The URL can be used to link to this page

BP 2012-09-20 PZNOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING & AGENDA PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION September 20, 2012 COMMISSIONERS: Edmund Haas — Chairman Gregory Frnka — Vice Chairman Anna Kittrell Craig Pritzlaff Charles Sangerhausen Glenn Portman Justin Goodale MEETING TIME AND PLACE: Pre -Session 6:00 p.m. lst Floor Conference Room (Open to the Public) Regular Session 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers (Open to the Public) Notice is hereby given that the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Coppell, Texas will meet in pre -session at 6:00 p.m. and in regular session at 6:30 p.m. on Thursday, September 20, 2012, to be held at Town Center, 255 Parkway Boulevard, Coppell, Texas. As authorized by Section 551.071(2) of the Texas Government Code, this meeting may be convened into closed Executive Session for the purpose of seeking confidential legal advice from the City Attorney on any agenda item listed herein. The purpose of the meeting is to consider the following items: ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION PRE -SESSION: (Open to the Public) 1. Briefing on the Agenda. REGULAR SESSION: 2. Call to Order. (Open to the Public) 3. Consider approval of the minutes for August 16, 2012. 4. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD -257-C, Neighborhood Credit Union, a zoning change request from C (Commercial) to PD -257-C (Planned Development -257- Commercial), to allow the development of an approximate 2,800 -square -foot bank facility with drive-thru lanes on approximately 1.25 acres of property located at the northeast corner of Denton Tap Road and Vanbebber Drive, at the request of Don Rankin, DR Rankin PLLC. STAFF REP.: Marcie Diamond ag092012 Page 1 of 4 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION 5. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of the Texas Bank Addition, Lots IRI & IR2 , Block A (Neighborhood Credit Union), Replat, being a replat of Lot 1, Block A, into Lots IRI & IR2, of the Texas Bank Addition to establish necessary easements and fire lanes to allow the development of an approximate 2,800 -square -foot bank facility with drive-thru lanes on Lot IRI containing 1.25 acres, with the remaining 1.25 acres being Lot IR2 on property located at the northeast corner of Denton Tap Road and Vanbebber Drive, at the request of Don Rankin, DR Rankin PLLC. STAFF REP.: Marcie Diamond 6. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD -250R7 -H, Old Town Addition (Main Street) Restaurant, Lot IR, Block B, a zoning change request from PD -250-H (Planned Development -250 -Historic) to PD -250R7 -H (Planned Development -250 Revision 7 - Historic), to establish a Detail Site Plan for a 3,574 -square -foot restaurant building on 0.52 acres of property located on the south side of West Bethel Road between Burnet Street and Main Street at the request of Greg Yancey, Main Street Coppell, LTD. STAFF REP.: Matt Steer 7. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD -256 -SF -9, Old Coppell Estates, Lots IR, 2R & C- CR, Block 1, a zoning change request from H (Historic) & SF -9 (Single Family -9) to PD - 256 -SF -9 (Planned Development -256 -Single Family -9), to allow the expansion of single family and common area uses on 0.76 acres of property located on the north side of West Bethel Road, west of Hearthstone Lane (373 & 369 Hearthstone Lane & 408 Bethel Road), at the request of Edward R. Crater, C -Native Exchange III, LP, Scott D. Park, and the Homeowners' Association of Old Coppell Estates, being represented by Edward R. Crater. STAFF REP.: Gary Sieb 8. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of the Old Coppell Estates, Lots IR, 2R & C -IR, Block 1, Replat, being a replat of Lots 1, 2 & C-1, Block 1, to incorporate 0.28 acres of unplatted property into (3) three lots. Lot IR (373 Hearthstone Lane), will contain 0.349 acres; Lot 2R (369 Hearthstone Lane), will contain 0.373 acres and Lot C -IR (a common area lot), will contain 0.035 acres, at the request of Edward R. Crater, C -Native Exchange III, LP, Scott D. Park, and the Homeowners' Association of Old Coppell Estates, being represented by Edward R. Crater. STAFF REP.: Gary Sieb 9. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of a text amendment to amend the Code of Ordinances, by amending Chapter 12, "Zoning", Article 12-29, "Sign Regulations", Section 12-29-1, "Definitions", by amending the definition of "Zoning District, Business", to include "HU, and by amending Article 12-29-3, "Provision for All Zoning Districts", by amending Subsection 2(A) iv. and amending Section 12-29-4, "Provisions" for Business Zoning Districts", by adding Subsection (B) iii. and amending Subsection 3(A) and 3(B) ag092012 Page 2 of 4 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION and adding Subsection 5; providing a Savings Clause; providing a Severability Clause; providing an Effective Date. STAFF REP.: Gary Sieb 10. Update on Council action for planning agenda items on September 11, 2012: A. An Ordinance for Case No. PD-202R-TH-1, Villas of Lake Vista, PH 2, a zoning change from PD-202-TH-1 to PD-202R-TH-1, to allow 39 single-family lots and (5) five common area lots to replace 62 townhome lots and (8) eight common area lots on 9.3 acres of property located on the south side of Lake Vista Drive, east of North MacArthur Boulevard. B. An Ordinance for Case No. PD -229R2 -LI, Minyard Addition, a zoning change from PD -229 -LI to PD -229R2 -LI, to allow the retention of the existing 12,500 - square -foot building and to constrict 252 car parking spaces and 60 trailer storage spaces with a masonry screening wall on 6.9 acres of property located at 849 Freeport Parkway. C. An Ordinance for Case No. PD -250R5 -H, Old Town Addition (Main SO Retail/Office Cottages, Lots 2R -4R, Block A, a zoning change from PD -250-H to PD -250R5 -H, for three (3) retail/office cottage buildings on three (3) separate lots on 0.35 acres of property located on the northwest corner of Main Street and Houston Street. D. An Ordinance for Case No. PD -250R6 -H, Old Town Addition (Main SO Retail/Restaurant, Lot IR, Block D, a zoning change from PD -250-H to PD - 250R6 -H, for a 5,034 -square -foot retail/restaurant building on 0.19 acres of property located on the southwest corner of West Main Street and Houston Street. E. Approval of Professional Services Agreements with David Lunsford, Cibola Venture Services to provide application review and inspections for oil and gas drilling and with Kenneth Tramm, Modern Geosciences to provide testing, monitoring activities. F. Approval of the Minyard Addition, Lot 4RI, Block 1, Replat, to relocate and abandon various fire lane easements to permit the retention of the existing 12,500 - square -foot building and to constrict 252 car parking spaces and 60 trailer storage spaces with a masonry screening wall on 6.9 acres of property located at 849 Freeport Parkway. G. Case No. PD -214R6 -C, Arbor Manor Retail (Jersey Mikes), a zoning change request from PD -214R5 -C to PD -214R6 -C, to allow an additional 1,500 -square - foot restaurant within the retail building proposed to be constricted on 1.5 acres of property located at 143 S. Denton Tap Road. H. Case No. PD -228R4 -HC, Vista Ridge Retail Amended, Lot 3R, Block A, (Elite Care), a zoning change request from PD -228 -HC to PD -228R4 -HC, to allow a 14,000 -square -foot medical facility on approximately 1.8 acres of property located on the north side of S.H. 121 approximately 400 feet east of Denton Tap Road. L Approval of the Vista Ridge Retail Amended, Lot 3R, Block A, Replat, being a replat of Lots 3 and 4, Block A into Lot 3R, of the Vista Ridge Retail Addition to establish necessary easements and fire lanes to allow a 14,000 -square -foot medical facility on approximately 1.8 acres of property located on S.H. 121 approximately 400 feet east of Denton Tap Road. ag092012 Page 3 of 4 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION J. APPEAL — Case No. PD -23882 -HC, Coppell Office Village, a zoning change request from PD -238R -HC (Planned Development -238 Revised -Highway Commercial) to PD -238R2 -HC (Planned Development -238 Revision 2 -Highway Commercial), to revise the Detail Site Plan to allow the existing 40 -square -foot monument sign to be externally illuminated with a four -foot bronze fixture with white florescent lighting in lieu of the existing internal LED lighting on 2.02 acres of property located at 225 East S.H. 121. 11. Director's Comments. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATE I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Coppell, Texas on this 14th day of September, 2012 at Juanita A. Miles Planning Secretary PUBLIC NOTICE STATEMENT FOR ADA COMPLIANCE The City of Coppell acknowledges its responsibility to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Thus, in order to assist individuals with disabilities who require special services (i.e., sign interpretative services, alternative audio/visual devices, and amanuenses) for participation in or access to the City of Coppell sponsored public programs, services and/or meetings, the City requests that individuals make requests for these services forty-eight (48) hours ahead of the scheduled program, service and/or meeting. To make arrangements, contact Vivyon V. Bowman, ADA Coordinator or other designated officials at (972) 462-0022, or (TDD 1 -800 -RELAY, TX, 1-800-735-2989). ag092012 Page 4 of 4 MINUTES OF AUGUST 16, 2012 The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Coppell met in Pre -session at 6:00 p.m., and in Regular session at 6:30 p.m., on August 16, 2012, in the Council Chambers of Coppell Town Center, 255 Parkway Boulevard, Coppell, Texas. The following Commissioners were present: COMMISSIONERS: Edmund Haas — Chairman Gregory Frnka — Vice Chairman Anna Kittrell Craig Pritzlaff Charles Sangerhausen Glenn Portman Justin Goodale Also present were Director of Planning, Gary Sieb; Assistant Director of Planning, Marcie Diamond; City Planner, Matt Steer; Civil Engineer, George Marshall; Chief Building Official, Michael Arellano and Secretary, Juanita Miles. The purpose of the meeting is to consider the following items: ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION PRE -SESSION: (Open to the Public) 1. Briefing on the Agenda. The Planning Commission was briefed on each posted agenda item in the Workshop Session. No vote was taken on any item discussed. REGULAR SESSION: (Open to the Public) 2. Call to Order. Chairman Haas called the meeting to order. 3. Consider approval of the minutes for July 19, 2012. Vice Chairman Frnka made a motion to approve the minutes for July 19, 2012, as written. Commissioner Sangerhausen seconded; motion carried (7-0), with Commissioners Goodale, Pritzlaff, Frnka, Haas, Sangerhausen, Portman and Kittrell voting in favor. None opposed. 4. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of the Minyard Addition, Lot 4R1, Block 1, Replat, to relocate and abandon various fire lane easements to permit the retention of the existing 12,500 -square - foot building and to construct 252 car parking spaces and 60 trailer storage spaces with a masonry screening wall on 6.9 acres of property located at 849 Freeport Parkway at the request of KTR Coppell, LLC, being represented by Eric Shutt, Jones & Carter. STAFF REP.: Marcie Diamond 1\11N081612 Page 1 of 7 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION Presentation: Assistant Planning Director, Marcie Diamond, introduced this case to the Commission with exhibits. She stated that staff is recommending approval with no conditions. Seth Reichenau'Jones & Carter, 6509 Windcrest Drive, Ste. 600, Plano, Texas, was present to represent this case, to address questions and stated he was in agreement with staff's recommendation. Public Hearing: Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. No one spoke. Chairman Haas closed the public hearing. Action: Commissioner Sangerhausen made a motion to approve the Minyard Addition, Lot 4RI, Block 1, Replat, with no conditions. Commissioner Portman seconded; motion carried (7-0), with Commissioners Goodale, Pritzlaff, Frnka, Haas, Sangerhausen, Portman and Kittrell voting in favor. None opposed. 5. Consider approval of the Rid2ecrest Estates, Final Plat, to allow 26 single-family lots and two (2) common area lots on 6.69 acres of property located at the northeast corner of East Sandy Lake Road and Lodge Street, at the request of Matt Alexander, Dowdey, Anderson & Associates, Inc. STAFF REP.: Marcie Diamond Presentation: Assistant Planning Director, Marcie Diamond, introduced this case to the Commission with exhibits. She stated that staff is recommending approval with conditions which she read into the record. Casey Ross, Dowdey, Anderson & Associates, Inc., 5225 Village Creek Drive, Plano, Texas, was present to represent this case, to address questions and stated he was in agreement with staff's recommendation. Action: Commissioner Kittrell made a motion to approve the Rid2ecrest Estates, Final Plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. Submission of Legal Descriptions and Exhibits for the easement abandonments. 