BM 1999-03-18 PZMinutes of March 18,1999
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Coppell met in pre -session at 6 p.m., and in
regular session at 6:30 p.m., on Thursday, March 18, 1999, in the Coppell Town Center, 255
Parkway Boulevard, Coppell, Texas 75019. The following members were present:
Chairman Stan Lowry
Vice Chairman Rick McCaffrey
Commissioner Texx Stewart
Commissioner Jon Nesbit
Commissioner Drew Halsey
Commissioner Greg McGahey
Also present were Assistant City Engineer Mike Martin, City Attorney Bob Hager, Fire Marshal
Travis Crump, Planning Director Gary Sieb, City Planner Isabelle Moro and Sr. Administrative
Secretary Barbara Jahoda. Commissioner Anna Kittrell was absent.
PRE -SESSION (Open to the Public)
1. Briefing on the Agenda.
Staff briefed the Commission on the cases. Pert Virtanen, Assistant Director of Planning,
was present to bid farewell to the Commission.
REGULAR SESSION (Open to the Public)
2. Call to Order.
Chairman Stan Lowry called the meeting to order.
3. Approval of Minutes dated February 18, 1999.
Commissioner Stewart made a motion to approve the minutes of February 18, 1999, as
written. Commissioner McCaffrey seconded; motion carried (5-0-1) with Commissioners
Nesbit, McGahey, McCaffrey, Halsey and Stewart voting in favor. Because of his absence
last month, Chairman Lowry abstained. None opposed.
4. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD -
108R4, Westchase, zoning change request from R, HO -R, PD -LI, and HO -PD -LI
1
(Retail, Historic Overlay -Retail, Planned Development -Light Industrial and Historic
Overlay Planned Development -Light Industrial) to PD -SF -9 (Planned Development,
Single Family -9), to allow the development of 102 residential lots on 37 acres of
property located along the south side of Bethel Road, east of Coppell Road, at the
request of Dowdey, Anderson & Associates, Inc.
Planning Director Gary Sieb introduced the item to the Commission, showing an exhibit of
the proposal, reminding the Commission why this case was held under advisement from last
month, and outlining the two major issues of concern to staff; i.e., not having an acceptable
tree mitigation plan and the D/FW noise issue. Mr. Sieb then stated that because these
issues have not been adequately addressed, it is staffs recommendation that this case, once
again, be held under advisement for another month. He then outlined the construction
guidelines he developed, designed to alleviate noise. He will have it reviewed by the City's
attorney retained out of Chicago, who is an airport noise expert.
Bill Anderson, Dowdey, Anderson & Associates, Inc., 5225 Village Creek Drive, Suite 200,
Plano, TX, 75093, was present to represent this item before the Commission and answer
any questions, addressing, at length, the two outstanding issues, stating that sound
mitigation items, such as those offered by Gary Sieb, will be offered to a potential
homebuyer as an upgrade option. Mr. Anderson then read the list drafted by Mr. Sieb.
Chairman Lowry asked Mr. Anderson if these items would be standard or considered as
upgrades. Mr. Anderson stated that some items would probably be standard, but not all.
Regarding the tree issue, Mr. Anderson stated that this developer is committed to saving as
many trees as possible, but working with the new Tree Ordinance is a challenge, and at this
stage of the game, he cannot commit to the number of trees which will ultimately be
removed from properties, but can, with some assurance, estimate tree loss within street
rights-of-way and alleys; but, wooded lots cannot be predetermined because the size and
shapes of homes will vary and differ. Mr. Anderson gave a scenario of someone wanting to
build a house on a wooded lot -- after footprinting the house, etc., he finds that 200 caliper
inches of trees have to be removed that physically cannot be placed on the lot because the
rest of the lot is heavily wooded. As the new Ordnance reads, 200 caliper inches equals
$20,000 that the developer will have to place into a fund for trees to be planted elsewhere in
the City, and Mr. Anderson doesn't feel this is right or fair. Because 80% of the lots on this
property are bare, Mr. Anderson would like the option to reforest properties within this
subdivision so that when the development is completed, it will have some level of quality in
trees.
Gary Sieb interjected that more planning should have been done a long time ago and
reiterated that this case should either be taken under advisement for another month or
denied, and in that case, the applicant could appeal that decision within 15 days to Council.
Chairman Lowry took a poll of Commissioners who might feel inclined to hold this case
under advisement, once again, assuming that those citizens present who would probably
like to be heard on this case, could get an idea how this case will go. The consensus of the
Commission was that this case should be taken under advisement because of outstanding
issues, including the need for a construction standard to be set for this neighborhood that
2
will be higher than other developments because of its proximity to the airport; inferring that
allowing options to buyers isn't enough. It was also felt that input needs to be obtained
from the Leisure Services Department as to tree mitigation.
