Loading...
BP 2014-09-18 PZNOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING & AGENDA PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION September 18, 2014 COMMISSIONERS: Edmund Haas — Chairman Glenn Portman — Vice Chairman Doug Robinson Ed Darling Justin Goodale Sue Blankenship Vijay Sarma MEETING TIME AND PLACE: Pre -Session 6:00 p.m. 1st Floor Conference Room (Open to the Public) Regular Session 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers (Open to the Public) Notice is hereby given that the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Coppell, Texas will meet in pre -session at 6:00 p.m. and in regular session at 6:30 p.m. on Thursday, September 18, 2014, to be held at Town Center, 255 Parkway Boulevard, Coppell, Texas. As authorized by Section 551.071(2) of the Texas Government Code, this meeting may be convened into closed Executive Session for the purpose of seeking confidential legal advice from the City Attorney on any agenda item listed herein. The purpose of the meeting is to consider the following items: ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION PRE -SESSION: 1. Briefing on the Agenda. REGULAR SESSION: 2. Call to Order. Open to the Public) (Open to the Public) 3. Consider approval of the minutes for August 21, 2014. 4. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD -241R3 -C, Red Hawk Office, a zoning change request from PD -241-C (Planned Development -241 -Commercial) to PD -241R3 -C (Planned Development - 241 Revision -3 -Commercial), to attach a Detail Plan on Lot 27R, Block A, to allow the construction of an approximate 4,723 -square -foot medical office building on 0.57 acres of property located on the west side of Denton Tap Road approximately 920 feet north of Bethel School Road, at the request of David Hayes, The Holmes Builders. STAFF REP.: Matt Steer ag091814 Pagel of 3 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION 5. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of the Red Hawk Addition, Lot 27R, Block A, Replat, being a replat of Lot 27, Block A, of the Red Hawk Addition, to establish various easements to accommodate an medical office building on 0.57 acres of property located on the west side of Denton Tap Road approximately 920 feet north of Bethel School Road, at the request of David Hayes, The Holmes Builders. STAFF REP.: Matt Steer 6. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD-265R-TH-1, Kyra (Canterbury) Court, a zoning change request from LI (Light Industrial) & PD-265-TH-1 (Planned Development -265 -Townhouse -1) to PD-265R-TH-1 (Planned Development -265 Revised -Townhouse -1), to attach a Revised Detail Plan to allow an expansion of the existing Planned Development District to incorporate an additional 1.58 acres of property and to increase the number of Townhomes from 15 to 22 and two (2) common areas to three (3) common areas on approximately 4.23 acres of property located on the north side of Belt Line Road, approximately 1,700 feet west of Moore Road at the request of Jason Rose, J Rose Architects and Planners. STAFF REP.: Gary Sieb 7. Consider approval of the Kyra (Canterbury) Court, Preliminary Plat, to revise the approved Preliminary Plat to incorporate an additional 1.58 acres of property and to increase the number of townhomes from 15 to 22 and two (2) common areas to three (3) common areas on approximately 4.23 acres of property located on the north side of Belt Line Road, approximately 1,700 feet west of Moore Road at the request of Jason Rose, J Rose Architects & Planners. STAFF REP.: Gary Sieb 8. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of a TEXT AMENDMENT — CHAPTER 12, of the Zoning Ordinance, Section 12-33-1.8, an amendment that required brick screening walls be constructed according to the new standard specifications. The details are proposed to be codified in the Zoning Ordinance as an appendix illustration. STAFF REP.: Gary Sieb 9. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of a TEXT AMENDMENT - CHAPTER 12, of the Zoning Ordinance, ARTICLE 35, "ACCESSORY STRUCTURES REGULATIONS", to amend Article 34 - Accessory Structures Regulations, deleting the 80% masonry requirements for accessory structures in non-residential districts and for structures that are 150 square feet or more in residential districts, unless they are visible from a public street. STAFF REP.: Marcie Diamond 10. Update on Council action for planning agenda items on September 9, 2014: A. An Ordinance for Case No. PD -209R5 -C, TownOaks Centre (Zoes Kitchen), a zoning change from PD -209R -C to PD -209R5 -C, to allow the re -occupancy of an existing vacant restaurant building and allowing for outdoor seating, fagade revisions, ag091814 Page 2 of 3 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION awning colors and sign variances on 2.36 acres of property located at 120 S. Denton Tap Road, Suite 490. B. An Ordinance for Case No. PD -97R4 -R, Universal Academy, a zoning change from PD -97-R and PD -97R3 -R to PD -97R4 -R, to allow the expansion of the existing charter school into the entire 113,196 -square -foot existing building, incorporation of an additional 0.8 acres of land and to increase the number of students to a maximum of 1,500 ( grades K-12) on approximately 12.4 acres of property located at 1001 E. Sandy Lake Road. C. An Ordinance for Case No. PD -274-H, Hammond Street a zoning change from LI to PD -274-H, to establish a Detail Site Plan for 18 townhomes on 2.447 acres of land located along the west side of Hammond Street, south of West Bethel Road, approximately 575 feet north of Burns Street and to amend the Land Use on the 2030 Comprehensive Plan from Industrial Special District to Old Coppell Historic District. D. Case No. S -1196R2 -TC, J. Macklin's Grill a zoning change request from S -1196R - TC to S-1 196R2 -TC, to amend the existing Special Use Permit to allow an 867 -square - foot covering, with an additional 180 -square -foot overhang, over the patio in front of the existing 3,700 -square -foot restaurant located at 130 N. Denton Tap Road, Suite 120. E. Case No. S -1258 -LI, Fairfield Inn & Suites, a zoning change request from LI to S- 1258 -Light Industrial (Special Use Permit -1258 -Light Industrial), to allow a 95 -room, four-story hotel on 2.075 acres of property located at the northeast corner of S.H. 121 and Northpoint Drive. 11. Director's Comments. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATE I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Coppell, Texas on this 12'h day of September, 2014 at Juanita A. Miles Planning Secretary PUBLIC NOTICE STATEMENT FOR ADA COMPLIANCE The City of Coppell acknowledges its responsibility to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Thus, in order to assist individuals with disabilities who require special services (i.e., sign interpretative services, alternative audio/visual devices, and amanuenses) for participation in or access to the City of Coppell sponsored public programs, services and/or meetings, the City requests that individuals make requests for these services forty-eight (48) hours ahead of the scheduled program, service and/or meeting. To make arrangements, contact Vivyon V. Bowman, ADA Coordinator or other designated officials at (972) 462-0022, or (TDD 1 -800 -RELAY, TX, 1-800-735- 2989). ag091814 Page 3 of 3 MINUTES OF AUGUST 21, 2014 The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Coppell met in Pre -session at 6:00 p.m., and in Regular session at 6:30 p.m., on August 21, 2014, in the Council Chambers of Coppell Town Center, 255 Parkway Boulevard, Coppell, Texas. The following Commissioners were present: COMMISSIONERS: Edmund Haas — Chairman Glenn Portman — Vice Chairman Doug Robinson Ed Darling Justin Goodale Sue Blankenship Commissioner Vijay Sarma was absent. Also present were Director of Planning, Gary Sieb; Assistant Director of Planning, Marcie Diamond, and Secretary, Juanita Miles. The purpose of the meeting is to consider the following items: ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION PRE -SESSION: Open to the Public) 1. Briefing on the Agenda. The Planning Commission was briefed on each posted agenda item in the Workshop Session. No vote was taken on any item discussed. REGULAR SESSION: 2. Call to Order. (Open to the Public) Chairman Haas called the meeting to order. 3. Consider approval of the minutes for July 17, 2014. Commissioner Robinson made a motion to approve the minutes for July 17, 2014 as written. Vice Chair Portman seconded; motion carried (6-0), with Commissioners Goodale, Robinson, Haas, Portman, Darling and Blankenship voting in favor. None opposed. 4. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. S -1196R2 -TC, J. Macklin's Grill, a zoning change request from S -1196R -TC (Special Use Permit -1196 Revised -Town Center) to S - 1196R2 -TC (Special Use Permit -1196 Revision 2- Town Center), to amend the existing Special Use Permit to allow an 867 -square -foot covering over the existing patio in front of the existing 3,700 -square foot restaurant located at 130 N. Denton Tap Road, Suite 120, at the request of Todd Kerr, J. Macklin's Grill. STAFF REP.: Gary Sieb MIN082114 Page 1 of 4 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION Presentation: Planning Director, Gary Sieb introduced this case to the Commission with exhibits and a color board. He mentioned eight notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of this request. No notices were returned in favor or in opposition. He stated that staff is recommending approval with no conditions. Helena Murphy, Cross Timbers Architects, 3605 Yucca Drive, Suite 102. Flower Mound, Texas, was present to represent this case, to address questions and stated agreement with staff's recommendation. Public Hearing: Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. No one spoke. Chairman Haas closed the public hearing. Action: Vice Chair Portman made a motion to recommend approval of Case No. 5 -119682 -TC, J. Macklin's Grill, a zoning change request from 5 -1196R -TC (Special Use Permit -1196 Revised -Town Center) to 5 -1196R2 -TC (Special Use Permit -1196 Revision 2- Town Center), with no conditions. Commissioner Robinson seconded; motion carried (6-0), with Commissioners Goodale, Robinson, Haas, Portman, Darling and Blankenship voting in favor. None opposed. 5. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. 