BP 2014-09-18 PZNOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING & AGENDA
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
September 18, 2014
COMMISSIONERS:
Edmund Haas — Chairman
Glenn Portman — Vice Chairman
Doug Robinson
Ed Darling
Justin Goodale
Sue Blankenship
Vijay Sarma
MEETING TIME AND PLACE:
Pre -Session 6:00 p.m. 1st Floor Conference Room (Open to the Public)
Regular Session 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers (Open to the Public)
Notice is hereby given that the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Coppell, Texas will
meet in pre -session at 6:00 p.m. and in regular session at 6:30 p.m. on Thursday, September 18, 2014,
to be held at Town Center, 255 Parkway Boulevard, Coppell, Texas.
As authorized by Section 551.071(2) of the Texas Government Code, this meeting may be convened
into closed Executive Session for the purpose of seeking confidential legal advice from the City
Attorney on any agenda item listed herein.
The purpose of the meeting is to consider the following items:
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
PRE -SESSION:
1. Briefing on the Agenda.
REGULAR SESSION:
2. Call to Order.
Open to the Public)
(Open to the Public)
3. Consider approval of the minutes for August 21, 2014.
4. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of Case No. PD -241R3 -C, Red Hawk Office, a zoning change request from
PD -241-C (Planned Development -241 -Commercial) to PD -241R3 -C (Planned Development -
241 Revision -3 -Commercial), to attach a Detail Plan on Lot 27R, Block A, to allow the
construction of an approximate 4,723 -square -foot medical office building on 0.57 acres of
property located on the west side of Denton Tap Road approximately 920 feet north of Bethel
School Road, at the request of David Hayes, The Holmes Builders.
STAFF REP.: Matt Steer
ag091814
Pagel of 3
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
5. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of the Red Hawk Addition, Lot 27R, Block A, Replat, being a replat of
Lot 27, Block A, of the Red Hawk Addition, to establish various easements to accommodate an
medical office building on 0.57 acres of property located on the west side of Denton Tap Road
approximately 920 feet north of Bethel School Road, at the request of David Hayes, The
Holmes Builders.
STAFF REP.: Matt Steer
6. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of Case No. PD-265R-TH-1, Kyra (Canterbury) Court, a zoning change
request from LI (Light Industrial) & PD-265-TH-1 (Planned Development -265 -Townhouse -1)
to PD-265R-TH-1 (Planned Development -265 Revised -Townhouse -1), to attach a Revised
Detail Plan to allow an expansion of the existing Planned Development District to incorporate
an additional 1.58 acres of property and to increase the number of Townhomes from 15 to 22
and two (2) common areas to three (3) common areas on approximately 4.23 acres of property
located on the north side of Belt Line Road, approximately 1,700 feet west of Moore Road at
the request of Jason Rose, J Rose Architects and Planners.
STAFF REP.: Gary Sieb
7. Consider approval of the Kyra (Canterbury) Court, Preliminary Plat, to revise the approved
Preliminary Plat to incorporate an additional 1.58 acres of property and to increase the number
of townhomes from 15 to 22 and two (2) common areas to three (3) common areas on
approximately 4.23 acres of property located on the north side of Belt Line Road,
approximately 1,700 feet west of Moore Road at the request of Jason Rose, J Rose Architects &
Planners.
STAFF REP.: Gary Sieb
8. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of a TEXT AMENDMENT — CHAPTER 12, of the Zoning Ordinance,
Section 12-33-1.8, an amendment that required brick screening walls be constructed according
to the new standard specifications. The details are proposed to be codified in the Zoning
Ordinance as an appendix illustration.
STAFF REP.: Gary Sieb
9. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of a TEXT AMENDMENT - CHAPTER 12, of the Zoning Ordinance,
ARTICLE 35, "ACCESSORY STRUCTURES REGULATIONS", to amend Article 34 -
Accessory Structures Regulations, deleting the 80% masonry requirements for accessory
structures in non-residential districts and for structures that are 150 square feet or more in
residential districts, unless they are visible from a public street.
STAFF REP.: Marcie Diamond
10. Update on Council action for planning agenda items on September 9, 2014:
A. An Ordinance for Case No. PD -209R5 -C, TownOaks Centre (Zoes Kitchen), a
zoning change from PD -209R -C to PD -209R5 -C, to allow the re -occupancy of an
existing vacant restaurant building and allowing for outdoor seating, fagade revisions,
ag091814
Page 2 of 3
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
awning colors and sign variances on 2.36 acres of property located at 120 S. Denton
Tap Road, Suite 490.
B. An Ordinance for Case No. PD -97R4 -R, Universal Academy, a zoning change from
PD -97-R and PD -97R3 -R to PD -97R4 -R, to allow the expansion of the existing charter
school into the entire 113,196 -square -foot existing building, incorporation of an
additional 0.8 acres of land and to increase the number of students to a maximum of
1,500 ( grades K-12) on approximately 12.4 acres of property located at 1001 E. Sandy
Lake Road.
C. An Ordinance for Case No. PD -274-H, Hammond Street a zoning change from LI to
PD -274-H, to establish a Detail Site Plan for 18 townhomes on 2.447 acres of land
located along the west side of Hammond Street, south of West Bethel Road,
approximately 575 feet north of Burns Street and to amend the Land Use on the 2030
Comprehensive Plan from Industrial Special District to Old Coppell Historic District.
D. Case No. S -1196R2 -TC, J. Macklin's Grill a zoning change request from S -1196R -
TC to S-1 196R2 -TC, to amend the existing Special Use Permit to allow an 867 -square -
foot covering, with an additional 180 -square -foot overhang, over the patio in front of
the existing 3,700 -square -foot restaurant located at 130 N. Denton Tap Road, Suite 120.
E. Case No. S -1258 -LI, Fairfield Inn & Suites, a zoning change request from LI to S-
1258 -Light Industrial (Special Use Permit -1258 -Light Industrial), to allow a 95 -room,
four-story hotel on 2.075 acres of property located at the northeast corner of S.H. 121
and Northpoint Drive.
11. Director's Comments.
ADJOURNMENT
CERTIFICATE
I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City
of Coppell, Texas on this 12'h day of September, 2014 at
Juanita A. Miles
Planning Secretary
PUBLIC NOTICE STATEMENT FOR ADA COMPLIANCE
The City of Coppell acknowledges its responsibility to comply with the Americans with Disabilities
Act of 1990. Thus, in order to assist individuals with disabilities who require special services (i.e.,
sign interpretative services, alternative audio/visual devices, and amanuenses) for participation in or
access to the City of Coppell sponsored public programs, services and/or meetings, the City requests
that individuals make requests for these services forty-eight (48) hours ahead of the scheduled
program, service and/or meeting. To make arrangements, contact Vivyon V. Bowman, ADA
Coordinator or other designated officials at (972) 462-0022, or (TDD 1 -800 -RELAY, TX, 1-800-735-
2989).
ag091814
Page 3 of 3
MINUTES OF AUGUST 21, 2014
The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Coppell met in Pre -session at 6:00 p.m., and in
Regular session at 6:30 p.m., on August 21, 2014, in the Council Chambers of Coppell Town
Center, 255 Parkway Boulevard, Coppell, Texas. The following Commissioners were present:
COMMISSIONERS:
Edmund Haas — Chairman
Glenn Portman — Vice Chairman
Doug Robinson
Ed Darling
Justin Goodale
Sue Blankenship
Commissioner Vijay Sarma was absent.
Also present were Director of Planning, Gary Sieb; Assistant Director of Planning, Marcie
Diamond, and Secretary, Juanita Miles.
The purpose of the meeting is to consider the following items:
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
PRE -SESSION:
Open to the Public)
1. Briefing on the Agenda.
The Planning Commission was briefed on each posted agenda item in the Workshop
Session. No vote was taken on any item discussed.
REGULAR SESSION:
2. Call to Order.
(Open to the Public)
Chairman Haas called the meeting to order.
3. Consider approval of the minutes for July 17, 2014.
Commissioner Robinson made a motion to approve the minutes for July 17, 2014 as written.
Vice Chair Portman seconded; motion carried (6-0), with Commissioners Goodale,
Robinson, Haas, Portman, Darling and Blankenship voting in favor. None opposed.
4. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of Case No. S -1196R2 -TC, J. Macklin's Grill, a zoning change
request from S -1196R -TC (Special Use Permit -1196 Revised -Town Center) to S -
1196R2 -TC (Special Use Permit -1196 Revision 2- Town Center), to amend the existing
Special Use Permit to allow an 867 -square -foot covering over the existing patio in front
of the existing 3,700 -square foot restaurant located at 130 N. Denton Tap Road, Suite
120, at the request of Todd Kerr, J. Macklin's Grill.
STAFF REP.: Gary Sieb
MIN082114
Page 1 of 4
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
Presentation:
Planning Director, Gary Sieb introduced this case to the Commission with exhibits and a
color board. He mentioned eight notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of
this request. No notices were returned in favor or in opposition. He stated that staff is
recommending approval with no conditions.
Helena Murphy, Cross Timbers Architects, 3605 Yucca Drive, Suite 102. Flower Mound,
Texas, was present to represent this case, to address questions and stated agreement with
staff's recommendation.
Public Hearing:
Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in
favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. No one spoke.
Chairman Haas closed the public hearing.
Action:
Vice Chair Portman made a motion to recommend approval of Case No. 5 -119682 -TC, J.
Macklin's Grill, a zoning change request from 5 -1196R -TC (Special Use Permit -1196
Revised -Town Center) to 5 -1196R2 -TC (Special Use Permit -1196 Revision 2- Town
Center), with no conditions.
Commissioner Robinson seconded; motion carried (6-0), with Commissioners Goodale,
Robinson, Haas, Portman, Darling and Blankenship voting in favor. None opposed.
5. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of Case No. 5 -1258 -LI, Fairfield Inn & Suites, a zoning change
request from LI (Light Industrial) to 5 -1258 -Light Industrial (Special Use Permit -
1258 -Light Industrial), to allow a 95 -room, four-story hotel on 2.075 acres of property
located at the northeast corner of S.H. 121 and Northpoint Drive, at the request of
Dilip Pranav, Chase Hospitality.
STAFF REP.: Marcie Diamond
Presentation:
Assistant Planning Director, Marcie Diamond introduced this case to the Commission with
exhibits, elevations and a color board. She stated that staff is recommending approval
subject to conditions which she read into the record.
Robert Barr, Project Manager, Chase Hospitality, LLC, 8530 Esters Blvd., Irving, Texas,
was present to represent this case, to address questions and stated agreement with staff's
recommendation.
Public Hearing:
Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in
favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. No one spoke.
Chairman Haas closed the public hearing.
MIN041912
Page 2 of 4
Action:
Vice Chair Portman made a motion to recommend approval of Case No. 5 -1258 -LI,
Fairfield Inn & Suites, a zoning change request from LI (Light Industrial) to 5 -1258 -Light
Industrial (Special Use Permit -1258 -Light Industrial), subject to the following conditions:
1. Additional comments will be provided upon detail engineering review.
2. Revise the first floor plan to relocate the fire riser room to be directly accessible from
the fire lane.
3. This property will need to be platted prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Commissioner Robinson seconded; motion carried (6-0), with Commissioners Goodale,
Robinson, Haas, Portman, Darling and Blankenship voting in favor. None opposed.
6. Update on Council action for planning agenda items on August 12, 2014:
A. An Ordinance for Case No. PD -183R -C, Coppell High School, a zoning change
from PD -183-C to PD -183R -C, to attach a Revised Detail Site Plan to allow a one-
story 80,701 -square -foot multipurpose building, a two-story 52,137 -square -foot
arena and a one-story 4,237 -square -foot kitchen addition on 63.54 acres of property
located at 185 W. Parkway Blvd.
B. An Ordinance for Case No. PD -211R -H, Hard Eight BBQ, a zoning change from
PD -211 -H -S-1226 and H to PD -211R -H, to allow an increase in property size to
accommodate 63 additional parking spaces on 2.98 acres of property located at 688
S. Freeport Parkway.
C. An Ordinance for Case No. PD-267R-RBN-TH, Avalon, a zoning change from C to
PD-267R-RBN-TH, to allow nine (9) townhouses on 0.7 acres of property located at
the southwest corner of Village Parkway and Kimbel Kourt.
D. An Ordinance for Case No. PD -171R5 -HC, GTE Shared Services Addition
(Wisenbaker), a zoning change from PD -171R4 -HC to PD -171R5 -HC, to attach a
Revised Detail Site Plan for a 80,980 -square -foot office/showroom/warehouse
building on 6.6 acres of property located at the northeast corner of Canyon Drive and
S.H. 121.
