BM 1999-05-20 PZMinutes of May 20,1999
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Coppell met in pre -session at 6 p.m., and in
regular session at 6:30 p.m., on Thursday, May 20, 1999, in the Coppell Town Center, 255 Parkway
Boulevard, Coppell, Texas 75019. The following members were present:
Chairman Stan Lowry
Commissioner Texx Stewart
Commissioner Anna Kittrell
Commissioner Jon Nesbit
Commissioner Drew Halsey
Commissioner Greg McGahey
Also present were Assistant City Engineer Mike Martin, City Attorney Bob Hager, Travis Crump,
Fire Marshal, Planning Director Gary Sieb, City Planner Isabelle Moro and Sr. Administrative
Secretary Barbara Jahoda. Vice Chairman Rick McCaffrey was absent.
PRE -SESSION (Open to the Public)
1. Briefing on the Agenda.
Staff briefed the Commission on the cases.
REGULAR SESSION (Open to the Public)
2. Call to Order.
Chairman Stan Lowry called the meeting to order.
3. Approval of Minutes dated April 15,1999.
Commissioner Nesbit made a motion to approve the minutes of April 15, 1999, as written.
Commissioner Kittrell seconded; motion carried (6-0) with Commissioners Nesbit,
McGahey, Kittrell, Lowry, Halsey and Stewart voting in favor. None opposed.
4. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No S-1159, Rollins Leasing
Corporation Addition, zoning change request from LI (Light Industrial) to LI-S.U.P.
(Light Industrial, Special Use Permit), to allow the use of a 4 -pump fuel island, truck
maintenance garage and truck wash on property located along the south side of
Wrangler Drive between Crestside and Lakeshore Drives, at the request of Mayse &
Associates.
City Planner Isabelle Moro introduced the item to the Commission, showing exhibits of the
proposal, stating that this truck leasing company is proposing to build a 23,000 square foot
regional facility that would house corporate training and regional offices facing Wrangler
Drive, as well as a truck maintenance facility, truck wash and four -pump diesel fuel island,
with an underground fuel storage tank, located immediately behind the office facility. She
then mentioned that the Special Use Permit request is to allow the truck maintenance, wash
and fueling facilities on this property. Ms. Moro went on to say that these facilities, which
include 107 truck stalls, will be screened by a six-foot high tilt wall and will have two
wrought -iron gates facing Wrangler Road which will remain open from 5 a.m. to midnight
Monday through Saturday. Ms. Moro explained that of the five truck bays proposed, two
will be used for maintenance, one will be a lube bay, one will house storage equipment,
including tires, and the fifth bay will be devoted to truck washing. This facility will be a
beige painted tilt wall structure with a white metal roof and each bay door will measure 16
feet in height. Ms. Moro indicated that signage is proposed over the bay doors and staff
requests elevations of these signs to determine whether or not these are to be considered
movement control signs. Ms. Moro described the office building to be two-tone beige and
white tilt wall accented with a band of tan face brick at the base, mentioning that the
windows will be glazed grey. Ms. Moro then referred to the Landscape Plan, indicating that
a bermed perimeter landscaped buffer along Wrangler Drive is proposed with staggered
Live Oak trees planted on top of the berm. She then mentioned that at the corner of
Lakeshore and Crestside, groupings of Crepe Myrtle trees are proposed and said that against
the 6' high screening wall, along Crestside and Lakeshore are staggered 15' high Live Oak
trees with groupings of Junipers, which will help screen a portion of the truck maintenance
bays. As far as the intensity of the use, Ms. Moro stated that the site will service anywhere
between 8-16 trucks a day. She expressed staffs concerns as to the health and safety issues
with the location for this truck -leasing proposal, stating that the Coppell Middle School
West campus is located less than 500' west of this site. She then informed the Commission
of some statistics of the campus, as well as its extra -curricular usage by C.I.S.D., as well as
community groups and City activities which can last as late as 10 p.m., including weekends.
Ms. Moro then showed a map indicating the locations of businesses/land owners in the area
who submitted written opposition to staff. She then showed a second map indicating
property owners within 200' of this site who have indicated opposition, totaling close to
30%. Because of this percentage, Ms. Moro stated that it will take a three-quarter vote by
Council to overrule or approve any recommendation made by the Commission. Ms. Moro
then showed a number of photographs taken of Rollins' Grand Prairie operation, albeit not a
regional facility, as well as the color board for this proposed facility. In conclusion, Ms.
Moro stated that staff recommends denial of this Special Use Permit request, indicating that
its use is inappropriate for this area, the intensity of the development is too great, its
proximity to the school campus is too close, the quality of the facility is not consistent with
the industrial facilities in our community, and the fact that there is considerable adjacent
property -owner opposition.
Commissioner Stewart questioned the gravel area shown on the Landscape Plan. Ms. Moro
explained that this area is inside the screening wall and is used for trucks backing up. She
2
Ilk
informed the Commission that the truck court area is completely screened from public
access, therefore, it is exempt from perimeter landscape requirements, as well as interior
landscape requirements.
Bill Dahlstrom, Dahlstrom McDonald, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, TX, was present to
represent this item before the Commission and answer any questions, introducing Dan
Norman from the headquarters facility in Wilmington, Delaware; Jed Pilato, Rollins
Leasing local representative; Mike Daniel, Civil Engineer with Nathan D. Maier; Ray
Wilshire and Michael Lloyd, traffic engineers, and Greg Daspit, Landscape Architect for the
project. Mr. Dahlstrom gave a Power Point presentation and emphasized Rollins request,
stating that the applicant wants to make this site one of their major regional headquarters in
the country with truck rental, as well as regional offices and training facilities. He then
stated that the truck rental use is permitted in Light Industrial zoning by right, and whether
or not the maintenance, truck wash and fueling station is approved, this use can go on this
site and truck traffic would be generated, adding that there are other far more intensive
industrial uses that could go on this property, as well. He showed photographs of existing
warehouse facilities in the immediate vicinity showing 30 or 40 docks apiece, again
emphasizing that this is an industrial district which means truck traffic. Dan Norman,
Rollins Leasing Corporation, One Region Plaza, Wilmington, DE 19803, then explained to
the Commission that Rollins is the third largest truck leasing firm in the country, with a
revenue base of over $650 million, giving a background of how this company started. Mr.
Norman stated that many Fortune 200 and 500 company management people will be
visiting this facility from time to time to make proposals/presentations, to see how their
trucks are being taken care of and to inspect what Rollins does. He stated that Rollins
handles transportation needs for such firms as Frito Lay, Sherwin Williams, Cracker Barrell
restaurants, Fisher Price, Ford Motor Company, Honda, Mitsubishi, Isuzu, Nabisco, etc.
