CP 2016-02-09City Council
City of Coppell, Texas
Meeting Agenda
255 Parkway Boulevard
Coppell, Texas
75019-9478
Council Chambers5:30 PMTuesday, February 9, 2016
KAREN HUNT GARY RODEN
Mayor Mayor Pro Tem
CLIFF LONG NANCY YINGLING
Place 1 Place 5
BRIANNA HINOJOSA-FLORES MARVIN FRANKLIN
Place 2 Place 6
WES MAYS MARK HILL
Place 3 Place 7
CLAY PHILLIPS
City Manager
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas will meet in Regular
Called Session at 5:30 p.m. for Executive Session, Work Session will follow immediately
thereafter, and Regular Session will begin at 7:30 p.m., to be held at Town Center, 255 Parkway
Boulevard, Coppell, Texas.
As authorized by Section 551.071(2) of the Texas Government Code, this meeting may be
convened into closed Executive Session for the purpose of seeking confidential legal advice
from the City Attorney on any agenda item listed herein.
The City of Coppell reserves the right to reconvene, recess or realign the Work Session or
called Executive Session or order of business at any time prior to adjournment.
The purpose of the meeting is to consider the following items:
1.Call to Order
2.Executive Session (Closed to the Public) 1st Floor Conference Room
Section 551.072, Texas Government Code - Deliberation regarding Real Property.
Discussion regarding contract and settlement agreements between CB
Parkway and the City of Coppell regarding Dallas Zoning case Z145-366
(SM) and property generally located south of Belt Line Road and west of
Northlake Road.
Page 1 City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 2/5/2016
February 9, 2016City Council Meeting Agenda
3.Work Session (Open to the Public) 1st Floor Conference Room
A.Discussion regarding amendments to hotel regulation ordinances.
B.Discussion regarding public facility usage.
C.Discussion regarding Citizen Summit.
D.Discussion of Agenda Items.
Hotel Memo and Exhibits .pdfAttachments:
Regular Session
4.Invocation 7:30 p.m.
5.Pledge of Allegiance
6.Presentation by Coppell High School students on Alzheimer’s
Awareness.
7.Citizens’ Appearance
8.Consent Agenda
A.Consider approval of the minutes: January 26, 2016.
Minutes.pdfAttachments:
B.Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. PD-186R8-LI, Duke
Freeport Addition, Lot 1R, Block A, a zoning change from PD-186R2-LI
(Planned Development-186 Revision 2-Light Industrial) to PD-186R8-LI
(Planned Development-186 Revision 8-Light Industrial), to attach a
Detail Site Plan for a 108,148-square-foot office/warehouse building on
7.36 acres of property located at the northeast corner of Bethel Road
and Freeport Parkway, and to amend the Land Use Map of the Coppell
2030 Comprehensive Master Plan from ‘Old Coppell Historic District’ to
‘Industrial Special District’ and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
Cover Memo.pdf
Ordinance.pdf
Exhibit A - Legal Descrption.pdf
Exhibit B - Detail Site Plan.pdf
Exhibit C -Tree Preservation Plan .pdf
Exhibit D -Landscape Plan.pdf
Exhibit E - Elevations.pdf
Exhibit F - Site Lighting Plan.pdf
Attachments:
C.Consider approval of CRDC appointments of President and Vice
President.
Page 2 City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 2/5/2016
February 9, 2016City Council Meeting Agenda
D.Consider Award of a proposal from Alliance Geotechnical, in the amount
of $199,960.00, for Construction Materials Engineering and Testing at
the Andrew Brown Parks, and authorizing the City Manager to sign the
necessary documents.
Memo.pdf
Agreement AB West.pdf
Agreement AB East.pdf
Attachments:
E.Consider approval to enter into an agreement with KI for supplying and
installing KI Architectural Walls for the Cozby Library and Community
Library, through TCPN #OT0012378C, in the amount of $122,878.11 as
budgeted in the total project cost; and authorizing the City Manager to
sign any necessary documents.
Staff Memo - KIAgreement.pdf
KI Wall Agreement.pdf
Attachments:
End of Consent Agenda
9.Presentation and discussion related to the proposed Bicycle and
Pedestrian Master Plan.
Memo.pdf
Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan.pdf
Attachments:
10.CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of Case No. PD-178R3-C/S-1194R6, Zenzero, a
zoning change request from PD-178R-C/S-1194R5 (Planned
Development-178 Revised-Commercial/Special Use Permit 1194
Revision-5) to PD-178R3-C/S-1194R6 (Planned Development-178
Revision 3-Commercial/Special Use Permit 1194-Revision-6), to amend
the Detail Site Plan to allow a 905-square-foot addition to the existing
restaurant located at 171 North Denton Tap Road, Suite 600.
Cover Memo.pdf
Staff Report.pdf
Site Plan & Elevations.pdf
Floor Plan.pdf
Parking Analysis.pdf
Attachments:
11.PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of Case No. S-1033R5-SF-12, Vista Academy, a
zoning change request from S-1033R4-SF-12 (Special Use Permit-1033
Revision 4-Single Family-12) to S-1033R5-SF-12 (Special Use
Permit-1033 Revision 5-Single Family-12), to allow for a
6,537-square-foot expansion to the existing 32,687-square-foot Charter
School and a revised floor plan on 4.85 acres of property located at 140
S. Heartz Road.
Page 3 City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 2/5/2016
February 9, 2016City Council Meeting Agenda
Cover Memo.pdf
Staff Report.pdf
Site Plan, Floor Plan, Tree Preservation Plan, Landscape Plan, Elevationspdf.pdf
Attachments:
12.PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of Case No. PD-221R3R-HC, Point West - Sun
Holdings (Revised), a zoning change request from PD-221R3-HC
(Planned Development-221 Revision 3-Highway Commercial) to
PD-221R3R-HC (Planned Development-221 Revision 3
Revised-Highway Commercial), to amend the Concept Plan on 17.14
acres to allow revised permitted uses, lotting patterns, circulation,
signage and attach a Detail Site Plan for two retail/restaurant buildings
totaling approximately 17,000 square feet on 3.9 acres of property
located at the northwest corner of IH-635 and S. Belt Line Road.
Cover Memo.pdf
Staff Report.pdf
Concept Site Plan Parcels (Sheet A-1).pdf
Concept Site Plan Buildings (Sheet A-2).pdf
Concept Landscape Plan (Sheet LI.01)r.pdf
Detail Site Plan (Sheet A-3).pdf
Detail Landscape Plans (Sheet L1.02 and L1.03).pdf
Elevations (Sheet A-4 and A-5).pdf
Perspective View (Sheet A-6).pdf
Bird's Eye View Sheet (A-7).pdf
Attachments:
13.City Manager Reports - Project Updates and Future Agendas
14.Mayor and Council Reports
Report by Councilmember Mays regarding a meeting with State
Librarian, Mark Smith.
15.Public Service Announcements concerning items of community interest with no
Council action or deliberation permitted.
16.Necessary Action from Executive Session
Adjournment
________________________
Karen Selbo Hunt, Mayor
Page 4 City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 2/5/2016
February 9, 2016City Council Meeting Agenda
CERTIFICATE
I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of
the City of Coppell, Texas on this 5th day of February, 2016, at _____________.
______________________________
Christel Pettinos, City Secretary
PUBLIC NOTICE - STATEMENT FOR ADA COMPLIANCE AND OPEN CARRY LEGISLATION
The City of Coppell acknowledges its responsibility to comply with the Americans With
Disabilities Act of 1990. Thus, in order to assist individuals with disabilities who require
special services (i.e. sign interpretative services, alternative audio/visual devices, and
amanuenses) for participation in or access to the City of Coppell sponsored public programs,
services and/or meetings, the City requests that individuals makes requests for these services
forty-eight (48) hours ahead of the scheduled program, service, and/or meeting. To make
arrangements, contact Vivyon V. Bowman, ADA Coordinator or other designated official at
(972) 462-0022, or (TDD 1-800-RELAY, TX 1-800-735-2989).
Pursuant to Section 30.06, Penal Code (trespass by license holder with a concealed handgun),
a person licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code (handgun licensing
law), may not enter this property with a concealed handgun.
Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (trespass by license holder with an openly carried
handgun), a person licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code (handgun
licensing law), may not enter this property with a handgun that is carried openly.
Page 5 City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 2/5/2016
Master
City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard
Coppell, Texas
75019-9478
File Number: 2016-2621
File ID: Type: Status: 2016-2621 Agenda Item Executive Session
1Version: Reference: In Control: City Secretary
02/01/2016File Created:
02/09/2016Final Action: Executive SessionFile Name:
Title: Discussion regarding contract and settlement agreements between CB
Parkway and the City of Coppell regarding Dallas Zoning case Z145-366
(SM) and property generally located south of Belt Line Road and west of
Northlake Road.
Notes:
Agenda Date: 02/09/2016
Agenda Number:
Sponsors: Enactment Date:
Attachments: Enactment Number:
Hearing Date: Contact:
Effective Date: Drafter:
History of Legislative File
Action: Result: Return
Date:
Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver-
sion:
1 Discussed under
Executive Session
02/09/2016City Council
Discussed under Executive Session Action Text:
Text of Legislative File 2016-2621
Title
Discussion regarding contract and settlement agreements between CB Parkway and the City
of Coppell regarding Dallas Zoning case Z145-366 (SM) and property generally located south
of Belt Line Road and west of Northlake Road.
Summary
Fiscal Impact:
Staff Recommendation:
Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017
Master Continued (2016-2621)
Goal Icon:
Sustainable City Government
Business Prosperity
Community Wellness and Enrichment
Sense of Community
Special Place to Live
Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017
Master
City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard
Coppell, Texas
75019-9478
File Number: 2016-2622
File ID: Type: Status: 2016-2622 Agenda Item Work Session
1Version: Reference: In Control: City Secretary
02/01/2016File Created:
02/09/2016Final Action: Work SessionFile Name:
Title: A.Discussion regarding amendments to hotel regulation ordinances.
B.Discussion regarding public facility usage.
C.Discussion regarding Citizen Summit.
D.Discussion of Agenda Items.
Notes:
Agenda Date: 02/09/2016
Agenda Number:
Sponsors: Enactment Date:
Hotel Memo and Exhibits .pdfAttachments: Enactment Number:
Hearing Date: Contact:
Effective Date: Drafter:
History of Legislative File
Action: Result: Return
Date:
Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver-
sion:
1 02/09/2016City Council
Text of Legislative File 2016-2622
Title
A.Discussion regarding amendments to hotel regulation ordinances.
B.Discussion regarding public facility usage.
C.Discussion regarding Citizen Summit.
D.Discussion of Agenda Items.
Summary
Fiscal Impact:
Staff Recommendation:
Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017
Master Continued (2016-2622)
Goal Icon:
Sustainable City Government
Business Prosperity
Community Wellness and Enrichment
Sense of Community
Special Place to Live
Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017
1
MEMORANDUM
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning
Date: February 9, 2016
Reference: Work Session discussion on proposed revisions to Hotel Regulations
2030: Business Prosperity
Introduction:
The regulations on hotels and motels were substantially revised approximately 10 years ago in response
to the new hotel products being developed in the metroplex. As of this time, there is a 157-room hotel
substantially complete (Four Points by Sheraton with conference center) on S. Belt Line Road and a 95-
room Fairfield Inn on S.H. 121 and Northpoint which is anticipated to start construction first quarter of
2016. Once again, the hotel market and products have changed, and re-visiting these regulations is
appropriate.
It is anticipated that applications for two hotels in close proximity to the Four Points, and a hotel on the
east side of Belt Line Road will be submitted on February 22nd for the March Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting. An application for two hotels, at Northpoint and SH 121, which was submitted
for the February Planning and Zoning meeting is being postponed until the March meeting. On tonight's
Council Agenda is a PD request at Belt Line and I-635, which includes a Concept Plan for two additional
hotels. Staff also has had preliminary discussions on two hotels on Freeport Parkway and SH 121, among
others. With a potential for nine new hotels in Coppell, staff felt it would be prudent to provide
development standards to assure these hotels will be of the high quality envisioned for Coppell.
Staff visited with local hotel developers and architects, surveyed surrounding cities and incorporated the
applicable provisions into these proposed ordinance amendments. As detailed in the attached, the draft
regulations include mandating items such as minimum number of rooms, size of rooms, interior
corridors, increased size of the lobby/atrium areas, meeting space, restaurant (full or limited service),
requires a porte-cochere and minimum lot size of 2 acres. In addition, the hotel must include 3 of 7
optional amenities. Residence hotels are recommended to have the same requirements, plus the existing
requirements of: a maximum of 22 room units per acre; open space in sufficient size to meet parking
requirements if it converts to multi-family; and a minimum separation of 1,500 feet from any other
residence hotel property.
Analysis:
On January 21st the Planning and Zoning Commission discussed the attached draft text amendment and
provided input including adding minimum size and additional regulations on amenities, revisiting the
definitions and discussed concerns with combining two hotels on one lot to meet minimum standards.
2
Since that time, staff has received input from several more hotel developers, with additional comments
and meetings anticipated prior to the February 9th Work Session. The input received will be summarized
and made part of the staff’s Work Session presentation.
Legal Review:
This item did not require City Attorney review.
Fiscal Impact:
None
Recommendation:
The Planning Department will incorporate comments from City Council, as well as input from hotel
developers and architects, into the presentation to the Planning and Zoning Commission scheduled for
February 18, 2016.
Attachments:
Staff Report presented to Planning and Zoning Commission on January 21, 2016, with the following
attachments:
Attachment “A” – Existing Regulations
Attachment “B” – Redlined Regulations
Attachment “C” – Proposed Regulations
Item #08
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
TEXT AMENDMENT: Sec. 12-30-18 - Hotel, Motel & Residence Hotel
And Sec. 42-1 – Definitions
P & Z HEARING DATE: January 21, 2016
C.C. HEARING DATE: February 9, 2016
STAFF REP.: Marcie Diamond, Assistant Director of Planning
REQUEST: Consider approval of text amendments to the Coppell Zoning Ordinance to
revise definitions and regulations for hotels, motels and residence hotels.
HISTORY: In 2006, Council approved text amendments which significantly revised the
regulations for hotels and motels. Prior to 2006, hotels and motels were
permitted in most non-residential zoning districts (O, R, C and HC) by Special
Use Permit, and by right in the H (Historic) District. At that time, the only
regulation of this use was the amount of parking required. The 2006 text
amendment enhanced the regulations to include the following:
Revised the definitions of hotel and motel;
Added a definition of residence hotel;
Deleted “motor hotel” and “tourist court”;
Allowed a hotel, motel and residence hotel by Special Use Permit in
“HC” and “H” districts;
Deleted these uses by Special Use Permit from the “O”, “R” and “C”
districts;
Deleted hotel and motel as permitted in the “H” district, (allowed by
S.U.P.), and
Required a minimum four (4) acres, for hotels, unless revised by City
Council, and
Provided development standards for these uses, as detailed in
Attachment “A” – Existing regulations, including requiring a minimum
of three amenities from the list of ten.
DISCUSSION: As noted above, the regulations on hotels and motels were substantially
revised approximately 10 years ago in response to the new hotel products
being developed in the metroplex. Since that time, there have been many
discussions with potential hoteliers and several rezonings in the city of
Coppell for various hotel products. As of this time, there is a 157-room hotel
substantially complete (Four Points by Sheraton with conference center) on
S. Belt Line Road and a 95-room Fairfield Inn on S.H. 121 and Northpoint
which is anticipated to start construction first quarter of 2016.
Item #08
Page 2 of 3
Once again, the hotel market and products have changed, and re-visiting these
regulations is appropriate. The purpose and intent of the 2006, as well as
current revisions, is to assure that the hotels built in Coppell are of the quality
envisioned for this community. Staff visited with local hotel developers and
architects, surveyed surrounding cities and incorporated the applicable
provisions into these proposed ordinance amendments. The revisions to the
regulations are detailed in the attachments to this staff report. Attachment
“A” is the Existing Regulations, Attachment “B” is a Red-lined Version, and
Attachment “C” is the Proposed Revised Ordinance.
The current regulations focus on addressing quality of a hotel based on
providing three of a list of ten potential amenities, and prescribing a four-acre
minimum for each hotel site. The proposed regulations will mandate:
minimum of 125 rooms
minimum room size of 300 square feet
interior corridor
increased the size of the lobby/waiting/atrium areas
minimum of 5,000 sq. ft. meeting space
Restaurant (full or limited service)
porte-cochere or other covered area
minimum of 2 acres
and a choice of three of the seven listed amenities:
1. Indoor/outdoor pool.
2. Spa/sauna.
3. Weight room/fitness center.
4. Playground.
5. Sports court.
6. Jogging trail.
7. Full service restaurant (minimum seating
capacity of 35) open to the general public
serving breakfast, lunch and dinner.
In addition to the above regulations, Residence Hotels will also be required
to provide: not more than 22 room units per acre; open space shall be
provided in sufficient quantity and location to allow for required additional
parking should the residence hotel convert to multi-family residences; and
a minimum separation of 1,500 feet from any other Residence Hotel
property.
Finally, staff reviewed the Definition Section (12-42-1) of the Zoning
Ordinance, and is recommending that “motel” as defined in this section be
deleted. The motel use has also been deleted from the SUP section which
regulates use. Motel use as described in the definition section, would not
be permitted. Similarly the Residence Hotel definition has been amended
to delete the words “external doorways into room units” as this would no
longer permitted.
Item #08
Page 3 of 3
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
Staff is recommending APPROVAL of the following text amendments:
Sec. 12-30-18 – Hotel, Motel and Residence Hotel be deleted in its entirety, and replaced with the
revised wording as attached as Attachment “C”.
Sec. 12-42-1, Special Definitions deleting motel and revising existing definitions of residence hotel;
ALTERNATIVES
1. Recommend approval of the request
2. Recommend disapproval of the request
3. Recommend modification of the request
4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Attachment “A” – Existing Regulations
2. Attachment “B” – Redlined Regulations
3. Attachment “C” – Proposed Regulations
Attachment “A”
Page 1 of 2
Existing Regulations:
Sec. 12-30-18. - Hotel, motel and residence hotel.
A special use permit for a hotel, motel or residence hotel use may be approved only when there
is a finding and determination by the city council, following a favorable recommendation by the
planning and zoning commission, that the type of hotel, motel or residence hotel proposed is
compatible and consistent with and will have no adverse affect on existing uses in the area, that the
proposed use is equal to or exceeds development standards of other uses and that the proposed
use will not adversely affect the ability to locate, in the future, additional uses that are allowed within
the zoning district of the area.
1. Hotel and motel developments shall be subject to the following development standards:
a. A minimum lot size for a hotel or motel development shall be no less than four
acres, with the exception that a lot size less than four acres may be permitted
provided the city council, following a favorable recommendation by the planning
and zoning commission, and after review of submitted data and facts, finds and
determines that such facility is an appropriate use, design and lay-out for the site
and area. Under no circumstance shall a lot of less than two acres be utilized for
this use.
b. Shall provide staff on-site 24-hours a day;
c. Shall contain a lobby with a minimum of 150 square feet;
d. Shall provide a minimum of three amenities from the list below:
1. Indoor/outdoor pool.
2. Spa/sauna.
3. Weight room/fitness center.
4. Playground.
5. Sports court.
6. Plaza/atrium.
7. Game room.
8. Jogging trail.
9. Conference room (1,000 square foot minimum).
10. Full service restaurant (minimum seating capacity of 35).
2. Residence hotel developments shall be subject to the following development standards:
a. Not more than 22 room units per acre;
b. Shall contain a lobby with a minimum of 150 square feet;
c. Shall maintain laundry facilities on-site for guest use;
d. Shall provide staff on-site 24-hours a day;
e. Shall provide a minimum of three amenities from the list below:
Attachment “A”
Page 2 of 2
1. Indoor/outdoor pool.
2. Spa/sauna.
3. Weight room/fitness center.
4. Playground.
5. Sports court.
6. Plaza/atrium.
7. Game room.
8. Jogging trail.
9. Conference room (1,000 square foot minimum).
10. Full service restaurant (minimum seating capacity of 35).
f. Shall maintain a minimum separation of 1,500 feet measured linearly from
property line to property line from any other hotel, motel or residence hotel
property.
g. All of the room units shall contain kitchen facilities.
h. Open space shall be provided in sufficient quantity and location to allow for
required additional parking should the residence hotel convert to multi-family
residences (two spaces per unit).
(Ord. No. 91500-A-434, § 3, 6-13-06)
Page 1 of 3
Attachment “B”
Proposed Revisions:
Sec. 12-30-18. - Hotel, motel and residence hotel.
A special use permit for a hotel, motel or residence hotel use may be approved only when there
is a finding and determination by the city council, following a favorable recommendation by the
planning and zoning commission, that the type of hotel, motel or residence hotel proposed is
compatible and consistent with and will have no adverse affect on existing uses in the area, that the
proposed use is equal to or exceeds development standards of other uses and that the proposed
use will not adversely affect the ability to locate, in the future, additional uses that are allowed within
the zoning district of the area.
1. Hotel and motel developments shall be subject to the following development standards:
a. A minimum lot size for a hotel or motel development shall be no less than four
acres, with the exception that a lot size less than four acres may be permitted
provided the city council, following a favorable recommendation by the planning
and zoning commission, and after review of submitted data and facts, finds and
determines that such facility is an appropriate use, design and lay-out for the site
and area. Under no circumstance shall a lot of less than two acres be utilized for
this use.
a. A minimum lot size for a hotel or motel development shall be no less than two
acres
b. There shall be a minimum of 125 guest rooms
c. Shall provide staff on-site 24-hours a day;
d. All units shall be accessed from a common interior corridor, except for first floor
units which may have direct access from an interior courtyard or swimming pool
area in addition to hallway access.
e. Each guestroom shall be a minimum of 300 square feet.
b.
f. Shall contain provide a lobby waiting/atrium areas with a minimum of 150 750
square feet; or five (5) square feet per guest room, whichever is greater, with a
maximum of 1,500 square feet, Lobbies/waiting/atrium areas and/or other open
space area may be counted towards fulfilling this requirements if seating is
provided.
g. Conference room/meeting space a minimum of 5,000 square feet.
h. Limited or full service* restaurant
i. A porte-cochere or other covered area shall be provided immediately adjacent to
the building entrance nearest the registration desk with an area for temporary
parking of at least two vehicles underneath the covered area for the guests
checking in or out.
j. A minimum lot size for a hotel or motel development shall be no less than two
acres.
c.
Page 2 of 3
Attachment “B”
d.k. In addition to the above, there Shall shall be provided a minimum of three
amenities from the list below:
1. Indoor/outdoor pool.
2. Spa/sauna.
3. Weight room/fitness center.
4. Playground.
5. Sports court.
6. Plaza/atrium.
7. Game room.
8. 6. Jogging trail.
9. Conference room (1,000 square foot minimum).
710. *Full service restaurant (minimum seating capacity of 35) open to the general
public serving breakfast, lunch and dinner.
2. Residence hotel developments, as defined in Section 12-42-1 of this Ordinance, shall be
subject to the following development standards:
a. A minimum lot size for a hotel or motel development shall be no less than two
acres.
b. There shall be a minimum of 125 guest rooms
a.c. Not more than 22 room units per acre;
d. Shall provide a lobby/waiting/atrium areas with a minimum of 750 square feet or
five (5) square feet per guest room, whichever is greater, with a maximum of 1,500
square feet, Lobbies/waiting/atrium areas and/or other open space area may be
counted towards fulfilling this requirements if seating is provided.
b. Shall contain a lobby with a minimum of 150 square feet;
c.e. Shall maintain laundry facilities on-site for guest use;
f. Shall provide staff on-site 24-hours a day;
g. All units shall be accessed from a common interior corridor, except for first floor
units which may have direct access from an interior courtyard or swimming pool
area in addition to hallway access.
h. Conference room/meeting space a minimum of 5,000 square feet.
i. Limited or full service* restaurant
d.j. A porte-cochere or other covered area shall be provided immediately adjacent
to the building entrance nearest the registration desk with an area for temporary
parking of at least two vehicles underneath the covered area for the guests
e.k. Shall provide a minimum of three amenities from the list below:
1. Indoor/outdoor pool.
2. Spa/sauna.
3. Weight room/fitness center.
4. Playground.
5. Sports court.
6. Plaza/atrium.
7. Game room.
Page 3 of 3
Attachment “B”
8.6. Jogging trail.
9. Conference room (1,000 square foot minimum).
7. Full service restaurant (minimum seating capacity of 35). *Full service
restaurant (minimum seating capacity of 35) open to the general public
serving breakfast, lunch and dinner.
10.
f.l. Shall maintain a minimum separation of 1,500 feet measured linearly from
property line to property line from any other hotel, motel or residence hotel
property.
g.m. All of the room units shall contain kitchen facilities.
h.n. Open space shall be provided in sufficient quantity and location to allow for
required additional parking should the residence hotel convert to multi-family
residences (two spaces per unit).
Sec. 12-42-1. - Definitions.
Hotel: An establishment offering lodging to the traveling public for compensation. A hotel is
distinguished from a motel in that access to the majority of the guest rooms is through a common
entrance and lobby. The establishment furnishes customary hotel services and may contain a
restaurant, club, lounge, banquet hall and/or meeting rooms. A hotel is a non-residential use.
Motel: An establishment offering to the traveling public the use of guest rooms or sleeping
accommodations for compensation. Such an establishment consists of a group of attached guest
rooms or sleeping accommodations the majority of which have private and direct access from
parking areas not through common entrance and lobby. The establishment furnishes customary
hotel services and may contain a restaurant, club, lounge, banquet hall and/or meeting rooms. A
motel is a non-residential use restaurant, club, lounge, banquet hall and/or meeting rooms. A hotel is
a non-residential use.
Residential hotel: A multi-dwelling, extended stay lodging facility consisting of efficiency units or
suites with a complete kitchen, suitable for long-term occupancy. Customary hotel services such as
linens, maid service and telephone are provided. Financial consideration being calculated on a
nightly, weekly, and/or monthly basis. Typical residence hotel attributes include, but are not limited
to, kitchen facilities and two-story design. and external doorways into room units. This definition shall
not include other dwelling units as defined by this article
DRAFT
Attachment “C”
Page 1 of 3
Proposed Revised Ordinance
Sec. 12-30-18. - Hotel and residence hotel.
A special use permit for a hotel or residence hotel use may be approved only when there is a
finding and determination by the city council, following a favorable recommendation by the planning
and zoning commission, that the type of hotel or residence hotel proposed is compatible and consistent
with and will have no adverse effect on existing uses in the area, that the proposed use is equal to or
exceeds development standards of other uses and that the proposed use will not adversely affect the
ability to locate, in the future, additional uses that are allowed within the zoning district of the area.
1. Hotel developments shall be subject to the following development standards:
a. A minimum lot size for a hotel development shall be no less than two acres.
b. There shall be a minimum of 125 guest rooms
c. Shall provide staff on-site 24-hours a day;
d. All units shall be accessed from a common interior corridor, except for first floor units
which may have direct access from an interior courtyard or swimming pool area in
addition to hallway access.
e. Each guestroom shall be a minimum of 300 square feet.
f. Shall provide a lobby waiting/atrium areas with a minimum of 750 square feet; or
five (5) square feet per guest room, whichever is greater, with a maximum of 1,500
square feet, Lobbies/waiting/atrium areas and/or other open space area may be
counted towards fulfilling this requirements if seating is provided.
g. Conference room/meeting space a minimum of 5,000 square feet.
h. Limited or full service* restaurant
i. A porte-cochere or other covered area shall be provided immediately adjacent to
the building entrance nearest the registration desk with an area for temporary
parking of at least two vehicles underneath the covered area for the guests checking
in or out.
j. A minimum lot size for a hotel or motel development shall be no less than two acres.
k. In addition to the above, there shall be provided a minimum of three amenities from
the list below:
1. Indoor/outdoor pool.
2. Spa/sauna.
3. Weight room/fitness center.
4. Playground.
5. Sports court.
6. Jogging trail.
7. *Full service restaurant (minimum seating capacity of 35) open to the general
public serving breakfast, lunch and dinner.
DRAFT
Attachment “C”
Page 2 of 3
2. Residence hotel developments, as defined in Section 12-42-1 of this Ordinance, shall be
subject to the following development standards:
a. A minimum lot size for a hotel development shall be no less than two acres.
b. There shall be a minimum of 125 guest rooms
c. Not more than 22 room units per acre;
d. Shall provide a lobby/waiting/atrium areas with a minimum of 750 square feet or five
(5) square feet per guest room, whichever is greater, with a maximum of 1,500
square feet, Lobbies/waiting/atrium areas and/or other open space area may be
counted towards fulfilling this requirements if seating is provided.
e. Shall maintain laundry facilities on-site for guest use;
f. Shall provide staff on-site 24-hours a day;
g. All units shall be accessed from a common interior corridor, except for first floor units
which may have direct access from an interior courtyard or swimming pool area in
addition to hallway access.
h. Conference room/meeting space a minimum of 5,000 square feet.
i. Limited or full service* restaurant
j. A porte-cochere or other covered area shall be provided immediately adjacent to
the building entrance nearest the registration desk with an area for temporary
parking of at least two vehicles underneath the covered area for the guests
k. Shall provide a minimum of three amenities from the list below:
1. Indoor/outdoor pool.
2. Spa/sauna.
3. Weight room/fitness center.
4. Playground.
5. Sports court.
6. Jogging trail.
7. *Full service restaurant (minimum seating capacity of 35) open to the
general public serving breakfast, lunch and dinner.
l. Shall maintain a minimum separation of 1,500 feet measured linearly from
property line to property line from any other residence hotel property.
m. All of the room units shall contain kitchen facilities.
n. Open space shall be provided in sufficient quantity and location to allow for
required additional parking should the residence hotel convert to multi-family
residences (two spaces per unit).
DRAFT
Attachment “C”
Page 3 of 3
Sec. 12-42-1. - Definitions.
Hotel: An establishment offering lodging to the traveling public for compensation. A hotel is
distinguished from a motel in that access to the majority of the guest rooms is through a common
entrance and lobby. The establishment furnishes customary hotel services and may contain a
restaurant, club, lounge, banquet hall and/or meeting rooms. A hotel is a non-residential use.
……
Residence hotel: A multi-dwelling, extended stay lodging facility consisting of efficiency units or suites
with a complete kitchen, suitable for long-term occupancy. Customary hotel services such as linens,
maid service and telephone are provided. Financial consideration being calculated on a nightly,
weekly, and/or monthly basis. Typical residence hotel attributes include but are not limited to, kitchen
facilities and two-story design. This definition shall not include other dwelling units as defined by this
article
Master
City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard
Coppell, Texas
75019-9478
File Number: 2016-2620
File ID: Type: Status: 2016-2620 Agenda Item Presentations
1Version: Reference: In Control: City Secretary
02/01/2016File Created:
02/09/2016Final Action: Student presentationFile Name:
Title: Presentation by Coppell High School students on Alzheimer’s Awareness.
Notes:
Agenda Date: 02/09/2016
Agenda Number: 6.
Sponsors: Enactment Date:
Attachments: Enactment Number:
Hearing Date: Contact:
Effective Date: Drafter:
History of Legislative File
Action: Result: Return
Date:
Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver-
sion:
1 02/09/2016City Council
Jamie Jun, Priya Mekala, Sara Koh and Sai Javangula gave a presentation to the City Council on
Alzheimer's Awareness.
Action Text:
Text of Legislative File 2016-2620
Title
Presentation by Coppell High School students on Alzheimer’s Awareness.
Summary
Fiscal Impact:
Staff Recommendation:
Goal Icon:
Sustainable City Government
Business Prosperity
Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017
Master Continued (2016-2620)
Community Wellness and Enrichment
Sense of Community
Special Place to Live
Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017
Master
City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard
Coppell, Texas
75019-9478
File Number: 2016-2619
File ID: Type: Status: 2016-2619 Agenda Item Passed
1Version: Reference: In Control: City Secretary
02/01/2016File Created:
02/09/2016Final Action: MinutesFile Name:
Title: Consider approval of the minutes: January 26, 2016.
Notes:
Agenda Date: 02/09/2016
Agenda Number: A.
Sponsors: Enactment Date:
Minutes.pdfAttachments: Enactment Number:
Hearing Date: Contact:
Effective Date: Drafter:
History of Legislative File
Action: Result: Return
Date:
Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver-
sion:
1 PassApproved on the
Consent Agenda
02/09/2016City Council
A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gary Roden,
that Consent Agenda Items A-E be approved. The motion passed by an unanimous vote.
Action Text:
Text of Legislative File 2016-2619
Title
Consider approval of the minutes: January 26, 2016.
Summary
Fiscal Impact:
Staff Recommendation:
Approval recommended.
Goal Icon:
Sustainable City Government
Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017
Master Continued (2016-2619)
Business Prosperity
Community Wellness and Enrichment
Sense of Community
Special Place to Live
Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017
255 Parkway Boulevard
Coppell, Texas 75019-9478City of Coppell, Texas
Minutes
City Council
5:30 PM Council ChambersTuesday, January 26, 2016
KAREN HUNT GARY RODEN
Mayor Mayor Pro Tem
CLIFF LONG NANCY YINGLING
Place 1 Place 5
BRIANNA HINOJOSA-FLORES MARVIN FRANKLIN
Place 2 Place 6
WES MAYS MARK HILL
Place 3 Place 7
CLAY PHILLIPS
City Manager
Karen Hunt;Cliff Long;Brianna Hinojosa-Flores;Wes Mays;Gary
Roden;Marvin Franklin;Mark Hill and Nancy Yingling
Present 8 -
Also present were City Manager Clay Phillips, Deputy City Managers Mario Canizares
and Mike Land, City Secretary Christel Pettinos and City Attorney Robert Hager.
The City Council of the City of Coppell met in Regular Called Session on Tuesday,
January 26, 2016, at 5:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of Town Center,
255 Parkway Boulevard, Coppell, Texas.
Call to Order1.
Mayor Hunt called the meeting to order, determined that a quorum was present
and convened into Executive Session at 5:40 p.m.
Councilmember Hinojosa-Flores arrived during the Executive Session.
Executive Session (Closed to the Public) 1st Floor Conference Room2.
Section 551.087, Texas Government Code - Economic Development Negotiations.
A.Discussion regarding economic development prospects south of
Northpoint Drive and west of Royal Lane.
Discussed under Executive Session
Page 1City of Coppell, Texas
January 26, 2016City Council Minutes
B.Discussion regarding economic development prospects south of
Bethel Road and east of S. Coppell Road.
Discussed under Executive Session
C.Discussion regarding economic development prospects south of
Wrangler Drive and west of Belt Line Road.
Discussed under Executive Session
Section 551.071, Texas Government Code - Consultation with City Attorney.
D.Consultation with City Attorney regarding a personal injury claim
against the City of Coppell by the Estate of Randall Caldwell.
Discussed under Executive Session
E.Consultation with the City Attorney seeking legal advice concerning:
1.Platting of property; and
2.The expenditure of public funds.
Discussed under Executive Session
Work Session (Open to the Public) 1st Floor Conference Room3.
Mayor Hunt adjourned the Executive Session at 6:44 p.m. and convened into
the Work Session at 6:50 p.m.
A.Discussion regarding potential bicycle lane signage.
B.Discussion regarding Citizen Summit.
C.Discussion regarding agenda items.
Presented in Work Session
Regular Session
Mayor Hunt adjourned the Work Session at 7:12 p.m. and reconvened into the
Regular Session at 7:30 p.m.
Invocation 7:30 p.m.4.
Councilmember Mays gave the Invocation.
Pledge of Allegiance5.
Mayor Hunt and the City Council led those present in the Pledge of Allegiance.
6.Consider approval of a proclamation naming the month of January as
“School Board Appreciation Month,” and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
Mayor Hunt read the proclamation for the record and presented the same to
members of the school boards for Coppell, Lewisville and Carrollton-Farmers
Branch ISD. A motion was made by Councilmember Wes Mays, seconded by
Page 2City of Coppell, Texas
January 26, 2016City Council Minutes
Councilmember Brianna Hinojosa-Flores, that this Agenda Item be approved.
The motion passed by an unanimous vote.
7.Presentation by C-FBISD on the new Cumulative Voting Education
Program.
James Goode, School Board President of the C-FBISD, made a presentation to
Council on the new Cumulative Voting Education Program for the May 2016
C-FBISD School Board election. All Place seating have gone away and only the
top seats with the most votes will win. This type of voting has been in place for
20 years. May 2016 will be the first time for this and will be in place for three
years.
Citizens’ Appearance8.
Mayor Hunt advised that no one signed up to speak.
9.Consider approval of the minutes: January 12, 2016.
Councilmember Yingling noted a correction was needed in the minutes. The
minutes now reflect the following report: "C. Councilmember Nancy Yingling
advised that there would be no report regarding the North Texas Council of
Governments Emergency Preparedness Planning Council meeting, as the
presentor had a flat tire and did not make the meeting. She did, however,
report that the Committee discussed the attack on the Dallas Police
Headquarters and how cities are using social media to disperse information in
these situations. Councilmember Yingling also reported that she sits on an
annual break-out committee for the Homeland Security Grant Program from the
Office of the Governor, and that they will be requesting $1.8 million for the
region, with 25% of the funds to be allocated to law enforcement. Finally,
Councilmember Yingling announced the 2016 TESSA Conference, a national
storm weather conference open to the public, will be held on March 5th at the
Colleyville Center."
A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Mayor
Pro Tem Gary Roden, that this Agenda Item be approved as amended. The
motion passed by an unanimous vote.
10.Consider approval of the resignations from Monica Diamond and Kim
Kelley from the Economic Development Committee.
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Gary Roden, seconded by
Councilmember Nancy Yingling, to accept the resignations of Monica Diamond
and Kim Kelley, and to appoint Sue Bird from an Alternate member to a Regular
member. The motion passed by an unanimous vote.
11.CITIZEN’S AGENDA REQUEST:
Council action for the City to provide the public a coherent summary of
the permitting processes that took place for the homes along Denton
Creek within the Villages of Coppell Phase III development, providing
supporting documentation or references to supporting documentation.
Presentation: Justin Raley, 929 Parker, made a presentation to Council about
the permitting process conducted for the homes along Denton Creek within the
Page 3City of Coppell, Texas
January 26, 2016City Council Minutes
Villages of Coppell Phase III.
Ken Griffin, Director of Engineering and Public Works, answered questions of
City Council.
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Roden, seconded by Councilmember
Mays, to approve this Agenda Item as presented. The motion failed by an
unanimous vote.
Nay:Councilmember Cliff Long;Councilmember Brianna
Hinojosa-Flores;Councilmember Wes Mays;Mayor Pro Tem Gary
Roden;Councilmember Marvin Franklin;Councilmember Mark Hill and
Councilmember Nancy Yingling
7 -
12.CITIZEN’S AGENDA REQUEST:
Council action for the City to provide the public a coherent summary of
the permitting processes that took place for the public drainage
structures along Denton Creek within the Villages of Coppell Phase III
development, providing supporting documentation or references to
supporting documentation, including explanation of the City's Utilities
and Water Superintendent's documented concerns about the project
being accepted before completion, as well as explanation for
reoccurring damages and repairs to the respective drainage structures
and total expended in tax payer dollars after development was
permitted.
Presentation: Justin Raley, 929 Parker, made a presentation to Council about
the permitting process conducted on the public drainiage structure along
Denton Creek within the Villages of Coppell Phase III.
Ken Griffin, Director of Engineering and Public Works, answered questions of
City Council.
A motion was made by Councilmember Yingling, seconded by Councilmember
Franklin, to approve this Agenda Item as presented. The motion failed by an
unanimous vote.
Nay:Councilmember Cliff Long;Councilmember Brianna
Hinojosa-Flores;Councilmember Wes Mays;Mayor Pro Tem Gary
Roden;Councilmember Marvin Franklin;Councilmember Mark Hill and
Councilmember Nancy Yingling
7 -
13.CITIZEN’S AGENDA REQUEST:
Council action for City to engage Corps of Engineers and FEMA to
explore opportunity to collaborate in developing and executing a
detailed study of Denton Creek, to ultimately understand and mitigate
damage to public and private property in Coppell while leveraging
federal funds to offset the burden to Coppell tax payers.
Presentation: Lisa Meagher, 953 Parker, made a presentation to Council to
engage the Corps of Engineers and FEMA to conduct a detailed study of
Denton Creek.
Ken Griffin, Director of Engineering and Public Works, answered questions of
Page 4City of Coppell, Texas
January 26, 2016City Council Minutes
City Council.
City Manager Clay Phillips offered for staff to meet with the citizens and their
engineer to further explain the process and answer any questions.
The Agenda Item failed due to lack of a motion.
14.CITIZEN’S AGENDA REQUEST:
Council action for review of process for adding citizen’s requests to
council meeting agenda.
Presentation: Justin Raley, 929 Parker, made a presentation to Council on
reviewing the process for adding citizen's requests to the Council agenda.
The Agenda item failed due to lack of a motion.
City Manager Reports - Project Updates and Future Agendas15.
City Manager Clay Phillips reported on the street drainage/greenspace project
along Denton Tap. The project is underway despite a water main break that
occurred. The Library and Life Safety Park Project are moving along as
scheduled. The Andy Brown Park Project has begun with Andy Brown Park
West now closed. Visit the website to see trail availability. Finally, the Citizen
Summit will be held on February 4th at 6pm.
Mayor and Council Reports16.
Report by Mayor Pro Tem Roden on the Texas Transportation
Commission.
Mayor Pro Tem Roden spoke about the Texas Transportation Commission's
study on Texas roads. Large amounts of money have been approved by
Propositions 1 and 7. Those funds will be applied to the most congested
roadways in the state. Meetings with local officials in the five metroplex areas
will be had to pinpoint the most congested areas in those communities.
Council Committee Reports concerning items of community involvement with no
Council action or deliberation permitted.
17.
A.CFBISD/LISD Liaison- Councilmember Hinojosa-Flores
B.CISD Liaison - Councilmembers Hinojosa-Flores and Mays
C.Coppell Seniors - Mayor Pro Tem Roden and Councilmember
Long
D.Dallas Regional Mobility Coalition - Mayor Hunt and Mayor Pro
Tem Roden
A. Councilmember Hinojosa-Flores touched on the presentation Mr. Goode did
on the Cumulative Voting Program C-FBISD is conducting with their elections.
There will be Town Hall meetings and good education opportunities before the
polls open in May. Visit their website for more information.
B. Councilmember Mays reported on the CISD School Board elections. May 7th
is Election Day. Candidate filing began on January 20th and closes on
February 23rd. Places 1, 2 and 3 are up for election, as well as a school bond
Page 5City of Coppell, Texas
January 26, 2016City Council Minutes
measure. Visit the website for dates and times on the informational meetings.
C. Mayor Pro Tem Roden reported on the Coppell Seniors. The rotating
process with the councilmembers is going well and is appreciated.
D. Mayor Pro Tem Roden reported on this item under Mayor and Council
Reports.
Public Service Announcements concerning items of community interest with no
Council action or deliberation permitted.
18.
Mayor Hunt spoke about the HEB Community Challenge, "It's Time Texas!" She
encourages everyone to sign up and log in their activity points.
Necessary Action from Executive Session19.
Nothing to report.
Adjournment
There being no further business before the City Council, the meeting was
adjourned.
________________________
Karen Selbo Hunt, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Christel Pettinos, City Secretary
Page 6City of Coppell, Texas
Master
City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard
Coppell, Texas
75019-9478
File Number: 2015-2529
File ID: Type: Status: 2015-2529 Agenda Item Passed
4Version: Reference: In Control: City Council
12/08/2015File Created:
02/09/2016Final Action: PD-186R8-LI, ORD Duke Freeport Addition, Lot 1R,
Blk A
File Name:
Title: Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. PD-186R8-LI, Duke
Freeport Addition, Lot 1R, Block A, a zoning change from PD -186R2-LI
(Planned Development-186 Revision 2-Light Industrial) to PD -186R8-LI
(Planned Development-186 Revision 8-Light Industrial), to attach a Detail Site
Plan for a 108,148-square-foot office/warehouse building on 7.36 acres of
property located at the northeast corner of Bethel Road and Freeport
Parkway, and to amend the Land Use Map of the Coppell 2030
Comprehensive Master Plan from ‘Old Coppell Historic District’ to
‘Industrial Special District’ and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
Notes:
Agenda Date: 02/09/2016
Agenda Number: B.
Sponsors: Enactment Date:
Cover Memo.pdf, Ordinance.pdf, Exhibit A - Legal
Descrption.pdf, Exhibit B - Detail Site Plan.pdf,
Exhibit C -Tree Preservation Plan .pdf, Exhibit D
-Landscape Plan.pdf, Exhibit E - Elevations.pdf,
Exhibit F - Site Lighting Plan.pdf
Attachments: Enactment Number: 91500-A-687
Hearing Date: Contact:
Effective Date: Drafter:
History of Legislative File
Action: Result: Return
Date:
Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver-
sion:
1 PassApproved12/17/2015Planning & Zoning
Commission
Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017
Master Continued (2015-2529)
Gary Sieb, Director of Planning introduced this case with exhibits, elevations and color board. He
mentioned 14 notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of this request. There were no
responses received in favor. One returned in opposition. There were also 29 courtesy notices
mailed to property owners within 800 feet of this request. He stated that staff is recommending
approval subject to conditions which he read into the record.
