Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
BP 2015-04-16 PZ
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING & AGENDA PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION April 16, 2015 COMMISSIONERS: Edmund Haas — Chairman Glenn Portman — Vice Chairman Doug Robinson Ed Darling George Williford Sue Blankenship Vijay Sarma MEETING TIME AND PLACE: Pre -Session 6:00 p.m. 1St Floor Conference Room (Open to the Public) Regular Session 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers (Open to the Public) Notice is hereby given that the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Coppell, Texas will meet in pre -session at 6:00 p.m. and in regular session at 6:30 p.m. on Thursday, April 16, 2015, to be held at City of Coppell Town Center, Council Chambers located at 255 Parkway Boulevard, Coppell, Texas. As authorized by Section 551.071(2) of the Texas Government Code, this meeting may be convened into closed Executive Session for the purpose of seeking confidential legal advice from the City Attorney on any agenda item listed herein. The purpose of the meeting is to consider the following items: ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION PRE -SESSION: Open to the Public) 1. Briefing on the Agenda. REGULAR SESSION: (Open to the Public) 2. Call to Order. 3. Consider approval of the minutes for March 19, 2015. 4. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD -263R2 -SF -9, The Preserve at Oak Grove, a zoning change request from PD -263R -SF -9 (Planned Development -263 Revised -Single Family -9) to PD -263R2 -SF -9 (Planned Development -263 Revision 2 -Single Family -9), to attach a revised tree preservation/mitigation plan on 3.56 acres of property zoned for nine (9) single-family lots to be located at the extension of Oak Grove Lane, at the request of Lynn Kadleck, Kadleck & Associates. STAFF REP.: Gary Sieb ag041615 Page 1 of 4 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION 5. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD -250R20 -H, Old Town Addition (Main St), PH III, a zoning change request from PD -250R8 -H (Planned Development -250 Revision 8 -Historic) to PD -250R20 -H (Planned Development -250 Revision 20 -Historic), to amend the Concept Plan and attach a Detail Site Plan to allow the development of 11 single-family lots fronting Hammond Street, one common area lot (access and utility easement) and to revise the development conditions on three retail lots fronting W. Main Street on approximately 2.1 acres of property located at the northeast corner of Hammond Street and Travis Street, at the request of Greg Yancey, Main Street Coppell, Ltd. STAFF REP.: Matt Steer 6. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of the Old Town Addition, Lots 1-11 & 1X, Block H, Replat, being a replat of Lots 5R -9R, Block D, into 11 residential lots, a common area lot and to adjust the lot size of Lot 5R on approximately 1.7 acres of property located at the northeast corner of Hammond Street and Travis Street, at the request of Greg Yancey, Main Street Coppell, Ltd. STAFF REP.: Matt Steer 7. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD -213R3 -H, Lost Creek PH II, a zoning change request from PD -213R2 -H (Planned Development -213 Revision 2 -Historic) to PD -213R3 -H (Planned Development -213 Revision 3 -Historic), to amend the Concept Plan and attach a Detail Site Plan to allow five (5) residential/retail units on 0.344 acres of property located at the south east corner of S. Coppell Road and Heath Lane at the request of Mark Haas, being represented by Jason Rose, J. Rose Architects. STAFF REP.: Gary Sieb 8. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD -258R -SF, Villas of Southwestern, a zoning change request from PD -258 -SF (Planned Development -258 -Single Family) to PD -258R -SF (Planned Development -258 Revised -Single Family), to amend the development regulations to allow two stucco homes, approval of a Detail Plan for Lot 2 (822 Mango Court) and approval of a Conceptual Plan for an additional stucco home within this subdivision, at the request of Ramana Juvvadi. STAFF REP.: Gary Sieb 9. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD -280-R, Verizon, a zoning change request from R (Retail) to PD -280-R (Planned Development -280 -Retail), to allow an 80 -foot telecommunication tower, antenna and facilities to be located approximately 300 feet south of Sandy Lake Road (1005 E. Sandy Lake Road), at the request of Kathy Zibilich, Griffin Harris PLLC. STAFF REP.: Gary Sieb 10. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. 5-1260-C, Urban Air, a zoning change request from C (Commercial) to 5-1260-C (Special Use Permit -1260 -Commercial), to allow a 28,342 -square - foot indoor commercial amusement center use at 110 W. Sandy Lake Road, Suite 160, at the ag041615 Page 2 of 4 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION request of Michael Browning, Urban Air Trampoline Park, being represented by Carlos Ruiz, NOVE Studios, LLC. STAFF REP.: Matt Steer 11. Consider approval of Andrew Brown Community Parks, Site Plan, site plan approval for park improvements, including pavilions, restrooms and concession buildings on property located at 234 E. Parkway Blvd. and 363 N. Denton Tap Road, at the request of Brad Reid, City of Coppell. STAFF REP.: Matt Steer 12. Update on Council action for planning agenda items on April 14, 2014: A. An Ordinance for Case No. PD -1081112-H, Coppell Life Safety Park, a zoning change from PD -108R8 -H (Planned Development -108 Revision 8 -Historic) to PD - 108R12 -H (Planned Development -108 Revision 12 -Historic), to allow the development of educational buildings and a Life Safety Park on 2.03 acres of property located at 820 S. Coppell Road. B. An Ordinance for Case No. PD -272R -LI, Prolo2is Park (d), Calleio, a zoning change from PD -272 -LI (Planned Development -272 -Light Industrial) to PD -272R -LI (Planned Development -272 Revised -Light Industrial), to amend the Concept Plan by reducing the parking requirement for warehouse use from one space per 1,000 square feet to one space per 2,500 square feet and to increase the number of proposed office/warehouse buildings from five (5) to six (6) and adjustments to building sizes and heights on approximately 110.2 acres of property located north of Sandy Lake Road, south of SH 121. C. An Ordinance for Case No. PD -278-R, Coppell Heights Addition, a zoning change from R (Retail) to PD -278-R (Planned Development -278 -Retail), to allow the subdivision of the existing property into two lots (one building per lot) and provide for shared parking, dumpsters, access and private utilities on 2.6 acres of property located south and east of the intersection of S. Belt Line Road and E. Belt Line Road. D. Approval of a six-month extension for Case No. S -1258 -LI, Fairfield Inn & Suites, to allow a 95 -room, four-story hotel located at the northeast corner of S.H. 121 and Northpoint Drive. E. Cozby Library & Community Commons, SPA, a site plan amendment for exterior renovations, building and parking lot expansions to the existing library facility on approximately two (2) acres of property located at 177 N. Heartz Road. F. Case No.S-1093R3-C, Taco Bell, a zoning change request from S -1093R2 -C (Special Use Permit -1093 Revision 2 -Commercial) to S -1093R3 -C (Special Use Permit -1093 Revision 3 -Commercial), to allow revised building elevations and attached signage for the existing restaurant with a drive-thru facility located at 115 N. Denton Tap Road. 13. Director's Comments. Consideration of a Council Resolution of April 14, 2015, requesting the Planning & Zoning Commission to evaluate possible changes to Mixed Use Districts in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and amendments to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. (Attachment) ADJOURNMENT ag041615 Page 3 of 4 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION CERTIFICATE I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Coppell, Texas on this 10th day of April, 2014 at Juanita A. Miles Planning Secretary PUBLIC NOTICE STATEMENT FOR ADA COMPLIANCE The City of Coppell acknowledges its responsibility to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Thus, in order to assist individuals with disabilities who require special services (i.e., sign interpretative services, alternative audio/visual devices, and amanuenses) for participation in or access to the City of Coppell sponsored public programs, services and/or meetings, the City requests that individuals make requests for these services forty-eight (48) hours ahead of the scheduled program, service and/or meeting. To make arrangements, contact Vivyon V. Bowman, ADA Coordinator or other designated officials at (972) 462-0022, or (TDD 1 -800 -RELAY, TX, 1-800-735- 2989). ag041615 Page 4 of 4 T X E C 1 T Y O F COPPELL o MEMORANDUM To: Mayor & City Council From: Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning Date: April 14, 2015 Reference: Resolution of the City Council requesting the Planning & Zoning Commission to consider possible alternatives to the Mixed Use Districts in the Zoning Ordinance and changes to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. 2030: Business Prosperity, Special Place to Live Introduction: This resolution is the outgrowth of a City Council discussion conducted on March 31, 2015, directing staff and Planning Commission to reanalyze the Mixed Use District provisions of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and evaluate the possibility of changing the Comprehensive Land Use Plan relative to these districts. Analysis: Staff is in process of requesting the Planning Commission to reanalyze the provision of MXD-1 (Mixed Use Neighborhood Center) and MXD-2 (Mixed Use Community Center), to determine a change or revision to these two zoning districts currently in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. Further, the Commission will consider amendments or changes to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan as an outgrowth of their reanalysis of the Zoning Districts. Legal Review: The City Attorney prepared the resolution discussed above. Fiscal Impact: None Recommendation: Staff recommends approval. Attachments: Resolution 1 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, REQUESTING THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO CONSIDER A RECOMMENDATION REGARDING THE POSSIBLE REPEAL OF "MXD-1" AND MXD-2" ZONING DISTRICTS AS TEXT CHANGE AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL AND THE CODE OF ORIDINANCES; AND TO CONSIDER A CHANGE OR AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING PLAN TO REVISE AND/OR ELIMINATE MIXED USED NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER AND MIXED USE COMMUNITY CENTER FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN; PROVIDING PUBLIC NOTICE AND HEARING; PROVIDING THE NOTICE AND HEARING TO CONSIDER SUCH AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has adopted the 2030 Comprehensive Land Use Plan by ordinance and conformance with state law; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted zoning use regulations establishing "MXD-1" and "MXD-2" zoning districts which contemplate mixed use developments within the corporate limits of the city; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that such zoning districts, as they currently exist, do not reflect the City's vision for mixed used development, if any, within the corporate limits of the City of Coppell; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined the Coppell 2030 Comprehensive Land Use Plan may not accurately reflect its vision concerning the identification of possible mixed use neighborhood center or mixed use community center; and WHEREAS, the City desires the Planning and Zoning Commission to give proper notice and conduct appropriate hearings to eliminate such uses from the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance until such time as the Council in its judgment has determined that such contemplated type of land use(s) meet the future growth vision of the City; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. The Planning and Zoning Commission is hereby requested to conduct, after appropriate notice and public hearings, a recommendation on whether or not to repeal the "MXD-1" IllLVA EVA 11131 zoning district and "MXD-2" zoning district and regulations thereunder as text change amendments to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and the Code of Ordinance of the City of Coppell; and, the Planning and Zoning Commission, pursuant to provisions of state law governing municipal comprehensive plan, conduct a public hearing considering a recommendation whether or not to amend the comprehensive plan revising or repealing mixed use neighborhood centers and/or community centers; and, amending the maps adopted in such ordinance plans or make other recommendations to the City Council to amend the respective ordinances. SECTION 2. That all ordinances and provisions of the Ordinances of the City of Coppell, Texas in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same are hereby, repealed, and all other provisions not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 3. That should any word, phrase, paragraph, section or portion of this ordinance, or of the Ordinances, as amended hereby, be held to be void or unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of said ordinance or of the Ordinances, as amended hereby, which shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. An offense committed before the effective date of this ordinance is governed by prior law and the provisions of the Ordinances, as amended, in effect when the offense was committed and the former law is continued in effect for this purpose. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage and publication of the caption as the law and charter in such cases provide. DULY PASSED and approved by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, on this the _ day of )2015. TM 71081 APPROVED: Karen Selbo Hunt, Mayor ATTEST: Christel Pettinos, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney (REH/mpm) IlLVA EVA D1:il MINUTES OF MARCH 19, 2015 The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Coppell met in Pre -session at 6:00 p.m. and in Regular session at 6:30 p.m. on March 19, 2015, in the Coppell Fire Station 93 Training Room, 133 Parkway Blvd., Coppell, Texas. The following Commissioners were present: COMMISSIONERS: Edmund Haas — Chairman Glenn Portman — Vice Chairman Doug Robinson Ed Darling Sue Blankenship Vijay Sarma Commissioner George Williford was absent. Also present were the Director of Planning, Gary Sieb; Assistant Director of Planning, Marcie Diamond; Senior Planner, Matt Steer; Assistant Director of Engineering, Michael Garza; Deputy Fire Chief, Tim Oates and Secretary, Juanita Miles. The purpose of the meeting is to consider the following items: ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION PRE -SESSION: (Open to the Public) 1. Briefing on the Agenda. The Planning Commission was briefed on each posted agenda item in the Workshop Session. No vote was taken on any item discussed. REGULAR SESSION: (Open to the Public) 2. Call to Order. Chairman Haas called the meeting to order. 3. Consider approval of the minutes for February 19, 2015. Vice Chairman Portman made a motion to approve the minutes for February 19, 2015, as written. Commissioner Darling seconded; motion carried (6-0), with Commissioners Sarma, Robinson, Haas, Portman, Darling and Blankenship voting in favor. None opposed. 4. Consider approval of the Cozbv Library & Community Commons, SPA, a site plan amendment for exterior renovations, building and parking lot expansions to the existing library facility on approximately two (2) acres of property located at 177 N. Heartz Road at the request of Vicki Chiavetta, being represented by Tony Blass, Hidell and Associates Architects. STAFF REP.: Gary Sieb min031915 Page 1 of 7 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION Presentation: Gary Sieb, Director of Planning, introduced this case to the Commission with exhibits, color board and elevations. He stated that staff is recommending approval with two conditions which he read into the record. Tones, Hidel and Associates Architects, 3033 Kellway Drive, Ste. 120, Carrollton, Texas, was present to represent this case, to address questions and stated agreement with staff's recommendation. Action: Vice Chair Portman made a motion to recommend approval of the Cozby Library & Community Commons, SPA, subject to the following conditions: 1. There will be additional comments during detailed engineering plan review. 2. A tree removal permit will be required prior to start of construction. Commissioner Robinson seconded; motion carried (6-0), with Commissioners, Sarma, Haas, Robinson, Portman, Darling and Blankenship voting in favor. None opposed. 5. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD -263R2 -SF -9, The Preserve at Oak Grove, a zoning change request from PD -263R -SF -9 (Planned Development -263 Revised -Single Family -9) to PD - 263R2 -SF -9 (Planned Development -263 Revision 2 -Single Family -9), to attach a revised tree preservation/mitigation plan on 3.56 acres of property zoned for nine (9) single-family lots to be located at the extension of Oak Grove Lane, at the request of Pat Atkins, TCCI Land Development, Inc. STAFF REP.: Gary Sieb Presentation: Gary Sieb, Director of Planning, introduced this case to the Commission with exhibits. He mentioned 18 notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of this request. One was returned in favor and one was returned in opposition. He stated that staff is recommending approval with no outstanding conditions. Lynn Kadleck, P.E., Kadleck & Associates, 2000 N. Central Expwy., Ste. 113, Plano, Texas, was present to represent this case, to address questions and stated agreement with staff's recommendation. Thomas Alford, Alford Media, 296 Freeport Pkwy., Coppell, Texas, addressed questions from the Commission concerning the trees involved for the tree preservation plan for the subject property. Ram Sunkavalli (Owner), Nine Oaks Realty, LLC, 2309 Sunflower Lane, Flower Mound, Texas, addressed Commission's concerns about the tree preservation agreement and HOA maintenance of common lot areas and the off-site tree preservation easement. Public Hearing: Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. The following person spoke: min031915 Page 2 of 7 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION Ahsan Karim, 540 Oak Grove Lane, Coppell, Texas, spoke in favor. Chairman Haas closed the public hearing. Action: After much discussion, Vice Chairman, Portman made a motion to hold Case No. PD -263R2 -SF - 9, The Preserve at Oak Grove, a zoning change request from PD -263R -SF -9 (Planned Development -263 Revised -Single Family -9) to PD -263R2 -SF -9 (Planned Development -263 Revision 2 -Single Family -9), under advisement until the April 16, 2015, Planning Commission meeting, to give the applicant time to revise the restrictive covenants of the HOA for the subdivision to include maintenance provisions for the off-site tree preservation easement. Chairman Haas seconded; motion carried (6-0), with Commissioners, Sarma, Haas, Robinson, Portman, Darling and Blankenship voting in favor. None opposed. 6. Consider approval of a six-month extension to Case No. S -1258 -LI, Fairfield Inn & Suites, to allow a 95 -room, four-story hotel to be located at the northeast corner of S.H. 121 and Northpoint Drive, at the request of Dilip Pranav, Acer Lodging, LLC. STAFF REP.: Marcie Diamond Presentation: Marcie Diamond, Assistant Director of Planning, introduced this case to the Commission with exhibits. She stated that staff is recommending approval. Dilip Pranav, Acer Lodging, LLC, 8530 Esters Blvd., Irving, Texas, was present to represent this case and to address questions. Action: Vice Chair Portman made a motion to recommend approval of a six-month extension to the requirement to secure a building permit for Case No. S -1258 -LI, Fairfield Inn & Suites. Commissioner Blankenship seconded; motion carried (6-0), with Commissioners, Sarma, Haas, Robinson, Portman, Darling and Blankenship voting in favor. None opposed. 7. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. S -1093R3 -C, Taco Bell, a zoning change request from S - 1093R2 -C (Special Use Permit -1093 Revision 2 -Commercial) to S -1093R3 -C (Special Use Permit -1093 Revision 3 -Commercial), to allow revised building elevations and attached signage for the existing restaurant with a drive-thru facility located at 115 N. Denton Tap Road, at the request of Taco Bell of America, being represented by Tammy Korte, ArcVision, Inc. STAFF REP.: Marcie Diamond Presentation: Marcie Diamond, Assistant Director of Planning introduced this case to the Commission with exhibits and a color board. She mentioned eight notices were mailed to property owners within 200 min031915 Page 3 of 7 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION feet of this request. None were returned in favor and none were returned in opposition. She stated that staff is recommending approval subject to conditions which she read into the record. Brandon Baguet, ARC Vision Inc., 1950 Craig Road, Ste. 300, St. Louis, Missouri, was present to represent this case, to address questions and stated agreement with staff's recommendation. Public Hearing: Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. No one spoke. Chairman Haas closed the public hearing. Action: Vice Chairman Portman made a motion to recommend approval of Case No. S -1093R3 -C, Taco Bell, a zoning change request from S -1093R2 -C (Special Use Permit -1093 Revision 2 -Commercial) to S -1093R3 -C (Special Use Permit -1093 Revision 3 -Commercial), subject to the following conditions: 1. Adding the building dimensions to the site plan. 2. Revising the labels on the Elevations to be north/south/east and west instead of front/ side and rear. 3. Update the masonry calculations. 4. Consider replacing existing monument sign current Sign Ordinance regulations with 40 square foot sign which complies with Commissioner Robinson seconded; motion carried (6-0), with Commissioners, Sarma, Haas, Robinson, Portman, Darling and Blankenship voting in favor. None opposed. 8. Consider approval of DCT Fellowship West, Site Plan, site plan approval for the development of an approximate 107,146 -square -foot office/warehouse building on 7.12 acres of property located at the northwest corner of Bethel Road and Creekview Drive at the request of Fellowship Church, being represented by Clayton Strolle, Pacheco Koch, LLC. STAFF REP.: Marcie Diamond Presentation: Marcie Diamond, Assistant Director of Planning, introduced this case to the Commission with exhibits and a color board. She stated that staff is recommending site plan approval subject to conditions which she read into the record. Clayton Strolle, P.E., Pacheco Koch, LLC, 8350 N. Central Expwy., Ste. 1000, Dallas, Texas, was present to represent this case, to address questions and stated agreement with staff's recommendation. Action: Vice Chair Portman made a motion for site plan approval of DCT Fellowship West, Site Plan, with the following conditions: 1. Additional comments will be generated at the time of Engineering review. 2. Tree removal permit is required prior to removal of any trees. min031915 Page 4 of 7 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION 3. Provision of a private easement document which states that the lift station and force main will be the Owner's responsibility. 4. Provide a copy of the 30' Permanent Gas Easement and verify it will not impact the development of the site. 5. Correct the number of future trailer parking spaces in the legend to 32, as indicated on the site plan. 6. Rectify the differences in the color elevations in relation to accent and window colors. 7. Correct the project name on the Elevation Sheets and Landscape Plan to "DCT Fellowship West". Commissioner Robinson seconded; motion carried (6-0), with Commissioners, Sarnia, Haas, Robinson, Portman, Darling and Blankenship voting in favor. None opposed. 9. Consider approval of the DCT Fellowship West Addition, Lot 1, Block 1, Minor Plat, to establish a building site and necessary easements for the development of an approximate 107,146 -square -foot office/warehouse building on 7.12 acres of property located at the northwest corner of Bethel Road and Creekview Drive, at the request of Fellowship Church, being represented by Clayton Strolle, Pacheco Koch, LLC. STAFF REP.: Marcie Diamond Presentation: Marcie Diamond, Assistant Director of Planning, introduced this companion case to the Commission with exhibits. She stated that staff is recommending approval subject to conditions which she read into the record. Clayton Strolle, P.E., Pacheco Koch, LLC, 8350 N. Central Expwy., Ste. 1000, Dallas, Texas, was present to represent this case, to address questions and stated agreement with staff's recommendation. Action: Vice Chair Portman made a motion to approve the DCT Fellowship West Addition, Lot 1, Block 1, Minor Plat, with the following conditions: 1. Additional comments will be generated at the time of detailed engineering review. 2. Revise "Variable Width Utility Easement" to include specific dimensions. 3. Add a note that the "Right -of -Way Agreement 30' ....." is for a gas transmission line and paving and landscaping are permitted within that easement, and provide a copy of that easement. 4. Remove the City Secretary's and Mayor's signature blocks and add the Planning and Zoning Commission's Secretary's signature block. Commissioner Robinson seconded; motion carried (6-0), with Commissioners, Sarnia, Haas, Robinson, Portman, Darling and Blankenship voting in favor. None opposed. 10. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD -2501120-H, Old Town Addition (Main St), PH III, a zoning change request from PD -250R8 -H (Planned Development -250 Revision 8 -Historic) to PD - 250R20 -H (Planned Development -250 Revision 20 -Historic), to amend the Concept Plan and attach a Detail Site Plan to allow the development of 11 single-family lots fronting Hammond min031915 Page 5 of 7 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION Street, one common area lot (access and utility easement) and to revise the development conditions on three retail lots fronting W. Main Street on approximately 2.1 acres of property located at the northeast corner of Hammond Street and Travis Street, at the request of Greg Yancey, Main Street Coppell, Ltd. STAFF REP.: Matt Steer Presentation: Matt Steer, Senior Planner, introduced this case to the Commission with exhibits. He mentioned eight notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of this request. None were returned in favor and none were returned in opposition. He stated that staff is recommending denial with reasons which he read into the record. Greg Yancey, Main Street Coppell, Ltd., 4656 N. O'Connor Road, Irving, Texas, presented a presentation, was present to represent this case, to address questions was not in agreement with staff's recommendation to deny. ****BREAK, 8:52 p.m.to 8:58 p.m. Tim Oates, Deputy Fire Chief/City of Coppell, 265 E. Parkway Blvd., Coppell, Texas, addressed Commission's concerns about the fire sprinkler system and the fire lanes. Public Hearing: Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. The following person spoke: Charles Cotten, Main Street Coppell, LTD., 4956 N. O'Connor Road, Irving, Texas, spoke in favor. Chairman Haas closed the public hearing. Action: After much discussion, Chairman Haas made a motion to recommend denial of Case No. PD - 250R20 -H, Old Town Addition (Main SO, PH III, a zoning change request from PD -250R8 -H (Planned Development -250 Revision 8 -Historic) to PD -250R20 -H (Planned Development -250 Revision 20 -Historic), per staff's recommendation. Commissioner Sarma seconded; motion fails (3-3), with Commissioners, Sarma, Haas, Robinson voting in favor. Commissioners Portman, Darling and Blankenship opposed. After more discussion and another failed vote, Chairman Haas made a motion to hold this case under advisement until the April 16, 2015, Commission meeting when all seven of the Commissioners are present to vote. 11. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of the Old Town Addition, Lots 1-11 & 1X, Block H, Replat, being a replat of Lots 5R -9R, Block D, into 11 residential lots, a common area lot and to adjust the lot size of Lot 511 on approximately 1.7 acres of property located at the northeast corner of Hammond Street and Travis Street, at the request of Greg Yancey, Main Street Coppell, Ltd. STAFF REP.: Matt Steer min031915 Page 6 of 7 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION Presentation: Matt Steer, Senior Planner asked the Planning Commission to deny the replat and the applicant will resubmit with the PD at the April 16, 2015, meeting. Action: Vice Chairman Portman made a motion to deny the Old Town Addition, Lots 1-11 & 1X, Block H, Replat, and resubmit with the PD at the April 16, 2015, Commission meeting. Chairman Haas seconded; motion carried (6-0), with Commissioners, Sarma, Haas, Robinson, Portman, Darling and Blankenship voting in favor. None opposed. 12. Director's Comments. There were no additional comments. ADJOURNMENT With nothing further to discuss, the meeting adjourned at approximately 9:46 p.m. Edmund Haas, Chairman Juanita A. Miles, Secretary min031915 Page 7 of 7 CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT CASE NO.: PD -263R2 -SF -9, The Preserve at Oak Grove P&Z HEARING DATE: March 19, 2015 (Continued to April 16, 2015) C.C. HEARING DATE: April 14, 2015 (now scheduled for the May 12, 2015 Council meeting) STAFF REP.: Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning LOCATION: The extension of Oak Grove Lane SIZE OF AREA: 3.56 acres of property CURRENT ZONING: PD -263R -SF -9 (Planned Development -263 Revised -Single Family -9) REQUEST: A zoning change request to PD -263R2 -SF -9 (Planned Development -263 Revision 2 -Single Family -9), to attach a revised tree preservation/mitigation plan on 3.56 acres of property zoned for nine (9) single-family lots. APPLICANT: Owner Applicant Nine Oaks Realty, LLC Kadleck and Associates Ram Dora Sunkavalli Lynn Kadleck 2309 Sunflower Lane 2000 N. Central Expressway Flower Mound, TX. 75028 Suite 113 (214) 989-6566 Plano, TX. 75074 Email: ram sunkavallig gmail. com (972) 881-0771 Email: l.kadleck2kadleckassociates.com HISTORY: This property was rezoned from SF -12 to Planned Development for nine single- family residences in May of 2014. At that time, a tree mitigation plan was submitted showing a number of trees being removed to accommodate residential building sites. In subsequent review of the plan, the owner of this property needs to revisit the mitigation plan to eliminate additional trees on the individual lots, hence, this application. HISTORIC COMMENT: When this property was initially considered for rezoning in 2014, there was a historic comment that stated there were seven homes on Oak Grove Lane (outside the area of this request) identified in the Historic Resource Survey prepared in 2009 for the Coppell Historic Society as being constructed in the Minimal Traditional style single -story, gable roof, lack of ornamentation, etc. They were identified as Lots 2, 5, 6, 10, 20, 21, and 26. They are not a part of this request. After supporting the nine - lot residential proposal last year, the Planning Commission authorized the calling of a public hearing to determine the appropriate zoning for the remainder of Oak Grove ITEM #04 Page I of 3 Lane including the lots specified above. The Commission's recommendation of residential Planned Development at the same density as that approved for the nine lots heard earlier was endorsed by the land owners and approved by Council in June of 2014. TRANSPORTATION: Oak Grove Lane is a 27 -foot wide, asphalt, substandard residential street with no curb, gutter, or sidewalk contained within a 60 -foot right-of-way. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North: single-family residential: PD -100 -SF -9, Planned Development for detached single-family uses South: non -conforming mobile home park; 2F-9, duplex zoning East: single-family residences; SF -7, single family detached uses West: office/warehouse; LI, Light Industrial uses COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Coppell 2030, A Comprehensive Master Plan, shows this land as appropriate for residential uses as an Urban Residential Neighborhood DISCUSSION: When this case was originally heard, neighborhood opposition was centered on the loss of a substantial numbers of trees. That concern was addressed by the developer in the form of a $47,000 mitigation fee required for zoning approval. After further engineering of this nine -lot residential project, and a more detailed analysis of the grading work that must be done to provide buildable sites for residential construction, additional trees must be removed from the site (Exhibit 10A). Specifically, this revised and more detailed analysis of additional tree removal required for grading and workable building footprints, reflects an additional $45,000 fee to address the added tree removal. Bottom line, tree mitigation fees are totaling over $90,000. Because of this, and the low lot count in this subdivision, the applicant has requested a modification to the approved Planned Development, hence this zoning request. The developer of this project has offered a rather innovation proposal to eliminate these expenses. Basically, he is proposing a tree preservation easement on an adjoining lot to more than compensate for the value of the trees he is removing. You will recall that this subdivision was carved out of a larger 11 -acre lot, all owned by Alford Media. A Tree Preservation Easement Agreement between Alford Media and the owner of this property conveys an 80 -foot width along the north boundary of the Alford site and a 50 -foot wide parcel along the east portion of the Alford site for permanent tree easement use (Exhibit IOC). Included in the Agreement is a legal description of the preservation area, a detailed tree survey of that area and a map outlining in graphic form the easement land. All said, the easement area contains far more trees than the requested additional tree removal on the residential lots. As stated in the attached engineer's letter of January 22, the tree mitigation requirement is 1,678 inches. The proposal before you here reflects a tree credit of 2003 caliper inches. That being the case, we can support the applicant's request. The Commission had several questions revolving around the means by which the 1.7 acre tree preservation area would be maintained by the Home Owners Association. We have reviewed the HOA document with our city attorney and ITEM #04 Page 2 of 3 are comfortable that the agreement provides for perpetual maintenance of the area. Being a part of the Homeowners Agreement document, each property owner will know the responsibility they have regarding the tree preservation area. As we recommended at the March public hearing, we continue to recommend approval of this request. A copy of the HOA document is attached for your review, titled "Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions". RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff is recommending APPROVAL of this request with no outstanding conditions. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Recommend approval of the request 2. Recommend disapproval of the request 3. Recommend modification of the request 4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date ATTACHMENTS: 1. Engineer's letter of January 22, 2015 2. Tree Easement Agreement (11 pages including exhibits) 3. Detailed Site Plan 4. Tree Survey Removal Plan (Sheet 10A) 5. Tree Inventory List (Sheet lOB) 6. Combined Tree Preservation Easement/Site Plan and Tree Survey Exhibits (Sheets IOC and 10D) 7. Copy of HOA Document titled "Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions" (pgs. 1-17) and "Nine Oaks Association Bylaws (pgs. 24-28) ITEM #04 Page 3 of 3 KADLECK & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING PLANNING SURVEYING 2000 N. CENTRAL EXPY., SUITE 113 PLANO, TEXAS 75074 972-881-0771/972-509-1861 (FAX) TBPE FIRM NO. F-6460/TBPLS REG. NO. 100555-00 January 22, 2015 Mr. Ram Sunkavalli 2309 Sunflower Lane Flower Mound, Texas 75028 Re: Tree Preservation Easement on Lot 1R, Block A, Alford Media Addition Replat, Coppell, . Texas Dear Ram: Attached is the Tree Preservation Easement drawing we prepared based on the information provided by Geoffry Steiner, the arborist with Steiner Saw Service, to show the tree inventory within the easement area. Per the Tree Survey/Mitigation Plan for what is now Lot 2R, Block A, to be replatted as Lots 1-9, Block A, lrby Addition Phase II (Nine Oaks, formerly called The Preserve at Oak Grove), there was a tree mitigation requirement of 1677.8 inches. The tree credit with this Tree Preservation Easement is 2003 inches. Please contact me with any questions. Si ce y, L. Kadleck K Bleck & Associates ELECTRONICALLY RECORDED 201500030192 02/05/2015 03:16:25 PM EASEMENT 1/13 NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: IF YOU ARE A NATURAL PERSON, YOU MAY REMOVE OR STRIKE ANY OR ALL OF THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION FROM ANY INSTRUMENT THAT TRANSFERS AN INTEREST IN REAL PROPERTY BEFORE IT IS FILED FOR RECORD IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS: YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OR YOUR DRIVER'S LICENSE NUMBER. TREE PRESERVATION EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS TREE PRESERVATION EASEMENT AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is made as of the1A day of December, 2014 (the "Effective Date"), by and between ALFORD COPPELL REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LLC, a Texas limited liability company ("Grantor"), and RAM DORA SLT KAVALLI, SUSHNIA CHERUKURU and SRI HARI KONERU (collectively, "Grantee"). RECITALS WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of certain real property situated in the City of Coppell, Dallas County, Texas, as more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto ("Grantor's Property '); WHEREAS, Grantee is the owner of certain real property situated in the City of Coppell, Dallas County, Texas, as more particularly described on Exhibit B attached hereto ("Grantee's Property"); and WHEREAS, in connection with the sale of Grantee's Property from Grantor to Grantee, Grantor has agreed. to permit Grantee access to that certain portion of Grantor's Property described on Exhibit C attached hereto (the "Easement Area") for the purpose of maintaining trees in the Easement Area. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 THE TREE PRESERVATION EASEMENT 1.1 Certain Definitions. In addition to terms defined elsewhere in this Agreement, the following definitions shall apply for purposes of this Agreement: (a) The term "Permitted Users" shall mean and be deemed to include the applicable Owner and their respective successors, assigns, heirs, grantees; ;mortgagees, tenants, subtenants, invitees, licensees, concessionaires, contractors and agents, and the officers, directors, partners, agents, employees, customers, visitors, contractors, licensees, and invitees of any of them. Tree Preservation Easement Agreement Page I (b) The term "Owner" or "Owners" means, with respect to Grantor's Property or Grantee's Property, the owner of record of any of Grantor's Property or Grantee's Property from time to time, whether one or more Persons, or any interest in fee simple, reversion, remainder or leasehold estate of 99 years or more. (c) The term "Person" shall mean any natural person and any corporation, partnership, limited liability company, trust, sole proprietorship, joint venture, governmental agency or authority or any other entity whatsoever. 1.2 Tree Preservation Easement. Subject to the terms hereof and for the consideration herein expressed, Grantor hereby grants and conveys to Grantee, for the benefit of Grantee and its Permitted Users, a perpetual, non-exclusive and appurtenant easement (the "Tree Preservation Easement") over, across and upon the Easement Area, for the purpose of maintaining trees in the Easement Area. Reference is made to the tree survey attached hereto as Exhibit D. The trees in the Easement Area shall be protected in compliance with the City of Coppell Code of Ordinances. The trees are being considered in the development of Grantee's Property and shall not be considered in any other developments. 1.3 No Interference. Owners shall not erect, install or place any building, improvement, fence, wall, curb or other barrier on, over, across or under the Easement Area that will impair, burden or interfere with the rights granted herein; provided, however, that this paragraph shall not prevent Grantor from making reasonable and necessary repairs permitted under this Agreement that may temporarily inhibit or preclude the use of the Tree Preservation Easement. ARTICLE 2 MISCELLANEOUS 2.1 Release and Continuing Obligations. If an Owner sells, transfers or assigns all of its interest in its entire portion of Grantor's Property or Grantee's Property, it shall be released from any future obligations hereunder with respect to such property arising after the effective date of such sale, transfer or assignment; provided, however, that all successors in title shall be bound by the rights and obligations hereof all of which are covenants running with the land. 2.2 GOVERNING LAW. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS APPLICABLE TO CONTRACTS TO BE PERFORMED ENTIRELY WITHIN SUCH STATE, INCLUDING ALL MEANS OF CONSTRUCTION, VALIDITY AND PERFORMANCE. EACH OWNER HEREBY IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF ANY STATE COURT SITTING IN OR WITH. JURISDICTION OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS, IN ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT AND HEREBY IRREVOCABLY AGREES THAT ALL CLAIMS IN RESPECT OF SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE HEARD AND DETERMINED IN A STATE COURT SITTING IN OR WITH JURISDICTION OF DALLAS Tree Preservation Easement Agreement Page 2 COUNTY, TEXAS. EACH OWNER AGREES THAT THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION 2.2 SHALL SURVIVE THE TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT. 2.3 Attorneys' Fees. If there is any legal action or proceeding to enforce or interpret any provision of this Agreement or to protect or establish any right or remedy of any parry, the unsuccessful party to such action or proceeding whether such action or proceeding is settled or prosecuted to final judgment, shall pay to the prevailing party as finally determined, all costs and expenses, including without limitation reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, incurred by such prevailing party in such action or proceeding, in enforcing such judgment, and in connection with any successful appeal from such judgment. 2.4 No Third Party Beneficiaries. Except as herein specifically provided, no rights, privileges or immunities conferred on the Owners by this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of any tenant, customer, employee, visitor or invitee of any Owner of any property, or any other third party; nor shall any tenant, customer, employee, visitor or invitee of any Owner of any property or any other third party be deemed to be a third party beneficiary of any of the provisions contained herein. 2.5 No Joint Venture. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed or construed to create the relationship of principal and agent or create any partnership, joint venture or other association between or among any of the Owners. 2.6 Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is declared invalid, such provision shall be severed from this Agreement and the remainder shall continue to be given full force and effect and, in lieu of such severable provision, there shall be added hereto a provision as similar thereto as shall be valid and enforceable. 2.7 Amendments. The provisions of this Agreement may be modified or amended, in whole or in part, only by declaration in writing, executed and acknowledged by all Owners, duly recorded in the real property records of Dallas County, Texas. Any amendments or modifications hereof, whenever made, shall be superior to any and all liens, to the same extent as this Agreement as if such amendment or modification had been executed concurrently herewith. 2.8 No Public Dedication. Nothing herein contained shall be deemed to be a gift or dedication of any portion of any parcel to the general public or for the general public or for any public purpose whatsoever, it being the intention of the Owners that this Agreement shall be strictly limited to the Owners of Grantor's Property and Grantee's Property and their Permitted Users. 2.9 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective successors and assigns. Any reference to an obligation or right of FC herein shall be deemed to include and may be exercised by FC's successors and assigns. 2.10 No Waiver. No waiver of any provision hereof shall be deemed to imply or constitute a further waiver thereof or any other provision set forth herein. Tree Preservation Easement Agreement Page 3 2.11 Non -Business Days. If any date herein set forth for the performance of any obligations by the parties should be on a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday, the compliance with such obligations shall be deemed acceptable on the next business day following such Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday. [SIGNATURE PAGES FOLLOW] Tree Preservation Easement Agreement Page 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is to be effective as of the Effective Date. GRANTOR: ALFORD COPPELL REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LLC, a Texas limited liability company By: Name: Tonna Alford Title: ;" -e zz STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DALLAS This instrument was acknowledged before me on this the J3 day of December, 2014, by Tom Alford, of Alford Coppell Real Estate Holdings, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, on behalf of said entily MTexm 1gotary Public in and for KRd�The State of Texas , W CMM. Tree Preservation Easement Agreement Signature Page GRANTEE: S UKURU SRI HART KONERU STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF DALLAS This instrument was acknowledged before me on this theA day of Dec _ r 14, by Ram Dora Sunkavalli. BRITrNEY SOLES Notary Public State of Texas Comm. Expires 06/24/' STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DALLAS Ty Public in and for State of Texas This instrument was acknowledged before me on this the-�3 Sushma Che BRITTNEY SOLES Notary Public State of Texas Comm. Expires 06/24/2097 otary Public i4nd for e State of Texas STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF FALL-" § day of Dece r, 2014, by d"A This instrument was acknowledged before me on this thea4 day of December, 2014, by Sri Hari Koneru. Notary Public in and fof CAIEV GWISANS The State of�pz" sOP 0 Tree Preservation Easement Agreement Signature Page EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Grantor's Proper Being Lot 1R, in Block 1, of Alford Media Addition Revised, being a replat of Lot 1, Block 1, Alford Media Addition, an Addition to the City of Coppell, Dallas County, Texas, according to the Replat thereof recorded in cc# 201400322625, Real Property Records, Dallas, County, Texas. 'free Preservation Easement Agreement Exhibit A EXMBIT B Legal Description of Grantee's Property Being Lot 2, in Block 1, of Alford Media Addition Revised, being a replat of Lot 1, Block 1, Alford Media Addition, an Addition to the City of Coppell, Dallas County, Texas, according to the Replat thereof recorded in cc4201400322625, Real Property Records, Dallas, County, Texas. The above referenced Lot 2 being subsequently described as follows upon recording of the replat described below: Being Lots I through 9, in Block 1, of the IRBY ADDITION PHASE II (The Preserve at Oak Grove), being a replat of Lot 2, Block 1, Alford Media Addition Revised, an Addition to the City of Coppell, Dallas County, Texas, according to the Replat thereof recorded in the Real Property Records, Dallas, County, Texas. Tree Preservation Easement Agreement Exhibit B W W'ZlIL s { J�4 v w N s. bb w N td W C O Y F Vl ^L ISI �I Q a W lrmll I I X08'% z /e l y fi Wpp�o 'Pi ,l£Zbl 3 ,OC.6Z.00 S p 000aJ WE �ng3�o M "02,62.00 N 3 a N o 'SAV , 5 Zp O9 M o n o w L� o / \ / 51 N^ w zF a of / m a/ e / r / g w — N > M cr) SII J I M� ¢ ���Ng F•A O W III w \ I mx 0 m o_ - -17 o- � I O / I I I / I — a S /I n E o — o w� J /lVm>i2jycj i2jod3321d r �x z w or �- zZ orc�U W ¢ n�'Pi Qoa>Q ioo�U �p nti mk otl�3�g e�?e �p �J w�aW,eY LL, Na Z (L -w o� Q - o U H Ism. ... mmm a�S� �SSMrvry rvrve�9�rvrvrv�A�mA��A�rv�SAAA� mrvo��o�oN oho s£EEEs E-EEE�E£ssss Es £E Ess£E -EEsEs _s£ E mo88mNa80000�^8888a �m88a�8�8���88888�8�88�888888 O m����umi��mmmmmmmmmhgeeeg�oe����meeeommmmmmmmmmmmmmm - U „,4,4,4„ min invn ,4 ,4 ti vvm ,4tirvtiti ti vm n - - n.4 mmm titi n ry min ti min mmm ,4ti tintiti ,4 a000000 Q - 3om 10 mmmmwm"".,mwmmmnmmmmnvmmmmmnmbvbmmmmmnv� nmm „ mnnmmbnbmmnmmmmnmmmnmmmmnromm e U No U N ......... mv�ry .............. rv��mry ry ^'^ .4 rvmm .4mne rvnry xEsYYYYxEExxssxYYEYx+yEYxxxs E Z"EYYE yExEEs 2022 022 2 200020 2022 020 0 0 00 02 0222 20,20,00 'o, 0"' 0 8o�ano888N�88a oo ooaaSB oo oao 0000aa 000aaoo8o�0�0�8008a8�o�o8�o8a8008aa8800�000aa U - .r mevm -- amrm NN .r NN N .r N .r .� m�omwemm rv.r m .4 NN ea .r .rN m NNN.r N rmaem Q � o8i 8i8�8�8nQ88m8Q88n88m8Q 8i8 m8Q888n888888i88Q�m8Q8n88Qu48nQ888mn888n�88Q mr 88nm�8�n88n88f a U S�mm m m mmmm mmmmmm m mm mmmmmm mmmm mmm m mm LL m m m mmmm mm m m m mm l Unrv.4mmmm.4 .4rvry .4vm n vm.4ry m.4 m.4 v.4 v.4v rv.4 .4vvry .4 .4 ium .4 .4 v.4 m.4rvry vnvry rvmrvv v.4 ,4 .� .4 .4n 0 mmmmmevaegaveevveevvaeevveevveevveeevveeaveevveeSgeeevveevaeevveeavveeaveevvee Filed and Recorded Official Public Records John F. Warren, County Clerk Dallas County, TEXAS 02/05/2015 03:16:25 PM $74.00 201500030192 Ll + .'pt"w z M omJ[res wn[re[ m[ rLoop vrnlry us LooAlco_ 4 e IT FlANAse FASFIJENT AND cRE'1t Aa5A. SCALE: 1"=40' tn �® LEGEND VICINITY MAP NO,HI-11 I'll SITE DATA TABLE EXISTING ZONING: SF -12 PROPOSEC ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 'SINGLE FAMILY" PROPOSED USE: SINGLE FAMILY p euNm OEKtOPM NF iNC.LP FA I Y' (SEE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS) NO. OF LOTS: 9 LOTS MINIMUM LOT AREA: 9000 SF MINIMUM LOT WIDTH (AT FRONT BLDG. UNE): 111 MINIMUM LOT DEPIH: 115 FEET MINIMUM DWELLING SIZE: 2.500 OF MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE: 35."6 AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 17,234 EF LOTS PER ACRE: 2.5 LOTS/AC, FRONT YARD: 25' MINIMUM SIDE YARD: 5' MINIMUM (AS NOTED) REAR YARD: 20' MINIMUM MAX. HEIGHT 2t/2 STORY/35 FEET A) Minimum 26 -foot front building line -116e p—PId for IT X,gI. family lots. B) The gerege door on Lots 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 rhlII be setback a mirlmum of twenty two feet (22] from Ne edge of the sitlewaIk r.Hbd the wl-I -sac. \ / / C) Momes to b1Misltle buil one aatbeave a omimdicasede o D)H eb It on elltssM1 llM1 m m' (2,660 square feet. \ \ rnt a¢ Do, / G)A�o olletl cuirinbmtayIt umtl en H,rI1t ora It lots which measures thirty Wtt(30')hom back to back, H) The individual owners of Lots 4 antl urs wall sus nto shownMonmBhee[ Lce of the llootl plaiNtlraanage / eas mart located on the lot they P. I) The e foot lel sonelbrlok entry [ea -1 (Lartlscape Pan) sM1 II be / tl by tM1e Homeownefs Associa[1on. 1 \\ J) A mnnamum6notl,th bIT, on boardwoodfenceshallbeconstructedalong the east sideof Lott and tot as \ Lot a6 vol D a T of an \ j5 tot to vol. D,rz.D o T ¢ / tot to mz ntl alsnng tM1e south. aof Lots 1 Through 4. The Inrfividuel lot owners sM1all be responsible for the / e of the fence losatetl t1 the lot IM1ey awn. / K) Nomperking will be allowetl wound the wMesac. loss, OOg1P9P _ j L) Pa fee e 9 tlnlhe tof$1285 Perlot. P211e6 �, - - —3.1 0UEEM NT gIL LEGAL DESCRIPTION e/a ala 9%37'4 E( t s 4 o.R 2 7.73 _ - �^ _ _ ]0 _ S 11 the of Iantl 2 5.3Q ' 2 35 70fiO' 50.90 ]00 a ract stuafed Joh, E Vest urvey, Abstract N. 1508 Cry f C . ppell Dallas' ) // County Texas antl bang a 11 of Lot 281ock 1 of Alford Meda Addro, R6' tl ddT to the Qty BEING t �' - of Coppell Dallas County Texas act Amg to the map thereof recorded' C ty CI ,Sh k Iu Hent Tl`' T Number 20140032 26 2 5 Offcal F.Wo Records of Dallas County, 1 exa3 old tract of land bang all /LOA of a called 3.581 acre V act conveyed to 90—Realty LLC by General Warranty Deed DXI—d'n BE 3 Instrument Number 2015000260]1 Offc al POblc Records of Dallas County Texas and berg mo I--t1541�t i r� ( 8 ri ( I paRCaladvdeaC/bedby metesandbeandaox nnowa Bio t 9 ,h tot BECINN NG of a set 518 rcb -mr Hch and mr a comer at the —t eaatedy—thaast coder M sa d \ E l 5I II \ ?FLACK Lot 2 sa d po 11 bang the southwest comer of Lot 13 of Irby Add ton as recorded 'n Volume 32 Sd Ird II-�5t5ETBgCK '1 II/110'`5W C.&y \�\ \� _- fM Lat is vo Mq�oaGtrtaas Page 71663Oaetl Reocords of Dodd to CARC en YTexasd—is LLC pby dbbd9o.,dedn Volume 2002109, "v II `rl �--_� p S ME� k, ( x f SSE R3A(1 Y'sErB K �� ZONED SF -12 THENCE N 89°17 30' w lith the south ne of sad Lot 2 and me north rL, of HhI sa tl 1s 69 acre A A T t t p b 9 t o U,bt e of 359.28 f f d D Inch -m, nd at the 1h t Omer of the 3a'o s'S•\ \\\\ Y �.._ -- -19.69 ct and the common c f G Lot 2 and Lot 1R M-1, 1 If tho XXN1 Alford Meda PRO,'S5E0 Addr R ed crnt'nu t, n ell d' t f 3]& —h00 feet to a set 5M h ran rod far a comer %�, A� �5^sE E. ENTRY 51n _ _rn ' told m - gme X-1—It comer of aad Lot 2: oPreDCT 41 . �s1 ]moo' 7Q.63' \ / 34 a GAK GROVE LANE THENCE,N200919'W, wth the common lne of sad Lot3lR atd2 ad'stance of 3]493 feet lou \ \ fl� � et W8 nth I. rod for a corner of the common nodh corner of sad Lots 1 R and 2 antl', the south a Q N, 5-40''E 'OAK GRDV PLANE t 1 Copps Road ne of Lot 13 Block A of Shatlow Pbd Estates as recorded 'H Volume 89188 Page 1904 Deed S9.g -�P;t 4 -:. T t -� P - 125E Records of Della C tYTxas `k :� \ 1 F _ E'r g Asphalt Paveme THENCE N89°3140 E rh th rthl f dL t2 and the south l'ne of sad Lo[13 pass ng a[ dstlook offth, Arid t f d /' h' d t the common south corner of s3tl Lot 13 and Lot R Y y`a \ —�>s.o 12 Block A of th d 0h d Wood EX.- t 'ng', all a tl'stanre of 497 78 foetto a so[ 6/8 f P\ X9 ( (f/ fAt,Lin `� \ r nrh ro, red roc a pD �t be ng me northeast corner of as d Lot z and n me wear I'll of ( /)I f1t �/ 1 �1 \ -p\-� Lot 14 of me sadlby Addition; KR O O F —ATL \ �_./ I'll / ) k& ETR\WAL� THENCE s 004225 Ewth the common fna of sad Lot 2 and Lot 14 p gat a doto—of 1, = 2` W U \. ( 1 14] 48 feet the southwest comer of sad Lot 14 and the north I'ne of Oak G L ne pooling at a - a 1 H` \ E LNT� �'E \ q d stance of 207 48 the south ne Oak Grove Lana and the nodhwest cora f d Lot 13 of the by c FI // / \\, lib\BET LAK W ZONED SF I2 I Addron oontnung nIII atlstarce of 360 71 to Me Po ,t of beg'nnng a,d torten ,g 1fi1106 s.alze.T. square feat ar3581 acres of Iantl. yN iV tot to t.2 1 DETAIL PLAN Lot 3/ 2 S4�»--o dRo.c.T 9 LOT SUBDIVISION It ar.a,° 5��I46°I DETAILED PD "SINGLE FAMILY° LOTS 1 THROUGH 9, BLOCK 1 T/ / 897,3 J000 � A !.a3 1 _ 1 _ � IRBY ADDITION PHASE II 1 '/A Z, pi N D'w 37aoo ase (NINE OAKS) N 1"� ZONED 2F-9 BEI A 3.561 ACRE TRACT IN TLE Ro 1e--. POINT OF JOHN F. VEST SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1508 N volt 2002moeitiea I, LIFE BEGINNING CITY OF COPPELL, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS , ] O.R. D.C.T.P9183 OWNER 90AKS REALTY LLC Do N 0 BOX 215 COPPELL TEXAS 75019 214-909-6566 I KADLECK a& ASSOCIA TES / \ (ail) ea 11— TZ e . - +sojirLs - .. ay,ea. a9 so 4, '1 i 4o . r ds — '94� 497.73' -- — — D�89`31 40 E _ 8 �,� 65 / 61 62 , / kgs �� i i 8 35 14z � � jae 9a 137 h44 j ,3a' 181 ]/ ' 92 / /� y d i° TY49 43 yas�a� 3 F, �- / - fie' P / /1,+ o' 27 11 �� %�`, 1 is I J5, X33 i� i 5 0 k� %� e i. ��79 8, zss �4—� 75z w �� Lot/ 2 � 1 � L Y2 / i o3— .355 � ` \ L i 151s *3 / za i y I e 1 2 > `, 356 ] I 1 ( / 1 41 Qt I� LS 358 ] 155 ) 29 Lt 16 1� 4. V� �T �,� X57 �s9, L'sa, , s I �uildm Pa '� r 1 2102 so A -,A s 1 91 I g a o s (Typlccl) k \ h". `co '� `, `, 16 1,32 VV , �� Lott o s Lot. 9 363%0 , I TTO 6\ O _ o _ , '� fc-......., _ 362 8 � \ I t9.: ;�zs 32 \ � �- \ ss 190 X'2 nYY`,�VS_73 �� 75� SEMACK �; l4 2112 47 II ,n oa.R. T o.20�� �i �, 1 �� �� h1t1 i 2� meq^ k x' ��� OAKS VE Di31VE T ENT L �s - -- yao>a s oRooT �N T 1 y\ / Fl o, L —1203 X02 R ��0a z �� A � - 7 �� �` /�� � 5' SCF[ ACK\, —�I X48 .371 qe 2y 5 V —`c 06 i j209 / (1 1) 2 �5 2 5a-� 3 3US/ \ _— — 14 \ 319 \ \8\ 31 3 348 lEnseuwT 3]425 312 I 21]/5 14.. TT 04v 30e 309 L� — k� 10g 68 FlO T boQa] 31oDv y 1� '.3 5 213% ) 4 T5 Lot -2 216 343�14 421 W / 25 fps 1 1 r]zsa�1a21 N 01 /k2 }7T t �a� T �/r 1 s 1. 1 Sao N 377 �� 3% 7 /4�1 /1(28 F8 ✓S\ /(oi2755� 1339 CrJ %r % 221 I 232 6 36 �✓� 26 ] 72 �i74 \\ \C` �} y �9� / 7 O 222 L� LA° in g23 1 1Q so h sa — 8 90 `L 036 / sm 3C \ 25�� ,.44 04 W67 age] /]s 28s : > e1 zes >/ _ /li Il�lii — 43 3] J � l26 l I ' / 3 241 01 '24z 22 228 1 .2]NT .4 9 / 266,� 283 - y; a4 29 J 29] oo� 2993 0 T�] , N89'bT30"W 373.00' , x VICINITY MAP LEGEND Tl IlIZI ". aLnx TREERROTEETION/TREE", n�A„oN TO AL r -S ERLSERVEOON SITE 1E aux ':n -- L � - IO TALI REFS REMOVEE ONSTE 16SRc I -1., T.111EII.S O/T.—TREII-1 araeavnTONCREO QR,11 21 vRESERVAT ON EA F 2SE. NETMTGATON ncM1es SEE SHEET IOC FOR TREE PRESERVATION CREDITS. f0A SEE SHEET 10B FOR TREE LIST 11 TREE SURVEY—REMOVAL PLAN 3.561 ACRE TRACT IRBY ADDITION PHASE II (NINE OAKS) JOHN F. VEST SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1508 CITY OF COPPELL,DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS EC KADLKR&RASSOCIATES (en.)�ea l TRaE R,9. xo. -yin/mals R, N. Ioosss oa aoo y,ssci tesc�R 9or t�ost� s�orvnafind sia.11�1 �0ary(ooa� 11b0 3d �o PON uu(W '�}i0 HNAnv 3S� 30N M3 3N o531VIDOSStl Yv ND3IQVN �L_ i�� jo ., sand 3ui ao3 -xaa3eaa3ea waasa3aa si inawnaoa snu SVX31 'A1Nf10O SVTVO 'll3ddOO d0 AiID 9091 'ON 1DVaS9V 'A3A8ns 1S3A 'd NHOf (S AVO 3NIN) II 3SVHd NOIlI4aV J.86 10"I 380V MT NVId IVAOVU8—A3AdnS 33EJi TREES TO R—IN SHALL BE PROTECTED xay Lxxe rea. DURING ALL PHA Of CONSTRUCTION. LEGEND • � AR ze9 D �xe9 wnN aEHso aamirvc aL,w SOME: 1'=50' o®� y VICINITY MAP \ / Lot 3s � \ \ mst Lot sa o.e B. D.e T, as I Lot ao , ^ , v �� "I-, xBD�T - - � I , 01 AI voi s5 orek a55. vq �t� _ N. .PRDC, T9-- DPLCT �-- -_ - - - N 891 E 882.82' - ET9.28erz `\ .'mxi .Fa N LET 0028'20' W x ,m '^as3 80.00' neo ..,.,s.�an APxp Q589'31'40' W.� 858.14' Y TREE PRESERVATION EASEMENT uLIT' —IT A 24 1 LT Ljj LULL' EAMEUENT T_ N, 2111113 ---------- — szE v G aD �. `= w. r ✓ ` \ VAL P, 71 Lo � � r -- ra. •, : I sa9.3oza�v 4.47 1 ELECTRIC EASExENT ; D .p ET IY N S 897730• E 13.72' bl sz w �I ARC C n� �,I 8° Ig oRo,PT 183 H ---- —d oaParss 11- - ---.�S 89'30'30' W 50.00 N. 2oaeomes9y A, D.R.I. ,I Ill % mee aaarecnon /raeR mincanox:\1 SEE SHEET 10D FOR TREE UST meessuavevRu ao OF TREES IN PRESERVATION EASEMENT TATAL-EreaeseaREE.NATetl a s 1e paaTseai �s,ne� TREE PRESERVATION EASEMENT AND TREE SURVEY COMBINED °'AL,aELs°"s"E 3.561 ACRE TRACT TEETAL—E—RE.CE°oxsTE III IRBY ADDITION PHASE II TOTALPRESEIRED/T.—TaEEsoxsTE= 12 Al (NINE OAKS) _ PRESERvnnox cREOIT-L,rws, oszs _ irec�, n ses JOHN F. VEST SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0. 1508 ca -. CITY OF COPPELL, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS PreESEavnnax EwsRmExT = aTo z,cm�al. mtl,es THS TIE DOCUMENONE T is IF NTEo KADLECK�& ASSOCIATES DECIEw UN ER THE arvN ,tiu a.E. 'G�zt�sa'oom x Er n7insnTiaN = 5. F - m^Gl:a1,11, 42258 E_ Mat. 2. 2015 Tevc y No - /TePLs 1,P1x _ 1-11-1. 81,SE8mEEE88-IEEE8E8888mmE8EEEEERE„E11EEE8-,E8EEE E 8 E p 8E oho Vry my>mrvr rvry mm $tirvrvn me mmrvm..rvrvammmm mnrvm minrry rm s EE£Ex ErEEE�EEYxx�Ex EE E-- E sEEYEx y.E x� m X88858 8S� 0888 8 8 8 D - v �mmvmi$�min u�v��n in v��n �n u�u�in in umi$$�o �o.... Dine... ... .......... . 0” - x Lj d z .,.,.o ' 0 N ¢^`¢ w�wz<a� W Nw��Z�a I�oao r 40 m z> 2 � OU uJo U nn.Y r.. mm�an nti .acm .. .m-i�.�ti ti vmnrvm rv,ti mom .N r ry min r e.nmme ..ti .�rv.-i .r n <0000 o� Q - oEeroEEmEmn�E�ci mm mm8n8meEn8mE8mmnEQeEEEE�$�nE$�om��r n��e creuciw �cr mmmEmr mmmn$c"im S+n z�� a U ar�E.l.l mrvrvry ...... aim.. m .. n ERSo ry .. ry m�,8�rvrv.. rv..en ry e ry ry rv^ ..mrvom ..mo�mrvrvry _ xEl- ----- EssssExxsx: _ E Z£xs£ xEx EEx aaaaaa u as a uu aaaaa u as a aaca a as as aaaa�aaaaaaaa u xu u o -a � uu �� 888 �SS88S88�88888�8m888888 �g8o8og8 888 88888 0 oaa6o�eaaaaaaaeaaaa>SSoB�����mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�,mmmmmmmmmm��mmmmmmm� 0888�8Ee�8EEE8Q8$�88EE88$8E3EEE�E88EE8EE8EEE8E�88$8$�$$E8��8EE�EE88R8$���$��$$;:8 a U 50 e�ry„NdSorv.. m o 9....... ..am m a e n88�n�S8�a88E..88S�ry ya°aaaaaaaadaaaaaaaaaaaanaaaaaacaaca acaaaaaaaaadaammaaaaaaaaaaaac aaaaa aaaaaa E �r8g X88 �8� �8�g8 o8$r oS8 � g888� 8888 a `o a mmmmmaaaaaaaaaaaae» aaaaa�aaa�aaa�a”�dJa"pddaoaeSSe5S5Saa�aaaaa<Qo�eaaeee�e DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS IRBY ADDITION PHASE II (NINE OAKS) APRIL 20, 2015 NORTHVILLE DEVELOPMENT LLC PO BOX 215 COPPELL, TX 75019 I I P a g e Table of Contents ARTICLEI - DEFINITIONS............................................................. ........................ ...........................1 ARTICLE II - GENERAL PROVISIONS...................................................................................6...................... 2 ARTICLE III - USE RESTRICTIONS.............................................................................................................. 2 ARTICLE IV - ASSOCIATION ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT............................................................ 4 ARTICLE V - ASSESSMENTS MAINTENANCE FUND AND ASSESSMENT LIENS ............................................. 