5 -1258 -LI, Fairfield Inn & Suites, a zoning change request from LI (Light Industrial) to 5 -1258 -Light Industrial (Special Use Permit - 1258 -Light Industrial), to allow a 95 -room, four-story hotel on 2.075 acres of property located at the northeast corner of S.H. 121 and Northpoint Drive, at the request of Dilip Pranav, Chase Hospitality. STAFF REP.: Marcie Diamond Presentation: Assistant Planning Director, Marcie Diamond introduced this case to the Commission with exhibits, elevations and a color board. She stated that staff is recommending approval subject to conditions which she read into the record. Robert Barr, Project Manager, Chase Hospitality, LLC, 8530 Esters Blvd., Irving, Texas, was present to represent this case, to address questions and stated agreement with staff's recommendation. Public Hearing: Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. No one spoke. Chairman Haas closed the public hearing. MIN041912 Page 2 of 4 Action: Vice Chair Portman made a motion to recommend approval of Case No. 5 -1258 -LI, Fairfield Inn & Suites, a zoning change request from LI (Light Industrial) to 5 -1258 -Light Industrial (Special Use Permit -1258 -Light Industrial), subject to the following conditions: 1. Additional comments will be provided upon detail engineering review. 2. Revise the first floor plan to relocate the fire riser room to be directly accessible from the fire lane. 3. This property will need to be platted prior to the issuance of a building permit. Commissioner Robinson seconded; motion carried (6-0), with Commissioners Goodale, Robinson, Haas, Portman, Darling and Blankenship voting in favor. None opposed. 6. Update on Council action for planning agenda items on August 12, 2014: A. An Ordinance for Case No. PD -183R -C, Coppell High School, a zoning change from PD -183-C to PD -183R -C, to attach a Revised Detail Site Plan to allow a one- story 80,701 -square -foot multipurpose building, a two-story 52,137 -square -foot arena and a one-story 4,237 -square -foot kitchen addition on 63.54 acres of property located at 185 W. Parkway Blvd. B. An Ordinance for Case No. PD -211R -H, Hard Eight BBQ, a zoning change from PD -211 -H -S-1226 and H to PD -211R -H, to allow an increase in property size to accommodate 63 additional parking spaces on 2.98 acres of property located at 688 S. Freeport Parkway. C. An Ordinance for Case No. PD-267R-RBN-TH, Avalon, a zoning change from C to PD-267R-RBN-TH, to allow nine (9) townhouses on 0.7 acres of property located at the southwest corner of Village Parkway and Kimbel Kourt. D. An Ordinance for Case No. PD -171R5 -HC, GTE Shared Services Addition (Wisenbaker), a zoning change from PD -171R4 -HC to PD -171R5 -HC, to attach a Revised Detail Site Plan for a 80,980 -square -foot office/showroom/warehouse building on 6.6 acres of property located at the northeast corner of Canyon Drive and S.H. 121. E. Westhaven PH 2A, Final Plat, to permit the development of 87 residential lots and 15 common area lots on 21.34 acres of property located south of S.H. 121, approximately 550 feet west of Magnolia Park. F. Case No. PD -274-H, Hammond Street, a zoning change request from LI to PD - 274 -H, to establish a Detail Site Plan for 18 townhomes on 2.447 acres of land located along the west side of Hammond Street, south of West Bethel Road, approximately 575 feet north of Burns Street and to amend the Land Use on the 2030 Comprehensive Plan from Industrial Special District to Old Coppell Historic District. G. Case No. PD -97R4 -R, Universal Academy, a zoning change request from PD -97-R and PD -97R3 -R to PD -97R4 -R, to allow the expansion of the existing charter school into the entire 113,196 -square -foot existing building, incorporation of an additional 0.8 acres of land and to increase the number of students to a maximum of 1,500 ( grades K-12) on approximately 12.4 acres of property located at 1001 E. Sandy Lake Road. H. Case No. PD -209R5 -C, TownOaks Centre (Zoes Kitchen), a zoning change request from PD -209R -C to PD -209R5 -C, to allow the re -occupancy of an existing MIN082114 Page 3 of 4 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION vacant restaurant building and allowing for outdoor seating, facade revisions, awning colors and sign variances on 2.36 acres of property located at 120 S. Denton Tap Road, Suite 490. During the Pre -Session, Planning Director Gary Sieb advised the Commission of Council's actions on August 12, 2014, and stated that Council approved all of the above -stated items. Gary also reminded Commissioners Darling, Goodale and Robinson to submit their applications to the City Secretary's office by Friday, September 12, 2014, to serve on the Planning Commission if interested in being considered for reappointment. 7. Director's Comments. There were no additional comments. ADJOURNMENT With nothing further to discuss, the meeting adjourned at approximately 6:41 p.m. Edmund Haas, Chairman Juanita A. Miles, Secretary MIN041912 Page 4 of 4 CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Case No.: PD -241R3 -C, Red Hawk Office P&Z HEARING DATE: August 21, 2014 C.C. HEARING DATE: September 9, 2014 STAFF REP.: Matt Steer, City Planner LOCATION: The west side of Denton Tap Road approximately 920 feet north of Bethel School Road SIZE OF AREA: 0.57 acres of property CURRENT ZONING: PD -241-C (Planned Development -241 -Commercial) REQUEST: A zoning change request to PD -241R3 -C (Planned Development -241 Revision -3 - Commercial), to attach a Detail Plan on Lot 27R, Block A, to allow the construction of a 4,723 -square -foot medical office building. APPLICANT: Owner/Applicant: Architect: The Holmes Builders (Hawkeye Commercial) Nove Studios Contact: David Hayes Contact: Mike Adams 225 East State Highway 121, Suite 120 P.O. Box 941852 Coppell, TX 75019 Plano, TX 75094 Phone:(214) 488-5200 Phone: (469) 682-8915 Fax: (214) 488-5255 Fax: N/A Email: dhayes(cr�holmescommercial.net mike(c_,,firmitasdesign.com HISTORY: On May 26, 2009, a Conceptual Planned Development for two commercial tracts was approved as a part of a Detailed Planned Development zoning for the residential component of PD-241-SF/C (Planned Development 241- Single- Family/Commercial) allowing for 54 single-family lots. In December 2011, a Detailed Planned Development was approved for one of the commercial lots (Lot 28R, Block A), allowing an 8,700 -square -foot office building which was subsequently constructed and is now fully occupied. HISTORIC COMMENT: There is no historic significance associated with the subject property. TRANSPORTATION: South Denton Tap Road is an improved six -lane, divided concrete arterial built within a 110 -foot right-of-way. ITEM # 4 Pagel of 3 SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING North — office; C (Commercial) South- residential; PD -241 -SF (Planned Development -241 -Single Family) East- daycare; PD -204-C (Planned Development -204 -Commercial) West -residential; PD -241 -SF (Planned Development -241 -Single Family) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Coppell 2030, A Comprehensive Master Plan, shows the property as suitable for Urban Residential Neighborhood. This office is acceptable in that "small scale commercial uses" are also appropriate in this land use category. DISCUSSION: This is the second of two commercial tracts of the Conceptual Planned Development for Red Hawk approved in June 2009. On the Conceptual Plan, a scaled 5,250 square foot professional office building was shown. This proposal is for a smaller, 4,723 square -foot building but the use proposed is a more intense land use (medical office) than what was previously planned. It is proposed to be located on the west side of S. Denton Tap Rd., just south of the Wynnpage office development. Site Plan: The building is proposed to be set back 30 feet from the S. Denton Tap right-of- way. The parking areas are proposed to be on the north and west of the proposed structure with a fire lane/mutual access easement extending from the office to the north through this development narrowing to 12' and connecting with the residential component to the south. This was previously approved with the initial Red Hawk request and is already installed with an emergency gate which will remain in place on the south property line. The fire lane is proposed to be extended to Denton Tap. There is an existing screening wall on the south and west sides of the site separating this use from the residential development. Parking: The parking required for a medical office is one parking space per 175 square feet of building area. The applicant is proposing to just meet the minimum parking required with 4,723 square feet of medical office by providing 27 spaces. Tree Survey/L.andscape Plan: There are numerous trees located on the northern boundary of the proposal. Only two are proposed to be removed with this request. The remainder will be limbed - up with the underbrush being removed and shrubs added to screen the parking. Eleven Live Oaks, four Cedar Elms, eight Eastern Red Cedars and two Crepe Myrtles are proposed to be planted in concert with the existing trees on the site (northern property line). This Landscape Plan meets the requirements of the recently revised Zoning Ordinance allowing for 30% of the site to be landscape area on lots smaller than two acres in size. Elevations/Signage: The structure is proposed to be 26 feet in height (measured to the peak). The office is proposed to be constructed of a grey brick, off-white/beige stone with a redwood stained siding serving as an accent. The roofing material where visible, is proposed to be champagne colored standing seam. A 40 -square -foot multi - ITEM # 4 Page 2 of 3 tenant monument sign is proposed to be located on the east side of the building perpendicular to Denton Tap. It is proposed to be constructed of the same stone as the office and to be externally illuminated with black pin -mounted letters. Currently, only potential sign locations are depicted on the building elevations and all signage will need to meet the ordinance in terms of size and type. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff is recommending APPROVAL of PD -241R3 -C, Red Hawk, subject to the following conditions being met: 1. Additional engineering comments will be generated upon detail engineering plan review. 2. The fire hydrant shall be private. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Recommend approval of the request 2. Recommend disapproval of the request 3. Recommend modification of the request 4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date ATTACHMENTS: 1. Site Plan 2. Landscape Plan 3. Tree Survey 4. Elevations ITEM # 4 Page 3 of 3 i II i it I I I I i \ \ 24' FIRE LANE / I � EX CURB TO /I BE REMOVED OI I Oi I �"�� II SPf.GES O i 24' FIRE LANE NI T IU E:45T'6 GONG PAVING 9000' I� TYP / TO REMAIN ENHANCED WALL \ 24 FIRE LANE 00 10 PAVING; MAINTENANGE \ EASEMENT O I� N 5.00p'm � O 9.00(9. OC' 11.000, EX CURB TO to BE REMOVED 1 - \\--- I p 24' FIRE LANE' SPACES m � II \ AREA DiRAIN TO To REMAIN Is 000 ._ HOW ie 000 \ \\\ \\000 -- � _.AsEERM`N \ \\ \ \\\ \\\\ \ \ \\ SPRINKLER � \ 12' EMIR ACCESS `iNEN FFH \\ IS BLDG SETBACK m WALL MAINTE-NANGE EASEMN- pl NB'1004'59"W WLL(W \ ` N89'12"W 11403' SITE PLAN SITE PROPOSED ZONING - PD -241 R3 -C (EXISTING PD -241-C) PROPOSED USE MEDICAL (OFFICE) CONSTRUCTION TYPE: 5B FULLY SPRINKLED RENTABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE: 4639 NON RENTABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE: 84 GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE: 4723 LOT COVERAGE = 4723/24831 = 19.02 FLOOR AREA RATIO= .190 MEDICAL SQUARE FOOTAGE= 4723 @ 175 SF/SPI SPACES TOTAL PARKING SPACES PROVIDED: 27 SPACES BUILDING HEIGHT = 26'-7" EXISTIN6 CURB I TO BE REMOVED EXISTING UTILITY P< TO BE RELOCATED �N—pp�y I I EXISTING UTILITY LINES TO REMAIN LEGAL DESCRIPTION —1, ADDITION CALLS GOUNN, TEXAS l CLEAN UP NORTH PERIMETER TREES AND BRUSH. REMOVE THE SMALLER UNDESIRABLE TRELS - I I • NOVE STUDIOS 505000ORUMRD.SM700 DALUS. TM Tam TELPHONE97 NITA082 FASC18RtE 214.290.8812 ` R45UE DATE NEWEYONS N84 -V5 I"E c200.0 ro I \ TREES REQUIRED: I I PERIMETER REQUIRED PROVIDED _ 1 J I I I / i J] �I _ i U4Rron iav ° 4EXnrvG F u _- n I wu. z -—ER -11 a c 8 r _ ( �ENoUMHPaas"snowCO INS\ 1? 