E. Westhaven PH 2A, Final Plat, to permit the development of 87 residential lots and
15 common area lots on 21.34 acres of property located south of S.H. 121,
approximately 550 feet west of Magnolia Park.
F. Case No. PD -274-H, Hammond Street, a zoning change request from LI to PD -
274 -H, to establish a Detail Site Plan for 18 townhomes on 2.447 acres of land
located along the west side of Hammond Street, south of West Bethel Road,
approximately 575 feet north of Burns Street and to amend the Land Use on the 2030
Comprehensive Plan from Industrial Special District to Old Coppell Historic
District.
G. Case No. PD -97R4 -R, Universal Academy, a zoning change request from PD -97-R
and PD -97R3 -R to PD -97R4 -R, to allow the expansion of the existing charter school
into the entire 113,196 -square -foot existing building, incorporation of an additional
0.8 acres of land and to increase the number of students to a maximum of 1,500 (
grades K-12) on approximately 12.4 acres of property located at 1001 E. Sandy Lake
Road.
H. Case No. PD -209R5 -C, TownOaks Centre (Zoes Kitchen), a zoning change
request from PD -209R -C to PD -209R5 -C, to allow the re -occupancy of an existing
MIN082114
Page 3 of 4
ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION
vacant restaurant building and allowing for outdoor seating, facade revisions, awning
colors and sign variances on 2.36 acres of property located at 120 S. Denton Tap
Road, Suite 490.
During the Pre -Session, Planning Director Gary Sieb advised the Commission of Council's
actions on August 12, 2014, and stated that Council approved all of the above -stated items.
Gary also reminded Commissioners Darling, Goodale and Robinson to submit their
applications to the City Secretary's office by Friday, September 12, 2014, to serve on the
Planning Commission if interested in being considered for reappointment.
7. Director's Comments.
There were no additional comments.
ADJOURNMENT
With nothing further to discuss, the meeting adjourned at approximately 6:41 p.m.
Edmund Haas, Chairman
Juanita A. Miles, Secretary
MIN041912
Page 4 of 4
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
Case No.: PD -241R3 -C, Red Hawk Office
P&Z HEARING DATE:
August 21, 2014
C.C. HEARING DATE:
September 9, 2014
STAFF REP.:
Matt Steer, City Planner
LOCATION:
The west side of Denton Tap Road approximately 920 feet north of Bethel School
Road
SIZE OF AREA:
0.57 acres of property
CURRENT ZONING:
PD -241-C (Planned Development -241 -Commercial)
REQUEST:
A zoning change request to PD -241R3 -C (Planned Development -241 Revision -3 -
Commercial), to attach a Detail Plan on Lot 27R, Block A, to allow the
construction of a 4,723 -square -foot medical office building.
APPLICANT:
Owner/Applicant: Architect:
The Holmes Builders (Hawkeye Commercial) Nove Studios
Contact: David Hayes Contact: Mike Adams
225 East State Highway 121, Suite 120 P.O. Box 941852
Coppell, TX 75019 Plano, TX 75094
Phone:(214) 488-5200 Phone: (469) 682-8915
Fax: (214) 488-5255 Fax: N/A
Email: dhayes(cr�holmescommercial.net mike(c_,,firmitasdesign.com
HISTORY: On May 26, 2009, a Conceptual Planned Development for two commercial tracts
was approved as a part of a Detailed Planned Development zoning for the
residential component of PD-241-SF/C (Planned Development 241- Single-
Family/Commercial) allowing for 54 single-family lots. In December 2011, a
Detailed Planned Development was approved for one of the commercial lots (Lot
28R, Block A), allowing an 8,700 -square -foot office building which was
subsequently constructed and is now fully occupied.
HISTORIC COMMENT: There is no historic significance associated with the subject property.
TRANSPORTATION: South Denton Tap Road is an improved six -lane, divided concrete arterial built
within a 110 -foot right-of-way.
ITEM # 4
Pagel of 3
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING
North — office; C (Commercial)
South- residential; PD -241 -SF (Planned Development -241 -Single Family)
East- daycare; PD -204-C (Planned Development -204 -Commercial)
West -residential; PD -241 -SF (Planned Development -241 -Single Family)
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Coppell 2030, A Comprehensive Master Plan, shows the property as suitable for
Urban Residential Neighborhood. This office is acceptable in that "small scale
commercial uses" are also appropriate in this land use category.
DISCUSSION: This is the second of two commercial tracts of the Conceptual Planned
Development for Red Hawk approved in June 2009. On the Conceptual Plan, a
scaled 5,250 square foot professional office building was shown. This proposal is
for a smaller, 4,723 square -foot building but the use proposed is a more intense
land use (medical office) than what was previously planned. It is proposed to be
located on the west side of S. Denton Tap Rd., just south of the Wynnpage office
development.
Site Plan:
The building is proposed to be set back 30 feet from the S. Denton Tap right-of-
way. The parking areas are proposed to be on the north and west of the proposed
structure with a fire lane/mutual access easement extending from the office to the
north through this development narrowing to 12' and connecting with the
residential component to the south. This was previously approved with the initial
Red Hawk request and is already installed with an emergency gate which will
remain in place on the south property line. The fire lane is proposed to be
extended to Denton Tap. There is an existing screening wall on the south and west
sides of the site separating this use from the residential development.
Parking:
The parking required for a medical office is one parking space per 175 square feet
of building area. The applicant is proposing to just meet the minimum parking
required with 4,723 square feet of medical office by providing 27 spaces.
Tree Survey/L.andscape Plan:
There are numerous trees located on the northern boundary of the proposal. Only
two are proposed to be removed with this request. The remainder will be limbed -
up with the underbrush being removed and shrubs added to screen the parking.
Eleven Live Oaks, four Cedar Elms, eight Eastern Red Cedars and two Crepe
Myrtles are proposed to be planted in concert with the existing trees on the site
(northern property line). This Landscape Plan meets the requirements of the
recently revised Zoning Ordinance allowing for 30% of the site to be landscape
area on lots smaller than two acres in size.
Elevations/Signage:
The structure is proposed to be 26 feet in height (measured to the peak). The
office is proposed to be constructed of a grey brick, off-white/beige stone with a
redwood stained siding serving as an accent. The roofing material where visible,
is proposed to be champagne colored standing seam. A 40 -square -foot multi -
ITEM # 4
Page 2 of 3
tenant monument sign is proposed to be located on the east side of the building
perpendicular to Denton Tap. It is proposed to be constructed of the same stone
as the office and to be externally illuminated with black pin -mounted letters.
Currently, only potential sign locations are depicted on the building elevations
and all signage will need to meet the ordinance in terms of size and type.
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
Staff is recommending APPROVAL of PD -241R3 -C, Red Hawk, subject to the following conditions being
met:
1. Additional engineering comments will be generated upon detail engineering plan review.
2. The fire hydrant shall be private.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Recommend approval of the request
2. Recommend disapproval of the request
3. Recommend modification of the request
4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date
ATTACHMENTS:
1.
Site Plan
2.
Landscape Plan
3.
Tree Survey
4.
Elevations
ITEM # 4
Page 3 of 3
i
II i
it I
I I I
i
\ \ 24' FIRE LANE /
I �
EX CURB TO /I
BE REMOVED OI
I Oi
I �"�� II SPf.GES O i
24' FIRE LANE NI
T IU
E:45T'6 GONG PAVING 9000' I�
TYP /
TO REMAIN ENHANCED
WALL \ 24 FIRE LANE 00 10 PAVING;
MAINTENANGE \ EASEMENT O I�
N 5.00p'm
� O 9.00(9. OC' 11.000,
EX CURB TO
to BE REMOVED 1 -
\\---
I p 24' FIRE LANE'
SPACES
m
� II \
AREA DiRAIN
TO
To REMAIN
Is 000 ._
HOW
ie 000 \ \\\ \\000
-- �
_.AsEERM`N \ \\ \ \\\ \\\\ \ \ \\
SPRINKLER �
\ 12' EMIR
ACCESS
`iNEN FFH \\ IS BLDG SETBACK m
WALL MAINTE-NANGE EASEMN- pl
NB'1004'59"W
WLL(W \ ` N89'12"W 11403'
SITE PLAN
SITE PROPOSED ZONING - PD -241 R3 -C (EXISTING PD -241-C)
PROPOSED USE MEDICAL (OFFICE)
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: 5B FULLY SPRINKLED
RENTABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE: 4639
NON RENTABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE: 84
GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE: 4723
LOT COVERAGE = 4723/24831 = 19.02
FLOOR AREA RATIO= .190
MEDICAL SQUARE FOOTAGE= 4723 @ 175 SF/SPI SPACES
TOTAL PARKING SPACES PROVIDED: 27 SPACES
BUILDING HEIGHT = 26'-7"
EXISTIN6 CURB
I
TO BE REMOVED
EXISTING UTILITY P<
TO BE RELOCATED
�N—pp�y
I
I
EXISTING UTILITY
LINES TO REMAIN
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
—1,
ADDITION
CALLS GOUNN, TEXAS
l
CLEAN UP NORTH PERIMETER TREES AND BRUSH. REMOVE THE SMALLER
UNDESIRABLE TRELS -
I I
•
NOVE
STUDIOS
505000ORUMRD.SM700
DALUS. TM Tam
TELPHONE97 NITA082
FASC18RtE 214.290.8812
` R45UE DATE
NEWEYONS
N84 -V5 I"E c200.0
ro I \
TREES REQUIRED:
I
I
PERIMETER REQUIRED PROVIDED
_ 1 J
I
I I / i J] �I _ i U4Rron iav ° 4EXnrvG F u _- n
I
wu.
z
-—ER -11 a c
8
r
_ ( �ENoUMHPaas"snowCO
INS\ 1? 1
101 l7i.'• r, � I aLLEXISTIXR TBE66"c
Iw
_. __ �li �I� PRonsnEaTEa
\ tl Z I _LI
MATERIALS ST: W.
"-I--
DESCRIPTION Q SIZE SPAC. I I
O.C.
_ NO
TREES-
LIVE OAKS 11 3"CAL A.S.I
QUERCUS VIRGIN_A 1 EL. LL
CEDAR ELMS 4 3'CAL A.S.'.I N I u—Q
UILMUS PARVIFOLIA
S.T.2 30 GAL A.S. I O F
Y
LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA'
EASTERN REO CEDARS 8 810, AS I i Z I
JUNPERUS VIRGINIANIASHR
Z =
LU
INDIAN HAWTHORN 91 SGAL 30'
o
RAPHIOLEPSIS
OWE. BURFORD HOLLY] SGAL 30" IIS " !J 1�— -2, 5 U)Q
f
ILE%BURFORDI NANA,1 --
cli
GROUNDCOVERS
ASIAN JASMINE SGAL 12" I —--
G --`_. ICWrt W M �
TRACHLOSPERE ASI ICUM " ' + + + L _ n- 0 �J
SEASONAL COLOR- - i
ASSORTED VARIETIES 00 4 -POTS - — / - + .: _.�5
LAWNS
a
N8 /
BERMUDASOD care 4'54"W 86.rp ` .ALL N84 54'12"N 11403 Q
LANDSCAPE NOTES
QBca
PDAE Cpac 1IHHARDWODn hNiC .. a �j
A_RRA SPLANT EDS SHAL BE PREPARED PLAAI WNARRCAASNTNINPFMGH--TTRREBENVADCTEHS
Annx m4LLm5BmPANTxeNTOODANnLi,Ba
E
9YTEAC0BSFROMEDDGLO.
I
S ANDSCAP CONTAACTOASHALL BE RESPONEE3LE FOA AEGOLAA -...