Mr. Norman then stated that this regional facility will house approximately 15 regional
executives based on the second floor of the office complex and approximately five office
employees and five technicians on the first shift and five technicians on the second shift
based on the first floor. Jed Pilato, representing Rollins Truck Leasing in Dallas, gave an
overview of what Rollins sells to their prospects/customers; i.e., they rent strictly to
commercial customers and don't deal in any gas powered equipment, one-way rentals, or
consumer rentals (strictly rentals from business to business). Rollins focuses on being a
one -source provider, being an investment borrower whereby customers can come to them
and use Rollins' borrowing power to finance their transportation. He stressed that all
engines/transmissions on vehicles are all electronic. They have major purchasing power
with major truck manufactures, etc., can provide consolidation of invoices, handle fuel tax
reporting, and handle everything that's involved in operating the truck. To do this,
customers must pay a premium and Fortune 500 and Fortune 200 companies are their
primary customers who are all under contract anywhere from five to seven years. Mr. Pilato
stated that typically, customers leave their facilities on Sunday nights and don't return until
the following weekend; during the week they are delivering their products. He stated that
Rollins is currently doing business with several clients in this industrial area; i.e., Fresenius
Medical, Lone Star Plywood, Alford Media Services, all of whom are quality house
companies. Mr. Pilato stressed that the only thing that takes place on their facility are the
actual fueling of the vehicles, the washing of the vehicle and if there is a problem with the
vehicle, it will be diagnosed and if a tire needs changing, this is done. If there is a major
3
engine failure, warranty coverages with major manufacturers are such that it's more cost
effective to take these problems to a major dealership to have the repair made. The concept
of the lube bay area is just that -- an in -and -out process and the average preventative
maintenance inspection takes about an hour -and -a -half. He then stressed that only Rollins
contract customers are allowed to uge their facilitieg. Mr. Pilato Said that one of the things
he loves about the company is the fact that they put more than what is required as far as
landscaping is concerned and they are environmentally concerned -- their fuel tanks will be
placed underground and will be electronically monitored by a national company so that
employees don't have a chance to make an error -- it is all computerized and at any time
they can tell you to the 10th of a gallon how many gallons of fuel are stored in the ground. If
the fuel volume drops because of a leak, an alarm goes off inside the facility that registers
back to the corporate office. He then stated that air compressors, etc., that make noise, are
all in rooms on the far side of the facility so that the noise generated by the facility is not
typical of a truck maintenance facility. As the maintenance facility manager, he stated that
each morning he walks around with the service manager to look at the facility; i.e., checks
the fence lines, checks the trash cans, makes sure there is no spilled oil, makes sure there is
nothing that could create an environmental problem, stating that this is the type of
commitment that Rollins has made to make sure that their facilities look the way they
should. Mr. Pilato then noted that only diesel fuel will be used and if someone filled a cup
with diesel fuel and threw a match in it, the match would extinguish because it has a very
high flash point, unlike gasoline, which is an explosive. He stressed that diesel fuel is not as
volatile a commodity. He then emphasized that all the fueling/services done on their
equipment are done by Rollins technicians -- a driver cannot come in to fuel his truck, nor
can the general public. Mr. Pilato then stated from an environmental standpoint, the law
doesn't require their crushing and draining every oil filter that comes off of a vehicle -- all
the used oil is withdrawn before it gets packaged and placed into a dumpster. He then
stressed that the law also doesn't require that they pre -treat the wastewater that they
generate, but Rollins voluntarily does this before it goes into the sanitary sewer. This is
done because Rollins is environmentally conscious and community friendly. Mr. Pilato
then stated that facilities handle no cash -- the fuel units are all bar-coded. Bill Dahlstrom
again stated that the truck rental facility is permitted by right and added that if the
maintenance, fuel station and wash bay were off premises, this would double the trips going
into the facility because the same vehicles would have to leave the premises to fuel up, be
maintained and be washed. This proposal is to keep the entire operation on one site. He
then listed the uses that are permitted in the Light Industrial zoning by right. Mr. Dahlstrom
then introduced and reviewed a Trip Generation projection of this site (see Exhibit A). He
stated that in every case, the afternoon peak hour is more for all the other uses than it is for
this truck leasing business and in the morning, three of the four uses are more than their site.
He stated that approximately 50 percent of the traffic generated by this facility will be
regular automobile traffic because of the number of employees and people coming to the
facility to visit -- only 10 percent of the traffic will be tractor -trailer traffic; the rest will be
panel trucks, step vans, econoline vans, etc., explaining that they don't have a proliferation
of tractor -trailer trucks that would be there with a large warehouse facility as exists on the
surrounding properties. He then referred to the Staff Report (see Exhibit B) to clarify a few
things that he felt necessary. He stated that the appropriateness of the truck rental facility is
not an issue because it is an allowable use -- there are no environmental issues raised with
this facility. He then referred to the comparison between the facility in Grand Prairie, which
4
is 12 years old, and what is being proposed for Coppell. He stated Rollins is not proposing
a chain-link fence as a screening mechanism here, but a 6' high masonry wall with heavy
landscaping. He stated that it isn't fair to compare a 12 -year old facility in a community that
allows chain-link fences to the regional facilities as shown in photographs and the facility
that is being proposed in Coppell. He then showed numerous slides taken that morning of
the parking areas of the surrounding environment which depicted numerous tractor -trailer
rigs backed up to loading docks, as well as trucks parked on the streets. He pointed out the
white sign for the Middle School and stated that directly across the street from the school
are two incredibly large warehouse facilities with over thirty bays each, which generate lots
of tractor -trailer traffic in the area. He then showed a slide depicting all the trucks at the
United Van Lines facility directly in back of the school, including one truck parked on the
street with no tractor attached. He then showed a slide to the right of the school depicting
an industrial building housing a bay at the corner, which is an automotive repair shop across
the driveway of the school. He also showed a slide of school property showing a bus depot
where repairs and oil changing are made. He stated that chemicals are stored on this school
site. He stated that the Rollins proposal is of a much higher quality environment, which is
nicely screened. Greg Daspit, Mayse & Associates, 14850 Quorum Drive, Suite 201,
Dallas, TX 75240, then gave a detailed description of the building orientation, the proposed
buffering and described the proposed over -abundance of landscaping and number and kinds
of trees to be planted that will be 4' caliper inches and 14'- 15' in height.
Chairman Lowry opened the Public Hearing, asking for people present who wanted to speak
either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. Those
choosing to speak were:
Mark Myers, 3601 Crescent, Dallas, TX - representing the Myers & Crow
Company. Mr. Myers distributed and described a colored brochure of the area to the
Commission. He stated that although many of the industrial buildings have truck
doors at the back, many are not used. Mr. Myers acknowledged that Rollins is a
good company, but his main reason for opposition is that he feels that the City of
Coppell can do better, meaning that this area is in a dramatic improvement mode.
Mr. Myers stated that on Airline there are some very large bulk buildings built years
ago, but along Wrangler, as well as Lakeshore, Beltline and Freeport Parkway today,
the City is enjoying a transformation of this industrial district to higher -use
buildings, meaning a higher employee count, higher paid employees, significantly
more tax base for the City for every square foot of building that is built. He pointed
out the proposed buildings in this area will total about 2 million feet over the next
five years and virtually all these buildings will be service center, office, office tech,
light distribution type buildings that will represent an investment of around $80
million. Also, he stated that the intersection of Freeport Parkway and LBJ is
becoming quickly an office module and those buildings represent investments in the
range of $100 per square foot which, again, means significant revenue to the City.
He is concerned that a facility like Rollins and others could not only hurt the value
of properties and buildings, but could discourage other developers from building
higher -end, higher -finished, higher -employee count facilities. He then described
how the Rollins truck traffic would probably enter and leave their facility, stating
that trucks don't normally like to make left turns against traffic, guessing that the
5
majority of the truck traffic will come to Freeport Parkway, go right passed the
proposed office buildings, as well as the buildings that are there now like Lucent, go
right by the Middle School and then turn into their facility on Wrangler Drive. He
feels that this is a real probability and a standard habit pattern for the trucking
industry. Consequently, Mr. Myers stated that he would like to see the Rollins
Company have a site somewhere other than this location.
Henry Knapek, representing Transwestern Property Company, 12221 Merit Drive,
Dallas, TX - stated that last December his company bought 32 acres of property at
the corner of Lakeshore and Beltline, feeling that this was an excellent location to
build a project that would not have to look at industrial buildings. He stated that the
first phase is 240,000 square feet which will have all over -head doors screened from
all streets with buildings backing up to each other and if the Rollins site is approved,
this heavily-officed project which will cost approximately $17 million will look
onto this Rollins facility. He feels that the Rollins building is not in keeping with
their understanding of what the City of Coppell is trying to do in this area. He
strongly feels that this is the wrong use for this particular piece of land. He feels
that truck drivers are uncontrollable at times, will drive over curbs, park their trucks
wherever and whenever they get ready to park them, stating that if the City is trying
to upgrade what's happening in the area, approving this project would be a mistake
and feels there are other locations within Coppell where they could locate. He, too,
requested that this proposal be denied.
