BP 2012 02-16 PZag021612
Page 1 of 4
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING & AGENDA
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
&
THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE
February 16, 2012
COMMISSIONERS:
Edmund Haas – Chairman
Greg Frnka – Vice Chairman
Aaron Duncan
Justin Goodale
Anna Kittrell
Craig Pritzlaff
Charles Sangerhausen
MEETING TIME AND PLACE:
Pre-Session 6:00 p.m. 1st Floor Conference Room (Open to the Public)
Regular Session 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers (Open to the Public)
Notice is hereby given that the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Coppell, Texas will
meet in pre-session at 6:00 p.m. and in regular session at 6:30 p.m. on Thursday, February 16, 2012, to
be held at Town Center, 255 Parkway Boulevard, Coppell, Texas.
As authorized by Section 551.071(2) of the Texas Government Code, this meeting may be convened
into closed Executive Session for the purpose of seeking confidential legal advice from the City
Attorney on any agenda item listed herein.
The purpose of the meeting is to consider the following items:
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
PRE-SESSION: (Open to the Public)
1. Briefing on the Agenda.
REGULAR SESSION: (Open to the Public)
2. Call to Order.
3. Consider approval of the minutes for January 19, 2012.
4. CONTINUED (Held under advisement):
Consider approval of the First Baptist Church of Coppell, Lot 1, Block A, Site Plan
Amendment, to allow Revised Elevations, the addition of a Covered Drop-off Area, Trellis
Structures and modifications to the landscaping and parking on 5.161 acres of property located
at 590 South Denton Tap Road, at the request of Tim Willis, HH Architects.
STAFF REP.: Gary Sieb
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
ag021612
Page 2 of 4
5. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of Case No. S-1255-C, The Learning Experience, a zoning change request
from C (Commercial) to S-1255-C (Special Use Permit-1255-Commercial), to permit an
approximate 11,000-square-foot day care to be located within the existing two-story building,
removal of a portion of the parking lot to accommodate the addition of a 5,150-square-foot
outdoor play area with a rubber surface to be located at 123 East Sandy Lake Road,
approximately 600 feet east of Denton Tap Road, at the request of 3B Developers, Inc, being
represented by Bob Anderson, Plan Solution Architects.
STAFF REP.: Gary Sieb
6. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of Case No. PD-253-H, Old Town Water Tank/Office Addition, Lots 1 &
2, Block A, a zoning change request from H (Historic) to PD-253-H (Planned Development-
253-Historic) to establish a Detail Site Plan, to allow for the reuse of the existing structures for
office uses and to retain the existing empty water tank on 0.514 acres of property located at
616/618 South Coppell Road, at the request of The Edinburg Group/dba Amcat, being
represented by Allan Palmer.
STAFF REP.: Matt Steer
7. Consider approval of the Old Town Water Tank/Office Addition, Lots 1 & 2, Block A,
Minor Plat, to subdivide the property to establish a building site and necessary easements to
allow for the reuse of the existing structures and a separate lot for retaining the existing empty
water tank on 0.514 acres of property located at 616/618 South Coppell Road, at the request of
the City of Coppell, being represented by Mindi Hurley.
STAFF REP.: Matt Steer
8. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of Case No. PD-95R-SF-9, Shadow Ridge Estates I, Lot 10, Block A, a
zoning change request from PD-95-SF-9 (Planned Development-95-Single Family-9) to PD-
95R-SF-9 (Planned Development-95 Revised-Single Family-9), to allow for a 767.5-square-
foot garage expansion which encroaches into the required rear yard on 0.33 acres of property
located at 202 Southern Belle Drive, at the request of Jordon Musser.
STAFF REP.: Gary Sieb
9. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of Case No. PD-199R6-HC, Zimmer, a zoning change request from PD-
199R5-HC-S-1211R2 (Planned Development-199 Revision 5-Highway Commercial-Special
Use Permit-1211 Revision 2) to PD-199R6-HC (Planned Development-199 Revision 6-
Highway Commercial), to revise the Detail Site Plan to allow a sign with a logo which exceeds
20% of the area of the sign on 1.4 acres of property located at the southwest corner of S.H. 121
and MacArthur Blvd. (697 E. Highway 121), at the request of Cary Moon of Zimmer.
STAFF REP.: Marcie Diamond
10. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of a text amendment to add Article 18A, Residential Urban Neighborhood
District (RBN), to the Zoning Ordinance (Section 12-18A of the Code of Ordinances).
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
ag021612
Page 3 of 4
11. Update on Council action for planning agenda items on February 14, 2012:
A. Case No. PD-246R-SF-12, Carter Addition PH III, a zoning change from SF-12 & A
to PD-246R-SF-12 , to attach a Detail Site Plan to permit 23 single-family lots and one
common area lot on 20.28 acres of property located on the south side of Carter Drive,
approximately 925 feet west of Moore Road.
B. Carter Addition PH III, Revised Replat, being a replat of the Carter Addition Phase
III, to re-subdivide the existing 24 single-family lots and two common area lots into 23
single-family lots and one common area lot on 20.28 acres of property located on the
south side of Carter Drive, approximately 925 feet west of Moore Road.
C. Case No. PD-251R-SF-12, Rosebriar Estates, a zoning change from SF-12 to PD-
251R-SF-12, to allow the development of six (6) single-family lots, with a minimum lot
size of 12,000 square feet and three (3) common area lots on 2.8 acres of property
located south of East Sandy Lake Road between Dobecka Drive and Castlebury Court
D. Rosebriar Estates, Preliminary Plat, to allow the subdivision of 2.8 acres of property
into six (6) single-family lots and three (3) common area lots on property located south
of East Sandy Lake Road between Dobecka Drive and Castlebury Court.
E. Case No. S-1256-R/O, Signature Living at Denton Creek, a zoning change from R &
O to S-1256-R/O, to allow a 57,708-square-foot (74 units, 79 beds) assisted living and
memory care facility on 5.3 acres of property located along the north side of East Sandy
Lake Road, east of Riverview Drive.
F. Signature Living at Denton Creek, Lots 1 & 2, Block A, Minor Plat, to establish a
building site with required easements and fire lanes to allow a 57,708-square-foot
assisted living and memory care facility on Lot 1, Block A (5.3 acres of property) with
the remainder of vacant land being platted as Lot 2, Block A (6.1 acres of property)
located along the north side of East Sandy Lake Road, east of Riverview Drive.
G. Case No. PD-214R5-C, Arbor Manors Retail, a zoning change from PD-214R2-C to
PD-214R5-C, to attach a Detail Plan to allow the development of an 11,000-square-foot
retail building to contain retail and office uses including two restaurants, one of which
will have drive-thru service on 1.5 acres of property located at 143 South Denton Tap
Road, approximately 145 feet north of West Braewood Drive.
H. Arbor Manors Addition, Lot 4R2R, Block A, Replat, being a replat of Lot 4R2,
Block A of the Arbor Manors Addition, to relocate the existing fire lane and mutual
access easement and to establish easements to allow the development of an 11,000-
square-foot retail building on 1.5 acres of property located at 143 South Denton Tap
Road, approximately 145 feet north of West Braewood Drive.
I. An Ordinance for Case No. S-1233R-LI, AT&T, a zoning change from LI to S-1233R-
LI, to allow nine (9) flush-mounted panel telecommunication antennae to be mounted
on an existing water tower and an equipment cabinet within the base of the water tower
located at 510 Southwestern Boulevard.
12. Director’s Comments.
ADJOURNMENT – Planning & Zoning Commission
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
ag021612
Page 4 of 4
Work Session: Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (Open to the Public)
1. Call to order.
2. Discussion concerning a recommendation to City Council on the Land Use Assumptions;
Water and Waste Water Capital Improvement Plans; Roadway Capital Improvement Plan; the
associated Impact Fee and the proposed Water and Waste Water Impact Fees.
STAFF REP.: George Marshall
Regular Session: Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (Open to the Public)
3. Consider approval of making a recommendation to City Council concerning the Roadway
Capital Improvement Plan and the associated Impact Fee.
STAFF REP.: George Marshall
4. Consider approval of making a recommendation to City Council concerning Land Use
Assumptions, Water and Waste Water Capital Improvement Plans and the proposed Water and
Waste Water Impact Fees.
STAFF REP.: George Marshall
ADJOURNMENT - Capital Improvements Advisory Committee
CERTIFICATE
I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City
of Coppell, Texas on this 10th day of February, 2012, at __________.
_________________________________
Juanita A. Miles
Planning Secretary
PUBLIC NOTICE STATEMENT FOR ADA COMPLIANCE
The City of Coppell acknowledges its responsibility to comply with the Americans with Disabilities
Act of 1990. Thus, in order to assist individuals with disabilities who require special services (i.e.,
sign interpretative services, alternative audio/visual devices, and amanuenses) for participation in or
access to the City of Coppell sponsored public programs, services and/or meetings, the City requests
that individuals make requests for these services forty-eight (48) hours ahead of the scheduled
program, service and/or meeting. To make arrangements, contact Vivyon V. Bowman, ADA
Coordinator or other designated official at (972) 462-0022, or (TDD 1-800-RELAY, TX, 1-800-735-
2989).
MIN011912
Page 1 of 11
MINUTES OF JANUARY 19, 2012
The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Coppell met in Pre-session at 6:00 p.m., and in
Regular session at 6:30 p.m., on January 19, 2012, in the Council Chambers of Coppell Town Center,
255 Parkway Boulevard, Coppell, Texas. The following Commissioners were present:
COMMISSIONERS:
Gregory Frnka – Chairman
Edmund Haas – Vice Chairman
Aaron Duncan
Anna Kittrell
Charles Sangerhausen
Craig Pritzlaff
Justin Goodale
MEETING TIME AND PLACE:
Also present were Planning Director, Gary Sieb; Assistant Planning Director, Marcie Diamond; City
Planner, Matt Steer; Civil Engineer, George Marshall; Graduate Engineer, Mike Garza; Deputy Fire
Chief/Prevention, Tim Oates and Secretary, Juanita Miles.
The purpose of the meeting is to consider the following items:
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
PRE-SESSION: (Open to the Public)
1. Briefing on the Agenda.
The Planning Commission was briefed on each posted agenda item in the Workshop Session. No
vote was taken on any item discussed.
REGULAR SESSION: (Open to the Public)
2. Call to Order.
Chairman Frnka called the meeting to order.
3. Nomination and Election of Chairman and Vice Chairman.
Commissioner Sangerhausen made a motion to nominate and elect Commissioner Haas as
Chairman, Commissioner Goodale seconded; motion carried (6-0), with Commissioners
Goodale, Pritzlaff, Haas, Frnka, Sangerhausen and Kittrell voting in favor. None opposed.
Chairman Haas made a motion to nominate and elect Commissioner Frnka as Vice Chairman,
Commissioner Kittrell seconded; motion carried (6-0), with Commissioners Goodale, Pritzlaff,
Haas, Frnka, Sangerhausen and Kittrell voting in favor. None opposed.
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
MIN011912
Page 2 of 11
4. Consider approval of the minutes for December 15, 2011.
Commissioner Goodale made a motion to approve the minutes for December 15, 2011, as
written. Commissioner Kittrell seconded; motion carried (6-0), with Commissioners Goodale,
Pritzlaff, Frnka, Haas, Sangerhausen and Kittrell voting in favor. None opposed.
5. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of Case No. PD-246R-SF-12, Carter Addition PH III, a zoning change
request from SF-12 (Single Family-12) & A (Agricultural) to PD-246R-SF-12 (Planned
Development-246 Revised-Single Family-12), to attach a Detail Site Plan to permit 23
single-family lots and one common area lot on 20.28 acres of property located on the
south side of Carter Drive, approximately 925 feet west of Moore Road, at the request of
Toll Brothers, being represented by Matt Alexander, Dowdey, Anderson & Associates,
Inc.
STAFF REP.: Marcie Diamond
Presentation:
Assistant Director, Marcie Diamond introduced this case to the Commission with exhibits. She
mentioned 22 notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of this request, 26
returned in opposition with concerns from the Rolling Hills and Carter neighborhoods, which
she read into the record; none returned in favor. She stated that staff is recommending approval
subject to conditions, with (3) three additional conditions, which she read into the record.
Rob Paul, Toll Dallas TX LLC, 2557 SW Grapevine Pkwy, Ste 100, Grapevine, Texas, was
present to represent this case, to address questions and stated he was in agreement with staff’s
recommendations.
Matt Alexander, Dowdey, Anderson & Associates, Inc., 5225 Village Creek Drive, Plano,
Texas, made a brief presentation of the revised changes and agreements to amend this request
to 22 lots and include other conditions as requested by the neighbors to the Commission which
he read into the record. He was also available for questions.
Public Hearing:
Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in
favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. The following
people spoke in favor:
Andy Lewis, 546 Rolling Hills Road, Coppell, Texas, spoke in favor.
Doug Reinhart, 534 Rolling Hills Road, Coppell, Texas, spoke in favor.
Dean Wilkerson, 538 Rolling Hills Road, Coppell, Texas, spoke in favor.
The following people spoke in opposition:
Lee Ann Odom, 433 Carter Drive, Coppell, Texas, spoke in opposition.
James Lasater, 533 Carter Drive, Coppell, Texas, spoke in opposition.
Brian Rathe, 501 Carter Drive, Coppell, Texas, spoke in opposition.
Steve Sheetz, 517 Carter Drive, Coppell, Texas, spoke in opposition.
Chairman Haas closed the public hearing.
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
MIN011912
Page 3 of 11
*Chairman Haas read into the record Commissioner Duncan’s arrival time at 7:46 p.m.
Action:
After much discussion, Commissioner Kittrell made a motion to approve Case No. PD-246R-
SF-12, Carter Addition PH III, a zoning change request from SF-12 (Single Family-12) & A
(Agricultural) to PD-246R-SF-12 (Planned Development-246 Revised-Single Family-12),
subject to the following conditions:
1. Revision to the Detail Site Plan to eliminate one lot along the west property line.
2. Revision to the PD Conditions on the Detail Site Plan to reflect the minimum house size
of 3,200 square feet.
3. Revision to the Detail Site Plan to indicate the location and define maintenance of the
retained decorative metal fencing.
4. Add a PD Condition that all lots facing Carter Drive shall have side or rear entry garage
door access.
5. Add a PD Condition that all lots within Carter Addition Phase III shall have only
ornamental metal fencing and that wood fencing along the lot lines is prohibited.
Vice Chairman Frnka seconded; motion carried (7-0), with Commissioners Goodale, Pritzlaff,
Frnka, Haas, Sangerhausen, Duncan and Kittrell voting in favor. None opposed.
6. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of the Carter Addition PH III, Revised Replat, being a replat of the
Carter Addition Phase III to re-subdivide the existing 24 single-family lots and two
common area lots into 23 single-family lots and one common area lot on 20.28 acres of
property located on the south side of Carter Drive, approximately 925 feet west of Moore
Road, at the request of Toll Brothers, being represented by Matt Alexander, Dowdey,
Anderson & Associates, Inc.
STAFF REP.: Marcie Diamond
Presentation:
Assistant Director, Marcie Diamond introduced this companion case to the Commission with
exhibits. She stated that staff is recommending approval subject to three amended conditions
which she read into the record.
Matt Alexander, Dowdey, Anderson & Associates, Inc., 5225 Village Creek Drive, Plano,
Texas, was present to represent this case, to address questions and stated he was in agreement
with staff’s revised recommendations.
Public Hearing:
Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in
favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. No one spoke:
Chairman Haas closed the public hearing.
Action:
Commissioner Sangerhausen made a motion to approve the Carter Addition PH III, Revised
Replat, subject to the following conditions:
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
MIN011912
Page 4 of 11
1. Revise the Replat to eliminate one lot along the west property line.
2. Revise the notes on the Replat to only reflect those relating to the Subdivision (not
Zoning) Ordinance.
3. Include the floodplain note on the plat that states:
"The City of Coppell will have no responsibility for maintenance of the
floodway/floodplain areas as shown hereon; however, the City does have the
authority to regulate activity in the floodway/floodplain as per the City’s Floodplain
Ordinance. The maintenance of these areas shall be the sole responsibility of the
individual lot owner(s), adjacent to said areas. There areas are to remain free of
improvements that may obstruct the flow of storm water and protected from
potential erosion by the owners. No fences will be allowed in the floodplain, along
with any other structures as per the City’s Floodplain Ordinance.”
Commissioner Duncan seconded; motion carried (7-0), with Commissioners Goodale, Pritzlaff,
Frnka, Haas, Sangerhausen, Duncan and Kittrell voting in favor. None opposed.
7. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of Case No. PD-251R-SF-12, Rosebriar Estates, a zoning change
request from SF-12 (Single Family-12) to PD-251R-SF-12 (Planned Development-251
Revised-Single Family-12), to allow the development of six (6) single-family lots, with a
minimum lot size of 12,000 square feet and three (3) common area lots on 2.8 acres of
property located south of East Sandy Lake Road between Dobecka Drive and Castlebury
Court, at the request of Brad Meyer, Contrast Development.
STAFF REP.: Marcie Diamond
Presentation:
Assistant Director, Marcie Diamond introduced this case to the Commission with exhibits and
color board. She mentioned 49 notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of this
request; one returned in favor; none returned in opposition. She stated that staff is
recommending approval subject to two conditions which she read into the record.
Brad Meyer, Contrast Development, LLC, 300 E. John Carpenter Frwy., Ste. 940, Irving,
Texas, was present to represent this case, to address questions and stated he was in agreement
with staff’s recommendations with exception to the restrictive parking.
Mike Garza, City of Coppell – Engineering Department, addressed questions from the
Commission about the provision of a U-turn to enter into the subdivision.
Public Hearing:
Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in
favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. The following
people spoke:
Marcia Brancheau, 106 Dobecka Drive, Coppell, Texas, spoke in favor.
Renetta Hamilton, 118 Dobecka Drive, Coppell, Texas, spoke in favor.
Chris Burgy, 100 Dobecka Drive, Coppell, Texas, spoke in favor.
No one spoke in opposition.
Chairman Haas closed the public hearing.
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
MIN011912
Page 5 of 11
Action:
Commissioner Goodale made a motion to approve Case No. PD-251R-SF-12, Rosebriar
Estates, a zoning change request from SF-12 (Single Family-12) to PD-251R-SF-12 (Planned
Development-251 Revised-Single Family-12), subject to the following conditions:
1. Revise the note on the plat prohibiting parking adjacent to Lot 1 to “No Parking shall be
permitted along the west side of the street, adjacent to Common Area, Lot 3X”.
2. Revision of the Landscape Plan to add three ornamental trees within the common area,
Lot 1X.
Commissioner Kittrell seconded; motion carried (7-0), with Commissioners Goodale, Pritzlaff,
Frnka, Haas, Sangerhausen, Duncan and Kittrell voting in favor. None opposed.
8. Consider approval of the Rosebriar Estates, Preliminary Plat, to allow the subdivision of
2.8 acres of property into six (6) single-family lots and three (3) common area lots on
property located south of East Sandy Lake Road between Dobecka Drive and Castlebury
Court, at the request of Brad Meyer, Contrast Development.
STAFF REP.: Marcie Diamond
Presentation:
Assistant Director, Marcie Diamond introduced this companion case to the Commission with
exhibits. She stated that staff is recommending approval subject to one condition which she
read into the record.
Brad Meyer, Contrast Development, LLC, 300 E. John Carpenter Frwy., Ste. 940, Irving,
Texas, was present to represent this case, address questions and stated he was in agreement
with staff’s recommendations with exception to the restrictive parking.
Action:
Commissioner Kittrell made a motion to approve the Rosebriar Estates, Preliminary Plat,
subject to the following condition:
1. Revise the note on the plat prohibiting parking adjacent to Lot 1 to “No Parking shall be
permitted along the west side of the street, adjacent to Common Area, Lot 3X”.
Vice Chairman Frnka seconded; motion carried (7-0), with Commissioners Goodale, Pritzlaff,
Frnka, Haas, Sangerhausen, Duncan and Kittrell voting in favor. None opposed.
9. PUBLIC HEARING;
Consider approval of Case No. S-1255-C, The Learning Experience, a zoning change
request from C (Commercial) to S-1255-C (Special Use Permit-1255-Commercial), to
permit an approximate 11,000-square-foot day care to be located within the existing two-
story building, removal of a portion of the parking lot to accommodate the addition of a
5,150-square-foot outdoor play area with a rubber surface to be located at 123 East Sandy
Lake Road, approximately 600 feet east of Denton Tap Road, at the request of 3B
Developers, Inc, being represented by Bob Anderson, Plan Solution Architects.
STAFF REP.: Gary Sieb
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
MIN011912
Page 6 of 11
Presentation:
Planning Director, Gary Sieb introduced this case to the Commission with exhibits and
elevations. He stated that staff is recommending approval subject to conditions, which he read
into the record. He mentioned 18 notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of
this request, none returned in favor or in opposition.
Bob Anderson, Plan Solutions Architects, 400 E. Royal Lane, Ste. 213, Irving, Texas, was
present to represent this case and to address questions about how the parking system works, and
expand upon the drop-off and pick-up procedure. Peter Buell, 3B Developers, 3308 Shorecrest
Drive, Dallas, Texas, was also available to address questions about the traffic issues.
Mike Garza, City of Coppell – Engineering Department, addressed questions from the
Commission about the traffic patterns.
Public Hearing:
Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in
favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. No one spoke.
Chairman Haas closed the public hearing.
Action:
After much discussion, Chairman Haas made a motion to hold Case No S-1255-C, The
Learning Experience, under advisement and continue to the February 16, 2012, meeting. The
Commission took this action so a representative of The Learning Experience can attend the
February meeting and explain how the parking system works, expand upon the drop-off and
pick-up procedure, defend a perceived parking shortage and offer any other information the
applicant feels is pertinent to this case. Commissioner Sangerhausen seconded; motion carried
(7-0), with Commissioners Goodale, Pritzlaff, Frnka, Haas, Sangerhausen, Duncan and Kittrell
voting in favor. None opposed.
*BREAK FROM 9:37 P.M. TO 9:47 P.M.
10. CONTINUED:
Consider approval of the First Baptist Church of Coppell, Lot 1, Block A, Site Plan
Amendment, to allow Revised Elevations, the addition of a Covered Drop-off Area, Trellis
Structures and modifications to the landscaping and parking on 5.161 acres of property
located at 590 South Denton Tap Road, at the request of Tim Willis, HH Architects.
STAFF REP.: Gary Sieb
Presentation:
Planning Director, Gary Sieb mentioned that this case was continued from the January 15th
meeting. On January 5th, a committee consisting of Planning Director, Gary Sieb,
Commissioners Frnka and Goodale and the applicant, met to discuss a different building
material to replace the metal panels. A letter was sent from the applicant requesting to hold and
continue their case; therefore, Mr. Sieb ask that this item be continued to February 16, 2012.
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
MIN011912
Page 7 of 11
Action:
Chairman Haas made a motion to continue and hold this First Baptist Church of Coppell, Lot
1, Block A, Site Plan Amendment, under advisement at the applicant’s request to the
February 16, 2012, meeting. Vice Chairman Frnka seconded; motion carried (7-0), with
Commissioners Goodale, Pritzlaff, Frnka, Haas, Sangerhausen, Duncan and Kittrell voting in
favor. None opposed.
11. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of Case No. S-1256-R/O, Signature Living at Denton Creek, a zoning
change request from R (Retail) & O (Office) to S-1256-R/O (Special Use Permit-
Retail/Office), to allow a 57,708-square-foot (74 units, 79 beds) assisted living and
memory care facility on 5.3 acres of property located along the north side of East Sandy
Lake Road, east of Riverview Drive, at the request of Signature Senior Living, LLC,
being represented by Steven Homeyer, Homeyer Engineering, Inc.
STAFF REP.: Matt Steer
Presentation:
City Planner, Matt Steer introduced this case to the Commission with exhibits, elevations and a
color board. He mentioned nine notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of this
request, one was received in favor; none in opposition. A telephone call was received from a
resident that lives on Trinity Court with concerns that were read into the record. He stated that
staff is recommending approval subject to conditions, which he read into the record.
Mike Garza, City of Coppell – Engineering Department, addressed concerns from the
Commission about the flood plain.
Steven Homeyer, Homeyer Engineering, Inc, 206 Elm Street Ste. 105, Lewisville, Texas, was
present to represent this case, to address questions and stated he was in agreement with staff’s
recommendations. Steven Vick, CEO for Signature Senior Living, LLC, addressed questions
from the Commission about the type of care given at the facility.
Public Hearing:
Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in
favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. No one spoke.
Chairman Haas closed the public hearing.
Action:
Commissioner Sangerhausen made a motion to approve Case No. S-1256-R/O, Signature
Living at Denton Creek, a zoning change request from R (Retail) & O (Office) to S-1256-R/O
(Special Use Permit-Retail/Office), subject to the following conditions:
1. The dumpster enclosure, monument sign and decorative fence details shall be included
on the 2nd sheet of the elevations.
2. Revise the Landscape Plan to include Cedar Elms as the dominant street tree along E
Sandy Lake.
3. Consider using a different species of overstory tree in place of the 13 Red Maples
proposed.
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
MIN011912
Page 8 of 11
4. There will be additional comments during detailed Engineering Plan review.
Commissioner Kittrell seconded; motion carried (7-0), with Commissioners Goodale, Pritzlaff,
Frnka, Haas, Sangerhausen, Duncan and Kittrell voting in favor. None opposed.
12. Consider approval of the Signature Living at Denton Creek, Lot 1 & 2, Block A, Minor
Plat, to establish a building site with required easements and fire lanes to allow a 57,708-
square-foot assisted living and memory care facility on Lot 1, Block A (5.3 acres of
property) with the remainder of vacant land being platted as Lot 2, Block A (6.1 acres of
property) located along the north side of East Sandy Lake Road, east of Riverview Drive,
at the request of Signature Senior Living, LLC, being represented by Steven Homeyer,
Homeyer Engineering, Inc.
STAFF REP.: Matt Steer
Presentation:
City Planner, Matt Steer introduced this companion case to the Commission with exhibits. He
stated that staff is recommending approval subject to one condition, which he read into the
record.
Steven Homeyer, Homeyer Engineering, Inc, 206 Elm Street Ste. 105, Lewisville, Texas, was
present to represent this case, to address questions and stated he was in agreement with staff’s
recommendations.
Action:
Commissioner Kittrell made a motion to approve the Signature Living at Denton Creek, Lot
1 & 2, Block A, Minor Plat, subject to the following condition:
1. There will be additional comments during detailed Engineering Plan review.
Vice Chairman Frnka seconded; motion carried (7-0), with Commissioners Goodale, Pritzlaff,
Frnka, Haas, Sangerhausen, Duncan and Kittrell voting in favor. None opposed.
13. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of Case No. PD-214R5-C, Arbor Manors Retail, a zoning change
request from PD-214R2-C (Planned Development-214 Revision 2-Commercial) to PD-
214R5-C (Planned Development-214 Revision 5-Commercial) to attach a Detail Plan to
allow the development of an 11,000-square-foot retail building to contain retail and office
uses including two restaurants, one of which will have drive-thru service on 1.5 acres of
property located at 143 South Denton Tap Road, approximately 145 feet north of West
Braewood Drive, at the request of Hermansen Land Development, Inc. being represented
by Randi Rivera, G & A Consultants.
STAFF REP.: Matt Steer
Presentation:
City Planner, Matt Steer introduced this case to the Commission with exhibits, elevations, color
board and color renderings. He mentioned 21 notices were mailed to property owners within
200 feet of this request, one returned in favor (with dumpster relocated), and 11 returned in
opposition (multiple responses in favor and in opposition came from outside the notification
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
MIN011912
Page 9 of 11
area). He stated that staff is recommending approval only if certain conditions are met, which
he read into the record.
Kirk Hermansen, Hermansen Land Development, 5944 Luther Lane, Ste. 725, Dallas, Texas,
and Tye Williams, Bigg Capital Holdings/dba Smashburger, 6865 N. Dallas Pkwy., Ste 200,
Plano, Texas, were present to represent this case, made their presentations before the
Commission, addressed questions and stated agreement with staff’s recommendations with
exception to the requested signage.
Lance Rose, NCA Partners Architecture, 5646 Milton Street, Ste. 610, Dallas, Texas, address
questions about the signage, landscaping, sidewalks and paving.
Public Hearing:
Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in
favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. The following
people spoke:
Lance Ouellette, Representative for the Property Owners, 1990 Lake Point Drive,
Lewisville, Texas, spoke in favor.
Sam Finger, 156 Peachtree Drive, Coppell Texas, spoke in opposition.
Ramana Atluri, 160 Peachtree Drive, Coppell, Texas, spoke in opposition.
Moresh Damle, 152 Peachtree Drive, Coppell, Texas, spoke in opposition.
Gopal Raghavan, 143 W. Braewood Drive, Coppell, Texas, spoke in opposition.
Sudhakar Perah, 145 Peachtree Drive, Coppell, Texas, spoke in opposition.
Neighborhood concerns were read into the record.
Chairman Haas closed the public hearing.
Mike Garza, City of Coppell – Engineering Department, addressed concerns from the
Commission about the driveway cut on Denton Tap and traffic on Braewood.
Action:
After much discussion, Commissioner Sangerhausen made a motion to approve Case No. PD-
214R5-C, Arbor Manors Retail, a zoning change request from PD-214R2-C (Planned
Development-214 Revision 2-Commercial) to PD-214R5-C (Planned Development-214
Revision 5-Commercial), subject to the following conditions as revised by the Commission:
1. Revise PD conditions notes as follows:
a. A sit down restaurant with 300 square foot patio area (Smashburger) and a sit
down restaurant with drive thru (Einstein Bros. Bagels) are permitted.
b. 560 square feet of landscaping shown on the northwest corner is being attributed
toward nonvehicular landscape area requirement.
c. The triangular landscape areas at the end of each parking space are being
attributed toward the nonvehicular landscape area requirement.
d. An 83-square-foot deficiency to the nonvehicular landscape area requirements
shall be permitted.
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
MIN011912
Page 10 of 11
e. A maximum 15-square-foot blade sign shall be allowed for each tenant. This
shall be in addition to the total sign areas allowed (one square foot per lineal
foot frontage on a dedicated street).
f. A maximum 40% logo shall be allowed for each tenant. This shall be calculated
as a part of the total allowable signage for each tenant.
g. The loading zone shall be allowed within the parking area as depicted on the
west side of the site.
h. Deliveries shall only occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 11:00 a.m.
2. Remove all other conditions under “Development Standards” within the PD Conditions
list including all other sign variance requests.
3. Relocate the dumpster enclosure to the north side of the proposed structure and adjust
parking and landscaping accordingly.
4. Reorient the drive thru order board to the south side of the structure and ensure the
speaker box is facing to the south.
5. Include parking lot lighting on the site plan. Ensure compliance with the glare and
lighting standards of the Zoning Ordinance.
6. There will be additional comments during detailed Engineering Plan review.
The Commission also advised that a neighborhood meeting be scheduled and held, so other
neighborhood concerns could be addressed prior to the City Council meeting.
Commissioner Pritzlaff seconded; motion carried (7-0), with Commissioners Goodale, Pritzlaff,
Frnka, Haas, Sangerhausen, Duncan and Kittrell voting in favor. None opposed.
14. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of the Arbor Manors Addition, Lot 4R2R, Block A, Replat, being a
replat of Lot 4R2, Block A of the Arbor Manors Addition, to relocate the existing fire lane
and mutual access easement and to establish easements to allow the development of an
11,000-square-foot retail building on 1.5 acres of property located at 143 South Denton
Tap Road, approximately 145 feet north of West Braewood Drive, at the request of
Hermansen Land Development, Inc., being represented by Randi Rivera, G&A
Consultants.
STAFF REP.: Matt Steer
Presentation:
City Planner, Matt Steer introduced this companion case to the Commission with exhibits. He
stated that staff is recommending approval subject to conditions, which he read into the record.
Kirk Hermansen, Hermansen Land Development, 5944 Luther Lane, Ste. 725, Dallas, Texas,
was present to represent this case, to address questions and stated agreement with staff’s
recommendations.
Public Hearing:
Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in
favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. No one spoke.
Chairman Haas closed the public hearing.
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
MIN011912
Page 11 of 11
Action:
Vice Chairman Frnka made a motion to approve Case No the Arbor Manors Addition, Lot
4R2R, Block A, Replat, subject to the following conditions:
1. Show the offsite mutual access and fire lane easements and provide recording
information on this plat prior to recordation.
2. A Tree Removal Permit is required prior to the start of construction.
3. There may be additional comments during engineering plan review.
Commissioner Duncan seconded; motion carried (7-0), with Commissioners Goodale, Pritzlaff,
Frnka, Haas, Sangerhausen, Duncan and Kittrell voting in favor. None opposed.
15. Update on Council action for planning agenda items on January 10, 2012:
A. An application submitted by Chesapeake Energy, to allow the drilling and
operation of five (5) additional wells and the re-issuance of one previously
approved well on the existing 3.013-acre pad site located north of Bethel Road,
west of Creekview Drive, known as the Fellowship Property.
B. An Ordinance for Case No. PD-241R-C, Red Hawk Office, a zoning change from
PD-241-C to PD-241R-C, to attach a Detail Plan on Lot 28R, to allow the
construction of a 7,871-square-foot office building on 0.92 acres of property
located at the northwest corner of Denton Tap Road and Bethel School Road.
C. An Ordinance for Case No. PD-252-H, Allstate Insurance Office, a zoning change
from H to PD-252-H, to allow site modifications to support conversion of a
residential structure to an office use on 0.25 acres of property located at 709 South
Coppell Road.
D. An Ordinance for a text amendment to revise Article 34, Landscaping Regulations
of the Zoning Ordinance (primarily Table 1, Plant Palette), to promote the use of
Xeriscaping.
During the Pre-Session, Planning Director, Gary Sieb advised the Commission of Council’s
actions on January 10, 2012 and stated that Council approved all of the above-stated items.
16. Director’s Comments.
Planning Director, Gary Sieb welcomed the new Commissioner, Craig Pritzlaff to the
Commission.
ADJOURNMENT
With nothing further to discuss, the meeting adjourned at approximately 12:49 a.m.
__________________________________
Gregory Frnka, Chairman
__________________________________
Juanita A. Miles, Secretary
Item # 4
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
CASE: First Baptist Church of Coppell, Lot 1, Block A,
Site Plan Amendment
P & Z HEARING DATE: December 15, 2011 (postponed to the January 19, 2012 meeting with a
request to continue to the February 16 meeting—see attached letter;
second letter received on February 2 requesting continuance until
March 22--staff recommends continuance)
C.C. HEARING DATE: January 10, 2012 (February 14, 2012—if second request to continue is
approved, the Council meeting is April 10, 2012)
STAFF REP.: Gary L. Sieb, Planning Director
LOCATION: 590 S. Denton Tap Road.
SIZE OF AREA: 5.161 acres of property.
CURRENT ZONING: C and SF-9 (Commercial and Single Family-9)
REQUEST: Site Plan Amendment to allow a 740-square-foot building expansion,
revised elevations, the addition of a covered drop-off area, trellis
structures and modifications to the landscaping and parking.
APPLICANT: Owner: Architect:
First Baptist Church of Coppell James Thomas Willis, AIA
590 S. Denton Tap Road HH Architects
Coppell, Texas 75019 5910 N. Central Expwy.
(972) 462-1643 Suite 1200
FAX: (972) 304-0100 Dallas, TX. 75206
(972) 404-1034
Fax: (972) 404-1036
Email: twillis@hharchitects.com
Item # 4
Page 2 of 4
HISTORY: The existing church facility was built in the early 70’s under the existing Commercial and
Single Family-9 District regulations. The rear 20 feet of the area was zoned PD-106-SF-9
in 1988; however, the property was never platted for SF-9 uses. The extension of the
parking area into this residentially-zoned area was accommodated in March of 2003. A
Minor Plat was approved at the same time. In October of the same year, the church asked
for and received administrative approval from the Planning Director to construct a free
standing monument sign of approximately 55 square feet. That sign exists today with the
message that was approved in 2003. In 2004, a request to provide stealth antennas within
the steeple of the church was submitted by Verizon Wireless for approval. Since the
antenna would be totally shielded from view, it was administratively approved in
September, 2004.
TRANSPORTATION:
Denton Tap Road is a concrete, six-lane divided roadway, built to standard, within 100
feet of right-of-way.
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North Medical office/retail, Single Family; C (Commercial), SF-9
(Single Family-9)
South Office, Single Family; C (Commercial), SF-12 (Single Family-12)
East Single Family; PD-106, SF-9 (Planned Development-106, Single Family-9
West Undeveloped; C (Commercial)
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
The Comprehensive Plan of March 2011 shows this property as suitable for religious
use.
DISCUSSION:
At first glance, this request appears to be pretty straight-forward with little reason to
discuss the proposed physical alterations to the existing building. The applicant
proposes to add 740 square feet to the existing structure, resulting in a 64,000-square-
foot church. Also proposed is a covered drop-off at the front of the church and a
number of façade changes. Upon closer observation of these façade changes however,
there are questions regarding the architectural design of the proposal, especially as it
relates to the “old world architectural style” which we have encouraged over the years.
There is no question that the proposal will significantly change the appearance of the
church and give it a modernistic feel with the use of glass, the introduction of metal
“grids“ as a design element on the face of the building, and the highly contemporary
“floating” horizontal elements attached to the steeple structure. Absent from the
applicant’s submittal is the provision of calculations showing that the steeple height
complies with zoning requirements—a request staff made during the Development
Review Committee meeting with the applicant.
Notwithstanding the inclusion of this information on the submittal exhibits, what this
review boils down to is whether the existing “look” of Coppell is to be preserved
Item # 4
Page 3 of 4
(especially along a Primary Image zone), or the remodeling of an existing structure in an
attempt to create a more contemporary building is to be permitted.
As the Planning Department strives to preserve and encourage our existing architectural
style, this form of Site Plan Amendment raises the question of where the community is
headed relative to its architectural design and heritage. As pointed out in our award
winning Comprehensive Plan:
“…preserving the integrity of what is good in the city” (pg. 3)
“The philosophy of the Plan is to preserve the character and quality of
…neighborhoods” (pg. 7)
“…built on the special aspects of the city’s existing character” (pg. 29)
“…a unique identity with …architecture reflecting local history, culture, and
other sense of community pride” (pg. 30)
“Encourage the use of materials…which reinforce the sense of Coppell as one
that is built for beauty…” (pg. 50)
Mentioned throughout the Plan are suggestions that major alterations which
significantly alter the appearance of recognized good urban design should be carefully
defined and enhance the beauty and character of the structure, not change it.
There is no question that the proposed modification to the church dramatically changes
the architectural character of the building. This proposal not only signifies a major
change in the appearance of a well-known church in this community, but also introduces
a number of questionable building materials that have value in certain areas of the city
such as the industrial and office districts, but certainly not on a landmark church.
ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION:
At the December 15, 2011 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission
continued this case to January so that a committee made up of Chairman Greg
Frnka, Commissioner Justin Goodale, and Planning Director Gary Sieb could
meet with the applicant and revise some elements of the façade—specifically the
areas shown with the metal material. The committee met on Friday, January 6,
2012. Conceptually, the proposed façade gained initial support of the committee,
but the applicant has asked for a continuance of the case until the February
Commission meeting in order for all back-up material (specifications of the façade
replacement, elevations, a new color board, approval of the church elders, etc.) to
be provided for Commission consideration. On February 2 we received a letter
(attached) asking to continue this case until the March 22 Commission hearing
Staff recommends CONTINUANCE of this case until March 22.
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
The Zoning Ordinance states that churches and their improvements shall not be denied
unless the health, safety, and general welfare of the community is in danger (Sec. 12-30-
15). It is obvious these proposed alterations to the church do not threaten this community;
however, staff cannot support this site plan amendment for the First Baptist Church of
Item # 4
Page 4 of 4
Coppell. It changes the character of the church, introduces a number of building materials
that are not compatible with the existing building, and ignores several vision statements
contained within the Comprehensive Plan.
With the proposed alterations to the building façade—specifically the metal
elements--the changes discussed at the January Planning Commission committee
meeting met with support. With those changes to the façade, staff can recommend
APPROVAL of the request.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Recommend approval of the request.
2. Recommend disapproval of the request
3. Recommend modification of the request
4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Site Plan
2. Elevations
3. Letter requesting continuance
4. Letter dated February 2 asking for continuance until March
ITEM # 5
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
CASE NO.: S-1255-C, The Learning Experience
P&Z HEARING DATE: January 19, 2012 (This public hearing was closed and case continued to
February 16, 2012—see comments under
“DISCUSSION”)
C.C. HEARING DATE: February 14, 2012 (March 27, 2012)
STAFF REP.: Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning
LOCATION: 123 East Sandy Lake Road
SIZE OF AREA: .94 acres of property
CURRENT ZONING: C (Commercial)
REQUEST: A zoning change to S-1255-C (Special Use Permit-1255-Commercial), to permit
an approximate 11,000-square-foot day care to be located within the existing two-
story building, removal of a portion of the parking lot to accommodate the
addition of a 5,150-square-foot outdoor play area with a rubber surface.
APPLICANT: Owner Architect
Peter Buell/3B Developers LLC Bob Anderson
14175 Proton Road Plan Solutions Architects
Dallas, TX 75244 400 E. Royal Lane, Suite 213
(214) 794-3722 Irving, TX. 75039
Email: pbuell@elfainstall.com (972) 373-9999
Fax: (972) 373-9001
Email: bob@plansolutions.net
HISTORY: This property was developed with a two-story office building approximately three
years ago, and has been vacant since completion. Although several attempts to
occupy the building were undertaken, no contract for occupancy was ever
accomplished, hence, the request for this rezoning application.
ITEM # 5
Page 2 of 3
TRANSPORTATION: Sandy Lake Road is an improved, concrete, four-lane divided thoroughfare built to
standard, within a 90-foot right of way.
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North: Commercial and Single-Family; Town Center (TC) and Planned Dev. 116-
SF-7 (PD-116-SF-7)
South: Single family residential; (SF-7)
East: Single family residential; (SF-7)
West: Commercial; (PD-209-R4)
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
The Comprehensive Plan of March 2011, shows the property as suitable for urban
residential neighborhood and residential neighborhood.
DISCUSSION: As pointed out in the HISTORY section of our staff report, this building was
constructed some time ago, and has remained vacant since completion. Although
several attempts were made to occupy it, those efforts failed and the structure
remains with no tenants. We have been approached by the property owner who
has a potential tenant wishing to occupy the entire building with a day care
facility. As staff understands, this is a national company that looks for these types
of buildings and transforms them to day cares. We have been advised that this
company has over 160 facilities spread throughout the country. Although the
exterior of the building will remain intact, changes to the site plan include the
addition of a new, six-foot high TREX fence at the rear of the building enclosing
the play area, removal of eight parking spaces to be replaced with a poured-in-
place rubberized material within the requested fenced area for play space, new
curbing, a sign package, and construction of a trash bin. Generally we require a
circular drive for day care users, but that recommendation is handled on a case-
by-case basis. Therefore, we are very much interested in how this facility will
address that issue. Parking requirements are one parking space for each ten
students. In addition, the application indicates 20 staff positions (which generally
means 20 parking spaces), and with 183 student positions, that totals 38 parking
spaces. The plan shows 39 total spaces, and we have some concern that enough
parking is being provided. To quell that concern, the applicant has indicated that
the facility is used on a sliding arrival schedule. That schedule could modify our
concerns, but the applicant needs to explain how that arrival schedule actually
works—what determines number of children per time schedule, is the schedule
based upon age specific data, how and where children enter the building, what
happens if all parking spaces are taken, etc.
In that this use is generally compatible with the neighborhood, it would occupy an
existing building that has been vacant for years, does not conflict with the
Comprehensive Master Plan, and complies with our regulations relative to Site
Plan, parking requirements, and signage; staff can support this use with
conditions.
On January 19, 2012 the Planning Commission closed the public hearing and
continued this case to February 16 in order to give the applicant an
ITEM # 5
Page 3 of 3
opportunity to have a representative of The Learning Experience appear
before the Commission and explain how the parking, maneuvering and drop
off of children will work on this site.
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
Staff is recommending APPROVAL of this request subject to the following conditions:
1. Agreement regarding how the traffic drop-off system works to insure no parking/circulation
problems.
2. A colored example of the logo
3. Show location of existing trash enclosure (dashed line will suffice)
4. Insure brick used on proposed trash enclosure matches brick on main building (state on Sheet A-2)
5. Dimension overall size of monument sign on Sheet A-2
6. Need as-builts from engineer prior to CO
7. Note: Planning Commission meeting is 1-19, not 1-9 on Sheet A-1
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Recommend approval of the request
2. Recommend disapproval of the request
3. Recommend modification of the request
4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Site Plan (Sheet A-1)
2. Trash/Signage Exhibit (Sheet A-2)
3. Photo of proposed screening fence
ITEM # 6
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
CASE NO.: PD-253-H, Old Town Water Tank/Office Addition, Lots 1 & 2, Block A
P&Z HEARING DATE: February 16, 2012
C.C. HEARING DATE: March 27, 2012
STAFF REP.: Matt Steer, City Planner
LOCATION: 616/618 South Coppell Road
SIZE OF AREA: 0.514 acres
CURRENT ZONING: H (Historic)
REQUEST: A zoning change to PD-253-H (Planned Development-253-Historic) to establish a
Detail Site Plan, to allow for the reuse of the existing structures for office uses
and to retain the existing empty water tank.
APPLICANT: Applicant: Architect:
The Edinburgh Group dba Amcat Architecture Plus
Allan Palmer Phillip Morse
P.O. Box 1068 16415 Addison Road, Suite 120
Coppell, Texas 75019 Addison, Texas 75001
Phone: 214-356-9242 Phone: 972-248-7660
Email: apalmer@amcatusa.com Email: pmorse@archplus.com
Owner: Surveyor:
City of Coppell Brittain & Cawford
Mindi Hurley Chris Blevins
255 Parkway Blvd P.O. Box 11374
Coppell, Texas 75019 Fort Worth, Texas 76110
Phone: 972-304-3677 Phone: 817-429-5112
Email: mhurley@coppelltx.gov Email: clb@brittain-crawford.com
HISTORY: The Old Coppell Master Plan was accepted by City Council in April of 2002. On
May 13, 2003, Council amended the Land Use component of the 1996
Comprehensive Plan and enlarged the Historic Overlay district, as proposed in the
Old Coppell Master Plan and as recommended in April, 2003 by the Planning and
Zoning Commission. On January 11, 2005, the HO (Historic Overlay) district,
containing various base zonings, was changed to a straight H (Historic) district,
which includes standards for construction, design guidelines and use regulations
for Old Coppell.
ITEM # 6
Page 2 of 3
The subject property contains two buildings and a historic water tank previously
used to serve the area. The larger of the two buildings (3,800 square foot) was
built in 1959 by J.P. Maynard, R. Story and volunteers. Originally constructed as
a two-bay Fire Station housing a 1941 Ford Fire Truck, it was later enlarged to
contain four bays. The smaller 1,300 square-foot “annex” building was
subsequently constructed and served as a city administrative facility. Portable
buildings were placed directly behind the fire station and served as the temporary
home to a variety of city offices. The buildings eventually became the Coppell
Senior Center for several years until the completion of the Grapevine Springs
Community and Senior Center facility in 2008.
The site was included in the Old Coppell Master Plan as an example of a
potential adaptive reuse. A very conceptual sketch was included in the plan
(attached). This depicted a restaurant/café with the exterior of the building having
a raised parapet with decorative cap to screen the mechanical equipment on the
roof, a brick veneer on the cinder-block, awnings over each window and an
outdoor eating area in the front.
TRANSPORTATION: Coppell Road is a two-lane, asphalt road contained within a variable width right-
of-way. The plans for the improvements currently underway show a variable
width right-of-way and approximately 34 feet of pavement with an eight-foot
sidewalk on the west and a six-foot sidewalk on the east. On-street angled parking
directly abuts this proposal and will provide this property and other adjacent
properties public parking.
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North – Flood plain; Planned Development–213 Revision 2-Historic (PD-213R2-H)
South – Retail; Historic
East - Vacant; Historic
West – Music school; Historic
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan of March 2011 shows the property as suitable
for development in accordance with the Old Coppell Historic District as
outlined in the Old Coppell Master Plan.
DISCUSSION: As stated in the Coppell Comprehensive Plan of March 2011, the adopted Old
Coppell Master Plan provides recommendations for future revitalization and
redevelopment in the district. Some of the recommendations (in bold) and how
they have been taken into account relative to this site are listed below.
1. Adaptive reuse and infill development - Specifically planned as an adaptive
reuse site, the conversion to an office use is appropriate.
2. Streetscapes and gateways – The “Bethel Road Project” currently under
construction contains a small segment of South Coppell Road directly in front
of this request which features on-street angled parking, a sidewalk and street
trees planted at the end of each parking row. The Streetscaping is further
enhanced with the landscaping proposed for this development. Three Live
Oaks, four Burr Oaks and one Shumard Red Oak are proposed to be integrated
throughout the existing development.
3. Urban design and architecture - The existing cinder block building is
proposed to be enhanced with a brick veneer and a raised parapet, screening
ITEM # 6
Page 3 of 3
the mechanical equipment on the roof, wooden canopies over the proposed
windows and doors.
4. Access and parking - In addition to the on-street parking of the Coppell Road
improvements, there is an existing parking area to the rear with 18 parking
spaces (17 required). This is proposed to be resurfaced and restriped. This
area is screened by the buildings, which is ideal for any development in Old
Town.
5. Business Development - Amcat is the proposed tenant who will provide more
office space in the district and will generate additional daytime population for
the area.
6. Marketing and promotion - The property was heavily marketed through the
Request for proposal (RFP) process which began in 2011.
7. Funding and incentives and fiscal implementations - The applicant is
planning to apply for a façade grant specific to the Old Town area.
8. Implementation strategies – Until completed, staff will continue to work
closely with the applicant in the implementation of this adaptive reuse of the
former Fire Station and Senior Center buildings.
The water tank component to this development is being platted as a separate lot
with Bethel Road access and the City of Coppell will retain ownership. Through
various discussions with the Historic Society, it has been determined that it will
eventually be painted and featured with a historic plaque similar to the one on the
Kirkland House summarizing the significance of the structure.
Staff is comfortable recommending approval of the Planned Development subject
to a minor drafting correction and an addition of a PD condition note relating to
the landscape deficiencies.
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
Staff is recommending APPROVAL of PD-253-H, Old Town Water Tank/Office subject to the following
conditions:
1. Add a Planned Development Condition note to the Site/Landscape Plan stating the deficiencies to the
perimeter, interior and nonvehicular landscaping area and tree requirements.
2. The wood door is proposed to have glass in the center. Revise the elevations and rendering accordingly.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Recommend approval of the request
2. Recommend disapproval of the request
3. Recommend modification of the request
4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Sketch of Adaptive Reuse from the Old Coppell Master Plan
2. Color Rendering
3. Site Plan/Landscape Plan/Tree Survey
4. Existing Conditions Plan
5. Black and White Elevations
Old Coppell Master Plan Adaptive Reuse
P&Z Meeting2-7-12
P&Z
Old Coppell Master Plan Adaptive Reuse
P&Z Meeting2-7-12
P&Z
ITEM # 7
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
Old Town Water Tank/Office Addition, Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, Minor Plat
P&Z HEARING DATE: February 16, 2012
C.C. HEARING DATE: March 27, 2012
STAFF REP.: Matt Steer, City Planner
LOCATION: 616/618 South Coppell Road
SIZE OF AREA: 0.514 acres
CURRENT ZONING: PD-253-H (Planned Development-253-Historic)
REQUEST: A minor plat to subdivide the property to establish a building site and necessary
easements to allow for the reuse of the existing structures and a separate lot for
retaining the existing empty water tank.
APPLICANT: Applicant: Architect:
The Edinburgh Group dba Amcat Architecture Plus
Allan Palmer Phillip Morse
P.O. Box 1068 16415 Addison Road, Suite 120
Coppell, Texas 75019 Addison, Texas 75001
Phone: 214-356-9242 Phone: 972-248-7660
Email: apalmer@amcatusa.com Email: pmorse@archplus.com
Owner: Surveyor:
City of Coppell Brittain & Cawford
Mindi Hurley Chris Blevins
255 Parkway Blvd P.O. Box 11374
Coppell, Texas 75019 Fort Worth, Texas 76110
Phone: 972-304-3677 Phone: 817-429-5112
Email: mhurley@coppelltx.gov Email: clb@brittain-crawford.com
HISTORY: The Old Coppell Master Plan was accepted by City Council in April of 2002. On
May 13, 2003, Council amended the Land Use component of the 1996
ITEM # 7
Page 2 of 3
Comprehensive Plan and enlarged the Historic Overlay district, as proposed in the
Old Coppell Master Plan and as recommended in April, 2003 by the Planning and
Zoning Commission. On January 11, 2005, the HO (Historic Overlay) district,
containing various base zonings, was changed to a straight H (Historic) district,
which includes standards for construction, design guidelines and use regulations
for Old Coppell.
The subject property contains two buildings and a historic water tank previously
used to serve the area. The larger of the two buildings (3,800 sq. ft.) was built in
1959 by J.P. Maynard, R. Story and volunteers. Originally constructed as a two
bay Fire Station housing a 1941 Ford Fire Truck, it was later enlarged to contain 4
bays. The smaller 1,300 sq. ft. “annex” building was subsequently constructed
and served as a city administrative facility. Portable buildings were placed
directly behind the fire station and served as the temporary home to a variety of
city offices. The buildings eventually became the Coppell Senior Center for
several years until the completion of the Grapevine Springs Community and
Senior Center facility in 2008.
The site was included in the Old Coppell Master Plan as an example of a
potential adaptive reuse. A very conceptual sketch was included in the plan. This
depicted a restaurant/café with the exterior of the building having a raised parapet
with decorative cap to screen the mechanical equipment on the roof, a brick
veneer on the cinder-block, awnings over each window and an outdoor eating area
in the front.
TRANSPORTATION: Coppell Road is a two-lane, asphalt road contained within a variable width right-
of-way. The plans for the improvements currently underway show a variable
width right-of-way and approximately 34' of pavement with an 8' sidewalk on the
west and a 6' sidewalk on the east. On-street angled parking directly abuts this
proposal and will provide this property and other adjacent properties public
parking.
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North – Flood plain; Planned Development–213 Revision 2-Historic (PD-213R2-H)
South – Retail; Historic
East - Vacant; Historic
West – Music school; Historic
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan of March 2011 shows the property as suitable
for development in accordance with the Old Coppell Historic District as
outlined in the Old Coppell Master Plan.
DISCUSSION: This is a Minor Plat to be considered concurrently with the Planned Development
proposal to allow the sale of this property not previously platted. The applicant is
proposing to renovate the two buildings on Lot 1, Block A for Amcat Offices.
The City of Coppell plans to retain ownership of Lot 2, Block A to preserve the
ITEM # 7
Page 3 of 3
Historic Water Tank on site. A 12-foot wide maintenance and access easement is
proposed on Lot 1, Block A, for the purpose of maintaining the water tank. Staff
recommends approval with no outstanding conditions.
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
Staff is recommending approval of Lot 1 & 2, Block A, Old Town Water Tank/Office Addition with no
outstanding conditions.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Recommend approval of the request
2. Recommend disapproval of the request
3. Recommend modification of the request
4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Minor Plat
ITEM #8
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
CASE NO.: PD-95R-SF-9, Shadow Ridge Estates I, Lot 10, Block A
P&Z HEARING DATE: February 16, 2012
C.C. HEARING DATE: March 27, 2012
STAFF REP.: Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning
LOCATION: 202 Southern Belle Drive
SIZE OF AREA: 0.33 acres
CURRENT ZONING: PD-95-SF-9 (Planned Development-95-Single Family-9)
REQUEST: A zoning change to PD-95R-SF-9 (Planned Development-95 Revised-
Single Family-9), to allow for a 767.5-square-foot garage expansion
which encroaches into the required rear yard.
APPLICANT: Mr. Jordon Musser
202 Southern Belle Drive
Coppell, Texas 75019
(214) 995-5935
(No Fax number)
Email: JordonMusser@gmail.com
HISTORY: There has been no recent development activity or history on the subject
parcel. Other than the original Shadow Ridge Estates subdivision which
was developed in the mid 1980’s, no additional activity has taken place
on this lot.
TRANSPORTATION: Southern Belle Drive is a local, residential, concrete street with 27 feet of
pavement width built within a 50-foot right-of-way.
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North: Single family detached residential homes; SF-12
ITEM #8
Page 2 of 3
South: Single family detached residential homes; PD-95-SF-9
East: Single-family detached residential homes; PD-115-SF-7
West: Single family detached residential homes; PD-95-SF-9
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
The Comprehensive Plan of March 2011 shows the property as suitable
for residential neighborhood uses.
DISCUSSION: This is an application by a home owner requesting a change to his
Planned Development zoning district by adding a 765 square foot garage
addition—roughly 30 feet wide by 25 feet deep--to the rear of his
existing house. A portion of that addition extends into a required yard
setback, hence, the request to amend the PD. The required setback is 20
feet, and this expansion would extend a portion of the garage into the
setback by 10 feet. In discussions with the applicant, we have been
advised the existing garage space will continue to be used for auto
storage, work on homeowner projects, etc. The new addition will be
used for additional storage of the owners’ vehicles, and being 30 feet
wide, could accommodate three cars. The new garage will be
constructed of brick similar, if not identical, to the existing brick used on
the residence. Also, the existing wood gables on the house will be
matched on the garage addition, and height of the addition will be 16.5
feet, same height as the existing house. The corner of the addition
requiring the PD amendment is 10 feet from an eight-foot high wooden
screening fence, the fence is adjacent to an alley to which this home
owner has no access, and the closest house across the property line is 35
feet away.
We have received comments from adjacent homeowners expressing
concern that this addition, if allowed, not turn into a garage offering
repair of vehicles that are not the owners. Such an activity is illegal, of
course, (running a business in a residential neighborhood). There has
also been discussion concerning noise from this property, and again, we
have noise standards that can address this concern. Staff has had
discussion with the applicant who understands the addition is to be used
for his personal use only. Assuming we receive no substantial
neighborhood opposition to this proposal, staff is comfortable
recommending approval of this request. To heighten comfort level in the
neighborhood, we have specifically recommended a condition be
included insuring no business activity occurs on the subject property. A
note or condition to that effect needs to be added to the submitted Site
Plan exhibit.
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
Staff is recommending APPROVAL of this request subject to the following conditions:
1. Need a letter from Oncor allowing concrete paving over their easement.
2. A note being added to the SITE PLAN stating this addition is for the sole
purpose of adding a garage structure in a residential neighborhood for
occupant use only.
ITEM #8
Page 3 of 3
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Recommend approval of the request
2. Recommend disapproval of the request
3. Recommend modification of the request
4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Site Plan (2 sheets)
2. Letter from Atmos Energy allowing paving of easement
25.0
10.0
13.0
14.8
27.7
44.8
EXTENDED CONCRETE DRIVE
20' SETBACK
SMALL TRIANGLE BEYOND 20FT SETBACK(76.8 SQ FT)
FENCE TO SECURE BACK YARD
REAR PROPERTY LINE
SIDE PROPERTY LINE
NOTES:1) ADDITION TO BE 30.7 FEET BY 25.0 FEET2)UNDER 24% COVERAGE AFTER RENOVATION
x x x xLOCATION
25.500
FRONT
FRONT ENTRY DOOR
WOOD SHUTTERS
16.5
25.500
ADDITION
VIEW B-B
BRICK
ADDITION
VIEW A-A 30.700
A
A
B
B
SIDING
REAR
REAR ENTRY DOOR
16X7 GARAGE DOOR
9X7 GARAGE DOOR
6-12 ROOF
NOTES:1) ADDITION TO BE 30.7 FEET BY 25.0 FEET
ITEM # 9
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
PD-199R6-HC- Zimmer
P&Z HEARING DATE: February 16, 2012
C.C. HEARING DATE: March 27, 2012
STAFF REP.: Marcie Diamond, Assistant Director of Planning
LOCATION: SWC of S.H. 121 and MacArthur Blvd.
SIZE OF AREA: 1.37 acres of property
CURRENT ZONING: PD-199R5-HC-S-1211R2 (Planned Development-199-Highway
Commercial Revision 5-Special Use Permit-1211 Revision 2)
REQUEST: A zoning change to PD-199R6-HC-Zimmer (Planned Development-199-
Highway Commercial Revision, to revise the Detail Plan to allow a sign
with a logo which exceeds 20% of the area of the sign
APPLICANT: Cary Moon
Zimmer
3301 Matrix Drive, Suite 200
Richardson, Texas 75082
817-296-2895
FAX: 214-774-0511
Cary.moon@zimmer.com
HISTORY: On November 14, 2006, Council approved a Site Plan on this tract to
allow a 9,300-square-foot retail building replacing a previously approved
gas station/convenience store. A Firestone auto repair garage was
completed in April of 2007 on the adjacent land. The building on the
subject property was completed in July of that year and has been vacant
since then. On October 13, 2009, Council approved a PD Amendment
and a replat which allowed Lot 4, Block A, to be subdivided into two lots
to allow the existing buildings to be on individual lots to permit separate
ownership. Since that time Zimmer has purchased this 9,300-square-foot
ITEM # 9
Page 2 of 3
building, and is in the process of relocating its headquarters from
Richardson to this property.
TRANSPORTATION: State Highway 121 frontage road, directly to the north of this parcel,
contains three lanes east bound in a variable width right-of-way.
MacArthur Boulevard is a P6D Major thoroughfare built to standard with
a six-lane divided street contained within a 120-foot right-of-way.
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North-SH 121; City of Lewisville
South-Bank of Texas; PD-199-R2-HC (Planned Development 199
Revision 2-Highway Commercial)
East-office development; City of Lewisville
West-Firestone; PD-199R4-HC (Planned Development 199 Revision 4-
Highway Commercial)
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan of March 2011, shows the property as
suitable for Freeway Special District uses.
DISCUSSION: As discussed in the History Section, this building has been vacant since
it was constructed almost five years ago. Zimmer, a medical supply
company, has purchased this entire building and is in the process of
relocating its headquarters from the City of Richardson. Zimmer will
occupy 4,584 square feet, approximately one-half of the building, the
remainder of the building will be potential retail lease space.
