Loading...
BP 2012-08-16 PZNOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING & AGENDA PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION August 16, 2012 COMMISSIONERS: Edmund Haas — Chairman Gregory Frnka — Vice Chairman Anna Kittrell Craig Pritzlaff Charles Sangerhausen Glenn Portman Justin Goodale MEETING TIME AND PLACE: Pre -Session 6:00 p.m. lst Floor Conference Room (Open to the Public) Regular Session 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers (Open to the Public) Notice is hereby given that the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Coppell, Texas will meet in pre -session at 6:00 p.m. and in regular session at 6:30 p.m. on Thursday, August 16, 2012, to be held at Town Center, 255 Parkway Boulevard, Coppell, Texas. As authorized by Section 551.071(2) of the Texas Government Code, this meeting may be convened into closed Executive Session for the purpose of seeking confidential legal advice from the City Attorney on any agenda item listed herein. The purpose of the meeting is to consider the following items: ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION PRE -SESSION: (Open to the Public) 1. Briefing on the Agenda. REGULAR SESSION: (Open to the Public) 2. Call to Order. 3. Consider approval of the minutes for July 19, 2012. 4. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of the Minyard Addition, Lot 4RI, Block 1, Replat, to relocate and abandon various fire lane easements to permit the retention of the existing 12,500 -square - foot building and to constrict 252 car parking spaces and 60 trailer storage spaces with a masonry screening wall on 6.9 acres of property located at 849 Freeport Parkway at the request of KTR Coppell, LLC, being represented by Eric Shutt, Jones & Carter. STAFF REP.: Marcie Diamond agos1612 Page 1 of 4 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION 5. Consider approval of the Ridgecrest Estates, Final Plat, to allow 26 single-family lots and two (2) common area lots on 6.69 acres of property located at the northeast corner of East Sandy Lake Road and Lodge Street, at the request of Matt Alexander, Dowdey, Anderson & Associates, Inc. STAFF REP.: Marcie Diamond 6. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD -214R6 -C, Arbor Manor Retail (Jersey Mikes), a zoning change request from PD -214R5 -C (Planned Development -214 Revision 5 - Commercial) to PD -214R6 -C (Planned Development -214 Revision 6 -Commercial), to allow an additional 1,500 -square -foot restaurant within the retail building proposed to be constricted on 1.5 acres of property located at 143 S. Denton Tap Road, approximately 155 feet north of West Braewood Drive, at the request of Hermansen Land Development, Inc., being represented by Randi Rivera, G & A Consultants. STAFF REP.: Matt Steer 7. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD -228R4 -HC, Vista Ridge Retail Amended, Lot 3R, Block A, (Elite Care) a zoning change request from PD -228 -HC (Planned Development -228 -Highway Commercial) to PD -228R4 -HC (Planned Development -228 Revision 4 -Highway Commercial), to attach a Detail Plan to Lots 3 and 4 to allow a 14,000 -square -foot medical facility on approximately 1.8 acres of property located on the north side of S.H. 121 approximately 400 feet east of Denton Tap Road, at the request of Coppell ED MOB, LLC, being represented by Namer Kaim, Kaim Associates, Inc. STAFF REP.: Matt Steer 8. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of the Vista Ridge Retail Amended, Lot 3R, Block A, Replat, being a replat of Lots 3 and 4, Block A into Lot 3R, of the Vista Ridge Retail Addition to establish necessary easements and fire lanes to allow a 14,000 -square -foot medical facility on approximately 1.8 acres of property located on S.H. 121 approximately 400 feet east of Denton Tap Road, at the request of Coppell ED MOB, LLC, being represented by Namer Kaim, Kaim Associates, Inc. STAFF REP.: Matt Steer 9. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of a text amendment to amend the Code of Ordinances, by amending Chapter 12, "Zoning", Article 12-29, "Sign Regulations", Section 12-29-1, "Definitions", by amending the definition of "Zoning District, Business", to include "HC", and by amending Article 12-29-3, "Provision for All Zoning Districts", by amending Subsection 2(A) iv. and amending Section 12-29-4, "Provisions" for Business Zoning Districts", by adding Subsection (B) iii. and amending Subsection 3(A) and 3(B) and adding Subsection 5; providing a Savings Clause; providing a Severability Clause; providing an Effective Date. STAFF REP.: Gary Sieb 10. Update on Council action for planning agenda items on August 14, 2012: ag081612 Page 2 of 4 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION A. An Ordinance for Case No. PD -255 -SF, Westhaven, a zoning change from HC to PD -255 -SF, to permit the development of 297 residential lots and 37 common area lots on property located south of S.H. 121, west of Magnolia Park. B. Case No. PD -229R2 -LI, Minyard Addition, a zoning change request from PD - 229 -LI to PD -229R2 -LI, to amend the Detail Site Plan of Lot 4R, to allow the retention of the existing 12,500 -square -foot building and to constrict 252 car parking spaces and 60 trailer storage spaces with a masonry screening wall on property located at 849 Freeport Parkway. C. Case No. PD-202R-TH-1, Villas of Lake Vista, PH 2, a zoning change request from PD-202-TH-1 to PD-202R-TH-1, to amend the Detail Site Plan to allow 39 single-family lots and (5) five common area lots to replace 62 townhome lots and (8) eight common area lots on property located on the south side of Lake Vista Drive, approximately 970 feet east of North MacArthur Boulevard. D. Villas of Lake Vista, PH 2, Preliminary Plat, and Council also granted the Planning & Zoning Commission authority for final plat approval to allow 39 single-family lots and (5) five common area lots on property located on the south side of Lake Vista Drive, approximately 970 feet east of North MacArthur Boulevard. E. APPEAL - Case No. PD -200R3 -SF -7, Petterson Addition, a zoning change request from PD -200R2 -SF -12 to PD -200R3 -SF -7, to allow the development of eight (8) residential lots and three (3) common area lots on property located along the north side of Sandy Lake Road, approximately 130 feet west of Summer Place Drive. F. APPEAL - Case No. PD-250R3R-H, Old Town Addition (Main St) Entry Feature Sign, Lot 1RX, Block B, a zoning change request from PD -250R3 -H to PD-250R3R-H, to establish a Detail Sign for the Entry Feature on property located at the southeast corner of Bethel Road and Main Street. G. Case No. PD -250R5 -H, Old Town Addition (Main St) Retail/Office Cottages, Lots 2R -4R, Block A, a zoning change request from PD -250-H to PD -250R5 -H, to establish a Detail Site Plan for three (3) retail/office cottage buildings on three (3) separate lots on property located on the northwest corner of Main Street and Houston Street. H. Case No. PD -250R6 -H, Old Town Addition (Main St) Retail/Restaurant, Lot 1R, Block D, a zoning change request from PD -250-H to PD -250R6 -H, to establish a Detail Site Plan for a 5,034 -square -foot retail/restaurant building on property located on the southwest corner of West Main Street and Houston Street. L A text amendment to add Article 18A, Residential Urban Neighborhood District (RBN), to the Zoning Ordinance (Section 12-18A of the Code of Ordinances). 11. Director's Comments. Joint meeting with City Council and the Economic Development Committee on Wednesday, September 5, 2012, at 6:00 p.m. at the Fire Station 43 --Training Room located at 133 Parkway Blvd., Coppell, Texas. ADJOURNMENT ag081612 Page 3 of 4 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION CERTIFICATE I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Coppell, Texas on this 10th day of August, 2012 at Juanita A. Miles Planning Secretary PUBLIC NOTICE STATEMENT FOR ADA COMPLIANCE The City of Coppell acknowledges its responsibility to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Thus, in order to assist individuals with disabilities who require special services (i.e., sign interpretative services, alternative audio/visual devices, and amanuenses) for participation in or access to the City of Coppell sponsored public programs, services and/or meetings, the City requests that individuals make requests for these services forty-eight (48) hours ahead of the scheduled program, service and/or meeting. To make arrangements, contact Vivyon V. Bowman, ADA Coordinator or other designated officials at (972) 462-0022, or (TDD 1 -800 -RELAY, TX, 1-800-735-2989). ag081612 Page 4 of 4 MINUTES OF JULY 19, 2012 The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Coppell met in Pre -session at 6:00 p.m., and in Regular session at 6:30 p.m., on July 19, 2012, in the Council Chambers of Coppell Town Center, 255 Parkway Boulevard, Coppell, Texas. The following Commissioners were present: COMMISSIONERS: Edmund Haas — Chairman Gregory Frnka — Vice Chairman Anna Kittrell Craig Pritzlaff Charles Sangerhausen Glenn Portman Justin Goodale Also present were Director of Planning, Gary Sieb; Assistant Director of Planning, Marcie Diamond; City Planner, Matt Steer; Civil Engineer, George Marshall; Graduate Engineer, Mike Garza and Secretary, Juanita Miles. The purpose of the meeting is to consider the following items: ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION PRE -SESSION: (Open to the Public) 1. Briefing on the Agenda. The Planning Commission was briefed on each posted agenda item in the Workshop Session. No vote was taken on any item discussed. REGULAR SESSION: 2. Call to Order. (Open to the Public) Chairman Haas called the meeting to order. 3. Consider approval of the minutes for June 21, 2012. Commissioner Kittrell made a motion to approve the minutes for June 21, 2012, as written. Commissioner Sangerhausen seconded; motion carried (7-0), with Commissioners Goodale, Pritzlaff, Frnka, Haas, Sangerhausen, Portman and Kittrell voting in favor. None opposed. 4. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD -200R3 -SF -7, Petterson Addition, a zoning change request from PD -200R2 -SF -12 (Planned Development -200 Revision 2 -Single Family -12) to PD -200R3 -SF -7 (Planned Development -200 Revision 3 -Single Family -7), to allow the development of eight (8) residential lots and three (3) common area lots on 2.27 acres of property located along the north side of Sandy Lake Road, approximately 130 feet west of Summer Place Drive, at the request of Nancy J. Petterson, represented by Tommy Cansler, Timberland Creek Companies, Inc. STAFF REP.: Matt Steer MINo71912 Page 1 of 9 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION Presentation: City Planner, Matt Steer introduced this case to the Commission with exhibits He stated that staff is recommending denial as submitted. If a new application is submitted that has the street "flipped" to the west side, staff would be able to support the request. He mentioned forty-three notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of this request; 11 returned in favor; one returned in opposition and one was undecided. Nine responses returned in favor outside the 200 - foot area. Bobby Rollings, Timberland Creels Co. Inc., 3221 St. Georges Drive, Plano, Texas, was present to represent this case, to address questions and stated he was not in agreement with staff's recommendation. Public Hearing: Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. No one spoke. Chairman Haas closed the public hearing. Action: After much discussion, Commissioner Sangerhausen made a motion to deny Case No. PD - 200R3 -SF -7, Petterson Addition, a zoning change request from PD -200R2 -SF -12 (Planned Development -200 Revision 2 -Single Family -12) to PD -200R3 -SF -7 (Planned Development -200 Revision 3 -Single Family -7), as submitted. Commissioner Pritzlaff seconded; motion carried (4- 3), with Commissioners Pritzlaff, Frnka, Sangerhausen and Portman voting in favor. Commissioners Goodale, Haas and Kittrell voted in opposition to deny. 5. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of the Petterson Addition, Lots 1R -8R & 1XR-3XR, Block A, Replat, to establish eight (8) single-family residential lots, three (3) common area lots and easements on 2.27 acres of property located along the north side of Sandy Lake Road, approximately 130 feet west of Summer Place Drive, at the request of Nancy J. Petterson, represented by Tommy Cansler, Timberland Creek Companies, Inc. STAFF REP.: Matt Steer Presentation: City Planner, Matt Steer introduced this companion case to the Commission and stated staff is recommending denial because of denial of zoning request. He also mentioned that one notice was mailed to the property owner and returned in favor of the request. Bobby Rollings, Timberland Creek Co. Inc., 3221 St. Georges Drive, Plano, Texas, was present to represent this case and to address any other questions. Public Hearing: Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. No one spoke. Chairman Haas closed the public hearing. 1\11N071912 Page 2 of 9 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION Action: Commissioner Kittrell made a motion to deny the Petterson Addition, Lots IR -8R & IXR- 3XR, Block A, Replat. Vice Chair Frnka seconded; motion carried (7-0), with Commissioners Goodale, Pritzlaff, Frnka, Haas, Sangerhausen, Portman and Kittrell voting in favor. None opposed. 6. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD -250R5 -H, Old Town Addition (Main St) Retail/Office Cottages, Lots 2R -4R, Block A, a zoning change request from PD -250-H (Planned Development -250 -Historic) to PD -250R5 -H (Planned Development -250 Revision 5 - Historic), to establish a Detail Site Plan for three (3) retail/office cottage buildings on three (3) separate lots on 0.35 acres of property located on the northwest corner of Main Street and Houston Street at the request of Greg Yancey, Main Street Coppell, LTD. STAFF REP.: Matt Steer Presentation: City Planner, Matt Steer introduced this case to the Commission with exhibits, elevations and a color board. He mentioned two notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of this request; one returned in favor; none returned in opposition. He stated that staff is recommending approval subject to submittal of a Detailed Landscape Plan. Greg Yancey, Main Street Coppell, LTD., 215 S. Denton Tap Road, Coppell, Texas, was present to represent this case, to address questions and stated he was in agreement with staff's recommendation. Public Hearing: Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. The following person spoke: Steven Chadick, 509 W. Bethel Road, Coppell, Texas, expressed his concerns with this request. Chairman Haas closed the public hearing. Action: Commissioner Sangerhausen made a motion to approve Case No. PD -250R5 -H, Old Town Addition (Main St) Retail/Office Cottages, Lots 2R -4R, Block A, a zoning change request from PD -250-H (Planned Development -250 -Historic) to PD -250R5 -H (Planned Development - 250 Revision 5 -Historic) subject to staff's condition. Vice Chair Frnka seconded; motion carried (7-0), with Commissioners Goodale, Pritzlaff, Frnka, Haas, Sangerhausen, Portman and Kittrell voting in favor. None opposed. Break f i�om 8:03 p. m. to 8:09 p. m. MINo71912 Page 3 of 9 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION 7. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD -250R6 -H, Old Town Addition (Main SO Retail/Restaurant, Lot IR, Block D, a zoning change request from PD -250-H (Planned Development -250 -Historic) to PD -250R6 -H (Planned Development -250 Revision 6 - Historic), to establish a Detail Site Plan for a 5,034 -square -foot retail/restaurant building on 0.19 acres of property located on the southwest corner of West Main Street and Houston Street at the request of Greg Yancey, Main Street Coppell, LTD. STAFF REP.: Matt Steer Presentation: City Planner, Matt Steer introduced this case to the Commission with exhibits, color elevations and a colorboard. He mentioned two notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of this request; none returned in favor; none returned in opposition He stated that staff is recommending approval subject to submittal of a Detailed Landscape Plan Greg Yancey, Main Street Coppell, LTD., 215 S. Denton Tap Road, Coppell, Texas, was present to represent this case with exhibits, to address questions and stated he was in agreement with staff's recommendation. Public Hearing: Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. No one spoke. Chairman Haas closed the public hearing. Action: Commissioner Kittrell made a motion to approve Case No. PD -250R6 -H, Old Town Addition (Main SO Retail/Restaurant, Lot IR, Block D, a zoning change request from PD -250-H (Planned Development -250 -Historic) to PD -250R6 -H (Planned Development -250 Revision 6 - Historic) subject to staff's condition. Commissioner Portman seconded; motion carried (7-0), with Commissioners Goodale, Pritzlaff, Frnka, Haas, Sangerhausen, Portman and Kittrell voting in favor. None opposed. 8. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD-250R3R-H, Old Town Addition (Main SO Entry Feature Sign, Lot IRX, Block B, a zoning change request from PD -250R3 -H (Planned Development -250 Revision 3 -Historic) to PD-250R3R-H (Planned Development -250 Revision 3 Revised -Historic), to establish a Detail Sign for the Entry Feature on 0.022 acres of property located at the southeast corner of Bethel Road and Main Street, at the request of Main Street Coppell, LTD being represented by Greg Yancey. STAFF REP.: Matt Steer Presentation: City Planner, Matt Steer introduced this case to the Commission with exhibits and elevations. He mentioned eight notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of this request; none returned in favor; three returned in opposition. He stated that staff is recommending approval with no conditions. MINo71912 Page 4 of 9 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION Greg Yancey, Main Street Coppell, LTD., 215 S. Denton Tap Road, Coppell, Texas, was present to represent this case, to address questions and stated he was in agreement with staff's recommendation. Public Hearing: Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. The following person spoke: Steven Chadick, 509 W. Bethel Road, Coppell, Texas, spoke in opposition to this request. Chairman Haas closed the public hearing. Action: After much discussion, Commissioner Goodale made a motion to approve Case No. PD- 250R3R-H, Old Town Addition (Main St) Entry Feature Sign, Lot IRX, Block B, a zoning change request from PD -250R3 -H (Planned Development -250 Revision 3 -Historic) to PD- 250R3R-H (Planned Development -250 Revision 3 Revised -Historic). Commissioner Portman seconded; motion failed (2-5), with Commissioners Goodale and Portman voting in favor. Commissioners Pritzlaff, Frnka, Haas, Sangerhausen and Kittrell voted in opposition to approval. Request denied. 9. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD-202R-TH-1, Villas of Lake Vista, PH 2, a zoning change request from PD-202-TH-1 (Planned Development -202 -Townhouse -1) to PD-202R-TH-1 (Planned Development -202 Revised -Townhouse -1), to amend the Detail Site Plan to allow 39 single-family lots and (5) five common area lots to replace 62 townhome lots and (8) eight common area lots on 9.3 acres of property located on the south side of Lake Vista Drive, approximately 970 feet east of North MacArthur Boulevard, at the request of WPC 2004 Coppell, LC, being represented by Matt Alexander, Dowdey, Anderson & Associates, Inc. STAFF REP.: Gary Sieb Presentation Director of Planning, Gary Sieb introduced this case to the Commission with exhibits, elevations and color boards. He stated that staff is recommending approval subject to conditions which he read into the record. He mentioned five notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of this request; none returned in favor; none returned in opposition. Matthew Alexander, Dowdy, Anderson & Associates, Inc., 5225 Village Creek Drive, Ste. 200, Plano, Texas, was present to represent this case with exhibits, to address questions and stated he was in agreement with staff s recommendations. Brno Pasquinelli, CB JENI Homes, 107 Suncreek Drive, Allen, Texas, addressed the Commission's questions about the homes. 