Vanessa McElroy, Development Services Manager/Duke Realty, 14241 N. Dallas Pkwy., Suite 1000,
Dallas, Texas, was present to represent this case. She addressed the concerns and questions
mentioned in the Work-Session which were:
Number of dock doors showing on the plan exceeded the number of doors that were proposed to
be used
Traffic flow in and out of development, especially onto Bethel Road vs Freeport Parkway
Number and types of trucks in the parking bays
Placement of trees located near power lines
She stated agreement with staff's recommendations.
Clayton Strolle, Pacheco Koch, LLC, 7557 Rambler Road, Suite 1400, Dallas, Texas, address the
Commission"s concerns with traffic flow in and out of the development, drainage and the amount of
trees added to the development.
Jim Morgenthaler, General Manager, Tohatsu America Corporation, 2005 Valley View Lane, Suite
200, Farmers Branch, Texas, addressed the Commission's concerns with the number of deliveries a
day and the type of trucks.
Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in favor or
opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. The following person spoke:
Cynthia Linder, 601 Loch Lane, Coppell Texas, was undecided and had concerns with water
drainage from the development on to her property, concerns about the amount of trees being
added, the start date of the development and if the screening wall will be retained or removed.
Chairman Haas closed the Public Hearing.
A motion was made by Vice Chairman Portman to recommend approval subject to the following
conditions:
1. There will be detailed engineering comments at time of detailed submittal.
2. Insure Sheets L2.00 and L2.01 , landscape requirements match (provided Perimeter
Landscaping figures do not match).
3. Parking spaces shall be a minimum 18 feet long; indicate on Site Plan number of each bank of
future parking spaces.
4. The number of dock doors for this project shall be limited to 14 in the rear, six of which are active.
Also, the Planning Commission recommended approval of an amendment to the Land Use Map of
the Coppell 2030 Comprehensive Master Plan from ‘Old Coppell Historic District’ to ‘Industrial
Special District’ (7-0).
Seconded by Commissioner Robinson; motion carried (7-0).
Action Text:
Chair Edmund Haas, Vice Chair Glenn Portman, Commissioner Sue
Blankenship, Commissioner Ed Darling, Commissioner Doug
Robinson, Commissioner Vijay Sarma, and Commissioner George
Williford
7Aye:
2 PassApproved01/12/2016City Council
Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017
Master Continued (2015-2529)
Presentation: Marcie Diamond, Assistant Director of Planning, made a presentation to Council.
Mayor Hunt opened the Public Hearing and advised that no one signed up to speak.
A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gary Roden, to
close the Public Hearing and approve this item. The motion passed by an unanimous vote.
Action Text:
Councilmember Cliff Long, Councilmember Brianna Hinojosa-Flores,
Councilmember Wes Mays, Councilmember Gary Roden,
Councilmember Marvin Franklin, Councilmember Mark Hill, and Mayor
Pro Tem Nancy Yingling
7Aye:
4 PassApproved on the
Consent Agenda
02/09/2016City Council
A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gary Roden,
that Consent Agenda Items A-E be approved. The motion passed by an unanimous vote.
Action Text:
Text of Legislative File 2015-2529
Title
Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. PD-186R8-LI, Duke Freeport Addition, Lot
1R, Block A, a zoning change from PD -186R2-LI (Planned Development -186 Revision 2-Light
Industrial) to PD-186R8-LI (Planned Development-186 Revision 8-Light Industrial), to attach a
Detail Site Plan for a 108,148-square-foot office/warehouse building on 7.36 acres of property
located at the northeast corner of Bethel Road and Freeport Parkway, and to amend the Land
Use Map of the Coppell 2030 Comprehensive Master Plan from ‘Old Coppell Historic
District’ to ‘Industrial Special District’ and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
Summary
Staff Recommendation:
On January 12, 2016, City Council unanimously approved this ZONING CHANGE and the
amendment to the Land Use Map of the Coppell 2030 Comprehensive Master Plan from ‘Old
Coppell Historic District’ to ‘Industrial Special District’ (7-0)
On December 17, 2015, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of this
ZONING CHANGE (7-0).
The Planning Commission also unanimously recommended approval of an amendment to the
Land Use Map of the Coppell 2030 Comprehensive Master Plan from ‘Old Coppell Historic
District’ to ‘Industrial Special District’ (7-0).
Commissioners Williford, Sarma, Robinson, Haas, Portman, Darling and Blankenship voted in
favor; none opposed.
The Planning Department recommended APPROVAL.
Goal Icon:
Business Prosperity
Page 3City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017
Master Continued (2015-2529)
Sense of Community
Page 4City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017
1
MEMORANDUM
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning
Date: February 9, 2016
Reference: Consider approval of an Ordinance for PD-186R8-LI, to attach a Detail Site Plan for a
108,148-square-foot office/warehouse building on 7.36 acres of property located at the northeast
corner of Bethel Road and Freeport Parkway and an amendment to the Land Use Map of the
Coppell 2030 Comprehensive Master Plan from ‘Old Coppell Historic District’ to ‘Industrial
Special District’
2030: Business Prosperity, Sense of Community
Introduction:
This is a request to build a warehouse/distribution facility for Tohatsu. This company, currently located
in Farmers Branch, is a distributor for Japanese-made outboard boat motors. This facility is proposed to
be 90% warehouse and 10% office with 25 employees. The Site Plan indicates that 55 parking spaces
will be constructed initially, with sufficient land available if additional parking is required in the future.
Given residential adjacency, in addition to the existing 6 foot-tall brick screening wall, the applicant is
providing a 190’ setback from the building to the residential property line, a 60’ wide landscape buffer
with 4” caliper overstory trees. This facility is closed in the evenings and on weekends, and generally
receives two shipments per month from Japan. Average number of trucks to and from this facility is 2-
3 per day and will be limited by PD ordinance to deliveries between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m.
Analysis:
On January 12, 2016, the City Council unanimously approved this PD amendment request, subject to
the standard condition that there will be detailed engineering comments at time of detailed submittal.
On December 17, 2015 the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended approval of
this PD Amendment request, subject to the standard condition that there will be detailed engineering
comments at time of detailed submittal.
Legal Review:
This item did not require City Attorney review.
Fiscal Impact:
None
Recommendation:
The Planning Department recommends approval
2
Attachments:
1. Ordinance
2. Exhibit A- Legal Description
3. Exhibit B – Detail Site Plan
4. Exhibit C - Tree Preservation Plan
5. Exhibit D - Landscape Plan
6. Exhibit E - Building Elevations
7. Exhibit F – Site Lighting Plan
Coppell/Duke Ordinance – PD186R8 Pg 1 TM 75211
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. ________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS,
AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP
OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, AS HERETOFORE AMENDED, BY
GRANTING A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM PD-186R2-LI (PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT-186 REVISION 2-LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) TO PD-186R8-
LI (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT-186 REVISION 8-LIGHT INDUSTRIAL),
TO ATTACH A DETAIL SITE PLAN FOR A 108,148-SQUARE-FOOT
OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDING ON 7.36 ACRES OF PROPERTY
LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BETHEL ROAD AND
FREEPORT PARKWAY, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A” ATTACHED HERETO AND
INCORPORATED HEREIN; PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE
DETAL SITE PLAN, TREE PRESERVATION PLAN, LANDSCAPE
PLAN,BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND SITE LIGHITNG PLAN,
ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBITS “B”, “C”, “D”, “E” AND “F” ;
PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL CONDITIONS; AND FURTHER APPROVING
AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE MAP OF THE COPPELL 2030
COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN FROM ‘OLD COPPELL HISTORIC
DISTRICT’ TO ‘INDUSTRIAL SPECIAL DISTRICT’ ATTACHED
HERETO AS EXHIBIT “G”, AND PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE;
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS
CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM
OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Commission and the governing body of the City
of Coppell, Texas, in compliance with the laws of the State of Texas and pursuant to the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, have given requisite notices by publication
and otherwise, and after holding due hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property
owners generally, and to all persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity
thereof, the said governing body is of the opinion that Zoning Application No. PD-186R8-LI should
be approved, and in the exercise of legislative discretion have concluded that the Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance and Map should be amended.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF COPPELL, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map of the City of Coppell,
Texas, duly passed by the governing body of the City of Coppell, Texas, as heretofore amended, be
and the same is hereby amended by granting a change in zoning from PD-186R2-LI (Planned
Coppell/Duke Ordinance – PD186R8 Pg 2 TM 75211
Development-186 Revision 2-Light Industrial) to PD-186R8-LI (Planned Development-186 Revision
8-Light Industrial), to attach a Detail Site Plan for a 108,148-square-foot office/warehouse building
on 7.36 acres of property located at the northeast corner of Bethel Road and Freeport Parkway, for
the property described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes.
SECTION 2. That the Property will be used and developed for Light Industrial purposes as
provided in the Code of Ordinances and to Plan to allow 108,148-square-foot office/warehouse
building is hereby approved subject to the following development regulations:
A. That accept as amended herein, the property shall be developed in accordance with
Ordinance 91500-A-307, which is incorporated herein as set forth in full and hereby
republished.
B. The building shall be constructed of concrete tilt-wall 4-60 Medium Texture material
in SW Aesthetic White finish with SW Worldly Gray and SW Rare Gray accent
colors as depicted in Exhibits “B” and “D”.
C. The hours of operation shall be between 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through
Friday, with no operations between close of business at 5:00 p.m. on Friday through
Monday at 8:00 a.m.
D. The loading and unloading of any supplies, merchandise or materials or any other
deliveries shall be limited to no more than four (4) times per day between the hours
of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday; and, there shall not be any
deliveries between 7:00 p.m. Friday through 7:00 a.m. Monday.
E. Fourteen (14) dock doors shall be permitted as shown on Exhibit “E”, “Building
Elevations”, and located only on the eastern elevations of the building. However only
Coppell/Duke Ordinance – PD186R8 Pg 3 TM 75211
six (6) of said doors in the loading area shall be used for loading or unloading; and,
all remaining doors shall be used for ventilation of the warehouse area.
F. A minimum of fifty-five (55) parking spaces shall be constructed with the initial
construction. In the event that fifty-five parking spaces is not sufficient, then up to an
additional seventy-four spaces shall be constructed as indicated on Exhibit “B” Detail
Site Plan.
G. Lighting of the truck court shall be directed toward the pavement surface and shall
be in accordance with the Site Lighting Plan attached hereto as Exhibit “F” and shall
meet the City Ordinance glare standards.
SECTION 3. That the Detail Site Plan (Exhibit “B”), Tree Preservation Plan (Exhibit “C”),
Landscape Plan (Exhibit “D”), Building Elevations (Exhibit “E”), and Site Lighting Plan, (Exhibit
“F”), all attached hereto and incorporated herein, respectively, and made a part hereof for all purposes,
are hereby approved.
SECTION 4. That the above property shall be used only in the manner and for the purpose
provided for by the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, as heretofore amended,
and as amended herein.
SECTION 5. That the development of the property herein shall be in accordance with
building regulations, zoning ordinances, and any applicable ordinances except as may be specifically
altered or amended herein.
SECTION 6. That an amendment to the Land Use Map of the Coppell 2030 Comprehensive
Master Plan from ‘Old Coppell Historic District’ to ‘Industrial Special District’, as illustrated in
Exhibit “G” shall also be approved.
Coppell/Duke Ordinance – PD186R8 Pg 4 TM 75211
SECTION 7. That all provisions of the Ordinances of the City of Coppell, Texas, in conflict
with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same are hereby, repealed, and all other provisions
not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 8. That should any sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of
this ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, the same shall not affect
the validity of this ordinance as a whole, or any part or provision thereof other than the part so decided
to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, and shall not affect the validity of the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance as a whole.
SECTION 9. An offense committed before the effective date of this ordinance is governed
by prior law and the provisions of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, as amended, in effect when
the offense was committed and the former law is continued in effect for this purpose.
SECTION 10. That any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions or terms
of this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Coppell, as heretofore amended, and upon conviction shall be punished by
a fine not to exceed the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense; and each and
every day such violation shall continue shall be deemed to constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 11. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage
and the publication of its caption, as the law and charter in such cases provide.
DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, this the _______ day of
___________________, 2016.
Coppell/Duke Ordinance – PD186R8 Pg 5 TM 75211
APPROVED:
_____________________________________
KAREN SELBO HUNT, MAYOR
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
CHRISTEL PETTINOS, CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________
ROBERT E. HAGER, CITY ATTORNEY
(REH/ag/75211/1-25-16)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
EXHIBIT “A”
24' WIDE PAINTED FIRE LANEPER CITY STANDARDS30'-0"5'-6"538'-0"7'-6"19'-0"24'-0"25'-10"24'-0"19'-0"11'-6"199'-0"130'-0"61'-10 1/2"
30'-0"321'-9 1/2"20'-2"30'-0"24'-0"56'-4"
76'-1"27'-0"(8) SP.= 81'-0"9'-0"(14) SP. @ 9'-0" = 126'-0"(14) FUTURE SP. = 125'-0"(14) SP. @ 9'-0" = 135'-0"49'-0"24'-0"31'-0"(14) SP. @ 9'-0" = 126'-0"(9) FUTURE SP. = 81'-0"42'-6"77'-6"487'-0"5'-6"30'-0"CONCRETE PAVINGREF. CIVILPROPOSED REFUSECONTAINER LOCATION(MIN. 5'-0" FROMADJACENT OPENING)12" HIGH CONCRETE CURB &GUTTER-REF. CIVIL6" HIGH CONCRETE CURB &GUTTER-REF. CIVILACCESSIBLE PARKING &CURB RAMPCONCRETE TILT WALLSCREEN PANEL (13'-0"ABV. FIN. PAVING) -PT.R30'-0"R10'-0"R30'-0"R30'-0"R54'-0"R30'-0"R30'-0"R30'-0"R30'-0"R30'-0"R30'-0"R30'-0"R30'-0"R30'-0"SITE DATA SITE AREABUILDING AREA MAIN OFFICE PACKAGING TRAINING/SUPPORT WAREHOUSETOTAL BUILDING AREACOVERAGEFLOOR AREA RATIOEXISTING ZONINGBUILDING HEIGHTBUILDING CODECONSTRUCTION TYPEOCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATIONPROPOSED USEOCCUPANT LOAD PROPOSED OFFICE (8,988 SF/100) PROPOSED WHSE. (98,653 SF/500) TOTAL OCCUPANT LOADEXITING REQUIREMENTS = 287.18 x .15PARKING REQUIRED91/300 SF OFFICE 30 SPACES1/1000 SF WHSE. 99 SPACESTOTAL 129 SPACESACCESSIBLE PARKING 3 SPACES320,713 S.F./7.13 AC.7,212 S.F.650 S.F.1,126 S.F.98,653 S.F.107,641 SF33.56%1:3.3OFFICE COMMERCIAL1 STORY +/- 41'-0" A.F.F.2012 IBCTYPE II BSTORAGE GROUP S-1OFFICE WAREHOUSE89.881197.30287.1843.07"PROVIDED129 (55 PROPOSED)(74 FUTURE)4 SPACES1. ALL DRIVE & APPROACHES SHALL MEET CITY OF COPPELLSTANDARDS.2. REFER TO PROJECT MANUAL FOR CONCRETE PAVING ANDSIDEWALK SPECIFICATIONS.3. PARKING LOT STRIPING SHALL BE 4" WIDE SPRAY APPLIEDWHITE VINYL ACRYLIC PAINT. (ALL SPACES @ 9'-0" WIDE X17'-6", TYP.)4. ALL CURB RADII SHALL BE 3'-0" UNLESS NOTEDOTHERWISE.5. REFER TO CIVIL FOR SITE GRADING INFORMATION.6. ALL CONCRETE STOOPS & ENTRANCES TO REF. 04/A8.02FOR THE SILL DETAIL.7.DOWEL STOOPS AND WALKS INTO GRADE BEAMS ATENTRANCES W/ #4'S AT 12" O.C.8. DIMENSIONS ARE TO GRID LINES, FACE OF CONCRETEPANELS AND FACE OF ROUGH OPENINGS.9.PROVIDE (1) ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL SIGN PERSTALL & (1) VAN ACCESSIBLE SIGN PER SECTION 502PARKING SPACES ON SHEET A1.07.10.REFER TO CIVIL FOR PAVING DETAILS.11.24' FIRE LANE w/6" WIDE RED STRIPE SHALL BEINSTALLED w/4" HIGH WHITE LETTERING PER CITY OF COPPELLSTANDARDS.12. FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE INSTALLED EVERY 600' ASPER IFC 2006, 508.5.1, EXCEPTION 2.GENERAL DATA 14241 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1000Dallas, TX 75254972.361.6700 972.361.6800 (fx)#DescriptionDateISSUANCESDRAWING INFORMATIONScale:Date:Checked By:Drawn By:Duke Realty Job #:A/E Job #:DRAWING / SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERProfessional Seal11-16-15Pre Submittal11-18-15Planning Submittal12-03-15DRC Submittal 12-08-15P&Z Submittal12-30-15City Council Submittal15-951DM11-16-151" = 40'-0"A1.00SITE PLANTOHATSU BUILD TO SUIT
P&Z Submittal
FREEPORT PARKWAY 972-980-8980DALLAS, TEXAS 7525414643 DALLAS PARKWAY, SUITE 636MEINHARDT & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS P.L.L.C.Client / Consultant 2Client / Consultant 110' TXU GAS/ELECTRICEASEMENT10' TXU GAS/ELECTRICEASEMENT*DUKE REALTY BUILD TO SUIT FOR TOHATSU OUTBOARDS*PART OF LOT 1, BLOCK A, DUKE FREEPORT ADDITION*VOLUME 2001065, PAGE 37, TEXAS DUGAN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP*CITY OF COPPELL, DALLAS COUNTY*7.362 ACRE TRACT, 320,714 S.F.*PREPARED APRIL 03, 2001PD-186R2-LISF-12PD-186R2-LIPD-186R7-LIPD-211R-HBUILDING INSPECTION:1. TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION TYPE: TYPE II-B2. FIRE PROTECTION TYPE: ESFR3. OCCUPANCY TYPE: GROUP S14: OCCUPANCY LOAD: OFFICE-100 SF/PERSON WAREHOUSE-500 SF/PERSON5. EXIT WIDTH: TOTAL OCCUPANTS X 0.15"= MINIMUM EXIT WIDTHREQUIREDFIRE DEPARTMENT1. FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE SPACED AT 300' (MAX.) ALONG FIRELANE EASEMENTS.2. FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED BETWEEN 3' AND 6' FROMFIRE LANE EASEMENT.3. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION (FDC) SHALL BE LOCATEDADJACENT (3') FROM FIRE HYDRANT.4. BUILDING SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A FIRE PUMP (BASED ONHYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS)5. ANY FUTURE GATES CROSSING FIRE LANE EASEMENTS SHALL BEEQUIPPED WITH BI-DIRECTIONAL GTT OPTICOM RECEIVERS ANDKNOX PADLOCK OVERRIDES FOR EMERGENCY ACCESS.6. USE OF ANY TRAFFIC CALMING DEVICES MUST BE APPROVED BYTHE FIRE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.F.H.F.H.F.H.F.H.F.H.FDCR20'-0"PROJECT LOCATIONDALLAS COUNTYMAPSCO 11 D*HOURS OF OPERATION WILL GENERALLY BE 8:00 AM TO5:00 PM* NO TRUCK TRAFFIC WILL OCCUR BETWEEN 7:00 PM &7:00 AM* SEALED DOCK DOORS AND VESTIBULES AREAREQUIRED AT BUILDING ENTRIESFINAL LOCATION OF (14) OVERHEAD DOOR & (6) ACTIVEDOOR POSITIONS TO BE DETERMINED & SUBMITTED FORBUILDING PERMIT REVIEW24" ARTICULATION24" ARTICUATION24" ARTICULATION24" ARTICULATION52'-0"37'-9"
23'-6"(13) FUTURE SP =117'-0"(6) FUTURE SP.(13) FUTURE SP. = 117'-0"60'-0"30'-0"40'-0"21'-1 1/2"(9) FUTURE SP.(3) FUTURE SP.15'-9"24" ARTICULATIONACCENTSTEEL STAIRREF.TRANSFORMERLOCATION(5) SP.=45'-0 1/16"7'-6 3/4"(7) FUTURE SP.18'-0"TYP.
18'-0"
TYP.
18'-0"TYP.
18'-0"
TYP.
G:\MISC\15951-TOHATSU-Duke\CD's\951-A100 Series.dwg, 12/29/2015 9:00:27 AM, 1:1
XXXXXXX XXX XXEXISTING TREE
TO REMAIN, TYP.
EXISTING TREE
TO BE REMOVED,
TYP.
TREE PROTECTION FENCING
TO REMAIN DURING
CONSTRUCTION, TYP.
EXISTING TREE
TO BE REMOVED,
TYP.
14241 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1000
Dallas, TX 75254
972.361.6700 972.361.6800 (fx)
#Description Date
ISSUANCES
DRAWING INFORMATION
Scale:
Date:
Checked By:
Drawn By:
Duke Realty Job #:
A/E Job #:
DRAWING / SHEET TITLE
SHEET NUMBERSTA
TE O F T E XASTCETHI
R
CA
EPACSDNALDEE
GEISRRT422 6KORINH
A
UGA N
12.30.15
TOHATSU BUILD TO SUIT
Client / Consultant 1
FREEPORT PARKWAYCOPPELL, TEXAS15142
11.18.2015
0 20 40 80
SCALE: 1" = 40'-0"
N
1" = 40'-0"
KAH
KAH TREE PRESERVATION PLANTREE PRESERVATION
PLAN
L1.01
PROJECT LOCATION
DALLAS COUNTY
MAPSCO 11 D
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
TREE PRESERVATION NOTES
1.EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED
DURING CONSTRUCTION FROM TREE STRUCTURE
DAMAGE AND COMPACTION OF SOIL UNDER AND
AROUND DRIP LINE (CANOPY) OF TREE.
2.IF ANY ROOT STRUCTURE IS DAMAGED DURING
ADJACENT EXCAVATION / CONSTRUCTION, NOTIFY
OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
IMMEDIATELY. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT A LICENSED
ARBORIST BE SECURED FOR THE TREATMENT OF ANY
POSSIBLE TREE WOUNDS.
3.NO DISTURBANCE OF THE SOIL GREATER THAN 4"
SHALL BE LOCATED CLOSER TO THE TREE TRUNK
THAN 1/2 THE DISTANCE OF THE DRIP LINE TO THE
TREE TRUNK. A MINIMUM OF 75% OF THE DRIP LINE
AND ROOT ZONE SHALL BE PRESERVED AT NATURAL
GRADE.
4.ANY FINE GRADING DONE WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT
ZONES OF THE PROTECTED TREES MUST BE DONE
WITH LIGHT MACHINERY SUCH AS A BOBCAT OR
LIGHT TRACTOR. NO EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT
WITH TRACKS IS ALLOWED WITHIN THE CRITICAL
ROOT ZONE OF THE TREES.
5.NO MATERIALS INTENDED FOR USE IN CONSTRUCTION
OR WASTE MATERIALS ACCUMULATED DUE TO
EXCAVATION OR DEMOLITION SHALL BE PLACED
WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE DRIP LINE OF ANY TREE.
6.NO EQUIPMENT MAY BE CLEANED OR TOXIC
SOLUTIONS, OR OTHER LIQUID CHEMICALS, SHALL BE
DEPOSITED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE DRIP LINE OF A
TREE, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: PAINT, OIL,
SOLVENTS, ASPHALT, CONCRETE, MORTAR, PRIMERS,
ETC.
7.NO SIGNS, WIRES OR OTHER ATTACHMENTS, OTHER
THAN THOSE OF A PROTECTIVE NATURE, SHALL BE
ATTACHED TO ANY TREE.
8.NO VEHICULAR / CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT TRAFFIC
OR PARKING IS ALLOWED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE
DRIP LINE OF TREES.
9.BORING OF UTILITIES MAY BE PERMITTED UNDER
PROTECTED TREES IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES. THE
MINIMUM LENGTH OF THE BORE SHALL BE THE WIDTH
OF THE TREE'S CANOPY AND SHALL BE A MINIMUM
DEPTH OF FORTY-EIGHT (48") INCHES.
10.IRRIGATION TRENCHING WHICH MUST BE DONE WITHIN
THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE OF A TREE SHALL BE DUG
BY HAND AND ENTER THE AREA IN A RADIAL MANNER.
11.ALL TREES TO BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE SHALL BE
FLAGGED BY THE CONTRACTOR WITH BRIGHT RED
VINYL TAPE (3" WIDTH) WRAPPED AROUND THE MAIN
TRUNK AT A HEIGHT OF FOUR (4') FEET ABOVE GRADE.
FLAGGING SHALL BE APPROVED BY OWNER'S
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO ANY TREE
REMOVAL. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT OWNER'S
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE WITH 72 HOURS
NOTICE TO SCHEDULE ON-SITE MEETING.
12.ALL TREES TO REMAIN, AS NOTED ON DRAWINGS,
SHALL HAVE PROTECTIVE FENCING LOCATED AT THE
TREE'S DRIP LINE. THE PROTECTIVE FENCING MAY BE
COMPRISED OF SNOW FENCING, ORANGE VINYL
CONSTRUCTION FENCING, CHAIN LINK FENCE OR
OTHER SIMILAR FENCING WITH A FOUR (4') FOOT
APPROXIMATE HEIGHT. THE PROTECTIVE FENCING
SHALL BE LOCATED AS INDICATED ON THE TREE
PROTECTION DETAIL.
13.WHEN A LOW HANGING LIMB IS BROKEN DURING THE
COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
NOTIFY THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
IMMEDIATELY. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE SHALL THE
CONTRACTOR PRUNE ANY PORTION OF THE DAMAGED
TREE WITHOUT THE PRIOR APPROVAL BY THE
OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.
X
EXISTING TREE
TO BE REMOVED
TREE PROTECTION FENCING
TO REMAIN DURING CONSTRUCTION
REFER TO 01/L1.01
EXISTING TREE
TO REMAIN
EXISTING TREE LEGEND
4'-0" MIN.3'-0"LIMITS OF DRIPLINE
01 TREE PROTECTIVE FENCING
NOT TO SCALE
REFER TO PLAN FOR
EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN
EXISTING GRADE TO
REMAIN UNDISTURBED
METAL T-POST AT
EACH OF FOUR CORNERS
SNOW FENCE, ORANGE VINYL
CONSTRUCTION FENCE, OR
CHAINLINK FENCE
TREE MITIGATION TABULATIONS
CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS
GROSS RETRIBUTION 272 cal. in.
minus (-)
PRESERVATION CREDIT:
Trees Preserved on Site 135 cal. in.
divided by (÷)
Total Trees on Site 407 cal. in.
equals (=)
Preservation Percentage 33%
times (x)
Gross Retribution 272 cal. in.
equals (=)
PRESERVATION CREDIT -89 cal. in.
minus (-)
LANDSCAPE CREDIT -155 cal. in.
equals (=)
62 trees, 4" cal.
62*2.5= 155
8 mitigation trees, 4" cal. in.- 32
NET RETRIBUTION 0
times (x) $100.00 x $100.00
equals (=)
CONTRIBUTION TO CITY $0.00
COPPELL REFORESTATION
AND NATURAL AREAS FUND
(6) MITIGATION
TREES
(2) MITIGATION
TREES
EXISTING PLANTING
TO REMAIN, TYP.
EXISTING TREE
TO REMAIN, TYP.
14241 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1000
Dallas, TX 75254
972.361.6700 972.361.6800 (fx)
#Description Date
ISSUANCES
DRAWING INFORMATION
Scale:
Date:
Checked By:
Drawn By:
Duke Realty Job #:
A/E Job #:
DRAWING / SHEET TITLE
SHEET NUMBERSTA
TE O F T E XASTCETHI
R
CA
EPACSDNALDEE
GEISRRT422 6KORINH
A
UGA N
12.30.15
TOHATSU BUILD TO SUIT
Client / Consultant 1
FREEPORT PARKWAYCOPPELL, TEXAS15142
11.18.2015
LANDSCAPE NOTES
1.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING AND
PROPOSED SITE ELEMENTS AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. SURVEY DATA
OF EXISTING CONDITIONS WAS SUPPLIED BY OTHERS.
2.CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ALL EXISTING
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT OF ANY CONFLICTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL
EXERCISE CAUTION WHEN WORKING IN THE VICINITY
OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES.
3.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM 2% SLOPE
AWAY FROM ALL STRUCTURES.
4.CONTRACTOR SHALL FINE GRADE AREAS TO ACHIEVE
FINAL CONTOURS AS INDICATED. LEAVE AREAS TO
RECEIVE TOPSOIL 3" BELOW FINAL FINISHED GRADE IN
PLANTING AREAS AND 1" BELOW FINAL FINISHED
GRADE IN LAWN AREAS.
5.ALL PLANTING BEDS AND LAWN AREAS SHALL BE
SEPARATED BY STEEL EDGING. NO STEEL EDGING
SHALL BE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO BUILDINGS,
WALKS, OR CURBS. CUT STEEL EDGING AT 45 DEGREE
ANGLE WHERE IT INTERSECTS WALKS AND CURBS.
6.TOP OF MULCH SHALL BE 1/2" MINIMUM BELOW THE
TOP OF WALKS AND CURBS.
7.ALL LAWN AREAS SHALL BE SOLID SOD
BERMUDAGRASS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE
DRAWINGS.
8.ALL REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE
PROVIDED WITH AN AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND
IRRIGATION SYSTEM WITH RAIN AND FREEZE SENSORS
AND EVAPOTRANSPIRATION (ET) WEATHER-BASED
CONTROLLERS AND SAID IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL
BE DESIGNED BY A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL AND
INSTALLED BY A LICENSED IRRIGATOR.
9.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE BID PROPOSAL LISTING
UNIT PRICES FOR ALL MATERIAL PROVIDED.
10.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING
ALL REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PERMITS.
MAINTENANCE NOTES
1.THE OWNER, TENANT AND THEIR AGENT, IF ANY,
SHALL BE JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR
THE MAINTENANCE OF ALL LANDSCAPE.
2.ALL LANDSCAPE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A NEAT
AND ORDERLY MANNER AT ALL TIMES. THIS SHALL
INCLUDE MOWING, EDGING, PRUNING, FERTILIZING,
WATERING, WEEDING AND OTHER SUCH ACTIVITIES
COMMON TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE.
3.ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF
TRASH, LITTER, WEEDS AND OTHER SUCH MATERIAL
OR PLANTS NOT PART OF THIS PLAN.
4.ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A
HEALTHY AND GROWING CONDITION AS IS
APPROPRIATE FOR THE SEASON OF THE YEAR.
5.ALL PLANT MATERIAL WHICH DIES SHALL BE
REPLACED WITH PLANT MATERIAL OF EQUAL OR
BETTER VALUE.
6.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SEPARATE BID
PROPOSAL FOR ONE YEAR'S MAINTENANCE TO BEGIN
AFTER FINAL ACCEPTANCE.
GENERAL LAWN NOTES
1.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE OPERATIONS AND
AVAILABILITY OF EXISTING TOPSOIL WITH ON-SITE
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER.
2.CONTRACTOR SHALL LEAVE LAWN AREAS 1" BELOW
FINAL FINISHED GRADE PRIOR TO TOPSOIL
INSTALLATION.
3.CONTRACTOR SHALL FINE GRADE AREAS TO ACHIEVE
FINAL CONTOURS AS INDICATED ON CIVIL PLANS.
ADJUST CONTOURS TO ACHIEVE POSITIVE DRAINAGE
AWAY FROM BUILDINGS. PROVIDE UNIFORM
ROUNDING AT TOP AND BOTTOM OF SLOPES AND
OTHER BREAKS IN GRADE. CORRECT IRREGULARITIES
AND AREAS WHERE WATER MAY STAND.
4.ALL LAWN AREAS SHALL BE FINE GRADED, IRRIGATION
TRENCHES COMPLETELY SETTLED AND FINISH GRADE
APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S CONSTRUCTION
MANAGER OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO LAWN
INSTALLATION.
5.CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL ROCKS 3/4"
DIAMETER AND LARGER, DIRT CLODS, STICKS,
CONCRETE SPOILS, ETC. PRIOR TO PLACING TOPSOIL
AND LAWN INSTALLATION.
6.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL LAWN AREAS
UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE. THIS SHALL INCLUDE, BUT
NOT BE LIMITED TO: MOWING, WATERING, WEEDING,
CULTIVATING, CLEANING AND REPLACING DEAD OR
BARE AREAS TO KEEP PLANTS IN A VIGOROUS,
HEALTHY CONDITION.
7.CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE ESTABLISHMENT OF
ACCEPTABLE TURF AREA AND SHALL PROVIDE
REPLACEMENT FROM LOCAL SUPPLY IF NECESSARY.
SOLID SOD NOTES
1.PLANT SOD BY HAND TO COVER INDICATED AREAS
COMPLETELY. ENSURE EDGES OF SOD ARE TOUCHING.
TOP DRESS JOINTS BY HAND WITH TOPSOIL TO FILL
VOIDS.
2.ROLL GRASS AREAS TO ACHIEVE A SMOOTH, EVEN
SURFACE, FREE FROM UNNATURAL UNDULATIONS.
3.WATER SOD THOROUGHLY AS SOD OPERATION
PROGRESSES.
4.IF INSTALLATION OCCURS BETWEEN SEPTEMBER 1
AND MARCH 1, OVER-SEED BERMUDAGRASS SOD
WITH WINTER RYEGRASS, AT A RATE OF FOUR (4)
POUNDS PER ONE THOUSAND (1000) SQUARE FEET.
HYDROMULCH NOTES
1.CONTRACTOR SHALL SCARIFY, RIP AND LOOSEN ALL
AREAS TO BE HYDROMULCHED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH
OF 4" PRIOR TO TOPSOIL AND HYDROMULCH
INSTALLATION.
2.BERMUDAGRASS SEED SHALL BE EXTRA HULLED AND
TREATED LAWN TYPE, SHALL BE DELIVERED TO THE
SITE IN ITS ORIGINAL UNOPENED CONTAINER AND
SHALL MEET STATE LAW REQUIREMENTS.
3.FIBER SHALL BE ONE HUNDRED PERCENT (100%)
WOOD CELLULOSE FIBER, DELIVERED TO THE SITE IN
ITS ORIGINAL UNOPENED CONTAINER AS
MANUFACTURED BY 'CONWEB' OR EQUAL.
4.FIBER TACK SHALL BE DELIVERED TO THE SITE IN ITS
ORIGINAL UNOPENED CONTAINER AND SHALL BE
'TERRO-TACK ONE', AS MANUFACTURED BY
GROWERS, INC. OR EQUAL.
5.HYDROMULCH WITH BERMUDAGRASS SEED AT A RATE
OF TWO (2) POUNDS PER ONE THOUSAND (1000)
SQUARE FEET.
6.USE A 4'X8' BATTER BOARD AGAINST ALL BED AREAS.
7.IF INSTALLATION OCCURS BETWEEN SEPTEMBER 1
AND MAY 1, ALL HYDROMULCH AREAS TO BE WINTER
RYEGRASS, AT A RATE OF FOUR (4) POUNDS PER ONE
THOUSAND (1000) SQUARE FEET. CONTRACTOR
SHALL BE REQUIRED TO RE-HYDROMULCH WITH
BERMUDAGRASS THE FOLLOWING GROWING SEASON
AS PART OF THIS CONTRACT.
8.ALL LAWN AREAS TO BE HYDROMULCHED SHALL
HAVE ONE HUNDRED PERCENT (100%) COVERAGE
PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE.
0 20 40 80
SCALE: 1" = 40'-0"
N
1" = 40'-0"
KAH
KAH LANDSCAPE PLANLANDSCAPE PLAN
L2.01
PROJECT LOCATION
DALLAS COUNTY
MAPSCO 11 D
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
LANDSCAPE TABULATIONS
CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS
PERIMETER LANDSCAPE
1.Street Frontage: 15' landscape buffer with one (1) tree,
3" cal., per 50 l.f.
2.Perimeter Landscape: 10' landscape buffer along
property lines with one (1) tree, 3" cal., per 50 l.f.
3.30" ht. parking lot screen: hedge or berm.
BETHEL ROAD: 428 l.f.
Required Provided
15' landscape buffer 15' landscape buffer
(9) trees, 3" cal.(9) trees, 4" cal.*
30" ht. screen 30" ht. evergreen hedge
5,609 s.f 5,609 s.f
FREEPORT PARKWAY: 675 l.f.
Required Provided
15' landscape buffer 15' landscape buffer
(14) trees, 3" cal.(14) trees, 4" cal.*
30" ht. parking screen 30" ht. evergreen hedge
8,801 s.f 8,801 s.f.
NORTH PROPERTY LINE: 531 l.f.
Required Provided
10' landscape buffer 10' landscape buffer
(11) trees, 3" cal.(11) trees, 4" cal.*
5,132 s.f.5,132 s.f.
EAST PROPERTY LINE: 754 l.f.
Required Provided
10' landscape buffer 10' landscape buffer
(14) trees, 3" cal.(2) existing trees, 3"+ cal.
(12) trees, 4" cal.*
6,850 s.f.6,850 s.f.
INTERIOR LANDSCAPE
1.10% of gross parking area to be landscape.
2.One (1) tree per 400 s.f. of required landscape area.
3.12% of total number parking spaces shall be planting
islands with trees.
Parking Lot: 35,00 s.f.
Parking Spaces: 57
Required Provided
3,500 (10%)5,157 s.f. (15%)
(9) trees (9) trees
(7) parking islands (7) parking islands
NON-VEHICULAR LANDSCAPING
1.Requirements: 15% of lot not covered by buildings to
be landscape open space. 50% of open space shall be
in the front yard. One (1) tree per 2500 s.f. of open
space.
Total Lot Area (Exclusive of building): 212,637 s.f.
Required Provided
31,896 s.f. (15%)53,131 (24%)
15,948 s.f. (50%)19,257 s.f. (60%)
(13) trees (6) existing trees, 3"+ cal.
(7) trees, 4" cal.*
SUMMARY
Required Provided
(70) trees (8) existing trees, 3"+ cal.
(62) trees, 4" cal.*
*additional 1" to be counted towards mitigation
plus:
(8) additional
mitigation trees, 4" cal.
14241 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1000
Dallas, TX 75254
972.361.6700 972.361.6800 (fx)
#Description Date
ISSUANCES
DRAWING INFORMATION
Scale:
Date:
Checked By:
Drawn By:
Duke Realty Job #:
A/E Job #:
DRAWING / SHEET TITLE
SHEET NUMBERSTA
TE O F T E XASTCETHI
R
CA
EPACSDNALDEE
GEISRRT422 6KORINH
A
UGA N
12.30.15
TOHATSU BUILD TO SUIT
Client / Consultant 1
FREEPORT PARKWAYCOPPELL, TEXAS15142
11.18.2015
PREPARED SOIL MIX PER
SPECIFICATIONS; TILL 6" MINIMUM
OF PREPARED SOIL MIX INTO
6" DEPTH OF EXISTING SOIL
3/16" X 4" BLACK EDGING,
STAKES ON INSIDE; EDGING SHALL
BE 1/2" MAXIMUM HEIGHT
ABOVE FINISH GRADE
TOP OF MULCH 1/2"
MINIMUM BELOW TOP OF
CONCRETE WALK / CURB
CONCRETE WALK LAWN / FINISH GRADE
NOTE:
NO STEEL EDGING SHALL
BE INSTALLED ALONG
SIDEWALKS OR CURBS
ROOTBALL,
DO NOT DISTURB
NATIVE SOIL
POCKET PLANTING
NOT ALLOWED
SHRUBS / GROUNDCOVER;
REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN
TOPDRESS MULCH PER
SPECIFICATIONS; 2" MINIMUM
SETTLED THICKNESS
SCARIFY SIDES
REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN
FOR SPACING6"
A.
E.
C.B.
I.
H.
F.
G.
D.
TREE PLANTING DETAIL LEGEND
AND NOTES
A.TREE: TREES SHALL CONFORM WITH
LATEST AMERICAN STANDARD FOR
NURSERY STOCK. www.anla.org
B.TREE PIT: WIDTH TO BE AT LEAST TWO
(2) TIMES THE DIAMETER OF THE ROOT
BALL CENTER TREE IN HOLE & REST
ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE
SOIL.
C.ROOT BALL: REMOVE TOP 13 BURLAP
AND ANY OTHER FOREIGN OBJECT;
CONTAINER GROWN STOCK TO BE
INSPECTED FOR GIRDLING ROOTS.
D.ROOT FLARE: ENSURE THAT ROOT
FLARE IS EXPOSED, FREE FROM MULCH,
AND AT LEAST TWO INCHES ABOVE
GRADE. TREES SHALL BE REJECTED
WHEN GIRDLING ROOTS ARE PRESENT &
ROOT FLARE IS NOT APPARENT.
E.ROOTBALL ANCHOR RING: REFER TO
MANUFACTURER'S GUIDELINES FOR
SIZING. PLACE ROOTBALL ANCHOR
RING ON BASE OF ROOTBALL, TRUNK
SHOULD BE IN THE CENTER OF THE
RING.
F.'U' BRACKET.
G.NAIL STAKE: REFER TO
MANUFACTURER'S GUIDELINES FOR
SIZING. INSTALL NAIL STAKES WITH
HAMMER OR MALLET FIRMLY INTO
UNDISTURBED GROUND. DRIVE NAIL
STAKES FLUSH WITH "U" BRACKET
ADJACENT TO ROOTBALL (DO NOT
DISTURB ROOTBALL).
H.BACKFILL: USE EXISTING NATIVE SOIL
(no amendments) WATER THOROUGHLY
TO ELIMINATE AIR POCKETS.
I.MULCH: DOUBLE SHREDDED
HARDWOOD MULCH 2 INCH SETTLED
THICKNESS, WITH 2" HT. WATERING
RING; ENSURE THAT ROOT FLARE IS
EXPOSED. BELOW GROUND STAKE
SHOULD NOT BE VISIBLE.
J.TREE STAKES:
TREE STAKE SOLUTIONS 'SAFETY
STAKE' BELOW GROUND MODEL
AVAILABLE FROM:
Tree Stake Solutions
ATTN: Jeff Tuley
(903) 676-6143
jeff@treestakesolutions.com
www.treestakesolutions.com
K.IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN A COPY
OF THE MANUFACTURER'S
SPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TO
INSTALLATION OF TREE STAKES.
CONTRACTOR SHALL ADHERE TO
MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION
GUIDELINES, SPECIFICATIONS, AND
OTHER REQUIREMENTS FOR TREE STAKE
INSTALLATION.
01 TREE PLANTING DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE 02 SHRUB / GROUNDCOVER DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
SECTION 32 9300 - LANDSCAPE
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 REFERENCED DOCUMENTS
A.Refer to Landscape Plans, notes, details, bidding requirements,
special provisions, and schedules for additional requirements.
1.2 DESCRIPTION OF WORK
A.Work included: Furnish all supervision, labor, materials, services,
equipment and appliances required to complete the work covered
in conjunction with the landscaping covered in these
specifications and landscaping plans, including:
1. Planting (trees, shrubs and grasses)
2. Bed preparation and fertilization
3. Notification of sources
4. Water and maintenance until final acceptance
5. Guarantee
1.3 REFERENCE STANDARDS
A.American Standard for Nursery Stock published by American
Association of Nurserymen: 27 October 1980, Edition; by
American National Standards Institute, Inc. (Z60.1) – plant
material
B.American Joint Committee on Horticultural Nomenclature: 1942
Edition of Standardized Plant Names.
C.Texas Association of Nurserymen, Grades and Standards
D.Hortis Third, 1976 - Cornell University
1.4 NOTIFICATION OF SOURCES AND SUBMITTALS
A.Samples: Provide representative quantities of sandy loam soil,
mulch, bed mix material, gravel and crushed stone. Samples
shall be approved by Owner's Authorized Representative before
use on the project.
1.5 JOB CONDITIONS
A.General Contractor to complete the following punch list: Prior to
Landscape Contractor initiating any portion of landscape
installation, General Contractor shall leave planting bed areas
three (3") inches below final finish grade of sidewalks, drives and
curbs as shown on the drawings. All lawn areas to receive solid
sod shall be left one (1") inch below the final finish grade of
sidewalks, drives and curbs. All construction debris shall be
removed prior to Landscape Contractor beginning any work.
B.Storage of materials and equipment at the job site will be at the
risk of the Landscape Contractor. The Owner cannot be held
responsible for theft or damage.
1.6 MAINTENANCE AND GUARANTEE
A.Maintenance:
1.The Landscape Contractor shall be held responsible for the
maintenance of all work from the time of planting until final
acceptance by the Owner. No trees, shrubs, groundcover or
grass will be accepted unless they show healthy growth and
satisfactory foliage conditions.
2.Maintenance shall include watering of trees and plants,
cultivation, weeding spraying, edging, pruning of trees,
mowing of grass, cleaning up and all other work necessary
of maintenance.
3.A written notice requesting final inspection and acceptance
should be submitted to the Owner at least seven (7) days
prior to completion. An on-site inspection by the Owner's
Authorized Representative will be completed prior to written
acceptance.