Zimmer has 62.6 linear feet of frontage, allowing for a 62.6 square foot
sign. Based on the current Sign Ordinance, this would allow 50.1 square
feet of individually mounted letters (black or white) and a 12.5 square
foot blue logo. This request is for a 29.3 square foot sign, with a 20-
square-foot logo, which is 69 percent of the sign. All other occupants in
this retail center (Firestone and Bank of Texas) complied with the sign
ordinance, the signs being either black or white, and their logo does not
exceed the 20%. In the Vista Point office/tech park to the west, which
was a part of the original Planned Development, all the signs are black,
have individually mounted letters, with various logos.
While we welcome Zimmer to this community, there is no justification
to vary the Sign Ordinance, especially considering its visibility, being
located at the intersection of SH 121 and MacArthur Boulevard.
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
Staff is recommending DENIAL of this request.
ITEM # 9
Page 3 of 3
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Recommend approval of the request
2. Recommend disapproval of the request
3. Recommend modification of the request
4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Location Map
2. Zimmer Company Information
3. Floor Plan
4. Sign Elevation
PD-199R6-HC- Zimmer679 E. Highway 121, Suite #130 Request: Detail Plan allow a sign with a logo which exceeds 20% of the area of the sign for Zimmer, Suite 130.All other signs will comply with the City of Coppell Sign Ordinance, as amended. 62’
ITEM # 10
Page 1 of 2
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
Residential Urban Neighborhood (RBN) District
P&Z HEARING DATE: February 16, 2012
C.C. HEARING DATE: March 27, 2012
STAFF REP.: Marcie Diamond, Assistant Director of Planning
PURPOSE: To consider approval of a Text Amendment to add Article 18A,
Residential Urban Neighborhood District (RBN), to the Zoning
Ordinance (Section 12-18A of the Code of Ordinances).
HISTORY: On March 22, 2011 the City Council followed the recommendations of the nine-
member Steering Committee and the Planning and Zoning Commission and
adopted Coppell 2030 - A Comprehensive Master Plan by adding Chapter
12A to the Code of Ordinances. This plan includes a variety of innovative
concepts and strategies to provide for long term sustainability for our
community. A key component of the Comprehensive Plan is the Future
Land Use Plan. As stated “The Future Land Use Plan serves as a framework
for future development and redevelopment decisions in Coppell… The land
use designations are for planning purposes and do not represent a change to
existing zoning or development regulations…implementation…must be
accompanied by code revisions.” This is the first proposal to design a new
zoning district which addresses one of the visions of the Comprehensive Plan.
This proposed zoning district is to provide development standards for well
planned, higher density residential uses, with the integration of non-residential
uses in various areas in the City of Coppell.
At the September 15, 2011 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission
reviewed, discussed and made various suggestions for revisions and additions
to this proposed Residential Urban District. A revised draft was discussed by
P&Z on November 17th.
On January 10, 2012 this RBN District was presented to the Council as a work
session item.
DISCUSSION: The Future Land Use Map of Coppell 2030-A Comprehensive Master Plan
designated 18 areas as Urban Residential Neighborhood. These areas vary in
size, location and proximity to existing residential neighborhoods, freeways
and future transit lines. While the stated purpose of this district is to:
“Provide areas for a wide variety of higher density residential uses
(typically greater than 4 dwelling units per acre) that serve the needs
ITEM # 10
Page 2 of 2
of residents seeking alternatives to low and medium density single
family detached housing,”
compatibility with and sensitivity to existing development is essential. Urban
Residential Neighborhood as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan, is being
proposed as a new zoning district proposed to accommodate this higher
density residential development.
Staff has reviewed various mixed use residential district regulations from
other areas of the country as well as visited various developments within the
metroplex. This research provided invaluable information on what to do and
what not to do. Most recently, this proposed district was reviewed by
developer/engineers/planners with experience in higher density residential
developments. Input from this group, Planning and Zoning Commission’s
recommendations plus comments made at the Council work session were
incorporated in this proposal.
Substantial revisions since the November P&Z meeting include:
Revised the lot size for single family detached lots from a
maximum of 5,000 to an average of 5,000 square feet. The stated
purpose of single family to “generally only be permitted to provide
a transition between existing single family detached developments
and proposed higher intensity RBN district uses” has been
retained.
Increased the maximum height of 5 story buildings adjacent to
freeways and transit corridors from 60 to 70 feet, to allow for
higher ceiling heights.
Added a more detailed illustration of the Residential Proximity
slope.
Revised the Build-to-line along Freeways, from 30 feet to a
minimum setback for residential structures of 60 feet from the
right-of-way line of the freeway.
Increased maximum lot coverage in single family detached from
40% to 45%, and townhouse from 70 to 75%.
Increased maximum building length from 200 to 250 feet.
Added regulations and a conceptual illustration of “bump-outs” for
on-street parking.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending APPROVAL of this text amendment which
establishes Article 18A, Residential Urban Neighborhood District
(RBN), to the Zoning Ordinance.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Proposed RBN (Residential Urban Neighborhood) District Ordinance
2. Pages 38 and 39 of Coppell 2030 - A Comprehensive Master Plan which describes the
Urban Residential Neighborhood land use category .
3. Future Land Use Map of Coppell 2030 - A Comprehensive Master Plan.
Page 1 of 16
ORDINANCE NO. __________________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL,
TEXAS, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE
ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE CODE
OF ORDINANCES, BY ADDING SECTION 12-18A
TO ESTABLISH ARTICLE 18.A – “RBN”
RESIDENTIAL URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD
DISTRICT, PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE;
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A
PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF
TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH
OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Commission and the governing
body of the City of Coppell, Texas, in compliance with the laws of the State of
Texas and pursuant to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell,
haven given requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and after holding due
hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property owners generally, and
to all persons interested and situation in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof,
the said governing body is of the opinion, and in the exercise of legislative
discretion have concluded that the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance should be
amended.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS
SECTION 1. That the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of
Coppell, Texas, duly passed by the governing body of the City of Coppell, Texas,
as heretofore amended, be, and the same is hereby amended by amending the Code
of Ordinances, Section 12-18A. “RBN” Residential Urban Neighborhood shall read
as follows:
ARTICLE 18.A – “ RBN” RESIDENTIAL URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD
Sec. 12-18A-0. - General purpose and description.
The City of Coppell recognizes that land is a precious, non-renewable resource, and
that conventional zoning tends to foster a pattern of development that excessively
separates land uses and results in the requirement of extensive vehicular travel. The
Page 2 of 16
Urban Residential Neighborhood (RBN) residential district zoning is intended
primarily as a residential area with supporting and complementary commercial and
public uses. The purpose of the Urban Residential Neighborhood (RBN) as
envisioned in the Coppell 2030 – A Comprehensive Master Plan is to provide a
development that will promote:
1. The physical and social integration of citizens diverse in age, lifestyle and
economic status, among others;
2. An adequate supply of housing that is affordable at all income levels;
3. A greater diversity of types of housing than found in other Coppell
neighborhoods;
4. An alternative means of developing land;
5. Public health, safety and welfare that fosters a strong sense of neighborhood
identity based on a shared, coherent, functionally efficient physical
environment; and
6. The distinctive, small-town character of Coppell.
Sec. 12-18A-1. - Use Regulations.
A building or premise shall be used only for the following purposes:
1. Any use permitted in the "2F-9", "TH-1", "TH-2", "MF-1", “MF-2”
Districts.
2. Single family detached dwellings with an average lot size of typically no
greater than 5,000 square feet, and shall generally only be permitted to
provide a transition between existing single family detached developments
and proposed higher intensity RBN district uses.
3. Any use permitted by special use permit, Section 12-30-6.
4. Home occupations.
5. Uses permitted in the “O” and “R” District are permitted as secondary
uses, whereas the primary uses within a RBN district shall be residential.
These office and retail uses are permitted with the following conditions:
Page 3 of 16
a. Such uses shall not be located in “stand alone” buildings but shall be
seamlessly integrated with residential units, or community/recreation
facilities associated with the development.
b. A lot containing “O” and “R” uses shall have frontage on a
Boulevard, a Freeway or at the corner of two Avenues as defined in
the Transportation Plan, of the Coppell 2030 Comprehensive
Master Plan.
i. The incorporation of ground floor retail may require off-
street loading facilities.
Sec. 12-18A-2. - Height Regulations.
The height of the structures shall be:
A. The maximum height shall be 35 feet or three stories, except,
a. when adjacent to a Freeway or along a transit corridor, the
maximum height shall be five-stories, not to exceed 70 feet.
i. Additional setbacks are required for the portions of the
building which exceed 35 feet as defined in Sec. 12-18A-
5 Architectural Guidelines and Standards.
ii. Additional building code requirements are applicable
when buildings exceed 55 feet in height.
b. When adjacent to existing Single Family (SF) or Two Family-9
(2F-9) uses, the maximum height in the RBN District shall be the
Page 4 of 16
same as the height of the homes adjacent to and within 100 feet
of the RBN district or minimum of 24 feet which ever is greater.
c. If the proposed building falls within the height envelope cr eated
by a 1:3 residential proximity slope originating from an adjacent
residentially zoned property line, the height can be increased one
foot for every three linear feet over 24 feet.
Sec. 12-18A-3. - Area Regulations.
A. To encourage context sensitive design and to promote pedestrian friendly
streetscapes in lieu of typical minimum setbacks, Build-to Lines are being
established (Refer to Sec. 12-18A-4. - Building Orientation for additional
information). The build-to lines shall be determined by the type of street
frontage as defined in the Transportation Plan, of the Coppell 2030
Comprehensive Master Plan.
1. Front yard (Build-to Lines) – the required front yards shall be
landscaped, and shall not contain any paving except for driveways
perpendicular to the street and pedestrian areas, including walkways and
plazas:
Page 5 of 16
a. Freeway – n/a (see 12-18A-3.A.3)
b. Boulevard – 15 feet
c. Avenue – 15 feet
d. Local Street – 10 feet
2. Build-to lines may be adjusted to provide for additional pedestrian
amenities, but in no event shall parking or driveways parallel to the
street be permitted between the curb line and the face of the building.
3. Minimum Front Yard Setback, adjacent to Freeways only.
a. No residential structure shall be located closer than 60 feet from
the freeway right-of-way line.
b. The minimum setback can be achieved through a combination of
common open space/landscaping and/or building setbacks.
B. Development Regulations
Regulation* SF Detached Duplex Townhouse Multifamily
Front yard and side
yards adjacent to streets
(except for garages)
Refer to Section 12-18A-3, Area Regulations
Garage setbacks Minimum 20’ setback from street or alley R.O.W. unless swing entry then may
observe build-to lines.
Minimum Side yards,
not adjacent to streets 5’ 10’
10’ up to 3
du’s 15’- 4 or
more du’s.
Max 6 du’s
per structure.
Building
separation:
10’ w/out
openings
15’ w/openings
Rear yards (not garage) 10’ 10’ 10’ 20’
Lot size (sq. ft.) Max average: 5,000 Min: 9,000 (4,500 per du) Min: 2,500
Lot width Max average: 50’ Min: 80’ (40’ per du) Min: 25’ Min: 50’
Lot Depth Minimum: 100’ Min: 100’ Min: 80’ Min: 100’
Maximum Lot Coverage 45% 40% 75% 50%
Maximum Height Refer to Sec. 12-18A-2
*Area regulations in this section may be adjusted if the reduction in lot area is equally compensated for
additional open space/plazas and/or pedestrian friendly common or public areas.
Page 6 of 16
C. Open Space/Common Areas:
a. To provide open/common areas for gathering places to promote
social interaction in higher density developments, open spaces
shall be provided within the developments with densities greater
than five (5) dwelling units per gross acre.
i. A minimum of 15% of the overall property shall be
devoted to common open space areas.
ii. A maximum of 50% of the common open area is allowed
to be in the flood plain, which shall adhere to the
regulations of the Flood Plain Ordinance.
iii. All units shall have pedestrian access to open
space/common area(s).
b. The provision of this open space is in addition to compliance
with the Park Dedication Ordinance.
Sec. 12-18A-4 – Building Orientation
The following standards are intended to orient buildings close to streets to promote
human-scale development, slow traffic and encourage walking in neighborhoods.
All developments in the RBN District shall be oriented to a street. The building
orientation standard is met when all of the following criteria are met:
a. All buildings shall have their primary entrance(s) oriented to the
street. Multi-family buildings entrances may include entrances to
individual units, lobby entrances, or breezeway/courtyard entrances
(i.e., to a cluster of units). Alternatively, a building may have its
entrance oriented to a side yard when a direct pedestrian walkway is
Page 7 of 16
provided between the building entrance and the street. In this case, at
least one entrance shall be provided not more than twenty (20) feet
from the closest sidewalk or street;
b. Off-street parking, drives (parallel to the street) or other vehicle
areas shall not be placed between buildings and streets.
Sec. 12-18A- 5 –Architectural Guidelines and Standards
As defined in the Coppell 2030 Comprehensive Master Plan, developments in
Urban Residential Neighborhoods should be of an “Architectural character
(which) is compatible with the style, proportions, period, materials and colors of
adjacent single family neighborhoods, but may vary to a greater degree in proximity
to higher intensity development areas”. The architectural standards are intended to
provide detailed, human-scale design, while affording flexibility to use a variety of
building styles. All buildings that are subject to this section shall comply with all of
the following standards. The graphics provided with each standard are intended to
show examples of how to comply. Other building styles and designs can be used to
comply, so long as they are consistent with the text of this section. An architectural
feature (i.e., as shown in the graphics) may be used to comply with more than one
standard.
Page 8 of 16
1. Where elevations are adjacent to a street, a minimum of fifty (50) percent of
front elevations, and a minimum of twenty-five (25) percent of side and rear
building elevations, shall be doors, porches, balconies, and/or windows.
This standard applies to each full and partial building story.
2. The continuous horizontal distance (i.e., as measured from end-wall to end-
wall) of individual buildings shall not exceed two hundred and fifty (250)
feet.
3. All buildings shall incorporate design features such as offsets, balconies,
projections, windows, reveals, or similar elements to preclude large
expanses of uninterrupted building surfaces. Along the vertical face of a
structure, such features shall occur every twenty (20) to thirty (30) feet,
Page 9 of 16
and on each floor shall contain at least two of the following features:
a. Recess (e.g., deck, patio, courtyard, entrance or similar feature) that
has a minimum depth of four feet;
b. Extension (e.g., floor area, deck, patio, entrance, or similar feature)
that projects a minimum of two feet and runs horizontally for a
minimum length of four feet; and/or
c. Offsets or breaks in roof elevation of two feet or greater in height.
Page 10 of 16
4. Detailed Design. All buildings shall provide detailed design along all street
facing elevations (i.e., front, rear and sides). Detailed design shall be
provided by using at least three of the following architectural features on all
elevations, as appropriate for the proposed building type and style (may vary
features on each elevation):
a. Dormers;
b. Gables;
c. Recessed entries;
d. Covered porch entries;
e. Cupolas or towers;
f. Pillars or posts;
g. Eaves (minimum one-foot projection);
h. Off-sets in building face or roof (minimum two feet);
i. Bay windows;
j. Balconies;
k. Decorative patterns on exterior finish (e.g., scales/shingles,
wainscoting, ornamentation, and similar features);
l. Decorative cornices and roof lines (e.g., for flat roofs);
m. An alternative feature providing visual relief, similar to options in
this section.
Page 11 of 16
5. Ground level front yard porches a minimum depth of 7’ feet are encouraged
for all single family, duplex and townhome developments. Porches may
encroach four (4) feet into the required front yard.
6. Additional regulations for buildings exceeding 35 feet in height.
a. The portions of buildings, which exceed 35 feet in height, shall be
setback an additional minimum of ten (10) feet for each story
exceeding three (i.e. the 4th story shall be setback 10 feet, and the 5th
story 20 feet).
b. Porches and balconies are permitted within these setback areas.
Sec. 12-18A-6. - Type of exterior construction.
At least 80 percent of the exterior of all structures shall be of masonry type (see
Sec. 12-42-1) construction exclusive of doors and windows. Each story above the
first floor of a straight wall structure shall be at least 80 percent masonry exclusive
of doors, windows and the area above the top plate line.
.Sec. 12-18A-7. - Parking regulations.
1. “SF”, “2F9” and “TH” Developments:
a. A minimum of two garage-enclosed parking space and two additional
off-street parking spaces (driveway may be counted toward provision of
off-street parking) shall be provided for each lot.
Page 12 of 16
b. Alley Served: Rear entry, alley-served developments are encouraged.
Garages shall be set back a minimum of 20 feet from the alley right -of-
way.
c. Front Entry: To keep the front of the structure from being dominated by
garage doors, for dwellings less than thirty-five feet wide, the dwelling
is limited to a single wide garage if such garage door is front facing.
d. The garage may be a tandem garage or, if a swing entry, rear or side
access, it may be a double garage.
e. In addition to the required off-street parking, another one-half space per
unit is required for guest parking. These required spaces are to be
located within 600 feet of the respective units
2. MF Development:
a. Parking spaces shall not be located between the buildings and the public
street right-of-way.
b. Two parking spaces shall be provided for every one- and two-bedroom
unit and 2.5 parking spaces per three-bedroom unit.
c. Structured parking is encouraged, especially when incorporating office
and/or retail uses.
d. At a minimum, covered parking spaces shall be provided for at least 50
percent of the total required parking spaces (not including required guest
parking). The covered parking structures shall be architecturally
compatible with the main structures.
e. In addition to the required off-street parking, another one-half space
behind the curb line per unit is required for guest parking. These
required spaces are to be located within 600 feet of the respective units
and can be provided on-site or on-street.
Page 13 of 16
3. On street-parking:
a. On-street parking shall be designed to allow safe and efficient
movement into and out of travel lanes.
b. To minimize additional paving, on-street should generally be limited
to parallel parking. Parallel parking spaces shall be a minimum
twenty (20) feet in length and eight (8) feet in width from face of
curb.
c. Parking stalls shall be spatially separated from through-lanes to
provide visibility for motorists driving, parking, or disembarking
parked vehicles.
d. Approval of Detail Plans will be subject to Engineering Department
review and approval.
e. Right-of-way widths will vary depending on type of street.
f. There shall be a maximum of six (6) parallel spaces between Bump -
Outs. Bump-Outs shall also be provided at all street intersections
where on-street parking is permitted.
Section 12-18A-8 .– Streetscape Design
The intent of the streetscape design it to provide pleasant and attractive pedestrian
environment while supporting safe vehicular movements. These areas shall be of
sufficient width to accommodate sidewalks, street trees, street furniture and other
amenities as appropriate.
Page 14 of 16
1. The streetscape area shall be defined as the area between the back of curb and
the build-to lines (face of the building).
2. The Property owner shall be responsible for the construction and maintenance
of this area, whether privately-owned or public right-of-way.
3. The streetscape area will vary in width depending on the type of street and the
build-to line associated with it (refer to Sec. 12-18A-3.1 - Area regulations).
4. Street trees shall be provided with the streetscape area:
a. 40-foot on center if not individually platted lots, and one tree per lot if
townhouse, duplex or single-family.
b. Trees shall be overstory trees, minimum 3” caliper at the time of
planting and shall be selected from the plant pallet in Article 34,
Landscape Regulations
c. If provided within the sidewalk , then trees shall be planted within 8-foot
x 8-foot tree wells. The tree well shall be covered with a 6-foot x 6-foot
tree grate with a two-foot opening for the tree trunk.
d. The trees shall be limed up to at least seven feet and pruned to leave a
minimum seven feet of clearance over pedestrian walkway and 14 feet
of clearance over on-street parking spaces and travel lanes.
5. Sidewalks shall generally be located five (5) feet from back of curb to provide a
buffer between vehicular and pedestrian movements. The width of the sidewalk
will vary depending on the built-to line and adjacent street classification, but
shall not be less than four (4) feet in width.
Sec. 12-18A-9. - Mechanical equipment.
Mechanical equipment shall be constructed, located and screened so as not to
interfere with the peace, comfort and repose of the occupant(s) of any adjacent
building or residence, and shall comply with Sec. 12-33-1 Location of Required
Screening.
Sec. 12-18A-10. - Refuse facilities.
1. Multifamily Uses:
Page 15 of 16
a. Every dwelling unit shall be located within 250 feet of a refuse
facility, measured along the designed pedestrian and vehicular travel
ways.
b. There shall be available at all times at least six cubic yards of refuse
container per 30 multi-family dwelling units.
c. Recycling container shall be provided.
d. For complexes with less than 30 units no less than four cubic yard
refuse container shall be provided.
e. Each refuse facility and recycling container shall be visually
screened by a six-foot high solid masonry enclosure on all sides
except the side used for refuse pickup service, which shall have gates
of solid screening material. These gates shall remain closed at all
times when not in active use.
f. Each refuse facility shall be located so as to provide safe and
convenient pickup by refuse collection agencies.
SECTION 2. That all provisions of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance
of the City of Coppell, Texas, in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be,
and the same are hereby, repealed, and all other provisions not in conflict with the
provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 3. That should any word, sentence, paragraph, subdivision,
clause, phrase or section of this ordinance, or of the Code of Ordinances, as
amended hereby, be adjudged or held to be void or unconstitutional, illegal, or
invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of said
ordinance or the Code of Ordinances, as amended hereby, which shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECTION 4. That an offense committed before the effective date of this
ordinance is governed by prior law and the provisions of the Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance, as amended, in effect when the offense was committed and the
former law is continued in effect for this purpose.
Page 16 of 16
SECTION 5. That any person, firm, or corporation violating any of the
provisions or terms of this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as
provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance for the City of Coppell, as
heretofore amended, and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine not to exceed
the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense; and each and every
day such violation shall continue shall be deemed to constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 6. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and
after its passage and the publication of its caption, as the law and charter in such
cases provide.
DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, this the ___ day
of _________, 2012.
APPROVED:
________________________________
DOUGLAS N. STOVER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________________
CHRISTEL PETTINOS, CITY
SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________
ROBERT E. HAGER, CITY ATTORNEY
FINAL DRAFT
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact
Fee Report
February 2012
Prepared for:
City of Coppell
Prepared by:
FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC.
4055 International Plaza, Suite 200
Fort Worth, Texas 76109
(817) 735‐7300
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
FINAL DRAFT
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report
February 2012
CITY OF COPPELL
255 Parkway
P.O. Box 9478
Coppell, Texas 75109
FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC.
4055 International Plaza, Suite 200
Fort Worth, Texas 76109
FNI Project Number: CPL11254
DRAFT
THIS DOCUMENT IS RELEASED FOR
THE PURPOSE OF INTERIM REVIEW
UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF JESSICA
BROWN, P.E., TEXAS NO. 90098 ON
FEBRUARY 7, 2012. IT IS NOT TO BE
USED FOR CONSTRUCTION,
BIDDING OR PERMIT PURPOSES.
FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC.
TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING
FIRM F‐ 2144
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Background ............................................................................................................................. 1‐1
2.0 Land Use Assumptions ........................................................................................................ 2‐1
2.1 Service Area ................................................................................................................... 2‐1
2.2 Historical Population ..................................................................................................... 2‐3
2.3 Projected Population ..................................................................................................... 2‐3
2.4 Land Use ........................................................................................................................ 2‐4
3.0 Capital Improvements Plan ............................................................................................... 3‐1
3.1 Water and Wastewater Load Projections ..................................................................... 3‐1
3.2 Water and Wastewater System Improvements............................................................ 3‐3
4.0 Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Analysis ............................................................... 4‐1
4.1 Service Units .................................................................................................................. 4‐1
4.2 Maximum Impact Fee Calculations ............................................................................... 4‐3
5.0 Roadway Impact Fee Analysis .......................................................................................... 5‐1
5.1 Methodology ................................................................................................................. 5‐1
5.2 Roadway Impact Fee Service Area ................................................................................ 5‐2
Roadway Impact Fee Land Use Assumptions ........................................................................... 5‐3
5.3 Establishment of the Roadway Capital Improvement Plan .......................................... 5‐3
5.4 Roadway Level of Service .............................................................................................. 5‐4
5.5 Roadway Impact Fee Service Units ............................................................................... 5‐5
5.6 Roadway Existing Conditions Analysis .......................................................................... 5‐6
5.7 Existing Conditions Analysis .......................................................................................... 5‐7
5.7.1 Existing Traffic Volumes ......................................................................................... 5‐7
5.7.2 Vehicle‐Miles of Existing Capacity (Supply) ........................................................... 5‐8
5.7.3 Vehicle‐Miles of Existing Demand ......................................................................... 5‐8
5.7.4 Vehicle‐Miles of Existing Excess Capacity or Deficiencies ..................................... 5‐9
5.8 Calculating Impact Fees ................................................................................................. 5‐9
5.8.1 Trip Generation .................................................................................................... 5‐10
5.8.2 Trip Length ........................................................................................................... 5‐11
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
ii
5.8.3 Projected Growth and Vehicle‐Miles of New Demand ........................................ 5‐12
5.8.4 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) ......................................................................... 5‐12
5.8.5 Vehicle‐Miles of New Capacity Provided ............................................................. 5‐16
5.8.6 Vehicle‐Miles of Existing Demand on Impact Fee CIP Roadways ........................ 5‐16
5.8.7 Maximum Cost per Service Unit .......................................................................... 5‐16
5.8.8 Land Use / Vehicle‐Mile Equivalency Table ......................................................... 5‐17
5.9 Calculating Impact Fees ............................................................................................... 5‐19
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
iii
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2‐1 Historical Population .............................................................................................. 2‐3
Table 2‐2 Water and Wastewater Population Projections .................................................... 2‐3
Table 2‐3 Non‐residential Acreage ........................................................................................ 2‐4
Table 3‐1 Water Design Criteria ............................................................................................. 3‐1
Table 3‐2 Wastewater Design Criteria ................................................................................... 3‐1
Table 3‐3 Projected Water Demands ..................................................................................... 3‐2
Table 3‐4 Projected Wastewater Flows ................................................................................. 3‐2
Table 3‐5 Water System Impact Fee Eligible Projects ........................................................... 3‐4
Table 3‐6 Wastewater System Impact Fee Eligible Projects .................................................. 3‐5
Table 4‐1 Service Unit Equivalencies ..................................................................................... 4‐2
Table 4‐2 Water and Wastewater Service Units .................................................................... 4‐2
Table 5‐1 Increase in Developed Acreages for Years 2011 to 2021 ...................................... 5‐3
Table 5‐2 Roadway Facility Vehicle‐Mile Capacities .............................................................. 5‐5
Table 5‐3 Existing Excess Capacity and Demand ................................................................... 5‐9
Table 5‐4 Existing Excess Capacity and Deficiencies .............................................................. 5‐9
Table 5‐5 Projected Vehicle‐Miles of New Demand ............................................................ 5‐12
Table 5‐6 Summary of Roadway Cost .................................................................................. 5‐14
Table 5‐7 Projected Vehicle‐Miles of New Capacity (Supply) .............................................. 5‐16
Table 5‐8 Vehicle‐Miles of Existing Demand on CIP Roadways ........................................... 5‐16
Table 5‐9 Cost Per Service Unit Calculation ......................................................................... 5‐17
Table 5‐10 Land‐Use Vehicle‐Mile Equivalency Table2 .......................................................... 5‐18
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2‐1 Service Area ........................................................................................................... 2‐2
Figure 2‐2 Existing Land Use ................................................................................................... 2‐5
Figure 2‐3 Existing Commercial Acres ..................................................................................... 2‐6
Figure 2‐4 Future Land Use ..................................................................................................... 2‐7
Figure 2‐5 Future Commercial Acres ....................................................................................... 2‐8
Figure 2‐6 Population and Non‐residential Acreage by Traffic Survey Zones ........................ 2‐9
Figure 3‐1 Water System Impact Fee Capital Improvements ................................................. 3‐6
Figure 3‐2 Wastewater System Impact Fee Capital Improvements ....................................... 3‐7
Figure 5‐1 Roadway Impact Fee CIP ...................................................................................... 5‐15
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
iv
APPENDICES
Appendix A Water System Project Cost Estimates
Appendix B Impact Fee Comparisons
Appendix C Existing Roadway Inventory
Appendix D Existing Roadway Capacity, Demand, Excess Capacity and Deficiencies
Appendix E Projected Vehicle‐Miles of New Demand
Appendix F Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction Cost
Appendix G Roadway Improvements Plan Project CIP Service Units of Supply
Appendix H Land Use Vehicle‐Mile Equivalency Table
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
1‐1
1.0 BACKGROUND
Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code requires an impact fee analysis before impact
fees can be created and assessed. Chapter 395 defines an impact fee as “a charge or
assessment imposed by a political subdivision against new development in order to generate
revenue for funding or recouping the costs of capital improvements or facility expansions
necessitated by and attributable to the new development.” In September 2001, Senate Bill 243
amended Chapter 395 thus creating the current procedure for implementing impact fees.
Chapter 395 identifies the following items as impact fee eligible costs:
Construction contract price
Surveying and engineering fees
Land acquisition costs
Fees paid to the consultant preparing or updating the capital improvements plan
(CIP)
Projected interest charges and other finance costs for projects identified in the CIP
Chapter 395 also identifies items that impact fees cannot used to pay for, such as:
Construction, acquisition, or expansion of public facilities or assets other than those
identified on the capital improvements plan
Repair, operation, or maintenance of existing or new capital improvements
Upgrading, updating, expanding, or replacing existing capital improvements to
serve existing development in order to meet stricter safety, efficiency,
environmental, or regulatory standards
Upgrading, updating, expanding, or replacing existing capital improvements to
provide better service to existing development
Administrative and operating costs of the political subdivision
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
1‐2
Principal payments and interest or other finance charges on bonds or other
indebtedness, except as allowed above
In April 2011, the City of Coppell, Texas, authorized Freese and Nichols, Inc. (FNI) to perform an
impact fee analysis on the City’s water and wastewater systems. The purpose of this report is
to address the methodology used in the development and calculation of water, wastewater and
roadway impact fees for the City of Coppell. Chapter 395 requires that land use assumptions
and CIP be updated at least every five years or a notice of determination to not update land use
assumptions, CIP or impact fees must be issued. The impact fees are being updated due to the
revised 2030 Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The methodology used herein satisfies the
requirements of the Texas Local Government Code Section 395 for the establishment of water,
wastewater and roadway impact fees.
The following table provides a list of abbreviations used in this report.
Abbreviation Full Nomenclature
AWWA American Water Works
CIP Capital Improvements Plan
FNI Freese and Nichols, Inc.
NCTCOG North Central Texas Council of Government
TSZ Traffic Survey Zone
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
2‐1
2.0 LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS
Population and land use are important elements in the analysis of water and wastewater
systems. Water demands and wastewater flows depend on the residential population and
commercial development served by the systems and determines the sizing and location of
system infrastructure. A thorough analysis of historical and projected populations, along with
land use, provides the basis for projecting future water demands and wastewater flows.
2.1 Service Area
The service area for Coppell’s water and wastewater systems is defined as the city limits.
Figure 2‐1 illustrates the service area.
