units/acre TOD Land Use Mix - Combined Area Low Density 20 du/acre Land Use Floor Area Sq. Ft.% of Total Housing Floor Area Created 1,193,664 79% Local Mixed Use Retail Services Floor Area 135,076 9% Employment Floor Area Created 183,824 12% Total 1,512,564 100% The combined area TOD scenario with low density development would create a new value in the range of $148.5 million as opposed to the current assessed value of $12.4 million. The retail could generate as much as $40.5 million in annual sales (2010 dollars). Land Use Approx. Acres % of Total Vacant Land 91 - Underused Commercial 5.3 - Total Land Available for Redevelopment 96 -Public and Semi-Public landOpen Space 9.6 10% Roads/Circulation 21.6 23% Parking (surface and deck)11.0 11% Institutional Use - - Remainder left for Development 53.6 55.8%Proposed Land Use MixMixed Use Residential/Retail 3.1 5.8% Mixed Use Residential/Employment 1.3 2.4% Residential Only 43.3 80.7% Employment Only (at 0.5 FAR)6.0 11.2% Approximate Households: 955 TOD - Combined Area Scenario Medium Density 35 dwelling units/acre TOD Land Use Mix - Combined Area Medium Density 35 du/acre Land Use Floor Area Sq. Ft.% of Total Housing Floor Area Created 1,927,490 79% Local Mixed Use Retail Services Floor Area 215,587 9% Employment Floor Area Created 296,833 12% Total 2,439,910 100% The combined area TOD scenario with medium density development would create a new value in the range of $180 million as opposed to the current assessed value of $12.4 million. The retail could generate as much as $64.6 million in annual sales (2010 dollars). Land Use Approx. Acres % of Total Vacant Land 91 - Underused Commercial 5.3 - Total Land Available for Redevelopment 96 -Public and Semi-Public landOpen Space 9.6 10% Roads/Circulation 21.6 23% Parking (surface and deck)13.6 14% Institutional Use - - Remainder left for Development 51.0 53.1%Proposed Land Use MixMixed Use Residential/Retail 4.9 9.7% Mixed Use Residential/Employment 1.9 3.8% Residential Only 40.9 80.3% Employment Only (at 0.7 FAR)3.2 6.2% Approximate Households: 1,542 The following tables show the combined land use program of Scenario 1 and the five additional tracts of Scenario 2 City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 108Chapter 4: Special Area PlansCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN TOD - Combined Area Scenario High Density 55 dwelling units/acre TOD Land Use Mix - Combined Area High Density 55 du/acre Land Use Floor Area Sq. Ft.% of Total Housing Floor Area Created 2,810,559 79% Local Mixed Use Retail Services Floor Area 312,473 9% Employment Floor Area Created 432,826 12% Total 3,555,858 100% The combined area TOD scenario with high density development would create a new value in the range of $349 million as opposed to the current assessed value of $12.4 million. The retail could generate as much as $93.7 million in annual sales (2010 dollars). Land Use Approx. Acres % of Total Vacant Land 91 - Underused Commercial 5.3 - Total Land Available for Redevelopment 96 -Public and Semi-Public landOpen Space 9.6 10% Roads/Circulation 21.6 23% Parking (surface and deck)13.8 14% Institutional Use - - Remainder left for Development 50.9 53.0%Proposed Land Use MixMixed Use Residential/Retail 7.2 14.1% Mixed Use Residential/Employment 2.8 5.4% Residential Only 36.6 72.0% Employment Only (at 2.0 FAR)4.3 8.5% Approximate Households: 2,248 City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 109Chapter 4: Special Area PlansCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Scenario 2 - Redevelopment Concept The redevelopment concept for Scenario 2 is a high intensity, mixed use, transit-oriented development. This concept shows what would be the most intense development within the community creating a new transit village around the proposed DART station. The concept illustration represents the medium density option of approximately 35 dwelling units per acre average over the site. This concept places the highest intensity and tallest structures closest to the transit station and decreases intensity and building height moving north toward existing single family neighborhoods. The realignment of the rail line to serve the station provides an opportunity to create a greenbelt and trail system in the existing Cotton Belt rail corridor. This will provide a buffer between the TOD and the single family neighborhoods to the north. It will also provide a pedestrian and bicycle linkage to the transit station for the rest of the community. The concept graphic below is a perspective from existing Belt Line Rd. looking southwest toward the intersection of Belt Line Rd. and Denton Tap. The existing Cotton Belt rail corridor is on the right side of the image and the possible relocated rail line, DART station and relocated Belt Line Rd. are on the left side of the graphic. Some of the key concepts envisioned for this redevelopment area include: • Development of the Coppell ISD site as a mixed use neighborhood adjacent to the transit station. The illustration does not show a school in this location, although that is a possibility. A more likely option would be the inclusion of office space for the District’s administrative functions. • Creation of an internal street grid with pedestrian scaled blocks and providing for internal automobile circulation. • Placement of non-residential mixed use buildings immediately adjacent to the realigned railroad tracks to minimize the impact of train noise on residences. • Creation of internal parks, open space and plazas, consistent with the open space characteristics described in Chapter 2. • Provision of high quality, Class A office space for the potential location of major employers. • Accommodation of automobile parking mostly in parking decks and structures internal to blocks. • Cohesive architectural design throughout the TOD area to create a unique sense of place and reinforce the area as a destination. Denton Tap and Belt Line Redevelopment Concept - Scenario 2 City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 110Chapter 4: Special Area PlansCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Future Planning Recommendations The Denton Tap and Belt Line District serves as a gateway to Coppell. Whether or not the proposed DART station occurs in this area, the development pattern should be that of a higher density, 24-hour, mixed-use activity center. If the proposed DART station is located near this area, the overall size of the redevelopment area will increase and there will be potential for even higher intensities of development. New mixed-use development regulations should be implemented and a detailed master plan for the area should be prepared to determine the appropriate magnitude of infill and densification for the area, and the means to seamlessly integrate redevelopment with the nearby North Lake transit-oriented development. The following is recommended to be addressed as part of development planning and a future Area Plan for the district. Recommended Land Uses The ultimate mixture of uses in the area would be appropriate for 24-hour activity. • Primarily multi-story commercial and office mixed-use structures, with urban residential uses in appropriate locations. • Increase building height (recommended 2-story minimum). No maximum height except where in close proximity to existing residential neighborhoods. • Infill existing parking lots and densify existing low-rise commercial structures as market conditions warrant. Street, Bicycle and Pedestrian Network New streets should be integrated to support mixed-use development. • Retrofit Belt Line Rd., Denton Tap Rd. and Southwestern Blvd. as appropriate to support adjoining mixed-use development and pedestrian activities. This may include the addition of on-street parking in some locations. • New public streets should be integrated to improve connectivity as part of redevelopment. Streets and pedestrian facilities should extend to the east and link with the North Lake TOD area. • Establish linkages with the future regional Veloweb off-street trail. Building Setbacks Area planning efforts for the district should establish recommended building setbacks along major thoroughfares and new internal public streets. • Create a consistent street front and pedestrian friendly feeling. • New building development along the major thoroughfares should be located in close proximity to the right-of-way to create a consistent street front and pedestrian friendly feel. Buildings should be designed with storefronts oriented along the roadways. Gateway Features Gateway improvements should include both public streetscape enhancements as well as significant architectural statements on private property. • Relocate or bury overhead utilities. • Improve street median landscaping. • Improve intersection and pedestrian crossing treatments. • Locate architecturally significant buildings at each corner of the Belt Line Rd. / Denton Tap intersection. Civic Space Public civic spaces should be identified as part of the detailed master plan. Such spaces may include pocket parks, public plazas, and community gardens. Design Guidelines Prepare mixed-use design guidelines for infill and new development. The guidelines should be implemented through new mixed-use development regulations. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 111Chapter 4: Special Area PlansCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Background and Existing Conditions The approximate 55-acre planning area currently consists of a scattered arrangement of single-story commercial structures with large setbacks from the street. Uses primarily consist of small and mid-size retail establishments offering wide choices of goods and services, including strip retail, big box retail (grocery), fast-food and other restaurants, and gas station outparcels. The commercial properties include large surface parking lots that are relatively underutilitized. The arrangement and placement of buildings with large surface parking areas is pedestrian unfriendly. A golf course and overhead powerlines are located to the north and west of the commercial area and a drainage area is adjacent to the south. Currently there are no civic gathering places for social interaction with the exception of a few outdoor dining areas adjacent to restaurants that are surrounded by surface parking. Belt Line and MacArthur District Belt Line MacArthurMall a r d Riverchase Crestview Blu e J a y Pelican CoralBethel Schoo l Hidden Hollow Beacon HillHollowBarrington Hollow RidgeBELT LINE & MACARTHUR REVITALIZATION AREA Existing developed commercial properties have limited connectivity to surrounding areas. Access primarily occurs by vehicles from multiple private driveway locations along Belt Line and Mac Arthur Roads. The Cotton Belt rail line (future DART rail line) parallels the north side of Belt Line Road. The future DART station is anticipated to be approximately 1 - 1.5 miles to the west on the south side of Belt Line Road and thus beyond typical walking distance to a transit stop. The north side of Belt Line Road is designated for a future regional 12-foot wide Veloweb off-street trail intended for use by fast-moving bicyclists. The trail could provide access to the future DART station for bicyclists. Both Belt Line Rd. and MacArthur Rd. are 4-6 lane divided thoroughfares, with turn-lanes provided at major street and driveway intersections. On-street parking is not allowed along either roadway. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 112Chapter 4: Special Area PlansCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Existing conditions include a number of vacant retail and restaurant spaces. The Cotton Belt rail line (future DART line) runs along the north side of Belt Line Road. Both Belt Line Rd. and MacArthur Blvd. are 4-6 lane divided thoroughfares designed to facilitate the quick movement of vehicles.. Existing low density retail areas while mostly occupied have large surface parking lots that are underutilized. Most existing commercial properties are well maintained, constructed of quality materials, and have high property values. An existing utility corridor with overhead power lines is adjacent to the western side of the planning area. Currently there is limited connectivity with neighborhoods to the west. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 113Chapter 4: Special Area PlansCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Current Value Per Square Foot The development at Belt Line Rd. and MacArthur Blvd. poses different challenges for revitalization and redevelopment to a mixed-use activity center than do other sites in Coppell. Unlike the other areas nearly all of this area is currently developed and the property values are much higher because of the active businesses. These sites are considered long-term redevelopment areas. Infill and increased density with multi-story buildings will require a rebound in the economy that will make purchase of these sites feasible in the future. To understand the potential for infill and densification, scenarios were modeled for the four quadrants as single blocks. The scenarios must create enough value to justify redevelopment. The proposed use for these blocks is mixed use residential/retail. Land Area and Value Total Value Per Square Foot Land Use Area SF Acres Imp. Value Land Value Total Value Value/SF NE Commercial Corner 369,803 8.5 $5,174,070 $3,337,040 $8,511,110 $23.02 NW Commercial Corner 706,960 16.2 $8,206,260 $5,189,660 $13,395,920 $18.95 SE Commercial Corner 522,729 12.0 $12,447,470 $4,641,090 $17,118,560 $32.75 SW Commercial Corner 288,259 6.6 $4,550,730 $2,934,200 $7,484,930 $25.97 Source: City of Coppell Geographic Information System and the Dallas Central Appraisal District City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 114Chapter 4: Special Area PlansCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Economics Summary Because of the high land cost, demolition costs and higher resulting site costs, a more aggressive land use program is necessary to distribute the costs over more square feet of development. Even with an aggressive program, however, the necessary leasing rates are too high for the market in the short term. As market conditions strengthen in the future, leasing and rental rates will increase, but this is expected to be no sooner than 2015. In this case, if poor performance brings the acquisition cost of these properties down, redevelopment will become more feasible. The intent of the program presented is to create a new destination using all of the available land at the intersection. The individual programs that were prepared for each site are listed in the tables below. The site is primarily mixed-use residential and commercial, planned for the individual quadrants to be phased separately if necessary, but with an overall program to create a retail mixed use destination with enough residential and employment to ensure activity on the site at all hours. This is one of the few opportunities in Coppell to create a new destination development that can add high value and taxable income to the city. The first table shows the SE and SW quadrants, and the second table shows the NE and NW quadrants and a composite program for all sites as a whole. The programs listed result in approximately $340 million in new development versus a current assessed value of approximately $46.5 million. Retail sales could be in the range of $170 million for all sites together. Because of the intensity of use, these scenarios do not provide workforce housing at market rate currently. Employment space provided is sufficient for 400 to 500 employees. Depending upon the housing types and unit sizes, the areas listed for residential could provide as many as 1,000 units of new housing. Belt Line and MacArthur District Program Land Use Mix Land Use SE SW NE NW All Sites Site Area (acres)12.0 6.6 8.5 16.2 43.0 New Circulation (acres)1.8 1.0 1.3 3.6 7.0 Open Space (acres)1.2 0.7 0.9 1.6 4.0 Development Area (acres)9.0 5.0 6.4 11.4 32.0 Development Area (sq.ft.)392,000 216,000 277,000 215,000 554,250 Site Value $17,118,560 $7,484,930 $8,511,110 $13,395,920 $43,510,520 Cost per Acre $1,426,522 $1,131,078 $1,002,544 $825,402 $1,073,234 Land Use Floor Area SE SW NE NW All Sites Land Use Type Sq. Ft.Percent of Total Sq. Ft.Percent of Total Sq. Ft.Percent of Total Sq. Ft.Percent of Total Sq. Ft.Percent of Total Retail/Commercial (footprint) 137,000 35% 76,000 35% 111,000 40% 248,000 50% 572,000 41% Mixed Use Office 39,000 22,000 28,000 50,000 139,000 Mixed Use Residential 69,000 38,000 56,000 124,000 287,000 Residential (footprint) 108,000 27% 58,000 27% 56,000 20% 33,000 7% 255,000 19% Parking Footprint (surface / deck)147,000 38% 82,000 38% 110,250 40% 215,000 43% 554,250 40% Total Floor Area Without Parking 353,000 194,000 251,000 455,000 1,253,000 City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 115Chapter 4: Special Area PlansCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Redevelopment Concept The redevelopment concept for the Belt Line Rd. and MacArthur Blvd. area consists of four mixed use quadrants defined by the four corners of the intersection of these two major roadways. While each quadrant has been individually programmed, it is the opportunity to redevelop the entire area that offers a unique opportunity to create a destination in Coppell that can draw specialty retail, dining, entertainment, housing and employment uses that are unique within the region. Some of the key concepts envisioned for this redevelopment area include: • Conversion of MacArthur Blvd. into a multi-way boulevard with on-street parking through the area • Creation of an internal street network in each of the four quadrants • Development of bicycle and pedestrian facilities along the rail and power line corridors • Maintaining a viable grocery store as an amenity for new residents • Conversion of surface parking to parking decks over time as density increases • Adoption of specific urban design and architectural guidelines • Creation of high quality office space in mixed use buildings • Creation of for-sale, urban residential housing in mixed use buildings • Recruitment of unique, destination retail, dining and entertainment uses Because of the high vehicular traffic volumes along MacArthur and Belt Line, the conversion of MacArthur into a multi-way boulevard through the redevelopment area will allow for the creation of inviting, pedestrian scale local streets with on-street parking separated from the main lanes. These local “slip streets” will provide opportunities for retail and dining uses to make use of wide sidewalks for outdoor displays and seating areas. The location of both the Cotton Belt rail corridor and the electric utility easement adjacent to this area provide an ideal opportunity to develop major pedestrian and bicycle facilities that will link this area to adjacent single-family and multi-family neighborhoods as well as providing a future link to a commuter rail station on the Cotton Belt line. The overall redevelopment concept for this area will create a compact, mixed use, pedestrian-oriented destination that will provide unique retail and dining options, various urban residential unit types and offer high end office space with convenient access to major transportation routes. Belt Line and MacArthur Redevelopment Concept N City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 116Chapter 4: Special Area PlansCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Future Planning Recommendations The Belt Line and MacArthur District is a key eastern gateway to Coppell and is a major destination for neighborhoods in eastern Coppell and northern Irving. Recommendations for this area are intended to gradually create a more dense mixed-use pedestrian friendly area. The existing conditions of the area require a gradual and sensitive approach to reaching the future vision for a vibrant mixed-use environment. New mixed-use development regulations should be implemented and a detailed Area Plan for the district should be prepared to determine the infill and densification of the area. Although not located within walking distance of the anticipated North Lake TOD / DART transit station, long-range development planning should focus on creating seamless connections with future development in the North Lake area. The following is recommended to be addressed as part of development planning and a future Area Plan for the district. Recommended Land Uses The ultimate mixture of uses in the area would be appropriate for a high activity mixed-use community center serving neighborhoods from a larger region. • Multi-story mixed-use structures, with urban residential uses integrated in appropriate locations throughout the development area. • Increase building height, especially in proximity to the intersection of Belt Line Rd. and MacArthur Blvd. Recommended 2-story minimum building heights, with no maximum height except where in close proximity to existing residential neighborhoods. • Infill existing parking lots and densify existing low-rise commercial structures as market conditions warrant. Street, Bicycle and Pedestrian Network New context sensitive public streets should be integrated to support mixed-use development. • Retrofit Belt Line Rd. and MacArthur Blvd. as an urban boulevard (with on-street parking) and pedestrian streetscape enhancements as appropriate to support adjoining mixed-use development and pedestrian activities. • Integrate new public streets as part of redevelopment to improve connectivity. Streets and pedestrian facilities on the south side of Belt Line Rd. should extend to the west and link with future development, including the North Lake area. • Establish linkages with the future regional Veloweb off-street trail. Building Setbacks Master planning efforts should establish recommended building setbacks along major thoroughfares and new internal public streets. • Create a pedestrian-friendly street edge with buildings placed at or near the sidewalk edge. • New building development along the major thoroughfares should be located in close proximity to the right-of-way to create a consistent street front and pedestrian friendly feel. Buildings should be designed with storefronts oriented along the roadways. Gateway Features Gateway improvements should include both public streetscape enhancements as well as significant architectural statements on private property. • Relocate or bury overhead utilities along Belt Line Rd. • Improve intersection and pedestrian crossing treatments. • Locate architecturally significant buildings at each corner of the Belt Line Rd. / MacArthur Blvd. intersection. Civic Space Public civic spaces should be identified as part of the detailed master plan. Such spaces may include pocket parks, public plazas, and community gardens. Design Guidelines Prepare mixed-use design guidelines for infill and new development. The guidelines should be implemented through new mixed-use development regulations. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 117Chapter 4: Special Area PlansCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN The U.S. Green Building Council recommends four approaches for local governments to achieve sustainability goals and move closer to lasting change. These approaches include strategies at different levels of involvement, from direct participation in a development project, to setting goals and expectations for future growth in the area. Approach 1: Lead by Example Set Goals and Make Commitments Showing commitment to a sustainable development agenda includes adopting a policy statement with relevant areas of sustainable practices. Create an Area Plan / Master Plan for Targeted Sites Such plans can ensure new development / redevelopment sites integrate certain sustainable practices. Clean Up Brownfield Contamination Helping to orchestrate the environmental remediation of infill sites with soil or groundwater contamination will eliminate the uncertainty in the development community about the site. Construct or Install Updated Infrastructure on the Site Constructing new or improved infrastructure in the targeted area will help mitigate some of the financial costs associated with redevelopment. In addition to streets and utilities, such improvements could also include parks and civic spaces, pedestrian streetscape enhancements, or other alternative modes of transportation. Approach 2: Remove Barriers Revise Development Ordinances Updates to regulations may range from line item updates to existing codes to new zoning ordinances that are more compatible with sustainable development, such as form-based codes, design-based zoning, and performance zoning. Write a Green Building Ordinance / Green Development Ordinance Recommend or require LEED (or equivalent) certification for buildings and for neighborhood developments. Use LEED as a checklist to analyze a project without necessarily requiring certification. Approaches to Support Redevelopment Approach 3: Incentives Provide an Expedited Review and Permitting Process This allows the City to offer a significant incentive to developers with little or no financial investment Provide Density Bonuses Allow an increase in density or height for development that follows green building principles. This approach ties incentives to specific public policy objectives such as promoting infill development. Owners and developers are able to build additional units, making such development more financially attractive. Offer Tax Credits and Abatements Extend incentives to developers and builders who follow measurable and verifiable green building goals. Increased property value from a sustainable neighborhood can offset a short-term reduction in tax revenue. Reduce or Waive Fees Offer reduced review or permit fees to developers and builders who commit to green building and neighborhood principles that have community-wide benefits. This strategy can be combined with an expedited review process. Approach 4: Technical Assistance and Education Provide Direct Technical Assistance Designate a staff member or members to work with developers and project teams who have less experience or familiarity with green development principles. Educate Staff Provide training to all city staff involved in the development review and approval process. This can help streamline the review process of green developments and can also signal the city’s commitment to green development. Compile Data Green development generally requires high-quality and detailed information about a site and the surrounding area. Centralizing the appropriate infrastructure, social, and other data (or training staff to require such information from applicants) can help streamline the development process and ensure that high-quality data is utilized in the process. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 118Chapter 4: Special Area PlansCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN • RA-1 Recognize the importance of maintaining and enhancing the City’s tax base, including property taxes, sales taxes and business and occupation taxes, to provide funds for capital facilities and City services for existing and future populations. • RA-2 Promote redevelopment of targeted areas as mixed-use activity centers that blend with existing neighborhoods, provide convenient shopping for daily necessities, and provide new housing options for residents of all stages of life. • RA-3 Promote the development or expansion of cultural facilities, including libraries, educational institutions, civic spaces, performing arts and art exhibition facilities, museums, and community centers, in redevelopment areas designated as mixed-use activity centers. • RA-4 Promote a wide range of goods and services for residents and businesses in mixed-use activity centers by providing incentives for appropriate retail development in these areas. • RA-5 Provide thoroughfare system improvements as a catalyst to support redevelopment in areas designated for mixed-use activity centers. Redevelopment Areas Policies • RA-6 Encourage the formation of public or business improvement districts for the construction of transportation infrastructure in redevelopment areas, which may include streets, curbs, or other structures; pedestrian or bicycle facilities; drainage; and street trees. • RA-7 Encourage the redevelopment of surface parking lots into mixed-use projects with transit-supportive uses in the Belt Line corridor. • RA-8 Provide interconnected streets between established neighborhoods and redeveloping areas such as mixed-use activity centers to ensure safe, efficient, and convenient pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicle access. • RA-9 Increase communication among government, businesses, major institutions and other entities that may provide economic opportunities, in order to: (a) enhance the common understanding of issues related to employment growth, business competitiveness, public policy goals and program implementation and (b) promote partnerships between government and business to achieve the goals of Coppell 2030 Plan. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN CHAPTER 5 Implementation COPPELL 2030 PLAN Sustainability Land Use Parks and Open Space Transportation & Mobility Healthy Neighborhoods Redevelopment Areas 119 City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 121Chapter 5: ImplementationCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Introduction The Implementation Plan contains specific action items drawing from policies and recommendations identified throughout Coppell 2030 Plan. The Implementation Plan goes beyond the typical implementation tools of zoning, subdivisions, and capital improvements to holistically address implementation and ensure the long- term sustainability of the community. The Implementation Plan arranges implementation measures consistent with the organized structure of Coppell 2030 Plan. Each table of the Implementation Plan identifies the policies in the corresponding element of the 2030 Plan, responsible parties to oversee and initiate implementation actions, time frames, and potential funding sources. Due to the broad nature of citywide implementation of Coppell 2030 Plan, more detailed information on individual actions will be addressed in the responsible departments’ work programs. Plans are only good intentions unless they immediately degenerate into hard work. -Peter Drucker City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 122Chapter 5: ImplementationCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Timeframe for Implementation Execution of the Implementation Plan will be an ongoing process throughout the 20- year planning horizon. The pace at which implementation occurs will be dependent on the City’s budget and market conditions. Each element of the Implementation Plan organizes action items by the timeframe in which they are recommended to be undertaken. The timeframes associated with each action are based on input from representatives of the responsible city departments and effort was made to identify reasonable timeframes for these actions. Some actions have aggressive timeframes for implementation due to their importance in implementing the key recommendations of the Coppell 2030 Plan. As such, it may be necessary to allocate additional resources to meet the specified timeframes for those actions. The timeframes included in the Implementation Plan are: • Short-term actions are those anticipated to be completed within 0-3 years • Mid-term actions within 3-5 years • Long-term actions within 5-10 years, and • Ongoing actions are part of current standard practices or programs and have no definite completion date. Implementation Action Lead Responsible Department Time Frame Potential Funding 1 Annual Updates to the Coppell 2030 Plan Planning Ongoing Variety of Sources. Staff will begin the program. Additional funding may be needed as updates are identified. 2 Citywide Sustainability Plan City Manager’s Office as lead with participation from multiple City Departments Short-term General Fund Staffing / Consulting Services. Funding will be needed to provide technical assistance. 3 Updates to City Development Ordinances and Policies Planning Short-to-mid- term dependent upon specific amendment General Fund Staffing / Consulting Services. Funding will be needed to complete all Ordinance and Policy updates in the timeframes identified and to provide technical assistance. 4 Updates to other City Plans and Policies Parks and Recreation, Engineering, Public Works, Economic Development Short-to-mid- term dependent upon specific amendment General Fund Staffing / Consulting Services. Funding will be needed to complete all Ordinance and Policy updates in the timeframes identified and to provide technical assistance. 5 Area Plans for Targeted Mixed-Use Activity Centers Planning Short to mid-term General Fund Staffing / Consulting Services. Funding will be needed to complete all Ordinance and Policy updates in the timeframes identified and to provide technical assistance. 6 Neighborhood Plans Planning Mid-term General Fund Staffing / Consulting Services. Funding will need to be identified. Annual Monitoring In order to monitor and evaluate the progress of the implementation actions, an annual report should be prepared by the City’s Planning Department and reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission and referred to the City Council. This review should be used to measure advancement toward the specific goals and policies of each Plan element, and the progress of specific implementation actions. This process will also determine the need for necessary annual updates to any element, policy, or implementation action of the Coppell 2030 Plan. Funding and the Budget Process The Implementation Plan is intended to be an integral part of the City’s budget and finance process. The Plan should be used as an information tool to identify funding priorities during the budget process and the formation of the City’s financial strategies and plans for the 2030 Plan implementation. Implementation Priorities Six key actions are designated as the top priorities for implementation of the Coppell 2030 Plan. These actions are complementary and together form the core of the implementation program. They each play a vital role in implementing the vision set forth by the Coppell 2030 Vision and the Coppell 2030 Plan. The actions are not prioritized and several may be implemented concurrently, since some actions draw upon separate funding sources or are the responsibility of separate City departments. Implementation Priorities City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 123Chapter 5: ImplementationCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Annual Updates to the Coppell 2030 Plan Beginning in early 2011 City Planning staff will prepare an annual monitoring report for the City Planning and Zoning Commission to evaluate the progress and effectiveness of the implementation actions outlined by the Coppell 2030 Plan Implementation Plan. In addition, this report will outline recommended updates to the Coppell 2030 Plan. The annual review by the Planning and Zoning Commission will occur in advance of the City’s annual budget preparation process in order for the Commission to outline a work program with associated funding requirements and provide recommendations to the City Manager and City Council to consider as part of the City’s budgeting process. Upon completion of the annual review, the City Planning and Zoning Commission will initiate any necessary updates to the Coppell 2030 Plan. Citywide Sustainability Plan There are a number of public and private sustainability efforts currently underway in Coppell to focus on community education, involvement, and successes. These efforts are primarily managed by the City of Coppell Green Team and other community partners such as the similarly named Coppell Green Team organized by the Coppell Chamber of Commerce. However these existing efforts do not have a Sustainability Plan outlining a framework of coordinated community-wide goals with “indicators” allowing for measured outcomes. Such indicators may be a statistic or trend allowing the community to evaluate where the community is and the positive or negative success in meeting the goals. By developing and adopting a Community Sustainability Policy with a Sustainability Action Plan, a holistic approach to community sustainability planning in Coppell will be established. The community involvement process will be expected to help determine appropriate sustainability topics and goals to include in the Plan, as well as the appropriate indicators for evaluating progress toward the goals of sustainability. Possible citywide sustainability topics may include: employment; sustainable businesses and “green jobs”; community health / health care / child care; education; local food production; climate change; transportation options; integrating land use and mobility; housing affordability; green building; energy conservation and renewable energy production; solid waste; water conservation and greywater; and storm water, streams, and hydrology. The Citywide Sustainability Action Plan should address: • existing practices and emerging opportunities for sustainability in both the public and private sectors; • recommended goals and targets for implementation; • recommended updates to city regulations; and • resources necessary to carry out the Plan. Updates to City Development Ordinances and Policies Implementation of new activity centers and the mixed- use land use strategy with pedestrian and bicycle friendly streets will require updates to the City’s Zoning Ordinance, development regulations, and related policies. The recommended updates to ordinances and policies identified throughout the Implementation Plan have been assigned a timeframe according to priority. Additional funding may need to be identified for staffing or consultant technical expertise to accomplish the amendments in the timeframes specified. Beginning in 2011 the City Planning staff will initiate updates for the following: • Mixed-use development / form-based code regulations, including appropriate regulations for the provision of on-street and off-street parking, civic spaces, signage, and streetscapes in mixed use districts. • Sustainable development practices, including appropriate principles of LEED for Neighborhood Development in redevelopment districts and freeway commercial areas. • Standards for civic space and landscape enhancements for new freeway commercial development areas and redevelopment projects. • Standards for bicycle parking and related accommodations in larger developments. • Standards for residential infill development to ensure compatibility with established neighborhoods. • Apply the regulatory framework in the targeted areas upon adoption of new mixed-use development regulations and completion of Area Plans for Mixed-Use Activity Centers. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 124Chapter 5: ImplementationCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Updates to Other City Plans and Policies Various City Departments and staff will be responsible for initiating updates to other City Plans, policies, and infrastructure design standards. These updates will be coordinated with City Planning staff, the Planning and Zoning Commission and other responsible City boards and commissions to ensure consistency with the implementation recommendations and vision of the Coppell 2030 Plan. The updates identified throughout the Implementation Plan have been assigned a timeframe according to priority. Additional funding may need to be identified for staffing or consultant technical expertise to accomplish the amendments in the timeframes specified. These updates will include: • “Context Sensitive Design” street design manual with detailed standards integrating pedestrian and on-street bicycle accommodations, streetscaping, on-street parking, and “green” street infrastructure. Bicycle accommodations include appropriate widths or lanes needed for designated on-street bicycle traffic corridors. Alternative designs and standards should be considered for greater storm water filtration and more appropriate storm water conveyance. The manual will include appropriate street standards for mixed-use centers and areas of higher intensity. • Adopting revised street right-of-way standards as necessary to implement the Context Sensitive Design street manual. • Suitable corridors in Coppell for an on-street cycling network (signed shared roadways and roadways for bicycle lanes) to include in the City-Wide Trails Implementation Plan, including coordination with the regional on-street network framework provided by Mobility 2030. • Sustainable “green building” codes for new and significant remodels of residential and commercial buildings, as well as standards for new development of commercial and multifamily buildings to include facilities for waste recycling. Phased implementation of new standards may be desirable. • Alternative methods and “green infrastructure” standards for storm water management in new site development that retain natural site drainage and mitigate impervious (pavement) coverage. Neighborhood Plans Maintaining healthy residential neighborhoods is a key recommendation of the Coppell 2030 Plan to ensure a long-term sustainable community. Thus, planning at the neighborhood level will be initiated to address the challenges of aging neighborhoods in Coppell and provide strategies to address their needs. Neighborhood Plans may include clusters of several neighborhoods located in close proximity to one another. Typically these areas are facing challenges related to age, maintenance of housing, and may have declining conditions or may be negatively impacted by nearby surrounding influences such as commercial or industrial districts. Precise boundaries of the Neighborhood Plans will be determined through additional community involvement and dialogue with residents prior to initiating the planning efforts. These Plans will include extensive resident involvement to prepare a framework addressing issues such as: • land use, • housing revitalization, • appropriate infill character and density, • urban design, • transportation, • essential public infrastructure and services, • economic development, • opportunities to leverage other resources, or partnerships, and • a capital improvement and funding plan. Area Plans for Targeted Mixed-Use Activity Centers The implementation of the higher intensity mixed-use activity centers will require the preparation of Area Plans to address the detailed retrofit and redevelopment of these areas which are primarily developed with low density suburban commercial uses. The concept calls for redevelopment, infill, and new growth to be targeted into compact, mixed-use, and walkable activity centers. Redevelopment of some of these activity centers are provided in Chapter 4 of the Coppell 2030 Plan. Implementation of the mixed-use activity center concepts must consider many factors including the capacity for growth, existing and future public facilities, street and streetscape improvements, community character, and environmental constraints. In addition consensus must be reached through extensive City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 125Chapter 5: ImplementationCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN The table below identifies Area Plans for Mixed Use Activity Centers recommended by the Coppell 2030 Plan for study. As staffing and funding become available additional Area Plans will commence. The priorities for preparing the Area Plans will consider many factors including: • Funding availability; • Requests by property owners and developers and opportunities for public and private partnerships; • Opportunities to implement the mixed-use activity center concept; • Development pressure manifested through frequent development requests; • Transit and economic development opportunities; and • Demographic shifts within the community. community involvement with property owners and businesses both within the area and in surrounding neighborhoods about the precise boundaries of the centers, the specific mix of uses, architectural form, needed public facilities, the type and design of public spaces, and potential public –private partnerships. Implementation is also dependent upon close coordination of land use and transportation planning. Several of the activity centers are located in the Belt Line corridor and within reasonable distance of the proposed DART transit station. All centers will require the implementation of new multi-modal street designs and on-street parking. After adoption, these Area Plans will serve as the blueprint and final arbiter on issues of land use, density and intensity. Until such time that the Area Plans are prepared, the Coppell 2030 Plan will be used by staff and decision makers to review and make findings for discretionary development projects. Implementation opportunities may occur on a project-by-project basis. Area Plan Estimated Start Date Description Old Coppell Master Plan Completed Historic District Master Plan and development standards have been adopted. Denton Tap and Belt Line District 2011 Mixed Use Neighborhood Center Additional description provided in Ch. 4. Belt Line and MacArthur Blvd District - Scenario 1 2012 Mixed Use Community Center Additional description provided in Ch. 4. Sandy Lake Rd. and MacArthur Blvd. District 2013 Mixed Use Neighborhood Center Study the infill and redevelopment of the mostly developed commercial area to serve as a hub for neighborhood activities and services, including new neighborhood civic gathering spaces serving neighborhoods for much of eastern Coppell. Denton Tap and Belt Line District - Scenario 2 TBD High intensity, mixed use, transit-oriented development district based on the assumption of a relocated Cotten Belt rail line and a new DART station in close proximity to the study area. Additional description provided in Ch. 4. Denton Tap Rd. and Sandy Lake Rd. District TBD Mixed Use Community Center Study the long-term redevelopment of existing commercial areas to serve as a higher intensity community-wide destination. This study would also include studying the conversion of the existing linear strip retail along Denton Tap Road south of Sandy Lake Rd to mixed-use neighborhood serving retail and higher density urban residential housing types. Denton Tap Rd. and Bethel School Rd. District TBD Mixed Use Neighborhood Center Study the infill and redevelopment of the area to serve as a hub for neighborhood activities and services, including new neighborhood civic gathering space serving neighborhoods both east and west of Denton Tap Rd. Also study the potential to integrate higher density urban residential housing. Sandy Lake Rd. and Moore Rd. District TBD Mixed Use Neighborhood Center Study the infill and redevelopment of the mostly developed commercial area to serve as a hub for neighborhood activities and services, including new neighborhood civic gathering spaces serving neighborhoods both north and south of Sandy Lake Rd. Also study the potential to integrate higher density urban residential housing. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 126Chapter 5: ImplementationCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN No. Sustainability Implementation Actions Plan Policy Responsible Departments Short-term Actions 1 Develop a Coppell Sustainability Plan and establish a Sustainability Action Plan with targets and goals to measure the community’s progress towards sustainability. S-1 CMO 2 Implement a sustainable landscape design and maintenance program for public and private properties through the Coppell SmartScape Program, with a native and adaptive plant list, that conserves water. The program efforts should address the use of such SmartScapes in new construction as well as incentives to retrofit existing landscapes on private properties citywide that meet SmartScape principles. S-1 PR 3 Establish a tree canopy coverage enhancement program.S-1 PR 4 Update city zoning and development regulations to integrate appropriate sustainability practices, include LEED for Neighborhood Development principles. S-3 PL Mid-term Actions 5 Develop and phase implementation of a sustainable “green building” codes for new and significant remodels of residential and commercial buildings.S-4 BI 6 Develop standards requiring new development of commercial and multifamily buildings to include facilities for waste recycling.S-4, S-7 BI 7 Develop regulations and storm water management standards for alternative methods of development that retain natural site drainage and mitigate impervious (pavement) coverage.S-6 ENG 8 Develop alternative street designs and standards that allow for greater filtration and more appropriate storm water conveyance.S-6 ENG Long-term Actions Ongoing 9 Provide community leadership and education programs in sustainability.S-1, S-4 CMO 10 Participate in state and federal efforts to address sustainable development and climate change. S-1 CMO 11 Coordinate with the NCTCOG to implement new standards for Integrated Storm Water Quality Management (ISWM). S-6, S-8 ENG 12 Participate in regional implementation actions that will provide for long-term improvement of air quality and attain federal air quality standards.S-2, S-3, S-9 CMO 13 Align the City with agency counterparts for grant funding opportunities.S-1 CMO 14 Promote water and energy conservation programs.S-9 CMO 15 Promote local agriculture on city-owned lands and within neighborhoods.S-2 PR 16 Promote the use of alternative landscaping that is native or climate tolerant and erosion resistant.S-2 PR 17 Promote tree planting as a way to reduce summer cooling loads and air pollution, making sure the trees do not cause the need for additional street lighting.S-4 PR 18 Expedite the entitlement process for projects that meet LEED certification standards or other environmentally sensitive programs.S-4 PL/BI Sustainability Implementation Actions City Department Codes Code Department Name BI Building Inspections CMO City Manager’s Office CE Code Enforcement CI Community Information ED Economic Development ENG Engineering PR Parks and Recreation PL Planning PW Public Works City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 127Chapter 5: ImplementationCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN No. Land Use Implementation Actions Plan Policy Responsible Departments Short-term Actions 1 Initiate Area Plans for targeted mixed use activity centers, as reflected on the future land use plan, to define the appropriate mix and density of uses and appropriate transitions to adjacent areas. LU-1, LU-2, LU-3, LU-4 PL 2 Update the City zoning Ordinance to create mixed-use / form-based development regulations. LU-2 PL 3 Apply new mixed-use / form-based zoning regulations to the Old Coppell District.LU-1, LU-2 PL 4 Update the zoning ordinance to allow live-work spaces, particularly in mixed-use developments.LU-3 PL 5 Adopt new parking regulations for mixed-use centers and consider removing minimum parking requirements and setting parking maximums in recognition of the increased pedestrian, bicycle and transit accessibility in these areas. LU-2 PL 6 Adopt urban design standards to facilitate development of more pedestrian-friendly and human-scale built environments.LU-7, LU-8 PL 7 Revise the City’s street standards to allow for on-street parking in mixed-use districts and to provide for context sensitive street design.LU-2 ENG 8 Explore extending the Old Coppell “brand” beyond the established historic district boundaries to provide greater connectivity with nearby major thoroughfares and neighborhoods.LU-7 ED 9 Adopt residential infill development standards to address compatible detached and attached housing infill development within established neighborhoods in terms of height, scale, architectural character, open space and setbacks, siting, and building orientation. LU-1 PL Mid-term Actions 10 Prepare a transit-oriented development zoning district for areas within the city limits adjacent to the proposed rail station and a detailed area plan for the City-owned property outside the city limits on the North Lake property. LU-2 PL 11 Apply new mixed-use / form-based development regulations to the future mixed use activity centers in the Belt Line Road corridor (Denton Tap and Belt Line, Belt Line and MacArthur Blvd) LU-2 PL 12 Apply new mixed-use / form-based development regulations to the future mixed use activity centers in established areas (Denton Tap Rd/Sandy Lake Rd, Denton Tap Rd / Bethel School Rd, Sandy Lake Rd / Moore Rd, and Sandy Lake Rd / MacArthur Blvd). LU-2 PL 13 Apply new mixed-use / form-based development regulations to areas where existing zoning and development patterns conflict with future land use designations. LU-1, LU-2 PL Long-term Actions 14 Implement a catalyst project in one of the Special Planning Areas with character defining buildings to create the desired physical context.LU-2 CMO Ongoing 15 Review existing zoning and apply new zoning upon completion of each Area Plan to assure that revised land use designations or newly-applicable policies are implemented through appropriate zones and development regulations. LU-1, LU-2, LU-3 PL 16 Direct resources and coordinate economic development and transportation planning to encourage redevelopment or stabilization in the mixed-use activity centers.LU-1, LU-2 CMO/ED/ENG 17 Require shared and off-street parking facilities in order to encourage the efficient use of parking. Ensure that such parking is compatible with the existing or desired character of the area and ensure that such parking is available for the duration of the use requiring the parking. LU-1 PL/ENG 18 Require “signature” development design to serve as a gateway to Coppell at the corner of I-635 and Belt Line – Point West.LU-5, LU-6, LU-8 PL 19 Promote the development of multi-story high-quality hotels with dining opportunities at each interchange location along IH-635.LU-5 ED/PL Land Use Implementation Actions Code Department Name BI Building Inspections CMO City Manager’s Office CE Code Enforcement CI Community Information ED Economic Development ENG Engineering PR Parks and Recreation PL Planning PW Public Works City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 128Chapter 5: ImplementationCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Parks and Open Space Implementation Actions No. Parks and Open Space Implementation Actions Plan Policy Responsible Departments Short-term Actions 1 Revise the City’s development regulations to incorporate park and civic space design standards based upon land use context and ensure the provision of appropriate park and civic spaces in new and redeveloped mixed-use projects. P-3 PL 2 Identify opportunities to develop new neighborhood parks and playgrounds and to upgrade existing neighborhood parks. P-1 PR 3 Pursue joint use and maintenance agreements with Coppell ISD for school playgrounds within existing neighborhoods and for new schools in new developments.PR/Coppell ISD Mid-term Actions 4 Adopt streetscape standards for mixed-use districts.P-4 PL/ENG Long-term Actions Ongoing 5 Construct park and recreation facility enhancements in accordance with the 2007 Parks Master Plan.P-1, P-2 PR 6 Improve access to parks and recreation areas through the design, individual development review process, street improvement plans, and implementation of the trails system.P-2 PL/ENG 7 Construct streetscape enhancements and develop new civic spaces in key locations to enhance Coppell’s distinct identity.P-4, P-5, P-7 ENG 8 Enhance major points of entry into Coppell and major intersections throughout the community with special design treatments including landscaping, public art and/or signage that reflect the unique character of the area. P-4, P-5, P-6, P-7 PL/ENG 9 Partner with TXDOT to implement urban design and landscape enhancements along highway frontages and at interchanges adjacent to Coppell. P-4, P-5, P-7 ENG 10 Promote collaboration among the business community and organizations involved in cultural resources to provide public art throughout the community and make cultural experiences accessible to all residents of Coppell. P-4, P-6 CMO 11 Encourage support for public art and cultural resources through individual and corporate philanthropy, and publicly recognize and celebrate gift giving of all types and levels.P-6, P-7 CMO 12 Increase opportunities for artists to apply their skills and creativity in the delivery of public services, in the planning and design of capital improvements or in the design and delivery of public information. P-6, P-7 CMO/ENG Code Department Name BI Building Inspections CMO City Manager’s Office CE Code Enforcement CI Community Information ED Economic Development ENG Engineering PR Parks and Recreation PL Planning PW Public Works City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 129Chapter 5: ImplementationCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN No. Transportation and Mobility Implementation Actions Plan Policy Responsible Departments Short-term Actions 1 Adopt a “Context Sensitive Design” manual with detailed standards to provide context sensitive solutions including multi-modal accommodations, streetscaping, on-street parking, and “green” street infrastructure. TM-1, TM-2, TM-3, TM-5, TM-6, TM-7 ENG 2 Adopt standards to integrate pedestrian and bike amenities with public streetscape improvements, particularly in mixed-use centers and areas of higher intensity. TM-2, TM-3, TM-4 ENG 3 Adopt standards for bicycle parking and accommodations in larger developments to facilitate bicycle use. TM-5 PL 4 Identify opportunities to improve walking and biking routes from neighborhoods to schools. TM-9 ENG 5 Update the City-Wide Trails Implementation Plan to identify suitable corridors for an on- street cycling network (signed shared roadways and roadways for bicycle lanes). TM-1, TM-2, TM-3 ENG 6 Adopt street and right-of-way standards that accommodate the extra widths or lanes needed for designated on-street bicycle traffic corridors. TM-3 ENG 7 Explore options to improve transportation efficiency and environmental friendliness of vehicular transportation systems including ride-sharing, alternative fuel and low-emission vehicles, travel-on-demand, etc. TM-1, TM-8 ENG Mid-term Actions 8 Explore options with DART to provide new transit systems and cross-town circulator service to destinations within Coppell, such as modern streetcars, local bus, or bus rapid transit and to provide efficient local circulation and linkages to DART stations. TM-4, TM-8 CMO/ENG 9 Complete construction of links to close all gaps in the citywide pedestrian network.TM-2, TM-3 ENG Long-term Actions 10 Develop a transportation linkage plan in collaboration with DART to provide linkages to DART stations.TM-4, TM-8 ENG Ongoing 11 Collaborate with regional agencies, school districts, community planning groups, community activists, public health professionals, developers, law and code enforcement officials, and others, to better realize the mobility, environmental, social, and health benefits of pedestrian and bicycle friendly communities. TM-8, TM-9 CMO 12 Apply for Safe Routes to School funding to implement strategic safety pedestrian and bicycle improvements around schools.TM-9 ENG 13 Construct trail facility enhancements in accordance with the adopted Trails Master Plan. TM-1, TM-2, TM-3 ENG 14 Continue to partner with the NCTCOG to implement recommendations of Mobility 2030. TM-8 ENG 15 Encourage a “park once” concept in redevelopment areas by integrating pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities connections to all parking areas. TM-3, TM-5, TM-6 PL/ENG 16 Provide funding in the Capital Improvements Plan to construct new streets, boulevards, on-street parking, and streetscape improvements to facilitate redevelopment in the mixed-use activity center districts. TM-1, TM-2 ENG 17 Implement education programs to increase and encourage pedestrian, bicycle, and traffic safety.TM-2, TM-9 PR 18 Provide a strong school curriculum and program for safety and travel choices with emphasis on environmental consequences, neighborhood livability, personal safety, and health.TM-2, TM-9 Coppell ISD 19 Evaluate new development proposals and exact appropriate improvements through the development review process. TM-1, TM-2, TM-3 PL Transportation and Mobility Implementation Actions Code Department Name BI Building Inspections CMO City Manager’s Office CE Code Enforcement CI Community Information ED Economic Development ENG Engineering PR Parks and Recreation PL Planning PW Public Works City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 130Chapter 5: ImplementationCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Healthy Neighborhoods Implementation Actions No. Healthy Neighborhoods Implementation Actions Plan Policy Responsible Departments Short-term Actions 1 Create a Registered Neighborhood Program to serve as the primary means for communication between the City and neighborhoods. HN-9 CI 2 Establish a neighborhood / homes association database and a citywide map of neighborhood boundaries, including primary neighborhood representative contacts and that is available to the public through the City’s website. HN-9 CI 3 Develop a neighborhood association resource kit to assist with the formation of neighborhood associations or reenergize existing associations, such as example bylaws, meeting agendas and preparation, and other information needed for an effective neighborhood association. HN-9 CMO/PL 4 Adopt the current version of the International Property Maintenance Code to provide a tool for ensuring compliance with community maintenance standards.HN-8 CE 5 Adopt citywide neighborhood architectural compatibility standards for new construction and infill, and as necessary integrate specific standards for individual neighborhoods into Neighborhood Plans. HN-2, HN-3, HN-5 PL 6 Establish an incentive grant program for Homes Associations to upgrade private neighborhood amenities such as fences, signs and landscaping. HN-8, HN-9 CMO 7 Explore establishing a matching grant program for homeowners who need assistance with major home repairs and maintenance costs.HN-8 CMO 8 Establish a safe home program to provide a place where children can go to get help in the neighborhood.HN-9 Police Mid-term Actions 9 Initiate Neighborhood Plans for aging neighborhoods to address challenges related to long- term health and sustainability, and include implementation strategies so these plans can be continuously monitored. HN-2, HN-3, HN-5, HN-6, HN-7, HN-8, HN-9 PL 10 Complete a walkability checklist for every neighborhood to identify areas with needed improvements.HN-6, HN-9 PL/ENG 11 Develop an environmental safety checklist to be completed by each neighborhood throughout the city. The checklist should identify existing safety hazards including poor visibility, inappropriate landscaping or fencing, etc. HN-7, HN-8, HN-9 Police Long-term Actions 12 Implement a Neighborhood Investment Program (NIP) as needed in aging neighborhoods to support infrastructure investments and revitalization programs for long-term neighborhood health and sustainability. HN-8, HN-9 PL Code Department Name BI Building Inspections CMO City Manager’s Office CE Code Enforcement CI Community Information ED Economic Development ENG Engineering PR Parks and Recreation PL Planning PW Public Works City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 131Chapter 5: ImplementationCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Healthy Neighborhoods Implementation Actions No. Healthy Neighborhoods Implementation Actions Plan Policy Responsible Departments Ongoing 13 Establish a clear relationship between the City’s budgeting processes and adopted neighborhood plans.HN-9 CMO 14 Monitor progress toward implementing adopted neighborhood plans and communicate results to City officials, neighborhood planning participants and interested citizens.HN-9 PL 15 Regularly update and maintain the neighborhood database contact information and provide regular communication between residents and the City.HN-9 CI 16 Ensure new neighborhoods establish an owners association.HN-9 PL 17 Provide technical assistance to existing neighborhoods for establishing or improving neighborhood associations.HN-9 PL 18 Encourage the formation of neighborhood activity committees to foster greater interaction among neighbors.HN-9 CI 19 Monitor homeownership levels in neighborhoods and when necessary implement programs to encourage ownership of affordable homes and owner occupancy in areas with high concentrations of rental single-family housing. HN-1, HN-4 PL/CE 20 Monitor the physical condition of neighborhoods and as necessary establish programs focused on housing rehabilitation and neighborhood revitalization.HN-1, HN-8 CE 21 Ensure that owners, managers, and residents of rental property improve and maintain the safety, durability, and livability of rental housing.HN-8 CE 22 Provide start-up assistance to neighborhoods that want to establish community gardens and modify the development regulations to encourage the set aside of areas for community gardens in new development and redevelopment areas. HN-9 PR 23 Encourage alley-loaded garages in new developments to reduce the visibility of vehicle parking from neighborhood streets and to reduce safety conflicts between pedestrians and automobiles in neighborhoods. HN-5 PL 24 Coordinate with CISD to develop a walking school bus program for elementary schools throughout the city.HN-9 ENG Code Department Name BI Building Inspections CMO City Manager’s Office CE Code Enforcement CI Community Information ED Economic Development ENG Engineering PR Parks and Recreation PL Planning PW Public Works City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 132Chapter 5: ImplementationCOPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN No. Redevelopment Areas Implementation Actions Plan Policy Responsible Departments Short-term Actions 1 Adopt application and review procedures for the retrofitting and redevelopment of targeted activity centers.RA-2, RA-9 PL/ED 2 Adopt a policy for public-private financing of new street improvements and streetscaping in mixed-use activity centers, including maintenance responsibilities of improvements in the public right-of-way. RA-5, RA-6 ED/CMO 3 Examine the financial incentives that may be available to developers and potential public- private partnerships to assist with retrofitting and redevelopment of targeted activity centers.RA-1, RA-2 ED/PL/CMO 4 Develop a municipal revenue impact statement that is completed for all redevelopment proposals to ensure the best long-term use of redevelopment sites.RA-1 ED/CMO 5 Create a redevelopment oversight organization with representatives from appropriate City departments, boards and committees to coordinate redevelopment activities.RA-2 ED/CMO 6 Adopt a redevelopment incentive package that provides for financial, development and procedural incentives for targeted redevelopment areas.RA-2 ED/CMO 7 Revise the development regulations to facilitate higher intensity, mixed use development and include incentive provisions for the provision of public amenities, shared parking, housing, etc. RA-2 PL Mid-term Actions 8 Create redevelopment districts for priority redevelopment areas to provide tax increment financing or other public funding mechanisms to facilitate redevelopment RA-6 ED/CMO 9 Create parking management districts to facilitate shared parking and the construction of parking facilities.RA-6 PL/ED/CMO 10 Prepare detailed redevelopment plans for each of the targeted redevelopment areas.RA-5 PL/ED Long-term Actions Ongoing 11 Assist with land assembly as needed to promote targeted redevelopment projects.RA-2, RA-3 ED 12 Apply for funding grants and other funding opportunities to assist with the construction of multi-modal street and infrastructure improvements as a demonstration project and catalyst to support redevelopment of a targeted area into a mixed-use activity center, such as the implementation of a multi-way boulevard concept. RA-5, RA-6 ED/ENG 13 Participate in the development of civic spaces and community facilities in mixed-use activity centers when appropriate in order to provide needed community places, facilities, and civic amenities. RA-3 PR 14 Recruit developers to partner with the City to redevelop priority areas.RA-2 ED/CMO 15 Coordinate with DART to ensure future rail transit facilities are compatible with the City’s land use goals.RA-9 ED/CMO Redevelopment Areas Implementation Actions Code Department Name BI Building Inspections CMO City Manager’s Office CE Code Enforcement CI Community Information ED Economic Development ENG Engineering PR Parks and Recreation PL Planning PW Public Works City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 APPENDIX A Community PROFILE COPPELL 2030 PLAN Demographics and Market Analysis Planning Context WRANGLER DRIVE AIRLINE DRIVE BELT LINE ROADSOUTHWESTERN BLVD. FRITZ DR.FREEPORT PKWY.BLVD.WETAG AY DART RAILROAD COPPELL RD.ROYALBETHEL RD.ANELRUBY RD.ROYALLANESANDY LAKE ROAD COPPELL ROADPAR K W AYBLV D DENTON TAP ROADPARKWA Y BLVD. SANDY LAKE ROAD ROADSAMUELMOOREBLVD.PARKWAY BLVD.MACAR T HURBLV D . SA N D Y AKLE ROADBLVD.RUHTRACAMRVIERC H A S EDR.BELT LINE ROAD DART RAILROAD BETHEL SCHOOL RD.HEARTZ ROADDENTON TAP ROADOMCKINGRIBDLANEBETHE L S CHOOL ROAD ROAD LINE S H.21.1 COPPELL RD.BETHEL RD. I H 63 5 I H 6 3 5 CREEKVIEW DR. BELTFREEPORT PKWY.DIVIDEND DRIVE POINT WESTDRIVE04000 2000 4000 LEGEND 2 Lane Undivided ( 60' R.O.W. ) 4 Lane Undivided ( 70' R.O.W. ) 4 Lane Divided ( 90' R.O.W. ) 6 Lane Divided ( 110' R.O.W. ) 4 Lane Divided in a 6 Lane DividedRight-of-Way. ( 110' R.O.W. ) Does Not Meet Current Thoroughfare Plan Meets Current Thoroughfare Plan Proposed Thoroughfare DATE: 05/27/08 CITY OF COPPELL MAJOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN 0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% Under 18 years 18-24 years 25-44 years 45-64 years Over 65 years Coppell Texas U.S. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Introduction A3 Overview A3 Purpose of a Comprehensive Plan A4 Basis in State Law A4 Charter Provisions A4 Demographics and Market Analysis A5 Demographics Population Trends A5 Population & Household Forecasts A6 Age & Income A7 Households & Housing A8 Preliminary Market Overview for Coppell Residential Property Values A9 Fundamentals: Household Growth A10 Retail Fundamentals A12 Employment Space Fundamentals A13 Fundamentals of Light Rail A14 Conclusions A14 Planning Context A15 Coppell Vision 2030 A16 Goals and Objectives A16 Coppell 2030 City Government Mission Statement A27 1996 Comprehensive Plan A31 Existing Land Use Map A32 Future Land Use Plan A33 North Lake A34 Parks and Recreation Master Plan A35 Parks, Trails & Sidewalk Map A36 Old Coppell Master Plan A37 Thoroughfare Plan A39 C.I.V.I.C Report A40 Streetscape Plan A40 Regional Planning Issues A41 Economic Development Strategic Plan A42 Five Year Plan A42 Table of Contents City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileIntroduction A3COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Overview The City of Coppell Comprehensive Plan was last updated in 1996 during a period of rapid growth for the community. Coppell is now almost fully developed and is at the point that citizens are focusing on preserving the integrity of what is good in the city, looking at innovative ways to complete remaining development areas, and addressing problematic elements within the community. The recently completed Coppell 2030 Plan (April 2009), the Old Coppell Master Plan (2002), and the City’s other past and current planning efforts serve as a framework and vision for updating the Comprehensive Plan. The purpose of this workbook is to provide background information and analysis related to the community planning process and the preparation of the Coppell 2030 Comprehensive Plan. This workbook: • Provides information about existing conditions; • Provides information about current and past planning efforts in the area; • Serves as the common frame of reference for visioning and goal setting sessions to be conducted during the planning process; • Identifies key planning issues that need to be addressed when planning for 2030. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA4 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Purpose of a Comprehensive Plan The Coppell 2030 Comprehensive Plan is intended to serve as the policy guide and “vision” for the future of Coppell and long-term community planning activities. This Plan officially updates and replaces the previous Plan adopted in 1996. The Plan builds on Coppell 2030 and its recommendations for: quality future programs and services, ensuring financial stability, sustaining the city’s infrastructure, maintaining our neighborhoods, supporting our business community and promoting all of the other elements that make up a desirable community. The Coppell 2030 Comprehensive Plan: • Establishes the community’s vision for the future development of the City, including land use and development options for the North Lake property owned by the City; • Provides a framework for allocating City resources through the budgeting process and for providing municipal services; • Provides a basis for considering and evaluating land use decisions, and planning for future development and redevelopment projects; • Integrates other City plans and policies in a cohesive manner; and • Provides implementation strategies. Introduction Basis In State Law Chapter 213 of the Texas Local Government Code provides the basis for comprehensive planning in Texas. This chapter reads in part: Sec. 213.002. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. (a) The governing body of a municipality may adopt a comprehensive plan for the long-range development of the municipality. A municipality may define the content and design of a comprehensive plan. (b) A comprehensive plan may: (1) include but is not limited to provisions on land use, transportation, and public facilities; (2) consist of a single plan or a coordinated set of plans organized by subject and geographic area; and (3) be used to coordinate and guide the establishment of development regulations. (c) A municipality may define, in its charter or by ordinance, the relationship between a comprehensive plan and development regulations and may provide standards for determining the consistency required between a plan and development regulations. (d) Land use assumptions adopted in a manner that complies with Subchapter C, Chapter 395, may be incorporated in a comprehensive plan. One of the primary ways in which a municipality regulates the development of land within its jurisdiction is through the implementation of a zoning ordinance. Here again, the comprehensive plan serves as the basis upon which all zoning decisions must be made. Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code requires that all zoning decisions must be consistent with a municipal comprehensive plan. That chapter reads in part: Sec. 211.004. COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. (a) Zoning regulations must be adopted in accordance with a comprehensive plan and must be designed to: (1) lessen congestion in the streets; (2) secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers; (3) promote health and the general welfare; (4) provide adequate light and air; (5) prevent the overcrowding of land; (6) avoid undue concentration of population; or (7) facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewers, schools, parks, and other public requirements. Charter Provisions The City of Coppell’s home rule charter also provides a basis for comprehensive planning. This charter provision provides broad authority to the City Council to include within the comprehensive plan policies that guide all municipal ordinances related to the physical development of the community. Article 9 – Planning of the charter reads in part: SECTION 9.01 - POWERS OF THE CITY The city shall have the power to adopt and enforce: A. A master plan to be used as a guide in considering passage of ordinances for the orderly growth and development of the city. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA5COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Demographics Coppell and Comparison Areas Population Trends (1970-2009) Population Trends Coppell and the surrounding region have experienced rapid population growth since 1970. This growth has generally slowed in the past decade in inner-ring suburbs such as Coppell and Irving. Cities to the north of Coppell (Flower Mound and Lewisville) have the highest population growth rates since 1990. According to 2008 U.S. Census estimates, the Dallas-Ft. Worth-Arlington metropolitan statistical area (MSA) added more population from 2000 to 2008 (more than 1.1 million people) than any other MSA in the nation. The table to the right is updated based on 2009 NCTCOG data. The Dallas-Ft. Worth urban area grew by more than 25 percent from 2000 to 2009. Coppell and Comparison Areas Population Growth Index (1990-2008) Source: U.S. Census (1970-2000), NCTCOG (2009 estimate) Source: U.S. Census Note: The growth index measures the rate of population growth over time, with 1990 as the base year (index of 1.00) 2000-2009 City 1970 1980 1990 2000 2009 Growth Coppell 1,728 3,826 16,881 35,958 39,550 10.0% Carrollton 13,855 40,595 82,169 109,576 120,950 10.4% Farmers Branch 27,492 24,863 24,250 27,508 31,100 13.1% Flower Mound 1,685 4,402 15,527 50,702 62,800 23.9% Grapevine 7,049 11,801 29,198 42,059 47,950 14.0% Irving 97,260 109,943 155,037 191,615 212,250 10.8% Lewisville 9,264 24,273 46,521 77,737 95,250 22.5% County 1970 1980 1990 2000 2009 Growth Dallas County 1,327,696 1,556,419 1,852,810 2,218,899 2,471,000 11.4% Denton County 75,633 143,126 273,775 432,976 628,300 45.1% Tarrant County 715,587 860,880 1,170,103 1,446,219 1,807,750 25.0% Region 1970 1980 1990 2000 2009 Growth Urban Area* 2,351,569 2,930,545 3,885,415 5,030,828 6,293,700 25.1% NCTCOG Region** 2,506,618 3,116,181 4,111,750 5,309,277 6,637,230 25.0% * 9 counties ** 16 counties From 1990 to 1999, Coppell grew steadily at about 7 percent per year. The city’s population then grew by 29 percent between 1999 to 2001. Population growth has slowed since 2002 as the amount of vacant land has diminished and growth has moved further north. 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 1990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008Coppell Flower Mound(2008: 4.46)Lewisville Grapevine Carrollton Irving Farmers Branch Dallas Co.Tarrant Co. Denton C o. 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 1990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008Coppell Flower Mound(2008: 4.46)Lewisville Grapevine Carrollton Irving Farmers Branch Dallas Co.Tarrant Co. Denton C o. Demographics & Market Analysis City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA6 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 35,958 42,05741,30139,84338,051 42,442 42,636 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 35,958 42,05741,30139,84338,051 42,442 42,636 Source: 2006-2008 American Community Survey, U.S. Census The graph to the left shows population forecasts for Coppell for every five years until 2030. Using ESRI 2009- 2014 forecast data as a base, the 2030 forecast assumes that Coppell will continue to grow but at a lower rate in each successive five-year increment after 2010. This is due to the fact that the amount of available land for development will continue to decline. Updated NCTCOG demographic forecasts will be incorporated into these projections when they are updated in January 2010. See page 9 of this report for more recent and detailed projections of demographic change within Coppell from 2009 to 2014. Coppell Population Forecasts Source: U.S. Census estimates; BWR projections based on ESRI BIS 2009-2014 data. Note: Updated population forecasts from NCTCOG will be available in January 2010. Average Household Size The average household size in Coppell and the greater Dallas-Fort Worth area have sharply increased since 1990, especially compared to the national average. 2000-2030 Population Growth 2000-2030 Employment Growth NCTCOG 2030 Forecast Maps NCTCOG 2030 forecast maps reveal high growth in the north suburbs and employment growth along major highway corridors. Population growth in Coppell and other “inner-ring suburbs is expected to be modest. Population & Household Forecasts Census Census Area 1990 2000 ACS 2010 2020 2030 Coppell 2.81 2.94 2.94 2.92 2.92 2.92 DFW Urban Area 2.61 2.69 2.79 2.69 2.68 2.68 Texas 2.73 2.74 2.82 N/A N/A N/A United States 2.63 2.59 2.61 N/A N/A N/A NCTCOG Projections2006-2008 City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA7COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN 0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% Under 18 years 18-24 years 25-44 years 45-64 years Over 65 years Coppell Texas U.S. Age & Income Coppell Total Population by Age Group Source: 2009 Adjusted Claritas (Coppell); U.S. Census 2008 Estimates (Texas and U.S.) Annual Median Household Income Source: 2009 Adjusted Claritas Source: 2006-2008 American Community Survey $0 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 $100,000 $120,000 Irving Texas United States DFW Urban Area Lewisville Farmers Branch Carrollton Grapevine Coppell Flower Mound Coppell has a much greater share of its population under the age of 18 than state and national averages. Coppell also has a much lower percentage of elderly residents. See page 11 for projections of household change by age cohort from 2009 to 2014. $108,057 Over $500,000 (3.7%) $100,000 to $149,999 (23.1%) $150,000 to 249,999 (21.0%) $250,000 to $499,999 (7.6%) $25,000 to $34,999 (3.6%) $35,000 to 49,999 (7.6%) $75,000 to $99,999 (14.1%) $50,000 to 74,999 (14.9%) $15,000 to $24,999 (2.2%) Under $15,000 (2.4%) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Percent of households Over $500,000 (3.7%) $100,000 to $149,999 (23.1%) $150,000 to 249,999 (21.0%) $250,000 to $499,999 (7.6%) $25,000 to $34,999 (3.6%) $35,000 to 49,999 (7.6%) $75,000 to $99,999 (14.1%) $50,000 to 74,999 (14.9%) $15,000 to $24,999 (2.2%) Under $15,000 (2.4%) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Percent of households Coppell Household Income Distribution Coppell has a high median household income at $111,427 annually, one of the highest in the DFW metroplex. A majority of Coppell households have annual incomes above $100,000. Only 16 percent of households have an annual income of less than $50,000. See page 11 for projections of household change by income from 2009 to 2014. Median Household Income: $111,427 Demographics & Market Analysis City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA8 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Households & Housing Coppell Housing Units by Value Household Type Total Households Percent of Total Households With own children under 18 Percent with children Percent Homeowners Married-couple family household 9,460 66.8% 5,777 61.1% 88.4% Male householder, no wife present, family 542 3.8% 311 57.4% 49.3% Female householder, no husband present, family 1,216 8.6% 1,081 88.9% 49.5% Nonfamily household 2,950 20.8% 0 0.0% 50.8% Total 14,168 7,169 50.6% 75.8% Source: 2009 Adjusted Claritas Only 14 percent of owner-occupied homes in Coppell are valued at less than $150,000. Two-thirds of households in Coppell are married-couple family households and half of the households in Coppell have children under 18 years of age. Single-parent and non-family households are much more likely to rent housing compared to married-couple households. Coppell Household Types Housing Units by YearHousing Units by Type of Structure Housing Tenure Source: 2006-2008 American Community Survey, U.S. Census More than 70 percent of housing units in Coppell are single units and are owner-occupied. 61 percent of housing units have been built since 1990. Coppell Housing Characteristics Owner Occupied (73.7%) Renter Occupied (26.3%) Owner Occupied (73.7%) Renter Occupied (26.3%) 1999-2007 (22.0%)1989 and older (38.8%) 1990-1998 (39.2%) 1999-2007 (22.0%)1989 and older (38.8%) 1990-1998 (39.2%) Single Unit (76.1%) 50+ Units (5.7%) 3 to 19 Units (14.3%)2 Units (0.4%) 20 to 49 Units (1.6%) Other Unit Type (1.9%) Single Unit (76.1%) 50+ Units (5.7%) 3 to 19 Units (14.3%)2 Units (0.4%) 20 to 49 Units (1.6%) Other Unit Type (1.9%) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1 Percent of Owner-occupied housing units Less than $100,000 $300,000 to $399,999 Over $500,000 $400,000 to $499,999 $100,000 to $149,999 $200,000 to $299,999 $150,000 to $199,999 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1 Percent of Owner-occupied housing units Less than $100,000 $300,000 to $399,999 Over $500,000 $400,000 to $499,999 $100,000 to $149,999 $200,000 to $299,999 $150,000 to $199,999 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Coppell DFW MSA U.S. Compared to the metroplex and the United States as a whole, housing units in Coppell are more affordable to its residents. Percentage of households that spend at least 30% of their income on housing Source: 2006-2008 American Community Survey, U.S. Census City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA9COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Demographics & Market Analysis Preliminary Market Overview for Coppell Today, residential areas of Coppell with the highest property valuations are primarily the newest or developing neighborhoods, typically located around the fringe of the city. Residential property values tend to be lower in established neighborhoods in the central portion of the city. Residential Property Values City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA10 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Preliminary Market Overview for Coppell Change in the metro Dallas area shows strong household growth, but at lower income levels, smaller household size and higher rental level than those seen in Coppell. Since housing markets are regional, a new DART light rail station will introduce new opportunities for Coppell that are likely to increase the number and types of units feasible. Source: ESRI BIS • Household growth in the local area is concentrated in households between 25 to 34 years of age and households over 55 years of age. • Greatest growth is in households with income between $50,000 to $99,999 per year, followed by households with income of $100,000 or more. • This demographic split indicates a need for units of medium value and higher that will appeal to seniors and units for young households. Fundamentals: Household Growth Projections for demographic change within Coppell from 2009 to 2014 are shown in the table below. • There will be demand for a moderate number of units in Coppell by 2014 • The challenge is financing in the current economy, not market demand • Project financing can be more difficult than individual mortgage financing • Almost all demand is for owner units rather than rentals $4,965 $164,215$159,250$117,974Average Household Income $(3,079)$121,944$125,023$96,208Median Household Income -0.733.734.433.3Median Age 7%28%29%23%Percent Renter HU's 28 3,827 3,799 2,786 Renter Occupied HUs 404 9,725 9,321 9,425 Owner Occupied HUs 3.35 3.03 3.01 2.94 Average Household Size 148%24%22%20%Percent Non-Family 258 3,205 2,947 2,424 Non-Family Households 174 10,347 10,173 9,787 Families 432 13,552 13,120 12,211 Households 1,448 41,001 39,553 35,958 Population 09 to 14201420092000 Demographic Change: Coppell, Texas $4,965 $164,215$159,250$117,974Average Household Income $(3,079)$121,944$125,023$96,208Median Household Income -0.733.734.433.3Median Age 7%28%29%23%Percent Renter HU's 28 3,827 3,799 2,786 Renter Occupied HUs 404 9,725 9,321 9,425 Owner Occupied HUs 3.35 3.03 3.01 2.94 Average Household Size 148%24%22%20%Percent Non-Family 258 3,205 2,947 2,424 Non-Family Households 174 10,347 10,173 9,787 Families 432 13,552 13,120 12,211 Households 1,448 41,001 39,553 35,958 Population 09 to 14201420092000 Demographic Change: Coppell, Texas City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA11COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Source: ESRI BIS Demographics & Market Analysis Source: Dallas Central Appraisal District $4,431 $87,640$83,209$64,077Average Household Income $2,499 $65,984$63,485$47,789Median Household Income 0.133.533.432.0Median Age 18%37%40%40%Percent Renter HU's 2.89 2.78 2.77 2.70 Average Household Size 58%32%31%31%Percent Non-Family 265,8022,559,4962,293,6941,881,056Households 09 to 14201420092000 Demographic Change: Dallas MSA $4,431 $87,640$83,209$64,077Average Household Income $2,499 $65,984$63,485$47,789Median Household Income 0.133.533.432.0Median Age 18%37%40%40%Percent Renter HU's 2.89 2.78 2.77 2.70 Average Household Size 58%32%31%31%Percent Non-Family 265,8022,559,4962,293,6941,881,056Households 09 to 14201420092000 Demographic Change: Dallas MSA City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA12 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Preliminary Market Overview for Coppell Retail Fundamentals The following chart enumerates consumer spending by residents of Coppell. The estimate of spending change shows support for retail in Coppell that is growing modestly, but still may be captured by existing retail businesses. The creation of any major new retail will require a strategy for location that captures outside-of-area spending, but there may be opportunities for existing business to expand or enhance offerings to increase capture. Further information about current retail supply is needed to complete this picture. As with housing, a primary barrier to expanding business opportunity despite market trends is the current lack of financing. Many businesses with long- standing credit lines that are necessary to fund gaps between receivables and payables have had these credit lines removed and are unable to expand. New businesses are risky and are currently finding difficulty in financing and meeting equity requirements to allay risk. $30,922$505,687$474,765Totals $672$10,993$10,321Smoking Products $210$3,442$3,232School Books and Supplies $746$12,195$11,449Personal Care Products $763$12,474$11,712Lawn & Garden $2,674$43,737$41,063Household Furnishings/Equip/Supplies $137$2,237$2,100Eyeglasses $1,023$16,737$15,714Drug $6,265$102,460$96,195Restaurant $9,971$163,058$153,087Food/Beverage at Home $293$4,791$4,498Reading $234$3,823$3,589Photo $572$9,348$8,777Toys, Sports Equip $958$15,670$14,712Pets $2,237$36,591$34,354TV/Video/Sound $306$5,001$4,695Movie/ Ent Admissions $450$7,352$6,903Computers and Software $3,411$55,776$52,365Apparel and Services Change (in Thousands) 2014 (in Thousands) 2009 (in Thousands)Consumer Spending - Coppell Residents $30,922$505,687$474,765Totals $672$10,993$10,321Smoking Products $210$3,442$3,232School Books and Supplies $746$12,195$11,449Personal Care Products $763$12,474$11,712Lawn & Garden $2,674$43,737$41,063Household Furnishings/Equip/Supplies $137$2,237$2,100Eyeglasses $1,023$16,737$15,714Drug $6,265$102,460$96,195Restaurant $9,971$163,058$153,087Food/Beverage at Home $293$4,791$4,498Reading $234$3,823$3,589Photo $572$9,348$8,777Toys, Sports Equip $958$15,670$14,712Pets $2,237$36,591$34,354TV/Video/Sound $306$5,001$4,695Movie/ Ent Admissions $450$7,352$6,903Computers and Software $3,411$55,776$52,365Apparel and Services Change (in Thousands) 2014 (in Thousands) 2009 (in Thousands)Consumer Spending - Coppell Residents City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA13COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Employment Space Fundamentals Coppell has employers that in 2008 provided almost 22,000 local jobs, and within 10 miles of Coppell there are over 1 million jobs. Source: Local Employment Dynamics, US Census, 2008 Demographics & Market Analysis 2.5%10,246255Public Administration 3.9%24,542966Other Services (excluding Public Administration) 1.5%81,4451,250Accommodation and Food Services 2.3%10,356241Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 3.1%72,0922,259Health Care and Social Assistance 3.3%54,6751,810Educational Services 1.0%107,9611,042Administration, Waste Management, Remediation 5.4%18,242985Management of Companies and Enterprises 1.9%82,6851,603Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 1.3%27,267351Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 1.6%87,6171,420Finance and Insurance 1.4%35,147478Information 1.7%73,5481,215Transportation and Warehousing 1.6%103,8941,709Retail Trade 3.7%85,3683,130Wholesale Trade 2.0%70,3951,417Manufacturing 3.0%57,3171,719Construction 1.2%1,53318Utilities 0.1%5,5816Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction 0.5%5843Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting Coppell Share10 Mi. RadiusCoppell 2008 Jobs by Industry Type (2-digit NAICS) 2.1%455,7519,364More than $3,333 per month 2.4%348,9758,389$1,251 to $3,333 per month 2.0%205,7674,124$1,250 per month or less Coppell Share10 Mi. RadiusCoppell2008 Jobs by Earnings Paid 2.2%1,010,49521,8772008 Total All Jobs Coppell Share10 Mi. RadiusCoppell 2.5%10,246255Public Administration 3.9%24,542966Other Services (excluding Public Administration) 1.5%81,4451,250Accommodation and Food Services 2.3%10,356241Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 3.1%72,0922,259Health Care and Social Assistance 