Brian Parks, representing the ownership of the building that is west of this proposed
site which houses Jay's Auto Repair. Mr. Parks stated that this property was bought
about a year ago and is going through some re-leasing at this point in time, stating
his company is seeing primarily office use on this property. He then said that if Jay's
Auto Repair shop's lease were expiring today, he would not be able to afford to stay
there, re-emphasizing this use is not consistent with what they expect to see on this
property. Mr. Parks agrees with Mr. Myers and Mr. Knapek that this use is not in
keeping with what is happening in this area and urged denial.
Chairman Lowry asked for a clarification of the Zoning Ordinance, asking whether
or not this use would be allowed without the fueling island, maintenance facility and
wash bay. Ms. Moro answered that the truck court is an allowable use.
Bill Dahlstrom again spoke to the Commission, stating that this use will actually be
a reduction in traffic than would be generated by other uses and reiterated that
industrial areas generate truck traffic.
Commissioner Nesbit asked whether or not other locations could be considered.
Mr. Pilato answered that this particular piece of property fits their needs, logistically
being right in-between two of their current facilities and puts them within close
proximity to several of their existing customers, indicating that it is the right size.
He stated that they could get by with only 3 1/2 or 4 acres, but they don't like
congested facilities. Commission McGahey then asked a question regarding the
traffic issue, stating that the amount of truck traffic generated on an average week is
50 in and 50 out and questioned the numbers on the traffic study of 88 a.m. trips and
57 p.m. trips. Roy Wilshire, 12700 Park Central Drive, Dallas, TX, defined that the
6
88 total inbound and outbound trips in the morning peak hour and 57 trips in the
afternoon peak hour is generated in the adjacent street, not necessarily the peak hour
of the facility, itself. He said that these numbers are what the facility generates
during the peak hour of the adjacent streets per day. Mr. McGahey then asked how
many Rollins corporate trucks are anticipated being parked in the facility on
average. Mr. Pilato answered that they are projecting domiciling approximately 100
vehicles but stressed that if companies had their trucks parked all the time, the
trucks wouldn't be needed. He emphasized that most of their vehicles are utilized.
He stated that on average, a truck runs between 100,000 to 130,000 miles per year.
He stated that it would be impossible to project how many trucks could be parked
on the site at any given time.
Extended discussion continued relative to who actually drives these trucks; i.e., Rollins
personnel or client people, whether or not trucks stay at the facility with drivers picking
them up in the morning, traffic concerns, safety concerns relative to the Middle School,
certification of the drivers, whether or not hazardous material is transported in these
vehicles, percentage of tractor trailer trucks, vs. other types of trucks, how often do trucks
use the facility strictly for gas, whether or not the fueling island, wash bay and maintenance
area would be adding truck traffic to the site, sight lines into the facility, defining the types
of trees to be planted, whether or not the Middle School had concerns about this truck site,
etc.
Planning Director Sieb stated that the applicant was always aware that the use is allowable,
but that the fuel island, maintenance facility and wash bay needed a Special Use Permit. He
stated that the applicant indicated that it would not be economically beneficial to build this
facility without the fueling, maintenance and wash bay aspects.
Discussion followed regarding the caliber of use in this vicinity, the possibility of it being in
a different location, from a drive-by standard, what difference is there between this facility
and others already in the area, the aesthetic viewpoint, what will actually be seen from the
street, location of the trucks, etc.
Chairman Lowry then closed the Public Hearing.
Commissioner Halsey made a motion to deny Case No. S-1159, Rollins Leasing
Corporation, zoning change from LI to LI-S.U.P. Commissioner Kittrell seconded the
motion; motion failed (2-4) with Commissioners Kittrell and Halsey voting in favor of
denial; Commissioners Nesbit, McGahey, Lowry and Stewart voting in opposition.
Planning Director Sieb reminded the Commission that 30 percent of property owners have
made it known that they are opposed to this rezoning with three people testifying about the
detrimental economic impact this use might have. He stated that one of the major goals of
this City Council is to promote economic development in the community and that is one
issue that wasn't even discussed but needs consideration. He also mentioned that there are
no other two-story buildings in the area.
7
Some discussion followed about the proposed height of the building. It was brought out
that the proposed building will be 22 feet high and adjacent facilities are probably of similar
height. Commissioner Halsey reminded the Commission that he believes Coppell is a hot
commercial market right now and if this facility doesn't go in now, something else that
would be more compatible to the area could come along in the future. Commissioner
Kittrell reminded the Commission that this property backs up to the Nicor Center which
houses has a dance school, preschool, etc., with a lot of traffic and kids, as well as its
proximity to the Middle School and feels that this is a safety issue. It was brought up that
other facilities in the area have the same safety issues. Roy Wilshire was asked to comment
on the traffic issue of this facility and other uses in the area. Mr. Wilshire commented that
several of the other allowed uses in the district include light industrial uses, warehouse uses,
office uses, etc., and stated that during the afternoon peak period, the allowed uses for light
industrial would be 139 percent higher. For the warehouse uses similar to those across the
street, it would be 25 percent higher; for office uses, it would be roughly three times higher.
Commissioner McGahey asked what the breakdown would be of trucks to this facility vs.
trucks to any other facility in the area. Mr. Wilshire stated that Rollins would only have 10
percent of their trucks as tractor -trailer combinations vs. other warehouse facilities, which
would have all trucks tractor -trailer. Numbers vary as to user. It was brought out that
Rollins intends to own this property vs. leasing it. Some discussion centered on increasing
the wall height in front of the building, the material on the sliding gates; time the gates will
be open/closed, the screening of the truck area, etc. Mr. Dahlstrom suggested moving the
taller trucks to the back of the facility and keep the shorter trucks near the front of the
facility. It was agreed that striping would be provided on the south portion of the property
for the parking of the tractor -trailer trucks. Discussion followed regarding conditions to be
placed on this Special Use Permit.
Chairman Lowry made a motion to approve Case No. S-1159, Rollins Leasing Corporation
Addition, zoning change request from LI (Light Industrial) to LI-S.U.P. (Light Industrial,
Special Use Permit), subject to the following conditions:
1) An 8' masonry screening wall across the frontage of Wrangler Drive be
provided, extending brick wainscot along its base.
2) The entry gate to the truck parking area will be decorative metal.
3) Adhere to the Landscaping Plan as submitted in the packet.
4) All tractor trailer parking shall be allowed only on the rear one-third of the lease
truck parking area. This is to be shown on the revised plat before Council
considers it.
5) There will be a $4,900 tree reparation fee required from the applicant.
6) There will be no parking of trucks/tractors/trailers that are available for leasing
and those that are currently being leased, except behind the screening wall in the
designated truck parking areas.
8
7) There will be no signage above the truck bays.
8) Approval of the color board of materials as presented to the Commission.
9) The Austrian Pine plantings should be listed on the plant legend on the
Landscape Plan.
Commissioner Stewart seconded the motion; motion carried (4-2) with Commissioners
Nesbit, McGahey, Lowry, and Stewart voting in favor. Commissioners Kittrell and Halsey
voting in opposition.
5. Consider approval of the Rollins Leasing Cory. Addition, Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block A,
Preliminary Plat and Site Plan, to allow the creation of 2 lots and the development of a
23,102 square foot regional office, a truck maintenance garage, truck wash and fuel
island on Lot 1 located on the south side of Wrangler Road, between Crestside and
Lakeshore Drives, at the request of Nathan D. Maier Engineers, Inc.
City Planner Isabelle Moro introduced the item to the Commission, showing an exhibit of
the proposal, stating that star recommends denial of this request but since the Commission
recommended approval of the Special Use Permit, the Site Plan, if approved, should be
subject to the conditions placed on the Special Use Permit and the Preliminary Plat should
have a condition relating to the requirement that a Site Plan review is necessary when Lot 2
is developed.