E
I
6
3
5
W
I
6
3
5
E Belt Line RdFreeport PkwyS Royal LnW Bethel Rd
E Sandy Lake Rd
S Belt Line RdE Parkway Blvd
W Sandy Lake Rd
N Mac
A
r
t
h
u
r
B
l
v
d
E Bethel School RdN Denton Tap RdAirline Dr S Denton Tap RdS Moore RdSH 121 Dividend DrS Coppell RdW SH
1
2
1
Lodge RdS
M
a
c
A
rthur
B
l
vdDeforest Rd
Creekview Dr Samuel BlvdWrangler DrN SH 121 HwyN Moo
re
RdMockingbird LnW P a r kway Blvd
N Coppell RdRiverchase D r
Ruby Rd N Heartz RdNorthpoint Dr
S Heartz RdFritz Dr Falc o n L n
Southwestern Blvd Hill DrStarleaf StPark Valley Dr
Pinyon LnPhi
l
l
ips
D
r
P lan tation Dr
Gate w a y Blv dPatriot D
r
A
lle
n R
d
Ledbetter RdPelican Ln
Mallard Dr
S County Line RdWood hurst DrE B e thel R d
W aterview DrShadowcrest Ln
Brooks Ln Meadowglen CirKaye St
Burns St
Canyon Dr
M e a dowcreek Rd
G r a ham DrSpyglass DrOak TrCov e DrGifford DrVillage P
kwyBarcl
a
y
AvBlue Jay Ln
Minyard Dr
L a ke V i s t a Dr
Winding Hollow LnCrestview D rLakes
hore Dr
Woodmoor Dr
A
lex D r
Edgewood DrHalifax Dr Fore s t H ill D r
L y n d sie DrQ u ail LnFalls Rd
P ar kvi ew P l c
Eagle Dr
Greenridge D r
Snowshill Tr
Carter D rAspenway DrS SH 121 C o w b o y D rE SH 121 Fallkirk DrHawk LnS SH 121 HwyBeechwood Ln
Crest
side DrMa
d
i
s
o
n
S
t
SH 121 R a m p
Lee Dr
Sanders LpRed c edar Way DrWi l l o w S p rings Dr
Cribbs Dr
Swan DrCottonwood DrCoral Dr
Creek Crossi
ng Chateaus DrTown Center BlvdSimmons DrRave n L n
Enterprise DrC opperst
o
n
e
T
rTrade Center DrBranchwood TrAsh l ey Dr Dickens DrLake P
a
r
k
DrCo
untry LnWoodlake Dr
Bradford Dr
Harris StCotton Rd Berkshire
LnInglenook CtShor e w o o d D r
Poin
t
West
B
lvd
Brock St S Holly StWynnpage Dr
Highland Dr
T
r
i
n
i
t
y
C
t
I63
5 - On Ramp 34
Houston St
Layton Dr
Mi
l
l
T
r
Halifa x Ln Lairds DrCharleston Dr
R o c k crest DrParr St
Gateview Blvd
Hidden Valley DrNorth Lake DrPark RdStonecrest Dr
Colonial Dr
E Peninsula Dr
Juniper Dr
Clayton Cir
Mobley WayPintail CtBlue Jay DrDobecka DrDove Cir Kimbel Kourt St James
P
l
Hackberry Rd
Forestwood Ln
Austin Ct
W SH 1
2
1
SH 121 N SH 121 HwySH 121 Cotton Rd³
Service Area
FIGURE 2-1CITY OF COPPELLSERVICE AREA
Created By Freese and Nichols, Inc.Job No.: CPL11254Location: H:\W_WW_PLANNING\DELIVERABLES\04_Final_Water_Wastewater_Impact_Fee_Report\(Figure_2-1)-Service_Area.mxdUpdated: Thursday, December 08, 2011 2:55:57 PM0 2,500
SCALE IN FEET
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
2‐3
2.2 Historical Population
The City of Coppell provided yearly population data from 2000 through 2010. The data
indicated an average growth rate of about 1% annual growth over the last 11 years. Table 2‐1
presents the historical populations for the City of Coppell.
Table 2‐1 Historical Population
Year Population Population Growth Growth Rate
2000 36,051 ‐ ‐
2001 36,867 816 2.3%
2002 37,683 816 2.2%
2003 38,499 816 2.2%
2004 38,650 151 0.4%
2005 38,900 250 0.6%
2006 39,200 300 0.8%
2007 39,350 150 0.4%
2008 39,565 215 0.5%
2009 39,655 90 0.2%
2010 39,750 95 0.2%
Average ‐ 370 1.0%
2.3 Projected Population
Population projections were developed based on data provided by City staff. FNI developed
initial population projections using geocoded billing data and existing and projected land use.
The City provided comments on the location of planned development and additional detail
about the existing land use. Table 2‐2 presents the population projections for the City of
Coppell water and wastewater service area. Figure 2‐2 shows the population projections by
traffic survey zone (TSZ).
Table 2‐2 Water and Wastewater Population Projections
Year Population
Average Annual
Population
Growth
Average Annual
Growth Rate
2011 39,913 ‐ ‐
2021 41,632 172 0.4%
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
2‐4
The projected growth in population is slightly less than the historical average due to the recent
slowdown of development and the natural slowdown in growth as the City approaches
buildout.
2.4 Land Use
The City provided an existing land use shapefile, which included the current zoning. A map of
the future land use was also provided by the City. In order to capture growth related to
commercial, retail, office, institutional, and industrial development, a commercial acreage for
each planning period was developed. The existing land use data was used to calculate the 2011
commercial acreage and the future land use data was used to calculate the 2021 commercial
acreage. The existing commercial acreage includes: developed nonresidential and
public/institutional. The future commercial acreage includes: mixed use community center, old
Coppell historic district, mixed use neighborhood center, freeway special district, commercial,
institutional, and industrial special district. Figure 2‐2 displays the existing land use, and Figure
2‐3 displays the existing commercial acres. Figure 2‐4 displays the future land use, and Figure
2‐5 displays the future commercial acres. Table 2‐3 and Figure 2‐6 present the non‐residential
acreage by planning year for the water and wastewater service area.
Table 2‐3 Non‐residential Acreage
Year Acres
Growth in
Acres
2011 2,269 ‐
2021 3,243 974
E I6 3 5 W I6 3 5 E Belt Line RdFreeport PkwyS Royal LnW Bethel RdE Sandy Lake RdE Parkway BlvdW Sandy Lake RdS Belt Line RdN MacArthur BlvdE Bethel School RdAirline DrN Denton Tap RdS Denton Tap RdS Moore RdDividend DrS Coppell RdW SH 121 Lodge RdS M acArthur Blv d
Deforest RdCreekview DrSamuel BlvdWrangler DrN SH 121 HwyN M o o r e R d Mockingbird LnW Parkway BlvdN Coppell RdRiverchase DrRuby RdN Heartz RdNorthpoint DrS Heartz RdFritz DrFalcon LnSouthwestern BlvdHill DrStarleaf StPark Valley DrPinyon LnP hillips D r
Plantation DrGateway BlvdSH 121 Patriot DrAl le n Rd Ledbet ter Rd
Pelican LnMallard DrS County Line RdWoodhurst DrE Bethel RdWaterview DrShadowcrest LnBrooks LnMeadowglen CirKaye StBurns StCanyon DrMeadowcreek RdG r a ham Dr Oak TrCove DrGifford DrGreenway DrBriarglen DrVillage PkwyBarclay AvBlue Jay LnMapleleaf LnCozby AvVillawood LnMinyard DrLake Vista DrWinding Hollow LnM e a d o w R u n Crestview DrMartel LnLakeshore DrBricknell LnWoodmoor DrAlex DrEdgewood DrHalifax DrPecan Hollow DrTupelo DrForest Hill DrLyndsie DrQuail LnFalls RdParkview PlcEagle DrCooper LnGreenridge DrSnowshill TrWhispering Hills DrC a rter DrAspenway DrS SH 121 Cowboy DrE SH 121 Fallkirk DrHawk LnKilbridge Ln
S SH 121 HwyTimber Ridge LnOakbend DrBeechwood LnHood DrCrestside DrSugarberry DrHeather Glen DrSandy Knoll DrCondor DrDogwood TrM a d i s on S tSH 121 RampLee DrMeadowview LnSanders LpRedcedar Way DrChristi LnWillow Springs DrCribbs DrW il le t D rGrace LnParker DrOriole LnSwan DrCottonwood DrStratford LnAce Ln Coral DrDillard LnHollywood DrCreekside LnKyle DrWaverly L n Creek Crossing Chateaus DrLevee PlP a r k w o o d L n Crane DrPla za Blvd
W e llin g to n R dBarrington DrExecutive DrT ow n C enter Blvd
Magnolia DrSimmons DrOakcrest LnTravis StCherrybark DrRaven LnEnterprise DrCoppers to n e T r Gibbs Crossing Walnut Grove LnRolling Hills RdRobin LnLeslie LnWales CtBasilwood DrLexington AvTrade Center DrBranchwood TrAshley DrVanbebber DrMarlee CirDickens DrL e a v a l l e y L n
Fairway Dr
Har w e ll S tLake Park D r Laguna LnMeadowood LnForest Ridge DrWrangler CirBeacon Hill Dr
Beal LnLondon Way Coun try Ln
A r b o r B ro ok LnAshford DrCambria DrE Natches Trace Woodlake DrBradford DrCastle Creek Dr
Harris StDeann DrDuncan DrCotton RdShadydale LnAvalon LnB e rks h i re L n
Hammond StGraywood LnInglenook CtSpringoak LnJohnson DrHarris RdGlade Point DrW Bethel School RdShorewood DrSparrow LnP o int W e s t Blvd
Brock StSwallow DrHavencrest LnS Holly StWynnpage DrTanbark CirHighland DrT r i n i t y C tI6 3 5 - O n R amp 34 Houston StKingsmill CtLayton DrCardinal LnB e l la V is t a D r
Anderson AvFinch LnSteamboat DrM ill Tr
Mullrany DrTealwood DrHalifax LnTrailwood LnRedwing DrPebble Creek DrGreentree DrLairds DrLo n g m e a d o w D r
River RdNe w p o rt DrAllencrest LnBullock DrPark Meadow WayDalmalley LnNash DrCharleston DrRockcrest DrW Natches T r a c e N SH 121 Loch LnWoodcrest LnHunters Ridge RdGlendale DrBeverly DrPlumlee PlcGateview BlvdLansdowne C r
Clear Creek LnOak Grove LnTennyson PlcCambridge Manor LnHid d e n Valley DrEdinburgh LnBlack Oak Cir North Lake DrGlenwood DrBrentwood DrWestminster WayFitness CtRaintree CirChesh i r e D r
W Town Center DrN SH 121 RdMeadowlark LnPepperwood StWestlake DrSaddle Tree TrPark RdKingsridge DrLockhaven LnWillingham DrAlendale DrHowell DrNixon StChestnut LnSpanish Moss DrWestwind D r
Lakeview DrOlympia LnBeau DrO l d Yor k R d
Gibson CtLaguna DrKirkland DrParish PlcP enuel DrArcher DrSand Point CtChalfont PlcColonial DrSora LnN Holly StManchester LnTurnberry LnDeforest CtW B raewood DrI635 - Exit 34 E Peninsula DrF airview Ct Dakota LnBritta n y D r
Sleepy Ho llow Ln Woodway Grapevine Creek DrJuniper DrG l en Lakes DrFieldcrest LpWrenwood DrPre st w ic k Ct
Mobley WayNatch e s Tra ce Greenwich LnPenfolds LnBrown TrDow n i n g D r
Autumnwood LnGeorgian DrH ig h la n d W a y Hidden Hollow CtBlue Jay DrDobecka DrDove CirKim be l Ko urt W Grapevine Mills PkwyS t J a m e s Pl
K a i l e y Way
Leisure LnRedwood DrState Champion PkwyCross Timbers Tr0 Hood DrRidgewood DrHackberry RdMatheson C t Indian Ro ck Dr
W arren Crossing Brighton LnCherrywood TrEdmondson DrIndependence DrSummer Place DrWillow LnCompton CtEn clav es Crt Homewood DrMartel CrtTara CtHearthstone LnWild Plum DrAlder CtRoundrock CirRockcrest CtDrexel DrC ro o k e d T re e C t
Hazelwood CoveHartford CirMitchell StT o w e r C t
Willow Springs CtNorthwestern DrApple
cross
C
t
Joshua LnCypress CtS ea H aw k C tCrestview CtMariners CtNorthshore CtDaVinci CtMaywood CirGlencrest CirMason CtGreenwood CtShiloh CtDuncan DrSH 121 Freeport PkwyW SH 121 SH 121 E Sandy Lake RdS Coppell RdN SH 121 HwySH 121 SH 121 Cotton RdSH 121 RampSH 121 ³0 1,200 2,400SCALE IN FEETEXISTING LAND USEDeveloped NonresidentialUndeveloped NonresidentialDeveloped ResidentialUndeveloped ResidentialEasementPublic/InstitutionalParks Open SpaceRailroadFIGURE 2-2CITY OF COPPELLEXISTING LAND USECreated By Freese and Nichols, Inc.Job No.: CPL11254Location: H:\W_WW_PLANNING\DELIVERABLES\04_Final_Water_Wastewater_Impact_Fee_Report\(Figure_2-2)-Existing_LandUse_Map.mxdUpdated: Friday, January 20, 2012 2:56:34 PM
E I6 35 W I6 35 E Belt Line RdFreeport PkwyS Royal LnW Bethel RdE Sandy Lake RdE Parkway BlvdW Sandy Lake RdS Belt Line RdN MacArthur BlvdE Bethel School RdAirline DrN Denton Tap RdS Denton Tap RdS Moore RdDividend DrS Coppell RdW SH 121 Lodge RdS M acArthur B lv d
Deforest RdCreekview DrSamuel BlvdWrangler DrN SH 121 HwyN M o o r e R d Mockingbird LnW Parkway BlvdN Coppell RdRiverchase DrRuby RdN Heartz RdNorthpoint DrS Heartz RdFritz DrFalcon LnSouthwestern BlvdHill DrStarleaf StPark Valley DrPinyon LnP h i l l i p s D r
Plantation DrGateway BlvdSH 121 Patriot DrAl le n Rd Ledb et te r Rd
Pelican LnMallard DrS County Line RdWoodhurst DrE Bethel RdWaterview DrShadowcrest LnBrooks LnMeadowglen CirKaye StBurns StCanyon DrMeadowcreek RdG r a ham Dr Oak TrCove DrGifford DrGreenway DrBriarglen DrVillage PkwyBarclay AvBlue Jay LnMapleleaf LnCozby AvVillawood LnMinyard DrLake Vista DrWinding Hollow LnM e a d o w R u n Crestview DrMartel LnLakeshore DrBricknell LnWoodmoor DrAlex DrEdgewood DrHalifax DrPecan Hollow DrTupelo DrForest Hill DrLyndsie DrQuail LnFalls RdParkview PlcEagle DrCooper LnGreenridge DrSnowshill TrWhispering Hills DrC a rter DrAspenway DrS SH 121 Cowboy DrE SH 121 Fallkirk DrHawk LnKilbridge Ln
S SH 121 HwyTimber Ridge LnOakbend DrBeechwood LnHood DrCrestside DrSugarberry DrHeather Glen DrSandy Knoll DrCondor DrDogwood TrMad i s on S tSH 121 RampLee DrMeadowview LnSanders LpRedcedar Way DrChristi LnWillow Springs DrCribbs DrW il le t D rGrace LnParker DrOriole LnSwan DrCottonwood DrStratford LnAce Ln Coral DrDillard LnHollywood DrCreekside LnKyle DrWaverly L n Creek Crossing Chateaus DrLevee PlP a r k w o o d L n Crane DrPlaza Blvd
W e llin g to n R d Barrington DrExecutive DrTo w n Center Blvd
Magnolia DrSimmons DrOakcrest LnTravis StCherrybark DrRaven LnEnterprise DrCoppers to n e T r Gibbs Crossing Walnut Grove LnRolling Hills RdRobin LnLeslie LnWales CtBasilwood DrLexington AvTrade Center DrBranchwood TrAshley DrVanbebber DrMarlee CirDickens DrL e a v a l l e y L n
Fairway Dr
Har w e ll S tLake Park D r Laguna LnMeadowood LnForest Ridge DrWrangler CirBea con H il l D r
Beal LnLondon Way Country Ln
A r b o r B ro ok LnAshford DrCambria DrE Natches Trace Woodlake DrBradford DrCastle Creek Dr
Harris StDeann DrDuncan DrCotton RdShadydale LnAvalon LnB e r k s h i r e L n
Hammond StGraywood LnInglenook CtSpringoak LnJohnson DrHarris RdGlade Point DrW Bethel School RdShorewood DrSparrow LnP o int W e s t Blvd
Brock StSwallow DrHavencrest LnS Holly StWynnpage DrTanbark CirHighland DrT r i n i t y C tI6 3 5 - O n R amp 34 Houston StKingsmill CtLayton DrCardinal LnB e l l a V is t a D r
Anderson AvFinch LnSteamboat DrM ill Tr
Mullrany DrTealwood DrHalifax LnTrailwood LnRedwing DrPebble Creek DrGreentree DrLairds DrLo n g m e a d o w D r
River RdNe w p o rt DrAllencrest LnBullock DrPark Meadow WayDalmalley LnNash DrCharleston DrRockcrest DrW Natches T r a c e N SH 121 Loch LnWoodcrest LnHunters Ridge RdGlendale DrBeverly DrPlumlee PlcGateview BlvdLansdowne C r
Clear Creek LnOak Grove LnTennyson PlcCambridge Manor LnHid d e n Valley DrEdinburgh LnBlack Oak Cir North Lake DrGlenwood DrBrentwood DrWestminster WayFitness CtRaintree CirChesh ir e D r
W Town Center DrN SH 121 RdMeadowlark LnPepperwood StWestlake DrSaddle Tree TrPark RdKingsridge DrLockhaven LnWillingham DrAlendale DrHowell DrNixon StChestnut LnSpanish Moss DrWestwind D r
Lakeview DrOlympia LnBeau DrO ld Yo r k Rd
Gibson CtLaguna DrKirkland DrParish PlcP enuel DrArcher DrSand Point CtChalfont PlcColonial DrSora LnN Holly StManchester LnTurnberry LnDeforest CtW B raewood DrI635 - Exit 34 E Peninsula DrFairview Ct Dakota LnBritta n y D r
Sleepy Hollow Ln Woodway Grapevine Creek DrJuniper DrG l en Lakes DrFieldcrest LpPr es tw ick Ct
Mobley WayN a t c h es Tr ac e Greenwich LnPenfolds LnBrown TrDow n i n g D r
Autumnwood LnGeorgian DrH ig h la n d W a y Hidden Hollow CtBlue Jay DrDobecka DrDove CirKim bel Kourt W Grapevine Mills PkwyS t J a m e s P l
K a i l e y Way
Leisure LnRedwood DrState Champion PkwyCross Timbers Tr0 Hood DrRidgewood DrHackberry RdM atheson Ct Indian Ro ck DrWarren Crossing Brighton LnCherrywood TrEdmondson DrIndependence DrSummer Place DrWillow LnCompton CtE n cla v es Cr t Homewood DrMartel CrtTara CtHearthstone LnWild Plum DrAlder CtRoundrock CirRockcrest CtDrexel DrC ro o k e d T re e C t
Hazelwood CoveHartford CirMitchell StT ow e r C t
Willow Springs CtNorthwestern DrApplec
r
o
s
s
C
t
Joshua LnCypress CtS ea H aw k C tCrestview CtMariners CtNorthshore CtDaVinci CtMaywood CirGlencrest CirGreenwood CtShiloh CtDuncan DrSH 121 Freeport PkwyW SH 121 SH 121 E Sandy Lake RdS Coppell RdN SH 121 HwySH 121 SH 121 Cotton RdSH 121 RampSH 121 ³0 1,200 2,400SCALE IN FEETCommercialOtherCityLimitParcelFIGURE 2-3CITY OF COPPELLEXISTING COMMERCIAL ACRESCreated By Freese and Nichols, Inc.Job No.: CPL11254Location: H:\W_WW_PLANNING\DELIVERABLES\04_Final_Water_Wastewater_Impact_Fee_Report\(Figure_2-3)-Existing_Commercial_Acres.mxdUpdated: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 4:09:22 PMThe existing commercial acreage includes: developed nonresidential and public/institutional.
E I6 3 5 W I6 3 5 E Belt Line RdFreeport PkwyS Royal LnW Bethel RdE Sandy Lake RdE Parkway BlvdW Sandy Lake RdS Belt Line RdN MacArthur BlvdE Bethel School RdAirline DrN Denton Tap RdS Denton Tap RdS Moore RdDividend DrS Coppell RdW SH 121 Lodge RdS M acArthur Blv d
Deforest RdCreekview DrSamuel BlvdWrangler DrN SH 121 HwyN M o o r e R d Mockingbird LnW Parkway BlvdN Coppell RdRiverchase DrRuby RdN Heartz RdNorthpoint DrS Heartz RdFritz DrFalcon LnSouthwestern BlvdHill DrStarleaf StPark Valley DrPinyon LnP hillips D r
Plantation DrGateway BlvdSH 121 Patriot DrAl le n Rd Ledbet ter Rd
Pelican LnMallard DrS County Line RdWoodhurst DrE Bethel RdWaterview DrShadowcrest LnBrooks LnMeadowglen CirKaye StBurns StCanyon DrMeadowcreek RdG r a ham Dr Oak TrCove DrGifford DrGreenway DrBriarglen DrVillage PkwyBarclay AvBlue Jay LnMapleleaf LnCozby AvVillawood LnMinyard DrLake Vista DrWinding Hollow LnM e a d o w R u n Crestview DrMartel LnLakeshore DrBricknell LnWoodmoor DrAlex DrEdgewood DrHalifax DrPecan Hollow DrTupelo DrForest Hill DrLyndsie DrQuail LnFalls RdParkview PlcEagle DrCooper LnGreenridge DrSnowshill TrWhispering Hills DrC a rter DrAspenway DrS SH 121 Cowboy DrE SH 121 Fallkirk DrHawk LnKilbridge Ln
S SH 121 HwyTimber Ridge LnOakbend DrBeechwood LnHood DrCrestside DrSugarberry DrHeather Glen DrSandy Knoll DrCondor DrDogwood TrM a d i s on S tSH 121 RampLee DrMeadowview LnSanders LpRedcedar Way DrChristi LnWillow Springs DrCribbs DrW il le t D rGrace LnParker DrOriole LnSwan DrCottonwood DrStratford LnAce Ln Coral DrDillard LnHollywood DrCreekside LnKyle DrWaverly L n Creek Crossing Chateaus DrLevee PlP a r k w o o d L n Crane DrPla za Blvd
W e llin g to n R dBarrington DrExecutive DrT ow n C enter Blvd
Magnolia DrSimmons DrOakcrest LnTravis StCherrybark DrRaven LnEnterprise DrCoppers to n e T r Gibbs Crossing Walnut Grove LnRolling Hills RdRobin LnLeslie LnWales CtBasilwood DrLexington AvTrade Center DrBranchwood TrAshley DrVanbebber DrMarlee CirDickens DrL e a v a l l e y L n
Fairway Dr
Har w e ll S tLake Park D r Laguna LnMeadowood LnForest Ridge DrWrangler CirBeacon Hill Dr
Beal LnLondon Way Coun try Ln
A r b o r B ro ok LnAshford DrCambria DrE Natches Trace Woodlake DrBradford DrCastle Creek Dr
Harris StDeann DrDuncan DrCotton RdShadydale LnAvalon LnB e rks h i re L n
Hammond StGraywood LnInglenook CtSpringoak LnJohnson DrHarris RdGlade Point DrW Bethel School RdShorewood DrSparrow LnP o int W e s t Blvd
Brock StSwallow DrHavencrest LnS Holly StWynnpage DrTanbark CirHighland DrT r i n i t y C tI6 3 5 - O n R amp 34 Houston StKingsmill CtLayton DrCardinal LnB e l la V is t a D r
Anderson AvFinch LnSteamboat DrM ill Tr
Mullrany DrTealwood DrHalifax LnTrailwood LnRedwing DrPebble Creek DrGreentree DrLairds DrLo n g m e a d o w D r
River RdNe w p o rt DrAllencrest LnBullock DrPark Meadow WayDalmalley LnNash DrCharleston DrRockcrest DrW Natches T r a c e N SH 121 Loch LnWoodcrest LnHunters Ridge RdGlendale DrBeverly DrPlumlee PlcGateview BlvdLansdowne C r
Clear Creek LnOak Grove LnTennyson PlcCambridge Manor LnHid d e n Valley DrEdinburgh LnBlack Oak Cir North Lake DrGlenwood DrBrentwood DrWestminster WayFitness CtRaintree CirChesh i r e D r
W Town Center DrN SH 121 RdMeadowlark LnPepperwood StWestlake DrSaddle Tree TrPark RdKingsridge DrLockhaven LnWillingham DrAlendale DrHowell DrNixon StChestnut LnSpanish Moss DrWestwind D r
Lakeview DrOlympia LnBeau DrO l d Yor k R d
Gibson CtLaguna DrKirkland DrParish PlcP enuel DrArcher DrSand Point CtChalfont PlcColonial DrSora LnN Holly StManchester LnTurnberry LnDeforest CtW B raewood DrI635 - Exit 34 E Peninsula DrF airview Ct Dakota LnBritta n y D r
Sleepy Ho llow Ln Woodway Grapevine Creek DrJuniper DrG l en Lakes DrFieldcrest LpWrenwood DrPre st w ic k Ct
Mobley WayNatch e s Tra ce Greenwich LnPenfolds LnBrown TrDow n i n g D r
Autumnwood LnGeorgian DrH ig h la n d W a y Hidden Hollow CtBlue Jay DrDobecka DrDove CirKim be l Ko urt W Grapevine Mills PkwyS t J a m e s Pl
K a i l e y Way
Leisure LnRedwood DrState Champion PkwyCross Timbers Tr0 Hood DrRidgewood DrHackberry RdMatheson C t Indian Ro ck Dr
W arren Crossing Brighton LnCherrywood TrEdmondson DrIndependence DrSummer Place DrWillow LnCompton CtEn clav es Crt Homewood DrMartel CrtTara CtHearthstone LnWild Plum DrAlder CtRoundrock CirRockcrest CtDrexel DrC ro o k e d T re e C t
Hazelwood CoveHartford CirMitchell StT o w e r C t
Willow Springs CtNorthwestern DrApple
cross
C
t
Joshua LnCypress CtS ea H aw k C tCrestview CtMariners CtNorthshore CtDaVinci CtMaywood CirGlencrest CirMason CtGreenwood CtShiloh CtDuncan DrSH 121 Freeport PkwyW SH 121 SH 121 E Sandy Lake RdS Coppell RdN SH 121 HwySH 121 SH 121 Cotton RdSH 121 RampSH 121 ³01,2002,400SCALE IN FEETFUTURE LAND USEPark and Open SpaceResidential NeighborhoodUrban Residential NeighborhoodMixed Use Neighborhood CenterOld Coppell Historic DistrictMixed Use Community CenterFreeway Special DistrictCommercialInstititionalIndustrial Special DistrictEasementRailroadFIGURE 2-4CITY OF COPPELLFUTURE LAND USECreated By Freese and Nichols, Inc.Job No.: CPL11254Location: H:\W_WW_PLANNING\DELIVERABLES\04_Final_Water_Wastewater_Impact_Fee_Report\(Figure_2-4)-Future_LandUse_Map.mxdUpdated: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 3:10:01 PM
E I6 35 W I6 35 E Belt Line RdFreeport PkwyS Royal LnW Bethel RdE Sandy Lake RdE Parkway BlvdW Sandy Lake RdS Belt Line RdN MacArthur BlvdE Bethel School RdAirline DrN Denton Tap RdS Denton Tap RdS Moore RdDividend DrS Coppell RdW SH 121 Lodge RdS M acArthur B lv d
Deforest RdCreekview DrSamuel BlvdWrangler DrN SH 121 HwyN M o o r e R d Mockingbird LnW Parkway BlvdN Coppell RdRiverchase DrRuby RdN Heartz RdNorthpoint DrS Heartz RdFritz DrFalcon LnSouthwestern BlvdHill DrStarleaf StPark Valley DrPinyon LnP h i l l i p s D r
Plantation DrGateway BlvdSH 121 Patriot DrAl le n Rd Ledb et te r Rd
Pelican LnMallard DrS County Line RdWoodhurst DrE Bethel RdWaterview DrShadowcrest LnBrooks LnMeadowglen CirKaye StBurns StCanyon DrMeadowcreek RdG r a ham Dr Oak TrCove DrGifford DrGreenway DrBriarglen DrVillage PkwyBarclay AvBlue Jay LnMapleleaf LnCozby AvVillawood LnMinyard DrLake Vista DrWinding Hollow LnM e a d o w R u n Crestview DrMartel LnLakeshore DrBricknell LnWoodmoor DrAlex DrEdgewood DrHalifax DrPecan Hollow DrTupelo DrForest Hill DrLyndsie DrQuail LnFalls RdParkview PlcEagle DrCooper LnGreenridge DrSnowshill TrWhispering Hills DrC a rter DrAspenway DrS SH 121 Cowboy DrE SH 121 Fallkirk DrHawk LnKilbridge Ln
S SH 121 HwyTimber Ridge LnOakbend DrBeechwood LnHood DrCrestside DrSugarberry DrHeather Glen DrSandy Knoll DrCondor DrDogwood TrMad i s on S tSH 121 RampLee DrMeadowview LnSanders LpRedcedar Way DrChristi LnWillow Springs DrCribbs DrW il le t D rGrace LnParker DrOriole LnSwan DrCottonwood DrStratford LnAce Ln Coral DrDillard LnHollywood DrCreekside LnKyle DrWaverly L n Creek Crossing Chateaus DrLevee PlP a r k w o o d L n Crane DrPlaza Blvd
W e llin g to n R d Barrington DrExecutive DrTo w n Center Blvd
Magnolia DrSimmons DrOakcrest LnTravis StCherrybark DrRaven LnEnterprise DrCoppers to n e T r Gibbs Crossing Walnut Grove LnRolling Hills RdRobin LnLeslie LnWales CtBasilwood DrLexington AvTrade Center DrBranchwood TrAshley DrVanbebber DrMarlee CirDickens DrL e a v a l l e y L n
Fairway Dr
Har w e ll S tLake Park D r Laguna LnMeadowood LnForest Ridge DrWrangler CirBea con H il l D r
Beal LnLondon Way Country Ln
A r b o r B ro ok LnAshford DrCambria DrE Natches Trace Woodlake DrBradford DrCastle Creek Dr
Harris StDeann DrDuncan DrCotton RdShadydale LnAvalon LnB e r k s h i r e L n
Hammond StGraywood LnInglenook CtSpringoak LnJohnson DrHarris RdGlade Point DrW Bethel School RdShorewood DrSparrow LnP o int W e s t Blvd
Brock StSwallow DrHavencrest LnS Holly StWynnpage DrTanbark CirHighland DrT r i n i t y C tI6 3 5 - O n R amp 34 Houston StKingsmill CtLayton DrCardinal LnB e l l a V is t a D r
Anderson AvFinch LnSteamboat DrM ill Tr
Mullrany DrTealwood DrHalifax LnTrailwood LnRedwing DrPebble Creek DrGreentree DrLairds DrLo n g m e a d o w D r
River RdNe w p o rt DrAllencrest LnBullock DrPark Meadow WayDalmalley LnNash DrCharleston DrRockcrest DrW Natches T r a c e N SH 121 Loch LnWoodcrest LnHunters Ridge RdGlendale DrBeverly DrPlumlee PlcGateview BlvdLansdowne C r
Clear Creek LnOak Grove LnTennyson PlcCambridge Manor LnHid d e n Valley DrEdinburgh LnBlack Oak Cir North Lake DrGlenwood DrBrentwood DrWestminster WayFitness CtRaintree CirChesh ir e D r
W Town Center DrN SH 121 RdMeadowlark LnPepperwood StWestlake DrSaddle Tree TrPark RdKingsridge DrLockhaven LnWillingham DrAlendale DrHowell DrNixon StChestnut LnSpanish Moss DrWestwind D r
Lakeview DrOlympia LnBeau DrO ld Yo r k Rd
Gibson CtLaguna DrKirkland DrParish PlcP enuel DrArcher DrSand Point CtChalfont PlcColonial DrSora LnN Holly StManchester LnTurnberry LnDeforest CtW B raewood DrI635 - Exit 34 E Peninsula DrFairview Ct Dakota LnBritta n y D r
Sleepy Hollow Ln Woodway Grapevine Creek DrJuniper DrG l en Lakes DrFieldcrest LpPr es tw ick Ct
Mobley WayN a t c h es Tr ac e Greenwich LnPenfolds LnBrown TrDow n i n g D r
Autumnwood LnGeorgian DrH ig h la n d W a y Hidden Hollow CtBlue Jay DrDobecka DrDove CirKim bel Kourt W Grapevine Mills PkwyS t J a m e s P l
K a i l e y Way
Leisure LnRedwood DrState Champion PkwyCross Timbers Tr0 Hood DrRidgewood DrHackberry RdM atheson Ct Indian Ro ck DrWarren Crossing Brighton LnCherrywood TrEdmondson DrIndependence DrSummer Place DrWillow LnCompton CtE n cla v es Cr t Homewood DrMartel CrtTara CtHearthstone LnWild Plum DrAlder CtRoundrock CirRockcrest CtDrexel DrC ro o k e d T re e C t
Hazelwood CoveHartford CirMitchell StT ow e r C t
Willow Springs CtNorthwestern DrApplec
r
o
s
s
C
t
Joshua LnCypress CtS ea H aw k C tCrestview CtMariners CtNorthshore CtDaVinci CtMaywood CirGlencrest CirGreenwood CtShiloh CtDuncan DrSH 121 Freeport PkwyW SH 121 SH 121 E Sandy Lake RdS Coppell RdN SH 121 HwySH 121 SH 121 Cotton RdSH 121 RampSH 121 ³0 1,200 2,400SCALE IN FEETCommercialOtherCityLimitParcelFIGURE 2-5CITY OF COPPELLFUTURE COMMERCIAL ACRESCreated By Freese and Nichols, Inc.Job No.: CPL11254Location: H:\W_WW_PLANNING\DELIVERABLES\03_DRAFT_Water_Wastewater_CIP_Report\(Figure_2-5)-Future_Commercial_Acres.mxdUpdated: Friday, January 20, 2012 4:06:30 PM
60845,0655,06564.85 Ac.45.49 Ac.623500411.40 Ac.557.26 Ac.60093,1913,19134.80 Ac.33.56 Ac.60754141284.24 Ac.388.16 Ac.60773,6163,85728.67 Ac.40.42 Ac.60833,5923,59247.60 Ac.48.00 Ac.403381,2001,47242.15 Ac.39.26 Ac.60793,0803,16548.08 Ac.55.42 Ac.61521,2621,34699.07 Ac.121.11 Ac.301742,1802,2530.36 Ac.0.26 Ac.607400218.01 Ac.266.34 Ac.60121,6291,99630.82 Ac.29.68 Ac.60811,7151,7182.89 Ac.5.24 Ac.60822,4712,48330.38 Ac.40.68 Ac.301731,2271,305101.50 Ac.105.96 Ac.615000153.35 Ac.302.44 Ac.60030085.74 Ac.289.78 Ac.60781,9731,97356.93 Ac.56.94 Ac.402111,9321,9691.43 Ac.1.41 Ac.6238103103129.59 Ac.221.40 Ac.615153162848.63 Ac.84.74 Ac.60063383414.70 Ac.9.95 Ac.60761,4331,43356.91 Ac.54.40 Ac.60802,5142,59632.63 Ac.40.43 Ac.24456526522.46 Ac.39.36 Ac.62340086.26 Ac.122.23 Ac.40061001.53 Ac.54.36 Ac.403210054.83 Ac.82.96 Ac.6237000.00 Ac.0.00 Ac.40236007.37 Ac.39.10 Ac.244716244720.94 Ac.24.32 Ac.6007002.97 Ac.13.18 Ac.6236000.00 Ac.0.00 Ac.90630011.80 Ac.20.68 Ac.9062000.00 Ac.0.00 Ac.60086616.67 Ac.21.93 Ac.I6 3 5 ..SANDY LAKE RD.BELT LINE RD.BETHEL RD.DENTON TAP RD.ROYAL LN.PARKWAY BLVD.MACARTHUR BLVD.FR EEPORT PKWY.