1\11N071912 Page 5 of 9 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION Public Hearing: Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. No one spoke. Chairman Haas closed the public hearing. Action: Commissioner Portman made a motion to approve Case No. PD-202R-TH-1, Villas of Lake Vista, PH 2, a zoning change request from PD-202-TH-1 (Planned Development -202 - Townhouse -1) to PD-202R-TH-1 (Planned Development -202 Revised -Townhouse -1), subject to the following conditions: 1. Add provided off-street parking total to the Development Data Chart. 2. Provide fire hydrant on Calcot Drive. 3. There will be additional Engineering comments during detailed plan review. 4. Need letter from Lewisville acknowledging removal of parking lot south of amphitheater. Commissioner Frnka seconded; motion carried (7-0), with Commissioners Goodale, Pritzlaff, Frnka, Haas, Sangerhausen, Portman and Kittrell voting in favor. None opposed. 10. Consider approval of Villas of Lake Vista, PH 2, Preliminary Plat, to allow 39 single-family lots and (5) five common area lots on 9.3 acres of property located on the south side of Lake Vista Drive, approximately 970 feet east of North MacArthur Boulevard, at the request of WPC 2004 Coppell, LC, being represented by Matt Alexander, Dowdey, Anderson & Associates, Inc. STAFF REP.: Gary Sieb Presentation: Director of Planning, Gary Sieb presented this companion case to the Commission with exhibits. He stated that staff is recommending approval subject to conditions which he read into the record. Matthew Alexander, Dowdy, Anderson & Associates, Inc., 5225 Village Creek Drive, Suite 200, Plano, Texas, was present to represent this case, to address questions and stated he was in agreement with staff's recommendations. Action: Vice Chairman Frnka made a motion to approve Villas of Lake Vista, PH 2, Preliminary Plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. Coordinate with the City of Lewisville and LID for curb cuts and drainage tie-ins. 2. Zoning is PD-202-RTH, not RSF. 3. Label Point of Beginning on Preliminary Plat. 4. Contact City of Lewisville and advise them of parking lot removal; obtain written acknowledgement from the City. 5. There will be additional comments during detailed Engineering plan review. 1\11N071912 Page 6 of 9 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION Commissioner Portman seconded; motion carried (7-0), with Commissioners Goodale, Pritzlaff, Frnka, Haas, Sangerhausen, Portman and Kittrell voting in favor. None opposed. 11. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD -238R2 -HC, Coppell Office Village, a zoning change request from PD -238R -HC (Planned Development -238 Revised -Highway Commercial) to PD -238R2 -HC (Planned Development -238 Revision 2 -Highway Commercial), to revise the Detail Site Plan to allow the existing 40 -square -foot monument sign to be externally illuminated with a four -foot bronze fixture with white florescent lighting in lieu of the existing internal LED lighting on 2.02 acres of property located at 225 East S.H. 121, at the request of Terry Holmes, Holmes Commercial. STAFF REP.: Gary Sieb Presentation: Director of Planning, Gary Sieb introduced the case history of this request to the Commission with exhibits and elevations. He stated that staff is recommending denial of the proposed revision to the approved sign and re -approval of the initial monument sign submitted by the applicant. He mentioned five notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of this request; none returned in favor; none returned in opposition. Terry Holmes, The Holmes Builders, 225 E. SH Highway 121, Suite 120, Coppell, Texas, was present to represent this case, to address questions and stated he was not in agreement with staff's recommendation. Public Hearing: Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. No one spoke. Chairman Haas closed the public hearing. Action: Commissioner Goodale made a motion to deny the proposed revision to the approved sign and re -approval of the initial monument sign submitted (PD -238R -HC). Commissioner Pritzlaff seconded; motion carried (6-1), with Commissioners Goodale, Pritzlaff, Frnka, Haas, Portman and Kittrell voting in favor. Commissioner Sangerhausen opposed the denial. 12. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD -229R2 -LI, Minyard Addition, a zoning change request from PD -229 -LI (Planned Development -229 -Light Industrial) to PD -229R2 -LI (Planned Development -229 Revision 2 -Light Industrial), to amend the Detail Site Plan of Lot 4R, to allow the retention of the existing 12,500 -square -foot building and to construct 252 car parking spaces and 60 trailer storage spaces with a masonry screening wall on 6.9 acres of property located at 849 Freeport Parkway at the request of KTR Coppell, LLC, being represented by Richard Nordyke, O'Brien & Associates, Inc. STAFF REP.: Marcie Diamond MINo71912 Page 7 of 9 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION Presentation: Assistant Planning Director, Marcie Diamond introduced this case to the Commission with exhibits and color renderings. She stated that staff is recommending approval subject to conditions which she read into the record. Richard Nordyke, O'Brian & Associates, Inc., 5310 Harvest Hill Road, Suite 136, Dallas, Texas, was present to represent this case, to address questions and stated he was in agreement with staff's recommendations. Public Hearing: Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. No one spoke. Chairman Haas closed the public hearing. Action: Commissioner Portman made a motion to approve Case No. PD -229R2 -LI, Minyard Addition a zoning change request from PD -229 -LI (Planned Development -229 -Light Industrial) to PD - 229R2 -LI (Planned Development -229 Revision 2 -Light Industrial), subject to the following conditions: 1. Replat of Lot 4R to revise the fire lanes and utility easements. 2. Label the screen wall on the site plan. 3. Correct the dimension of the landscape buffer along Freeport Parkway. Vice Chairman Frnka seconded; motion carried (7-0), with Commissioners Goodale, Pritzlaff, Frnka, Haas, Sangerhausen, Portman and Kittrell voting in favor. None opposed. 13. Update on Council action for planning agenda items on July 10, 2012: A. An Ordinance for Case No. PD -235-0 to SF -12, Akula, a zoning change from PD - 235 -0 to SF -12, to allow this property to be incorporated with the adjacent property to permit the development of one single-family home located at 1180 Sandy Lake Road. B. An Ordinance for Case No. PD -171R3 -HC, GTE Shared Services Addition (Clear C2 Office), a zoning change from PD -171 -HC to PD -171R3 -HC, to allow a 11,077 - square -foot office building on property located on the north side of Canyon Drive, east of S.H. 121. C. An Ordinance for Case No. PD -194R4 -LI, Amberpoint Business Park, Lot 2R -3R, Block A (Avera), a zoning change from PD -194R3 -LI to PD -194R4 -LI, to allow a 300,800 -square -foot office/warehouse building on property located on the east side of Northpoint Drive, north of Wagon Wheel Park. D. An Ordinance for Case No. PD -116R2 -SF -7, Chaucer Estates, Lots 4 & 7, Block C, a zoning change from PD -116R -SF -7 to PD -116R2 -SF -7, to relocate and modify the existing rear fences on property located at 187 Chaucer Court and 101 Dickens Drive. E. Case No. PD -255 -SF, Westhaven, a zoning change request from HC to PD -255 -SF, to permit the development of 297 residential lots and 37 common area lots on property located south of S.H. 121, west of Magnolia Park. MINo71912 Page 8 of 9 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION F. Westhaven, Preliminary Plat, to permit the development of 297 residential lots and 37 common area lots on property located south of S.H. 121, west of Magnolia Park. G. Ridgecrest Estates Preliminary Plat, and Council also granted the Planning & Zoning Commission authority for final plat approval for 26 single-family lots and two common area lots on property located at the northeast corner of East Sandy Lake Road and Lodge Road. During the Pre -Session, Planning Director, Gary Sieb advised the Commission of Council's actions on July 10, 2012 and stated that Council approved all of the above -stated items. 14. Director's Comments. Mr. Sieb encouraged everyone to meet our new Deputy City Manager, Mike Land, from the City of Prosper. He also mentioned that the Residential Urban Neighborhood District text amendment goes to City Council on August 14tH ADJOURNMENT With nothing further to discuss, the meeting adjourned at approximately 10:41 p.m. Edmund Haas, Chairman Juanita A. Miles, Secretary MINo71912 Page 9 of 9 CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Minyard Addition, Lot 4RI, Block 1, Replat P&Z HEARING DATE: August 16, 2012 C.C. HEARING DATE: September 11, 2012 STAFF REP.: Marcie Diamond, Assistant Director of Planning LOCATION: 849 Freeport Parkway SIZE OF AREA: 6.9 acres of property CURRENT ZONING: PD -229R -LI (Planned Development -229 Revised -Light Industrial) REQUEST: A replat to relocate and abandon various fire lane easements to permit the retention of the existing 12,500 -square -foot building and to constrict 252 car parking spaces and 60 trailer storage spaces with a masonry screening wall. APPLICANT: Owner: KTR Coppell, L.L.C. 300 Barr Harbor Drive Conshohocken, PA 19428 484-530-1800 Engineer: Eric Shutt Jones & Carter 6509 Windcrest Drive, Suite 600 Plano, Texas 75024 eshuttL& j onescarter. com HISTORY: The original warehouse and office buildings were constricted in 1980. In 1996 a site plan and plat were approved to allow the expansion of the existing office/warehouse facility which included the constriction of a 240,000 -square - foot warehouse. This approval was subject to several conditions: ➢ The Board of Adjustment granting a Special Exception allowing reduction in the amount of parking to be provided. A 242 parking space variance was granted on September 12, 1996, and, ➢ Asphalt fire lanes were permitted for