2. A tree removal permit will be required prior to the removal of any trees. 3. Park development fees in the amount of $1,285 will be assessed at the time of the Final Plat. 4. During detail engineering plan review the drainage will also be further evaluated. Vice Chairman Frnka seconded; motion carried (7-0), with Commissioners Goodale, Pritzlaff, Frnka, Haas, Sangerhausen, Portman and Kittrell voting in favor. None opposed. MIN081612 Page 2 of 7 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION 6. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD -214R6 -C, Arbor Manor Retail (Jersey Mikes), a zoning change request from PD -214R5 -C (Planned Development -214 Revision 5 - Commercial) to PD -214R6 -C (Planned Development -214 Revision 6 -Commercial), to allow an additional 1,500 -square -foot restaurant within the retail building proposed to be constructed on 1.5 acres of property located at 143 S. Denton Tap Road, approximately 155 feet north of West Braewood Drive, at the request of Hermansen Land Development, Inc., being represented by Randi Rivera, G & A Consultants. STAFF REP.: Matt Steer Presentation: City Planner, Matt Steer introduced this case to the Commission with exhibits. He mentioned 22 notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of this request; two returned in favor; zero in opposition. He stated that staff is recommending approval with one condition which he read into the record. Kirk Hermansen, Hermansen Land Development, 5944 Luther Lane, Ste. 725, Dallas, Texas, made a power point presentation, was available to address questions and stated he was in agreement with staff s recommendation. Public Hearing: Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. No one spoke. Chairman Haas closed the public hearing. Action: Commissioner Sangerhausen made a motion to approve Case No. PD -214R6 -C, Arbor Manor Retail (Jersey Mikes), a zoning change request from PD -214R5 -C (Planned Development -214 Revision 5 -Commercial) to PD -214R6 -C (Planned Development -214 Revision 6 -Commercial), subject to the following condition: 1. Development shall be in accordance with the approved site plan, floor plan, and sign plan. Commissioner Pritzlaff seconded; motion carried (7-0), with Commissioners Goodale, Pritzlaff, Frnka, Haas, Sangerhausen, Portman and Kittrell voting in favor. None opposed. 7. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD -228R4 -HC, Vista Ridge Retail Amended, Lot 3R, Block A, (Elite Care), a zoning change request from PD -228 -HC (Planned Development - 228 -Highway Commercial) to PD -228R4 -HC (Planned Development -228 Revision 4 - Highway Commercial), to attach a Detail Plan to Lots 3 and 4 to allow a 14,000 -square - foot medical facility on approximately 1.8 acres of property located on the north side of S.H. 121 approximately 400 feet east of Denton Tap Road, at the request of Coppell ED MOB, LLC, being represented by Namer Kaim, Kaim Associates, Inc. STAFF REP.: Matt Steer MIN081612 Page 3 of 7 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION Presentation: City Planner, Matt Steer introduced this case to the Commission with exhibits, elevations and a color board. He mentioned five notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of this request; one returned in favor; zero in opposition. He stated that staff is recommending approval with conditions which he read into the record. Namer Kaim & Rich Garcia, Kaim Associates, Inc., 24080 Hwy. 59 N. Ste. 175, Kingwood, Texas, were present to represent this case, to address questions and stated agreement with staff's recommendation. Public Hearing: Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. No one spoke. Chairman Haas closed the public hearing. Action: Commissioner Portman made a motion to approve Case No. PD -228R4 -HC, Vista Ridge Retail Amended, Lot 3R, Block A, (Elite Care), a zoning change request from PD -228 -HC (Planned Development -228 -Highway Commercial) to PD -228R4 -HC (Planned Development - 228 Revision 4 -Highway Commercial), subject to the following conditions: 1. Add a PD conditions Table to the Site Plan indicating: a. The attached signage will consist of white and black halo -lighted channel letters and a back -plate (cloud) painted to match the surface to which it is mounted, b. An exception to required perimeter landscaping on the west and north property lines was approved with the Conceptual PD, and c. Two monument signs were approved (one 60 square foot multi -tenant and one 40 square foot single tenant) with the Conceptual PD. 2. There is an $11,179.00 pro rata fee for the water line in addition to the impact fees. 3. There may be additional comments during detailed engineering plan review. Commissioner Goodale seconded; motion carried (7-0), with Commissioners Goodale, Pritzlaff, Frnka, Haas, Sangerhausen, Portman and Kittrell voting in favor. None opposed. 8. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of the Vista Ridge Retail Amended, Lot 3R, Block A, Replat, being a replat of Lots 3 and 4, Block A into Lot 3R, of the Vista Ridge Retail Addition to establish necessary easements and fire lanes to allow a 14,000 -square -foot medical facility on approximately 1.8 acres of property located on S.H. 121 approximately 400 feet east of Denton Tap Road, at the request of Coppell ED MOB, LLC, being represented by Namer Kaim, Kaim Associates, Inc. STAFF REP.: Matt Steer Presentation: City Planner, Matt Steer introduced this companion case to the Commission with exhibits. He stated that staff is recommending approval with conditions which he read into the record. MIN081612 Page 4 of 7 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION Namer Kaim, Kaim Associates, Inc., 24080 Hwy. 59 N., Ste. 175, Kingwood, Texas, was present to represent this case, to address questions and stated agreement with staff's recommendation. Public Hearing: Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. No one spoke. Chairman Haas closed the public hearing. Action: Commissioner Kittrell made a motion to approve the Vista Ridge Retail Amended, Lot 3R, Block A, Replat, subject to the following conditions: 1. There is an $11,179.00 pro rata fee for the water line in addition to the impact fees. 2. There may be additional comments during detailed engineering plan review. Vice Chairman Frnka seconded; motion carried (7-0), with Commissioners Goodale, Pritzlaff, Frnka, Haas, Sangerhausen, Portman and Kittrell voting in favor. None opposed. 9. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of a text amendment to amend the Code of Ordinances, by amending Chapter 12, "Zoning", Article 12-29, "Sign Regulations", Section 12-29-1, "Definitions", by amending the definition of "Zoning District, Business", to include "HC", and by amending Article 12-29-3, "Provision for All Zoning Districts", by amending Subsection 2(A) iv. and amending Section 12-29-4, "Provisions" for Business Zoning Districts", by adding Subsection (B) iii. and amending Subsection 3(A) and 3(B) and adding Subsection 5; providing a Savings Clause; providing a Severability Clause; providing an Effective Date. STAFF REP.: Gary Sieb Presentation: Planning Director, Gary Sieb stated late last year a Sign Ordinance Review Committee was formed to review several portions of the Zoning Ordinance dealing with signs. The formation of this Committee was preceded by a letter submitted by the Chamber of Commerce suggesting changes be made. Over a period of four months, the Committee developed a series of proposed amendments that addressed concerns with the sign provisions of the Zoning Ordinance - City Code Chapter 12, as well as recommendations directed toward sections of the Temporary Signs standards contained within our City Code, Chapter 6. The Committee is submitting to the Planning Commission the recommended changes to the Zoning Ordinance for discussion. Public Hearing: Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. The following people spoke: Tony Moline, Coppell Chamber of Commerce, 509 W. Bethel Road, Ste. 200, Coppell, Texas, spoke in favor. MIN081612 Page 5 of 7 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION Kimberly Hatley, Historic Coppell Properties, 413 W. Bethel Road, Ste. 100, Coppell, Texas, spoke in favor of the changes to the sign ordinance and further requested allowance for a monument sign on her property. Barry Irwin, Irwin Law Firm, 207 S. Denton Tap Road, Ste. 100, Coppell, Texas, spoke in favor. Chairman Haas closed the public hearing. Action: After much discussion, Chairman Haas made a motion to reopen and continue the public hearing to the September 20th Planning Commission meeting for further discussion. Vice Chairman Frnka seconded; motion carried (7-0), with Commissioners Goodale, Pritzlaff, Frnka, Haas, Sangerhausen, Portman and Kittrell voting in favor. None opposed. 10. Update on Council action for planning agenda items on August 14, 2012: A. An Ordinance for Case No. PD -255 -SF, Westhaven, a zoning change from HC to PD -255 -SF, to permit the development of 297 residential lots and 37 common area lots on property located south of S.H. 121, west of Magnolia Park. B. Case No. PD -229R2 -LI, Minyard Addition, a zoning change request from PD -229 - LI to PD -229R2 -LI, to amend the Detail Site Plan of Lot 4R, to allow the retention of the existing 12,500 -square -foot building and to construct 252 car parking spaces and 60 trailer storage spaces with a masonry screening wall on property located at 849 Freeport Parkway. C. Case No. PD-202R-TH-1, Villas of Lake Vista, PH 2, a zoning change request from PD-202-TH-1 to PD-202R-TH-1, to amend the Detail Site Plan to allow 39 single- family lots and (5) five common area lots to replace 62 townhome lots and (8) eight common area lots on property located on the south side of Lake Vista Drive, approximately 970 feet east of North MacArthur Boulevard. D. Villas of Lake Vista, PH 2, Preliminary Plat, and Council also granted the Planning & Zoning Commission authority for final plat approval to allow 39 single-family lots and (5) five common area lots on property located on the south side of Lake Vista Drive, approximately 970 feet east of North MacArthur Boulevard. E. APPEAL - Case No. PD -200R3 -SF -7, Petterson Addition, a zoning change request from PD -200R2 -SF -12 to PD -200R3 -SF -7, to allow the development of eight (8) residential lots and three (3) common area lots on property located along the north side of Sandy Lake Road, approximately 130 feet west of Summer Place Drive. F. APPEAL - Case No. PD-250R3R-H, Old Town Addition (Main St) Entry Feature Sign, Lot 1RX, Block B, a zoning change request from PD -250R3 -H to PD- 250R3R-H, to establish a Detail Sign for the Entry Feature on property located at the southeast corner of Bethel Road and Main Street. G. Case No. PD -250R5 -H, Old Town Addition (Main St) Retail/Office Cottages, Lots 2R -4R, Block A, a zoning change request from PD -250-H to PD -250R5 -H, to establish a Detail Site Plan for three (3) retail/office cottage buildings on three (3) separate lots on property located on the northwest corner of Main Street and Houston Street. MIN081612 Page 6 of 7 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION H. Case No. PD -250R6 -H, Old Town Addition (Main St) Retail/Restaurant, Lot IR, Block D, a zoning change request from PD -250-H to PD -250R6 -H, to establish a Detail Site Plan for a 5,034 -square -foot retail/restaurant building on property located on the southwest corner of West Main Street and Houston Street. L A text amendment to add Article 18A, Residential Urban Neighborhood District (RBN), to the Zoning Ordinance (Section 12-18A of the Code of Ordinances). During the Pre -Session, Planning Director, Gary Sieb advised the Commission of Council's actions on August 14, 2012 and stated that Council approved all of the above -stated items except Item E which was withdrawn at applicant's request. 