The applicant was present but did not appear before the Commission.
No discussion followed.
Commissioner McGahey made a motion to approve the Rollins Leasing Cory. Addition, Lot
1 and Lot 2, Block A, Preliminary Plat and Site Plan, subject to the following conditions:
SITE PLAN CONDITIONS:
1) An 8' masonry screening wall across the frontage of Wrangler Drive be
provided, extending brick wainscot along its base.
2) The entry gate to the truck parking area will be decorative metal.
3) Adhere to the Landscaping Plan as submitted in the packet.
4) All tractor trailer parking shall be allowed only on the rear one-third of the lease
truck parking area. This is to be shown on the revised plat before Council
considers it.
5) There will be a $4,900 tree reparation fee required from the applicant.
0
6) trucks/tractors/trailers that are available for leasing and those that are currently
being leased, except behind the screening wall in the designated truck parking
areas.
7) There will be no signage above the truck bays.
8) Approval of the color board of materials as presented to the Commission.
9) The Austrian Pine plantings should be listed on the plant legend on the
Landscape Plan.
PRELIMINARY PLAT CONDITION:
1) When Lot 2 is developed, Site Plan review will be required.
Commissioner Stewart seconded the motion; motion carried (4-2) with Commissioners
Nesbit, McGahey, Lowry and Stewart voting in favor. Commissioners Kittrell and Halsey
voting in opposition.
A ten-minute break was observed.
6. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. S-1160, Smoothie Factory,
zoning change request from TC (Town Center) to TC-S.U.P. (Town Center, Special
Use Permit), to allow a juice store to operate in Eleanor's Square located at 230 N.
Denton Tap Road, at the request of Ken and Annie Cartwright.
Planning Director Gary Sieb introduced the item to the Commission, showing an exhibit of
the proposal, stating that staff recommends approval, subject to the conditions outlined in
the Staff Report. He emphasized that there are 91 parking spaces left in the Eleanor's
Square center, which means that no other restaurants will be allowed unless additional
parking is provided.
Commissioner Halsey questioned the condition of operational hours and the fact that no
Sunday hours were stipulated. Mr. Sieb stated that these hours were volunteered by the
applicant. After some discussion with the applicant, it was decided to add Sunday hours so
that the Special Use Permit would not have to be amended in the future.
Annie Cartwright, 822 Crestoak Place, Denton, TX 76201, was present to represent this
item before the Commission and answer any questions. She stated that they may wish to be
open on Sundays from noon to 6 p.m. in the future and requested that this be added to
Condition No. 1.
Chairman Lowry opened the Public Hearing, asking for people present who wanted to speak
either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward.
There were none.
10
Chairman Lowry closed the Public Hearing.
No discussion followed.
Commissioner Nesbit made a motion to approve Case No. S-1160, Smoothie Factory,
zoning change request from TC (Town Center) to TC-S.U.P. (Town Center, Special Use
Permit), subject to the following conditions:
1) Hours of operation will be from 7 a.m. to 9 p.m. Monday through Friday; 7 a.m.
to 8 p.m. Saturday, and if desired, 12 noon to 6 p.m. Sunday.
2) Signage will comply with colors allowed in the shopping center.
3) Parking will meet the zoning ordinance requirements
Commissioner McGahey seconded the motion; motion carried (6-0) with Commissioners
Nesbit, McGahey, Kittrell, Lowry, Halsey and Stewart voting in favor. None opposed.
7. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. S-1161, AT&T Wireless
Services, zoning change request from A (Agriculture) to A-S.U.P. (Agriculture, Special
Use Permit) to allow a communications antenna to be mounted to an existing TU
Electric tower with an equipment cabinet at the base of the tower located
approximately 710' northwest of the intersection of MacArthur Boulevard and the
D.A.R.T. right-of-way, at the request of AT&T Wireless Services.
Planning Director Gary Sieb introduced the item to the Commission, showing exhibits of
the proposal, stating that at one point there was concern as to the access to this property, but
the Fire Department has indicated to the applicant that the existing 20' wide easement that's
being provided to the TU facility would also work for this applicant. He then stated that
staff recommends approval of this request, subject to the conditions outlined in the Staff
Report, stating that Conditions 4 and 6 have been addressed.
Bill Bauman, 5501 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, TX, was present to represent this item before the
Commission and answer any questions, addressing staff s recommendations. He stated that
the size of the shelter is necessary because of the amount and size of equipment needed to
provide adequate service to the area now and in the future. He stated that if the proposed
Fixed Wireless system becomes activated for this area, the radio equipment will be housed
at this site. He then addressed the brick vs. brick -like veneer concern. Mr. Bauman stated
that these seamless cabinets (weighing approximately 28,000 lbs.) are made by injecting a
mold with concrete. He added that in order to meet the spirit of Coppell's ordinance
regarding 80 percent masonry, a dye will be added the concrete during the final coat and a
1/4' thick grid will create a brick -like pattern. This procedure makes the cabinet waterproof,
which is necessary to house delicate equipment. Because the shelter is recessed
approximately 3 feet underground, it would be unadvisable to brick the structure due to
erosion. Mr. Sieb stated that concrete is a masonry material and for the reasons stated, Mr.
Bauman's request is acceptable.
11
Chairman Lowry opened the Public Hearing, asking for people present who wanted to speak
either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward.
There were none.
Chairman Lowry closed the Public Hearing.
Commissioner Kittrell made a motion to approve Case No. S-1161, AT&T Wireless
Services, zoning change request from A (Agriculture) to A-S.U.P. (Agriculture, Special Use
Permit), subject to the following conditions:
1) Council waive the minimum separation distance between the antenna and
residential uses.
2) The Dalworth Quick -set veneer in an earth -tone maroon color be used as the
outer casing of the base building.
3) Inventory of Existing Sites be compiled prior to the Council meeting.
Commissioner Nesbit seconded the motion; motion carried (6-0) with Commissioners
Nesbit, McGahey, Kittrell, Lowry, Halsey and Stewart voting in favor. None opposed.
8. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. 5-1162, Anamia's Tex-Mex
Restaurant, zoning change request from TC (Town Center) to TC-S.U.P. (Town
Center, Special Use Permit), to allow a 3,600 square foot private club restaurant to be
located at 106 N. Denton Tap Road, at the request of Javier Espinoza.
City Planner Isabelle Moro introduced the item to the Commission, showing exhibits of the
proposal, stating that staff recommends approval of this Special Use Permit, subject to the
conditions outlined in the Staff Report, adding one condition pertaining to specifying the
color of the raceway on the sign elevation.
Jay Ortiz, 633 Shadowcrest, Coppell, TX 75019, was present to represent this item before
the Commission and answer any questions, addressing staff comments, commenting that the
sign will be white in color.
Commissioner Kittrell asked whether or not the seating would be more than what they
presently have at their Sandy Lake/Moore Road location. Mr. Ortiz answered that the
facility will be 700 square feet larger than at the present location, but most of this space will
be going into having a larger kitchen. The seating capacity will be about the same.
Chairman Lowry opened the Public Hearing, asking for people present who wanted to speak
either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward.
Those speaking were:
Kathleen Vint, 105 Dickens, Coppell, TX - opposes this request for a number of
reasons; i.e., the developer stated that restaurants would be located in the wing on
12
A.1- other end of the anchor store, away from the Chaucer Estates homes; a private
club would encourage additional traffic, particularly at night; lack of adequate
parking spaces; the kitchen area should have specific restrictions placed on it; the
grease pit and open garbage area would create health concerns to nearby residents;
no outdoor music or outdoor lighting at the rear of the restaurant should be
permitted, etc.
Jim McCown, 109 Dickens, Coppell, TX - opposes this request because the
developer clearly stated that there would be a maximum of two restaurants in this
development and that they would be on the far wing; feels this use is too intrusive
on the existing homes; i.e., the cooking odors for 12 or 14 hours, 365 days a year,
will be intense; has concerns about the dumpster area where used cooking oil and
garbage will be housed, etc.