MOWNO WEEDRiG ➢t GATTONFERTTLIZINO�PAiIMNG AW OTfffitaT
NmEN Irt ANCtlL' PLANTM ', ONTTLFPI ACCEPFANCE OF PAOIECC SHEETNUMBER
THEN BE AESPONSA3LRPOR STANDARD MAWT NANC2 �\
S. PROVIDtl OTB SBAA WARRANTYONTREES, SFARJBS, OANAF4:NTAL GRASSES '-
GxoDnvcovBxs, rxcLDDLs nAcrGRS BEroNDmNTAwcroR'S L_3
CDNT DLPWBAT�AEGNDPHGA�,ETc LANDSCAPE PLAN
Sf:AIF 1"-10
.TREE SURVEY
EXISTING TREE SURVEY: TREES SIX INCH CALIPER AND GREATER
I
# KEY DESCRIPTION SIZE PROTECT REMOVE
CALIPER
1. HACKBERRY 6" X
2.HACKBERRY 9" X
3. BRADFORD PEAR 6" X
4. BRADFORD PEAR 6" X
5. LIVE OAK 6" X
6. HACKBERRY 7" X
7. LIVE OAK 6" X
8. HACKBERRY 8" X
9. AMERICAN ELM 7" X
10. HACKBERRY 7" X LJ
11. HACKBERRY 7" X
12. HACKBERRY 8" X 1'
13. HACKBERRY 7" X Z --
14. HACKBERRY 9" X 1
15. HACKBERRY 9" X
16. MESQUITE 12" X
17. HACKBERRY 6" X
COMMON NAME/ BOTANICAL NAME
HACKBERRY/CELTIS OCCIDENTALIS I
BRADFORD PEAR/PYRUS BRADFORD
LIVE OAK/QUERCUSVIGINIANA
AMERICAN ELM/ULMUS AMERICANA
MESQUITE/PROSOPIS GLANDULOSA
in U
o I 6
z ;I
I i
I f
I I
I
�I
`I
T I
4
I
� I
I
I � I
w w w
NOVE
STUDIOS
00 QUORUM RD. SEE TR
MUAS,TEXAS7Q54
TELEPHONE 9/2.687.9082-
FASCNRIIE214.299.8612
ISSUE DATE
6/08/2014
a
NB�j 731"E 200.02' ,• s/oz/zoaa
"3. 4 S. 6 1. g 9. ,. 11. -12 14. Y 8 zoly
j. 13. i
1
16
I U & 1 i7..
ig
- �x
J �
V d
I ❑>
' I
E-•
\ ml. U Q p
w I. dam.
O z�
INX
Qw
1 mmomm
NEENE
W m F.
J J
I a
148'1 04'Sq'W 86.07' N51 59 12 W 114.03'
� U
-- \ SHEET NUMBED
TREE SURVEY „_.,..,�.., L-1
ELEVATION NOTES
STONE: GRANDBURY -CREAM
1, BRICK: SUMMIT - l59 PEBBLE GRAY
3, ROOF: BERRIDGE ;COLOR CHAMPAGNE
4, WINDOW FRAMES: CLEAR ANODIZED ALUM
5, AWNING: CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM
WEST ELEVATION 3116"=1-0„
SIGNAGE NOTES
THE GROSS SIGN AREA SHALL NOT EXCEED 56.5 SF
■®�ii1393�0 1]
Iii31P1iR33fi1370• W
■ioii� ■
MONUMENT SIGN 114"=v-0„
�a1a
=UUMPSTER PLANI
EAST ELEVATION 3116 -1'.0"
7 5101N&
CANOPY
VENEER
STOREFRONT
NOVE
STUDIOS
DALLAS, TE%AS76264
TELEPHONE 972.687.9UB2
FASCIVILE 214.299.8612
IISSUE ,
REVI IONIS
W
Lu z
0
U o�
� as
p F -
Z
0Q
z
=
0
Q oOf
In
O N
L�JJ H
/
c)
of 0 J
J
Lu
0-
0-
0
-
0-
0
U
I.,niio reirm �n,
ry aaPro
9/02/20H
S.EET NUMBER
A4-1
PROIECI
ER
14022
''I'l''liiim m -m -m -m -m -m -m -lo
5TANPIN6 5EAH
METAL ROOF
—CAST STONE NEA
ERIOK VENEER
NOVE
STUDIOS
5056 QUORUM RD. STE 70
DALU, TEX, S 75254
TELEPHONE 972.6BUD82
FASCIMILE 214.299.8612
ISSUE DAIE
9/02/2014
REVISIONS
T.O.
NORTH ELEVATION 3„6"=,'-o”
W Z
U 0 F-
RE
� as
O �Y
z
� oQ
z=
0
QLu
of
2 U)a
ON
115'_1" w M
F-
0 O
J
v�iamn avv�aai.
9/02/2014
SHEEI NUMBER
A4-2
PROI; 22ER
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
Red Hawk Addition, Lot 27R, Block A, ReWat
P&Z HEARING DATE: August 21, 2014
C.C. HEARING DATE: September 9, 2014
STAFF REP.: Matt Steer, City Planner
LOCATION: The west side of Denton Tap Road approximately 920 feet north of Bethel School
Road
SIZE OF AREA: 0.57 acres of property
CURRENT ZONING: PD -241-C (Planned Development -241 -Commercial)
REQUEST: A replat of Lot 27, Block A, of the Red Hawk Addition, to establish various
easements to accommodate an office building.
APPLICANT: Owner/Applicant: Engineer:
The Holmes Builders (Hawkeye Commercial) Kadleck & Associates
Contact: David Hayes Contact: Lynn Kadleck
225 East State Highway 121, Suite 120 2000 N Central Expy, Ste 113
Coppell, TX 75019 Plano, TX 75074
Phone:(214) 488-5200 Phone: (972) 881-0771
Email: dhayesgholmescommercial. net 1.kadleckgkadleckassociates.com
HISTORY: On May 26, 2009, a Conceptual Planned Development for two commercial tracts
was approved as a part of a Detailed Planned Development zoning for the
residential component of PD-241-SF/C (Planned Development 241- Single-
Family/Commercial) allowing for 54 single-family lots. In December 2011, a
Detailed Planned Development was approved for one of the commercial lots (Lot
28R, Block A), allowing an 8,700 -square -foot office building which was
subsequently constructed and is now fully occupied.
HISTORIC COMMENT: There is no historic significance associated with the subject property.
TRANSPORTATION: South Denton Tap Road is an improved six -lane, divided concrete arterial built
within a 110 -foot right-of-way.
ITEM # 5
Page I of 2
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING
North — office; C (Commercial)
South- residential; PD -241 -SF (Planned Development -241 -Single Family)
East- daycare; PD -204-C (Planned Development -204 -Commercial)
West -residential; PD -241 -SF (Planned Development -241 -Single Family)
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Coppell 2030, A Comprehensive Master Plan, shows the property as suitable for
Urban Residential Neighborhood. This office is acceptable in that "small scale
commercial uses" are also appropriate in this land use category.
DISCUSSION: This is the companion request to PD -241R3 -C, Red Hawk Office. It is a replat of
Lot 27, Block A, which was previously platted with the overall Red Hawk
development. A wall maintenance easement is shown along the south and west
property lines allowing access to the Homeowner's Association of Red Hawk for
maintenance purposes. A fire lane easement is proposed to extend to the west
and connect with an existing north -south fire lane already installed. This portion
of the fire lane easement is being adjusted to reflect exact dimensions from the
site plan. The building setbacks remain the same from what was approved on the
original plat. They are shown at 30 feet from Denton Tap and 15 feet from the
south property line. Staff recommends approval subject to the three conditions
outlined below.
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
Staff is recommending APPROVAL of the replat subject to the following conditions being met.
1. Additional engineering comments will be generated upon detail engineering plan review.
2. The fire hydrant shall be private.
3. Show the existing fire lane in a light line type and proposed fire lane in a darker line type, as the existing
one can be abandoned by this plat but needs to be shown.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Recommend approval of the request
2. Recommend disapproval of the request
3. Recommend modification of the request
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Replat
ITEM # 5
Page 2 of 2
o —
LEGEND o
® A—, N—ee a
I T11
warn ar wnv sere bb (Preo
EN NG
N vc
E5)rery
n
olion �\
V net stn
VICINITY MAP
N 89'27'31"
IF 11 57a.L7 Asea116' Row
879" 7Ta-
W N89'S5'12"W u Al
Fp F;11 N '04'5
114.03'„
86.07'COMMON AREA
A Lo 1R
N. 2111112
— -- — --- _ _ WASHINGTON DRIVE 111o.PMRl T. 1174 `sq
O _
/IT
I
695 \\
o.p.R o.CT. \ ell
In.1ruNo 21111015E/45 I 2 \
.Paoc. T. 1 rostra ov RD C.T 4sT4s \ ry
IN111 12
1
13
I
OWNER'S CERTIFICATION
REAS, RESTSTONE
Nd
Crow SurveyCAbsbect No301 Cit, of Copp.11 Dallas C.Ity Texese sa ld—be ngnall Of Lottl27,
DHF A of Red Hawk, an atldition m the City of Coppell, Dallas County, Texas and O-Ub,d In
Count, Clerk Instmment Numner20110D246745, Off- Property RSLOrds of Dallas County, Texas,
saitl tract of lend eo oval 1dt, Creststone Grouo LOT b Ctleed reoortled In Ceunty-b Instmment No.
,El 1"1'as follows rop.Ny A .... ds of alias ounty, T nd setdtract of RON tieing
l -d
BEGINNING et a found 510 inch ironrod for a corner In the west lineof penton Tap Road (a 110 foot
h9hl of way), seld paint being the Don n east miner of said Lot 27 end Lot 1, Block A. of
Wynnpe9e Plaza Addition, es recorded IN Volume 2002047, Page 101, Deetl Remrtls of D-.Ilas
County. T.—
"""'
exas
ington Dr ve (a 0 foo Aghl of vey), tl point being t e most
northwest comer of said CommonA ea Lot1Xi
THENCE. N 87°0459" 0 with Me —h line of Washington Drive, a distance of 8607 feetto a found
516 inoh irenand found fore Domer at the —11- south Domer of said Lot 27 and Lot 26, BI—A of
the said Rad Hawk —,—
THENCE N 00°08'31" E. tle 011 Me north line of Washington Drive end .Nth the common line of
sold Lot 26 and Lot 27. a distance of 11973 foot m a mond 518 'inch 1. rod for comer at the
southeast corner of en Alley right of way es dedmemd by the map of Wynnpe9e Plaza addition es
corded in Volume 92001, Page 2952, Dead Records of Dallas County, Texas, saitl point being Me
HE corner of said Lot 26 end Lot 27 and the common west corner of said Lot 27 and the
above said Lot 1,
the Po nE o£ Beg_ NG antl Containing 24,831nsquere feetor OS/0 sore at le�nd,nw of 200 02 feetto
SURVEYOR S CERTIFICATE
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS.
THAT, L L LYNN KADLECK, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor in the State of Texas, do
hereby certify that I have prepared this plat from an -.dual on the greund survey of the land; end the
is shown hereon ere wfoN,d -11b, pl—d under my personal supervision In __Nb,
MatheepI.FNg rola-.and regulation of the city of Coppell, Texas.
DATED MIS[he day of ,2014.
NOT FOR RECORDING
L.LYNN KADLECK
Registered Professional
Lantl Surveyor No. 3352
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF COLLIN }
IEFIRII
__d
L ELynnIlld Natlleck nknovmt1, me 1 be Me personrwh— Illy Names
1purpos. Subecribedste Me mregoaI9
aNd ac N—,.dged to me that ne e.ecuied Me same BN, the and consera
idtons
i
therein expressed.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE[histhe tlay of ,2014.
OWNER'S DEDICATION
NOW THEREFORE, KNOWALLMEN BYTHESE PRESENTS
Tbat. CR ESTSTONE GROUP LTD., R [be Owner of the berem descnbed property, and does bereby
use. Th, maintenance of paving on the utility and fire lane easements Is Me res
any pubic utility shall nave the right to remove and keep removed all er parts of
NO IN
iINSFIGrevntith the construction „mermen—, orbffi- cy of lbs —p-- Lght or ingress orr egress to
11 11, nspec[ing,
patron ng. m ning and adding to or lemoviog ell or parts of Its respedlve system without he
ssity at elny time of pmnudng ON. permission of anyone_ (Any punlin utility mall nava Me dgnt tof
'ingress anqd -.gdrass mNin privatyp oe pmhnp-.Iry ne pue of read'mg maters and any maintena nc-. or
service eroe may e tiliry).rpos
M1er ce9 (roam Seams In to th11 IN. h. herb or pe reoa�onnas nada deescrlptf
l- Osu
cl by
Th,i plat ap N—d subject to ell plating ortlina—A rules, regulations and
Goppell. Texas.
Exer-d to is toe_day& .2014.
BY CRESTSTCNE GROUP LTD.