B.Guarantee:
1.Trees, shrubs and groundcover shall be guaranteed for a
twelve (12) month period after final acceptance. The
Contractor shall replace all dead materials as soon as
weather permits and upon notification of the Owner. Plants,
including trees, which have partially died so that shape, size,
or symmetry have been damaged, shall be considered
subject to replacement. In such cases, the opinion of the
Owner shall be final.
a.Plants used for replacement shall be of the same size
and kind as those originally planted and shall be planted
as originally specified. All work, including materials,
labor and equipment used in replacements, shall carry a
twelve (12) month guarantee. Any damage, including
ruts in lawn or bed areas, incurred as a result of making
replacements shall be immediately repaired.
b.At the direction of the Owner, plants may be replaced
at the start of the next year's planting season. In such
cases, dead plants shall be removed from the premises
immediately.
c.When plant replacements are made, plants, soil mix,
fertilizer and mulch are to be utilized as originally
specified and re-inspected for full compliance with the
contract requirements. All replacements are to be
included under "Work" of this section.
2.The Owner agrees that for the guarantee to be effective, he
will water plants at least twice a week during dry periods
and cultivate beds once a month after final acceptance.
3.The above guarantee shall not apply where plants die after
acceptance because of injury from storms, hail, freeze,
insects, diseases, injury by humans, machines or theft.
4.Acceptance for all landscape work shall be given after final
inspection by the Owner provided the job is in a complete,
undamaged condition and there is a stand of grass in all
lawn areas. At that time, the Owner will assume
maintenance on the accepted work.
C.Repairs: Any necessary repairs under the Guarantee must be
made within ten (10) days after receiving notice, weather
permitting. In the event the Landscape Contractor does not
make repairs accordingly, the Owner, without further notice to
Contractor, may provide materials and men to make such repairs
at the expense to the Landscape Contractor.
1.7 QUALITY ASSURANCE
A.General: Comply with applicable federal, state, county and local
regulations governing landscape materials and work.
B.Personnel: Employ only experienced personnel who are familiar
with the required work. Provide full time supervision by a
qualified foreman acceptable to Landscape Architect.
C.Selection of Plant Material:
1.Make contact with suppliers immediately upon obtaining
notice of contract acceptance to select and book materials.
Develop a program of maintenance (pruning and fertilization)
which will ensure the purchased materials will meet and / or
exceed project specifications.
2.Substitutions: Do not make plant material substitutions. If
the specified landscape material is not obtainable, submit
proof of non-availability to Landscape Architect, together
with proposal for use of equivalent material. At the time
bids are submitted, the Contractor is assumed to have
located the materials necessary to complete the job as
specified.
3.Landscape Architect will provide a key identifying each tree
location on site. Written verification will be required to
document material selection, source and delivery schedules
to site.
4.Measurements: Measure trees with branches and trunks or
canes in their normal position. Do not prune to obtain
required sizes. Take caliper measurements six inches above
ground for trees up to and including 4" caliper size, and
twelve inches above ground for larger sizes. Measure main
body of all plant material of height and spread dimensions,
do not measure from branch or root tip-to-tip.
5.Owner's Authorized Representative shall inspect all plant
material with requirements for genus, species, cultivar /
variety size and quality.
6.Owner's Authorized Representative retains the right to
further inspect all plant material upon arrival to the site and
during installation for size and condition of root balls and
root systems, limbs, branching habit, insects, injuries and
latent defects.
7.Owner's Authorized Representative may reject
unsatisfactory or defective material at any time during the
process work. Remove rejected materials immediately from
the site and replace with acceptable material at no additional
cost to the Owner. Plants damaged in transit or at job site
shall be rejected.
1.8 PRODUCT DELIVERY, STORAGE AND HANDLING
A.Preparation:
1.Balled and Burlapped (B&B) Plants: Dig and prepare
shipment in a manner that will not damage roots, branches,
shape and future development.
2.Container Grown Plants: Deliver plants in rigid container to
hold ball shape and protect root mass.
B.Delivery:
1.Deliver packaged materials in sealed containers showing
weight, analysis and name of manufacturer. Protect
materials from deterioration during delivery and while stored
on site.
2.Deliver only plant materials that can be planted in one day
unless adequate storage and watering facilities are available
on job site.
3.Protect root balls by heeling in with sawdust or other
approved moisture retaining material if not planted within 24
hours of delivery.
4.Protect plants during delivery to prevent damage to root
balls or desiccation of leaves. Keep plants moist at all
times. Cover all materials during transport.
5.Notify Owner's Authorized Representative of delivery
schedule 72 hours in advance job site.
6.Remove rejected plant material immediately from job site.
7.To avoid damage or stress, do not lift, move, adjust to
plumb, or otherwise manipulate plants by trunk or stems.
PART 2 - PRODUCTS
2.1 PLANTS
A.General: Well-formed No. 1 grade or better nursery grown stock.
Listed plant heights are from tops of root balls to nominal tops of
plants. Plant spread refers to nominal outer width of the plant,
not to the outer leaf tips. Plants will be individually approved by
the Owner's Authorized Representative and his decision as to
their acceptability shall be final.
B.Quantities: The drawings and specifications are complimentary.
Anything called for on one and not the other is as binding as if
shown and called for on both. The plant schedule is an aid to
bidders only. Confirm all quantities on plan.
C.Quality and size: Plant materials shall conform to the size given
on the plan, and shall be healthy, symmetrical, well-shaped, full
branched and well rooted. The plants shall be free from injurious
insects, diseases, injuries to the bark or roots, broken branches,
objectionable disfigurements, insect eggs and larvae, and are to
be of specimen quality.
D.Approval: All plants which are found unsuitable in growth, or are
in any unhealthy, badly shaped or undersized condition will be
rejected by the Owner's Authorized Representative either before
or after planting and shall be removed at the expense of the
Landscape Contractor and replaced with acceptable plant as
specified at no additional cost to the Owner.
E.Trees shall be healthy, full-branched, well-shaped, and shall meet
the minimum trunk and diameter requirements of the plant
schedule. Balls shall be firm, neat, slightly tapered and well
wrapped in burlap. Any tree loose in the ball or with a broken
root ball at time of planting will be rejected. Balls shall be ten
(10") inches in diameter for each one (1") inch of trunk diameter,
measured six (6") inches above ball. (Nomenclature confirms to
the customary nursery usage. For clarification, the term
"multi-trunk" defines a plant having three (3) or more trunks of
nearly equal diameter.)
F.Pruning: All pruning of trees and shrubs, as directed by the
Landscape Architect prior to final acceptance, shall be executed
by the Landscape Contractor at no additional cost to the Owner.
2.2 SOIL PREPARATION MATERIALS
A.Sandy Loam:
1.Friable, fertile, dark, loamy soil, free of clay lumps, subsoil,
stones and other extraneous material and reasonably free of
weeds and foreign grasses. Loam containing Dallasgrass or
Nutgrass shall be rejected.
2.Physical properties as follows:
a.Clay – between 7-27 percent
b.Silt – between 15-25 percent
c.Sand – less than 52 percent
3.Organic matter shall be 3%-10% of total dry weight.
4.If requested, Landscape Contractor shall provide a certified
soil analysis conducted by an approved soil testing
laboratory verifying that sandy loam meets the above
requirements.
B.Organic Material: Compost with a mixture of 80% vegetative
matter and 20% animal waste. Ingredients should be a mix of
course and fine textured material.
C.Premixed Bedding Soil as supplied by Vital Earth Resources,
Gladewater, Texas; Professional Bedding Soil as supplied by
Living Earth Technology, Dallas, Texas or Acid Gro Municipal Mix
as supplied by Soil Building Systems, Dallas, Texas or approved
equal.
D.Sharp Sand: Sharp sand must be free of seeds, soil particles and
weeds.
E.Mulch: Double Shredded Hardwood Mulch, partially decomposed,
dark brown. Living Earth Technologies or approved equal.
F.Organic Fertilizer: Fertilaid, Sustane, or Green Sense or equal as
recommended for required applications. Fertilizer shall be
delivered to the site in original unopened containers, each
bearing the manufacturer's guaranteed statement of analysis.
G.Commercial Fertilizer: 10-20-10 or similar analysis. Nitrogen
source to be a minimum 50% slow release organic Nitrogen
(SCU or UF) with a minimum 8% sulfur and 4% iron, plus
icronutrients.
H.Peat: Commercial sphagnum peat moss or partially decomposed
shredded pine bark or other approved organic material.
2.3 MISCELLANEOUS MATERIALS
A.Steel Edging: All steel edging shall be 3/16" thick x 4" deep x
16' long with 6 stakes per section, painted black at the factory
as manufactured by The J.D. Russell Company and under its
trade name DURAEDGE Heavy Duty Steel.
B.Staking Material for Shade Trees: refer to details.
C.Gravel: Washed native pea gravel, graded 1 inch to 1-1/2 inch.
D.Filter Fabric: 'Mirafi Mirascape' by Mirafi Construction Products
available at Lone Star Products, Inc., (469) 523-0444 or
approved equal.
E.River Rock: 'Colorado' or native river rock, 2" - 4" dia.
F.Decomposed Granite: Base material shall consist of a natural
material mix of granite aggregate not to exceed 1/8" diameter in
size and shall be composed of various stages of decomposed
earth base.
PART 3 - EXECUTION
3.1 BED PREPARATION & FERTILIZATION
A.Landscape Contractor to inspect all existing conditions and
report any deficiencies to the Owner.
B.All planting areas shall be conditioned as follows:
1.Prepare new planting beds by scraping away existing grass
and weeds as necessary. Till existing soil to a depth of six
(6") inches prior to placing compost and fertilizer. Apply
fertilizer as per Manufacturer's recommendations. Add six
(6") inches of compost and till into a depth of six (6") inches
of the topsoil. Apply organic fertilizer such as Sustane or
Green Sense at the rate of twenty (20) pounds per one
thousand (1,000) square feet.
2.All planting areas shall receive a two (2") inch layer of
specified mulch.
3.Backfill for tree pits shall be as follows: Use existing top soil
on site (use imported topsoil as needed) free from large
clumps, rocks, debris, caliche, subsoils, etc., placed in nine
(9") inch layers and watered in thoroughly.
C.Grass Areas:
1.Blocks of sod should be laid joint to joint (staggered joints)
after fertilizing the ground first. Roll grass areas to achieve
a smooth, even surface. The joints between the blocks of
sod should be filled with topsoil where they are evidently
gaped open, then watered thoroughly.
3.2 INSTALLATION
A.Maintenance of plant materials shall begin immediately after each
plant is delivered to the site and shall continue until all
construction has been satisfactorily accomplished.
B.Plant materials shall be delivered to the site only after the beds
are prepared and areas are ready for planting. All shipments of
nursery materials shall be thoroughly protected from the drying
winds during transit. All plants which cannot be planted at once,
after delivery to the site, shall be well protected against the
possibility of drying by wind and Balls of earth of B & B plants
shall be kept covered with soil or other acceptable material. All
plants remain the property of the Contractor until final
acceptance.
C.Position the trees and shrubs in their intended location as per
plan.
D.Notify the Owner's Authorized Representative for inspection and
approval of all positioning of plant materials.
E.Excavate pits with vertical sides and horizontal bottom. Tree
pits shall be large enough to permit handling and planting
without injury to balls of earth or roots and shall be of such
depth that,when planted and settled, the crown of the plant shall
bear the same relationship to the finish grade as it did to soil
surface in original place of growth.
F.Shrub and tree pits shall be no less than twenty-four (24")
inches wider than the lateral dimension of the earth ball and six
(6") inches deeper than it's vertical dimension. Remove and haul
from site all rocks and stones over three-quarter (3 4") inch in
diameter. Plants should be thoroughly moist before removing
containers.
G.Dig a wide, rough sided hole exactly the same depth as the
height of the ball, especially at the surface of the ground. The
sides of the hole should be rough and jagged, never slick or
glazed.
H.Percolation Test: Fill the hole with water. If the water level does
not percolate within 24 hours, the tree needs to move to another
location or have drainage added. Install a PVC stand pipe per
tree planting detail as approved by the Landscape Architect if the
percolation test fails.
I.Backfill only with 5 parts existing soil or sandy loam and 1 part
bed preparation. When the hole is dug in solid rock, topsoil from
the same area should not be used. Carefully settle by watering
to prevent air pockets. Remove the burlap from the top 13 of the
ball, as well as all nylon, plastic string and wire. Container trees
will usually be root bound, if so follow standard nursery practice
of ‘root scoring’.
J.Do not wrap trees.
K.Do not over prune.
L.Mulch the top of the ball. Do not plant grass all the way to the
trunk of the tree. Leave the area above the top of the ball and
mulch with at least two (2") inches of specified mulch.
M.All plant beds and trees to be mulched with a minimum settled
thickness of two (2") inches over the entire bed or pit.
N.Obstruction below ground: In the event that rock, or
underground construction work or obstructions are encountered
in any plant pit excavation work to be done under this section,
alternate locations may be selected by the Owner. Where
locations cannot be changed, the obstructions shall be removed
to a depth of not less than three (3') feet below grade and no
less than six (6") inches below the bottom of ball when plant is
properly set at the required grade. The work of this section shall
include the removal from the site of such rock or underground
obstructions encountered at the cost of the Landscape
Contractor.
O.Trees and large shrubs shall be staked as site conditions require.
Position stakes to secure trees against seasonal prevailing winds.
P.Pruning and Mulching: Pruning shall be directed by the
Landscape Architect and shall be pruned in accordance with
standard horticultural practice following Fine Pruning, Class I
pruning standards provided by the National Arborist Association.
1.Dead wood, suckers, broken and badly bruised branches
shall be removed. General tipping of the branches is not
permitted. Do not cut terminal branches.
2.Pruning shall be done with clean, sharp tools.
3.Immediately after planting operations are completed, all tree
pits shall be covered with a layer of organic material two
(2") inches in depth. This limit of the organic material for
trees shall be the diameter of the plant pit.
Q.Steel Curbing Installation:
1.Curbing shall be aligned as indicated on plans. Stake out
limits of steel curbing and obtain Owners approval prior to
installation.
2.All steel curbing shall be free of kinks and abrupt bends.
3.Top of curbing shall be 12" maximum height above final
finished grade.
4.Stakes are to be installed on the planting bed side of the
curbing, as opposed to the grass side.
5.Do not install steel edging along sidewalks or curbs.
6.Cut steel edging at 45 degree angle where edging meets
sidewalks or curbs.
3.3 CLEANUP AND ACCEPTANCE
A.Cleanup: During the work, the premises shall be kept neat and
orderly at all times. Storage areas for all materials shall be so
organized so that they, too, are neat and orderly. All trash and
debris shall be removed from the site as work progresses. Keep
paved areas clean by sweeping or hosing them at end of each
work day.
END OF SECTION
KAH
KAH LANDSCAPE SPECS AND DETAILSLANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS
AND DETAILS
L2.02
BDFGCHAEJKL1234534251EFBCHGADJKL41'-0"
14'-0"5'-0"2'-0"
36'-0"32'-0"14241 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1000Dallas, TX 75254972.361.6700 972.361.6800 (fx)#DescriptionDateISSUANCESDRAWING INFORMATIONScale:Date:Checked By:Drawn By:Duke Realty Job #:A/E Job #:DRAWING / SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERProfessional Seal11-16-15Pre Submittal11-18-15Planning Submittal12-03-15DRC Submittal 12-08-15P&Z Submittal12-30-15City Council Submittal15-951DM11-16-151" = 20'-0"A6.00OVERALL ELEVATIONSTOHATSU BUILD TO SUIT
COPPELL, TEXAS
FREEPORT PARKWAY 972-980-8980DALLAS, TEXAS 7525414643 DALLAS PARKWAY, SUITE 636MEINHARDT & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS P.L.L.C.Client / Consultant 2Client / Consultant 110'-0"
41'-0"14'-0"10'-0"5'-0"2'-0"
34'-0"
36'-0"
9'-0"
34'-0"
36'-0"SMOOTHFINISHCONCRETETILT WALLHOLLOW METALACCESS DOOR-PT.PRE-FIN. METALCANOPY SYSTEMLINE OF ROOFPROFILE BEYOND34" DEEP CONTINUOUSPANEL REVEALS(TYP.) - PT.RECESSED ALUM. & GLASSSTOREFRONT SYSTEMSMOOTH FINISHCONCRETE TILT WALLPAINTED ACCENTSMOOTH FINISHCONCRETE TILT WALLPRE-FIN. METALCANOPY SYSTEM34" DEEP CONTINUOUSPANEL REVEALS(TYP.) - PT.RECESSED ALUM. & GLASSSTOREFRONT SYSTEMSMOOTH FINISHCONCRETE TILT WALLPAINTED ACCENT24" PANEL ARTICULATIONOFFSETSMOOTH FINISHCONCRETE TILT WALLSCREEN PANEL (T.O.P.13'-0" ABV. FINISHEDPAVING)-PT.34" DEEP CONTINUOUSPANEL REVEALS(TYP.) - PT.SMOOTH FINISHCONCRETE TILT WALLLINE OF ROOFBEYONDSMOOTH FINISHCONCRETE TILT WALLPAINTED ACCENT34" DEEP CONTINUOUSPANEL REVEALS(TYP.) - PT.SMOOTH FINISHCONCRETE TILT WALLLINE OF ROOFBEYONDEMERGENCY OVERFLOWROOF SCUPPERS ADJACENTTO ROOF DRAINSPRE-FINISHED HI LIFT OVERHEADSECTIONAL DOOR W/ DOCKBUMPERS-TYP.HOLLOW METALDOOR & STEELSTAIR-PT. TYP.RECESSED ALUM. & GLASSSTOREFRONT SYSTEM24" PANELARTICULATIONOFFSET24" PANELARTICULATIONOFFSET24" PANELARTICULATIONOFFSETFIXED SUPPLY INTAKELOUVER AS REQ'D.SECURITY WALLMOUNTED CUT-OFFLIGHTING (MNT.22'-6"A.F.F.) TYPICAL24" PANELARTICULATIONOFFSET13'-0"24" PANELARTICULATIONOFFSET13'-0"22'-6"24" PANELARTICULATIONOFFSET(6)RECESSED DOCKLEVELERS (LOCATIONSTO BE DETERMINED)FINAL LOCATIONS OF (14) OVERHEAD DOORSAND (6) ACTIVE DOCK POSITIONS TO BEDETERMINED AND SUBMITTED FOR BUILDINGPERMIT REVIEWG:\MISC\15951-TOHATSU-Duke\CD's\951-A600 Articulation Series.dwg, 12/29/2015 8:51:36 AM, 1:1
Designer Date Scale Drawing No. IKDec 07 2015 SHOWN1 of 1 TOHATSUPlan ViewScale 1" = 30'LUMINAIRE SCHEDULESymbolLabelQtyFileLumensLLFWattsCatalog NumberDescriptionLampA18TWH_400M.ies380001.00456B96O7AZ_(42TRT).ies32001.0048TWH 400MGENERAL PURPOSEBUILDING MOUNTEDLUMINAIRE, 400W MH,W/ CLEAR LAMP.ONE 400 WATT CLEARED28 PULSE STARTMETAL HALIDE INHORIZONTAL POSITION6O7AZ (42TRT)6" OPEN DOWNLIGHTWITH SPECULARREFLECTOR.ONE 42-WATT TRIPLETUBE COMPACTFLUORESCENT,VERTICAL BASE UPPOSITION.STATISTICSDescription SymbolAvgMaxMinMax/MinAvg/MinCalc Zone #22.3 fc7.4 fc0.2 fc37.0:111.5:11.72.12.52.63.22.82.82.82.82.82.82.83.32.82.82.82.82.82.82.83.22.71.62.02.73.63.33.83.43.93.22.73.23.93.43.93.43.93.22.73.23.93.43.93.44.23.22.52.11.61.10.80.60.40.30.30.20.21.41.82.74.06.26.16.96.16.03.83.13.86.06.16.96.16.03.83.13.86.06.26.96.37.95.53.32.41.81.30.90.70.50.40.30.20.21.82.23.25.66.45.45.65.25.03.82.83.85.05.25.65.25.03.82.83.85.05.35.75.68.27.74.82.92.11.41.00.70.50.40.30.20.21.42.12.74.16.17.26.84.82.92.01.41.00.70.50.40.30.20.20.21.01.42.13.05.57.76.05.94.63.02.31.51.10.80.50.40.30.20.20.20.81.11.62.53.15.37.65.95.84.63.02.31.51.10.80.60.40.30.20.20.20.91.21.72.53.25.47.15.75.94.52.82.01.41.10.80.60.40.30.20.20.20.60.81.11.52.23.05.35.93.64.53.52.61.91.41.10.80.60.40.30.20.20.20.60.81.21.52.12.83.94.52.42.62.12.11.81.41.10.80.60.40.30.30.20.20.60.91.11.51.92.12.22.61.11.31.91.91.61.31.00.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.60.81.11.41.71.91.81.31.21.41.91.91.61.31.00.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.60.81.11.41.71.81.81.32.42.62.12.11.81.41.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.11.51.92.12.12.53.64.63.52.62.01.41.10.80.60.40.30.30.20.20.20.60.91.21.52.12.73.74.35.75.94.42.82.01.41.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.60.91.11.52.23.05.35.45.85.74.63.02.31.61.20.90.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.21.72.53.15.15.15.85.74.63.02.31.61.20.90.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.21.72.63.25.25.25.65.84.52.82.01.41.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.21.52.23.05.35.43.64.53.52.62.01.51.10.80.60.50.30.30.20.20.20.60.91.21.62.12.83.94.52.42.62.12.11.81.41.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.21.51.92.12.22.61.21.41.91.91.71.31.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.11.41.71.91.81.31.21.41.91.91.71.31.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.11.41.71.91.81.32.42.62.12.11.81.41.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.21.51.92.12.12.53.74.63.52.62.01.51.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.60.91.21.62.12.73.74.35.75.94.52.82.01.41.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.21.52.23.05.35.45.85.74.63.02.31.61.20.90.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.21.72.53.25.15.15.85.74.63.02.31.61.20.90.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.31.72.63.25.25.25.65.84.52.82.01.41.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.21.52.23.05.35.43.64.53.52.62.01.51.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.60.91.21.62.12.83.94.52.42.62.12.11.81.41.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.21.51.92.12.22.61.21.41.91.91.71.31.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.11.41.71.91.81.31.21.41.91.91.71.31.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.11.41.71.91.81.32.42.62.12.11.81.41.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.21.51.92.12.12.53.74.63.52.62.01.51.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.21.62.12.73.74.35.75.94.52.82.01.41.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.21.52.23.05.35.45.85.74.63.02.31.61.20.90.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.21.72.53.25.15.15.85.74.63.02.31.61.20.90.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.31.72.63.25.25.25.65.84.52.82.01.41.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.21.52.23.05.35.43.64.53.52.62.01.51.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.60.91.21.62.12.83.94.52.42.62.12.11.81.41.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.21.51.92.12.22.61.21.41.91.91.71.31.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.11.41.71.91.81.31.21.41.91.91.71.31.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.11.41.71.91.81.32.42.62.12.11.81.41.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.21.51.92.12.12.53.74.63.52.62.01.51.10.80.60.50.30.30.20.20.20.60.91.21.62.12.73.74.35.75.94.42.82.01.41.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.60.91.21.52.23.05.35.45.85.74.63.02.31.61.20.90.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.91.21.72.53.25.15.15.85.74.63.02.31.61.20.90.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.91.21.72.63.25.25.25.65.84.42.82.01.41.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.91.21.52.23.05.35.43.64.53.52.62.01.51.10.80.60.40.30.30.20.20.20.91.21.52.12.83.94.52.42.62.12.11.81.41.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.21.21.51.92.12.22.61.11.31.91.91.61.31.00.80.60.50.40.30.20.21.11.41.71.91.81.31.21.41.91.91.61.31.00.80.60.50.40.30.20.21.11.41.71.91.81.32.42.62.12.11.81.41.10.80.60.40.30.30.20.21.11.51.92.12.12.73.74.63.52.62.01.41.10.80.60.40.30.20.20.21.21.52.12.73.85.55.75.94.52.82.01.41.10.80.60.40.30.20.20.21.52.23.05.57.75.95.84.63.02.31.51.10.80.60.40.30.20.20.21.72.53.15.47.76.05.94.63.02.31.51.10.80.50.40.30.20.20.21.72.63.35.77.87.97.25.03.02.11.41.00.70.50.40.30.20.20.21.62.43.46.69.010.89.25.73.82.83.74.95.55.75.55.03.82.93.95.05.25.75.68.27.74.82.92.11.41.00.70.50.40.30.20.22.33.25.27.78.57.07.96.76.14.03.13.95.96.27.26.36.14.13.03.45.65.66.65.87.55.23.22.51.81.30.90.70.50.40.30.20.22.12.73.34.75.13.74.43.74.23.32.73.34.23.74.43.74.23.32.73.13.63.23.63.23.93.12.52.11.61.10.80.60.40.30.30.20.21.62.12.62.93.12.83.32.83.02.82.82.83.02.93.42.93.02.82.72.72.72.63.12.62.62.32.11.61.20.90.70.50.40.30.20.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.111.111.1
Master
City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard
Coppell, Texas
75019-9478
File Number: 2016-2617
File ID: Type: Status: 2016-2617 Agenda Item Passed
1Version: Reference: In Control: City Secretary
02/01/2016File Created:
02/09/2016Final Action: CRDC OfficersFile Name:
Title: Consider approval of CRDC appointments of President and Vice President.
Notes:
Agenda Date: 02/09/2016
Agenda Number: C.
Sponsors: Enactment Date:
Attachments: Enactment Number:
Hearing Date: Contact:
Effective Date: Drafter:
History of Legislative File
Action: Result: Return
Date:
Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver-
sion:
1 PassApproved on the
Consent Agenda
02/09/2016City Council
A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gary Roden,
that Consent Agenda Items A-E be approved. The motion passed by an unanimous vote.
Action Text:
Text of Legislative File 2016-2617
Title
Consider approval of CRDC appointments of President and Vice President.
Summary
Fiscal Impact:
Staff Recommendation:
Goal Icon:
Sustainable City Government
Business Prosperity
Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017
Master Continued (2016-2617)
Community Wellness and Enrichment
Sense of Community
Special Place to Live
Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017
Master
City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard
Coppell, Texas
75019-9478
File Number: 2016-2614
File ID: Type: Status: 2016-2614 Agenda Item Passed
1Version: Reference: In Control: Parks and
Recreation
01/29/2016File Created:
02/09/2016Final Action: Alliance GeotechFile Name:
Title: Consider Award of a proposal from Alliance Geotechnical, in the amount of
$199,960.00, for Construction Materials Engineering and Testing at the
Andrew Brown Parks, and authorizing the City Manager to sign the necessary
documents.
Notes:
Agenda Date: 02/09/2016
Agenda Number: D.
Sponsors: Enactment Date:
Memo.pdf, Agreement AB West.pdf, Agreement AB
East.pdf
Attachments: Enactment Number:
Hearing Date: Contact:
Effective Date: Drafter:
History of Legislative File
Action: Result: Return
Date:
Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver-
sion:
1 PassApproved on the
Consent Agenda
02/09/2016City Council
A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gary Roden,
that Consent Agenda Items A-E be approved. The motion passed by an unanimous vote.
Action Text:
Text of Legislative File 2016-2614
Title
Consider Award of a proposal from Alliance Geotechnical, in the amount of $199,960.00, for
Construction Materials Engineering and Testing at the Andrew Brown Parks, and authorizing
the City Manager to sign the necessary documents.
Summary
See attached memo.
Fiscal Impact:
Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017
Master Continued (2016-2614)
[Enter Fiscal Impact Statement Here]
Staff Recommendation:
The Parks and Recreation Department recommends approval.
Goal Icon:
Community Wellness and Enrichment
Sense of Community
Special Place to Live
Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017
1
MEMORANDUM
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Brad Reid, Director of Parks and Recreation
Date: February 9, 2016
Reference: Consider Award of a proposal from Alliance Geotechnical, in the amount of
$199,960.00, for Construction Materials Engineering and Testing at the Andrew
Brown Parks, and authorizing the City Manager to sign the necessary documents.
2030: Special Place to Live – Beautiful Green City
Community Wellness and Enrichment – Multi-Use Trail System Connecting the
City, Community Gathering Places, Recreation Programs and Services for All
Generations
Sense of Community – Successful Community Events and Festivals
Introduction:
It is vital that the new amenities at Andrew Brown Park East and West be constructed as the architects
and engineers intended. To insure this occurs, the materials and installation methods should be tested
along the way by a firm specializing in these types of tests. This is a standard practice in the
construction industry and is done to protect the owner from faulty construction materials and
installation practices.
Background:
Alliance Geotech Group was commissioned to perform the geotechnical explorations and analysis for
the engineering of the park renovations. It is recommended that the same company be utilized for the
Materials Engineering and Testing Services because the geotechnical anal ysis often leads to
determination of specific tolerances in the construction materials used. In other words, this company
is already familiar with the project design parameters and will hold the contractor accountable to those
parameters.
Analysis
The proposal received from Alliance is a conservative estimate of the scope of work that will be
necessary for the project at hand. It is possible that all allocated funds will not be necessary for the
completion of the project.
2
Legal Review:
Agenda item did not require legal review.
Fiscal Impact:
The fiscal impact is $199,960.00 for this agenda item.
Recommendation
The Parks and Recreation Department recommends approval of this item.
Master
City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard
Coppell, Texas
75019-9478
File Number: 2016-2618
File ID: Type: Status: 2016-2618 Agenda Item Passed
1Version: Reference: In Control: Library
02/01/2016File Created:
02/09/2016Final Action: Library KI AgreementFile Name:
Title: Consider approval to enter into an agreement with KI for supplying and
installing KI Architectural Walls for the Cozby Library and Community Library,
through TCPN #OT0012378C, in the amount of $122,878.11 as budgeted in
the total project cost; and authorizing the City Manager to sign any necessary
documents.
Notes:
Agenda Date: 02/09/2016
Agenda Number: E.
Sponsors: Enactment Date:
Staff Memo - KIAgreement.pdf, KI Wall Agreement.pdfAttachments: Enactment Number:
Hearing Date: Contact:
Effective Date: Drafter:
History of Legislative File
Action: Result: Return
Date:
Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver-
sion:
1 PassApproved on the
Consent Agenda
02/09/2016City Council
A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gary Roden,
that Consent Agenda Items A-E be approved. The motion passed by an unanimous vote.
Action Text:
Text of Legislative File 2016-2618
Title
Consider approval to enter into an agreement with KI for supplying and installing KI Architectural
Walls for the Cozby Library and Community Library, through TCPN #OT0012378C, in the
amount of $122,878.11 as budgeted in the total project cost; and authorizing the City Manager
to sign any necessary documents.
Summary
During the value engineering process the architect recommended KI for interior glass walls and
doors to help reduce costs and because it can be reconfigured should it be desirable or
Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017
Master Continued (2016-2618)
necessary. KI a member of TCPN and offers the best value and flexibility for a product of its
nature. Library staff visited several libraries that have this product and were very pleased with
its appearance and functionality.
Fiscal Impact:
The agreement amount is for $122,878.11 and will be funded by the CRDC and General Fund.
The cost is included in the total project cost of $8.4 million.
Staff Recommendation:
The Library Department recommends approval of this item.
Goal Icon:
Sustainable City Government
Community Wellness and Enrichment
Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017
1
MEMORANDUM
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Vicki Chiavetta, Director of Library Services
Date: February 5, 2016
Reference: Consider approval to enter into an agreement with KI for supplying and installing KI
Architectural Walls for the Cozby Library and Community Commons, through TCPN
#OT0012378C, in the amount of $122,878.11 as budgeted in the total project cost; and
authorizing the City Manager to sign any necessary documents.
2030: Community Wellness and Enrichment: Community Gathering Places, Community
Education Programs and Support of Top Quality Schools
Sustainable City Government Strategy: Excellent and Well-Maintained City
Infrastructure and Facilities
Introduction:
The library expansion project includes a number of interior glass walls and doors. The study rooms,
teen space, business center, quiet reading room and toddler are a will be faced with glass walls. The
KI product is designed to be reconfigured as needed, similar to furniture, and therefore was separate
from the construction contract.
Analysis:
During the value engineering process the architect recommended KI for interior glass walls and doors
to help reduce costs and because it can be reconfigured should it be desirable or necessary. KI a
member of TCPN and offers the best value and flexibility for a product of its nature. Library staff
visited several libraries that have this product and were very pleased with its appearance and
functionality.
Legal Review:
None
Fiscal Impact:
The agreement amount is for $122,878.11 and will be funded by the CRDC and General Fund. The
cost is included in the total project cost of $8.4 million.
2
Recommendation:
The Library Department recommends approval of this item.
DATE:
Susie Rustad
DRAWING #:
LUCIDO, JOE
256247SE_W_05.cmdrw 2/5/2016
BY:
PAGE
WILLIAM T COZBY PUBLIC LIBRARY:
127B
D
127A
D45LB1
45LB145LB11PWSP/A145LB145LB145LB145LB145LB145LB145LB145LB145LB144LB11PWSP/A143.5LD3L45LB143.5LD3R59' -10"Scale: 3/32" = 1'
Susie Rustad
LUCIDO, JOE
256247SE_W_05.cmdrw
PAGE
DATE:
BY:
2/5/2016DRAWING #:
WILLIAM T COZBY PUBLIC LIBRARY:
PAGE
2/5/2016
Susie Rustad
256247SE_W_05.cmdrwDRAWING #:DATE:
LUCIDO, JOE
BY:
WILLIAM T COZBY PUBLIC LIBRARY:
*
F-NL38LB21PWSP/A138.5LB239LB2PLEP/A184LD1L38LB21PWSP/A119' -11-1/2"Scale: 3/16" = 1'
PAGE
DATE:256247SE_W_05.cmdrw
LUCIDO, JOE
Susie Rustad
DRAWING #:2/5/2016
BY:
WILLIAM T COZBY PUBLIC LIBRARY:
DATE:
PAGE
LUCIDO, JOE
DRAWING #:
Susie Rustad
256247SE_W_05.cmdrw
BY:
2/5/2016
WILLIAM T COZBY PUBLIC LIBRARY:
*
C-NL
1PWSP/A1
37LB1 33LB133LB184LD5L37LB11PWSP/A1
18' -10"
Scale: 1/4" = 1'
DRAWING #:
Susie Rustad
DATE:
PAGE
LUCIDO, JOE
256247SE_W_05.cmdrw
BY:
2/5/2016
WILLIAM T COZBY PUBLIC LIBRARY:
BY:
PAGE
DRAWING #:
Susie Rustad
2/5/2016DATE:256247SE_W_05.cmdrw
LUCIDO, JOE
WILLIAM T COZBY PUBLIC LIBRARY:
*
G
45.5LB145.5LB1 43.5LD4L 12LB1
1PWP2/A1
1PWSP/A1
12' -4-5/8"
Scale: 3/8" = 1'
LUCIDO, JOE
256247SE_W_05.cmdrw 2/5/2016DATE:
Susie RustadBY:
DRAWING #:
PAGE
WILLIAM T COZBY PUBLIC LIBRARY:
LUCIDO, JOE
2/5/2016
PAGE
Susie RustadBY:
DATE:DRAWING #:256247SE_W_05.cmdrw
WILLIAM T COZBY PUBLIC LIBRARY:
*
E
*
E
*
E
*
E
*
E
2.25WP2P1P147.25LB1
1PWSP/A1
43.5LD2R
UG3/A1
37.5S134.5LB1 31.25LB148LB143.5LD2L34.5LB1
2.25WP2P1P133.5S135LB1
33.5S337.25S132LB1 32LB1
1PWSP/A1
37.5S143.5LD2R UG3/A1
33.5S133.75S3UG3/A1
33.5S243.5LD2L
UG3/A1
33.75S343.5LD2L46.5LB1 48LB1
2.25WP2P1P12.25WP2P1P137.25S18' -10"11' -7-9/16"7' -7-7/16"12' -4"7' -6-1/16"6' -8"11' -6-13/16"
Scale: 1/8" = 1'
BY:
LUCIDO, JOE
Susie Rustad
256247SE_W_05.cmdrwDRAWING #:
PAGE
2/5/2016DATE:
WILLIAM T COZBY PUBLIC LIBRARY:
2/5/2016
PAGE
DATE:DRAWING #:256247SE_W_05.cmdrw
Susie Rustad
LUCIDO, JOE
BY:
WILLIAM T COZBY PUBLIC LIBRARY:
TTFIELD VERIFICATION
REQUIRED TO LOCATE
BULKHEAD
38.25LB1
41.5LB1
1PWSP/A1
47.5LB11PWP2/A1
38.25LB1
41.25LB1
7'0.00"4' -1-1/2"6' -6"
Scale: 1/4" = 1'
BY:
256247SE_W_05.cmdrw
LUCIDO, JOE
DATE:
Susie Rustad
PAGE
2/5/2016DRAWING #:
WILLIAM T COZBY PUBLIC LIBRARY:
BY:
LUCIDO, JOE
Susie Rustad
2/5/2016256247SE_W_05.cmdrw DATE:
PAGE
DRAWING #:
WILLIAM T COZBY PUBLIC LIBRARY:
*
C-NL
39.75LB1 39.75LB1 39.75LB1
1PWSP/A1
39.75LB1
1PWSP/A1
84LD5L
20' -5"
Scale: 1/4" = 1'
BY:
LUCIDO, JOE
256247SE_W_05.cmdrwDRAWING #:DATE:2/5/2016
PAGE
Susie Rustad
WILLIAM T COZBY PUBLIC LIBRARY:
256247SE_W_05.cmdrw DATE:
LUCIDO, JOE
BY:Susie Rustad
2/5/2016DRAWING #:
PAGE
WILLIAM T COZBY PUBLIC LIBRARY:
*
E
*
E
43.5LD2R 43.5LD2R42LB1 24LB11PWSP/A124LB1 24LB1
1PWSP/A1
43LB1
20' -6"
20' -6"
Scale: 1/4" = 1'
BY:Susie Rustad
256247SE_W_05.cmdrw DATE:DRAWING #:
LUCIDO, JOE
2/5/2016
PAGE
WILLIAM T COZBY PUBLIC LIBRARY:
DATE:
BY:
DRAWING #:
Susie Rustad
256247SE_W_05.cmdrw
LUCIDO, JOE
PAGE
2/5/2016
WILLIAM T COZBY PUBLIC LIBRARY:
*
B-L
*
B-L
UCON47.5GP148D1R 48D1L47.5GP1
UCON
16'
Scale: 1/4" = 1'
256247SE_W_05.cmdrw
Susie Rustad
PAGE
2/5/2016
BY:
LUCIDO, JOE
DATE:DRAWING #:
WILLIAM T COZBY PUBLIC LIBRARY:
LD1
SIDE A&B
FRAME: ZLTBD.LoR
LEAF: ZLTBD.LoR
LD2
SIDE A&B
FRAME: ZLTBD.LoR
LD3
SIDE A&B
FRAME: ZLTBD.LoR
LEAF: ZLTBD.LoR
LD4
SIDE A&B
FRAME: ZLTBD.LoR
LEAF: ZLTBD.LoR
LD5
SIDE A&B
LEAF: ZLTBD.LoR
LB1
SIDE A&B
LB2
SIDE A&B
D1
SIDE A&B
FRAME: ZGTBD.LoR
LEAF: ZGTBD.LoR
S1
SIDE A&B
S2
SIDE A SIDE B
S3
SIDE A SIDE B
GP1
SIDE A&B
ZGTBD.MOD
G2
G2
G1 C1 C1 C1 C1 C1
G1
G1
AFF 56"GLASS HEIGHT 104"DOOR LEAF 104.6"GLASS HEIGHT 114.8"DOOR LEAF 116"AFF 35"GLASS HEIGHT 114.8"DOOR LEAF 116"AFF 62"GLASS HEIGHT 114.8"DOOR LEAF 116"AFF 37.1"GLASS HEIGHT 116"DOOR LEAF 116.6"20.5"AFF 35.75"DOOR LEAF 92.62"88.25"20.5"CL
PD
CL
PD
CL CL
5"38.15"5"5.13"5.13"82.36"18"18"G2 G2
G2 G2 G2 G2 G2
G1
108"120"120"120"120" 120" 108"24.25"94.75"120"116.25" 120"116.25" 120"116.25" 120"92"24.25" 94.75" 120"2 2
Scale: 1/16" = 1'
C1
POWDERCOAT
G2
G1
GLASS (TEXTURE TO INSIDE IF APPLICABLE)
A1
ANODIZED
STANDARD TBD
1/2 INCH CLEAR TEMPERED
1/4 INCH CLEAR TEMPERED - VERTICAL
CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM 8-MINUTE ETCH
TBD1
GLT
GLA/V
AL-AO
FINISH TYPE FINISH CODE
FINISH SUMMARY
NEW 220'10.72"
TOTAL 220'10.72"
LIGHTLINE
NEW 46'0"
TOTAL 46'0"
GENIUS
LINEAL FOOTAGE LEGEND
TBD 2NOTOP ELECTRICAL ST302 1/2" FLEXIBLE
NO TOP DATA LT309 3/4" EMT
SYMBOL PREWIRED FEED COLOR GANG TYPE COVER # CONDUIT
MODULAR ELECTRICAL LISTED TOP TO BOTTOM IS LEFT TO RIGHT IN PANEL
GENIUS ELECTRICAL LEGEND
NOINSULATED BASE AND CEILING TRIM:
YESGLAZING GASKET:
NOSEISMIC KIT W/ ESCUTCHEON PLATE:
TBDFLOOR TYPE:
DRYWALL ATTACHED CEILING RAIL
TBDCEILING GRID TYPE:
120"
108"CEILING HEIGHT:
NOCARB COMPLIANT:
LIGHTLINE PROJECT NOTES
A1 CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM 8-MINUTE ETCHPOST TRIM
A1 CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM 8-MINUTE ETCHDOOR TRIM
A1 CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM 8-MINUTE ETCHCEILING TRIM
A1 CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM 8-MINUTE ETCH4.00" BASE TRIM
LIGHTLINE TRIM TYPES
NOHANG ON COMPONENTS:
NOSEISMIC KIT W/ ESCUTCHEON PLATE:
TBDFLOOR TYPE:
TBDCEILING GRID TYPE:
120"CEILING HEIGHT:
NOCARB COMPLIANT:
GENIUS PROJECT NOTES
C1 STANDARD TBDGENIUS FLUSH CONNECTOR
C1 STANDARD TBDWALL POST BACK COLOR
C1 STANDARD TBDDOOR AND GLAZING TRIM
C1 STANDARD TBDRECESSED CEILING RAIL
C1 STANDARD TBD4" BASE COVER
GENIUS TRIM TYPES
2
ON KI ARCHITECTURAL WALLS INSTALLED UNDER CONTRACT THROUGH KI, PIVOT HINGE DOORS ARE SET TO SWING TO THE OPEN POSITION AS A DEFAULT. IF "NEUTRAL" OR "SWING CLOSED" ARE DESIRED, PLEASE CONSULT YOUR KI CERTIFIED INSTALLER.
MISC:
DOOR STOP:
STRIKE HEIGHT:
HANDLE FINISH:
HANDLE HARDWARE:
FRAME STYLE:
E.
LIGHTLINE FRAMELESS GLASS PIVOT HUNG
CYL SCHLAGE JUPITER AL50PD (QTY: 1)
626
38.00"
IVES FS439 (QTY: 1)
NORTON 8301 OVERHEAD CLOSERS (A0 ONLY) (QTY: 1)
F.
LIGHTLINE FRAMELESS GLASS SLIDING HARDWARE
ROCKWOOD LP3301FHU X 98.00" X 1/2" GLASS, 86"CC, 98"OAL (QTY: 1)
US32D
NON-LOCKING
SOFT STOP
G.
LIGHTLINE FRAMELESS GLASS PIVOT HUNG
ROCKWOOD LP3301FHU X 110.00" X 1/2" GLASS, 98"CC, 110"OAL (QTY: 1)
US32D
NON-LOCKING
IVES FS439 (QTY: 1)
NORTON 8301 OVERHEAD CLOSERS (A0 ONLY) (QTY: 1)
MISC:
DOOR STOP:
STRIKE HEIGHT:
HANDLE FINISH:
HANDLE HARDWARE:
FRAME STYLE:
A.
LIGHTLINE FRAMELESS GLASS DOUBLE PIVOT HUNG - HC
SLI FORMS & SURFACES DT1014-36-630, F&S, 36"CC, 42"OAL (QTY: 2)
630
IVES FS439 (QTY: 2)
DORMA RTS88-HO OVERHEAD CLOSERS (QTY: 1)
B.
GENIUS SOFT STOP SLIDING HARDWARE
SLI FORMS & SURFACES DT1014-36-630, F&S, 36"CC, 42"OAL (QTY: 2)
630
LOCKING
C.
LIGHTLINE FRAMELESS GLASS SLIDING HARDWARE
SLI FORMS & SURFACES DT1014-36-630, F&S, 36"CC, 42"OAL (QTY: 2)
630
LOCKING/NON-LOCKING
SOFT STOP
D.