Larry Mendez, 139 Tennyson Place, Coppell, TX - opposes this use primarily
because of the odor problems this restaurant will incur. Would like Anamia's to be
located in the development but not so close to the existing homes.
Joyce Skelton, 153 Dickens Drive, Coppell, TX - opposes this use primarily because
of the private club aspect, liquor being served so close to existing homes, and
possible partying in the restaurant.
Jay Ortiz, owner of Anamia's, addressed the Commission, again, stating that his is a family
restaurant and does not advertise liquor, which is kept in the back room. No partying goes
on in his restaurant. He usually shuts down by 9 p.m. He said that tenants in his present
location have never complained about odors being emitted by the restaurant.
Commissioner Halsey asked whether or not the developer had mentioned anything about
that location vs. the other side of the anchor store. Mr. Ortiz stated that Hollywood Video is
slated to go into the corner of the other wing and if there were room in that wing, he would
relocate, but there isn't. He wishes to remain in the heart of Coppell. Mr. Ortiz stated that
he's never had a problem with the Sanitation Inspector and his facility. Additional
discussion centered around whether or not there is a zoning restriction as to restaurant
location at this shopping center (the answer was "no"); adequacy of parking spaces, any
restriction of hours of the shopping center, control over health inspections, distance of
restaurant from retaining wall, etc. Jim McCown stated that if the restaurant were located in
the other wing, there would be a greater distance between it and the homes behind it,
probably 150' or more and odors would not be as intense, and he feels that denying this
request is the right thing to do. Kathleen Vint again spoke re the parking spaces provided at
the rear of the facility and how they would intrude on the homes behind it and stating this
area needs to be moderated as to noise, traffic and lights. She reiterated the fact that there
would be a big difference if this use were located on the other wing.
Chairman Lowry closed the Public Hearing.
There was further discussion relative to lighting and adequacy of parking spaces. Ms. Moro
showed pictures of the existing screening wall, indicating that the concrete base is about 34
high and the brick masonry wall is approximately 8' high. She stated that there is attached
lighting on the building. With regard to the adequacy of parking spaces, there are 109
spaces on site; 65 spaces are required by current tenants. There are currently 45 extra
13
parking spaces available.
Commissioner Halsey made a motion to approve Case No. S-1162, Anamia's Tex-Mex
Restaurant, zoning change request from TC (Town Center) to TC-S.U.P. (Town Center,
Special Use Permit), subject to the following conditions:
1) The hours of operation will be 11 a.m. to 10 p.m. Monday through Sunday.
2) The sale of beer, wine and alcohol on the premise will be permitted.
3) Final exit door locations will have to be approved by the Building Official.
4) The color of the raceway to match the color of the brick.
Commissioner McGahey seconded the motion; motion carried (5-1) with Commissioners
Nesbit, McGahey, Lowry, Halsey and Stewart voting in favor. Commissioner Kittrell
voting in opposition.
9. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD -163R, Windsor Estates,
zoning change for property zoned PD -SF -9 (Planned Development, Single Family -9) to
amend the development conditions of the Planned Development as they pertain to the
entry features of the subdivision and the creation of additional common areas to
accommodate landscaping on a 15.78 acre tract of land located along the north side of
DeForest Road, approximately 600 feet east of Allen Road, at the request of Halff
Associates, Inc.
Planning Director Gary Sieb introduced the item to the Commission, showing exhibits of
the proposal, stating that staff recommends approval of this amendment, subject to the
conditions outlined in the Staff Report, adding that if there is citizen opposition to the entry
18' tower feature, it be scaled back in size.
Kelly Jordan, Coppell Optimum Assets, 308 Park Meadow Way, Coppell, TX, was present
to represent this item before the Commission and answer any questions, addressing staff
comments and showing a color board of the stone, brick and cast stone to be used on the
entry feature. He stated that all staff conditions have already been addressed. He then
stated that the tower structure is intended to be a bus shelter for the children in the
neighborhood.
Commissioner Kittrell asked whether or not the tower must be 18' high. Mr. Jordan replied
that he is not stuck on this height but in order to get a particular design decided upon, it was
hard to shorten it for fear that it would look "squatty". He stated that the trees in the area
will far surpass the height of the tower. Commission Stewart asked whether or not this
structure could be scaled by a child. The answer was "no". Some discussion centered on
amount and height of trees to be planted.
Chairman Lowry opened the Public Hearing, asking for people present who wanted to speak
14
either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward.
There were none.
Chairman Lowry closed the Public Hearing.
No further discussion followed.
Commissioner Stewart made a motion to approve Case No. PD -163R, Windsor Estates,
zoning change for property zoned PD -SF -9 (Planned Development, Single Family -9) to
amend the development conditions of the Planned Development as they pertain to the entry
features of the subdivision and the creation of additional common areas to accommodate
landscaping, subject to the following conditions:
1) Label the sidewalk and bike trail on the wall elevation plans.
2) Plant materials must be on plant palette.
3) Modify the HOA document to reflect the latest changes to the planned
development.
4) Specify height of screening wall on marquee sign elevation.
Commissioner Kittrell seconded the motion; motion carried (6-0) with Commissioners
Nesbit, McGahey, Kittrell, Lowry, Halsey and Stewart voting in favor. None opposed.
10. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD -179, DeForest Court, zoning
change request from A (Agriculture) to PD -SF -12 (Planned Development, Single
Family -12), to allow the development of an 11 -lot residential subdivision with common
areas on 4.0 acres of property located at 703 DeForest Road, at the request of Halff
Associates, Inc.
Planning Director Gary Sieb advised the Commission that this case was withdrawn by the
applicant.
11. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of the DeForest Court, Renlat of Lot 2 of the
Nettie Long Addition, to allow the development of an 11 -lot residential subdivision
with common areas on 4.0 acres of property located at 703 DeForest Road, at the
request of Halff Associates, Inc.
Planning Director Gary Sieb advised the Commission that this case was withdrawn by the
applicant.
12. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD -120R2, Waterside Estates,
Phase II, zoning change request for property zoned PD -SF -9 (Planned Development,
Single Family -9), to amend the development conditions for Lot 8, Block D, to change a
25' front building line to a 15' side building line located at 902 Spyglass Cove, at the
15
request of Sammy and Patsy Thornton.
City Planner Isabelle Moro introduced the item to the Commission, showing exhibits of the
proposal, stating that approximately four years ago the owner of this corner lot received a
Board of Adjustment variance of 10' to the 25' front platted building line to allow the
construction of a 4' open wrought iron fence to be set back 15' from the property line along
the frontage of Spyglass Drive. The present owner is requesting this 25' building line to be
reduced to 15' to match the current fence line in order to accommodate a swimming pool.
She went on to explain that once a side yard has been established, the fence code allows the
placement of a fence at the property line. Ms. Moro then stated that staff has great concern
with allowing the fence to go up to the property line due to the visibility and street
appearance of this corner lot and the impact this would have on the other homes in the
immediate area. Ms. Moro stated that staff recommends the building line and fence line to
be the same. She also advised the Commission that staff was contacted by a third -party
management company, hired by the Homeowners Association, advising that any
improvement that the homeowner is proposing on his lot will be subject to the Architectural
Review Committee of the HOA. The homeowner needs to have this proposal submitted to
them prior to this case going before Council. Ms. Moro then stated that staff recommends
approval of this request, subject to the conditions outlined in the Staff Report, adding a
condition that this request receive approval by the HOA Architectural Review Committee.
At this point, Commissioner Stewart excused himself from discussion because he lives
within 200' of this home and received a notice.
Sammy Thornton, 902 Spyglass Cove, Coppell, TX, was present to represent this item
before the Commission and answer any questions. Mr. Thornton explained his request in
detail, showing photographs of other corner lots in his development that have five-foot side
yards, acknowledging that he must have his plans approved by the HOA Architectural
Review Committee and stating that he would like the right to place his fence at the property
line because of the trees he planted in that area. He stated that he would like to enclose
these trees behind his fence, if possible.