11. Director's Comments. Mr. Sieb reminded the Commissioners of the Joint meeting with City Council and the Economic Development Committee on Wednesday, September 5, 2012, at 6:00 p.m. at the Fire Station 43 --Training Room located at 133 Parkway Blvd., Coppell, Texas. He also mentioned discussion topics be submitted to him for the agenda by August 24tH ADJOURNMENT With nothing further to discuss, the meeting adjourned at approximately 9:20 p.m. Edmund Haas, Chairman Juanita A. Miles, Secretary MIN081612 Page 7 of 7 P&Z HEARING DATE: C.C. HEARING DATE: STAFF REP.: LOCATION: SIZE OF AREA: CURRENT ZONING: REQUEST: APPLICANT: CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT PD -257-C, Neighborhood Credit Union September 20, 2012 October 9, 2012 Marcie Diamond, Assistant Planning Director NEC of Denton Tap Road & Vanbebber Drive 1.25 acres of property C (Commercial) A zoning change to allow the development of an approximate 2,800 -square -foot bank facility with drive-thrl lanes. Owner/Developer: Neighborhood Credit Union 13649 Montfort Drive Dallas, Texas 75240 214-748-9393 Civil Engineer: Dr Rankin, PLLC 2321 Daybreak Trail Plano, Texas 75093 972-378-0683 e-mail: drr0Wrrankin.com Architect: Gahl Architecture, Inc. 3875 Regent Drive Dallas, Texas 75229 214-956-8500 e-mail: iim t_�,,vahlarchitecture.com HISTORY: On May 13, 2003, Council approved a Site Plan to allow the constriction of a one-story, 6,700 -square -foot bank facility, plus a 2,200 -square -foot office on Lot 1 of the Texas Bank Addition, which is the subject tract of land. Council also approved a Minor Plat for two lots, Lot 1 (bank lot) containing 1.74 acres and Lot 2, containing 3.61 acres for future development. In November 2004, Council approved a replat of Lots 1R and 2R, Block A of the Texas Bank Addition to allow the constriction of a 20,045 square foot day care center on Lot 2R. Creme de la Creme has since been constricted on this site. TRANSPORTATION: Denton Tap Road is a six -lane divided roadway, built within 110 feet of right-of- way. Vanbebber is a residential collector, built within 50 feet of right-of-way. ITEM = 04 Page 1 of 3 SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING North: Creme De La Creme; C (Commercial) East: Braewood West 2nd Rev., Single Family; SF -7 South: Convenience food store with gas pumps and Car Wash; C (Commercial) West: Red Hawlc, Single Family under constriction; PD -241 -SF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Coppell 2030, A Comprehensive Master Plan, indicate this property suitable for Mixed Use Neighborhood Center which includes neighborhood serving retail uses. DISCUSSION: As mentioned in the History section of this report, the Site Plan and Plat for a Texas Bank, with a drive-thrl facility, was approved nine years ago on this property, but was never constricted. Since that time the property to the north has been developed with Creme de la Creme day care facility. The remainder of the property (2.56 acres) was recently purchased by Neighborhood Credit Union. The current owner of the property, Neighborhood Credit Union, is requesting approval for a 2,791 -square -foot facility, with four drive-thrl lanes on approximately one-half of the vacant land. A financial institution is appropriate at this location as it is permitted by right in the existing Commercial zoning district. The applicant is requesting a PD to allow several variances to the base zoning district regulations. Site/Landscape Plan While compliant in all other aspects, including setbacks, parking, and lot coverage, one variance being requested is to the required perimeter landscaping along the northern property line. The Landscape Ordinance requires a 10 -foot - wide landscape buffer adjacent to all property lines, not adjacent to a street. Where adjacent to a mutual access easement, this 10 -foot buffer shall be provided on each side of the drive. The applicant is only providing a five-foot wide landscape buffer adjacent to the mutual access easement along the northern property line. However, the trees and the landscaped area that would have been required have been provided elsewhere on the site. Given this Landscape Plan exceeds other requirements especially along the street frontages where up to 20 feet of additional buffer is being provided, staff can support this variance. This property abuts an existing single-family subdivision to the east. As required, a six -foot -tall masonry screening wall is being provided along this property line. The intervening lot between this property and the Creme property is also owned by the Neighborhood Credit Union. To provide a consistent barrier, and to respond to a request by a neighboring residential property owner, staff is recommending that this six-foot wall be extended this additional 200 feet to connect with the existing wall to the north. This development will enjoy access from Denton Tap Road and Vanbebber Drive. A mutual access/fire lane will encircle the building. Along the north side, this mutual access/fire lane will straddle the common property line. The entire 24 - foot width will need to be constricted with this development. ITEM = 04 Page 2 of 3 Elevations The building is proposed to be a combination of face brick and stone veneer with stucco accents. The C (Commercial) District requires 80% masonry on each facade. However, given the architectural design, several of the facades are slightly under the 80% threshold. The aggregate total of all four facades meets that 80% masonry requirement; therefore staff can support this variance. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff is recommending APPROVAL of PD -257-C, Neighborhood Credit Union, subject to the following conditions: 1. The entire fire lane which straddles the common property line shall be constricted with this development. 2. Consideration be given to extending the screening wall from this property to the Creme de la Creme property to the north with this development. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Recommend approval of the request 2. Recommend disapproval of the request 3. Recommend modification of the request 4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date ATTACHMENTS: 1. Site Plan 2. Landscape Plan 3. Elevations 4. Sign Plan ITEM = 04 Page 3 of 3 Texasbank Addtlon PROPOSED WATER METER SCHEDULE Volume 2005048 Page 20 I. J "I"wn'1La wn.sa ms�La srw M.R. D.C.T.-- IECE 2.564 ACRES 3 1 NU° (111,706 SF) LEGEND PDDPD1Eo P—o 7PE — — 2 -1 amN L1 nTPnLL o PDP � EVo IVvI.RE1 1E,IEAmA aDLE J I ® aoPo EsncovAT erEn EIMII 1111cl POLE II III xDUE NI. NWPOSEDSITEDDaTw6 Lot 1R2, Block A 5 Texasbank Addition 1.2244 ACRES ol. s s.I ImI AP AD (57,486.5 SF) NI 10°° sLot 1R1, BIockA e �� O Texasbank Addition TM 1.245 ACRES (54 219.5 SF) A I. _ _ a"I ,„ I FF 51200E I 2,79 11 1 1 I �I LOT 1R1 BRICK SCREENING WALL SECTION 1 ,� a -- — --- 11 �� I 60 FROAlB L�GU NE�� z LOCATION MAP V )% %n SCALE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING CONDITIONS 3.Tota1 masonry Facia m Equal Eight/ Percent (sada). Site Plan Notes W lIl require cry apapro,zl ane,Il regNre np Nans cn µ3ns L�eLn BLOCK A, LOT 1R3 SRE INFORMATION III 1-1— 111: TIA11 aEA. 211.1 Pz III, zza) LOT 1-11 EREQIIIEI R`AIL(2111/2ao 4)-141 11 REpu[RED: 14 T.T.LArvD1C1�PE AREA �L1a2a 2Go 1F 311 1 P 5 Nn11� 10es gar flootlsyle n e . i N aII kel p-, dn-1 �emang cre[ pavx n[con clb11 H -I rWng &erlre,ea/s Pea, opo FOL�mk�hma9q Oma l naXon mz bul eo«9°Al, re I Id o,.p..mIV.. manae a / E �s a SITE PLAN F:REaNE I �� sTAmPFgcorvcR TEXASBANK ADDITION at PROP SED 'E Is:gho qPs yEal - / / BLOCK A, LOT 1111 -- -- — H -- ------------ AP NEIGHBORHOOD CREDIT UNION FH )us`1NG DRIVE/\ - 1z5_ sa�L—F53ss — 231 sa va''-4S.s9 360 S Denton Tap Road 5 ^ rI - Lot 2R� Block A Second Revised �Fexasbajik Addition Vo unne 200 048, Pagel_ DENTON TAP ROAD / M.R D.C.T. BRAEWOOD WEST 2.789 ACRES I Vol 80153, Pg 53 _ 6 e masonry screenlnq wa14on Existing Overhead A Po)ver to RemaiP. M.R.D.C.T. Constructed per City StandaOCK TBPE FIRM #8838 301 NORTH ALAND ROAD 2321 DAYBREAK TRAIL ROCKWALL, TEXAS 75087 L1R1 East Property Li. BLOCK A L, Lt7 Lot fi Lat 5 11 L/ ZONINuG:45F-7 Lot 3 Lot 2 Lott _ _ _ _ -u ------ — PF 500°r 13"N � - _ 212.33 � � C 50039']3 W 194.21' jx lsan assrnsr `_- -____ •.. �'ms,y,a _ __ - L _F — � I F- — — — — — _ — _ Lot 1R1acTi Ar— mse Texasbank Addtlon PROPOSED WATER METER SCHEDULE Volume 2005048 Page 20 I. J "I"wn'1La wn.sa ms�La srw M.R. D.C.T.-- IECE 2.564 ACRES 3 1 NU° (111,706 SF) LEGEND PDDPD1Eo P—o 7PE — — 2 -1 amN L1 nTPnLL o PDP � EVo IVvI.RE1 1E,IEAmA aDLE J I ® aoPo EsncovAT erEn EIMII 1111cl POLE II III xDUE NI. NWPOSEDSITEDDaTw6 Lot 1R2, Block A 5 Texasbank Addition 1.2244 ACRES ol. s s.I ImI AP AD (57,486.5 SF) NI 10°° sLot 1R1, BIockA e �� O Texasbank Addition TM 1.245 ACRES (54 219.5 SF) A I. _ _ a"I ,„ I FF 51200E I 2,79 11 1 1 I �I LOT 1R1 BRICK SCREENING WALL SECTION 1 ,� a -- — --- 11 �� I 60 FROAlB L�GU NE�� z LOCATION MAP V )% %n SCALE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING CONDITIONS 3.Tota1 masonry Facia m Equal Eight/ Percent (sada). Site Plan Notes W lIl require cry apapro,zl ane,Il regNre np Nans cn µ3ns L�eLn BLOCK A, LOT 1R3 SRE INFORMATION III 1-1— 111: TIA11 aEA. 211.1 Pz III, zza) LOT 1-11 EREQIIIEI R`AIL(2111/2ao 4)-141 11 REpu[RED: 14 T.T.LArvD1C1�PE AREA �L1a2a 2Go 1F 311 1 P 5 Nn11� 10es gar flootlsyle n e . i N aII kel p-, dn-1 �emang cre[ pavx n[con clb11 H -I rWng &erlre,ea/s Pea, opo FOL�mk�hma9q Oma l naXon mz bul eo«9°Al, re I Id o,.p..mIV.. manae a / E �s a SITE PLAN F:REaNE I �� sTAmPFgcorvcR TEXASBANK ADDITION at PROP SED 'E Is:gho qPs yEal - / / BLOCK A, LOT 1111 -- -- — H -- ------------ AP NEIGHBORHOOD CREDIT UNION FH )us`1NG DRIVE/\ - 1z5_ sa�L—F53ss — 231 sa va''-4S.s9 360 S Denton Tap Road 5 ^ rI - Lot 2R� Block A —' 1.245 ACRES ^- EDWARD CROW SURVEY �Fexasbajik Addition Vo unne 200 048, Pagel_ DENTON TAP ROAD / M.R D.C.T. (lla' RIGHT-OF-WAY) / 2.789 ACRES ,487 SF) . C, PD -204 _ 13649 MONFORT DRIVE 3875 REGENT DRIVE j Y \5 D CIVIL ENGINEER: SURVEYOR: DR RANKIN, PLLC AI BEDFORD GROUP, INC. Texasbank Addtlon PROPOSED WATER METER SCHEDULE Volume 2005048 Page 20 I. J "I"wn'1La wn.sa ms�La srw M.R. D.C.T.-- IECE 2.564 ACRES 3 1 NU° (111,706 SF) LEGEND PDDPD1Eo P—o 7PE — — 2 -1 amN L1 nTPnLL o PDP � EVo IVvI.RE1 1E,IEAmA aDLE J I ® aoPo EsncovAT erEn EIMII 1111cl POLE II III xDUE NI. NWPOSEDSITEDDaTw6 Lot 1R2, Block A 5 Texasbank Addition 1.2244 ACRES ol. s s.I ImI AP AD (57,486.5 SF) NI 10°° sLot 1R1, BIockA e �� O Texasbank Addition TM 1.245 ACRES (54 219.5 SF) A I. _ _ a"I ,„ I FF 51200E I 2,79 11 1 1 I �I LOT 1R1 BRICK SCREENING WALL SECTION 1 ,� a -- — --- 11 �� I 60 FROAlB L�GU NE�� z LOCATION MAP V )% %n SCALE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING CONDITIONS 3.Tota1 masonry Facia m Equal Eight/ Percent (sada). Site Plan Notes W lIl require cry apapro,zl ane,Il regNre np Nans cn µ3ns L�eLn BLOCK A, LOT 1R3 SRE INFORMATION III 1-1— 111: TIA11 aEA. 211.1 Pz III, zza) LOT 1-11 EREQIIIEI R`AIL(2111/2ao 4)-141 11 REpu[RED: 14 T.T.LArvD1C1�PE AREA �L1a2a 2Go 1F 311 1 P 5 Nn11� 10es gar flootlsyle n e . i N aII kel p-, dn-1 �emang cre[ pavx n[con clb11 H -I rWng &erlre,ea/s Pea, opo FOL�mk�hma9q Oma l naXon mz bul eo«9°Al, re I Id o,.p..mIV.. manae a / E �s a SITE PLAN F:REaNE I �� sTAmPFgcorvcR TEXASBANK ADDITION at PROP SED 'E Is:gho qPs yEal - / / BLOCK A, LOT 1111 -- -- — H -- ------------ AP NEIGHBORHOOD CREDIT UNION FH )us`1NG DRIVE/\ - 1z5_ sa�L—F53ss — 231 sa va''-4S.s9 360 S Denton Tap Road 5 ^ rI - — —' 1.245 ACRES ^- EDWARD CROW SURVEY ABSTRACT 4757 COPPELL, DALLAS COUNTY, TX DENTON TAP ROAD / ZONING: C to PD (lla' RIGHT-OF-WAY) / (COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) OWNER DEVELOPER: ARCHITECT: NEIGHBORHOOD CREDIT UNION GALL ARCHITECTURE INC. _ 13649 MONFORT DRIVE 3875 REGENT DRIVE DALLAS, TEXAS 75240 DALLAS, TEXAS 75229 (219)798-9393 (219) 956-8500 \5 D CIVIL ENGINEER: SURVEYOR: DR RANKIN, PLLC AI BEDFORD GROUP, INC. TBPE FIRM #8838 301 NORTH ALAND ROAD 2321 DAYBREAK TRAIL ROCKWALL, TEXAS 75087 PLANO, TEXAS 75093 (972) 722-0225 -' - - (972) 378-0683 FAX 0361 ______------ 05-2312 1oft LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE: The ovine,, tenant and mel, agent. If any snail be jointly and severally responsible for the maintenance of all landscaping. All required landscaping shall be malmalned In a neat and o,dMy manner at all times. This shall I""" "tedging, pruning, fertilizing, watering, wweediIg, and— such activities common to the maintenance of landscaping. Landscaped areas shall be kept free of trash, Ilter, weeds, and other such "Anel or plants not a ped of the landscaping. All plant metelials shall be malntalned In a healthy and growing con II as Is appropriate for me n of the year. Plant material which die shall be replaced with plant mat 1W of similia, variety and size. STAKING WIRE (2t GAUGE TTP.) SET MOM OF TREE 1" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE RENOW ALL THINE AND HIRE AROUND BALL REMOVE BURLAP_(" TOP 1/3 OF BALL (TIP.) II- 1- 3" MULCH LAYER (TTP. PLANTING SOIL ill„II (SEE NOTES) 1111111111 IIIIIEI!I�li UNDISTURBED SOIL SMALL TREE PLANTING DETAIL REINFORCED RUBBER H05E (TIP.) 8' STEEL FENCE POST (2 PER THEE T .) HOLE IS 2= MOTH OF BALL (T .) WATER CATCH BASIN FINISHED GRADE YD DEPTH (TTP.) SIZE BE WIA¢112WNK V• a' fx.wu • IeNA.I. naso' (I.xr wl Tuta / ISH' l EmasEo roe UP FINISH' LEGEND r I w 1^416P 'q 1xv xEH ItESRW O url u (xxWU ECmUS -rsEI M EYE BOLT TYP, 3 PLCS, ® NP)� 1..1AAA RIW 9MW M ,{yam; w e.x N.m,lx �y^.;• ;°4WD 0 W) xnaxxE-El¢rWsr.ncaLr A—Eo 1AV1 Ix” (xosxxl Nuxtxuu DUCKBILL ROOTBALL KIT W/ 2. 