LIGHTLINE FRAMELESS GLASS PIVOT HUNG
FORMS & SURFACES DT1014-36-630, F&S, 36"CC, 42"OAL (QTY: 2)
630
NON-LOCKING
IVES FS439 (QTY: 1)
DORMA BTS75V ADA FLOOR CLOSER WITH HOLD OPEN (QTY: 1)
HARDWARE SETS
DOOR SCHEDULE
KI DOOR SCHEDULE
127B N/A LD2 LH D.LUP - LIGHTLINE PIVOT DOOR FRAMELESS GLASS DOOR 1/2 INCH CLEAR TEMPERED
127A N/A LD2 RH D.LUP - LIGHTLINE PIVOT DOOR FRAMELESS GLASS DOOR 1/2 INCH CLEAR TEMPERED
*N/A D1 LH B.-LOCK YST - GENIUS SLIDING DOOR ALUMINUM GLASS DOOR STANDARD TBD
*N/A LD5 LH C.-NO LOCK LUDS - LIGHTLINE SLIDING DOOR FRAMELESS GLASS DOOR - SOFT STOP 1/2 INCH CLEAR TEMPERED
*N/A LD1 LH E.LUP - LIGHTLINE PIVOT DOOR FRAMELESS GLASS DOOR 1/2 INCH CLEAR TEMPERED
*N/A LD4 RH C.-LOCK LUS - LIGHTLINE SLIDING DOOR FRAMELESS GLASS DOOR - SOFT STOP 1/2 INCH CLEAR TEMPERED
*N/A D1 RH B.-LOCK YST - GENIUS SLIDING DOOR ALUMINUM GLASS DOOR STANDARD TBD
*N/A LD3 LH G.LUP - LIGHTLINE PIVOT DOOR FRAMELESS GLASS DOOR 1/2 INCH CLEAR TEMPERED
*N/A LD1 RH E.LUP - LIGHTLINE PIVOT DOOR FRAMELESS GLASS DOOR 1/2 INCH CLEAR TEMPERED
*N/A LD1 RH E.LUP - LIGHTLINE PIVOT DOOR FRAMELESS GLASS DOOR 1/2 INCH CLEAR TEMPERED
*N/A LD1 LH E.LUP - LIGHTLINE PIVOT DOOR FRAMELESS GLASS DOOR 1/2 INCH CLEAR TEMPERED
*N/A LD1 RH E.LUP - LIGHTLINE PIVOT DOOR FRAMELESS GLASS DOOR 1/2 INCH CLEAR TEMPERED
*N/A LD1 RH E.LUP - LIGHTLINE PIVOT DOOR FRAMELESS GLASS DOOR 1/2 INCH CLEAR TEMPERED
*N/A LD6 LH F.-NO LOCK LUDS - LIGHTLINE SLIDING DOOR FRAMELESS GLASS DOOR - SOFT STOP 1/2 INCH CLEAR TEMPERED
*N/A LD5 LH C.-NO LOCK LUDS - LIGHTLINE SLIDING DOOR FRAMELESS GLASS DOOR - SOFT STOP 1/2 INCH CLEAR TEMPERED
DOOR #ROOM # TAG HAND HARDWARE SET DOOR FRAME DOOR LEAF DOOR LEAF FINISH
Susie Rustad
LUCIDO, JOE
BY:
DRAWING #:
PAGE
256247SE_W_05.cmdrw 2/5/2016DATE:
WILLIAM T COZBY PUBLIC LIBRARY:
KI WALL BUSINESS CENTER 119 New 12 Lineal feet of Wall $7,093.66
KI WALL CONFERENCE ROOM 108 New 20 Lineal feet of Wall $10,576.19
KI WALL QUIET READING 121 New 20 Lineal feet of Wall $10,324.73
KI WALL STORY TIME 126 New 16 Lineal feet of Wall $9,098.52
KI WALL STUDY 114 New 20 Lineal feet of Wall $8,378.36
KI WALL STUDY ROOMS 129-133 New 82 Lineal feet of Wall $39,909.74
KI WALL TEEN 118A New 19 Lineal feet of Wall $8,146.03
KI WALL TEEN 118B New 17 Lineal feet of Wall $4,817.50
KI WALL TODDLER 127 New 60 Lineal feet of Wall $19,797.69
Components $118,142.42
KI Installation (Non Union Straight Wage)$0.00
KI Freight $3,760.47
Performance Bond $975.22
KI Seismic $0.00
KI Tachy CAD $0.00
Genius Film Installation $0.00
Lightline Film Installation $0.00
KI Attic Stock Percentage (0%)$0.00
KI Estimated Sales Tax - Material (0%)$0.00
KI Estimated Sales Tax - Install (0%)$0.00
KI Estimated Sales Tax - Freight (0%)$0.00
Total $122,878.11
LIGHTLINE NOTES
FILM REQUIRES MORE CLARIFICATION TO BE QUOTED.
PLEASE PROVIDE A SPECIFICATION AND SIZING FOR THE FILM STRIPING
LOCK CORES QUOTES ARE CONSTRUCTION CORES ONLY. MASTER KEYING TO BR PROVIDED AND INSTALLED
BY OTHERS.
If sales tax field shows $0, then sales tax is not included in project price. See Additional
Information page for more detail.
Part Number Description Ext. Sell
KI Wall QuotationEmail: Wall.quotes@ki.com
Phone: 1-800-424-2432
Project Name:WILLIAM T COZBY PUBLIC LIBRARY: WALLS Quote #:256247SE_W_01
Creation Date:04/08/2015 BOM Tab:Quote BOM
Revised Date:02/05/2016 Exp. Date:05/05/2016
KI Rep Name:LUCIDO, JOE Prepared By:Susie Rustad
Contract used:TCPN - OT0012378C
Sold To Company:Ship To Company:WILLIAM T CROZBY PUBLIC LIBRARY
Address:Contact:
Address:
City/State/Zip:
City/State/Zip:DALLAS, TX 77025
Date 2/5/2016 256247SE_W_05.cmdrw Page 20 / 23
Approved By :_______________________ Date:_________________
Signature
Service Information
Date 2/5/2016 256247SE_W_05.cmdrw Page 21 / 23
- Installation and delivery is based on Non Union Straight Wage with no-charge access and exclusive use of unloading docks and elevators capable of accommodating a 84.00" x 120.00" panel. If elevators cannot
accommodate KI Wall panels, additional installation charges will apply including but not limited to:
:- Coordination, scheduling, and payment of any necessary costs for hoisting, elevators, crane time, and all associated operations,
flaggers, riggers, and traffic control.
:- Coordination, implementation and costs for removal, protection, and/or installation of exterior windows to facilitate stocking
and debris removal.
- All areas shall be free and clear of other trades prior to commencement of installation. Following installation, the general contractor must provide protection, Quality Control sign-off and facilitate product
replacement, installation repairs and trade back charges. If the following items are the result of changes caused by the General Contractor, additional changes will be assessed:
:- Crew scaling charges for down time and remobilization minimum eight hour per man charge per occurrence.
:- Production loss and crew over staffing and reduction due to schedules and delivery impacts.
:- Overtime premiums for schedule delays or adjustments regardless of the basis (unless directly attributed to KI).
:- Interior and exterior logistical coordination (parking shuttles, ramps, and platforms, product lay down, phased work areas, etc.).
:- Jurisdictional requirement/charges (wall bracing and seismic supports or any other changes not detailed and approved.
:- Relocation of cut stations due to site logistics and scheduling.
- ASCE Standard-7, Section 13.5.8: Additional installation services and hardware charges will be added to the price stated above in the event compliance with Section 13.5.8 of the ASCE Standard 7-05 (2005) (or any
successor or replacement code or section thereto) is required or requested by customer or local inspectors. Customer agrees that customer shall be responsible for determining whether compliance with ASCE Standard 7-05,
13.5.8 is required and shall communicate any such requirements to KI no less than 2 weeks prior to commencement of installation. At the time of this quote, project specific signed and sealed structural calculations
and/or drawings were not a requirement. This quote does not include the engineering fees for project specific signed and sealed structural calculations and/or drawings. If project specific signed and sealed
structural calculations and /or drawings are required we can provide them for an additional fee. Also, if the seismic/structural calculations require additional bracing materials and labor beyond KI's standard
ICC parts kit, the customer may be subject to additional costs via change order.
- Final seismic code compliance is pending on the Lightline product. Prior to order, KI reserves the right to review final compliance by issuing a request to an independent 3rd party to determine final result. KI will ask
for a change order at that time in the amount of $400 for unstamped documents, or if required, $800 for a stamped document by professional engineer.
- Building/Construction permits, if required, are by customer. KI recommends that the customer consults with their local building code department.
- Please reference KIs Power/Data Instruction manual which details standard power/data configurations and locations. Limiting panel types and the number of configurations of electrical/data/strobes/thermostats/light
switch cutouts, or boxes in the panels, will simplify future reconfigurations and make for a more efficient use of your KI Wall System.
- The production lead-time for KIs Architectural Wall factory assembled products is approximately 6 to 8 weeks from purchase order or endorsed contract receipt, verified field dimensions, and shop drawing/finish
approvals. Field fabricated track layout may start inside of 4 weeks from drawing approval. Please consult your KI Sales Representative or Project Estimator on specific lead-times for this project.
-KI offers a 4" base solution for Lightline as our default option, as it provides the most flexibility to accommodate floor variations. 2.5" base is available for projects with floor variances of +/- 1/4" or +/- 1/8" if plate
glass doors are specified. Consult your KI representative to discuss base height options for your particular project.
Additional Information
Date 2/5/2016 256247SE_W_05.cmdrw Page 22 / 23
1.The sales/use tax included on this quotation is for estimate purposes only it is subject to change. It is the customers responsibility to pay any applicable sales/use tax due upon invoicing. A
customer will not be charged sales/use tax if a valid exemption certificate is provided to KI's Finance Department. If no certificate is on file, the appropriate sales/use tax rate in effect at shipment
will be applied and tax will be added to the customer's invoice.
2.All products listed above will be manufactured in accordance with KI specifications. Finishes will be standard unless stated otherwise.
3.The first and last page of this quote must accompany you company's purchase order and the quote number must be referenced in the body of the purchase order to ensure accurate and timely entry
of the product and pricing. Without this information there may be delays in entry, manufacturing, delivery, and installation of the product. In addition, if this is the first time you are ordering
from KI, please include a tax exempt certificate, if applicable, and contact your sales rep for proper account activation.
4.KI requires a valid purchase order to be printed on an official company document and signed by an authorized agent of your company. The purchase order should stipulate exactly the merchandise
or service to be transacted by quantity, stock keeping unit (SKU), and price. KI will not accept a quotation or quote worksheet as the basis of an order unless it is specifically referenced in the
purchase order. In the event that a customer does not issue standard purchase orders, then all quotes or quote worksheets must be accompanied by a statement on an official company document
(letterhead will suffice) authorizing KI to proceed with an order as documented on a quote. Signatures on the quote or worksheet will not be adequate to an order. Order requests received that do
not meet these minimum requirements will likely result in delays to the entry, manufacturing and shipping of the product. Please issue all purchase orders to KI at the below address and fax the
order to KI at the fax number listed below or to the Send PO To: company specified below.
5.Please refer to KI's Acknowledgement or for a complete version of KI's Terms and Conditions and Warranties. Non-Standard items are not returnable and not cancelable. The warranty on
non-standard product is one year. Modification to U.L. Listed products eliminates the listing. Product will not have U.L. Listing labels unless specifically spelled out in the quote.
6.KI's standard credit terms are Net 30 days. It is the policy of KI to grant the extension of credit to those customers who meet or exceed predetermined base line credit worthiness requirements as
established by KI. Ki reserves the right to modify credit terms at its discretion.
7.Leasing Provisions - The first and last monthly payments are required at the time of signing. Lease quotations subject to IFC credit approval. Rates are based upon current market and subject to
change of notice.
8.Freight and Fuel surcharge - KI reserves the right to apply a Freight and Fuel surcharge to customer orders. This may vary over time due to prevailing economic conditions. The freight and fuel
surcharge on this quote is an estimate. The final fuel surcharge fee will be determined at the time the order is placed.
9.Drawings provided in this quote are for pricing and specification review only. Formal shop drawing submittals are generated upon purchase order receipt, and lead-times begin after drawing
approval, verified field dimensions, and finish approvals are received.
10.Door leaf undercuts for KI Architectural Walls are determined by the nominal manufactured height of the panel units. At the nominal setting, the undercut varies by product line and door type with
Genius non-frameless glass doors set at 3/4" and Lightline and Genius frameless sliding doors set to 1/2". Frameless glass swing doors for both Genius and Lightline are set to 2/3" undercut.
Variances in the floor condition across the entire layout will impact the undercut. Custom height doors are available, but limit the configurability of the door unit, and are subject to additional lead
times, as actual measurements must be taken after the frames and panels are installed.
Issue PO To: KI (Krueger International)Send PO To:KI (Krueger International)
1330 Bellevue Street 1330 Bellevue Street
Green Bay, WI 54302 Green Bay, WI 54302
Phone: 800-454-9796 Phone: 800-454-9796
Fax: 800-405-2264 Fax: 800-405-2264
Website: Website:
To ensure your Purchase Order (PO) is processed quickly and efficiently, please adhere
to the following requirements:
1. All purchase orders must be issued to KI or KI c/o the dealer with this address: 1A
KI, 1330 Bellevue Street, Green Bay, WI 54302
2. The following items must be included on all purchase orders:
-Sold To/Bill To Information: complete legal name, address, telephone number and
fax number 2A
-Ship To Information: complete legal name, address, contact name, contact phone
number 2B
-Purchase Order Number: a customer-specific identifier, typically a sequential purchase
order number or requisition number 2C
-Issue Date: date the purchase order was issued 2D
-Sales Tax: applicable sales tax will be added upon KI invoicing. If tax exempt, customer
must provide or have the tax exempt certificate on file at KI 2E
-Purchase Order Total: total of all items and services included on the purchase order 2F
-Authorization: signature of authorized purchasing agent or buying entity 2G
-Order Details: reference a fully optioned KI quote (ex: 11KGH-85432) or include all the
information listed below 2H
-Quantity of each item
-Complete model number, including all finish and option information (by line
item)
-Net purchase price (by line item)
-Extended net purchase price (all line items)
-Any additional applicable charges (ex: installation and/or delivery charges)
-Contract name and/or number if pricing is based on a contract reference
3. Signatures on a quote or a worksheet cannot be accepted as a purchase order.
4. In the event that you do not have a formal Purchase Order process, please contact your KI
Sales Representative or call 1-800-424-2432, and we will assist you with creating a PO.
Purchase Orders that do not meet these requirements will be placed on hold until complete
information is received by KI. Purchase orders on hold are not released to manufacturing or
assigned a delivery date. KI order lead times begin once the order is released to manufacturing.
Order contact, delivery Information and Request delivery information can be on your P.O. or
P.O. cover page.
Please review KI Terms & Conditions.
If your order contains C.O.M. (customers own material) please see KI Terms & Conditions
and KIs COM Shipping Location guide.
In the case of subcontract issuance, KI only accepts independent purchase orders (ie., those not tied to a prime
contract) for products and services totalling $50,000 or less. If the product and services exceed $50,000, and the
purchase order is linked to a prime contract, a copy of the prime contract must accompany the purchase order
for review and acceptance of all terms and conditions.
DOWNLOAD KI TERMS & CONDITIONS
DOWNLOAD SUBMITTING AN ORDER INSTRUCTIONS
DOWNLOAD COM SHIPPING LOCATION GUIDE
DOWNLOAD THE PURCHASE ORDER COVER SHEET
DOWNLOAD THE QUICKSHIP COVER SHEET
To download the documents above go to http://www.ki.com/about/corporate/order.aspx
Purchase Order Requirements
Project: WILLIAM T COZBY PUBLIC LIBRARY: WALLS
Sold to Distributor
Company name:Company name:
Contact Person:Salesman:
Contact Phone:Salesman Phone:
Contact Fax:Salesman Fax:
Date 2/5/2016 Page 23 / 23
Master
City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard
Coppell, Texas
75019-9478
File Number: 2016-2626
File ID: Type: Status: 2016-2626 Agenda Item Agenda Ready
1Version: Reference: In Control: Parks and
Recreation
02/03/2016File Created:
Final Action: Bicycle and Pedestrian Master PlanFile Name:
Title: Presentation and discussion related to the proposed Bicycle and Pedestrian
Master Plan.
Notes:
Agenda Date: 02/09/2016
Agenda Number: 9.
Sponsors: Enactment Date:
Memo.pdf, Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan.pdfAttachments: Enactment Number:
Hearing Date: Contact:
Effective Date: Drafter:
History of Legislative File
Action: Result: Return
Date:
Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver-
sion:
1 02/09/2016City Council
City Manager Clay Phillips introduced this item as a Work Session-type discussion. No action is
being requested at this time. However, due to the anticipated large turnout of citizens, it is being held
in the Council Chambers.
Presentation: Guy McLain, Assistant Director of Parks and Recreation, made a presentation on the
proposed Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan and answered questions of Council. The Master Plan
proposes recommendations for bicycles, pedestrians, community-wide programs and internal
programs and policies.
Action Text:
Text of Legislative File 2016-2626
Title
Presentation and discussion related to the proposed Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan.
Summary
See attached memo.
Fiscal Impact:
Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017
Master Continued (2016-2626)
[Enter Fiscal Impact Statement Here]
Staff Recommendation:
No action is required.
Goal Icon:
Community Wellness and Enrichment
Special Place to Live
Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017
1
MEMORANDUM
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Brad Reid, Director of Parks and Recreation
Date: February 9, 2016
Reference: Presentation and discussion related to the proposed Bicycle and Pedestrian Master
Plan
2030: Special Place to Live – Effective Mobility Within Coppell
Community Wellness and Enrichment – Multi-Use Trail System Connecting the City
Introduction:
As a result of increasing interest from the Coppell community in improving bicycling and pedestrian
access in the city, the Parks and Recreation Department began working with Alta Planning and
Design, a nationally recognized bicycle and pedestrian planning firm, to develop a master plan for
the streets and trails of Coppell, which addresses this need. The plan is currently in the final stages
of development and is now ready for the endorsement of the City Council. This process has taken
many months to complete (began in July 2014) and included a number of methods to receive public
input. A Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Planning Committee was formed, which included Parks and
Recreation Department, Engineering Department, Human Resources, Police and Planning
Department staff, as well as interested members of the community. The Park Board approved the
Plan Recommendations on February 1, 2016.
Background:
The proposed Master Plan represents the efforts of many people over the past year and a half and
much input from the cycling community, walkers and joggers who live and play here, or simply use
our roadways for transportation. This plan includes recommendations for improving the conditions,
creating awareness and establishing guidelines for future amenities and policies related to bicycle and
pedestrian safety. The plan should be considered a blueprint for what can be considered as future
opportunities present themselves. A prime example of this is occurring as the plan is being finalized.
The design considerations for Parkway Blvd. are currently being established because portions of the
roadway itself are deteriorating and need to be replaced. In lieu of considerations only of auto traffic
and replacing the roadway section as it exists today without pedestrian and bicycle designs, the
engineers are looking at how bicyclist/pedestrians might be better served with a different road section.
2
Establishment of this master plan will identify these opportunities when previously they might not
have been considered.
Analysis
The recommendations outlined should not be considered the law of the city but suggestions as to how
multiple modes of transportation could be deliberated as future development occurs. Each
transportation route should be carefully designed with community input when a change in the
proposed infrastructure is being considered. Further, the recommendations in this plan include
suggested bicycle networks, pedestrian networks, programs which include education and enforcement
criteria along with policies to “foster a culture in which bicycling and walking are a part of daily life
for Coppell residents.”
Legal Review:
Agenda item did not require legal review.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact for this agenda item.
Recommendation
This item is brought forth for information and deliberation only. No action is requested at this meeting
The City of Coppell appreciates the efforts of the hundreds of citizens and community members who
participated in the development of the Coppell Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. Their creativity, passion,
and commitment to a brighter future for bicycling and walking were integral to the success of this planning
effort. The following citizens, City staff, and agency and organization representatives significantly contributed
to the development of the Plan.
Matt Steer, Senior Planner, City of Coppell Planning Department
Eric Newton, City Marshall, City of Coppell Administration/Human Resources Department
Cayce Williams, Police Officer - Sergeant Special Investigations Unit, City of Coppell Police Department
George Marshall, Civil Engineer, City of Coppell Engineering Department
Guy McLain, Assistant Director of Parks and Recreation, City of Coppell Parks and Recreation Department
Brad Reid, Director of Parks and Recreation, City of Coppell Parks and Recreation Department
John Elias, Park Operations Manager, City of Coppell Parks and Recreation Department
Ed Guignon, Vice Chairman Parks and Recreation Board
Edmund Haas, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission
Sid Grant, Assistant Superintendent for Business and Support Services at Coppell ISD
Karen Hunt, Mayor
Gary Roden, Mayor Pro Tem / Council Place 4
Cliff Long / Council Place 1
Brianna Hinojosa-Flores / Council Place 2
Wes Mays / Council Place 3
Nancy Yingling / Council Place 5
Marvin Franklin / Council Place 6
Mark Hill / Council Place 7
Paul Wojciechowski, P.E., AICP, LCI, Principal-In-Charge
Catrine Machi, AICP, LCI, Project Manager
Kevin Neill, AICP, Planner
The Coppell Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
provides a framework for future investments and
studies in bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure and
programs, with a focus on improving connectivity to
local destinations, tying into the regional trail
network, improving safety and accessibility for all
bicyclists and pedestrians, supporting economic
development, and improving quality of life for Coppell
residents.
Through a series of recommended physical
improvements and supporting policies, programs,
and activities, the Plan sets forth a comprehensive
strategy that can strengthen and expand the trail and
on-street bikeway network and encourage trail usage,
walking and bicycling for transportation and recreation.
The City of Coppell will be a community in which people of all ages and abilities can safely,
comfortably, and conveniently travel by bicycle or on foot.
To help achieve this vision, the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan defines a number of goals and objectives to
target specific community needs. These goals are broad, value-based expressions of the community’s desires.
The Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan includes a comprehensive set of infrastructure and programming
recommendations specifically tailored to make Coppell a premier community for walking and bicycling in the
Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex. These recommendations are built on a solid foundation of input from the public,
City staff, and technical analysis.
The Plan recommends nearly 35 miles of trails and paths for walking and bicycling, which will enhance safety,
connectivity and accessibility for people of all ages and abilities. Whether going to the store, heading to school,
commuting to school, getting some exercise, or just enjoying the outdoors, these shared use paths provide a
safe and comfortable experience for everyone, including bicyclists, walkers, wheelchair users, joggers, and
inline skaters. Once complete, these trails and sidepaths will be an important part of the DART transportation
and recreation network in Coppell.
The Plan also includes recommendations for
17 miles of on-street bikeways to connect
residents and visitors to the trail system, local
parks, and other popular destinations. These
on-street bikeways range from shared lanes
with marking and signage to protected bike
lanes. Each bikeway recommendation takes
into account roadway conditions like motor
vehicle speeds, roadway width, presence of
parking, and other important factors. These
important considerations ensure that each
bikeway supports a balanced, safe, and
efficient transportation network for all road
users.
Education, encouragement, and enforcement programs support
walking and bicycling activity and can be cost effective
complements to infrastructure investments. When combined with
physical improvements like sidewalks, greenways, and on-street
bikeways, these types of programs foster a social environment that
values and supports active transportation. The Plan recommends a
variety of supporting programs designed to increase active
transportation and encourage walkers, bicyclists, and even motor
vehicle drivers to be safe, responsible, and respectful when
traveling in Coppell. These recommended programs include bicycle
skills courses for children and adults, bicycling and walking route
maps, organized bike rides, National Bike Month and National Bike
to Work Day activities and events, and targeted traffic enforcement
in school zones and busy areas.
Chapter 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................ 1
Purpose ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1
Background ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2
The Planning Process ............................................................................................................................................................................... 3
Plan Components ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 4
Chapter 2. Existing Conditions .................................................................................................................................................................. 5
Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 5
Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................................................................... 5
Bicycle and Pedestrian Crashes ......................................................................................................................................................... 13
Community Initiatives and Programs ............................................................................................................................................. 14
Guidance and Regulations .................................................................................................................................................................... 16
Opportunities and Constraints ........................................................................................................................................................... 20
Chapter 3. Public Engagement................................................................................................................................................................. 21
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 21
Steering Committee ................................................................................................................................................................................. 21
Public Workshop ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 21
Online Survey ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 23
Eco Coppell Earthfest ............................................................................................................................................................................. 35
Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 36
Chapter 4. Vision, Goals & Objectives ................................................................................................................................................... 39
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 39
Vision Statement ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 39
Goals and Objectives ............................................................................................................................................................................... 39
Chapter 5. Recommendations .................................................................................................................................................................. 43
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 43
The Bicycle Network ............................................................................................................................................................................... 44
The Pedestrian Network ....................................................................................................................................................................... 52
Community-Wide Programs ............................................................................................................................................................... 57
Internal Practices and Policies ........................................................................................................................................................... 62
Chapter 6. Implementation ....................................................................................................................................................................... 65
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 65
Early Action Steps .................................................................................................................................................................................... 65
Funding Sources ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 67
Performance Measures .......................................................................................................................................................................... 70
Appendix A: Design Guidelines ............................................................................................................................................................... 73
Map 1: Existing Trail Facilities in Coppell .......................................................................................................................................... 12
Map 2: Bicycle and Pedestrian Crash Locations, 2009 – 2013 .................................................................................................. 14
Map 3: Proposed Bicycle Network ......................................................................................................................................................... 47
Map 4: Recommended Pedestrian Network...................................................................................................................................... 54
Table 1: Existing Shared Use Path Inventory .................................................................................................................................... 11
Table 2: Top 10 Corridors for Pedestrian Improvements........................................................................................................... 28
Table 3: Top 10 Intersections for Pedestrian Improvements ................................................................................................... 29
Table 4: Top 10 Corridors for Bicycle Improvements .................................................................................................................. 32
Table 5: Top 10 Intersections for Bicycle Improvements ........................................................................................................... 33
Table 6: Recommended Bikeways by Facility Type ....................................................................................................................... 48
Table 7: Recommended Signed/Marked Shared Roadway Projects ...................................................................................... 48
Table 8: Recommended Bicycle Boulevard Projects ..................................................................................................................... 49
Table 9: Recommended Bike Lane Projects ...................................................................................................................................... 49
Table 10: Recommended Protected Bike Lane / Cycle Track Projects ................................................................................. 49
Table 11: Recommended Sidepath Projects ...................................................................................................................................... 50
Table 12: Recommended Shared Use Path Projects ...................................................................................................................... 51
Table 13: Recommended Intersection Improvements ................................................................................................................. 55
Table 14: Design Guidelines and Reference Manuals ................................................................................................................... 63
Table 15: Performance Measurement Data and Sources ............................................................................................................ 70
Bicycling, walking and trail use are on the rise in Coppell. Residents and community members have expressed
a growing interest in trail expansion. The City currently boasts a strong, interconnected sidewalk network,
more than a dozen miles of sidepaths and bike lanes, and nearly ten miles of multi-use trails. Coppell’s
existing trails are heavily used for recreation, fitness and exercise, but their lack of connectivity afford little
value for transportation-oriented trips. As the City continues to grow, it is important that future capital
investments and development projects incorporate trails, on-street bikeways, and pedestrian paths as vital to
the community.
The purpose of the Coppell Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan is to provide a framework for future
investments and studies in bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure and programs, with a focus on improving
connectivity to local destinations, tying into the regional trail network, improving safety and accessibility for
all bicyclists and pedestrians, supporting economic development, and improving quality of life for Coppell
residents.
Through a series of recommended physical improvements and supporting policies, programs, and activities,
the Plan sets forth a comprehensive strategy that can strengthen and expand the trail and on-street bikeway
network and encourage trail usage, walking and bicycling for transportation and recreation.
The Coppell Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (The Plan) is an outward expression of the community’s
desire and commitment to supporting bicycling and walking as safe, healthy, and convenient forms of
transportation and recreation in Coppell. The Plan builds on local planning efforts, including the Coppell 2030
Comprehensive Master Plan and Trails Master Plan,
both of which laid the foundation for trail development
and active transportation in Coppell. The Plan expands
on the shared use path network established in these
plans and recommends the study and feasibility of a
complete network for off-street paths supported by on-
street bikeways to connect residents and visitors to the
people and places that make Coppell a strong, unique
and attractive community.
Local initiatives like Safe Cycling Coppell and Living
Well in Coppell have been instrumental in building the
need for a long-range strategy to address bicycling and
walking. These citizen-driven initiatives stress the
importance of a safe and comfortable infrastructure for
walking and bicycling as integral the community’s
economic vitality, quality of life, and long-term health.
Regional initiatives like BikeDFW and the North Central
Texas Council of Governments’ Veloweb network of
interconnected trails and bikeways have also helped to
expand interest in, and support for, bicycling and
bicycle facilities. The popularity and success of the
Campion Trail, just a short distance from Coppell, is a
testament to the growing desire for trails and bikeways
as community assets. By developing this long-range
planning document, the City can integrate local efforts
into the region-wide Veloweb and create seamless
connections to surrounding municipalities.
The development of the Plan relied on an
interactive, engaging, and thorough planning
process in order to identify opportunities and
recommend projects, programs and policies that
reflect the values, needs and aspirations of the
community. Extensive field work, research, and
data analysis documented and scrutinized the
context for plan development in order to identify
opportunities and constraints that will impact
bicycle and pedestrian facility development. An
online survey, a public open house, and other
engagement activities offered residents an
opportunity to shape the Plan’s vision, goals and
recommendations. A steering committee consisting
of Coppell staff and important community
stakeholders guided the planning process from
start to finish, ensuring both the process and
resulting products addressed critical issues and
reflected the will and desire of the community.
Figure 5 displays the various inputs that influenced the development of the plan.
The Plan document is composed of the following chapters, as well as an appendix that includes valuable
resources for plan implementation and additional documentation of the planning process.
The introduction provides a brief overview of the purpose and background of the Plan, the benefits of a Bike
and Walk Friendly Community, and the planning framework that guide the recommendations and
implementation strategies in the Plan.
The existing conditions chapter describes the physical, social, and policy contexts surrounding the
development of this Plan. Included in this chapter are thorough analyses of bicycling and walking facilities,
roadway characteristics, bicycle and pedestrian crash data, local and regional plans and policies, and current
programs that support and encourage active transportation. Understanding, acknowledging and addressing
these existing conditions creates a foundation for the programs, policies, and projects recommended in this
Plan.
The public involvement chapter summarizes the outreach and participation efforts to engage Coppell
residents, planning partners, and key stakeholders. From public workshops and pop-up meetings to online
surveys and mapping tools, the planning process utilized a diversity of media platforms to build consensus
for walking and bicycling and solicit ideas to shape the walking and bicycling environment. The community’s
input is a driving force behind the Plan’s vision, goals and recommendations.
This chapter establishes a bold and progressive vision for the future of bicycling and walking in Coppell. A
series of diverse and holistic goals and objectives are designed to achieve this vision.
This chapter describes the capital projects and supporting programs recommended to transform Coppell into
a Bike and Walk Friendly Community. Recommendations are categorized using the Five E’s framework of a
Bike and Walk Friendly Community – engineering, education, encouragement, enforcement, and evaluation.
Together, these Five E’s create a holistic approach to fostering a social and physical environment that support
and encourage walking and bicycling as safe, comfortable, and convenient transportation modes.
This chapter provides a comprehensive strategy to implement the Plan, including early action steps, project
prioritization criteria, cut sheets for high priority projects, cost estimates, funding sources, and maintenance
activities. These implementation strategies are critical to the initial and long-term success of the Plan.
The appendix of the plan includes supplemental materials and documentation to enhance and assist the City
with plan implementation.
As the City of Coppell continues on its path to make bicycling and walking valued recreation activities and
viable modes of transportation, a thorough assessment of the current environment for non-motorized
transportation and recreation can guide future investments in bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure and
supporting programs. This chapter describes existing conditions for walking and bicycling in Coppell,
including land use and development patterns, the transportation network, and bicycle and pedestrian
facilities, as well as community input related to current activity and desired improvements. The opportunities
and constraints identified at the end of this chapter are grounded in an inventory of these existing conditions
and can provide a foundation for the development of a city-wide network of bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
The City of Coppell is a community of approximately 39,880 citizens located in northwest Dallas County,
featuring a diversity of residential neighborhoods, a network of beautiful parks and open spaces, unique
cultural and civic assets, thriving retail and commercial corridors and nodes, and a growing light industrial
base. The City’s attractive amenities and location within the Dallas-Fort Worth Metropolitan Area make it a
desirable community to live, work, learn and play in. Coppell is surrounded by residential communities,
including Irving to the south, Lewisville to the north, Grapevine and Farmers Branch to the west, and
Carrollton to the east.
Development patterns in the City of Coppell have a significant impact on walking and bicycling activity. The
subdivision and platting of residential neighborhoods, commercial and retail centers, and larger employment
centers can affect walking and bicycling distances, route choice and directness, and connectivity between
residential neighborhoods and important community destinations such as parks, schools, and retail centers.
The distinct separation of land uses evident in Coppell is common among suburban communities in the
United States, many of which employ single-use zoning practices that date back to the 1920s. While the
grouping of land uses into different areas of the city was originally intended to promote the health and
general welfare of city residents, it has increased travel distances and contributed to the reliance on personal
motor vehicles to access employment, shopping, and other key destinations.
Residential neighborhoods and subdivisions dominate the landscape and character of Coppell, comprising
almost 50% of all land uses (by current zoning designation). The winding residential streets and low degree
of connectivity between adjacent neighborhoods are common characteristics of residential development
patterns of the latter half of the 20th Century. While these characteristics add to the ambiance of the
neighborhoods and reduce cut-through traffic, they also increase walking and bicycling distances, making it
more difficult to access nearby destinations.
While bicycle and pedestrian connectivity may be
challenging, there are many positive attributes to
Coppell’s residential neighborhoods. The majority
of neighborhoods possess sidewalks, tree lawns,
and mature trees, creating a comfortable and
inviting environment for walking and bicycling.
Newer developments like Old Town Coppell are
incorporating wider sidewalks, narrow residential
lots, shorter block lengths, a mixture of land uses,
and other New Urbanist principles that support a
walkable and bikeable environment.
Commercial and retail activities are located
throughout the City of Coppell, with the great
majority concentrated along Denton Tap Road
between Highland Road just north of State Highway
121 and Belt Line Road. Additional commercial
nodes can be found at MacArthur Boulevard and
Belt Line Road, MacArthur Boulevard and Sandy
Lake Road, and MacArthur Boulevard and State
Highway 121. Many of these commercial
destinations are difficult to access for bicyclists and
pedestrians due to high volumes of motor vehicle
traffic, particularly along Denton Tap Road.
Light industrial, manufacturing and warehousing,
and other corporate offices are concentrated in the
west and southwest of Coppell. This area of Coppell
is well situated between State Highway 121 and
Interstate 635 and in close proximity to Dallas-Fort
Worth International Airport (DFW), making it an
ideal location for distribution centers. When
coupled with Coppell’s favorable climate for
business and proactive approach to economic
development, numerous national and international
companies, including Amazon, the Container Store,
Mohawk Industries, Panasonic Avionics
Corporation, and Samsung have chosen to locate
their headquarters, logistics and distribution
centers, and operations in Coppell.
Coppell’s park system provides residents and
visitors of all ages with a diverse array of active and
passive recreational opportunities, including
walking and bicycling trails, ball fields, lakes, a
biodiversity education center, an aquatic center, a
senior and community center, a dog park and even
a tennis center. While the City’s 17 parks are
dispersed throughout the City, major parks like
Andrew Brown Park, Wagon Wheel Park, and Grapevine Springs Park and Preserve draw the most significant
number of visitors and are major destinations in the community. Creating connections between residential
neighborhoods and these important community destinations will extend bicycle and pedestrian mobility and
expand recreational facilities to include sidewalks, trails and on-street bikeways as extensions to the park
system.
Because of its regional context within the
fourth largest metropolitan area in the
United States, the City of Coppell must
balance regional mobility with local
connectivity, accessibility and convenience.
Larger roadways like interstates, toll ways
and state highways provide the greatest
mobility and the least degree of accessibility.
At the other end of the spectrum, local streets
provide minimal mobility, but the greatest
level of access to adjacent properties. The
functional classification concept of mobility
versus access is displayed in the figure to the
right.
These same roadways that serve motor
vehicles are also integral to pedestrian and
bicycle mobility, access, and connectivity.
While off-street trails are an important component of a bicycle and pedestrian network, facilities along
roadways, including sidewalks, sidepaths, on-street bicycle lanes, and cycle tracks, would provide greater and
more direct mobility throughout the community while also providing greater access to community
destinations.
The largest roadways in and around Coppell are
limited access principal arterials. The City is
surrounded on all sides by major highways: State
Highway 121 and the Sam Rayburn Tollway to the
north and west, Interstate 35E to the east, and
Interstate 635 to the south. While these major
highways provide easy access from Coppell to
destinations throughout the region, they also serve
as barriers to regional bicycle and pedestrian
travel.
Principal arterial roadways in Coppell provide a
high level of mobility. S Belt Line and E Belt Line both facilitate the through movement of motor vehicle traffic
while minimizing access to adjacent properties. Denton Tap Road, while also classified as a principal arterial
roadway, provides direct access for many adjacent commercial properties and adjacent roadways. As such,
through traffic flow suffers, particularly during peak travel hours (rush hours), causing significant delay.
Minor arterial roadways also focus on mobility over accessibility. Minor arterials in Coppell include Sandy
Lake Road, MacArthur Blvd, Royal Lane, and Freeport Parkway.
Collector roadways, which provide greater access than arterials but still less than local roadways, can be ideal
corridors for bicycling and walking. These roadways often carry less motor vehicles than arterials roadways
while still providing a high level of connectivity to destinations throughout the community. Collector
roadways in Coppell include S Coppell Road, Bethel Road (east of Freeport), Heartz Road, Bethel School Road,
Parkway Blvd, and Mockingbird Lane.
The City of Coppell has also identified other
important roads that, while not established as
functionally classified roadways (arterials or
collectors), are integral to the transportation
network. These roads, which have been identified in
the City of Coppell Major Thoroughfare Plan,
include Moore Road, Riverchase Drive, Creekview
Drive, Ruby Road, Plantation Road, Samuel
Boulevard, Gateway Boulevard, Airline Drive, and
Wrangler Drive.
Most arterial and collector roadways in Coppell
offer minimal comfort for bicycle and pedestrian
travel, which is problematic for encouraging active
transportation. By incorporating sidewalks, bicycle
lanes, and other facilities for bicycle and pedestrian
travel, these roadways can be modified to increase
safety, comfort and user experience for all road
users. As motor vehicle volumes and speeds
increase, greater separation between motor
vehicles and non-motorized users is necessary in
order to support a variety of bicyclist and
pedestrian types.
Local roads throughout the City provide access
from arterials and collectors to individual lots and
parcels. These local roads are often shorter and
narrower than arterial and collector roadways,
with parking permitted on one or both sides of the
road, lower posted speed limits, lower volumes of
traffic. Given these characteristics, local roads often
provide the most comfortable and enjoyable
walking and bicycling experience without
significant modifications or improvements.
Sidewalks, marked crosswalks, and other
pedestrian facilities are an integral component of
the non-motorized transportation network in
Coppell. These facilities support safe and
comfortable travel for walkers, joggers, families
pushing strollers, and persons with wheelchairs or
other mobility assistive devices.
Sidewalks line most roadways in the City of Coppell
and range in width from 4 feet to 8 feet and are
buffered from motor vehicle traffic by a planter
strip. These planter strips are often wider along busier roadways, which helps to provide additional
separation from motor vehicles and a perception of safety and comfort for pedestrians. Notable exceptions of
sidewalks immediately adjacent to the roadway include segments of MacArthur Blvd, Sandy Lake Road, West
Parkway Blvd, Moore Road, Denton Tap Road, and Deforest Road.
Requirements in the City’s zoning code and subdivision regulations have helped to create a well -connected
network of sidewalks throughout Coppell. The vast majority of residential neighborhoods, collectors, and
arterial roadways have sidewalks on both sides of the road. While there are some minor sidewalk gaps
located on important corridors like Town Center, Parkway, and Bethel Road, most gaps in the sidewalk
network occur in the light industrial areas along the south and west periphery of the City. These gaps do not
greatly affect connectivity between neighborhoods and most common pedestrian trip generators like parks,
schools, and retail. They do, however, limit pedestrian connectivity to and from many of the larger
employment centers in the light industrial areas in the west and southwest of Coppell.
Crosswalk markings provide guidance for
pedestrians who are crossing roadways by defining
paths across intersections or other crossing points.
While marked pedestrian crosswalks do not in and
of themselves slow traffic or reduce pedestrian
crashes, there are several reasons to install marked
crosswalks, including:
To indicate a preferred pedestrian crossing
location
To alert drivers to an often-used pedestrian
crossing
To indicate school walking routes
A Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) study
“Safety Effects of Marked versus Unmarked
Crosswalks at Uncontrolled Location: Final Report
and Recommended Guidelines” noted that in some
locations, crosswalks should be installed with other
pedestrian facility enhancements to decrease
possible pedestrian crash risks.
The City of Coppell commonly uses stamped and
dyed concrete that is patterned to look like red
bricks in order to identify pedestrian crossing
locations. In school zones and other intersections
with higher volumes of pedestrian traffic, the City
often supplements or replaces these brick pattern
crosswalks with “transverse” striping (two parallel
lines, one on each side of the crosswalk) and other
high visibility pavement markings to increase
pedestrian awareness.
The majority of signalized intersections in Coppell
include push button activated pedestrian signal
heads, which alert pedestrians of the appropriate
signal phase during which to cross the street. More
than half of all signalized intersections include
pedestrian signal heads at each crossing leg. While
nearly all signalized intersections are equipped
with these pedestrian enhancements, pedestrian
crossing distances can be very long.
On-street bikeways are important components of a
bicycle network. There are currently no on-street
bicycle facilities in the City of Coppell. However, the
lack of on-street bikeways does not signify a lack of
bicycle activity on roadways in Coppell.
Considerable bicycle activity has been documented
on multiple field visits, particularly for school-
related and recreational trips. Utilizing GPS data
from the popular activity-tracking service Strava,
the map below identifies frequently-used roads and
trails for bicycling. The brightest lines on the map
are the most heavily used, while the darker lines
are less frequently used.
While the information that can be gleaned from these Strava maps is useful for identifying commonly used
routes and developing recommendations for bicycle facilities and improvements, there are some limitations
that must be acknowledged. First, and perhaps most important, the majority of Strava users are experienced
recreational road cyclists, generally comfortable on most roadways. Other bicyclist types like casual adult
bicyclists and children bicycle riders are not adequately accounted for in these observations. As a result,
many of the roadways commonly used by experienced bicyclists and identified on the map above may not be
suitable for travel by these other bicyclist types. With these limitations in mind, the Strava data still highlights
opportunities for local and regional routes and connections to important community destinations. Many of
the bicycle rides on this map originate from Bicycles Plus at E Belt Line Rd and S MacArthur Blvd, as well as
Andrew Brown Park Central parking lot. Commonly used roadways include Parkway Blvd, Heartz Rd, Moore
Rd, N Coppell Rd, Freeport Parkway, Southwestern Blvd, and E Bethel School Rd.
Shared use paths allow for two-way, off-street
travel by bicyclists, pedestrians, skaters,
wheelchair users, runners, persons with limited
mobility, and other non-motorized users. The term
“shared use path” and “trail” are often used
interchangeably; however, the term “trail” can be
more encompassing than “shared use path” and
include natural surface trails and even sidewalks.
Shared use paths are wider, paved trails frequently
found in parks, along rivers, and in greenbelts or
utility corridors where there are few conflicts with
motorized vehicles. They can also be located
adjacent to the roadway, providing children and
casual bicycle riders with a more comfortable
experience. When located within a roadway right-
of-way, these shared use paths, or “sidepaths”, must be designed to enhance safety and minimize conflict with
motor vehicles, particularly at unsignalized intersections and other motor vehicle crossings.
The 12.5 miles of shared use paths in the City of Coppell are located within municipal parks and along major
roadways. The majority of shared use paths in the City of Coppell are linear in nature (rather than loop trails)
and offer both transportation and recreation benefits. The following table provides an inventory of all
existing shared use paths in the City.
These shared use paths serve as the foundation of Coppell’s bicycle and pedestrian network. Although there is
still a low degree of connectivity between many of these sidepaths and park trails, they are beginning to
support bicycling and walking trips throughout the community, especially when coupled with the City’s
expansive network of sidewalks. These existing trails, along with previously planned trail alignments and trail
segments currently under design and/or construction, are shown in the map below.
Crashes with motor vehicles represent a significant threat, both real and perceived, to the safety of bicyclists
and pedestrians. National and local surveys show that safety concerns are the most common reason people
do not bicycle more often. Many bicyclists feel that motorists do not see them or are openly hostile to them on
roadways, particularly at intersections. An examination of the debilitating impacts of crashes on bicyclists
and pedestrians emphasizes the vulnerability of these road users. For example in 2009, bicyclists and
pedestrians constituted a combined total of just 2% of commuters nationwide, yet represented 13% of all
traffic fatalities nationwide.
Local traffic collision data can be a valuable source of information for identifying trends in bicycle and
pedestrian crashes, understanding specific crash characteristics, and developing countermeasures to create a
safer environment for non-motorized roadway users. Utilizing data supplied by the Coppell Police
Department and obtained from the North Central Texas Council of Governments website, the following map
identifies all bicycle and pedestrian crash locations in Coppell during a five year period from 2009 to 2013.
Because of the lack of information associated with these crash locations, little is known about the
circumstances contributing to each crash. However, general trends such as type of roadway and location
along the roadway (road segment v. intersection) can be formulated to develop plan recommendations.
A total of 31 crashes involving bicyclists and pedestrians occurred in Coppell between 2009 and 2013. Ten of
these crashes involved pedestrians, and 21 involved bicyclists. None of these crashes were fatal. The majority
of these crashes occurred on arterial and collector roadways, including MacArthur, Sandy Lake, Denton Tap,
Belt Line, Moore Rd, and Parkway Blvd. Many were located at roadway intersections rather than mid-block,
an indication of the potential for conflict between motorists and other road users given the high number of
turning movements. There are also a number of crashes in close proximity to significant community
destinations, including New Tech High, Austin Elementary, Denton Creek Elementary, and businesses along
Denton Tap Road. Two of the 10 pedestrian crashes occurred on I-635 near the Freeport Parkway exit.