7 ARTICLE VI - IMPROPER MAINTENANCE BY OWNER............................................................. I.................. 8 ARTICLE VII - ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL................................................................................................. 9 EXHIBIT A IRBY ADDITION PHASE II (NINE OAKS) Plat EXHIBIT B TREE PRESERVATION EASEMENT AGREEMENT EXHIBIT C BYLAWS EXHIBIT D ASSOCIATION FILLING 21 Page DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS For IRBY ADDITION PHASE II (NINE OAKS) THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF DALLAS § These Covenants made as of the Wednesday, April 1 st of, 2015, by Northville Development LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company. r1 "IMII•-17.1 Whereas, Developer desires to establish the Land as a single family development consisting of lots which are individually owned in fee simple; Whereas, Developer desires to establish certain covenants, easements, and restrictions for the mutual benefit and protection of the Owners; Now, therefore, Developer does hereby publish and declare that the following terms, provisions, covenants, conditions, easements, restrictions, reservations, uses, limitations, and obligations shall run with the Land, and shall be a burden and benefit to the Developer, the Owners and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns: ►_1ArLIMIZI P7491i!111POR►K Section 1.01 As used in these Covenants, the following terms shall have the meaning set forth below: (a) "Association" shall mean the Coppell Nine Oaks OWNERS ASSOCIATION, a Texas nonprofit corporation, created for the purposes and possessing the rights, powers, and authority set forth herein and in the Charter. (b) 'Board of Directors" shall mean the Board of Directors of the Association named in the Charter and their successors as duly elected and qualified from time to time. (c) 'Building" shall mean any vertical structure located on the Land. (d) "Bylaws" shall mean the Bylaws of the Association initially adopted by the Board of Directors, as duly amended from time to time. (e) "Charter" shall mean the Articles of Incorporation of the Association filed with the Secretary of State of Texas as duly amended from time to time. (t7 "Common Areas" or "common areas" shall mean those portions of the Land as described in or on the Plat that do not constitute lots, streets, roads or alleys. Accordingly, the Common Areas means those portions of the Land designated as such on the Plat, including any recreational centers or similar areas. The Common Areas also include: (i) any areas within the Property owned by the City, the Association or any other governmental entity but which are required to be maintained by the Association; (ii) any landscape, wall maintenance, pedestrian access or maintenance easements reflected on the Plat, required by the City or recorded by separate instrument, including, but not limited to, that certain Tree Preservation Easement Agreement by and between Alford Coppell Real Estate Holdings, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, and Ram Dora Sunkavalli, Sushma Cherukuru and Sri Hari Koneru, filed 02/05/2015, recorded in cc#201500030192, Official Public Records, Dallas County, Texas, attached hereto as Exhibit B (the "Tree Preservation Easement'); and (iii) those areas, if any, which are owned by an Owner, 31 Page but on which are located monuments, signs, fences, landscaping, berms, sidewalks, irrigation systems or other improvements that may be maintained by the City or by the Association. The Common Areas shall also include all improvements on or to any portion of any of the areas described in the preceding sentence. Declarant shall at all times have and retain the right, but not the obligation, to effect minor redesigns or reconfigurations of the Common Areas and to execute any open space declarations application to the Common Areas which may be permitted in order to reduce property taxes, and to take whatever steps as may be appropriate to lawfully avoid or minimize the imposition of federal and state ad valorem and/or income taxes. (g) "Covenants" shall mean the covenants, conditions, easements, charges, servitudes, liens, reservations, and assessments set forth herein. (h) 'Deed" shall mean a deed or other instrument conveying the fee simple title to a lot. (i) "Developer" shall mean Northville Development LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company, and any party to whom it shall expressly assign in writing its rights, powers, privileges, or prerogatives hereunder. Q) "First Lien Indebtedness" shall mean any indebtedness secured by a first and prior lien or encumbrance upon a Lot. (k) "First Mortgage" shall mean any bank, insurance company, savings and loan association, mortgage company, agency, or instrumentality of the United States Government or other institutional holder of First Lien Indebtedness. (1) "Land" shall mean that certain tract of land located in Dallas County, Texas, and more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof, together with all and singular the rights and appurtenances pertaining thereto. (m) "Lot" or "Lots" shall mean, individually or collectively, those certain lots designated as Block 1, Lots 1 through 9, IRBY ADDITION PHASE II an addition to the City of Coppell, Texas, according to the plat thereof recorded in the Map Records of Dallas County, Texas. Any portion of street right-of-way as designated on said plat (including any portion of said street right-of-way designated thereon) as a part of the Common Area of the Association) is not subject to voting, payment or other entitlement of the true residential "Lots" of the subdivisions, as defined in this paragraph. (n) "Owner" shall mean and refer to the person or persons, entity or entities, who own of record fee simple title to a Lot. The term "Owner" to exclude any person or persons, entity or entities, having an interest in a Lot merely as a security for the performance of an obligation and the term 'owner" to include Developer if Developer is a record owner of fee simple title to a Lot. "Plat" shall mean that certain Plat depicting the IRBY ADDITION PHASE II (NINE OAKS), an addition to the City of Coppell, Dallas County, Texas, as approved by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas for recording in the Map Records of Dallas County, Texas, as the same may be amended from time to time and further described on Exhibit A. (p) "Residence" shall mean that portion of a Building which is located wholly on a Lot and which is designed as a single-family dwelling unit (including that portion of any such Residence which is a garage for the parking of automobiles). 41 Page ARTICLE II - GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 2.01 The land shall be subject to the Covenants and said Covenants shall run with, be for the benefit of, and bind and burden the Land. Section 2.02 The Covenants shall be binding upon and for the benefit of each owner and his heirs, executors, administrators, trustees, personal representatives, successors, and assigns, whether or not so provided or otherwise mentioned in the Deed. ARTICLE III - USE RESTRICTIONS Section 3.01 All lots within the land are hereby restricted as follows: (a) All lots shall be used for single-family residential purposes only. No Building or structure shall be erected, altered, placed, or permitted to remain on any Lot other than a single-family dwelling and, if any, its customary and usual accessory structures (unless prohibited herein). No Building or structure intended for or adapted to business purposes shall be erected, placed, permitted, or maintained on such premises, or any part thereof, save and except those related to development, construction, and sales purposes of the Developer. This covenant shall be construed as prohibiting the engaging in or practice of any commerce, industry, business, trade, or profession on any lot. The restrictions on use herein contained shall be cumulative of, and in addition to, such restrictions on usage as may from time to time be applicable under and pursuant to the statutes, rules, regulations, and ordinances of the City of Coppell, Texas, or any other governmental authority having jurisdiction over any lot. (b) No Residence constructed in the NINE OAKS shall contain less than 2,000 square feet of fully enclosed floor area devoted to living purposes measured from exterior wall to exterior wall for any residence. The fully enclosed floor area devoted to living purposes shall be exclusive of porches, terraces, garages, and other areas not heated or air conditioned. In addition to the foregoing, all Residences shall have a garage of sufficient size for at least two automobiles. (c) No exterior television, radio, satellite disk, or other antenna of any type shall be placed, allowed, or maintained upon any Lot or Building without prior written approval and authorization of the Board of Directors, as hereinafter defined. The Board of Directors may consider permitting such if such receivers are screened from view from any street or road. (d) At least eighty percent (80%) of the exterior walls of the first floor of each Building on a Lot shall be of masonry construction exclusive of doors and windows. Each story above the first story of a Residence shall have masonry coverage consistent with the ordinances of the City of Coppell, Texas. All exterior fireplaces shall be of masonry construction. (e) No exterior storage of any items of any kind shall be permitted except with prior written approval and authorization of the Board of Directors. Any such storage as is approved and authorized shall be in areas attractively screened or concealed (subject to all required approvals as to architectural control) from view from neighboring property, pathways, and streets. This provision shall apply without limitation, to campers, trailers, boat trailers, travel trailers, boats, mobile homes, and un- mounted pickup camper units. Also without limitation, no automobile, truck, unregistered vehicle, or other vehicle, regardless of ownership, age, condition, or appearance shall remain on any lot in any manner which could be construed as being stored, neglected, abandoned, or otherwise not in frequent use, except pursuant to written approval and authorization of the Board of Directors. (f) No garbage or trash will be placed about the exterior of a Building, except in receptacles meeting the specifications of the City of Coppell, Texas, and the Board of Directors, and the placement, maintenance, and appearance of all such receptacles shall be subject to reasonable rules and regulations of the Board of Directors. All rubbish, trash, and garbage shall be regularly removed from each Lot and shall not be allowed to accumulate thereon. 5 1 P a g e (g) No machinery, fixtures, or equipment of any type, including without limitation, heating, air conditioning, or refrigeration equipment, and clotheslines shall be placed, allowed, or maintained upon the ground on any Lot, except with the prior written approval and authorization of the Board of Directors, and then only in areas attractively screened or concealed (subject to all required approvals as to architectural control) from the view of neighboring property, pathways, and streets; and no such machinery, fixtures, or equipment shall be placed, allowed, or maintained anywhere other than on the ground (such as on the roof) except if screened or concealed (subject to all required approvals as to architectural control) in such manner that the screening or concealment thereof appears to be part of the integrated architectural design of the building and does not have the appearance of a separate piece or pieces of machinery, fixtures, or equipment. (h) No gas, electric power, telephone, water, sewer, cable television, or other utility or service lines of any nature or kind shall be placed, allowed, or maintained upon or above the ground on any Lot, except along the perimeter boundary of the Land except to the extent, if any, underground placement thereof may be prohibited by law or would prevent the subject line from being functional. The foregoing shall not prohibit service pedestals and above -ground switch cabinets and transformers where required. (i) No open fires or burning shall be permitted on any Lot any time, and no incinerators, or like equipment shall be placed, allowed, or maintained upon any Lot. The foregoing shall not be deemed to include the use, in customary fashion, of outdoor residential barbecues or grills, however, such barbecues shall not include underground or pit barbecues on an ongoing basis. (j) Except with respect to signs and advertisements placed and maintained by the Developer prior to the conveyance by it of all of the Lots, no exterior signs or advertisements may be placed, allowed, or maintained on any Lot without prior written approval and authorization of the Board of Directors, except for (i) during the applicable initial construction and sales period, one professional sign (of not more than fifteen (15) square feet in size) per Lot may be utilized for advertising and sales purposes; (ii) thereafter, a dignified "for sale" sign (of not more than five (5) square feet in size) may be utilized by the Owner of the respective Lot for the applicable sale situation; (iii) mailboxes and residential name plates may be placed and maintained in conformity with such common specifications, including without limitations, reasonable restrictions, as to size, as may be adopted by the Board of Directors, and (iv) yard signs during election periods as permitted by the City of Coppell, (k) No on-going repairs of any detached machinery, equipment, or fixtures, including without limitation motor vehicles, shall be made upon any portion of any Lot within view of neighboring property, pathways, and streets, without prior written approval and authorization of the Board of Directors. (1) No oil exploration, drilling, development or refining operation, and no quarrying or mining operations of any kind, including oil wells, service, tanks, tunnels, or mineral excavations or shafts shall be permitted upon or under any Lot; and no derrick or other structure designed for use in boring for oil or natural gas shall be erected, maintained, or permitted on any Lot. (m) No Lot shall be maintained or utilized in such a manner as (in the discretionary judgment of the Board of Directors) to present an unsightly appearance, or as to unreasonably offend the morale of or as to constitute a nuisance or unreasonable annoyance to, or as to endanger the health of, other owners or residents of the Land, and no noxious or otherwise offensive condition or activity shall be allowed to exist or be conducted thereon. (n) No Lot shall be maintained or utilized in violation of the Covenants. (o) Motor vehicles owned or in the custody of any Owner can be parked only in the garage or garage apron located upon or pertaining to such owner's Lot, or in parking areas designated by the Board of Directors. No buses, vans, or trucks having a carrying capacity in excess of % tons or designed for commercial purposes shall be placed, allowed, or maintained on any Lot, except with prior written approval and authorization of the Board of Directors. 6 1 P a g e (p) The garage door on each lot shall be kept closed at all times except when such garage is being entered or exited, and all garages which face a public street shall have operational automatic garage door openers. (q) No Building or improvement (fences, etc.) shall be permitted to fall into disrepair, and any such Building shall at all times be kept in good condition and repair, adequately painted, or otherwise finished. (r) The Owners of any Lot shall have the right to lease or rent all, but not less than all, of such Lot with the Residence and appurtenances thereon. Any such lease or tenancy is and shall be subject to all of the provisions of this Declaration. (s) Front yard or publicly visible side yard retaining walls shall be of stone, brick, or other approved materials. Other materials such as railroad ties or boards are not permitted unless specifically approved by the Board of Directors. (t) Any fence or wall must be constructed of brick or high quality wood. No wooden lap fencing or shadow box fencing is permitted. No fence shall exceed eight feet (8') in height. ARTICLE IV - ASSOCIATION ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT Section 4.01 The Board of Directors of the Association shall consist of not less than three (3) no more than six (6) members, the exact number to be fixed in accordance with the provisions of the Bylaws. The initial Board of Directors shall consist of and Section 4.02 The Association shall have two classes of voting membership: (a) Class A: Class A members shall be all Owners with the exception of the Developer. Class A members shall be entitled to one (1) vote for each Lot which they own. When more than one person holds record title to a Lot, all such persons shall be members of the Association; however, the vote for such Lot shall be exercised as they among themselves determine, but in no event shall more than one vote be cast with respect to any such Lot. (b) Class B: The Class B member shall be the Developer. The Class B member shall have a total number of votes equal to votes per lot which he owns. However, on the later of (a) December 31, 2025, or when the Class B member only retains title to one remaining Lot, the Class B member shall at all times thereafter be entitled to only one (1) vote for every Lot owned by it. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, the Class B member shall be entitled to only one (1) vote for each Lot which it then or thereafter owns. Section 4.03 Each Owner of a Lot shall be a member of the Association, and such membership shall continue so long as such person or entity continues to be an Owner. The membership of any Owner in the Association shall be appurtenant to and may not be separated from record ownership of any Lot, and the transfer of any membership in the Association which is not made as a part of the transfer of a lot shall be null and void. Ownership of a Lot shall be the sole qualification of being a member of the Association. Each Owner shall comply with all rules and regulations as established by the Association from time to time. Land within the street right-of-way of the NINE OAKS street system that is designated as Common Area of the Association on the recorded plat of the subdivision, while not a true voting "Lot", shall be considered land within the Association and a part of the maintenance common area. Section 4.04 On behalf of the Association the Board of Directors shall have the duty to enforce the covenants and maintain all common areas on the land and shall have the right, power, and authority to do any act which is consistent with or required by the provisions of these Covenants or the Bylaws, whether the same be expressed or implied, included but not limited to the following: 71 Page (a) The power to levy and collect Assessments (of whatever nature) for the maintenance, repair, or replacement of the common areas existing on the land and for such other purposes as are herein provided for; (b) The power to keep accounting records with respect to all activities and operation of the Association, and hire management or legal services to provide for administration of the Association; (c) The power to contract with and employ others for maintenance and repair; (d) The power to purchase insurance covering potential liability for use of the common areas and for other risks and [(e)'-r"owerto adopt rules and regulations concerning the operation of the Association. If the Board of Directors shall fail or refuse to enforce the Covenants or fail to maintain the common T areas for an unreasonable period of time, after written request to do so, then any aggrieved Owner may enforce these Covenants on his own behalf by appropriate action, whether in law or in Equity or the City of Coppell, through its City equity or the City of Coppell, through its City Council, may enforce such covenants to the extent herein set forth. Section 4.05 For the purpose of these restrictions, Common Areas that are expected to be maintained by the Association include, but are not limited to: (a) Entry wall and entry landscaping of the NINE OAKS on Oak Grove Ln; (b) (Tree Preservation Easement (c) All fences and walls including retaining walls excluding individual lot fencing that are in �_ designated Common Areas on the recorded plat of the subdivision. Section 4.06 Of the common areas listed above, the following are "Common Areas of City Interest" as that term is used herein: (a) Tree Preservation Easement Section 4.07 Of the common areas listed below, the following are "Common Areas of Association Interest" as that term is used herein: 81 Page (a) I Private utility easements of Nine Oaks on the recorded plat of the subdivision (Exhibit A) (b) I Private drainage easements of Nine Oaks on the recorded plat of the subdivision at LOT lines areas granted to allow for lot to lot drainage ( Exhibit A) (c) JAII fences and walls including retaining walls that are on lot of the owner. Section 4.08 Should the Association or the Board of Directors fail or refuse to maintain such Common Areas of City Interest to City specifications for an unreasonable time, not to exceed ninety days after written request to do so, the City of Coppell, by and through a majority of its City Council members, shall have the same right, power and authority as is herein given to the Association and its Board of Directors to enforce these covenants and levy assessments necessary to maintain the Common Areas of City Interest listed in Section 4.06. It is understood that in such event, the City of Coppell, Texas, through its City Council, may elect to exercise the rights and powers of the Association or its Board of Directors, to the extent necessary to take any action required and levy any assessment that the association might have, either in the name of the Association, or otherwise, to cover the cost of maintenance of said Common Areas of City Interest. ARTICLE V - ASSESSMENTS MAINTENANCE FUND AND ASSESSMENT LIENS Section 5.01 The Association shall possess the right, power, authority, and obligation to establish an annual assessment sufficient in the judgment of the Board of Directors to pay when due all charges and expenses related to the operation of the Association. Such annual assessments so established shall be payable by the Owners on the first day of each calendar year. They shall be applied to the payment of charges for which the Association is responsible, including, without limitation, charges relating to maintenance and repair, public liability and other insurance coverage which is required or permitted to be maintained by the Association, taxes, assessments, and other governmental impositions not separately levied and assessed, utilities not separately assessed, professional services (such as accounting and legal), and such other costs and expenses as may reasonably related to the proper operation, management, and administration of the Association. No consent or approval of the Owners shall be required for the establishment of the annual assessments contemplated by this section. During initial sales and construction phases, Owners other than the original developer shall pay a pro rata assessment based upon the balance of the remaining calendar year, to be calculated starting the month following the date of purchase, with one twelfth (1/12) of the annual assessment calculated for each remaining month of the calendar year. This pro rata assessment is due and payable within 30 days from the date of purchase. Thereafter, the assessments are annual as per this section. Initial assessments are anticipated to be Thirty Dollars ($30) per lot per month which will be the basis for determining pro rata assessments on a calendar year basis. Section 5.02 Prior to the commencement of each calendar year, the Association, through the Board of Directors, shall prepare and deliver to each of the Owners a budget setting forth the anticipated expenses for the ensuing year. Such budget shall be in sufficient detail so as to inform each Owner of the nature and extent of the expenses anticipated to be incurred, and shall be accompanied by a statement setting forth each owner's annual pro rata share thereof and the date on which such annual assessment first 91 Page commences to be payable. The Board may provide that annual assessments shall be paid monthly, quarterly, semi-annually, or annually. No further communication shall be necessary to establish the amount of each owner's obligation regarding the annual assessment payable hereunder, and the failure of the Board of Directors to timely deliver the budget provided for herein shall in no event excuse or relieve an owner from the payment of the annual assessments contemplated hereby. Any budget prepared and delivered to the Owners as hereby contemplated may be amended as and to the extent reasonably necessary, and the amount of an Owner's annual assessment changed, to correspond therewith. Section 5.02(a). The Annual Assessments shall include reasonable amounts, as determined by the Board, collected as reserves for the future periodic maintenance, repair, and/or replacement of all or a portion of the Common Area. All amounts collected as reserves, whether pursuant to this Section or otherwise, shall be deposited by the Association in a separate bank account to be held in trust for the purposes for which they were collected and are to be segregated from and not commingled with any other funds of the Association. Assessments collected as reserves shall not be considered to be advance payments of regular Assessments. Section 5.03 In addition to the annual assessments contemplated hereunder, the Association shall possess the right, power, and authority to establish special assessments from time to time as may be necessary or appropriate in the judgment of the Board of Directors to pay (i) non-recurring expenses relating to the proper operation, management, and the administration of the Association, or (ii) non-recurring expenses relating to the proper maintenance, care, alteration, improvement, or reconstruction of specific Lots (including the Buildings thereon) in the manner hereinafter specified. Section 5.04 Each Owner shall be personally obligated to pay his pro rata share of all assessments established pursuant to these Covenants. Each Owner's pro rata share shall be equal to a percentage of the total amount of the assessments established pursuant to these Covenants determined by dividing one by the total number of Lots. Any unpaid assessments shall constitute the personal obligation of the Owner of such Lot at the time such assessment became due. No Owner shall be entitled to exempt himself from the liability of such Owner's obligation to pay such assessments by an abandonment of his Lot or by any other action whatsoever. Any such assessment not paid within thirty calendar days (30) days of the date due shall bear interest at the rate of (20%) per annum, and shall be recoverable by the Association, together with interest as aforesaid and all costs and expenses of collection of suit, including reasonable attorney's fees, in a court of competent jurisdiction sitting in Dallas County, Texas. It shall be the responsibility of the Board of Directors to collect any such delinquent assessments, the existence of which shall be made known by written notice delivered to the defaulting owner and such Owner's First Mortgagee. Notwithstanding the previous paragraph, until such time as Class B member votes transition to one vote per lot pursuant to Section 4.02(b), the Developer shall not be obligated to pay pro rata share assessments on lots owned by the Developer. Section 5.05 An Owner's pro rata share of all assessments established pursuant to these Covenants shall be secured by a lien upon such Owner's Lot and the Residence located thereon in favor of the Association, which lien shall be prior and superior to all of the liens and encumbrances upon such Lot and Residence, regardless of how created, evidenced, or perfected, other than the liens securing the payment of First Lien Indebtedness and the lien for unpaid taxes, assessments, and other governmental impositions. Such lien and encumbrance may be enforced by any means available at law or in equity, including, without limitation, a no judicial foreclosure sale of the Lot of a defaulting owner conducted in accordance with the provisions of V.T.C.A. Property Code Section 51.002 with the Board of Directors having the power to appoint a trustee to conduct such sale. The Association or any other Owner may be the purchaser at such foreclosure sale. Section 5.06 The Association shall promptly transmit to an Owner, such Owner's First Mortgagee, or any other interested party requesting such information, a statement setting forth the amount of any delinquent assessments payable by an owner, as well as the amount of the annual assessment payable at the time of such request. 