1 101 l7i.'• r, � I aLLEXISTIXR TBE66"c Iw _. __ �li �I� PRonsnEaTEa \ tl Z I ­_LI MATERIALS ST: W. "-I-- DESCRIPTION Q SIZE SPAC. I I O.C. _ NO TREES- LIVE OAKS 11 3"CAL A.S.I QUERCUS VIRGIN_A 1 EL. LL CEDAR ELMS 4 3'CAL A.S.'.I N I u—Q UILMUS PARVIFOLIA S.T.2 30 GAL A.S. I O F Y LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA' EASTERN REO CEDARS 8 810, AS I i Z I JUNPERUS VIRGINIANIASHR Z = LU INDIAN HAWTHORN 91 SGAL 30' o RAPHIOLEPSIS OWE. BURFORD HOLLY] SGAL 30" IIS " !J 1�— -2, 5 U)Q f ILE%BURFORDI NANA,1 -- cli GROUNDCOVERS ASIAN JASMINE SGAL 12" I —-- G --`_. ICWrt W M � TRACHLOSPERE ASI ICUM " ' + + + L _ n- 0 �J SEASONAL COLOR- - i ASSORTED VARIETIES 00 4 -POTS - — / - + .: _.�5 LAWNS a N8 / BERMUDASOD care 4'54"W 86.rp ` .ALL N84 54'12"N 11403 Q LANDSCAPE NOTES QBca PDAE Cpac 1IHHARDWODn hNiC .. a �j A_RRA SPLANT EDS SHAL BE PREPARED PLAAI WNARRCAASNTNINPFMGH--TTRREBENVADCTEHS Annx m4LLm5BmPANTxeNTOODANnLi,Ba E 9YTEAC0BSFROMEDDGLO. I S ANDSCAP CONTAACTOASHALL BE RESPONEE3LE FOA AEGOLAA -... MOWNO WEEDRiG ➢t GATTONFERTTLIZINO�PAiIMNG AW OTfffitaT NmEN Irt ANCtlL' PLANTM ', ONTTLFPI ACCEPFANCE OF PAOIECC SHEETNUMBER THEN BE AESPONSA3LRPOR STANDARD MAWT NANC2 �\ S. PROVIDtl OTB SBAA WARRANTYONTREES, SFARJBS, OANAF4:NTAL GRASSES '- GxoDnvcovBxs, rxcLDDLs nAcrGRS BEroNDmNTAwcroR'S L_3 CDNT DLPWBAT�AEGNDPHGA�,ETc LANDSCAPE PLAN Sf:AIF 1"-10 .TREE SURVEY EXISTING TREE SURVEY: TREES SIX INCH CALIPER AND GREATER I # KEY DESCRIPTION SIZE PROTECT REMOVE CALIPER 1. HACKBERRY 6" X 2.HACKBERRY 9" X 3. BRADFORD PEAR 6" X 4. BRADFORD PEAR 6" X 5. LIVE OAK 6" X 6. HACKBERRY 7" X 7. LIVE OAK 6" X 8. HACKBERRY 8" X 9. AMERICAN ELM 7" X 10. HACKBERRY 7" X LJ 11. HACKBERRY 7" X 12. HACKBERRY 8" X 1' 13. HACKBERRY 7" X Z -- 14. HACKBERRY 9" X 1 15. HACKBERRY 9" X 16. MESQUITE 12" X 17. HACKBERRY 6" X COMMON NAME/ BOTANICAL NAME HACKBERRY/CELTIS OCCIDENTALIS I BRADFORD PEAR/PYRUS BRADFORD LIVE OAK/QUERCUSVIGINIANA AMERICAN ELM/ULMUS AMERICANA MESQUITE/PROSOPIS GLANDULOSA in U o I 6 z ;I I i I f I I I �I `I T I 4 I � I I I � I w w w NOVE STUDIOS 00 QUORUM RD. SEE TR MUAS,TEXAS7Q54 TELEPHONE 9/2.687.9082- FASCNRIIE214.299.8612 ISSUE DATE 6/08/2014 a NB�j 731"E 200.02' ,• s/oz/zoaa "3. 4 S. 6 1. g 9. ,. 11. -12 14. Y 8 zoly j. 13. i 1 16 I U & 1 i7.. ig - �x J � V d I ❑> ' I E-• \ ml. U Q p w I. dam. O z� INX Qw 1 mmomm NEENE W m F. J J I a 148'1 04'Sq'W 86.07' N51 59 12 W 114.03' � U -- \ SHEET NUMBED TREE SURVEY „_.,..,�.., L-1 ELEVATION NOTES STONE: GRANDBURY -CREAM 1, BRICK: SUMMIT - l59 PEBBLE GRAY 3, ROOF: BERRIDGE ;COLOR CHAMPAGNE 4, WINDOW FRAMES: CLEAR ANODIZED ALUM 5, AWNING: CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM WEST ELEVATION 3116"=1-0„ SIGNAGE NOTES THE GROSS SIGN AREA SHALL NOT EXCEED 56.5 SF ■®�ii1393�0 1] Iii31P1iR33fi1370• W ■ioii� ■ MONUMENT SIGN 114"=v-0„ �a1a =UUMPSTER PLANI EAST ELEVATION 3116 -1'.0" 7 5101N& CANOPY VENEER STOREFRONT NOVE STUDIOS DALLAS, TE%AS76264 TELEPHONE 972.687.9UB2 FASCIVILE 214.299.8612 IISSUE ,­ REVI IONIS W Lu z 0 U o� � as p F - Z 0Q z = 0 Q oOf In O N L�JJ H / c) of 0 J J Lu 0- 0- 0 - 0- 0 U I.,niio reirm �n, ry aaPro 9/02/20H S.EET NUMBER A4-1 PROIECI ER 14022 ''I'l''liiim m -m -m -m -m -m -m -lo 5TANPIN6 5EAH METAL ROOF —CAST STONE NEA ERIOK VENEER NOVE STUDIOS 5056 QUORUM RD. STE 70 DALU, TEX, S 75254 TELEPHONE 972.6BUD82 FASCIMILE 214.299.8612 ISSUE DAIE 9/02/2014 REVISIONS T.O. NORTH ELEVATION 3„6"=,'-o” W Z U 0 F- RE � as O �Y z � oQ z= 0 QLu of 2 U)a ON 115'_1" w M F- 0 O J v�iamn avv�aai. 9/02/2014 SHEEI NUMBER A4-2 PROI; 22ER CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Red Hawk Addition, Lot 27R, Block A, ReWat P&Z HEARING DATE: August 21, 2014 C.C. HEARING DATE: September 9, 2014 STAFF REP.: Matt Steer, City Planner LOCATION: The west side of Denton Tap Road approximately 920 feet north of Bethel School Road SIZE OF AREA: 0.57 acres of property CURRENT ZONING: PD -241-C (Planned Development -241 -Commercial) REQUEST: A replat of Lot 27, Block A, of the Red Hawk Addition, to establish various easements to accommodate an office building. APPLICANT: Owner/Applicant: Engineer: The Holmes Builders (Hawkeye Commercial) Kadleck & Associates Contact: David Hayes Contact: Lynn Kadleck 225 East State Highway 121, Suite 120 2000 N Central Expy, Ste 113 Coppell, TX 75019 Plano, TX 75074 Phone:(214) 488-5200 Phone: (972) 881-0771 Email: dhayesgholmescommercial. net 1.kadleckgkadleckassociates.com HISTORY: On May 26, 2009, a Conceptual Planned Development for two commercial tracts was approved as a part of a Detailed Planned Development zoning for the residential component of PD-241-SF/C (Planned Development 241- Single- Family/Commercial) allowing for 54 single-family lots. In December 2011, a Detailed Planned Development was approved for one of the commercial lots (Lot 28R, Block A), allowing an 8,700 -square -foot office building which was subsequently constructed and is now fully occupied. HISTORIC COMMENT: There is no historic significance associated with the subject property. TRANSPORTATION: South Denton Tap Road is an improved six -lane, divided concrete arterial built within a 110 -foot right-of-way. ITEM # 5 Page I of 2 SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING North — office; C (Commercial) South- residential; PD -241 -SF (Planned Development -241 -Single Family) East- daycare; PD -204-C (Planned Development -204 -Commercial) West -residential; PD -241 -SF (Planned Development -241 -Single Family) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Coppell 2030, A Comprehensive Master Plan, shows the property as suitable for Urban Residential Neighborhood. This office is acceptable in that "small scale commercial uses" are also appropriate in this land use category. DISCUSSION: This is the companion request to PD -241R3 -C, Red Hawk Office. It is a replat of Lot 27, Block A, which was previously platted with the overall Red Hawk development. A wall maintenance easement is shown along the south and west property lines allowing access to the Homeowner's Association of Red Hawk for maintenance purposes. A fire lane easement is proposed to extend to the west and connect with an existing north -south fire lane already installed. This portion of the fire lane easement is being adjusted to reflect exact dimensions from the site plan. The building setbacks remain the same from what was approved on the original plat. They are shown at 30 feet from Denton Tap and 15 feet from the south property line. Staff recommends approval subject to the three conditions outlined below. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff is recommending APPROVAL of the replat subject to the following conditions being met. 1. Additional engineering comments will be generated upon detail engineering plan review. 2. The fire hydrant shall be private. 3. Show the existing fire lane in a light line type and proposed fire lane in a darker line type, as the existing one can be abandoned by this plat but needs to be shown. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Recommend approval of the request 2. Recommend disapproval of the request 3. Recommend modification of the request ATTACHMENTS: 1. Replat ITEM # 5 Page 2 of 2 o — LEGEND o ® A—, N—ee a I T11 warn ar wnv sere bb (Preo EN NG N vc E5)rery n olion �\ V net stn VICINITY MAP N 89'27'31" IF 11 57a.L7 Asea116' Row 879" 7Ta- W N89'S5'12"W u Al Fp F;11 N '04'5 114.03'„ 86.07'COMMON AREA A Lo 1R N. 2111112 — -- — --- _ _ WASHINGTON DRIVE 111o.PMRl T. 1174 `sq O _ /IT I 695 \\ o.p.R o.CT. \ ell In.1ruNo 21111015E/45 I 2 \ .Paoc. T. 1 rostra ov RD C.T 4sT4s \ ry IN111 12 1 13 I OWNER'S CERTIFICATION REAS, RESTSTONE Nd Crow SurveyCAbsbect No301 Cit, of Copp.11 Dallas C.Ity Texese sa ld—be ngnall Of Lottl27, DHF A of Red Hawk, an atldition m the City of Coppell, Dallas County, Texas and O-Ub,d In Count, Clerk Instmment Numner20110D246745, Off- Property RSLOrds of Dallas County, Texas, saitl tract of lend eo oval 1dt, Creststone Grouo LOT b Ctleed reoortled In Ceunty-b Instmment No. ,El 1"1'as follows rop.Ny A .... ds of alias ounty, T nd setdtract of RON tieing l -d BEGINNING et a found 510 inch ironrod for a corner In the west lineof penton Tap Road (a 110 foot h9hl of way), seld paint being the Don n east miner of said Lot 27 end Lot 1, Block A. of Wynnpe9e Plaza Addition, es recorded IN Volume 2002047, Page 101, Deetl Remrtls of D-.Ilas County. T.— """' exas ington Dr ve (a 0 foo Aghl of vey), tl point being t e most northwest comer of said CommonA ea Lot1Xi THENCE. N 87°0459" 0 with Me —h line of Washington Drive, a distance of 8607 feetto a found 516 inoh irenand found fore Domer at the —11- south Domer of said Lot 27 and Lot 26, BI—A of the said Rad Hawk —,— THENCE N 00°08'31" E. tle 011 Me north line of Washington Drive end .Nth the common line of sold Lot 26 and Lot 27. a distance of 11973 foot m a mond 518 'inch 1. rod for comer at the southeast corner of en Alley right of way es dedmemd by the map of Wynnpe9e Plaza addition es corded in Volume 92001, Page 2952, Dead Records of Dallas County, Texas, saitl point being Me HE corner of said Lot 26 end Lot 27 and the common west corner of said Lot 27 and the above said Lot 1, the Po nE o£ Beg_ NG antl Containing 24,831nsquere feetor OS/0 sore at le�nd,nw of 200 02 feetto SURVEYOR S CERTIFICATE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS. THAT, L L LYNN KADLECK, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor in the State of Texas, do hereby certify that I have prepared this plat from an -.dual on the greund survey of the land; end the is shown hereon ere wfoN,d -11b, pl—d under my personal supervision In __Nb, MatheepI.FNg rola-.and regulation of the city of Coppell, Texas. DATED MIS[he day of ,2014. NOT FOR RECORDING L.LYNN KADLECK Registered Professional Lantl Surveyor No. 3352 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF COLLIN } IEFIRII __d L ELynnIlld Natlleck nknovmt1, me 1 be Me personrwh— Illy Names 1purpos. Subecribedste Me mregoaI9 aNd ac N—,.dged to me that ne e.ecuied Me same BN, the and consera idtons i therein expressed. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE[histhe tlay of ,2014. OWNER'S DEDICATION NOW THEREFORE, KNOWALLMEN BYTHESE PRESENTS Tbat. CR ESTSTONE GROUP LTD., R [be Owner of the berem descnbed property, and does bereby use. Th, maintenance of paving on the utility and fire lane easements Is Me res any pubic utility shall nave the right to remove and keep removed all er parts of NO IN iINSFIGrevntith the construction „mermen—, orbffi- cy of lbs —p-- Lght or ingress orr egress to 11 11, nspec[ing, patron ng. m ning and adding to or lemoviog ell or parts of Its respedlve system without he ssity at elny time of pmnudng ON. permission of anyone_ (Any punlin utility mall nava Me dgnt tof 'ingress anqd -.gdrass mNin privatyp oe pmhnp-.Iry ne pue of read'mg maters and any maintena nc-. or service eroe may e tiliry).rpos M1er ce9 (roam Seams In to th11 IN. h. herb or pe reoa�onnas nada deescrlptf l- Osu cl by Th,i plat ap N—d subject to ell plating ortlina—A rules, regulations and Goppell. Texas. Exer-d to is toe_day& .2014. BY CRESTSTCNE GROUP LTD. STATE OF TEXAS } COUNTY OF DALLAS } BEFORE ME, the under g—d authority in and for the State of Texas, on this tlay personally appeared Terry Holmes. of Creslstone Group Ltd., known m C. m be the person whose name Is subscribed tc tE. mregoin9 Instrument end.- ,I.dg.d m m that h-.-.x-.cut-.d the same for the purposes and—deraffin therein expressed and In Me cap.dty therein -- GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE MIs tlay Of_, 2014 Chairmen. Plann119& A.11, Commission Date — pp -Mt, of Coppell, Texas Approved antl Accepted: Mayor Date Of App— CiryofCoppd Texas The undersigned, the City Secretary of M-. City of Coppell. Texas. hereby certifies th—. foregoing (nal plat of Lot 27R, Block A of Rad Hawk, an atltlition m the City of Coppell was submi d to the Cit, Council on the day Of 2014. and the Council. by formal action, men and there aooepted the detlication of Me streets. alleys, perks, easements, pNblle plicas, end water antlsawer no@ —h --d Me the ams --thereof by s,g-g N, name as hereinabove subscribed,y to WITNEGG MV HAND. this the_ day of ,2014_ Cit, Secretary REPEAT RED HAWK LOT 27R, BLOCK A LOT 17 E-1 A R ACRE TF�CT IN 'HE EDWARD A. CROWSURVEY, D ABSTRACT NO. 301 CITY OF COPPELL, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS OWNER HA COMMERCIAL LLC 221E SH121 CtCP 4 S' E PS -.5019 21 TnA LEC & ASSOCIATES ja7n)"asacone'Pts nH,,` N. ,oa - n 90'00 00', 111p 0 �ins�uE. + N ry eLocA eo.e.e.nc,. ze e s -----�—_ � Y � � Nso po Dow�ea4uNN � Nw Q oaPe LOT 27R, BLOCK A N z 0 24,832 SFS 0.570 AC z 0 _ FIT— INc A,fzfT9Aw: n �wp. f,�NEN AMIITIIANCE I oJ zzs z `l �2p�Npo246T45UT AT o Z m W I IF 11 57a.L7 Asea116' Row 879" 7Ta- W N89'S5'12"W u Al Fp F;11 N '04'5 114.03'„ 86.07'COMMON AREA A Lo 1R N. 2111112 — -- — --- _ _ WASHINGTON DRIVE 111o.PMRl T. 1174 `sq O _ /IT I 695 \\ o.p.R o.CT. \ ell In.1ruNo 21111015E/45 I 2 \ .Paoc. T. 1 rostra ov RD C.T 4sT4s \ ry IN111 12 1 13 I OWNER'S CERTIFICATION REAS, RESTSTONE Nd Crow SurveyCAbsbect No301 Cit, of Copp.11 Dallas C.Ity Texese sa ld—be ngnall Of Lottl27, DHF A of Red Hawk, an atldition m the City of Coppell, Dallas County, Texas and O-Ub,d In Count, Clerk Instmment Numner20110D246745, Off- Property RSLOrds of Dallas County, Texas, saitl tract of lend eo oval 1dt, Creststone Grouo LOT b Ctleed reoortled In Ceunty-b Instmment No. ,El 1"1'as follows rop.Ny A .... ds of alias ounty, T nd setdtract of RON tieing l -d BEGINNING et a found 510 inch ironrod for a corner In the west lineof penton Tap Road (a 110 foot h9hl of way), seld paint being the Don n east miner of said Lot 27 end Lot 1, Block A. of Wynnpe9e Plaza Addition, es recorded IN Volume 2002047, Page 101, Deetl Remrtls of D-.Ilas County. T.— """' exas ington Dr ve (a 0 foo Aghl of vey), tl point being t e most northwest comer of said CommonA ea Lot1Xi THENCE. N 87°0459" 0 with Me —h line of Washington Drive, a distance of 8607 feetto a found 516 inoh irenand found fore Domer at the —11- south Domer of said Lot 27 and Lot 26, BI—A of the said Rad Hawk —,— THENCE N 00°08'31" E. tle 011 Me north line of Washington Drive end .Nth the common line of sold Lot 26 and Lot 27. a distance of 11973 foot m a mond 518 'inch 1. rod for comer at the southeast corner of en Alley right of way es dedmemd by the map of Wynnpe9e Plaza addition es corded in Volume 92001, Page 2952, Dead Records of Dallas County, Texas, saitl point being Me HE corner of said Lot 26 end Lot 27 and the common west corner of said Lot 27 and the above said Lot 1, the Po nE o£ Beg_ NG antl Containing 24,831nsquere feetor OS/0 sore at le�nd,nw of 200 02 feetto SURVEYOR S CERTIFICATE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS. THAT, L L LYNN KADLECK, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor in the State of Texas, do hereby certify that I have prepared this plat from an -.dual on the greund survey of the land; end the is shown hereon ere wfoN,d -11b, pl—d under my personal supervision In __Nb, MatheepI.FNg rola-.and regulation of the city of Coppell, Texas. DATED MIS[he day of ,2014. NOT FOR RECORDING L.LYNN KADLECK Registered Professional Lantl Surveyor No. 3352 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF COLLIN } IEFIRII __d L ELynnIlld Natlleck nknovmt1, me 1 be Me personrwh— Illy Names 1purpos. Subecribedste Me mregoaI9 aNd ac N—,.dged to me that ne e.ecuied Me same BN, the and consera idtons i therein expressed. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE[histhe tlay of ,2014. OWNER'S DEDICATION NOW THEREFORE, KNOWALLMEN BYTHESE PRESENTS Tbat. CR ESTSTONE GROUP LTD., R [be Owner of the berem descnbed property, and does bereby use. Th, maintenance of paving on the utility and fire lane easements Is Me res any pubic utility shall nave the right to remove and keep removed all er parts of NO IN iINSFIGrevntith the construction „mermen—, orbffi- cy of lbs —p-- Lght or ingress orr egress to 11 11, nspec[ing, patron ng. m ning and adding to or lemoviog ell or parts of Its respedlve system without he ssity at elny time of pmnudng ON. permission of anyone_ (Any punlin utility mall nava Me dgnt tof 'ingress anqd -.gdrass mNin privatyp oe pmhnp-.Iry ne pue of read'mg maters and any maintena nc-. or service eroe may e tiliry).rpos M1er ce9 (roam Seams In to th11 IN. h. herb or pe reoa�onnas nada deescrlptf l- Osu cl by Th,i plat ap N—d subject to ell plating ortlina—A rules, regulations and Goppell. Texas. Exer-d to is toe_day& .2014. BY CRESTSTCNE GROUP LTD. STATE OF TEXAS } COUNTY OF DALLAS } BEFORE ME, the under g—d authority in and for the State of Texas, on this tlay personally appeared Terry Holmes. of Creslstone Group Ltd., known m C. m be the person whose name Is subscribed tc tE. mregoin9 Instrument end.- ,I.dg.d m m that h-.-.x-.cut-.d the same for the purposes and—deraffin therein expressed and In Me cap.dty therein -- GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE MIs tlay Of_, 2014 Chairmen. Plann119& A.11, Commission Date — pp -Mt, of Coppell, Texas Approved antl Accepted: Mayor Date Of App— CiryofCoppd Texas The undersigned, the City Secretary of M-. City of Coppell. Texas. hereby certifies th—. foregoing (nal plat of Lot 27R, Block A of Rad Hawk, an atltlition m the City of Coppell was submi d to the Cit, Council on the day Of 2014. and the Council. by formal action, men and there aooepted the detlication of Me streets. alleys, perks, easements, pNblle plicas, end water antlsawer no@ —h --d Me the ams --thereof by s,g-g N, name as hereinabove subscribed,y to WITNEGG MV HAND. this the_ day of ,2014_ Cit, Secretary REPEAT RED HAWK LOT 27R, BLOCK A LOT 17 E-1 A R ACRE TF�CT IN 'HE EDWARD A. CROWSURVEY, D ABSTRACT NO. 301 CITY OF COPPELL, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS OWNER HA COMMERCIAL LLC 221E SH121 CtCP 4 S' E PS -.5019 21 TnA LEC & ASSOCIATES ja7n)"asacone'Pts nH,,` N. ,oa - CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Case No.: PD-265R-TH-1, Kyra (Canterbury) Court P&Z HEARING DATE: September 18, 2014 C.C. HEARING DATE: October 14, 2014 STAFF REP.: Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning LOCATION: North side of Belt Line Road, 1,700 feet west of Moore Road SIZE OF AREA: 4.23 acres of property CURRENT ZONING: LI (Light Industrial) & PD-265-TH-1 (Planned Development -265 -Townhouse -1) REQUEST: A zoning change request to PD -265R -Townhouse -1 (Planned Development -265 Revised -Townhouse -1) to attach a Revised Detail Plan to allow an expansion of the existing Planned Development District to incorporate an additional 1.58 acres of property and to increase the number of townhomes from 15 to 22 and three (3) common areas. APPLICANT: Owner Texas Utilities Elec. Co. P. O. Box 219071 Dallas, TX. 75221-9071 No Phone given Fax: No Fax given Email: no email provided Prospective Purchaser J. Rose Architects/Planners 2120 Cosmos Way Argyle, TX. 76226 (214) 454-7895 Fax: (972) 534-1850 email: jasongj rosearchitect.com HISTORY: In March of this year this applicant rezoned an adjacent piece of property to PD residential for 15 narrow -lot single-family structures. In the intervening time frame, the property immediately adjacent to the west has become available and this proposal would add a like residential use, by increasing the density to 22 units. HISTORIC COMMENT: We have found nothing of historic significance attached to this property. ITEM # 06 Pagel of 3 TRANSPORTATION: Beltline Road is a P6D, four -lane, concrete, divided highway built to standard within a 110 -foot right-of-way which can be expanded to three travel lanes in each direction. This section of Belt Line Road is in the city of Dallas SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North: single-family residences; Planned Development -104 -SF -9 South: vacant property within the city of Dallas East: vacant land; "A", Agriculture West: industrial warehouse; " LP' Light Industrial COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Coppell 2030, A Comprehensive Master Plan, shows this property as appropriate for Urban Residential neighborhood DISCUSSION: Under the HISTORY section of this report, we stated that the property immediately east of this request was recently rezoned for a residential PD. That was a difficult case to review and was delayed one month to allow a number of clarifying revisions be made to the initial request including density reduction, additional landscaping, and screening wall location verification among others. Since the zoning was granted in March, that same applicant has been working with Texas Utilities Electric Company, endeavoring to purchase their 1.6 acre parcel and extend the residential proposal to the west. That effort has been successful and this application would add seven additional single-family detached narrow -lot residences to the initial plan, extend the cul-de-sac westward, and add one additional common area to provide required guest parking. The 15 -lot subdivision was approved unanimously by both Planning Commission and City Council. That being the case and the fact that this is merely an extension of the approved plan, we can support this request. There are a number of issues that must be addressed before this project can be constructed. They are listed below as conditions for approval. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff is recommending APPROVAL of this zoning request with the following conditions: 1. There will be additional comments during detailed engineering plan review. 2. The storm drain connection will need to be approved by the city of Dallas and approval letter submitted to Engineering. 3. Drainage into DART right of way will need to be approved by DART and approval letter submitted to Engineering. 4. Driveway and median cut needs approval by the city of Dallas and approval letter submitted to Engineering. 5. The screening wall will not be allowed within the utility easement or within a reasonable distance from the water line. 6. No trees or structures are allowed over the water line easement. 7. Detail sight visibility at the intersection of East Belt Line Road and Kyra Court. 8. Ensure sidewalks are constructed along Belt Line Road. 9. With railroad track removal on site, the tracks crossing Belt Line need removal also. ITEM # 06 Page 2 of 3 10. Median opening along Belt Line must be constructed prior to first building permit issued. 11. Tree removal permit required prior to start of construction. 12. Show tree mitigation totals on Plan. 13. Acreage shown on Landscape Plan and Sheets L1 and L2 incorrect. 14. Sheet Al (Floor Plans), 01 change to "two story plan". ALTERNATIVES: 1. Recommend approval of the request 2. Recommend disapproval of the request 3. Recommend modification of the request 4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date ATTACHMENTS: 1. Site Plan (Sheet 01) 2. Tree Removal Plan/Details (Sheets L1, L2) 3. Landscape Plan (Sheet L3) 4. Typical Floor Plans (Sheet Al) ITEM # 06 Page 3 of 3 y v 82 sFv �ow11` r �17,658 o\ 4 CUL -D -SAC ve 4 �73s Ss24 D27 151 \<M \\ 01 SITE PLAN ` SCALE 1-30'-0" GENERAL NOTES Drawn By: 1. BESIDES UTILITY CONNECTIONS, NO CONSTRUCTION WILL BE ALLOWED Jason R. lease WITHIN THE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN. PFepailon D,JU, 2, THE MANDATORY HOME OWNERS ASSOCIA J�v�ILL OWN AND MAINTAIN Novembe 11 2013 ALL COMMON AND OPEN SPACES —DE—SAC PARKING, SCREENING Revisions: WALLS, MONUMENT SIGN D ALL COMMMON AREA LANDSCAPING SEPTEMBER 9 2014 WITHIN THE PER NT. Holes. (1) 1 cu. V.0 ENN . V Ec�aic �avJsuirn.N -- � I I O \ .1a SF fj ,35 SF Fn Om L. KE RL e .e ED A A� R a C I s s sG' kvn e VES q—q-2014 ge 5 e E K Ems, n5 uvtenaK O W o z YY� v 1 E YOU T ^, -3X, 1-22. BLOCK A LL) 7 ACRES U ITUATED IN THE MCKINNEY & WILLIAMS SURVEY, ABSTRACTN0. 1054, J.G. GARLOCK SURVEY, �\\� ABSTRACT N0. 312 T/ CITY OF COPPELL, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS ,^ W ARCHITECTDEVELOPER: HAAS ROSES AT LOST CREEK LLC JASON ROSE, ARCHITECT (214)454-7895 T., (972)534-1850 F. SURVEYOR: PIBURN &CARSON DUSTIN DAVISON, S.I. T. .(214)328-3500 T., (214)328-3512 F. I J ENGINEER: GN ORACLE ENGINEERING SHEET MATT KOSTIAL, P.E. (214)321-1436 T, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: DFL GROUP, LLC 01 JOHN FAIN, ASLA FEED AP (817) 479-0730 T, SITE DATA TABLE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS - SUMMARIES 1. PER TABLE R302.1(1) OF THE 2012 IRC, PROPOSED USE PD (7H-2) THE FOLLOWING APPLY 2012 -DWELLINGS WITHOUT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS; DEE SEPARATION REQUIRES A 1 HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATED WALL, PROTECTED FROM BOTH SIDES a MAXIMUM LOT COUNT 22 UNITS 1. 2' TO c5' SEPARATION REOUIRES ALL PROJECTIONS TO HAVE THEIR UNDERSIDE PROTECTED BY TOTAL SITE 184,129 SF SF 4.227 ACRES A 1 HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATED COVERING. �J - MINIMUM LOT SIZE 4,105 SF Al. OPENINGS: UP': NO OPENINGS ALLOWED; 3'-5': MAXIMUM OF 25% OF WALL AREA +CURRENTLY DOPTED CODE AT THE TIME OF PERMIT APPLICATION WILL APPLY, AVERAGE LOT SIZE 5,619 SF TR _ MINIMUM LOT DEPTH 75.94' 2 MINIMUM FRONT SETBACK OF 15, MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 35' 3. MINIMUM GARAGE DOOR SETBACKS 22' FROM ROW LINE - AVERAGE LOT DEPTH 137' 4. NO PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION SHALL ENCOMPASS MORE THAN 259 AVERAGE LOT WIDTH 3659' OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. LOT 1X AREA 3.586 SF - LOT 2X AREA 27,031 OF 5. NO PARKING ALONG STREET LOT 3X AREA 1,884 SF 6. RESIDENCES SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF THREE (3) BEDROOMS. TIT -2 LAND 184,129 SF SF 4.227 ACRES GROSS DENSITY 5.2 (TH-2 I -d ore.) 7 CITY OF CADDELL PUBLIC SIDEWALKS TO BE 5' WID MIN UNIT SIZE 11,500 SOFT -2 STORY MIN UNIT 200 SOFT -1 STORYcl GROSS BUSIZE NG AREA 1 41. D R NQ t MAX. LOT COVERAGE 419 PNO "G OVi5G9RKPGSCj 1 VOC, i �o MIN FRONT SETBACK 15' D SAV VQ� MIN REAR SETBACK 15' ORMER`Y RA11-96 pG 2 � o MIN SIDE SETB 5' CXPS VOL' e 75 M G. HEIGHT 35 (2012 IRC) 3 PARKING PER UNIT 2 GARAGE .5 OFF-STREET °` 2.5 PER UNIT } FI -11111— P.EE� .10 y v 82 sFv �ow11` r �17,658 o\ 4 CUL -D -SAC ve 4 �73s Ss24 D27 151 \<M \\ 01 SITE PLAN ` SCALE 1-30'-0" GENERAL NOTES Drawn By: 1. BESIDES UTILITY CONNECTIONS, NO CONSTRUCTION WILL BE ALLOWED Jason R. lease WITHIN THE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN. PFepailon D,JU, 2, THE MANDATORY HOME OWNERS ASSOCIA J�v�ILL OWN AND MAINTAIN Novembe 11 2013 ALL COMMON AND OPEN SPACES —DE—SAC PARKING, SCREENING Revisions: WALLS, MONUMENT SIGN D ALL COMMMON AREA LANDSCAPING SEPTEMBER 9 2014 WITHIN THE PER NT. Holes. (1) 1 cu. V.0 ENN . V Ec�aic �avJsuirn.N -- � I I O \ .1a SF fj ,35 SF Fn Om L. KE RL e .e ED A A� R a C I s s sG' kvn e VES q—q-2014 ge 5 e E K Ems, n5 uvtenaK O W o z YY� v 1 E YOU T ^, -3X, 1-22. BLOCK A LL) 7 ACRES U ITUATED IN THE MCKINNEY & WILLIAMS SURVEY, ABSTRACTN0. 1054, J.G. GARLOCK SURVEY, �\\� ABSTRACT N0. 312 T/ CITY OF COPPELL, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS ,^ W ARCHITECTDEVELOPER: HAAS ROSES AT LOST CREEK LLC JASON ROSE, ARCHITECT (214)454-7895 T., (972)534-1850 F. SURVEYOR: PIBURN &CARSON DUSTIN DAVISON, S.I. T. .(214)328-3500 T., (214)328-3512 F. I J ENGINEER: GN ORACLE ENGINEERING SHEET MATT KOSTIAL, P.E. (214)321-1436 T, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: DFL GROUP, LLC 01 JOHN FAIN, ASLA FEED AP (817) 479-0730 T, N111" N e... �.. ��.�I E �E`�� �M= \ �oN °s s.".�< o� �E .Ea BEFORE A�-a o-sss-ea.. e s YOU OIQ.. TEMPORARY IRRIGATION WILL BE REQUIRED TO ESTABLISH \ TU RE IN ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHOUT A PERMANENT IRRIGATION SYSTEM. SOD TURF IN G _ [ ALL DISTURBED AREAS AS IDENTIFIED ON GRADING AND r EROSION CONTROL PLANS. 9 I � PROJECTo,,.LOCATION MAP V T 1 1 I I r�a 4 -AS ae \ I I �S 1122 REFERENCE SHEET L2 FOR DETAILS. FL Well, LLC T �,� Vo,, ALtiLIN-- —111111 11—TI-IN N11111 .1 IN IHI -NIIINI IH , > oT . ,= o=> ,T, , = oT T=� R�_ _D =��� _O, T oT T=X Tat Fo>=o OF --1 FILE 111HOIT —HI -1 E—Ell 11111EN 1 -1 -IN 21 EAST BELT LINE ROAD a n=sE(fxem=ri n KYRA COURT ==��,ANF=�=,�D,RFF==N�=auD DWTREE REMOVAL PLAN Et—FFomED-U.. ro= 2.996 acres NOTE: EXEMPT TREES NOT SHOWN, CITY OF COPPELL DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS =AVMDNT INTO ME FUND EE'NU _/j, Ll 101 102 03 L04 105 106 107 108 109 110 'It 112 113 LR4 I is .7 118 119 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 ills 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 112210 1123 112 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 11 '3 11x44 1135 1136 1137 TOTAL CALIPER INCHES ON SITE TOTAL CALIPER INCHES (EXEMPT) TOTAL PROTECTED TREES TOTAL PROTECTED CALIPER INCHES REMOVED TOTALPROTE D CALIPER INCHES PRESERVED PERCENTAGE PROTECTECTREES PRESERVED REQUIRED MITIGATION TREE REPLACEMENT CREDITS - 24@4' CALIPER = 96" 12 @3'CALI PER=36�' TOTAL INCHES PLANTED 69'� X $100 PAYMENT INTO TREE FUND -NOTE: ONLY TREES IN COMMON AREAS ARE INCLUDED AS MITIGATION TREES. 394 193 201 201 0 TA 31' 12" $6,900 ' ORGM11, LLC OFaaQ 111-0— r—lo FILE r —E—D —EI' OF -N N' 41U4 ftl�12111ND D—IN, 1011D 01 —111-111L ETE'11'1,0N, 01T'1EN1"1E0'D1'FI �'E'1`= rL1E11'N'1'Er' "I T I LE ELEIT11- DI—NI FILE 1111011 L-11— I E—Ell 11111EN 1E1`I1110_ KYRA COURT TREE REMOVAL DETAILS 2.996 acres CITY OF COPPELL DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS rESIN m— 11TE S11LE 111 111E I N� -C, L2 TREE SURVEY Canopy C ... py Canopy. Canopy Cuxe, %Uwi CaL Species N S E W Cl— tron, Conditior Preserve 4 J,A Oak 3 3 3 3 Dom 70 Poor Exempt Exempt 4 LiMe Oak 3 Exempt 3_ 3 Dom So Poo, E.-Popt xcm t 5 Cedar Elm 5 5 5 Dom 70 Good Expar, t I Exempt 5 ::Cedar Elm 4 4 4 4 Dom 90 Good Exempt 4 Ceder Elm 4 .3 4 4 Dom 70 Good Exempt R_ no 8 Willow 12 25 10 12 , Dom 90 Goadl 12 Me,q.itP 20 8 2 25 Cullum 50 Poor Poor U_ PaCan 10 8 12 12 C.Do. 50 Good 0 8 on wn: �0#� �Co.�D - Do #14:: Mesquite ID IC 1 CoDm.#30� �Iql,� 6 Mulberry 12 1 3 3 6 SNIP 1 20 Fair 6 Mulberry 3 3 3 8 Sup 50 Good ME 3 Pecan 10 6 8 19 Dom 60 Good 7 ::11,,Ib,,r, 9 4 6_ 3 CO Dom 50 Good Exempt 6 ::Hackberry 8 12 , 15 12 Dom 60 Good Exempt 9 4 9 A,h is 8 10 12 Dom 60 Good 1. I 1 E::Cedar Amer. Elm 11 12 0 8 C. Dom 60 Poo, P— it L' 15 Ash 20 14 20 10 m 50 Good 20 14 16 Hockborry is 15 30 22 Dom 80 Good 4 Elm 6 3 10 1 Dom ED to.., Ixe-ed, 14 mesquite 12 is 12 13 COom 50 Good C' Do' 50 8 Harkberry, 9 1 8 8 7 C.Dem 50 Good Exempt 10 Ash do 10 8 9 C. Dom 50 Good 7 7 A 1 10 10 CoDom 50 Good 2- 4 A, 4 4 4 CE, Dom 70 Good 4 Ash 3 1 Exempt k 4 4 E 4 Flackborry 6 5 7 6 CO Dom 50 Good Exempt 6, 0 8 8 Harkber 10 8 9 8 CoDom 5C Poo, Exempt 9 _Aackberry 10 8 2 1 _L_ C. 50 Goo Exempt - r6 Ii 5 Hackberry 6 8 7 1. Iman SO Good Exempt 6 C so 11 Hackberry 12 8 8 6 Co Dom 50 Fair 2 S so JD.m j12 7 Ash 10 9 8 8 C. Dom 50 Good Good l. E Good Eu Go 8 Hackberry, 10 6 8 10 C. Dom 50 Good Exempt ip 8 Flackbenry 1 9 4 6 8 C.D.m 50 Good Exempt Good "I - 5 Ash 8 1 8 1 8 8 Cc Dom 50 Good Exempt Good 6 Cedar 8 8 8 8 C. Dom 60 Good Good JE.xempt 4 Cedar 6 6 5 6 CO Dom 60 Good Exempt Good 50 Good Exempt 4 Ash 10 5 7 6 Co Dom .0, 4 Goo Ash 9 9 11 10 Co Dam 50 Good 4 Ash 10 8 10 6 Co Dom 50 Good Exempt 7 Cedar 8 S 7 9 Co Dom 60 Good Good 8 Hackbcory 1 11 8 9 9 CO Dan 50) Good Exempt 6 10 10 6 C. Dom 60 Good -:Hackberry 6 1 Ash 12 10 13 10 CO Dom 50 Good 4 Cedar 6 1 5 4 Co Dom, 80 GoodExempt 9 Ash 12 10 10 12 C. Dom 1 50 Good 9 J.M!,sq..td _12 _10 12 10_ CO Dom _50 Good .... .. Exempt 6 MI 10 9 10 Co Dom 50 Good Exempt 14 Rk,kiary 12 12 12 12 Dom 50 Good 10 Am Elm 12 14 12 12 Dom 80 G-cl 4 Cedar 6 6 6 6 CO Dom 80 Good Exiannot 8 9 10 6 Cc Dom 60 Poor Exempt 4 h 9 8 9 8 C. Dom 60 Poo, Exempt 4 Ash 1 8 8 9 Co Dom 1 50 IG ad Exempt Ash 1 8 9 9 Cc Dom 1 50 IGood Exempt 3 a d cyp 3 3 3 Dom 60 Poo, ExCrupt 3 d ryp 3 3 3 3 Dom 50 Good Exempt 3 I. I. I. I. I. I. L. Ca I. I. I. I. L. 10 I. 4 Ash PLANTING NOTES: PiaNT slzE. TYPE. ND COrvomCN suB�ECT TO APPRovaL GF owNERs REPRESENTATIVE_ - LLGNTRACTOR RESPONSIBLEE FOR EGAN STOALL PROTECT ACCEPTANCE_ V a. ALL CONTA ER GROWN PLANTS TO HAVE FULL