When compared to national crash statistics, there are noticeable differences in the data that point to Coppell’s
unique character. For example, there were 48% more bicycle crashes than pedestrian crashes in Coppell. In
comparison, there were 45% more pedestrian crashes than bicycle crashes in the United States in 2013.1 This
may be an indication that pedestrians in Coppell benefit from a robust network of sidewalks and crosswalks,
or that the lack of bicycle infrastructure in the City leads to less predictable bicyclist behavior. Without
additional information regarding number of bicycle and pedestrian trips and/or miles traveled, it can be
difficult to draw definitive conclusions.
Creating a bicycle and pedestrian-friendly community takes more than sidewalks, trails and bike lanes.
Programs, activities, and events that build a social culture that supports and embraces active transportation
are integral components of a holistic approach to transform the way people move about the community. In
the City of Coppell, numerous efforts are already underway to build community support for walking and
bicycling and encourage more people to choose active transportation when traveling in Coppell.
Living Well in Coppell (LWiC) has emerged as one
of the community’s leading organizations working
to create a more healthy and active environment in
Coppell. The volunteer-based initiative works in
concert with the City of Coppell to “enable and
encourage active, healthy lifestyles within the
community, and to help Coppell become known in
the D/FW area as a “healthy” community.” Physical
wellness is one of the three focus areas for LWiC,
along with nutritional wellness and personal/social
wellness. At part of its kick-off event in October of
2014, LWiC hosted a “Bike with the Mayor” and a
“Walk with the City Manager” on the trail system in
Andrew Brown Park.
1 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. "Traffic Safety Facts 2013: A Compilation of Motor Vehicle
Crash Data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System and the General Estimates System’ DOT HS 812 139
(2015).
Formed in 2013 by Coppell residents, Safe Cycling Coppell advocates for safer roads and trails through
infrastructure improvements like signage, pavement markings, and dedicated bicycle facilities. The group has
encouraged the Coppell City Council and other entities in Coppell to build support for investments in bicycle
infrastructure that provides residents and visitors of all ages and abilities with the opportunity to safely and
comfortable access destinations throughout the community by bicycle.
The Coppell Independent School District (CISD) is
an ardent proponent of active transportation and
supports and encourages walking and bicycling to
school. While many children walk and bike to
school on a daily basis, the CISD organizes a
number of events to encourage more families and
children to choose walking and bicycling. In
addition to the annual Walk to School Day event
every October, seven schools also participate
monthly “Walk to School Wednesdays”. Some
schools and their parent-teacher organizations are
more active than others and support walking and
bicycling on a daily basis.
The CISD School Health Advisory Council (SHAC)
also works throughout the school district to
communicate to administrators, parents, and community stakeholders the important connection between
health and learning. As a leader in healthy and active living within the school district, SHAC plays an
important role in building healthy habits in Coppell youth and their families.
The City of Coppell Police Department also plays an important role in creating a culture that supports walking
and bicycling, particularly for school children. By actively enforcing strict school speed limits in the 15
designated school zones located throughout the City, the Police Department builds respect for pedestrians
and fosters an environment in which children (and their parents) feel safe walking to and from school,
especially when crossing or traveling along busier roadways like MacArthur, Parkway, and Moore.
The Life Safety Park will provide educational opportunities to school children, families, and the general public
regarding overall life safety programs such as fire procedures, severe weather response, and pedestrian
caution.
Many residents and area cyclists take part in organized recreational rides that travel through Coppell and
neighboring municipalities. Some of these rides begin at destinations within Coppell, including Andrew
Brown Park and Bicycles Plus. Bicycles Plus hosts four rides every week that begin at the store and travel
from 20 to 55 miles in and around Coppell. Run On! Coppell hosts weekly social runs every Wednesday. These
runs offer people of all skill levels the opportunity to run two to five miles in a fun, social setting with
assistance and advice from staff and coaches. These runs often take advantage of Coppell’s great trail and
sidewalk network. Andrew Brown Park, Wagon Wheel Park, and Coppell Nature Park are common
destinations for these weekly runs.
There are several elements of governance within cities that affect transportation infrastructure, fostering or
hindering the bicycling and walking environment. Ordinances as set forth in the city’s municipal code are
regulations governing new development and redevelopment. Plans often articulate a community’s bold,
multi-year vision, and lay out steps through goals, objectives and strategies. While they are not generally
regulatory, they can effectively guide city leaders and staff toward the vision. Policies are a stronger
statement of intent and while not regulatory in the legal sense, they can sustain a community vision through
changes in political leadership and organizational changes. Practices might be the most important element of
change, as they encompass what city staff actually work on every day. Without programs, staff and funding
dedicated to a practice area like ‘Active Transportation’ or ‘Bicycle/Pedestrian Coordination’, plans and
policies can be crippled or made ineffective. For example, within the Coppell Master Plan are many stated
policies to improve the city’s infrastructure for bicycling and walking and if these two modes are fully
integrated into routine daily operations of the Public Works and Planning departments, key bicycling
infrastructure in particular might actually get on the ground.
The Coppell 2030 Plan was adopted by the City in 2011 and provides a
long-range blueprint for future growth and development. Bicycling and
walking enjoy a robust presence in the Coppell 2030 Plan and are key
elements in the Plan’s vision, policy plan, planning framework, healthy
neighborhoods initiatives, and transportation and mobility sections.
Bicycling and walking are also incorporated in various sections of the
implementation plan as well.
Vision 2030 provides the community’s overall framework for growth and
development, and ensures that Coppell’s high standard of living is
maintained as the City evolves. The vision evolved from numerous public
meetings and engagement opportunities and reflects the needs, desires and
aspirations of the community. The Vision 2030 is built around a singular yet
broad vision statement:
Coppell is A Family Community for a Lifetime
Coppell residents choose to make Coppell their hometown because of our Small
Town Feel, our Inviting Community Gathering Places, our Active, Healthy Lifestyle for
All, our Top Quality Schools, and our Diverse Faith-Based Values.
Coppell is our Special Place to Live because of our Beautiful Green City, our Great
Livable Neighborhoods, our Viable Community Commercial Centers, our Prosperous
Business Center, and our Convenient Access and Effective Mobility.
This vision statement is general yet succinct, encapsulating the values and aspirations of the community in
just a few short sentences. While not explicitly stated in the vision statement itself, bicycling, walking, and an
active transportation network supporting health and human-scale mobility are integral to many of the
elements of the Vision 2030.
The Policy Plan section of Coppell 2030 provides the city charter provisions and state statues justifying the
planning exercise, which could potentially strengthen the bicycling and walking policies and recommendations
and make them more likely to be implemented.
The Coppell 2030 Plan is built on the following five “core pillars”:
Sustainable Community
Placemaking
Mixed Use Activity Centers
Land Use and Mobility
Healthy Neighborhoods
Since “mobility” is the primary area bicycling and walking pertain to, each of the other pillars can be
strengthened if Coppell fully optimizes all of its opportunities to improve the multimodal environment.
Chapter 5 of Coppell 2030 provides detailed implementation strategies for the areas of Sustainability, Land
Use, Parks and Open Space, Transportation and Mobility, Healthy Neighborhoods, and Redevelopment. The
following sample of Coppell 2030 Transportation and Mobility actions related to the bicycling and walking
environment demonstrate the community’s desire and will foster a culture and environment that will support
active transportation:
TM-1 Provide a balanced transportation system, less dependent on the private automobile,
supported by both the use of emerging technology and the location of jobs, housing, commercial
activity, parks and open space.
TM-2 Improve mobility options and accessibility for the non-driving elderly, children, disabled, low-
income and other members of the population.
TM-3 Provide a safe and interconnected network of pedestrian and bicycle routes throughout the
city, with connections to regional transit services, that provides linkages among employment sites,
housing, and mixed-use centers.
TM-4 Provide walking and biking corridors linking neighborhoods and other destinations in Coppell
to the future DART station in the Belt Line corridor.
TM-5 Provide short-term and/or long-term bicycle parking in commercial and mixed use districts, in
employment centers and multifamily developments, at educational facilities, in parks and
recreational areas, at special events, and at transit facilities.
TM-7 Implement traffic calming measures to minimize the impact of regional trips through Coppell,
while supporting the travel needs of the community.
TM-9 Work with the Coppell Independent School District to increase walking and biking to school by
improving routes from neighborhoods to schools.
As defined in the City of Coppell municipal code, the Transportation Plan is the official plan for the orderly
physical development of highways, roads, and streets in the City of Coppell. The Transportation plan included
in Coppell 2030 is an update of the prior plan approved in 1996, and designates roadways within a context-
sensitive framework as follows:
Freeway
Boulevard
Boulevard with on-street parking in mixed-use centers
Avenue
Avenue with on-street parking in mixed-use centers
Local Street
Alley/Rear Lane
The Transportation Plan furthers classifies roads within these designations by the functional classification of
principal/minor arterial, Collector, and Local. Bicycle and pedestrian provisions in the design parameters are
included for boulevards, avenues and local streets. None of these designations or functional classifications
utilizes annual average daily traffic volumes (AADT) to assign descriptions or levels. While quite common, it
is a key missing element when considering certain corridors for on-street bicycle facilities, as allotting
roadway space for such facilities has to take motor vehicle capacity and flow into account. At the time the
Transportation Plan was updated for Coppell 2030, best practices in developing bicycling networks were not
a priority.
Much progress in bicycle network and facility design has occurred in the last 5 years, and many cities all
across the U.S. have implemented effective, safe and relatively low-cost bicycle facilities through the method
of “right-sizing” roadways, commonly known as road diets. While Coppell 2030 does not specifically mention
this tried-and-true strategy, language in the plan provides for considering changes to roadways in the
Thoroughfare plan, as follows:
The Comprehensive Plan will need to build consensus about any needed revisions to the street
standards such as aesthetic enhancements, multi-modal accommodations, and the potential addition
of on-street parking in future mixed-use and redevelopment districts such as Old Coppell.
The Coppell 2030 Plan transportation system balances the regional, community, and neighborhood
functions to achieve the desired community form and character. These functions include roadways,
trails, pedestrian systems, and transit. Since it will be necessary to transition the design and function
of existing streets over time, the 2030 Transportation Plan outlines a framework for context sensitive
street types which should be used as a guide to update the City’s existing street design manuals with
integrated standards for Context Sensitive Solutions.
The form and character of each street type is recommended with the understanding that the final
design may vary based on further study and determinations of the city, transportation planners and
engineers, key stakeholders, and citizens-at-large.
The City of Coppell is revisiting the Streetscape Plan to identify opportunities to incorporate additional design
elements to support bicycle, pedestrian and motorist safety, both at intersections and along corridors as
supported by the Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devices and the engineering judgement of city staff.
The trails master plan provides a framework for critical off-street linkages between community parks and
other local destinations. The Plan includes projects of the Regional Veloweb that provide connectivity to
surrounding communities and regional trails and is primarily focused on off-street multiuse recreational
trails and sidepaths alongside roadways. The plan includes short-and long-term projects, many of which have
been implemented. Section 2.6 above describes current trails, or shared-use paths.
Codes and ordinances are a critical element in fostering bicycling and walking safety and connectivity,
typically included in sections pertaining to traffic operations and laws, zoning, subdivision regulations, land
use, and others. Some of the best cities for bicycling in the U.S. have given “teeth” to plans and visions by
including a wide variety of bicycle and pedestrian design elements in the municipal code. Following are
summaries of the code sections of City of Coppell regulations pertaining to bicycling and walking from Code
911 (all verbiage is comment, not code language):
Sec 8-6-2. Requires bicycle helmet for persons over the age of 14
Sec 8-8-2. Imposes penalties for drivers who block intersections. The owner of a motor vehicle is liable for a
civil penalty if the vehicle proceeds into an intersection at a system location when the traffic control signal for
that vehicle's direction of travel is emitting a steady red signal.
Sec 9-11-12. Allows bicycles on sidewalks, often a safety and connectivity necessity.
Sec 12-31-6. Off street parking requirements. One strategy for encouraging bicycling and walking is to require
fewer car parking spaces in commercial zones than has traditionally been the norm in suburban
environments. This allows total lot size to be smaller, resulting in a more human-scale, walkable urban form.
Sec 12-31-8. Location of Parking Spaces. This section of the code acknowledges opportunities for shared
parking among adjacent businesses, particularly those with that have different hours of operation. Businesses
are encouraged to share parking, or work with adjacent or nearby properties to “trade” parking, e .g., on busy
weekend nights a restaurant or pub might utilize parking of a nearby municipal building, church, or business
that operates during the day only.
Chapter 13 - Subdivision Regulations include roadway design requirements in Appendix C – Design Criteria
and Standards. There is currently no mention of bicycle facilities in the standards.
The City of Coppell has made substantial progress toward its vision of a multimodal community,
implementing many trail and sidepath projects from the Trail Master Plan, and continuous improvements to
the sidewalk network.
The city’s subdivision regulations that pertain to streets and roads do not include reference or design
requirements for on-street bicycle facilities.
As Coppell is surrounded on three sides by major freeway corridors and roadways under the jurisdiction of
TxDOT, close collaboration with this statewide agency is critical for any infrastructure projects. Multi-lane
freeway corridors often create substantial barriers to bicycle and pedestrian connectivity within
communities.
As Coppell continues to evolve, an interconnected system of pedestrian and bicycle facilities can play an
integral role in attracting and retaining new residents and businesses that value the City’s diverse
recreational offerings and the opportunities to live a healthy and active lifestyle. Based on an analysis of the
existing conditions in the City, the following opportunities and constraints must be considered in order to
develop a safe, connected, and accessible active transportation network.
The Andrew Brown Park Trail is the most popular corridor for walking, bicycling, and jogging in
Coppell. As the City’s active transportation system continues to grow, the Andrew Brown Park Trail
can serve as the backbone of Coppell’s bicycle and pedestrian network. Providing a safe, comfortable
and family-friendly path that crosses Denton Tap Road, increases connectivity to numerous
destinations, and links to additional bikeways and walkways is critical to capitalize on this asset.
Partnerships with neighboring municipalities and regional agencies offer opportunities to connect to
the growing Veloweb Regional Trail System and adjacent trail systems like the Campion Trail in
Irving.
Branded and coordinated wayfinding signs along shared use paths and on-street bikeways can lead
bicyclists to community destinations and inform residents and visitors about recommended
corridors for bicycle travel.
The incorporation of pedestrian-scale lighting, shade trees, bicycle parking, benches, water fountains,
and trash and recycling containers, and other amenities along shared use paths and sidewalks can
provide an attractive, comfortable, and inviting space for residents and visitors.
Wide collector and local roadways in the industrial areas of Coppell, such as Ruby Road and
Creekview Drive, provide unique opportunities for on-street bikeways that connect Coppell residents
and visitors to these areas’ businesses and places of employment.
With ample curb-to-curb width, additional vehicle capacity, and numerous community destinations
along its length, Parkway Blvd presents an excellent opportunity to develop a signature and iconic
on-street bikeway project.
Home to the City’s Farmers Market and an eclectic blend of residences, shops and restaurants, Old
Town Coppell is quickly growing into one of the area’s most unique, pedestrian-friendly destinations
in the community.
Local and regional planning efforts have identified the DART-owned Cotton Belt Rail Corridor that
runs through southern Coppell as a corridor for future trail development, which will enhance east-
west connectivity and provide residents and visitors with direct access to Old Town Coppell.
Ample park land and undeveloped park properties like Grapevine Creek Park provide ideal locations
for the installation of single-track hiking and mountain biking trails to expand opportunities for
walking and bicycling and diversify the City’s recreational offerings.
With heavy volumes of motor vehicle traffic, wide pedestrian crossings, and auto-oriented retail and
commercial development, Denton Tap Road divides Coppell into two distinct halves and presents
significant barriers to bicycle and pedestrian travel. Whether crossing the corridor or traveling along
it, Denton Tap Road is the single biggest constraint to walking and bicycling in Coppell.
The Interstate Highways and Tollways surrounding Coppell limit regional connectivity to adjacent
communities.
A lack of on-street bikeways limits residents’ ability to bicycle to destinations not accessible by
shared use paths and trails.
Deep residential lots and a lack of public lands along Grapevine Creek limit the riparian corridor’s
potential for trail or greenway development.
There is a lack of soft surface and natural surface trails for mountain biking, running, and other
recreational activities.
Meaningful and productive public outreach and engagement is vital to the success of the Coppell Bicycle and
Pedestrian Master Plan. The City of Coppell is implementing a thorough, interactive outreach and engagement
process to involve Coppell residents and community members in planning. Through their input, residents,
business owners, visitors, and other people interested in walking and bicycling in Coppell will help shape the
vision, goals, objectives, and recommended projects and programs. As a result, the Master Plan will directly
reflect the needs and desires of the community and put forth a community-driven blueprint for the future of
walking and bicycling in Coppell.
This chapter summarizes the activities held by the City of Coppell in order to create a transparent,
participatory, and informative public engagement element throughout the course of the planning process.
The City convened a Steering Committee, consisting of city staff, elected officials, coordinating agency and
stakeholder representatives, local advocates, and community residents, to oversee the planning process,
provide input and direction at key decision points, and encourage public participation. The Steering
Committee met four times during the course of the planning process and supplied invaluable insight, ideas,
and feedback to develop the Plan goals, objectives, and recommendations. Given the responsibilities of the
Steering Committee members with regard to implementing the Plan, their wide range of varied support and
endorsements are vital to the enduring success of the Plan for years to come.
On Wednesday, February 11, 2015, the City of
Coppell held a public workshop at Town Center
from 6:00 – 8:00 pm to provide information about
the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan to community
members and solicit input to guide the plan
direction and recommendations. The workshop
consisted of a brief presentation providing an
overview of the planning process and timeline, a
question and answer session to address general
questions from attendees, and an interactive
mapping and input session to generate feedback on
specific issues and opportunities. While 78
individuals signed in at the information table,
roughly 90 attendees were counted during the
opening presentation.
The mapping and input session was designed to provide multiple opportunities for attendees to share their
ideas for making Coppell a better place to walk and bike. Whether highlighting a dangerous or uncomfortable
street crossing, pointing out a commonly-used street that lacks sidewalks, or suggesting motorist education
and awareness programs to support safer streets for bicyclists and pedestrians, public workshop attendees
communicated their ideas on large maps, on multiple input boards, and comment forms.
Two maps were stationed in the Town Center
atrium for attendees to identify walking and
bicycling destinations, commonly used streets and
trails, and barriers and obstructions that make
walking and bicycling difficult, dangerous, or
uncomfortable. Popular destinations included Old
Town Coppell, Wagon Wheel Park, Andrew Brown
Park, Grapevine Springs Park, MacArthur Park,
Coppell High School, commercial destinations along
Denton Tap Road, and destnations in nearby by
adjacent communities, particularly DART stations
in Lewisville and Carrollton, and the Campión Trail
in Irving. Barriers to bicycling and walking received
equal attention (if not more) at the mapping
stations. The most common type of barrier for both
walking and bicycling was signalized intersections along arterial and collector roadways, particularly those
along Denton Tap Road, MacArthur Blvd, State Highway 121, and Beltline Road. Other important barriers for
bicycling and walking included crossing Parkway Blvd by Coppell High School, narrow sections of sidewalk
along Denton Tap Rd over Denton Creek, a missing sidewalk segment on Parkway Blvd east of Moore Road,
and the recently closed State Highway 121 underpass at Denton Creek, part of a popular regional bicycling
route leading to Grapevine and Flower Mound.
There are a variety of infrastructure improvements
and facility types designed to provide for safe and
comfortable bicycling and walking. While the
selection of an appropriate bicycle or pedestrian
facility depends greatly on the context of the
roadway, surrounding land uses, and intended user
type, it is important nonetheless to understand the
types of facilities that residents and potential users
in the community desire. At the Bicycle and
Pedestrian Toolbox Station, public workshop
attendees selected the bicycle and pedestrian
improvements that they would most like to see in
Coppell. Those in attendance expressed their desire
for facilities that provide a high level of separation
from motor vehicle traffic. The most desired
facilities types were:
cycle tracks (12 votes)
bicycle lanes and buffered bicycle lanes (6 votes)
shared lane markings (6 votes)
sidewalks (5 votes)
multi-use sidepaths (4 votes)
multi-use paths (2 votes)
pedestrian-activated signals and crossings (1 vote)
In order to understand the types of bicyclists that currently bicycle in Coppell and/or would like to do so in
the future, the City asked attendees to identify themselves as one of four types of bicyclists: fast and highly
experienced; enthused and confident; interested but concerned; and no way, no how. While the fast and
highly experienced category commonly represents just a small percentage of the general population in most
cities in the U.S., this group represented more than two thirds of individuals (12 of 17) that visited the Cyclist
Types Station. The project team has noted similarly high engagement levels of experienced bicyclists through
additional stakeholder meetings and contact. Coppell appears to have a significant community of recreation
and “sport” bicyclists that are very interested in roadway and trail projects that may impact bicycling.
Unlike the other input stations at the public
workshop, the Comment Form Station allowed
attendees an opportunity to provide whatever type
of input or feedback they desired to share. Twenty
comment forms were completed, addressing
everything from specific streets that are dangerous
for walking and bicycling to educating non-
residents that drive through the community every
day. The following comments have been selected by
the project team because they express common
sentiments echoed throughout the public workshop
and paint a picture of walking and bicycling in
Coppell:
“I lived in Waco 25 years ago and rode bicycles
with my young child – to breakfast, to the park, etc. I’ve never felt safe doing this in Coppell.”
“I fall into the category of enthused bicyclists who are afraid to ride their bikes due to safety
concerns. A dedicated bike lane on our major streets would be a HUGE improvement over what we
have now and would encourage citizens like me to ditch our cars and ride a bike instead. Thank
you!”
“We live by Andrew Brown (Park) and love the trails but would really like to go to Old Town,
Wagon Wheel, Irving Trails, DART, and Denton Tap businesses.”
“Please give equal priority to making our city very walkable while also addressing biking needs and
concerns.”
“[I would like to see] safe biking access on sidewalks or protected bike lanes for my children.”
“[Parkway Blvd] is a priority for bicycles and walkers!! Getting this road bicycle and walker
friendly will do loads to move people east-west… on bikes & on foot. #1 Priority! Fix this and
Coppell is well on its way to leaving the car keys at home.”
While the high attendance at the public meeting was a strong indicator for community interest in the Bicycle
and Pedestrian Master Plan, it represented just a small fraction of the total population of Coppell. To reach a
broader audience, the City of Coppell created an online survey and distributed it through the city’s website
and social media outlets, including Facebook and Twitter. In just one month, 574 individuals completed the
survey. The input gathered through this online survey will help identify issues and opportunities for walking
and bicycling and will help to create a blueprint for the City of Coppell to become a great place to walk and
bike.
Questions about the survey respondents themselves can help the City better understand who is and who
wants to be walking and bicycling in Coppell.
As shown in the figure below on the following page, over 95% of all respondents live in the City of Coppell,
and more than two thirds of respondents use the City’s parks and trails for recreation. More than 60% of
respondents also shop at businesses in Coppell as well, indicating that many daily trips by those in the
Coppell community are to destinations located within the Coppell city limits.
The vast majority of respondents were between the ages of 30 and 59, representing almost one in ten
individuals that completed the survey. The largest single age group represented in the survey results was the
40-49 category, constituting 38% of all respondents. The smallest single age group represented in the survey
responses was the 10-19 category, with only three individual survey responses.
96.7%
67.1%60.5%55.9%
21.6%10.3%6.1%4.4%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%I live hereI use recreationalfacilities here(e.g. parks andtrails)I shop hereI own propertyhereI work hereI go to schoolhereI own a businesshereOther (pleasespecify)HOW ARE YOU CONNECTED TO THE CITY OF COPPELL?
(574 RESPONSES)
0.7%3.0%
21.4%
38.4%
28.9%
6.8%0.9%
WHAT IS YOUR AGE? (440 RESPONSES)
10-19
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
Females represented a significantly larger portion of survey respondents, constituting nearly two thirds of
the 440 individuals that responded to this question. Males, in comparison, represented only 34%, while 2% of
respondents selected “Other”.
Bicyclists are often grouped into categories that correspond with their level of experience and perceptions of
comfort and safety bicycling in traffic. By learning more about the types of bicyclists in Coppell, the City can
plan for improvements that will have the greatest impact for different user groups. For example, the fast and
highly experienced group of bicyclists are comfortable and confident riding in the traffic lane with motor
vehicles. The types of improvements that will help this group are relatively minor, like bicycle loop detectors
that will actuate a traffic signal when a bicyclist arrives at a signalized intersection, or addressing potholes
along popular corridors for road cycling. In comparison, the interested but concerned category often desire
the bicycle facilities that provide greater separation from motor vehicle traffic, like dedicated bicycle lanes
and cycle tracks. As shown in the chart below, the interested but concerned category represents more than
half of all respondents. In comparison, the fast and highly experienced category represents only 10% of
survey respondents. It is important to note that these groups are not static; as bicyclists gain more confidence
and feel comfortable riding in a variety of situations, they often move from the interested but concerned to
the enthused and confident category.
64%
34%
2%
WHAT IS YOUR GENDER IDENTITY? (440 RESPONSES)
Female
Male
Other
10.3%
27.3%
54.8%
7.6%
WHAT TYPE OF BICYCLIST ARE YOU? (553 RESPONSES)
Fast and Highly Experienced
Enthused and Confident
Interested, but Concerned
No Way, No How
When asked to select the three most significant obstacles to walking in Coppell, survey respondents focused
on the long distances between destinations (35%), the lack of safety and perception thereof along roads and
sidewalks (27%), and the lack of safe street crossings (24%). Other common responses include poorly
maintained sidewalks, a lack of shade, and a lack of sidewalks or paths. It should be noted that more than one
in every four respondents walks frequently and has no concerns with the pedestrian environment.
When asked about the reasons they choose to walk instead of drive, survey respondents pointed to a number
of different factors that influence their decision. As shown in the chart on the following page, the most
important reason was health. Ninety-nine percent of all respondents acknowledged the health benefits of
walking. The second most influential reason is to be outdoors and socialize with friends (95%), and the third
most influential reason was that walking is better for the environment than driving (69%). Only 2% of survey
respondents have no choice but to walk, as it is their primary means of transportation.
35.3%
26.8%26.6%23.6%22.9%19.6%19.4%
11.3%9.9%9.0%7.4%5.1%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%The distance todestinations is too far towalkI do walk frequentlyThe roads and sidewalksdo not feel safeNot enough safe placesto cross the streetThe sidewalks are notwell-maintainedThere isn't enoughshadeThere are no sidewalksor pathsThe trails/greenwaysthat do not feel safeOtherLack of people/friendsto walk withI don't know the bestwalking routesLack of interest inwalkingWHAT ARE THE TOP THREE OBSTACLES OR CONCERNS
THAT PREVENT YOU FROM WALKING MORE FREQUENTLY?
(CHECK UP TO THREE) (433 RESPONSES)
Many residents and visitors are interested in walking to destinations throughout Coppell, especially parks
and trails (84% of all respondents), friends’ and family members’ houses (60%), and recreation centers and
gyms (58%). Many individuals also want to access restaurants, shops, and school.
More than half of all children (51%) walk for transportation purposes, according to parents who completed
the survey. When it comes to their children walking in Coppell, parents are most concerned with too much
traffic (62%), a lack of safe street crossings (53%), and high motor vehicle speeds (52%).
Enhancements to the pedestrian network can have a significant impact of pedestrian activity. When asked
which types of improvements would influence survey respondents to walk more often, individuals
69%
99%
94%
54%
32%
2%
0%25%50%75%100%
Walking is better for the environment than driving.
Walking is good for my health.
Walking is a good way to be outdoors and/or socialize
with friends
Walking is less expensive and/or stressful than driving
and parking.
Walking is the most practical/convenient way for me to
get to my destination.
I have no choice. Walking is my only option and primary
form of transportation.
WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING INFLUENCES IMPACT YOUR
DECISION TO WALK INSTEAD OF DRIVE (449 RESPONSES)
84.2%
60.1%57.5%55.7%52.1%46.3%41.2%
16.0%9.6%5.1%3.6%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%Parks or trailsHouses offriends orfamilyGym orrecreationcenterNodestination,just walking…Restaurants/barsSchoolShopping/errandsGovernmentbuildingsMedical/Dental officesWorkOtherWHAT LOCATIONS ARE YOU MOST INTERESTED IN
WALKING TO? (449 REPSONSES)
highlighted the importance of an interconnected sidewalk network that links to important destinations and
off-street paths as the two most important factors that will encourage them to walk more frequently. Other
desired improvements included security features and lighting (selected by 89% of respondents), roadway
crossing improvements (84%), and more sidewalks (79%).
Survey respondents identified multiple corridors and intersections in need of improvements to create a safer,
more comfortable pedestrian experience. Table 4 on the following page displays the corridors most in need of
pedestrian improvements, as identified by survey respondents. Many of the corridors listed below exhibit
common characteristics that contribute to a less comfortable pedestrian experience, including heavier traffic
volumes, multiple travel lanes, higher motor vehicle speeds, and longer crossing distances. As arterial and
collector roadways, most of these corridors are primary routes by which residents and visitors access the
City’s most popular destinations. As such, it is important that these corridors provide safe, convenient and
comfortable pedestrian infrastructure.
91%91%89%84%79%77%76%
43%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%Sidewalknetwork thatconnects where Iwant to goOff-street pathsSecurity featuresand goodlightingRoadwaycrossingimprovementsfor pedestriansMore sidewalksSidewalksseparated fromtraffic by parkedcars or…Wider sidewalksDirectional andwayfindingsignage forpedestriansWHAT IS THE LIKELIHOOD THAT THE FOLLOWING TYPES OF
PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES WOULD INFLUENCE YOU TO WALK
MORE OFTEN?
(427 RESPONSES)
Many of the same corridors listed above were also prevalent in survey responses identifying intersections in
need of improvement. Many Coppell residents find it just as challenging, if not more so, to cross some of these
busy roads as they do traveling along them. Table 3 lists the intersections most in need of pedestrian
improvements, as identified by survey respondents. The table highlights the perceived lack of safety and
comfort at some of the City’s largest, most heavily traveled intersections (for cars, bicycles, and motor
vehicles). These intersections also represent some of the most common intersections identified as barriers
for pedestrian travel by attendees at the first public workshop.
When asked about the obstacles they face when bicycling in Coppell, survey respondents do not feel safe on
area roads and trails (66% of all respondents), they do not feel safe crossing streets (45%), and they are
concerned that drivers are too aggressive (42%). All three of these top barriers to bicycling relate to roads
and/or motor vehicles.
Similar to walking, survey respondents find health and fitness as the most appealing reason for riding a
bicycle (over 90%). Other popular answers included spending more time outdoors (80%), fun and socializing
(73%), beautiful scenery (53%), quality time spent with children or grandchildren (45%), and environmental
impact (41%).
Survey respondents expressed their desire to access popular recreation destinations by bicycle. More than
four in every five survey respondents chose parks or trails (84%) as a destination they’d like to access by
65.9%
45.0%41.7%
24.8%22.9%17.0%
8.2%8.2%7.8%7.0%4.8%3.0%1.3%1.1%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%The roads/trails do notfeel safeStreet crossings feelunsafeDrivers are tooaggressiveThere isn't enoughbicycle…I don't know the bestroutes for bikingThere are no bicyclefacilities to take me…I do ride frequently; noconcerns here!I have too much tocarryThe distance to mydestination is too farLack of interest inbikingI get too sweatyI don't have access to abikeI can't bike for otherreasonsI don't know how tobikeWHAT ARE THE TOP THREE OBSTACLES OR CONCERNS
THAT MAY PREVENT YOU FROM BIKING? (CHECK UP TO 3
ANSWERS)(525 RESPONSES)
91.2%
80.2%72.5%
53.4%45.6%41.4%
27.1%24.2%
12.2%11.1%8.8%7.1%5.3%1.1%
0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%Health and fitnessMore time outdoorsPleasure/fun/socializingBeautiful sceneryQuality time spent withchildren/grandchildrenLess impact on theenvironmentReducing the amountof time spent in a carMoney saved on fuelFewer traffic jamsConnected networkEasier to findconvenient parkingFaster commuteI do not bicycleOther (please specify)WHAT ASPECTS OF BIKING ARE MOST APPEALING TO
YOU? (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) (524 RESPONSES)
bicycle. Other popular destinations included recreation centers and gyms (58%), friends’ and family
members’ houses (53%), shopping and retail destinations (44%), and schools (43%). Over half of
respondents that answered this question also acknowledged that they often like to bike for fitness and leisure
and have no particular destination at all.
When asked about their children’s bicycling activity, survey respondents with children indicated that 37% of
children bike for transportation purposes. Parents are most concerned with too much traffic (69%), a lack of
safe street crossings (67%), and a lack of on-street bicycle facilities like bike lanes (57%).
Bicycle facilities can have a significant impact on bicycle activity. With an interconnected network of bicycle
facilities like off-street paths, cycle tracks and bike lanes, many community residents will choose to bike to
destinations throughout the Coppell. When asked which improvements will encourage them to bicycle more
frequently, respondents identified off-street paths, cycle tracks, buffered bike lanes, and intersection
enhancements as the most significant potential improvements.
84.2%
58.2%56.7%52.5%44.2%43.3%34.8%
18.4%12.7%12.2%7.0%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%Parks or trailsGym orrecreationcenterNo destination,just biking forfitness or leisureHouses offriends or familyShopping/errandsSchool (yours oryour children's)Restaurants/barsGovernmentbuildingsMedical/DentalofficesWorkI don't bike andprefer not toWHAT LOCATIONS ARE YOU MOST INTERESTED IN RIDING
A BIKE TO? (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) (543 RESPONSES)
Survey respondents identified multiple corridors and intersections in need of improvements for bicycle
safety and mobility. Table 4 displays the corridors most in need of bicycle improvements, as identified by
survey respondents. The same four roadways - Denton Tap, Sandy Lake, Parkway and MacArthur –listed as
the top four corridors in need of bicycle improvements were the same four listed as the top corridors for
pedestrian improvements, an indication that there is a desire to walk and bike along these arterial corridors
and that residents find these corridors lacking in terms of safety and/or comfort.
Many of the same corridors listed above were also prevalent in survey responses identifying intersections in
need of improvement. Many Coppell residents find it just as challenging, if not more so, to cross some of these
busy roads as they do traveling along them. Table 5 shows the intersections most in need of bicycle
improvements, as identified by survey respondents. Six of the ten intersections are along Denton Tap Road,
three along Sandy Lake Road, and three along MacArthur Blvd. While many of these intersections were also
identified as barriers to pedestrian travel, the notable inclusion of MacArthur Blvd and Beltline Road reflects
92%88%84%82%79%71%62%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%Off-street pathsCycle tracks (bikelanes physicallyseparated bycurb or parking)Buffered bikelanesIntersectionimprovementsfor bicyclistsStriped bike lanesBicycle Boulevard(shared, low-speed streets)Directional andwayfindingsignage forbicyclistsWHICH FACILITY TYPES WOULD INFLUENCE YOU TO BIKE
MORE OFTEN? (492 RESPONSES)
many cyclists’ desire for a safer regional connection to the Campion Trail just south of Coppell in neighboring
Irving.
Survey respondents also pointed to the need for bicycle parking at destinations throughout the City. The
greatest need for bicycle parking is at the Tom Thumb Shopping Center, the CVS at Denton Tap Rd and
Parkway Blvd, the Kroger at Sandy Lake Rd and MacArthur Blvd, and other commercial destinations
throughout Coppell.
At the end of the survey, an open field was provided for respondents to share any additional thoughts, ideas,
or concerns with the City. The comments ranged from general support for the project to specific concerns
about texting and driving. Despite the diversity of opinions and ideas expressed, there are a number of
common themes that emerged from these open comments:
“Let's build this plan and have a healthy life.”
“I love riding my bike to run errands, get to schools, the library, YMCA, dentist and doctor appts,
etc. It's how I grew up and why I chose the location of our house. I would love for Coppell to
become a more biker friendly town and encourage people to get out on their bikes and help the
environment!”
“Let's make Coppell known for great parks and a great biking system. That's something to be proud
of.”
“I appreciate the small town walking feel especially closer into the heart of Coppell.
Fortunately/unfortunately my particular neighborhood is locked in by several creeks and is on the
outskirts of town making it difficult to enjoy walkability to the fullest.”
“I would like to see the city focus on safe pedestrian/bike paths to all of the schools so that we can
instill the idea of walking to get places in our young population and encourage a healthy lifestyle
early on.”
“I would love to be able to walk or ride my bike to any destination within the City of Coppell as a
daily practice, not just recreational.”
“Other cities around us are really ahead of the game in cycling/biking. The activity is growing more
and more. Cycling/biking events are also a way to generate $$$ for the city by having more visitors
to Coppell spending money within our city limits. It also promotes health.”
“I love the paths we have in place so far, we just need more of them and I would love it if we could
connect with surrounding cities”
“I would like to have a safe way to bike over 635 into and out of the Irving / Las Colinas area”
“This is a great town, we'd love to see more bike/jogging trails, especially connecting to a
metroplex-wide system (e.g. Valley Ranch and Campion Trail). Thanks!”
“Coppell is isolated and we need the ability to get out of town by other ways besides cars.”
“Security is always a concern in more remote areas, particularly at night. Will there be police
bicycle patrols in the areas?”
“I have to ride my bike daily for exercise on a trainer in my house because I am so afraid I will be
hit on the road. An improvement needs to be made to give bicyclists the opportunity to ride all
through the city in safety.”
“Limit car traffic!!!!”
“Reduce the nonresident drive through traffic on all roads. At least reduce speed limits and
enforce!”
“Many sidewalks in my neighborhood are unsafe and need maintenance.”
“The fact that you are reaching out to get the public's opinion gives me great confidence that
Coppell leadership will hit a home run with this project and makes me want to stay here. Thanks!”
“Thank you for putting this survey together and implementing an awesome plan.”
“I'm excited to see this survey and the thought of better bike paths in Coppell.”
“Thanks for consulting us to get our opinion on this very important subject for the Coppell
community.”
“Thank you for looking into this. We really could benefit from being a bike and pedestrian friendly
city.”
“Keep it up. It's been a very long time coming.”
“I am excited at the work being done, and support the Parks department in this effort.”
On Saturday, April 11, the City of Coppell hosted a
booth at the Annual EcoCoppell Earthfest to share
information about the Plan and gather additional input
and ideas from Coppell residents and visitors. More
than 150 individuals stopped by the booth to learn
about the plan, and 15 individuals and families shared
their ideas for walking and bicycling in Coppell on
large speech boxes (shown below), which were posted
for all attendees to see. Residents expressed their
desires for dedicated bicycle lanes, encouraging more
children to walk and bike to school, improving
connections to popular destinations like Old Town
Coppell, fixing broken and uneven sidewalks
throughout the City, and creating safer crossings along
Denton Tap Road.
Whether it’s at the corner of Parkway Boulevard and Denton Tap Road during the middle of rush hour, or the
Andrew Brown Park Trail on a Saturday afternoon, people in Coppell are already walking and bicycling a
great deal. Through on-line survey responses and input provided at the Public Workshop, residents shed light
on how, where, and why they walk and bike in Coppell, as well as their desires for improving walking and
bicycling throughout the City. While the survey respondents and public workshop attendees represented a
diverse cross section of the Coppell community, there was a consensus that the highest priorities for
improving bicycling and walking conditions were to expand and improve the pathway and trail network,
develop an on-street network of protected bikeways that provide a high level of safety, comfort, and
separation from motor vehicle traffic, and improve the pedestrian network, particularly at major
intersections and along major corridors.
Visioning and goal setting is an important part of any planning effort. A strong vision and supporting goals
and objectives provide the foundation for all physical and programmatic recommendations in the Plan. Based
on public input from community residents, steering committee members, and key stakeholders, the Plan’s
vision statement encapsulates the values and desires of the community, painting a picture for the future of
bicycling and walking in Coppell:
Visioning and goal setting is an important part of any planning effort. A strong vision and supporting goals
and objectives provide the foundation for all physical and programmatic recommendations in the Plan. Based
on public input from community residents, steering committee members, and key stakeholders, the Plan’s
vision statement encapsulates the values and desires of the community, painting a picture for the future of
bicycling and walking in Coppell:
The City of Coppell will be a community in which people of all ages and abilities can safely,
comfortably, and conveniently travel by bicycle or on foot.
To help achieve this vision, the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan defines a number of goals and objectives
to target specific community needs. Goals are broad, value-based expression of the community’s desires,
describing the ideal situation that would result if all plan purposes were fully realized. Goals give direction to
the plan as a whole and are concerned with the long-term. Objectives are action-oriented statements that
should be undertaken to reach a particular goal. These goals and objectives are based on the input from
community members, guidance from the steering committee, and a detailed analysis of existing conditions.
1.1: Implement a continuous network of bike lanes, signed shared bikeways, and bike boulevards that serve
all bicycle user groups, including both recreational and utilitarian riders.
1.2: Implement an accessible network of pedestrian supportive infrastructure, including sidewalks, curb
ramps, and trails in high-priority pedestrian areas.
1.3: Provide a bicycle, pedestrian and trail network that is safe and attractive and meets the needs of all
genders, ages and abilities.
1.4: Evaluate streets for bike facilities based on the recommended projects in this Plan when performing
street resurfacing or restriping projects.
1.5: Include priority bikeway and trail projects within the City’s Capital Improvement Program.
1.6: Eliminate gaps in the bicycle network to improve connectivity between destinations.
1.7: Require new private development projects to finance and install bicycle facilities, sidewalks, and multi-
use trails where recommended in the Coppell Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan and Trails Master Plan, as
part of on-site improvements and off-site mitigation measures as appropriate. Such requirements should be
required through updates to the Subdivision Regulations and others sections of the municipal code.
1.8: Adopt and adhere to existing and future standards established by manuals including, but not limited to
the AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(MUTCD) and the NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide.
1.9: Adopt revised roadway design standards to ensure compliance with context sensitive design principles.
2.1: Adopt and implement the Coppell Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan.
2.2: Designate City of Coppell staff member(s) to be responsible for the coordination of non-motorized
transportation.
2.3: Expand sources for funding construction and maintenance of trails and bikeways beyond the
Transportation Alternatives Program through NCTCOG.
2.4: Create a sustainable, dedicated source of bikeway funding within the annual city budget.
2.5: Encourage bikeway and trail advocates and other interested citizens to serve on government boards and
committees.
2.6: Pursue public-private partnerships in the planning and implementation of bikeway and trail projects.
2.7: Preserve potential corridors for future use including rail corridors, canals/ditches, utility rights-of-way
and natural corridors.
3.1: Establish ‘annual bike/ped/trails census’ counts.
3.2: Begin monitoring on-street bicycle use as before/after data collection on future on-street bikeways.
3.3: Monitor bicycle and pedestrian collision data to seek continuous reduction in bicycle and pedestrian
collision rates
3.4: Track public opinion about walking and bicycling through citizen surveys
4.1: Educate and inform the general public on bicycle and walking safety issues and encourage non-motorized
transportation with programs that target pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists.
4.2: Install signage along all on-street bikeways and trails to assist with way-finding and to increase awareness of
bicyclists and other trail users.
4.3: Support Safe Routes to School and other efforts, including educational and incentive programs to encourage
more students to bicycle or walk to school, through a partnership with school district and other interested parties.
4.4: Encourage employers to provide incentives and support facilities for employees that commute by bicycle.
4.5: Partner with trail and bicycling advocacy groups, the medical and health community, bike shops, businesses,
and outlying communities on education and encouragement programs.
4.6: Promote bicycling and walking through City-sponsored events.
4.7: Educate professional drivers (transit drivers, delivery drivers, etc) on bicyclist rights and safe motoring behavior
around bicyclists.
4.8: Encourage large employers, colleges, activity centers and major transit stops to provide secure bicycle storage
facilities and racks and promote their efforts.
4.9: Require bicycle parking and other end-of-trip facilities within new commercial development and retrofit public
facilities with bicycle parking where it is absent.
5.1: Increase attention by law enforcement officers to bicycle-related violations by both motorists and bicyclists, and
emphasize positive enforcement for safe bicycling behavior by children. Law enforcement officers should be
recruited to participate in educational programs in schools.
5.2: Increase enforcement efforts to prevent the obstruction of dedicated bikeways and walkways.
5.3: Reduce aggressive and/or negligent behavior among drivers, bicyclists and pedestrians.
5.4: Ensure that all bicycle or pedestrian collisions are accurately recorded into a collision database for future
analysis and monitoring.
5.5: Establish volunteer bike patrol on trails.
6.1: Work with the medical community to develop programs that promote the health and wellness benefits
associated with walking and cycling.
6.2: Work with Safe Routes to Schools efforts to encourage healthy walking and bicycling habits from an early age.
6.3: Increase activity among Coppell’s residents through the provision of a comprehensive bikeway and trail
network.
6.4: Reduce the numbers of crashes involving bicyclists and trail users by at least 30 percent.
6.5: Increase helmet use among bicyclists, particularly those required by City ordinance who are 14 years of age and
under.