101 Page ARTICLE VI - IMPROPER MAINTENANCE BY OWNER Section 6.01 In the event any Lot (including Building or Residence located thereon) is, in the judgment of the Board of Directors so maintained by its Owner as to not comply with these Covenants or so as to present a public or private nuisance or so as to substantially detract from the appearance or quality of the neighboring Lots or other areas of the Land which are substantially affected thereby or related thereto, the Association, through the Board of Directors, may, by resolution, make a finding to that effect specifying that the particular condition or conditions which exist, and pursuant thereto deliver notice thereof to the offending Owner that unless corrective action is taken within ten (10) days, the Association will cause such action to be taken at such owner's cost. If at the expiration of said ten (10) day period of time the requisite corrective action has not been taken, and unless a reasonable extension is approved by the Board of Directors the Board shall be authorized and empowered, on behalf of the Association, to cause such action to be taken. Such corrective action allows for access, and trespass may be necessary to complete the maintenance. The cost (the "Maintenance Cost") thereof shall be assessed against the Lot of the offending Owner and shall be secured by the Maintenance Lien as hereinafter provided. Written notice of such assessment shall be delivered to the offending Owner which notice shall specify the amount of such Maintenance Cost and shall demand payment thereof within thirty (30) days after the date of said notice. Section 6.02 The Board of Directors shall have the right at any time there are unpaid Maintenance Costs outstanding with respect to a Lot to file with the County Clerk of Dallas County, Texas, a statement describing such lot and declaring the amount of unpaid Maintenance costs relating thereto in which event, upon such filing, there shall be automatically imposed on such Lot a Lien (the "Maintenance Lien") in favor of the Association for the amount of such unpaid Maintenance Costs relating to any such lot. Upon a payment of the Maintenance Costs secured by such maintenance Lien by or on behalf of the Lot against which the Maintenance Lien is imposed, the Board of Directors shall file or record with the County Clerk of Dallas County, Texas, and appropriate release of such Maintenance Lien previously filed against the Lot thereof for such Maintenance Costs. The Maintenance Lien shall be for the sole benefit of the Association. Section 6.03 Each Owner, for himself, his heirs, executors, administrators, trustee, personal representatives, successors and assigns, covenants and agrees: (a) That he will pay to the Association within thirty (30) days after the date of written notice thereof any Maintenance Costs assessed against his Lot; and (b) That by accepting any Deed to his Lot, he shall be and remain personally liable for any and all Maintenance Costs assessed against his Lot while he is (or was) the Owner thereof, regardless of whether such Covenants or agreement are expressed in such Deed and regardless of whether he signed the Deed. Section 6.04 If the Owner of any Lot fails to pay the Maintenance Cost when due, the Board of Directors may enforce the payment of the Maintenance Cost and/or the Maintenance Lien by taking either or both of the following actions, concurrently or separately, and by exercising either of the remedies hereinafter set forth, the Board of Directors does not preclude or waive its rights to exercise the other remedy: (a) Bring an action at law and recover judgment against the Owner personally obligated to pay Maintenance Cost; (b) Foreclose the Maintenance Lien against the Lot in accordance with the prevailing Texas law relating to the foreclosure of realty mortgages and liens (including the power of conducting a non - judicial sale in accordance with the provisions of V.T.C.A. Property Code Section 51.002 and the right to recover a deficiency). The Board of Directors shall have the power to appoint a trustee to conduct such sale. The sale or transfer of any Lot shall not affect the Maintenance Lien. Section 6.05 In any action taken pursuant to Section 6.04 of this Article, the Owner shall be personally liable for, and the maintenance Lien shall be deemed to secure the amount of, the Maintenance Cost 111 Page together with interest thereon at the rate of twenty percent (20%) per annum, and reasonable attorney's fees. ARTICLE VII - ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL Section 7.01 The Developer hereby appoints an Architectural Control Committee (herein so called), which shall consist of three (3) members who shall be natural persons. The initial members of the Architectural Control Committee are: I , and . All matters before the Architectural Control Committee shall be decided by majority vote of its members. After Thursday April 2"d, 2025, the Association shall assume all of the rights and powers of the Architectural Control Committee and shall exercise same, through the Board of Directors, in the manner herein provided. In the event of death, incapacity or resignation of a member of the Architectural Control Committee, the successor for such member shall be appointed by the majority of the remaining members of the Architectural Control Committee, if such death, incapacity or resignation occurs on or before the above date and by the Association if such death, incapacity or resignation occurs thereafter. Section 7.02 No Building, fence, wall, sign, exterior light, or other structure or other apparatus, either permanent or temporary, shall be commenced, erected, placed, or maintained upon the Land (or any Lot constituting a part thereof), nor shall any remodeling or reconstruction thereof, exterior addition thereto, change therein, or alteration, excavation, subdivision, or re -subdivision thereof, including without limitation changes in or alterations to grade, roadways, and walkways, be made until three (3) copies of the plans and specifications showing the nature, kind, shape, height, materials, color, and location, and other material attributes of same, shall have been submitted to and approved in writing as to harmony of external design and location in relation to surrounding structures and topography by the Architectural Control Committee. All plans and specifications submitted to the Architectural Control Committee shall include plats showing the proposed locations on the Land and the dimensions of all improvements and shall specify in addition to construction diagrams and specifications, all materials to be used and color schemes for all improvements. If the Board fails to approve or disapprove such design and location within thirty (30) days after such plans and specifications have been submitted to it, approval of the Architectural Control Committee will be deemed to have been given, and this Article will be deemed to have been fully complied with. The Architectural Control Committee shall have the right in the sole discretion of the Architectural Control Committee, to disapprove any plans and specifications submitted to it for any of the following reasons: (a) If such plans and specifications are not in accordance with any of the provisions of these Covenants or the codes, ordinances, and regulations of the City of Coppell, Texas; (b) if the external design, elevation, appearance, location, or color scheme for the proposed improvements are not in harmony with the general surroundings of the Land or with the adjacent dwellings or structures or with the topography; (c) if the plans and specifications submitted are incomplete; (d) if the design, appearance, or location of any landscaping is not in harmony with the general surroundings or topography; (e) if the Architectural Control Committee deems the plans and specifications, or any part thereof, to be contrary to the interest, welfare, or rights of any or all parts of the Land. The Architectural Control Committee is authorized to accept whatever drawings, plans, or specifications as it deems desirable within its sole discretion to be in satisfaction of the foregoing. The decision of the Architectural Control Committee shall be final, conclusive, and binding upon all Owners. Neither the Architectural Control Committee nor Developer shall be responsible in any way for any defects in any plans or specifications submitted, revised, or approved in accordance with the foregoing, nor for any structural or other defects in any work done according to such plans and specifications. The signature of any two members of the Architectural Control Committee on any such plans and specifications with "approved" or "disapproved" written or stamped thereon shall be prima facie evidence as to such approval or disapproval being the act of the full Architectural Control Committee. Section 7.03 The Architectural Control Committee shall have the right, but not the obligation, to enforce the provisions of these Covenants and to such end shall have the same powers as herein given to the Association and its Board of Directors. If the Architectural Control Committee shall fail or refuse to enforce these Covenants for an unreasonable period of time after written request to do so by any aggrieved Owner, then such aggrieved Owner may enforce these Covenants on his own behalf by appropriate action. 121Page Section 7.04 Neither Developer, the Association, the Architectural Control Committee, and the Board nor the officers, directors, members, employees and agents of any of them, shall be liable in damages to anyone submitting plans and specifications to any of them for approval, or to any Owner of property affected by these restrictions by reason of mistake in judgment, negligence, or nonfeasance arising out of or in connection with the approval or disapproval variance or failure to approve or disapprove any such plans and specifications. Every person who submits plans or specifications, and every Owner of any of said property agrees that he will not bring any action of suit against Developer, the Association, the Architectural Control Committee, the Board, or the officers, directors, members, employees and agents of any of them, to recover any such damages and hereby releases, and quitclaims all claims, demands, and causes of action arising out of or in connection with any judgment, negligence, or nonfeasance and hereby waives the provisions of any law which provides that a general release does not extend to claims, demands, and causes of action not known at the time the release is given. ; oh2; ARTICLE VIMASSOCIATION ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT Section 8.01 The Architectural Control Committee may allow reasonable variances and adjustments of these conditions and restrictions in order to overcome practical difficulties and prevent unnecessary hardships in the application of the regulations contained herein, but is not under any obligation to issue variances. However, variances shall be in conformity to the intent and purposes hereof and provided also that in every instance such variance or adjustment will not be materially detrimental or injurious to other Lots or improvements on the Land. Determination of such a finding shall lie with the Architectural Control Committee. Granting of a variance for one property does not obligate the Committee to grant further variances for other properties. Each such variance request shall be on a case by case basis. Should the Committee find that a granted variance produced an undesirable result, the Committee may elect not to grant other similar requests?; oh2; ARTICLE IX\LAND SUBJECT TO THIS DECLARATION Section 9.01 All of the property and any right, title, or interest therein shall be owned, held, leased, sold, and/or conveyed by Developer, and any subsequent owner of all or part thereof, subject to these Covenants and the covenants, restrictions, charges, and liens set forth herein. ; oh2; ARTICLE X\MISCELLANEOUS Section 10.01 Subject to the limitations of Section 10.03, these Covenants may be revoked or amended in the following manner: (a) Until December 31, 2025, the Board of Directors, together with a majority of the Owners, shall have the right, from time to time, to revoke or amend these Covenants for any purpose by instrument bearing the signature of a majority of the Board of Directors and a majority of the Owners duly acknowledged and recorded in the records of the Office of the County Clerk of Dallas County, Texas. (b) On or after January 1, 2026, sixty percent (60%) of the Owners may from time to time revoke or amend these Covenants for any purpose by instrument bearing the signatures of sixty percent (60%) of the Owners, duly acknowledged and recorded in the Deed Records of the office of the County Clerk of Dallas County, Texas. Section 10.02 These Covenants shall be effective upon the date of recordation hereof, and as amended from time to time, shall continue in full force and effect to and including December 31, 2025. From and after said date, these Covenants, as amended, shall be automatically extended for successive periods of ten (10) years, unless there is an affirmative vote to terminate these Covenants by the then Owners of fifty-one percent (50%) of the Lots and approval by majority of the then members of the City Council of the City of Coppell Section 10.03 Sections 10.01 and 10.02, notwithstanding, the provisions hereof in regard to the duty of the Association and/or its Board of Directors to maintain all the common areas as set out in Article IV, the assessment procedure set out in Article V, and the rights extended to the City of Coppell set out in 131 Page Section 4.07 in regard to the Common Areas of City Interest set out in Section 4.06, shall not be revoked or amended without the additional approval of a majority of the then members of the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas. Section 10.03 If any provisions of these Covenants shall be held invalid or unenforceable, the same shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any of the other provisions hereof. Section 10.04 Whenever notices are required to be sent hereunder, the same shall be sent to the Owner who is the intended Recipient, by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested and postage prepaid, at the address of such Owner's Lot and further provides that any such notice may be delivered in person. Notices shall be deemed received when actually received and whether or not received when deposited in a regularly maintained receptacle of the United State Postal Service in accordance with the provisions hereof. Notices sent to the Architectural Control Committee or the Association shall be sent by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested and postage prepaid, only at such address as has previously been specified by the Architectural Control Committee to the Owners or by the Board of Directors to the Owners, respectively. The Architectural Control Committee and the Association may, from time to time, change such specified addresses by giving the Owners notice of such change in the manner herein provided. Section 10.05 Whenever the context so requires, the use of any gender shall be deemed to include all genders, the use of the plural shall include the singular, and the singular shall include the plural. Section 10.06 All captions, titles, or headings of the Articles or sections in these Covenants are for the purpose of reference and convenience only, and are not to be deemed to limit, modify, or otherwise affect any other provisions hereon, or to be used in determining the intent or context hereof. Section 10.07 If any interest purposed to be created by these Covenants is challenged under the Rule Against Perpetuities or any related rule, by interest shall be construed as becoming void and of no effect as of the end of the applicable period of perpetuities computed from the date when the period of perpetuities starts to run on the challenged interest; the "lives in being" for computing the period of perpetuities shall be those which would be used in determining the validity of the challenged interest. EXECUTED on the date first above written. DEVELOPER: Northville Development LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company By: STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DALLAS This instrument was acknowledged before me on the / / day of / / 120 by , of (Northville Development LLC). A Texas Limited Liability, on behalf of said Company. Notary Public State of Texas My Commission Expires: 14|Pa8e EXHIBITA IRBY ADDITION PHASE 11 (NINE OAKS) Plat / El% PS SE 11 -I 7LA111 151 Page EXHIBIT B TREE PRESERVATION EASEMENT AGREEMENT ELECTRONICALLY RECORDED 201500030192 02105/2015 03:16:25 PM EASEMENT 1/13 NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RICH": IF YOU ARE A NATURAL PERSON, YOU MAY REMOVE OR STRIKE ANY OR ALL OF THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION FROM ANY INSTRUMENI' THAT TRANSFERS AN INTEREST IN REAL PROPERTY BEFORE IT IS FILED FOR RECORD IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS: YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OR YOUR DRIVER'S LICENSE NUMBER. 'PREF PRESERVATION EASEMENT AGREEMENT 1'IIIS.�'MJ7tF-E PRESFRVAIION EASEMENI' AGREF.MENT (this "dgmement) is made asofthef/gday of December, 2014 (die "EQecrim Ilene"), by and between ALFORD COPPELL REAL ESTATE I IOLDINGS, LLC, a Texas limited liability company ("Granio?), and RAM DORA SIINKAVALLI, SUSIIMA CHERUKURU and SRI HARI KONERU (collectively, "G—aee"). RECITALS WHLRF.AS, Grantor is the owner of certain real property situated in the City of Coppell, Uallm Counly,'foxes, as more particularly described on �xhibjl A attached hereto ("Gromor i Propert)?); WI IEREAS, Grantee is the ower of eerain real property situated in the City of Coppell, Dallas County, Texas, as more partianlarly described on Exhibit B attache! hereto ("Grantee's Propery+'); and WHEREAS, in connection with the sale of Grantee's Property from Grantor to Grantee, Grantor has agreed to permit Grantee access to that certain portion of Grantor's Property described on Exhibit ; attached hereto (the "E a meni Ared') for the purpose of maintaining Irms in the Easement Area. AGREEMF.N1' NOW, TI IEREFORF., in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and suMciency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows: ARTICLE I THE TREE PRESERVATION EASEMENT 1.1 Certain •linidona. In addition to terms defined elsewhere in this Agreement, the following definitions shall apply for purptisK of ibis Agreement: (a) The term "Permitted Uwrs' shall mean and be deemed to include the applicable Owner and their respective successors, assigns, heirs, grantees, murtgagocs, tenants, sublenants, invitees, licensees, concessionaires, contractors and ,genas, and the of iccrs, directors, partners, agents, mploym% customers, visitors, contractors, licensees, and invitees of any of (hero. Tree Prnavarim P meat Agreement Page I 161 Page lt.. ,emu "(Mrx✓'vr `t/xnnr , ani, Hiu,,wxxl to ura,twr's Hupeny w Grantee's I-topedy, the owner of record of my of Grantor's Pruperty of Grantee's PfWcdy from time to time, whether one or marc Persons, or any interest in fee simple, rcvcrsion, remainder or leasehold estate of 99 years or more. (c) The term "PenorP shall mean my natural person and any corporation, partnership, limited liability company, tout, sole proprietorship, joint venture, govcmrnental agency or authority or my other entity whatsoetrr. 1.2 Trec Preservation Fasemenl. Subject to the terms hereof and for the consideration herein expressed, Grantor hereby groats and conveys to Gmnlec, for the benefit of Grmtm and its permitted Users, a perpetual, non-exclusive and appurtenant easement (the "Dire Pre alien Eare—a") over, across and upon the Easement Arca, for the purpose of maintaining trees in the Eitsement Arca. Reference is made to the tree survey attached hereto as Exhibit D. The recs in the Easement Nes shall be prowled in compliance with the City of Coppell Code of Ordinances. The tr arc being considered in the development of Grantee's Property end shall not be considered in any other dei.clopments. 1.3 No Imcrferenw. Owners stroll not erect, inswll or plate my building, improvement, fence, wall, curb or ther barrier on, raver, across err under the Easement Area that will impair, burden or huerfete with the rights granted herein; provided, however, that this paragraph shall not prevent Grantor from making reasonable orad necessary repairs permitted under this Agreement that may temporarily inhibit or preclude the use of the Tree Preservation E semrnt. ARTICLE 2 MOSCELLANF.OUS 2.1 Relem and Continuina ObIjgatj_qga. If m Owner ells, transfers oT assigns all of its interest in its entire portion of Grantor's Property or Cirantee's Properly, it shall be released from any future obligations hereunder with rtnpect to such property arising aft" the cOm ive date or such sale, transfer or assignment; glovLded however, that all successors in title shall be (round by the rights and obligations hertmfall of"Nth are covenants running with the land. 2.2 GOVERNING L&W. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS APPLICABLE'f0 CONTRACTT S TO BE PERFORMED ENTIRELY WITHIN SUCI I STATE INCLUDING ALL MEANS OF CONSTRUCT -ION, VALIDITY AND PERFORMANCE. PAC(I OWNER HEREBY IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF ANY STAT: COURT SITIING IN OR Willi JURISDICTION OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS, IN ANY ACFION OR PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT' AND HEREBY IRREVOCABLY AGREES T)IAT ALL CLAIMS IN RESPECT OF SUCH ACTION Olt PROCEEDING SHALL. BE HEARD AND DETEPMENFD IN A STATE COURT SITTING IN OR WITH JURISDICI'ION OF DALLAS Tree Pas—o- rasaotrm AZ -1 t'aae2 171 Page 2.11 Non•Oushtess Daus. If any date ht_nin set forth for the performance of any obligations by the parties should be at a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday, the compliance with such obligations shall be deemed a Wable on the next business day following such Saturday. Sunday or legal holiday. (SIGNATURE PAGLV I,'OLLOIPJ T— Prese ui n E --t Agrcerrent Paaa 4 241Page Nine Oaks Association Bylaws Bylaws of the Nine Oaks Association A Texas Nonprofit Association Article I. Name and Purpose Section 1.01: NAME. The NAME of this organization shall be the Nine Oaks Association INC, hereafter referred to as THE ASSOCIATION. It shall be a nonprofit organization incorporated under the laws of the State of Texas. Section 1.02: PURPOSE: The Bylaws shall govern the Corporation and its members and facilitate the fulfillment of the purposes provided in the Articles of Incorporation. (You may add or delete any purpose that does or does not apply to your Association. Remember to keep the purpose statement in compliance with IRS rulings, as spelled out in the enclosed IRS Publication 557.) Article II. MEMBERSHIP. SECTION 2.01: ELIGIBILITY FOR MEMBERSHIP. Any current resident of, or owner of property in, the Nine Oaks (IRBY Addition Phase II), Being Lots 1 through 9, in Block1, Alford Media Addition Revised, an Addition to the City of Coppell, Dallas County, Texas, according to the replat thereof recorded in the Real Property Records, Dallas, County, Texas (ExhibitA), is eligible for Membership in the Association upon [full payment of the annual dues, and] completion of an Application for Membership form. Section 2.02: HONORARY MEMBERSHIP. Any person may acquire honorary membership in the Association, upon full payment of the Association dues, by a majority vote of the Membership at a regularly scheduled meeting. Honorary Membership entities the person to a mailed copy of each newsletter and free participation in neighborhood events for one year from the date of membership. Honorary Membership does not, however, include voting rights. (This is Optional. Sometimes, previous residents of a neighborhood want to keep up with their ties to the neighborhood, or active Realtors want copies of the newsletters, etc. as a sales tool.) Section 2.03: ANNUAL DUES. The amount required for annual dues shall be 360$ each year, unless changed by a majority vote of the members in attendance at an annual meeting of the full membership. Full payment of the annual dues will entitle the Resident or Property Owner to full membership privileges for one year from the date of payment. 251 Page Dues may, on occasion, be paid by donation of comparable products or services to the Association, by prior approval of the Officers of the Association. Section 2.04: VOTING RIGHTS. The full payment of the annual dues will entitle each person over age eighteen in the Member's household (excluding Honorary Members) to one vote apiece in all Association elections. Section 2.05: TERMINATION OF MEMBERSHIP. Membership in the Association is automatically terminated whenever the Member is in default of payment of the annual Association Dues. A member may also be removed by a majority vote of the membership. Section 2.06: RESIGNATION. Any Member may resign by filing a written resignation with the Secretary of the Association. Such resignation shall not relieve the resigning Member of the obligation to pay any dues, assessments, or other charges theretofore accrued and unpaid. Upon resignation, however, the resigning Member will be refunded any un -accrued dues on a pro -rated basis. And/Or, when the Member moves from the neighborhood. ARTICLE III. OFFICERS. Section 3.01: OFFICERS. The Association shall have the following officers: 1) President, 2) Vice -President, 3) Treasurer, and 4) Secretary. Section 3.02: ELECTION OF OFFICERS. The Officers shall be elected by majority vote at the annual meeting of the full membership. Section 3.03: TERM OF OFFICE. The Officers shall serve a one-year term, with no limitations on future terms. (Some Associations organize with a General Membership and a Board of Directors (comprised of a Chair, Vice -Chair, Treasurer& Secretary). In this case, the Board of Directors is usually given more decision-making powers than this proposed organizational structure. You may also want to provide for Assistant Officers, especially the Treasurer and Secretary, in the event these officers are temporarily unable to attend to their duties. The term of office shall commence upon election and continue until successors are elected at the annual meeting.) 261Page Section 3.04: DUTIES. The duties of the Officers are as follows: 1) The PRESIDENT shall be the principal executive officer of the Association and shall preside over all meetings, represent the Association on public occasions, and make such committee appointments from the membership as shall be deemed advisable for the effective conduct of the work of the Association. 2) The VICE-PRESIDENT shall assist the President as the President requests, and represent the Association on appropriate occasions. The Vice -President shall also, in the absence or disability of the President, perform the duties and exercise the powers of the President of the Association. 3) The TREASURER shall collect, safeguard, disburse and make periodic reports of all funds collected in the name of the Association. 4) The SECRETARY shall keep attendance records and record the proceedings of all meetings, maintain adequate records of the Association activities, and conduct such official correspondence as shall be required. 5) The duties of the officers shall not be limited as enumerated above, but they may discharge in addition such duties as are assigned by the Association Membership. 6) Unless so authorized, no officer shall have any power or authority to bind the Association by any contract or engagement, to pledge its credit, or to render if liable pecuniarily for any purpose or in any amount. Section 3.05: VACANCIES AND REMOVAL FROM OFFICE. Any Officer may be removed by a majority vote of the members of the Association (excluding the Officer to be removed). Upon the death, removal, resignation, or incapacity of an Officer of the Association, a majority of the Association shall elect a successor. Section 3.06: MANAGEMENT. The Association shall be managed by the Officers so elected, with powers consistent with the Articles of Incorporation and these Bylaws of the Association. ARTICLE IV. MEETINGS OF MEMBERS. Section 4.01: PLACE OF MEETINGS. Meetings of the Members shall be held at the principal business office of the Association or at any other place the President or a majority of the Members may from time to time select. Section 4.02: REGULAR MEETINGS. Regular meetings of the Association shall be held quarterly, at a time and place designated by the President. (Decide how often you want to meet. Remember, there will be times when you might get too busy to meet as often as you like.) 271 Page Section 4.03: ANNUAL MEETING. An annual meeting of the Members shall be held in the month of April of each year, if possible. At such meeting, the Members shall elect the Officers of the Association, receive reports on the affairs of the Association, and transact any other business which is within the power of the Members. If an annual meeting has not been called and held within six months after the time designated for it, any Member may call the annual meeting. Decide what month (or season of the year) would be best for your major annual meeting. Section 4.04: SPECIAL MEETINGS. Special meetings of the Members may be called by the President, by a majority of the Officers of the Association, or by five percent (5%) or more of the Members entitled to vote. Section 4.05: NOTICE OF MEETINGS. A written or printed notice of each meeting, stating the place, day, and hour of the meeting, shall be given by the Secretary of the Association, or by the person authorized to call the meeting, to each Member of record entitled to vote at the meeting. This notice shall be given at least seven (7) days before the date named for the meeting, with the exception of Regular Monthly Meetings for which, once a firm date, time and place have been publicized to all the members, no further notice shall be required. Section 4.06: QUORUM. The Members present at any properly announced meeting shall constitute a quorum at such meeting. 60% of members must be present to ensure a quorum. ARTICLE V. VOTING. Section 5.01: VOTING. All issues shall be decided by a majority vote of members present at the meetings. Section 5.02: VOTING BY MAIL. Where Officers are to be elected by Members, or any changes in the Bylaws are to be voted on, or any other election is to be made whereby a count of the votes of all members may be desired, such election may be conducted by mail or by distribution ballot in such manner as the officers of the Association shall determine advisable. ARTICLE VI. COMMITTEES. Section 6.01: AUTHORIZATION TO ESTABLISH COMMITTEES. The Association may establish committees as deemed necessary to pursue its stated objectives. Members of Committees shall be appointed by the President. 281 Page ARTICLE VII. FINANCES. Section 7.01: EXPENDITURES. Expenditures of funds amounting to over One Hundred Dollars ($100) in any month must be approved by majority vote of the Membership present at any properly -announced meeting of the Membership. Printing of the Neighborhood Newsletter, Neighborhood Informational Notices and the Neighborhood Directory are exempted by this rule. The figure you choose to insert here will depend on the amount of your budget and your anticipated monthly expenditures. Section 7.02: FINANCIAL REPORTS. Quarterly and Annual Financial Reports shall be prepared by the Treasurer and presented to the Members at the quarterly and annual meetings. Financial reports should be given at every scheduled meeting. ARTICLE VII. AMENDMENTS. Section 8.01: PROCEDURE. These Bylaws may be amended by a two-thirds majority vote of those present at any regular meeting of the Members of the Association, provided seven days written notice of the proposed amendment and of the meeting is given. ARTICLE IX. ACCEPTANCE OF BYLAWS Section 9.01: VOTING. Acceptance of these Bylaws shall be by a two-thirds majority vote of those present at any regular meeting of the Members of the Association, provided written copies of the Bylaws and written notice of the meeting is given to all Members at least seven days prior to the meeting. ARTICLE X. NON-COMPLIANCE WITH BYLAWS. Section 10.01: NON-COMPLIANCE PENALTIES. Noncompliance with the Bylaws of the Association may result in termination of membership for the offender, upon a two thirds majority vote by the membership of the Association. Under no circumstance will noncompliance with any section of these Bylaws constitute the forfeiture of the rights of the Association to exist or the rights of the Association to enforce the Bylaws of the Association. T H E . C 1 T Y O F COFFELL MEMORANDUM To: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Matthew Steer, Senior Planner Date: April 9, 2015 Reference: Consider approval Item 95: PD -250R20 -H, Old Town Addition (Main St), PH III, to amend the Concept Plan and attach a Detail Site Plan to allow the development of 11 single-family lots fronting Hammond Street, one common area lot (access and utility easement) on 2.1 acres Consider approval of Item 96: Old Town Addition, Lots 1-11 & 1X, Block H, Replat, being a replat of Lots 5R -9R, Block D, into 11 residential lots, a common area lot and to adjust the lot size of Lot 5R on approximately 1.7 acres of property. 