Some discussion followed regarding retention of the 4' wrought iron fence vs. a wooden
fence. Mr. Thornton stated that it will be retained and will be heavily landscaped. Further
discussion followed regarding other corner lots in the subdivision that have front and side
yards and whether or not those who sent in written opposition were immediate neighbors.
Ms. Moro answered that they were not from the immediate area.
Chairman Lowry opened the Public Hearing, asking for people present who wanted to speak
either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward.
One person chose to speak as follows:
Jeff Perry, 762 Teal Cove, Coppell, TX - did not oppose this request because other
corner homeowners have fence lines on the property line but stated he heard rumors
that Mr. Thornton was replacing the wrought iron fence with a wooden fence. Mr.
Perry suggested that he plant shrubs along the wrought iron fence to insure some
amount of privacy, which would improve the look of his property.
16
Some discussion followed as to how to curve the present fence to encompass the trees. It
was decided to run the fence perpendicular to the back corner of the house, then curve the
fence to 5' to encompass the trees near the property line.
Chairman Lowry closed the Public Hearing.
Commissioner McGahey made a motion to approve Case No. PD -120R2, Waterside
Estates, Phase II, zoning change request for property zoned PD -SF -9 (Planned
Development, Single Family -9), to amend the development conditions for Lot 8, Block D,
subject to the following conditions:
1) Approval from the Homeowners Association's Architectural Review
Committee be attained.
2) The revised 4' wrought iron fence configuration be as shown on the exhibit
(attached as Exhibit Q.
3) The proposed pool must abide by setback requirements for in -ground and
above -ground swimming pools and spas stated in Section 35-3 of the Zoning
Ordinance.
Commissioner Nesbit seconded the motion; motion carried (5-0-1) with Commissioners
Nesbit, McGahey, Kittrell, Lowry and Halsey voting in favor. None opposed.
Commissioner Stewart abstained.
13. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. ZC-599, Carrollton -Farmers
Branch I.S.D., Riverchase Elementary School, zoning change request from TH-1
(Townhouse -1) to SF -7 (Single -Family -7), to allow the construction of an elementary
school on approximately 10 acres of property located at the northeast corner of
MacArthur Boulevard and Starleaf Street, at the request of Glenn Engineering.
City Planner Isabelle Moro introduced the item to the Commission, stating because schools
are not permitted in the Town House zoning classification, a zoning change to SF -7 is
recommended since most adjacent properties have like zoning. She then stated that staff
recommends approval of the Plat with no conditions.
City Attorney Hager suggested a condition as follows:
"No improvements will be allowed in the flood plain except as permitted
and approved by the City Engineer."
Robert Howman, Glenn Engineering, Inc., 100 Decker Court, #250, Irving, TX 75062, was
present to represent this item before the Commission and answer any questions, stating that
he is in agreement with the condition.
17
Chairman Lowry opened the Public Hearing, asking for people present who wanted to speak
either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward.
There were none.
Chairman Lowry closed the Public Hearing.
Commissioner Halsey made a motion to approve Case No. ZC-599, Carrollton -Farmers
Branch I.S.D., Riverchase Elementary School, zoning change request from TH-1
(Townhouse -1) to SF -7 (Single -Family -7), subject to the following condition:
1) No improvements will be allowed in the flood plain except as permitted
and approved by the City Engineer.
Commissioner McGahey seconded the motion; motion carried (6-0) with Commissioners
Nesbit, McGahey, Kittrell, Lowry, Halsey and Stewart voting in favor. None opposed.
14. Consider approval of the Carrollton -Farmers Branch I.S.D., Riverchase Elementary
School, Preliminary Plat and Site Plan, to allow the construction of an elementary
school on approximately 10 acres of property and the dedication of the Starleaf Street
right-of-way located at the northeast corner of MacArthur Boulevard and Starleaf
Street, at the request of Glenn Engineering.
City Planner Isabelle Moro introduced the item to the Commission, showing exhibits of the
proposal, pointing out that this is the companion case to the zoning case previously
approved. Ms. Moro showed a color board and colored elevation rendering of the proposed
building and reminded the applicant that at least 80 percent masonry is required and CMU
and metal panels cannot be counted towards this requirement. She then stated that staff
recommends approval of both the Preliminary Plat and Site Plan, subject to the conditions
as outlined in the Staff Report.
Robert Howman, Glenn Engineering, Inc., was present but did not speak.
Some discussion followed relative to the lack of lighting in this area. The school will
address this concern to TU Electric.
Commissioner Kittrell made a motion to approve the Carrollton -Farmers Branch I.S.D.,
Riverchase Elementary School, Preliminary Plat and Site Plan, subject to the following
conditions:
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL:
1. No improvements will be allowed in the floodplain until approved by
the City Engineer.
2. Eliminate the Lot 2, Block 1 designation for Starleaf Drive r.o.w. dedication.
18
CONDITIONS FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
1. City Council will have to approve the 4' -high combination metal and brick
column fence along the north, south, and east side of play area.
2. Future planting islands along the eastern property line must be a minimum of
150 square feet and a minimum width of 9'.
3. Approval of the exterior building materials shown on the submitted color board.
4. Building must be at least 80% masonry construction.
Commissioner McGahey seconded the motion; motion carried (6-0) with Commissioners
Nesbit, McGahey, Kittrell, Lowry, Halsey and Stewart voting in favor. None opposed.
15. Consider approval of the Coppell High School Addition, Site Plan Amendment, to
allow the construction of a band hall addition, principal's suite, dining/lecture hall,
and 9th grade classroom wing addition located at 185 W. Parkway Boulevard, at the
request of Glenn Engineering.
City Planner Isabelle Moro introduced the item to the Commission, showing exhibits, a
color board and colored rendering of the proposed building. Ms. Moro stated that a number
of existing trees on this site will be affected by the proposed construction of a 9t" Grade
wing, band hall, dining/lecture hall, additional corridors and the principal's suite, stating that
the Superintendent has asked that the tree survey and Tree Preservation Plan requirements
be waived. The plan is to relocate a number of the affected trees to the Middle School
North campus. Ms. Moro then advised the Commission that during the Development
Review process, staff had concern about the lack of a tree survey and the school has
provided one, which has been accepted by the Leisure Services Department, that will serve
for City-wide forestry planting purposes. Ms. Moro then stated that staff recommends
approval of the Site Plan, subject to the condition outlined in the Staff Report.
Robert Howman, Glenn Engineering, Inc., was present but did not speak.
Some discussion followed questioning the calculations of the buildable allowable area
shown on Table 1.2A. Robert Howman stated that this has to do with building separation.
Apparently this item was addressed by the Building Official during the preliminary review
and it was decided that since this is a Site Plan amendment approval request, the Building
Inspection Department didn't feel it was appropriate at this time to address this discrepancy
but when it comes through for plan review, this will be addressed. Gary Sieb stated that if
the building needs to be reduced in size, he has the right to "sign -off' on what's called minor
revisions to site plans without having to go through the regular process. Commissioner
Halsey had a concern relative to the landscaping and tree survey and reasoning behind not
holding the school to the same standards as other developers. Ms. Moro related that schools
are exempt from the ordinance; however staff did want some documentation as to what
trees are existing on this property.
19
Commissioner Nesbit made a motion to approve the Coppell High School Addition, Site
Plan Amendment, subject to the following condition:
1) Approval of the exterior building materials as shown on the
submitted color board.
Commissioner Halsey seconded the motion; motion carried (6-0) with Commissioners
Nesbit, McGahey, Kittrell, Lowry, Halsey and Stewart voting in favor. None opposed.