STATE OF TEXAS }
COUNTY OF DALLAS }
BEFORE ME, the under g—d authority in and for the State of Texas, on this tlay personally
appeared Terry Holmes. of Creslstone Group Ltd., known m C. m be the person
whose name Is subscribed tc tE. mregoin9 Instrument end.- ,I.dg.d m m that h-.-.x-.cut-.d the
same for the purposes and—deraffin therein expressed and In Me cap.dty therein --
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE MIs tlay Of_, 2014
Chairmen. Plann119& A.11, Commission Date —
pp -Mt, of Coppell, Texas
Approved antl Accepted:
Mayor Date Of App—
CiryofCoppd Texas
The undersigned, the City Secretary of M-. City of Coppell. Texas. hereby certifies th—. foregoing
(nal plat of Lot 27R, Block A of Rad Hawk, an atltlition m the City of Coppell was submi d to the
Cit, Council on the day Of 2014. and the Council. by formal action, men and there
aooepted the detlication of Me streets. alleys, perks, easements, pNblle plicas, end water antlsawer
no@ —h --d Me the ams --thereof by s,g-g N, name as hereinabove subscribed,y to
WITNEGG MV HAND. this the_ day of ,2014_
Cit, Secretary
REPEAT
RED HAWK
LOT 27R, BLOCK A
LOT 17 E-1 A R
ACRE TF�CT IN 'HE
EDWARD A. CROWSURVEY,
D ABSTRACT NO. 301
CITY OF COPPELL, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS
OWNER
HA COMMERCIAL LLC
221E SH121
CtCP 4 S' E PS -.5019
21
TnA LEC & ASSOCIATES
ja7n)"asacone'Pts nH,,` N. ,oa -
n
90'00 00', 111p
0
�ins�uE.
+
N ry
eLocA eo.e.e.nc,.
ze
e s -----�—_
� Y � �
Nso po Dow�ea4uNN
�
Nw
Q
oaPe
LOT 27R, BLOCK A
N z
0
24,832 SFS 0.570 AC
z
0
_ FIT—
INc
A,fzfT9Aw:
n �wp. f,�NEN AMIITIIANCE
I oJ zzs z `l �2p�Npo246T45UT
AT
o Z
m W
I
IF 11 57a.L7 Asea116' Row
879" 7Ta-
W N89'S5'12"W u Al
Fp F;11 N '04'5
114.03'„
86.07'COMMON AREA
A Lo 1R
N. 2111112
— -- — --- _ _ WASHINGTON DRIVE 111o.PMRl T. 1174 `sq
O _
/IT
I
695 \\
o.p.R o.CT. \ ell
In.1ruNo 21111015E/45 I 2 \
.Paoc. T. 1 rostra ov RD C.T 4sT4s \ ry
IN111 12
1
13
I
OWNER'S CERTIFICATION
REAS, RESTSTONE
Nd
Crow SurveyCAbsbect No301 Cit, of Copp.11 Dallas C.Ity Texese sa ld—be ngnall Of Lottl27,
DHF A of Red Hawk, an atldition m the City of Coppell, Dallas County, Texas and O-Ub,d In
Count, Clerk Instmment Numner20110D246745, Off- Property RSLOrds of Dallas County, Texas,
saitl tract of lend eo oval 1dt, Creststone Grouo LOT b Ctleed reoortled In Ceunty-b Instmment No.
,El 1"1'as follows rop.Ny A .... ds of alias ounty, T nd setdtract of RON tieing
l -d
BEGINNING et a found 510 inch ironrod for a corner In the west lineof penton Tap Road (a 110 foot
h9hl of way), seld paint being the Don n east miner of said Lot 27 end Lot 1, Block A. of
Wynnpe9e Plaza Addition, es recorded IN Volume 2002047, Page 101, Deetl Remrtls of D-.Ilas
County. T.—
"""'
exas
ington Dr ve (a 0 foo Aghl of vey), tl point being t e most
northwest comer of said CommonA ea Lot1Xi
THENCE. N 87°0459" 0 with Me —h line of Washington Drive, a distance of 8607 feetto a found
516 inoh irenand found fore Domer at the —11- south Domer of said Lot 27 and Lot 26, BI—A of
the said Rad Hawk —,—
THENCE N 00°08'31" E. tle 011 Me north line of Washington Drive end .Nth the common line of
sold Lot 26 and Lot 27. a distance of 11973 foot m a mond 518 'inch 1. rod for comer at the
southeast corner of en Alley right of way es dedmemd by the map of Wynnpe9e Plaza addition es
corded in Volume 92001, Page 2952, Dead Records of Dallas County, Texas, saitl point being Me
HE corner of said Lot 26 end Lot 27 and the common west corner of said Lot 27 and the
above said Lot 1,
the Po nE o£ Beg_ NG antl Containing 24,831nsquere feetor OS/0 sore at le�nd,nw of 200 02 feetto
SURVEYOR S CERTIFICATE
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS.
THAT, L L LYNN KADLECK, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor in the State of Texas, do
hereby certify that I have prepared this plat from an -.dual on the greund survey of the land; end the
is shown hereon ere wfoN,d -11b, pl—d under my personal supervision In __Nb,
MatheepI.FNg rola-.and regulation of the city of Coppell, Texas.
DATED MIS[he day of ,2014.
NOT FOR RECORDING
L.LYNN KADLECK
Registered Professional
Lantl Surveyor No. 3352
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF COLLIN }
IEFIRII
__d
L ELynnIlld Natlleck nknovmt1, me 1 be Me personrwh— Illy Names
1purpos. Subecribedste Me mregoaI9
aNd ac N—,.dged to me that ne e.ecuied Me same BN, the and consera
idtons
i
therein expressed.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE[histhe tlay of ,2014.
OWNER'S DEDICATION
NOW THEREFORE, KNOWALLMEN BYTHESE PRESENTS
Tbat. CR ESTSTONE GROUP LTD., R [be Owner of the berem descnbed property, and does bereby
use. Th, maintenance of paving on the utility and fire lane easements Is Me res
any pubic utility shall nave the right to remove and keep removed all er parts of
NO IN
iINSFIGrevntith the construction „mermen—, orbffi- cy of lbs —p-- Lght or ingress orr egress to
11 11, nspec[ing,
patron ng. m ning and adding to or lemoviog ell or parts of Its respedlve system without he
ssity at elny time of pmnudng ON. permission of anyone_ (Any punlin utility mall nava Me dgnt tof
'ingress anqd -.gdrass mNin privatyp oe pmhnp-.Iry ne pue of read'mg maters and any maintena nc-. or
service eroe may e tiliry).rpos
M1er ce9 (roam Seams In to th11 IN. h. herb or pe reoa�onnas nada deescrlptf
l- Osu
cl by
Th,i plat ap N—d subject to ell plating ortlina—A rules, regulations and
Goppell. Texas.
Exer-d to is toe_day& .2014.
BY CRESTSTCNE GROUP LTD.
STATE OF TEXAS }
COUNTY OF DALLAS }
BEFORE ME, the under g—d authority in and for the State of Texas, on this tlay personally
appeared Terry Holmes. of Creslstone Group Ltd., known m C. m be the person
whose name Is subscribed tc tE. mregoin9 Instrument end.- ,I.dg.d m m that h-.-.x-.cut-.d the
same for the purposes and—deraffin therein expressed and In Me cap.dty therein --
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE MIs tlay Of_, 2014
Chairmen. Plann119& A.11, Commission Date —
pp -Mt, of Coppell, Texas
Approved antl Accepted:
Mayor Date Of App—
CiryofCoppd Texas
The undersigned, the City Secretary of M-. City of Coppell. Texas. hereby certifies th—. foregoing
(nal plat of Lot 27R, Block A of Rad Hawk, an atltlition m the City of Coppell was submi d to the
Cit, Council on the day Of 2014. and the Council. by formal action, men and there
aooepted the detlication of Me streets. alleys, perks, easements, pNblle plicas, end water antlsawer
no@ —h --d Me the ams --thereof by s,g-g N, name as hereinabove subscribed,y to
WITNEGG MV HAND. this the_ day of ,2014_
Cit, Secretary
REPEAT
RED HAWK
LOT 27R, BLOCK A
LOT 17 E-1 A R
ACRE TF�CT IN 'HE
EDWARD A. CROWSURVEY,
D ABSTRACT NO. 301
CITY OF COPPELL, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS
OWNER
HA COMMERCIAL LLC
221E SH121
CtCP 4 S' E PS -.5019
21
TnA LEC & ASSOCIATES
ja7n)"asacone'Pts nH,,` N. ,oa -
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
Case No.: PD-265R-TH-1, Kyra (Canterbury) Court
P&Z HEARING DATE: September 18, 2014
C.C. HEARING DATE: October 14, 2014
STAFF REP.: Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning
LOCATION: North side of Belt Line Road, 1,700 feet west of Moore Road
SIZE OF AREA: 4.23 acres of property
CURRENT ZONING: LI (Light Industrial) & PD-265-TH-1 (Planned Development -265 -Townhouse -1)
REQUEST: A zoning change request to PD -265R -Townhouse -1 (Planned Development -265
Revised -Townhouse -1) to attach a Revised Detail Plan to allow an expansion of
the existing Planned Development District to incorporate an additional 1.58 acres
of property and to increase the number of townhomes from 15 to 22 and three (3)
common areas.
APPLICANT:
Owner
Texas Utilities Elec. Co.
P. O. Box 219071
Dallas, TX. 75221-9071
No Phone given
Fax: No Fax given
Email: no email provided
Prospective Purchaser
J. Rose Architects/Planners
2120 Cosmos Way
Argyle, TX. 76226
(214) 454-7895
Fax: (972) 534-1850
email: jasongj rosearchitect.com
HISTORY: In March of this year this applicant rezoned an adjacent piece of property to PD
residential for 15 narrow -lot single-family structures. In the intervening time
frame, the property immediately adjacent to the west has become available and
this proposal would add a like residential use, by increasing the density to 22
units.
HISTORIC COMMENT: We have found nothing of historic significance attached to this property.
ITEM # 06
Pagel of 3
TRANSPORTATION: Beltline Road is a P6D, four -lane, concrete, divided highway built to standard within
a 110 -foot right-of-way which can be expanded to three travel lanes in each
direction. This section of Belt Line Road is in the city of Dallas
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North: single-family residences; Planned Development -104 -SF -9
South: vacant property within the city of Dallas
East: vacant land; "A", Agriculture
West: industrial warehouse; " LP' Light Industrial
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Coppell 2030, A Comprehensive Master Plan, shows this property as appropriate
for Urban Residential neighborhood
DISCUSSION: Under the HISTORY section of this report, we stated that the property
immediately east of this request was recently rezoned for a residential PD. That
was a difficult case to review and was delayed one month to allow a number of
clarifying revisions be made to the initial request including density reduction,
additional landscaping, and screening wall location verification among others.
Since the zoning was granted in March, that same applicant has been working
with Texas Utilities Electric Company, endeavoring to purchase their 1.6 acre
parcel and extend the residential proposal to the west. That effort has been
successful and this application would add seven additional single-family detached
narrow -lot residences to the initial plan, extend the cul-de-sac westward, and add
one additional common area to provide required guest parking. The 15 -lot
subdivision was approved unanimously by both Planning Commission and City
Council. That being the case and the fact that this is merely an extension of the
approved plan, we can support this request. There are a number of issues that
must be addressed before this project can be constructed. They are listed below
as conditions for approval.
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
Staff is recommending APPROVAL of this zoning request with the following conditions:
1. There will be additional comments during detailed engineering plan review.
2. The storm drain connection will need to be approved by the city of Dallas and
approval letter submitted to Engineering.
3. Drainage into DART right of way will need to be approved by DART and approval
letter submitted to Engineering.
4. Driveway and median cut needs approval by the city of Dallas and approval letter
submitted to Engineering.
5. The screening wall will not be allowed within the utility easement or within a
reasonable distance from the water line.
6. No trees or structures are allowed over the water line easement.
7. Detail sight visibility at the intersection of East Belt Line Road and Kyra Court.
8. Ensure sidewalks are constructed along Belt Line Road.
9. With railroad track removal on site, the tracks crossing Belt Line need removal also.
ITEM # 06
Page 2 of 3
10. Median opening along Belt Line must be constructed prior to first building permit
issued.
11. Tree removal permit required prior to start of construction.
12. Show tree mitigation totals on Plan.
13. Acreage shown on Landscape Plan and Sheets L1 and L2 incorrect.
14. Sheet Al (Floor Plans), 01 change to "two story plan".
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Recommend approval of the request
2. Recommend disapproval of the request
3. Recommend modification of the request
4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Site Plan (Sheet 01)
2. Tree Removal Plan/Details (Sheets L1, L2)
3. Landscape Plan (Sheet L3)
4. Typical Floor Plans (Sheet Al)
ITEM # 06
Page 3 of 3
y v
82 sFv �ow11`
r �17,658 o\
4
CUL -D -SAC ve
4 �73s
Ss24
D27
151
\<M \\
01 SITE PLAN `
SCALE 1-30'-0"
GENERAL NOTES Drawn By:
1. BESIDES UTILITY CONNECTIONS, NO CONSTRUCTION WILL BE ALLOWED Jason R. lease
WITHIN THE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN. PFepailon D,JU,
2, THE MANDATORY HOME OWNERS ASSOCIA J�v�ILL OWN AND MAINTAIN Novembe 11 2013
ALL COMMON AND OPEN SPACES —DE—SAC PARKING, SCREENING Revisions:
WALLS, MONUMENT SIGN D ALL COMMMON AREA LANDSCAPING SEPTEMBER 9 2014
WITHIN THE PER
NT.