Mr. Anderson admitted his frustration and stated that he doubts the committee that made up
the new Tree Ordinance has ever taken the Ordinance, in a real life situation, to see what
makes sense. He feels that the Ordinance has no mechanism to allow the developer to
distribute trees, and get credit doing so, to other lots in order to make a wooded
development -- it implies that if 80% of the lots have no trees, that's okay because there's
money in the bank to plant new trees in other areas of the City; i.e., parks. He stated that he
needs feedback and direction from the City and stated that he has spent many hours trying
to figure out a fair representation -- trying to ascertain what the City wants this development
to look like when it is done. He then stated that with regard to the noise problem, the
developer is very sensitive to this issue and has no problem offering optional items and said
that the goal is to reduce the internal noise by 25 decibels.
When asked about the true intent of the Tree Ordinance, Mr. Sieb stated that he would not
debate what the Ordinance says since Council passed it, and we must abide by it; however,
a Planned Development allows some flexibility and reminded the Commission of the
McMillan case heard last month. He quoted from a memo written by Brad Reid, Park
Planner and Landscape Manager, summarizing it to say that the Tree Ordinance is a
"preservation" ordinance, and stated that there seems to be no "preservation" in this
proposed development and gave examples. Mr. Sieb stated that the Ordinance is saying that
where a grove of trees exists, it might be preserved, suggesting a new look should be taken
as to how this development is laid out so that groves of trees can be preserved.
Regarding trees, Commissioner McCaffrey asked Mr. Anderson to provide a written log of
information regarding what trees in public spaces will be saved and removed and their
caliper inch count. Regarding the larger lots, he said that he would like to see the number of
caliper inches planned to go into less treed lots, total caliper inches presently on property
and the approximate amount to be removed. Regarding an acoustical engineer, Mr.
McCaffrey expressed interest in seeing a standard for housing in Coppell at a certain level
of acoustical design, asking Mr. Anderson what the developer intends to do above that
design and how will it affect decibel levels. Then if other options are offered, how will that
affect decibel levels? He stated that those kinds of numbers are needed in order to make a
competent decision.
Bill Dahlstrom, attorney, 8333 Douglas, Dallas, TX, was also present to address these
issues. Regarding the Tree Ordinance, Mr. Dahlstrom expressed his opinion that he doesn't
believe the applicant will take down all the trees and believes there's a reasonableness
standard built into any ordinance. He then said that he doesn't believe the intent of this
Ordinance is to deprive the property owner the right to use his property for single family
uses. Regarding the acoustic issue, he stated that this is a very sensitive and difficult issue
to deal with. Mr. Dahlstrom expressed his concern over enforceability of legal
requirements for requiring any kind of sound mitigation on property which clearly has been
shown by all the contour maps to be outside the critical contours, stating that in the year
3
2000, take -offs will be over Coppell Road. He suggested staff consult with its City
Attorney to find out how enforceable sound restrictions are and determine whether or not
this is called for in this kind of development. City Attorney Hager interjected that the City
has employed an expert in overflights who has worked with these kinds of problems and
stated that he should be consulted about these matters. Mr. Hager then said that he will look
into the enforceability issue because he also shares some concerns with Mr. Dahlstrom.
Chairman Lowry opened the Public Hearing, asking for people present who wanted to
speak either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward,
stating that it appears to be the intent of the Commission to hold this case under advisement
to be heard again on April 15th. Those choosing to speak were:
Woody McMinn, 362 Hearthstone Lane, Coppell, TX - Asked for a raise of hands
of those people attending, who live near this proposed subdivision, who oppose this
zoning change. Of the approximate 25 in attendance, there was no show of hands.
He urged the Commission to make a prompt decision because the contract on the
property is very time sensitive.
Stacy Brownrigg, 342 Hearthstone Lane, Coppell, TX - Shed some light on the
acoustic issue, stating he is a production sound mixer and adding that airport noise
is not an issue and requiring additional construction standards is not necessary. He
said that it is rare that he hears an airplane when he's inside his house, stating that
noise can never be totally eliminated.
Mike McFarlane, 305 Hearthstone Lane, Coppell, TX - Expressed frustration that a
lot of people showed up tonight (for the third time) to support this development,
making it clear that if they are not all here at the next meeting, it won't be because
they are not concerned or don't care about the use of this property. He then said that
people may have other commitments on April 15'''.
Dave Tapley, 346 Hearthstone Lane, Coppell, TX - Concerned about the tree
mitigation issue. Asked if this property were developed Light Industrial, what
would happen with regard to having huge concrete buildings on the land? Gary
Sieb replied that the same tree mitigation plan would have to be submitted for
whatever use.