1-1 11.11 uzxcnaxs m owas l'(,m uu) l, BE WIA¢112WNK SWRUB PLANTING DETAIL (ate uj sE<noxs Ta eoEwAs Ir (ws uul rmA/xp¢cnte N UP AV_ M EYE BOLT TYP, 3 PLCS, ,{yam; w e.x N.m,lx �y^.;• ;°4WD wxTNN. Ix” (xosxxl Nuxtxuu DUCKBILL ROOTBALL KIT W/ EDGE DETAIL -BED MATERIAL AND TURF HOLE IS ]N WIDTH OF BALL [TYP.1 ORIENT "FACE" OF SHRUB „ TOWARD STREET OR T CROW OF SI FLUSH 'H FINISHED GRADE WATER CATCH BASIN IISHED GRADE MULCH LAYER[TYP.) TREE PLANTING 9ETQIL (2 1/2 " CAL. OR LARGER) USE TWO (2) 5LONG MILL STEEL P05T W/ GUY TIRES FOR TREES CHECK PERCOLATION RATE, INSTALL TREE SUMP IF UNACCEPTABLE FOR GUARANTEE, WRAP RED OAK LIVE OAK a CADDC MAPLE TREE TRUNK5 W/ BURLAP 51ARTING AT BASE OF TRUNK EXTENDING UP TO BOTTOM BRANCHING. TYPICAL `TREE PLANTING PIT' BCD PREPARATION MINIMI:MS LSE THE CREAT Ell OF CALIPER OR BALL BLAME'1'Ell BSB BATES REOUTRE 10: 1 BAT L TO C AT TPER RATTO IHPN'IMIM CONTAIS ER BALLS MAY BE SMALLER SO USE CALIPER SIZE S B -S%10 B11 -BN 60% PIDI x S CUI11n25% TDA 611x'!5"/0 GLOW'll R I Vfl'�1(.:1L k:.lti ICLtS'10 A1U IIV (.c1LLULA�110N0S kOlt O1THGl1 S1UCG5 cu-i.]s N 6 B -fill" UU-tfi" IU -1011" CU-fi.]9' IU -2]'S FTE ALLEY PROPOSED WATER METER SCHEDULE LOCATION MAP YOT TO SGIL£ v. DENTON TAP ROAD CITY SUBMITTAL (lOD' RIGHT-OFWAY) n LANDSCAPE PLAN 0 5 TO 20 40 80 SCALE. i"-20'-0" _p9 W�A°F NgTF O Fnt�i August 09. 2012 360 S. Denton Tap Road Coppell Texas Texas Bank Addition Blpck'A' Lot'TRT' RICKY D. PETTY TITLE andscape Augpst 09 2073 .-HE 7"= 20'-0" LP -1 —UNDISTURBED SOIL SWRUB PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE r3186" EYE BOLT TYP, 3 PLCS, ROOTBALL 2 X 4 TIMBER TRIANGLE RATCHET TENSIONER DUCKBILL ROOTBALL KIT W/ �GLAVANIZED TENSIONING CABLES PLAN VIEW SPREAD = 50% TREE HT, AVG. SET CROWN OF TREE 2" ABOVE ADJACENT GRADE 2 X 4 TIMBER TRIANGLE RATCHET TENSIONER ICI H . REMOVE ALL TWINE AND WIRE HEAD AROUND BALL, REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF BALL ROTOTILL AND MIX 75% EXIST - XISTING601L 60 LSe% COMPOST AND AGRO60AK CRY6TAL5 PER MANUFACTURER TO A DEPTH THE GREATER OF IS% DF 40%HT. ROOT BALL DEPTH OR 12 INCHES MIN, TO BRANCHES 2" MULCH LAYER(TYPJ FINISH GRADE CCT ALL - DO NOT DISTURB SIZE: MIN, Ira" DIA, PER I" CAL. _ W/ GO' DIA. DEPTH NDISTURBED SOIL SX ROOT BALL DIA. DUCKBILL ROOTBALL KIT W/ GLAVANIZED TENSIONING CABLES TREE PLANTING 9ETQIL (2 1/2 " CAL. OR LARGER) USE TWO (2) 5LONG MILL STEEL P05T W/ GUY TIRES FOR TREES CHECK PERCOLATION RATE, INSTALL TREE SUMP IF UNACCEPTABLE FOR GUARANTEE, WRAP RED OAK LIVE OAK a CADDC MAPLE TREE TRUNK5 W/ BURLAP 51ARTING AT BASE OF TRUNK EXTENDING UP TO BOTTOM BRANCHING. TYPICAL `TREE PLANTING PIT' BCD PREPARATION MINIMI:MS LSE THE CREAT Ell OF CALIPER OR BALL BLAME'1'Ell BSB BATES REOUTRE 10: 1 BAT L TO C AT TPER RATTO IHPN'IMIM CONTAIS ER BALLS MAY BE SMALLER SO USE CALIPER SIZE S B -S%10 B11 -BN 60% PIDI x S CUI11n25% TDA 611x'!5"/0 GLOW'll R I Vfl'�1(.:1L k:.lti ICLtS'10 A1U IIV (.c1LLULA�110N0S kOlt O1THGl1 S1UCG5 cu-i.]s N 6 B -fill" UU-tfi" IU -1011" CU-fi.]9' IU -2]'S FTE ALLEY PROPOSED WATER METER SCHEDULE LOCATION MAP YOT TO SGIL£ v. DENTON TAP ROAD CITY SUBMITTAL (lOD' RIGHT-OFWAY) n LANDSCAPE PLAN 0 5 TO 20 40 80 SCALE. i"-20'-0" _p9 W�A°F NgTF O Fnt�i August 09. 2012 360 S. Denton Tap Road Coppell Texas Texas Bank Addition Blpck'A' Lot'TRT' RICKY D. PETTY TITLE andscape Augpst 09 2073 .-HE 7"= 20'-0" LP -1 North Elevation UN NO101111-ull -� Illliil�llll!lLll----- - - -------- ll�lliiilill Main Wall -Gross Tabulation 1238 Openings -105 Main Wall - Net Wall Area 1133 Masonry Brick/Stone Material 903 79.70% Awning Material 12 1.06% Stucco Wall Area 218 19.24% 1133 100.00% South Elevation Main Wall -Gross Tabulation 1245 Openings -72 Main Wall - Net Wall Area 1173 Masonry Brick/Stone Material 886 75.53% Awning Material 18 1.53% Stucco Wall Area 269 22.93% 1173 100.00% East Elevation Main Wall -Gross Tabulation 1137 Openings -134 Main Wall - Net Wall Area 1003 Masonry Brick/Stone Material 877 87.44% Awning Material 29 2.59% Stucco Wall Area 97 9.67% 1003 100.00% West Elevation S.F. Wall% Main Wall -Gross Tabulation 1227 Openings -176 Main Wall - Net Wall Area 1051 Masonry Brick/Stone Material 822 78.21% Awning Material 26 2.47% Stucco Wall Area 203 19.31 1051 100.00% Total Building Elevations Total Wall Materials 4847 Total Openings -487 Masonry Brick/Stone Material 3488 80.00% Awning Materia I 85 1.95 Stucco Wall Area 787 18.05% Total Wall Materials 4360 100.00% errco enoun reiuRe\ nxnis Nam xtx, n/ IsT ONxr "'N— NINNN, MLLKe.,aa en T.I. oM ... .e n< -arr. ar o —u e. 1.R.,e� - uO . =a r NIT �^n� I'LL -Ge ",.LL m. e.Un=;::a: I. ..:,...�„.� m T-. -FT NEW Nmx�!al Nana ME- --- ------------------ sm UN NO101111-ull -� Illliil�llll!lLll----- - - -------- ll�lliiilill SOUTH ELEVATION 3CR:14° -1-t NORTH ELEVATION u�Re neo .n. ei Fa.mR oar RENT- mwR ¢ mecxF ttm�wou�I% ILL I NR hrn1:0 ad bfR aVO4 Mh RR� ,rlra 1. IF ro %- 11 " ]—R -- T, Ox [%rtepR Nx xxG Ox 01 IN. ORM =v oM ..x .E1 E M. - ONE. mE ..x .REE FNI o o— m mr E.RER.m-- nrs.a - ro xx Gm — MARE — ..... x.ro.FR...nr . � Rnon.a n,..a.nRE.T-x�W.., . RE� xar x -1 ME �:�`a�R 3 T m=nANI . j r_. LJJ� IN mx E.x.R o 11 1 1o ® E .x REr R . min x;.A- 1. TO T=R!NNAD E ExREE r.�.xm,..r°o°o :.Ewn,mo.a xa.,ma< .. .. uRE mcE REREER .n..Em.R. RM -A ON ..anRs .mt . R aua oRER .xaxRs.n... sP.0 x.ER E uEE .rcE REREu .n..Em.n _ mxxRE ..�.. a» EnERxR .................�:: .............................., mmurc MRRER o. ER,EEnR ExnxRs.n..x:P.RE ORER Lij NOR -All ON I r ,E.REREo ,.nm aess x 9M00M "AAA. M¢x, m. =N Y ' waxxxx .uxxut m.xE \.s \ \.s \: \. .� \......... A= N ER INII MOO aar-a ,RIANTAIR �.I Ell ma,...�„ J uRER roR rat ateu,RE ro wNME ,u Raor axa w[rxsxm EEwxu, mw[ T st[ewxoa xxexuoo snm —AN OR a. a.oco NON. u ?S EAST ELEVATION Oo„�Le KM NMT � �a .R.rREn xxMa rxm,. mm O REE.MM—,wss O Z Mn%r TA 11 NENT K nrmm REv oRER mco mus ..42 NEW 0 a� N I R N. �n roRE,.E,�xn�.. Z_ i} TM � xn0oo rcu�vnx x�mx: aR J 1 ISI ISI ISI 5, x F 91F �s 5 W El RO ME TIRE ON eoi n anae ARRE. c -Mn- lw W Q a ,z y� _ — ——— °°�RR � - - - - - - - of ki mxnxwvs mrrn von .... `axnxuas mrrn RERE U i : xrcnxxim REUE s,.m.c x, ro M"MID .� REw �Enx=„ro�....x. ® o ® ® LL rx� W REFER ro s,Runwu em ucae .ReFP[0 a:, zroRE uxm zxoow ' rRE�FEnm�RE. OnRmF.m.mEro Z OMA_ RAN. IMEER ��U.EREERxTMxm� a moxa ��U.rREER.TMxm� .a xTM xR a�R ..a xTM IR a�R cEa�aAa0 a�,=ror. E�.,,R,t ,• ro.FERE. nxnn a� . ,. r.RE �Enx1En.Ewx,.FO..E � � � roREREREER.n..ER a,,��E.,,� RE RE.aR xa x.m� „A. 2-1 ON E-3 AN— nEn,�E RLL ,.� TMAN BNAND A.�� E.TMxnO~,..m�=ti� mI..OA.x.a .�xR..n REnxSEn �.�an ,E.RERE. nxnn a� R —A RE.EER R I x mxa NAM N � �oRE .,, _ IAINR rotREREo .nm ass . x RE REE ., M00 iEalOa ELEva 1— . v a .RER �roRE x RR.R �. ro x a ROnr REn.�E..E . xx FR.. R —E a R mKroRE nERx R a ro �R ERR x RE Ra axx. .W ..REE E..%'RE.n,.nn.,R.mronnxn E.RROR.~E.,x.ca„R..a.o A601 WEST Z ELEVATION m"�""2012-06 -0 V-0 -}�Y �" ALLPsrcs RAN[ R' B' Y ON lP? TS, A ","Ll, MMMNN FRAM[ ,CXtM L b PANED FNGH nro Y AIMNAUNFRAME b A—SWM A HANDICAPPED SIGNAGE O PIPE BOLLARD "'ME ME "A"SQUARE ^C E. FOR TIP IM - C RCXETS AT I CONCRETE PD - SIZE AS— / �, ,/R' SQUARE TUBE FRAME WITH REOMRED FOTNG OR APPLIGINN J ,/Y ... PICAETS FOR DAIf STEEL 1A65 ON FRAM[ FOR LDCXNG SECTION - SPACE RCAETS AT B' 0.C. HVAC WALL ELEVATION 1 D• - GR IIS [ AGNE TI S10NE x u P GOING- 9ZE AS STONE ONE' G' CMU FIILED NTH R[WR[D FOR APPLICATION CONCREETE VWHHSSTAANRI NDARD HVAC WALL ELEVATION M DOWf15 INTO GP ARCHITE-RAL GS1 STINT GP Si0 10 SidlE MALL CONCRETE OR APP I TN ASM-NE[TMSiU ]F ------D MTI RFOURFO FOR APGLIGTON N Ax NSplRY REIMFgHCIMGA� OHVAC WALL ELEVATION ARCHIIECTIIRAL CAST STONE CAP PRORDE DOWELS J IN10 CAP STONE FIXED Z' BWARE TUBE INTO STONE WALL iRANE M1H 1/1' SOMARE DCAP RASHING� [T BOLT FR ME INTO WALL UNDER GTUNE CAP CMU WALL PAINTED ON STONE DN[R D' CNU INSIDE OF SCREEN WALL FILLED WITH CONCREIE WITH STANDARD SglRY REINFORCING CONCRETE FDOIING - SIZE AS REOURED FOR APPLICATION OHVAC WALL SECTION O OHVAC WALL PLAN "+'a1N.ri'RETE ALLEY 12-1896R4 Sheet 2 4f 2 NHCU TO BE DETERMINED COPPELL, TEXAS Aunt Rep. J. HAGLE Designee° RFF Date 08.10.12 client sme: Estimatin Art Engineering Landlord r1-MAB/8-13 12'. Add indicator bullet —/f directional 2 RMS/8 1612'. h g o and Tov 111 p K R3 RFF 0821.12chn mon. to Pmestone R4 RFF 09 0412H en a add numbers 214- Manw Ria 4214-902-2045 114-942-1440 Fax 114 4411444 13146 9-38m -21-49- 7403 21 a,3%I0116 114349-3844 Fax 314349 8RA 1335 Pa�i<Center 4xive, Unit C Yista, Cd 4203 160-461-NO3 Fax 150-461-]033 463 liazter Avenue, Suite 200 Lauisriile, ItY40.04 502414-3075 Eox 50L412-0013 2504 5and Hill Paint Circle ha -grP t FL 33837 063-414-117)4 Eaa 863-42-U it 37 Waterfront Park court 4awsonville, UA 34534 044-851-7462 Faz114-344-- P4. Boz 125, 246 Oora1 3- -, i%]0314 361-563-5544 Faa361-6434533 � � t y i k u . SETBACK T, DEITCaN TAP BOAS' 12-1896R4 Sheet 2 4f 2 NHCU TO BE DETERMINED COPPELL, TEXAS Aunt Rep. J. HAGLE Designee° RFF Date 08.10.12 client sme: Estimatin Art Engineering Landlord r1-MAB/8-13 12'. Add indicator bullet —/f directional 2 RMS/8 1612'. h g o and Tov 111 p K R3 RFF 0821.12chn mon. to Pmestone R4 RFF 09 0412H en a add numbers 214- Manw Ria 4214-902-2045 114-942-1440 Fax 114 4411444 13146 9-38m -21-49- 7403 21 a,3%I0116 114349-3844 Fax 314349 8RA 1335 Pa�i<Center 4xive, Unit C Yista, Cd 4203 160-461-NO3 Fax 150-461-]033 463 liazter Avenue, Suite 200 Lauisriile, ItY40.04 502414-3075 Eox 50L412-0013 2504 5and Hill Paint Circle ha -grP t FL 33837 063-414-117)4 Eaa 863-42-U it 37 Waterfront Park court 4awsonville, UA 34534 044-851-7462 Faz114-344-- P4. Boz 125, 246 Oora1 3- -, i%]0314 361-563-5544 Faa361-6434533 i 2'-0 1 1 OPPOSITE FACE STEEL SUPPORTS WITH CONCRETE FOOTwc ©D/F DIRECTIONAL 2.16 SQ. FT O S/F DIRECTIONAL 2.16 SQ. FT (2) MERCURY VAPOR FLOOD (1) REQUIRED SCALE. 3/4" = T -D' (1) REQUIRED SCALE. 3/4' = T-0" T-10" LAMPS (BY OTHERS) 33" MANUFACTURE & INSTALL: FLAT ALUM. PANELS ON A 2" x 1" ALUM. RECT TUBE FRAME OD/F MONUMENT SIGN SCALE: 3/8"=1'-0" SIDE VIEW @ 2" x 2" ALUM. SQ. TUBE SUPPORTS - PAINT BLACK w/ OPAQUE WHITE 3M VINYL GRAPHICS (1) REQUIRED - MANUFACTURE & INSTALL 5" SET SUPPORTS IN (2) 1'-6" DEEP x 6" DIA. CONCRETE PIER FOUNDATIONS 35.333 SQ. FT SIGNAGE PREFORMED ALUMINUM CHANNEL LETTERS & LOGO - PTM. FASCIA COLOR (TB.D ) 10'_3/8" CAPSULE PRE -FINISHED BLACK RETURNS 1/4" THIC. BIACIC 32 SQ FT TOTAL ACRYuc EwsH 1" aLacK JEwEUTE RETAINER MNTD. TO TM W 1/8"WHIT E ACRVLITE SG FACES- �ghb�iho0� LETTERS & LOGO OWTHROHAVEDUAL ETAILS OR F BLACK PERFORATED VINYL ro LOGO SHOW TH RU END SU DETAILS � TO BE OPAQUED ON END SURFACE • , CAPSULE TO HAVE 3630-22 BLACK n O CHANNEL LETTER/LOGO/CAPSULE DISPLAY P (1) REQUIRED - MANUFACTURE & INSTALL SCALE: 3/8" = T-0" 3 X 32 SQ FT = 96 SQ FT TOTAL VINYL w/ SHOW THRU WHITE COPY 6500k WHITE L.E.D. ILLUMINATION JACKETED LED 2NDARV WIRETHRU 1/2" FLEXIBLE METALLIC CONDUIT TO LED POWER SUPPLY IN GALVANIZED BOX BEHIND WALL ELECTRICAL PRIMARY & MO UNT F LUSH TO FASCIA w/NON- OBUILDING ELEVATION - NORTH NOT TO SCALE 0 FRONT ENTRANCE ELEVATION - WEST NOT TO SCALE OBUILDING ELEVATION - SOUTH NOT TO SCALE 3291 Manar Way Uailas.i# )5235 214-90Z20Up Faz 214-402-2044 12106 Yailiant Sankaron1— )0211 219-344.3804 fv tip -344-8P4 1335 Park Center pri.e, Unit C Yista CA42pai I60 -Y17-7003 fan 110-417.7033 413 6azter avenue, Suite 10 touisviila XY 40204 sp2-4prs aa. 50t -m2-013 2ssa sa"a xni POInc arae havenpor[ FL 33631 813-430-1100 6az .11-110 3J Waterfm"t Gari Court 8-851viile. GA F.21 800-851-2012 F. 210-344-8)24 P.6. Boa 1". 20811-1 Brine 1. 11— . 18374 361-563-5544 fan 361-143-6533 8'-6" T-0" STONE TOPPER -BUFF 28„ 24" WHITE WHITE LIMESTONE "� --"'= -°-� WHITE 3M VINYL DETAILS PIN MOUNTED 1" OFF BRICK - ry _ w/STUDS _ '�.�� •! 1/4" THICK PTD. BLACK ALUMINUM m FLAT CUT OUT NUMBERS -:. �_— PIN MOUNTED 1 OFF BR K w/STUDS - LANDSCAPE CONCRETE PD - BUFF i 2'-0 1 1 OPPOSITE FACE STEEL SUPPORTS WITH CONCRETE FOOTwc ©D/F DIRECTIONAL 2.16 SQ. FT O S/F DIRECTIONAL 2.16 SQ. FT (2) MERCURY VAPOR FLOOD (1) REQUIRED SCALE. 3/4" = T -D' (1) REQUIRED SCALE. 