3.3%54,6751,810Educational Services 1.0%107,9611,042Administration, Waste Management, Remediation 5.4%18,242985Management of Companies and Enterprises 1.9%82,6851,603Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 1.3%27,267351Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 1.6%87,6171,420Finance and Insurance 1.4%35,147478Information 1.7%73,5481,215Transportation and Warehousing 1.6%103,8941,709Retail Trade 3.7%85,3683,130Wholesale Trade 2.0%70,3951,417Manufacturing 3.0%57,3171,719Construction 1.2%1,53318Utilities 0.1%5,5816Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction 0.5%5843Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting Coppell Share10 Mi. RadiusCoppell 2008 Jobs by Industry Type (2-digit NAICS) 2.1%455,7519,364More than $3,333 per month 2.4%348,9758,389$1,251 to $3,333 per month 2.0%205,7674,124$1,250 per month or less Coppell Share10 Mi. RadiusCoppell2008 Jobs by Earnings Paid 2.2%1,010,49521,8772008 Total All Jobs Coppell Share10 Mi. RadiusCoppell City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA14 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Preliminary Market Overview for Coppell Unemployment in Dallas County was at 8.7 percent in October 2009, up from a low of 3.3 percent in 2001. In 2008, unemployment rose from 4.4 percent to 7.5 percent in response to the downturn in the national economy. Despite the rising unemployment figures, employment increased in Coppell from 2004 to 2008 by over 4,200 jobs. The problem in the Dallas metro area is most likely not a collapse of employment, but job creation that is not keeping pace with population change as new employment age people enter the market. Light rail in Coppell offers opportunities for employment as the access provided increases the range of available job candidates, a favorable situation for any employer choosing to locate near the station. With this in mind, in further analysis we will examine the impact of light rail in employment location and the potential for Coppell. Fundamentals of Light Rail Light rail can offer development opportunities to Coppell that can enhance the market potential for housing and employment. In a study of over 60 rail stations and their surrounding environments completed for the Portland metro area Westside rail, we found the following: • The demographics of users and residents near light rail tend to be higher income people in professional and technical occupations. • Employers will locate near light rail because it gives them an advantage by increasing the radius of available employees and by lowering the time and cost of commuting. • People are willing to relocate as residents near light rail, even if they only use the service periodically, because it offers more options for travel to the central city for work, entertainment, and other cultural events. • Developers like light rail for two reasons: fixed guideway transit and demographics. When there is a fixed guideway, the transit improvement cannot be moved as can a bus route, for instance. This means that the amenity being relied on is there for the foreseeable future and creates certainty for potential residents and employers that may rely upon it. The demographics for light rail indicate a higher end market for housing because of the occupations of the typical ridership. • Parking can be reduced by the mode share of the transit, reducing development costs on a site-by-site basis, particularly if employers engage in demand management, a cost savings not available without the fixed investment of light rail. For the reasons above, it may be that a DART system station can offer new opportunities to the city of Coppell that can enhance the local economy and add to the already livable environment. Conclusions • Underlying fundamentals for housing indicate demand over a five-year period that may be pent up for several years due to financial and economic uncertainty. • Underlying demand for retail over the next five years exists, but again will likely be pent up until financial constraints ease and consumers experience more confidence in outlook. • The presence of a light rail station in Coppell will provide a new location attractive to employers and housing developers. Employment and housing in Coppell, aided by the attractiveness of increased access provided by light rail may make new development more feasible and less risky than at other locations. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA15COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Planning Context In order to be successful, the Coppell 2030 Comprehensive Plan must build on the meaningful input from the community as well as prior community planning efforts. As such, the Comprehensive Plan provides an opportunity to coordinate and validate the goals, objectives and policies from numerous adopted citywide plans and studies. This section provides an inventory and brief summary of the City’s policy plans and studies pertinent to community planning. Coppell Vision 2030 Coppell Vision 2030 provides the community’s overall vision, as well as recommended Strategies, Goals, and Objectives for achieving the community vision. The following pages identify the community’s recommended Strategies, Goals, and Objectives to achieve their desired community in 2030. Coppell 2030 – A Family Community for a Lifetime 3 PASSION FOR COPPELL A FAMILY COMMUNITY FOR A LIFETIME Coppell 2030 - Our Vision Coppell is A Family Community for a Lifetime Coppell residents choose to make Coppell their hometown because of our Small Town Feel, our Inviting Community Gathering Places, our Active, Healthy Lifestyle for All, our Top Quality Schools, and our Diverse Faith-Based Values. Coppell is our Special Place to Live because of our Beautiful Green City, our Great Livable Neighborhoods, our Viable Community Commercial Centers, our Prosperous Business Center and our Convenient Access and Effective Mobility. We have a PASSION FOR COPPELL City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA16 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN • Help new residents make Coppell their hometown • Develop effective programs for welcoming new residents from all cultures • Strengthen community and civic orientation programs • Increase the involvement and commitment to Coppell among adult residents of all cultures • Provide meaningful incentives to get residents involved in the community New Residents Welcomed and Involved • Develop and support a variety of community events • Increase resident attendance at community events and festivals • Develop cultural events that welcome all residents • Support small scale events aimed at Coppell residents (age and interest specific) • Expand community parades • Support successful community gardens and other “Green” initiatives Successful Community Events and Festivals • Businesses support and contribute to community organizations and events • Residents volunteer, contribute and support community events and organizations • Businesses support and sponsor city programs, services and events • Residents involved in City Government on Boards, Commissions and Committees • Residents actively involved in and take responsibility for their neighborhoods Residents and Businesses Engaged and Contributing to Community Sense of Community Goals and Objectives City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA17COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Effective Community Partnerships • Promote a sense of ownership in the Coppell community among businesses and residents • Increase understanding among various cultural groups • Enhance effective relationships between City and residents • Strengthen effective partnerships between City and School districts • Enhance effective collaboration between City and Community and Service organizations • Strengthen effective cooperation between City and the faith-based community • Support mentoring programs for young people • Broaden relationship with the senior citizen community • Enhance and develop leadership programs • Expand residents’ interest and understanding of City Government • Increase participation on City Boards, Commissions, Task Forces, Committees and Programs • Increase opportunities for youth leadership • Involve “retired” elected officials as leaders emeritus • Increase voter turnout in elections Future Civic and Community Leaders Development Sense of Community Planning Context City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA18 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN • Support housing for all stages of life available in Coppell • Maintain high percentage of home ownership • Ensure attractive, well- maintained homes (single- family and multi-family) • Assure that all homes (owner- occupied and rental) meet current City codes and ordinances • Promote new urban housing with density in selected locations, such as zero lot line homes, townhouses, condos and mixed-use development • Become the model “Green” community demonstrating best practices • Provide incentives for beautification and “Greening” • Ensure well-maintained neighborhood, public infrastructure including streets, alleys, utilities and fences • Ensure well-maintained private infrastructure including entrances, fences and common areas • Incorporate xeriscape concepts in landscape design • Adapt building standards to include “Green” concepts and methods for construction and developments • Develop and enhance an effective code compliance for assuring that homes, both owner-occupied and rental, meet codes • Upgrade neighborhood infrastructure, including streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks • Ensure that homeowners take responsibility for maintaining their homes and yards • Develop attractive, well- designed, mixed-use developments that integrate professional offices, small scale retail, public space and residential in areas such as Old Coppell, Sandy Lake / MacArthur, Sandy Lake / Denton Tap, and Belt Line / Belt Line • Upgrade appearance and quality of neighborhood commercial properties • Develop and support strong neighborhood associations with active resident involvement Quality Housing for Family Generations Beautiful Green City Revitalizing Neighborhoods Special Place to Live Goals and Objectives City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA19COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN • Provide efficient local traffic flow • Expand safe and usable sidewalks and trails connecting the community gathering places, parks, neighborhoods and other destinations of interest • Provide well-maintained streets and sidewalks • Develop effective alternative public transportation options to take residents to desired destinations within Coppell • Comply with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessibility: sidewalks, trails, public transportation • Increase safety for automobiles, bikes and pedestrians • Participate in regional rail service to Dallas - Fort Worth region • Maintain and enhance accessibility to DFW Airport • Determine level of participation in a regional transportation authority • Maintain and enhance convenient access to all major thoroughfares • Develop regional connections for Coppell residents and employees of Coppell businesses Quality Mobility Within Coppell Easy Access to Dallas - Fort Worth Region Special Place to Live Planning Context City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA20 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Goals and Objectives • Develop Old Coppell as a mixed-use development with retail, restaurants, entertainment, professional offices, Farmers’ Market, living opportunities around a square • Enhance parks as destination for sports, Wagon Wheel, Andy Brown and MacArthur • Enhance Town Center area as Coppell’s civic center: City Hall, Library, Municipal Justice Center, Fire Station and Plaza • Enhance Andy Brown East with a variety of venues for events and passive recreation and enjoyment for picnics and gatherings • Complete Grapevine Springs Park and facilities Center with a variety of venues, programs and services for all generations • Expand programs and services that support personal health, fitness and wellness • Maintain and enhance youth and adult recreational sports • Expand Aquatic and Recreation Center facilities including classes, fitness training and programming space • Support success of community gardens • Expand relationship with non- profit sports associations and Coppell I.S.D. • Develop and maintain the Town Center Plaza and the square in Old Coppell for small scale performances and presentations • Create an organization to direct, promote and coordinate arts in the city • Maintain and support the Theatre Coppell and expand opportunities for performing arts programs and venues • Develop outdoor performing arts venues for major productions • Develop and maintain effective relationship with arts organizations Community Gathering Places Recreation Programs and Services for All Generations Expand Cultural Arts Amenities and Opportunities Community Wellness and Enrichment City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA21COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN • Establish a reputation as a community that values personal wellness and fitness • Promote high-quality medical and healthcare service accessible for Coppell residents • Maintain high-quality emergency response by the City • Expand City facilities and programs with venues for personal fitness and wellness • Foster a community that values personal wellness and fitness • Support the expansion of adult and continuing education programs and services for personal and professional development enrichment • Expand and support the City Library programs and services • Expand City Library space such as”mini” auditorium, computer lab and business center • Promote safe schools • Promote and expand “Green” education programs in schools • Support Nature Park • Support education programs and services for children and youth • Complete and maintain multi- use trail system that links city parks and other communities’ trails such as soft surfaces • Ensure sidewalks connectivity throughout the city • Create safe routes for bicycles • Maintain a well-marked trail system • Provide Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) access to trail system Residents Wellness and Longevity Community Education Programs and Support of Top Quality Schools Multi-Use Trail System Connecting the City Community Wellness and Enrichment Planning Context City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA22 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN • Create incentives for business retention and redevelopment • Attract the “right” businesses to Coppell in the “right” locations and expand support and auxiliary businesses to help existing businesses • Stay abreast of legislation and new opportunities that impact economic development • Expand participation from local businesses especially non retail to contribute and be involved in the community and create a value for them to do it • Develop the “Coppell Brand” as a valued address for business • Develop a “gateway” at the corner of I-635 and Belt Line - Point West with a high-quality hotel, offices, warehouses retail and restaurants • Differentiate Coppell from other communities along major highways • Develop State Highway 121 with infill retail and professional offices • Attract high-quality hotels with dining opportunities nearby • Increase visibility of commercial corridors through more effective signage • Develop Old Coppell that is pedestrian-friendly • Develop an Old Town Square framed by small niche retail businesses, commercial businesses, restaurants, professional offices, townhouses and condos • Provide easily accessible with convenient parking in Old Coppell • Make Old Coppell as an attractive destination for shopping, eating and entertainment • Increase opportunities for living in Old Coppell Retention and Attraction of Businesses that Generate Revenues for the City Major Retail and Top Quality Business Office Park Along I-635 & State Highway Old Coppell as a Small Town Village Business Prosperity Goals and Objectives City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA23COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN • Promote redevelopment of shopping centers to improve business vitality and appearance • Promote redevelopment retail center at Denton Tap / East Belt Line • Match retail businesses with current and future resident base • Promote redevelopment of MacArthur / Sandy Lake into an attractive, well-designed, mixed-use development with public spaces • Recognize Coppell’s niche retail businesses - unique stores that draw residents and non- residents • Provide opportunities for executive suites or small offices with ownership opportunities • Support mixed-use developments such as options for work-life space • Provide services in Library for local home-based offices • Provide a “mail/delivery drop” business in retail centers to cut down on neighborhood nuisance • Ensure that home-based businesses comply with city ordinances and regulations Community Commercial Centers Home Offices and Home Based Businesses Business Prosperity Planning Context City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA24 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN • Provide City services and facilities that are valued by residents and consistent with the City’s mission • Provide opportunity for feedback from residents on City services and service delivery • Determine the residents’ and businesses’ needs and the role of the City as the service provider • Use technology to operate more efficiently and effectively • Maintain high level of customer satisfaction with City services • Incorporate “Green” concepts where economically feasible in new City facilities • Use more fuel-efficient City vehicles • Explore alternative water sources for irrigation purposes • Develop or redevelop all City properties with xeriscape techniques where appropriate • Convert to alternative energy sources where economically feasible • Maintain and fund preventative maintenance plans for City infrastructure and facilities • Ensure facilities have capacity to support future growth • Reduce maintenance costs of City infrastructure maintenance • Build new City facilities only if the City has the financial resources to maintain Excellent City Services with High Level of Customer Satisfaction “Green” City Operations and Facilities Excellent and Well Maintained City Infrastructure and Facilities Sustainable City Government Goals and Objectives City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA25COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN • Hire the most qualified employees committed to public service • Continue training programs to upgrade skills of City workforce • Monitor competitive markets for compensation plan • Maintain an effective, performance-based compensation system • Recruit multilingual employees for customer service positions • Integrate technology into daily operations • Encourage City employees to live in Coppell • Deliver City services in the most cost-effective manner • Attract sales tax generating businesses to Coppell • Implement plans to maximize revenue on undeveloped and redeveloped property • Assess the appropriate user fees for sports teams and non residents • Ensure that city incentives, economic development maximize financial impact to the city Top Quality City Work Force Financial Resources to Support City Services Sustainable City Government Planning Context City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA27COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Coppell 2030 City Government Mission Statement The Mission of Coppell City Government is to create a vibrant and sustainable “Family Community for a Lifetime” by: • Maintaining a safe and secure community • Providing essential infrastructure and services for daily living • Regulating developments, buildings, land use and appearance for community and residents’ benefit • Supporting expansion of the City’s local economy • Enriching residents’ lives through facilities, services and programs • Planning for a vibrant city and livable neighborhoods • Serving as an advocate and partner for the City’s and community’s interests • Enhancing the physical beauty of the City • In a financially responsible manner 80 Coppell 2030 – A Family Community for a Lifetime COPPELL CITY GOVERNMENT MISSION Planning Context City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA28 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Coppell 2030 City Government Mission Principle 1 Maintain a Safe and Secure Community Principle 2 Provide Essential Infrastructure and Services for Daily Living • Preparing for, response to, and recovery from a national, regional or local disaster or emergency situation • Providing a rapid response to all emergency calls • Preventing problems through community education for citizens • Having well-trained staff prepared for emergency and non-emergency situations • Keeping current equipment and facilities to support community safety • Using technology (phones, cameras) for community safety • Maintaining low crime rate within Coppell • Getting citizens involved in, and sharing responsibility for community safety • Maintaining “no tolerance” for drugs or criminal activities • Having a highly visible police presence in the Coppell community • Having visible numbers and well-lighted corridors and neighborhoods • Have reflective corners at critical intersections • Providing crossing guards for student safety • Providing superior quality water with adequate supply for the future • Collecting wastewater • Collecting and disposing of solid waste • Managing recycling program • Providing well-maintained streets • Providing well-maintained alleys • Providing well-maintained sidewalks and paths • Developing and administering zoning standards and enforcement • Planning the lighting for public R.O.W. (with TXU) • Regulating and facilitating technology infrastructure • Planning, developing and maintaining bike paths and trails • Planning, developing and maintaining parks • Planning, developing and maintaining city buildings and facilities City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA29COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN • Determining and administering zoning for land uses • Developing and regulating appearance and design standards • Developing and regulating maintenance standards for buildings and homes • Enforcing codes and ordinances • Regulating empty commercial buildings and homes • Providing incentives for updating buildings and homes • Developing and regulating building standards • Applying current trends to new developments • Developing “Green” standards and incentives for more energy conservative buildings and homes • Developing and regulating signs and visible impairments • Regulating parking Principle 3 Regulate Developments, Buildings, Land Use and Appearance for Community and Residents’ Benefit Principle 4 Support Expansion of the City’s Local Economy • Providing incentives for businesses • Streamlining development services and permitting process • Promoting and marketing city for business development • Recruiting and attracting “right” businesses consistent with vision and plan • Facilitating and supporting city – business relations • Supporting