Holes.
(1) 1 cu. V.0 ENN .
V
Ec�aic �avJsuirn.N --
� I
I O
\ .1a SF fj ,35 SF Fn
Om L. KE
RL
e .e ED A
A� R
a
C
I
s
s
sG' kvn
e VES q—q-2014
ge
5
e E K Ems, n5
uvtenaK
O W
o z YY� v
1 E
YOU T ^,
-3X, 1-22. BLOCK A LL)
7 ACRES U
ITUATED IN THE MCKINNEY & WILLIAMS SURVEY,
ABSTRACTN0. 1054, J.G. GARLOCK SURVEY, �\\�
ABSTRACT N0. 312 T/
CITY OF COPPELL, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS ,^
W
ARCHITECTDEVELOPER:
HAAS ROSES AT LOST CREEK LLC
JASON ROSE, ARCHITECT (214)454-7895 T., (972)534-1850 F.
SURVEYOR:
PIBURN &CARSON
DUSTIN DAVISON, S.I. T. .(214)328-3500 T., (214)328-3512 F. I J
ENGINEER:
GN
ORACLE ENGINEERING SHEET
MATT KOSTIAL, P.E. (214)321-1436 T,
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:
DFL GROUP, LLC 01
JOHN FAIN, ASLA FEED AP (817) 479-0730 T,
SITE DATA TABLE
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS
-
SUMMARIES
1. PER TABLE R302.1(1) OF THE 2012 IRC,
PROPOSED USE
PD (7H-2)
THE FOLLOWING APPLY 2012 -DWELLINGS WITHOUT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS;
DEE SEPARATION REQUIRES A 1 HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATED WALL, PROTECTED FROM
BOTH SIDES
a
MAXIMUM LOT COUNT
22 UNITS
1. 2' TO c5' SEPARATION REOUIRES ALL PROJECTIONS TO HAVE THEIR UNDERSIDE PROTECTED
BY
TOTAL SITE 184,129 SF SF 4.227 ACRES
A 1 HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATED COVERING.
�J
-
MINIMUM LOT SIZE
4,105 SF
Al. OPENINGS: UP': NO OPENINGS ALLOWED; 3'-5': MAXIMUM OF 25% OF WALL AREA
+CURRENTLY DOPTED CODE AT THE TIME OF PERMIT APPLICATION WILL APPLY,
AVERAGE LOT SIZE
5,619 SF
TR _
MINIMUM LOT DEPTH
75.94'
2 MINIMUM FRONT SETBACK OF 15,
MINIMUM LOT WIDTH
35'
3. MINIMUM GARAGE DOOR SETBACKS 22' FROM ROW LINE
-
AVERAGE LOT DEPTH
137'
4. NO PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION SHALL ENCOMPASS MORE THAN 259
AVERAGE LOT WIDTH
3659'
OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
LOT 1X AREA
3.586 SF
-
LOT 2X AREA
27,031 OF
5. NO PARKING ALONG STREET
LOT 3X AREA
1,884 SF
6. RESIDENCES SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF THREE (3) BEDROOMS.
TIT -2 LAND 184,129
SF SF 4.227 ACRES
GROSS DENSITY
5.2 (TH-2 I -d ore.)
7 CITY OF CADDELL PUBLIC SIDEWALKS TO BE 5' WID
MIN UNIT SIZE
11,500 SOFT -2 STORY
MIN UNIT
200 SOFT -1 STORYcl
GROSS BUSIZE
NG AREA
1 41. D R NQ
t
MAX. LOT COVERAGE
419
PNO
"G OVi5G9RKPGSCj
1 VOC, i
�o
MIN FRONT SETBACK
15'
D SAV VQ�
MIN REAR SETBACK
15'
ORMER`Y
RA11-96 pG 2
� o
MIN SIDE SETB
5'
CXPS
VOL'
e
75
M G. HEIGHT
35 (2012 IRC)
3
PARKING PER UNIT
2 GARAGE
.5 OFF-STREET
°`
2.5 PER UNIT
}
FI
-11111— P.EE�
.10
y v
82 sFv �ow11`
r �17,658 o\
4
CUL -D -SAC ve
4 �73s
Ss24
D27
151
\<M \\
01 SITE PLAN `
SCALE 1-30'-0"
GENERAL NOTES Drawn By:
1. BESIDES UTILITY CONNECTIONS, NO CONSTRUCTION WILL BE ALLOWED Jason R. lease
WITHIN THE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN. PFepailon D,JU,
2, THE MANDATORY HOME OWNERS ASSOCIA J�v�ILL OWN AND MAINTAIN Novembe 11 2013
ALL COMMON AND OPEN SPACES —DE—SAC PARKING, SCREENING Revisions:
WALLS, MONUMENT SIGN D ALL COMMMON AREA LANDSCAPING SEPTEMBER 9 2014
WITHIN THE PER
NT.
Holes.
(1) 1 cu. V.0 ENN .
V
Ec�aic �avJsuirn.N --
� I
I O
\ .1a SF fj ,35 SF Fn
Om L. KE
RL
e .e ED A
A� R
a
C
I
s
s
sG' kvn
e VES q—q-2014
ge
5
e E K Ems, n5
uvtenaK
O W
o z YY� v
1 E
YOU T ^,
-3X, 1-22. BLOCK A LL)
7 ACRES U
ITUATED IN THE MCKINNEY & WILLIAMS SURVEY,
ABSTRACTN0. 1054, J.G. GARLOCK SURVEY, �\\�
ABSTRACT N0. 312 T/
CITY OF COPPELL, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS ,^
W
ARCHITECTDEVELOPER:
HAAS ROSES AT LOST CREEK LLC
JASON ROSE, ARCHITECT (214)454-7895 T., (972)534-1850 F.
SURVEYOR:
PIBURN &CARSON
DUSTIN DAVISON, S.I. T. .(214)328-3500 T., (214)328-3512 F. I J
ENGINEER:
GN
ORACLE ENGINEERING SHEET
MATT KOSTIAL, P.E. (214)321-1436 T,
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:
DFL GROUP, LLC 01
JOHN FAIN, ASLA FEED AP (817) 479-0730 T,
N111" N
e... �.. ��.�I E �E`��
�M=
\ �oN °s s.".�< o� �E .Ea BEFORE
A�-a o-sss-ea.. e s YOU OIQ..
TEMPORARY IRRIGATION WILL BE REQUIRED TO ESTABLISH
\ TU RE IN ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHOUT A PERMANENT
IRRIGATION SYSTEM. SOD TURF IN G _ [
ALL DISTURBED AREAS AS IDENTIFIED ON GRADING AND
r EROSION CONTROL PLANS.
9 I �
PROJECTo,,.LOCATION MAP
V T 1 1 I I r�a
4 -AS
ae \ I
I
�S 1122
REFERENCE SHEET L2 FOR
DETAILS.
FL Well, LLC
T
�,�
Vo,, ALtiLIN-- —111111 11—TI-IN N11111 .1 IN IHI -NIIINI IH ,
> oT . ,= o=> ,T, ,
= oT T=� R�_ _D =��� _O, T oT T=X Tat Fo>=o OF
--1 FILE 111HOIT —HI -1 E—Ell 11111EN 1 -1 -IN
21
EAST BELT LINE ROAD
a
n=sE(fxem=ri
n KYRA COURT
==��,ANF=�=,�D,RFF==N�=auD DWTREE REMOVAL PLAN
Et—FFomED-U.. ro= 2.996 acres
NOTE: EXEMPT TREES NOT SHOWN, CITY OF COPPELL
DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS
=AVMDNT INTO ME FUND EE'NU
_/j, Ll
101
102
03
L04
105
106
107
108
109
110
'It
112
113
LR4
I is
.7
118
119
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
ills
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
112210
1123
112
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
11 '3
11x44
1135
1136
1137
TOTAL CALIPER INCHES ON SITE
TOTAL CALIPER INCHES (EXEMPT)
TOTAL PROTECTED TREES
TOTAL PROTECTED CALIPER INCHES REMOVED
TOTALPROTE D CALIPER INCHES PRESERVED
PERCENTAGE PROTECTECTREES PRESERVED
REQUIRED MITIGATION
TREE REPLACEMENT CREDITS -
24@4' CALIPER = 96"
12 @3'CALI PER=36�'
TOTAL INCHES PLANTED
69'� X $100
PAYMENT INTO TREE FUND
-NOTE: ONLY TREES IN COMMON
AREAS ARE INCLUDED AS
MITIGATION TREES.
394
193
201
201
0
TA
31'
12"
$6,900
' ORGM11, LLC OFaaQ
111-0— r—lo FILE r —E—D —EI' OF -N
N'
41U4 ftl�12111ND D—IN,
1011D 01 —111-111L
ETE'11'1,0N,
01T'1EN1"1E0'D1'FI �'E'1`= rL1E11'N'1'Er' "I
T I LE
ELEIT11-
DI—NI FILE 1111011 L-11— I E—Ell 11111EN 1E1`I1110_
KYRA COURT
TREE REMOVAL DETAILS
2.996 acres
CITY OF COPPELL
DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS
rESIN m— 11TE S11LE 111 111E I N�
-C, L2
TREE SURVEY
Canopy C ... py Canopy. Canopy Cuxe, %Uwi
CaL Species N S E W Cl— tron, Conditior Preserve
4 J,A Oak 3 3 3 3 Dom 70 Poor Exempt
Exempt
4 LiMe Oak 3 Exempt
3_ 3 Dom So Poo, E.-Popt
xcm t
5 Cedar Elm 5 5 5 Dom 70 Good Expar, t
I Exempt
5 ::Cedar Elm 4 4 4 4 Dom 90 Good Exempt
4 Ceder Elm 4 .3 4 4 Dom 70 Good Exempt
R_ no
8 Willow 12 25 10 12 , Dom 90 Goadl
12 Me,q.itP 20 8 2 25 Cullum 50 Poor Poor
U_
PaCan 10 8 12 12 C.Do. 50 Good
0
8 on
wn: �0#� �Co.�D -
Do
#14:: Mesquite ID IC 1 CoDm.#30� �Iql,�
6 Mulberry 12 1 3 3 6 SNIP 1 20 Fair
6 Mulberry 3 3 3 8 Sup 50 Good
ME
3 Pecan 10 6 8 19 Dom 60 Good
7 ::11,,Ib,,r, 9 4 6_ 3 CO Dom 50 Good Exempt
6 ::Hackberry 8 12 , 15 12 Dom 60 Good Exempt
9 4
9 A,h is 8 10 12 Dom 60 Good
1. I
1
E::Cedar
Amer. Elm 11 12 0 8 C. Dom 60 Poo, P—
it L'
15 Ash 20 14 20 10 m 50 Good
20 14
16 Hockborry is 15 30 22 Dom 80 Good
4 Elm 6 3 10 1 Dom ED to.., Ixe-ed,
14 mesquite 12 is 12 13 COom 50 Good
C' Do' 50
8 Harkberry, 9 1 8 8 7 C.Dem 50 Good Exempt
10 Ash do 10 8 9 C. Dom 50 Good
7
7 A 1 10 10 CoDom 50 Good
2-
4 A, 4 4 4 CE, Dom 70 Good
4 Ash 3 1 Exempt
k 4
4 E
4 Flackborry 6 5 7 6 CO Dom 50 Good Exempt
6,
0 8
8 Harkber 10 8 9 8 CoDom 5C Poo, Exempt
9 _Aackberry 10 8 2
1 _L_ C. 50 Goo Exempt
-
r6 Ii
5 Hackberry 6 8 7 1. Iman SO Good Exempt
6
C so
11 Hackberry 12 8 8 6 Co Dom 50 Fair
2 S so
JD.m
j12
7 Ash 10 9 8 8 C. Dom 50 Good
Good
l. E Good
Eu Go
8 Hackberry, 10 6 8 10 C. Dom 50 Good Exempt
ip
8 Flackbenry 1 9 4 6 8 C.D.m 50 Good Exempt
Good
"I -
5 Ash 8 1 8 1 8 8 Cc Dom 50 Good Exempt
Good
6 Cedar 8 8 8 8 C. Dom 60 Good
Good
JE.xempt
4 Cedar 6 6 5 6 CO Dom 60 Good Exempt
Good
50 Good Exempt
4 Ash 10 5 7 6 Co Dom .0,
4 Goo
Ash 9 9 11 10 Co Dam 50 Good
4 Ash 10 8 10 6 Co Dom 50 Good Exempt
7 Cedar 8 S 7 9 Co Dom 60 Good
Good
8 Hackbcory 1 11 8 9 9 CO Dan 50) Good Exempt
6 10 10 6 C. Dom 60 Good
-:Hackberry
6 1 Ash 12 10 13 10 CO Dom 50 Good
4 Cedar 6 1 5 4 Co Dom, 80 GoodExempt
9 Ash 12 10 10 12 C. Dom 1 50 Good
9 J.M!,sq..td _12 _10 12 10_ CO Dom _50 Good .... .. Exempt
6 MI 10 9 10 Co Dom 50 Good Exempt
14 Rk,kiary 12 12 12 12 Dom 50 Good
10 Am Elm 12 14 12 12 Dom 80 G-cl
4 Cedar 6 6 6 6 CO Dom 80 Good Exiannot
8 9 10 6 Cc Dom 60 Poor Exempt
4 h 9 8 9 8 C. Dom 60 Poo, Exempt
4 Ash 1 8 8 9 Co Dom 1 50 IG ad Exempt
Ash 1 8 9 9 Cc Dom 1 50 IGood Exempt
3 a d cyp 3 3 3 Dom 60 Poo, ExCrupt
3 d ryp 3 3 3 3 Dom 50 Good Exempt
3
I.