For the official record, City Attorney Hager asked for a list of names and addresses of those
people in attendance. Chairman Lowry acknowledged Mr. McFarlane's frustration, adding
that it's difficult for the Commission to continue Public Hearings, but when a case is not
ready for Council, there is no other choice.
Commissioner Stewart made a motion to continue the Public Hearing for Case No. PD -
108R4, Westchase, to the Commission meeting of April 15a' and to accept the petitions
and list of citizens who came out to support this case and make them part of the official
record (attached as Exhibit A). Commissioner McGahey seconded the motion; motion
carried (6-0) with Commissioners Nesbit, McGahey, Lowry, McCaffrey, Halsey and
Stewart voting in favor of continuance. None opposed.
5. Consider approval of the Westchase, Preliminary Plat, to allow the development of
4
102 residential lots on 37 acres of property located along the south side of Bethel
Road, east of Coppell Road, at the request of Dowdey, Anderson & Associates, Inc.
Planning Director Gary Sieb stated that because the Public Hearing for a zoning change for
this proposed development is being held under advisement to April 15', this Preliminary
Plat must be denied.
Commissioner McCaffrey made a motion to deny the Westchase, Preliminary Plat.
Commissioner Nesbit seconded the motion; motion carried (6-0) with Commissioners
Nesbit, McGahey, Lowry, McCaffrey, Halsey and Stewart voting in favor of denial. None
opposed.
6. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. S -1110R, PCS PrimeCo
Wireless Communications Antenna and Accessory Cabinet, zoning change request
for property zoned HC-S.U.P. (Highway Commercial, Special Use Permit) to amend
the Special Use Permit Site Plan to allow 2 additional accessory cabinets at the base
of an existing TU Electric tower located on a T.U. easement south of Fritz Drive,
approximately 1,346 feet east of Royal Lane, at the request of Masterplan.
City Planner Isabelle Moro introduced the item to the Commission, showing an exhibit of
the proposal, stating that clarification of the existing photinia hedge around the cabinet site
needs to be addressed because it seems to be growing inward, crowding the cabinet. She
then stated that staff recommends approval of this Special Use Permit with no conditions.
William Cothrum, 500 South Ervay, Dallas, TX, representing PrimeCo, was present to
represent this item before the Commission and answer any questions, addressing, the
photinia issue. He said that it will be trimmed back.
Chairman Lowry opened the Public Hearing, asking for people present who wanted to
speak either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward.
There were none.
Chairman Lowry closed the Public Hearing.
No discussion followed.
Commissioner McCaffrey made a motion to approve Case No. S -1110R, PCS PrimeCo
Wireless Communications Antenna and Accessory Cabinet with no conditions.
Commissioner Nesbit seconded the motion; motion carried (6-0) with Commissioners
Nesbit, McGahey, Lowry, McCaffrey, Halsey and Stewart voting in favor. None opposed.
7. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. S -1111R, PCS PrimeCo
Wireless Communications Antenna and Accessory Cabinet, zoning change request
for property zoned LI-S.U.P. to amend the Special Use Permit Site Plan to allow 2
additional accessory cabinets at the base on an existing T.U. Electric tower
5
located on a T.U. easement approximately 1,350 feet east of S.H. 121 frontage road
and along the north side of Sandy Lake Road, at the request of Masterplan.
City Planner Isabelle Moro introduced the item to the Commission, showing an exhibit of
the proposal, stating this is similar to the previous request. Again, staff recommends
approval of this Special Use Permit with no conditions.
William Cothrum, 500 South Ervay, Dallas, TX, representing PrimeCo, was present to
represent this item before the Commission and answer any questions.
Chairman Lowry opened the Public Hearing, asking for people present who wanted to
speak either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward.
There were none.
Chairman Lowry closed the Public Hearing.
No discussion followed.
Commissioner Nesbit made a motion to approve Case No. S -1111R, PCS PrimeCo
Wireless Communications Antenna and Accessory Cabinet with no conditions.
Commissioner McGahey seconded the motion; motion carried (6-0) with Commissioners
Nesbit, McGahey, Lowry, McCaffrey, Halsey and Stewart voting in favor. None opposed.
8. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD -169R, Lauren Estates,
zoning change request for property zoned PD -SF -7 to amend the development
conditions of the Planned Development to allow the development of 2 residential lots
instead of 3 lots on approximately 1.5 acres of property located along the west side of
Moore Road, approximately 680' south of Sandy Lake Road, at the request of
Dewayne Randle.