M O O R E R D .SH 121 .BETHEL SCHOOL RD.SH 121 HWY.SH 121 SERVICE R.AIRLINE DR.COPPELL RD.DIVIDEND DR.CREEKVIEW DR.SAMUEL BLVD.DEFOREST RD.MOCKINGBIRD LN.RIVERCHASE DR.RUBY RD.PI N Y O N L N .COUNTY LINE RD.GATEWAY BLVD.P H I L L I PS D R .HILL DR.L E D BE T TE R RD.STARLEAF ST.AL L E N RD.PELICAN LN.SHADOWCREST LN.CANYON DR.MALLARD DR.KAYE ST.BURNS ST.C O V E DR.GREENWAY DR.WINDING HOLLOW LN.MINYARD DR.BAR C L A Y A V .MAPLELEAF LN.BRIARGLEN DR.EDGEWOOD DR.CRESTVIEW DR.BRICKNELL LN.QUAIL LN.MARTEL LN.A S P E N W A Y D R.ALEX DR.HALIFAX DR.GREENRIDGE DR.OAKBEND DR.HOOD DR.HEATHER GLEN DR.C A R TER DR.SUGARBERRY DR.SANDERS LP.CHRISTI LN.BRAEWOOD DR.ACE LN.CRIBBS DR.P A RK W O O D L N .NATCHES TRACE .CHATEAUS DR.TOW N C ENTER BLVD.RAVEN LN.ROBIN LN.DILLARD LN.TOWN CENTER DR.LEXINGTON AV.CO P P E R S T O N E T R .LESLIE LN.ROLLING HILLS RD.I6 3 5 - O N RAMP 34 .VANBEBBER DR.WALES CT.HAMMOND ST.FOREST RIDGE DR.HOLLY ST.FA IRWAY DR.SH 121 RD.GRAYWOOD LN.P O IN T W E S T BLVD.COTTON RD.GLADE POINT DR.HARRIS RD.SPARROW LN.ANDERSON AV.TANBARK CIR.T R I N I T Y C T .LOCH LN.WESTMINSTER WAY.BLACK OAK CI R.BULLOCK DR.FITNESS CT.M IL L TR .SANDY OAK LN.OLYMPIA LN.PHEASANT LN.KINGSRIDGE DR.BEAU DR.HOWELL DR.COATS ST.GRAPEVINE CREEK DR.COLONIAL DR.BETHEL SCHOOL CT.G LEN LAKES DR.JUNIPER DR.FIELDCREST LP .OAKBROOK DR.BROWN TR.BRIARCOVE LN.S T J A M E S P L .WILD PLUM DR.RUSTIC MEADOW WAY.AUTUMN LN.HARTFORD CIR.I635 ..SH 121 .SANDY LAKE RD.SH 121 .SH 121 .COPPELL RD.SH 121 .SH 121 .SH 121 HWY..SH 121 .SH 121 SERVICE R.³0 1,200 2,400SCALE IN FEETLEGENDTSZ BoundariesStreetsParcelCity LimitsLakeFIGURE 2-6CITY OF COPPELLPOPULATION ANDNON-RESIDENTIAL ACRES BY TSZCreated By Freese and Nichols, Inc.Job No.: CPL11254Location: H:\W_WW_PLANNING\DELIVERABLES\04_Final_Water_Wastewater_Impact_Fee_Report\(Figure_2-6)-Pop_and_Non-Residential_Ac_by_TSZ.mxdUpdated: Monday, February 06, 2012 2:13:05 PMTSZ ID2011 Population2021 Population2011 Comm. Acres2021 Comm. Arces
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
3‐1
3.0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
An impact fee capital improvements plan (CIP) was developed for the City of Coppell to ensure
high quality water and wastewater service that promotes residential and commercial
development. The recommended improvements will provide the required capacity and
reliability to meet projected water demands and wastewater flows through year 2021.
3.1 Water and Wastewater Load Projections
The population and land use data was used to develop future water demands and wastewater
flows based on a projected average day per capita use and peaking factors. Based on historical
water usage and wastewater flows, design criteria were developed. The design criteria for
water and wastewater are presented in Table 3‐1 and Table 3‐2, respectively. Table 3‐3
presents the projected water demands. Table 3‐4 presents the projected wastewater flows for
the City of Coppell.
Table 3‐1 Water Design Criteria
Average
Residential
Usage
(gpcd)
Average
Day
Commercial
Water
Usage
(gpd/acre)
Maximum
Day to
Average
Day
Peaking
Factor
Peak
Hour to
Maximum
Day
Peaking
Factor
140 2,000 2 2
Table 3‐2 Wastewater Design Criteria
Average
Daily
Residential
Loading
(gpcd)
Average
Daily
Commercial
Loading
(gpd/acre)
Peak Wet
Weather
to Average
Daily
Peaking
Factor
75 700 4
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
3‐2
Table 3‐3 Projected Water Demands
Year
Average Day
Demand
(MGD)
Maximum Day
Demand
(MGD)
Peak Hour
Demand
(MGD)
2011 10.1 20.3 40.5
2021 12.3 24.6 49.3
Table 3‐4 Projected Wastewater Flows
Year
Average Annual
Daily Flow
(MGD)
Peak Wet
Weather Flow
(MGD)
2011 4.58 18.33
2021 5.39 21.57
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
3‐3
3.2 Water and Wastewater System Improvements
FNI updated the existing water and wastewater models in H2OMap Water and H2OMap Sewer.
The water demands and wastewater loadings were redistributed based on the revised land use
assumptions. FNI developed proposed water and wastewater system improvements based on
the results of the hydraulic models. The City of Coppell is approaching buildout and the existing
water and wastewater systems are appropriately sized to meet future demands and loads. The
cost for the project required for the 10‐year growth period used in the impact fee analysis for
both the water systems is shown in Table 3‐5. Costs listed for the existing projects are based on
actual design and construction costs provided by the City. Detailed cost estimate for the
proposed water system project is included in Appendix A. Tables 3‐5 and 3‐6 show 2011
percent utilization as the portion of a project’s capacity required to serve existing development.
It is not included in the impact fee analysis. The 2021 percent utilization is the portion of the
project’s capacity that will be required to serve the City of Coppell in 2021. The 2011‐2021
percent utilization is the portion of the project’s capacity required to serve development from
2011 to 2021. The portion of a project’s total cost that is used to serve development projected
to occur from 2011 through 2021 is calculated as the total actual cost multiplied by the 2011‐
2021 percent utilization. Only this portion of the cost is used in the impact fee analysis. The
10‐year water system projects are shown on Figure 3‐1. The 10‐year wastewater projects are
shown on Figure 3‐2.
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report City of Coppell 3‐4 Table 3‐5 Water System Impact Fee Eligible Projects No. Description of Project Percent UtilizationCost Based on 2011 Dollars2011* 2021 2011‐2021 Capital Cost Current Development 10‐Year (2011‐2021) Beyond 2021 EXISTING PROJECTS A 24‐inch Sandy Lake Road and Coppell Road water line from Denton Tap Road to Wagon Wheel EST 65% 100% 35% $985,030 $640,270 $344,761 $0 B 12‐inch water line along Ruby Road from Royal Lane to Coppell Road 90% 100% 10% $324,480 $292,032 $32,448 $0 C 12‐inch water line along western edge of City from Northpoint Drive to Gateview Drive 80% 100% 20% $526,320 $421,056 $105,264 $0 D Wagon Wheel 2.0 MG EST 50%75%25%$2,786,990$1,393,495$696,748$696,748E Village Parkway Pump #6 20%100%80%$273,607$54,721$218,886$0F 30‐inch Sandy Lake Road water line from MacArthur Blvd. to Denton Tap Road 80% 100% 20% $1,862,720 $1,490,176 $372,544 $0 G 16‐inch water line from Bethel Road to Airline Drive along Denton Tap 65% 100% 35% $804,708 $523,060 $281,648 $0 H 12‐inch SH 121 water line from Coppell Road to Denton Tap 90% 100% 10% $615,109 $553,598 $61,511 $0 I 12‐inch water line along Belt Line Road and west along Dividend from the existing 12‐inch water line of Lakeshore Drive to the existing 12‐inch water line at Freeport Parkway 10% 90% 80% $950,040 $95,004 $760,032 $95,004 J Impact Fee Study 0%100%100%$40,000$0$40,000$0Existing Project Sub‐total $9,169,003$5,463,412$2,913,840$791,752PROPOSED PROJECTS 1 Replacement of existing 12‐inch with a 20‐inch water line from the Southwestern Elevated Storage Tank 40% 90% 50% $1,134,660 $453,864 $567,330 $113,466 Proposed Project Sub‐total $1,134,660$453,864$567,330$113,466Total Cost $10,303,663$5,917,276$3,481,170$905,218* Utilization in 2011 on Proposed Projects indicates a portion of the project that will be used to address deficiencies within the existing system, and therefore are not eligible for impact fee cost recovery for future growth.
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report City of Coppell 3‐5 Table 3‐6 Wastewater System Impact Fee Eligible Projects No. Description of Project Percent UtilizationCost Based on 2011 Dollars2011* 2021 2011‐2021 Capital Cost Current Development 10‐Year(2011‐2021) Beyond 2021 EXISTING PROJECTS A Existing 30‐inch forcemain in Basin C80%100%20%$1,164,000$931,200$232,800$0B Existing 24‐inch gravity line in Basin A90%100%10%$1,476,000$1,328,400$147,600$0C Existing 21‐inch gravity line in Basin A85%100%15%$357,600$303,960$53,640$0D Existing 18‐inch gravity line in Basin A85%100%15%$321,600$273,360$48,240$0E Existing 15‐inch gravity line in Basin A85%100%15%$428,400$364,140$64,260$0F Existing 21‐inch gravity line in Basin B75%100%25%$357,600$268,200$89,400$0G Existing 27‐inch gravity line in Basin B75%100%25%$751,800$563,850$187,950$0H Existing 15/24‐inch gravity line in Basin E80%95%15%$1,045,800$836,640$156,870$52,290I Existing 30‐inch gravity line in Basin C and E75%95%20%$2,263,200$1,697,400$452,640$113,160J Saint Joseph 30‐inch forcemain (discharge from Deforest PS) 70% 100% 30% $2,312,041 $1,618,429 $693,612 $0 K Existing 20‐inch forcemain from Sandy Lake Lift Station 75% 100% 25% $1,172,750 $879,563 $293,188 $0 L Upsize Deforest and Sandy Lake Lift Stations70%100%30%$2,611,742$1,828,219$783,522$0M Existing 12‐inch gravity line in Northwest section of Basin A 70% 100% 30% $1,123,200 $786,240 $336,960 $0 N Impact Fee Study 0%100%100%$40,000$0$40,000$0Existing Project Sub‐total $15,425,733$11,679,600$3,580,682$165,450Total Cost $15,425,733$11,679,600$3,580,682$165,450* Utilization in 2011 on Proposed Projects indicates a portion of the project that will be used to address deficiencies within the existing system,and therefore are not eligible for impact fee cost recovery for future growth.
[Ú [Ú
UT UT
(#UT
(#UT
1.5 MG Southwestern ESTOverflow Elev.: 672.5 ft.
2.0 MG Wagon Wheel ESTOverflow Elev.: 672.5 ft.
Village Parkway PS6.0 MG GST4.0 MG GST41.0 MGD Firm Capacity
,1
,A ,F,A
,A
,A ,F
,E
,B,B
,C
,G
,G
,1
,H ,H
,H
,I
,I
,I
,I
,D
12''24''30''16''8''
1
2
'
'
12''
30''12''12''
24''
30''
24''16''24''
16''16''24''
12''16''16
'
'
24''12''12''12''12''12''24''12''24''
24''16''24''
12''
30''12''30''
16''
12''
30''
12''
12''
30''
12''16''16''12''24''
12''
12''12''24''
12''
30''
12''
30''30''12''30''30''12''24''16''12''30''12''
30''12''12''
12''
30''24''30''
20
'
'20''20''20''20''20''
E
I
6
3
5
W I635
E Belt Line RdFreeport PkwyS Royal LnW Bethel Rd
E S
a
n
d
y
L
a
k
e
R
d
S Belt Line RdW Sandy Lake Rd
N Mac
A
r
t
h
u
r
B
l
v
d
E Bethel School Rd
E Parkway BlvdN Denton Tap RdAirline DrSH 121 S Denton Tap RdS Moore RdDividend DrS Coppell RdW SH 121 Lodge RdS MacArthur BlvdDeforest Rd
C r e ekview Dr Samuel BlvdWrangler DrN SH 121 HwyN SH 121 Service RN Moo
re
RdMockingbird LnW P
a
r
k
w
a
y
B
l
v
d
N Coppell RdE SH 121 Service RRiverchase Dr
Ruby Rd N Heartz RdNorthpoint DrS Heartz RdFritz Dr
Falcon Ln
Southwestern Blvd Hill DrStarleaf StPark V a lle y D r
Pinyon LnPhi
l
l
ips
D
r
Plantation Dr
Gateway BlvdPatriot DrA
l
l
e
n
R
d
Ledbetter RdW SH
1
2
1
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
R
Pelican Ln
Malla
r
d
D
r
S County Line RdWoo
d
h
u
r
s
t
D
r
E Bethel Rd Waterview DrShadowcrest Ln
Brooks Ln
Kaye St
Burns St
Canyon Dr
Meado
w
c
r
e
e
k
R
dS SH 121 Service RGr
aham DrSpyglass DrOak TrCove DrGifford DrGreenway Dr
Briarglen Dr Vi
l
lage
PkwyBarclay AvBlue
J
a
y
L
n
Mapleleaf Ln
Cozby Av
V illaw ood L n
Minyard Dr
Lake Vista Dr
Winding Hollow LnMe
a
d
o
w
R
u
n
Crestview Dr
Martel L
n
Lakeshore DrBricknell LnWoodmoor Dr
Alex Dr
Edgewood DrHalifax Dr
Pecan Hollow Dr
Tupelo DrForest Hill DrLyndsie Dr
Quail Ln
Falls Rd
Parkview Plc
Cooper Ln
G reenridge Dr
Snowshill Tr
Whispering Hills DrC
arter Dr Aspenway DrS SH 121 Cowboy DrE SH 121 Fallkirk DrHawk LnK
il
b
r
i
dge LnS SH 121 HwyTimber Ridge LnOakbend DrBeechwood Ln
Hood Dr
Crestside DrHeather Glen DrSandy Knoll DrSH 121 - Exit Condor DrD o g w o o d Tr
Meadowglen CirM
a
d
i
son StSH 121 Ra m p
Lee Dr
Mead owview L nSand er s LpRedcedar Way Dr
Christi Ln
Willow Spri n gs D rCribbs Dr
Willet
D
r
Grace Ln
P arker DrOriole Ln
Swan DrCottonwood DrStratford LnAce LnCoral Dr
Dillard Ln Creekside LnKyle D
r
Cr e e k C r o s s i ng Chateaus DrLevee Pl
Parkwood
Ln
Crane DrPlaza BlvdWellin
gton Rd
Barrington Dr
Executive DrTown Center BlvdMagnolia DrSimmons DrOakcrest LnTravis St Cherrybark DrRaven Ln
Enterprise DrCoppersto
n
e T
r
Gibbs Cros s in g
Waln u t G r ove Ln
Rolling Hills RdRobin Ln
Wales Ct
Basilwood Dr
Lexington AvTrade Center DrBranchwood TrAshley Dr
Vanbebber Dr
Marlee Cir
Dickens DrL
eaval
l
ey
L
n
Fairway DrHarwell StLake Park
D
r
Rocky Bran
c
h LnLaguna LnMeadowood Ln
Forest Ridge Dr
Wrangler CirBeacon Hill DrBeal Ln
London Way Country LnAr
bo
r Brook Ln
Ashfo
r
d
D
r
Cambria DrE Nat c h e s T r a c e
Woodl
a
k
e
D
r
B ra d f ord Dr
Cas
t
le Creek DrHarris StDeann DrDuncan Dr
Cotton Rd
E I635 - Exit 33 Service RShadydale LnAvalon Ln
Berksh
i
re
LnHammond StGraywood Ln Inglenook CtSpringoak LnJohnson Dr
Harris RdGlade Point Dr
W Bethel Scho o l R d Lake Forest DrSh o r e w ood D rSparrow Ln B itternut Dr
Brock St
Swallow Dr
Havencrest LnS Holly StWynnpage DrTanbark CirHighland Dr
Tri
ni
t
y Ct
I635 - O
n Ramp 34
Houston St
Kingsmill Ct
Layton Dr
Cardinal Ln
Anderson AvFinch LnSteamboat Dr
Mi
l
l
T
r
Mullran
y
D
r
Tealwood DrHalifax Ln Trailwood LnRedwing D rPebble Creek DrGreentree DrLairds DrThompson Dr
Lo
n
g
m
e
a
d
o
w
D
r
River RdNewport Dr An
d
o
v
e
r
LnAllencrest LnPark
M
e
a
d
o
w
W
a
y
Dalm
a
l
l
e
y
L
n
Charleston Dr Rockcrest DrLoch LnWoodcrest LnHunters Ridge RdGlendale Dr Beverly DrG a te view B l v d
Clear Creek Ln
Oak Grove Ln Tennyson PlcCambridge Ma
n
o
r
LnHidden Valley DrEdinburgh LnBlack Oak CirNorth Lake DrGlenwood DrBrentwood Dr
Westminster Way
Fitness Ct
R a intr ee Cir C h es hir e Dr
W Town Ce nt e r D r
M e adowla r k Ln Pepperwood StHarrison Dr
Westlake DrS a ddle T ree T r Highland Meadow DrPark RdPheasant Ln
Kingsridge Dr Lockhaven Ln
Post Oak Dr Willingham DrAlendale Dr
W I63
5
-
E
x
i
t
3
5
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
R Howell DrNixon StChestnut Ln
Flagstone LnSpani s h M o ss DrW e s t c h e s te r DrWestwind DrLakeview Dr
Sandy Oak Ln
O l y mpia Ln
Beau Dr
Old
York
RdGibson CtHearthwood Dr
Loxley Dr
Kirkland Dr
Parish PlcCoats St
Penuel D r
Stonecrest Dr
Archer Dr Sand Point CtC ha lfo nt P l c
Colonial Dr
Sora LnManchester LnLakewood CtSuzanne Way Turnberry L n
Deforest CtCre
s
twood
D
r
Mesquitewood StW
B
raewood Dr
Pine hurst DrBethel School CtI
6
3
5 -
E
xit 3
4
Cooper
E Peninsula Dr
Fairview CtDakota Ln Br
i
t
t
an
y
D
rSleepy Hollow LnE I635
-
E
x
i
t
3
5
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
R Woodway Grapevine Creek DrHampton CtJuniper Dr
Glen Lakes D r
Field
c
r
e
s
t
L
p
Wrenwood Dr Prestwick CtMobley WayNatches Trace Greenwich Ln
Penfolds LnOakb r ook DrBro
w
n
T
r
Stringfellow DrSH 121 - turnaround Breanna WayTeal Cove
Autumnwood Ln
Exchange CirHighla
n
d
Way Pi n t a il C t
Briarcove Ln
Hidden H o l l o w C t
Grace Dr
Blue Jay DrDobecka DrDove Cir
E I635 - On
R
a
m
p
3
5
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
R Be
n
t
T
r
e
e
C
r
t
Armstrong BlvdClear Haven R d St James
P
l
Kai
ley WayHummingbird D r
Le isure Ln Redwood DrTanglewood LnBricknell DrState Champion PkwyCross Timbers Tr
Southern Belle DrBryan Ln0 Hood Dr
Ridgewood DrCa
ne
moun t L n
Matheson CtIndi a n R o
ck DrChinab
erry Way Dri
f
twood
Dr
Warren Crossing
Brighton Ln
Austin Ct
Edmondson Dr
Warwick Ln
Independence Dr
Biltmore Ct
Willow Ln
Ba y CirEncl
aves CrtW Penins u l a D r
Woodhill StGifford CtMartel CrtTara Ct Beaver Run DrHearth st one L n
Alde
r
C
t
S
heffield Ct
Roundrock CirVill
a
g
e Green Dr
Spanish Moss CtWestminster CtHampton DrRockcrest Ct
Wh ite S p ruce DrSunri
se Dr
Lakeview Cr
o
o
k
e
d
T
r
e
e
C
t
Tanager DrHartford CirReeder DrWoodland CoveMitchell StTow
e
r
C
t Elm Fork DrWestwood CtWillow Springs CtNorthwestern DrApp
l
e
c
ro
s
s
C
t
Carriage Ct
Flintshire W
a
y
Se
a
H
a
w
k
C
tClaremont CtCres
t
v
i
e
w
C
t
Eastgate Dr
Mariners Ct
Maywoo
d
C
i
r Glencrest CirDelta CtMason CtElmhill Ct
Cuttingham Ct
Hardwick Ct
Park Valley CtShiloh Ct
Fountain Head Ln
Crane Cir
Elmvale Ct
Westbury CtChelsea BayAsher CtLeisure CtGraywood CtE SH 121 Service RE Parkwa y B l v d
S SH 121 Service RS SH 121 Service RSH 121 Meadowglen Cir
S H 1 2 1 R a m p
I635 - On Ramp 34
E Sandy Lake Rd
E S H 121 Service RCotton RdWrangler CirI635 - Exit 34 N SH 121 HwyFre
e
p
o
r
t
P
k
w
y
N SH 121 Service RS H 121 - tu rnar
ound Aspenway DrE SH 121 N SH 121 Service R
S Coppell RdD u n can Dr24''12''10''16''10''12''
16''12''16''12''12''
16''
1
2
'
'12''12
'
'12''12''12''16''12''16''
12''
1
2
'
'
12''
12''16''12''1
6
'
'10''16''
10''10''12''24
'
'12''12''12''12''24''
12'
'
12''
12''
12
'
'
1
2
'
'
10''
12
'
'
16''12''16''10''12''24''
16''
12''
12''
16''
16''
12''
12''
12''
12''12''12''
12''
1
0
'
'12''10''16''10''12''12''12''10''12''12''12''
1
2
'
'16''10''12'
'
16''12''12''12''
12''12''16''12''12''10''24''12''16''
12''16''10''12''12''12''16''24''
12''
16''
12''12
'
'
12''16''12''12''10
'
'16''16''12''16''12''12''16''
12''12''12''
1
0
'
'
16''
16''
12''
12''
16''10''12''12''16''12''12''24''24''
1
2
'
'12''16''
16''
12''12''12''
16''
1
2
'
'12''10''
1
2
'
'16''1
2
'
'
12''
16''12''12''12''
16'
'12''12''
12''12''12''16''12''12''12''10''12''12''16'
'12''12''16''12''
1
0
'
'
12''12''12''16''10''12''
1
6
'
'12''16''
12''
12''12''12''16''16''12'
'16''
12''
16''12''12''12''10''16''16''12''16''12''16''12''12''12''12''10''12''
16''16''12''12''10''
12''16''12''
16''10''12''16''
12
'
'12''24'
'
10''
12''
12''
16'
'12''12''12''24''10''12''12''24''
16''
12''
12
'
'
12
'
'16''16''
12''12'
'
12''
10''12'
'12''24''10''10''16''12''16''12''16''
1
6
'
'16''16''16''12''12''16''12''16''12''16''10''12''10''
12''12''12''12'
'16''12''12''10''24''12''16''12''12''12''12''12''16''24''
12''
12''
12''
16''12'
'12''12''16''
12''
12''
24''16''24''12''16''12''12''24''12''12'
'
12''
16''
16''
12''
12''10''
12''
12''
12''12''16''10''10''
16''
12''12''12''12''12''12''16''12''16''12
'
'16''16''12''16''10''12''12''12''12''1
2
'
'12''12''10''8''6''2''4''3''1''
0''8''8''8''8''
8''
6''6''8''8''6''8
'
'6''8''8''
8''8''
6''
8''
8''
6''
8''
6''
8''8''6''8''8''8''8''
8''6''
8''6''8''8'
'8''8''6''8''8''8''6''
8''8''8''6''8'
'8''8''
8''
8
'
'
8''
8''
8''
8''8''8''6
'
'
8''8''
8''
8''8''8''8''8''
8''8''8''8''8''
8''
8''8''8''8''
8''
8''
2''
8''
8''8''8''
8''
8''
8''6''8''
6''8''8''8''8
'
'8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''
8''8''
8''6''8''8''
8''8''8''
8''
8''
8''
8'
'8''8''8''
8''8''8''
8''6''8''6''8''2''6''4''8''8''8''8''
6''8''8''6''
8''6''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''6''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''
8''8''8''
8''
6''8''8''6''8''8''
8''
8''6''8''8''8''6''6''8''8''8''8''8''
8''
8''8''8''6''6''8''8''8''8''
8''8''8''8''
8''
8''
8'
'
8''8''8''8''8''8'
'8''8''6''8''8''8''8''
8''
6''8''8''6''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''6''
8''8''6''8''
8''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''4''8''8''8''6'
'
8''
8''
8''
6''6''8''8
'
'8''6''8''8''
6''
8''8''
8''
8''8''6''
8''
8''
8''
8''8''8''8''8''8''
8''
8''
6''8''8''6''8''8''6''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''
8''6''8''
8''8''8''8''
8
'
'
8''6''8''8''6''8''8''8''
8''8''8''
6''8''6''
8''8''6''8''6''
8''6''8''8''8''8''
8''8''8''8''8''8''6''6''
8''
8''
8''
8''
8''
8''8''6''8''8''8''6''6''
6''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''
8''2''6''8''
8''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8'
'8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8'
'8''8''8''8''8''6''8''
8''
8''
8''
8''8''8''
8''
8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8'
'6''8''8''6''
8''8''8''
8'
'8''6''8''
8
'
'
8''8''8''
8''
8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''
8''8''8''
8''
6''6''8''6''8'
'8''8''
8''8'
'
8''8''6''8''8''
8''
8''8''8''
8''
8''
8''
8''
8''
6''
8''
8''8''6''
8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''
6''8''8''8''
8''
8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''
8''
8
'
'6''8''
8''
8''
6''
8''8''8''
6''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''6''8''8''
8''
8''
8''8''6''8''6''8''8''8''
8''
8''
8
'
'
6''8''8''6''6''8''8''8''
8''
8''
8''2''6''8''8''
6''
8''6''8'
'8''8''6''8''8''6''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''
6''6''8''8''8''
8''
8''
8''
8''8''
8''
8''
8''
6''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''
6''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8'
'8''6''8''
8''
8''
8''8''8''
8''
8'
'
8''8''6''8''8''6''8''8''
6''8''8''8''
8''8''8''
6''8''8''
8''
8''
6''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''
8''
6''
8''8''6''8''
8''8''6''2''8''8''
8''
8''8''8''8''8''8''
8''
8''8''8''8''
8''8''6''
8''8''
8''
8''8''8''8''8''
8''
8''
8''
6''6''8''6''8''8''8''
8''8''8''8''
8''6''8''8''8''
8''
8''8''8''8''8''
8'
'8''
8''
8''
8''
8''
8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''6''8''
8''8''8''4''8''8''
8''
8''8''6''8''8''8'
'
8''8''8''
8''6''8''
8
'
'
6''8''8''8''8''
8''8''8''
8''
8''
8
'
'
8''
8''
6''8''8''6''
8''
8''
8''
8''
8''
8''
8''
8''
8''
6''
8''8''8''
8''6''8''8'
'
8''
8''
8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''
8''
8''8''8''
8''
8''
8''8''8''6''8''6''8''8''8''8'
'6''8''8''8''8''8''
8''
8''
8''
8''8'
'
8''
8''
8''
8''8''6''
8''
8''
8''8''8''6''8''8''
8''
8'
'8''8''
8''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''
8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''
8''8''8''
8''
8
'
'
8''
8''
6''8''8''
8''
8''8''8''6''8''8''8''6''
6''
8''
8''
8''8''8''8''8''8''
8''8''8''8''8''
8''
6''8''6''
8''8''8''8''6''8''
8''
8''8''8''8''8''
8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''
8''6''8''8''6''6''8'
'
6''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''
6
'
'
8''
8''8''8''
8''6''8''8''6''6''8''8''
8''8''8''
8''8''4''8''8''8''
8''
8''8''6''8''
8''
8''8''8''
8''
8''8''8''
8''8''8''8''6''8''6''8''
8''
8''6''8''8''6''8''8''4''6''4''8''6''8''6''
8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''
4''8''8''8''
8''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''6''8''
8''
8''6''8''8''
8''
6''
8''
8''
6''8''6''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''
8''8''8''
8''
8''
8''8''8''
8''6''6''
8''8''8''8''6''
8''8''8''6''8''6''8''
8''
8''
6''8''
6''
8''
8''
8''6''6''
8'
'
8''
6''8''8''6''8''
8''8'
'8''6''
8''
8''
8''6''6''8''
8''
6''8''8''8''8''
8''
8''
8''8''8''8''
8''8''8''
8''8''4''
8''
8''
8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''
8''8''8''
6''8''8''8''8''8''8''
8''8''8'
'
8''
8''
6''
8''8''6''8''
8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''
8''
8'
'8''8''8''8''
8''
6''8''8''
8''
8''8''8''
8''
8''8''8''
8''8''8''
6''8''8''8''
8''
8''
6''
8''
8''
8''
8''
8''
6''8''8''8''8''
8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8
'
'8''8''8''8''8
'
'8''8''
6''8''8''8''8''8''8''
8''
8
'
'8''8''8''
6''6''6''
8''
8''8''6''6''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''6''8''
8''8''8''8''
8''8''6''8''
8''
8''8''8''6''8''
8''8''8
'
'8''8''8''8''8''
8''
8''6''
8''
8''8''8''8''8''
6''8''8''8''8''8''6''
6''8''8''6''8''8''
8''6''6''
6
'
'8'
'8''8''8''8''6'
'8''8''6''
8''
8''6''8
'
'8''6''
8''
8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8'
'
8''
8''8''8''8''8'
'6''8''
8''
8
'
'8''6''8''
8''6''8''6'
'
8''8''6''8''
6''
8''
8''6''8''
8''
8'
'8''8''
8''8''8'
'8''8''8''6''8
'
'
8''
8''8''6''
8''
8''8''6''6''FIGURE 3-1CITY OF COPPELLWATER IMPACT FEECAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
Created by Freese and Nichols, Inc.Job No.: [CPL11254]Location: H:\W_WW_PLANNING\DELIVERABLES\WORKING\(Figure-1)-Water_System.mxdUpdated: Wednesday, July 13, 2011
LEGEND
(#UT Existing Elevated Storage Tank
(#UT Existing Eligible Impact FeeElevated Storage Tank
UT Existing Ground Storage Tank
[Ú Existing Pump Station
[Ú Existing Eligible Impact FeePump Station
Existing EligibleImpact Fee Water Line
Proposed EligibleImpact Fee Water Line
8" and Smaller Water Line
10" and Larger Water Line
Streets
Lake
Parcel
City Limits I
0 1,000 2,000
SCALE IN FEET
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
Vä
Vä
"C`
Meter Station
,B
,C,C
,B
,D
,E
,H ,I
,F ,G
,G
,A,K
,K
,J
Sandy Lake Lift StationFirm Capacity 4.2 MGD ,M
Deforest Lift StationFirm Capacity 14.1 MGD ,L
24''18''21''27''15''30''27''24''24''30''
15''
21''24''27''
30''30''24''24''24''
21''24''24''30''15''30''18''27''
30''
30''24''27''30''21''24''30''24''15''24''30''21''30''24''15''24''
30''15''30''15''30''15''18''24''27''24''15''30''
30'' F.