I.
I.
I.
I.
I.
L.
Ca
I.
I.
I.
I.
L.
10
I.
4
Ash
PLANTING NOTES:
PiaNT slzE. TYPE. ND COrvomCN suB�ECT TO APPRovaL GF owNERs REPRESENTATIVE_
- LLGNTRACTOR RESPONSIBLEE FOR EGAN STOALL PROTECT ACCEPTANCE_
V a. ALL CONTA ER GROWN PLANTS TO HAVE FULL NGOROUS ROOT SYSTEM. _MPLETELO ENCOMPASSING
CALL ONT NRs WELL RourvoeD AND FDL Y BR
\ Tore To PRovBE DWNEB 'U PRE D " GF HErcHT.
NT41N E CLOY
\ \\ \ S.
T. /PROTECT vlsBluTY TRIANGLE wrtH PwvT MATERIAL PER CITY sTArvonreos AT ALL Erv.RArvces To
V A C78\ Cerate e.
BE
FIPER PLArvTINc BEDS OUTLINED IN SCEs'. WHERE ',.Rues
NTIRE w u
\ \ 3"—Cal o CLI s RB T FT.
A A AcLoe eEs aF aLEITORDID cA oN aF oBTNLs DINT, Es ro ee uM EPHONE.R SO A SO
roti cosi Rs L uTLHAS. Ino u
\ 1 TE LE. ELECTRIC, as WATER AND sEWEe.LAN' D E Ta E REIEuREoo erL
CONTRACTOR AT NO 'H"NOT0 REMAIN CONTRACTOR 'HALL PRUNE ONL' ON APPeOvu of CT' c E
E" c TREES ARE
ARBORIST. S, B TO INCLUDE REMOVAL OF ALL SUCKER GROWTH; DEAD AND DISEASED BAND ALL AND a1 2n 36
LIMBS: VINES, BRIARS AND OTHER INVASIVE GROWTH. LIMBS INTERFERING WITH VISIBILITY, AND ALL
\ \ 1 1 1 1 \ \ l ERWORK BRPNCHTO MAKE ALL CUT' FLU'H TE REMNNING TIME. RETAIN NATURAL 'RAPE OF PUWTALL.
TAT
i RJ PROVIDED ASO4 COURTESY SAND NOTRENTENDEDEFOR BID PURPOSES. CONTRACTOR TO
\ 1 1 1PAGE' PRIOR TO PRICING,
1 I l (T Q vl � � � 1 EDGING BETWEEN LAWN AND PLANTING BEDS REFER To SPECIFICATIONS FILE ALL CORNERS
l 4
\ 1 II I 1 l j ; ET (oR EQUAL) PER MANUFACTURES INSTRUCTIONS ON ALL GROUNDCOVEREAHRUe PROF ECT, oO dATION MAP Ip
L M Ava LABIUTr CANNOT BE DETERMINED. IT Is THE
lEjl_ SEASONAL PRET
\ \ 1 1 1 1 l l l l l DURINBCTHE OFF—SEASaNE PURCHASE AND HOLD BIB PUNTS FOR 47EIA1 LL
aF cDNTRacTDR T ALL BIB PUNTS WHEN AVNIPBLE IN
NATO FATION OCCURS
\ ON IiKsG LLEFTIOII xo mn�x
prtulrvG LOT ISUNDs As sHDwN ON ENCLOSED DETaL SHEET. (BERMS MAv NOT BE sHDwN
\ \\ 1 I l I l l r�� i T LANG .w
CONTRACTOR SHALL 'TAKE TREE LoraTlorvs FOR AaPRovu ev owNER. 42J i T. PR OR o PwvTN . co \ D� u
\ J � Ca
4' Q vi
4„_C
I I I C7> (7 vl l (6) QUrIU C7> UICr
4 —Cal
4” —Cal REFERENCE SHEET L4 FOR
DETAILS.
Decors osed Granite Trail
r r — �� l (3) Ulcr
4" —Cal
V A V C2> u
Q
ECI
Cal
LOT 2 � O YFL 61' p, moi ' e�
cal a�,a II
—Cal A A V� A A \ 4 l
HC
FSTANT
RE A A V A V AA A V A — _
V A\ \V_So' Ber nulla oRH
E�RFPNERE F"
—
\
r l "Sod 'Up5—Gal alncl Decors osed Grgnite Tra
Cl N d IF
0
I Cl6) Cecota a
PLANT LIST
Symbol anontity
Code
Scientific Nome
Common Nome
Planting Size
Comments
G
20
Quvi
Quercus virginiano
Southern live ook
4"—Col
B & B, 5mgle aGight trunk,
:1/1
4
Ulcr
Ulmus cross folio
SEA- elm
4" —Col
B & B, Single s16ghl trunk,
0
22
0u
Quercus mo hlenbergH
Chinquapin ook
4"—Col
B & B, Sngle aGight trunk,
®
16
Nadcgo
Na di,, dom li- 'Gulfstream'
am nA,di,D
3—Gal
2' OC
IS
14
pa'Al
BOp[HUI,A, in di- 'Clara'
Indian hawthorn, Clara
5—Gal
3' OG
0
34
C,cat,
Cerci, A,.d ens i, 'T,x,nsis'
Texas r,dbud
3"—Co1
B & B, Single stalght trunk,
Cru
AINADHITIN FIT IT PF .iu.v irvrovf TEMPORARY IRRIGATION WILL BE REQUIRED TO ESTABLISH
-11 E-11TINN nrs.v sys M (scss) O TURF IN ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHOUT A PERMANENT
IRRIGATION SYSTEM. SOD TURF IN
BEFORE ALL DISTURBED AREAS AS IDENTIFIED ON GRADING AND
'� YOU DIG,.. EROSION CONTROL PLANS.
KYRA COURT
LANDSCAPE PLAN
2.996 acres
CITY OF CORRELL
RAI IAS COUNTY, TFXAS
SPAIN D111 HITE S11LE 1111 FARE A GO
DRE" , La.3 A 1
- L3
ONE STORY ROOFLINE
AT REAR
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS
1, PER TABLE R302.1(1) OF THE 2012 IRC,
THE FOLLOWINGAPPLY 2012—DWELLINGS WITHOUT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS;
<5' SEPARATION REQUIRES A 1 HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATED WALL, PROTECTED FROM BOTH SIDES.
11. 2' TO c5' SEPARATION REQUIRES ALL PROJECTIONS TO HAVE THEIR UNDERSIDE PROTECTED BY
A 1HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATED COVERING.
li 1. OPENINGS c3': NO OPENINGS ALLOWED; 3'-5': MAXIMUM OF 25% OF WALL AREA
+CURRENTLY ADOPTED CODE AT THE TIME OF PERMIT APPLICATION WILL APPLY.
2, MINIMUM FRONT SETBACK OF 15.
3, MINIMUM GARAGE DOOR SETBACKS 22' FROM ROW LINE ..E
5 5�
4, NO PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION SHALL ENCOMPASS MORE AN 4�
OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT,
5. NO PARKING ALONG STREET
6. RESIDENCES SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF THREE (3) BEDROOMS,
*I
02 ONE STORY PLAN
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
1oT -F)
CORRELL
TEXAS
E AL IN
rvoa111AKE 3
DALLAS
TEXAS
01 SITE PLAN
C 9
Drawn By:
Jason R Rase
Prepatlon Date:
IR 15 2013
Revision
Seolembe 9 2014
Notes.
A� nun
S 1
x
rI)
.,J
G �
�EREO qR�
5 �W ARWT
W
S
83d1 }P
p 9-9-2014
s
LLJ
CC
W �
v� F^
O v
CCS LTJ
S
cC
J
SHEET
Al
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
Kyra (Canterbury) Court, Preliminary Plat
P&Z HEARING DATE: September 18, 2014
C.C. HEARING DATE: October 14, 2014
STAFF REP.: Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning
LOCATION: North side of Belt Line Road, 1,700 feet west of Moore Road
SIZE OF AREA: 4.23 acres of property
CURRENT ZONING: LI (Light Industrial) & PD-265-TH-I (Planned Development -265 -Townhouse -1)
REQUEST: A preliminary plat to revise the approved preliminary plat to incorporate an
additional 1.58 acres of property and to increase the number of townhomes from
15 to 22 and one additional common area, resulting in a total of three common
areas.
APPLICANT:
Owner
Texas Utilities Elec. Co.
P. O. Box 219071
Dallas, TX, 75221-9071
No Phone given
Fax: No Fax given
Email: No email provided
Prospective Purchaser
J. Rose Architects/Planners
2120 Cosmos Way
Argyle, TX. 76226
(214) 454-7895
Fax: (972) 534-1850
email: jason(a(a�jrosearchitect.com
HISTORY: In March of this year this applicant rezoned an adjacent piece of property to PD
residential for 15 narrow -lot single-family structures. In conjunction with that
rezoning a preliminary plat was submitted reflecting the 15 -lot subdivision with
two common area parcels. With potential purchase of this land, the applicant
wishes to rescind the existing plat and submit a revised preliminary plat reflecting
22 residential lots with three common areas.
HISTORIC COMMENT: We have found nothing of historic significance attached to this property.
ITEM # 07
Page I of 2
TRANSPORTATION: Beltline road is a P6D, four -lane, concreter, divided highway built to standard within
a 110 -foot right-of-way which can be expanded to three travel lanes in each
direction. This section of Beltline Road is in the city of Dallas.
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North: single family residences; Planned Development 104 -SF -9
South: vacant property within the city of Dallas
East: vacant land; "A", Agriculture
West: industrial warehouse; "Lr,, Light Industrial
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Coppell 2030, A Comprehensive Master Plan, shows this property as appropriate
for Urban Residential neighborhood.
DISCUSSION: This is a companion piece to the request to rezone this property to PD residential.
The applicant wishes to add seven single-family lots and one common area lot to
a 15 -lot subdivision which was approved in March. The proposed lots are the
same size, have the same setbacks and coverage as the approved plan. There are
no outstanding issues that would preclude us from supporting this request.
Therefore, staff can recommend approval of this application with a number of
conditions. Several of these conditions were approved with the earlier March
case, and although the applicant is aware of them, they need to be restated here
for clarity of development requirements. They are listed in the
RECOMMENDATION comments stated below.