Planning Director Gary Sieb introduced the item to the Commission, showing exhibits of
the proposal, stating that this Planned Development was previously approved with three
lots. He stated that staff recommends approval of this request, subject to the six conditions
outlined in the Staff Report.
Dewayne Randle, 4012 Hackmore Loop, Irving, TX 75061, was present to represent this
item before the Commission and answer any questions. He stated he was in agreement with
the conditions. When asked the reasoning for the 16' -wide easement between the two
properties, Mr. Randle said this allows a formal/legal access to the rear yards, since the
properties are so deep.
Chairman Lowry opened the Public Hearing, asking for people present who wanted to
speak either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward.
There were none.
2
Chairman Lowry then closed the Public Hearing.
No discussion followed.
Commissioner McGahey made a motion to approve Case No. PD -169R, Lauren Estates,
subject to the following conditions being placed on the face of the PD plan:
1. All drives shall be privately owned/maintained.
2. Optional security gates shall be accessible to all property owners.
3. Private drives shall be accessible by all property owners.
4. All private drives acting as fire lanes shall be constructed of 6 inch concrete
with #3 rebar on 24 -inch centers on 6 -inch sand base.
5. No buildings or structures shall be constructed on lots 1R and 2R until plans
for same shall have been submitted to and approved by Dewayne Randle,
Architect. The architect shall review plans within 7 days of receipt. If
plans have not been reviewed within 7 days, plans shall be considered
approved and accepted.
6. Opticom gates with knox box over ride will be required if security gates are
constructed.
Commissioner McCaffrey seconded the motion; motion carried (6-0) with Commissioners
Nesbit, McGahey, Lowry, McCaffrey, Halsey and Stewart voting in favor. None opposed.
9. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of the Lauren Estates, Replat of Lot 1 of
Harrison Estates No. II, to allow the creation of 2 residential lots on approximately
1.5 acres of property located along the west side of Moore Road, approximately 680'
south of Sandy Lake Road, at the request of Winkelman & Associates.
Planning Director Gary Sieb stated that staff recommends approval of this replat, subject to
the condition outlined in the Staff Report.
Dewayne Randle, 4012 Hackmore Loop, Irving, TX 75061, indicated that he had nothing to
add and did not speak.
Chairman Lowry opened the Public Hearing, asking for people present who wanted to
speak either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward.
There were none.
Chairman Lowry then closed the Public Hearing.
7
Commissioner Halsey made a motion to approve the Lauren Estates, Replat of Lot 1 of
Harrison Estates No. U, subject to the following condition:
1. Add to plat: "Opticom gates with knox box over ride will be required if
security gates are built."
Commissioner McGahey seconded the motion; motion carried (6-0) with Commissioners
Nesbit, McGahey, Lowry, McCaffrey, Halsey and Stewart voting in favor. None opposed.
10. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of the Park West Commerce Center,
Replat of Lots 1R-1 and R-2, Block 2, to allow the subdivision of a 48.87 acre tract
of land into 2 separate lots located along the north side of Airline Drive,
approximately 2,100' west of Beltline Road, at the request of Pacheco Koch
Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Planning Director Gary Sieb introduced the item to the Commission, showing an exhibit of
the proposal, stating that staff recommends approval of this replat, subject to the conditions
outlined in the Staff Report.
Mike Coker, 6390 LBJ Freeway, Suite 100, Dallas, TX 75240, was present to represent this
item before the Commission and answer any questions, stating that he is in agreement with
staff conditions.
Chairman Lowry opened the Public Hearing, asking for people present who wanted to
speak either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward.
There were none.
Chairman Lowry closed the Public Hearing.
Commissioner McCaffrey made a motion to approve the Park West Commerce Center,
Replat of Lots 1R-1 and R-2, Block 2, subject to the following conditions:
1) The applicant acknowledge that site plan review with both Planning
Commission and City Council will be required before any building can occur on
this replat area.
2) If the existing channel on the east side of the property is not going to be
enclosed into a drainage system, then a wider drainage easement will be
required to accommodate the 4:1 side slopes and a minimum of 10' wide
channel bottom.
Commissioner Nesbit seconded the motion; motion carried (6-0) with Commissioners
Nesbit, McGahey, Lowry, McCaffrey, Halsey and Stewart voting in favor. None opposed.
11. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of the Northlake 635 Business Park, Replat
of Lot 1, Block D and Site Plan, to allow the development of 2 office and warehouse
buildings totaling 240,800 square feet on 32.83 acres of property located at the
northwest corner of Beltline Road and Lakeshore Drive, at the request of Halff
Associates, Inc.