a period not to exceed four years. In 2007, Council approved a PD for this property which allowed the renovation, retention and expansion of the existing office/warehouse and office buildings and allowed the constriction of four office/warehouse buildings, totaling approximately 503,250 square feet. This PD incorporated the parking variances approved by the Board, but required the asphalt fire lanes to be replaced with concrete. Shortly thereafter, the replica Minyard Grocery Store was moved from this site to the corner of Bethel and Coppell Roads in Old Coppell. ITEM = 4 Page 1 of 3 In July 2008, Council approved an amendment to this PD to allow a revised monument sign package which included the 14 -foot tall monument sign at the corner of Freeport and Bethel Roads, a 60 -square -foot sign on Lot 2 and two multi -tenant industrial park signs. The Detail Site Plan approved in 2007 provided for the removal of the existing 12,500 -square -foot trick service building and the constriction of a 90,000 - square -foot office/warehouse building (50% office/50% warehouse) and 195 parking spaces on the subject tract. This property was also replatted in 2007 to establish various utility and fire lane easements to support the redevelopment of this site. However, these easements conflict with the development of this site as currently proposed, and therefore needs to be replatted. On August 14 of this year Council approved a rezoning request to amend Lot 4 of this PD to allow the retention of the existing 12,500 -square -foot building and to constrict 252 car parking spaces and 60 trailer storage spaces screened with a masonry wall to serve two major tenants of this development. TRANSPORTATION: Bethel Road is a four -lane divided thoroughfare built within 90 feet of right-of-way. Freeport Parkway is a four -lane divided thoroughfare built within 90 feet of right-of- way. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North — office; PD -229R -LI, South — truck service building; PD -229R -LI, East — office/warehouse; LI (light Industrial) West — office/warehouse; PD -229R -LI, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Coppell 2030, A Comprehensive Master Plan, designates this area as Industrial Special District DISCUSSION: As stated in the History Section, when this property was rezoned in 2007, it was also replatted to establish various easements to support the redevelopment of this site for a 90,000 -square -foot office/warehouse use. Given that the existing building will now be retained, and additional paving and screening are being provided to allow for an increase in vehicle and trailer storage, portions of the platted fire lane may be abandoned. As indicated on the proposed replat, the two north -south fire lanes are being abandoned while the east -west connections from Freeport Parkway to the existing warehouse facilities are being retained. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff is recommending APPROVAL of Minyard Addition, Lot 4RI, Block 1, Replat, with no conditions. ITEM = 4 Page 2 of 3 ALTERNATIVES: 1. Recommend 2. Recommend 3. Recommend ATTACHMENTS: 1. Replat approval of the request disapproval of the request modification of the request ITEM = 4 Page 3 of 3 AMNd 1tlOtl33Hf = fr t _ c ?� LLI CL N55 Y��a Q y�j Wwk z r��� a ¢ < It 'W.,. z. zz in uW Z nL II�b=m "Mj 5 a acr s 5 a d a ezzI'£ $ g a s E $ r E '$r la I - ze EL'4Lg 01 _ vE,°n E$ uayi° n' Env 13 E2IE a° o _ °x_ a;€a= _ EL ZE dp,a ,azoo au E;K °m - aaL�'oEn _ i€NPr .21 cEa I I - PL - a - ; ° °LEfru zE o _ "6 o -O9°PE;A a c ax 3E one$g_aa w & oz on"$ a - e� r s°�s °€ Pl z c _ v$, zs z v$," m� ol _ - a�- € Ea mu 3m._ ucc rm rn �$ r �E o z rvo°�oa z° r. no. zu�.6. <u v,u w m m mu mE`° G Iz (n . r$u o I. Imr mu ms°� 3 Iz 8 pbza4 ('M'0'tl H101M 3lEtlltltlA) o- - AtlNUItlVd 1HOd33tld r ----- - - -- -a.��o •.ao..z.3os - I I � irv53' 10 n o / luso - N I szofe - TT � LDT L t i i f C o� f}-a� 8 are ao l ig Rg- -_— I) �— — was -------- -0011 .ee..�.,e x m �� �-------— --- — —— -- _= ------ --- w --------------------------�� -----� A _ + — z a m�3 oo Aw � zao wpm P&Z HEARING DATE: STAFF REP.: LOCATION: SIZE OF AREA: CURRENT ZONING: REQUEST: APPLICANT: CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Rid2ecrest Estates, Final Plat August 16, 2012 Marcie Diamond, Assistant Director of Planning NEC of East Sandy Lake Road and Lodge Road 6.69 acres of property PD -254 -SF (Planned Development -254 -Single Family) Final Plat approval to allow 26 single-family lots and two common area lots. Owner: SIVAII VILLAS LTD 131518 Peyton Dr. Dallas, Texas 75240 214-566-8059 Civil Engineer: Matt Alexander Dowdey, Anderson & Associates 5225 Village Creek Drive Plano, Texas 75093 972-931-0694 HISTORY: In June 1998, Council denied a requested rezoning from SF -12 to a PD for SF -7 to permit the development of 23 single-family homes on this tract with an average lot size of 9,398 square feet and a net density of 3.48 dwelling units per acre. At that time, the Comprehensive Plan designated this area as Low Density Residential, which was defined as one to three dwelling units per acre. There was significant neighborhood opposition to this request. On May 12, 2012, Council approved PD -254 -SF which established the lotting pattern and special conditions for the development of 26 single-family lots and two common area lots on this tract of land. This approval was in part based on the Coppell 2030, A Comprehensive Master Plan, designates this property as suitable for Urban Residential Neighborhood, which is defined as areas to provide "for a wide variety of higher density residential uses (typically greater than four dwelling units per acre)". The Ordinance for PD -254 -SF was passed by Council on June 12, 2012. On July 10, 2012, Council approved the Preliminary Plat for this property, as well as provided the Planning and Zoning Commission the authority to approve the Final Plat. ITEM =5 Page 1 of 2 TRANSPORTATION: Sandy Lake Road is designated as a four -lane divided thoroughfare and is built to standard within a 110 -foot right-of-way. Lodge Road is a Local Street built to standard paving width; within a substandard right-of-way of 50 feet (60 feet is standard). SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North — Pecan Valley; PD -113 -SF -9 South -Highland Meadows; PD -99 -SF -7 and Stringfellow Addition; SF -12 East — Rejoice Lutheran Church; SF -12 West — Carrick Addition; SF -12 Pecan Ridge Estates — PD -113 -SF -9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Coppell 2030, A Comprehensive Master Plan, designates this property as suitable for Urban Residential Neighborhood, which is defined as areas to provide "for a wide variety of higher density residential uses (typically greater than four dwelling units per acre) that serve the needs of residents seeking alternatives to low and medium density single-family detached housing". DISCUSSION: City Council recently approved a PD zoning and Preliminary Plat to allow the development of 26 single family homes and two common areas on this property. At the time of Preliminary Plat approval Council also granted the Planning and Zoning Commission the approval authority for this Final Plat. One of the conditions of approval was the various existing easements (permanent and temporary constriction easement and drainage) to be abandoned by Council action. These instruments would then be filed for record with the Final Plat. These easement abandonments are tentatively scheduled for Council consideration at their August 28th meeting. This Final Plat reflects all aspects of the Preliminary Plat and Detail Site Plan of PD 254, as approved by City Council, and therefore staff can support this request. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff is recommending APPROVAL of the Final Plat for Ridgecrest Estates, subject to the following conditions: 1. Submission of Legal Descriptions and Exhibits for the easement abandonments. 2. A tree removal permit will be required prior to the removal of any trees. 3. Park development fees in the amount of $1,285 will be assessed at the time of the Final Plat. 4. During detail engineering plan review the drainage will also be further evaluated. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Recommend approval of the request 2. Recommend disapproval of the request 3. Recommend modification of the request 4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date ATTACHMENTS: 1. Final Plat ITEM -5 Page 2 of 2 Fr _ - (M08 .09 X3) mo av0a 30001 r� N 3 I Roo ug a oP� m� b'o'oed ,fZ'OGS,tl NMSL,OMS o�m S o. 8 o V) _ - _ _ -0009-- __ _ 0009 -- � -}.0009 -,0009--- ---pL fiS-- p` ON F -J N�ZZ. ra �x 0�2�2s N _ ` Q V)wa wQ 2 F —�Q a OFN >ald� d}� VIw Z° ¢w w< a � OR Q d 4 z zQu tm � � ZQ V)4 ww ¢.. 3j 10 _- AKN e' NQOZ wO Z a03 ui O- wa : N Ws� �� O< - z 091 w n - f I -I I ' 091 ry /j0i �( — — — —209L I II _ I I 9 t0 I Fr _ - (M08 .09 X3) mo av0a 30001 r� N 3 I Roo Ea x r a oP� m� b'o'oed ,fZ'OGS,tl NMSL,OMS o�m _ a% - 598f-- _ ___ _ - bl � - - --- 0009 _ _ - _ _ -0009-- __ _ 0009 -- � -}.0009 -,0009--- ---pL fiS-- '��to -\can ------Z _ ______________ --___ II Iv < w z�o O - I •��Ci m n - f I -I I - - �N� _ ry /j0i �( — — — —209L I II _ I I 9 t0 I fo w � :L9'YS,?ryE xmiano0 I I I I is3ao30ala '° 1 ,S .bl'Lb ,00'09 ,00'09 I,LO'bS / ep M1 , I° alb 13' S 6E 120.Od •ttF r -J -ALJ � I emll � - ag wo >6eZ 5115IYE i 120.00' - N N m U 0.80'49 ,00'09 ,00'09 68'19 i a J 3 1 gl ,9L'OB ,69'Z9 ,Zb'09 ,Ot'pt �x Z? I I sl2S'13•E 1 U I •8199 y I ^ n SIM61YE [ 43.15' 19Z9 Zl= s \ SI tl51YE 1.anoo 013i3a33\ NJX1216'µ \\ tl L9 I .l6 Z9l I r N: I.BS'Lei .333093-5-1 .Sl, Fr _ - (M08 .09 X3) mo av0a 30001 r� N 3 I sz ug o Lo ai a Wog aYo waa �zs� 8 a.£^ -`- �a ERo ae-`yam a ��o¢Wo ww <.. o3jo z x _� $I�svUz < oQ� <m z= - -IQcE m W o� -4 2Ec ea ` o g ;m oI `<< -mea m m omI < a § say au<" ' :$wE�m lu a Ia$ a u$ v£c ub Ec- EE I.a cE�E°='ESac omcatW�QE N"i a. L°Lbm'dEEncE E 5— 'E m4 z Ez�aa4=oE 0 £4 F m mi-" a Iz poEad �Ca - `ca ca -- _ a Xe_ - `o EE _ X CS-nS:`O. a9 $°mE� mXrc m£ az EO EmE°Sfr° Ea m a gm 52 eE zI �z mE z _a.