16. Consider approval of The Reserve, Final Plat, to allow the development of 21
residential lots on 9.71 acres of property located along the south side of Bethel Road,
approximately 970' west of Denton Tap Road, at the request of Dowdey, Anderson
and Associates.
Planning Director Gary Sieb introduced the item to the Commission, showing an exhibit of
the proposal, stating that staff recommends approval of the Final Plat, subject to the
conditions outlined in the Staff Report.
The applicant was present but did not speak.
No discussion followed.
Commissioner Halsey made a motion to approve The Reserve, Final Plat, subject to the
following conditions:
1) List PD conditions on the face of the plat.
2) Abide by the Engineering Department comments as follows:
a) During plan review and/or construction process, it may be
determined that permanent erosion control may be needed
along the rear of the lots adjacent to the floodplain.
b) No development/improvement will be allowed in the 100 -year
floodplain.
Commissioner McGahey seconded the motion; motion carried (6-0) with Commissioners
Nesbit, McGahey, Kittrell, Lowry, Halsey and Stewart voting in favor. None opposed.
17. Consider approval of the Coppell Greens, Phase Two, Final Plat, to allow the
development of 102 residential lots and 3 common areas on 29.62 acres of property
located along the west side of Denton Tap Road, approximately 275.80' north of State
Highway 121 Bypass.
Planning Director Gary Sieb introduced the item to the Commission, showing an exhibit of
the proposal, stating that although the original Planned Development allowed 226 lots on
Phases I and II; it now totals 223 lots. He went on to state that staff recommends approval
of the Final Plat, subject to the condition outlined in the Staff Report.
KII
Bill Anderson, Dowdey, Anderson & Associates, Inc., 5225 Village Creek Drive, Suite 200,
Plano, TX, was present but did not speak.
No discussion followed.
Commissioner Stewart made a motion to approve Coppell Greens, Phase Two, Final Plat,
subject to the following condition:
1) Sidewalks being provided at common areas.
Commissioner McGahey seconded the motion; motion carried (6-0) with Commissioners
Nesbit, McGahey, Kittrell, Lowry, Halsey and Stewart voting in favor. None opposed.
18. Consider approval of the Castlebury Court, Final Plat, to allow the development of 19
residential lots on 5.427 acres of property located along the south side of Sandy Lake
Road, approximately 278' west of Lodge Road, at the request of Goodwin and
Marshall, Inc.
City Planner Isabelle Moro introduced the item to the Commission, showing an exhibit of
the proposal, stating this Plat conforms with the approved Preliminary Plat. She went on to
state that staff recommends approval of the Final Plat, subject to the conditions outlined in
the Staff Report.
The applicant was present but did not speak.
No discussion followed.
Commissioner McGahey made a motion to approve the Castlebgg Court, Final Plat,
subject to the following conditions:
1) HOA document will have to be approved by the City Attorney prior to the
plat being recorded with Dallas County.
2) Include reference line to record the volume and page information on the
final plat.
3) Submit black lines instead of blue lines.
Commissioner Kittrell seconded the motion; motion carried (6-0) with Commissioners
Nesbit, McGahey, Kittrell, Lowry, Halsey and Stewart voting in favor. None opposed.
19. General discussion concerning planning and zoning issues
A. Update on Council planning agenda actions
Planning Director Sieb updated the Commission on the Planning and Zoning
cases brought before Council on May 11th, stating that the Westchase zoniN
case hearing was closed and held under advisement to Council's June 8
meeting. He also stated that Council approved Town Center West
21
Boulevard extending to the high school with a 10' setback vs. the 15' setback
recommended by the Commission. He added that a 7" curb and a retaining
wall will be constructed on the north side to help protect the screening wall.
Next, Mr. Sieb stated that the Blockbuster request was approved with a 12
square foot blue and yellow ticket stub logo.
B. Director's comments
There were none.
With nothing further to discuss, the meeting adjourned at approximately 11:30 p.m.
:r4y,., LO .. - 10
Stan Lowry, Ch rm
Aarb
H. Jahoda, Sr. Administrative Secretary
22
Trip Generation Review
Proposed Rollins Site
Coppell, Texas
May, 1999
INTRODUCTION
Jenkens and Gilchrist of Dallas, Texas has retained the services of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
(KHA) to review potential trip generation for a site located between Belt Line Road and Freeport Parkway
in southern Coppell, Texas (See Location Map). This site is zoned Light Industrial (LI), as are the
surrounding tracts of land. The study site is 7.10 acres bound by Wrangler Drive, Crestside, and
Lakeshore.
Rollins Truck Leasing Corporation has proposed to construct a new maintenance and leasing facility at the
study site. The new facility would consist of regional and truck leasing office space, truck maintenance
building, and non-commercial fueling station for company-owned vehicles.
The purpose of this study is to review trip generation for the proposed Rollins Truck Leasing use as
compared to other possible uses permitted under the current zoning. Trip rates for the Rollins Truck
Leasing use are derived from a case study that matches proposed uses. Other trip rates are computed
through the use of the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 6`h Edition.
POTENTIAL LAND -USES
Per the Coppell Zoning Ordinance Code Book, 1996 Edition, uses permitted by LI zoning include those
listed under Office (0), Retail (R), and Commercial (C) Districts, as well as the specific uses listed under
LI zoning. For comparative purposes, KHA identified sample uses permitted by the current zoning. For
this study, General Light Industrial, Warehousing, Office, and Shopping Center were evaluated. The
following assumptions were made in the computations:
• General Light Industrial — 45 percent building coverage on-site
• Warehousing — 45 percent building coverage on-site
• Office — 25,000 square foot building floorplate with an FAR less than 2.0 to 1
• Retail — 25 percent building coverage on-site
These assumptions yielded the following building areas:
• General Light Industrial — 139,174 square feet (SF)
• Warehousing— 139,174 SF
• Office — 150,000 SF (Six floor building and 0.49 to 1 FAR)
• Shopping Center — 77,294 SF
The proposed Rollins Truck Leasing use has 23,102 SF of building space, resulting in a five percent
building coverage on-site.
TRIP GENERATION
The ITE Trip Generation Manual, 6`h Edition provides average trip generation rates based upon field study
data collected for a wide variety of land -uses. The number of trip ends generated by a particular use is a
function of an independent variable such as building square footage. Within the manual, formulas are
provided for the land -uses, which are used to generate the number of trip ends for peak hours. Table 1
provides a summary of sample trip generations for the uses considered in this comparative study. The
percentage of trucks within the trip generations for industrial/warehouse uses typically average ten percent
with a range up to twenty percent, according the ITE Trip Generation Manual.
GATPTOLPEOPLE\md1\Rollins Site Trip Study.doc
4-
EXHIBIT A
Trip Generation Review
Proposed Rollins Site
Coppell, Texas
May, 1999
Table 1
Sample Trip Generations
Land Use
SF
ITE Code
AM Peak Hour Tris
PM Peak Hour Trips
Light Industrial
139,174
110
128
136
Warehouse
139,174
150
63
71
Office
1 150,000
710
234
1 224
Shopping Center
1 77,294
1 820
80
1 289
The proposed Rollins Truck Leasing use trip generation was based upon a case study performed at a site
that would be similar in nature. The case study site had 13,360 SF of building space and generated 51 trips
during the AM peak period, and 33 trips during the PM peak period. The proposed Rollins Truck Leasing
center in Coppell would have 23,102 SF of building space. Using linear regression and building SF as the
independent variable, the proposed Coppell site would generate 88 trips during the AM peak period, and 57
trips during the PM peak period.
Comparing the generated trips for the proposed Rollins site in Coppell with the sample trip generations in
Table 1 reveals the sample generations being higher with the exception of warehouse and retail during the
AM peak period. Table 2 summarizes the differences between the proposed Rollins Truck Leasing use and
the sample study uses.