City Planner Isabelle Moro introduced the item to the Commission, showing exhibits of the
proposal, stating that both buildings will be U-shaped, each having interior truck courts,
thus shielding this area from both Lakeshore Drive and Beldine Road. She said that staff
needs documentation from the applicant relative to the wetland area to the east of the
property with regard to the landscape that is proposed along Beltline Road to make sure this
is acceptable to the Corp of Engineers. She added that with regard to the utility poles,
which carry Paragon Cable lines in the ditch area along Beltline Road, staff has been
advised that Paragon is in the process of constructing a fiber-optic system in this area. Once
this system is in place (in about two months), these poles will be relocated along the east
side of Beltline, leaving no utility poles from Lakeshore to Wrangler Drive. Ms. Moro then
discussed some staff concerns with regard to the Landscape Plan; i.e. lack of screening of
parking spaces from the abutting property line, etc. Regarding the tree survey mitigation
plan, Ms. Moro stated that Brad Reid, Park Planner and Landscape Manager, has reviewed
the plan, confirming that some of the trees are injured and requesting six additional trees be
shown on the survey and has asked that four additional trees be preserved and mitigated.
She then showed colored elevation renderings of the building and the color board to the
Commission, stating that staff recommends approval of the Replat with no conditions and
approval of the Site Plan, subject to the conditions outlined in the Staff Report.
Todd Abbott, Halff Associates, Inc., 8616 Northwest Plaza Drive, Dallas, TX 75225, was
present to represent this item before the Commission and answer any questions. When
asked whether or not he was in agreement with staff comments, Mr. Abbott deferred to
Chris Russell, Landscape Architect, 5744 Richmond Avenue, Dallas, TX, who stated that
they were in agreement with all but one of the staff comments, addressing the wetland area
to the north of the site. Mr. Russell stated that he would like to clean this area up; i.e.,
remove dead debris, thus creating an amenity, rather than screening this area off from the
public. He then requested that the 30" landscape screen not be mandatory between the two
abutting properties since the property to the north already has a hedge. Chairman Lowry
advised Mr. Russell that the Planning and Zoning Commission does not have the authority
to waive this requirement and that this request would have to be granted by the Board of
Adjustment. Planning Director Sieb asked for an opinion from the Commission as to their
feelings regarding the 30" screening hedge so that he can make a recommendation to the
Board of Adjustment and advise Council. It was determined that this 30" hedge be
required. Jim Gaspard, Transwestern Properties, 12221 Merit Drive, Suite 450, Dallas, TX
75251, addressed some questions relative to the monument signs since their size and
material have yet to be determined. After some discussion, Mr. Gaspard stated that generic
signs will be designed before this case goes to Council.
Chairman Lowry opened the Public Hearing, asking for people present who wanted to
speak either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward.
9
There were none.
Chairman Lowry closed the Public Hearing.
Commissioner Halsey made a motion to approve the Northlake 635 Business Park, Replat
of Lot 1, Block D, as submitted and approve the Site Plan, subject to the following
conditions:
1) Show limits of the protected wetland areas along Beltline Road on the site
plan.
2) Staff requests that the applicant provide documentation that the proposed
landscaping along Beltline Road is allowed as shown.
3) Staff requests that the utility lines be placed underground or the poles be
relocated to a less conspicuous location on the site.
4) Screen parking spaces along the northern property line with a 30" high
hedge.
5) Substitute the Texas Ash tree with a tree on the city approved plant palette.
6) Submit dimensions and elevations of the two monument signs.
7) Compliance with the Leisure Services Department comments (see Brad
Reid's memo dated March 11, 1999, attached as Exhibit B).
Commissioner McGahey seconded the motion; motion carried (6-0) with Commissioners
Nesbit, McGahey, Lowry, McCaffrey, Halsey and Stewart voting in favor. None opposed.
12. Consider approval of the Coupell Crossing Addition, Lot 2, Block 1, Preliminary
Plat, to allow the development of two office/showroom buildings on 3.2 acres of
property located west of MacArthur Blvd., along the north side of the D.A.R.T.
right-of-way and along the east side of the Dallas Power & Light Company easement,
at the request of Dunaway Associates, Inc.
City Planner Isabelle Moro introduced the item to the Commission, showing an exhibit of
the proposal, stating that the Preliminary Plat, showing the 24' wide emergency apparatus
access road to the adjoining subdivision and the Lone Star Gas Measuring Station to the
south, conforms with the approved Site Plan and staff recommends approval of the Plat,
with no conditions.
Chris Lam, Dunaway Associates, Inc., 2351 W. Northwest Highway, Suite 3280, Dallas,
TX 75220, was present to represent this item before the Commission and answer any
questions.
10
No discussion followed.