Chamber’s business retention program • Maintaining a “business friendly” image of City Government • Planning, developing and maintaining parks and equipment • Planning, developing and maintaining the Library • Developing and managing recreation programs • Developing and managing senior program • Planning, developing and maintaining ball fields and athletic fields • Financing, supporting, facilitating community events /festivals • Supporting schools • Facilitating support for community organizations • Building a sense of Coppell community • Providing public information • Regulating use of City facilities • Serving as a clearing house of community events • Maintaining facilities for community use • Maintaining aquatic center • Supporting/subsidizing/facilitating programs Principle 5 Enrich Residents’ Lives Through Facilities, Services and Programs Planning Context City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA30 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Principle 6 Plan for a Vibrant City and Livable Neighborhoods • Preparing, monitoring and updating the Strategic Plan • Developing and updating Comprehensive Plan • Developing and updating Capital Improvement Program (CIP) • Planning maintenance of City infrastructure • Developing and updating financial plans and projections • Developing and updating master plans • Planning and updating transportation plan and representing City to Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) • Coordinating with regional governmental bodies • Monitoring plan implementation Principle 7 Serve as an Advocate and Partner for the City’s and Community’s Interests • Providing representation on DFW Airport Board • Suing and litigating in the interest of the City • Lobbying federal and state governments • Working with schools • Working with chamber of commerce • Working with DART • Working with other cities • Working to develop technology infrastructure • Marketing City • Proposing legislation Principle 8 Enhance the Physical, Beauty of the City • Develop consistent standards for medians and streetscapes on major corridors • Design, maintain and update parks and their amenities • Design, maintain and update City facilities • Design, maintain and update entrances and gateways • Design, maintain and update neighborhood streets and alleys • Design, maintain and update lighting (low voltage) • Design, maintain and update public spaces • Design, maintain and update buffers from unsightly equipment and facilities • Design, maintain and update streetscapes and medians • Design attractive landscapes with low water use and low maintenance costs Principle 9 Manage Municipal Government in a Financially Responsible Manner • Providing value for residents’ tax dollars and fees • Delivering services in the most cost-effective manner • Providing adequate resources for defined services and service levels • Investing in the City organization, infrastructure and in realizing the 2030 Vision • Maintaining financial reserves consistent with City policy • Balancing the tax base and revenue sources • Maintaining affordable taxes and fees for residents • Having responsible level of debt with at least “AA” bond rating Coppell 2030 City Government Mission City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA31COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN 1996 Comprehensive Plan The 1996 Comprehensive Plan was prepared at a time when Coppell was nearly 75 percent undeveloped. Replacing a previous plan from 1987, the 1996 Comprehensive Plan established a framework of goals and objectives, future land use plan, thoroughfare plan, urban design, and implementation which helped guide the community through a period of substantial growth. While the existing Plan was prepared to guide growth, now that Coppell is almost fully developed the Comprehensive Plan update must be focused on innovative ways to preserve the integrity of the community. The 2030 Comprehensive Plan will need to emphasize maintaining the existing Coppell character, and integrating revitalization and/or redevelopment districts to ensure a long-term “sustainable” community. The following summarizes important planning issues related to various components of the 1996 Plan and elements where consensus will need to be developed with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan: Policy Framework: The Comprehensive Plan goals and policies must be updated based on the vision established by Coppell Vision 2030 and reflect current priorities of citizens. Sustainability / “Green” Development: The Plan will need to determine the most appropriate manner to integrate current priorities that will ensure long- term community sustainability, including “green” development. This may include a greater emphasis upon mixed-use development/redevelopment and new housing options, energy and water efficiency, multi- modal transportation options in lieu of the automobile, and providing appropriate public and private infrastructure to support new “green” technologies. Land Use Plan: The land use plan needs to be updated, including the future land use descriptions which may need additional description and guidelines defining appropriate development and expectations in the various land use categories. In addition, a market assessment will provide information to assist planning for the realistic market potential of future commercial and mixed-use development areas in the community, including possible infill or increased density in existing developed areas. Where appropriate, recommendations from the Parks and Recreation Plan must be integrated for open space and gathering places. Currently the community does not adequately provide housing for all generations. The Plan will need to address impacts and opportunities related to expected DFW population growth by 2030, and the expected market demand of new residents desiring to locate in communities such as Coppell. More diversity in housing choices will be needed in the future due to changing demographics and market preferences. The Plan will need to address options for potential higher density housing in the community such as smaller lot single-family housing integrated as planned neighborhoods. This may also include flexibility in zoning standards to allow individual site infill / densification, such as allowing attached housing structures in a single-family district, and possible requirements to meet design or performance standards. Urban Design: This element of the Plan will need to be revised based on the actual street/streetscape design in Coppell as well as any potential modifications needed to these plans. Design standards may need to be established to help guide compatible “infill” development or redevelopment, particularly in areas where higher density mixed-use development may occur in close proximity to established neighborhoods. In addition, urban design guidelines should be provided in the 2030 Plan to address the quality and design expectations for mixed-use districts and community “nodes.” Thoroughfare Plan: This element of the Comprehensive Plan must be expanded to integrate multi-modal transportation options that will provide circulation within the community and connectivity to the surrounding region (e.g. DART, local bus circulators / trolleys, bike, and pedestrian facilities, etc.). In addition, the Plan must integrate both off-street recreational trails and the potential for on-street bicycle and transit facilities. This may require consideration of modified street sections to accommodate multi-modal transportation as well as the potential for on-street parking in mixed-use districts, particularly in areas of the community where redevelopment may likely occur by 2030. Implementation: This element of the Comprehensive Plan will require significant updates to accommodate the vision of Coppell Vision 2030 and the greater emphasis upon preserving the integrity of the community, accommodating redevelopment of challenging areas, multi-modal transportation, new housing options, and potential higher density mixed-use developments within the community. Planning Context City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA32 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Existing Land Use Map Source: 2005 North Central Texas Council of Governments City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA33COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Hunters RidgeEdinburghHowellCheshire HarrisonLoxley Brentwood GlenwoodOak Grove North LakeClear Creek CoatsGibson Archer PheasantButtonwood Hidden ValleyKirkland Lockhaven Post Oak Meadowlark ColonialWillingham PenuelWestwindCambridge ManorPepperwoodKaileyHawkenSandy Oak Dakota Braewood Natch e s T r a c e Par k H igh lands Ashfo r d Pinehurst B r i t t a n ySummer Westcheste r Clayton BreannaDove Highland Glenlakes FairviewSand PointLakewoodBro w n ManchesterCre s twood Michelle Bay LansdownePark w a y Old YorkBelt LineBethel Sandy Lake MacArthurDenton TapMooreHeartzBethel School Airline In t e r s t a t e 6 3 5 LodgeSamuelHillDeforest Ruby Fritz WranglerFreeport Stonecrest Brighton RoyalMockingbirdA l l e n Riverchase Gateway Southw e s t e r nNorthpoint PinyonPhillipsPatriot Halifax Falcon Village Plantation LedbetterPelican Hood OakMall a r dGifford Belt Line Shadowcrest HarrisKaye Brooks BurnsBricknell CoppellPark Valley CoveCooper Blue JayWoodh urst Alex Canyon GrahamBarclayCozby SpyglassShadowcrest QuailBriarglen Mead o w c r e e k Watervi e w Minyard Grace Villawood Greenway Mapleleaf EagleLyndsie AspenwayCrestview Lee Redcedar Parkview C a r t e r DuncanAceForest Hill Woodmoor Winding HollowHavencrest Lagun a Edgewood Christi StarleafNatches T race Pecan HollowKilb r i d g e Falls Greenrid g e Wil le t CondorOrioleOakbendFallkirk TupeloMeadow RunCoralSwanWhispering HillsBeechwood Cribbs CrestsideDillard Timber RidgeCreekview ParkerSugarberry HollySandersMadisonSandy KnollStratfordBeal MeadowglenCrane Leslie Robin Heather GlenWaver l y LeveeRolling HillsMartel Hackberry Mead o w v i e w RavenCottonwoodHollywood Lakeview Creekside We l l i ng t o nParkwood Marlee WalesAshleyBarringtonOakcrest ExecutiveSimmonsMagnolia Di v i d e n d Peninsula Bethel Schoo l LexingtonCountryEnterpriseDeannArmstrongBasilwood Cherrybark FairwayAva l o n Ha r w e l l Brock Rockcre st River BradfordFinchWalnut Grove Trin i ty Cambri a LochHickory Ridge WestwoodBranchwoodVanbebber Lak e P a r k Ar bo r B rook Johnson Bitternut Berkshi reWestlakeBeacon H i l l Creek Crossing Sparrow KyleLairds Rocky BranchLayton SpringoakTanbarkGraywood Forest Ridge Woo d h u r s t Willow Springs SwallowWestminster Woo d l a k e ShadydaleParr NashInglenookGibbs Crossing Spanish Moss Kingsmill Teal Castle CreekHammondMullra n y Cardinal Dogwood GreentreeGlade Point BullockBelt Line PinyonLake ForestRollin g B r o o k Havencrest AndersonC o p p e r s t o n e Wynnpage Mea d o w w o o d TrailwoodRedwingLondon WayNewportPlumlee AllencrestAuburnTurnberryBella V is ta Gateview Town CenterBeverl y MelindaLynnPark M e a d o w Willow Springs HawkThompson Steamboat Dalm a l l e y Fitness TennysonRaintreeSoraWoodcrestCharleston Beau KimbelGlendale Sti l l Fo res t Pedmore LongmeadowPebble CreekBlack OakPenfoldsWrenwood DunlinDowningMesquitewoodSleepy HollowGreenwich Oakbrook BryanExchangeHi l l h a v e n HearthwoodKilmichael Briarcove Stringfellow GeorgianPrestwickL e a v a l l e y Ridgewood Kingsridge Clover Meadow Bent T ree Autumnwood N o t t i n g h am Grapevine CreekFlagstoneClifton Wood way Fiel d c r e s t CowboyW i s e Bur n i n g T r e e Chaucer Hidden HollowRedwoodSt JamesTara Chesnut Clear HavenScottCastleburyTanglewood HummingbirdBenson Willow Dr i f twood WilshireBiltmoreHigh land WayCres tha ven MathesonEnclavesCanemountForestwood Mossy OaksSouthern BelleParishShorewood LeisureCompton Coventry Woodhill NixonCherrywood Je b DoverStonemeade Blackfield Forest BendKingstonRichmondMagnoliaHalifax DobekaHomewoodIndependence TealwoodCarolina HearthstoneSh e f f ie ld Beaver RunHazelwood Roundrock WoodlandLibertyDrexel WindhamSunriseIndian RockForest Crest H a w k Leavalley FalconRiverviewHartfordCascadeTanagerRipplewoodHollowRustic M e a d o w MitchellReederFlintshire BethelCarrington Stanto n Kings Canyon Autumn Breckland Heights Ald e r MartelCrossTimbersBuckingham FleetwoodCr o o k e d T r e e Crown Po in t Elm Fo rkBayouBrushy C reek Island BayCypress WestburyNorthwestern CarriageFairlands Cedar RidgeEastgate St AndrewsShady Oaks Wil low R idge ClaremontSpri n g H i l l WoodparkCedar Crest Candlelight Edmonson Heml o c k DeltaAp p l e c r o s s Northshore GlencrestMaywo o d Alendale Saddle Tree Cove MarinersSpyglass PortsideFountainHead Pintail Fr e epo r t Aberde en Shiloh Moonlight Elm Hill Hardwick Dartmouth CuttinghamAbbeyFirelight Salem Burns CrossingEastwick Greenwood ChelseaMacArthurChalfont Par kw a y Denton TapSnowshill AsherElmvaleDiamond RidgeBriarwoodLenten Pho e n i x Jennings Foxtail Sandy Lake RoyalFreeportBeth e l S c h o o l Se a H a w kHeartzLake VistaWine t r e e Stonewi ck CoppellCoppellParkway Interst a t e 6 3 5Park MeadowglenMiltonWarwick Cotswold ThornburyHarrisonHillMillPlazaVillage Braewood Parkview Moore Dividend Point WestFallkirkKilbridgeCraneBankers CottageLakeshore Heath MobleyMcNear Rosemount BethelSOUTH SH 121WES T S H 1 2 1 NORTH SH 121EAST SH 121 EAST S H 1 2 1 Suzanne BristolPark ValleyHollowTreeJoshua Sandalwood Misty HarborQuietValleyMorningMistBrant Sandy Lake KnightsOly m p i a MasonCOPPELL FUTURE LAND USE PLAN Created in the Planning Department Revised: September 4, 2008 DENTON COUNTY DALLAS COUNTY TARRANT COUNTYCITY LIMIT ® Legend Freeway Commercial Freeway Office Light Industrial/Showroom Mixed Use Regional Retail Neighborhood Retail Residential High Density Residential Medium Density Residential Low Density Public Institutional Park/Open Space Historic District Flood Plain 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 Feet Planning Context Future Land Use Plan - Last Revised September 4, 2008 Source: City of Coppell City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA34 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Although physically located in the City of Dallas, the City of Coppell owns 500-acres of land adjacent to North Lake. The Comprehensive Plan will need to provide a recommended development approach for this area which may include a new DART station and the potential for mixed-use / Transit Oriented Development (TOD) at higher densities than otherwise developed within Coppell. North Lake City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA35COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Parks and Recreation Master Plan Largely focused on facility and programming needs, the City’s Parks and Recreation Master Plan provides a framework for future improvements to meet the parks and recreation needs of existing and future residents of the community. Trails Master Plan: The trails master plan provides a framework for critical linkages between community parks and other local destinations. The linkages provide connectivity to surrounding communities and regional trails. The Plan is primarily focused on off-street multiuse recreational trails. Important parks and recreation issues related to the 2030 Comprehensive Plan include: • The design of park improvements planned throughout the city can help establish the “Coppell brand”. • Adult bikers typically prefer to use on-street corridors to avoid slower recreational users on trails and to provide greater connectivity to destinations. However the Trails Master Plan primarily consists of “off-street” trails. The Comprehensive Plan will need to build consensus for providing “multi-modal” streets with bicycle and transit accommodations, and any necessary revisions to the city’s standard thoroughfare cross-sections. C ITY OF C OPPELL , T EXAS P ARKS AND R ECREATION M ASTER P LAN E XECUTIVE S UMMARY N OVEMBER 2007 Planning Context City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA36 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Parks, Trails & Sidewalks Map The Parks, Trails, and Sidewalks Map identifies the existing sidewalk network and proposed future trails that link parks and other community destinations such as schools and retail areas. Currently there are various locations throughout Coppell with gaps in the existing sidewalk network, and there are limited options for bikers on the city’s major thoroughfares. The City has a process underway to identify improvements that will address critical sidewalk gaps. However the Comprehensive Plan will need to build consensus for an interconnected system of multi-modal transportation choices in 2030 including pedestrians, bicyclists, and local and regional transit services. In the future, linkages from neighborhoods to transit facilities will be important. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA37COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Old Coppell Master Plan The Old Coppell Master Plan outlines recommendations for land use, streetscape, and urban design with various public policy recommendations for implementation in the approximate 135-acre historic district. The Master Plan is intended to capture and preserve the largely rural style representative of North Texas in the first half of the twentieth century. New development projects recently completed in the area include a medical/office building, restaurant, community center, as well as a townhouse neighborhood under development. In addition the City is constructing street and streetscape improvements to Coppell Road south of Bethel Road to be completed in 2010. Some concern has been expressed by the community that development has not occurred more rapidly. The Comprehensive Plan process will consider whether any revisions to the Master Plan are appropriate. The Comprehensive Plan will need to build consensus about the following issues: • The Master Plan recommends creating a “building enclosure” along Coppell and Bethel Roads to create a comfortable feel for pedestrians, with this context represented throughout the Plan by a variety of photos and graphic images. However the concept site plan for the City owned property identifies building footprints and surface parking lots essentially similar to Coppell Town Center with a suburban development pattern of freestanding structures separated by surface parking lots. The Comprehensive Plan / Old Coppell Master Plan should consider other options for providing parking and building types in Old Coppell in order to create the desired “building enclosure,” including emphasizing on-street parking and the potential for creating public parking areas in-lieu of required off- street parking areas for each individual development site. • Residential uses are encouraged, including residential above ground-floor retail. However the Master Plan identifies few areas where this mixed- use residential may occur. Also, the freestanding arrangement of buildings surrounded by parking may make upper level residential undesirable to potential tenants. An “urban” rowhouse or attached townhouse product with rear alleys would be most appropriate for the Old Coppell context. Such uses are not currently provided within the core area of Old Coppell. Residential dwelling types with front-loaded garages (facing the street) should be discouraged in this district. © 2002 Looney Ricks Kiss, Inc. The portion of this copyright pertaining to images is as photographic works only and excludes any copyright for any portion of the graphic, architectural, landscape and site designs contained within the work designed by others.Sheet 18 of 25Old Coppell Master Plan Visual Simulation Existing Condition Coppell Road Looking South to the Bethel Road Intersection Proposed Condition Coppell Road Looking South to the Bethel Road Intersection The proposed condition transforms the existing condition into a highly desirable environment. The compatible new infill development reinforces the district’s character, provides “building enclosure” for a more comfortable street, and will generate activity and greater economic prosperity. The new streetscape will be attractive to pedestrians and the on-street parking provides a buffer between pedestrians and moving vehicles. Other improvements include human scaled streetlights, street trees and planters, as well as the renovation of the historic house terminating Coppell Road. The existing condition has deficiencies both functionally and aesthetically. Functionally, there are not enough buildings to generate a critical mass and create a vibrant and economically healthy commercial district. Likewise, the road has no defined edge, and the adjacent parking area to the left has a continuous “curb cut,” which is unattractive and ineffective for guiding traffic patterns accessing the parking area. The lack of sidewalks discourages pedestrian activity, and the overhead wiring creates visual clutter. © 2002 Looney Ricks Kiss, Inc. The portion of this copyright pertaining to images is as photographic works only and excludes any copyright for any portion of the graphic, architectural, landscape and site designs contained within the work designed by others.Sheet 17 of 25Old Coppell Master Plan Access & Parking Access Old Coppell is fortunate to already have good access to and through the district by means of Bethel and Coppell Roads. The section of this plan entitled “Streetscapes” already addressed recommendations for redesigning streets. Other recommendations not tied as directly to streetscape issues include: „Turning radii at street intersections should be kept to an absolute minimum in order to reduce the distance required by pedestrians to cross streets. A reasonable standard is 5 to 15 ft. „New driveways should be limited in both their number and width. Generally, no more than one driveway should exist per building, and maximum driveway widths should not exceed 24 feet. „Although Coppell and Bethel Roads are technically regulated to prohibit through truck traffic, this issue needs to be marked with signage and enforced more vigorously. Parking Generally, parking areas should be located convenient to associ- ated uses, but should not front directly onto streetscapes. An acceptable exception is parking lots located to the side of buildings in which the more narrow dimension fronts the street and is properly screened. The following standards should be followed in planning and designing parking lots: „Parking lots should not be located between the front of buildings and their adjacent streets. „Parking lots should preferably be located behind buildings, although locations to the sides of buildings are acceptable. „Side-loaded lots fronting streets should be screened with a peripheral treatment at least 3 ft. in height. Recommended screening includes wooden fences (picket) and dense ever- green hedges. „Shared parking should be used for multiple buildings rather than conventional suburban standards that assume the driver must drive to each individual destination. „Rear-loaded parking accessed by alleys is encouraged for all housing. When accessed by a front driveway, garages should not project beyond the front façade of the house, and should be designed to minimize their visual impact as viewed from the street. The sketch above left illustrates desirable features for designing parking lots in Old Coppell. Intensified peripheral screening Landscaped islands Minimize curb