- um - w _� CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT CASE NO.: PD -214R6 -C, Arbor Manor Retail (Jersey Mikes) P&Z HEARING DATE: August 16, 2012 C.C. HEARING DATE: September 11, 2012 STAFF REP.: Matt Steer, City Planner LOCATION: 143 S. Denton Tap Road SIZE OF AREA: 1.5 acres of property CURRENT ZONING: PD -214R5 -C (Planned Development -214 Revision 5 -Commercial) REQUEST: A zoning change to PD -214R6 -C (Planned Development -214 Revision 6 - Commercial), to allow an additional 1,500 -square -foot restaurant within a retail building. APPLICANT: Developer: Representative: Hermansen Land Development G&A Consultants, inc. Michael Herrera Randi Rivera 5944 Luther Lane, Ste. 725 111 Hillside Drive Dallas, Texas 75225 Lewisville, Texas 75057 Phone: (214) 373-4202 (972) 436-9712 michaet'uheriiiinsenlinddevelopineritcom randi"u��acor1.coln HISTORY: On May 8, 2007, PD -214R2 -SF -9&C (Planned Development -214 Revision -2 - Single -Family -9 & Commercial) was approved allowing for a Concept Site Plan for the development of 73 single-family homes on approximately 24 acres and commercial uses on approximately five acres of property located south of Sandy Lake Road; west of Denton Tap Road. Tree mitigation and retribution for the overall tract was determined at that time. On October 12, 2010, Council approved a Detail Plan to allow the constriction of a 4,639 -square -foot medical office building on the first commercial component of the conceptual planned development for Arbor Manors. The only access approved at that time was from Bethel School Road. Subsequently, with the approval of PD -214R5 -C in February 2012, an additional access point was approved. This will serve both the medical office user to the south and the subject property. The site has yet to develop. The approved PD includes a Detail Plan to allow the development of an approximate 11,000 square foot retail building to contain retail and office uses including two restaurants (Smashburger & Einstein Bros. Bagels). The Einstein Bros. Bagels restaurant was originally designed with a drive-thru. ITEM = 6 Page 1 of 3 This was eliminated from the plan per a Council condition of approval. Subsequently, the plans were revised and an ordinance has been approved with additional parking and a 200 square foot patio area in place of the drive-thru. TRANSPORTATION: Denton Tap Road is a P6D, improved, concrete, six -lane divided thoroughfare contained within a 110 -foot right-of-way. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING North — restaurant; C (Commercial) South — medical office; PD -214R4 -C (Planned Development -214 Revision 4 - Commercial) East — retail uses (Braewood Shopping Center); C, (Commercial) West — residential uses (Arbor Manors); PD -214R2 -SF -12 (Planned Devel opment-214-Revsion-2- Single Family -12) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Coppell Comprehensive Plan shows the property suitable for mixed use neighborhood center. DISCUSSION: As mentioned in the HISTORY section, on February 14, 2012, PD -214R5 -C, Arbor Manors Retail was approved. This was a Detail Plan to allow the development of an approximate 11,000 -square -foot retail building to contain retail and office uses including two restaurants (Smashburger & Einstein Bros. Bagels). The Einstein Bros. Bagels restaurant was originally designed with a drive-thru. This was eliminated from the plan per a Council condition of approval. Subsequently the plans were revised and additional parking and a 200 -square -foot patio area were included. Parking: The parking required for a retail use is one parking space per 200 square feet of building area, for a medical office, one parking space per 175 square feet of building area and for a restaurant use, one parking space per 100 square feet. Jersey Mikes is proposing an additional 1,500 square feet of restaurant space than was initially approved in February 2012. This equates to a total area of 6,800 square feet for all restaurants (including patios). The medical office component is proposed to be 1,748 and the retail is proposed to be 2,702 square feet. In total, 92 spaces are required and 94 are proposed, exceeding the requirements by two spaces. Hours of Operation: The proposed hours of operation for Jersey Mikes (10 a.m. to 9 p.m. everyday) is within the limits of the two approved restaurants for this site. Einstein Bros. Bagels hours of operation is approved from 5 a.m. to 5 p.m. everyday and Smashburger is approved from 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. everyday. Therefore, staff is supportive of the proposed hours of operation. ITEM = 6 Page 2 of 3 Signage: A PD condition granted with the proposal included a 15 -square -foot blade sign for each tenant. Jersey Mikes is proposing a blade sign and have included it on the elevation sheet. The other signage shall be a shade of white to match the other two already approved and is in accordance with the size requirements; therefore, staff is supportive of the proposed sign package. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff is recommending APPROVAL of PD -214R6 -C, Arbor Manor Retail, subject to the following conditions being met: 1. Development shall be in accordance with the approved site plan, floor plan, and sign plan. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Recommend approval of the request 2. Recommend disapproval of the request 3. Recommend modification of the request 4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date ATTACHMENTS: 1. Site Plan 2. Floor Plan/Sign Plan ITEM = 6 Page 3 of 3 M31N301Itl13M SWNVW W Mtl 8v 1'A Nnoo sv77va a g llmm SO ALO " ..aq a sax WE ON 10tltl1S9V , 'A mn5 MOHO tl awma3 WN ops NVId 311S SNI SZNdZIfISlsO� �` saoNvw aoeev,_� �wuna owe®emvno owwue^a V �I�18 '2iZtl4 logy J 831N30 lld13M SHOWN 8098V _ oa - Z�-A -55 I I Ao u m CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT CASE NO.: PD -228R4 -HC, Lot 3R, Block A, Vista Ride Retail Amended (Elite Care) P&Z HEARING DATE: August 16, 2012 C.C. HEARING DATE: September 11, 2012 STAFF REP.: Matt Steer, City Planner LOCATION: North side of S.H. 121 approximately 400 feet east of Denton Tap Road SIZE OF AREA: 1.8 acres of property CURRENT ZONING: PD -228 -HC (Planned Development -228 -Highway Commercial) REQUEST: A zoning change to PD -228R4 -HC (Planned Development -228 Revision 4 - Highway Commercial), to attach a Detail Site Plan to Lots 3 and 4 to allow a 14,000 -square -foot medical facility. APPLICANT: Architect: Kaim Associates, Inc. Namer Kaim 24080 Hwy 59 N, Suite 175 Kingwood, Texas 77339 Phone: 281-358-0964 Email: nkaimr�,kaim-inc.com Engineer: Bleyl & Associates Austin Love 100 Nugent Street Conroe, Texas 77301 Phone: 936-441-7833 clove&,ble, lengineering.com HISTORY: In February of 1998, Presbyterian Hospital was granted Site Plan approval on a 14.8 acre parcel, of which this request is a part. That 1998 request proposed two buildings -- a 75,000 -square -foot ambulatory care facility and a 45,000 -square - foot medical office. In late 2004, staff learned the hospital was no longer interested in building on this site. In August 2007, a Conceptual Planned Development zoning change was granted on the 14 -acre parcel allowing seven individual lots. A Detail Plan was approved on three lots in Phase One development, permitting a 2,300 -square -foot gas station/convenience store on 1.2 acres, a 20,000 -square -foot retail building on 2.9 acres, and a 69,800 -square -foot Market Street grocery on 6.9 acres. The remaining 3.8 acres was shown to ITEM = 7 Page 1 of 4 include a bank site (currently constricted Bank of America) and three pad sites on the remainder, each requiring Detail Site Plan approval before development could occur. Whataburger was approved in October 2010 for the lot just east of the bank and has since been constricted. This request will combine the last two southeastern lots into one for the development of an emergency medical building. TRANSPORTATION: State Highway 121 (Sam Rayburn Tollway) has been developed to freeway standards, contains one-way service roads, each 33 feet wide, within 450 feet of right-of-way. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North — Market Street; PD -228 -HC, (Planned Development 228, Highway Commercial) South — State Highway 121; City of Lewisville East — vacant land and developed office; PD -205R -HC, (Planned Development 205R -Highway Commercial) West — Whataburger; PD -228R3 -HC, (Planned Development -228 Revision 3 - Highway Commercial) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Coppell 2030, A Comprehensive Master Plan, shows this property as suitable for Freeway Special District. DISCUSSION: Site Plan: The proposed building meets the minimum setback distances of the Highway Commercial District. There are mutual access/fire lane easements along the north and west property lines and running east/west in front of the proposed building then extending north into the existing Market Street development. These drives have already been platted, some already constricted and provide the proposed site with more than adequate access. The proposed emergency medical facility has two canopies — a drive-thru on the south side for ambulances used to transport patients to and from the facility and one on the west side of the building to be used by the public for covered drop-off and pick-up purposes (no ambulance use). Parking: The parking required for a medical use is one parking space per 175 square feet of building area. The site meets the required parking by providing 80 spaces for the 14,000 -square -foot facility, just meeting code requirement of 80 parking spaces. Elevations/Signage: The building materials (red brick, and brown/beige colored stone) are proposed to match the overall Planned Development's, including Market Street, the Taste of Market Street, Bank of America, Whataburger and the existing retail building. The proposed 145 linear feet of frontage along SH 121 equates to 145 total square feet of attached signage allotted to the building. After several discussions with the sign company and the architect, the sign package is close to meeting the standards of the ordinance. The signage will