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
Staff is recommending APPROVAL of this request with the following conditions:
1. This is a Preliminary Plat document, not a Final Plat document
2. There will be additional comments during detailed Engineering plan review.
3. All utility easements shall remain clear of structures and trees.
4. Contain sidewalk within Lot 1X. Note that it enters Lot 1.
5. Place note on plat that all garages will be set back from street row at least 22 feet.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Recommend approval of the request
2. Recommend disapproval of the request
3. Recommend modification of the request
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Plat document
ITEM # 07
Page 2 of 2
VICINITY MAP
o +D ao im1
SCALE: t = +D'
40'46'S6�
AL 430.17'
83'39'31" W
SURX2vOR'S CERTIFICATE CL=421.15'
"PRELIMINARY, THIS DOCUMENT SHALL
NOT BE RECORDED FOR ANY PURPOSE." i g op p
Ile s ,1,1 Sas s "N i
Dom
.1 DIL
—LEGEND—
p
NO
VRA CpUj
I Sl—
o c It, "
AL=571.45
CB=S 52'55'11" W
63y� CL=569.45' oxxERs aRnRaTE
603 I `` 6,. '✓� fid'"' /
STATE D,oil AS
ODAITI OF
4 211 11-11-1
a�
�9S reem R� z,%�aI°be�osi
e+V�11
CAR
2004028 Pdi 00141,
_ s°e 422E are„ o,e
17~111 °� T1 awe.
LFT 1 ° d r12
POINT OF BEGINNING
1111. vE oruE e w di ems �y
L019 22 1X�2%�R J . %OCX KIYRA ICO Rif a
r, 111, °a ,ero,aee ,°11I 1111, g 2, oeea aero,a�, o°IIa°
O. 111317 .ee,
mord wn�m deo,s N 11 a 111 W-1, Ea o d,>y .1121.15 reel,
xD CE
° o
An, publ11e
N. m°�me0a0Ce 0, =e,�Ce ,101�,ea 0, Om�aO,iv Oe,ro,mea ov mm almy m0 111,10aa v
f 19;.0., ,od r1,,,,1 m, ,d o.A.aT.
a�sm°ce or 1.raza reel m o o-°�,. °, °
TMM s
,,4174.11 ree, am ° o mrn oea,e s°1m szssll was,, r� ° dls,°ore o+1711.417 +ee,.
ee `~alai Ior'SE'o . �..1"" 134.171 1d,11'1'111
a,
nme 111 aa�aml�
_Aa 2114�ifN,Ci,v
FINAL PLAT
2G
KYRA COURT
-
r Ga:13reGOK IE,ELo,MENT 1LI,
Lots 1 - 22, 1M, 2x, & 3X, Mock 1
4227 ACRES 5VTUATIED IN THE
LG. CARE®CK SURVEY, ABSTRACT No. 312
ITITE IE
_INI aE oALiAs o
City of Coppell,
ee
Dollos County, Texas
Herein stated and as Ne act and dead ei said wmo°ny. e e=ecuted Ili,some in the _pId,
RockDrook
OWNER/DEVELOPER ENGINEER SURVEYOR
Oevelapment LLC ORACLE ENGINEERING 12801 NABS ENAEXP. EERS NC
CENTRAL SURE I—
or .11- title
Gi4EN antler. y ntl antl seal Ina V 2
No y otic in antl r or lanae
.
2500 Rockoraak d1 330 Eol,ra;: LN"
Lewi(21Ia, 1544117 89 5 6E L�II�2f 1J 32181136 05 CONOACT. GUSTN EGAVISON
EACs.
CONTACE. JASON ROSEMATT KOSIIAL
MAT S. 201ACON SHEET 1 Of 1
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
TEXT AMENDMENT — Section 12-33-1.8A
"SCREENING WALLS"
P&Z HEARING DATE: September 18, 2014
C.C. HEARING DATE: October 14, 2014
STAFF REP.: Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning
PURPOSE: To amend Article 33-1.8, Screening Walls by specifying that all new masonry
screening walls be constructed to a new minimum standard specification.
Existing masonry screening walls are exempt from this regulation when repairs or
replacement of sections is necessary.
DISCUSSION: This amendment to the Zoning Ordinance was precipitated by concerns expressed
by citizens and Homeowners Associations who have become alarmed at the cost
of repairing common area screening walls when they fail. The concern has been
with the type of wall being built here as thin wall construction. Basically this
amendment will require all new screen walls to be constructed of a minimum two
brick courses (as opposed to the existing one brick course) when developers
propose these walls to give their projects privacy, identity, security or for other
reasons. Historically, thin walls have a tendency to fail after a certain number of
years based upon quality of construction, type of material used, soil conditions, or
maintenance issues. We have observed walls that have required complete re -build
in as little as 6 years. By adopting this new regulation, the condition of failed
walls will be reduced and citizens will not have the obligation of picking up the
cost of these failures.
From a construction standpoint, a two course or solid stone wall will be a bit more
expensive than a thin wall. We have quotes from two local developers that
offered pricing on their walls. Specifically, the masonry thin wall at the Standard
Pacific project off 121 was $103 per lineal foot. That wall has a height of six feet.
The more substantial masonry wall constructed by Weekly at Lodge and Sandy
Lake is the type of stone wall we are referencing in this amendment. Its cost was
$145 per lineal foot and it is also six feet tall. A substitute for thin wall was the
screening the city constructed on the south side of Sandy Lake Road in the
Woodridge subdivision, just west of MacArthur in 2011-12. That six foot wall
cost in the neighborhood of $156 per lineal foot. That figure included engineering
the wall; irrigation retro -fit, tear down of the old wall, removal of the debris, and a
cast stone subdivision identification sign. In addition, we also received
information regarding the Red Hawk meandering wall along Denton Tap Road.
That wall is quoted as costing close to $300 per lineal foot. It should be pointed
out that the Red Hawk wall was an option that the developer elected to construct
to give his subdivision a different character than the majority of screening walls in
ITEM #8
Page I of 2
Coppell. A developer would still have that option if the new guidelines are
adopted.
What this whole proposal boils down to is who pays for construction/maintenance
of these walls. Does the developer pay at the outset of the development, or do the
owners of property have the responsibility of repairing walls that have a tendency
to fail because of the type wall constructed? In our mind, the developer should
construct a wall that will meet the test of time. We believe this revision to the
Zoning Ordinance will accomplish that objective.
Specifically we recommend that Section 33-1.8A be amended to add:
"See graphic drawings of typical screening wall construction at end of this
article"
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
Staff is recommending APPROVAL of this amendment to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance by adding
the wording specified above and the graphic examples included as an attachment to this report.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Recommend approval of the request
2. Recommend disapproval of the request
3. Recommend modification of the request
4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Additional wording to add to zoning text (in blue)
2. Graphic exhibit of proposed screening wall minimum construction diagram
A. Screening Wall Construction Types
B. Typical Screening Wall Details
ITEM #8
Page 2 of 2
Sec. 12-33-0. Purpose.
To encourage the most appropriate use of land and conserve and protect the privacy and value of
adjacent permitted uses, regulations are prescribed for the location and type of various screening devices
to be used when required in the various zoning districts or in this section in accordance with the following
standards.
(Ord. No. 91500-A-30)
Sec. 12-33-1. Location of required screening.
Where the side, rear, or service side of an apartment, or the side, rear, or service side of a non-
residential use is adjacent to a single-family or two-family residential district, a screening wall not
less than six feet in height shall be erected separating the use from the adjacent residential district.
In addition, a perimeter landscape area at least ten feet wide shall adjoin the screening wall. The
perimeter landscape area shall contain trees spaced no less than 40 feet apart and include such
landscaping as outlined in Table 1 of article 34. No screening is required adjacent to a street except
as required in paragraph 2. in this section. All screening walls shall conform to 12-33-1.8. All trees
and landscape areas shall comply with sections 12-34-1-6 and 12-34-1-7.
2. When the side, rear or service side of a non-residential or multi -family use is adjacent to a public
thoroughfare with greater than 60 feet of right-of-way screening six feet in height shall be provided.
All screening walls shall conform to 12-33-1.8.
3. In a non-residential district where parking space for motor vehicles is provided adjacent to or within
ten feet of a residential district, whether the district boundary lines are separated by a street or alley
or not, screening two feet in height shall be provided between the boundary of such parking areas
and the residential district. This requirement does not waive the requirements of paragraph 1,
however, providing screening as required in paragraph 1. may fulfill the requirements of this
paragraph.
4. In all districts where screening of loading areas facing a street is required, screening shall be
provided not less than six feet in height adjacent to the loading area at the property line. Said
screening shall be required parallel to all streets and located 30 feet from the street R.O.W./property
line except where such use was in existence at the date of adoption of this Ordinance. Screening
adjacent to a street shall conform to 12-33-1.8. Screening may be allowed 15 feet behind the front
property line provided that a landscape plan has been submitted and approved by the planning
commission that clearly indicates the screening wall location.
5. In all districts where screening of open storage is required such screening shall be required only for
those areas used for open storage. A six feet high screening wall shall be provided and maintained
parallel to the property line adjacent to the area to be screened. If the screening wall for open
storage is required along a street edge, the screening wall shall be located 30 feet from the street
R.O.W./property line and shall conform to 12-33-1.8. Screening may be allowed 15 feet behind the
front property line provided that a landscape plan has been submitted and approved by the planning
commission that clearly indicates the screening wall location.
6. Refuse storage areas for all uses other than single-family, duplex and townhome dwellings shall be
visually screened by a six-foot high solid masonry enclosure on all sides except the side used for
refuse pickup service, which shall have gates of solid screening material. These gates shall remain
closed at all times when not in active use.
7. Ground and wall mounted and roof -mounted mechanical and utility equipment.
(A) All ground and wall mounted mechanical and utility equipment including, but not limited to, air
conditioning units, generators, and transformers shall be visually screened by a solid screening
wall at a minimum height so as to provide visual screening of such equipment from adjacent
Page 1
properties and public rights-of-way. Installation of evergreen landscaping material, as deemed
acceptable to the director of planning, may be substituted in lieu of the screen wall, under
circumstances where the topography, zoning and use of such property would promote the
general health, safety, and welfare of the community.
(B) All roof -mounted utility and mechanical equipment including, but not limited to, fans, vents, air
conditioning units, cooling towers, and satellite dishes, shall be screened so as not to be visible
at ground level from the adjacent properties and/or public rights-of-way, that complies with fire
code requirements. In general, the screening of roof mounted utility and mechanical equipment
shall be provided by a parapet wall, unless otherwise permitted by the city council.
Overall screening height shall be the height of the highest element of roof -mounted
equipment.
The outside of the screening device, if independent of the building fagade, shall be painted
or otherwise finished in a color similar to the building fagade, trim, or roof surface,
whichever color is more effective in minimizing the visibility of the equipment and screen
from public rights-of-way and/or adjacent properties.
8. The city council may waive or modify, in exceptional cases, the requirements of this section. All
forms of screening shall conform to the requirements of the ordinances of the city governing the sight
distance for traffic safety and other city ordinances. The types of permissible screening are:
(A) A brick wall with a minimum height of six feet and a maximum height of eight feet shall be
located on the street right-of-way line. The color of the wall shall be limited to earth -tone colors,
(i.e. brown, tan, red, gray, etc.). The color of the wall shall be uniform and/or compatible on both
sides of a thoroughfare for the entire length of the thoroughfare between two intersecting
thoroughfares. When walls are built in sections, the colors shall be as closely similar as
possible, but shall, in no case, be incompatible. Plans and specifications for the wall shall be
approved by the city. Masonry columns shall be expressed at a minimum of ten feet and a
maximum of 30 feet on centers and should typically be taller than the remainder of the wall.
Brick detailing at the top of the wall shall produce a change in plane or texture. Developers are
encouraged to create offsets in the wall to provide visual variety. The wall shall be placed on an
appropriate structural concrete footing. See graphic drawings of Screening—Wall Construction
Type and Typical Screening Wall Details at end of this article.
Trees shall be planted in the landscaping strip between the curb and screening wall according
to standards set in article 34 for non-residential and multi -family lots. Landscaping, in the form
of trees and shrubs, shall be used to break up long continuous lengths of wall. In general, a
minimum of 15 percent of the wall elevation should be screened with vegetation. The developer
may, at his option, install planter beds adjacent to the wall. In such event, the developer shall
provide total maintenance for the beds until an owners association is in existence to provide
maintenance in accordance with article 34. The developer shall install automatic irrigation
bubblers or other means of irrigation approved by the city. Plant materials shall be selected from
the plant palette in the approved Coppell Streetscape Plan.
(B) Where appropriate, as long as the view beyond the fence is appropriately landscaped and is not
a view of the rear yards or fences of housing, a combination of brick and ironwork can be
utilized. The masonry portion shall be constructed according to the criteria described in the
previous paragraph (A). Landscaping and maintenance requirements are also identical except
that a landscaped area must be provided behind open ironwork to provide an appropriate view
beyond. These landscaped areas beyond shall also become the responsibility of an owners
association or individual property owner to provide proper maintenance.
(C) Where subdivisions are platted so that the side yards of single-family residential lots are
adjacent to a roadway that is identified as a primary or secondary image zone in the approved
city streetscape plan, the developer shall provide a screening wall to screen the rear portion of
the lots. The wall shall conform to criteria established in paragraphs A and B of this subsection.