cuts in number and width Dumpsters located to the rear of parking area and completely screened A combination of ornamental fencing and vegetation can be used to effectively screen parking areas. Extensive landscaping creates a “green edge” along the perimeter of this lot that screens views of parked cars. An opaque wall that compliments the associated building can be used in place of landscaping, especially where space limitations exist. This dumpster is located to the rear of the parking area and is completely screened from view. One parking area serves multiple uses © 2002 Looney Ricks Kiss, Inc. The portion of this copyright pertaining to images is as photographic works only and excludes any copyright for any portion of the graphic, architectural, landscape and site designs contained within the work designed by others.Sheet 10 of 25Old Coppell Master Plan Concept Plan The Concept Plan was formulated during the planning and design “charrette,” which occurred between November 12th and 14th, 2001. The Concept Plan provides a general overview of the key planning ideas, and it serves essentially as a table of contents for the more detailed Master Plan document to follow. The key ideas are summa- rized below. Streetscape Improvements Bethel and Coppell Roads currently lack a strong visual definition, and they are not pedestrian friendly. Although both roads should continue to function with two travel lanes, future streetscape improvements should include: on-street parking, generous side- walks, paved cross-walks at intersections, pedestrian-scaled streetlights, and shade trees. A long-term goal, if funds become available, should be the removal of utility poles and burying of overhead wiring. Also, in order to provide a sense of arrival for visitors to Old Coppell, high-quality, pedestrian-scaled signage designating the “Old Coppell” district should be considered for key entry points into the district where the character of Old Coppell becomes clearly evident. Renovations & Infill Development The study area includes several older buildings that contribute to the historic character of Old Coppell. These buildings are typically one -story vernacular frame buildings dating from the early-1900s. Their preservation and adaptive reuse should be encouraged so they can serve as the framework in which new development is integrated. Infill development should occur on undeveloped or underdeveloped properties, and it should fit the general design character of the older “character-defining” buildings. Commercial structures should dominate the core of the study area, while residential development should occur on peripheral sites east of Coppell Road. Also, there are some instances in which existing character defining buildings are on sites that are underdeveloped and call for additional infill development that would not accommo- date their retention. In such cases, it is recommended that the existing older buildings be relocated to other vacant lots within the study area. The southern end of Coppell Road is expected to develop primarily as office with residential above. Grapevine Springs Park The park is both historically significant and an important commu- nity resource for passive recreation. The park’s WPA improvements from the 1930s should be carefully restored and existing paths should be improved. It is recommended that new paths also be created, and a narrow winding road should be developed that connects the southerly leg of Coppell Road with the existing Park Road entrance off of Bethel Road. This road might be bisected by a parking area in a manner that discourages through traffic. Picnic areas with pavilions and small parking areas should also be provided at certain points along the new park road. Farmers Market It is recommended that a farmers market be established for Old Coppell. It can initially be very small and located in a temporary location. An example of one potential location would be the gravel parking lot for the Art Annex on Bethel Road. As the farmers market grows in scale, it might move to a larger site, and it would be an excellent interim use for existing vacant lots prior to their development. Ultimately, the farmers market might move to the proposed village green, described below. Village Green As a long-term objective, a village green should be developed at the southeast corner of Bethel Road and the southerly leg of Coppell Road. This formal green space could be anchored by a central gazebo, and include paved paths and seating. The perimeter should have shade trees and buildings facing the green to define the edges. The park should also be equipped with utility connections to accommodate special events, as well as the farmers market addressed above. In the near term, it is anticipated that the existing two homes on this site would remain, but they might be relocated to other sites in the long- term when the green is developed. Old Coppell Inn and Bed & Breakfast There appears to be significant market demand for overnight accomodations in Coppell. An inn should include approximately 40 to 50 rooms, meeting space, and a restaurant. It is proposed that an inn be located on Bethel Road to the immediate east of the proposed village green (See Sheets 12, 20 and Appendix A for additional information). Interest in a possible bed & break- fast has also been expressed. If this is to be developed, an appropriate location would be at the end of Mitchell Street in place of, or along with, the townhomes that are proposed in the concept plan at the far left. Senior Center & Community Center The City is planning a new Senior Center to replace the existing facility on the north leg of Coppell Road. It is proposed that this center be located on the south side of Bethel Road immediately east of the proposed Old Coppell Inn. The new Senior Center would back up to the park, and a rear parking lot would be located southwest of the center and be shared with a new Community Center. The Community Center should be located on the east side of Coppell Road immediately south of the village green. In addition to serving as a community center, it could serve as a visitors center and a local history museum. Greenway System Old Coppell is fortunate to have two features lending them- selves to the development of a greenway system: the St. Louis & Southwestern Railroad and Grapevine Springs Creek. Another feature is Hunterwood Park, immediately north of the study area. The “Cottonbelt Trail” is already proposed in the City’s 1996 Comprehensive Plan to parallel the north side of the railroad. That concept should continue to be pursued. Likewise, the creek system that meanders throughout the study area should be developed with a paved greenway linking to the Cottonbelt Trail. Key Commercial/Mixed-Use Infill Existing Buildings Single-Family Civic Infill Park/Open Space Greenway Intersection Improvements Gateways Senior CenterVillageGreen CommunityCenter GrapevineSprings Park Old Coppell Inn City of CoppellService Center Restaurant Future Infill Study Area Boundary Streetscape Improvements Townhouses Old Coppell Concept Plan The Old Coppell Master Plan recommends creating parking areas that serve multiple uses, thus making it easier to create a “building enclosure” along streets as depicted above. Planning Context City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA38 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN © 2002 Looney Ricks Kiss, Inc. The portion of this copyright pertaining to images is as photographic works only and excludes any copyright for any portion of the graphic, architectural, landscape and site designs contained within the work designed by others.Sheet 16 of 25Old Coppell Master Plan Urban & Architectural Design Setback & HeightMassingRoof FormsFacades & Materials∅ Blank, windowless walls are discouraged, as arecanopy designs inconsistent with historic precedents.; Buildings should employ storefront designs that in-clude ample ground floor transparency to create pedes-trian interest. ; Clapboard siding and metal roofs over porches are appropriate materials for Old Coppel ∅ The flat horizontal planes of this facade create a mo- notonous storefront, making it difficult to tell where one store begins and the other one ends. ∅ This building features an inappropriate roof form thatis typical of strip commercial development and has nohistoric precedents in Old Coppell. ; The shallow setback of these buildings helps framethe street and provide a pedestrian scale. ; This building utilizes a a varied pattern of buildingsegments, porch columns and awnings to break up themassing into a human scale. ∅ Buildings with deep front setbacks create a disjointedauto-oriented development pattern along a street. Appropriate;NOInappropriate∅∅∅∅∅YES ; The use of architectural embellishements, such as ar-cades and gable roofs should be used to create changes inbuilding mass to provide visual interest and variety. ; The awnings complement the building’s architectural style, accentuate the rhythm of the windows and the human scale of this one-story building. It is recommended that detailed design guidelines be prepared toregulate all future development within Old Coppell. Guidelinesshould expand upon the following general principles: Building Setback, Orientation & Height „Commercial buildings should be built in close proximity to thesidewalk, with the exception being restaurants with frontoutdoor dining. „Institutional buildings can be set back from the street todistinguish themselves as special buildings. „Townhouses should front directly onto the sidewalk, al-though a shallow lawn can be bridged with a front stoop. „Building facades should be parallel with the street, and theprimary entrance should front the primary adjacent street. „Buildings should not exceed 2.5 stories or 35 feet, notincluding architectural elements such as cupolas andsteeples. Building Massing & Roof Forms „The massing of new buildings should be consistent with thegeneral massing of the existing “character defining” build-ings. „Buildings having facades longer than those historicallyfound in the district should utilize distinct vertically-orientedbays to break up the massing. „Massing should be broken up through the use of facadeplane projections and recesses, pilasters, roof line variations,color and material variations, and canopies. „The predominant roof form should be a gable. Gable endsfronting the street are particularly appropriate based onhistoric precedents. „Exceptions to the gable roof form are most appropriate for in-stitutional buildings that warrant distinction. Architecturalelements such as cupolas and steeples are appropriate forinstitutional buildings. „Roofs can be screened by parapet facades. Facades & Materials „All buildings should have the main entrance fronting theprimary adjacent street, and entrances should be wellarticulated through design. Corner entrances are acceptablefor corner buildings. „The primary construction form should be frame. Horizontalclapboard should be the primary exterior material, but boardand batten (vertical boards) is an acceptable alternative. „Exterior facade materials should be either wood or acementitious material duplicating wood. „Foundations should be raised and constructed of brick. „All window and door openings should be vertically oriented,and should be vertically aligned between floors. Verticallyoriented windows may be ganged (grouped side-by-side) in amanner that has a collective horizontal orientation. „Commercial buildings should have a minimum of 60% glazedarea (window and door openings) for ground floor frontfacades. „Glass should be transparent rather than tinted or reflective. „Canopies should be either wooden and parallel with thesidewalk, or should be angled awnings made of canvas orsimilar materials. Synthetic materials and internal lightingshould not be used for awnings. Canopies should be at least7 ft. above grade. ;This building is consistent with 2.5 story maximum height for Old Coppell. The porch canopy and the adja- cent one-story wing further reduce the perceived height. ; The predominant roof form should be a gable. Gable ends fronting the street are particularly ap-propriate based on historic precedents in Old Coppell. ; These single-family homes relate strongly to the streetwhile still allowing for a small front yard and porch. ;Vertically oriented projecting bays are used here tobreak up the main horizontal roof plane and articulatethe primary entrance of the building. ; Pyramidal roofs are an acceptable roof form and arecommon for bungalows.; As indicated by the historic photographs on Sheet 2,there is a historic precedent for parapet wall screeninggable roofs in Old Coppell, although few examples havesurvived. © 2002 Looney Ricks Kiss, Inc. The portion of this copyright pertaining to images is as photographic works only and excludes any copyright for any portion of the graphic, architectural, landscape and site designs contained within the work designed by others.Sheet 14 of 25Old Coppell Master Plan Streetscapes & Gateways Mitchell Street Mitchell Street presently consists of a 35 ft. perpetual easement with two approximately 8 ft. driving lanes (one in each direction). Other conditions are generally consistent with those described on Sheet 13 for Bethel and Coppell Roads, although curb cuts are minimal. The following streetscape conditions are recommended for Mitchell Road: „24 ft. of paving with parallel parking on one side (7’ x 22’) „Street trees in 5 ft. planting strip on one side „5 ft. sidewalk on one side (concrete or brick) Although the proposed pavement width is relatively narrow, these dimensions work fine for such low-volume streets, as on-coming traffic can accommodate one another when passing parked cars. Other Considerations With respect to the dimensions recommended for all three streets, it is recognized that they are inconsistent with current City standards and the City’s Major Thoroughfare Plan. Regardless, it is important that they be accommodated in Old Coppell. It is also understood that existing buildings will preclude the recommended cross- sections for some areas, including nearly half of the length of the Bethel Road improvements. Where widths are too narrow, parallel or even no parking should occur. Also, ADA criteria should be consulted before installing brick sidewalks or crosswalks, as non- textured paving may be necessary. Streetscape Furnishings Benches, waste containers, tree grates and other elements of street furniture can contribute greatly to the character of an area, while providing pedestrians with outdoor amenities. These elements should be carefully selected to ensure compatibility with the character of the area and with each other. While this plan provides a relatively detailed scheme for the redevelopment of Old Coppell’s streetscape network, the next step will be detailed design work and construction documents. It is recommended that definitive deci- sions on the exact style and model of streetscape components occur at that time. In the interim, tentative recommendations are provided here, with an emphasis on general design character. Benches A simple wooden bench scored high with the respondents in the Vision Survey portion of the public input. It is unknown if any benches were historically found in Old Coppell. However, this style fits the vision for Old Coppell as put forth in the Master Plan because it is compatable with vernacular architecture. Trash Receptacles The receptacle shown above at left is the type recommended. They typically come in a dark color (black or dark green). It is recom- mended that the same color be used for the trash receptacles and the street lights in order to achieve some level of uniformity. Street Lights It is recommended that the lighting in Old Coppell be a “clean” design more representative of the 1930s and 1940s than the Victorian lighting styles often found in historic downtowns. This style will compliment the simplicity of the older buildings in Old Coppell, as well as fit in with their era of construction. Street lights should be approximately 14 feet in height. Proposed Mitchell Street Streetscape Furnishings Gateways Street lightsBenchesTrash Receptacles It is recommended that key entrances into Old Coppell be enhanced to serve as gateways to provide a sense of arrival. These three gateways were identified by market survey respondents as the primary means of travel into and through Old Coppell. The entry from the southern leg of Coppell Road was not included as a gateway since few, if any, use it as a means of entry into Old Coppell. Gateway treatements will give clues to the traveller that they are approaching a special place. Possible gateway statements include new bridges over streams with pedestrian scaled lighting and simple, well-designed signage, as shown below. Existing Conditions Proposed Streetscape Character Sidewalk Planting Strip Street © 2002 Looney Ricks Kiss, Inc. The portion of this copyright pertaining to images is as photographic works only and excludes any copyright for any portion of the graphic, architectural, landscape and site designs contained within the work designed by others.Sheet 11 of 25Old Coppell Master Plan Land Use Plan The proposed mechanism for regulating land uses within the study area is mixed use zoning that will accommodate a rich variety of uses. While this proposed land use plan should remain flexible to adapt to changing market conditions, as the proposed zoning will achieve, the following land uses are currently considered optimal. Mixed Use: Retail & Service Concentration Retail and service uses should be concentrated in the core of Old Coppell along Bethel and Coppell Roads. Uses such as specialty retail are critical to generating pedestrian traffic in the study area. See Sheet 21 for detailed recommendations for specific tenant types. Also, in the case of multi-storied buildings, office and residential uses are appropriate for upper floors. Restaurants should be concentrated in the core of the study area. They are particularly important to activating the streets, and will be key destinations to anchor the district. Outdoor dining fronting the streets should be encouraged, and several existing buildings will lend themselves to adaptation. Lodging should consist of bed and breakfasts and a small inn. Bed and breakfasts could be located in a variety of places within Old Coppell, while the proposed inn is shown east of the proposed village green on Bethel Road, although other sites exist. Being a mixed-use category, uses such as office and residential are permitted. However, retail and service should be the primary focus. Mixed Use: Office Concentration Office development is proposed on a relatively small scale through- out Old Coppell. There is significant market demand for spaces ranging from 500 square feet to 5,000 square feet. Within the core of the study area, office space should exist on upper floors to allow more active uses to occur on the ground floor, such as retail and restaurants. However, offices are a good use for the northern and southern ends of Coppell Road. While the primary focus of this category is office, retail, service and residential uses may occur. Residential Although housing is critical to providing a 24-hour “lived in” atmosphere, homes will need to be relatively limited in numbers due to several issues, including the proximity of the DFW flight path. Housing is proposed for locations east of Coppell Road and peripheral to the core of the study area, but it should be relatively dense and include both townhouses and single-family homes. Apartments over ground floor retail and offices should also be encouraged throughout the district. Institutional The only institutional use currently existing is the Senior Center on Coppell Road. It is proposed that this use relocate to Bethel Road, with a Community Center located nearby. The City is also develop- ing the new Service Center in the most southern portion of the area. Parks & Open Space The existing Grapevine Springs Park occupies nearly half of the study area, and is continued in this plan. A new village green is proposed on the corner of Bethel Road and the southerly leg of Coppell Road, which will be a smaller and more formal space than the existing park. Also, open space associated with the Grapevine Springs Creek and floodplains are proposed for preservation and greenway improvements. Key Mixed Use: Retail & ServiceConcentration Mixed Use: Office Concentration Residential Institutional Parks & Open Space Study Area Boundary Optimal Ground Floor Land Use Plan Small scale lodging such as this inn would fit the scale and character of Old Coppell and fill a city-wide need for alternative overnight accomodations. While retail is the recommended ground floor use, office and residential uses are encouraged on the upper floors of buildings in the core of Old Coppell. This building’s flexible design allows for active retail uses to be located on the first floor and office or residential uses to occupy the upper floor. • Opportunities should be explored for extending the Old Coppell “brand” beyond the established historic district boundaries to provide greater connectivity with nearby major thoroughfares and neighborhoods. For example, opportunities should be considered to extend the Old Coppell “brand” to link with Belt Line, Denton Tap, and Freeport such as through streetscaping and signage to draw residents and visitors to the heart of the district. • The Master Plan recommends creating detailed design guidelines to regulate future development within Old Coppell based on a framework of design expectations and graphic examples provided by the Master Plan. However those guidelines have currently not been completed. A form-based code may be the most appropriate means to implement the public policy recommendations for land use and urban design in a unified manner. • A catalyst project(s) is likely needed to help kick- off redevelopment by investing in the public infrastructure improvements / streetscape / on-street parking. In addition, a catalyst project(s) should include character defining buildings to create the desired physical context. Old Coppell Land Use Plan Old Coppell Urban & Architectural Design Recommendations and Streetscape Standards City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA39COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Thoroughfare Plan Background and detail related to the City’s Thoroughfare Plan is provided in Section 4 of the 1996 Comprehensive Plan. The Thoroughfare Plan map identifies Coppell’s network of thoroughfare roadways consisting of 2-lane, 4-lane, and 6-lane roadways. The map also identifies whether or not the roadways meet the Thoroughfare Plan recommended improvements for number of lanes, as either a divided or undivided roadway. WRANGLER DRIVE AIRLINE DRIVE BELT LINE ROADSOUTHWESTERN BLVD. FRITZ DR.FREEPORT PKWY.BLVD.WETAG AY DART RAILROAD COPPELL RD.ROYALBETHEL RD.ANELRUBY RD.ROYALLANESANDY LAKE ROAD COPPELL ROADP A R K W AYBLV D DENTON TAP ROADPARKWA Y BLVD. SANDY LAKE ROAD ROADSAMUELMOOREBLVD.PARKWAY BLVD.MACAR T HURBLV D . SA N D Y AKLE ROADBLVD.RUHTRACAMRVIERCH A S E DR.BELT LINE ROAD DART RAILROAD BETHEL SCHOOL RD.HEARTZ ROADDENTON TAP ROADOMCKINGRIBDLANEBETH E L S C HOOL ROAD ROAD LINE S H.21.1 COPPELL RD.BETHEL RD. I H 6 3 5 I H 6 3 5 CREEKVIEW DR. BELTFREEPORT PKWY.DIVIDEND DRIVE POINT WESTDRIVE04000 2000 4000 LEGEND 2 Lane Undivided ( 60' R.O.W. ) 4 Lane Undivided ( 70' R.O.W. ) 4 Lane Divided ( 90' R.O.W. ) 6 Lane Divided ( 110' R.O.W. ) 4 Lane Divided in a 6 Lane Divided Right-of-Way. ( 110' R.O.W. ) Does Not Meet Current Thoroughfare Plan Meets Current Thoroughfare Plan Proposed Thoroughfare DATE: 05/27/08 CITY OF COPPELL MAJOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN The Comprehensive Plan will need to build consensus about any needed revisions to the street standards such as aesthetic enhancements, multi-modal accommodations, and the potential addition of on-street parking in future mixed-use and redevelopment districts such as Old Coppell. 