3/4' = T-0" T-10" LAMPS (BY OTHERS) 33" MANUFACTURE & INSTALL: FLAT ALUM. PANELS ON A 2" x 1" ALUM. RECT TUBE FRAME OD/F MONUMENT SIGN SCALE: 3/8"=1'-0" SIDE VIEW @ 2" x 2" ALUM. SQ. TUBE SUPPORTS - PAINT BLACK w/ OPAQUE WHITE 3M VINYL GRAPHICS (1) REQUIRED - MANUFACTURE & INSTALL 5" SET SUPPORTS IN (2) 1'-6" DEEP x 6" DIA. CONCRETE PIER FOUNDATIONS 35.333 SQ. FT SIGNAGE PREFORMED ALUMINUM CHANNEL LETTERS & LOGO - PTM. FASCIA COLOR (TB.D ) 10'_3/8" CAPSULE PRE -FINISHED BLACK RETURNS 1/4" THIC. BIACIC 32 SQ FT TOTAL ACRYuc EwsH 1" aLacK JEwEUTE RETAINER MNTD. TO TM W 1/8"WHIT E ACRVLITE SG FACES- �ghb�iho0� LETTERS & LOGO OWTHROHAVEDUAL ETAILS OR F BLACK PERFORATED VINYL ro LOGO SHOW TH RU END SU DETAILS � TO BE OPAQUED ON END SURFACE • , CAPSULE TO HAVE 3630-22 BLACK n O CHANNEL LETTER/LOGO/CAPSULE DISPLAY P (1) REQUIRED - MANUFACTURE & INSTALL SCALE: 3/8" = T-0" 3 X 32 SQ FT = 96 SQ FT TOTAL VINYL w/ SHOW THRU WHITE COPY 6500k WHITE L.E.D. ILLUMINATION JACKETED LED 2NDARV WIRETHRU 1/2" FLEXIBLE METALLIC CONDUIT TO LED POWER SUPPLY IN GALVANIZED BOX BEHIND WALL ELECTRICAL PRIMARY & MO UNT F LUSH TO FASCIA w/NON- OBUILDING ELEVATION - NORTH NOT TO SCALE 0 FRONT ENTRANCE ELEVATION - WEST NOT TO SCALE OBUILDING ELEVATION - SOUTH NOT TO SCALE 3291 Manar Way Uailas.i# )5235 214-90Z20Up Faz 214-402-2044 12106 Yailiant Sankaron1— )0211 219-344.3804 fv tip -344-8P4 1335 Park Center pri.e, Unit C Yista CA42pai I60 -Y17-7003 fan 110-417.7033 413 6azter avenue, Suite 10 touisviila XY 40204 sp2-4prs aa. 50t -m2-013 2ssa sa"a xni POInc arae havenpor[ FL 33631 813-430-1100 6az .11-110 3J Waterfm"t Gari Court 8-851viile. GA F.21 800-851-2012 F. 210-344-8)24 P.6. Boa 1". 20811-1 Brine 1. 11— . 18374 361-563-5544 fan 361-143-6533 CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Texas Bank Addition, Lots IRI & IR2 , Block A (Neighborhood CU), Replat P&Z HEARING DATE: September 20, 2012 C.C. HEARING DATE: October 9, 2012 STAFF REP.: Marcie Diamond, Assistant Planning Director LOCATION: NEC of Denton Tap Road & Vanbebber Drive SIZE OF AREA: 2.56 acres of property CURRENT ZONING: C (Commercial) REQUEST: A replat of Lot 1, Block A into Lots 1R1 & 1R2, of the Texas Bank Addition to establish necessary easements and fire lanes to allow the development of an approximate 2,800 -square -foot bank facility with drive-thrl lanes on Lot 1R1 containing 1.25 acres, with the remaining 1.25 acres being Lot 1R2. APPLICANT: Owner/Developer: Neighborhood Credit Union 13649 Montfort Drive Dallas, Texas 75240 214-748-9393 Civil Engineer: Dr Rankin, PLLC 2321 Daybreak Trail Plano, Texas 75093 972-378-0683 e-mail:drr0 drrankin.com Architect: Gahl Architecture, Inc. 3875 Regent Drive Dallas, Texas 75229 214-956-8500 e-mail: iim t_�,,vahlarchitecture.com HISTORY: On May 13, 2003, Council approved a Site Plan to allow the constriction of a one-story, 6,700 -square -foot bank facility, plus a 2,200 -square -foot office on Lot 1 of the Texas Bank Addition, which is the subject tract of land. Council also approved a Minor Plat for two lots, Lot 1 (bank lot) containing 1.74 acres and Lot 2, containing 3.61 acres for future development. In November, 2004 Council approved a replat of Lots 1R and 2R, Block A, of the Texas Bank Addition to allow the constriction of a 20,045 -square -foot day care center on Lot 2R. Creme de la Creme has since been constricted on this site. ITEM = 05 Page 1 of 2 TRANSPORTATION: Denton Tap Road is a six -lane divided roadway, built within 110 feet of right-of- way. Vanbebber is a residential collector, built within 50 feet of right-of-way. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING North: Creme De La Creme; C (Commercial) East: Braewood West 2nd Rev., Single Family; SF -7 South: Convenience food store with gas pumps and Car Wash; C (Commercial) West: Red Hawk, Single Family under constriction; PD -241 -SF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Coppell 2030, A Comprehensive Master Plan, indicate this property suitable for Mixed Use Neighborhood Center which includes neighborhood serving retail uses. DISCUSSION: This is a companion request to the rezoning request to a PD to allow the proposed credit union facility. This property was platted in 2003 for a bank, then replatted in 2004 for a daycare center on the northern portion. This replat is to subdivide the remaining 2.56 acres into two lots, Lot 1R1 to contain the Neighborhood Credit Union and Lot 1R2 for future development. This replat provides needed utility easements and realigns the mutual access and fire lane easements to support the development of this lot. The entire 24 -foot -wide mutual access easement/fire lane which straddles this common lot line will need to be built with this development. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff is recommending APPROVAL of Texas Bank Addition, Lots 1R1 & 1R2 Block A (Neighborhood CU), Replat subject to the following conditions: 1. The entire fire lane which straddles the common property line shall be constricted with this development. 2. Additional comments may be generated upon review of final engineering. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Recommend approval of the request 2. Recommend disapproval of the request 3. Recommend modification of the request 4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date ATTACHMENTS: 1. Replat ITEM = 05 Page 2 of 2 i II I I II I I o II I I II I I IN I W� I dt I j I I �, r - - F7 n - w.e�---F--, I -- ' me cggem ,�.x R\\' o...._r. I I '--r I 9, \ .,. r I I I I roe.` .�z -ISI LL — —----------- -,R — --- e N90°00'00 -E. '' -- — - - ----2]4.0,]. 6 � I v vvv r- :=------� � to I G✓ EASEMENTS TO BE ABANDONED BY THIS PLAT Lot 1RZ, Block A To—bank Addition Lot 1RL, Block A Te—bank Addition I I I \ \ I I I �E I ✓ "I =I L/LL� 1' - 50' — E' SEIVIENT P. EP.NGONN ENT EXHIBIT 1, -1cI I II I Igl I r I Ir I I I IT I � I= I T Lot 1R^ Block A TR.—ba k Addition i 1.245 ACRES 'I� (54.219.5 SE) 1 I EI '� FF=512.00' - I__— ttu, I — _ _ . L , I^ N.02°31'SBNJyI w,� I 49.60--------------------- ' TPI SBEGINNIN4 i �♦ _ Wim__ ��..,rr --Ilr/��I I _'226.06' I I 48.68'S 85°26'21 W _ _ VE VANBEBBER DRI _ - — Iv..+:e x�sncar=wavl Ji - iT[x �rx I \ Q, \\ 1{, Lot 1112 Block A Tex Stank Addition��- 7� ° v I' n, R I 1.245 ACRES ('7,4 6.5 SF) RIS 'I fll IQ-I� I FF -51L00' -CI iw, � I O o d I d a 1 P I II n l i t I I I✓ III 2.564 ACRES (111, 7065F) ------------------------ �I^ Ind R5fi]9]70'•/1 �eT,— L=259.39' 1' - 50' — E' SEIVIENT P. EP.NGONN ENT EXHIBIT 1, -1cI I II I Igl I r I Ir I I I IT I � I= I T Lot 1R^ Block A TR.—ba k Addition i 1.245 ACRES 'I� (54.219.5 SE) 1 I EI '� FF=512.00' - I__— ttu, I — _ _ . L , I^ N.02°31'SBNJyI w,� I 49.60--------------------- ' TPI SBEGINNIN4 i �♦ _ Wim__ ��..,rr --Ilr/��I I _'226.06' I I 48.68'S 85°26'21 W _ _ VE VANBEBBER DRI _ - — Iv..+:e x�sncar=wavl Ji - iT[x �rx I i, h 1—.— " ,.d. COl L NKIV TH, I 'NO0 J 172 ]6 0 N RIC TBIDE ITT) u .RELIT UNION 136 V NTFORT DRIVE 2'LW -1-75240 ]/a v3v3 OWNER'SCERTFIcnTE STATE OF TEXAS § COJNTY OF DALLAS § WHEREAS NEIGHBORHOOD CREDIT UNION h iz2564 ere pa[ rfl d' h d d 5 y. b "tN b 301, h ty ' pp 1, D II tY T b - g d dby Sp -.I Wa yD d d d' N ""'R`2 C01J1249 Off"al Pobf R d Ml,,, 1 T db -SLOT It, BLO KA f TEYASBANKADDITION d' g he pl d d'I, L 200 048 Page 20 of th Off bl co dt of Dallas ou q Texas a nd bengmorepartel IVd br URI—' B bI NNING at a ea peed' d NN.df r the nor[hx ert corner ofa toll-neattn - Y to n A the north r oe of Vanbebber Dive (vacable vdthl w<' htheI,- Ine of Denton Tap Rnad 1110 a 1 THENCE . h d I' NO ETH 02'3 159 WET I d- f4960 fee -,,d df df h b g ' g If to HPI,ight b—,g d' f$6]9]Df d, hI,,dL g fN hPIT1 28 We TH nn I" i —d I-- ap Rod -h -d c n gh h gh gl ofo23]0c f ran 0m of2939f /, h' dt dmrarner, In I No ITH 00"0505 EAST ad pt 83IR -t I. arapp,d'ron rotl found for the no h.- Irnerof sal Lt dL- n n fTIE PH fAd add THN d - -d I OR H90`OC 00 EASTa d,,..I, 2]u.6]f y' h' d t he,or[heaet corner IT I,] N,t 1E R,d th, —th—tf I N THEN ESOUTHW 91 \VEST d f40654f ettoa capped Iro df dt h h of 'd nd be HE —Rd in the north R_ofm dV be9ber Drve; THE NCE alongxad,o hf SO NEST dirtanreof 226.06 feet to a rapped In rod found foR,r —HEIRS, corner of Bald comercutbfr line; THENCE a long xa'd corner cut off fie NORTH 48`3X3 WEST distance of 43.63 feet to the POINT OF BEG NN NG, CONTA N NG 2.564 acres or 111,]C6 square feet of land more or less REPLAT LOTS 1 R & 1 R2, BLOCK A TEXASBANK ADDITION 2.564 ACRES Being o Re plot of Lotl R, Block A fDV-b ROA/ LRVEY,B R CTNO.9o1 SCS ENT NT.PPO-D, 111 C.PFELL -UNI, TEN,E El ((al1((�1) Bedford Group Inc. CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT PD -250R7 -H, Old Town Addition (Main SO Restaurant, Lot IR, Block B P&Z HEARING DATE: September 20, 2012 C.C. HEARING DATE: October 9, 2012 STAFF REP.: Matt Steer, City Planner LOCATION: South side of West Bethel Road, between Burnet Street & Main Street SIZE OF AREA: 0.52 acres of property CURRENT ZONING: PD -250-H (Planned Development -250 -Historic) REQUEST: A zoning change to PD -250R7 -H (Planned Development -250 Revision 7 - Historic), to establish a Detail Site Plan for a 3,574 -square -foot restaurant building. APPLICANT: Applicant: Architect: Greg Yancey Bill Peck Main Street Coppell LTD William Peck & Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 1790 105 W. Main Street Coppell, Texas 75019 Lewisville, Texas 75057 Phone: (972) 215-9400 Phone: (972) 221-1424 Email: -,re,yancev Email: bill peckarchitects.com HISTORY: In January 2007, 17 acres were rezoned to Historic and the future land use plan was amended to allow for a continuation of the targeted uses outlined in the Old Coppell Master Plan - retail, offices, restaurants and similar uses. In August 2010, a final plat of the entire property was approved. This subdivided the larger tract of property for the purpose of establishing street rights-of-way and easements for necessary infrastructure to support development. This resulted in a total of seven blocks containing nine lots and seven different street segments. In April 2011, the zoning for the conceptual planned development was approved. This depicted the overall plan and presented the general regulations each Detailed Planned Development should follow. In April 2012, the first of the detail plans ITEM = 06 Page 1 of 3 was approved for 44 patio -home lots. In May 2012, the Old Town Square was approved as was the entry feature of the subject property and an 80 -space parking lot. In August 2012, three retail/office cottages, a replica service station for a retail/restaurant site and a neon "Main Street Coppell" sign were approved. TRANSPORTATION: Bethel Road is a recently improved two-lane concrete road with intermittently spaced angled and parallel parking contained within a variable width right-of- way. Main Street is currently under constriction. It will be a two-lane divided boulevard within a 114 -foot right-of-way. Burnet Street is a two-lane local road within an 80 -foot right-of-way with perpendicular parking on both sides. Crockett Street is a two-lane local road within a 44 -foot right-of-way. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING North: barber shop, Coppell Home Decor, beauty salon; H (Historic) South: vacant, planned for office; PD -250-H (Planned Development — 250 — Historic) East: Coppell Deli; H (Historic) West: Entry Feature/Sign; PD-250R3R-H (Planned Development — 250 -Revision 3 Revised — Historic) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Coppell 2030, A Comprehensive Master Plan shows the property as suitable for development in accordance with the Old Coppell Historic Special Area Plan. DISCUSSION: This is a request to build a 3,574 -square -foot restaurant building for the Local Diner on the south side of Bethel Road between Burnet and Main Streets. Access to the building is provided from both the proposed parking area to the rear of the stricture and from Bethel Road. The Historic District was formulated around the premise of promoting pedestrian activity within Old Coppell while ensuring that new constriction is compatible with the unique character of the area. Staff feels that both of these objectives have been accomplished. Site Plan: There are three on -street parallel parking spaces on Bethel Road, 35 proposed parking spaces on site (behind the building) and additional parking along Burnet and Main Streets to adequately serve this proposed restaurant. The proposed building is approximately 3 '/2 to 5 '/z feet from the front property lines. There is an existing ten -foot sidewalk with nine -foot by five-foot tree wells along Main Street and one is proposed to be designed similarly along Burnet Street. There is an eight -foot sidewalk along Bethel which will tie in with a proposed sidewalk directly abutting the building. Landscaping: The trees proposed in the tree wells and landscape islands along Burnet Street will be Cedar Elms and Red Oaks to match the existing trees found along newly constricted Main Street. The parking/service area is proposed to be well screened with a variety of shrubs and plantings. Crockett Street will have a significant amount of screening material as will Main Street and Burnet Street adjacent to the parking lot. ITEM = 06 Page 2 of 3 Elevations/Signage: Dark reddish brown brick is proposed as the main field brick with a darker brick serving as an accent and a buff color brick as trim. A variety of window coverings are proposed: metal awnings, black fabric awnings and metal canopies. At the entrance on the south side of the building, a rounded metal canopy is proposed. The metal awnings would not typically be allowed within the H District; however, an exception to this requirement was granted during the conceptual plan approval. Sign areas are depicted on the North and South Elevations. The final signage design is under development. Staff recommends that in the future, the signage for this building be allowed to be reviewed administratively for compliance with the conceptual PD and the H District. Staff is comfortable recommending approval of this request. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff is recommending APPROVAL of PD -250R7 -H, Lot 1R, Block B, Old Town Addition (Main Street) subject to the following condition: 1. The Director of Planning shall be allowed to administratively review the proposed signage for the Local Diner. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Recommend approval of the request 2. Recommend disapproval of the request 3. Recommend modification of the request 4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date ATTACHMENTS: 1. Site Plan 2. Landscape Plan 3. Elevations ITEM = 06 Page 3 of 3 MAID STREET BUFFET STREET z SITE PLAN 1 ar✓.Ei =io SIT= DATA TABLE EXIS-INC, ZONINC, - PD -250-A PROPOSED ZONINC, - PD -25086-A PROPOSED USE- RES-AUR/,N- AREA OF PROPOSED USE- N1 , ACRES BUILDINC, AREA - 3,5T< 50, F', BUILDINC, ASIC—F = 20-0I/a REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKINC, REQUIRED PARKINC, - 3,5T< / 100 = 36 SPACES PROVIDED PARKINC, - 35 ON SI'E + 5-44RED PARKINC, PFO—OSED LO' COV FRAC F -15,92% - 6A"'O "IDNICz�' VICINITY PLAN N.T.S. OWNER d—ROFESSIONAI INFOR"A'ION ONS-� o VIS -A �JG--�-S E4V- HG+�4VD VI—hG=.-X'o0" P-9'2-3"-6562 ARCH --G- al P= WLJAMP FE =cK dAVDA550GW-=@IVC. 'Ow W -s- MAN 5-. P-9'2-22'- 424 �4VDSGAP-ARCH--G- GARO_ ---DMAV D=sIG-V s-..DIOS P.O. aOX 532346 RIG�ARDSOV.-X oOS3 P-9'2-9SC-"30 clVl_=VG-N =R G--VV-VG- CC- D — - -CK-R 'O,,5.,1 --9'O IRVNG --x,45 006C&2 P:,9 u _ '6 Mfl o �- w-_ C Z N Z c�3 - O C s F c C REVISIONS DATE i nin: 311-2012 A-oo5 MAIN STREET ... . ....... 1-g I ear ....... .. Y", I, IIA - IpIa.,.ig Big B 1� 4 5FO 211 . .. ... ... 2 2 1/2 1011 11 � PLANT &MATERIALS LIST Jurisdiction of Project IFISOXA- IFUSINITIO 0-1— iI0a0M0..11A.0-DBDDU.A F- 110 1c'apinq Requirements �;�d sc CIT70F Co—� IND _A. 14 I__ DMID or NOD—A-10NIFT DEERENaDIF FFlMltLG,,lYl,-,�.0V.- IYIM. ISE IF _oR Site Location m Professionals Information VI'L'L--P'ECK&ASSOCIATES, INC LEWISVILLE TEXAS SH- NO. 972 2 21 1424 -1111-1�1111TIIT CADOLDELD AN FELDMAN DESfN STUDIOS L1.01 P 0 BOX 13234 RICHARDSON,TEKAS750S3 972 9SO 1730 PRIN—SAll � Eom,E - - MARA�c�,.,AREmA�E,ROAE�R SNF,16 & LPJIPM 9JfAl GW55 p'�M'�or ro�xw[ ST -1o1 ......u.... owmv Es , KIM— ............... m� DRY RIVER BED CROSS SECTION 2' � MORONx,.roREmo�E AR ooE�, --+ISEUNISPE 11_ reee rinNnNG tio,Nsws -H- PEEIEPA` 19i8i1111®�9�Ifilh ml e�2,V�fds38PE1"` DU-MUR 5' BENCH, 56 SERIES, RECYCLES LATS No 11E 111T I - SENEGAL I PROVIDE COMPLETE GRADING AND SOIL PREPARATION. INCLUDING AMENDMENTS, AS SPECIFIED LEGAIN ARCHITECT PART 2 - PRODUCTS I COMPOST 2 FEET IS , PUT 3 MIT 'IT A I SHALL BE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH SHREDDED CEDAR MULCH, A BED PREPARATION AND PREPARATION FOP SOD INSTALLATION I I INSPECT ALL ERSTING CONDPONS AND OTHER ITEMS OF GORE 1 2, NICEIT THAT ALL NGAIIEFI PLANTS AND THEIR INGLI lAv, BACK I GRITS FALLRARFF�AS TO BE PREPARED WITH ORGANIC TECHNIOUS5 ONLI, 2 ED R C FARE OUT "AGO AND FLOOD IND FINE IIIDI TIE IEII TO DIVIN IN 'OR AND IF ED AREA' M 2 ADD' N``,o P"TISK �N ALL AAREAS PR�A,E D� E��ANSE sD�E sMDD.�. END OF SECTION —10 ND ILINCTIREI ETHER Ul NOT ON THE RDCPLANI,DREs �ADSHA LLED R� F�s°TE'PNRE°RAND IF..N,RAA'AD,DRs s DR2 ALL LA" AND LAND"A' E DIED AREAS AGE TO BE SEPARATED PCGAFAI IDINUS FNLIII AFTER _, NOTED ON THE PLAN,All— FILL lElPGNlALTl FOR FALINE TO OBTAIN CASARERI REVIEW OFTHE LA1111 INULTS NO PART CA' GNP 'E"I'EDA GLDE'A AND NATURAL 1— SEATEIAL TIED IN IEDI AND SHALL BE SECTOR A2915 - I C&�Ll WILL APPLICABLE FEDERAL STATE, COUNNI AND LOCAL PRIEFLAT CIA "V'PNN' LANDSCAPE MAT' AL' AND AMIED .11 PllVDE GNMIUA OF PENnoO `"APS "P",NCE SIT 'PPET"T, aE s�.HLAP ISO NOT AGE 1111TITITIONI OF FREE, SHRUB AND GRA55 MAIENAL5 IF COMPLI WITH APPLICABLE PEOUIREMENTS OF ANN Z. 1 AGE, CAN 'I ANDARD FOR N .. ED' 'I' CK APPLICABLE STATE AND I AM" KAN STAND ADD FOR STOCK, APPROVED NOV 6, —6 Al 2 AT PRESS .0LAN FAIL 1111 A�sE�RNEEENDN�uERsr�ss,A,PR�;�oPDR, -OUT, E>As N EGL 61 THE UNDERGROUND 11 A m 11 S 2 TIE IIIINATINN A—E. ATILL .1 OPERATIONAL AT TIE TIME 'TAT PLANTING SPEPSHONS COMMENCE DAMAGE TO THE "GATIoN .. TEM FALL PLAN' MAIIIIAL ' FOR THIS PROTECT SHALL 11 PIP1111-1111M, NVL,FNA TREES 1 'GNTANE' GROWN PLANTS SHALL HAVE BEEN A TEPPED-ITP AS ANTS LL FIVE 11IN N TIE Co"'N" POP ADENNATEI ..ITHE 1. FLA pM,E�PD HBI ETRREAEREoEREsNINIEELENO' BE EVEDEUTE FOLLOWING TREE CARE PROCEDURES SHALL BE ART ED 1 DO III MADE FL111 IUII 11 LVAID ETIEM GLEN 11 UK IN. LEAVE THE BRANCH _LA, NPACT 2 Do NOT UU ANI LM OF TION"GALAND ON "OHNED I DO IDT US OF WO , 1111PT, LOU NNI IRA' IF —PPED SIT BURLAP DUPING PLANTING OPERATION S UN L' Do "I STAKE OF FIT AN' IIIIS IN SPEIRL IFIE K LIFE ITILINK CIA, THE CONTRA, I AM EIPONIBLE FAR ANI TREES THAI NEED 'TALKS PAZ A PE"D IF ONE FEAR AGO NOT HANDLE AN' FREE BI IS TRINI AN' TAPE HANDLED IN SUCH A MANNER SHOULD BE REJECTED E ,E, 'EARMATERIALS NOT IN GA.,GUS TH"NA `NNDLGN AS SCAN AS WEATHERPERMITS AFTER NOTIFICATION Al OMEPS 'HAT III PLANTS HAVE I EDPLAN I , F ON C OF LEAR , START N C FROM I HE DATE EPLA OEM EN I AAGE SAN I MATERIAL,AND IN THE OPINION OF THE �ZEI�IEI�EP�ITEEILEN�PAT��VE'�H�ATE THEP—LE. E)OCIPIED AFTER III DATE OF INITIAL ICCIPTRNIE IFIE1 TIE DATE IF NATALLA ION INITIAL ACCEPTANDE THE NUACGNsA PR EPARDION FOP PLANT MATERIAL INSTALL AT ON B FEE OF PLANTING �t�o. `PeEFER�AEENREoiEEATHAT�EHOLD No s Eo eE NO PLANTS SToo c �NPOLS�INAL HO, HEAT (mADEP�AREASS�AN s Eo eE PRo.Ec,Eo FROM .nE SIMMER I STAGE H.CALONG FOR TREES PRIOR TO DIOGING HOLES. .E LIFT IN THE SENT11 OF THE F.LE AND THE IlEl ALL UPON THAI PEDESTAL. P U. AND IF 'FAIL, AND AT AT AH A DEPTH THAT THE IIEWN 0 PRESS', E"TING ASIDE OF SOL FORM A 'HILL UGV A A, N ML FIT TLC LAIIEI THAN THE PT TV FAILIHATE ICIEND MULAH OUT TO THE EDGE OF THE FREE PIT, PUT KEEP AGA' FROM TRUNKS I ALL EICAVATED MATERIAL UNACCEPTABLE FOR REUIE SHALL BE I PEMOVI C.NTA PER AND SIT PLANT MAT11 AT AT SUCH A LEVEL THAI AFTER IETILEIINT, THE IMIGN IF THE PILL BLL IF AT FINISHED GRADE 2 "N"' "I "I" GOALS OF AN' PACTRALLS THAT HARD POT .01ND POOR TO NATALLAT AN 3 GOVER PLANTING BEDS WITH A MINIMUM 3 LAIER OF SPECIFIED MULCH I LA, DOD IN AN IDEILI MANNEI TO CIA" ALL 'A" 111L INDIA BULL AND WTH A GOD ROLLED AFTLR 24 HOURS AFTER LAIING AND LATER 5 KEEP SOD AREOTATELI WATERED UNTIL SAID MAKES A FIRM ICIONDITAN TV THE EVIL F SEED PLANTING TO A DEPTH of x. sMDD,A AND FREE DE SLONE, AND FEARS TH D��FE PALO '�°°°°EEED TO , AD OF GOTs'w(o;E;, �"IEEEoRIN.EA�N IlAll 11 ,M EI IN HASITH 5 KEEP AREA AEFOUAIELI WATERED FNIIL A STAND OF THE GRASS IS ESUABLSHED 6 PE -SEED TO �5SIAALIAH A 'HICK STAND OF GRASS IF PACESSARI END OF SECIIDN A29 IN QZ J CL Lu cc CL w N Q Z � BE, W � (o Lu ZUza g 2 1 0 L1.02 A201 WEST ELEVATION ( MAIN ST) —LE IM — I o M IVaRI K 6 =-TI5RI KLI =R CO --II' CU O M aRIGK Lcmm aRIGK RIC -- I MC2 2, 5Rl K'1-,-RRIV -501 LCC -IT aRI K Lcm aRIGK RCXa.R" Lcm aRIGK RIC. MCR M NaRI K M Il aRI K M 5RICK R XI5— M 5RIGK R I5 R" 1 aRI K OL_MV 'LR 9 F,'R PCV L I—OMOOTI,, Lcm aRIGK R I5— COLOIR 5W �1<—ALLIC-a_1G= LCC- TI5RIGK/ROLLOCK CCM=aRIGK-RIC—mLR 10,IX4-LRO-- TRIM 5OCRO:SMOOTI-- ML— COLOR -5W69915LLCKM.L— COLOR LI—C—CL..MIV..M aLCGK 12,--TM-T L I:11— LOR L MIV M 13, RR.-. T —TCLLI-11— COLOR- L -L -M— 5-C—MIVG COLOR 5— LI-11— -GKCI11— —5101 ROO5 COLOR - 5— \ A201 EAST ELEVATION pew �r°s3 z c a omc c r O ' C Z �I C C r .Ti c, REVISIONS DATE C eie: 311-2012 A'^O� SOUTH ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION E,45T ELEVATION FF,ONT ELEVATION UJEST ELEVATION z A D1 DUl IPSTEiz L,4i(OUT SGAL= /4 -_ '-O" GENEFAL NOTES: U DUMFSTEF ENCLOSUFE TO BE CONSTRUCTED FROM 8' CMU BLOCK UJ/ BFICK VENEEF ON THE EXTEFIOF FACE OF BLOCK. 2) DUMFSTEF ENCLOSUFE GATE TO BE CONSTFUCTED FFOI" f STEEL AND FAINTED BLACK TO MATCH THE FEST OF THE FAINTED METAL ELEMENTS ON THE MAIN STFUCTUFE./ BRICK U,ALL CA- ACI"E BRICK - RIDGEI"AR & TOS OF DJM�5T=_--NCL0J-15=_1 DU1 IPSTEiz FFONT ELEV. 5 L-- 3 " _ - DUl IPSTEiz SIDE ELEV. WILLIAM PECK & LOCAL DINER These plans are constretltoprocu the basic construction information by necto essary or erso in authority structure. These construction documents must beons. if and re to be by the builder or person in authority of this project. Any tliscrepancy, error, and/ or omissions, if any, are to be brought to the attention of the Designer prior to any construction or purchases being made. It is recommended that the owner or builder obtain ASSOCIATES INC. LOT 1R BLOCK—B All Federal staterindLoc Local es for: HVAC anicHons take precedr to constrver constructionofanykind.NOTE All Fetleral, state, and Local cotles, ortlinances, and restrictions take precetlence over any part of these OLD TOWN ADDITION rings nst documents which may conflict with same, and must be strictly obeyed and followed before and ARCHITECTS°°ringcoONSTion. THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND THERE USE, ARE THE PROPERTY OF WILLIAM PECK 8 ASSOCIATES. INC. AND ARE NOT TO BE TRACED. REUSED OR REPRODUCED IN ANYWAY. BY ANY Lewisville, Tx (972) 221-1424 COPPELL TEXAS MEANS, WITHOUTTHE EXPRESSED WRITTEN PERMISSION OF WILLIAM PECK& ASSOCIATES, INC.. > ALL RIGHTS RESERVED BRICK R-NNING BOND ACI"E BRICK - RCX5-R1 TC PATCH 5-ILDING STEELGATE-AINTED BLACK O'DJM�ST=_�ENGLOJ�S=_AFF. DU1 IPSTEiz FFONT ELEV. 5 L-- 3 " _ - DUl IPSTEiz SIDE ELEV. WILLIAM PECK & LOCAL DINER These plans are constretltoprocu the basic construction information by necto essary or erso in authority structure. These construction documents must beons. if and re to be by the builder or person in authority of this project. Any tliscrepancy, error, and/ or omissions, if any, are to be brought to the attention of the Designer prior to any construction or purchases being made. It is recommended that the owner or builder obtain ASSOCIATES INC. LOT 1R BLOCK—B All Federal staterindLoc Local es for: HVAC anicHons take precedr to constrver constructionofanykind.NOTE All Fetleral, state, and Local cotles, ortlinances, and restrictions take precetlence over any part of these OLD TOWN ADDITION rings nst documents which may conflict with same, and must be strictly obeyed and followed before and ARCHITECTS°°ringcoONSTion. THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND THERE USE, ARE THE PROPERTY OF WILLIAM PECK 8 ASSOCIATES. INC. AND ARE NOT TO BE TRACED. REUSED OR REPRODUCED IN ANYWAY. BY ANY Lewisville, Tx (972) 221-1424 COPPELL TEXAS MEANS, WITHOUTTHE EXPRESSED WRITTEN PERMISSION OF WILLIAM PECK& ASSOCIATES, INC.. > ALL RIGHTS RESERVED CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT PD -256 -SF -9, Old Coppell Estates, Lots IR, 2R & C -IR, Block I P&Z HEARING DATE: September 20, 2012 C.C. HEARING DATE: October 9, 2012 STAFF REP.: Gary L. Sieb, Planning Director LOCATION: 369 & 373 Hearthstone Lane & 408 Bethel Road SIZE OF AREA: 0.76 acres of property CURRENT ZONING: SF -9 (Single Family -9) and H (Historic) REQUEST: A zoning change to PD -256 -SF -9 (Planned Development -256 -Single Family -9), to allow the expansion of two single family lots into land owned by a public utility. APPLICANT: Mr. Edward R. Crater 373 Hearthstone Lane Coppell, Texas 75019 (972) 745-3310 Fax: (972) 745-7750 e-mail: ecrater@deloitte.com HISTORY: There has been no recent development on the residential properties. The land the applicant wishes to purchase from the current owner was developed with a brick utility building in 1998 by Paragon Cable and has been through ownership changes since that time. Tax records show the current owner of the cable lot to be C -Native Exchange. Physically, there has been no change from the original development on the cable property. TRANSPORTATION: Bethel Road is projected to be improved to a 28 -foot -wide concrete street within a 50 -foot right-of-way with limited on -street parking. Constriction should begin through this area within the next year. ITEM = 07 Page 1 of 2 SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North: open area and single family residences; H and SF -9 South: medical office building; PD -108 R6 -H East: single family homes, SF -9 West: office building; H COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Coppell 2030, A Comprehensive Master Plan, shows this property as Residential Neighborhood DISCUSSION: This zoning request is the first of a two part development scenario. First is a request for a change in zoning to accommodate possible enlargement to two single-family lots in Old Coppell Estates by incorporating an adjacent lot to the west. The second part relates to re -platting the property if the zoning application is granted. Specifically, our zoning applicant, the owner of 373 Hearthstone (Edward Crater), has purchased the former Paragon Cable lot (approximately 13,000 square feet) to his west with the intention of enlarging his residential property by about 80 feet of depth, and selling the C -Native Exchange (Paragon) property north of his lot to his adjacent neighbor, Scott Park. To accommodate his building plans, the zoning on both lots needs to be identical for permit purposes. Mr. Crater plans to remove the existing brick building, some of the trees and replace with a new swimming pool, an addition to his existing residence, an approximate 800 -square -foot free- standing garage/workshop building on the acquired tract and extension of the existing 7-8 foot stone screening wall along Bethel Road. The wall additions and landscaping adjacent to the wall will be maintained by the existing HOA. The curb cut that exists on Bethel Road permitting access to the cable company land will remain to give additional access to the residential property. Although Mr. Park has not yet developed plans for his lot, he is in agreement with this zoning request and will purchase his portion of the cable lot if the zoning is granted. We have received no opposition to this request. In fact, all returned notices are in favor of the proposal. That being the case, staff has no objection to the zoning request. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff is recommending APPROVAL of this request. There are no outstanding conditions to be met. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Recommend approval of the request 2. Recommend disapproval of the request 3. Recommend modification of the request 4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date ATTACHMENTS: 1. Site Plan, Elevation, and adjacent Zoning Exhibit (Sheet A1.01) ITEM = 07 Page 2 of 2 PD -234-H PD -252-H PD -250-H PD -206-H 4 PD REQUEST & SURROUNDING ZONING 3 VICINITY MAP 2 SITE PLAN - PROPOSED w m BLOCK1 T., 0.035 ACRE BETHEL ROAD ELEVATION (SOUTH ELEVATION) Replat of Lots 1, 2 and C-1 Block 1 to incorporate 0.28 acres of unplatted property into these lots. Lot 1 R (373 Hearthstone) will contain 0.349 acres, Lot 2R (369 Hearthstone) will contain 0.373 acres, and Lot C-1 R (common area lot) will contain 0.035 acres c c c C a C N C J V) C E to N -t✓s N Q Qca MCj -0 r co N W v N Ir q�y r E+ HPH Profed W.: 1208 ......, �.,m Proposed Site Plan, South El. , Vignit Map,&Adjarsnt Zoning A1.01 CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Old Coppell Estates, Lots IR, 2R & C -IR, Block 1, Replat P&Z HEARING DATE: September 20, 2012 C.C. HEARING DATE: October 9, 2012 STAFF REP.: Gary Sieb, Planning Director LOCATION: 369 & 373 Hearthstone Lane & 408 Bethel Road SIZE OF AREA: 0.76 acres of property CURRENT ZONING: SF -9 (Single Family -9) and H (Historic) REQUEST: A replat of Lots 1, 2 & C-1, Block 1, to incorporate 0.28 acres of unplatted property into (3) three lots. Lot IR (373 Hearthstone Lane), will contain 0.349 acres; Lot 2R (369 Hearthstone Lane), will contain 0.373 acres and Lot C -IR (a common area lot), will contain 0.035 acres. APPLICANT: Mr. Edward R. Crater 373 Hearthstone Lane Coppell, Texas 75019 (972) 745-3310 Fax: (972) 745-7750 Email: ecrater(t-Weloitte.com HISTORY: There has been no recent platting history on these properties. The Old Coppell Estates subdivision plat was approved in late 1995. There have been recent re - platting of two to three lots (the Vaughn Addition), but nothing of a significant nature. The residential lots in question here currently contain single-family detached strictures and the property to the west wishing to be incorporated into these lots is developed with a parking lot and small masonry building. Paragon Cable built the utility building on the western parcel in 1998 to serve its customers. It is now vacant. The Paragon tract was subsequently sold and the current owner is C -Native Exchange III, LP. ITEM = OR Page 1 of 2 TRANSPORTATION: Bethel Road is projected to be improved to a 28 -foot -wide concrete street within a 50 -foot right-of-way with limited on -street parking. Constriction should begin through this area within the next year. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North: open area and single family residences; H and SF -9 South: medical office building; PD -108 R6 -H East: single-family homes; SF -9 West: office building; H COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Coppell 2030, A Comprehensive Master Plan, shows the property as Residential Neighborhood. DISCUSSION: This is the second part of the process described in the zoning request to accommodate expansion of two residential single-family lots in Old Coppell Estates. Part one was the zoning application to rezone from SF -9 and H to PD - SF -9, two residential lots and property to the west of the two lots which most recently housed a cable company operation. The building is now vacant and the contiguous property owner has purchased the lot for expansion of his and his neighbor's lots by about 7,000 square feet each. Part two is to replat the vacant cable property into the adjacent residential lots to the east. With approval of the zoning application, staff can support this request to replat the property into the adjacent single-family properties. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff is recommending APPROVAL of this request with no outstanding conditions yet to be met. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Recommend approval of the request 2. Recommend disapproval of the request 3. Recommend modification of the request ATTACHMENTS: 1. Minor Replat Document ITEM = OR Page 2 of 2 i GRAPHIC SCALE 1 nctn = OR Ft, IS tl/P ed(so set) D A 2, CityM orc nty, T FLOOD CERTIFT As determI dCbyFthe FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS far D -Blas County. ins subject pr-perty Does Id,e- (100 Year FI -.d). Map date e/26/20G1 HA pd,,Ny /oil nafar-I C, Tns-uses. This oFl--d Statement sn-II n-tInd wndCreee-tt,IiObd d ghtd n � ne ort DF lode I —made or rw y..e� — 569'47'13"E 81.86' Sio5 IxI'd 1=aAli— u.x.wcT. xsT. xo. �almmoasH I SOD'49'02"W ,,6.00' 56970'S8'E 120.00' LOT 2R, BLOCK....1 I 18,232 50, FT., 0.373 ACRE SI Di I` + seuiax� 71 f�_ _ soar g ��m,»aw.N •r Y�E m.m �r r; I ..8 0� LOT 1R, BLOCK 1 RI m 15,192 50. FT., 0.349 ACRE J� 2. Irvmrun l61' N69'47'}0'W 79.23' 120.T.=\ _ 1 .f r +n,e N00'4902 E POINT OfN69'4D'00"W 120 00' GEG NNING 7.01'ueurn cvexlwrxBE1KEL ROAD ven LOT c -1R, BLOCK 1 1,524 50. PT., 0.035 ACRE OSGERS DEDICATION NOW, THEREFORE, KNOW ALL MEN BI THESE PRESENTS AT. C—MT ENONANOE 11. W. ll W R & KIMBERLY K CRATEK NA/EOSNERY A3illOO DN OF OLD COPPELL L9TME3, IND., AND SCOTT D. & KEW J. PARK, does hereby d -pt inns r plat desk -tion ins h n d—,bed p Arty as OLD COPPELL ESTATES. - d - Vit, Athe are ne eby reserved For 1 IF—- -s indicated_ re -n. The E.—e— spawn Hereon tbepusnt t -lir -ndg1.k ved-g-rtsll-a ylpduble nstrudt egre aslruclipngb - e�FILE patrolling.—ininge e atnd addingto- tnenes2112 Ody -!1 C-ppell, Texas tots H, 2012— by -!t C-ppell, Texas lois By C T II. EDWARD R CRATER (INSERT NAME) STATESTATE COUNT tOF ° TEAS COUNT t°OF FDALLAS A on eo e p - tont eAgofng Un Ih Ant and a nowledgadh to oAgoinghU,,th—nt and K--, ldgedn to e tilt t to iln In e toot t Ne ,anoldd in the cap -y erein At -tea. and n the sop v eren Ade, In sea or -rr ee, hy N L, t aay of seal -FF ee. IIIA 2112 r -- eav o — --- Notary Pab'c'n and For the State o1 Nofary Pub'd 'n Ind f -r the State -t Tex-, owners owners. sen ilea lL wnhe v F Coppen FIDpon Adm�n�etaon , 2112 od Copn Eetos IncIn� All C,Aest Puwy . cEFF 933It �.L t I 75243It ysuit. T45 - g a -s 7506} HD-dpl-n Admin rstrator, D-fe nstrument Not9200_A 32, 1, tIdt ell 'InDeed Remrdsa Dal las CoulniyF is KI—Ty anld beingya STATE OF TENAG COUNTI OF DALLAS CRATE ON I IN OF OLD IIPPELL ESTATE , ING, aplM1c`rded ani tract OF Assoclati-n At Old OCappKI Est-{eld D Rv by r -rded I-VoluhmA 99213, Page 2884. ds -'id Deed owners Records, D-Ilas bet Co only, TTe=as. and nng mo p tiCuld,lly descvibed -s, 020, g 0 3, Map BEGINNING pth" h 11 111 51 in 59 WeAL 0 75 HAH F.,AIRA ALL _ II tracl, some b g the C -1g at y e -! Bethel Rood (o-or�obe w�dtn g or - b THENCE N-rtn 00 deg. 05 In 58 sec West. - ng ins West lin said C—Native E—Inge III tract. 1/1 - CZ,tyCoanty, T a d-mnlln�ing gong-tM1e c sold C—Natl\rc OEx 14 11 Mlllp lr8act, and said Lot 1R2, A Foto distance of 184.00 Feet to m /2' od found Fr m c a 5/8'n rod ,th RPLS 1855' d s North 37 deg.- n 55 s c. W I 0.3 t 'd g the o s 2, Did Ca y s acro g the P -t thereon re— nstrument _ 1100211432 THENCE Sh 89 and sald LAI4R2, p deg log the most southerly Southeast dNn g heast c sold Lo14R2,s beinglen III t'oct, 1/zM Nortneost turner or eo�d C—N-tire E -n-nge III telAt. Fs -me b g Internal wrner -f slid Ldf, L HA -1 /2"70mast south y Dutnwest turner or sod Lot ER, same being e Nonnwest eorner -F Lot 2. THENCE o Z18 n ( Asa Set -I S t 09ht of -y IT, of All HeartdhstonenLaneery th th, North rghrt hof ao0y acne ofPAT -e Cer of call Lot C-1, same b g/e g pont n the Nonh E. 9THENCE NN, 01 1 41 Nin 12 idaB RoO -rest t- ut AAHA R_ For the S-neast C—NIlv ro rner -F -tones d d THECE C-1 BEd Nt he North, —dining y 948 sGDb Eethe -cAmpa Rod dedsta ce9. 23sF", IF'It'-PONT M1e PONS -One tract INNING tind IF tllg PRELI:11MINARY- NOT TO BE RECDRDEDpp II. TA= MGGS COUNTY OF L R.P.S NO .6122 STATE Oven uynd11 myI. and and se- -F -Frse los e y es - ns thenen exp—ed NOFIy PLdsscon Esperes ,My C-1 REPLAT OLD COPPELL ESTATES LOTS C -1R, 1R, & 2R, BLOCK 1 32,948 SQ. FT. OR 0.756 ACRE BEING A REPLAT OF LOTS C-1, 1, & 2, BLOCK 1, OLD CORRELL ESTATES, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF COPPELL, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 96D2D, PAGE 2043, OF THE MAP RECORDS OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS AND BEING A PLAT OF THAT D.30 TRACT IN THE JAMES W. ANDERSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 18, IN THE CITY OF COPPELL DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND IN DEED TO C—NATIVE EXCHANGE III, LP, RECORDED UNDER INSTRUMENT NUMBER 2006DO313265, OF THE DEED RECORDS OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS PEISER & MANION SURVEYING, LLC DATEoet,atzos _.peisers—eying.com IE "ED n—naa 77— DE I Ad ANN L I { cw rExal �D os of nvrv. L A 1T—a0t-1009 (F0) 6 BMORTDCAGFT CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT A Text Amendment to amend the Code of Ordinances Chapter 12, "Zoning", Article 12-29 "Sign Regulations" P&Z HEARING DATE: August 16, 2012 (continued with the hearing open to September 20) C.C. HEARING DATE: September 11, 2012 (October 9, 2012) STAFF REP.: Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning PURPOSE: To consider approval of a text amendment to amend the Code of Ordinances, by amending Chapter 12, "Zoning", Article 12-29, "Sign Regulations" Section 12- 29-1, "Definitions", by amending the definition of "Zoning District, Business" to include "HC", and by amending Article 12-29-3, "Provision for All Zoning Districts" by amending Subsection 2(A)iv, and amending Section 12-29-4, "Provisions" for Business Zoning Districts", by adding Subsection (B)III and amending Subsection 3(A) and 3(B) and adding Subsection 5; providing a Savings Clause; providing a Severability Clause; providing an Effective Date. HISTORY: We have had few Sign Regulation modifications to the Zoning Ordinance in the recent past. In May of 2011, the Planning Department received a letter from the Coppell Chamber of Commerce requesting a review of sign standards and consideration of suggestions regarding amendments to the Code. In July of that same year, Council appointed a Sign Ordinance Review Committee to address the Chamber's concerns, and in August the Committee met to review signs. Over the next four months, the Committee met and developed a number of recommendations directed at amending the Sign Code. Although the Committee's work was completed in March of 2012, pending Council elections postponed any action being taken on this subject until the elections were over. DISCUSSION: As stated in the HISTORY portion of this report, late last year a Sign Ordinance Review Committee was formed to review several portions of the Zoning Ordinance dealing with signs. The formation of the Committee was preceded by a letter submitted by the Chamber of Commerce criticizing the existing ordinance and suggesting changes that might be made (letter attached). Council approved a committee composed of eight (8) individuals representing the City, Chamber of Commerce, the Economic Development Committee, Planning Commission the industrial community and a commercial property owner who owns several properties in Coppell (member list is attached). ITEM = 9 Page 1 of 