Commissioner Nesbit made a motion to approve the Coppell Crossing Addition, Lot 2,
Block 1, PrelimipM Plat, with no conditions. Commissioner Halsey seconded the motion;
motion carried (6-0) with Commissioners Nesbit, McGahey, Lowry, McCaffrey, Halsey
and Stewart voting in favor. None opposed.
13. Consider approval of the Coppell Crossing Addition, Lot 1, Block 1. Final Plat, to
allow the development of two retail buildings on 2.967 acres of property located along
the west side of MacArthur Blvd., approximately 200' north of the D.A.R.T. right-of-
way, at the request of Dunaway Associates, Inc.
City Planner Isabelle Moro introduced the item to the Commission, showing an exhibit of
the proposal, stating that a Final Plat and Site Plan were previously approved by both the
Commission and Council about a year ago and stated that the Final Plat was never filed
with the County, pointing out differences between the two Plans. She then stated that staff
recommends approval of the Plat, with no conditions.
Chris Lam, Dunaway Associates, Inc., 2351 W. Northwest Highway, Suite 3280, Dallas,
TX 75220, was present to represent this item before the Commission and answer any
questions but had no comments.
No discussion followed.
Commissioner McGahey made a motion to approve the Coppell Crossing Addition, Lot 1,
Block 1, Final Plat, with no conditions. Commissioner Nesbit seconded the motion;
motion carried (6-0) with Commissioners Nesbit, McGahey, Lowry, McCaffrey, Halsey
and Stewart voting in favor. None opposed.
14. Consider approval of the IAAM Headquarters, Lot 1. Block 1. Preliminary Plat and
Site Plan, to allow the development of a 38,567 square foot office building on 4.377
acres of property located along the south side of Fritz Drive and along the north side
of I.H. 635, at the request of Halff Associates, Inc.
Planning Director Gary Sieb introduced the item to the Commission, showing exhibits of
the proposal, pointing out that this site is immediately south of the Fritz facility and stating
that staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat with the two conditions outlined in
the Staff Report. With regard to the Site Plan, Mr. Sieb stated that staff also recommends
approval, subject to the condition that the applicant specify colors of all building materials
which are graphically shown on the color board. Mr. Sieb pointed out that the second
condition outlined in the Staff Report relative to providing building elevations has been
met.
Paul Chapel, Haldeman, Powell and Partners, 15303 Dallas Parkway, Suite 300, Dallas, TX
75248, was present to represent this item before the Commission and answer any
11
questions, stating that the applicant is in agreement with staff comments.
No discussion followed.
Commissioner McCaffrey made a motion to approve the IAAM Headquarters, Lot 1,
Block 1, Preliminary Plat and Site Plan, subject to the following conditions:
Preliminary Plat approval:
1) Show ADA ramps at driveways.
2) A 20' drainage easement will be needed for off-site drainage.
Site Plan approval:
1) Specify colors of all building materials which are graphically shown
on color board.
Commissioner McGahey seconded the motion; motion carried (6-0) with Commissioners
Nesbit, McGahey, Lowry, McCaffrey, Halsey and Stewart voting in favor. None opposed.
15. Consider approval of the Eckerd, Final Plat, to allow the development of an 11,200
square foot retail building on 1.52 acres of property located at the southeast corner
of Denton Tap Road and Parkway Blvd., at the request of the Richard Group.
City Planner Isabelle Moro introduced the item to the Commission, showing an exhibit of
the proposal, stating that this Final Plat conforms with the previously approved Preliminary
Plat and stating that staff recommends approval, with the condition outlined in the Staff
Report.
The applicant was present but did not speak.
No discussion followed.
Commissioner Halsey made a motion to approve the Eckerd, Final Plat, subject to the
following condition:
1) Correcting the year reference in the various signature blocks from
1998 to 1999.
Commissioner McCaffrey seconded the motion; motion carried (6-0) with Commissioners
Nesbit, McGahey, Lowry, McCaffrey, Halsey and Stewart voting in favor. None opposed.
16. General discussion concerning planning and zoning issues
Planning Director Sieb stated that this meeting was rather bitter/sweet for him
because of Pert Virtanen's presence during the Pre -Session. Gary stated that during
his tenure, Pert was an outstanding staff person and it was always hoped that he
would be coming back to work; however, due to health problems, this will not be
12
the case. Pert is wished well will be missed by all.
A. Update on Council planning agenda actions
Planning Director Sieb updated the Commission on the Planning and Zoning
cases brought before Council on March 9", mentioning that the Deer Run
request for a six-month extension of time to file its Final Plat for townhouses
was denied as was the Estates of Denton Creek zoning change appeal. He
then advised that Council approved the McMilan PD with the pool, cabana
and patio request because these amenities cannot be built if this area does
not get removed from flood plain. Next, he mentioned that the Valley
Ranch PD was denied because a 10,000 square foot building was being
requested instead of the Commission recommended 8,000 square foot
building.