2030: Sense of Community, Special Place to Live Introduction: This request is for 11 patio home units on 32 foot wide lots, with a 118 foot depth, similar to the ones found on the west side of S. Coppell Road in the first phase of the originally planned project. The side yards are requested to be one -foot on one lot and six -feet on the abutting lot. All structures are proposed to be two-story units with two -car rear -entry garages from a private alley, and have approximately 41 % to 51% lot coverage. Darling Homes has contracted to build these residences with the same variety of front elevations, as were included in Phase I. The homes are proposed to front on Hammond Street with 5 of the homes fronting office/warehouse use and 6 fronting the proposed residences in the vacant land. The back side of the proposed homes will back to the side of a retail use on the south end and the remainder will back to the rear of restaurant & retail uses. Screening is shown on the east and north sections of the proposal and has been removed from the southernmost lot subsequent to the initial submittal. This home will now side to Travis Street. The plat has also been revised to include this area as part of the southernmost lot. Analysis: On March 16, 2015, the Planning & Zoning Commission held this case under advisement to the April 16, 2015 Meeting. On March 24, 2015, Staff sent the Planning Commissioners an email conveying a list of typical uses (not all inclusive) that could occupy these buildings serving both the immediate neighborhood and the community at large that might be appropriate for the 4 commercial/service buildings being requested for rezoning to residential use in Old Town. The uses include: Artisan's workshop Barber, beauty shop Business equipment service, i.e. mailing, stamps, ups type, etc. Consumer repair services (shoe repair, alterations, etc.) Dry cleaners Fix -it shop Florist Incidental retail/ service use Pet service Day care Also, in the email it was mentioned that when the Planned Development Conceptual Plan was developed for this area, there was considerable conversation regarding local business that might be interested in the type of commercial/service buildings depicted. These included pest control, plumbing services, woodworking/carpentry activities, among others. On April 7, 2015, a meeting was held between the Deputy City Manager Mike Land, Planning Director Gary Sieb, and Senior Planner Matt Steer and the applicants, Charles Cotten of CSE Development and Greg Yancey of Provident Real Estate to discuss the next steps in the zoning process. Legal Review: • Under consultation with the City Attorney, this application was re -advertised and notices sent to surrounding property owners within 200 feet. Another public hearing and presentation to the Commission is appropriate at the upcoming meeting. • We received a letter of opposition to this request. Recommendation: Staff is continuing the recommendation of denial for the zoning change, based on: • The proposal being in conflict with the Comprehensive Master Plan which calls for service/office space in this location, • The proposal being in conflict with the current established Planned Development zoning of the property which calls for service uses. The subject area was to serve as a transition from the office/distribution/warehouse uses to the west and those retail/restaurant & office uses within this same Planned Development to the east. • The property to the west across from the southern five lots is zoned Light Industrial which allows for more intense land uses by right which could create even more potential future incompatibility with the properties. • Airplane noise is an area of annoyance and complaints for residential users throughout the city and this will be one of the closest areas where residential is allowed, • A civic use was considered in developing plans for the Old Town area, and the original Planned Development conceptual plan for this property was drafted with the property south of Travis being the future site for a civic or nonresidential use. Based on sound land use planning, a nonresidential land use across the street from another is better suited than a residential use across from a non-residential development. Staff is not recommending the use be changed, but if it is, staff has developed a conceptual design option that keeps with the concepts of the original overall Old Town (Main Street) plan with an understanding that certain land uses have already been constructed in the immediate area. First, the existing alley extending east/west from Hammond to the retail north/south alley could be retained. Second, the existing plan showing retail/service use fronting Travis could also be retained. As mentioned above, this will eventually have streetscaping (sidewalks/tree wells & storefront) and will face vacant City of Coppell property that could potentially develop as a civic use in the short or long term, another retail use. Third, an office type use north of the east/west alley could serve as a transition between the proposed residential to the north and the retained service use to the south that fronts Travis. In short, by leaving this previously approved lot fronting Travis Street as retail/service, retaining the existing alley and adding an office space to the north of the alley (similar to the one under construction just north of this proposal), all of the direct residential frontage unto the warehouse to the west side of Hammond could be eliminated. The remaining residential shown could be used for home based businesses or artist cottages, for example. An exhibit depicting a conceptual sketch plan is attached. In addition to recommending denial of the zoning request, we further recommend denial of the Replat. Attachments: 1. Zoning Staff Report 2. Conceptual Sketch Plan 3. Site Plan 4. Amended Conceptual Plan 5. Landscape Plan 6. Elevations from Phase I 7. Replat Staff Report 8. Replat (2 Pages) CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT CASE NO.: PD -250R20 -H, Old Town Addition (Main Street), PH III P&Z HEARING DATE: March 19, 2015 (Continued to April 16, 2015) C.C. HEARING DATE: April 14, 2015 (now scheduled for the May 12, 2015 Council meeting) STAFF REP.: Matthew Steer, Senior Planner LOCATION: NEC of Hammond Street & Travis Street SIZE OF AREA: 2.1 acres of property CURRENT ZONING: PD -250R8 -H (Planned Development -250 Revision 8 -Historic) REQUEST: A zoning change request to PD -250R20 -H (Planned Development -250 Revision 20 -Historic), to amend the Concept Plan and attach a Detail Site Plan to allow the development of 11 single-family lots fronting Hammond Street, one common area lot (access and utility easement) and to revise the development conditions on three retail lots fronting West Main Street. APPLICANT: Applicant: Engineer: Greg Yancey Mike Glenn Main Street Coppell LTD Glenn Engineering Corp. P.O. Box 1790 105 Decker Court, Suite 910 Coppell, Texas 75019 Irving, Texas 75062 Phone: (972) 215-9400 Phone: (972) 717-5151 Email: grew,, a�y2verizon.net Email cmglenn2glennengineering.com HISTORY: In January 2007, approximately 17 acres of what was known as the "Carter Crowley" tract were rezoned to Historic and the future land use plan was amended to allow for a continuation of the targeted uses outlined in the Old Coppell Master Plan - retail, offices, restaurants and similar uses. In August 2010, a final plat of the entire property was approved. This subdivided the larger tract of property for the purpose of establishing street rights-of-way and easements for necessary infrastructure to support development. This resulted in a total of seven blocks containing nine lots and seven different street segments. In April 2011, the zoning for the conceptual planned development was approved. This depicted the overall plan and presented the general regulations each detailed planned development should follow. In April 2012, the first of the detail plans was approved for 44 patio - home lots. In May 2012, the Old Town Square was approved as was the entry feature of the subject property and an 80 -space parking lot. In August 2012, three retail/office cottages, a replica service station for a retail/restaurant site (Simmer) ITEM # 6 Page I of 5 and a neon "Main Street Coppell" sign were approved. In October 2012, the Local Diner site was approved at the southeast corner of Bethel Road and recently constructed Main Street, east of the entry tower. In February 2013, a planned development amendment was approved which allowed for administrative review and approval of detail plans when in general conformance with the Concept Plan and conditions. Subsequently, ten additional sites have been administratively approved and one has been amended to allow for the freestanding "Frost Cupcakery" sign. HISTORIC COMMENT: There is no historic significance related to the subject property. TRANSPORTATION: Both Travis and Houston Streets connect South Coppell Road with Hammond Street and provide east/west connections between East & West Main Streets. They are each 24 feet wide two-way streets within 81 -foot rights-of-way with intermittent on -street angled parking on both sides. Hammond Street ends in a cul-de-sac north of this property. It is an asphalt street with 60 feet of right of way and is 33 feet wide adjacent to this tract. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North — office under construction, vacant retail; PD -250R15 -H (Planned Development -250 Revision 15 -Historic) and PD -250R12 -H (Planned Development -250 Revision 12 -Historic) South — vacant City owned land; PD -250R8 -H (Planned Development -250 Revision 8 -Historic) East — restaurant, retail, & park; PD -250R1 1 -H (Planned Development -250 Revision 11 -Historic) and PD -250R8 -H (Planned Development -250 Revision 8 -Historic) West — office/warehouse and vacant; LI (Light Industrial) and PD -274-H (Planned Development -274 Historic) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Coppell 2030, A Comprehensive Master Plan, shows the property as suitable for development in accordance with the Old Coppell Historic District Special Area Plan. DISCUSSION: PLEASE REFER TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEMO FOR UPDATES SINCE LAST SUBMITTAL. This request is to rezone this property to reflect a residential land use in place of previously approved retail/service uses. Staff cannot support this request. If it were to be approved, the residences would be adjacent to an active warehouse district on the west side of the property — one of the most undesirable and dangerous mixes of uses possible. Truck traffic and high density zero lot line patio homes are not compatible. Typical of any urban patio home development, these lots have very little sideyards and no backyards except driveways, making the only area for children to play, the front yard. In this particular case, playing in the front yard is not advisable. On the five southern lots, safety is a major concern. The rear of the homes would be adjacent to the service area of restaurant (one constructed and two anticipated) and retail uses on the east side. In other parts of ITEM # 6 Page 2 of 5 Coppell, dumpsters would be located away from the main building and as far from any residential as possible, as these have a foul odor and attract rodents and insects. The proposed homes would be approximately 80 feet to the current dumpster at Simmer and even closer to anticipated future restaurant dumpsters. These proposed residences would share the distinction of being be the closest residential structures in the city to D/FW Airport take -off and landing patterns resulting in potential for noise complaints in excess of those we currently receive from residences to the east of this proposal as well as far north of this site (where the planes are much higher in the air). In addition, the City is a joint partner in this overall Planned Development. We have invested significant expenditures in building the infrastructure to support the service oriented uses that were envisioned to add a much needed land use to the area. Within the original development agreement for the overall Planned Development, the "project" was defined as 44 townhome lots, approximately 13 retail office cottages built with craftsman architectural style, eleven retail/service buildings and two restaurants, all of which is to be anchored by a publicly owned town square (the additional 64 patio homes on east side of S. Coppell Road were not included in the "project" boundaries). If any change in zoning is approved, the development agreement would in turn need to be modified. The following is a technical review of the plans submitted and will only be relevant if the land use change to residential is approved. This detailed development plan envisions a single family, detached housing type and requests a series of 11 patio homes similar to the ones found on the west side of S. Coppell Road in the first phase of the originally planned project. As depicted on the Site Plan, the homes are proposed to be setback approximately 16 to 24 feet from the right-of-way (28-35 feet from Hammond Street pavement). The lot sizes are basically 32 feet in width by 118 feet in depth with the two end lots four to five feet wider. All structures are proposed to be two-story units with two -car rear -entry garages from a private alley, and have approximately 41 % to 51 % lot coverage. Darling Homes has contracted to build these residences, and exhibits submitted with the application show the same variety of front elevations, as were included in Phase I. The proposed private alley (Common Area X Lot) in the rear is proposed to extend from Travis Street into the existing alleyway through a portion of Lot 5R, Block D (causing it's boundaries to be reconfigured). A 15 -foot wide drive is proposed to extend to the west, then north connecting in with the existing alley running east/west to Hammond Street. The driveways leading to the garage for each residence are 20 feet minimum depth allowing two cars to park (in addition to the two garage parking spaces). A 12 -foot landscaped screening strip separating the residential alley from the 24 -foot commercial alley is proposed. Six Live Oak trees are shown to be used in conjunction with the 29 Nellie R Stevens as the evergreen screening to offer some relief to the anticipated retail/restaurant uses abutting to the east. In addition, rows of Nellie R. Stevens are shown screening this development proposal on the north and south sides. A PD condition to install fire sprinklers in each of the three southernmost retail buildings fronting West Main Street has been included in this request; hence these ITEM # 6 Page 3 of 5 lots are part of the zoning request. Fire Sprinklers were agreed upon between the applicant and Fire Department instead of providing the initially requested fire lane easement over the 24 -foot commercial alleyway (the existing and proposed northern retail buildings already have or will have fire sprinklers and did not need to be included). Again, staff is not recommending the use be changed, but if it is, there are necessary changes that should be made to the plans. First, as shown in the Old Town (Main Street) aerial attached, the existing alley extending east/west from Hammond to the retail north/south alley should be retained. Second, the existing plan showing retail/service use fronting Travis should be retained. This will eventually have streetscaping (sidewalks/tree wells & storefront) and will face another vacant City of Coppell property that could potentially develop as a civic use in the short term or in long term, another retail use. It is not appropriate to limit the uses for the large tract based on what is done across the street. Third, the existing east/west alley should be retained with a new 10 -foot common area lot with Nellie R Stevens, to the north, serving as a buffer. In short, by leaving this previously approved lot fronting Travis Street as retail/service, retaining the existing alley and adding a 10 - foot buffer area as was proposed abutting Travis, some, but not all, of the direct residential frontage unto the warehouse to the west side of Hammond will be eliminated. The drive leading into the warehouse development to the west is approximately 80 feet north (measured from centerline of the existing alley to centerline of the drive), so this will not alleviate all of the residential to warehouse frontage. If all lots fronting the warehouse development were to be removed to the north edge of the drive, five of the proposed 32 -foot wide lots would need to be eliminated from the proposal. A second aerial with the proposal overlaid is attached for reference. A Landscape Plan has been submitted. As mentioned, this shows the Nellie R. Stevens on the north, south and east side of the property to screen this project from the surrounding uses. One of the intents of the creation of the Historic District was to encourage a mix of uses and promote pedestrian activity, not to isolate residences from incompatible land uses. This is unfortunately what needs to be done in this unique situation. An overall Concept Plan has been provided showing this proposal in relation to the overall Planned Development District. This includes a parking table that shows that the overall parking required decreases with the proposed uses 2.5 parking spaces per lot as opposed to 1 parking space per 200 square feet or in some instances 300 square feet for service uses. All and all, staff recommends denial of the application based on the inappropriateness of residential land use at this particular location. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff is recommending DENIAL of the rezoning request due to the following reasons. 1. The current zoning calls for retail/service uses in this location as this is the most appropriate transition from the retail/restaurant uses to the east to the warehouse uses to the west. 2. Airplane noise is very prevalent in the area. ITEM # 6 Page 4 of 5 3. Close proximity to restaurant dumpsters and high intensity restaurant/retail uses. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Recommend approval of the request 2. Recommend disapproval of the request 3. Recommend modification of the request 4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date ATTACHMENTS: 1. Two Aerials 2. Three Lot Layouts (legal size) 3. Site Plan 4. Amended Conceptual Plan 5. Landscape Plan (2 sheets) 6. Elevations from Phase I ITEM # 6 Page 5 of 5 sketch plan CREATED IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF COPPELL I3EIHIS NoisnOH PROM o z A &CD4 r A I 0 j II I _ r - - - - - - 0 J N 88°12'07" E 156.80' I I I� 0 ,w _ 6 _III I 3 X_-dn lob eajy uowwoo ry _ _ _ L III Fill M..LZ l o88S I W Ln (V I 0 s3 d. in � 0 it J IIS a.�1 p J 0 F � I� i� (�ewd(�wsd aenws _ 1❑ I I C� � ___+__�1LL__M.L,ZIo@8-S__ r� I I - � W IN 88012'07" E 95.00' W I— o cr W a '� a �� Wo ��,d„ws3nQnws ___ _ z " _----- 002 __MyL.Z1a88-� v I Of ---rII III Q INI n �(%� 1❑I Cl)CD d (�d(,ws3nQnws z� H ME 0 M. I 30W is ❑ - IIN r _ a E >_ J m " FOS j CC N li - - (�ewa iw❑ae nws : - rc�� `_— -�- �- .001 / C > - - G LZlo8fl3 [n60 �r- 6) - ool I T / - I ( d1 wi enw,5 OS l ,0902 0 W CO oQ r `D to M, "I�i a ISI x wS 3 -M zi,os (a�ewdl wis3. J / 34 W N N� _Ir_____,PffaZl__MyL.Zl a9@S__ _I___� � zzo H 0 / 3 ill lil moo J M / " -- (�ewd�-�s3nQnws E M s�z�saLa�aes_-- U 0 F------ C) _— -- -- ---,47ZZL_M.LZL@89--- ---, i I I w I (a��d(,w=3a��ws ---- ZI_�d.LZka889 Ln of 0 O I II -�------I ill " 6L'EZl M.J.Zlo885 X-HLL lob easy uoLULuOD �I 'M'O2i .L8 1332JiS SIAV` J1 a va7a nu i� aiarcu��n as yauaa ayni u7 nu i.r uaa nan e7iauni ana uyaOo J rl rr �ivu iu crani 7iv�wav xr.r7a � SVXH.L `'TIHddOO �«> = m �' WOi113H139153M Z g S10Z-6-E:FIJ,VQ SIDA IIH:) I'y 'DNI d Lo — NV Id AdVDSQNV I SAIVIOOSSv �� `� � i z m wow �I� 313:1dI�VI I IIM o ro o Q �,�.�,� ,aro. ,,. • •P�w�,.., e..q==., / ALIS 'IVf11djDNO� 3 H —��L NV -1, 3115 a va7a nu i� aiarcu��n as yauaa ayni u7 nu i.r uaa nan e7iauni ana uyaOo J rl rr �ivu iu crani 7iv�wav xr.r7a � rvv r�nu ,u aunt vyn Tun m7 n7a ,a7in nu you a au7u v7 7aa in7rr .uu aini �' WOi113H139153M Z g p-� — Q i z wow —��L I � I Q I _ 1HHa1Sl�aooao o� r- _ n -- ffi--------— ,4—�- I ` ffi -w III -w II I h�_�I Im�l ioos'i ; io -"`ii i U ` e n 133a1S NOISHOH $ m �g rrr m S d \ =v � III _ 17-771 z o Z x � I I z Y — — J �m - T j oma" J — L — I � _ I I i _L _ o 133a1SSAn i nn 133a1S Sine i ----------------------- ------------------------------------ - — --------------------------------------------------- i I i -- 9 s � qC aC aC 4C ti S r � � oeu4e-ooas6�u��6 a-�'�� �r�ow4�bu'-auoee�asz6 4�uew�r6i � ,% –o o+;= «`' LL •`'< �m""' `. - SVX31 `ll3dd00 NOI1100V NMOL (3 -10 S3WOHNMOl63SVHd ll3dd0O133HISNIVW Ndld 3ddOSaNdl T J SOICu5N75IC NVWJI NS—Ol"p NOIL-3- HILI DN Lj El El a � o ❑z_ El Seo Oase°aw 5 E El a El 1 ❑ o egoaa 91 Y_ El e so xNH a EL ❑El =x= W: o¢EogN_zm 8 H!" o OEM, 1015 -D 1015 -E 1015 -F 1020 -D 1020 -E 1020 -F 1025 -D 1025 -E 1025 -F 1030 -D 1030 -E 1030 -F CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Old Town Addition, Lots 5R1 -16R1, Block D, Replat P&Z HEARING DATE: March 19, 2015 (Denied and Resubmitted for April 16, 2015) C.C. HEARING DATE: April 14, 2015 (now scheduled for the May 12, 2015 Council meeting) STAFF REP.: Matthew Steer, Senior Planner LOCATION: NEC of Hammond Street & Travis Street SIZE OF AREA: 1.7 acres of property CURRENT ZONING: PD -250R8 -H (Planned Development -250 Revision 8 -Historic) REQUEST: Being a replat of Lots 5R -9R, Block D, into 11 residential lots, a common area lot and to adjust the lot size of Lot 5R. APPLICANT: Applicant: Engineer: Greg Yancey Mike Glenn Main Street Coppell LTD Glenn Engineering Corp. P.O. Box 1790 105 Decker Court, Suite 910 Coppell, Texas 75019 Irving, Texas 75062 Phone: (972) 215-9400 Phone: (972) 717-5151 Email: gregyancey2verizon.net Email cmglenn2glennengineering.com HISTORY: In January 2007, approximately 17 acres of what was known as the "Carter Crowley" tract were rezoned to Historic and the future land use plan was amended to allow for a continuation of the targeted uses outlined in the Old Coppell Master Plan - retail, offices, restaurants and similar uses. In August 2010, a final plat of the entire property was approved. This subdivided the larger tract of property for the purpose of establishing street rights-of-way and easements for necessary infrastructure to support development. This resulted in a total of seven blocks containing nine lots and seven different street segments. In April 2011, the zoning for the conceptual planned development was approved. This depicted the overall plan and presented the general regulations each detailed planned development should follow. In April 2012, the first of the detail plans was approved for 44 patio - home lots. In May 2012, the Old Town Square was approved as was the entry feature of the subject property and an 80 -space parking lot. In August 2012, three retail/office cottages, a replica service station for a retail/restaurant site (Simmer) and a neon "Main Street Coppell" sign were approved. In October 2012, the Local Diner site was approved at the southeast corner of Bethel Road and recently constructed Main Street, east of the entry tower. In February 2013, a planned development amendment was approved which allowed for administrative review ITEM # 11 Page 1 of 3 and approval of detail plans when in general conformance with the Concept Plan and conditions. Subsequently, ten additional sites have been administratively approved and one has been amended to allow for the freestanding "Frost Cupcakery" sign. HISTORIC COMMENT: There is no historic significance related to the subject property. TRANSPORTATION: Both Travis and Houston Streets connect South Coppell Road with Hammond Street and provide east/west connections between East & West Main Streets. They are each 24 feet wide two-way streets within 81 -foot rights-of-way with intermittent on -street angled parking on both sides. Hammond Street ends in a cul-de-sac north of this property. It is an asphalt street with 60 feet of right of way and is 33 feet wide adjacent to this tract. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North — office under construction, vacant retail; PD -250R15 -H (Planned Development -250 Revision 15 -Historic) and PD -250R12 -H (Planned Development -250 Revision 12 -Historic) South — vacant City owned land; PD -250R8 -H (Planned Development -250 Revision 8 -Historic) East — restaurant, retail, & park; PD -250R11 -H (Planned Development -250 Revision 11 -Historic) and PD -250R8 -H (Planned Development -250 Revision 8 -Historic) West — office/warehouse and vacant; LI (Light Industrial) and PD -274-H (Planned Development -274 Historic) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Coppell 2030, A Comprehensive Master Plan, shows the property as suitable for development in accordance with the Old Coppell Historic District Special Area Plan. DISCUSSION: PLEASE REFER TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEMO FOR UPDATES SINCE LAST SUBMITTAL. This is the companion request to the rezoning. Staff recommended denial of the zoning; therefore, we are recommending denial for the plat. The following is a brief summary of the plat submittal. As stated on the second page of the plat document, the purpose for the replat is to subdivide 11 residential lots, 1 common area lot, to dedicate necessary easements and to move the west lot line of Lot 5R, Block D to accommodate the private alley extension to Travis Street. The lots range in width from 32 to 37 feet with a depth of 116 to 124 feet. A 16 foot front yard building line is depicted and a one foot side yard is shown on one lot with a six foot side yard on the abutting lot sharing the mutual lot line. A private 5' maintenance use and drainage easement is proposed on each mutual lot line. This private easement contains one -foot on the property with the one -foot setback and four feet on the lot containing the 6' setback, similar to what was provided in the previous Phase I and II zero lot line layouts. The purpose for the easement is for drainage and to allow the property owner with the one -foot setback adequate room for maintenance of their side yard and side fagade. ITEM # 11 Page 2 of 3 A Common Area X Lot is shown for the private alley and screening. The maintenance of the 5 -foot maintenance utility and drainage easements and the common area X -lot are the responsibility of the property owner and the existing Property Owner's Association, respectively. A note has been added to the plat stating that "no construction of structures or flatwork, or location of grills or cooking appliances between units and no outside storage visible from streets is allowed." Additionally, the seller is noted as the parry responsible for alerting the prospective purchasers this key information. This will help maintain the aesthetics and uniformity of the development and will advise the potential homeowners of this restriction before they submit plans for construction within this side yard. The city has had numerous inquiries and code compliance issues associated with this topic on Phase I. A note that was included in the Phase I and II plats that will be carried forward to this one and states "the property described in this plat is located within close proximity to the flight approach and departure paths of Dallas -Fort Worth International Airport and may be subject to increased noise levels resulting from aircraft operations occurring above or in close proximity to the property." For the reasons listed in the zoning case (current zoning calls for retail/service uses in this location, airplane noise is very prevalent in the area and the close proximity to restaurant dumpsters and high intensity restaurant/retail uses), staff is recommending denial of the replat. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff is recommending DENIAL of the proposed replat as the zoning was recommended for denial. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Recommend approval of the request 2. Recommend disapproval of the request 3. Recommend modification of the request ATTACHMENTS: 1. Replat (2 pages) ITEM # 11 Page 3 of 3 Hinos M—M xE N 88°12'7" E �' w - - 250.00' \o W CD o r F r Z N N 8 Z �I r Zi 0 i ...... -------- A I i 106.79' 50.01' -- �---- N 88°127" --- - E o� 156.80' � I 0 InT x f I--- Ji i N 88°12'7" E �--- -�csl- nn„Czlo88s m --I 95.00' it o1 I i o t o E _' � L J E 5w C o L O) CD 0 I � I� Rv,sa-sol � J � L---� ` Q V0 =/ N 88°1_2'7” E 1 - la o - - 95.00' - - iw a ---I-- J a rn W p °xah,3asRws CD I 1 li. li 1 (`i�m I,� p I�NI LL '�ILU `��... Z , M oo ` o Z� �.LLBIL_MyLzlo8fl3__1r m � � � JA N Im Ilm J ISI M gF� n° C JrOD 1 O I I� t�ewa>>wsa aenwe m _ zo 'Ol � - �_ _�___ — i- L __ El0 I X100 X100❑o - — __ —_�,_, -- � i N 88°1_2'7" E N��-�-- �- 95.00' ool 2 Im a� N 1 O . CC _ (�ewal iwsa a e nw s Ico °! E Iz m wE I - m J II- x Wo Iw �I o Mo a,os e _ _t�ewa�-w�sa ae nws war o M r-- It_____.Pffaz6__MyLz1 o8fl3---II__-� LL N O II JZo r NIS 1 M v oIM ��oa 0 SIV I Ola JI E - ❑o J O 0�---�I_= �� d� s3aQ°ws z a �fA ---------- ---- S o N L N 8�°12T' E 95.00' C t�ewa� en 87.5 T--- 0' — F -------- - s � I � I � � F-�-�--- Lffzzl-sn.LzLeesWs�y Ln mi 00 Iv�I 0 °I °° z a°n ,vli�e.oz I z cv £L 170LZ9 L9 0056 o❑ ,9L'09Z M „LO,Z X088 S -o o� am 'M'02i .L8 1332JiS SIAV` J1 - Q 2 W Y Q TrT U d W F JOF a 4 - m ><Uw, 0 O o'rv0 SA �� p r r Z N U 0m41dm 000ZZ =��=rnx o 3'P o��s J a EiPe 2 K¢ K 0 UO ¢ U¢ U r" O m ¢ o Q z te d w ❑ uri =2mm o `Waa z g a o w r o o ❑ O U I3I HIS NoisnOH xE N 88°12'7" E �' w - - 250.00' \o W CD o r F r Z N N 8 Z �I r Zi 0 i ...... -------- A I i 106.79' 50.01' -- �---- N 88°127" --- - E o� 156.80' � I 0 InT x f I--- Ji i N 88°12'7" E �--- -�csl- nn„Czlo88s m --I 95.00' it o1 I i o t o E _' � L J E 5w C o L O) CD 0 I � I� Rv,sa-sol � J � L---� ` Q V0 =/ N 88°1_2'7” E 1 - la o - - 95.00' - - iw a ---I-- J a rn W p °xah,3asRws CD I 1 li. li 1 (`i�m I,� p I�NI LL '�ILU `��... Z , M oo ` o Z� �.LLBIL_MyLzlo8fl3__1r m � � � JA N Im Ilm J ISI M gF� n° C JrOD 1 O I I� t�ewa>>wsa aenwe m _ zo 'Ol � - �_ _�___ — i- L __ El0 I X100 X100❑o - — __ —_�,_, -- � i N 88°1_2'7" E N��-�-- �- 95.00' ool 2 Im a� N 1 O . CC _ (�ewal iwsa a e nw s Ico °! E Iz m wE I - m J II- x Wo Iw �I o Mo a,os e _ _t�ewa�-w�sa ae nws war o M r-- It_____.Pffaz6__MyLz1 o8fl3---II__-� LL N O II JZo r NIS 1 M v oIM ��oa 0 SIV I Ola JI E - ❑o J O 0�---�I_= �� d� s3aQ°ws z a �fA ---------- ---- S o N L N 8�°12T' E 95.00' C t�ewa� en 87.5 T--- 0' — F -------- - s � I � I � � F-�-�--- Lffzzl-sn.LzLeesWs�y Ln mi 00 Iv�I 0 °I °° z a°n ,vli�e.oz I z cv £L 170LZ9 L9 0056 o❑ ,9L'09Z M „LO,Z X088 S -o o� am 'M'02i .L8 1332JiS SIAV` J1 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE UTILITY APPROVAL STATE OF TEXAS§ ppl—d by wUN vHr"AS'§ OWNER'S CERTIFICATE NC SKH AtmesE ev Date COUNTY of DALLAS§ y oncor eectnc Dei v Ch.pboy Date 9 LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS 111 AND LOT 1X, BLOCK H and LOT 5R2, BLOCK STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF DALLAS§ ADDITION ty 73 20 t Oftal P,11d Re—ft Carl. Cd,ly Te ald 011— .1 the ode,"led allb,ty a NdR, "'d 2015 do the day BEGINthe N NO ath do "d t the iHto'ereedion of lavas eraet(Aevanahleewiatnangnt-orwzyy)BI ana Is rvx�n GIVEN UNDERMYHAND AND SEAL OF THE OFFIICE irametor p poses ana consaeaeon the 2011 Date Sur et(A73H g aoy)er � Y rI p Aammisator s ale�g the �enhery ugh the ea v eer Hamme�a suet a�a N mss sate erTe;ae APPROVAL the len y e t v e m I ae�e m,ret(do OU lots ghtreil-y),��9 y to OF Z Steof t(nea,aele SO g y)�aaalseh e most lehhwe v me,mg the of LU9M er-wav l�le erHamm e�a Co THENCE NoIth 11 deLl2on, O7es'eyc'dE' dt, Los dthLeotgoRfthe,ly 1, e Lot 9R a d,Dao,e of 11110 feet to do 201p.pell to the Cly Co—I do the The; da`,ydtUXdthe of E9 E9 feet to a to N G Cola,log a ompledareae q feet er 169l apes erlaoa, mea erlese aesemn,aPaeato, Appm aL Ednn Date NOTES late 1 RODS SET OwRS) ARE CAPPED IN YELLoAND MARKED °RPLS v pp Te;ae 2ETHE FLOOD STATEMENT F ED OR RT OCKC 0OCNR ySHALLALLBERESPONSIBLOR E F Flood lo—a— Rate Map Dallas EXAS § 5 DE dated g 232001 ION OFtea Areas, p mheronl l.fwl.fsdSTAT, COUNTY OF DALLAS§OR LLS OR COOINGAPPLANCES BE "' ENUNTS LAY THIS Th at th� e I I does U0,Te I y a d B tLt0h CK, I Dt dBeE C G t A R h R h e Te, 0 d L ,TIS d' p., ope y s C E P CLOSE PROX MITY TO THE FIT GHT APPIR CACH AND DEPARTURE PAT IT A OF e (e9 that pall U, Ile a ne )�to t,,,,c, buls to, Ka,eo Selbo F,Ut Mayo, PURPOSE OF REPLAT STATE OF TEXAS § 'OUNl v or uATTF, The purpose of this replat is to subdivide 11 residential lots, 1 Common Area lot and to dedicate necessary easements and to e e ��mem a�amove the west lot line of Lot 5R. GIIN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAT OF THE OFFICE thd__ day 2011 REPEAT LOTS 1-11, BLOCK H, LOT 1X, BLOCK H, and LOT 5R2, BLOCK D OLD TOWN MAIN (MAIN STREET) PHASE III BEING A REPEAT OF LOT 5R -9R BLOCK D OLD TOWN ADDITION SITUATED IN JAMES A. SIMMONS SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 1296 CITY OF COPPELL, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS P&Z HEARING DATE: C.C. HEARING DATE: STAFF REP.: LOCATION: SIZE OF AREA: CURRENT ZONING: REQUEST: APPLICANT: HISTORY: HISTORIC COMMENT CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT CASE NO.: PD -213R3 -H, Lost Creek, PH II March 19, 2015 April 14, 2015 Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning SEC of S. Coppell Road and Heath Lane 0.344 acres of property PD -213R2 -H (Planned Development -213 Revision 2 -Historic) A zoning change request to PD -213R3 -H (Planned Development -213 Revision 3 - Historic), to amend the Concept Plan and attach a Detail Site Plan to allow five (5) residential/retail units. OWNER Mr. Clive Brooks 560 Coppell Road Coppell, TX, 75019 APPLICANT JR Rose, Architects 2120 Cosmos Way Argyle, TX. 76226 (214) 454-7895 Fax: (972) 534-1850 Email: jason(a�jrosearchitect.com There has been no recent development history on this parcel. It has been zoned H (Historic) for a number of years, and has been vacant at least 30 years, There are no structures of historic significance on this property. TRANSPORTATION: Coppell Road is an unimproved asphalt road with no curb/gutter and drainage ditches on each side. It is scheduled to be rebuilt this summer to a 34 foot wide, concrete, undivided road within 60 feet of right-of-way with curb, gutter, parking on the west side and sidewalks on both sides of the street at this location. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North: vacant and townhomes; PD -213R2 -H, Planned Development Historic South: single-family home; H, Historic East: townhomes; PD -213R2 -H, Planned Development Historic West: retail; H, Historic ITEM #07 Page I of 3 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Coppell 2030, A Comprehensive Master Plan, shows this property as suitable for Old Coppell Historic uses DISCUSSION: This is a request to develop a small .4 acre parcel in Old Town for work/live condominium structures. Initially, the proposal reflected 5, free-standing, two- story units with work space/kitchens downstairs and living/sleeping units above. In submittal for hearing, however, the applicant has reduced his application to 4 units. If the health and safety provisions of the building and fire codes can be successfully addressed, the use could be supported. It should be noted, however, that the floor plans submitted with this application violates our life/safety codes, i.e., the upstairs middle bedroom does not meet building egress requirements. Another life/safety concern relates to the requirement that all buildings be sprinklered due to the minimal space between buildings (5 feet). Fire has also stated that if these buildings are to be supplied with a single sprinkler riser room, they must be attached by canopies, covered breezeways, common roofs or common walls. That is not reflected in the plans submitted. There are a number of other concerns regarding the intensity of development that need to be addressed. As submitted, the project ignores a number of guidelines specified in the Historic District including setbacks, corner development, coverage, landscaping, parking standards and a host of others. Although the list of concerns is extensive, the majority could be eliminated by a reduction in density to 2-3 units. By meeting the provisions of the fire and building codes, and by reducing the overall building number, adequate parking could be provided on site, landscaping standards would be met, historic guidelines would be followed and the project could gain staff support. To examine the proposal in detail, a more clearly defined picture of our concerns emerges. For example, when a use which has a non-residential component (the work/live proposal) is adjacent to a residential use, the non-residential use must screen itself from the residential by a minimum six foot tall masonry screening wall. The applicant opposes that screening requirement and wishes to retain an existing older 6 foot tall wood fence on his eastern property line. In addition, our ordinances state that any new structure shall conform to the existing building setback pattern established on the same street. Stated another way, when there is an existing building facade (the front setback line on the residences east of this property along Heath Lane) any future development on adjacent land must abide by that established setback. Instead of the required 15 foot setback, the applicant proposes 5 feet, ignoring the setback he established when he developed the adjacent subdivision. Further, a non-residential use is required to have a minimum ten foot setback from an adjacent residential use which applies to the South property line of the proposal currently showing 5 feet. The Historic District Design Guidelines allow some alteration to landscape plans, but this Site Plan is short of plant material. Although the landscape plan shows 4000 square feet being provided (over 500 feet short), a question arises as to how that number was determined. Another concern expressed by the next door neighbor relates to a common driveway that has been in existence for over 40 years. If not relocated, the south building proposed by the developer would need major alteration. The south property owner wants the drive to remain, the developer wants it moved. It appears that prescriptive rights or adverse possession might be involved here, possibly placing a cloud on the title regarding this drive and whether it may or may not have to be moved, thus ITEM #07 Page 2 of 3 potentially requiring a redesign of this project. This is a legal question that would require further discussion between the two parties for resolution. Required screening, established building lines, corner lot setback requirements, adjacent residential setbacks, intensity of development, landscape shortages, existing driveway issues, parking concerns all contribute to problems with this request. This proposal reflects severe overbuilding on this small parcel. There are more than planning issues here. We have building code problems, street design and engineering issues, neighborhood opposition among others. This case is not yet ready to move forward and needs to be denied at this time. Although recognition of the use is noted, the overbuilding problem needs to be resolved before this case can gain staff support. The applicant feels his proposal is the "highest and best use" of this parcel. We have included his response to the review comments made during the Development Review Committee's analysis of this project, and do not agree with his conclusions. If the applicant revises his plan to two to three buildings with parking meeting code, setbacks being enlarged, additional landscaping being provided and properly addressing the provisions of our building and fire codes, this proposal could be supported. However, there are just too many changes needing to be made to the Plan to make it conform to requirements. We would recommend denial with potential resubmittal --meeting ordinance and code requirements --at some future date. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff is recommending DENIAL of this request. There are just too many code problems that need careful resolution before this case is ready to move forward. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Recommend approval of the request 2. Recommend disapproval of the request 3. Recommend modification of the request 4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date ATTACHMENTS: 1. Building Elevations (Sheet A-1 2 copies) 2. Site Plan (Sheet AO) 3. Typical Floor Plan (Sheet A 1 different from Elevations A 1) 4. Landscape Plan (Sheet L1) 5. Landscape Details (Sheet L2) 6. Planting Specifications (Sheet L3) 7. Turf Specifications (Sheet L4) 8. Letter responding the Development Review Committee comments dated April 2, 2015 (5 pages) ITEM #07 Page 3 of 3 �' � + rel; � �► �-� ■-_:: sr" t-4. FRP G,,i-cl C.Af IT �= Cai� r�w.[ s+•srro..n� �a �el„�e.�+r�dl � e � Drown Dy. Jssm R. Rose Prepotlon Date: Fehnigy 17 1015 Revlelons: WAOD: e vi e. J LL) D 4 �.t w 4 a� SHEET Drawn Aose 8y. Jam R Prepation 15Date: Fly 12 70 Redslons: Notes:: 4 J C C) D ^ lew OF F ` r, LJYi' WORK J SHEET Al LEGAL DESCRIPTION 660 c m Now Lon amc imn Lor -, ttaN QfY a CaPPFlI. Daus IX NM ME S _ HEATH LANE--- _ / PROP. INLET EXISTSTORM RCP l50' ROW 5'X45' VISIBILITY TRIANGLE 'll / T R �' �.• ST. FH a I — — — 149.70' 01 SITE PLAN SCALE r 20'-0' 9 eDrawn By. kmA Rase Pr:02,lO,, Date: Revs lone i4 5 Notes 0 O a x a 7 RL, U O. O I FlQrl IMIN{\C,'t' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION USE OR REGULATORY APPROVAL SHEET 1 / EXIST. 8 WA E O• / PROP. 4' SIN P. S WER�TAP� N89d56'14"W ,-149.70' PROPOSED 5 B.L _ �NAI�R SER E — — — —� — — _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ /I I � _ 0 0 I 1 TYPE II BARRIER 5' SIDE YARD (4)9' x14 SPACES 11 = 1 I a co 0 a Q Im 5' SIDE YARD FE U o � 1 I 5' SIDE YARD (4)9'x1' x SPACES a I — — — 149.70' 01 SITE PLAN SCALE r 20'-0' 9 eDrawn By. kmA Rase Pr:02,lO,, Date: Revs lone i4 5 Notes 0 O a x a 7 RL, U O. O I FlQrl IMIN{\C,'t' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION USE OR REGULATORY APPROVAL SHEET 1 f SHIEFT Al IN, b RETAIL/2.5 CAR REp' --------------------- r - - - - - - - ---------- C) Lu—§RUARE )ROMITS&I --------------------------------- -7 211 f SHIEFT Al BEFOREYOU DIG_ HEATH LANE (50' ROW)G RATE VABILITYTP1NGLE n/ 01 SJTT� 4 Lai ntu ��J�B� DENOTES AREAS TO SE SOLID BERMUDA 501, (7) Ilcoca 7 -Gal. 1 UCr 3 —Cal III 0111IINS Syr,bol Code Nome SdEn nic Nome Common Name Plont'ing Size Comments 4 Laintu LagerstL.e is indica 'Tuscarora' Tuscarora' crape myHle 45—Gal 3 IS 5 canes 3 FIAT Ulmus c .... [ IT. Ced., elm 3"—Col B & B O3 Ce G Ce is canade Sis Eastern redbud 45—Gal 3" Cal O21 oca 01 SJTT� 4 Lai ntu ��J�B� DENOTES AREAS TO SE SOLID BERMUDA 501, (7) Ilcoca 7 -Gal. 1 UCr 3 —Cal NOTE: IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM TREE CALIPER CALIPER MEASUREMENT HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE AS REQUIRED BY CITY. T F TIE I EXIAN A ALL PLANT K ALE"R'LUNE, LI HEIS NAE�ALL SE MAI "TRIED RB EA- TO TIE APPEREATES E1oPERtaw"EA of PLANTING NOTES: PLANT SIZE, TYPE, AND CONDITION SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 2. ALL PLANT MATERIAL TO BE NURSERY GROWN STOCK. 3- CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF ALL PLANT MATERIAL UNTIL PROJECT ACCEPTANCE - 4. ALL CONTAINER GROWN PLANTS TO HAVE FULL, VIGOROUS ROOT SYSTEM, COMPLETELY ENCOMPASSING CONTAINER, 5. ALL PLANTS WELL ROUNDED AND FULLY BRANCHED. ALL TREES WITH SPREAD 2/3 OF HEIGHT, 6 CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OWNER WITH PREFERRED MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE OF ALL PLANTS AND S. LAWN J. MAI NTAIN/PROTECT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE WITH PLANT MATERIAL PER CITY STANDARDS AT ALL ENTRANCES TO SITE, 8. PREP ENTIRE WIDTH OF ALL DEFINED PLANTING BEDS WITH MIX AS OUTLINED IN SPECS. WHERE SHRUBS ARELOCATED ALONG CURB, SET SHRUBS BACK FROM CURB 3 FT. 9. SEE DETAIL SHEET FOLLOWING FOR PLANTING DETAILS. 10. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO TELEPHONE, TELE CABLE, ELECTRIC, GAS, WATER AND SEWER ANY DAMAGE TO UTILRIES TO BE REPAIRED BY CONTRACTOR AT NO COST TO OWNER. 11. EXISTING TREES ARE SHOWN TO REMAIN, CONTRACTOR SHALL PRUNE ONLY ON APPROVAL OF CITY ARBORIST. WORK TO INCLUDE REMOVAL OF ALL SUCKER GROWTH; DEAD AND DISEASED BRANCHES AND LIMBS; VINES, BRIARSAND OTHER INVASIVE GROWTH; AND ALL INTERFERING BRANCHES. MAKE ALL CUTS FLUSH TO REMAINING LIMB- RETAIN NATURAL SHAPE OF PLANT- ALL WORK SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 12, QUANTITIES ARE PROVIDED AS A COURTESY AND NOT INTENDED FOR BID PURPOSES, CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY PRIOR TO PRICING. 13. INSTALL EDGING BETWEEN LAWN AND PLANTING BEDS, REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS, FILE ALL CORNERS SMOOTH. 14, INSTALL CURLER BLANKET (OR EQUAL) PER MANUFACTURES INSTRUCTIONS ON ALL GROUNDCOVER/SHRUB BEDS WITH A SLOPEOF 4r1 OR GREATER. 15. AT TIME OF PLAN PREPARATION. SEASONAL PLANT AVAILABILITY CANNOT BE DETERMINED. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO SECURE AND RESERVE ALL B&B PLANTS WHEN AVAILABLE IN CASE ACTUAL INSTALLATION OCCURS DURING THE OFF—SEASON, PURCHASE AND HOLD BOB PLANTS FOR LATE SEASON INSTALLATION. 16. BERM ALL PARKING LOT ISLANDS AS SHOWN ON ENCLOSED DETAIL SHEET. (BERMS MAY NOT BE SHOWN ON GRADING PLAN.) 1J. PRIOR TO PLANTING. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE TREE LOCATIONS FOR APPROVAL BY OWNER. �y[J�\ FAIN • CUPP AR If �I S.Y -EI ARCHITECTS, - LANDSCAPE PLAN Drawn By: Jason R. Rase repa Ion te: Re so 2I ryR 2015 Revisions, Notes: J C w a x 0 3 b � y U cl PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION USE OR REGULATORY APPROVAL 41 4 ryCI, U IT LLJ ISI � I p� V SHEET Ll PLANT LIST Syr,bol ouan tilt' Code Nome SdEn nic Nome Common Name Plont'ing Size Comments 4 Laintu LagerstL.e is indica 'Tuscarora' Tuscarora' crape myHle 45—Gal 3 IS 5 canes 3 FIAT Ulmus c .... [ IT. Ced., elm 3"—Col B & B O3 Ce G Ce is canade Sis Eastern redbud 45—Gal 3" Cal O21 oca Ilex corn uta 'Ca nssa' Carissa holly 7—Gal, 36 O.C. Q3 Pich Pistocio chinensis Chinese pisioche 3"—Col B & B 0 T,.chelaspermum o i.licu Asi— jasmine t FEE 12 O.C. 0 Stipa 1W,H HT,X Mexican Feather GYp S9 1-0a1 1B" O.C. NOTE: IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM TREE CALIPER CALIPER MEASUREMENT HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE AS REQUIRED BY CITY. T F TIE I EXIAN A ALL PLANT K ALE"R'LUNE, LI HEIS NAE�ALL SE MAI "TRIED RB EA- TO TIE APPEREATES E1oPERtaw"EA of PLANTING NOTES: PLANT SIZE, TYPE, AND CONDITION SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 2. ALL PLANT MATERIAL TO BE NURSERY GROWN STOCK. 3- CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF ALL PLANT MATERIAL UNTIL PROJECT ACCEPTANCE - 4. ALL CONTAINER GROWN PLANTS TO HAVE FULL, VIGOROUS ROOT SYSTEM, COMPLETELY ENCOMPASSING CONTAINER, 5. ALL PLANTS WELL ROUNDED AND FULLY BRANCHED. ALL TREES WITH SPREAD 2/3 OF HEIGHT, 6 CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OWNER WITH PREFERRED MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE OF ALL PLANTS AND S. LAWN J. MAI NTAIN/PROTECT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE WITH PLANT MATERIAL PER CITY STANDARDS AT ALL ENTRANCES TO SITE, 8. PREP ENTIRE WIDTH OF ALL DEFINED PLANTING BEDS WITH MIX AS OUTLINED IN SPECS. WHERE SHRUBS ARELOCATED ALONG CURB, SET SHRUBS BACK FROM CURB 3 FT. 9. SEE DETAIL SHEET FOLLOWING FOR PLANTING DETAILS. 10. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO TELEPHONE, TELE CABLE, ELECTRIC, GAS, WATER AND SEWER ANY DAMAGE TO UTILRIES TO BE REPAIRED BY CONTRACTOR AT NO COST TO OWNER. 11. EXISTING TREES ARE SHOWN TO REMAIN, CONTRACTOR SHALL PRUNE ONLY ON APPROVAL OF CITY ARBORIST. WORK TO INCLUDE REMOVAL OF ALL SUCKER GROWTH; DEAD AND DISEASED BRANCHES AND LIMBS; VINES, BRIARSAND OTHER INVASIVE GROWTH; AND ALL INTERFERING BRANCHES. MAKE ALL CUTS FLUSH TO REMAINING LIMB- RETAIN NATURAL SHAPE OF PLANT- ALL WORK SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 12, QUANTITIES ARE PROVIDED AS A COURTESY AND NOT INTENDED FOR BID PURPOSES, CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY PRIOR TO PRICING. 13. INSTALL EDGING BETWEEN LAWN AND PLANTING BEDS, REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS, FILE ALL CORNERS SMOOTH. 14, INSTALL CURLER BLANKET (OR EQUAL) PER MANUFACTURES INSTRUCTIONS ON ALL GROUNDCOVER/SHRUB BEDS WITH A SLOPEOF 4r1 OR GREATER. 15. AT TIME OF PLAN PREPARATION. SEASONAL PLANT AVAILABILITY CANNOT BE DETERMINED. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO SECURE AND RESERVE ALL B&B PLANTS WHEN AVAILABLE IN CASE ACTUAL INSTALLATION OCCURS DURING THE OFF—SEASON, PURCHASE AND HOLD BOB PLANTS FOR LATE SEASON INSTALLATION. 16. BERM ALL PARKING LOT ISLANDS AS SHOWN ON ENCLOSED DETAIL SHEET. (BERMS MAY NOT BE SHOWN ON GRADING PLAN.) 1J. PRIOR TO PLANTING. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE TREE LOCATIONS FOR APPROVAL BY OWNER. �y[J�\ FAIN • CUPP AR If �I S.Y -EI ARCHITECTS, - LANDSCAPE PLAN Drawn By: Jason R. Rase repa Ion te: Re so 2I ryR 2015 Revisions, Notes: J C w a x 0 3 b � y U cl PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION USE OR REGULATORY APPROVAL 41 4 ryCI, U IT LLJ ISI � I p� V SHEET Ll Contact Information: TREE STAKESOLUTIONS wwAreestakesolutions.com JEFF TULEY 903-676-6143 U" BRA, NAIL ST FORM SAU 2 X BALL DIA. THINBRANCHES BY 1/3 RETAINING SHAPE OF PLAD (DO NOT CUT LEADER.) ALL TREES — PLANT SO THAT TOP OF R00 BALL IS 2" ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE — PANT ALLCUTS OVER I" DIA. — FLAG GUYING WIRES IMTIT SURVEYOR TAPE FOOTBALL ANCHOR RING 30-36' NAIL STAKE -ACCOMODATE ROOTBALL AND PENETRATE UND�I STUBBED GROUND ATILT ULCH ROOTBALL RING PLANTS/SPACING PER PLAN 3" MULCH INSTALLED BEFORE PLANTING P, BED PREP �\ JZT \ PER SPECS EDGING 1" ABOVE FINISH GRADE A 4" STEEL EDGING STAKE ON INSIDE OF BED ORM snucER BEDDING PLANTS I = EDGING DETAIL SPECIFIED PLANTING MIX - WATER & TAMP TO C-1 F NOT TO S2AI F REMOVE AIR POCKETSIII PLANTING NOTES: . PLANT SIZE, TYPE, AND CONDI ON SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. NAIL STAKE 30"-36 NAILS' ALL PLANT MATERAL TO BE NURSERY GROWN STOCK. ACCOMODATE 3. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF ALL PLANT MATERIAL UNTIL PROJECT ACCEPTANCE_ FOOTBALL AN 4, ALL CONTAINER GROWN PLANTS TO HAVE FULL, VIGOROUS ROOT SYSTEM, COMPLETELY ENCOMPASSING PENETRATE CONTAINER, 5, ALL PLANTS WELL ROUNDED AND FULLY BRANCHED. ALL TREES WITH SPREAD 2/3 OF HEIGHT. 2 X BALL DIA UNDISTURBED fi. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OWNER WITH PREFERRED MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE OF ALL PLANTS AND LAWNS. STAKING FOR MULTI—TRUNK TREES & J. MAINTAIN/PROTECT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE WITH PLANT MATERIAL PER CITY STANDARDS AT ALL ENTRANCES TO TREES 2" CAL. & UNDERSITE. 8. PREP N71RE WIDTH OF ALL DEFINED PLANTING BEDS WITH MIX AS OUTLINED IN SPECS, WHERE SHRUBS THIN BRANCHES BY 1/3 RETAINING SHAPE OF PLANT. (DO NOT CUT LEADER.) FORM SAUCER WITH 3" CONTINUOUS RIM ZI0 SCALE: NOT TO SCALE 3" MULCH SPECIFIED PLANTING _ 1K MIX. WATER OF TAMP TOCREMOVE AIR — L III=111= TS NOTE: 6" WIDTH IS MINIMUM. _ IF PLANTED IN DEFINED BED, —MIN_ PREP, ENTIRE BED AS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS. SHRUB PLANTING SCALE NOT TO SCALE SAFETY STAKE BY TREE STAKE SOLUTIONS D. SEE LOCAL SHEET FOLLOWNGBFORRPLAN71NG DETAILS CURB s FT. 10. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCA ION OF ALL UTILITIES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO TELEPHONE, SCALE: NOT TO SCALE TELE CABLE, ELECTRIC, GAS, WATER AND SEWER ANY DAMAGE TO UTILITIES TO BE REPAIRED BY CONTRACTOR AT NO COST TO OWNER. 11. EXISTING TREES ARE SHOWN TO REMAIN, CONTRACTOR SHALL PRUNE ONLY ON APPROVAL OF CITY ARBORIST. WORK TO INCLUDE REMOVAL OF ALL SUCKER GROWTH; DEAD AND DISEASED BRANCHES AND LIMBS; VINES, BRIARSAND OTHER INVASIVE GROWTH; AND ALL INTERFERING BRANCHES. MAKE ALL CUTS FLUSH TO RE MINI NO LIMB_ RETAIN NATURAL SHAPE OF PLANT_ ALL WORK SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF OWNER'S NOTE: IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM F REPRESENTATIVE. CALIPER MEASUREMENT HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE AS REQUIRED BY CITY. 12, OUANTITIES ARE PROVIDED AS A COURTESY AND NOT INTENDED FOR BID PURPOSES, CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY PRIOR TO PRICING. 13. INSTALL EDGING BETWEEN LAWN AND PLANTING BEDS, REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS, FILE ALL CORNERS SMOOTH. 4, INSTALL CURLER BLANKET (OR EQUAL) PER MANUFACTURES INSTRUCTIONS ON ALL GROUNDCOVER/SHRUB PLANT MIX BEDS WITH A SLOPEOF 41 oR GREATER. (REF. SPECS FOR 15. AT TIME OF PLAN PREPARATION. SEASONAL PLANT AVALABILITY CANNOT BE DETERMINED. IT IS THE DEPTH, MIX, ETC.) RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO SECURE AND RESERVE ALL BAR PLANTS WHEN AVAILABLE IN CASE ACTUAL INSTALLATION OCCURS DURING THE OFF—SEASON, PURCHASE AND HOLD BOB PLANTS FOR LATE 3SEASON INSTALLATION. 3:1 MAXIMUM SLOPE 16. BERM ALL PARKING LOT ISLANDS AS SHOWN ON ENCLOSED DETAIL SHEET. (BERMS MAY NOT BE SHOWN ON 1 GRADING PUW) PRIOR O PLANTING. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE TREE LOCATIONS FOR APPROVAL BY OWNER. CURB TYPICAL PARKING LOT ISLAND MOUNDING as �y[J�\ FAIN • CURB A If �I S.Y LANDSCAVE ARCHITECTS, LLC J�� �+ LANDSCAPE DETAILS Drawn By: Jason R. Rose repa Ion te: Re so 2I ryR 2015 Revisions, oe C�l ME 0 O 3 7J N J U v PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION USE OR REGULATORY APPROVAL ,All 11 PICA1111 A 11-1 nsd °w bit neolinvl w — Doi 'co °arm'",° eaearemeteode p u g �th branehee n ly , iqt , All °m Atem trees a ° f three innilhor zi�' m°le. 8�ap Nursery grown slo�k°o andscape Ncndectby. b. Perennials in pots, Nu ps, bulbs as spa died vegetFliO ,h p Od-e n y g th Df cop g s, o h Ter bnl U other materlaleh ul l0 greading, panpling,Np ante growth or avegetative p a grass on)eeg ass erus On)da , adicale (Cyp weeds r grass will b, a. Teri tapsall°(cos by antractar): °gea d I Deers ao daA90 emn„e,.6—,09 3 IMulch,, IMu—Shredded p and wood y unoeee°tome. i:aged bags ° bwA shredded motenal s Dpp °red eq� valen�ommer y variable bale peal moss or eonetmanon grade°yellow pine, -in brown With A, —1-d lu,nbuAU l. L don_ FumIip le o v o itesee and eonneebone on H Ant,des,eant — writ—prOOf Or egu Edg,nq —3,T6 X green. new nnd anu d. w�,h 2.02 MIXES F(D 21D ehili— t2_,O at 30 e_itAdd SF R. Plating M., far Annuals/Perenn,bls zo` 2 of Bond P—ide 5Oi50 peat maw t° topsori m- rose for drndoge:e PART III — EXEcuTION to °u y One,met1. q 3,02 I—ECTION 31 P 3.03 FIELD MEASUREMENTS .n plo- 3.04 EXGVATION FOR PLANTING A, Ant Shope — V fi—I hbnd feet order °r twice the boll, rot bottom. or shrubs — Size p ting b d as shown on ngse 4, R—fill tho—ghly, full tree Ie -Py. p 4 PCTE it I,—eep Pants bDoe nthAot dr --till benealh 9 exisl,ngnt ees. 3.05 PLANTING A, General set p s 2' tfog 9,.d, l° a for sewing. e. set p gids b o Z at�I a ing mibh�ee hP rntnmpea s 3. Add ly =° n a«ordanre 'iUh stan'darrd industry proNl e gion it Fo oughly settle b water Pdnnq nnd tumpinq soil in 6 5`s Prepare 3' d outside root b anling. ughly w 7. A-, trees o argesa ed ted °pl.n,. nli—descant accortl ng t manufacturers 6n5truction °ing 'p -r, p,r trade standards. 9 P ing manure thnt has been hood df°g s tA hng.p Of boll to iia b�nd,ng a ap of boll nnd Atop of -hip g f°m under ball, but eut all ring Dp ing p r - loose. or 6. Raciff II bhp in°g manure in 6 lids. C Catainer Grown Plants ° pap ing manure that nae been hood BE:,f,ll wIth plbnl,ng 6 it D. Muhhing ng W 11h 3 °f maleh. g has settled. odd ndditi—I muleh to regain D. Pruning wig= d b mSnc w tlea tngPE'U C,15 tn 3.07 CLEAN—UP A, seep and wash p ,,d su t—A Remo a annng a onsl—ldn d mdadfnq mors, o-nsh°and au amen m�soeuaneaus moieRnls. 3.08 MAINTENANCE A C°ntrad°r res ns le r°r routine, n re9�lar site P�til Flnnl A�replanre Is awarde v Ownee nW°rk �ndudes 9 ((OSekleau etl) 7. M°w,ng 9(weekly) umee, levels Deka od eholl dddreee III f egae epee. .orae. �4a FAINCUPPETT � �'� fi �LANOSCAPE ARGHITEl;TS. LLG � � k N 5 xre 4 PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS Drawn By: Jason R. Rase repo Ion te: Re 2I ryR 2015 evlsons: O epi; S: SII nV C w a 0 3 b � U v PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION USE OR REGULATORY APPROVAL grndOe =peen a eIhGwhere n ICI ARA11 IDEA bd 0) 1AL-ry m v thea orr A, ., RA,AE HEdw mehs e roHb t., iwmleh o so pe n1 seed nom edm e emir SAlinD. Dep Th, of Agticullure os io lob IPng,!A ty. n g motion. acre, ry,g p is and a, su�nd mte a11re/2 - 2 la s Pe th B ours s pe acre when e supe ism'f 13/4.1 and sieepe, ar, i z r wefib,r a� w rw��nofpsoade srpe �s ilb— conn 3 nrn /4,i, rr, -11e ws Ah- ne ng hay3 Ions per I, pp ed yreenaDr air area, but mws, Eb. Mnn ndur mater relenti'ion lEn Ubt 2C5 11DRO-MULGITING r boy Ali h _Ll It em ulson is pp ed overeths to co plate the mulch. a SAO p kn�e .a� e malate deed mane where other mw,enwlpodndI— Dber not egrEd'inq EAHr Ar w e to ldcl qdIUHy t. A,rac (4'J m Ilsngr 5 E g d/the rlb Ahon topsoil oa d gm E further d rea any a a�swrbea du q q d,ngll and consirwcuo p Drees. rtn�n pe �meteregdrodea oreos ono rwwre -,Ed ag oeos y The e grad'inq c b—fil Ping o hnting m do /berms. afond ar e seed, and re,,Ired End q 3.a2 GRASS SEEDING sw; ed unlit moothea sow seed ound� thor 9 rinq n not 'ell ire d'mglos nd'it'ions,rm r grpassd amq w w n ep me and mu smnd nr D. Provide p ani grass s ding 1 ISEdHed Seed Ecc Th e.otherwise directe y weer Dr Owners Rep emniairve_ bIr wit rice. End Ann -Rye G-2 wt the rwte wi p n per were_ pwn "CIA lee,.Hz,r of w mie of 20/25 prwn s Gr 1. A 3.03 WILD FLOWERS 10 p ds/acre 0°s Eyed Dol 5 pp ds ° Ere snos Am— ds/wc ws Prtmrrse os v as/a=re ds/a s/acs c Dlile Rluesiem you ds/Here 3.04 MULCH beA— and shrill be at the rate of 1 e1 e2 z An, pe were. 105 I—EIT GN mna. Intl. p ar anootll proieruon when so d�reEl,d, IPOL nem as d�reded. m -6 MAINTENANCE EM de sg tomp cd an oler s sn cess y work of mainlennnre. Mnmtain supe ao goinst er i n. 3.07 REHVDROMULCHINA P.The Own en„na've es'gnnte EGE, to gra d be eng.q(Rerm aria gs t.nglin 5d `y>')m= At,LET seeded CRUraetar`shEll e pe armed withoo;I'�gence an ,he pa i of the SECT ON D2922 SSDD NO PART I - GENERAL 1.01 DESCRIPTION sdd b dp` p r.bbn e�ng 4_Mecellwnenwe m nwgemeni p ddGee Pmtsh tshCrng, Secnon a2a 2. Lawns andwdiGrasses, Sediao Dn 02930 1 02 REFERENCE STANDARDS 1 9ye of Horticultural Nomenclature Second Ed Non, . phwny D ane inr Conslm Nlon, tem 'ES. SeedIS i r Emsfon C. Urolno St- renn 1,04 Inclu PRODUCT wDELIIMERv, eSTORAGE AND HANDLING 2 Fdrnish End dehyer ea h ww ey CErER, bwge dr the 2. on Arm A Tanon Fertl,lz r Lnw. nwI ,re_ 1.05 JOB CONDITIONS A Plwnting --n. p Protect and ME,nihin Sodded AGE, C. 12FA I PART 11 - PRODUCTS 2.01 MATERIALS A, Sod SDdT Ass an wings. e n eat. n to mn,e than three ehor to ed an w crit m etrspe o m least 1�2 eg. pdnot m.A Th- I. ngin. n AT Th, Dep amen, o q ,Ih e D, i ,An r1 Entr l.gy.r he 3, FELUUzer ,. SU : p Stones, rind mbar e conn one meh 3. My o Lectshthal em eriere with sodding o C. P epa e sod bed. moo of b'�nga edgmgw �detwlis,bel�owgrad sgs wll meet nAp owl of Owners Rep.eseplalive belore dding A. Sodding: ornI,E y4h edypeopio i,rlde wenn ooa99,e,a edges ,1 ni z HAiEn 3.d In Ed- A- eglt (two pe) o y I�nP, t IIr q 3 Sod S�Ell no' be A t, w��gn�rn H.Frhna,,A: ePtn°�I Al Th a - Crw'LET plaornlee ooi of wmtnn miwo a enuo s.nw 3,05 MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT he'�gm edm'aedimwl wEgeA es w y n A Remd d9maged o cnrreAdd ridges. and Dther ewnnre 9 rites ehdll be 9$ �y[J�\ FAIN • CURR AR —Di ARCHITECTS, LLC TURF SPECIFICATIONS Drawn By: Jason R. Rase repo ton ter Revisions, 2I ryR 2015 evins: O 2� S: \\ nu ME C w a O 3 b � O C U ti V PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION USE OR REGULATORY APPROVAL OR .,�l A� F W N C U LLJ Fit 7' SHEET L4 f HAAS ROSE AT LOST CREEK LLC Imagine... Believe... Build April 2, 2015 Gary L. Sieb, AICP, Planning Director City of Coppell 255 Parkway Blvd. Coppell, TX 75019 Direct: 972.304.3618 Subject: "560 Coppell Road DRC Responses" Dear Mr. Sieb, Agency Reviewed By Review Date Comments Building Inspection Jack Foster 2/25/2015 1. These Comments are the result of a site plan review only. They are not the result of a full Building plan review. Further comments should be expected when building and related plans are submitted with permit application(s). Noted 2. Provide detailed code analysis, including Building Construction Type, Occupancy Type(s), separation distances, minimum plumbing fixture calculation, etc. to allow consideration of building heights, areas and fire separation distances. Use 2012 code. Note: Section 705.3 "Buildings on the same lot" will not apply because maximum area for Type V construction of Group R-2 Occupancies is exceeded. Occupancy Type Classification: R-2 "Live/work units" -2012 International Building Code Construction Type Classification: V -B Group R-2, Type V -B (Unprotected) Aa={7,000+[7,000x0]+0 Tabulated Aa=7,000 SQFT per Story If=[F/P-0.25]W/30 (Open Frontage Increase) lf=[(155.417'/310.834')-0.25]50' (ROW)/30 If=[0.25]1.667 Frontage Increase If=.15 Aa={7,000+[7,000X0.15]+[7,000X2]) Aa={7,000+1,050+14,000) Modified Aa=22,050 First Floor=1,164 SgFt per Unit X5 Units=5,820 SgFt Total Gross Second Floor=1,164 SgFt per Unit X5 Units=5,820 SgFt Total Gross *Complies as a single building on one lot per 2012 International Building Code" **Separation to comply with Live/work units as specified in the 2012 International Building Code. ***"Uses within Live/work units, complying with Section 419 are not considered separate occupancies." JR ROSE DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES • 141 DICKENS DRIVE . COPPELL, TX • 75019 Tel. 214,454.7895 Fax 972.534.1850 HAAS ROSE ATLOST CREEK LLC Imagine... Believe... Build 3. Separation of less than 3' will require 1 -hour fire rated walls with no openings. Plans show openings. Exterior Walls -"Buildings on the same lot and considered as portions of one building in accordance with section 705.3 are not required to comply with this section." 4. Live/work units must be sprinklered. Agree 5. 10' drive is too narrow for 2 -way traffic. Due to the small travel distance and arrangement of driveways applicant feels 10' is adequate. Drive is not a required firelane and minimizing this drive will maximize greenspace. However, in the event this is uncompromisable, site allows increase to 15' width. 6. Trees at intersections appear to be in sight triangle. Agree 7. Parking on Coppell Rd. is in ROW. Agree 8. Indicate handicap parking for businesses. Complied, 1 Accessible Parking Space Required. 9. Indicate how parking requirements are met. Total Residential Dwelling Units=5 Required Provided 10 10 Additional On Site Parking Spaces=10 (See unit allowances by use in compliance with City of Coppell Parking Ordinance) *Each "unit's" downstairs fully complies with office use parking requirements **Each "unit's downstairs complies with retail use parking requirements save and except kitchen. ***4 Public Spaces along Coppell Road although not required compliment and serve the economic long term success of proposed Live/work lofts to the benefit of both tenant and community. 10. Include note on plat/PD condition that live/work units may only have single tenants. (i.e. Proprietor of business in work portion must live in living unit. and vice versa.) Agree 11. Live/work unit area includes porch and garage. Without these, units are less than stated minimum of 2000 square feet. (Previous calculations show wrong #'s) For purposes of calculating allowable area under 2012 IBC we incorporated all areas as totality of area still falls well under allowable area. 12. PD condition: Not more than five nonresidential JR ROSE DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES ® 141 DICKENS DRIVE + COPPELL, TX • 75019 Tel. 214.454.7895 Fax 972.534.1850 HAAS ROSE ATLOST CREEK LLC Imagine... Believe... Build workers or employees are allowed to occupy the nonresidential area at any one time. Agree CITY OF COPPELL DRC REPORT Agency Reviewed By Review Date Comments Engineering Fire Administration Parks and Recreation Planning Department 2/26/2015 2/23/2015 2/25/2015 2/24/2015 Mike Garza Tim Oates John Elias Gary Sieb 1. There will be additional comments during detailed engineering plan review. Agree 2. The existing drive on Coppell rd will have to be coordinated and agreed upon the owners. There are prescriptive rights to this drive. Texas Property rights are very clear. Adverse Possession (a method of acquiring title to real property by possession for a statutory period under certain conditions) does not apply to property platted prior to such possession. While retaining our legal rights we will coordinate with neighboring property in good citizenship but are not willing to encumber the right to the legal rights and use of our property. 