2 Over a period of four months, the Committee developed a series of proposed amendments that addressed concerns with sign provisions of the Zoning Ordinance (City Code, Chapter 12), as well as recommendations directed toward sections of the Temporary Signs standards contained within our City Code, Chapter 6. The zoning sign amendments must, of course, be considered by the Planning Commission before a recommendation can be forwarded to City Council; hence, the reason for this advertised public hearing. Chapter 6 of the City Code, however, does not require Planning Commission action and goes directly to Council for action. Our game plan is to recommend changes to the Zoning Ordinance to the Planning Commission with this document. After the Commission has acted, we envision taking the zoning text amendment changes with proposed changes to Temporary Signs to Council in the form of a workshop review. Once City Council has been briefed on both recommendations, we envision taking them both to a Council hearing, probably in September. What follows is a series of recommendations regarding zoning text amendments. Although the majority of these recommendations were unanimous votes on the part of the Committee, some were consensus only, and conflicting views of Committee members that might be expressed during our discussion will be elaborated upon during the public hearing. At conclusion of the August public hearing, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to continue this case to the September 20 hearing date in order to gain additional information on the entire signage subject. Commission directed staff to provide information regarding businesses that had passed upon locating or left Coppell because of the sign ordinance; requested staff provide photo -shopped photos of existing retail centers depicting what attached signage would look like if allowed to have non -restricted colors; needed a more clearly stated definition of "logo'; suggested minor changes to proposed wording in the ordinance. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff is recommending APPROVAL of these text amendments. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Recommend approval of the request 2. Recommend disapproval of the request 3. Recommend modification of the request 4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date ATTACHMENTS: 1. Text Amendment Changes (in red) 2. Letter of concern from the Chamber of Commerce 3. Sign Ordinance Review Committee members list 4. Police Department memo ITEM = 9 Page 2 of 2 Sec. 12-29-1. Definitions. Zoning district, business. Means any zoning district designated by this ordinance as O, R, C, TC, 11(', or LI. Any PD district with the previous listed zoning prefix is also included in this list, unless specifically excluded by this provision. Sec. 12-29-3. Provisions for all zoning. (A)Movement control signs: Movement control signs may be erected at any occupancy or any premises, other than single-family or duplex premises, may be attached or detached, and may be erected without limits as to number; provided that such signs shall comply with all other applicable requirements of this section. Movement control signs shall be premise signs only and shall not be construed as any sign listed in sections 12-29-4 or 12- 29-5. The occupant who erects a monument control sign on the premises shall comply with the following requirements: i. Each sign must not exceed three square feet in effective area; ii. If a sign is an attached sign, the words must not exceed six inches in height; iii. Each sign must convey a message which directs vehicular or pedestrian movement within or onto the premises on which the sign is located; iv. the signs must contain no advertising identification message, Lfflp _'ss �t...�`Y... 8. GrGffi ti: .... ��laiailli��ait a� aJ� l`��„�ILMIu: ....p� ��.....a� p � ...0 �Qu:� .�. W jddrc^� . ,ill yddrcaJatwl cr^ �hcdl he .�A- iiichc, iii ,�Lc ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Sec. 12-29-4. Provisions for business zoning districts. 1. ..... 2. ..... (A)..... (B) One monument sign is permitted on the premises as follows: On -sites greater than two acres in area. Maximum size -60 square feet. Maximum height—Six feet. Minimum setbacks -15 feet from street right-of-way, 75 feet from property lines other than those property lines fronting the street right-of- way. ii. On -sites two acres in area or less. Maximum size -40 square feet. Maximum height—Four feet. Minimum setbacks -15 feet from street right-of-way, 75 feet from property lines other than those property lines fronting the street right-of- way. iii • .. �... Ll ,Y � iiY., � U." ,��tl��Atli��V9� ;ik,'�tli ;i iai9U:" a� �"�'� U:".d� a U."a�.�d i C�Ap..,,9 U:"9� p-a�qICV'�.: �Vjfll � M�� I�� Lffl � �Y a��u� ol` X25 �u:°u:°� Jro� ii c°.Dt� .,rto �,u.Dtu.,r, ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... (C) ..... 3. Attached signs:.. ... (A) Mounting: All signs and their words shall be mounted parallel to the building surface to which they are attached, and shall project no more than 18 inches from that surface. Signs shall not be mounted on or to the roof surface and support members shall not project above the roof. Attached signs shall cgli p �yj fli, � YJ %11".; Y . � C 11'� .. _ �[„��V Ytl�7�� aC Y �V:'„��V 4tli!h�a.? aCq� �. �'{�`7'i�. ��V ��C?��,� tl��a��7 �tl��G Q��c �"t V:4 .��d ur oljl!�". JM Mid iliopLJtLTS M USt th-, k 0l_ . iflaWk 01- MW,11fl C'QpQrs,. d. In the event that a building has existing attached signs of all one color, not compliant with the colors specified herein, then the new sign may either match the color of the existing signs on the building, or be white, ivory, black or neutral. e. It is the intent of this provision that all tenant signage be the same color in any individual building. Raceways shall match the color of the materials to which they are mounted. All illumination shall be limited to white or off-white. No flpL la�Mlt�M SY II Ifl �IM ..................................................................................................................................... S au 11_ flI LIQ ; gm, oflii .- r Logos in any color shall be permitted, but shall not exceed 20 percent of the area of the sign.... (B)..... ii. For buildings and leaseholds with one front facade, (front facade being defined as the building surface directly facing a dedicated street, or where street frontage does not exist, it shall be defined as the width of the lease space which contains the main entry), attached signs located at a height of 36 feet or less are permitted a maximum aggregate effective area equal to one -square foot per lineal foot of building or leasehold frontage as applicable, or 300 square feet, whichever is less. 11aI I d� ..0 p)WJM `Y`Y.:�III Y MUW2� u:... g a41s flim ..0 u. M�o pa�fl: sfi[n, a ts... AV Ytl.,tlI,s aC�7�y.p�V� aCfi:" V:" U:"�� VU." aC��V:"a�„ VMAaC....to NIL ,YqgaCiV. 00t..,�RV:"ptlpu:"aC.. root 01 .,.00fi[alo;�- 0p1 fi[:lu `Yfi[pu uL fi[lu°.\ `su d., tliofi[ to u p d � tli 9of[9U." R aC�u:"� 111. a .gi� ➢ �G.�. ` . 4 � � � ��tltl��7 d U tl��I tlio �'�� V �:d.... W.i4�LA .��q� Di VaC� To: Coppell City Council Frorn: Coppell Chamber of Cotrunerce Re: Coppell CitySignage Ordinance Date: April 29,2011 'Fhe Coppell Chamber of Commerce conducts a yearly survey of Coppell businesses to assess the mood and needs of the business community. While the overall mood of the business cominunity is consistently a good one, by far the largest concern Of Our busiriess community is the sign ordinance restrictions. As their advocates, the Chamber f=eels obligated to voice their concerns -to the city in general and the Council in particular. Restrictions regarding size, trademarks, and color are perceived throughout the business community to be obstacles to doing business in Coppell. A trademarked sign is probably the most recognizable marketing tool for any fratichise owner. Franchise owners drive business to their business with sign recognition more than any other business. Easing signage rules to accorninodate the franchise owner would benefit Customers of the business as inuch as the franchisee. Lhiderstandably, the city has as vision and image it would like to project to its residents, but. at the same time Our businesses attract new lac tne owners atid provide tax dollars to run the city. The businesses are customers of the city and we should try to understand each other's needs so that we have aa, win, in solution. Considerations fear charas In terms of priority we would like to see the city council address the color of' all exterior signage. '['his would include both the building -frontage, rn0flUment and drive thru signs for shopping centers. Today CoPpell's code allows,for 10% color within the size of the sign; we would. like consideration for up t,o 100% as seen in the comparison below. As for the drive thru signs, we would like to have the ability to have the business narrie and color on those signs as well. We ask that the council consider this tbr milt le reasons. For sora e national. brands andr.nost retail. stores, the design and color is a patent and trademark for the franchise. Brand awareness is the top priority when it, comes to marketing theirstore to both new and existing customers, When the city restricts the exterior branding, they basically restrict the ability to rnarket arid drive greater sales.. "The more sales the stores produce the greater the sales tax. dollars are for the city. When the City imposes further restrictions by requiring black signage and require backlit lighting (no ouhvard lurnination ot° lunination that cast a Iight agyaInst the brick thzis outliningy the the signs (Jesign of - lettering) customer awareness and. visablity is greatly derninished. Additionally, we would like consideration for larg ,er signs or have the fomlula th.at is based on linear fibotage adjusted to acconimodate larger signs. We also as that the size of the monument signs be increased -to allow for more tenants to post their retail names. This may be a small increase of height to allow for additional tenant slot& Both these points are HjUstrated below: L.,astly, we would like the city council to consider tempo.rary sl mage for specific and defined events like grand openings that would go beyond banners. For example, short terin allowances Ibr contour signs, -reather flags, etc. -- only allowed around store frontage and away from city streets l'br periods no longer than one week. Additional restrictions oil the number ot'signs ,,allowed and that the signs are professionally designed/produced would be acceptable. "Understandably, the city has a vision and image it would like to prqject to its residents, but at the same time our bUSinesses attract new home owners and provide tax dollars to run the city. T'he businesses are custorners of the city and we should try. to understandeach other's needs so that we have a win, will solution. Casey Klein Vice President of Operations pp ll FamUy YMCA 146 Town Center Blvd Copp ll, TX 75019 Phone: (972) 393-5121 Fax: (972) 393-5947 www.ggppe jlye ,yjQ[g NurtUring Youth Development, Energizing Healthy Living and Inspiring Social Responsibility MEMO Date: February 23, 2012 To: Mac Tristan, Chief of Police From: Gary Nix, Deputy Chief of Police Subject: Sign Ordinance, section 12-29-4 The ordinance requires that the signage in the windows of businesses be limited. The reasons for limiting signage in the windows are based on long held and proven recommendations from various crime prevention institutes and clime prevention training courses. The basic reason to limit signs is to allow the maximum visibility from the street or parking lot into and out of the business. First, the officers can see in the business while on patrol for any potential crimes such as robberies, disturbances, suspicious persons, or other crimes. If the officer observes a crime being committed or about to be committed they can plan their approach to the location, get assistance, and respond in a manner that is safe for the business operator and the officers. Secondly, the visibility allows the business owner to see out of the business to see any approaching suspicious persons or activity so that they might have time to call for police assistance before the crime occurs. Finally, the visibility allows potential customers approaching the business the ability to see in the business as they approach and not enter the business if a crime is in progress and avoid becoming a hostage or being injured. While from a law enforcement perspective the more visibility the better and we would prefer no signage in windows, but we understand that is not practical or realistic. We understand the desire and need to advertise and place safety information for the public in windows. It is felt that the less signage or other obstruction in windows the better and safer.