This chapter presents a comprehensive set of infrastructure and programming recommendations specifically
tailored to reach the Plan vision in which Coppell’s trail and roadway system will comfortably, safely and
efficiently facilitate bicycle and pedestrian transportation for users of all ages and abilities. These
recommendations are built on a solid foundation of input from the public, City staff, and technical analysis.
The chapter is divided into four sections: bicycle network recommendations, pedestrian network
recommendations, community-wide program recommendations, and internal program and policy
recommendations. Bicycle network recommendations consist of bicycle facilities, wayfinding signage and
markings, end-of-trip (bicycle parking) facilities, and other improvements that enhance the bicycling
experience. Pedestrian recommendations include sidewalks, shared use paths, and crossing improvements at
high-priority locations throughout Coppell. Community-wide programs consist of education, encouragement,
and enforcement, recommendations that foster a culture in which bicycling and walking are a part of daily life
for Coppell residents. Internal program and policy recommendations address engineering, planning, and
evaluation opportunities to integrate bicycling and walking into the City policies and operations. Together,
these elements constitute a comprehensive, Five E’s approa ch to transforming Coppell into a bicycle and
pedestrian friendly community.
People who bicycle vary in their physical abilities, experience levels, and the types of bicycles they ride.
Creating a comprehensive bicycle network requires the provision of comfortable, convenient, and safe
facilities that accommodate the different types of expected users. Many streets in Coppell, such as low-speed,
low-volume neighborhood streets, may not need any special facilities to accommodate bicyclists, while others
with larger volumes and higher speeds may require significant bikeway infrastructure investments. These
infrastructure investments come in the form of signed and bicycle boulevards, dedicated bicycle lanes, cycle
tracks, shared use paths, wayfinding signage, intersection improvements, and other elements that support
bicycle transportation and enhance bicycling’s visibility as a valued, respected, and viable mode of travel in
Coppell.
Each bicycle facility type recommended in this plan is described below. The facility types are presented by
degree of separation from motor vehicle traffic, from least separation to most separation. More detailed
descriptions of each facility type are included in the design guidelines in the appendix of the Plan.
On shared roadways, bicyclists and motor vehicles
use the same roadway space. These facilities are
typically used on roads with low speeds and traffic
volumes, however they can be used on higher
volume roads with wide outside lanes or shoulders.
A motor vehicle driver will usually have to cross
over into the adjacent travel lane to pass a bicyclist,
unless a wide outside lane or shoulder is provided.
While bicyclists are permitted on nearly all
roadways except for interstate highways, signed
and marked shared roadways indicate preferred
bicycle routes through the use of wayfinding
signage and shared lane markings. These design
elements increase motorist awareness of bicyclists
and support safe and responsible road use.
Bicycle Boulevards are low-volume, low-speed
streets modified to enhance bicyclist by using
treatments such as signage, pavement markings,
traffic calming and/or traffic reduction, and
intersection modifications. These treatments, also
referred to as neighborhood greenways or quiet
streets, allow through movements of bicyclists
while discouraging similar through-trips by non-
local motorized traffic through traffic calming and
traffic diversion design elements.
Bike lanes designate an exclusive space for
bicyclists through the use of pavement markings
and signage. The bike lane is located adjacent to
motor vehicle travel lanes and is used in the same
direction as motor vehicle traffic. Bike lanes are
typically on the right side of the street, between the
adjacent travel lane and curb, road edge or parking
lane.
Bike lanes adjacent to on-street parallel parking
require special treatment in order to avoid crashes
caused by an open vehicle door. The bike lane
should have sufficient width to allow bicyclists to
stay out of the door zone while not encroaching into
the adjacent vehicular lane. Parking stall markings,
such as parking “Ts” and double white lines create a
parking side buffer that encourages bicyclists to
ride farther away from the door zone.
Buffered bike lanes are conventional bicycle lanes
paired with a designated buffer space that provides
additional separation between the bicycle lane and
the adjacent motor vehicle travel lane and/or
parking lane.
This treatment is appropriate for bike lanes on
roadways with high motor vehicle traffic volumes
and speed, adjacent to parking lanes, or a high
volume of truck or oversized vehicle traffic.
Where space permits, buffers are sometimes placed
on both sides of the bike lane. Buffered bike lanes
differ from protected bike lanes because the buffer
space uses only paint and no physical barrier.
Protected bike lanes, also referred to as cycle
tracks, provide a space on or next to the roadway
for exclusive use by bicyclists, separated from
traffic by a physical barrier of some kind. These
facilities are different from sidewalks and sidepaths
in that pedestrians are not permitted to use them.
Barriers may be in the form of planters, raised
curbs, parking, bollards, or other streetscape
elements. Protected bike lanes can be configured
for either one-way or two-way travel.
Shared use paved trails along roadways, also called
Sidepaths, are a type of trail that runs adjacent to a
street. Because of operational concerns like
numerous conflict points in the form of driveways
and street crossings, as well as the bi-directional
nature of sidepaths, these facilities must be
designed with additional care and consideration.
However, as a low-stress bikeway, sidepaths are an
attractive facility type for children and casual adult
bicycle riders, and therefore can have a significant
impact on ridership. Sidepaths in the City of Coppell
can be found on N Coppell Rd, Sandy Lake Rd, and
Freeport Pkwy.
A shared use path (also known as a greenway or
multi-purpose trail) allows for two-way, off-street
bicycle use and also may be used by pedestrians,
skaters, wheelchair users, joggers and other non-
motorized users. These facilities are frequently
found in parks, along rivers, beaches, and in
greenbelts or utility corridors where there are few
conflicts with motorized vehicles. Trail facilities can
also include amenities such as lighting, signage, and
fencing (where appropriate).
Key features of shared use paved trails include:
Frequent access points from the local road
network.
Directional signs to direct users to and
from the trail.
A limited number of at-grade crossings
with streets or driveways.
Terminating the trail where it is easily accessible to and from the street system.
Separate treads for pedestrians and bicyclists when heavy use is expected.
The Coppell Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan recommends more than 50 miles of new on-street bikeways
and shared use paths. Once installed, this comprehensive bicycling network will offer residents and visitors of
all ages and abilities safe, convenient, and comfortable facilities that connect people to parks, schools,
employment centers, commercial districts, and other popular destinations. The bicycling recommendations
provided in this chapter represent a master planning level of detail and may change as individual projects are
studied, designed and implemented. Individual segments may be enhanced or upgraded to a higher facility
type as opportunities present themselves.
The recommended bicycle facilities are displayed below in Map 2. Each facility is listed in the Recommended
Bicycle Facilities table on the following page.
The following table summarizes all bikeways recommended in this planning process by facility type. This
table also includes previously planned bikeway facilities and projects under design and/or construction.
Tables 7 through 12 group Plan recommendations by facility type and display each recommended bikeway
project, including project limits, proposed length, and recommendation status (proposed, previously
proposed, and under design/construction). Like the facility descriptions above, these tables are listed in
order by degree of separation from motor vehicle traffic, from least separated to most separated.
Most trips begin and end as walking trips, even when a car, bicycle, bus, or train is also involved. The City of
Coppell has a comprehensive network of pedestrian facilities, but there are some gaps in the network, either
in the form of missing sidewalks or challenging intersections and street crossings. There are also some aging
sidewalks in poor condition, which can present significant impediments to pedestrians, particularly
pedestrians with limited mobility, physical impairments, or mobility-assistance devices such as walkers,
wheelchairs, and mobility scooters. The City addresses these deficiencies by improving existing sidewalks,
adding ADA-compliant crossings, and adding new sidewalks as part of redevelopment, street reconstruction,
new or upgraded traffic signals, and targeted spot improvements. This section of the Plan identifies specific
pedestrian infrastructure recommendations to enhance connectivity, accessibility, and safety for pedestrians
of all ages and abilities.
Most trips begin and end as walking trips even
when a car, bicycle, bus, or train is also involved.
Generally, Coppell has a very complete walking
network and there are few places where walking
facilities are not available. Pedestrians use several
different types of facilities to travel in Coppell,
primarily multi-use paths, sidepaths, and sidewalks.
Each of these facility types is described briefly
below.
These facilities, which were described above in
greater detail, are shared by many active
transportation and recreation users including
pedestrians, bicyclists, and in-line skaters. The
Denton Creek Trail, Andrew Brown Park Trail, and
Freeport Connector Trail between Freeport Pkwy and Bethel Rd are all examples of shared use paths in
Coppell. This plan recommends 15 miles of new multi-use paths.
Sidepaths, which were described earlier in this
chapter above in greater detail, are an increasingly
prevalent asset to the City’s pedestrian network.
These wide shared use facilities can be found on
Sandy Lake Rd, Freeport Pkwy, Coppell Rd. Heavy
use by walkers, runners, and bicyclists is a
testament to the popularity of sidepaths among
Coppell residents and visitors alike.
Sidewalks are the most common walking facility in
Coppell. There are more than 240 miles of
sidewalks throughout the City of Coppell, providing
essential connections between residential
neighborhoods and nearby destinations. Some are
directly adjacent to travel lanes without any buffer
or barrier, while others are buffered by landscaping,
parking, or other physical means.
Intersections in Coppell should be designed for
pedestrian safety and comfort, with pedestrian
enhancements appropriate to traffic speed, traffic
volume, pedestrian crossing distance, and other
similar factors. Marked crosswalks provide a
delineated space for pedestrians and other
sidewalks users to cross. Differences in striping
patterns (e.g. double ladder or piano key
crosswalks) and paving surfaces (e.g. raised
and/or brick crosswalks) offer varying levels of
visibility and delineation between pedestrians and
automobiles, bicyclists, and other roadway users.
The selection of crosswalk location and type of
striping pattern used is through careful
engineering judgement of city staff referencing
documents such as the Manual of Uniform Traffic
Control Devices.
In addition to crosswalk markings, a host of other crosswalk elements can be utilized to create a safe and
comfortable pedestrian experience, including bulb-outs, median refuge islands, push button-activated
pedestrian signal heads, countdown timers, ADA-accessible curb ramps, leading pedestrian intervals, and
flashing beacons. While each intersection identified for improvements will require individual analysis to
determine appropriate design elements, the City of Coppell should provide a consistent and uniform
experience for pedestrians throughout the entire community.
The Coppell Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan recommends nearly fifty miles of pedestrian facilities to
accompany the existing 250 miles of sidewalks, shared use paths, and sidepaths located throughout the City.
These new shared use paths and sidepaths will expand the pedestrian network, address critical gaps and
barriers, increase accessibility and safety, and support a positive and comfortable experience for people of all
ages and abilities. While there are no specific recommendations for new sidewalk segments, the Plan does
provide policy recommendations, including a sidewalk prioritization strategy and a Complete Streets
Ordinance, both of which are described later in this chapter. These recommendations will help to ensure that
all roadway projects address pedestrian mobility.
In addition to the linear facilities mentioned above, the Plan also identifies a number of intersections for
which pedestrian improvements are recommended. The recommendations for intersection improvements
are conceptual in nature and will require additional analysis beyond the scope of this Plan to determine the
character and design of each intersection improvement. A number of potential design elements for safe and
accessible pedestrian crossings are included in the design guidelines section of the appendix for reference.
It is important to note that the recommended pedestrian facilities do not constitute an exclusive schedule of
pedestrian projects. The City of Coppell should pursue and implement additional pedestrian projects as part
of a Complete Streets approach to transportation investments and maintenance, in conjunction with
programmed capital improvements and private development, and as other opportunities arise.
The map on the following page identifies recommended shared use paths, sidepaths, and intersection
improvements.
Table 11 and Table 12 in the previous section of this chapter identify each recommended sidepath and shared
use path, respectively. Table 13 below lists each intersection recommended for pedestrian improvements.
While a continuous pedestrian network supports opportunities for walking, additional streetscape
enhancements and traffic calming elements transform the public realm by prioritizing walking as the primary
mode of transportation, slowing and even reducing motor vehicle traffic, creating an attractive and
comfortable environment that invites pedestrian activity, and adding character and quality to the streetscape
and adjacent land uses. Both of these roadway design elements - streetscape enhancements and traffic
calming - are discussed in greater detail in the design guidelines in the appendix of the Plan.
Landscaping, street trees, pedestrian-scale lighting,
benches, street furniture, and even public art can
have a profound effect on improving the pedestrian
experience along a corridor. Many of the streets in
Old Town Coppell demonstrate the impact of
pedestrian-focused streetscape enhancements on the
character of a street. Design elements like street
trees, multi-textured and multi-colored sidewalk and
pavement surfaces, benches, pedestrian-scale
lighting, bulb-outs, and mid-block pedestrian
crossings enhance the public realm and create a
warm and inviting space for social interaction. For
the City of Coppell, capital investments in public
spaces like these can be a significant catalyst for
private investment.
Traffic calming is a design principle that seeks to
lower vehicular traffic speeds using physical and
visual cues. These tools are typically self-enforcing:
the roadway’s physical conditions influence drivers’
speed and behavior rather than regulatory devices
and enforcement measures. Traffic calming works
best on local streets with residential areas and highly
trafficked commercial corridors. Extensive research
shows that slower motorist speeds reduce overall
crash severity and frequency, and improve cyclist
and pedestrian comfort within and adjacent to traffic.
Slower traffic also tends to reduce roadway noise,
which contributes to overall neighborhood livability
and walking comfort.
Traffic calming countermeasures are divided into two
general types: vertical and horizontal. Vertical speed
control measures are composed of slight rises in the
pavement, on which motorists and bicyclists must
reduce speed to cross. Speed humps, speed tables,
and raised crosswalks are examples of vertical traffic calming. Horizontal traffic calming devices, on the other
hand, cause drivers to slow down by constricting the roadway space or by requiring careful maneuvering.
Curb extensions, chicanes, chokers (neckdowns), and traffic circles are the most common applications of
horizontal traffic calming.
Education, encouragement, and enforcement programs support walking and bicycling activity and can be cost
effective complements to infrastructure investments. When combined with physical improvements like
sidewalks, greenways, and on-street bikeways, these types of programs foster a social environment that
values and supports active transportation.
Building on the Five E’s approach outlined in the introduction of the Plan, the following education,
encouragement and enforcement programs and accompanying actions offer a layered approach to increasing
walking and bicycling activity, supporting safe, responsible, and respectful use of roads and trails, and
creating a community where people of all ages and abilities feel comfortable walking or riding a bicycle for
any trip.
Creative partnerships with local agencies, organizations, institutions and community groups are critical to the
success of these programs. The City should consider opportunities for local partners to take lead or
supporting roles in as many of these programs as possible, as dictated by their strengths, capacities,
resources and alignment with their missions and goals.
Increasing citizens’ access to bicycle skills classes
can increase residents’ understanding of basic
bicycle operations, sharing the road with motor
vehicles, hazard avoidance and maneuvering, and
even bicycle maintenance. These skills and
resources equip residents with the confidence and
knowledge to safely and responsibly ride their
bicycles to destinations in and around Coppell.
The City of Coppell should deliver at least two adult
bicycling skills classes per year. These classes could
be stand-alone program offerings through the Parks
and Recreation Department, or integrated into a
larger community event like the annual EcoCoppell
Earthfest. The Life Safety Park will be a perfect venue for these classes.
Partnering with local bike shops and/or advocacy organizations can increase program delivery efficiency and
utilize existing resources. BikeDFW, for example, offers a variety of bicycle skills courses taught by League of
American Bicyclists certified instructors. Courses
available through BikeDFW include Learning to
Ride a Bicycle, Traffic Skills 101, Group Riding, and
Commuting.
Bicycle rodeos and other education courses
designed to build bicycling skills for children are an
effective way to instill safe and responsible
bicycling practices and support bicycling as a means
of transportation for Coppell’s next generation.
The City of Coppell should incorporate at least two
youth-oriented bicycle education classes into the
Parks and Recreation Department’s program
offerings each year. BikeDFW already offers two
classes specifically targeting youth audiences:
Learning to Ride a Bicycle and Bicycling Skills 123
Youth. By partnering with BikeDFW, Coppell can
utilize this advocacy organization’s expertise and
experience in delivering a refined and effective
bicycle education curriculum. Again, the Life Safety
Park will be a great resource for holding these
classes.
As the City of Coppell’s network of trails and on-
street bikeways expands, residents and visitors
alike will turn to the City’s website for trail
information, bicycle network maps, and other
information. This presents the City with the ideal
opportunity to provide a variety of information and
resources to equip citizens with all they need to
know about walking and bicycling in Coppell.
Through a single page dedicated to bicycling and
walking, the City can share educational materials,
information about bicycle facility types and their
intended users, descriptions of upcoming capital
projects, bicycling and walking maps, upcoming
events and activities, links to community partners’
websites, plans and studies, and capital projects.
Community outreach and engagement is an ongoing
process. While many Coppell residents and
stakeholders participated in the planning process,
the majority of the community may not feel the
impact of the plan until individual projects are
implemented near their homes, places of
employment, or on their daily travel routes. As
individual projects are implemented, particularly
those that involve substantial modifications like
road diets, cycle tracks, and shared use paths, the
City must engage and inform community residents
and adjacent property owners about the coming
improvements, how they relate to the City’s overall
vision and approach to creating a walk- and bike-
friendly community, and the benefits that these
projects will provide for people of all ages and
abilities.
The City should hold community meetings for
significant bicycling and walking capital
improvement projects to inform residents and
adjacent property owners of project details,
address community concerns, and build support for
non-motorized transportation facilities. In addition
to public meetings, the City should also use door
hangers, mailers, or other forms of communications
to provide project updates, explain infrastructure improvements and proper operations of a vehicle or bicycle
with regard to the specific project, and, more generally, garner support for walking and bicycling by extolling
their health, social, economic, transportation, and quality of life benefits.
Many schools in the City of Coppell already participate the Coppell Independent School District’s Walk to
School Wednesdays. Living Well in Coppell, the City of Coppell and the Coppell Independent School District
have even produced a short Youtube video to promote the program and encourage families to participate. In
addition to the twice a month Walk to School Wednesdays, some schools have more active groups as well.
Schools like Cottonwood Creek Elementary, Wilson Elementary, and Town Center Elementary have high rates
of walking and bicycling on a daily basis. The City of Coppell should continue to support Walk to School
Wednesdays and other efforts and initiatives to encourage walking and bicycling to school.
Raising awareness for the City’s growing network of shared use paths and bicycle facilities is a simple and
effective method to encourage walking and bicycling. The City should develop a community-wide bicycle
network and trails map to familiarize residents and visitors with safe and convenient facilities for walking,
bicycling, and jogging. These maps can be provided in print and online and can be supplemented with
additional information, including trail mileage, nearby destinations, and etiquette and safety tips for trail
usage and on-street bicycling.
Route-specific maps and guides offer residents and visitors unique bicycling and walking routes to access
local destinations or tour the community. The City of Coppell should develop a series of walking and bicycling
maps that showcase the growing network of shared use paths, on-street bikeways, and sidewalks. These
routes can start and end at common destinations like the CORE, the Senior and Community Center, or Wagon
Wheel Park. Both bicycling and walking routes should vary in terms of length in order to provide choices for
people of various physical abilities and bicyclists of different skill levels.
In partnership with the League of American Bicyclists, cities across the country host events and activities to
promote National Bike Month, Week, and Day. These events can increase visibility for bicycling, encourage
community members to bicycle for trips of all purposes, and build riders’ comfort and confidence to bicycle
on streets and in traffic.
The City of Coppell should develop a month-long National Bike Month program, complete with Bike to Work
Day events, organized bicycle rides, a Bike to Work Challenge, bicycle education courses, and other events to
increase ridership. The League of American Bicyclists has a number of valuable online resources to help plan,
organize and executive successful events and activities, including an event organizing handbook, a calendar
linking to local events and activities, and tips for people interested in commuting to work.
Individualized marketing campaigns are a unique
approach to Transportation Demand Management
(TDM) that focus on increasing bicycling, walking
and transit trips through concentrated outreach,
promotional materials, and personalized support.
Programs like Go Bronzeville in Chicago, IL and
SmartTrips in Portland, OR are shining examples of
community transformation through these
individualized marketing campaigns. The City of
Coppell should explore partnerships, funding
sources, potential neighborhoods, and other
feasibility factors for the creation of an
individualized marketing campaign.
Ongoing group bike rides can target many groups of
people and cover countless topics or themes. In
most cases, however, the purpose is the same: to
provide a safe, comfortable, and social setting for
bicycling. New riders experience riding safely in a
group while learning bicycling skills and rules of the
road, and all riders have the opportunity to meet neighbors, share in a feeling of camaraderie, and build
community.
End-of-trip facilities are an integral component of a
successful, functional bicycle network. Without safe,
secure and convenient bicycle parking, many
residents and visitors will choose other means of
transportation, viewing the lack of bicycle parking
as a significant deterrent. The City of Coppell, the
Coppell Independent School District, and numerous
businesses have installed bicycle parking at
locations throughout the community. The City of
Coppell and its community partners should
continue to increase the bicycle parking supply with
secure, attractive, and highly visible bicycle parking
facilities, including short-term bicycle parking solutions like racks and corrals, and long-term solutions like
lockers and secure parking areas.
Schools, commercial districts and other areas with
high volumes of bicycle and pedestrian activity, as
well as locations with significant incidences of
bicycle and pedestrian crashes, can benefit from an
increased police presence. Motorists who routinely
fail to yield the right-of-way to pedestrians, as
required by law, or drive in excess of the speed limit
are unlikely to change their behavior if they
perceive that there are no consequences to their
actions. Targeted enforcement of traffic safety laws
and “sting” operations can reduce dangerous and
illegal behaviors such as texting while driving or
failing to yield for pedestrians in a crosswalk.
Hundreds of communities around the U.S.
implement targeted crosswalk enforcement. In Las Vegas, for example, crossing decoys often wear seasonal
costumes (such as a turkey at Thanksgiving, or a leprechaun in March) to earn greater media attention. While
targeted crosswalk enforcement often results in citations, the greater impact comes through media publicity
of the event to reinforce the importance of obeying pedestrian crossing laws.
Law enforcement officers play a daily role in helping to foster a culture of respect and responsibility among
all road users. Regular trainings create a uniform understanding of their responsibilities with regard to traffic
law enforcement for bicyclists, pedestrians, and motorists. Trainings can also create a dialogue between
officers and other City staff, giving officers a chance to discuss ideas for new or revised legislation to further
improve traffic safety. The City of Coppell should provide regular training sessions for law enforcement
officers relating to bicyclist, pedestrian, and motorist traffic law and interactions among various modes of
transportation.
Bicycle patrol units are often used to increase
social interaction between police departments and
the people they serve. These units patrol
neighborhoods, parks, special events and festivals,
and other community-oriented events
The City of Coppell should utilize a Bicycle Patrol
Unit to demonstrate the Department’s
commitment to and investment in bicycling as an
important transportation mode, both for the
department and for the community at large.
Other than one-time drivers education courses,
there are few formal opportunities for motorists
and/or bicyclists to learn the legal rights and
responsibilities specific to bicycling and walking. The Engineering, Parks and Recreation, and Planning
Departments can work with the Police Department to develop traffic citation diversion classes so that road
users (pedestrians, bicyclists, and/or motorists) who commit offenses known to endanger pedestrians and
bicyclists can, at the discretion of the officer, be invited to take a safety and diversion class in lieu of paying
fines.
While the recommended facilities and programs described above provide direct and tangible benefits for
Coppell residents and visitors, the City can also adopt internal practices and policies that integrate bicycling
and walking into the very way the City does business. Adopting nationally-recognized standards and
guidelines for facility design, prioritizing sidewalk infill and repair, and evaluating the effectiveness of new
facilities and programs are all examples of internal practices and policies that support non-motorized
transportation. The following recommendations provide engineering and evaluation opportunities.
As indicated above, the Plan does not specifically recommend individual sidewalk segments or spot
improvements. The sidewalk system in Coppell is very comprehensive and is in relatively good condition;
however, cracked and heaving sidewalk slabs create tripping hazards and accessibility issues for pedestrians
with limited mobility or mobility assistance devices, and minor gaps in the network reduce connectivity.
Potential prioritization criteria may include the following:
Feedback from the community;
Proximity to schools;
Proximity to parks and community centers;
Proximity to commercial destinations; and
Sidewalk condition (good, hazardous, missing, etc).
This prioritization process should be integrated into the ADA Transition Plan that the City will be developing
in the near future.
Streets are planned, designed, constructed and maintained to accommodate all street users - pedestrians,
bicyclists, transit users, and motor vehicle drivers. The Complete Streets movement in the United States has
gained considerable traction over the last twenty years, with thousands of communities expressing their
intent to create a truly multi-modal transportation system that supports safe travel for all roadway users.
The City of Coppell should consider drafting and adopting an ordinance or resolution to formalize and
institutionalize the integration of all modes of transportation into roadway funding, design, construction,
operations and maintenance. Establishing a municipal policy will delegate roles and responsibilities and
create a system through which all transportation projects can be evaluated and will ensure the practice
continues through changes in city staff and elected officials. Resources are available through the National
Complete Streets Coalition, a program of Smart Growth America, a national non-profit dedicated to making
communities work for everyone.
Landmarks, destinations, neighborhood business districts, natural features and other visual cues help
residents and visitors navigate through Coppell. However, many of the recommended bicycle routes utilize
less familiar, lower-volume roadways that people may not typically use while traveling by bus or car. The
placement of wayfinding signs throughout the City will indicate to bicyclists their direction of travel, location
of destinations, and the distance (and travel time by bike) to those destinations, in turn increasing comfort,
convenience and utility of the bicycle network. Wayfinding signs also provide a branding element to raise the
visibility of the City’s growing active transportation network. Wayfinding is critical to successful integration
of on-street and off-street facilities into a seamless, interconnected network.
Design guidelines for sidewalks, trails, on-street bikeways, and other non-motorized transportation facilities
can ensure consistent conditions for walking and bicycling throughout the community. Agencies and
organizations like the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the National Association of City
Transportation Officials (NACTO), and the American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials
(AASHTO), and the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) have developed numerous research and
practice-based manuals to support local planners, engineers, and designers to create safe, effective and
functional facilities for bicycle and pedestrian travel. As the City of Coppell continues to expand its network of
non-motorized transportation facilities, the following manuals and design guidelines should be consulted to
ensure project success.
While the expansion of the greenway and on-street bikeway network will draw additional bicyclists, the lack
of convenient, accessible, and secure bicycle parking may deter residents and visitors from taking bicycle
trips to local businesses, parks, schools, and other destinations in the community. The City of Coppell should
develop and adopt a bicycle parking ordinance establishing minimum requirements for bicycle short- and
long-term parking spaces in new developments and major renovations based on land use classification. A
model bicycle parking ordinance has been included in the appendix for reference. The Association of
Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals’ Bicycle Parking Guide, 2nd Ed. (2010) should be consulted for
additional guidance related to rack selection, installation, and maintenance.
A multi-modal approach to crash reduction is a comprehensive safety program that includes establishing
measurable goals for reducing incidents and collisions for all modes of travel. By developing a system for
routine analysis for pedestrian and bicycle-related crashes, other cities have been able to implement safety-
driven, multi-modal enforcement programs along with strategic infrastructure changes. The City of Coppell
should conduct a thorough analysis of reported bicycle and pedestrian crashes to identify high-crash
locations, monitor the impact of capital improvements on crash rates, and develop specific recommendations
for countermeasures that reduce the likelihood of crashes and improve bicycle and pedestrian safety. Data
can be obtained from TXDOT, NCTCOG, Coppell Police Department, and bicycle-driven crash inventories such
as www.bikemaps.org. Such an analysis should be conducted every two years.
Bicycle and pedestrian counts are a key metric that can determine the success of the City’s efforts to increase
bicycling and walking throughout the community. A successful count program will utilize a variety of
techniques to measure Plan implementation and individual project impacts. The City should establish a count
program to track levels of bicycling and walking at key locations throughout Coppell. Resources available
through the National Bicycle and Pedestrian Documentation Project will assist the City in identifying count
locations, training manual count volunteers, and extrapolating meaningful information from raw count data
in order to make informed decisions and share successes with the community.
The League of American Bicyclists’ Bicycle Friendly Community program and the Federal Highway
Administration and Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center’s Walk Friendly Community program
acknowledge the efforts of local governments throughout the United States to support bicycling and walking
as valued forms of transportation and recreation. Each organization utilizes the Five E’s approach to creating
bike and walk friendly communities, which groups activities into engineering, education, encouragement,
enforcement and evaluation categories. Each of these five categories is integral to this comprehensive
approach and must be embraced by the City in order to achieve either designation. Only five communities in
Texas have achieved Bicycle Friendly Community status: Austin (Silver), Houston (Bronze), Richardson
(Bronze), San Antonio (Bronze), and the Woodlands Township (Bronze). Only the City of Austin has achieved
Walk Friendly Community status.
The Coppell Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan provides a comprehensive set of recommendations and
physical improvements that, once implemented, will increase safety, connectivity, accessibility, and comfort
for bicycling and walking throughout the City. Implementing the Plan will require commitment, persistence,
creativity, partnerships, funding, and continued community support. As the City of Coppell and its partners
throughout the region continue to foster a bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly community for residents and
visitors alike, a clear, action-oriented implementation strategy will be necessary to move the Plan forward.
This Plan is a vision and a guide to the future. It provides the blueprint for Coppell to develop a complete,
connected, and safe non-motorized transportation network, increase opportunities for active transportation,
and add to the quality of life that makes the City of Coppell a great place to live, work and play. With this
charge firmly in mind, the following implementation actions and priorities provide a comprehensive strategy
to realize the goals and objectives set forth in this Plan and establish Coppell as a premier community for
walking and bicycling. They go beyond a list of infrastructure improvements and provide a framework to
integrate active transportation into many aspects of the City processes.
The following early action steps are designed to initiate Plan implementation, sustain momentum from the
planning process, and set the foundation for future progress. The following early action items, which
represent a mix of policy, procedures, capital projects, and programs, provide early opportunities to engage
community partners and establish strong and lasting relationships on which successful implementation
efforts will depend. It should be understood that this list may not be feasible to execute these steps in order
or immediately. Some items will need time to be included in City budgets or studied and reviewed by city staff
or special committees.
Adopting the Plan is an important step, not just for its symbolic value representing the City’s commitment to
bicycling and walking, but also for its policy value as a guiding document for future capital investments and
transportation decisions. The adoption process varies from community to community, depending on existing
policies and procedures. The City of Coppell should undertake a formal adoption process and incorporate this
Plan as a supplemental document supporting the Comprehensive Plan.
Creating an active Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee will ensure that key stakeholders, agencies and
organizations are involved in the implementation of the Plan and can report on its progress. Members of the
Steering Committee for the planning process should be invited to serve on the Bicycle and Pedestrian
Advisory Committee, along with other leaders throughout the community, including public safety
representatives, Safe Cycling Coppell, and the Coppell Chamber of Commerce. This new committee should be
a forum for active transportation leaders to convene periodically and discuss implementation progress, keep
members up-to-date on bicycle- and pedestrian-related projects throughout the region, share resources and
tools, and maintain momentum for bicycling and walking in the community. Key duties of the committee
should include the following:
Champion for implementing the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan;
Advise the City on plan implementation;
Facilitate cooperation among local agencies and jurisdictions;
Identify and recommend sources of funding;
Coordinate outreach and programming efforts;
Apply for Bicycle Friendly Community and Walk Friendly Community Status; and
Monitor plan implementation through various performance measures.
The committee can also function as a conduit to the community at-large, sharing information about
implementation progress and achievements and directing residents and visitors to the appropriate resources
and information.
Another element of this step will be to designate a point person, called the Bicycle Coordinator, from existing
city staff, to serve in the role of liaison to this committee as well as point person for walking and bicycling
issues. Ideally this representative will be from public works or city administration so that they can
coordinate between departments in working with activities and initiatives of the advisory committee.
Designating this staff person is key to a bicycling friendly community application.
The City of Coppell has a number of projects in various stages of development that will enhance bicycle and
pedestrian safety, connectivity and accessibility. Roadway projects on MacArthur Blvd, Freeport Pkwy, and
Bethel Rd, as well as trail projects like the Grapevine Springs Trail near Pinkerton Elementary and the
Grapevine Creek Trail from MacArthur Blvd to Grapevine Creek Park will have a significant impact on non-
motorized transportation, improving safety along busy roadways and increasing connectivity to local
destinations. The completion of these projects will be a significant accomplishment for the City of Coppell,
expanding opportunities for non-motorized transportation and recreation and demonstrating the City’s
commitment to walking and bicycling.
Continual monitoring of implementation progress is essential to the success of the Plan. Baseline
measurements of key data like bicycling and walking activity, crash rates, miles of facilities, program
participation numbers, and travel mode share provide a point of comparison to determine the impact of
infrastructure projects and supporting education, encouragement, and enforcement programs. Bicycle and
pedestrian counts and other performance measurements are discussed in further detail later in this chapter.
While the expansion of the trail and on-street bikeway network will draw additional bicyclists, the lack of
convenient, accessible, and secure bicycle parking may deter residents and visitors from taking bicycle trips
to local businesses, parks, schools, and other destinations in the community. The City of Coppell should
consider developing and adopting a bicycle parking ordinance establishing minimum requirements for
bicycle parking spaces in new developments and major renovations based on land use classification. A model
bicycle parking ordinance has been included in the appendix for reference. The Association of Pedestrian and
Bicycle Professionals’ Bicycle Parking Guide, 2nd Ed. (2010) should be consulted for additional guidance
related to rack selection, installation, and maintenance.
While the sidewalk system in Coppell is in relatively good condition, cracked and heaving sidewalk slabs
create accessibility issues for pedestrians with limited mobility or mobility assistance devices, and minor
gaps in the network reduce connectivity. The City of Coppell should develop a prioritization strategy to
address these issues based on factors like community complaints, proximity to schools, parks, and other
community destinations. This is likely to happen in the upcoming ADA Transition plan.
High priority projects have been identified based on their ability to meet plan goals and improve safety,
accessibility, connectivity. These projects will have the most significant impact in creating a community in
which bicycling and walking are safe, comfortable and convenient forms of transportation for people of all
ages and abilities. Funding for bikeway projects can be very competitive, and the project development
process can significantly increase the amount of time it takes to construct bicycle and pedestrian projects.
With these considerations in mind, it is imperative that the City of Coppell begin to identify and pursue
traditional and innovative funding sources to implement high priority projects.
By creating and adopting this Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, the City has communicated to the
community its commitment to walking and bicycling as safe, comfortable and convenient transportation
choices for people of all ages and abilities throughout Coppell. The City should continue to communicate with
residents and stakeholders by establishing an online presence to share information, provide updates on
projects and events, and receive feedback and information from residents. By providing resources like this
Plan, bicycling and walking maps, local ordinances, regional projects and resources like those found on
NCTCOG’s webpage, and links to community partners’ initiatives, the City can equip residents and visitors
with the information they need to incorporate walking and bicycling into their daily trips.
Funding bicycle and pedestrian capital projects and supporting programs will require a diverse and creative
approach. While the funding landscape at the federal level remains uncertain, the City of Coppell must still
pursue federal transportation dollars through the current extension of the transportation bill, yet be flexible
and spontaneous enough to capitalize on partnerships, in-kind matches, and other non-traditional
opportunities to implement the Plan. The following section of this chapter provides an overview of funding
sources that should be utilized.
The federal government has numerous programs and funding mechanisms to support bicycle and pedestrian
projects, most of which are administered by the US Department of Transportation in cooperation with state
and regional entities. The following federal programs are made available to local communities in Texas
through state and regional entities, including Texas Department of Transportation, Texas Department of
Parks and Wildlife, the North Central Texas Council of Governments, and Dallas County.
The Federal Highway Administration directs the current surface transportation funding and authorization
bill, Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century, commonly referred to as MAP-21. Many of the funding
programs from the previous transportation bill, the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation
Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), have been consolidated and reorganized in a manner that
allows for greater discretion for state and local entities. The bill has been reauthorized several times. The
TXDOT, with support from NCTCOG, is responsible for establishing application procedures, reviewing
applications, and awarding and administering MAP-21 funding in the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex. The
following MAP-21 programs consider bicycle and pedestrian projects an eligible activity for which funding
may be allocated.
The Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) provides funding for a variety of non-motorized
transportation facilities and activities previously funded under separate program categories in SAFETEA-LU,
including the Recreational Trails Program, Transportation Enhancements, and Safe Routes to Schools. Eligible
activities and projects include on- and off-road pedestrian and bicycle facilities, infrastructure projects
improving access to public transportation, recreational trails projects, projects and systems that provide safe
routes for non-drivers, safe routes to school projects, and boulevards and roadways in the right-of-way of
former Interstate System routes.
CMAQ funds transportation projects to reduce ozone and carbon monoxide pollution and meet national
ambient area air quality standards (NAAQS) in Clean Air Act non-attainment areas. The construction of
pedestrian and bicycle facilities using CMAQ funding must explicitly provide a transportation function. CMAQ
can provide funds for projects that bring sidewalks into compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA). Non-construction projects such as printed materials related to safe walking are eligible for CMAQ
funds as well. These projects must be geared towards walking primarily for transportation rather than
recreation and must be included in a plan developed by the State and each Metropolitan Planning
Organization.
The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is intended to achieve significant reduction in traffic
fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads by funding projects, strategies and activities consistent with
a state’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP).
The Surface Transportation Program (STP) provides funding that may be used by States and localities for
projects to preserve and improve the conditions on any Federal-aid highway, bridge and tunnel projects,
public road projects, pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure, and transit capital projects. Bicycle and pedestrian
infrastructure projects include ADA sidewalk modification, recreational trails, bicycle transportation, on- and
off-road trail facilities for non-motorized transportation, and infrastructure projects and systems that will
provide safe routes for non-drivers, including children, older adults and individuals with disabilities to access
daily needs.
Section 402 funds can be used to develop education, enforcement and research programs designed to reduce
traffic crashes, deaths, severity of crashes, and property damage. Eligible program areas include reducing
impaired driving, reducing speeding, encouraging the use of occupant protection, improving motorcycle
safety, and improving bicycle and pedestrian safety. Examples of bicycle and pedestrian safety programs
funded by Section 402 are comprehensive school-based pedestrian and bike safety education programs,
helmet distribution programs, pedestrian safety programs for older adults, and general community
information and awareness programs.
The Department of Transportation’s Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER)
Discretionary Grants Program was created as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
with the purpose of funding road, rail, transit and port projects that achieve critical national objectives,
including livability, economic competitiveness, environmental sustainability, and safety. More than $500M
was made available in FY 2014. 72 applications were funded, many of which focused or incorporated active
transportation elements. One grant recipient was the NCTCOG, whose Land Use-Transportation Connections
to Sustainable Schools project was awarded $210,000 to create a structured dialogue to improve
transportation safety and multimodal transportation options to schools. Awards ranged from $125,000 to
$25M.
The goal of the Land and Water Conservation Fund is the creation and maintenance of high quality recreation
resources through the acquisition and development of public outdoor recreation areas and facilities. The
program operates on a reimbursing basis. The local sponsor matches 50% of the project cost prior to
applying for the grant. After the project is approved, the sponsoring park and recreation board receives a
reimbursement of 50% of the actual project costs. Applicants must submit a bill to the grant coordinator to
request the federal share of the cost throughout the grant term.
While not traditionally viewed as a source of funding for bicycle and pedestrian projects, the Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) program provides money for streetscape revitalization and other
improvements that can enhance walking and bicycling. Federal Community Development Block Grant
grantees may “use Community Development Block Grants funds for activities that include, but are not limited
to: acquiring real property; reconstructing or rehabilitating housing and other property; building public
facilities and improvements, such as streets, sidewalks, community and senior citizen centers and
recreational facilities; paying for planning and administrative expenses, such as costs related to developing a
consolidated plan and managing Community Development Block Grants funds; provide public services for
youths, seniors, or the disabled; and initiatives such as neighborhood watch programs.” The Dallas County
Department of Planning and Development receives an allotted amount of funds through the US Department of
Housing and Urban Development Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG). Roughly 65% of
the funds are allocated to 16 municipalities in Dallas County with populations of less than 50,000. Allocation
is based on population and percentage of population classified as low and moderate income. In 2015, no
funds were allocated to the City of Coppell.
The Texas Parks & Wildlife Department provides local agencies and organizations with a variety of funding
sources to develop places and programs that support recreation activities and connect Texans to the state’s
diverse and abundant natural resources. The Outdoor and Indoor Recreation Grants each provide a 50%
funding match for local units of governments to acquire and develop parkland, renovate existing public
recreation areas, and construct recreation centers, nature centers, and other park facilities.
While external funding sources for bicycle and pedestrian projects and programs continue to be in short
supply and high demand, local funds can often be the most reliable funding source to get a project done or
develop an encouragement or education program. In addition, local funding is often required as match for
external funding sources. With this in mind, it is imperative that the City of Coppell explore, identify, and
pursue one or more of these local funding strategies as a means of implementing the plan.
The City of Coppell has multiple sales tax revenue streams that allow the City to provide a high level of service
to residents and visitors through high quality infrastructure, amenities, and services. These include:
the 1-percent sales tax for general revenue;
the ¼-percent Crime Prevention and Control District sales tax;
the ¼-percent Street Maintenance sales tax, which is expected to generate over $4M in FY 2014-
2015; and
the ½-percent CRDC sales tax, which was recently reauthorized and expanded to improve existing
community facilities and amenities, including the Andrew Brown Jr Park system, green spaces, and
trails projects throughout the City.
As with most cities, Coppell has limited funds with which to implement bicycle and pedestrian projects and
programs. By creating a dedicated set-aside in the Capital Improvement Plan, the City can focus, prioritize,
and plan for capital expenditures for trails, on-street bikeways, and other projects that improve conditions for
walking and bicycling. This set-aside may also be used as a local match for external funding sources, or as
contributory towards bicycle and pedestrian elements of larger projects. Dedicated funding sources for
supporting education and encouragement programs should also be established within the Parks and
Recreation Department budget.
Local governments in the State of Texas may adopt local ordinances imposing an impact fee on new
development within their jurisdiction in order to fund infrastructure improvements that support
development and the community at-large, including parks, recreational facilities, roads, bridges, water
treatment and distribution facilities, and drainage control. Enabling legislation for impact fees was adopted
by the Texas state legislature and signed into law in 1987. The City of Coppell currently assesses impact fees
for water, sewer and roadway facilities as authorized in Chapter 17 of the City’s Code of Ordinances.
In 1987, the State of Texas passed into law the Public Improvement District Assessment Act, which allows
counties and municipalities to levy and collect special assessments in order to finance public infrastructure to
promote economic growth and development. A Public Improvement District can be established for the
construction of street and sidewalk improvements; park, recreation and cultural improvements; the creation
of pedestrian malls; public safety and security; landscaping and aesthetic improvements; and a host of other
capital projects.
Data gathering and analysis is essential to communicating the success of implementation efforts to
stakeholders, media, and the public at large. Data can be used to track community transformation through
changes in infrastructure, activity and attitudes over time. The performance metrics listed in the table should
be explored for their potential to monitor and communicate implementation progress.
The following evaluation actions and programs support an accountable and transparent implementation
process and create feedback loops through which future needs, issues and opportunities can be identified.
Establishing a citywide pedestrian and bicycle counts program helps collect quantitative data to track
bicycling and walking trends and measure the success of walking and bicycling projects. The City of Coppell
should develop a bicycle and pedestrian count program comprised of manual counts, automatic counts, and
intercept surveys. Volunteer support from community groups like Living Well in Coppell or Coppell Senior
High School for manual counts can actively engage community residents and increase awareness for bicycling
and walking. Counts are usually schedule in early September on two days in the middle of the week. In
addition, counts should be collected before projects are started and following completion to measure
resulting usage.
The City of Coppell should publish a report every two years summarizing implementation progress. The
report card can highlight completed greenways and bicycle facilities, share stories of successful programs and
partnerships, and use data collected over time to quantify the impact of the plan on health, transportation,
equity, and economic activity. The document can be posted on the City’s website, distributed via social media,
and printed for dissemination at public facilities and community events.
Crash reports from collisions involving bicyclists and pedestrians can be an invaluable resource for learning
about the behavior of motorists, bicyclists, and walkers, as well as roadway conditions and characteristics
that may lead to collisions. The City of Coppell should conduct a thorough analysis of reported bicycle and
pedestrian crashes to identify high-crash locations, monitor the impact of capital improvements on crash
rates, and develop specific recommendations for countermeasures that reduce the likelihood of crashes and
improve bicycle and pedestrian safety. Data can be obtained from TXDOT, NCTCOG, Coppell Police
Department, and bicycle-driven crash inventories such as www.bikemaps.org. Such an analysis should be
conducted every two years.
Streets serve a multitude of functions: providing access to places, goods and services, serving as public space,
capturing, channeling and sometimes filtering stormwater, and serving as corridors for key utility systems.
Streets are such an integral part of everyday life, it is important that we maximize their value and their safety.
Coppell’s streets take several forms and serve a variety of functions. They can provide a safe, peaceful route
for children to walk or bicycle to school; a way for employees to get to work by bicycle, automobile or public
transit; a place for residents and visitors to access shopping and dining; and for people to just sit and relax. It
is critical that these corridors move people and goods safely and efficiently. When total preference is given to
a particular use, this usually comes at the expense of other uses. Therefore, Coppell’s streets should be
designed to give sufficient consideration to all uses.
The purpose of this section of the Plan is to provide a framework of best practices in bicycle and pedestrian
facility design as a guide for Coppell to use in its efforts towards developing a network of Complete Streets
and trails throughout the City, for the benefit of all residents and visitors.