3. Will there be one main domestic meter and sub meters for each unit? We have concerns about this. One public meter. It is our intent to assign a property manager to handle individual utility billing to the occupantslowners. 4. Site visibility will need to be checked at the corner. 45'x 45' (face of curb) will be maintained as required. All 5 units will be equipped with automatic fire sprinkler protection, including small rooms, void space between floors and attic space. Due to the proposed construction, we do not have void accessible areas between the floors, nor accessible attic spaces. 1. Parks Development Fees $1,285 per unit. JR ROSE DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES • 141 DICKENS DRIVE r COPPELL, TX s 75019 Tel. 214.454.7895 Fax 972.534.1850 HAAS ROSE ATLOST CREEK LLC Imagine... Believe... Build Acknowledged 1. Enlarge Vicinity Map. Revised 2. inadequate /missing I.s. calculations (need over 6,000 sq.ft.) Revised 3. parking not allowed in front yard 4. inadequate parking *Applicant agrees that a Public Parking & Sidewalk Easement will be granted to City of Coppell via separate instrument. Total Residential Dwelling Units=5 Required Provided 10 10 Additional On Site Parking Spaces=10 (See unit allowances by use in compliance with City of Coppell Parking Ordinance) *Each "unit's" downstairs fully complies with office use parking requirements **Each "unit's downstairs complies with retail use parking requirements save and except kitchen. ***4 Public Spaces along Coppell Road although not required compliment and serve the economic long term success of proposed Live/work lofts to the benefit of both tenant and community. 5. tandum parking not allowed We are asking for an exception to this based upon the use of proposed live/work lofts as residential owner/occupant's parking is achieved in covered garage and visitors parking is accommodated behind garages. Visitors will leave before Owner/occupants will. This request is also in relationship to the small site constraints. 6. corner lot building requires two front yards. As proposed due to site constrants. 7. there is a minimum 10 foot buffer from adjacent residential uses Applicant is asking for a 5' build line. Residences to the East have an additional 15' build line in existence as well as an 8' cedar board on board fence with steel posts. 8. to be compatible, structures should have gabled roof lines Applicant wishes to retain commercial "feel" of designs as well as architectural accuracy. 9. established building line on Heath Lane not followed. As proposed, we are requesting 5' Build Line. 10. Need PD condition stating primary use is commercial, secondary is residential. Use will be governed by the 2012 International Building Code Live/Work Units. JR ROSE DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES • 141 DICKENS DRIVE . COPPELL, TX • 75019 Tel. 214.454.7895 Fax 972.534.1850 HAAS ROSE AT LOST CREEK LLC Imagine... Believe... Build 11. This property appears to be severely overbuilt, density needs reduction. We feel the small scale nature of our proposed units reduce the scale and feel vs a single large building with parking lot. We feel density must be looked at in terms of scale vs. U/A and is appropriate along a heavily trafficked road like Coppell Road. 12. sheets EX1 and EX2 only for engineering. Agreed. 13. a commercial use adjacent to residential requires a minimum 6; masonry screen wall. Due to the use being Live/Work Lofts we feel the 6' cedar board on board to the South is acceptable. 14. There seems to be some issue with the South curb cut location shown on two lots? Can be coordinated at final engineering review. According to U.S. Small Business Administration statistics, over half of all small businesses begun in the last decade have been home-based—that's more than 24 million in real numbers—with a new home-based business being launched every 11 seconds. Source: ("The Growth of Home Based Businesses" The Cooperator by Matthew Worley) Attached The advancement of technology has far surpassed slow changing City Zoning categories reluctant to change. What we are proposing is the appropriate and highest best use of this unique property. Although I wish to avoid the controversial term "mixed-use" we are in effect blending the transition from this properties presence along Coppell Road and it's close proximity to the recent economic investments in Old Town Coppell with the residential neighborhood both in scale and character. This site, along with three others have sat vacant throughout an almost decade long building boom in North Texas. We are presenting a substantial economic investment at our risk toward what we believe will be an appealing unique jewel for the area of old Town Coppell. This will be our third project within the Old Town Coppell neighborhood and if approved bring our combined total investment to over fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000) with no economic incentives requested from the citizens of Coppell. Our project provides for the Planning Department's desire to make this a "mixed-use" type situs, provides economic viability not afforded on such a small site via separated occupancy types and business types, and answers the highest -and -best use all developers seek all the while providing an architecturally attractive facade in a highly visible historic feeling streetscape with on street parking and wide sidewalks to encourage neighborhood access to the old Town. The only unknown is what unique types of businesses and services will endeavor to establish themselves within a vibrant high-income community such as Coppell. Will it be music instruction, an artist or architect, furniture finisher, tutor, accountant, the possibilities are as endless as they are exciting. I hope the City will join in our excitement towards making this a unique and beautiful project. JR ROSE DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES • 141 DICKENS DRIVE e COPPELL, TX + 75019 Tel. 214.454.7895 Fax 972.534.1850 CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT CASE NO.: PD -258R -SF, Villas of Southwestern P&Z HEARING DATE: April 16, 2015 C.C. HEARING DATE: May 12, 2015 STAFF REP.: Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning LOCATION: 822 Mango Court SIZE OF AREA: 3.87 acres of property CURRENT ZONING: PD -258 -SF (Planned Development -258 -Single Family) REQUEST: A zoning change request to PD -258R -SF (Planned Development -258 Revised - Single Family), to amend the development regulations to allow two stucco homes, approval of a Detail Plan for Lot 2 (822 Mango Court) and approval of a Conceptual Plan for an additional stucco home within this subdivision. APPLICANT: APPLICANT V. J. Bora and Ramana Juvvadi 1916 Cottonwood Valley Circle Irving, TX, 75038 (214) 924-5169 Email: rriuvvadi2gmail.com HISTORY: This property was rezoned from LI Light Industrial to PD for residential development in November of 2012. The PD consisted of seven single-family lots on a rather unusual design for a public street based upon the limited access to the property. HISTORIC COMMENT: There are no structures of historic significance located on this property. TRANSPORTATION: As mentioned in the HISTORY comment, this is an unusually designed single-family subdivision with a 30 -foot access street (10 -foot access easement and 20 feet of private property) based upon the fact that the access to Southwestern Boulevarda four -lane divided thoroughfare recently constructed to code with concrete pavement in a 90 - plus feet of right of way—was extremely limited. ITEM #08 Page I of 2 SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North: single-family residences; PD -108 -R -SF -9, Planned Development for detached homes South: vacant industrial land; LI, Light Industrial East: School administration (Brock Center); C, Commercial West: scattered single family; C, Commercial COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Coppell 2030, A Comprehensive Master Plan, was amended with the rezoning of this property to Residential Neighborhood in 2012. The proposal before you complies with the amended Master Plan. DISCUSSION: In order to build stucco residences in Coppell, a special exception to our masonry building materials specifications must be made. That is the case here. Specifically, this applicant is asking to allow 100% stucco on a specified lot (Lot 2) and further requests the right to build one more stucco house in this small seven -lot subdivision. Historically, the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance dealing with stucco construction were placed in the code in an attempt to limit this construction type in favor of a more "old world" architectural style with brick, stone and wood elements. A provision was placed in the code; however, that would allow stucco on a limited basis through the Special Use or Planned Development process. That is what has happened --most recently in the 56 -lot Chateaus subdivision that allowed up to 10 stucco homes as long as they were separated by three masonry units. The developer actually built six. Applying that same rationale and ratio of stucco to masonry residences (less than 10%) would limit this subdivision to the one unit being specifically asked for. Therefore, we would recommend that the one specific stucco residence be approved; that the additional unit be denied based upon the ratio provision and historical comments stated above. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff is recommending APPROVAL of the requested stucco residence on Lot 2, DENIAL of a second stucco structure and the following condition: 1. Include a note on Sheets 2 and 3 that state "100% stucco' in bold letters. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Recommend approval of the request 2. Recommend disapproval of the request 3. Recommend modification of the request 4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date ATTACHMENTS: 1. Site Plan (8 '/2"x 11" exhibit) 2. Elevations (Sheet 2 and 3, 24"x 36" exhibits) ITEM #08 Page 2 of 2 100' ROW I TP.E55EL 20' SAN. SEWER EASEMENT VOLUME 68079, PAGE 100 POINT OF BEGINNING D.R.D.C.T. 12' IRF (CM) — 504 , 20' 03.39' 15' T.P.&L. EASE W N 85°27'32" E a I stoer- 12' IRF (CM) H.O.A. — — — b I PAGE 105, D.R.D.C.T. LOMMONARE 15' T.P.&L. EASEMENT VOLUME 71207, — _ — — 8 0 m 950• 7 I A 25' Drainage Ease 99405E Volume 91211, Peg D.R.D.C.T. VIJAY K. SORRA&RAMANA JUWADI I, /vo / TYP D.C.C.INST. NO. 201200131254 i p . W 20' P.R.D.C.T. 0 o p op c WW1 N holt—_ 6-h } = I e N 90°00'00° W 120.46 ar It �u ad 066S /a „W I;�,°,� e'S�DFYAaoxR H.O.A. �C Ipo5 Q �Q W /�' } a?i 6 o COMMON AREA 1X �µ a g W ro m F h I o N z 73,556 SQ. FT. N'"0 Q4 4 W = 2� 7854 SF - O I Pinkert 5 90°00'00' E 140.91' O 00 O H.O.A. LOT 3X (56 ADDITIO PARKI c 5 rn (9' ') C6 / \ 8258 SF I 0 oto / \ a st05YAR0 W ZONE AE per FIRM PANEL NO. / v / age 25402 48113CO115 J Dated 0812312001 3 H.O.A. \ N 90Acres 0000 W 92.25' CO T / COMMON AREA 2X�_ N _ H.O.A. / COMMON A piX X3 U _ N 90°OD'00" E u� _ 195.97 20' SAN. SEWER EASEMENT / / y I 11.5' UTILIPLE$MT.. &,VSIDEWALK F£ML g 12' IRF (CM) VOLUME 68079, PACE 100 / / w / N 90°00'00' W 129.95. C", �/ enc C°' D.R.D.C: r. N 89'4�E 91.33' '' � 9. 2' 60.00 60.03' PPrp1,�OrAaPe 5 7gJ9'0311 / / / � 89.25' TILITY ESMT. G 25'eUIwINGUN! _ ( / / N 89'44'35' E81 .45' O F —1 12' IRF (CM) / / / a'stotnnao No v Q I NI 3I� 'I 6065565704 LLIQ 65665E y Q 5E 6 N O E I �I SII 1 �"- N 1o'RFARSMAM SP/ / I10925 SF E,Ne9PGw 9 ' 60.00 60.00' 1N`EOpO Gj' GO m O 125'IRF(CM) 89°58'48" W 12'IRF(CM) N o oh 20' m w bN 188.57' J o O 112' IRF (CM) Ingress &Egress Restrictive Covenants P JP Daniel C. Soto8O 89 12' IR (CM) Called 0.108 apes Volume 94002, Page 2212 12' IRF (CM) LP Volume 83140, Page 5283 D.R.D.C.T. N 89°02'24" W O D.R.D.C.T. 010 99.3 1' N O Daniel C. Soto Apes Daniel C. Soto Volume 94002, Page 2212 'age 25482 Volume 94002, Page 2212 D.R.D.C.T. N Coppell Independent School DistrictT' D.R.D.C.T. I rG O Called 0.108 Acres W - Volume 95033, Page 279 rn D.R.D.C.T. RTY LINE TABLE 112" IRF z F TION DISTA CE _p r\315'Drainage Easement 5' ,,, O Volume 91211, Page 1011 "37'53" E 15.14' 00N a D.R.D.C.T. I Pinker) co '°37'53" E 16.60' J a � \1 O n a '14'51 W 16.09 5 Recdprocal Easement Agreement Volume 87087, Page 3937 °14'00" E 29.91' o W Volume ed 20'Strip 7,P °52 35 E 27.02 g Volume 83140, Page 5279 D.R.D.C.T. °07'25" E 14.50' lZ 5 89°51'33" W 20.06' 12' IRF (CM) 112' IRF (CM) )WAY CURVE TABLE -R C5 Site Plan 19°15'56" g SOUTHWESTERN 300.00-BLVD. - - - ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" - 1'-0" NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" ----------------------- - ------------------------------------------ SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" - 1'-0" NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" LED - ------ ------------ NEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1-0" ---------------- = Ymem � � EH - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-O" CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT CASE NO.: PD -280-R, Verizon P&Z HEARING DATE: April 16, 2015 C.C. HEARING DATE: May 12, 2015 STAFF REP.: Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning LOCATION: 1005 E. Sandy Lake Road SIZE OF AREA: One acre of property (actual site is 525 square feet) CURRENT ZONING: R (Retail) REQUEST: A zoning change request to PD -280-R (Planned Development -280 -Retail), to allow an 80 -foot telecommunication tower, antenna and facilities. APPLICANT: REPRESENTING LEASEE (VERIZON) Griffin Harris PLLC Ms. Kathy Zibilich 8150 N. Central Expressway Suite 1475 Dallas, TX. 75206 (214) 420-8700 Fax: (214) 420-8704 Email kzibilich2griffinharris.com HISTORY: There has been no development history on this parcel for a number of years. It is owned by the city and has been partially occupied with a sewage pump station for over 50 years. HISTORIC COMMENT: There is no historic significance other than the lift station is over 50 years old. TRANSPORTATION: Sandy lake Road is a four -lane divided, concrete road contained within an approximate 110 foot right-of-way. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING North: non -conforming plant nursery; R, Retail South: Universal Academy; PD -97R -3-R, Planned Development for a charter school East: St. Joseph's Retirement Village; PD- 114 -R -SF -7, Planned Development for a retirement community West: Universal Academy; PD -97R -3-R, Planned Development for a charter school ITEM #09 Page I of 2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Coppell 2030, A Comprehensive Master Plan, shows this property as suitable for Mixed Use Neighborhood. DISCUSSION: This is a pretty straight -forward request for construction of a cell tower on city owned land behind the Universal Academy charter school at Sandy Lake and MacArthur Boulevard. The tower will be located behind an existing six-foot tall masonry screening fence and will be at least 300 feet south of Sandy Lake Road. The city has an existing sanitary sewer pump station on the site (it has been there in excess of 50 years), and as seen in the included exhibits, the cell tower will be so located as to not interfere with any pump station activities. In addition, the applicant has agreed to place a concrete access drive to the site, and construct a six- foot tall masonry fence with gate at the site entrance that will totally screen the tower equipment from public view. The tower equipment will be enclosed by a chain-link fence, and although we do not generally advocate chain link, it will be totally surrounded by a six foot brick wall. Finally, this cell tower will be of stealth design, basically an 80 -foot tall cylinder with antennas interior to the tower, and of an off-white or buff color. It is a somewhat isolated site, the tower will be designed as a tall cylinder, the facility equipment will be totally screened from public views, and the lease will bring additional monthly income to the city. The lease is structured in five year increments, for a total of 25 years with a final expiration date of 2040. Support of this request is recommended with conditions listed below. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff is recommending APPROVAL of this request with the following condition: 1. The property will need to be platted. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Recommend approval of the request 2. Recommend disapproval of the request 3. Recommend modification of the request 4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date ATTACHMENTS: 1. Tower Elevation (Sheet A-1) 2. Site Plan (Sheet C-1) 3. Enlarged Site Plan (Sheet C-2) 4. Brick Wall Detail (Sheet SE -4) 5. Wall Detail (Sheet C-8) ITEM #09 Page 2 of 2 BORN SPM WPY 3`CP tOCC �S TEy SON SF �9y PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH TURNPIKE My e9R PAT VD 87 � A 2 SITE o SANDY LAKE RD BELT LINE RD VICINITY MAP �� scALe NTs EXAMPLE OF NEW STEALTH TOWER FOR REFERENCE ONLY. PAINT FOR NEW STEALTH TOWER TO BE DETERMINED BY OTHERS. STEALTH TOWER (SAMPLE SITE) \� SCALE: NTS NOTE: ALLPRO CGI SCOPE OF WORK DOES NOT INCLUDE A STRUCTURAL EVALUATION OF THIS TOWER OR THE NEW MOUNT STRUCTURE. NEW ANTENNAS & EO UI CREPT SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAVE NOT BEEN EVALUATED TO VERIFY THE TOWER OR STRUCTURE HAS THE CAPACITY TO ADEQUATELYSUPPORT THESE ANTENNAS & EQUIPMENT. PRIOR TO ANY ANTENNA OR EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION. A STRUCTURAL EVALUATION OF TOWER OR STRUCTU RE, NCLUDING ALL MOUNTING SYSTEMS AND HARDWARE, SHOULD BE PERFORMED. TOWER FOUNDATION AND DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS ARE SEPARATE DOCUMENTS OUTSIDE THIS CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT SET CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR POSTING TEMPORARY FCC NUMBER WHEN TOWER ERECTION BEGINS NOTE: ELEVATION PLANA MEANT TO DEPICT TOWER HEIGHT AND IS NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION. FOR CONSTRUCTION SEE TOWER DRAWINGS AND/OR STRUCTURAL ANALYSES PREPARED BY OTHERS TOP OF TOWER ELEV. 80'-0" AGL 526 5' AMSL fi (N) LESSEE'S ANTENNA CENTERLINE r ELEV 75'-0' AGL ISI 521.5' AM SL Cl NEW SITE BUILD (N) LESSEE'S ANTENNA CENTERLINE a ELE51 65-0SL° AGL ISI 1005E SANDY LAKE RD CORRELL, TX 75019 rr � 511,5' AM DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL I (N) LESSEE'S ICE BRIDGE (N) LESSEE'S GPS ANTENNA (N) LESSEES OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT (N) GENERATOR — 446.5' ABEL MR /TOWER ELEVATION \� SCALE: 3/16' = V-0" r NEW SITE BUILD SANDY LAKE SITE # ID 301560 (N) 80 -0" STEALTH TOWER. 1005E SANDY LAKE RD CORRELL, TX 75019 (SEE TOWER MANUFACTURER'S DALLAS COUNTY DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION) ALLPRO CONSULTING GROUP, INC. ST�I,fy�t (N) 6'-0" CHAIN LINK FENCE (SEE 1/C-8 FOR DETAIL) CFAC{iAL GGOFGE di.........9179 t�•, SHEET NAME TOWER ELEVATION LATITUDE: 32' 58' 05.2107" SHEET NUMBER /��1 A I LONGITUDE: -96' 57' 23,2425" ELEVATION: 447.2 AMSL (E) ROAD V/ J (E) BLDG (N) LESSEE'S 525 SO, FT. LEASE AREA. (SEE ENLARGED \ / PLAN C-2 FOR DETAILS) SEE SURVEY FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LEASE AREA, ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT (N) eo'—o" STEALTH TOWER, (SEE TOWER MANUFACTURER'S E DRAVNNGSFOR ADDITIONAL CTOR SHALL RESTORE AND REPAIR ANY INFORMATION) D AREAS CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION TO L OR BETTER CONDITION NOTE: DURING CONSTRUCTIONCONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN AN ORANGE FENCE PERIMETER AROUND THE SITE AT ALL TIMES FOLLOWING CLOSE OF EVERY BUSINESS DAY (-,V OVERALL SITE PLAN SCALE. 1/32" = 1'-0' NORTH w (N) 18'-0' WIDE �D CONCRETE DRIVEWAY LSI (SEE 3/C-7 FOR DETAIL) (N) TELCO PEDESTAL (EXACT LOCATION TO BE FIELD VERIFIED) (N) KNOXBOX THAT CAN BE USED BY THE CARRIER, THE CITY FOR LIFT STATION AND THE FIRE DEPARTMENT (N) 18'-0•. WIDE SEE-THROUGH GATE (SEE 3/SE-4 FOR DETAIL) t _ (N) 6'-0" BRICK WALL (° (SEE 1 & 2/SE-4 FOR DETAIL) r (E) BLDG I I III = (E) POWER POLE TO O BE UTILIZED III I 11 11 ❑ / T I I o I I (E) I I 1 BLDG I I O W (N) GRAVEL Z� ROAD O (N) LESSEE'S OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT WITHIN NEW BRICK WALLS (E) GRAVEL ROAD NOTE: ALL GO CGI SCOPE OF WORK DOES NOT INCLUDE A STRUCTURAL EVALUATION OF THIS TOWER OR STRUCTURE. NEW ANTENNAS & EQUIPMENT SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAVE NOT BEEN EVALUATED TO VERIFY THE TOWER OR STRUCTURE HAS THE CAPACITY TO ADEQUATELY SUPPORT THESE ANTENNAS & EQUIPMENT, PRIOR TO ANY ANTENNA OR EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION. A STRUCTURAL EVALUATION OF TOWER OR STRUCTURE, INCLUDING ALL MOUNTING SYSTEMS AND HARDWARE, SHOULD BE PERFORMED. (E) OVERHEAD SERVICE LINE o a NEW SITE BUILD SANDY LAKE SITE # ID 301560 1005E SANDY LAKE RD CORRELL, TX 75019 DALLAS COUNTY ALLPRO CONSULTING GROUP, INC. )pSi MOT'tACKAL GLOF1Gk ,.:....91793....... kdH�}SSty �A,y F'_yLa�� SHEET NAME OVERALL SITE PLAN SHEET NUMBER C-1 0' = TRUE NORTH AZ -O UTILITY VERIFICATION NOTE: ALPHA CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL SECTOR EXISTING BURIED AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. GAMMA BETA CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ALL SECTOR SECTOR DAMAGED UTILITIES AT HIS OWN COST AND COORDINATE ANY AZ-2C� 120° REPAIRS WITH RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANY ANTENNA ORIENTATION o a NEW SITE BUILD SANDY LAKE SITE # ID 301560 1005E SANDY LAKE RD CORRELL, TX 75019 DALLAS COUNTY ALLPRO CONSULTING GROUP, INC. )pSi MOT'tACKAL GLOF1Gk ,.:....91793....... kdH�}SSty �A,y F'_yLa�� SHEET NAME OVERALL SITE PLAN SHEET NUMBER C-1 NOTE: ALLPRO CGI SCOPE OF WORK DOES NOT INCLUDE A STRUCTURAL EVALUATION OF THIS TOWER OR STRUCTURE NEW ANTENNAS & EQUIPMENT SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAVE NOT BEEN HAS THE TO VERIFY THE TOWER OR STRUCTUREBE HAS THE CAPACITY TO ADEQUATELY SUPPORT THESE ANTENNAS &EQUIPSENT . PRIOR TO ANY ANTENNA OR EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION, A STRUCTURAL EVALUATION OF TOWER OR STRUCTURE, INCLUDING SHOULD ALL MOUNTING SYSTEMS AND HARDWARE, D BE PERFORMED. (N) LESSEE'S MUSHROOM GATE STOP. (SEE 1/C-8 FOR DETAIL) (N) LESSEE'S 12'-0' WIDE DOUBLE SWING GATE (SEE 1/C-8 FOR DETAIL) (N) 80 -0STEALTH TOWER, (SEE TOWER MANUFACTURER'S DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION) (N) GRAVEL COMPOUND. (SEE 1/C-1 FOR DETAIL) I (N) GRAVEL ROAD ENTRY 24-HOUR EMERGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION POSTED ON NEW GATE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR POSTING ALL FCC, FAA AND ARAGON WIRELESS WARNING SIGNS ON WALL (SEE 4/C-7 ____________ FOR DETAIL) (N) LESSEE'S 200A 1 -METER H -FRAME WITH HOFFMAN BOX FOR TELCO (SEE 1/E-2 FOR DETAIL) — (N) LESSEES FIBER MUX J (N) LESSEE'S 15'-0' A 35'-0" LEASE AREA. SEE SURVEY FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION (N) TRANSFORMER 1 (N) LESSEES 10'-0" A 21'-0" ar EQUIPMENT PAD o ` ESP (N) LESSEES GPS ANTENNA (N) LESSEES OUTDOOR (N) s'-0" CHAIN LINK FENCE MOUNTED TO ICE BRIDGE EQUIPMENT (SEE 1/C-8 FOR DETAIL) POST, (SEE 1/C-5 FOR DETAIL) (N) LESSEES ICE BRIDGE (SEE 2/C-5 FOR DETAIL) J ENLARGED SITE PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0' NORTH m ANY AREA ALTERED FROM CONSTRUCTION TO BE RETURNED TO ITS ORIGINAL STATE. GRASS AREA SHALL BE SEEDED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL SEEDS HAVE GERMINATED NOTE 3: CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. m: CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ALONG PERIMETER OF ALL CONSTRUCTION SUFFICIENT TO PREVENT STORM WATER RUNOFF CONTAMINATION, (SEE 1/C-6 FOR DETAIL). NOTE 5: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAN-UP AND REMOVE FROM THE WORK SITE ON A DAILY BASIS (OR SOONER IF DIRECTED BY THE AFRICAN WIRELESS PROJECT MANAGER) ALL THE AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS, RESULTING FROM HIS OWNWORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY A DUMP STEP OR SIMILAR TRASH STORAGE/REMOVAL DEVICE AT JOBSITES WHERE CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS OR GARBAGE IS GENERATED. NOTE 6 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF ALL SURFACE GROWTH, INCLUDINGTREES, VEGETATION, RUBBISH, UNDERGROWTH, STUMP AND ROOT STRUCTURES, SURFACE BOULDERS, AND ANY OTHER OBJECTIONABLE MATERIAL FROM THE TOWER BASE. GUYS PATHS, GUY ANCHOR AREA, BUILDING AREA, AND ROADS. r 0 = TRUE NORTH C._L_ IA -0 ALPHA E ATOP GAMMA BETA SECTOR SECTOR AZ-24� =120' ANTENNA ORIENTATION NEW SITE BUILD SANDY LAKE SITE # ID 301560 1005 E SANDY LAKE RD CORRELL, TX 75019 DALLAS COUNTY LLPR0 CONSULTING GROUP, INC. ?� Y' A !4Si morFACKAL GLOB, ,.:....91793.....•. -ET NAME ENLARGED SITE PLAN SHEET NUMBER C-2 NOTE 1: � THE CONTRACTOR WILL, UPON BECOMING AWARE OF SUBSURFACE OR LATENT PHYSICAL NOTE: /11 � CONTRACTOR REQUIRED TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE CONDITIONS DIFFERING FROM THOSE DISCLOSED BY THE ORIGINAL SOIL INVESTIGATION WORK, "OFF" LEASE AREA, PROMPTLY NOTIFY THE OWNER VERBALLY TO E PERMIT VERIFICATION OF THE DIFFERING / CONDITIONS, AND IN WRITING, AS TO THE NATURE OF THE DIFFERING CONDITIONS. NO / CLAIM BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR ANY CONDITIONS DIFFERING FROM THOSE / \C_ ANTICIPATED IN THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND DISCLOSED BY THE SOIL \� STUDIES WILL BE ALLOWED UNLESS THE CONTRACTOR HAS SO NOTIFIED THE OWNER, / _ VERBALLY AND IN WRITING, AS REQUIRED ABOVE,OF SUCH DIFFERING SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS. I (N) GRAVEL ROAD ENTRY 24-HOUR EMERGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION POSTED ON NEW GATE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR POSTING ALL FCC, FAA AND ARAGON WIRELESS WARNING SIGNS ON WALL (SEE 4/C-7 ____________ FOR DETAIL) (N) LESSEE'S 200A 1 -METER H -FRAME WITH HOFFMAN BOX FOR TELCO (SEE 1/E-2 FOR DETAIL) — (N) LESSEES FIBER MUX J (N) LESSEE'S 15'-0' A 35'-0" LEASE AREA. SEE SURVEY FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION (N) TRANSFORMER 1 (N) LESSEES 10'-0" A 21'-0" ar EQUIPMENT PAD o ` ESP (N) LESSEES GPS ANTENNA (N) LESSEES OUTDOOR (N) s'-0" CHAIN LINK FENCE MOUNTED TO ICE BRIDGE EQUIPMENT (SEE 1/C-8 FOR DETAIL) POST, (SEE 1/C-5 FOR DETAIL) (N) LESSEES ICE BRIDGE (SEE 2/C-5 FOR DETAIL) J ENLARGED SITE PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0' NORTH m ANY AREA ALTERED FROM CONSTRUCTION TO BE RETURNED TO ITS ORIGINAL STATE. GRASS AREA SHALL BE SEEDED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL SEEDS HAVE GERMINATED NOTE 3: CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. m: CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ALONG PERIMETER OF ALL CONSTRUCTION SUFFICIENT TO PREVENT STORM WATER RUNOFF CONTAMINATION, (SEE 1/C-6 FOR DETAIL). NOTE 5: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAN-UP AND REMOVE FROM THE WORK SITE ON A DAILY BASIS (OR SOONER IF DIRECTED BY THE AFRICAN WIRELESS PROJECT MANAGER) ALL THE AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS, RESULTING FROM HIS OWNWORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY A DUMP STEP OR SIMILAR TRASH STORAGE/REMOVAL DEVICE AT JOBSITES WHERE CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS OR GARBAGE IS GENERATED. NOTE 6 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF ALL SURFACE GROWTH, INCLUDINGTREES, VEGETATION, RUBBISH, UNDERGROWTH, STUMP AND ROOT STRUCTURES, SURFACE BOULDERS, AND ANY OTHER OBJECTIONABLE MATERIAL FROM THE TOWER BASE. GUYS PATHS, GUY ANCHOR AREA, BUILDING AREA, AND ROADS. r 0 = TRUE NORTH C._L_ IA -0 ALPHA E ATOP GAMMA BETA SECTOR SECTOR AZ-24� =120' ANTENNA ORIENTATION NEW SITE BUILD SANDY LAKE SITE # ID 301560 1005 E SANDY LAKE RD CORRELL, TX 75019 DALLAS COUNTY LLPR0 CONSULTING GROUP, INC. ?� Y' A !4Si morFACKAL GLOB, ,.:....91793.....•. -ET NAME ENLARGED SITE PLAN SHEET NUMBER C-2 NEW WROUGHT IRON 0NEW GATE ELEVATION AT COMPOUND ENTRY SCALE: 1/2 —1-0 NEW CORRUGATED HALF PIPE ---------- EXTERIOR BRICK VENEER TO MATCH _ (E) EAST BRICK WALL MATCH WITH EXISTING CHANNEL �1 EXTERIOR SOLI ER BRICK CAP CH ;T BRICK WALL JR BRICK TO MATCH ST BRICK WALL EEL BEAM 1FETY TROUGH GRILL JRRUGATED PE `GI BRICK WALL ELEVATION NOT AR MAINTENANCE WILL RE REQUIRED TO SCALE: 1/2=1'-0" KEEP SAFETY GRILL CLEANED FROM DEBRIS EXISTING SURFACE #5 BARS 4'-6" X 2'-0" W 16" SPACING 0 DOWEL SHEET NAME BRICK WALL DETAIL ENTRY BRICK WALL DETAIL SHEET NUMBER I SCALE: 1'=1 —0" SE -4 EXTERIOR SOLIDER COURSE BRICK CAP — TO MATCH (E (E) EAST BRICK WALL EXTERIOR BRICK VENEER J TO MATCH (E) EAST BRICK WALL _ 4" FINISHING BLOCK 5" BOND BEAM W/ 1 �4 ,•^' �1 CONT. AT TOP OF WALL ' #9 WIRE LADDER TYPE �HORIZ. JOINT REINF. @ 16" a I I8" THICK CMU WALL o u BLOCK WALL I G 8" BOND BEAM W/ 1 #A CONT. AT MID HEIGHT OF WALL 1 IT, NEW SITE BUILD SANDY LAKE #5 BARS @ 16 SPACING REFER TO DETAIL 1/C-8 FOR SPACING REQUIREMENTS SITE # ID 301560 NEAR 3-0" GATE VICINITY 1005E SANDY LAKE RD I COPPELL, S XF 11 COUNTY DALLAS COO GROUT—FILLED CMU ALL CELLS .021 II BETWEEN FOOTING AND TOP II OF SURFACE. ALSO, GROUT—LL OSURF II CMU ALL CELLS WITH VERTICAL II (SEE DETAIL 1 FOR GROUT LOCATION) TION) A LLP R 0 FINISHED GGNSULTING GROUP. ING. SURFACE - r1 _1 BARS @ 12 SPACING rc ie i¢s sa 5�'q• � P k�Pi��} ^• ll (3) y6 BARS EQUALLY SPACED PROPOlED 6" THICK 0 _ .... i J4Si MO�ACKAL GEORGIC 2' 0" OF COMPACTED SAND UNDER CONCRETE FOOTING d.... =; ••••••""',:,"":: z it '� 917•A R iii ti' 1 9B�}}Ssrnfvi�,L Y%_y�a a SHEET NAME BRICK WALL DETAIL ENTRY BRICK WALL DETAIL SHEET NUMBER I SCALE: 1'=1 —0" SE -4 8'-0" MAX. 12-0" 8'-0" MAX. 8'-0" MAX. 8'-0" MAX. 13 GAP BETWEEN — 15 GATES: 1" MIN. / 3" MAX. 3 5 12 12 m ,_ �`YiXi� i �C)>TXYCCj)TiC�) ✓ o I 14 16 9 � �T 5 B Qi -.i-—i-_-ii ii ii -ii i - .. - L —i •. ii-- -_—iii _ii _ _ — _ — — —— VIII III (IIIIIII IIIIII III IIIIII OEMIII III".IIIIIII f is � _ Al— ; IIIIIII IIIIII IIII � III _—_ _ IIIIII VIII IIIIIII — — — -- � IIII IIII I — — — '^ � VIII IIIIII V IIIIIII ii— p III — III a IIII=III I lIIIIIII-I I � I I U:. — III- 20 � :IIII � I •.LJ. I L IIII III IIIIII — I I , I —III IIIIIII ii � ' w 1-111-11—III 12" 12" 12" 10" SUB—GRADE _/ �I6' CHAIN LINK FENCE DETAIL �LSCA LE NTS 3 m J REFERENCE NOTES' coRNER. END OR PULL POST : 3" NOMINAL SCHEDULE ao PIPE. GENERAL NOTES: 1 FENCING PER ASTM Fss7. SITE BUILD INSTALL SANDY LAKE 2. LINE POST: 2 1/2" SCHEDULE 40 PIPE. PER ASTM F1083, LINE POSTS SHALL BE EQUALLY SPACED AT MAXIMUM 8'-0" O.C. 2, INSTALL SWING GATES PER ASTM F900, 3, COMPLY WITH LOCAL ORDINANCE OF BARBED WIRE PERMIT REQUIREMENT, IF SITE # ID 301560 3. TOP RAIL & BRACE RAIL: 1 1/2" PIPE, PER ASTM F1083, REQUIRED, 1005E SANDY LAKE RD 4. FABRIC: 9 GAUGE CORE WIRE SIZE 2" MESH, CONFORMING TO ASTM A392. 4. POST & GATE PIPE SIZES ARE INDUSTRY STANDARDS ALL PIPE TO BE 1-1/4" NOMINAL SCHEDULE 40 GALVANIZED MINIMUM (HOT DIP. ASTM F1083 COPPELL, TX 75019 DALLAS COUNTY .021 5. TIE WIRE: MINIMUM 11 GAUGE PVC. A SINGLE WRAP OF FABRIC TIE AT POSTS GRADE "A" STEEL). ALL GATE FRAMES SHALL BE WELDED, ALL WELDING AND RAILS. BY HOG RINGS SPACED MAXIMUM 24 INTERVALS AT TENSION WIRE 6TENSION WIRE9 GAUGE PVC . : . SHALL BE COATED WITH (3) COATS OF COLD GALVANIZING (OR EQUAL). 5. ALL OPEN POSTS SHALL HAVE END—CAPS. fi. USE GALVANIZED HOG—RING WIRE TO MOUNT ALL SIGNS A LLP R 0 CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 7. NOT USED. 8. STRETCHER BAR: 3/16' X 3/4" X HEIGHT OF FENCE. 7, ALL SIGNS MUST BE MOUNTED ON INSIDE OF FENCE FABRIC. 9. 3/8" DIAGONAL ROD WITH PVC TURNBUCKLE OR DIAGONAL THREADED ROD, gn..