B. Director's comments
Planning Director Sieb informed the Commission of the upcoming meetings
to gather citizen input on the 1999-2000 fiscal year budget on Wednesday,
March 31" at 7 p.m. at the Coppell Middle School East Cafeteria, Thursday,
April 1' at 7 p.m. at the Cottonwood Creek Elementary Cafeteria, and
Tuesday, April Oh at 7 p.m. at the Lee Elementary Cafeteria.
With nothing further to discuss, the meeting adjourned at approximately 8:17 p.m.
Stan Lowry, Chairman
ATTEST:
x5 - k jrv4.-,
Bar ara H. oda, Sr. Administrative Secretary
13
Ap p 0. C;(v , r\ E, I vx PlAvro Ir CP VD ---. 106 Rl
rtltw.-a 305 REAP-174S"ror-i M
G4dkf SSe.6l 3-L1. tAe-c,...o- As4v\,%,
3 t9
70
aq(v
3b(P �-hS�0Y1� t-Vl
33t l�W. �I'hstoo�t I -h
7sr 6Exen/d ro4
36r ,y�j+tc� L�►.
3's%— ✓
373 #m+t^rHsrow
MMIBIT A
V war,
March 181) 1999
To the Coppell Planning and Zoning Commission:
RE: Rezoning of land just south of Bethel Road and just east of Coppell Road
from Light Industrial to Single Family Residential.
My name is J o h J B0': "t, C f, -r and I reside at
-315 / J e 4 -,*,4-h Z .4 ,✓ A.— , Coppell, TX, 75019.
(Iam i�fav�qro / opposed to the rezoning of land just south of Bethel Road and just
(circle one)
East of Coppell Road (otherwise known as the Westchase Subdivision) from Light
Industrial to Single Family Residential.
Although unable to attend the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on Thursday,
March 18, 19999 I hereby authorize one of the designated Howmeowners' Association of
Old Coppell Estates board members listed below to submit my wishes, by way of this
proxy, to the Commission during the public hearing.
Signed,
Dated,
Homewoners' Association of Old Coppell Estates board members:
Rocky Johnson
Mike McFarlane
Woody McMinn
Ron Hoyl
March 18, 1999
To the Coppell Planning and Zoning Commission:
RE: Rezoning of land just south of Bethel Road and just east of Coppell Road
from Light Industrial to Single Family Residential.
r �o�My name is 1 1 M�`-�i and I reside at
3 S Ooh 5�� a �-,r� • , Coppell, TX, 75019.
I am in favoE;Dopposed to the rezoning of land just south of Bethel Road and just
code one)
East of Coppell Road (otherwise known as the Westchase Subdivision) from Light
Industrial to Single Family Residential.
Although unable to attend the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on Thursday,
March 18, 19991 I hereby authorize one of the designated Howmeowners' Association of
Old Coppell Estates board members listed below to submit my wishes, by way of this
proxy, to the Commission during the public hearing.
S igned,
Dated,
3 I � Al
Homewoners' Association of Old Coppell Estates board members:
Rocky Johnson
Mike McFarlane
Woody McMinn
Ron Hoyl
March 1811999
To the Coppell Planning and Zoning Commission:
RE: Rezoning of land just south of Bethel Road and just east of Coppell Road
from Light Industrial to Single Family Residential.
My name is 6 ' ' and I reside at
l�
,Coppell, TX, 75019.
I am in favor opposed to the rezoning of land just south of Bethel Road and just
(circle one)
East of Coppell Road (otherwise known as the Westchase Subdivision) from Light
Industrial to Single Family Residential.
Although unable to attend the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on Thursday,
March 18, 19991 I hereby authorize one of the designated Howmeowners' Association of
Old Coppell Estates board members listed below to submit my wishes, by way of this
proxy, to the Commission during the public hearing.
Signed,
Dated, 2 /�
c�
Homewoners' Association of Old Coppell Estates board members:
Rocky Johnson
Mike McFarlane
Woody McMinn
Ron Hoyl
March 18, 1999
To the Coppell Planning and Zoning Commission:
RE: Rezoning of land just south of Bethel Road and just east of Coppell Road
from Light Industrial to Single Family Residential.
My name is CN���-S J. je�Vern*gJ JR- and I reside at
.3 S'j &n9Dt—.r7-VA140 ZAt%l&
' , Coppell, TX, 75019.
I amin favor o opposed to the rezoning of land just south of Bethel Road and just
e one)
East of Coppell Road (otherwise known as the Westchase Subdivision) from Light
Industrial to Single Family Residential.