NGOROUS ROOT SYSTEM. _MPLETELO ENCOMPASSING CALL ONT NRs WELL RourvoeD AND FDL Y BR \ Tore To PRovBE DWNEB 'U PRE D " GF HErcHT. NT41N E CLOY \ \\ \ S. T. /PROTECT vlsBluTY TRIANGLE wrtH PwvT MATERIAL PER CITY sTArvonreos AT ALL Erv.RArvces To V A C78\ Cerate e. BE FIPER PLArvTINc BEDS OUTLINED IN SCEs'. WHERE ',.Rues NTIRE w u \ \ 3"—Cal o CLI s RB T FT. A A AcLoe eEs aF aLEITORDID cA oN aF oBTNLs DINT, Es ro ee uM EPHONE.R SO A SO roti cosi Rs L uTLHAS. Ino u \ 1 TE LE. ELECTRIC, as WATER AND sEWEe.LAN' D E Ta E REIEuREoo erL CONTRACTOR AT NO 'H"NOT0 REMAIN CONTRACTOR 'HALL PRUNE ONL' ON APPeOvu of CT' c E E" c TREES ARE ARBORIST. S, B TO INCLUDE REMOVAL OF ALL SUCKER GROWTH; DEAD AND DISEASED BAND ALL AND a1 2n 36 LIMBS: VINES, BRIARS AND OTHER INVASIVE GROWTH. LIMBS INTERFERING WITH VISIBILITY, AND ALL \ \ 1 1 1 1 \ \ l ERWORK BRPNCHTO MAKE ALL CUT' FLU'H TE REMNNING TIME. RETAIN NATURAL 'RAPE OF PUWTALL. TAT i RJ PROVIDED ASO4 COURTESY SAND NOTRENTENDEDEFOR BID PURPOSES. CONTRACTOR TO \ 1 1 1PAGE' PRIOR TO PRICING, 1 I l (T Q vl � � � 1 EDGING BETWEEN LAWN AND PLANTING BEDS REFER To SPECIFICATIONS FILE ALL CORNERS l 4 \ 1 II I 1 l j ; ET (oR EQUAL) PER MANUFACTURES INSTRUCTIONS ON ALL GROUNDCOVEREAHRUe PROF ECT, oO dATION MAP Ip L M Ava LABIUTr CANNOT BE DETERMINED. IT Is THE lEjl_ SEASONAL PRET \ \ 1 1 1 1 l l l l l DURINBCTHE OFF—SEASaNE PURCHASE AND HOLD BIB PUNTS FOR 47EIA1 LL aF cDNTRacTDR T ALL BIB PUNTS WHEN AVNIPBLE IN NATO FATION OCCURS \ ON IiKsG LLEFTIOII xo mn�x prtulrvG LOT ISUNDs As sHDwN ON ENCLOSED DETaL SHEET. (BERMS MAv NOT BE sHDwN \ \\ 1 I l I l l r�� i T LANG .w CONTRACTOR SHALL 'TAKE TREE LoraTlorvs FOR AaPRovu ev owNER. 42J i T. PR OR o PwvTN . co \ D� u \ J � Ca 4' Q vi 4„_C I I I C7> (7 vl l (6) QUrIU C7> UICr 4 —Cal 4” —Cal REFERENCE SHEET L4 FOR DETAILS. Decors osed Granite Trail r r — �� l (3) Ulcr 4" —Cal V A V C2> u Q ECI Cal LOT 2 � O YFL 61' p, moi ' e� cal a�,a II —Cal A A V� A A \ 4 l HC FSTANT RE A A V A V AA A V A — _ V A\ \V_So' Ber nulla oRH E�RFPNERE F" — \ r l "Sod 'Up5—Gal alncl Decors osed Grgnite Tra Cl N d IF 0 I Cl6) Cecota a PLANT LIST Symbol anontity Code Scientific Nome Common Nome Planting Size Comments G 20 Quvi Quercus virginiano Southern live ook 4"—Col B & B, 5mgle aGight trunk, :1/1 4 Ulcr Ulmus cross folio SEA- elm 4" —Col B & B, Single s16ghl trunk, 0 22 0u Quercus mo hlenbergH Chinquapin ook 4"—Col B & B, Sngle aGight trunk, ® 16 Nadcgo Na di,, dom li- 'Gulfstream' am nA,di,D 3—Gal 2' OC IS 14 pa'Al BOp[HUI,A, in di- 'Clara' Indian hawthorn, Clara 5—Gal 3' OG 0 34 C,cat, Cerci, A,.d ens i, 'T,x,nsis' Texas r,dbud 3"—Co1 B & B, Single stalght trunk, Cru AINADHITIN FIT IT PF .iu.v irvrovf TEMPORARY IRRIGATION WILL BE REQUIRED TO ESTABLISH -11 E-11TINN nrs.v sys M (scss) O TURF IN ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHOUT A PERMANENT IRRIGATION SYSTEM. SOD TURF IN BEFORE ALL DISTURBED AREAS AS IDENTIFIED ON GRADING AND '� YOU DIG,.. EROSION CONTROL PLANS. KYRA COURT LANDSCAPE PLAN 2.996 acres CITY OF CORRELL RAI IAS COUNTY, TFXAS SPAIN D111 HITE S11LE 1111 FARE A GO DRE" , La.3 A 1 - L3 ONE STORY ROOFLINE AT REAR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS 1, PER TABLE R302.1(1) OF THE 2012 IRC, THE FOLLOWINGAPPLY 2012—DWELLINGS WITHOUT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS; <5' SEPARATION REQUIRES A 1 HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATED WALL, PROTECTED FROM BOTH SIDES. 11. 2' TO c5' SEPARATION REQUIRES ALL PROJECTIONS TO HAVE THEIR UNDERSIDE PROTECTED BY A 1HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATED COVERING. li 1. OPENINGS c3': NO OPENINGS ALLOWED; 3'-5': MAXIMUM OF 25% OF WALL AREA +CURRENTLY ADOPTED CODE AT THE TIME OF PERMIT APPLICATION WILL APPLY. 2, MINIMUM FRONT SETBACK OF 15. 3, MINIMUM GARAGE DOOR SETBACKS 22' FROM ROW LINE ..E 5 5� 4, NO PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION SHALL ENCOMPASS MORE AN 4� OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, 5. NO PARKING ALONG STREET 6. RESIDENCES SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF THREE (3) BEDROOMS, *I 02 ONE STORY PLAN PROJECT LOCATION MAP 1oT -F) CORRELL TEXAS E AL IN rvoa111AKE 3 DALLAS TEXAS 01 SITE PLAN C 9 Drawn By: Jason R Rase Prepatlon Date: IR 15 2013 Revision Seolembe 9 2014 Notes. A� nun S 1 x rI) .,J G � �EREO qR� 5 �W ARWT W S 83d1 }P p 9-9-2014 s LLJ CC W � v� F^ O v CCS LTJ S cC J SHEET Al CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Kyra (Canterbury) Court, Preliminary Plat P&Z HEARING DATE: September 18, 2014 C.C. HEARING DATE: October 14, 2014 STAFF REP.: Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning LOCATION: North side of Belt Line Road, 1,700 feet west of Moore Road SIZE OF AREA: 4.23 acres of property CURRENT ZONING: LI (Light Industrial) & PD-265-TH-I (Planned Development -265 -Townhouse -1) REQUEST: A preliminary plat to revise the approved preliminary plat to incorporate an additional 1.58 acres of property and to increase the number of townhomes from 15 to 22 and one additional common area, resulting in a total of three common areas. APPLICANT: Owner Texas Utilities Elec. Co. P. O. Box 219071 Dallas, TX, 75221-9071 No Phone given Fax: No Fax given Email: No email provided Prospective Purchaser J. Rose Architects/Planners 2120 Cosmos Way Argyle, TX. 76226 (214) 454-7895 Fax: (972) 534-1850 email: jason(a(a�jrosearchitect.com HISTORY: In March of this year this applicant rezoned an adjacent piece of property to PD residential for 15 narrow -lot single-family structures. In conjunction with that rezoning a preliminary plat was submitted reflecting the 15 -lot subdivision with two common area parcels. With potential purchase of this land, the applicant wishes to rescind the existing plat and submit a revised preliminary plat reflecting 22 residential lots with three common areas. HISTORIC COMMENT: We have found nothing of historic significance attached to this property. ITEM # 07 Page I of 2 TRANSPORTATION: Beltline road is a P6D, four -lane, concreter, divided highway built to standard within a 110 -foot right-of-way which can be expanded to three travel lanes in each direction. This section of Beltline Road is in the city of Dallas. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North: single family residences; Planned Development 104 -SF -9 South: vacant property within the city of Dallas East: vacant land; "A", Agriculture West: industrial warehouse; "Lr,, Light Industrial COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Coppell 2030, A Comprehensive Master Plan, shows this property as appropriate for Urban Residential neighborhood. DISCUSSION: This is a companion piece to the request to rezone this property to PD residential. The applicant wishes to add seven single-family lots and one common area lot to a 15 -lot subdivision which was approved in March. The proposed lots are the same size, have the same setbacks and coverage as the approved plan. There are no outstanding issues that would preclude us from supporting this request. Therefore, staff can recommend approval of this application with a number of conditions. Several of these conditions were approved with the earlier March case, and although the applicant is aware of them, they need to be restated here for clarity of development requirements. They are listed in the RECOMMENDATION comments stated below. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff is recommending APPROVAL of this request with the following conditions: 1. This is a Preliminary Plat document, not a Final Plat document 2. There will be additional comments during detailed Engineering plan review. 3. All utility easements shall remain clear of structures and trees. 4. Contain sidewalk within Lot 1X. Note that it enters Lot 1. 5. Place note on plat that all garages will be set back from street row at least 22 feet. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Recommend approval of the request 2. Recommend disapproval of the request 3. Recommend modification of the request ATTACHMENTS: 1. Plat document ITEM # 07 Page 2 of 2 VICINITY MAP o +D ao im1 SCALE: t = +D' 40'46'S6� AL 430.17' 83'39'31" W SURX2vOR'S CERTIFICATE CL=421.15' "PRELIMINARY, THIS DOCUMENT SHALL NOT BE RECORDED FOR ANY PURPOSE." i g op p Ile s ,1,1 Sas s "N i Dom .1 DIL­ —LEGEND— p NO VRA CpUj I Sl— o c It, " AL=571.45 CB=S 52'55'11" W 63y� CL=569.45' oxxERs aRnRaTE 603 I `` 6,. '✓� fid'"' / STATE D,oil AS ODAITI OF 4 211 11-11-1 a� �9S reem R� z,%�aI°be�osi e+V�11­ CAR 2004028 Pdi 00141, _ s°e 422E are„ o,e 17~111 °� T1 awe. ­LFT 1 ° d r12 POINT OF BEGINNING 1111. vE oruE e w di ems �y L019 22 1X�2%�R J . %OCX KIYRA ICO Rif a r, 111, °a ,ero,aee ,°11I 1111, g 2, oeea aero,a�, o°IIa° O. 111317 .ee, mord wn�m deo,s N 11 a 111 W-1, Ea o d,>y .1121.15 reel, xD CE ° o An, publ­11e N. m°�me0a0Ce 0, =e,�Ce ,101�,ea 0, Om�aO,iv Oe,ro,mea ov mm almy m0 111,10aa v f 19;.0., ,od r1,,,,1 m, ,d o.A.aT. a�sm°ce or 1.raza reel m o o-°�,. °, ° TMM s ,,4174.11 ree, am ° o mrn oea,e s°1m szssll was,, r� ° dls,°ore o+1711.417 +ee,. ee `~alai Ior'SE'o . �..1"" 134.171 1d,11'1'111 a, nme 111 aa�aml� _Aa 2114�­i­fN,Ci,v FINAL PLAT 2G KYRA COURT - r Ga:13reGOK IE,ELo,MENT 1LI, Lots 1 - 22, 1M, 2x, & 3X, Mock 1 4227 ACRES 5VTUATIED IN THE LG. CARE®CK SURVEY, ABSTRACT No. 312 ITITE IE _INI aE oALiAs o City of Coppell, ee Dollos County, Texas Herein stated and as Ne act and dead ei said wmo°ny. e e=ecuted Ili,some in the _pId, RockDrook OWNER/DEVELOPER ENGINEER SURVEYOR Oevelapment LLC ORACLE ENGINEERING 12801 NABS ENAEXP. EERS NC CENTRAL SURE I— or .11- title Gi4EN antler. y ntl antl seal Ina V 2 No y otic in antl r or lanae . 