Page 2
The length of wall shall be equal to one-half of the depth of the lot or to the fenced in rear
portion of the lot, whichever is greater.
(D) Where subdivisions are platted so that the side yards of single-family residential lots are
adjacent to a dedicated roadway and where a cul-de-sac approaches the paved roadway, but
does not intersect with it, the developer shall provide, at his sole expense, a living screen
composed of plants in the approved plant palette. Plants shall be a minimum of three feet in
height. Plant spacing shall vary, depending on the type of plants, as required by the city council;
however, suggested maximum spacings are 25 feet for trees and 12 feet for shrubs. A solid
living screen is not required. The living screen shall not be planted opposite the front yard of
residential lots which front on streets which intersect with the paved roadway. The developer
shall provide total maintenance for the living screen until adjacent lots are sold. At the end of the
maintenance period, all plants in the living screen shall be in a healthy and growing condition.
The living screen shall be planted between the sidewalk and the right-of-way line.
(E) At development and subdivision entry features, all walls and raised planter beds shall be of
brick or stone construction unless otherwise approved by the planning and zoning commission
and city council. The wall construction and landscaped requirements of paragraphs (A) and (B)
shall apply to development and subdivision entry features. In addition, the design of the entry
feature must conform to the visibility requirements of the subdivision and zoning ordinances.
Paving materials should be incorporated into the design of the pavement at entry features in a
manner compatible with that used at major or secondary intersections in the city.
(F) In the light industrial zoned district where the site is not adjacent to a residential zoned district or
a residential use screening walls shall be constructed of a masonry material and design that is
compatible with the adjacent building.
9. Where subdivisions are platted so that the rear yards of single-family, two-family, or townhouse
residential lots are adjacent to a dedicated roadway, or separated from a roadway by an alley or
service road, the developer shall provide, at his sole expense, screening that conforms to section 12-
33-1.8.
Page 3
BATTER EACH SIDE 1" COPING
FOR EVERY 2' IN HEIGHT
BUILDERS STONE 4" STONE VENEER
4" BLOCK—,,,,wpvvv D
FINISH FINISH
GRADE 12" BLOCK `T\/\\j\\jC//a GRADE
\/T\/j/\\/j�\/�\/jX\Y Xy Xy\ j CONCRETE FOOTING
\\;�\��\��y�/\\\���\Tye/\\X/\�i/\\//\\�//\�/\\�\\//\
���x
FROST
LINE
/i\\l/\\/i\\/i\\/i\\/i\\/i\\/i\\/\\!i\!i./i
STACKED STONE WALL BLOCK WALL WITH STONE VENEER
Screening Wall Construction Type
SCREENING WALL
PROPOSED DETAILS
CITY OF COPPELL BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT
0 1 2
1 INCH = 2 FT.
11Ao11 DIIIIImmIIIIIIaeITIOII IILDIIoirvsamialI o-aatad i, 0,13D
=,
T. WITH 6" HOOK
a EVERY 12" O.C.
COLUMN
AR PATTERN WITH
MR JOINTS 1/8'
(LLV)
ANGLE IRON
-R COURSE
DOTING 4-0
EACH WAY
:TE PIER,
5/2.2
X2' COLUMN AT THICKWALL
SCALE: 1/2" = 1
PL
_HEADER
-
3.0
COURSE
RUNNING BOND
GAUGE HOT GIPPED GALVANIZED
LADUR WIRE TO EXTEND
—SETBETWEEN
51DE OF®
COMPACTED AND MOISTURE
HORIZONTALLY, IN WALL PANELS ,
EACH BRICK COURSE.
LADUR WIRE AND N1 OTHER
t T��
Z .'
. . GALVANI t ANGLE IRON
CONDITIONED SUBGRADE
ii
is±iiiiiii'll�ii llwlu
TIT, 1111K B COURSE
HORIZONTALLY, IN WALL PANELS.
BETWEEN EACH BRICK COURSE.
GE 4
SO EP HOLES
3 4" EXPANSION
EAC PANEL-
LADDER WIRE AND ALL OTHER
ANGLE IRON.. BEA(LER 4" INTO
COLUMN EACH END (TYP.)
J NT, TYP.
4" CLEARANCE (TYP.)
18"� CONCRETE PIER,
W
R-. DET. 05/2.2
THICKWALL
ELEVATION
=,
T. WITH 6" HOOK
a EVERY 12" O.C.
COLUMN
AR PATTERN WITH
MR JOINTS 1/8'
(LLV)
ANGLE IRON
-R COURSE
DOTING 4-0
EACH WAY
:TE PIER,
5/2.2
X2' COLUMN AT THICKWALL
SCALE: 1/2" = 1
PL
3/8' THCKWALL COLUMN BEYOND
BRICK THINWALL PANEL WITH NO.S
GAUGE HOT GIPPED GALVANIZED
LADUR WIRE TO EXTEND
—SETBETWEEN
51DE OF®
COMPACTED AND MOISTURE
HORIZONTALLY, IN WALL PANELS ,
EACH BRICK COURSE.
LADUR WIRE AND N1 OTHER
WALL
Z .'
MA50NRY REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE
MANUFACTURED BY DUR–O–WAL
CONDITIONED SUBGRADE
Pu
F
AND MEET ASTM A— CLASS 2–H
REQUIREMENTS
BRICK SOLDIER GOUR5E
HORIZONTALLY, IN WALL PANELS.
BETWEEN EACH BRICK COURSE.
DRAINAGE WEEP HOLES
3 4" EXPANSION
GLV. 5IEEL
LADDER WIRE AND ALL OTHER
ANGLE IRON.. BEA(LER 4" INTO
COLUMN EACH END (TYP.)
J NT, TYP.
4" CLEARANCE (TYP.)
MASONRY REINFORCEMENT SHALL
BE MANUFACTURED BY
W
#3 BARS TO BE CENTERED IN 5'
SLABS
4" CONCRETE MOW STRIP (2)-p3
=,
T. WITH 6" HOOK
a EVERY 12" O.C.
COLUMN
AR PATTERN WITH
MR JOINTS 1/8'
(LLV)
ANGLE IRON
-R COURSE
DOTING 4-0
EACH WAY
:TE PIER,
5/2.2
X2' COLUMN AT THICKWALL
SCALE: 1/2" = 1
WITH ff3 ® 12" O.C. (C.N.0)
10' O.C. MA%IMUM—
THICKWALL SECTION CONCRETE PIER SECTION PLAN
SCALE: t/2" - 1'-D' SECTION SCALE: 112 - t' -O"
Typical Screening Wall Details
-./• BRICK SOLDIER COURSE WITH
ALTERNATING DEPTH 1 1/4"
I
BRICK RUNNING BOND WITH
,�.�BRICK TES AS NEEDED
4 65 VERTICAL WITH 6"
I' HOOK IN PIER CAP
). HLL COLUMN SORT WITH
3000 P51 CONCRETE
F' BRICK SOLDIER COURSE
4–J4 TIESEACH WAY
1•-1"rl'-4" PIER CAP
CONCRETE PIER,
rT',I REF: DET 05/2.2
4-@5 TOWELS 0 EACH
PIER (TYP)
THICKWALL COLUMN
SECTION SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"
]• VOID FU_ ED WITH
GROUT TTP.
4 EA. #5 REHAB WITH
03 GAUGE TES 18"
JOINT, TYP.
PL
GRADE
BR
OR CONC. SLAB
COMPACTED AND MOISTURE
09 GAUGE HOT TIPPET GALVANIZED
L.'
CONDITIONED SUBGRADE
LADDER WIRE TO EXTEND
PER SGILS ENGINEER
REQUIREMENTS
HORIZONTALLY, IN WALL PANELS.
BETWEEN EACH BRICK COURSE.
3 4" EXPANSION
LADDER WIRE AND ALL OTHER
J NT, TYP.
MASONRY REINFORCEMENT SHALL
BE MANUFACTURED BY
W
DOWEL, TYP.
DUR–O–WAL AND MEET (ASTM
A153 CLASS 2-8) REQUIREMENTS
b
rr
4" CONC. SLAB
PILASTER
b3�
d�
CONTINUOUS
UNDER THINWALL
18" CONCRETE PIER, TTP
1•_4•
BOND BREAKER (STYROFOAM, TTP)
S
4–,'S VERT. WITH
4" THICK CONCRETE SLAB
a
TIES ® 10" O.C.
PIER:
I.
RT. WTH
.�.
d3 TES ® 10. O.C.
WITH ff3 ® 12" O.C. (C.N.0)
10' O.C. MA%IMUM—
THICKWALL SECTION CONCRETE PIER SECTION PLAN
SCALE: t/2" - 1'-D' SECTION SCALE: 112 - t' -O"
Typical Screening Wall Details
-./• BRICK SOLDIER COURSE WITH
ALTERNATING DEPTH 1 1/4"
I
BRICK RUNNING BOND WITH
,�.�BRICK TES AS NEEDED
4 65 VERTICAL WITH 6"
I' HOOK IN PIER CAP
). HLL COLUMN SORT WITH
3000 P51 CONCRETE
F' BRICK SOLDIER COURSE
4–J4 TIESEACH WAY
1•-1"rl'-4" PIER CAP
CONCRETE PIER,
rT',I REF: DET 05/2.2
4-@5 TOWELS 0 EACH
PIER (TYP)
THICKWALL COLUMN
SECTION SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"
]• VOID FU_ ED WITH
GROUT TTP.
4 EA. #5 REHAB WITH
03 GAUGE TES 18"
JOINT, TYP.
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
TEXT AMENDMENT - CHAPTER 12, ARTICLE 35,
"ACCESSORY STRUCTURES REGULATIONS"
P&Z HEARING DATE: September 18, 2014
C.C. HEARING DATE: October 14, 2014
STAFF REP.: Marcie Diamond, Assistant Director of Planning
PURPOSE: To amend Article 34 -Accessory Structures Regulations, deleting the 80%
masonry requirements for accessory structures in non-residential districts and for
structures that are 150 square feet or larger in residential districts, unless they are
visible from a public street.
DISCUSSION: Currently, the 80% masonry regulation does not apply to accessory structures in
residential districts which are less than 150 square feet. However, the 80%
masonry requirement does apply to all residential accessory buildings which
exceed 150 square feet and all accessory buildings in non-residential zoned areas.
The current regulation, in some instances, imposes a financial hardship and does
not serve the public good when the structure is not visible from a public street.
Examples of this are accessory structures in a homeowner's back yard such as a
cabana or arbor, shade structures at day care centers and patios in industrial areas.
Specifically, the following amendment to the Zoning Ordinance is being
proposed:
ARTICLE 35. ACCESSORY STRUCTURES REGULATIONS
Sec. 12-35-1. Non-residential and multi -family residential uses.
With the exception of swimming pools and spas, each building and structure used
for or accessory to non-residential or multi -family residential purposes shall be
considered a principal building as defined in section 12-42-24 If the column
wall or support of the structure is not visible from around level from the abutting
public street then the 80% masonry requirement shall not apply. The regulations
detailed in 12-35-3 of this article shall govern the location of swimming pools and
spas accessory to non-residential and multi -family residential uses.
Sec. 12-35-2. Single-family and two-family residential uses
B. Accessory buildings that are 150 square feet in area, or more, shall observe the
following regulations:
ITEM # 9
Page I of 2
1. Maximum height - 12 feet.
2. Minimum setbacks:
(a) Rear:
i. Ten feet. Exception: When the accessory building is a garage
or carport with rear alley access, the rear setback shall be no
less than 20 feet.
ii. the same as the required front yard setback when the rear
property line is adjacent to a street.
(b) Side:
i. The same as the minimum setback required for the main
structure. Exception: When the accessory building is a garage
or carport with side alley access, the side setback on that side
shall be no less than 20 feet.
ii. Fifteen feet from aside property line that is adjacent to aside
street.
iii. Ten feet from the main structure on an adjacent property.
3. Materials: When the columns, walls or supports are visible from the --round
level of the abutting public street, then 80 percent of the exterior walls must be
masonry that closely resembles the masonry used in the main building. For
accessory structures 300 square feet in area or less, posts spaced at least six feet
apart and banisters and railings less than three feet in height shall not be
considered exterior walls and shall not be subject to masonry requirements.
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
Staff is recommending APPROVAL of the Text Amendment as described above.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Recommend approval of the request
2. Recommend disapproval of the request
3. Recommend modification of the request
4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date
ATTACHMENTS: None
ITEM - 9
Page 2 of 2