match that of Market Street. ITEM = 7 Page 2 of 4 Proposed are reverse illuminated halo -lighted black & white channel letters. The black letters will appear black during the day and when lighted at night will appear white with a halo around the light. One variance requested is to the color of the "24 HR EMERGENCY' sign located on the front elevation. The applicant is requesting a white color, whereas black signage is required to match the other proposed signage on the building. Per a mandate of the State Health Services Licensing Regulations the word "emergency" is required to be either red or white. White is preferable over red, as the Bank of America and Whataburger each have white signage; therefore, staff is comfortable recommending white be allowed in this instance. The other exception is for a back -plate (cloud) to each letter. Typically, a raceway is used to attach signage. This is required by ordinance to be painted the same color as the building. The "cloud" is similar to the raceway in that it will be painted the same color as the brick to which it is mounted. It is proposed to provide a smooth surface for the halo lighting concept to work effectively. Since this is not technically a raceway, and is a slight deviation from the ordinance, it is recommended by staff to be approved as a PD condition. There are two monument signs — an existing 60 -square -foot multitenant sign and a proposed 40 -square -foot single tenant sign. These were approved with the Conceptual Planned Development in 2007. The single tenant sign will be located on the south-east portion of the site, setback 15 feet from the SH 121 right-of- way. This is proposed to be externally illuminated and will have "Elite Care" in black with the logo in color. Landscaping Plan: The proposed plant materials are compatible with the Bank of America's and Whataburger's sites. Shown are 16 Chinquapin Oak, 15 Chinese Pistache and seven Crepe Myrtle Trees as the primary plantings. When the overall conceptual planned development was approved in 2007, concessions to the perimeter landscaping requirements of the Zoning Ordinance were granted. The overall conceptual planned development ordinance states that the 15 -foot perimeter landscaping along the road frontage and ten -foot perimeter landscaping on the east side are required. However, the perimeter landscaping along the west and north lot lines can be reduced. The interior (parking lot) landscape area and nonvehicular open space requirements are standard. The initial submittal had an insufficient amount front yard nonvehicular open space. The plans have since been altered by shifting the building to the north slightly in order to meet this requirement. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff is recommending APPROVAL of PD -228R4 -HC, Lot 3R, Block A, (Elite Care) subject to the following conditions: 1. Add a PD conditions Table to the Site Plan indicating: a. The attached signage will consist of white and black halo -lighted channel letters and a back -plate (cloud) painted to match the surface to which it is mounted, b. An exception to required perimeter landscaping on the west and north property lines was approved with the Conceptual PD, and ITEM = 7 Page 3 of 4 c. Two monument signs were approved (one 60 square foot multi -tenant and one 40 square foot single tenant) with the Conceptual PD. 2. There is an $11,179.00 pro rata fee for the water line in addition to the impact fees. 3. There may be additional comments during detailed engineering plan review. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Recommend approval of the request 2. Recommend disapproval of the request 3. Recommend modification of the request 4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date ATTACHMENTS: 1. Color Rendering 2. Sign Package 3. Site Plan 4. Landscape Plan 5. Elevations ITEM = 7 Page 4 of 4 9 W O ~ 6 G K zLL v�am Z J a = W r mo a O 2 U _ J a _ 3 W J r m D m fn w Z 9 y J a n 41 V S GLn O m a ?? £ N m o o u o ww ��� r g Uj lf! F owx ori � m LL 3 J rvw w '> fo a�z W z rn W 11J N .. rfl LL U) AAI J a 3'-6" " m 2'- 1/2" a m = N 4 N m n a 1� G N i m III � LL d _76 Nt J o ❑00013110 m � F to W U t=ll V w Z m U 41. •� V ausi¢>zSU Z a U1 ❑ 0 0 0 0❑ O CP a N ws Fr °q ga a g> > > a00 E ao 00 IN ~ a � of > O U v U� a Oz Z. ° m E m c E _ - o� 33 J W w Z Z S M Z U n. Q 0) E N N a _ v OQ b Lu w 0 u zdz Q J� g Lij�"O �W-z �QE p%FN a�E z �z E fj '.m-. m�^v z Y a a �? y w Q z J m`ao av A:v N J a a mUIO iota we ¢ H U. UOmM ui O J v z Z a ............... Q W .z. w z D o Lli 66 LUQd'U7 pOZ ,�...,..J H F' Wim^ Z:�•-' ZN Q v✓I.' o un=n - 496 L IS3 cc ui .' �U�Fgu?.i H LL N Q 2 Q J O O� LL � In Q W w LL lL J .-i m > K H m .. E Q w • . . . W 1� I' IYGi1R7M11 j1f� Lu �((VF""" 3 10 �U� rru e m U u�x w a U O N u W I- Ib � u o o - o v m • a Z E N O c U f J N C V \ -0� d G G T `C !0 VI 01E N N v F m h u1 Dl .O N V U w O. O C C _ C Q m�EZ'.0cm .Y A o m z o 0o0 Ln L a) m aU G 3 a o uwz Y u O u u x 3 °� o M E 9 ill ff o LL N u y m a ^= v o it o m z m c N O in F u� r = Uj C 3 C ^ F"' E �n N L .''' in N x ¢ ~ x o> v zwm Wit? J Z OU OL .-i0 tiMCJ �N'� JL 5 z a w aQ oGu io�N 41�-u • • • e • • • u- "- N J 3 W N� > E0 d�z a M o aaw ww z ~ > v o .. a u v 3 d �- r DIY _ E z z w z m 0 w m rn CO I- i �1"✓nG N I O N • N N v N O m v o O C — C .O O W ry LooEEYE E o y O V otE 0- E «n.,_ E ✓/// 3 a° o �EEo m n oEz_ 0G0 4-;cl: 0 v o __ _fu -- �f �rE 000000❑ ffIrrI U. c ❑00000❑ _..... �" m rno ai � @0 w A E t c t E o` o �m N � a "Wo e IifU�r �i� V 'f c O C N N o u - � d 5m� x m 8 pP vNi FAN ti E Rcie gmgl Ems„ NL a O c m « 0 L mg mm o c g U) ;4 SMI A 996 L 1S3 PP J ua = y J qj g "'noto-l1J rn m t i Z or 9 V v u Uf V1 in W e z � U N n M y Y C 0 a o v a o 0 'n u f f U - C O Y > 'b d m O J d 41 v � 1!1 > b n u N OLin - iq r N m 1V ti N v O � i � N � l d I IJ Q; v b E - c rn x S' 5 � b I a `r w d a nociNNY I� u IL W7 .w g a u`i¢Ss°au 0000000 - q d °d n 3 to �i� Ep �16 ItCY g �" E .o 0 o e eQ s 3 2 BE Pv b u A • s d Y in du � E � C 0 �rn uj c E" 6 a3 al a Cl d a o N N a U nS n dP - A 9S61'1S3 c o ti a` CL is/p LU f, rlr�r, s � erica/ro�i I d%ioi A G N U C m N N Y n G m W = I-• E > m p O6 O N O a z U L U E O OM T Cw d o a N w m N x N V U C N � +p+ N ai, �o N O fp p U� ml • J W N CO —0 p o N U N m O > z v 0° a o 1 8 E L N �aS _ _ O _ v •c Ln co Ile L U N O C N O IllII W m p LL o r C �l o c c Z a w z m O U p C C O i� > p O E � ti p U r '�• .v, N 3E Eoc v C p J N— m O ii in 66E c q Glw OT� OS - U o N U U e o p x v p m O o U10'� e z L - M T Itl CL p. 0 O v u ��a a N v T N C U D iu - C w m - 11000000 - �i//iii 6 i v zzRN.0-1 LU — / T d � ry -------- __ _ o i Cmi ; r � r i i xx O Lm' r� ' a rvpm m „• � o]n0 S� aim ' ' u mrn c gym= mm ��o . ; O ..........t...,-• o 9561 -1S3 ::Lu Unup - II = � f�IYfIN.� r a ya f J j.O..S'U jN yaalcis . I mol `lladdo;]� •auj `salutiaoss pap livio-a 6�?Plx nisi F 'V loolu `E 1011 z „ Z , JoIlLIOD .JULIOI>3tpayN futpu-elsaa.j 4 h966 Nor/IRZ al.l llS V 6; A III sxtlfz suzlalsA�� Aa�ua�.tauz� uo.�snoH .I2{Ea3�AH p .Yr a w p 4- if LU N J ❑ y z J I I I � N w w w W w w W OO O >: �o ® o 3„Ib ,ZI,005 LO'99Z ^'U'J , , zU� zLL 0 II wzg z _ 0 11 III 11 I Yg �l l I II I ®/ °z w °VdN z°o ° �� o o ol ti I MLb.Z l/,DON •• ( / I I uu`��'� Uv a �. v5 ID Ij Q - 60ZT-M zse ;--oa oW pofoid . aagmrgattr 999LL XL'2e/�N. Z 9S WASEI9I SSV^ ��jJr� OOp S P 3NN1D31I H DWI Q� lvl 1-7;71-611 3d V:)SUNVl 9 S+ M 5960-8SG[BLmd t96o-asenaz 6ESLL XI VmaR8 SLI WI^SN6S"HORM sexaZ `lloddoD Jajuaa polpow x i?utpuuls3a.z3 3 sUBIOTS M LfouaSzauug uagsnog zaueauD o m N ti P Q� ppp a 9 N Co N ti Q� LL 9 a x LL � X .`s U � Co N� N ti Q� 9 a N� 60ZS-Bib ZEB ;ua—a—ow po. • Z9E Wd 9EI9I TTI SO�L'TJOSS smmj, UoddoD 3N N1D31IHJ1dtl 3.d tl:)S4Ntl,. �3JU3D jumpow x $U1t:)s9soas"In",FFFFFM Ouipuils6bid Mgnm Suets S4d AouaIMMI uYSnOH WaS u W Wi rc °z F j°lips 41WN i-~ QQd l?KC O zzNO 3 YO 3£Oz w !WQ 111W D rc zoa� W=FQ ° alb 1 RWw� a d cuao moo rc amW o�zSrcoQd W 8� °FAY ° �o Q°�aFQorc r Volaw t R 31191 Y-w�'Niy�rm � � �'u ow r_m �z u' oF4- N�m�oi ° a�° 'rcmN _ N3�� FLLmK 12 °� F QwOu�iK 3O Fzd'Y m�FON��� K fpwQ o0 �o wNV�4w4 Q °K�LL 3�wf4 W OjF U WwY OwoiQ d wrc�m QoQi � oa�Q Q�� £w 4F- wQQa QOYw ozq'" Th -i0 W a° ° a 2§w Ing 4 -,F NOF oil 11... I FEW 3mUpF oo of °FORW-Z Q O�WOF O°UK ° oNLL Ff��Q1QWQ W 0, 3 w w; S 11 JV wF1m; Of lip! is M s 9!WwOrcmOa W W£LLNN W��wO O �- ~a'QVViFF �Oin � O� w Of NQw O OQO �£ w�zzQpz YWO� O Kw QUQI 3�°mow°Ww0 � KJNVj KN�NN K° K�£I. Omz�zgQwQ uk' ZO C�9£WW�W O O 4zuwi O�zKz O� OttNm£ z Fu cVQKUF mOWK oK nNWNu att£�F3£�£ mg 0o c� 0/I. II pop � wNw �33Q/ /I I I of r;l r I ° I I I Z I °Q Hs �i Ona^ ti S� �QgrcN t um�ob ti K�� 't 11 �11N� u�, lJ�a Q�� � MR 7 �..�Fv! m £ 6 g its �Q£ / H 901011 spot /o =H ON - - a M11 3 O Z� ® 0 u W Wi rc °z F j°lips 41WN i-~ QQd l?KC O zzNO 3 YO 3£Oz w !WQ 111W D rc zoa� W=FQ ° alb 1 RWw� a d cuao moo rc amW o�zSrcoQd W 8� °FAY ° �o Q°�aFQorc r Volaw t R 31191 Y-w�'Niy�rm � � �'u ow r_m �z u' oF4- N�m�oi ° a�° 'rcmN _ N3�� FLLmK 12 °� F QwOu�iK 3O Fzd'Y m�FON��� K fpwQ o0 �o wNV�4w4 Q °K�LL 3�wf4 W OjF U WwY OwoiQ d wrc�m QoQi � oa�Q Q�� £w 4F- wQQa QOYw ozq'" Th -i0 W a° ° a 2§w Ing 4 -,F NOF oil 11... I FEW 3mUpF oo of °FORW-Z Q O�WOF O°UK ° oNLL Ff��Q1QWQ W 0, 3 w w; S 11 JV wF1m; Of lip! is M s 9!WwOrcmOa W W£LLNN W��wO O �- ~a'QVViFF �Oin � O� w Of NQw O OQO �£ w�zzQpz YWO� O Kw QUQI 3�°mow°Ww0 � KJNVj KN�NN K° K�£I. Omz�zgQwQ uk' ZO C�9£WW�W O O 4zuwi O�zKz O� OttNm£ z Fu cVQKUF mOWK oK nNWNu att£�F3£�£ mg 0o c� 0/I. II pop � wNw �33Q/ /I I I of r;l r I ° I I I Z I °Q Hs �i Ona^ ti S� �QgrcN t um�ob ti K�� 't 11 �11N� u�, lJ�a Q�� � �..�Fv! m £ 6 g �� �Q£ / �� spot /o ON 60ZT-M zE8 ;--oa—oW pofoid • aunmr-V 998LL XL'21.S G $ z9E Wd 9ET9T ��LTI SolvlJOSS SLxa,I, jjaddoD 31IN1D31IHJNtl TT�/1� TT. ^^. 1 17 .1 g S96P8SGT8Lmd i?utpuuls3ojd MgMN sUVIOTS I[df'3UOSzauuguausnogzaueauD Nm ig Zz w o<� x� g a C7 wii o 8 Eo= a €w H S <S a < y ug 'PIN Wo Z g Z aN 9 s�_ —_o s =- _ - - _ _ - - -- _ _ -pY - i t a-cm-rti�aoa aw m�m��x m__saa ciao mnr¢_an_cm en _or oe Em-� a-oa=ana-�na em_v�_ snmmu_-x �N w.