M
.
20'' F.M.30'' F.M.20'' F.M.20''
F
.
M
.
30'' F.M .30'' F.M.30'' F.M.30'' F.M.
30'
'
F
.
M
.
3
0
'
'
F
.M
.
30'' F.M.
30'' F
.
M
.
3
0'' F.M.30'
'
F
.M
.
E
I
6
3
5
W I635
E Belt Line RdFreeport PkwyS Royal LnW Bethel Rd
E Sandy Lake Rd
S Belt Line RdW Sandy Lake Rd N MacA
r
thu
r
B
lvd
E Bethel School Rd
E Parkway BlvdN Denton Tap RdAirline DrSH 121 S Denton Tap RdS Moore RdDividend DrS Coppell RdW SH
1
2
1
Lodge RdS MacArthur BlvdDeforest Rd
Creekview Dr Samuel BlvdWrangler DrN SH 121 HwyN SH 121 Service RN Moo
re
RdMockingbird LnW P
a
r
k
w
a
y
B
l
v
d
N Coppell RdE SH 121 Service RRiverchase Dr
Ruby Rd N Heartz RdNorthpoint DrS Heartz RdFritz Dr
Falcon Ln
Southwestern Blvd Hill DrStarleaf StPark V a lle y D r
Pinyon LnPhi
l
l
ips
D
r
Plantation Dr
Gateway BlvdPatriot DrA
l
l
e
n
R
d
Ledbetter RdW SH
1
2
1
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
R
Pelican Ln
Malla
r
d
D
r
S County Line RdWoo
d
h
u
r
s
t
D
r Waterview DrShadowcrest Ln
Brooks Ln
Kaye St
Burns St
Canyon Dr
Meado
w
c
r
e
e
k
R
dS SH 121 Service RGr
aham DrSpyglass DrOak TrGifford DrGreenway Dr
Briarglen Dr
Village Pkwy
Barclay AvBlue
J
a
y
L
n
Mapleleaf Ln
Cozby Av
V illaw ood L n
Minyard Dr
Lake Vista Dr
Winding Hollow LnMeadow Run Martel L
n
Lakeshore DrBricknell LnWoodmoor Dr
Alex Dr
Edgewood DrHalifax Dr
Pecan Hollow Dr
Tupelo DrForest Hill DrLyndsie Dr
Quail Ln
Falls Rd
Parkview Plc
Eagle Dr
Cooper Ln
G reenridge Dr
Snowshill Tr
Whispering Hills DrC
arter Dr Aspenway DrS SH 121 Cowboy DrE SH 121 Fallkirk DrHawk LnK
il
b
r
i
dge LnS SH 121 HwyTimber Ridge LnOakbend DrBeechwood Ln
Hood Dr
Crestside DrSugarberry Dr
Heather Glen DrSandy Knoll DrSH 121 - Exit Condor DrD o g w o o d Tr
Meadowglen CirM
a
d
i
son StSH 121 Ra m p
Lee Dr
Mead owview L nSanders LpRedcedar Way Dr
Christi Ln
Willow Spri n gs D rCribbs Dr
Wi
l
l
et
D
r
Grace Ln
P arker DrOriole Ln
Swan DrCottonwood DrStratford LnAce LnCoral Dr
Dillard Ln Creekside LnKyle D
r
Waverly LnCr e e k C r o s s i ng Chateaus DrLevee Pl
Parkwood
Ln
Crane DrPlaza BlvdWellin
gton Rd
B a r r ing ton Dr
Executive DrTown Center BlvdMagnolia DrSimmons DrOakcrest LnTravis St Cherrybark DrRaven Ln
Enterprise DrCoppersto
n
e T
r
Waln u t G r ove Ln
Rolling Hills RdRobin Ln
Leslie Ln
Wales Ct
Lexington AvTrade Center DrBranchwood TrAshley Dr
Vanbebber DrDickens DrL
eaval
l
ey
L
n
Fairway DrHarwell StLake Park
D
r
Rocky Bran
c
h LnLaguna LnMeadowood Ln
Forest Ridge Dr
Wrangler CirBeacon Hill DrBeal Ln
London Way Country LnAr
bo
r Brook Ln
Ashfo
r
d
D
r
Cambria DrE Nat c h e s T r a c e
Woodl
a
k
e
D
r
B ra d f ord Dr
Cas
t
le Creek DrHarris StDeann DrDuncan Dr
Cotton Rd
E I635 - Exit 33 Service RShadydale LnAvalon Ln
Berksh
i
re
LnHammond StGraywood Ln Inglenook CtSpringoak LnJohnson Dr
Harris RdGlade Point Dr
W Bethel Scho o l R d
Sh o r e w ood D rSparrow Ln
P
oint We
st
BlvdB itternut Dr
Brock St
Swallow Dr
Havencrest LnS Holly StWynnpage DrTanbark CirHighland Dr
Tri
ni
t
y Ct
I635 - O
n Ramp 34
Houston St
Kingsmill Ct
Layton Dr
Cardinal Ln
Anderson AvFinch LnSteamboat Dr
Mi
l
l
T
r
Mullran
y
D
r
Tealwood DrHalifax Ln Trailwood LnRedwing D rPebble Creek DrGreentree DrLairds DrThompson Dr
Lo
n
g
m
e
a
d
o
w
D
r
River RdNewport Dr An
d
o
v
e
r
LnAllencrest LnBullock DrPark
M
e
a
d
o
w
W
a
y
Dalm
a
l
l
e
y
L
n
Nash DrCharleston Dr Rockcrest DrW Natches Tra
c
e
N SH 121 Loch LnWoodcrest LnHunters Ridge RdGlendale Dr Beverly DrParr St
G a te view B l v d Lansdow n e C r
Clear Creek Ln
Oak Grove Ln Tennyson PlcCambridge Ma
n
o
r
LnHidden Valley DrBlack Oak CirNorth Lake DrGlenwood DrWestminster Way
Fitness Ct
Rai n tre e CirW Town Ce nt e r D rN SH 121 RdM e adowla r k Ln Pepperwood StHarrison Dr
Westlake DrS a ddle T ree T r Highland Meadow DrPark RdPheasant Ln
Kingsridge Dr
Fountain DrPost Oak Dr Willingham DrAlendale Dr
W I63
5
-
E
x
i
t
3
5
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
R Howell DrNixon StChestnut Ln
Flagstone LnSpani s h M o ss DrWestwind DrSandy Oak Ln
W I635 -
O
n
R
a
m
p
3
3
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
R
O ly m pia Ln
Beau Dr
Old
York
RdGibson CtHearthwood Dr
Loxley Dr
SH 121 - R
a
m
p
Kirkland Dr
Parish PlcCoats St
Hawken Dr
Penuel D r
Stonecrest Dr
Archer Dr Sand Point CtC ha lfo nt P l c
Colonial Dr
Sora LnN Holly StManchester LnLakewood CtTurnberry L n
Deforest CtCre
s
twood
D
r
Mesquitewood StW
B
raewood Dr
Pine hurst Dr
I635 - Ex it 34
Cooper
E Peninsula Dr
Fairview CtDakota Ln Br
i
t
t
an
y
D
rSleepy Hollow LnE I635
-
E
x
i
t
3
5
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
R Woodway Grapevine Creek DrHampton CtJuniper DrField
c
r
e
s
t
L
p
Wrenwood Dr Prestwick CtMobley WayNatches Trace Greenwich Ln
Oakb r ook DrStringfellow Dr
S H 121 - turnaround Breanna WayTeal Cove
Autumnwood Ln
Georgian DrExchange CirHighla
n
d
Way Pi n t a il C t
Briarcove Ln
Hidde n H o llo w C t
Grace Dr
Blue Jay DrDobecka DrBurning Tree Ln
Dove Cir
E I635 - On
R
a
m
p
3
5
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
R Be
n
t
T
r
e
e
C
r
t
Kimbel Kourt Armstrong BlvdClear Haven R d St James
P
l
Kai
ley WayCedar Crest Dr
Hummingbird D r
Le isure Ln
Tanglewood LnBricknell DrState Champion PkwyCastlebury CtSouthern Belle DrBryan LnRidgewood DrCa
ne
moun t L n
Hackberry RdMatheson CtIndi a n R o
ck DrChinab
erry Way Dri
f
twood
Dr
Warren Crossing
Brighton Ln
Cherrywood TrAustin Ct
Warwick Ln
Summer Place DrBiltmore Ct
Willow Ln
Amberwood DrEncl
aves CrtW Penins u l a D r
Woodhill StGifford CtMartel CrtTara Ct Beaver Run DrHearth st one L n
Alde
r
C
t
S
heffield Ct
Roundrock Cir
Spanish Moss CtWestminster CtHampton DrRockcrest Ct
Wh ite S p ruce DrSunri
se Dr
C
r
o
o
k
e
d
Tr
ee Ct
Tanager DrHazelwood Cove
Hartford CirReeder DrWoodland CoveMitchell StElm Fork DrWestwood CtWillow Springs CtNorthwestern DrApp
l
e
c
ro
s
s
C
t
Carriage Ct
Se
a
H
a
w
k
C
tClaremont CtEastgate DrDaVinci CtMaywoo
d
C
i
r Glencrest CirHood C
t
Delta CtMason CtElmhill Ct
Cuttingham Ct
Hardwick Ct
Park Valley CtGreenwood Ct
Hickory Ridge Dr Arbor Manors DrFountain Head Ln
Crane Cir
Elmvale Ct
Westbury CtLeisure CtGraywood CtSH 121 E SH 121 SH 121 - turnaround
S H 1 2 1 R a m pSH 121 N SH 121 RdI6
3
5
-
E
x
i
t
3
4
SH 121 S SH 121 E SH 121 Service RW SH
1
2
1
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
R
N SH 121 Service R
W SH
1
2
1
Fre
e
p
o
r
t
P
k
w
y
Wrangler CirAspenway DrN SH 121 Service RS Coppell RdI635 - On Ra
m
p 34
SH 1
2
1
-
E
x
i
t
E Sandy Lake Rd
D u n can DrMeadowglen Ci rN SH 121 HwyE SH 121 Service R
Cotton Rd16'' F.M.0'' F.M.2'' F.M.0'' F.M.33''
12''15''10''24''18''48''21''10''15'
'10''12''
10''
10''15'
'
10''
10''
15''
1
0
'
'12''15''10''12''
24
'
'10''10''10''10''12''10''
12''
1
0
'
'
33''
10''
15''
10''
12''15''10''12''12
'
'
10''10''10''
12''10'
'
12''10''10''12''10''12''10''12''12''15''10''10''1
2
'
'
10''
12''
1
0
'
'
10''
12''
12''12''12''10''10''10''12''
10''
12''
1
2
'
'10''1
2
'
'10''10''10''10''10''
1
0
'
'
2
4
'
'
10''12''15''10'
'10''10''12''10''12''10''10''
10''12''12''10''
10''
10''12''10''
24
'
'10''10''10''12''10''10'
'10''12''10''10''10''15''
15''
1
0
'
'
33''10''12''10''10''10''12''
10''12''10''12''10''
10''10''10''10''
12''
15''
10
'
'
15''10'
'10''10''10''
10''10''10''10''10''
15''10''15''
12''15''10''10''10''10''12''10''1
2
'
'
10''10''12''10''12''33''
10''10''10''
12''10''12''
10''
15''
10''
10''10''12''
18''12''10''12''15''10''10''10''18''10'
'
12''15''10'
'
10''
10''
15''
10''12''10''10''10''24''10''12''
10''18''10''18''
18''10''15''10''12''10''
10''
12''
10''
12''
12''
18''12'
'10''10'
'
10''10''12''10''15''12''15''
10''10''10''
12''10''10''18''12''10''
15''
12''
10''10''1
5
'
'
15''12''12''10''10''10''12''12''10''
10''
12''
1
8
'
'
18''10''
10''10''10''
10''
12''12''10''10''10''
10''
12''
10''
15''12''15''15''
10''
10''
10''
10''
12'
'12'
'
12''
15''10''10''
10''12''10''
15''15''15''
12''
15''12''12''10''12''12''15''1
0
'
'12''15''10''15''10''8''6''0''4''8''6''
8''8''6''8''8''4''6''6''
4''
6''
8''6''8''8''8''8''8''4''8''8''8''
8''
8''8''8''8''8''6''8''
8''
4''8''8''8'
'
8''8''8
'
'
8''6''8''8''
6''6''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''4''8''6''8''
6''
6''8''8''8''8''6''
8
'
'
8''
6''
6
'
'8''6''8''
8''
8''6''8''6''8''
8''
8''
8''
8''6''6''8''6''0''8''8''
8''8''8''8''8''8''8''
8''8''8''
8''
8
'
'8'
'
6''
6''6''8''8''6''6''
8''6''8''
8''8''8''
6''
6''
8''8''8''4''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''
8''
8''6''8''8''0''8''8''8''8''0''4''8''8''8''
6''
8''
8''6''8
'
'8''8''8''8''6''
8''6''8''8''6''8''8''8''6''6''8''
8''
8''8''8''8''4''8''
6''
8''
6''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''8'
'
8''8''6''8''6''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''4''8'
'8''8''
8''
6''
8''
8''6''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8
'
'6''6''8''8'
'
6''8''8''8''8''8''4''6'
'8''6''8''8''8''8''
8''
8''
8''8''6''
6''
8''8''8''
8''
8''8''8''8''8''
8''8''8''8''8''4''6''
8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''
8''
8''8'
'
8''
8''
8''6''8''8''8''6''6''
8'
'
8''
8''
6''8''8''
8''
8''6''6''
6''
8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''6''6''8'
'8''8''6''8''8''6''
6''
8''6''
8''8''8''6''8'
'6''6''6''8''
8''8''8''6''6''
8''8''8''
8''6''8''
8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''
0''8''8''8'
'8''8''
8''
6''
8''
6''
4''8''
8''
8''
6''8''8''6''8''
8''6''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''
8''
8''4''6''4''8''
8''4''8''8''8''
8''8''8''8''8''4''8''8''
8''
8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''6''
8''8''4''8''6''8''8''
6''
8'
'8''6''
6''8''
8''
8''
8''
8''
6''
8''
8''
8''
8''6''6''8''8''6''6''8''
8''8''8''
8''
8''
8''
8''8''8''8''8''6''
8''8''
8''
8''8''8''
8''4''8''
8''
8''8''8''8''8'
'
6''
4''8''8''8''8''8''
8''
8
'
'8''8'
'
8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''6''
8''8''6''8
'
'8''8''8''8''8''8''
8''6''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8'
'
8''
8''8''8''6''8''8''
8''8''6''4''8''4''4''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''6''6''
8''
8''6''8''6''8''
8''
8''8''6''8''6''8''8''8''8''
8'
'8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''
8''8''8''
8''
8''
6''4''8''8''8''8''
8''
4''8''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''4''8''8''6''6''8''8''8''8''
8''
8''8''6''
8''
6''
8''
6''
6''6''8'
'
8''
8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''6''4''8''6''6''8''8''8''8''6''6''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''4''6''8''8''6''8''
6''8''8''6''8''8''6''
8''
8''8''8''8''
8''
8''8''6''6''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''
6''
4''
6''
4''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''
8'
'
8''
6''6''8''6''8''8''
8''
6''8''8''
6''8''8''8''6''8''
8''8''8''8''8''
8''
8''
6''8''8''
8''8''8''8
'
'
8''
8''8''8''6''
8''
6''8''8''
8''
8''
4''
8''
4''
6''
8''8''8''
8''
8''8''6''8''8''6''
8''6''6''8''8''8''6''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''
6''8''8'
'8''8''8''8''8''8''
6''8''8''6''8''8''8
'
'6''6''6''8''4''8''
8''8''6''8''8''8''
6''8''6''
8''6''8''
8''6''8''
8''
6''6''8''8''8''8'
'8''8''8''8''8''8''8''
8''
8''
8''8''8''
8''
8''
8''8''4''4''8''8''6''8''8''6''
8''8''8''8''
4''
8''
8''
8''8''8''
6''4''8
'
'8'
'
8''
8''8''8''8''6'
'
8'
'8''8
'
'
6''
8''
8''6''8''6''8''6''8''6''6''8''8''6''8''
8''
8
'
'
8''
8''6''8''8''8''
8''8''6''8''8''8''8''
8''8''8''8''8''
6''
8''
8''
8'
'8''8''8''8''8''8''
8''
6''6''8''8''8''8''6''8''4''
8''
8''
8'
'
8''8''8''8''8''8'
'
6''6''8''8''4''8''8''8''6''8''8''8
'
'
6''
6
'
'
6''
8''
6''
8''8''8''
6''8''8''8''
8''8''8''6''8''6''
4''4''6''
8''8''8''8''8''6''
6''
8''
8''
8''8''8''6''
8''8''8''8''8''8''8''
8''
6''
8'
'8''6''
8''
6''
6''
8''
6''
8''8''8''8''6''
8''
6''
8''
6''4''
8''
8''
8''
8''
6''8''8''8''8''8''
8''
8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''6''6''8''8''
8''
8''
8''
6''8''8
'
'8'
'
8''
8''
8''8''8''
8''8''8'
'8''8''
4''
8''8''6''8''
8
'
'8''8''8''6''8''
8''8''6''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''6''8''8''
6''8''6''8''8''8''
8''
8''
4''
8''6''6''4''
8''
8''
8''6''8''8''
8''
8''
6''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''
8''
8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''
6''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''
8''8''6''8''
8''
6''
8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''
8''
6''
8''
6''8''8''
8''
8''8''8''8''
8''8''8''8''8''6''8''
8''
6''8''6''
8''
8''8'
'
8''8''8''
8''8''8''8''
8''
6''
8''
6''
8''
8''
8''
8''
8''6''8''6''8''8''
8''
8''8''8''8''
6''
6''
8''
8''
8''
8''6''8''
8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''
8''
6''
8''
8''8''8''
6''
8''8''8''6''4''8''6''8''
8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''
8''6''8''8''8''8''
8''8''8''8
'
'
8''6''8''
8''8''8''8''8''
8''8''8''8''8''8''8''6''
8''8''6''8''8''
8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''6''
8''8''6''8''8''6''8''8''8''
8''
6''
8''
8''
4''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''
6''
8''
6''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''8'
'8''8
'
'4''6''
8''
8''8''8''8''
8''
8''
8''
8''8''8''8''8''8''8''6''6''8''8''
8''6''8''8
'
'
8''
6''
8''
8''
8''
6''
8''6''6''6''6''8''6''
8'
'
8
'
'8''8''8''0''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''
8''8''8''8''8''6''
8''
8''
8''6''8''
4''8''8''6''8''6''
6''
8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''
6''8''8''
8''8''8''8''8''6''8''
8''
8''
8''6''8''8''8''
8''
8''8''8''6''8''6''6''8''8''8''8''
8''
6''8''8''8''8''
8
'
'8''6''6''
4''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''6''6''8''8''4
'
'8''8''8''8''8''8''
8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''
6''8''8''8''8''8''4''8''4''8''
6''8''8''8''
8''8'
'8''8''8''
8''8''8''
8''6''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''
8''
8''8''8''8''8''
6''8''8''8''
6''
8''
8''
8''
6''
8''
8''8''8''8''6''
8''
8''8''8''
8
'
'
8''
8''
8''6''8''6''8''4''8''8''8''8''8''8'
'8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''
8''
8''8''0''8''8''8''8''
6''8''8''8''8''8''8''
8''
8''8''8''
8''
8''
8''8''8''8''
8''8''8'
'
6''6''6''
8''8''8''8''
8''8''8''8''6''6''6''
8''8''6''8''
8''
8''8''6''8''
8''8''8''
8''
8''
8''
6''
8''
8''
6''
FIGURE 3-2CITY OF COPPELLWASTEWATER IMPACT FEECAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
Created by Freese and Nichols, Inc.Job No.: [CPL11254]Location: H:\W_WW_PLANNING\DELIVERABLES\WORKING\(Figure-1)_Existing_Wastewater_System.mxdUpdated: Wednesday, July 13, 2011
LEGEND
Existing Eligible Impact FeeWastewater Lines
Existing Eligible Impact FeeForce Mains
8" and Smaller Wastewater Line
10" and Larger Wastewater Line
Force Main
Vä Existing Eliible Lift Station
"C`Meter Station
!(Manhole
Streets
Parcel
City Limits
Lake
SEWER BASINS
Basin 'A'
Basin 'B'
Basin 'C'
Basin 'E'
Basin 'F'
I
0 1,000 2,000
SCALE IN FEET
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
4‐1
4.0 WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS
The impact fee analysis involves determining the utilization of existing and proposed projects
required as defined by the capital improvement plan to serve new development over the next
10‐year time period. For existing or proposed projects, the impact fee is calculated as a
percentage of the project cost, based upon the percentage of the project’s capacity required to
serve development projected to occur between 2011 and 2021. Capacity serving existing
development and development projected for more than 10 years in the future cannot be
charged to impact fees.
4.1 Service Units
The maximum impact fee may not exceed the amount determined by dividing the cost of
capital improvements required by the total number of service units attributed to new
development during the impact fee eligibility period. A water service unit is defined as the
service equivalent to a water connection for a single‐family residence. The City of Coppell does
not directly meter wastewater flows and bills for wastewater services based on the customer’s
water consumption. Therefore, a wastewater service unit is defined as the wastewater service
provided to a customer with a water connection for a single‐family residence.
The service associated with public, commercial, and industrial connections is converted into
service units based upon the capacity of the meter used to provide service. The number of
service units required to represent each meter size is based on the safe maximum operating
capacity of the appropriate meter type. The City uses Class I turbine meters. American Water
Works Association (AWWA) standards C701 (Cold Water Meters – Turbine Type) was used to
determine the safe maximum operating capacity. The service unit equivalent for each meter
size used by the City is listed in Table 4‐1.
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
4‐2
Table 4‐1 Service Unit Equivalencies
Meter Size
Safe Maximum Operating
Capacity (gpm)(1)
Service Unit Equivalent
5/8” x 3/4” 30 1.0
1” 50 1.7
1‐1/2” 100 3.3
2” 160 5.3
3” 350 11.7
4” 630 21.0
6” 1,400 46.7
8” 2,400 80.0
(1) Safe maximum operating capacity is based on AWWA standards C701
Typically, in Coppell, single‐family residences are served with 5/8‐inch water meters. Larger
meters represent public, commercial, and industrial water use. The City provided data that
included the meter size of each active water meter as of June 2011. Table 4‐2 shows the water
and wastewater service units for 2011 and the projected service units for 2021.
Table 4‐2 Water and Wastewater Service Units
Meter Size
2011
Connections
2011
Service
Units
2021
Connections
2021
Service Units
Growth in
Service Units
5/8” x 3/4” 11,219 11,219 11,702 11,702 483
1” 202 337 211 352 15
1‐1/2” 103 343 107 357 14
2” 487 2,597 628 3,349 752
3” 18 210 29 338 128
4” 24 504 30 630 126
6” 3 140 5 233 93
8” 204 16,320 213 17,040 720
Total 12,260 31,670 12,925 34,001 2,331
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
4‐3
4.2 Maximum Impact Fee Calculations
Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code states that the maximum impact fee may not
exceed the amount determined by dividing the cost of capital improvements required by the
total number of service units attributed to new development during the impact fee eligibility
period less the credit to account for water and wastewater revenues used to finance capital
improvement plans.
The total projected costs include the projected capital improvement costs to serve 10‐year
development, the projected finance cost for the capital improvements, and the consultant cost
for preparing and updating the Capital Improvements Plan. A 4.0% interest rate was used to
calculate financing costs. Comparison graphs showing impact fees in other cities throughout
the Metroplex are presented in Appendix B.
Water Impact Fee:
Total Capital Improvement Costs $3,481,170
Financing Costs $1,157,947
Total Eligible Costs $4,639,117
Growth in Service Units 2,331
Maximum Water Impact Fee = Total Eligible Costs/Growth in Service Units
= $4,639,117/2,331
= $1,990 per Service Unit
Maximum Allowable Water Impact Fee = Maximum Impact Fee – 50% Credit
= $1,990 ‐ $995
= $995 per Service Unit
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
4‐4
Wastewater Impact Fee:
Total Capital Improvement Costs $3,580,682
Financing Costs $1,191,047
Total Eligible Costs $4,771,729
Growth in Service Units 2,331
Maximum Wastewater Impact Fee = Total Eligible Costs/Growth in Service Units
= $4,771,729/2,331
= $2,047 per Service Unit
Maximum Allowable Wastewater Impact Fee = Maximum Impact Fee – 50% Credit
= $2,047 ‐ $1,024
= $1,024 per Service Unit
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
5‐1
5.0 ROADWAY IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS
5.1 Methodology
To update the roadway impact fee system, a series of work tasks were undertaken that
included the following:
• A roadway conditions inventory of major thoroughfares in Coppell was updated for lane
geometries, roadway classifications and segment lengths. The existing roadway network
was evaluated based on updated traffic volume count information, collected in August
2011, to determine roadway capacity, current utilization, and deficiencies, if present, for
the service area.
• Both the AM and PM peak hour movements were analyzed to determine the most critical,
thus the vehicle‐mile of travel during the PM peak hour was retained as the appropriate
service unit for measuring capacity and system utilization for the impact fee calculation,
Roadway capacity values were based on data developed by the NCTCOG for level of service
“C/D” operations.
• New vehicle‐miles of demand were calculated for each service area based on updated land
use assumptions by service area for the program planning period. The land use
equivalency table was used as a basis for deriving projected vehicle‐miles from growth
over the ten‐year planning period.
• An analysis of previous roadway impact fee Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) was
conducted based on updated traffic volume count information to ensure excess capacity
remained in program projects for each service area.
• A CIP was prepared based on growth needs from future development (land use
assumptions), other capital improvements programming and City Staff input. Roadway
cost data including construction, engineering and right‐of‐way for impact fee projects were
prepared and compiled by service area based on cost estimates and data provided by the
City. For recently completed projects, actual costs were incorporated into the system
database.
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
5‐2
• The cost of capacity supplied, cost attributable to new development and the maximum
cost per service unit was calculated for each service area. A credit of 50% was applied to
the overall cost of the capital improvements program for the identification of the
maximum allowable cost per service unit consideration.
• The Land Use Equivalency Table (service unit generation for specific land use categories)
was updated to incorporate new trip rate and trip length data. Trip rate data was obtained
from Trip Generation, Eighth Edition by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trip
length statistics for the city were obtained from a workplace survey conducted by the
NCTCOG.
• Example fee calculations were prepared based upon sample land uses, associated service
unit equivalencies, and the maximum allowable cost per service unit.
This section documents the procedures, findings, and conclusions of the study.