2500 Rockoraak d1 330 Eol,ra;: LN" Lewi(21Ia, 1544117 89 5 6E L�II�2f 1J 32181136 05 CONOACT. GUSTN EGAVISON EACs. CONTACE. JASON ROSEMATT KOSIIAL MAT S. 201ACON SHEET 1 Of 1 CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT TEXT AMENDMENT — Section 12-33-1.8A "SCREENING WALLS" P&Z HEARING DATE: September 18, 2014 C.C. HEARING DATE: October 14, 2014 STAFF REP.: Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning PURPOSE: To amend Article 33-1.8, Screening Walls by specifying that all new masonry screening walls be constructed to a new minimum standard specification. Existing masonry screening walls are exempt from this regulation when repairs or replacement of sections is necessary. DISCUSSION: This amendment to the Zoning Ordinance was precipitated by concerns expressed by citizens and Homeowners Associations who have become alarmed at the cost of repairing common area screening walls when they fail. The concern has been with the type of wall being built here as thin wall construction. Basically this amendment will require all new screen walls to be constructed of a minimum two brick courses (as opposed to the existing one brick course) when developers propose these walls to give their projects privacy, identity, security or for other reasons. Historically, thin walls have a tendency to fail after a certain number of years based upon quality of construction, type of material used, soil conditions, or maintenance issues. We have observed walls that have required complete re -build in as little as 6 years. By adopting this new regulation, the condition of failed walls will be reduced and citizens will not have the obligation of picking up the cost of these failures. From a construction standpoint, a two course or solid stone wall will be a bit more expensive than a thin wall. We have quotes from two local developers that offered pricing on their walls. Specifically, the masonry thin wall at the Standard Pacific project off 121 was $103 per lineal foot. That wall has a height of six feet. The more substantial masonry wall constructed by Weekly at Lodge and Sandy Lake is the type of stone wall we are referencing in this amendment. Its cost was $145 per lineal foot and it is also six feet tall. A substitute for thin wall was the screening the city constructed on the south side of Sandy Lake Road in the Woodridge subdivision, just west of MacArthur in 2011-12. That six foot wall cost in the neighborhood of $156 per lineal foot. That figure included engineering the wall; irrigation retro -fit, tear down of the old wall, removal of the debris, and a cast stone subdivision identification sign. In addition, we also received information regarding the Red Hawk meandering wall along Denton Tap Road. That wall is quoted as costing close to $300 per lineal foot. It should be pointed out that the Red Hawk wall was an option that the developer elected to construct to give his subdivision a different character than the majority of screening walls in ITEM #8 Page I of 2 Coppell. A developer would still have that option if the new guidelines are adopted. What this whole proposal boils down to is who pays for construction/maintenance of these walls. Does the developer pay at the outset of the development, or do the owners of property have the responsibility of repairing walls that have a tendency to fail because of the type wall constructed? In our mind, the developer should construct a wall that will meet the test of time. We believe this revision to the Zoning Ordinance will accomplish that objective. Specifically we recommend that Section 33-1.8A be amended to add: "See graphic drawings of typical screening wall construction at end of this article" RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff is recommending APPROVAL of this amendment to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance by adding the wording specified above and the graphic examples included as an attachment to this report. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Recommend approval of the request 2. Recommend disapproval of the request 3. Recommend modification of the request 4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date ATTACHMENTS: 1. Additional wording to add to zoning text (in blue) 2. Graphic exhibit of proposed screening wall minimum construction diagram A. Screening Wall Construction Types B. Typical Screening Wall Details ITEM #8 Page 2 of 2 Sec. 12-33-0. Purpose. To encourage the most appropriate use of land and conserve and protect the privacy and value of adjacent permitted uses, regulations are prescribed for the location and type of various screening devices to be used when required in the various zoning districts or in this section in accordance with the following standards. (Ord. No. 91500-A-30) Sec. 12-33-1. Location of required screening. Where the side, rear, or service side of an apartment, or the side, rear, or service side of a non- residential use is adjacent to a single-family or two-family residential district, a screening wall not less than six feet in height shall be erected separating the use from the adjacent residential district. In addition, a perimeter landscape area at least ten feet wide shall adjoin the screening wall. The perimeter landscape area shall contain trees spaced no less than 40 feet apart and include such landscaping as outlined in Table 1 of article 34. No screening is required adjacent to a street except as required in paragraph 2. in this section. All screening walls shall conform to 12-33-1.8. All trees and landscape areas shall comply with sections 12-34-1-6 and 12-34-1-7. 2. When the side, rear or service side of a non-residential or multi -family use is adjacent to a public thoroughfare with greater than 60 feet of right-of-way screening six feet in height shall be provided. All screening walls shall conform to 12-33-1.8. 3. In a non-residential district where parking space for motor vehicles is provided adjacent to or within ten feet of a residential district, whether the district boundary lines are separated by a street or alley or not, screening two feet in height shall be provided between the boundary of such parking areas and the residential district. This requirement does not waive the requirements of paragraph 1, however, providing screening as required in paragraph 1. may fulfill the requirements of this paragraph. 4. In all districts where screening of loading areas facing a street is required, screening shall be provided not less than six feet in height adjacent to the loading area at the property line. Said screening shall be required parallel to all streets and located 30 feet from the street R.O.W./property line except where such use was in existence at the date of adoption of this Ordinance. Screening adjacent to a street shall conform to 12-33-1.8. Screening may be allowed 15 feet behind the front property line provided that a landscape plan has been submitted and approved by the planning commission that clearly indicates the screening wall location. 5. In all districts where screening of open storage is required such screening shall be required only for those areas used for open storage. A six feet high screening wall shall be provided and maintained parallel to the property line adjacent to the area to be screened. If the screening wall for open storage is required along a street edge, the screening wall shall be located 30 feet from the street R.O.W./property line and shall conform to 12-33-1.8. Screening may be allowed 15 feet behind the front property line provided that a landscape plan has been submitted and approved by the planning commission that clearly indicates the screening wall location. 6. Refuse storage areas for all uses other than single-family, duplex and townhome dwellings shall be visually screened by a six-foot high solid masonry enclosure on all sides except the side used for refuse pickup service, which shall have gates of solid screening material. These gates shall remain closed at all times when not in active use. 7. Ground and wall mounted and roof -mounted mechanical and utility equipment. (A) All ground and wall mounted mechanical and utility equipment including, but not limited to, air conditioning units, generators, and transformers shall be visually screened by a solid screening wall at a minimum height so as to provide visual screening of such equipment from adjacent Page 1 properties and public rights-of-way. Installation of evergreen landscaping material, as deemed acceptable to the director of planning, may be substituted in lieu of the screen wall, under circumstances where the topography, zoning and use of such property would promote the general health, safety, and welfare of the community. (B) All roof -mounted utility and mechanical equipment including, but not limited to, fans, vents, air conditioning units, cooling towers, and satellite dishes, shall be screened so as not to be visible at ground level from the adjacent properties and/or public rights-of-way, that complies with fire code requirements. In general, the screening of roof mounted utility and mechanical equipment shall be provided by a parapet wall, unless otherwise permitted by the city council. Overall screening height shall be the height of the highest element of roof -mounted equipment. The outside of the screening device, if independent of the building fagade, shall be painted or otherwise finished in a color similar to the building fagade, trim, or roof surface, whichever color is more effective in minimizing the visibility of the equipment and screen from public rights-of-way and/or adjacent properties. 8. The city council may waive or modify, in exceptional cases, the requirements of this section. All forms of screening shall conform to the requirements of the ordinances of the city governing the sight distance for traffic safety and other city ordinances. The types of permissible screening are: (A) A brick wall with a minimum height of six feet and a maximum height of eight feet shall be located on the street right-of-way line. The color of the wall shall be limited to earth -tone colors, (i.e. brown, tan, red, gray, etc.). The color of the wall shall be uniform and/or compatible on both sides of a thoroughfare for the entire length of the thoroughfare between two intersecting thoroughfares. When walls are built in sections, the colors shall be as closely similar as possible, but shall, in no case, be incompatible. Plans and specifications for the wall shall be approved by the city. Masonry columns shall be expressed at a minimum of ten feet and a maximum of 30 feet on centers and should typically be taller than the remainder of the wall. Brick detailing at the top of the wall shall produce a change in plane or texture. Developers are encouraged to create offsets in the wall to provide visual variety. The wall shall be placed on an appropriate structural concrete footing. See graphic drawings of Screening—Wall Construction Type and Typical Screening Wall Details at end of this article. Trees shall be planted in the landscaping strip between the curb and screening wall according to standards set in article 34 for non-residential and multi -family lots. Landscaping, in the form of trees and shrubs, shall be used to break up long continuous lengths of wall. In general, a minimum of 15 percent of the wall elevation should be screened with vegetation. The developer may, at his option, install planter beds adjacent to the wall. In such event, the developer shall provide total maintenance for the beds until an owners association is in existence to provide maintenance in accordance with article 34. The developer shall install automatic irrigation bubblers or other means of irrigation approved by the city. Plant materials shall be selected from the plant palette in the approved Coppell Streetscape Plan. (B) Where appropriate, as long as the view beyond the fence is appropriately landscaped and is not a view of the rear yards or fences of housing, a combination of brick and ironwork can be utilized. The masonry portion shall be constructed according to the criteria described in the previous paragraph (A). Landscaping and maintenance requirements are also identical except that a landscaped area must be provided behind open ironwork to provide an