�sa-mc-oa ai �na_En m-ao v+ a--<-a_..mc--<imm_--<-e�a�mt �Y - - - - - - _-- _ X - -_- _ PQEa a a < a Rm nm_m<_m P ah_ocax _eu_o— 6,6 a m'Y no v o oc a m n� M_xo _a Em--ra-r a3 �Y / y: /< Main � : .... ........ a.: � quauta8eue yaalcis . aanlaaa,yai�+ mol `llaCldo;]� 'Ouj `SO ELa(7Ss a uauz tt to a� t t sz pap I. 2T P.27 �'_A 'V loolu `IdE 1011 z 7 „ .zalua, juatpow fut 116- UZ pu laaz 4 ' [,[c car I, •.�,��si � :�, ,�sve, �,�oe�r� surtats�[���fa�a�.tauz�AolsnoH.ta�eai� a w � � Y � G � ya r a v K 3 w � � Y � G � 'M 3 8 � �� B H HEH HEHHHHEA HHRH HP'N HAAoo CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Vista Ridge Retail Amended, Lot 3R, Block A, Replat P&Z HEARING DATE: August 16, 2012 C.C. HEARING DATE: September 11, 2012 STAFF REP.: Matt Steer, City Planner LOCATION: North side of S.H. 121 approximately 400 feet east of Denton Tap Road SIZE OF AREA: 1.8 acres of property CURRENT ZONING: PD -228 -HC (Planned Development -228 -Highway Commercial) REQUEST: Being a replat of Lots 3 & 4, Block A into Lot 3R, of the Vista Ridge Retail Addition to establish necessary easements and fire lanes to allow a 14,000 -square - foot medical facility. APPLICANT: Architect: Kaim Associates, Inc. Namer Kaim 24080 Hwy 59 N, Suite 175 Kingwood, Texas 77339 Phone: 281-358-0964 Email: nkaim c�,kaim-inc.com Engineer: Bleyl & Associates Austin Love 100 Nugent Street Conroe, Texas 77301 Phone: 936-441-7833 alove t�,bleylen,ineerin,.com HISTORY: In February of 1998, Presbyterian Hospital was granted Site Plan approval on a 14.8 acre parcel, of which this request is a part. That 1998 request proposed two buildings -- a 75,000 -square -foot ambulatory care facility and a 45,000 -square - foot medical office. In late 2004, staff learned the hospital was no longer interested in building on this site. In August 2007, a Conceptual Planned Development zoning change was granted on the 14 -acre parcel allowing seven individual lots. A Detail Plan was approved on three lots in Phase One development, permitting a 2,300 -square -foot gas station/convenience store on 1.2 acres, a 20,000 -square -foot retail building on 2.9 acres, and a 69,800 -square -foot Market Street grocery on 6.9 acres. The remaining 3.8 acres was shown to include a bank site (currently constricted Bank of America) and three pad sites on the remainder, each requiring Detail Site Plan approval before development could occur. Whataburger was approved in October 2010 for the lot just east of the bank and has since been constricted. This request will combine the last two southeastern lots into one for the development of an emergency medical building. ITEM = R Page 1 of 2 TRANSPORTATION: State Highway 121 (Sam Rayburn Tollway) has been developed to freeway standards, contains one-way service roads, each 33 feet wide, within 450 feet of right-of-way. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North — Market Street; PD -228 -HC, (Planned Development 228, Highway Commercial) South — State Highway 121; City of Lewisville East — vacant land and developed office; PD -205R -HC, (Planned Development 205R -Highway Commercial) West — Whataburger; PD -228R3 -HC, (Planned Development -228 Revision 3 - Highway Commercial) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Coppell 2030, A Comprehensive Master Plan, shows this property as suitable for Freeway Special District. DISCUSSION: This is the companion request to the Planned Development case for the proposed 14,000 -square -foot emergency medical facility. Currently the property is platted into two lots — Lots 3 and 4, Block A. These are proposed to be platted into one - Lot 3R, Block A. The easements will remain as previously dedicated. Staff is recommending approval. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff is recommending APPROVAL of Lot 3R, Block A, Vista Ridge Retail Amended subject to the following conditions: 1. There is an $11,179.00 pro rata fee for the water line in addition to the impact fees. 2. There may be additional comments during detailed engineering plan review. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Recommend approval of the request 2. Recommend disapproval of the request 3. Recommend modification of the request ATTACHMENTS: 1. Replat ITEM = R Page 2 of 2 0 W F-lf) U Z d w J Z Q QK UU F Z Q 00 p�U� W Y 1 °tt(9Up w zzo w _ O ¢� JpOXO aIz > ozz� V/ m W �QX ¢0 Opw -� aa� zZ ___-- u-5 goo om YMQzv0 =F�2 in L Q �-- r O �w 00J 0 j �agza¢X am a I N �¢>o LL J o a �LL W Q>��wOQ 0>400l9'9101 4NOOl8 `9101 —OZ. W OI—p - JQ�awo rR LL _ — — — 3 LbZla00S — LO'99Z — F a> mU azo Z Q m— d o Awa LIJ on oo Y aaa� wtom mono I- .60'0643 4t7.Z4o00S oQo> 9IM 8$�,Z' v� wow X bb >�z / / oa /"/M�� V oa ��, i2Jii�No � o gF � M,lb,Zs(JOPLV6 VS -! „66,�9ocl zr 0 0. V o o U K W N U i N O w O \ a o � m Um w`rvN Avid / o � I v J GvoOj db1 NC1N30 Ali W Z � Z n SAM M z� sin Q Z Q oo W � ` '$a m m 8 k e I U r 5 OOw m U W< � 0 N W !"Mod! - Tz"StsK ! a 7 \ B u $� K .� HMO oo Oo _ e m F . U ^ _ ��Ell �rj ZUp U ��ap JWM ��o N�WO b�W�M O U) _ U�U N¢ U) U) '0 a wW J~ U m0WWaQz<�x W� � a x W C)woOIw V- UPJ JOU W 00 W �pC7wco fit O O a D a Z a Q &$ e W Q m 0� �•R� O W ouu sego_ �./ SAIT d- m € U) y ?' ms ¢ 0 m z �q _IS W CO -�a �9 gWS GO _s BmR a O Ila - u _ 3 O O P x- l _ LLg� ��_._� w if �. � I v J GvoOj db1 NC1N30 Ali W Z � Z n SAM M z� sin Q Z Q oo W � ` '$a m m O N U r m U W< � 0 N W Tz"StsK ! 7 \ JZ OWLU Q Z 2 O H oo LL _ 2A Z Z Y ¢ U ^ m �rj ZUp U ��ap JWM ��o N�WO b�W�M O U) _ U�U W U) U) '0 a wW J~ U m0WWaQz<�x W� � a x W C)woOIw V- UPJ JOU W 00 W �pC7wco fit O O a D a Z a Q xwjOM W o O rn W Q m 0� �•R� O W ouu sego_ �./ SAIT m 0 U) y ?' 0 m z W CO GO � I v J GvoOj db1 NC1N30 Ali Z � Z oc SAM M z� sin Q oo i SAM M ` '$a m m $II Tz"StsK ! "UH! U$ � A 12 dgao & � i _ -J 8 3 , 8 WIN c P„y9 mFo - a fit 4 sego_ CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT A Text Amendment to amend the Code of Ordinances Chapter 12, "Zoning", Article 12-29 "Sign Regulations" P&Z HEARING DATE: August 16, 2012 C.C. HEARING DATE: September 11, 2012 STAFF REP.: Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning PURPOSE: To consider approval of a text amendment to amend the Code of Ordinances, by amending Chapter 12, "Zoning", Article 12-29, "Sign Regulations" Section 12- 29-1, "Definitions", by amending the definition of "Zoning District, Business" to include "HC", and by amending Article 12-29-3, "Provision for All Zoning Districts" by amending Subsection 2(A)iv, and amending Section 12-29-4, "Provisions" for Business Zoning Districts", by adding Subsection (B)III and amending Subsection 3(A) and 3(B) and adding Subsection 5; providing a Savings Clause; providing a Severability Clause; providing an Effective Date. HISTORY: We have had little Sign Regulation modifications to the Zoning Ordinance in the recent past. In May of 2011, the Planning Department received a letter from the Coppell Chamber of Commerce requesting a review of sign standards and consideration of suggestions regarding amendments to the Code. In July of that same year, Council appointed a Sign Ordinance Review Committee to address the Chamber's concerns, and in August the Committee met to review signs. Over the next four months, the Committee met and developed a number of recommendations directed at amending the Sign Code. Although the Committee's work was completed in March of 2012, pending Council elections postponed any action being taken on this subject until the elections were over. DISCUSSION: As stated in the HISTORY portion of this report, late last year a Sign Ordinance Review Committee was formed to review several portions of the Zoning Ordinance dealing with signs. The formation of the Committee was preceded by a letter submitted by the Chamber of Commerce criticizing the existing ordinance and suggesting changes that might be made (letter attached). Council approved a committee composed of eight (8) individuals representing the City, Chamber of Commerce, the Economic Development Committee, Planning Commission the industrial community and a commercial property owner who owns several properties in Coppell (member list is attached). Over a period of four months, the Committee developed a series of proposed amendments that addressed concerns with sign provisions of the Zoning ITEM = 9 Page 1 of 2 Ordinance (City Code, Chapter 12), as well as recommendations directed toward sections of the Temporary Signs standards contained within our City Code, Chapter 6. The zoning sign amendments must, of course, be considered by the Planning Commission before a recommendation can be forwarded to City Council; hence, the reason for this advertised public hearing. Chapter 6 of the City Code, however, does not require Planning Commission action and goes directly to Council for action. Our game plan is to recommend changes to the Zoning Ordinance to the Planning Commission with this document. After the Commission has acted, we envision taking the zoning text amendment changes with proposed changes to Temporary Signs to Council in the form of a workshop review. Once City Council has been briefed on both recommendations, we envision taking them both to a Council hearing, probably in September. What follows is a series of recommendations regarding zoning text amendments. Although the majority of these recommendations were unanimous votes on the part of the Committee, some were consensus only, and conflicting views of Committee members that might be expressed during our discussion will be elaborated upon during the public hearing. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff is recommending APPROVAL of these text amendments. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Recommend approval of the request 2. Recommend disapproval of the request 3. Recommend modification of the request 4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date ATTACHMENTS: 1. Text Amendment Changes (in red) 2. Letter of concern from the Chamber of Commerce 3. Sign Ordinance Review Committee members list 4. Police Department memo ITEM = 9 Page 2 of 2 Sec. 12-29-1. Definitions. Zoning district, business. Means any zoning district designated by this ordinance as O, R, C, TC, 11(', or LI. Any PD district with the previous listed zoning prefix is also included in this list, unless specifically excluded by this provision. Sec. 12-29-3. Provisions for all zoning. (A)Movement control signs: Movement control signs may be erected at any occupancy or any premises, other than single-family or duplex premises, may be attached or detached, and may be erected without limits as to number; provided that such signs shall comply with all other applicable requirements of this section. Movement control signs shall be premise signs only and shall not be construed as any sign listed in sections 12-29-4 or 12- 29-5. The occupant who erects a monument control sign on the premises shall comply with the following requirements: i. Each sign must not exceed three square feet in effective area; ii. If a sign is an attached sign, the words must not exceed six inches in height; iii. Each sign must convey a message which directs vehicular or pedestrian movement within or onto the premises on which the sign is located; iv. the signs must contain no advertising identification message, Lfflp _'ss �t...�`Y... 8. GrGffi ti: .... ��laiailli��ait a� aJ� l`��„�ILMIu: ....p� ��.....a� p � ...0 �Qu:� .�. W jddrc^� . ,ill yddrcaJatwl cr^ �hcdl he .�A- iiichc, iii ,�Lc ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Sec. 12-29-4. Provisions for business zoning districts. 1. ..... 2. ..... (A)..... (B) One monument sign is permitted on the premises as follows: On -sites greater than two acres in area. Maximum size -60 square feet. Maximum height—Six feet. Minimum setbacks -15 feet from street right-of-way, 75 feet from property lines other than those property lines fronting the street right-of- way. ii. On -sites two acres in area or less. Maximum size -40 square feet. Maximum height—Four feet. Minimum setbacks -15 feet from street right-of-way, 75 feet from property lines other than those property lines fronting the street right-of- way. iii • .. �... Ll ,Y � iiY., � U." ,���tl��Atli��V9� ;ik,'�tli ;i iai9U:" a� �"�'� U:".d� a U."a�.�d i C�Ap..,,9 U:"9� p-a�qICV'�.: �Vjfll � M�� I�� Lffl � �Y a����u� ol` X25 �u:°u:°� Jro� ii c°.Dt� .,rto �,u.Dtu.,r, ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... (C) ..... 3. Attached signs:.. ... (A) Mounting: All signs and their words shall be mounted parallel to the building surface to which they are attached, and shall project no more than 18 inches from that surface. Signs shall not be mounted on or to the roof surface and support members shall not project above the roof. Attached signs shall cgli p �yj fli, � YJ %11".; Y . � C 11'� .. _ �[„��V Ytl�7�� ��aC Y �V:'„��V 4tli!h�a.? aCq� �. �'{�`7'i�. ���V ��C?��,� tl��a��7 �tl��G Q��c �"t V:4 .���d ur oljl!�". JM Mid iliopLJtLTS M USt th-, k 0l_ . iflaWk 01- MW,11fl C'QpQrs,. d. In the event that a building has existing attached signs of all one color, not compliant with the colors specified herein, then the new sign may either match the color of the existing signs on the building, or be white, ivory, black or neutral. e. It is the intent of this provision that all tenant signage be the same color in any individual building. Raceways shall match the color of the materials to which they are mounted. All illumination shall be limited to white or off-white. No flpL la�Mlt�M SY II Ifl �IM ..................................................................................................................................... S au 11_ flI LIQ ; gm, oflii .- r Logos in any color shall be permitted, but shall not exceed 20 percent of the area of the sign.... (B)..... ii. For buildings and leaseholds with one front facade, (front facade being defined as the building surface directly facing a dedicated street, or where street frontage does not exist, it shall be defined as the width of the lease space which contains the main entry), attached signs located at a height of 36 feet or less are permitted a maximum aggregate effective area equal to one -square foot per lineal foot of building or leasehold frontage as applicable, or 300 square feet, whichever is less. 11aI I d� ..0 p)WJM `Y`Y.:�III Y MUW2� u:... g a41s flim ..0 u. M�o pa�fl: sfi[n, a ts... AV Ytl.,tlI,s aC�7�y.p�V� aCfi:" V:" U:"�� VU." aC��V:"a�„ VMAaC....to NIL ,YqgaCiV. 00t..,�RV:"ptlpu:"aC.. root 01 .,.00fi[alo;�- 0p1 fi[:lu `Yfi[pu uL fi[lu°.\ `su d., tliofi[ to u p d � tli 9of[9U." R aC�u:"� 111. a .gi� ➢ �G.�. ` . 4 � � � ��tltl��7 d U tl���I tlio �'�� V �:d.... W.i4�LA .��q� Di VaC� To: Coppell City Council Frorn: Coppell Chamber of Cotrunerce Re: Coppell CitySignage Ordinance Date: April 29,2011 'Fhe Coppell Chamber of Commerce conducts a yearly survey of Coppell businesses to assess the mood and needs of the business community. While the overall mood of the business cominunity is consistently a good one, by far the largest concern Of Our busiriess community is the sign ordinance restrictions. As their advocates, the Chamber f=eels obligated to voice their concerns -to the city in general and the Council in particular. Restrictions regarding size, trademarks, and color are perceived throughout the business community to be obstacles to doing business in Coppell. A trademarked sign is probably the most recognizable marketing tool for any fratichise owner. Franchise owners drive business to their business with sign recognition more than any other business. Easing signage rules to accorninodate the franchise owner would benefit Customers of the business as inuch as the franchisee. Lhiderstandably, the city has as vision and image it would like to project to its residents, but. at the same time Our businesses attract new lac tne owners atid provide tax dollars to run the city. The businesses are customers of the city and we should try to understand each other's needs so that we have aa, win, in solution. Considerations fear charas In terms of priority we would like to see the city council address the color of' all exterior signage. '['his would include both the building -frontage, rn0flUment and drive thru signs for shopping centers. Today CoPpell's code allows,for 10% color within the size of the sign; we would. like consideration for up t,o 100% as seen in the comparison below. As for the drive thru signs, we would like to have the ability to have the business narrie and color on those signs as well. We ask that the council consider this tbr milt le reasons. For sora e national. brands andr.nost retail. stores, the design and color is a patent and trademark for the franchise. Brand awareness is the top priority when it, comes to marketing theirstore to both new and existing customers, When the city restricts the exterior branding, they basically restrict the ability to rnarket arid drive greater sales.. "The more sales the stores produce the greater the sales tax. dollars are for the city. When the City imposes further restrictions by requiring black signage and require backlit lighting (no ouhvard lurnination ot° lunination that cast a Iight agyaInst the brick thzis outliningy the the signs (Jesign of - lettering) customer awareness and. visablity is greatly derninished. Additionally, we would like consideration for larg ,er signs or have the fomlula th.at is based on linear fibotage adjusted to acconimodate larger signs. We also as that the size of the monument signs be increased -to allow for more tenants to post their retail names. This may be a small increase of height to allow for additional tenant slot& Both these points are HjUstrated below: L.,astly, we would like the city council to consider tempo.rary sl mage for specific and defined events like grand openings that would go beyond banners. For example, short terin allowances Ibr contour signs, -reather flags, etc. -- only allowed around store frontage and away from city streets l'br periods no longer than one week. Additional restrictions oil the number ot'signs ,,allowed and that the signs are professionally designed/produced would be acceptable. "Understandably, the city has a vision and image it would like to prqject to its residents, but at the same time our bUSinesses attract new home owners and provide tax dollars to run the city. T'he businesses are custorners of the city and we should try. to understandeach other's needs so that we have a win, will solution. Casey Klein Vice President of Operations pp ll FamUy YMCA 146 Town Center Blvd Copp ll, TX 75019 Phone: (972) 393-5121 Fax: (972) 393-5947 www.ggppe jlye ,yjQ[g NurtUring Youth Development, Energizing Healthy Living and Inspiring Social Responsibility MEMO Date: February 23, 2012 To: Mac Tristan, Chief of Police From: Gary Nix, Deputy Chief of Police Subject: Sign Ordinance, section 12-29-4 The ordinance requires that the signage in the windows of businesses be limited. The reasons for limiting signage in the windows are based on long held and proven recommendations from various crime prevention institutes and clime prevention training courses. The basic reason to limit signs is to allow the maximum visibility from the street or parking lot into and out of the business. First, the officers can see in the business while on patrol for any potential crimes such as robberies, disturbances, suspicious persons, or other crimes. If the officer observes a crime being committed or about to be committed they can plan their approach to the location, get assistance, and respond in a manner that is safe for the business operator and the officers. Secondly, the visibility allows the business owner to see out of the business to see any approaching suspicious persons or activity so that they might have time to call for police assistance before the crime occurs. Finally, the visibility allows potential customers approaching the business the ability to see in the business as they approach and not enter the business if a crime is in progress and avoid becoming a hostage or being injured. While from a law enforcement perspective the more visibility the better and we would prefer no signage in windows, but we understand that is not practical or realistic. We understand the desire and need to advertise and place safety information for the public in windows. It is felt that the less signage or other obstruction in windows the better and safer.