5.2 Roadway Impact Fee Service Area
Chapter 395 requires that service areas be defined for impact fees to ensure that facility
improvements are located in proximity to the area that is generating the need. Legislative
requirements stipulate that roadway service areas be limited to a six mile maximum and must
be located within the current city limits. Roadway service areas are different from other impact
fee service areas, which can extend beyond the city limits and include its Extra Territorial
Jurisdiction (ETJ) or other defined area of service. This is primarily because roadway systems
are "open" to both local and regional use as opposed to a defined limit of service that is
provided with water and wastewater systems. For roadways, the result is that new
development can only be assessed an impact fee based on the cost of necessary capital
improvements within that service area.
No changes were made to the service area structure and is illustrated in Figure 2‐1.
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
5‐3
Roadway Impact Fee Land Use Assumptions
Land use assumptions serve as the basis from which travel demands are developed over the
planning period. For this system update, service unit generation (future growth) was based on
the net population and employment growth as identified in the “Land Use Assumptions for
Impact Fees” report prepared by the City and discussed as part of Chapter 2.
For roadways, both population and employment data are necessary for the determination of
both residential and non‐residential traffic (vehicle‐miles) over the planning period. Derived
demographic data, in conjunction with service unit generation from the land use equivalency
table, formed the basis for ten‐year growth estimates. Table 5‐1 details the breakout of the
increase in Developed Acreages within the service area.
Table 5‐1 Increase in Developed Acreages for Years 2011 to 2021
Land Use Acres
Commercial
Commercial/Office/Retail 170
Freeway Commercial/Office/Retail 595
Light Industrial 209
Public Institutional 0
Residential
Residential High Density (16 units per acre) 0
Residential Medium Density (4 units per acre) 478
Residential Low Density (2 units per acre) 0
Parks and Open Space 279
Total 1,730
5.3 Establishment of the Roadway Capital Improvement Plan
Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code specifies the requirements necessary to
prepare a capital improvements plan. These requirements include:
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
5‐4
• A description of the existing capital improvements within the service area and the cost to
upgrade, update, improve, expand or replace the improvements to meet existing needs
and usage
• An analysis of the total capacity, the level of current usage, and commitments for usage of
capacity of the existing capital improvements
• A description of all or the parts of the capital improvements and their costs necessitated by
and attributable to new development in the service area based on approved land use
assumptions
• A definitive table establishing the specific level or quantity of use, consumption,
generation, or discharge of service unit for each category of capital improvements and an
equivalency table establishing the ratio of the service unit to various types of land uses,
including residential, office, retail/commercial, light industrial, and institutional.
• The total number of projected service units necessitated by and attributable to new
development within the service area based on the approved land use assumptions
• The projected demand for capital improvements required by the new service units
projected over a reasonable period of time
• A plan for awarding a credit for the portion of the ad valorem tax generated by new service
units during the program period that is used for the payment of improvements, or a credit
equal to 50 percent of the total projected cost of implementing the capital improvements
plan
The plan must contain two distinct components: analysis of existing conditions and analysis of
projected conditions. To analyze these components two measures of performance must be
established, they are: level‐of‐service and service units.
5.4 Roadway Level of Service
Level‐of‐Service (LOS) is a term used in traffic engineering to describe the performance of the
roadway system. Roadway level‐of‐service is the basic design criterion used in thoroughfare
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
5‐5
planning. The design level‐of‐service determines the capacity for which the roadway is
intended. Level‐of‐service is rated from “A” to “F”. The higher level of service (A‐B) provides
better driving conditions, but typically requires higher construction cost. Level of Service “E” is
considered to be the capacity limit of urban roadways. Level of Service “C/D” is the design
level‐of‐service selected for the Impact Fee Analysis for the City of Coppell. Table 5‐2 lists the
maximum service volumes for level‐of‐service “C/D” as a function of facility type.
Table 5‐2 Roadway Facility Vehicle‐Mile Capacities
Roadway Facility Roadway Type
Capacity “LOS C/D Vehicles per
hour per lane‐mile of Roadway
Facility(1)
Principal Arterial – Divided P6D 700
Divided Local Arterials C4D 625
Undivided Collector – 4 Lane C4U 440
Undivided Collector – 2 Lane C2U 350
(1) Hourly capacity for LOS “C/D” obtained from NCTCOG DFW Regional Travel Model and the Highway Capacity
Manual
5.5 Roadway Impact Fee Service Units
Service units establish a relationship between roadway projects and demand placed on the
street system by development, as well as the ability to calculate and assess impact fees for
specific development proposals. As defined, service unit means; “a standardized measure of
consumption, use, generation, or discharge attributable to an individual unit of development in
accordance with generally accepted engineering or planning standards for a particular category
of capital improvements or facility expansions."
To determine the roadway impact fee for a particular development, the service unit must
accurately identify the impact that the development will have on the major roadway system
(i.e., arterial and collector roads) serving the development. This impact is a combination of the
number of new trips generated by the development, the particular peaking characteristics of
the land‐use(s) within the development, and the length of each new trip on the transportation
system.
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
5‐6
The service unit must also reflect the capacity, which is provided by the roadway system, and
the demand placed on the system during the time in which peak, or design, conditions are
present on the system. Transportation facilities are designed and constructed to accommodate
volumes expected to occur during the peak hours (design hours). These volumes typically occur
during the peak hours as motorists travel to and from work.
The vehicle‐mile during the PM peak hour was retained as the service unit for impact fees in
Coppell. This service unit establishes a more precise measure of capacity, utilization and
intensity of land development through the use of published trip generation data. It also
recognizes legislative requirements with regards to trip length.
The PM peak hour is recommended as the time period for assessing impacts because the
greatest demand for roadway capacity occurs during this hour. Roadways are sized to meet
this demand, and roadway capacity is more accurately defined on an hourly basis. Traffic
volume data collected August 2011 at over 20 locations throughout the city confirmed the PM
peak hour as the highest period of use.
5.6 Roadway Existing Conditions Analysis
An accurate service unit is required to calculate and assess impact fees for new developments.
As defined in Chapter 395, “Service unit means a standardized measure of consumption, use,
generation, or discharge attributed to an individual unit of development calculated in
accordance with generally accepted engineering or planning standards, based on historical data
and trends applicable to the political subdivision in which the individual unit of development is
located during the previous 10 years.” In other words it is a measure of supply and demand.
The service unit must accurately reflect the supply, which is provided by the roadway system.
Transportation facilities are designed to accommodate peak hour traffic volumes because the
heaviest demand for the roadway capacity occurs during the peak hour. These peak hours
typically occur during the morning (AM peak) and evening (PM peak) rush hours as motorist
travel to and from work. The impact fee analysis for the City of Coppell was developed for PM
peak traffic volumes. For the supply side the unit of measurement is the service volume that is
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
5‐7
provided by a lane‐mile (lane‐miles) of roadway facility. This number is also the capacity of the
roadway based on an acceptable level‐of‐service; in this case that level‐of‐service is “C/D”.
The service unit must also reflect the demand that a particular development will place on the
transportation system. The impact the development has on the street system is directly related
to: the trips generated by development, land‐use for which the development is intended, and
the average length of each trip on the transportation system. For the demand side this unit is a
vehicle‐trip of one‐mile in length (vehicle‐miles).
Service units create a link between supply (roadway projects) and demand (new development).
Both supply and demand can be expressed as a combination of the number of vehicles traveling
during the peak hour and the distance traveled by these vehicles in miles. Thus, the Service
Unit for roadway impact fees is vehicle‐mile.
5.7 Existing Conditions Analysis
An inventory of major roadway facilities was conducted to determine existing conditions
throughout Coppell. This analysis determined the capacity provided by the existing roadway
system, the demand currently placed on the system, and the existence of any deficiencies on
the system. Data for the inventory was obtained from field reconnaissance, traffic volume
counts, the City Thoroughfare Plan and City Staff, and is detailed in Appendix C.
5.7.1 Existing Traffic Volumes
Existing directional PM peak hour volumes were obtained from automated traffic counts
collected by the City from their comprehensive traffic count program in November
2011. Automated traffic counts at 20 separate locations were collected on major
roadways (as identified in the Thoroughfare Plan as arterial or collector status)
throughout the city. In an effort to minimize the total number of counts, data was
collected at locations where traffic volumes would typify link volumes on the major
segments within the immediate area. For segments not counted, estimates were
developed based on peaking characteristics of area roadways or data from adjoining
roadway counts. This data was compiled for roadway segments throughout the city and
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
5‐8
entered into the database for use in calculations. A summary of volumes by roadway
segment is included in Appendix D as part of the existing capital improvements
database.
5.7.2 Vehicle‐Miles of Existing Capacity (Supply)
The vehicle‐miles of existing capacity for each counted roadway segment were obtained
using the equation below:
Vehicle–Miles of Capacity = Capacity per peak hour per lane x Number of lanes x Length
(miles)
Example: a 4‐lane divided roadway that is 2 miles in length and has a capacity of 625 vehicles
per hour per lane:
Vehicle–Miles of Capacity = 625 vehicles per hour x 4 lanes x 2 miles = 5,000 vehicle‐
miles per hour
This existing capacity is calculated for the service area and is not limited to only those
roadways identified in the impact fee capital improvements program. A summary of
existing capacity for the service area is illustrated in Table 5‐3. A complete detailed
listing by roadway segment is provided in Appendix D.
5.7.3 Vehicle‐Miles of Existing Demand
The vehicle‐miles of existing demand or the current usage of the facilities for each
roadway segment was obtained using the equation below:
Vehicle–Miles of Demand = PM peak hour volume x Length of Roadway (miles)
For example: a 3‐mile long roadway that has a PM peak hour traffic volume of 400 vehicles
per hour:
Vehicle–Miles of Demand = 400 vehicles per hour x 3 miles = 1,200 vehicle‐miles per hour
This existing demand is calculated for the service area and is not limited to only those
roadways identified in the impact fee capital improvements program. A summary of the
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
5‐9
existing demand for the service area is illustrated in Table 5‐3. A complete detailed
listing by roadway segment is provided in Appendix D.
Table 5‐3 Existing Excess Capacity and Demand
Service Area
Excess Capacity
(Peak Hour Veh‐Miles)
Demand
(Peak Hour Veh‐
Miles)
City 26,697 43,511
5.7.4 Vehicle‐Miles of Existing Excess Capacity or Deficiencies
From the calculation of vehicle‐miles of existing capacity and demand for each roadway
segment, the excess capacity or deficiencies for each direction can be determined. A
deficiency exists if a roadway is over capacity or has an hourly traffic volume that is
below its acceptable level‐of‐service in any direction of travel. If this is the case then the
deficiency is deducted from the available supply. A summary of existing excess capacity
and/or deficiencies for each service area is illustrated in Table 5‐4. A complete detailed
listing by roadway segment is provided in Appendix D. Roadways with deficiencies in
the City of Coppell are Parkway Boulevard, Sandy Lake Road, Bethel Road, Belt Line
Road, Freeport Parkway, Denton Tap Road, and MacArthur Boulevard.
Table 5‐4 Existing Excess Capacity and Deficiencies
Service Area
Excess Capacity
(Peak Hour Veh‐Miles)
Deficiencies
(Peak Hour Veh‐
Miles)
City 26,697 1,451
5.8 Calculating Impact Fees
Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code requires a description of all capital
improvements and their cost attributable to new development within the service area. To
determine the cost attributable to new development, the following information needs to be
calculated or supplied: future land use assumptions, vehicle‐miles of new demand, a capital
improvement plan, vehicle‐miles of new capacity supplied by the capital improvements plan
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
5‐10
and the costs for the roadway improvements. The recommended service unit for assessing
impact fees for the impact new development has on roadway facilities is a combination of the
trips generated (vehicles) by the new development during the peak hour and the average trip
length (miles) of each trip. The following section describes the methodology used in developing
service units for new developments.
5.8.1 Trip Generation
The trip generation rates are used to determine the number of vehicles added to the
roadway system as a result of new development. The trip generation rates were
developed for the PM peak weekday period. The trip generation rates were established
using the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual 8th edition.
Development units were chosen by size (e.g.: office building, retail, industrial), by
number of units (e.g.: residential, multifamily) and by the number of students (schools).
The following development units are typically used:
• Dwelling Units (DU) – Total number of habitable dwellings within the development.
This should not be mistaken as bedrooms. For example a single‐family residence is
one dwelling unit; a 50 unit apartment complex is 50 dwelling units.
• Gross Floor Area (GFA) – Total square feet of building floor area bounded by the
exterior boundary of outer building walls. Uncovered and outdoor patios are
excluded from GFA.
• Acres – The total number of acres included in the development.
• Students – The total number of students attending an institution.
Adjustments to the trip generation rates are necessary to reflect the differences
between driveway volumes and the total amount of traffic added to adjacent roadways.
The actual “traffic impact” of the new development is based only on the traffic added to
the adjacent roadways. The actual traffic added to the adjacent roadways is determined
by adjusting the driveway volumes to account for pass‐by trips, diverted trips, and
internal trips.
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
5‐11
• Pass‐by trips – are those trips attracted to a development from traffic that would
otherwise pass‐by the site on an adjacent roadway. For example, a stop at a
convenience store on the way from the office to home is a pass‐by trip for the
convenience store. The trip does not create an additional burden on the street
system and therefore should not be double‐counted. The burden of this type
should be assigned to the office and/or residence.
• Diverted trips – are those trips that are already on the roadway system and are
diverted to the roadway system serving the new development. For example, a trip
from home to work along Parkway Boulevard would be a diverted trip if the travel
path was changed to Sandy Lake Road the purposes of stopping at the dry cleaners.
On a system‐wide basis, this trip also does not add a significant additional burden
to the street system so it is not considered in assessing impact fees.
• Internal trips – are those that would typically be made in a mixed‐use development
between two uses within the development, not utilizing a thoroughfare outside the
development for that trip. For example, a trip between a shopping center and a
restaurant contained within the same site would be considered and internal trip,
and does not create any additional burden on the roadway system.
5.8.2 Trip Length
Trip lengths in miles will be used in conjunction with site trip generation to establish the
vehicle‐miles of travel, the service unit to be used for assessing impact fees. As with trip
generation, trip lengths are used in the development of travel forecasting models for
use in assessing roadway needs, as well as for assessing impact fees. As previously
stated, trip lengths are limited to six miles. Each trip has an origin and destination, half
of the trip length will be assigned to the origin and half of the trip length will be assigned
to the destination. Therefore, the average trip length for a development is half the total
trip length, allowing the maximum total trip length under state law to be six miles. The
trip length data used in this report was based on information generated in the 1984 and
1994 NCTCOG Workplace Survey and the 2001 National Household Travel Survey.
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
5‐12
5.8.3 Projected Growth and Vehicle‐Miles of New Demand
Project growth for roadway impact fees is represented by an increase in the vehicle‐
miles over a 10‐year period. The basis used to calculate the increase in vehicle‐miles is
population and employment projections that were prepared as part of the land use
assumptions detailed in the Section 2.0. The calculation for the increase in the vehicle‐
miles due to new development is made up of three components:
• Increase in the acreage for each land use for the 10‐year study period
• Trip generation rates for PM peak hour of adjacent street traffic (provided by the ITE
Trip Generation Manual, 8th edition)
• Average trip length (provided by NCTCOG 1984 and 1994 Workplace Survey and
2001 National Household Travel Survey)
A summary of the vehicle‐miles of new demand is illustrated in Table 5‐5. A complete
detailed listing by land use category is provided in Appendix E.
Table 5‐5 Projected Vehicle‐Miles of New Demand
Service Area Projected Vehicle‐Miles Of
New Demand
City 45,131
5.8.4 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP)
The capital improvements plan includes roadway improvements that are needed to
accommodate long‐term growth. The impact fee CIP can only contain roadways which
are included on the city’s official thoroughfare plan and are classified as arterial and
collector status streets. Freese and Nichols, along with City staff, evaluated roadway
projects for inclusion in the CIP based on: 1) future growth areas, 2) projected 10‐year
traffic demand, 3) ability to recoup roadway costs (cost share or previously constructed
roadways with excess capacity), 4) financial considerations, and 5) staff input. Chapter
395 also allows the City to include their share of the cost for state and federal highways
to also be included in this plan. At this time no state highways are included in the CIP.
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
5‐13
An assessment of the existing impact fee capital improvements plan was conducted to
ensure that excess capacity remains in the impact fee roadway projects. Using traffic
count data, a determination was that all projects within the Impact Fee CIP contain
excess capacity and can be retained in the program.
The projects included in the Impact Fee Roadway CIP are listed in Table 5‐6 and
illustrated in Figure 5‐1.
The following costs were included in the preparation of the 10‐year CIP program:
• Construction price
• Surveying and engineering fees
• Land acquisition costs
• Fees paid for the preparation of the capital improvements plan
• Projected interest charges and other finance costs
The total projected cost for the 10‐year impact fee CIP is $26,673,091 in 2011 dollars
($35,746,000 cost with financing). A detailed Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction
Cost for each roadway is provided in Appendix F. A summary of the cost for the impact fee
CIP are provided in Table 5‐6.
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
5‐14
Table 5‐6 Summary of Roadway Cost
RECOUPMENT PROJECTS
No. ROADWAY FROM TO COST COST w/
FINANCING
1(1) SANDY LAKE RD CITY LIMIT (WEST)N. COPPELL ROAD $4,697,908 $6,296,000
2(1) SANDY LAKE RD MACARTHUR BLVD. CITY LIMIT (EAST) $5,193,720 $6,960,000
3(1) BETHEL RD CITY LIMIT (WEST)FREEPORT PKWY.$7,280,321 $9,756,000
4(1) SOUTHWESTERN BLVD COPPELL ROAD GRAPEVINE CREEK $1,204,349 $1,614,000
5(1) MACARTHUR BLVD. BETHEL SCHOOL
ROAD
BELT LINE ROAD $325,394 $437,000
Total:$18,701,691 $25,063,000
EXPANSION PROJECTS
No. ROADWAY FROM TO COST COST w/
FINANCING
6(2) SANDY LAKE ROAD N. COPPELL ROAD GRAPEVINE CREEK $6,102,000 $8,177,000
7(3) FREEPORT PKWY SH 121 SANDY LAKE RD $881,800 $1,182,000
(4)
8(3) FREEPORT PKWY RUBY ROAD SANDY LAKE RD $987,600 $1,324,000(4)
Total:$7,971,400 $10,683,000
TOTAL ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS $26,673,091 $35,746,000
(1) Cost from City Contract Documents
(2) Engineer's Probable Construction Cost Estimates provided by the City
(3)Freese and Nichols Conceptual Level Cost Estimates
(4)City only responsible for 20% of Total Cost
§¨¦635State Hwy 121Sandy Lake Rd
Belt Line
R
dDenton Tap RdCoppell RdFreeport (State Rd)Royal LnFreeport PkwySouthwestern Blvd
Bethel Rd
Sandy Lake Rd State Hwy 121Belt Line RdParkway Blvd
MacA
r
t
h
u
r
B
l
v
d
Bethel School RdRoyal
¬«3
¬«8
¬«6
¬«2¬«8
¬«7
¬«5
¬«4
¬«1
³0 1,200 2,400
SCALE IN FEET
IMPACT FEE PROJECTS
Impact Fee Roadways
Recoupment Roadways
Coppell City Limits
FIGURE 5-1CITY OF COPPELLROADWAY IMPACT FEES
Created By Freese and Nichols, Inc.Job No.: CPL11254Location: H:\TRANSPORTATION\WORKING\RoadImpactFee_5-1_2012_01.mxdUpdated: Monday, January 23, 2012 2:09:06 PM
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
5‐16
5.8.5 Vehicle‐Miles of New Capacity Provided
The vehicle‐miles of capacity added are calculated in a similar manner as the vehicle‐
miles of existing capacity supplied.
Vehicle–Miles of New Capacity = Capacity per peak hour per lane x Number of
lanes x Length (miles)
The calculated capacity is for the new impact fee roadways. The vehicle‐miles of new
capacity supplied for each service area is provided in Table 5‐7. A complete detailed
listing by roadway segment is provided in Appendix G.
Table 5‐7 Projected Vehicle‐Miles of New Capacity (Supply)
Service Area Projected Vehicle‐Miles of
New Capacity (Supply)
City 17,491
5.8.6 Vehicle‐Miles of Existing Demand on Impact Fee CIP Roadways
The vehicle‐miles of existing demand on CIP roadways are provided in Table 5‐8. A
complete detailed listing by roadway segment is provided in Appendix G.
Table 5‐8 Vehicle‐Miles of Existing Demand on CIP Roadways
Service Area Vehicle‐Miles of Existing
Demand
City 6,732
5.8.7 Maximum Cost per Service Unit
The maximum cost per service unit is a calculation of the cost per service unit (dwelling,
1000 sq. ft GFA, acre) for a service area. This maximum cost per service area is the cost
of the CIP divided by the growth attributable to new development projected to occur
with a 10‐year period. Table 5‐9 illustrates these calculations for the roadway impact
fees. The maximum fee per service unit is calculated to be $619. The credited cost per
service unit is $309.
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
5‐17
Table 5‐9 Cost Per Service Unit Calculation
Line # Service Area
1 Total Veh‐Miles of Capacity Added by the CIP 17,491
(From Projected Veh‐Miles of New Capacity) (Table 5‐7)
2 Total Veh‐Miles of Existing Demand on CIP Roads 6,732
(From Veh‐Miles of Existing Demand on CIP Roadways)(Table 5‐8)
3 Total Veh‐Mile of Existing Deficiencies on Existing Roads 1,451
(From Excess Capacity and Deficiencies)(Table 5‐4)
4 Net Amount of Veh‐Mile Capacity Added 9,308
(Line #1‐Line #2‐Line #3)
5 Total Eligible Cost of CIP Within Service Area $35,746,000
(From Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Costs)(Table 5‐6)
6 Cost of Net Capacity Supplied $19,022,150
(Net of Capacity Added/Total of Capacity Added)*CIP Cost ‐(Line
#4/Line #1)*(Line #5)
7 Cost to Meet Existing Needs and Usage $16,723,850
(Total Cost of CIP‐Cost of Net Capacity Supplied) ‐Line #5‐Line #6
8 Total Veh‐Mile of New Demand Over 10 Years 45,131
(From Projected Vehicle‐Miles of New Demand)(Table 5‐5)
9 % of Capacity Added Attributed to New Growth 484.9%
(Total of New Demand/Net Amount of Capacity Added) ‐Line #8/Line
#4
10 If Line 8 > Line 4, Reduce Line 9 to 100% 100.0%
11 Cost of Capacity Added Attributed to New Growth $19,022,150
(Cost of Net Capacity Supplied * Cost Attributed to New Growth) ‐Line
#6*Line#10
12 Maximum Fee per Service Unit ‐Without Credit $421
(Cost of Net Capacity Attributed to New Growth/Total Veh‐Mile of New
Demand) ‐ Line #11/Line #8
13 Percent of Fee Recoverable 50%
14 Maximum Assessable Fee Per Service Unit $210
(Line #12*Line #13)
5.8.8 Land Use / Vehicle‐Mile Equivalency Table
A land use/vehicle‐mile equivalency table establishes the service unit rate for various land uses.
This table is a result of combining PM peak hour trip generation rates with average trip length
information for various land uses. These rates are based on an appropriate development unit
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
5‐18
for each land use. For example; office, retail, and light industrial, are based on development of
1,000 square feet of gross floor area, while single‐family and multi‐family residential is based on
dwelling units. The City of Coppell’s Land‐Use Vehicle Mile Equivalency Table is made up of five
main land uses with specific use categories, they are: residential, office, retail/commercial,
light industrial, and institutional. Table 5‐10 illustrates the total service units generated by the
various land uses. Appendix H provides the land‐uses used for this table.
Table 5‐10 Land‐Use Vehicle‐Mile Equivalency Table2
ITE Land Use Dev. Unit
Trip
Rate(1)
Trip
Length
Veh‐Mi Per
Dev Unit
Residential
Residential (Medium/Low) DU 1.01 4.20 4.24
Residential (High Density) DU 0.62 4.20 2.60
Others Not Specified DU 1.01 4.20 4.24
Office
General Office Building 1000 sq. ft.1.49 4.80 7.15
Medical / Dental Office 1000 sq. ft. 3.46 4.80 16.61
Others Not Specified 1000 sq. ft.1.49 4.80 7.15
Retail / Commercial
Shopping Center 1000 sq. ft.1.99 3.20 6.38
Home Improvement Superstore 1000 sq. ft. 1.12 1.95 2.19
Super market 1000 sq. ft.4.64 1.05 4.87
Restaurant 1000 sq. ft. 5.28 1.90 10.02
Fast food with drive thru 1000 sq. ft.15.36 2.15 33.02
Convenience Market with Gasoline Pumps Fuel Positions 5.32 0.90 4.79
Hotel Rooms 0.59 3.20 1.89
Bank with Drive Thru 1000 sq. ft. 10.13 1.25 12.66
Others Not Specified 1000 sq. ft.1.99 3.20 6.38
Light Industrial
General Light Industrial 1000 sq. ft.0.98 3.30 3.20
Industrial Park 1000 sq. ft. 0.86 3.30 2.84
Mini Warehouse (Self Storage) 1000 sq. ft.0.26 3.30 0.86
Others Not Specified 1000 sq. ft. 0.97 3.30 3.20
Institutional
Jr. / Community College Students 0.12 3.00 0.36
Private School (K‐8) Students 0.60 2.10 1.26
Day Care Center Students 0.82 2.10 1.72
Church 1000 sq. ft.0.55 1.45 0.80
Others Not Specified 1000 sq. ft. 0.55 1.45 0.80
(1) Average Trip Rate with Reductions
(2) If not specified in table, use ITE Trip Generation Manual 8th Edition
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
5‐19
5.9 Calculating Impact Fees
The calculation of the actual fee charged to development is a two‐part process as follows:
Part 1: Determine number of service units (vehicle‐miles) generated by the development using
the land‐use vehicle‐mile equivalency table.
No. of Development Units x Vehicle‐miles (Total Service Units) per development unit
= Development’s Vehicle‐miles
Part 2: Calculate the impact due by new development. This fee based on the cost per service
unit for the service area where the development is located.
Development’s Vehicle‐miles (from part 1) x Cost per vehicle‐mile (from CIP calculation)
= Impact Fee due from development
Examples: The following fee would be assessed to new developments which has a maximum
(Assessable) fee per service unit of $210.