Figure 62: Complete streets take many different forms. In Indianapolis, Indiana, the Indianapolis Cultural
Trail provides a cycle track to separate bicyclists from both pedestrians and motor vehicles.
The transportation network should accommodate
pedestrians with a variety of needs, abilities, and
possible impairments. Age is one major factor that
affects pedestrians’ physical characteristics, walking
speed, and environmental perception. Children have
low eye height and walk at slower speeds than
adults. They also perceive the environment
differently at various stages of their cognitive
development. Older adults walk more slowly and
may require assistive devices for walking stability,
sight, and hearing.
The Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(MUTCD) recommends a normal walking speed of
three and a half feet per second when calculating the
pedestrian clearance interval at traffic signals.
Typical walking speeds can drop to two and a half to
three feet per second in areas with older
populations and persons with mobility impairments.
While the type and degree of mobility impairment
varies greatly across the population, the
transportation system should accommodate these
users to the greatest reasonable extent.
Sidewalks are the most fundamental element of the
walking network, as they provide an area for
pedestrian travel that is separated from vehicle
traffic. Sidewalks are typically constructed of
concrete and are separated from the roadway by a
curb and gutter and preferably a landscaped
planting strip area. Sidewalks are a common
application in both urban and suburban
environments.
Sidewalks should be more than areas to travel; they
should provide places for people to interact. There
should be places for standing, visiting, and sitting.
Sidewalks should contribute to the character of
neighborhoods and business districts, strengthen
their identity, and be an area where adults and
children can safely participate in public life.
Attributes of well-designed sidewalks include the
following:
Accessibility: A network of sidewalks should be
accessible to all users. Roadway crossing distances
and distances between crossings should be
minimized to accommodate and encourage pedestrian travel.
Adequate width: Two people should be able to walk
side-by-side. Different walking speeds should be
possible. In areas of intense pedestrian use, sidewalks should accommodate the high volume of walkers.
Safety: Design features of the sidewalk should allow pedestrians to have a sense of security and predictability.
Sidewalk users should not feel they are at risk due to the presence of adjacent traffic.
Continuity: Walking routes should be obvious and
should not require pedestrians to travel out of their
way unnecessarily.
Landscaping: Plantings and street trees should
contribute to the overall psychological and visual
comfort of sidewalk users, and be designed in a
manner that contributes to the safety of people.
Drainage: Sidewalks and curb ramps should be
designed so that standing water is minimized.
Social space: There should be places for standing,
visiting, and sitting. The sidewalk area should be a
place where adults and children can safely
participate in public life.
Quality of place: Sidewalks should contribute to the
character of neighborhoods and business districts.
The sidewalk area can be broken down into four distinct zones:
The Frontage Zone allows pedestrians a comfortable “shy” distance from the building fronts. It provides
opportunities for window shopping, to place signs, planters, or chairs. Not applicable if adjacent to a
landscaped space.
The Pedestrian through Zone is the area intended for pedestrian travel. This zone should be entirely free of
permanent and temporary objects. Wide through zones are needed in downtown areas or where pedestrian
flows are high.
The Furnishing Zone buffers pedestrians from the adjacent roadway, and is also the area where elements such
as street trees, signal poles, bicycle racks, sings, and other street furniture are properly located.
The Parking Lane/Enhancement Zone acts as a flexible space to further buffer the sidewalk from moving
traffic. Curb extensions and bike corrals may occupy this space where appropriate.
The concept of sidewalk zones should be strictly followed, particularly in dense commercial areas, for a
sidewalk to function properly and provide safe passage for all users. This is especially important for users
with visual or physical impairments to be able to effectively navigate the corridor.
Other considerations such as sidewalk obstructions, driveways, width and access through construction areas
are important to consider as well.
Intersections are also an important piece of the
pedestrian realm. Attributes of pedestrian-friendly
intersection design include:
Clear Space: Corners should be clear of obstructions.
They should also have enough room for curb ramps,
for transit stops where appropriate, and for street
conversations where pedestrians might congregate.
Visibility: It is critical that pedestrians on the corner
have a good view of vehicle travel lanes and that
motorists in the travel lanes can easily see waiting
pedestrians.
Legibility: Symbols, markings, and signs used at
corners should clearly indicate what actions the
pedestrian should take.
Accessibility: All corner features, such as curb
ramps, landings, call buttons, signs, symbols,
markings, and textures, should meet accessibility
standards and follow universal design principles.
Separation from Traffic: Corner design and
construction should be effective in discouraging
turning vehicles from driving over the pedestrian
area. Crossing distances should be minimized.
Lighting: Good lighting is an important aspect of
visibility, legibility, and accessibility.
These attributes will vary with context but should
be considered in all design processes. For example,
more remote intersections may have limited or no
signing. However, legibility regarding appropriate
pedestrian movements should still be taken into
account during design.
Bicyclists, by nature, are much more affected by poor facility design, construction and maintenance practices
than motor vehicle drivers. Bicyclists lack the protection from the elements and roadway hazards provided
by an automobile’s structure and safety features. By understanding the unique characteristics and needs of
bicyclists, a facility designer can provide quality facilities and minimize user risk.
Similar to motor vehicles, bicyclists and their bicycles exist in a variety of sizes and configurations. These
variations occur in the types of vehicle (such as a conventional bicycle, a recumbent bicycle or a tricycle), and
behavioral characteristics (such as the comfort level of the bicyclist). The design of a bikeway should consider
reasonably expected bicycle types on the facility and utilize the appropriate dimensions.
It is important to consider bicyclists of all skill levels when creating a non-motorized plan or project. Bicyclist
skill level greatly influences expected speeds and behavior, both in separated bikeways and on shared
roadways. Bicycle infrastructure should accommodate as many user types as possible, with decisions for
separate or parallel facilities based on providing a comfortable experience for the greatest number of people.
The bicycle planning and engineering professions currently use several systems to classify the population,
which can assist in understanding the characteristics and infrastructure preferences of different bicyclists.
The most conventional framework classifies the “design cyclist” as Advanced, Basic, or Child. A more detailed
understanding of the US population as a whole is illustrated in the adjacent
figure. Developed by planners in Portland, OR and supported by data
collected nationally since 2005, this classification provides the following
alternative categories to address varying attitudes towards bicycling in the
US:
Strong and Fearless (approximately 1% of population) – Characterized by
bicyclists that will typically ride anywhere regardless of roadway
conditions or weather. These bicyclists can ride faster than other user
types, prefer direct routes and will typically choose roadway connections -
- even if shared with vehicles -- over separate bicycle facilities such as
shared use paths.
Enthused and Confident (5-10% of population) – This user group
encompasses bicyclists who are fairly comfortable riding on all types of
bikeways but usually choose low traffic streets or shared use paths when
available. These bicyclists may deviate from a more direct route in favor of
a preferred facility type. This group includes all kinds of bicyclists such as
commuters, recreationalists, racers and utilitarian bicyclists.
Interested but Concerned (approximately 60% of population) – This user
type comprises the bulk of the cycling population and represents bicyclists
who typically only ride a bicycle on low traffic streets or multi-use trails
under favorable weather conditions. These bicyclists perceive significant
barriers to their increased use of cycling, specifically traffic and other
safety issues. These people may become “Enthused & Confident” with
encouragement, education and experience and higher level facilities, such
as buffered and protected bike lanes.
No Way, No How (approximately 30% of population) – Persons in this
category are not bicyclists, and perceive severe safety issues with riding in
traffic. Some people in this group may eventually become regular cyclists with time and education. A
significant portion of these people will not ride a bicycle under any
circumstances.
On shared roadways, bicyclists and motor vehicles
use the same roadway space. These facilities are
typically used on roads with low speeds and traffic
volumes, however they can be used on higher
volume roads with wide outside lanes or shoulders.
A motor vehicle driver will usually have to cross
over into the adjacent travel lane to pass a bicyclist,
unless a wide outside lane or shoulder is provided.
Shared roadways employ a large variety of
treatments from simple signage and shared lane
markings to more complex treatments including
directional signage, traffic diverters, chicanes,
chokers, and/or other traffic calming devices to
reduce vehicle speeds or volumes.
Signed Shared Roadways are facilities shared with
motor vehicles. They are typically used on roads
with low speeds and traffic volumes, however can be
used on higher volume roads with wide outside
lanes or shoulders. A motor vehicle driver will
usually have to cross over into the adjacent travel
lane to pass a bicyclist, unless a wide outside lane or
shoulder is provided.
Bicycle Route signage (Manual of Uniform Traffic
Control Devices Sign D11-1) should be applied in the
following circumstances:
• Beginning or end of Bicycle Route.
• At major changes in direction or at
intersections with other bicycle routes.
• At intervals along bicycle routes not to
exceed ½ mile.
A marked shared roadway is a general purpose
travel lane marked with shared lane markings
(SLM) used to encourage bicycle travel and proper
positioning within the lane. In constrained
conditions, the SLMs are placed in the middle of the
lane to discourage unsafe passing by motor vehicles.
On a wide outside lane, the SLMs can be used to
promote bicycle travel to the right of motor vehicles.
In all conditions, SLMs should be placed outside of
the door zone of parked cars.
Bicycle Boulevards are low-volume, low-speed
streets modified to enhance a bicyclist’s experience
by using treatments such as signage, pavement
markings, traffic calming and/or traffic reduction,
and intersection modifications. These treatments,
also referred to as bicycle boulevards or quiet
streets, allow through movements of bicyclists while
discouraging similar through-trips by non-local
motorized traffic.
Jurisdictions throughout the country use a wide
variety of strategies to determine where specific
treatments are applied. While no federal guidelines
exist, several best practices have emerged for the
development of bicycle boulevards. At a minimum,
bicycle boulevards should include distinctive
pavement markings and wayfinding signs. They can
also use combinations of traffic calming, traffic
diversion, and intersection treatments to improve
the bicycling environment. The appropriate level of
treatment to apply is dependent on roadway
conditions, particularly motor vehicle speeds and volumes.
Route Selection. Bicycle boulevards should be developed on streets that improve connectivity to key
destinations and provide a direct route for bicyclists. Bicycle boulevards parallel to commercial streets
improve access for “interested but concerned” bicyclists and complement bike lanes o n major roadways.
Local streets with existing traffic calming, traffic diversions, or signalized crossings of major streets are good
candidates, as they tend to be existing bicycle routes and have low motor vehicle speeds and volumes. Other
streets where residents have expressed a desire for traffic calming are also good options.
Basic Treatments. Signs and pavement markings are the minimum treatments necessary to designate a street
as a bicycle boulevard. Together, they visibly designate a roadway to both bicyclists and motorists. Signs, and
in some cases pavement markings, provide wayfinding to help bicyclists remain on the designated route.
Additional Treatments. Vertical and horizontal traffic
calming, intersection improvements, and even traffic
diversion can be used to complement basic signage and
pavement markings, improve safety, and reduce vehicle
speeds and traffic volumes.
Common vertical traffic calming elements employed to
reduce vehicle speed include speed humps, speed tables
and raised crosswalks, which help to slow motor vehicles.
Horizontal traffic calming elements like curb extensions,
chicanes, chokers, and traffic circles cause drivers to slow
down by restricting the roadway space or by requiring
careful maneuvering. Such measures may reduce the
design speed of a street, and can be used in conjunction
with reduced speed limits to reinforce the expectation of
lowered speeds.
Intersection improvements are aimed at improving safety
for all road users while giving priority to bicycle
movements. These include stop signs at cross-streets,
traffic circles, curb extensions, bike boxes, median islands,
hybrid beacons, and rectangular rapid flashing beacons.
Traffic diversion measures are designed to reduce motor
vehicle traffic volumes, which in turn increase bicyclists’
comfort while also decreasing opportunities for conflict.
Such traffic diversion measures include partial closures,
diagonal diverters, median diverters, and even full
closures.
Description. Typically found in less-dense areas, shoulder bikeways are paved roadways with striped
shoulders (4’+) wide enough for bicycle travel. Shoulder bikeways often, but not always, include signage
alerting motorists to expect bicycle travel along the roadway. Shoulder bikeways should be considered a
temporary treatment, with full bike lanes planned for construction when the roadway is widened or
completed with curb and gutter. This type of treatment is not typical in urban areas and should only be used
where constraints exist.
Guidance. If 4 feet or more is available for bicycle travel, the full bike lane treatment of signs, legends, and an
8” bike lane line would be provided. If it is not possible to meet minimum bicycle lane dimensions, a reduced
width paved shoulder can still improve conditions for bicyclists on constrained roadways. In these situations,
a minimum of 3 feet of operating space should be provided.
Description. Bike lanes designate an exclusive
space for bicyclists through the use of pavement
markings and signage. The bike lane is located
adjacent to motor vehicle travel lanes and is
used in the same direction as motor vehicle
traffic. Bike lanes are typically on the right side
of the street, between the adjacent travel lane
and curb, road edge or parking lane.
Many bicyclists, particularly less experienced
riders, are more comfortable riding on a busy
street if it has a striped and signed bikeway than
if they are expected to share a lane with vehicles.
Bike lanes adjacent to on-street parallel parking
require special treatment in order to avoid
crashes caused by an open vehicle door. The
bike lane should have sufficient width to allow
bicyclists to stay out of the door zone while not
encroaching into the adjacent vehicular lane. Parking stall markings, such as parking “Ts” and double white
lines create a parking side buffer that encourages bicyclists to ride farther away from the door zone.
Guidance. Bike lanes should be a minimum of 4 feet
when no curb and gutter is present. When curb and
gutter are present, a 5 foot minimum is required, or
3 feet more than the gutter pan width if the gutter
pan is wider than 2 feet.
On arterial roads with higher speeds, greater widths
are recommended. However, in order to discourage
motor vehicle use of the bike lane, a 7 foot maximum
width is recommended.
For a bike lane adjacent to on-street parallel
parking, 12-foot minimum from curb face to edge of
bike lane is required, with a preferred width of 14.5
feet.
Conventional front-in diagonal parking is not
compatible or recommended with the provision of
bike lanes, as drivers backing out of conventional
diagonal parking have limited visibility of
approaching bicyclists. Under these conditions,
shared lane markings should be used to guide
bicyclists away from reversing automobiles.
Description. Buffered bike lanes are conventional bicycle lanes paired with a designated buffer space,
separating the bicycle lane from the adjacent motor vehicle travel lane and/or parking lane. Buffered bike
lanes are allowed as per MUTCD guidelines for buffered preferential lanes in Section 3D-01.
Buffered bike lanes are designed to increase the space between the bike lane and the travel lane or parked
cars. This treatment is appropriate for bike lanes on roadways with high motor vehicle traffic volumes and
speed, adjacent to parking lanes, or a high volume of truck or oversized vehicle traffic.
Guidance. Where bicyclist volumes are high or where bicyclist speed differentials are significant, the desired
bicycle travel area width is 7 feet.
Buffers between the bike lane and adjacent travel lane or parking lane should be at least 2 feet wide. If 3 feet
or wider, buffers should be marked with diagonal or chevron hatching.
Overview. A cycle track is an exclusive bike facility that combines the user experience of a separated path with
the on-street infrastructure of a conventional bike lane. A cycle track is physically separated from motor
traffic and distinct from the sidewalk. This separation offers a higher level of comfort than bike lanes and are
attractive to a wider spectrum of the public. Cycle tracks have different forms but all share common
elements—they provide space that is intended to be exclusively or primarily used by bicycles, and are
separated from motor vehicle travel lanes, parking lanes, and sidewalks.
Cycle tracks may be one-way or two-way, and may be at street level, sidewalk level or at an intermediate
level. If at sidewalk level, a curb or median separates them from motor traffic, while different pavement
color/texture separates the cycle track from the sidewalk. If at street level, they can be separated from motor
traffic by raised medians, on-street parking or bollards.
A two-way cycle track is desirable when more destinations are on one side of a street (therefore preventing
additional crossings), if the facility connects to a path or other bicycle facility on one side of the street, or if
there is not enough room for a cycle track on both sides of the road.
Intersections and approaches must be carefully designed to promote safety and facilitate left-turns from the
right side of the street.
Guidance. Cycle tracks should ideally be placed along streets with long blocks and few driveways or m id-block
access points for motor vehicles. Cycle tracks located on one-way streets have fewer potential conflict areas
than those on two-way streets. In situations where on-street parking is allowed, cycle tracks shall be located
between the parking lane and the sidewalk (in contrast to conventional bike lanes). Protection should be
provided through physical barriers and can include bollards, parking, a planter strip, an extruded curb or on-
street parking. Cycle tracks using these protection elements typically share the same elevation as adjacent
travel lanes.
Description. Similar to a two-way cycle track, a
shared used path adjacent to a roadway provides
for two way travel separated from motor vehicle
traffic.
Occasionally referred to as a roadside trail or a
sidepath, a shared use path allows for two-way,
off-street bicycle use and also may be used by
pedestrians, skaters, wheelchair users, runners
and other non-motorized users. These facilities
are frequently found in parks, along rivers, and in
greenbelts or utility corridors where there are few
conflicts with motorized vehicles.
Along roadways, these facilities create a situation
where a portion of the bicycle traffic rides against
the normal flow of motor vehicle traffic and can
result in wrong-way riding where bicyclists enter
or leave the path. In addition, driveways, cross
streets, and other access points to the adjacent
road increase the number of motor vehicle turning
movements across the trail. These trail crossings
must be carefully controlled with appropriate
signage, pavement markings and other physical
improvements to minimize the potential for
conflict.
When designing a bikeway network, the presence
of a nearby or parallel path should not be used as
a reason to not provide adequate shoulder or
bicycle lane width on the roadway, as the on-
street bicycle facility is preferred over a sidepath
or roadside trail by experienced bicyclists and
those who are cycling for transportation purposes.
Guidance. While sidepath width varies depending
on its context, volume, and mix of users, typical
widths range from 10 to 14 feet. Twelve to 14 feet
is recommended for heavy use situations with high
concentrations of multiple users such as runners,
bicyclists, inline skaters (rollerbladers) and
pedestrians. In rare circumstances, a width of 8
feet may be permitted. These circumstances
include low bicycle traffic, occasional pedestrian
use, minimal maintenance vehicle usage, and short
distances in which physical constraints limit path
width.
Motor vehicle speeds affect the frequency at which automobiles pass bicyclists as well as the severity of
bicycle and pedestrian crashes that can occur on a roadway. Slower vehicular speeds also improve motorists’
ability to see and react to non-motorized users, minimize conflicts at driveways and other turning locations
and in many cases can improve vehicular throughput. Maintaining slower motor vehicle speeds and reducing
traffic in areas where pedestrian and bicycle traffic is regularly expected greatly improves comfort and safety
for non-motorized users on a street.
This section presents an overview of traffic calming treatments that can be applied to Coppell’s roadways.
Traffic calming treatments can be divided into two different types:
“Hard” traffic calming are engineering measures taken with the sole intent of slowing traffic and
reducing conflict.
“Soft” traffic calming includes placemaking design measures that have the added effect of traffic
calming, as well as educational and enforcement measures.
A reduction in speed limit is a simple way to make the roadway a safer place for pedestrians and bicyclists.
Statistically, eighty percent of pedestrians struck by a car going 40 mph will die; at 30 mph the likelihood of
death is 40 percent. At 20 mph, the fatality rate drops to just 5 percent (The National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration)
Lane narrowing is when an excessively large lane is reduced through the striping of a shoulder or the
addition of bike lanes. This helps reduce traffic speed and adds dedicated space for bicyclists.
Road diets are a reduction in the number of lanes along a roadway. Typically, these are four lane roads
reduced to three lanes (although larger road diets are done as well), often with the addition of bike lanes.
This not only improves conditions for bicyclists, but it enhances the pedestrian environment and often
improves traffic flow and vehicle-on-vehicle collision rates as well. Average annual daily traffic volumes
(AADT) for potential road diet candidates can range from as low as 3,000 to more than 25,000. For roadways
with higher levels of AADT, a thorough traffic analysis should be undertaken to alleviate safety and capacity
concerns.
Speed humps are raised areas usually placed in a series across both travel lanes. Longer humps reduce
impacts to emergency vehicles. Some speed hump designs can be challenging for bicyclists, however gaps can
be provided in the center or by the curb for bicyclists and to improve drainage. Speed humps can also be
offset to accommodate emergency vehicles.
Motor vehicle traffic volumes affect comfort for bicyclists and pedestrians on local streets. Higher vehicle
volumes reduce bicycle and pedestrian comfort and can result in more conflicts. Traffic diversion treatments
reduce motor vehicle volumes by completely or partially restricting through traffic on select neighborhood
streets such as bicycle boulevards.
These are curb extensions placed on both sides of the street, narrowing the travel lane and encouraging all
road users to slow down. When placed at intersections, pinchpoints are known as chokers or neckdowns.
They reduce curb radii and further lower motor vehicle speeds.
Chicanes are essentially curb extensions arranged in an alternating pattern that require cars to oscillate along
a roadway to avoid them. These are effective on long, straight neighborhood streets where speeding is an
issue.
Large setbacks in roadside development are a result of car-oriented development practices which typically
locate a large parking lot in the front of the building. Redeveloping these properties with little or no setback
creates a sense of enclosure, adds visual stimuli, and creates a seemingly pedestrian environment, all of which
help to slow traffic.
Street trees, landscaping and other aesthetic elements such as art or banners produce a feeling of enclosure
and add visual stimuli along a roadway corridor. Green elements often have added environmental benefits as
well.
Textured street material, such as the use of pavers, creates visual stimuli and a feeling of a special district or
pedestrian-oriented area which can help to calm traffic.
Appropriately scaled street lighting can provide a
safer, more inviting and more visible environment
for all roadway users. Pedestrian-scaled street
lighting along with other improvements such as
street trees can alert motorists to a potential
presence of pedestrians and bicycles, slowing down
traffic in these areas. Lighting must have uniform
distribution along a roadway and not be designed
based on spacing of light poles and street trees.
Enforcement and awareness measures such as
signage, speed traps and educational programs can
help to reduce speeding in problem areas. However,
the effectiveness of these programs depends on
adequate frequency and duration.
Intersections are junctions at which different modes of transportation meet and facilities overlap. An
intersection facilitates the interchange between bicyclists, motorists, pedestrians and other modes in order to
advance traffic flow in a safe and efficient manner. Designs for intersections with bicycle and pedestrian
facilities should reduce conflict between non-motorized travelers and motorists by heightening the level of
visibility, denoting clear right-of-way and facilitating eye contact and awareness with other modes.
Intersection treatments can improve both queuing and merging maneuvers for bicyclists, and are often
coordinated with timed or specialized signals.
The size of a curb’s radius can have a significant impact on pedestrian comfort and safety. A smaller curb
radius provides more pedestrian area at the corner, allows more flexibility in the placement of curb ramps,
results in a shorter crossing distance and requires vehicles to slow more on the intersection approach. During
the design phase, the chosen radius should be the smallest possible for the circumstances. One effective way
of minimizing the curb ramp radius is by adding curb extensions or bulb-outs, which are appropriate for any
crosswalk where it is desirable to shorten the crossing distance and there is a parking lane adjacent to the
curb.
A marked crosswalk signals to motorists that they
must stop for pedestrians and encourages
pedestrians to cross at designated locations.
Installing crosswalks alone will not necessarily
make crossings safer, especially on multi-lane
roadways. However, high-visibility crosswalks make
crossings more visible to motorists and add a sense
of security for pedestrians. High-visibility
crosswalks should be combined with advanced stop
bars and other tools to increase safety. At mid-block
locations, crosswalks can be marked where there is
a demand for crossing and there are no nearby
marked crosswalks.
Median pedestrian refuges at intersections provide
pedestrians with a secure place to stand in case they
are unable to walk the entire distance of the
crossing in one movement. This is especially
important for young, elderly and disabled users in
areas where crossing distances are great.
Traffic circles are a type of Horizontal Traffic
Calming that can be used at minor street
intersections. Traffic circles reduce conflict potential
and severity while providing traffic calming to the
corridor.
A raised crosswalk or intersection can eliminate
grade changes from the pedestrian path and give
pedestrians greater prominence as they cross the
street. Raised crosswalks should be used where a
special emphasis on the pedestrian is desired.
Parking control involves restricting or reducing on-
street parking near intersections with high pedestrian
activity. Locating parking away from the intersection
improves motorist’s visibility on the approach to the
intersection and crosswalk. Improved sight lines at
intersections reduces conflicts between motorists and
pedestrians. This can be accomplished in part through the use of bulb-outs.
Curb ramps are the design elements that allow all users to make the transition from the street to the
sidewalk. There are a number of factors to be considered in the design and placement of curb ramps at
corners. Properly designed curb ramps ensure that the sidewalk is accessible from the roadway. A sidewalk
without a curb ramp can be useless to someone in a wheelchair, forcing them back to a driveway and out into
the street for access.
The configuration of a safe intersection for bicyclists may include elements such as color, signage, medians,
signal detection and pavement markings. Intersection design should take into consideration existing and
anticipated bicyclist, pedestrian and motorist movements. In all cases, the degree of mixing or separation
between bicyclists and other modes is intended to reduce the risk of crashes and increase bicyclist comfort.
The level of treatment required for bicyclists at an intersection will depend on the bicycle facility type used,
whether bicycle facilities are intersecting, and the adjacent street function and land use.
A bike box is a designated area located at the head
of a traffic lane at a signalized intersection that
provides bicyclists with a safe and visible space to
get in front of queuing motorized traffic during the
red signal phase. Motor vehicles must queue behind
the white stop line at the rear of the bike box.
The appropriate treatment at right-turn lanes is to
place the bike lane between the right-turn lane and
the rightmost through lane or, where right-of-way
is insufficient, to use a shared bike lane/turn lane. A
bike lane pocket should have signage indicating
that motorists should yield to bicyclists through the
conflict area.
Colored pavement within a bicycle lane increases
the visibility of the facility and reinforces priority of
bicyclists in conflict areas where the paths of motor
vehicles and bicycles are likely to cross. For
example, Figure 113 shows a motorist preparing to
merge across the bicycle lane (the conflict area)
and into the right-turn-only lane. Green colored
pavement was given interim approval by the
Federal Highways Administration in March 2011.
The colored surface should be skid resistant and
retro-reflective.
The shared bicycle/right turn lane places a
standard-width bike lane on the left side of a
dedicated right turn lane. A dotted line delineates
the space for bicyclists and motorists within the
shared lane. This treatment includes signage
advising motorists and bicyclists of proper
positioning within the lane. This treatment is
recommended at intersections lacking sufficient
space to accommodate both a standard through
bike lane and right turn lane. Maximum shared turn
lane width is 13 feet, and the bike lane pocket
should have a minimum width of 4 feet, with 5 feet
preferred.
Bicycle pavement markings through intersections indicate the intended path of bicyclists through an
intersection or across a driveway or ramp. They guide bicyclists on a safe and direct path through the
intersection and provide a clear boundary between the paths of through bicyclists and either through or
crossing motor vehicles in the adjacent lane.
User-activated push buttons, bicycle-activated loop detectors, video detection cameras, and remote traffic
microwave sensor detection (RTMS) are all useful and effective tools to assist bicyclists at intersections.
Proper bicycle detection should meet two primary criteria: 1) accurately detects bicyclists and 2) provides
clear guidance to bicyclists on how to actuate detection (e.g., what button to push, where to stand). Bicycle
loops and other detection mechanisms can also provide bicyclists with an extended green time before the
light turns yellow so that bicyclists of all abilities can reach the far side of the intersection.
A bicycle signal is an electrically powered traffic control
device that should only be used in combination with an
existing conventional or hybrid signal. Bicycle signals
are typically used to improve identified safety or
operational problems involving bicycle facilities. Bicycle
signal heads may be installed at signalized intersections
to indicate bicycle signal phases and other bicycle-
specific timing strategies. Bicycle signals are typically
used to provide guidance for bicyclists at intersections
where they may have different needs from other road
users (e.g., bicycle-only movements, or leading bicycle
intervals).
The ability to navigate through a city is assisted by
landmarks, natural features and other visual cues. Signs
throughout the city should indicate to bicyclists:
Direction of travel
Location of destinations
Travel time/distance to those destinations
These signs will increase users’ comfort and
accessibility to the bicycle systems.
Signage can serve both wayfinding and safety purposes
including:
Helping to familiarize users with the bicycle
network
Helping users identify the best routes to
destinations
Helping to address misperceptions about time
and distance
Helping overcome a “barrier to entry” for
people who are not frequent bicyclists (e.g.,
“interested but concerned” bicyclists)
A community-wide bicycle wayfinding signage plan
would identify:
Sign locations
Sign type – what information should be included and design features
Destinations to be highlighted on each sign – key destinations for bicyclists
Approximate distance and travel time to each destination
Bicycle wayfinding signs also visually cue motorists that they are driving along a bicycle route and should use
caution. Signs are typically placed at key locations leading to and along bicycle routes, including the
intersection of multiple routes. Too many road signs tend to clutter the right-of-way, and it is recommended
that these signs be posted at a level most visible to bicyclists rather than per vehicle signage standards.
A bicycle wayfinding system consists of comprehensive signing and/or pavement markings to guide bicyclists
to their destinations along preferred bicycle routes. There are three general types of wayfinding signs:
confirmation, turn, and decisions signs.
Confirmation signs indicate to bicyclists that they
are on a designated bikeway and make motorists
aware of the bicycle route. These signs can include
destinations, distance/time, and arrows.
Confirmation signs should be placed every ¼ to ½
mile on off-street facilities and every 2 to 3 blocks
along on-street bike facilities, unless another type of
sign is used. They should be placed soon after turns
to confirm destination(s). Pavement markings can
also act as confirmation that a bicyclist is on a
preferred route.
Turn signs indicate where a bikeway turns from one
street onto another street. Turn signs can be used with pavement markings and should include destinations
and arrows.
Turn signs should be placed on the near-side of
intersections where the bike routes turn (e.g. where
the street ceases to be a bicycle route or does not go
through). Pavement markings can also indicate the
need to turn to the bicyclist.
Decisions signs mark the junction of two or more
bikeways and inform bicyclists of the designated
bike route to access key destinations. Decisions signs
can include destinations and arrows, distances and
travel times.
Decisions signs should be placed on the near-side of
intersections in advance of a junction with another
bicycle route, and along a route to indicate a nearby
destination.
An off-street multi-use trail allows for two-way, off-
street bicycle use and also may be used by
pedestrians, skaters, wheelchair users, joggers and
other non-motorized users. These facilities,
sometimes called greenways or shared use paths,
are frequently found in parks, along rivers, beaches,
and in greenbelts or utility corridors where there
are few conflicts with motorized vehicles. Trail
facilities can also include amenities such as lighting,
signage, and fencing (where appropriate).
Key features of multi-use trails include:
Frequent access points from the local road
network.
Directional signs to direct users to and from
the path.
A limited number of at-grade crossings with streets or driveways.
Terminating the path where it is easily accessible to and from the street system.
Separate treads for pedestrians and bicyclists when heavy use is expected.
Multi-use trails can provide a desirable facility, particularly for recreation, and users of all skill levels
preferring separation from traffic. Bicycle paths should generally provide directional travel opportunities not
provided by existing roadways.
Ten feet is the minimum allowed for a multi-use trail. Twelve to fourteen feet are recommended for heavy use
situations with high concentrations of multiple users. A separate track (5’ minimum) can be provided for
pedestrian use. Multi-use trail widths can be narrowed to eight feet for rare exceptions, such as low
anticipated bicycle use, minimal maintenance vehicle use, and physically constrained conditions.
A 2 foot or greater shoulder on both sides of the trail
should be provided. An additional foot of lateral
clearance (total of 3’) is required by the MUTCD for
the installation of signage or other furnishings.
When constructed from crushed limestone,
decomposed granite, or a similar aggregate surface,
a shoulder can also serve runners and walkers that
desire a softer surface than asphalt or concrete,
which effectively widens the functional width of the
path. When developing a shoulder with the intention
of serving runners and walkers, it is important to
minimize cross slope in order to provide the flattest
possible surface.
Clearance to overhead obstructions should be 8 feet
minimum, with 10 feet recommended.
When striping is required, use a 4 inch dashed
yellow centerline stripe with 4 inch solid white edge
lines. Solid centerlines can be provided on tight or
blind corners, and on the approaches to roadway
crossings. Edge striping can be provided along turns
and in constrained situations with little or no
shoulder or effective clear width.
While asphalt is the most common surface for multi-
use trails, concrete has proven to be more durable
over the long term. Saw-cut concrete joints (rather
than troweled) improve the experience of trail users.
In contrast to paved surface paths, unpaved multi-use
trails limit user types and are not as conducive to
transportation-oriented trips, especially in wet or
snowy conditions. In corridors with considerable
bicycle and pedestrian use, the provision of 2 foot
gravel shoulders or a parallel granular surface trail
can help to separate bicycle and pedestrian traffic.
Any access point to the trail should be well-defined
with appropriate signage designating the pathway
as a bicycle facility and prohibiting motor vehicles.
High-visibility access points and trailheads can also
incorporate gateway structures, public art, or other
unique features to highlight the trail as an
important community amenity.
A clear and consistent wayfinding signage program
is essential to the success of any trail. These signs
help trail users track their locations, mark their
progress, and navigate a trail or trail system with
confidence. A wayfinding signage program should
include kiosk maps at trailheads, reference location
signs (mile markers) along the trail, street and trail
name signs at crossings, and guide signs highlighting
destination(s) distance/time.
Multi-use trail wayfinding signs should follow the
general principles for bicycle route and guide signs
found in the AASHTO Guide to Bicycle Facilities (4th
Edition). The use of green and white D Series Route
Signs, described in greater detail in the Guide to
Bicycle Facilities and the FHWA’s Manual on
Uniform Traffic Control and Design, can provide
continuity throughout the trail network, both on-
street and off.
A trail or trail network should have a consistent,
uniform brand that imparts a unique identity and
resonates with both users of the trail system and the
general community. This brand can be applied to
trailheads, guide signs, mile markers, trail entry
points, and trail crossings, and other points of
increased visibility. The brand can also be used on
printed and online material. While a combination of
the D Series Route Signs and uniquely branded
wayfinding signs can visually connect the on-street
bikeway network to off-street shared use path(s),
care must be taken to reduce visual clutter and still
provide essential information to trail users.
Map signs and information kiosks at trailheads convey important information to trail users before they begin
their journey. This information can include maps of the trail or trail system, location of attractions and
destinations, trail intersections with other trails or bikeways, trail etiquette, intended trail users, and hours of
operation.
Well-designed crossings can mitigate many
operational issues and provide a higher degree of
safety and comfort for path users. In most cases, at-
grade path crossings can be properly designed to
provide a reasonable degree of safety and can meet
existing traffic and safety standards. Path facilities
that cater to bicyclists can require additional
considerations due to the higher travel speed of
bicyclists versus pedestrians.
Consideration must be given to adequate warning
distance based on vehicle speeds and line of sight,
with the visibility of any signs absolutely critical.
Directing the active attention of motorists to
roadway signs may require additional alerting
devices such as a flashing beacon, roadway striping
or changes in pavement texture. Signing for path
users may include a standard “STOP” or “YIELD”
sign and pavement markings, possibly combined
with other features such as bollards or a bend in the
pathway to slow bicyclists. Care must be taken not
to place too many signs at crossings lest they begin
to lose their visual impact.
A number of striping patterns have emerged over the years to delineate path crossings. A median stripe on
the path approach will help to organize and warn path users. Crosswalk striping is typically a matter of local
and State preference, and may be accompanied by pavement treatments to help warn and slow motorists. In
areas where motorists do not typically yield to crosswalk users, additional measures may be required to
increase compliance.
A marked/unsignalized crossing typically consists of
a marked crossing area, signage and other markings
to slow or stop traffic. The approach to designing
crossings at mid-block locations depends on an
evaluation of vehicular traffic, line of sight, pathway
traffic, use patterns, vehicle speed, road type, road
width, and other safety issues such as proximity to
major attractions.
When space is available, using a median refuge
island can improve user safety by providing
pedestrians and bicyclists space to perform the safe
crossing of one side of the street at a time.
Enhanced marked crossings are unsignalized
crossings with additional treatments designed to
increase motor vehicle yielding compliance on multi-
lane or high volume roadways. These enhancements
include pathway user or sensor actuated warning
beacons, Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons (RRFB), or
in-roadway warning lights.
Rectangular rapid flash beacons show the most
increased compliance of all the warning beacon
enhancement options. A study of the effectiveness of
going from a no-beacon arrangement to a two-
beacon RRFB installation increased yielding from 18
percent to 81 percent. A four-beacon arrangement
raised compliance to 88%. Additional studies of long
term installations show little to no decrease in
yielding behavior over time.
Path crossings within approximately 400 feet of an
existing signalized intersection with pedestrian
crosswalks are typically diverted to the signalized
intersection to avoid traffic operation problems when
located so close to an existing signal. For this
restriction to be effective, barriers and signing may
be needed to direct path users to the signalized
crossing. If no pedestrian crossing exists at the signal,
modifications should be made.
Path crossings should not be provided within approximately 400 feet of an existing signalized intersection. If
possible, route path directly to the signal. In the US, the minimum distance a marked crossing can be from an
existing signalized intersection varies from approximately 250 to 660 feet. Engineering judgment and the
context of the location should be taken into account when choosing the appropriate allowable setback.
Pedestrians are particularly sensitive to out of direction travel and jaywalking may become prevalent if the
distance is too great.
Signalized crossings provide the most protection for crossing path users through the use of a red-signal
indication to stop conflicting motor vehicle traffic. The two types of path signalization are full traffic signal
control and hybrid signals.
A full traffic signal installation treats the path crossing as a conventional 4-way intersection and provides
standard red-yellow-green traffic signal heads for all legs of the intersection.
Hybrid beacon installation faces only cross motor vehicle traffic, stays dark when inactive, and uses a unique
‘wig-wag’ signal phase to indicate activation. Vehicles have the option to proceed after stopping during the
final flashing red phase, which can reduce motor vehicle delay when compared to a full signal installation.
While full traffic signals must meet MUTCD pedestrian, school, or modified warrants, hybrid beacons may be
installed without meeting traffic signal control warrants if roadway speed and volumes are excessive for
comfortable path crossings.
Bicycle/pedestrian underpasses provide critical
non-motorized system links by joining areas
separated by barriers such as railroads and highway
corridors. In most cases, these structures are built in
response to user demand for safe crossings where
they previously did not exist.
Grade-separated crossings are advisable where
existing bicycle/pedestrian crossings do not exist,
where ADT exceeds 25,000 vehicles and where 85th
percentile speeds exceed 45 miles per hour.
Safety is a major concern with underpasses. Shared-
use path users may be temporarily out of sight from
public view and may experience poor visibility
themselves. To mitigate safety concerns, an
undercrossing should be designed to be spacious,
well-lit, equipped with emergency cell phones at
each end and completely visible for its entire length
from end to end.
Bicycle/pedestrian overcrossings provide critical non-motorized system links by joining areas separated by
barriers such as deep canyons, waterways or major transportation corridors. In most cases, these structures
are built in response to user demand for safe crossings where they previously did not exist.
As mentioned above, grade-separated crossings may be needed where existing bicycle/pedestrian crossings
do not exist, where ADT exceeds 25,000 vehicles, and where 85th percentile speeds exceed 45 miles per hour.
Overpasses require a minimum of 17 feet of vertical clearance to the roadway below versus a minimum
elevation differential of around 12 feet for an undercrossing. This results in potentially greater elevation
differences and much longer ramps for bicycles and pedestrians to negotiate.
Overcrossings for bicycles and pedestrians typically fall under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA),
which strictly limits ramp slopes to 5% (1:20) with landings at 400 foot intervals, or 8.33% (1:12) with
landings every 30 feet. These requirements can provide challenges in physically constricted conditions.
Commonly referred to as Rails-to-Trails or Rail-
Trails, these projects convert vacated rail corridors
into off-street paths. Rail corridors offer several
advantages, including relatively direct routes
between major destinations, fewer at-grade
crossings than parallel alternative routes, and
generally flat terrain. Rail-Trails can be found in
urban, suburban and rural settings, often traveling
from cities and towns out into the countryside.
In some cases, rail owners may rail-bank their
corridors as an alternative to a complete
abandonment of the line, thus preserving the rail
corridor for possible future use.
The railroad may form an agreement with any
person, public or private, who would like to use the
banked rail line as a trail or linear park until it is
again needed for rail use. Municipalities should
acquire abandoned rail rights-of-way whenever
possible to preserve the opportunity for trail
development.
Rail-to-trails can involve many challenges including the acquisition of the right of way, cleanup and removal
of toxic substances, and rehabilitation of tunnels, trestles and culverts. It is often impractical and costly to add
material to existing railroad bed fill slopes. This results in trails that meet minimum path widths, but often
lack preferred shoulder and lateral clearance widths. A structural engineer should evaluate existing railroad
bridges for structural integrity to verify they are capable of carrying the appropriate design loads.
Master
City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard
Coppell, Texas
75019-9478
File Number: 2015-2528
File ID: Type: Status: 2015-2528 Zoning Ordinance Passed
4Version: Reference: In Control: City Council
12/08/2015File Created:
03/08/2016Final Action: PD-178R3-C/S-1194R6, ORD ZenzeroFile Name:
Title: Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. PD-178R3-C/S-1194R6,
Zenzero, a zoning change from PD-178R-C/S-1194R5 (Planned
Development-178 Revised-Commercial/Special Use Permit 1194
Revision-5) to PD-178R3-C/S-1194R6 (Planned Development -178 Revision
3-Commercial/Special Use Permit 1194-Revision-6), to allow a
905-square-foot addition to the existing restaurant located at 171 North
Denton Tap Road, Suite 600 and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
Notes:
Agenda Date: 03/08/2016
Agenda Number: B.
Sponsors: Enactment Date: 03/08/2016
Cover Memo.pdf, Ordinance.pdf, Exhibit A.pdf, Exhibit
B.pdf, Exhibit C.pdf
Attachments: Enactment Number: 91500-A-688
Hearing Date: Contact:
Effective Date: Drafter:
History of Legislative File
Action: Result: Return
Date:
Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver-
sion:
1 PassApproved12/17/2015Planning & Zoning
Commission
Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017
Master Continued (2015-2528)
Matt Steer, Sr. Planner introduced this case with exhibits. He mentioned 16 notices were mailed to
property owners within 200 feet of this request. There were no responses received in favor or in
opposition. There were also 63 courtesy notices mailed to property owners within 800 feet of this
request. He stated that staff is recommending approval.
Ginger Blazek, the property owner, 171 N. Denton Tap Road, Suite 600, Coppell Texas, was present
to represent this case, to address questions and stated agreement with staff's recommendations.
Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in favor or
opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. No one spoke.
Chairman Haas closed the Public Hearing.
A motion was made by Commissioner Darling to recommend approval. Seconded by Commissioner
Williford; motion carried (7-0).
Action Text:
Chair Edmund Haas, Vice Chair Glenn Portman, Commissioner Sue
Blankenship, Commissioner Ed Darling, Commissioner Doug
Robinson, Commissioner Vijay Sarma, and Commissioner George
Williford
7Aye:
2 PassApproved01/12/2016City Council
Presentation: Marcie Diamond, Assistant Director of Planning, made a presentation to Council and
advised that the applicant had requested this case be held open until the February 9th Council
Meeting.
Mayor Hunt opened the Public Hearing and advised that no one signed up to speak.
A motion was made by Councilmember Brianna Hinojosa-Flores, seconded by Councilmember
Wes Mays, to hold the Public Hearing open and continue it at the February 9th Council meeting. The
motion passed by an unanimous vote.
Action Text:
Councilmember Cliff Long, Councilmember Brianna Hinojosa-Flores,
Councilmember Wes Mays, Councilmember Gary Roden,
Councilmember Marvin Franklin, Councilmember Mark Hill, and Mayor
Pro Tem Nancy Yingling
7Aye:
3 PassClose the Public
Hearing and
Approve
02/09/2016City Council
Presentation: Marcie Diamond, Assistant Director of Planning, made a presentation to Council.
Ginger Blasek, 171 N. Denton Tap Rd., applicant, spoke to Council about her plans for the site.
Mayor Hunt reminded the Council that this is a continued Public Hearing and asked for those who
signed up to speak:
1) David Stonecipher, 216 Redwood Dr., spoke in support of the request.
2) Candy Sheehan, 321 Quiet Valley, spoke in favor of the request.
A motion was made by Councilmember Mark Hill, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gary Roden, to close
the Public Hearing and approve this Agenda Item. The motion passed by an unanimous vote.
Action Text:
Councilmember Cliff Long, Councilmember Brianna Hinojosa-Flores,
Councilmember Wes Mays, Councilmember Gary Roden,
Councilmember Marvin Franklin, Councilmember Mark Hill, and Mayor
Pro Tem Nancy Yingling
7Aye:
4 PassApproved on the
Consent Agenda
03/08/2016City Council
A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Councilmember Cliff Long,
that Agenda Items A-I were approved on the Consent Agenda. The motion passed by an unanimous
vote.
Action Text:
Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017
Master Continued (2015-2528)
Councilmember Cliff Long, Councilmember Brianna Hinojosa-Flores,
Councilmember Wes Mays, Councilmember Gary Roden,
Councilmember Marvin Franklin, and Councilmember Mark Hill
6Aye:
Text of Legislative File 2015-2528
Title
Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. PD-178R3-C/S-1194R6, Zenzero, a zoning
change from PD-178R-C/S-1194R5 (Planned Development-178 Revised-Commercial/Special
Use Permit 1194 Revision-5) to PD-178R3-C/S-1194R6 (Planned Development-178 Revision
3-Commercial/Special Use Permit 1194-Revision-6), to allow a 905-square-foot addition to the
existing restaurant located at 171 North Denton Tap Road, Suite 600 and authorizing the Mayor
to sign.