�.,lnaoaxro�i- nc:,ie icmca 10. CORNER POST BRACE: 1 5/8" DIA. EACH CORNER EACH WAY, 11. FINISH GRADE SHALL BE UNIFORM, LEVEL AND EXTEND 12" BEYOND FENCE BOUNDARY. METAL MUSHROOM STOP INSTALL W/ SLOT PARALLEL 12. GATE POST: 4" SCHEDULE 40 PIPE, FOR GATE WIDTHS UP THRU 10 FEET OR TO CLOSED GATES '• 20 FEET FOR DOUBLE SWING GATE, PER ASTM F1083. FINISHED GRADE < ., ,•„ ,.. •• • .. d0 13. GATE FRAME: 1 1/2" PIPE, PER ASTM F1083. 14. 4" X 6' HANDHOLD WITH 4CHAIN AND LOCKS. WELD CHAIN TO THE GATE 3 " AF WITHOUT THE HANDHo�D. — —•'� ••• GEOFIGE dfj 91793 .� GG 9Q¢9p`���CL:i 15. GATE DIAGONAL PVC 1 1/2" PIPE. av CONCRETE FOUNDATION ;p , 16. GATE FRAME BRACE: 1 5/8" DIAMETER. 17. NOT USED - NOTE. MUSHROOM STOP TO BE "MASTER HALCO ,#15912' a.locAs 18. LINE POST CONCRETE FOUNDATION (2000 PSI). 10" SHEET NAME 19. CORNER POST CONCRETE FOUNDATION (2000 PSI). WALL DETAILS 20. GATE POST CONCRETE FOUNDATION (2000 PSI). 21. SIGNAGE PROVIDED BY OWNER. MUSHROOM GATE STOP SHEET NUMBER � scALe NTs p C-8 CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT CASE NO.: S -1260-C, Urban Air P&Z HEARING DATE: April 16, 2015 C.C. HEARING DATE: May 12, 2015 STAFF REP.: Matt S. Steer, Senior Planner LOCATION: 110 W. Sandy Lake Road SIZE OF AREA: One acre of property CURRENT ZONING: C (Commercial) REQUEST: A zoning change request to S -1260-C (Special Use Permit -1260 -Commercial), to allow a 28,342 -square -foot indoor commercial amusement center use. APPLICANT: Michael Browning Jr. Carlos Ruiz Urban Air Trampoline Park Nove Studios PO Box 92008 5050 Quorum Dr., Ste. 700 Southlake, Texas 76092 Dallas, Texas 75254 Phone: 800 960-4778 (972) 687-9082 Email: michaelgurbanairtrampolinepark.com carlosgnovesudios.com HISTORY: In 1987 Council approved a Final Plat for the development of this shopping center, including an approximate 65,000 square foot anchor grocery store. This store was originally a Skaggs Alpha Beta and became an Albertsons in the mid-1990s. Albertsons closed its doors in June 2008. Sprouts was approved in December 2008 to occupy 28,900 square feet of this space. HISTORIC COMMENT: There is no historic significance associated with the subject property. TRANSPORTATION: Sandy Lake is a recently widened four -lane divided thoroughfare within an approximate 112 -foot right-of-way. Denton Tap Road is a six -lane divided thoroughfare built to standard within a 120 -foot right-of-way. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North — Iglesia Mundo de Fe, Ballet Academy and Taco Bell; PD -207-C and C South — Arbor Manors and Retail; PD -214R -C and R East — Tom Thumb Shopping Center and Frost Bank; TC West — Sprouts; S -1249-C (Special Use Permit -1249 -Commercial) ITEM #10 Page 1 of 3 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan shows this property suitable for Neighborhood Retail uses. DISCUSSION: Urban Air Trampoline Park is proposing to develop a 28,342 -square -foot family indoor fitness/recreation center which is proposed to be suitable for all ages and fitness levels. According to the applicant, the park will offer special jump times for parents and children under five years of age, adult fitness classes, and tween & teen focused Friday and Saturday night events. Proposed are wall-to-wall trampoline arenas, trampoline dodgeball courts, slam dunk tracks, a foam pit, and a 2,000 - square -foot "Urban Warrior Course" based around the television show "American Ninja Warrior." These proposed areas and amenities should be labeled on the floor plan. This is listed as a condition of approval. Signage: The proposed attached signage is a 40 -square -foot "Urban Air Trampoline Park" logo which according to the applicant is undergoing the required trademark/service mark designation. After the application to the United States Patent and Trademark Office is submitted, proof will need to be provided with the sign permit application before this will be allowed. No additional monument signs are being requested although it is anticipated that a name plate or verbiage on the existing signs will be requested. These can be accommodated through the permitting process. Parking/Site Plan: When this property was platted in the 1980's the anchor store separately platted this building and a portion of the parking lot. The Deed Restrictions on this property provides for mutual access, shared parking and utilities among these separately platted lots. Parking for indoor fitness/recreation is required at a ratio of one space per 200 square feet of gross floor area. At this ratio, this lease space requires 142 parking spaces, and 296 parking spaces are existing. Sprouts is required to have 145 spaces (28,900 square feet and parked at a ratio of one parking space per 200 square feet of building area); therefore, there is sufficient parking to accommodate this use in the center. The vacant 9,840 square feet on the east side of this proposal will require 49 spaces which will be accommodated via the nine surplus on this lot and the shared parking agreement amongst the center. Staff is comfortable in recommending approval of this case, as all the provision of the Zoning Ordinance will be met after the logo design is registered as a trademark/service mark. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff is recommending APPROVAL of this request subject to the following conditions being met: 1. Submit proof of a USPTO trademark/service mark for the proposed 100% logo signage. 2. Label all separate areas of the floor plan and indicate use proposed for each area. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Recommend approval of the request 2. Recommend disapproval of the request 3. Recommend modification of the request 4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date ITEM #10 Page 2 of 3 ATTACHMENTS: Signage proposal (8.5" x 11") Site Plan 3. Floor Plan ITEM #10 Page 3 of 3 407 0" 1 6 1' 0" 9"' " I 1'4'3 1' 10�\ 127 0" 12 41 4'9,3 r'Trampoline Park L -L- 8' Sr, SCOPE OF WORK: FABRICATE & INSTALL (1) ONE ILLUMINATED OVAL CABINET ILLUMINATED CABINET MATERIAL I COLOR PRIMED & WELDED STEEL FRAME I WHITE .050 ALUMINUM SKINIRETAINERS I PMS 158C 20 OZ COOLEY FLEX PRINT 1 20 OZ HO LAMPS & BALLAST WELDED & PRIMED STEEL FRAME LOUVER VENT ALUMINUM WIRE & SOCKET COVERS 4 HO LAMPS SNAP IN SOCKETS CUT OFF SWITCH / ALUMINUM SKIN & JOB DESCRIPTION ILLUMINATED CABINET CUSTOMER APPROVAL: Note: The colors depicted on this rendering may not match actual colors used on the finished display. Please referto the detail DATE BY COMPANY OR JOB NAME URBAN AIR TRAMPOLINE drawing forthe approved color specifications. Note: The cost of providing electrical wiring to the sign area, all required permits and all special inspections 3.11-15 LM are not included this sign proposal. Note: The proportion of signs shown building and landscape area photos is an approximate representation. CUSTOMER CONTACT MICHEAL BROWNING IR PLEASE READ CAREFULLY: Before you OKihis proof, please read yourcopy carefully and completely. Check for spelling errors and copy omissions. ADDRESS 110 SANDY LAKE RD #150, COPPELL TX We will not be held responsible for any errors which are not marked on this proof. Any changes or alterations from the original instructions will be charged © according to time and material and charged under Customer Alterations. Any reprints desired due to mistakes discovered after proofing will be at the expense �' PHONE 800-960A778 UL 100525-147 D RBANAIRTRAMPOLINEPARK.COM rm of the customer. Sign and date this form if this is the FINAL PROOF APPROVAL. DO NOT return this form unless this piece is 100% approved, with no further SALESPERSON T EMAIL MICHEAL@Uchanges. By signing this to" I am approving the above described job and I hereby acknowledge that I have read and accept the proofing policy and Terms VAN MILLER TDLR 81934 STOREFRONT LF 40+ LF and Conditions of Legacy Signs of Texas, available below as well as on ourwebsite. Please sign and return so that we may process your order. 10375 Alta Vista Road, Keller, TX 76244 1 0 817.431.5700 / F 817.431.5799 SIGN SF 40 SF CLIENT SIGNATURE: DATE: 2 OF 3 OC COPYRIIGHT This drawing was created to assist you in visualizing our proposal. The original ideas herein are the property of Legacy Signs of Texas Permission to copy or revise this drawing can only be obtained through a written agreement with Legacy Signs of Texas. See your sales representative or 2 0 4 call Legacy Signs of Texas.By signing this drawing document, I understand that I am not obligated to purchase this project, notwithstanding, the above artwork cannot be submitted for pricing, duplication and/or manufacturing to another sign company, architectural company or other business entity for the purpose or intent of manufacturing or for use as intellectual property, such as, but not limited to, a company logo, unless the represented logo was provided to Legacy Signs of Texas by the customer and input into this drawing document by a Legacy Signs of Texas employee. a= EXTENT OF URBAN AIR �I TENANT SRAGE EXTERIOR ELEVATION SCALE: NTS 517E PLAN SCALE: NTS PROJECT ADDRESS Urban Air Trampoline Park 110 W. Sandy Lake Rd. Coppell, TX 75019 Owner / Landlord Capstone Commercial 4300 Sigma Rd. Dallas Jeff Strong jstrong@capstonecommerciaLcom 972-250-5800 ARCHITECT CONTACT NOVE Studios 5050 Quorum Drive Carlos Ruiz carlos@novestudios.com 972.687.9082 PARKING CALCULATIONS Urban Air (28,342) Required: 142 Provided: 296 STORE HOURS OF OPERATION Sun - Thurs 10AM to 8PM Fri - Sat 10AM to 11 PM 6 A� 43- �Trampolme Park i EXTENT OF URBAN AIR �I TENANT SRAGE EXTERIOR ELEVATION SCALE: NTS 517E PLAN SCALE: NTS PROJECT ADDRESS Urban Air Trampoline Park 110 W. Sandy Lake Rd. Coppell, TX 75019 Owner / Landlord Capstone Commercial 4300 Sigma Rd. Dallas Jeff Strong jstrong@capstonecommerciaLcom 972-250-5800 ARCHITECT CONTACT NOVE Studios 5050 Quorum Drive Carlos Ruiz carlos@novestudios.com 972.687.9082 PARKING CALCULATIONS Urban Air (28,342) Required: 142 Provided: 296 STORE HOURS OF OPERATION Sun - Thurs 10AM to 8PM Fri - Sat 10AM to 11 PM 6 A� 43- �Trampolme Park 0• 0 0 00 NOVE STUDIOS 5050 QUORUM RD. STE 700 DALLAS, TEXAS 75254 TELEPHONE 972.6879082 FASCIMILE 2142998612 - -�- s 'oaA _ su iTE xa (=j- _ _ _ ❑_ _ _ Lo ®0� EtM �am suiT xz IIT—E n �I�ITTII EAU aA z carE VIE, AREA 000 ❑❑ MEZZANINELl ❑ ❑ ❑ Y L Ll Ll Ll oRM ^(U LL � N El❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑❑❑ Q Lu > W E 0_' J l j 0o Q Q 0 Z w L 159'4" LEASE SPACE I oq icE This Document was produced suor under the direct T r Architect Ke ou agStamaong / / Registration #6286. This Document may not be used for construction, permitting or regulatory approval. / SUITE PLAN CPEt!i', OB: 14017-102 19 1 d DATE: 12.1.14 north SHEET: A02-01 3 FRONT ELEVATION n SUITE PLAN — 28 342 SF CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Andrew Brown Community Parks, Site Plan P&Z HEARING DATE: April 16, 2015 C.C. HEARING DATE: May 21, 2015 STAFF REP.: Matthew S. Steer, Senior Planner LOCATION: 234 E. Parkway Blvd. & 363 N. Denton Tap Road SIZE OF AREA: Approximately 62 acres of property (Andrew Brown West — 42 acres & Andrew Brown East — 20 acres) CURRENT ZONING: TC (Town Center) REQUEST: Site plan approval for park improvements, including pavilions, restrooms, recreational fields and concession buildings. APPLICANT: Applicant: Landscape Architect: Brad Reid Adam Brewster Parks & Recreation Department Dunaway Associates 255 Parkway Boulevard 550 Bailey Avenue, Suite 400 Coppell, Texas 75019 Fort Worth, Texas 76107 Phone: (972) 462-5100 Phone: (817) 335-1121 Email: Breidgcoppelltx.gov Abrewstergdunaway-assoc.com HISTORY: In March 1999, Council approved the preliminary plat and site plan for the Coppell Aquatic & Recreation Center. In May 2000, Council approved the final plat which was filed for record on June 5, 2000. In September 2004, Council approved a replacement of a 70 -foot light standard with an 80 -foot light standard to permit a wireless communication antenna with ground -mounted equipment attached to the concession stand/restroom facility located at Andrew Brown West with a subsequent expansion of the ground equipment and replacement of the antennae in July 2010. In September 2010, Council approved an 11,600 -square -foot expansion to the then 37,700 -square -foot recreation center increasing the size to 49,300 square feet. HISTORIC COMMENT: The Historic Resource Survey provided by the Coppell Historical Society, shows Denton Creek as a Historic Site. This abuts Andrew Brown Park along the northern property line. This plan has no impact on the creek. ITEM #11 Page 1 of 5 TRANSPORTATION: Parkway Boulevard is a C41), four -lane divided thoroughfare built to standard in a 90 -foot right of way. Denton Tap Road is a P61), six -lane, concrete divided thoroughfare developed to standard and contained within a 110-120 foot right-of-way. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North — Denton Creek, flood plain, and single-family housing; TC (Town Center), PD -133 FP, Planned Development -133 -Flood Plain, PD -165 -SF -7 South — Park land; TC (Town Center) East — Park land; TC (Town Center) West — Residential and park land; SF -9 (Single Family — 9), TC (Town Center) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Coppell 2030, A Comprehensive Master Plan, shows this property as suitable for parks and open space. DISCUSSION: The Andrew Brown Park CRDC redevelopment project was conceived under the premise of creating a balance of active recreation and passive green spaces to foster opportunities for small group outings, families and friends to gather daily, and large group activities during seasonal events. An interactive Festival Plaza with Grand Pavilion and waterside Civic Green could become home to civic gatherings, festivals and other community celebrations. Re -branded sports areas are anticipated to anchor Andrew Brown West for local youth sports activities. This proposal does not include changes to Andrew Brown Central. This proposal includes two areas totaling 62 acres. The changes to Andrew Brown West encompass 42 acres & those to Andrew Brown East, 20 acres. A number of plan sheets accompany this staff report. Each Sheet is outlined below. Existing Conditions Andrew Brown West (Attached aerial): Currently, the amenities at Andrew Brown West consist of: a concession stand with restrooms, two large soccer fields, five small soccer fields, two basketball courts, and two multiuse fields for field sports and softball. Also, there are several soccer practice areas directly abutting the asphalt parking area. The existing parking lot is estimated to have around 400 parking spaces. As mentioned in the History Section above, in September 2004, Council approved a replacement of a 70 -foot light standard with an 80 -foot light standard to permit a wireless communication antenna with ground -mounted equipment attached to the concession stand/restroom facility. A subsequent expansion of the ground equipment and replacement of the antennae was approved in July 2010. Currently, these antennae and equipment are owned by Verizon and the City leases space to them. The Parks Department and Verizon need to determine whether these will remain in the current location, will be moved, or removed from the site. This is listed as a condition of approval. Site Plan Andrew Brown West (Sheet LLOW) Proposed are: five large soccer fields, one half -sized soccer field, a 2,903 -square - foot "Soccer Restroom/Concessions Building", two volleyball courts, two full-size basketball courts, two basketball half -courts, a playground & gathering area, four smaller soccer fields, batting cages, and a softball four-plex with a 2,522 -square - foot restroom/concessions building. A large monument is proposed at the entry to ITEM #11 Page 2 of 5 Andrew Brown West leading into a parking area that wraps the softball four-plex and contains approximately 600 spaces. The parking lot is sufficiently landscaped with a 26 -foot drive aisle and 9'x19' parking spaces. There are 12 identity monuments (six on each side of Denton Tap Road) which provide a unique theme for the park system. These are explained in detail on the elevation sheet. Landscape Plan Overall & Landscape Plan West (Sheets L2.OW, L2.1W) There are 284 overstory trees (50 Cedar Elms, 63 Lacebark Elms, 103 Live Oaks, and 68 Red Oaks) and 23 accent trees (Crape Myrtles) proposed in Andrew Brown West in concert with 24 existing trees which remain. Existing Conditions of Andrew Brown East (Attached aerial): Currently, a softball four-plex occupies the majority of the 20 -acre site. There is a pavilion/restroom area at the entry, a basketball court, open space and a hike and bike trail between two ponds. Site Plan East (Sheet LLOE) The proposal is situated with the arrival court north of the current parking area. This consists of a lawn area with a 20 -foot walk on both sides which curve and lead to the 2,116 -square -foot Grand Pavilion. There is a small 595 -square -foot Group Pavilion on the west side and a 913 -square -foot restroom/storage facility on the east side. North of the Grand Pavilion is a "Great Lawn" with 10 -foot bowed walkways on both sides. Both to the east and the west of the great lawn is "open green" space. On the north end of the 10 -foot bowed walkway is a proposed channel connecting the existing ponds on the east and west. Both to the northwest and northeast are 15 -foot bridges over the channel both leading on the north side to the 1,075 -square - foot `Boardwalk Overlook." On the east side of the east "open green" is a 1,160 - square -foot "Performance Pavilion and Overlook." Hardscaping Details East (Sheet LLIE) There are variations in the hardscaping materials for the circular drop off area and within the new walkways adding detail and interest to the design. Some of the concrete walks are stamped and colored with a textured finish and brick banding while other areas consist entirely of brick pavers. The colors are not finalized at this time, but when selected will be earth -tone and will complement the materials uses on the structures. Landscape Plan East (Sheet L2.lE) There are 124 overstory trees (Nine Cedar Elms, 40 Lacebark Elms, 39 Live Oaks, & 36 Red Oaks) and 35 accent trees (18 Vitex, 11 Crape Myrtles, 6 Redbuds) proposed to be planted alongside 20 existing trees. There are discrepancies between the numbers in the plant schedule and the landscaping calculations that should be rectified and additional overstory trees may be required. This is listed as a condition within staff s recommendation. Four-Plex Restroom/Concession West (Sheet A1.1W) Proposed is a 28 -foot high concession/restroom/storage facility with a red/brown brick with cast stone accents and a composite slate shingle. There are gable ends with grey painted steel trusses on the east/west elevations which open to the ITEM #11 Page 3 of 5 breezeway leading to the restrooms and concessions. The north elevation includes doors to the storage area and the south is a solid brick wall. Soccer Restroom/Concession West (Sheet A1.2W) This is a 28 -foot high restroom/concession facility similar to the Four-plex restroom/concession facility above, except for the breezeway that extends through the structure terminates into a rounded covered pavilion with seating and tables. All materials are the same as the Four-plex restroom/concessions facility. Playground Pavilion & Monuments West (Sheet A1.3W) The playground pavilion is 20 feet high measured to the peak and consists of red/brown brick and cast stone accents similar to the above two facilities. The covered area is 17'x 35'. The Entry Monument is a roughly 6' x 6' monument extending 24 feet in height (measured to the peak). It is proposed to have the same brick and cast stone and incorporates the steel trusses as found on the entrances to the restroom/concession facilities. It is proposed to have a standing seam metal roof. There are 12 identity monuments, all of the same design, but only 15 feet in height. Grand Pavilion (Sheet ALAE) This is a 46 -foot high covered pavilion (measured to the peak of the cupolas). The materials are red/brown brick with cast stone accents and two grey steel trusses on both the north and south elevations. The covered area is 72' x 26' with a 41'x16' trellis on each end. Performance Pavilion (Sheet A1.2E) This is a 33 -foot high covered pavilion (measured to the peak) with grey painted steel trusses in the middle of the east/west elevations and on the ends of north/south elevations. The brick and cast stone match the other structures throughout the proposal. Boardwalk Pavilion (Sheet A1.3E) This is a 36 -foot high covered pavilion measured to the peak of the cupola. The center of the pavilion is a 37 -foot diameter rotunda with a 41'x14' terrace extending from each side. The materials are consistent with the other facilities proposed throughout. Restroom/Storage & Monuments (Sheet A1.4E) This is a 21 -foot high restroom facility with a red/brown brick with cast stone accents and a composite slate shingle. On the west elevation is a gable end with grey painted steel trusses. The north elevation includes doors to the storage area and the south is a solid brick wall. The same entry monument is shown in Andrew Brown East as was depicted in Andrew Brown West. The location of the monument should be identified on the Site Plan. In summary, the vision for this plan began about five years ago with the adoption of Coppell 2030 (March 10, 2009). Coppell 2030 outlined a desire to enhance Andrew Brown West as a destination for sports and Andrew Brown East as a place for a variety of events and passive recreation and enjoyment for picnics and ITEM #11 Page 4 of 5 gathering. This project has undergone a master planning process beginning 2012, which involved forming an Andrew Brown Park Master Plan Committee and several public input meetings. The plans have been revised numerous times based on concerns raised and valuable input received. This is the final plan that will be constructed, if approved. Staff is recommending approval of this plan, subject to three conditions outlined below. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff is recommending APPROVAL of this request with three conditions: 1. Determine whether the telecommunication antenna and equipment will remain, be relocated, or will be removed from Andrew Brown West. 2. Identify the location of the Entry Monument on the Andrew Brown East Plan. 3. Rectify the discrepancies between the plant schedule and the landscape calculations. Include additional trees to fulfill the tree requirement of the Landscape Ordinance (three accent trees count for one overstory tree). ALTERNATIVES: 1. Recommend approval of the request 2. Recommend disapproval of the request 3. Recommend modification of the request 4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date ATTACHMENTS: 1. Existing Conditions Aerial (11"x17") 2. Site Renderings (11 "x 17"s) 3. Cover Page 4. LLOW Site Plan West 5. L2.OW Landscape Plan Overall 6. L2.1W Landscape Plan West 7. LLOE Site Plan East 8. L L I E Hardscaping Details East 9. L2.IE Landscape Plan East 10. Al. 1W 4 Plex Restroom/Concession West 11. A1.2W Soccer Restroom/Concession West 12. A1.3W Playground Pavilion & Monuments West 13. Al. IE Grand Pavilion 14. A1.2E Performance Pavilion 15. A1.3E Boardwalk Pavilion 16. A1.4E Restroom/Storage & Monuments ITEM #11 Page 5 of 5 0 200 400 800 1,200 1,600 Feet Created in the Planning Department on April 7, 2015 N -+ Andrew Brown Community Park s T H E - C I T Y O F COFFELL A �i►.I�+�� � � 91a[ -1a Ys�i� O L 11, , 4 e S io— � • t I ' fir• ■ q 4 ! '�" On ,4 Raw - v ! " @ • y 1 r� d. Existing Wildflower/ Nature Preserve Area ®___ —_ Kid Country Playground Existing ® ' Parking -`a Pavilion Bridge ,I Existing Creekside Trail Overlook — A Performance _ Fountain �.- Bride Pavilion �. Boardwalk 1 WlArea ldflower Civic Green Ovd Lalwn - - �- J/ Grandy. - -_ jl- Pa�vil"on Concrete Trail Lakesi e -- - - �E Pavillon ` ( Bridge Existing Nature b = " reserve Area Arrival Fountain --O�UI't Vehicle Access Loop r N z Aquatic d NOW Recreation Center op If ..> ®___ —_ Kid Country Playground Existing ® ' Parking raw -&- m DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE SUBMITTAL ANDREW BROWN COMMUNITY PARK 234 E PARKWAY BLVD & 363 N DENTON TAP ROAD COPPELL, TEXAS MARCH 18, 2014 OWNER: SHEET INDEX: SITE DESIGN (DUNAWAY ASSOC.) cDNER 255 Parkway Blvd. Coppell, TX 75019 coPPi 2. 0 W DRC SITE PLAN WEST 0 W DLANDAPE PLAN OVERALL RC SC (972) 462-5100 LR1 W DRC LANDSCAPE PLAN WEST Contact: Brad Reid- v;? , e -1.0 E DRC SITE PLAN EAST LR.1 E DRC LANDSCAPE PLAN EAST ARCHITECTURE (GHLA) CITY COUNCIL: WEST a;:z w SOCCER RESTROOM / CD CESSION A,.� W PLAYGROUND PAMLION & MONUMENTS EAST Karen Hunt Mayor Cliff Long Council Member A1.1 E GRAND PAVILION \ Bob Mahalik Council Member A,.a E PERPDRMANCE PAMLION A1.3 E BOARDWALK PION AML Wes Mays Council Member / 1.4 E RESTROOM/STORAGE h MONUMENTS Gary Roden Council Member a ,P° Nancy Yingling Council Member \ m aAre Marvin Franklin Council Member PROJE Mark Hill Council Member ILOCATI S LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: 550 Bailey Avenue • Suite 400 �` - ," Fort Worth Texas 7 w Y Tel: 817.335.11211 LOCATION MAP ax: 817.3.7 FIM REG. F-11147 NOR,~ Contact: Elizabeth McIlrath pay T--,' lll� TYPICAL PARKING LAYOUT bill, UAIA ZON INC TO - TOWN CENTER INTI ED IMPROVEMENTS II Q �3u Wa � 111 z a H G w N z3o 3 3 w Z o 0 o�z a � 1.1 RE 11, Th El NI O_ Th7 TIED 0 0 312 612 01 5 Irath E111 ssoc.com E.L1.0W SITE DATA ZONING 'TC' — TOWN CENTER U5E SEA EARN 1.888 277 AT / 43.35 AC �TE ELDAAIEA 144 74 F / ZT A Ac BEBELOANRCAPFENITA FIELD AREA s ASES/4 / zCST Ac A 'PACES PAR�NPARKING LOT PFRInnFTFR — LE 9a Ac CITY OF CORRELL LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS 'FEES ('I/a DO OF LANDSCAPE AREA 4 PERIMETER LANDSCAPE SCREEN HEIGH' 3D MIN & WIDTH 10 MIN I'D TRF ES BEAD LF 0F PARKING LOT PERIMETER) 620 LF / 50 1313 NON -VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE* (12 NEW. 1 E%ISTINGJ FEEATURREE3LANDSCAPING SSITE F) EA5- BLDG AREA) N 159] 140,842 'REES (1/4600 GO OF NON -VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE) SF 943,803 SF (943.803 SF / 4.000) 236 TREES 236 TREES (217 NEW. 19 E -TING) FIELD AREA NOT INCLUDED IN NON -VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE TOTAL PLANT SCHEDULE 0 0 1 W a Q N z3a 0 Z 0o � Q m a J 3> ow w F z U oz�o ZD, a�M 0 iT � R or o AG EST 1000.10001GRAPHIC SCALE AAl N0RR1 1—h - HAF 0 • �� I I -A I t � I I �- GRAPHS[SCCI ° rE, { f f ? Ii °_° E r.°aaa NORTM I�°� -�o I L2.1 W 3 Na LJJ Q Q 111 I a W CL � Q I U F �w z3a I � > Y ¢ N I J F m Q a z � I Qoz�o w� a z�z ao° I �- GRAPHS[SCCI ° rE, { f f ? Ii °_° E r.°aaa NORTM I�°� -�o I L2.1 W X BGARDwAu; "� OJERLOOK BRIDGE _ G TURETRAILe F �R1pM GANG PAT � yaw (STING NATT URE TRAIL SITE DATA USE —P1 SITA IASE V1, IT I GROUP PAVILION RANL ON 5950SFE PR 11 RIT AND FT PUTS FT RFORMANCFGPAV LcoN EE 2,RR FT FT PROVIDER 5 ACCESSIBLE LATE I PARK PROPERTY EDUNDARI IS DUST PLATTED SOUNTARI SHURWN LED. CITY DATA TO PEFLEC7 3 A SHOWN( ON IEFLOODPLAIN WILL E ON PANEL48113CB155K. DATEDCJULY7. 2014 PEVISED aADDITIONALURPLASTUDY0MAP 5ER IMPROVEMENT 1 NATURE TR T I H r - �/ - ` ���1 PERFORMANCE OK CH NNEL / V /��lILION&OVERLO IOOGING PA EXISTING NATURE TRAILEAST POND OPEN G EN REAT W `` $ryk / T (AN / r d'K_ \� ND PAVILI OPE GREEN / Lu R TROOM -GE a / J lOG NG PA HNATURE TRAIL & JAI It EXISTI BRIDGE \ f JOGGING PAH `W` CONN CT— WEST _ ARRIVAL /----- Q POND COURT N >Z LlJ ED G, OUP PAV.-IDILIa a ot:Z wo Q N G �Rw1� �<� A JJJVAA I1 g poYaR/j \ / THEORE RECRATION u CENTER rTIN u _ 1 ^ L— �� IN OLA E7 f T ��i� _ HSCA I� L SLE rzoo AAT L Lullt.t \ �^^ Ill J I uP �poer l� \ � RARKw+Y eLv 1 nc =1m — uKH OOSAG2015 �— 550 Bailey Avenue • 7610 400 1� Fort Worth, Texas 76107 �T ���/�� �Duwo►way wNTED �J Tel: 817.335.1121 Fax: 817.335.7437 a.. \\Y�� TX REG F-1114 Contact: Elizabeth McIlrath \ --Temcilrath@dunaway-assoc.com v L1.0 E G RAP FDC SCALE ARRIVAL COURT ENLARGEMENT ~ SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" voRTH 3-1 /2' X 3-1 /2' X 3OC GALVANIZED STEEL ANGLE W/ S (HO /BARP TORP0 IC,E)TAL SS 3/8'/0 3-3/4' HILTI 1282555E ® 1 MAX svACING BRICK PAVERS EDGE BRICK PAVING SCALE 1" = 1" AP OVER SAND SETTNG ONO .INT (12' MIN] PAVNA —1—I e• —I —� IT �CKEN SLAB 12 TCFINT TRANSITION TYPE 1 - CONTINOUS TYPE 2 - MITRE BRICK PAVING BAND - INTERSECTIONS SCALE: 1/2,. – 1 –0' PAVING LEGEND BRC,8 CL PAVER (COLOR TO COMPLIMENT ARCHITECTURE PANUON) STAMPED AND COLORED ECONCRETE W TEXTURE FINISH BY BOMANITE OR EOUAL MEDIUM BROOM FINISH SAND SETTING BED i a � III _ � •� BATCH THICKNESS —III III I AD ION PHNA BAND ED,„o 1 550 Bailey Avenue • 111400 CASO.20 1.0.10001 'TE 1 DUNAWAY Fort Worth, Texas 76107 Tel: 817.335.1121 D // Fax: 817 .7437 ATX REG. F-1114) aan ev. Contact: Elizabeth McIlrath emcilrath@dunaway-assoc.com 2011 L1.lE i PLANT SCHEDULE LE�� ff ma r,P sr O e wsEnrrxna xnmlE.r w�srxocuux xnmrr r,e L.x.Emur.c uau rr .s ' / 00 0 SUAIA CLI SITE AREA OWN CENTER 675,030 SF / 20.09 AC SITE AREA MINUS WATER SURFACE AREA 725,155 SF / 18.85 AC SUIT A ARK EA PARKING LOT PER METER 606CSF/ '16 AC 05 SPACES CITY OF CORRELL LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS NI E(11 gE cn A1 RIO, LPNDSCAPE ARE OF S ANTINO ISLAND LOCATION (1 PER 1 ACE) TREES (1AOG/ LOT AREA) F. YES VES ) FGP),KING 3 6 NEIGITT 30P LAND ` MIN. S& WIDTH CAPE SCREEN NMIN, N/A TREES (1/50 LF. OF PARKING LOT PERIMETER) FOA-VEH ICULAR OPNG [SITEE AREA -BLDG AREA) % 15M] N/A (7725L 55LAND SEA- 7,092 SF) x 15% TREES (1/4. 000SF OF NON -VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE) 107709 9F IF77G9 SF (725.155 SF / AGOO) 161 TREES 167 TREES 159 NEW 28 ENSUING) C) O I GRAPHIC SCALE o Hill Hill Hill Hill III Ls�na�, - _ o EN= o aa�. 11EEa oz aIII t '07 71 -1 r -1 r EAOUTHWT� ELEVATIONS FLIED IONS oo 1,1 1E 0 LZOO�y�a�L,I ---------Hill I Hill Hill Hill Hill U Z El ❑O NTH C)/,,EFNJJa0 4PLEX RESTROOM/CONCESSION co P4, EVATION waZ7��u az;mp��og� � �m9�E,x�0 � SOCCER RESTROOM/CONCESSION - — — — — — — — — — -- - - - - - - ME ...... 8 M11-1 L-1 F -1 l/ELElII L F 7 L I.F 11 fit F -I 11 1 11 11 1 11 11 1 11 11 1 11 Hill lill lill Al 111- ITEEI LLJ -E �oj, S ?�TH EAST ELEVATION FLOOR PLAN Lu F llu III u 11 u Go, NH/T EST ELEVATIOM �4S?��HWEST ELEVATIOMT, L_AI.2W aoao �o„ mZ �a4 EASTIWEST ELEVATIONS nog, ��« �,.� s��E: ,i, s EST CW G pq , ? IDENTITY MONUMENT ELEVATION , pq ENTRYMONUMENT ELEVATION Z QQ - - Fxoo-1 > Q w 0 0 O � a y o w ~ z W aq IDENTITY MONUMENT PLAN aq ENTRY MONUMENT PLAN aq FLOOR PLANa4 NORTH/SOUTH ELEVATIONS Q g Q o J a MONUMENTS THE PLAYGROUND PAVILION �A r�oao A1.3W HLo THE GRAND PAVILION ilii uu uu ini III Hill Hill Hill 11 Hill Hill 1 11 11 1 11 11 1 11 11 1 11 1 11 11 1 11 11 1 11 11 1 11 11 1 11 11 1 Hill 11 Hill 11 Hill 11 111 11 Hill 11 11 1 11 1111 I� aka `r EAST/WEST ELEVATIONS ...... .... El MEN —EllEl m MEN Z /MV Go2, N7TH TH ELEVATIONS oaG T. . /,F LLI 6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 71F 0 D C FIND --- 46 - - 4k --- 46 - - 41 F- - - - Hk - - 4k 4k - 4= FLOOR PLAN 4k - - Ai=== PERFORMANCE PAVILION= Fpl1 u ii iu d ii uiiuu I.F 10 L— — — — — — 11112 ❑Z FF" 0 R w 11111 ILL ui Z IL< Efj ELEVATIONS 1 1111 11 1111 11 1111 11 1111 11 Hill 11 1111 11 Hill 11 1111 11 Hill 11 1111 11 Hill 11 1111 11 Hill 11 1 UJ Hill 0 D Hill u gp,, /,NORTH/SOUTH ELEVATIONS I�p4 TRELLIS END ELEVATION /a3 EASTIWEST ELEVATIONS <,E:�i,s-,_o- II BOARDWALK PAVILION foil NORTH/SOUTH ELEVATIONS _ — — — — — — — — — — — — � — — — — — CLQ ��migo �\ \\ W I / -.,.( �� ��� =IL LL ---11 11 ---- ILL z � ----- —, IGH A1.3E RESTROOM/STORAGE 11 I'll H" 11 1 11 ITI III 111111 111 11 Hill 1111 111111 EAST ELEVATION �R 11111 I'LL H Juu Hull Hull H, HI[Hfllj Hull H . ........... - EM MONUMENT ELEVATION LU �aa1 WEST ELEVATION I'LL 1-- o 0 D aZ ENTRY MONUMENT PLAN — — — — — — - L LU U IT, , MONUMENTS wll log as FLOOR PLAN a6 ST�/1H �YATION 1�AlA