Although unable to attend the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on Thursday,
March 18, 1999) I hereby authorize one of the designated Howmeowners' Association of
Old Coppell Estates board members listed below to submit my wishes, by way of this
proxy, to the Commission during the public hearing.
Signed,
Dated, L/
Homewoners' Association of Old Coppell Estates board members:
Rocky Johnson
Mike McFarlane
Woody McMinn
Ron Hoyl
March 18, 1999
To the Coppell Planning and Zoning Commission:
RE: Rezoning of land just south of Bethel Road and just east of Coppell Road
from Light Industrial to Single Family Residential.
My name is
and I reside at
Coppell, TX, 75019.
I amin favor of opposed to the rezoning of land just south of Bethel Road and just
one)
East of Coppell Road (otherwise known as the Westchase Subdivision) from Light
Industrial to Single Family Residential.
Although unable to attend the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on Thursday,
March 181, 19991 I hereby authorize one of the designated Howmeowners' Association of
Old Coppell Estates board members listed below to submit my wishes, by way of this
proxy, to the Commission during the public hearing.
Signed,
4211�Ct4
Dated,
M,94� I� 1
Homewoners' Association of Old Coppell Estates board members:
Rocky Johnson
Mike McFarlane
Woody McMinn
Ron Hoyl
I
March 18, 1999
To the Coppell Planning and Zoning Commission:
RE: Rezoning of land just south of Bethel Road and just east of Coppell Road
from Light Industrial to Single Family Residential.
VMy name is and I reside at
z
JS -� Coppell, TX, 75019.
I am n favor o / opposed to the rezoning of land just south of Bethel Road and just
e one)
East of Coppell Road (otherwise known as the Westchase Subdivision) from Light
Industrial to Single Family Residential.
Although unable to attend the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on Thursday,
March 18, 19999 I hereby authorize one of the designated Howmeowners' Association of
Old Coppell Estates board members listed below to submit my wishes, by way of this
proxy, to the Commission during the public,,hearing.
Signed,
Dated,
Homewoners' Association of Old Coppell Estates board members:
Rocky Johnson
Mike McFarlane
Woody McMinn
Ron Hoyl
March 18, 1999
To the Coppell Planning and Zoning Commission:
RE: Rezoning of land just south of Bethel Road and just east of Coppell Road
from Light Industrial to Single Family Residential.
My name is -jS . Spw-vLE-L-s, and I reside at
330 \Ae-wr4) bre. t--sn*_ , Coppell, TX, 75019.
I am in favor of opposed to the rezoning of land just south of Bethel Road and just
e one)
East of Coppell Road (otherwise known as the Westchase Subdivision) from Light
Industrial to Single Family Residential.
Although unable to attend the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on Thursday,
March 18, 19992 I hereby authorize one of the designated Howmeowners' Association of
Old Coppell Estates board members listed below to submit my wishes, by way of this
proxy, to the Commission during the public hearing.
Signed,
Dated,
Homewoners' Association of Old Coppell Estates board members:
Rocky Johnson
Mike McFarlane
Woody McMinn
Ron Hoyl
av • ,,o G 1 TY OF GEPPELL C t TY OF COPPELL
LEISURE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
OFFICE MEMO I
DATE:
TO:
FROM.
SUBJECT:
NO. am PM
�= f
March 11, 1999
fi1J�l
Gary Sieb, Director of Plaaning
Brad Reid, Park Planning and Landscape Manager !:7mg
Tree Survey Performed on the Northlake 635 Business Park, Phase I
I visited the above mentioned site this week in order to familiarize myself with the site
characteristics and condition of the existing trees. As you are aware, the tree surveyor for this
project has omitted from the reparation fist, several trees which would ordinarily fall within the
size and species guidelines for being protected trees. All of the tees being exempted from the
protected list are of the species Prosopis grandulosa (mesquite). While several spec ma s at this
location are desirable of preserving, most are not in a condition which would generally be
classified as a tree to be protected and preserved. Many of these trees have suffered significaaR
bark damage at the base, are emitting a brown flux or ooze and are dropping large limbs. This
situation creates an unsafe, weak wooded tree which is in obvious decline.
I also noticed the tree survey performed at this site is not complete. There are a few trees of note
which are not reflected on the survey and need to be added to the list of trees for which r+epwation
is due. Also, a few of the trees should be mitigated which are fisted on the tree survey but are not
_. proposed to be replaced. In particular, trees with tag numbers 24, 27, 43 and 91 should be
mitigated and reparation made as damage to these trees is minimal and with trimming and care,
they could make acceptable landscape trees.
P1
Please let the know � you need additional information.
EMBIT B