A. Single‐Family Dwelling
(1 dwelling unit x 4.24 vehicle‐miles) / 1 dwelling unit = 4.24 vehicle‐miles
4.24 Vehicle‐miles x $210 / vehicle‐mile = $890
B. 10,000 square foot (s.f.) General Office Building
(10,000 s.f. x 7.15 vehicles‐miles)/1000 s.f. units = 71.50 vehicle‐miles
71.50 vehicle‐miles x $210 / vehicle‐mile = $15,015
C. 60,000 s.f. Retail Shopping Center
(60,000 s.f. x 6.38 vehicle‐miles)/ 1,000 s.f. units = 382.80 vehicle‐miles
475.20 vehicle‐miles x $210/vehicle‐mile = $99,792
D. 100,000 s.f. Light Industrial Development
(100,000 s.f. x 3.20 vehicle‐miles)/ 1,000 s.f. units =320 vehicle‐miles
323 vehicle‐miles x $210/ vehicle‐mile = $67,830
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
5‐20
E. 4,000 Student Junior/Community College
(4,000 Students. x 0.36vehicle‐miles)/ 1 Student = 1,440 vehicle‐miles
1,440 vehicle‐miles x $210/ vehicle‐mile = $302,400
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
Appendix A
Water System Project Cost Estimates
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
Construction Project Number 1
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1 20" Pipe 4,618 LF $120 554,208
2 30" Boring and Casing 200 LF $465 93,000
3 Pavement Repair 3,500 LF $50 175,000
SUBTOTAL: $822,210
CONTINGENCY 20% $164,450
SUBTOTAL: $986,660
ENG/SURVEY 15% $148,000
SUBTOTAL: $1,134,660
PROJECT TOTAL $1,134,660
City of the Coppell
Water CIP
Project Description
20-inch water line from Southwestern EST
Detailed Description
Replacement of existing 12-inch with a 20-inch water line from the Southwestern Elevated Storage Tank
UPDATE
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
Appendix B
Impact Fee Comparison
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report City of Coppell Water and Wastewater Impact Fee per Service Unit Comparison
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report City of Coppell Water, Wastewater, and Roadway Impact Fee per Single Family Home Comparison
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
Appendix C
Existing Roadway Inventory
Street From To Length Pavement No. of Traffic Volume Traffic Volume TDP Config(FT) Type Lanes (PM) N/E (PM) S/WPARKWAY BLVDCOPPELL ROAD DENTON TAP ROAD 6210 CONC 4D 254 266 C4DPARKWAY BLVDDENTON TAP ROAD MOORE ROAD 5400 CONC 4D 521 290 C4DPARKWAY BLVDMOORE ROAD SAMUEL BLVD. 1650 CONC 2U 521 290 C2UPARKWAY BLVDSAMUEL BLVD. MACARTHUR BLVD. 3550 CONC 4U 521 290 C4USANDY LAKE ROADCITY LIMIT (WEST) COPPELL ROAD 4980 CONC 4D 312 465 C4D/6SANDY LAKE ROADCOPPELL ROAD DENTON TAP ROAD 5870 CONC 4D 645 682 C2USANDY LAKE ROADDENTON TAP ROAD MACARTHUR BLVD. 10330 CONC 4D 842 903 C4DSANDY LAKE ROADMACARTHUR BLVD. CITY LIMIT (EAST) 4920 CONC 4D 565 1,401 C4D/6BETHEL ROADCITY LIMIT (WEST) FREEPORT PKWY. 6430 CONC 4D 373 328 C2UBETHEL ROADFREEPORT PKWY. DENTON TAP ROAD 5310 ASP 2U 383 345 C2USOUTHWESTERN BLVDFREEPORT PKWY. COPPELL ROAD 1790 CONC 2U 197 154 C4USOUTHWESTERN BLVDCOPPELL ROAD DENTON TAP ROAD 3610 CONC 2U 197 154 C2UBELT LINE ROADCITY LIMIT (SOUTH) SOUTHWESTERN BLVD. 8450 CONC 6D 2281 1175 P6DBELT LINE ROADSOUTHWESTERN BLVD. MACARTHUR BLVD. 12090 CONC 4D 980 633 P6DBELT LINE ROADMACARTHUR BLVD. CITY LIMIT (EAST) 5810 CONC 6D 1031 1320 P6DROYAL LANECITY LIMIT (SOUTH) BETHEL ROAD 2990 CONC 4D 617 560 C4DROYAL LANEBETHEL ROAD SANDY LAKE ROAD 6140 CONC 4D 443 399 C4D/6FREEPORT PKWYIH-635 BETHEL ROAD 6740 CONC 4D 531 1197 C4D/6FREEPORT PKWYBETHEL ROAD RUBY ROAD 3220 CONC 4D 342 152 C4D/6FREEPORT PKWYRUBY ROAD SANDY LAKE ROAD 3940 A/C 2U 758 128 C2UCOPPELL ROADSOUTHWESTERN BLVD. BETHEL ROAD 2140 ASP 2U 202 170 C2UCOPPELL ROADBETHEL ROAD SANDY LAKE ROAD 5360 ASP 2U 202 170 C2UDENTON TAP ROADSOUTHWESTERN BLVD. SANDY LAKE ROAD 7860 CONC 6D 2315 847 P6DDENTON TAP ROADSANDY LAKE ROAD CITY LIMIT (NORTH) 6020 CONC 6D 2162 1100 P6DMACARTHUR BLVDBELT LINE ROAD N. OF RIVERCHASE 1565 CONC 6D 1,419 745 C4DMACARTHUR BLVDN. OF RIVERCHASE SANDY LAKE ROAD 4940 CONC 4D 1,419 745 C4DMACARTHUR BLVDSANDY LAKE ROAD CITY LIMIT (NORTH) 10000 CONC 4D 1,293 623 C4DCoppell Roadway Impact Fees 2011Existing Roadway Inventory
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
Appendix D
Existing Roadway Capacity, Demand, Excess
Capacity and Deficiencies
Length Length Lanes Type Veh-MiRoadway From To (Feet) (Miles) Capacity Total % in Directional Veh-Mi Veh-Mi Veh-Mi Veh-Mi Excess Excess Total Excess Excess Excess Total A B Volume Service Supply Total Direction A Direction B Total Capacity Capacity Capcity Deficiencies Deficiencies DeficienciesPk-Hr Northbound Southbound Area Supply Demand Demand Demand Direction A Direction B Peak-Hour Direction A Direction B Peak-HourPer lane Eastbound Westbound Peak-Hour Peak-Hour Peak-Hour Peak-Hour Peak-Hour Veh-Mi Veh-Mi Veh-Mi veh-Mi veh-Mi veh-MiPARKWAY BLVDCOPPELL ROAD DENTON TAP ROAD 6210 1.18 4 C4D 625254 266520 100% 1470 2,940 299 313 612 1,171 1,157 2,329 0 0 0PARKWAY BLVDDENTON TAP ROAD MOORE ROAD 5400 1.02 4 C4D 625521 290811 100% 1278 2,557 533 297 829 746 982 1,727 0 0 0PARKWAY BLVDMOORE ROAD SAMUEL BLVD. 1650 0.31 2 C2U 350521 290811 100% 109 219 163 91 253 0 19 19 -53 0 -53PARKWAY BLVDSAMUEL BLVD. MACARTHUR BLVD. 3550 0.67 4 C4U 440521 290811 100% 592 1,183 350 195 545 241 397 638 0 0 0SANDY LAKE ROADCITY LIMIT (WEST) COPPELL ROAD 4980 0.94 4 C4D 625312 465777 100% 1179 2,358 294 439 733 885 740 1,625 0 0 0SANDY LAKE ROADCOPPELL ROAD DENTON TAP ROAD 5870 1.11 4 C2U 350645 6821,327 100% 778 1,556 717 758 1,475 61 20 81 0 0 0SANDY LAKE ROADDENTON TAP ROAD MACARTHUR BLVD. 10330 1.96 4 C4D 625842 9031,745 100% 2446 4,891 1,647 1,767 3,414 798 679 1,477 0 0 0SANDY LAKE ROADMACARTHUR BLVD. CITY LIMIT (EAST) 4920 0.93 4 C4D 625565 1,4011,966 100% 1165 2,330 526 1,305 1,832 638 0 638 0 -141 -141BETHEL ROADCITY LIMIT (WEST) FREEPORT PKWY. 6430 1.22 4 C2U 350373 328700 100% 852 1,705 454 399 853 399 454 852 0 0 0BETHEL ROADFREEPORT PKWY. DENTON TAP ROAD 5310 1.01 2 C2U 350383 345727 100% 352 704 385 346 731 0 6 6 -33 0 -33SOUTHWESTERN BLVDFREEPORT PKWY. COPPELL ROAD 1790 0.34 2 C4U 440197 154351 100% 149 298 67 52 119 82 97 179 0 0 0SOUTHWESTERN BLVDCOPPELL ROAD DENTON TAP ROAD 3610 0.68 2 C2U 350197 154351 100% 239 479 135 105 240 105 134 239 0 0 0BELT LINE ROADCITY LIMIT (SOUTH) SOUTHWESTERN BLVD. 8450 1.60 6 P6D 7002,281 1,1753,456 100% 3361 6,722 3,650 1,880 5,531 0 1,480 1,480 -290 0 -290BELT LINE ROADSOUTHWESTERN BLVD. MACARTHUR BLVD. 12090 2.29 4 P6D 700980 6331,613 43% 3206 6,411 2,244 1,449 3,693 962 1,756 2,718 0 0 0BELT LINE ROADMACARTHUR BLVD. CITY LIMIT (EAST) 5810 1.10 6 P6D 7001,031 1,3202,351 100% 2311 4,622 1,134 1,453 2,587 1,176 858 2,035 0 0 0ROYAL LANECITY LIMIT (SOUTH) BETHEL ROAD 2990 0.57 4 C4D 625617 5601,176 100% 708 1,416 349 317 666 359 391 750 0 0 0ROYAL LANEBETHEL ROAD SANDY LAKE ROAD 6140 1.16 4 C4D 625443 399842 100% 1454 2,907 515 464 979 938 990 1,928 0 0 0FREEPORT PKWYIH-635 BETHEL ROAD 6740 1.28 4 C4D 625531 1,1971,728 100% 1596 3,191 678 1,528 2,206 918 68 985 0 0 0FREEPORT PKWYBETHEL ROAD RUBY ROAD 3220 0.61 4 C4D 625342 152493 100% 762 1,525 208 93 301 554 670 1,224 0 0 0FREEPORT PKWYRUBY ROAD SANDY LAKE ROAD 3940 0.75 2 C2U 350758 128886 100% 261 522 566 96 661 0 166 166 -304 0 -304COPPELL ROADSOUTHWESTERN BLVD. BETHEL ROAD 2140 0.41 2 C2U 350202 170372 100% 142 284 82 69 151 60 73 133 0 0 0COPPELL ROADBETHEL ROAD SANDY LAKE ROAD 5360 1.02 2 C2U 350202 170372 100% 355 711 205 173 378 150 183 333 0 0 0DENTON TAP ROADSOUTHWESTERN BLVD. SANDY LAKE ROAD 7860 1.49 6 P6D 7002,315 8473,162 100% 3126 6,252 3,446 1,261 4,707 0 1,865 1,865 -320 0 -320DENTON TAP ROADSANDY LAKE ROAD CITY LIMIT (NORTH) 6020 1.14 6 P6D 7002,162 1,1003,262 100% 2394 4,789 2,465 1,254 3,719 0 1,140 1,140 -71 0 -71MACARTHUR BLVD.BELT LINE ROAD N. OF RIVERCHASE 1565 0.30 6 C4D 6251,419 7452,164 100% 556 1,112 421 221 641 135 335 470 0 0 0MACARTHUR BLVD.N. OF RIVERCHASE SANDY LAKE ROAD 4940 0.94 4 C4D 6251,419 7452,164 100% 1170 2,339 1,328 697 2,025 0 472 472 -158 0 -158MACARTHUR BLVDSANDY LAKE ROAD CITY LIMIT (NORTH) 10000 1.89 4 C4D 6251,293 6231,916 100% 2367 4,735 2,449 1,180 3,629 0 1,188 1,188 -81 0 -81Subtotal27.9068,756 25,310 18,200 43,511 10,378 16,319 26,697 -1,311 -141 -1,451Traffic counts conducted in August 2011Hourly Vehicle-MileCapacity per LaneMile of Roadway Facility Roadway Facility Type Designation for LOS "C/D"Principal Arterial - Divided P6D 700Divided Local Arterials C4D 625Undivided Collectors - 4 lane C4U 440Undivided Collectors - 2 Lane C2U 350DirectionCoppell Roadway Impact Fees 2011Existing Roadway Capacity, Demand, Excess Capacity and Deficiencies PM Peak-Hour VolumeFreese and Nichols, Inc. 4055 International Plaza, Ste. 200Fort Worth, Texas 76109-4895
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
Appendix E
Projected Vehicle‐Miles of New Demand
Year 2011
TOTAL SERVICE UNITS1 Unit of Trip No. of
Land Use (Veh-Mi/Dev Unit) Generation Units per
Acre2 Acres Veh-Mile3
Commercial
Commercial/Office/Retail 5.13 1000 sq.ft. GFA 10.89 309 17,282
4Freeway Commercial/Office/Retail 5.13 1000 sq.ft. GFA 10.89 94 3,157
*Light Industrial 2.55 1000 sq.ft. GFA 15.24 1,369 53,138
Public Institutional 1.72 1000 sq.ft. GFA 15.24 497 13,063
Residential
Residential High Density 2.60 DU 16 181 7,521
Residential Medium Density 3.90 DU 4 34 535
Residential Low Density 3.90 DU 2 2,755 21,506
Parks and Open Space 0.38 Acres 1 905 340
Total 6,144 116,541
* Assumed 77% of the existing developed non-residential is industrial
Year 2021
TOTAL SERVICE UNITS1 Unit of Trip No. of
Land Use (Veh-Mi/Dev Unit) Generation Units per
Acre2 Acres Veh-Mile3
Commercial
Commercial/Office/Retail 5.13 1000 sq.ft. GFA 10.89 480 26,781
4Freeway Commercial/Office/Retail 5.13 1000 sq.ft. GFA 10.89 689 23,085
Light Industrial 2.55 1000 sq.ft. GFA 15.24 1,578 61,267
Public Institutional 1.72 1000 sq.ft. GFA 15.24 497 13,074
Residential
Residential High Density 2.60 DU 16 181 7,521
Residential Medium Density 3.90 DU 4 512 7,993
Residential Low Density 3.90 DU 2 2,756 21,509
Parks and Open Space 0.38 Acres 1 1,183 445
Total 7,875 161,674
Difference 2011-2021
TOTAL SERVICE UNITS1 Unit of Trip No. of
Land Use (Veh-Mi/Dev Unit) Generation Units per
Acre2 Acres Veh-Mile3
Commercial
Commercial/Office/Retail 5.13 1000 sq.ft. GFA 10.89 170 9,499
4Freeway Commercial/Office/Retail 5.13 1000 sq.ft. GFA 10.89 595 19,929
Light Industrial 2.55 1000 sq.ft. GFA 15.24 209 8,129
Public Institutional 1.72 1000 sq.ft. GFA 15.24 011
Residential
Residential High Density 2.60 DU 16 00
Residential Medium Density 3.90 DU 4 478 7,458
Residential Low Density 3.90 DU 2 00
Parks and Open Space 0.38 Acres 1 279 105
Total 1,732 45,131
ACRES TO UNIT OF TRIP GENERATION CONVERSION FACTORS
Number of Dwelling Units per Acre Notes:
(High Density) 16 units per acre
1 See Average Land Use Trip Calculations
2 See Trip Generation Conversion Factors
Number of Dwelling Units per Acre 3 Calculated by multiplying the Total Service Units by the No. of units
(Medium Density) 4 units per acre per Acres by the Acres provided in the land use assumptions
4 Reduce the Freeway Commercial/Office/Retail by 40%.
Number of Dwelling Units per Acre The 40% represents the number of trips added to the
(Low Density) 2 units per acre Freeway system and not the Coppell Roadway System
Gross Floor Area per Acre
(Commercial) 25% coverage 10.89* sq ft per acre
Gross Floor Area per Acre
(Light Industrial) 35% coverage 15.24* sq ft per acre
Gross Floor Area per Acre
(Public Institutional) 35% coverage 15.24* sq ft per acre
*all #'s are for 1,000 square feet
INCREASE IN VEH-MILES
Projected Vehicle Miles of New Demand
YEAR 2011 (EXISTING)
YEAR 2021 (PROJECTED)
Freese and Nichols, Inc. 4055 International Plaza, Ste. 200
Fort Worth, Texas 76109-4895
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
Appendix F
Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction
Cost
OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST
SCHEMATIC DESIGN PHASE
TEAGUE NALL AND PERKINS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
CLIENT: CITY OF COPPELL
DESCRIPTION: WEST SANDY LAKE ROAD - PHASE II
(COPPELL ROAD NORTH TO DENTON TAP ROAD)
DATE: APRIL 2004
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL
PAVING IMPROVEMENTS
1 RIGHT-OF-WAY PREPARATION 7820 STA $25.00 $195,500
2 MOBILIZATION 1 LS $200,000.00 $200,000
3 CONCRETE REMOVAL 5000 SY $5.00 $25,000
4 HMAC REMOVAL 17100 SY $5.00 $85,500
5 UNCLASSIFIED STREET EXCAVATION 50000 CY $6.00 $300,000
6 8" CEMENT STABLIZED SUBGRADE 44000 SY $1.85 $81,400
7 CEMENT STABLIZATION (42#/SY) 924 TON $85.00 $78,540
8 8" REINFORCED CONCRETE PAVEMENT 42400 SY $27.50 $1,166,000
9 8" ENHANCED PAVEMENT 1500 SY $100.00 $150,000
10 REMOVE 6" HMAC PAVEMENT TRANSITION 1450 SY $5.00 $7,250
11 STEPPED BLOCK RETAINING WALLS 750 SF $25.00 $18,750
12 6" REINFORCED CONCRETE DRIVEWAY 800 SY $30.00 $24,000
13 PVC CONDUIT 5800 LF $10.00 $58,000
14 PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGNAGE 1 LS $80,000.00 $80,000
15 BARRICADES, SIGNS & TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LS $200,000.00 $200,000
16 EROSION CONTROL 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000
17 10' BIKE PATH 53100 SF $3.50 $185,850
18 5' SIDEWALK 25650 SF $3.00 $76,950
19 STREET LIGHT FOUNDATION 60 EA $2,000.00 $120,000
20 RESTORE PARKWAYS 7820 STA $20.00 $156,400
21 RESTORE/RECONSTRUCT EXISTING IRRIGATION 1 LS $30,000.00 $30,000
SUBTOTAL PAVING $3,289,140
BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS
1 DEMO EXISTING BRIDGE 1 EA $35,000.00 $35,000
2 FLEXIBLE BASE 280 CY $50.00 $14,000
3 18" DRILL PIERS 152 LF $60.00 $9,120
4 30" DRILLED PIERS 375 LF $90.00 $33,750
5 CONCRETE ABUTMENTS 105 CY $550.00 $57,750
6 CONCRETE BENTS 83 CY $600.00 $49,800
7 8" THICK BRIDGE DECK 13004 SF $12.00 $156,048
8 EXPOXY WATERPROOFING 3650 SF $1.00 $3,650
9 CONCRETE SURFACE TREATMENT 12716 SF $1.50 $19,074
10 TYPE C PRESTRESSED CONCRETE GIRDERS 1581 LF $70.00 $110,670
11 CONCRETRE RIP-RAP 175 CY $250.00 $43,750
12 STRUCTURAL STEEL - ARMOR JOINT 6400 LB $4.00 $25,600
13 SPECIAL TRAFFIC / PEDESTRIAN RAIL 193 LF $125.00 $24,125
14 SPECIAL TRAFFIC / BICYCLE RAIL 386 LF $140.00 $54,040
15 CONCRETE APPROACH SLABS 144 CY $250.00 $36,000
16 METAL BEAM GUARD FENCE 400 LF $25.00 $10,000
17 ELECTRICAL CONDUIT 880 LF $3.00 $2,640
18 LIGHT STANDARDS 4 EA $1,500.00 $6,000
19 ENHANCED PAVEMENT 2175 SF $5.00 $10,875
SUBTOTAL BRIDGE $701,892
WATER IMPROVEMENTS
1 RELOCATE / ADJUST 24" WATER LINE 700 LF $150.00 $105,000
2 RELOCATE MISC. WATER (HYDRANTS, VALVES, ETC) 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000
SUBTOTAL WATER $155,000
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
1 8" SS LINE 230 LF $100.00 $23,000
2 ADJUST MH & MISC. 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000
SUBTOTAL SANITARY SEWER $33,000
UTILITY ADJUSTMENTS
1 RELOCATE TXU OVERHEAD TRASMISSION POLES 4 EA $10,000.00 $40,000
SUBTOTAL UTILITY ADJUSTMENT $40,000
STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS
1 DEMO RCP STORM DRAIN 849 LF $7.50 $6,368
2 DEMO HEADWALLS 6 EA $500.00 $3,000
3 CONNECT TO EXISTING RCP 7 EA $400.00 $2,800
4 CONNECT TO EXISTING 10x8 RCB 1 EA $1,500.00 $1,500
5 5'X3' RCB 385 LF $215.00 $82,775
6 6'X3' RCB 190 LF $225.00 $42,750
7 6'X4' RCB 440 LF $230.00 $101,200
8 9'X6' RCB 130 LF $300.00 $39,000
9 10'X8' RCB 50 LF $360.00 $18,000
10 48" CLASS III RCP 240 LF $100.00 $24,000
11 42" CLASS III RCP 110 LF $95.00 $10,450
12 39" CLASS III RCP 85 LF $90.00 $7,650
13 36" CLASS III RCP 440 LF $70.00 $30,800
14 33" CLASS III RCP 275 LF $65.00 $17,875
15 30" CLASS III RCP 185 LF $60.00 $11,100
16 27" CLASS III RCP 50 LF $55.00 $2,750
17 24" CLASS III RCP 665 LF $50.00 $33,250
18 21" CLASS III RCP 455 LF $45.00 $20,475
19 18" CLASS III RCP 900 LF $40.00 $36,000
20 10' RECESSED CURB INLET 6 EA $2,500.00 $15,000
21 12' RECESSED CURB INLET 5 EA $2,750.00 $13,750
22 14' RECESSED CURB INLET 5 EA $3,000.00 $15,000
23 20' RECESSED CURB INLET 5 EA $3,500.00 $17,500
24 4' COMBINATION INLET 1 EA $2,500.00 $2,500
25 6x6 DROP INLET 1 EA $5,000.00 $5,000
26 6' SQUARE MANHOLE 2 EA $5,000.00 $10,000
27 5' SQUARE MANHOLE 1 EA $4,000.00 $4,000
28 4' SQUARE MANHOLE 7 EA $3,000.00 $21,000
29 TRENCH SAFETY 4600 LF $2.00 $9,200
30 WINGWALL FOR MBC 9x6 1 EA $10,000.00 $10,000
SUBTOTAL DRAINAGE $614,693
TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT
1 SIGNALIZATION FOR 2 INTERSECTIONS 1 LS $155,000.00 $155,000
SUBTOTAL SIGNALIZATION $155,000
LANDSCAPING / IRRIGATION
1 WEST SANDY LAKE ROAD 1 LS $500,000.00 $500,000
2 404 MITIGATION 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000
SUBTOTAL LANDSCAPING $550,000
OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST
SCHEMATIC DESIGN PHASE
TEAGUE NALL AND PERKINS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
CLIENT: CITY OF COPPELL
DESCRIPTION: WEST SANDY LAKE ROAD - PHASE II
(COPPELL ROAD NORTH TO DENTON TAP ROAD)
DATE: APRIL 2004
COST OPINION SUMMARY-PHASE II
I PAVING IMPROVEMENTS $3,289,140
II BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS $701,892
III WATER IMPROVEMENTS $155,000
IV SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS $33,000
V UTILITY ADJUSTMENTS $40,000
VI STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS $614,693
VII TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS $155,000
VIII LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS $550,000
SUBTOTAL $5,538,725
CONTINGENCY (10%) $553,870
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $6,093,000
FLOODPLAIN/ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION FEES $9,000
PROJECT TOTAL $6,102,000
Roadway Description:Quantity Unit
Roadway Length 3,400 LF
Right-of-Way Width 110 FT
Roadway Width (BOC - BOC) 66 FT
Undivided Roadway = 1 , Divided Roadway = 2 2
Item No. Item Description
Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Cost
1 Mobilization (5% of Construction Cost) 1 LS $100,000.00 $100,000
2 Right of Way Preparation 10 ACRE $2,000.00 $20,000
3 Unclassified Street Excavation or Embankment 8,400 CY $10.00 $84,000
4 8" Reinforced Concrete Pavement 27,500 SY $28.00 $770,000
5 8" Lime or Cement Stabilized Subgrade 28,300 SY $4.00 $113,200
6 Lime or Cement for Stabilization (40lbs/SY) 600 TON $100.00 $60,000
7 6" Monolithic Curb 15,000 LF $5.00 $75,000
8 Sidewalk and Ramps 34,000 SF $4.00 $136,000
9 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 1 LS $251,640.00 $251,640
10 Traffic Signals 1 LS $120,000.00 $120,000
11 Hydromulching 13,600 SY $1.00 $13,600
12 Top Soil 13,600 SY $2.00 $27,200
13 Pavement Markings & Signage 13,600 LF $1.00 $13,600
14 Traffic Control 1 LS $33,000.00 $33,000
15 Erosion Control 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000
16 Landscaping and Irrigation 1 LS $65,000.00 $65,000
17 Lighting (Foundations, Poles, Conduit, Conductors) 30 EA $4,000.00 $120,000
Subtotal Construction Cost Estimate $2,022,300
Contingency 20% $404,500
Total Construction Cost Estimate $2,426,800
Right-of-Way Cost 374,000 SF $4.00 $1,496,000.00
Engineering Services (15% of Construction Cost) 15.0%$364,100.00
Surveying Services (3% of Construction Cost)3.0%$72,900.00
Geotechnical Services (1% of Construction Cost) 1.0%$24,300.00
Testing (1% of Construction Cost) 1.0%$24,300.00
*Total Capital Cost (Based on Unit Prices for Nov. 2011) $4,409,000.00
*Total Capital Cost Per Foot $1,300.00
*Future Capital Cost (Based on 3% Inflation for 10 years) $5,926,000.00
*This estimate does not include Legal, Administration, or Financial Cost
Note: The city is only responsible for 20% of cost
6-Lane Divided Principal Arterial from SH 121
to Sandy Lake Road
Date Performed: 11/28/11
City of Coppell, Texas
Conceptual Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate
Freeport Parkway
Project Summary:
Roadway Description:Quantity Unit
Roadway Length 4,050 LF
Right-of-Way Width 95 FT
Roadway Width (BOC - BOC) 50 FT
Undivided Roadway = 1 , Divided Roadway = 2 2
Item No. Item Description
Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Cost
1 Mobilization (5% of Construction Cost) 1 LS $160,000.00 $160,000
2 Right of Way Preparation 10 ACRE $2,000.00 $20,000
3 Pavement Removal 12,400 SY $8.00 $99,200
4 Unclassified Street Excavation or Embankment 7,500 CY $10.00 $75,000
5 8" Reinforced Concrete Pavement 24,800 SY $28.00 $694,400
6 8" Lime or Cement Stabilized Subgrade 25,800 SY $4.00 $103,200
7 Lime or Cement for Stabilization (40lbs/SY) 600 TON $100.00 $60,000
8 6" Monolithic Curb 17,900 LF $5.00 $89,500
9 Sidewalk and Ramps 40,500 SF $4.00 $162,000
10 Bridge 1 LS $1,300,000.00 $1,300,000
11 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 1 LS $261,000.00 $261,000
12 Traffic Signals 1 LS $120,000.00 $120,000
13 Hydromulching 16,700 SY $1.00 $16,700
14 Top Soil 16,700 SY $2.00 $33,400
15 Pavement Markings & Signage 16,200 LF $1.00 $16,200
16 Traffic Control 1 LS $39,000.00 $39,000
17 Erosion Control 1 LS $24,000.00 $24,000
18 Landscaping and Irrigation 1 LS $30,000.00 $30,000
19 Lighting (Foundations, Poles, Conduit, Conductors) 0 EA $4,000.00 $0
Subtotal Construction Cost Estimate $3,303,600
Contingency 20% $660,800
Total Construction Cost Estimate $3,964,400
Right-of-Way Cost 45,000 SF $4.00 $180,000.00
Engineering Services (15% of Construction Cost) 15.0%$594,700.00
Surveying Services (3% of Construction Cost)3.0%$119,000.00
Geotechnical Services (1% of Construction Cost) 1.0%$39,700.00
Testing (1% of Construction Cost) 1.0%$39,700.00
*Total Capital Cost (Based on Unit Prices for Nov. 2011) $4,938,000.00
*Total Capital Cost Per Foot $1,220.00
*Future Capital Cost (Based on 3% Inflation for 10 years) $6,637,000.00
*This estimate does not include Legal, Administration, or Financial Cost
Note: The city is only responsible for 20% of cost
4-Lane Divided Local Arterial from Ruby Rd
to Sandy Lake Rd
Date Performed: 11/28/11
City of Coppell, Texas
Conceptual Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate
Freeport Parkway
Project Summary:
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
Appendix G
Roadway Improvements Plan Project CIP
Service Units of Supply
Length Length Lanes Type Veh-MiProject Roadway From To (Feet) (Mile) Capacity % in Veh-Mi Veh-Mi Excess Total TotalPk-Hr A B Service Total Total Capacity Project Project Per lane Northbound Southbound Area Supply Demand Peak-Hour Cost CostEastbound Westbound Peak-Hour Peak-Hour Veh-Mi w/ FinancingRECOUPEMENT PROJECTS1* SANDY LAKE ROAD CITY LIMIT (WEST) COPPELL ROAD 4980 0.94 4 C4D 625 312 465 100% 2,358 733 1,625 $4,697,908 $6,296,0002* SANDY LAKE ROAD MACARTHUR BLVD CITY LIMIT (EAST) 4920 0.93 4 C4D 625 565 1,401 100% 2,330 1,832 498 $5,193,720 $6,960,0003* BETHEL ROAD CITY LIMIT (WEST) FREEPORT PKWY 6430 1.22 4 C4D 625 373 328 100% 3,045 853 2,192 $7,280,321 $9,756,0004* SOUTHWESTERN BLVD COPPELL ROAD DENTON TAP ROAD 1500 0.28 4 C4U 440 197 154 100% 500 100 400 $1,204,349 $1,614,0005* MACARTHUR BLVD. BETHEL SCHOOL ROAD BELT LINE ROAD 2630 0.50 6 P6D 700 1,419 745 100% 2,092 1,078 1,014 $325,394 $437,000EXPANSION PROJECTS6* SANDY LAKE ROAD COPPELL ROAD DENTON TAP ROAD 5870 1.11 4 C4D 625 645 682 100% 2,779 1,475 1,304 $6,102,000 $8,177,0007** FREEPORT PKWY SH 121 SANDY LAKE ROAD 3170 0.60 6 P6D 700 0 0 100% 2,522 0 2,522 $881,800 $1,182,0008** FREEPORT PKWY RUBY ROAD SANDY LAKE ROAD 3940 0.75 4 C4D 625 758 128 100% 1,866 661 1,204 $987,600 $1,324,000Subtotal6.33 17,491 6,732 10,759 $26,673,091 $35,746,000Hourly Vehicle-MileCapacity per LaneMile of Roadway Facility Roadway Facility Type Designation for LOS "C/D"Principal Arterial - Divided P6D 700Divided Local Arterials C4D 625Undivided Collectors - 4 lane C4U 440Undivided Collectors - 2 Lane C2U 350 PM Peak-Hour VolumeDirectionCoppell Roadway Impact Fee - 2011Roadway Improvements Plan ProjectCIP Service Units of Supply
Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee Report
City of Coppell
Appendix H
Land Use Vehicle‐Mile Equivalency Table
LAND USE ITE Land Use1ITE Land Use Development Trip Generation No. of Pass By Diverted Average Average Land Use Trip NCTCOG5 1/2 Trip Average Total Service UnitsCode UnitRate2StudiesRate3Trips4Trip Rate Rate with deductions Trip Length LengthTrip Length6(Veh-Mi/Dev Unit)7Commercial / Office / RetailGeneral Office 710 1000 sq. ft. 1.49 235 0 0 9.60 4.80Medical-Dental Office 720 1000 sq. ft. 3.46 43 0 0 9.60 4.80Electronic Superstore 863 1000 sq. ft. 4.5 3 0.4 0.33 3.90 1.95Pharmacy with drive thru 881 1000 sq. ft. 10.35 19 0.49 0.13 1.50 0.75Toy Superstore 864 1000 sq. ft. 4.99 2 0 0 4.30 2.15Specialty Retail Center 814 1000 sq. ft. 2.71 5 0 0 3.10 1.55Free standing Discount Superstore 813 1000 sq. ft. 4.61 64 0.28 0 3.80 1.90Apparel Store 876 1000 sq. ft. 3.83 7 0 0 3.10 1.55Resturant 932 1000 sq. ft. 11.15 46 0.43 0.17 3.80 1.90Shopping Center 820 1000 sq. ft. 3.73 412 0.34 0.19 6.40 3.20Super market 850 1000 sq. ft. 10.5 40 0.36 0.31 2.10 1.05Fast food with drive thru 934 1000 sq. ft. 33.84 118 0.49 0.11 4.30 2.15Automotive Care Center 942 1000 sq. ft. 3.38 5 0 0 4.50 2.25Hotel 310 Rooms 0.59 25 0 0 6.40 3.20Bank with Drive Thru 912 1000 sq. ft. 25.82 71 0.47 0.26 2.50 1.25Home Improvement Superstore 862 1000 sq. ft. 2.37 39 0.48 0.09 3.90 1.95Auto Parts Sales 843 1000 sq. ft. 5.98 5 0.43 0.13 2.30 1.15Garden Center 817 1000 sq. ft. 3.8 12 0 0 3.10 1.55Arts and Crafts Store 879 1000 sq. ft. 6.21 2 0 0 2.30 1.15Convenience Market with Gasoline Pu853 Fueling Positions 19.07 54 0.66 0.18 1.80 0.90Furniture Store 890 1000 sq. ft. 0.45 19 0.53 0.16 4.80 2.40Discount Club 857 1000 sq. ft. 4.24 25 0 0 4.00 2.52 2.30 1.15 2.035.13Light IndustrialGeneral Light Industrial 110 1000 sq. ft. 0.97 27 0 0 6.60 3.30Industrial Park 130 1000 sq. ft. 0.86 42 0 0 6.60 3.30Manufacturing 140 1000 sq. ft. 0.73 56 0 0 6.60 3.30Mini Warehouse (Self Storage) 151 1000 sq. ft. 0.26 13 0 0 6.60 3.30Utilities 170 1000 sq. ft. 0.76 3 0 0 0.77 0.77 6.60 3.30 3.302.55Public Institutional Middle/Jr high school 522 1000 sq. ft. 1.19 9 0 0 4.20 2.10Private School (K-8) 534 Students 0.6 8 0 0 4.20 2.10High School 530 1000 sq. ft. 0.97 22 0 0 4.20 2.10Day Care Center 565 Students 0.82 71 0 0 4.20 2.10Jr. / Community College 540 Students 0.12 5 0 0 6.00 3.00Church 560 1000 sq. ft. 0.55 12 0 0 0.81 0.81 2.90 1.45 2.141.72Residential - High DensityApartment 220 DU 0.62 90 0 0 0.62 0.62 8.40 4.20 4.202.60Residential - Medium/Low DensitySingle-family detached housing 210 DU 1.01 314 0 0 8.40 4.20Residential Condominium / Townhous230 DU 0.52 62 0 0 0.93 0.93 8.40 4.20 4.203.90Parks and Open SpaceCity Park 411 acres 0.16 3 0 0 0.16 0.16 4.70 2.35 2.350.38Notes:1 Source ITE Trip Generation Manual 8th Edition2 Average number of PM peak hour trips per development unit3 Source Trip Generation Handbook, 2nd Edition4 Source Trip Generation Handbook, 2nd Edition5 Source NCTCOG 1984 & 1994 Workplace Survey and 2001 National Household Travel Survey6 Minimum average value of 1/2 trip length or 6 miles7 Calculated by multiplying the average trip length by the average trip rate w/ deductions CITY OF COPPELLAVERAGE LAND USE TRIP CALCULATIONS