appropriate view beyond. These landscaped areas beyond shall also become the responsibility of an owners association or individual property owner to provide proper maintenance. (C) Where subdivisions are platted so that the side yards of single-family residential lots are adjacent to a roadway that is identified as a primary or secondary image zone in the approved city streetscape plan, the developer shall provide a screening wall to screen the rear portion of the lots. The wall shall conform to criteria established in paragraphs A and B of this subsection. Page 2 The length of wall shall be equal to one-half of the depth of the lot or to the fenced in rear portion of the lot, whichever is greater. (D) Where subdivisions are platted so that the side yards of single-family residential lots are adjacent to a dedicated roadway and where a cul-de-sac approaches the paved roadway, but does not intersect with it, the developer shall provide, at his sole expense, a living screen composed of plants in the approved plant palette. Plants shall be a minimum of three feet in height. Plant spacing shall vary, depending on the type of plants, as required by the city council; however, suggested maximum spacings are 25 feet for trees and 12 feet for shrubs. A solid living screen is not required. The living screen shall not be planted opposite the front yard of residential lots which front on streets which intersect with the paved roadway. The developer shall provide total maintenance for the living screen until adjacent lots are sold. At the end of the maintenance period, all plants in the living screen shall be in a healthy and growing condition. The living screen shall be planted between the sidewalk and the right-of-way line. (E) At development and subdivision entry features, all walls and raised planter beds shall be of brick or stone construction unless otherwise approved by the planning and zoning commission and city council. The wall construction and landscaped requirements of paragraphs (A) and (B) shall apply to development and subdivision entry features. In addition, the design of the entry feature must conform to the visibility requirements of the subdivision and zoning ordinances. Paving materials should be incorporated into the design of the pavement at entry features in a manner compatible with that used at major or secondary intersections in the city. (F) In the light industrial zoned district where the site is not adjacent to a residential zoned district or a residential use screening walls shall be constructed of a masonry material and design that is compatible with the adjacent building. 9. Where subdivisions are platted so that the rear yards of single-family, two-family, or townhouse residential lots are adjacent to a dedicated roadway, or separated from a roadway by an alley or service road, the developer shall provide, at his sole expense, screening that conforms to section 12- 33-1.8. Page 3 BATTER EACH SIDE 1" COPING FOR EVERY 2' IN HEIGHT BUILDERS STONE 4" STONE VENEER 4" BLOCK—,,,,wpvvv D FINISH FINISH GRADE 12" BLOCK `T\/\\j\\jC//a GRADE \/T\/j/\\/j�\/�\/jX\Y Xy Xy\ j CONCRETE FOOTING \\;�\��\��y�/\\\���\Tye/\\X/\�i/\\//\\�//\�/\\�\\//\ ���x FROST LINE /i\\l/\\/i\\/i\\/i\\/i\\/i\\/i\\/\\!i\!i./i STACKED STONE WALL BLOCK WALL WITH STONE VENEER Screening Wall Construction Type SCREENING WALL PROPOSED DETAILS CITY OF COPPELL BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 0 1 2 1 INCH = 2 FT. 11Ao11 DIIIIImmIIIIIIaeITIOII IILDIIoirvsamialI o-aatad i, 0,13D =, T. WITH 6" HOOK a EVERY 12" O.C. COLUMN AR PATTERN WITH MR JOINTS 1/8' (LLV) ANGLE IRON -R COURSE DOTING 4-0 EACH WAY :TE PIER, 5/2.2 X2' COLUMN AT THICKWALL SCALE: 1/2" = 1 PL _HEADER - 3.0 COURSE RUNNING BOND GAUGE HOT GIPPED GALVANIZED LADUR WIRE TO EXTEND —SETBETWEEN 51DE OF® COMPACTED AND MOISTURE HORIZONTALLY, IN WALL PANELS , EACH BRICK COURSE. LADUR WIRE AND N1 OTHER t T�� Z .' . . GALVANI t ANGLE IRON CONDITIONED SUBGRADE ii is±iiiiiii'll�ii llwlu TIT, 1111K B COURSE HORIZONTALLY, IN WALL PANELS. BETWEEN EACH BRICK COURSE. GE 4 SO EP HOLES 3 4" EXPANSION EAC PANEL- LADDER WIRE AND ALL OTHER ANGLE IRON.. BEA(LER 4" INTO COLUMN EACH END (TYP.) J NT, TYP. 4" CLEARANCE (TYP.) 18"� CONCRETE PIER, W R-. DET. 05/2.2 THICKWALL ELEVATION =, T. WITH 6" HOOK a EVERY 12" O.C. COLUMN AR PATTERN WITH MR JOINTS 1/8' (LLV) ANGLE IRON -R COURSE DOTING 4-0 EACH WAY :TE PIER, 5/2.2 X2' COLUMN AT THICKWALL SCALE: 1/2" = 1 PL 3/8' THCKWALL COLUMN BEYOND BRICK THINWALL PANEL WITH NO.S GAUGE HOT GIPPED GALVANIZED LADUR WIRE TO EXTEND —SETBETWEEN 51DE OF® COMPACTED AND MOISTURE HORIZONTALLY, IN WALL PANELS , EACH BRICK COURSE. LADUR WIRE AND N1 OTHER WALL Z .' MA50NRY REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE MANUFACTURED BY DUR–O–WAL CONDITIONED SUBGRADE Pu F AND MEET ASTM A— CLASS 2–H REQUIREMENTS BRICK SOLDIER GOUR5E HORIZONTALLY, IN WALL PANELS. BETWEEN EACH BRICK COURSE. DRAINAGE WEEP HOLES 3 4" EXPANSION GLV. 5IEEL LADDER WIRE AND ALL OTHER ANGLE IRON.. BEA(LER 4" INTO COLUMN EACH END (TYP.) J NT, TYP. 4" CLEARANCE (TYP.) MASONRY REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE MANUFACTURED BY W #3 BARS TO BE CENTERED IN 5' SLABS 4" CONCRETE MOW STRIP (2)-p3 =, T. WITH 6" HOOK a EVERY 12" O.C. COLUMN AR PATTERN WITH MR JOINTS 1/8' (LLV) ANGLE IRON -R COURSE DOTING 4-0 EACH WAY :TE PIER, 5/2.2 X2' COLUMN AT THICKWALL SCALE: 1/2" = 1 WITH ff3 ® 12" O.C. (C.N.0) 10' O.C. MA%IMUM— THICKWALL SECTION CONCRETE PIER SECTION PLAN SCALE: t/2" - 1'-D' SECTION SCALE: 112 - t' -O" Typical Screening Wall Details -./• BRICK SOLDIER COURSE WITH ALTERNATING DEPTH 1 1/4" I BRICK RUNNING BOND WITH ,�.�BRICK TES AS NEEDED 4 65 VERTICAL WITH 6" I' HOOK IN PIER CAP ). HLL COLUMN SORT WITH 3000 P51 CONCRETE F' BRICK SOLDIER COURSE 4–J4 TIESEACH WAY 1•-1"rl'-4" PIER CAP CONCRETE PIER, rT',I REF: DET 05/2.2 4-@5 TOWELS 0 EACH PIER (TYP) THICKWALL COLUMN SECTION SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" ]• VOID FU_ ED WITH GROUT TTP. 4 EA. #5 REHAB WITH 03 GAUGE TES 18" JOINT, TYP. PL GRADE BR OR CONC. SLAB COMPACTED AND MOISTURE 09 GAUGE HOT TIPPET GALVANIZED L.' CONDITIONED SUBGRADE LADDER WIRE TO EXTEND PER SGILS ENGINEER REQUIREMENTS HORIZONTALLY, IN WALL PANELS. BETWEEN EACH BRICK COURSE. 3 4" EXPANSION LADDER WIRE AND ALL OTHER J NT, TYP. MASONRY REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE MANUFACTURED BY W DOWEL, TYP. DUR–O–WAL AND MEET (ASTM A153 CLASS 2-8) REQUIREMENTS b rr 4" CONC. SLAB PILASTER b3� d� CONTINUOUS UNDER THINWALL 18" CONCRETE PIER, TTP 1•_4• BOND BREAKER (STYROFOAM, TTP) S 4–,'S VERT. WITH 4" THICK CONCRETE SLAB a TIES ® 10" O.C. PIER: I. RT. WTH .�. d3 TES ® 10. O.C. WITH ff3 ® 12" O.C. (C.N.0) 10' O.C. MA%IMUM— THICKWALL SECTION CONCRETE PIER SECTION PLAN SCALE: t/2" - 1'-D' SECTION SCALE: 112 - t' -O" Typical Screening Wall Details -./• BRICK SOLDIER COURSE WITH ALTERNATING DEPTH 1 1/4" I BRICK RUNNING BOND WITH ,�.�BRICK TES AS NEEDED 4 65 VERTICAL WITH 6" I' HOOK IN PIER CAP ). HLL COLUMN SORT WITH 3000 P51 CONCRETE F' BRICK SOLDIER COURSE 4–J4 TIESEACH WAY 1•-1"rl'-4" PIER CAP CONCRETE PIER, rT',I REF: DET 05/2.2 4-@5 TOWELS 0 EACH PIER (TYP) THICKWALL COLUMN SECTION SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" ]• VOID FU_ ED WITH GROUT TTP. 4 EA. #5 REHAB WITH 03 GAUGE TES 18" JOINT, TYP. CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT TEXT AMENDMENT - CHAPTER 12, ARTICLE 35, "ACCESSORY STRUCTURES REGULATIONS" P&Z HEARING DATE: September 18, 2014 C.C. HEARING DATE: October 14, 2014 STAFF REP.: Marcie Diamond, Assistant Director of Planning PURPOSE: To amend Article 34 -Accessory Structures Regulations, deleting the 80% masonry requirements for accessory structures in non-residential districts and for structures that are 150 square feet or larger in residential districts, unless they are visible from a public street. DISCUSSION: Currently, the 80% masonry regulation does not apply to accessory structures in residential districts which are less than 150 square feet. However, the 80% masonry requirement does apply to all residential accessory buildings which exceed 150 square feet and all accessory buildings in non-residential zoned areas. The current regulation, in some instances, imposes a financial hardship and does not serve the public good when the structure is not visible from a public street. Examples of this are accessory structures in a homeowner's back yard such as a cabana or arbor, shade structures at day care centers and patios in industrial areas. Specifically, the following amendment to the Zoning Ordinance is being proposed: ARTICLE 35. ACCESSORY STRUCTURES REGULATIONS Sec. 12-35-1. Non-residential and multi -family residential uses. With the exception of swimming pools and spas, each building and structure used for or accessory to non-residential or multi -family residential purposes shall be considered a principal building as defined in section 12-42-24 If the column wall or support of the structure is not visible from around level from the abutting public street then the 80% masonry requirement shall not apply. The regulations detailed in 12-35-3 of this article shall govern the location of swimming pools and spas accessory to non-residential and multi -family residential uses. Sec. 12-35-2. Single-family and two-family residential uses B. Accessory buildings that are 150 square feet in area, or more, shall observe the following regulations: ITEM # 9 Page I of 2 1. Maximum height - 12 feet. 2. Minimum setbacks: (a) Rear: i. Ten feet. Exception: When the accessory building is a garage or carport with rear alley access, the rear setback shall be no less than 20 feet. ii. the same as the required front yard setback when the rear property line is adjacent to a street. (b) Side: i. The same as the minimum setback required for the main structure. Exception: When the accessory building is a garage or carport with side alley access, the side setback on that side shall be no less than 20 feet. ii. Fifteen feet from aside property line that is adjacent to aside street. iii. Ten feet from the main structure on an adjacent property. 3. Materials: When the columns, walls or supports are visible from the --round level of the abutting public street, then 80 percent of the exterior walls must be masonry that closely resembles the masonry used in the main building. For accessory structures 300 square feet in area or less, posts spaced at least six feet apart and banisters and railings less than three feet in height shall not be considered exterior walls and shall not be subject to masonry requirements. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff is recommending APPROVAL of the Text Amendment as described above. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Recommend approval of the request 2. Recommend disapproval of the request 3. Recommend modification of the request 4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date ATTACHMENTS: None ITEM - 9 Page 2 of 2