1996 Comprehensive Plan design section for “Primary Streets” for roadways such as Belt Line Rd, Denton Tap Rd, Sandy Lake Rd, MacArthur Blvd, Parkway Blvd, Freeport Pkwy, and Royal Lane. The 2030 Comprehensive Plan will need to determine appropriate street sections for mixed-use and redevelopment districts and adjustments as needed to accommodate multi-modal users. Planning Context City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA40 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Streetscape Plan (Appendix D- Subdivision Regulations): The Streetscape Plan was developed to provide standards for streetscape improvements throughout Coppell. The document has served as a guide for both public and private improvements that occur in and adjacent to thoroughfare rights-of-way. The major design issues focus on unifying the street image zones and edges, creating identifiable City entry points, and emphasizing major and secondary intersections. Goals: Create an identifiable image for the City of Coppell to visitors and residents alike. Improve the aesthetic quality and bring cohesiveness and unity to the street scene. Provide simplicity in design and elements of low maintenance without compromising the overall quality of the project. Key Recommendations of the Streetscape Plan relevant to the 2030 Comprehensive Plan include: • Unity – create a sense of cohesiveness throughout the City that links many various projects and unifies the City’s public thoroughfares. • Identity – create a quality image of Coppell and a sense of arrival when one enters the City’s boundaries and travels its thoroughfares. • Simplicity – provide designs that are simple, yet aesthetically pleasing, and that have their own character but will not overpower existing or future development. • Major and secondary intersections should be identified and treated with a variety of elements – special paving and crosswalks, landscaping, new signage, new lighting and traffic signal standards, etc. • All entrances into the City of Coppell need a strong definition. C.I.V.I.C. Report (Committee to Improve the Visual Image of Coppell) Building on the Coppell Streetscape Plan, the Committee to Improve the Visual Image of Coppell report prepared in 1997 has played a significant role in defining the visual appearance of the community during a period of rapid growth. • The Report identifies recommendations for gateway areas. The Comprehensive Plan should build consensus about possible major public art and streetscape enhancements to coincide with the gateway monument markers as a means of reinforcing the Coppell identity. • The Comprehensive Plan will need to build consensus about the community image standards and whether the Coppell identity and upscale development standards should be modified to accommodate corporate or franchise identity. • The C.I.V.I.C report recommends development within 400-feet of a freeway and within 300-feet of an existing or proposed divided thoroughfare should be considered highly visible, although thoroughfares through the industrial districts west of Denton Tap Road have a lower priority. The Comprehensive Plan will need to build consensus about the type(s) of desired land uses and community identity along the I-635 and S.H. 121 highway “image” corridors. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA41COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Planning Context Regional Planning Issues Transit Access to transit service is an important component of an effective multi-modal transportation system. Currently, the City is not served by either intra- or inter-city transit service. Coppell Vision 2030 identified both intra-city public transportation and participation by the City in regional transit as priorities. Both types of service can improve the quality of life of Coppell residents by providing transportation choice and creating economic development opportunities through transit oriented development. DART Commuter Rail The community opted out of the Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) system many years ago and does not currently have the sales tax revenue available to join the DART system. However, the existing rail line along Belt Line Road at the City’s southern boundary is slated for future service in DART’s 2030 Plan. The City- owned property north of North Lake could provide a future DART station location. Because a large percentage of the City’s residents work outside of Coppell, it is important to plan for alternative transportation modes to get them to and from their places of employment within the region as traffic congestion will continue to worsen as the region’s population grows. The Comprehensive Plan will identify development strategies for the North Lake property in the event that a DART station is located there. Strategies should also be considered for how the City can provide the financial mechanism to join the DART system. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 Appendix A: Community ProfileA42 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Economic Development Strategic Plan The City’s current Economic Development Strategic Plan identifies three main goals for the City’s economic development program. The goals are: Goal I – Recruitment: To recruit a broad range of businesses which have a long-term positive impact on the growth of the tax base. Goal II – Retention/Expansion: To retain and expand existing businesses to preserve and enhance the tax base. Goal III – Old Coppell: Transform/Revitalize Old Coppell into a viable activity center utilized by Coppell and surrounding communities generally consistent with the Old Coppell Master Plan. The Comprehensive Plan process will need to utilize these goals to: • identify appropriate land use and development strategies that preserve appropriate sites for commercial and industrial development; • identify specific tools that may be appropriate to encourage retention and expansion of existing businesses; and • maximize the potential redevelopment of Old Coppell as a signature mixed-use activity center for the City. Five Year Plan FY08-09 through FY12-13 Each year the City staff prepares an update to the Five Year Plan that reports on the projected financial resources necessary to conduct all of the various programs of the municipal government. The most recent update was prepared in March of 2009. As this update was prepared during the most challenging portion of the current national economic recession, there are significant concerns regarding the level of municipal revenues necessary to fund operations and maintenance budgets as well as debt service requirements. The current projection recognizes a potential gap in general fund revenues of approximately $4,000,000. Other key issues raised in the Five Year Plan include: • The debt service component of the tax rate has increased significantly over the past ten years which places a strain on the City’s ability to generate sufficient revenue for operations and maintenance. • Sales tax growth is slowing. • Development and building related fee revenue is decreasing as a result of slowing in the development industry. • The community is reaching build out and therefore, long-term revenue projections must take into account a finite amount of land that is available for development in the future and the impact this will have on property tax base growth. As the Comprehensive Plan is developed, close attention should be given to understanding how land use policies will impact the revenues needed to provide municipal services. With relatively little land available for development, the land use plan and policies for redevelopment areas should be strategic in identifying land uses that provide maximum revenue potential for the City. Further, strategies should be identified to protect and enhance existing, developed areas of the community in order to provide long-term value and to realize increased property values and tax generation through redevelopment opportunities. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN B-1 APPENDIX B Planning Policies COPPELL 2030 PLAN Sustainability Policies Land Use Policies Parks & Open Space Policies Transportation & Mobility Policies Healthy Neighborhoods Policies Redevelopment Areas Policies City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 B-3COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Appendix B: Planning PoliciesIntroduction Coppell 2030 includes many recommendations that will help the community achieve its vision for the future. As the City considers its future actions it is important that it review those actions in the context of the recommendations in this plan. Such actions may include land use and zoning decisions, allocation of resources through the annual budgeting process, the granting of economic development incentives, etc. The basic philosophy of the 2030 Plan is to preserve the character and quality of Coppell’s existing neighborhoods while creating new community activity centers that provide a variety of higher density housing options along side vibrant retail and commercial uses. Five core pillars of the Plan support this philosophy: • Sustainable Community • Placemaking • Mixed Use Activity Centers • Land Use and Mobility • Healthy Neighborhoods “The city shall have the power to adopt and enforce a master plan to be used as a guide in considering passage of ordinances for the orderly growth and development of the city.” -Section 9.01 of the City of Coppell Home Rule Charter Each section of Coppell 2030 includes a number of policy statements that will help the City ensure that its actions are consistent with the plan. These policy statements are intended as guides to be used by the City Council, board and commission members and city staff as they carry out their duties to implement the recommendations in this Plan. The following pages include a summary of all of the policy statements found in the Plan. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 B-4 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLANAppendix B: Planning PoliciesSustainability Policies Policy Number Policy S-1 Create efficiencies, synergies, and consistencies among city policies, plans, and programs. S-2 Pursue the development of “clean” or “green” sector industries that benefit Coppell’s environment and economy. S-3 Promote land use patterns that increase energy efficiency in buildings and transportation systems by making energy efficiency a critical element when developing new development regulations and modifying old regulations and policies. S-4 Promote sustainable or “green building” practices for the construction and operation of buildings. S-5 Design new and major remodels to public buildings, and where feasible, long term building leases for facilities, to achieve certification by the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED®) Green Building Rating System to conserve resources, including but not limited to energy and renewable resources. S-6 Incorporate sustainable “green design” solutions for streets, storm water, and other infrastructure projects. S-7 Support increased recycling and composting throughout the community, and reduce the amount of solid waste disposal. S-8 Maintain and improve the water quality of significant wetlands and water bodies through design of storm water drainage facilities on both public and private property. S-9 Explore opportunities for promoting “green” renewable energy use and alternative fuels. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 B-5COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Appendix B: Planning PoliciesLand Use Policies Policy Number Policy LU-1 Balance future growth by preserving existing stable neighborhoods and focusing commercial and residential growth in mixed-use centers and corridors at a pedestrian scale. LU-2 Encourage the redevelopment and reuse of lands used in the past or already used for linear “strip commercial” development to uses compatible with adjoining neighborhoods and focus more compact “nodal” pattern of higher intensity development to mixed-use activity centers. Include densities in these areas that support transit use. LU-3 Include a variety of housing types with varying levels of affordability as part of the mix of activities accommodated in the redevelopment of the mixed-use activity centers. LU-4 Proactively facilitate infill development for private developers through active land assembly, land reclamation and street and utility system improvements. LU-5 Direct large-scale commercial and auto-oriented uses dependent upon high traffic volumes to freeway interchange activity centers. LU-6 For industrial activities which tend to have substantial off-site impacts or demands on public services, limit the zones where they are permitted outright, and require additional reviews where they may be appropriate. LU-7 Establish a unique architectural theme and sense of place in new developments that differentiate Coppell from other communities. LU-8 Encourage the use of materials, architectural design, and a quality of finish work which reinforce the sense of Coppell as one that is built for beauty and to last. Reflect this quality in both public and private development projects. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 B-6 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLANAppendix B: Planning PoliciesParks and Open Space Policies Policy Number Policy P-1 Maintain master development plans for city parks that address user group needs, development priorities, development and maintenance costs, program opportunities, financing strategies and citizen involvement. P-2 Base priorities for improving and developing parklands on documented needs and criteria including long-term maintenance costs, location in deficient areas, broad community support, location adjacent to schools and other public facilities, support of neighborhood stabilization and community development projects and policies, and consistency with park master development plans.. P-3 Create neighborhood or community gathering spaces in each activity center. P-4 Encourage the beautification of Coppell by incorporating appropriate streetscape elements along thoroughfares and at major intersections. P-5 Provide a part of the construction cost of public projects for the purchase and installation of art. P-6 Create incentives for the provision of public art as part of private development projects. P-7 Emphasize important places, transitions and gateways within Coppell by celebrating them with works of public art. P-8 Coordinate parks planning with the school district and develop joint-use agreements. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 B-7COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Appendix B: Planning PoliciesTransportation & Mobility Policies Policy Number Policy TM-1 Provide a balanced transportation system, less dependent on the private automobile, supported by both the use of emerging technology and the location of jobs, housing, commercial activity, parks and open space. TM-2 Improve mobility options and accessibility for the non-driving elderly, children, disabled, low- income and other members of the population. TM-3 Provide a safe and interconnected network of pedestrian and bicycle routes throughout the city, with connections to regional transit services, that provides linkages among employment sites, housing, and mixed-use centers. TM-4 Provide walking and biking corridors linking neighborhoods and other destinations in Coppell to the future DART station in the Belt Line corridor. TM-5 Provide short-term and/or long-term bicycle parking in commercial and mixed-use districts, in employment centers and multifamily developments, at educational facilities, in parks and recreational areas, at special events, and at transit facilities. TM-6 Provide an adequate supply of on-street parking to support land uses in existing and emerging mixed- use activity centers. TM-7 Implement traffic calming measures to minimize the impact of regional trips through Coppell, while supporting the travel needs of the community. TM-8 Participate in regional transportation planning activities and pursue opportunities to improve connectivity with the regional transportation system. TM-9 Work with the Coppell Independent School District to increase walking and biking to school by improving routes from neighborhoods to schools. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 B-8 COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLANAppendix B: Planning PoliciesHealthy Neighborhoods Policies Policy Number Policy HN-1 Preserve a balance in the city’s population by attracting families with children to maintain stable established residential neighborhoods and a vital public school system. HN-2 Provide a diverse range of housing types and mixed-income housing, particularly in new mixed-use activity centers, which are attractive and affordable to potential home buyers at all income levels. HN-3 Encourage new higher density housing in urban residential neighborhoods and mixed use activity centers with convenient access to transit, services, parks, schools and community facilities. HN-4 Support homeownership opportunities in new multi-dwelling housing by encouraging the creation of condominiums, cooperatives, mutual housing associations, and limited equity cooperatives. HN-5 Ensure compatible infill residential development design that supports the conservation, character and fabric of existing neighborhoods. HN-6 Make community services accessible to residents of neighborhoods by walking, bicycle and transit, where possible. HN-7 Protect established neighborhoods from excessive off-site impacts including pollution, noise, vibration, odors, and glare. HN-8 Encourage healthy and safe housing through such means as maintenance, repair and renovation, increased home ownership opportunities, and neighborhood preservation and revitalization efforts. HN-9 Encourage the active involvement of neighborhood residents and businesses in decisions affecting their neighborhood through active neighborhood and business associations. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 B-9COPPELL 2030 - A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Appendix B: Planning PoliciesRedevelopment Areas Policies Policy Number Policy RA-1 Recognize the importance of maintaining and enhancing the City’s tax base, including property taxes, sales taxes and business and occupation taxes, to provide funds for capital facilities and City services for existing and future populations. RA-2 Promote redevelopment of targeted areas as mixed-use activity centers that blend with existing neighborhoods, provide convenient shopping for daily necessities, and provide new housing options for residents of all stages of life. RA-3 Promote the development or expansion of cultural facilities, including libraries, educational institutions, civic spaces, performing arts and art exhibition facilities, museums, and community centers, in redevelopment areas designated as mixed-use activity centers. RA-4 Promote a wide range of goods and services for residents and businesses in mixed-use activity centers by providing incentives for appropriate retail development in these areas. RA-5 Provide thoroughfare system improvements as a catalyst to support redevelopment in areas designated for mixed-use activity centers. RA-6 Encourage the formation of public or business improvement districts for the construction of transportation infrastructure in redevelopment areas, which may include streets, curbs, or other structures; pedestrian or bicycle facilities; drainage; and street trees. RA-7 Encourage the redevelopment of surface parking lots into mixed-use projects with transit-supportive uses in the Belt Line corridor. RA-8 Provide interconnected streets between established neighborhoods and redeveloping areas such as mixed-use activity centers to ensure safe, efficient, and convenient pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicle access. RA-9 Increase communication among government, businesses, major institutions and other entities that may provide economic opportunities, in order to: (a) enhance the common understanding of issues related to employment growth, business competitiveness, public policy goals and program implementation and (b) promote partnerships between government and business to achieve the goals of Coppell 2030 Plan. City Council Hearing DRAFT - January 2011 AGENDA REQUEST FORM DATE: March 8, 2011 ITEM #: 19 CITY MANAGER'S REPORT A. Project Update and Future Agendas. Agenda Request Form - Revised 09/027 Document Name: %manrep AGENDA REQUEST FORM DATE: March 8, 2011 ITEM #: 20 MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS A. Report by Mayor Stover regarding the Metroplex Mayors’ Meeting. B. Report by Mayor Stover regarding the Movie Series in Town Center Plaza. C. Report by Mayor Stover regarding Recent Auto and Wheel Thefts. Agenda Request Form - Revised 09/02 Document Name: %mayorreport AGENDA REQUEST FORM DATE: March 8, 2011 ITEM #: 21 PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENTS CONCERNING ITEMS OF COMMUNITY INTEREST AND NO COUNCIL ACTION OR DELIBERATION IS PERMITTED Agenda Request Form - Revised 09/02 Document Name: %mayorreport AGENDA REQUEST FORM DATE: March 8, 2011 ITEM #: 22 NECESSARY ACTION RESULTING FROM EXECUTIVE SESSION Agenda Request Form - Revised 09/02 Document Name: %necessaryactionexec CERTIFICATE OF AGENDA ITEM SUBMISSION Council Meeting Date: March 8, 2011 Department Submissions: Item No. 9B was placed on the Agenda for the above-referenced City Council meeting by the Parks and Recreation Department. I have reviewed the Agenda Requests (and any backup if applicable) and hereby submit these items to the City Council for consideration. ____________________ Parks and Recreation Department Item Nos. 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18 were placed on the Agenda for the above-referenced City Council meeting by the Planning Department. I have reviewed the Agenda Requests (and any backup if applicable) and hereby submit these items to the City Council for consideration. ____________________ Planning Department Financial Review: I certify that I have reviewed all the items submitted for consideration on the Agenda for the above-referenced City Council Meeting and have inserted any financial comments where appropriate. ____________________ Finance Department CERTIFICATE OF AGENDA ITEM SUBMISSION Council Meeting Date: March 8, 2011 Department Submissions: City Manager Review: I certify that I have reviewed the complete Agenda and Packet for the above-referenced City Council Meeting and hereby submit the same to the City Council for consideration. ____________________ City Manager (or Deputy City Manager)