Table 2
Trip Generation Differentials
Land Use
AM Trips
PM Trips
Percent Difference
AM Period
Percent Difference
PM Period
Rollins Truck Leasing
88
57
Light Industrial
128
136
+45%
+139%
Warehouse
63
71
-28%
+25%
Office
234
224
+166%
+293%
Sho inaCenter
80
289
-9%
+407%
The proposed Rollins Truck Leasing use at this location would result in potentially lower trip generation
during the peak periods as compared to a light industrial and office use. Warehouse and retail uses would
result in lower trip generation (25 trips and 8 trips, respectively) during the AM peak period. The trip
generation during the AM peak hour for a shopping center does occur during the same hours as a truck
leasing center, thus the lower number of trips as compared to the proposed truck leasing use. All sample
uses resulted in higher trip generation during the PM peak period, as compared to the proposed Rollins
Truck Leasing use.
SUMMARY
Based upon this study, the proposed Rollins Truck Leasing use would not result in high trip generation
during the peak periods. As compared to other allowable uses on the study site, the truck leasing use was
lower in all cases except for warehouse and retail during the AM peak period. The sample uses were
considerably higher than the truck leasing use during the PM peak period. Therefore, the truck leasing use
appears to have the lowest trip generation potential of the land -uses studied (with warehouse being
comparable).
-2-
\\RANGER\VOL1\PROD\TPTO\2PEOPLE\mdl\Rollins Site Trip Study.doc
Location Map
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
CASE NO.: S-1159, Rollins Leasing Corporation Addition
P & Z HEARING DATE: April 15, 1999
C.C. HEARING DATE: May 11, 1999
LOCATION: Along the south side of Wrangler Drive between Crestside and
Lakeshore Drives.
SIZE OF AREA: 7.02 acres of property; 23,102 sf office/industrial facility
CURRENT ZONING: LI (Light Industrial)
REQUEST: LI-S.U.P. (Light Industrial, Special Use Permit)
APPLICANT:
Developer:
Rollins Leasing Corp.
One Region Plaza
Willington, DE 19803
(302) 426-3545
FAX: (302) 426-2757
Architect:
Mayse & Associates
14850 Quorum Dr., Ste. 201
Dallas, TX 75240
(972) 386-0338
FAX: (972) 386-0578
HISTORY: No zoning or platting history.
TRANSPORTATION: Wrangler Drive is currently under construction and will become a
4 -lane undivided collector street in a 60' -wide right-of-way. Both
Lakeshore and Crestside Drives are C2U, two-lane undivided road
built in a 60' -wide right-of-way.
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North- office/warehouse; "LI" Light Industrial
South - vacant; "LI" Light Industrial
East - office/warehouse; "LI" Light Industrial
West - commercial; "LI" Light Industrial
EMBIT B
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan shows the property as suitable for
light industrial and showroom type of uses.
DISCUSSION: The applicant is proposing to construct corporate training and regional
offices, as well as a 4 -pump fuel island, truck maintenance and truck
wash facility on this 7 -acre site. The maintenance and washing facility
are located behind the office building and screened by a 6' -high masonry
screen wall with 2 sliding gates limiting access to the truck court. The
applicant has provided staggered planting of 4" -caliper Live Oak trees,
15' in height against the screening wall along both the Lakeshore and
Crestside street frontages. Also, against the 6' -high screening wall are
groupings of Sea Green Junipers being proposed to soften the long
continuous lengths of wall along both street frontages. According to the
applicant the gates will be closed only between the hours of midnight to
5:00 a.m. The view beyond the sliding gates during regular business
hours is problematic to staff especially when Wrangler Drive will
become a 4 -lane undivided collector street with considerable east -west
vehicular traffic, going to the Middle School West.
The proposed fuel island structure measures approximately 19' high and
40' wide. The fuel storage tank will be placed underground immediately
to the west of the fuel structure. The 5 maintenance bays adjoin the
regional offices and are generally a tilt wall construction with metal
overhead doors and metal roof panels. The elevation shows signs
located immediately above the overhead doors. Staff would like to
request the actual elevation of each sign to determine if they could be
considered movement control signs, as claimed by the applicant. The
bays will be partially concealed by the 6 -high masonry screen wall
proposed around the perimeter of the property. Each of the bay doors is
approximately 16' -high. More than 60% of those bay doors will be
exposed. The staggered 15' -high Live Oak trees against the screening
wall will screen only a portion of the bay doors from the view from
public right-of-ways.
According to the applicant this facility would service anywhere from 8 to
16 trucks a day. The site has the capacity to park 106 trucks at any one
time. The proposed hours of operation are from 5:00 am to midnight,
Monday through Saturday. The amount of truck traffic generated on an
average week is 50 in and 50 out. The heaviest truck traffic occurs from
4:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. and from 5:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. The intensity
of truck traffic, as well as the extended hours of operation are
troublesome.
Item # 4
Staff has great concern with the location of this proposed use. With the
Coppell Middle School West campus located less than 500' to the west of
this site and given the quality of the surrounding office buildings. and
industrial buildings, we feel that this is too intense a use at this location.
Staff certainly would not be opposed to the use for one of our remote
interior lots at any of the other industrial parks. Concentrating heavy
truck traffic by the Middle School campus is a health and safety concern.
For the first time in an industrial park, adjacent landowners and
developers have expressed concern over the quality and type of use being
proposed and expressed that concern to staff. Much of the apprehension
related to the inappropriateness of the use, as well as the inconsistency of
the project compared with the overall development of the surrounding
properties. The increased truck traffic, environmental issues and image
were all factors that were cited that would negatively impact surrounding
properties.
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
The planning staff recommends denial of this special use permit request for a
number of reasons. We feel it is an inappropriate use for the property, the
intensity of the development is too great for the area, and its proximity to the
Middle School campus is especially troublesome with regards to truck activity.
Upon visiting another similar site staff is of the opinion that the quality of the
facility is not consistent with the industrial facilities in our community. The truck
court and truck maintenance bays at this other facility are screened with a 6' to 8'
high chain-link fence with barbed wire on top that provide no visual screen. The
above ground fuel storage tank is located next to the bays and it measures
approximately 25' in height. The storage tank is extremely visible from the street.
All sliding gates to the truck court and maintenance area are kept opened during
business hours, allowing full view of the truck area to a person standing on the
ground of an adjacent property or street. A substantial number of trucks and
trailers at this site are randomly parked in the truck court. The visual impact of
over 100 parked trucks is unsightly. Finally, considerable adjacent property
owners' opposition has surfaced.
ALTERNATIVES: 1) Recommend approval of the request
2) Recommend disapproval of the request
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Site Plan
2) Site Details and Elevations
3) Elevations
4) Landscape Plan
Item # 4
V 696Lr Solna .Lat !� 81 t �1P�ft�l
Addition to the ctr or C�Rs�t� MATS �+o. Z, on
oocordlnV to the Vap therer p rCo�Vb ume 92t
J343. Mop Records Dollos Cour ty i t,roa. 92 29.
` Neta• To the best of my bwJwedgs the segment
m"'w d An Vet• dJ020. Po 21J0. ORacr.. does, not
s,fhet the subject *ftVWty
law Nets; This, lot !s not in rhe 100pr no v1 Nesor+d Zone.
tons, A. oceordln9 to the ftud reod tnswenee Aeto
Alep Cann Pon« Ivo, #"170 0010 0. doted JD/7!i/gt
this lot Is In alcor Zen• X. locos *vineve on
ne! lnv�s,stl�etod
c- arc.
Lot d
11oi� a soh Z �
� � ♦ to r
Scale: t •- 20'
'L°' - 7'r
far
' NO story &lck
Frornt Ro dence
fair
r tir ,.
�'.�• t.�Ie /
iar S 0 43
V�iMr
!' F.U. t ow"Id"t
ML�. ....
. Ll+so■� t i/rit. tewnY
Nese.• Me nunentstlen round An the coater-
• AP2 4MA014rar 4VyE line of SpJgres,s, Dr. and Soros" Cavo was
m m
EXHIBIT C