Summary
Staff Recommendation:
On February 9, 2016, City Council unanimously approved this ZONING CHANGE (7-0).
On January 12, 2016, City Council left the public hearing open and continued this request to the
February 9, 2016, Council meeting.
On December 17, 2015, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of this
ZONING CHANGE (7-0). Commissioners Williford, Sarma, Robinson, Haas, Portman, Darling
and Blankenship voted in favor; none opposed.
The Planning Department recommended APPROVAL.
Goal Icon:
Business Prosperity
Sense of Community
Page 3City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017
1
MEMORANDUM
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning
Date: March 8, 2016
Reference: Consider approval of an ordinance for PD-178R3-C/S-1194R6, to amend the Detail Site
Plan to allow a 905-square-foot addition to the existing restaurant located at 171 North
Denton Tap Road, Suite 600.
2030: Business Prosperity, Sense of Community
Introduction:
This is a proposal to amend the current Planned Development zoning to allow for a 900-square-foot
addition. The site has a substantial amount of parking in the rear where the expansion is proposed to
replace a current patio area and four parking spaces. The proposed addition will be architecturally
compatible with the existing retail building.
Analysis:
On February 9, 2016, the City Council tabled approved this PD/SUP request, there are no outstanding
conditions.
On January 12, 2016, the City Council tabled this request, with the public hearing left open to the
February 9th meeting, at the request of the applicant.
On December 17, 2015, the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended approval of
this PD/SUP request, there are no outstanding conditions.
Legal Review:
The City Attorney reviewed this ordinance.
Fiscal Impact:
None
Recommendation:
The Planning Department recommends approval
Attachments:
1. Ordinance
2. Exhibit A – Legal Description
3. Exhibit B- Site Plan/Elevations
4. Exhibit C - Floor Plan
Coppell Pg 1 TM 75671
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. ________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, AMENDING
THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE CITY OF
COPPELL, TEXAS, AS HERETOFORE AMENDED, BY GRANTING A
CHANGE IN ZONING FROM. PD-178R-C/S-1194R5 (PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT-178 REVISED-COMMERCIAL/SPECIAL USE PERMIT
1194 REVISION-5) TO PD-178R3-C/S-1194R6 (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT-
178 REVISION 3-COMMERCIAL/SPECIAL USE PERMIT 1194-REVISION-
6), TO AMEND THE DETAIL SITE PLAN TO ALLOW A 905-SQUARE-
FOOT ADDITION TO THE EXISTING RESTAURANT LOCATED AT 171
NORTH DENTON TAP ROAD, SUITE 600 AND BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A” ATTACHED HERETO AND
INCORPORATED HEREIN; PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE
SITE PLAN/ELEVATION PLAN, AND FLOOR PLAN, ATTACHED
HERETO AS EXHIBITS “B”, AND “C”, PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL
CONDITIONS; AND PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING
A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND
DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Commission and the governing body of the City of
Coppell, Texas, in compliance with the laws of the State of Texas and pursuant to the Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, have given requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and
after holding due hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property owners generally, and to
all persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, the said governing body
is of the opinion that Zoning Application No. PD-178R3-C/S-1194R6 should be approved, and in the
exercise of legislative discretion have concluded that the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map
should be amended.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COPPELL, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map of the City of Coppell,
Texas, duly passed by the governing body of the City of Coppell, Texas, as heretofore amended, be and
the same is hereby amended by granting a change in zoning from PD-178R-C/S-1194R5 (Planned
Development-178 Revised-Commercial/Special Use Permit 1194 Revision-5) to PD-178R3-C/S-
1194R6 (Planned Development-178 Revision 3-Commercial/Special Use Permit 1194-Revision-6), to
amend the Detail Site Plan to allow a 905-square-foot addition to the existing restaurant located at 171
Coppell Pg 2 TM 75671
North Denton Tap Road, Suite 600, for the property described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made
a part hereof for all purposes.
SECTION 2. That the Property will be used and developed for Commercial purposes as
provided in the Code of Ordinances and the Detail Site Plan to allow allow a 905-square-foot addition
to the existing restaurant and the same is hereby approved subject to the following development
regulations:
A. That accept as amended herein, the property shall be developed in accordance with
Ordinance 91500-A-278, which is incorporated herein as set forth in full and hereby
republished.
B. A 150 square foot landscape island shall not be required on adjacent to the north wall of
the building addition shall not be required.
SECTION 3. That the Site Plan/Elevations and Floor Plan attached hereto as Exhibits “B” and
“C” respectively and made a part hereof for all purposes, are hereby approved as development
regulations.
SECTION 4. That the above property shall be used only in the manner and for the purpose
provided for by the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, as heretofore amended,
and as amended herein.
SECTION 5. That the development of the property herein shall be in accordance with building
regulations, zoning ordinances, and any applicable ordinances except as may be specifically altered or
amended herein.
SECTION 6. That all provisions of the Ordinances of the City of Coppell, Texas, in conflict
with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same are hereby, repealed, and all other provisions not
in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 7. That should any sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this
ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, the same shall not affect the
Coppell Pg 3 TM 75671
validity of this ordinance as a whole, or any part or provision thereof other than the part so decided to be
unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, and shall not affect the validity of the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance as a whole.
SECTION 8. An offense committed before the effective date of this ordinance is governed by
prior law and the provisions of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, as amended, in effect when the
offense was committed and the former law is continued in effect for this purpose.
SECTION 9. That any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions or terms of
this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Coppell, as heretofore amended, and upon conviction shall be punished by a
fine not to exceed the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense; and each and every
day such violation shall continue shall be deemed to constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 10. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage and
the publication of its caption, as the law and charter in such cases provide.
DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, this the _______ day of
___________________, 2016.
APPROVED:
_____________________________________
KAREN SELBO HUNT
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
CHRISTEL PETTINOS, CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________
ROBERT E. HAGER, CITY ATTORNEY
(REH)
Sheet:Job Number:1585Issue Date:Revisions:12-8-15669 Airport Freeway, Suite 101Hurst, Texas 76053Phone 972-255-1515www.DLArchitecture.netDaniels & LoveladyA r c h i t e c t u r eFax 972-255-4141
A1.0
ZEN15001
12/08/15
ZENZERO KITCHEN AND BAKERY
COPPELL, TEXAS
171 N. DENTON TAP ROAD, SUITE 600
COPPELL, TEXAS 75019
GINGER BLAZEK
1FLOOR PLAN
1/8"=1'-0"
AREA CALCULATIONS
Master
City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard
Coppell, Texas
75019-9478
File Number: 2016-2581
File ID: Type: Status: 2016-2581 Agenda Item Passed
3Version: Reference: In Control: City Council
01/13/2016File Created:
03/08/2016Final Action: S-1033R5-SF-12, ORD Vista AcademyFile Name:
Title: Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. S-1033R5-SF-12, Vista
Academy, a zoning change from S -1033R4-SF-12 (Special Use
Permit-1033 Revision 4-Single Family-12) to S-1033R5-SF-12 (Special Use
Permit-1033 Revision 5-Single Family-12), to allow for a 6,537-square-foot
expansion to the existing Charter School and a revised floor plan on property
located at 140 S. Heartz Road and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
Notes:
Agenda Date: 03/08/2016
Agenda Number: C.
Sponsors: Enactment Date:
Cover Memo.pdf, Ordinance .pdf, Exhibit A - Legal
Description.pdf, Exhibits B, C, D & E .pdf
Attachments: Enactment Number: 91500-A-689
Hearing Date: Contact:
Effective Date: Drafter:
History of Legislative File
Action: Result: Return
Date:
Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver-
sion:
1 PassApproved01/21/2016Planning & Zoning
Commission
Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017
Master Continued (2016-2581)
Marcie Diamond, Assistant Director of Planning, reviewed the history of this property and presented
this case with exhibits and elevations. She mentioned 62 notices were mailed to property owners
within 200 feet of this request. There were two responses received opposed with concerns about
traffic and none received in favor. There were also 226 courtesy notices mailed to property owners
within 800 feet of this request. She stated that staff is recommending approval with conditions which
she read into the record.
Terry Wright, Wright Group Architects-Planners, 1110 S. Elm Street, Carrollton Texas, was present to
represent this case, to address questions and stated agreement with staff's recommendations.
Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in favor or
opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. No one spoke.
Chairman Haas closed the Public Hearing.
A motion was made by Vice Chairman Portman to recommend approval subject to the following
conditions:
1.This charter school shall be licensed and maintained in accordance with state law and may
provide instruction for Kindergarten through eight (8th) grade.
2.The student enrollment capacity under this Special Use Permit shall not exceed five hundred
(500) students.
3.Dwarf Yaupon Holly shrubs shall be replanted along the north and east property line to adhere to
the Landscape Plan.
Seconded by Commissioner Robinson; motion carried (7-0).
Action Text:
Chair Edmund Haas, Vice Chair Glenn Portman, Commissioner Sue
Blankenship, Commissioner Ed Darling, Commissioner Doug
Robinson, Commissioner Vijay Sarma, and Commissioner George
Williford
7Aye:
2 PassClose the Public
Hearing and
Approve
02/09/2016City Council
Presentation: Marcie Diamond, Assistant Director of Planning, made a presentation to Council.
Terry Wright, 1110 S. Elm Street, Carrollton, applicant, addressed Council.
Mayor Hunt opened the Public Hearing and advised that no one signed up to speak.
A motion was made by Councilmember Wes Mays, seconded by Councilmember Cliff Long, to close
the Public Hearing and approve this Agenda Item subject to the following condition:
1) Dwarf Yaupon Holly shrubs shall be replanted along the north and east property line to adhere to
the Landscape Plan.
The motion passed by an unanimous vote.
Action Text:
Councilmember Cliff Long, Councilmember Brianna Hinojosa-Flores,
Councilmember Wes Mays, Councilmember Gary Roden,
Councilmember Marvin Franklin, Councilmember Mark Hill, and Mayor
Pro Tem Nancy Yingling
7Aye:
3 PassApproved on the
Consent Agenda
03/08/2016City Council
A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Councilmember Cliff Long,
that Agenda Items A-I were approved on the Consent Agenda. The motion passed by an unanimous
vote.
Action Text:
Councilmember Cliff Long, Councilmember Brianna Hinojosa-Flores,
Councilmember Wes Mays, Councilmember Gary Roden,
Councilmember Marvin Franklin, and Councilmember Mark Hill
6Aye:
Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017
Master Continued (2016-2581)
Text of Legislative File 2016-2581
Title
Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. S-1033R5-SF-12, Vista Academy, a zoning
change from S-1033R4-SF-12 (Special Use Permit-1033 Revision 4-Single Family-12) to
S-1033R5-SF-12 (Special Use Permit-1033 Revision 5-Single Family-12), to allow for a
6,537-square-foot expansion to the existing Charter School and a revised floor plan on property
located at 140 S. Heartz Road and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
Summary
Staff Recommendation:
On February 9, 2016, City Council unanimously approved this ZONING CHANGE (7-0).
On January 21, 2016, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of this
ZONING CHANGE (7-0). Commissioners, Williford, Sarma, Robinson, Haas, Portman, Darling
and Blankenship voted in favor; none opposed.
The Planning Department recommended APPROVAL.
Goal Icon:
Sense of Community
Page 3City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017
1
MEMORANDUM
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning
Date: March 8, 2016
Reference: Consider approval of an ordinance for SUP-1033R5-SF-12, to allow a 6,537-square-foot
expansion to the existing 32,687-square-foot Charter School.
2030: Business Prosperity, Sense of Community
Introduction:
This property had been used for a charter school in addition to a church since fall of 2009. In 2011,
Responsive Education Solutions (owner of Vista Academy) purchased the property. The church is no
longer a secondary use, and therefore renovation plans include the re-purposing of the sanctuary for a
4,000-square-foot gymnasium, additional offices, and a 6,537-square-foot building expansion to include
six (6) new classrooms. The enrollment is 330 students which is less than the 500 students permitted by
the existing SUP.
Analysis:
On February 9, 2016 City Council unanimously approved this SUP request subject to conditions which
have been incorporated into the ordinance.
On January 21, 2016, the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended approval of this
SUP request, subject to: this charter school shall be licensed and maintained in accordance with state
law and may provide instruction for Kindergarten through eight (8th) grade, and the student enrollment
shall not exceed five hundred (500) students, and Dwarf Yaupon Holly shrubs shall be replanted along
the north and east property line to adhere to the Landscape Plan.
Legal Review:
The City Attorney reviewed this ordinance
Fiscal Impact:
None
Recommendation:
The Planning Department recommends approval
Attachments:
1. Ordinance
2. Exhibit A – Legal Description
2
3. Exhibit B - Site Plan
4. Exhibit C- Landscape Plan
5. Exhibit D - Tree Preservation Plan
6. Exhibit E - Elevations
TM 75674
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. ________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS,
AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP
OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, AS HERETOFORE AMENDED, BY
GRANTING A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM S-1033R4-SF-12 (SPECIAL
USE PERMIT-1033 REVISION 4-SINGLE FAMILY-12) TO
S-1033R5-SF-12 (SPECIAL USE PERMIT-1033 REVISION 5-SINGLE
FAMILY-12), TO ALLOW FOR A 6,537-SQUARE-FOOT EXPANSION
TO THE EXISTING 32,687-SQUARE-FOOT CHARTER SCHOOL AND A
REVISED FLOOR PLAN ON 4.85 ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT
140 S. HEARTZ ROAD, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A” ATTACHED HERETO AND
INCORPORATED HEREIN; PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE
SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN, TREE PRESERVATION PLAN AND
ELEVATIONS, ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBITS “B”, “C”, “D” AND
“E”, RESPECTIVELY; PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL CONDITIONS;
PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY
OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS
($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Commission and the governing body of the City
of Coppell, Texas, in compliance with the laws of the State of Texas and pursuant to the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, have given requisite notices by
publication and otherwise, and after holding due hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all
property owners generally, and to all persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the
vicinity thereof, the said governing body is of the opinion that Zoning Application No. S-1033R5-
SF-12 should be approved, and in the exercise of legislative discretion have concluded that the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map should be amended.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF COPPELL, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map of the City of Coppell,
Texas, duly passed by the governing body of the City of Coppell zoning change request from
S-1033R4-SF-12 (Special Use Permit-1033 Revision 4-Single Family-12) to S-1033R5-SF-12
(Special Use Permit-1033 Revision 5-Single Family-12), to allow for a 6,537-square-foot
expansion to the existing 32,687-square-foot Charter School and a revised floor plan on 4.85
TM 75674
acres of property located at 140 S. Heartz Road and being more particularly described in Exhibit
“A” attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes, subject to special conditions.
SECTION 2. That Special Use Permit 1033R4-SF-12 for a private school is hereby
approved subject to the following special conditions:
A) This charter school shall be licensed and maintained in accordance with state
law and may provide instruction for Kindergarten through eighth (8th) grade.
B) The student enrollment capacity under this Special Use Permit shall not
exceed five hundred (500) students.
C) Solid waste receptacle enclosure shall be maintained with solid screening
gates which shall remain closed except during service.
D) Comply with the Traffic Management Plan as depicted on the Site Plan and
located in accordance with the Site Plan for on-site queuing of vehicles for
student drop-off and pick-up as depicted on the approved site plan which shall
prohibit on-street queuing.
E) Dwarf Yaupon Holly shrubs shall be replanted along the north and east
property line to adhere to the Landscape Plan.
F) That the occupants shall comply in all respects to development of the site in
accordance with the approved site plan, landscape plan, and elevations/sign
plan and other development/special conditions contained in Section 3 of this
ordinance.
SECTION 3. That the Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Tree Preservation Plan and Elevations,
and notes set forth therein, attached hereto as Exhibits “B”, “C”, “D”, and “E” respectively, and
made a part hereof for all purposes, are hereby approved as special conditions.
TM 75674
SECTION 4. That the above property shall be used only in the manner and for the purpose
provided for by the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, as heretofore
amended, and as amended herein.
SECTION 5. That the development of the property herein shall be in accordance with
building regulations, zoning ordinances, and any applicable ordinances except as may be
specifically altered or amended herein.
SECTION 6. That all provisions of the Ordinances of the City of Coppell, Texas,
including any prior special use permits in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the
same are hereby, repealed, and all other provisions not in conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 7. That should any sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section
of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, the same shall not
affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole, or any part or provision thereof other than the part so
decided to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, and shall not affect the validity of the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as a whole.
SECTION 8. An offense committed before the effective date of this ordinance is governed
by prior law and the provisions of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, as amended, in effect
when the offense was committed and the former law is continued in effect for this purpose.
SECTION 9. That any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions or terms
of this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Coppell, as heretofore amended, and upon conviction shall be punished by
a fine not to exceed the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense; and each and
every day such violation shall continue shall be deemed to constitute a separate offense.
TM 75674
SECTION 10. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage
and the publication of its caption, as the law and charter in such cases provide.
DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, this the
_______ day of ___________________, 2016
APPROVED:
___________________________________________
KAREN SELBO HUNT
ATTEST:
___________________________________________
CHRISTEL PETTINOS, CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________________
ROBERT E. HAGER, CITY ATTORNEY
(REH/mpm)
HEARTZ ROADLONDON WAY9
DBH
1
LO
EXISTING LAWN TO
REMAIN, TYP. REPAIR
AND REPLACE AS
NECESSARY DUE TO
CONSTRUCTION
EXISTING LAWN TO
REMAIN, TYP. REPAIR
AND REPLACE AS
NECESSARY DUE TO
CONSTRUCTION
LAWN SOLID SOD
BERMUDAGRASS, TYP.
LAWN SOLID SOD
BERMUDAGRASS, TYP.LIMIT OF SODLIMIT OF SODLAWN SOLID SOD
BERMUDAGRASS, TYP.
1
LO
49
DBH
19
DBH
LAWN SOLID SOD
BERMUDAGRASS, TYP.
1
LO
1
2
4
5
6
3
89
10
11
12
13
14
15
17
16
18 19
21
22
23
20
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33 34 35
36
37 38 40
41 42 43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
EXISTING TREES
TO REMAIN, TYP.
EXISTING
LANDSCAPE
TO REMAIN, TYP.
EXISTING LANDSCAPE
TO REMAIN, TYP.
EXISTING LANDSCAPE
TO REMAIN, TYP.
EXISTING LANDSCAPE
TO REMAIN, TYP.
EXISTING TREES
TO REMAIN,
TYP.
39
53
54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63
64
65
66
67
67
62
68
697071727374757677
78
79
EXISTING TREES
TO REMAIN, TYP.
EXISTING TREES
TO REMAIN, TYP.
EXISTING LANDSCAPE
TO REMAIN, TYP.
DATE: October 28, 2015
JOB NO. A1235
OF
SHEET NO.
WRIGHT GROUP Architects-Planners, PLLC, 2015
WRIGHT GROUP
ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, PLLC
1110 S. ELM STREET
CARROLLTON, TEXAS
7 5 0 0 6
(9 7 2) 2 4 2 - 1 0 1 5
COPPELL CLASSICAL ACADEMY140 S. HeartzCoppell, TexasResponsive Education SolutionsSTA
TE O F T E XASTCETHI
R
C
A
EPACSDNALDEE
GEISRRT422 6KORINH
A
UGA N
01/12/16
0 15 30 60
SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"
N
PLAN
L2.01
LANDSCAPE
LANDSCAPE TABULATIONS
CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS
PERIMETER LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS
1.10' landscape buffer along property lines with one (1)
tree, 3" cal., per 50 l.f.
2.15' landscape buffer with one (1) tree, 3" cal., per 50 l.f.
of street frontage.
SOUTH PROPERTY LINE - 462 l.f.
Required Provided
10' landscape buffer 10' landscape buffer
(9) trees, 3" cal.(1) existing tree
(8) trees, 3" cal.
NORTH PROPERTY LINE - 473 l.f.
Required Provided
10' landscape buffer 10' landscape buffer
(9) trees, 3" cal.(9) trees, 3" cal.
HEARTZ ROAD - 453 l.f.
Required Provided
15' landscape buffer 15' landscape buffer
(9) trees, 3" cal.(6) existing trees
(3) trees, 3" cal.
LONDON WAY - 453 l.f.
Required Provided
15' landscape buffer 15' landscape buffer
(9) trees, 3" cal.(9) trees, 3" cal.
INTERIOR LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS
1.10% of gross parking area to be landscape.
2.One (1) tree per 400 s.f. of required landscape area.
3.12% of total number parking spaces shall be planting
islands with trees.
4.All vehicular use areas shall be screened from all abutting
properties and/or public right-of-ways with a 30" ht.
evergreen screen.
Parking Lot: 49,174 s.f.
Parking Spaces: 102
Required Provided
4,917 s.f. (10%)5,809 s.f. (12%)
(12) trees (12) existing trees
(2) trees, 3" cal.
(13) parking islands (15) parking islands
evergreen screen, 30" ht.evergreen screen, 30" ht.
OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS
1.15% of site to be devoted to feature landscaping,
excluding buildings.
2.50% of feature landscaping shall be located in front yard.
3.One (1) tree per 4,000 s.f. of open space.
Site Area: 211,615 s.f.
Building Area: 37,760 s.f.
Net Site Area: 173,855 s.f.
Required Provided
26,078 s.f. (15%)72,851 (49%)
13,039 s.f. (50%)35,297 s.f.
(7) trees (6) existing trees
(1) tree, 3" cal.
SUMMARY
Required Provided
(55) trees (54) existing trees
(3) trees, 3" cal.
TREE PRESERVATION NOTES
1.EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED DURING
CONSTRUCTION FROM TREE STRUCTURE DAMAGE AND
COMPACTION OF SOIL UNDER AND AROUND DRIP LINE
(CANOPY) OF TREE.
2.IF ANY ROOT STRUCTURE IS DAMAGED DURING ADJACENT
EXCAVATION / CONSTRUCTION, NOTIFY OWNER'S
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY. IT IS
RECOMMENDED THAT A LICENSED ARBORIST BE SECURED
FOR THE TREATMENT OF ANY POSSIBLE TREE WOUNDS.
3.NO DISTURBANCE OF THE SOIL GREATER THAN 4" SHALL BE
LOCATED CLOSER TO THE TREE TRUNK THAN 1/2 THE
DISTANCE OF THE DRIP LINE TO THE TREE TRUNK. A
MINIMUM OF 75% OF THE DRIP LINE AND ROOT ZONE SHALL
BE PRESERVED AT NATURAL GRADE.
4.ANY FINE GRADING DONE WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONES
OF THE PROTECTED TREES MUST BE DONE WITH LIGHT
MACHINERY SUCH AS A BOBCAT OR LIGHT TRACTOR. NO
EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT WITH TRACKS IS ALLOWED
WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE OF THE TREES.
5.NO MATERIALS INTENDED FOR USE IN CONSTRUCTION OR
WASTE MATERIALS ACCUMULATED DUE TO EXCAVATION OR
DEMOLITION SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE
DRIP LINE OF ANY TREE.
6.NO EQUIPMENT MAY BE CLEANED OR TOXIC SOLUTIONS, OR
OTHER LIQUID CHEMICALS, SHALL BE DEPOSITED WITHIN THE
LIMITS OF THE DRIP LINE OF A TREE, INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO: PAINT, OIL, SOLVENTS, ASPHALT, CONCRETE,
MORTAR, PRIMERS, ETC.
7.NO SIGNS, WIRES OR OTHER ATTACHMENTS, OTHER THAN
THOSE OF A PROTECTIVE NATURE, SHALL BE ATTACHED TO
ANY TREE.
8.NO VEHICULAR / CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT TRAFFIC OR
PARKING IS ALLOWED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE DRIP LINE
OF TREES.
9.BORING OF UTILITIES MAY BE PERMITTED UNDER PROTECTED
TREES IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES. THE MINIMUM LENGTH
OF THE BORE SHALL BE THE WIDTH OF THE TREE'S CANOPY
AND SHALL BE A MINIMUM DEPTH OF FORTY-EIGHT (48")
INCHES.
10.IRRIGATION TRENCHING WHICH MUST BE DONE WITHIN THE
CRITICAL ROOT ZONE OF A TREE SHALL BE DUG BY HAND
AND ENTER THE AREA IN A RADIAL MANNER.
11.ALL TREES TO BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE SHALL BE
FLAGGED BY THE CONTRACTOR WITH BRIGHT RED VINYL
TAPE (3" WIDTH) WRAPPED AROUND THE MAIN TRUNK AT A
HEIGHT OF FOUR (4') FEET ABOVE GRADE. FLAGGING SHALL
BE APPROVED BY OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
PRIOR TO ANY TREE REMOVAL. CONTRACTOR SHALL
CONTACT OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE WITH 72
HOURS NOTICE TO SCHEDULE ON-SITE MEETING.
12.ALL TREES TO REMAIN, AS NOTED ON DRAWINGS, SHALL
HAVE PROTECTIVE FENCING LOCATED AT THE TREE'S DRIP
LINE. THE PROTECTIVE FENCING MAY BE COMPRISED OF
SNOW FENCING, ORANGE VINYL CONSTRUCTION FENCING,
CHAIN LINK FENCE OR OTHER SIMILAR FENCING WITH A FOUR
(4') FOOT APPROXIMATE HEIGHT. THE PROTECTIVE FENCING
SHALL BE LOCATED AS INDICATED ON THE TREE PROTECTION
DETAIL.
13.WHEN A LOW HANGING LIMB IS BROKEN DURING THE
COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
NOTIFY THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
IMMEDIATELY. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE SHALL THE
CONTRACTOR PRUNE ANY PORTION OF THE DAMAGED TREE
WITHOUT THE PRIOR APPROVAL BY THE OWNER'S
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.
LANDSCAPE NOTES
1.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
SITE ELEMENTS AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY
DISCREPANCIES. SURVEY DATA OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
WAS SUPPLIED BY OTHERS.
2.CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY
CONFLICTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE CAUTION WHEN
WORKING IN THE VICINITY OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES.
3.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM 2% SLOPE AWAY
FROM ALL STRUCTURES.
4.CONTRACTOR SHALL FINE GRADE AREAS TO ACHIEVE FINAL
CONTOURS AS INDICATED. LEAVE AREAS TO RECEIVE
TOPSOIL 3" BELOW FINAL FINISHED GRADE IN PLANTING
AREAS AND 1" BELOW FINAL FINISHED GRADE IN LAWN
AREAS.
5.ALL PLANTING BEDS AND LAWN AREAS SHALL BE
SEPARATED BY STEEL EDGING. NO STEEL EDGING SHALL BE
INSTALLED ADJACENT TO BUILDINGS, WALKS, OR CURBS.
CUT STEEL EDGING AT 45 DEGREE ANGLE WHERE IT
INTERSECTS WALKS AND CURBS.
6.TOP OF MULCH SHALL BE 1/2" MINIMUM BELOW THE TOP OF
WALKS AND CURBS.
7.ALL LAWN AREAS SHALL BE SOLID SOD BERMUDAGRASS,
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS.
8.ALL REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH
AN AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM WITH
RAIN AND FREEZE SENSORS AND EVAPOTRANSPIRATION (ET)
WEATHER-BASED CONTROLLERS AND SAID IRRIGATION
SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED BY A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL
AND INSTALLED BY A LICENSED IRRIGATOR.
9.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE BID PROPOSAL LISTING UNIT
PRICES FOR ALL MATERIAL PROVIDED.
10.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL
REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PERMITS.
MAINTENANCE NOTES
1.THE OWNER, TENANT AND THEIR AGENT, IF ANY, SHALL BE
JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE
MAINTENANCE OF ALL LANDSCAPE.
2.ALL LANDSCAPE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A NEAT AND
ORDERLY MANNER AT ALL TIMES. THIS SHALL INCLUDE
MOWING, EDGING, PRUNING, FERTILIZING, WATERING,
WEEDING AND OTHER SUCH ACTIVITIES COMMON TO
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE.
3.ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF TRASH,
LITTER, WEEDS AND OTHER SUCH MATERIAL OR PLANTS NOT
PART OF THIS PLAN.
4.ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A HEALTHY
AND GROWING CONDITION AS IS APPROPRIATE FOR THE
SEASON OF THE YEAR.
5.ALL PLANT MATERIAL WHICH DIES SHALL BE REPLACED WITH
PLANT MATERIAL OF EQUAL OR BETTER VALUE.
6.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SEPARATE BID PROPOSAL FOR
ONE YEAR'S MAINTENANCE TO BEGIN AFTER FINAL
ACCEPTANCE.
IRRIGATION REPAIR NOTES
1.THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE
MODIFICATION / REPAIR OF THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM
WITH THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SO THAT ALL
PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE WATERED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTENT OF THE PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS.
2.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING
EXISTING CONDITIONS OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM ON
SITE. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR
MAINTAINING THE INTEGRITY OF THE EXISTING
IRRIGATION WHERE POSSIBLE, INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO: IRRIGATION CONTROLLER, METER,
SLEEVING, ETC.
3.CONTRACTOR SHALL INCLUDE IN BID: MATERIALS,
LABOR, ETC. TO MODIFY / REPAIR EXISTING
IRRIGATION SYSTEM.
4.CONTRACTOR SHALL MATCH EXISTING EQUIPMENT
CURRENTLY USED ON-SITE.
5.ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS (EXISTING AND PROPOSED)
SHALL BE 100% IRRIGATED WITH AN UNDERGROUND
AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM AND SHALL INCLUDE
RAIN AND FREEZE SENSORS. REFER TO LANDSCAPE
PLAN FOR LIMITS OF WORK.
6.IRRIGATION SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL FLAG EXISTING
IRRIGATION IN THE FIELD THAT INCLUDES BUT IS NOT
LIMITED TO: HEADS, VALVES, QUICK COUPLERS,
MAINLINE, ETC.
7.LAWN AND PLANTING BEDS SHALL BE ON SEPARATE
ZONES.
8.NORTH AND EAST SIDES OF BUILDINGS SHALL BE
ZONED SEPARATELY FROM SOUTH AND WEST SIDES.
9.ALL EXISTING MAINLINE SHALL BE LOCATED AND
CAPPED WHERE NECESSARY.
10.CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EXISTING 4" POP-UP
HEADS AND REPLACE WITH 12" POP-UP HEADS IN ALL
AREAS WHERE EXISTING LAWN IS BEING CONVERTED
TO PLANTING.
11.IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL SELECT THE PROPER
ARC AND RADIUS FOR EACH NOZZLE TO ENSURE 100%
AND PROPER COVERAGE OF ALL LAWN AREAS AND
PLANT MATERIAL. NO WATER SHALL SPRAY ON
BUILDINGS OR WALLS, NOR SHALL WATER THROW OR
SPRAY ONTO SIDEWALKS OR STREETS.
12.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALTERNATE TO
CONVERT ALL PLANTING AREAS TO DRIP IRRIGATION IF
CURRENTLY SPRAY IRRIGATION.
DATE: October 28, 2015
JOB NO. A1235
OF
SHEET NO.
WRIGHT GROUP Architects-Planners, PLLC, 2015
WRIGHT GROUP
ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, PLLC
1110 S. ELM STREET
CARROLLTON, TEXAS
7 5 0 0 6
(9 7 2) 2 4 2 - 1 0 1 5
COPPELL CLASSICAL ACADEMY140 S. HeartzCoppell, TexasResponsive Education SolutionsSTA
TE O F T E XASTCETHI
R
C
A
EPACSDNALDEE
GEISRRT422 6KORINH
A
UGA N
01/12/16
AND DETAILS
L2.02
LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS
PREPARED SOIL MIX PER
SPECIFICATIONS; TILL 6" MINIMUM
OF PREPARED SOIL MIX INTO
6" DEPTH OF EXISTING SOIL
3/16" X 4" BLACK EDGING,
STAKES ON INSIDE; EDGING SHALL
BE 1/2" MAXIMUM HEIGHT
ABOVE FINISH GRADE
TOP OF MULCH 1/2"
MINIMUM BELOW TOP OF
CONCRETE WALK / CURB
CONCRETE WALK LAWN / FINISH GRADE
NOTE:
NO STEEL EDGING SHALL
BE INSTALLED ALONG
SIDEWALKS OR CURBS
ROOTBALL,
DO NOT DISTURB
NATIVE SOIL
POCKET PLANTING
NOT ALLOWED
SHRUBS / GROUNDCOVER;
REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN
TOPDRESS MULCH PER
SPECIFICATIONS; 2" MINIMUM
SETTLED THICKNESS
SCARIFY SIDES
REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN
FOR SPACING6"
A.
E.
C.B.
I.
H.
F.
G.
D.
TREE PLANTING DETAIL LEGEND
AND NOTES
A.TREE: TREES SHALL CONFORM WITH
LATEST AMERICAN STANDARD FOR
NURSERY STOCK. www.anla.org
B.TREE PIT: WIDTH TO BE AT LEAST TWO
(2) TIMES THE DIAMETER OF THE ROOT
BALL CENTER TREE IN HOLE & REST
ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE
SOIL.
C.ROOT BALL: REMOVE TOP 13 BURLAP
AND ANY OTHER FOREIGN OBJECT;
CONTAINER GROWN STOCK TO BE
INSPECTED FOR GIRDLING ROOTS.
D.ROOT FLARE: ENSURE THAT ROOT
FLARE IS EXPOSED, FREE FROM MULCH,
AND AT LEAST TWO INCHES ABOVE
GRADE. TREES SHALL BE REJECTED
WHEN GIRDLING ROOTS ARE PRESENT &
ROOT FLARE IS NOT APPARENT.
E.ROOTBALL ANCHOR RING: REFER TO
MANUFACTURER'S GUIDELINES FOR
SIZING. PLACE ROOTBALL ANCHOR
RING ON BASE OF ROOTBALL, TRUNK
SHOULD BE IN THE CENTER OF THE
RING.
F.'U' BRACKET.
G.NAIL STAKE: REFER TO
MANUFACTURER'S GUIDELINES FOR
SIZING. INSTALL NAIL STAKES WITH
HAMMER OR MALLET FIRMLY INTO
UNDISTURBED GROUND. DRIVE NAIL
STAKES FLUSH WITH "U" BRACKET
ADJACENT TO ROOTBALL (DO NOT
DISTURB ROOTBALL).
H.BACKFILL: USE EXISTING NATIVE SOIL
(no amendments) WATER THOROUGHLY
TO ELIMINATE AIR POCKETS.
I.MULCH: DOUBLE SHREDDED
HARDWOOD MULCH 2 INCH SETTLED
THICKNESS, WITH 2" HT. WATERING
RING; ENSURE THAT ROOT FLARE IS
EXPOSED. BELOW GROUND STAKE
SHOULD NOT BE VISIBLE.
J.TREE STAKES:
TREE STAKE SOLUTIONS 'SAFETY
STAKE' BELOW GROUND MODEL
AVAILABLE FROM:
Tree Stake Solutions
ATTN: Jeff Tuley
(903) 676-6143
jeff@treestakesolutions.com
www.treestakesolutions.com
K.IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN A COPY
OF THE MANUFACTURER'S
SPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TO
INSTALLATION OF TREE STAKES.
CONTRACTOR SHALL ADHERE TO
MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION
GUIDELINES, SPECIFICATIONS, AND
OTHER REQUIREMENTS FOR TREE STAKE
INSTALLATION.
01 TREE PLANTING DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE 02 SHRUB / GROUNDCOVER DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
SECTION 32 9300 - LANDSCAPE
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 REFERENCED DOCUMENTS
A.Refer to Landscape Plans, notes, details, bidding requirements,
special provisions, and schedules for additional requirements.
1.2 DESCRIPTION OF WORK
A.Work included: Furnish all supervision, labor, materials, services,
equipment and appliances required to complete the work covered
in conjunction with the landscaping covered in these
specifications and landscaping plans, including:
1. Planting (trees, shrubs and grasses)
2. Bed preparation and fertilization
3. Notification of sources
4. Water and maintenance until final acceptance
5. Guarantee
1.3 REFERENCE STANDARDS
A.American Standard for Nursery Stock published by American
Association of Nurserymen: 27 October 1980, Edition; by
American National Standards Institute, Inc. (Z60.1) – plant
material
B.American Joint Committee on Horticultural Nomenclature: 1942
Edition of Standardized Plant Names.
C.Texas Association of Nurserymen, Grades and Standards
D.Hortis Third, 1976 - Cornell University
1.4 NOTIFICATION OF SOURCES AND SUBMITTALS
A.Samples: Provide representative quantities of sandy loam soil,
mulch, bed mix material, gravel and crushed stone. Samples
shall be approved by Owner's Authorized Representative before
use on the project.
1.5 JOB CONDITIONS
A.General Contractor to complete the following punch list: Prior to
Landscape Contractor initiating any portion of landscape
installation, General Contractor shall leave planting bed areas
three (3") inches below final finish grade of sidewalks, drives and
curbs as shown on the drawings. All lawn areas to receive solid
sod shall be left one (1") inch below the final finish grade of
sidewalks, drives and curbs. All construction debris shall be
removed prior to Landscape Contractor beginning any work.
B.Storage of materials and equipment at the job site will be at the
risk of the Landscape Contractor. The Owner cannot be held
responsible for theft or damage.
1.6 MAINTENANCE AND GUARANTEE
A.Maintenance:
1.The Landscape Contractor shall be held responsible for the
maintenance of all work from the time of planting until final
acceptance by the Owner. No trees, shrubs, groundcover or
grass will be accepted unless they show healthy growth and
satisfactory foliage conditions.
2.Maintenance shall include watering of trees and plants,
cultivation, weeding spraying, edging, pruning of trees,
mowing of grass, cleaning up and all other work necessary
of maintenance.
3.A written notice requesting final inspection and acceptance
should be submitted to the Owner at least seven (7) days
prior to completion. An on-site inspection by the Owner's
Authorized Representative will be completed prior to written
acceptance.
B.Guarantee:
1.Trees, shrubs and groundcover shall be guaranteed for a
twelve (12) month period after final acceptance. The
Contractor shall replace all dead materials as soon as
weather permits and upon notification of the Owner. Plants,
including trees, which have partially died so that shape, size,
or symmetry have been damaged, shall be considered
subject to replacement. In such cases, the opinion of the
Owner shall be final.
a.Plants used for replacement shall be of the same size
and kind as those originally planted and shall be planted
as originally specified. All work, including materials,
labor and equipment used in replacements, shall carry a
twelve (12) month guarantee. Any damage, including
ruts in lawn or bed areas, incurred as a result of making
replacements shall be immediately repaired.
b.At the direction of the Owner, plants may be replaced
at the start of the next year's planting season. In such
cases, dead plants shall be removed from the premises
immediately.
c.When plant replacements are made, plants, soil mix,
fertilizer and mulch are to be utilized as originally
specified and re-inspected for full compliance with the
contract requirements. All replacements are to be
included under "Work" of this section.
2.The Owner agrees that for the guarantee to be effective, he
will water plants at least twice a week during dry periods
and cultivate beds once a month after final acceptance.
3.The above guarantee shall not apply where plants die after
acceptance because of injury from storms, hail, freeze,
insects, diseases, injury by humans, machines or theft.
4.Acceptance for all landscape work shall be given after final
inspection by the Owner provided the job is in a complete,
undamaged condition and there is a stand of grass in all
lawn areas. At that time, the Owner will assume
maintenance on the accepted work.
C.Repairs: Any necessary repairs under the Guarantee must be
made within ten (10) days after receiving notice, weather
permitting. In the event the Landscape Contractor does not
make repairs accordingly, the Owner, without further notice to
Contractor, may provide materials and men to make such repairs
at the expense to the Landscape Contractor.
1.7 QUALITY ASSURANCE
A.General: Comply with applicable federal, state, county and local
regulations governing landscape materials and work.
B.Personnel: Employ only experienced personnel who are familiar
with the required work. Provide full time supervision by a
qualified foreman acceptable to Landscape Architect.
C.Selection of Plant Material:
1.Make contact with suppliers immediately upon obtaining
notice of contract acceptance to select and book materials.
Develop a program of maintenance (pruning and fertilization)
which will ensure the purchased materials will meet and / or
exceed project specifications.
2.Substitutions: Do not make plant material substitutions. If
the specified landscape material is not obtainable, submit
proof of non-availability to Landscape Architect, together
with proposal for use of equivalent material. At the time
bids are submitted, the Contractor is assumed to have
located the materials necessary to complete the job as
specified.
3.Landscape Architect will provide a key identifying each tree
location on site. Written verification will be required to
document material selection, source and delivery schedules
to site.
4.Measurements: Measure trees with branches and trunks or
canes in their normal position. Do not prune to obtain
required sizes. Take caliper measurements six inches above
ground for trees up to and including 4" caliper size, and
twelve inches above ground for larger sizes. Measure main
body of all plant material of height and spread dimensions,
do not measure from branch or root tip-to-tip.
5.Owner's Authorized Representative shall inspect all plant
material with requirements for genus, species, cultivar /
variety size and quality.
6.Owner's Authorized Representative retains the right to
further inspect all plant material upon arrival to the site and
during installation for size and condition of root balls and
root systems, limbs, branching habit, insects, injuries and
latent defects.
7.Owner's Authorized Representative may reject
unsatisfactory or defective material at any time during the
process work. Remove rejected materials immediately from
the site and replace with acceptable material at no additional
cost to the Owner. Plants damaged in transit or at job site
shall be rejected.
1.8 PRODUCT DELIVERY, STORAGE AND HANDLING
A.Preparation:
1.Balled and Burlapped (B&B) Plants: Dig and prepare
shipment in a manner that will not damage roots, branches,
shape and future development.
2.Container Grown Plants: Deliver plants in rigid container to
hold ball shape and protect root mass.
B.Delivery:
1.Deliver packaged materials in sealed containers showing
weight, analysis and name of manufacturer. Protect
materials from deterioration during delivery and while stored
on site.
2.Deliver only plant materials that can be planted in one day
unless adequate storage and watering facilities are available
on job site.
3.Protect root balls by heeling in with sawdust or other
approved moisture retaining material if not planted within 24
hours of delivery.
4.Protect plants during delivery to prevent damage to root
balls or desiccation of leaves. Keep plants moist at all
times. Cover all materials during transport.
5.Notify Owner's Authorized Representative of delivery
schedule 72 hours in advance job site.
6.Remove rejected plant material immediately from job site.
7.To avoid damage or stress, do not lift, move, adjust to
plumb, or otherwise manipulate plants by trunk or stems.
PART 2 - PRODUCTS
2.1 PLANTS
A.General: Well-formed No. 1 grade or better nursery grown stock.
Listed plant heights are from tops of root balls to nominal tops of
plants. Plant spread refers to nominal outer width of the plant,
not to the outer leaf tips. Plants will be individually approved by
the Owner's Authorized Representative and his decision as to
their acceptability shall be final.
B.Quantities: The drawings and specifications are complimentary.
Anything called for on one and not the other is as binding as if
shown and called for on both. The plant schedule is an aid to
bidders only. Confirm all quantities on plan.
C.Quality and size: Plant materials shall conform to the size given
on the plan, and shall be healthy, symmetrical, well-shaped, full
branched and well rooted. The plants shall be free from injurious
insects, diseases, injuries to the bark or roots, broken branches,
objectionable disfigurements, insect eggs and larvae, and are to
be of specimen quality.
D.Approval: All plants which are found unsuitable in growth, or are
in any unhealthy, badly shaped or undersized condition will be
rejected by the Owner's Authorized Representative either before
or after planting and shall be removed at the expense of the
Landscape Contractor and replaced with acceptable plant as
specified at no additional cost to the Owner.
E.Trees shall be healthy, full-branched, well-shaped, and shall meet
the minimum trunk and diameter requirements of the plant
schedule. Balls shall be firm, neat, slightly tapered and well
wrapped in burlap. Any tree loose in the ball or with a broken
root ball at time of planting will be rejected. Balls shall be ten
(10") inches in diameter for each one (1") inch of trunk diameter,
measured six (6") inches above ball. (Nomenclature confirms to
the customary nursery usage. For clarification, the term
"multi-trunk" defines a plant having three (3) or more trunks of
nearly equal diameter.)
F.Pruning: All pruning of trees and shrubs, as directed by the
Landscape Architect prior to final acceptance, shall be executed
by the Landscape Contractor at no additional cost to the Owner.
2.2 SOIL PREPARATION MATERIALS
A.Sandy Loam:
1.Friable, fertile, dark, loamy soil, free of clay lumps, subsoil,
stones and other extraneous material and reasonably free of
weeds and foreign grasses. Loam containing Dallasgrass or
Nutgrass shall be rejected.
2.Physical properties as follows:
a.Clay – between 7-27 percent
b.Silt – between 15-25 percent
c.Sand – less than 52 percent
3.Organic matter shall be 3%-10% of total dry weight.
4.If requested, Landscape Contractor shall provide a certified
soil analysis conducted by an approved soil testing
laboratory verifying that sandy loam meets the above
requirements.
B.Organic Material: Compost with a mixture of 80% vegetative
matter and 20% animal waste. Ingredients should be a mix of
course and fine textured material.
C.Premixed Bedding Soil as supplied by Vital Earth Resources,
Gladewater, Texas; Professional Bedding Soil as supplied by
Living Earth Technology, Dallas, Texas or Acid Gro Municipal Mix
as supplied by Soil Building Systems, Dallas, Texas or approved
equal.
D.Sharp Sand: Sharp sand must be free of seeds, soil particles and
weeds.
E.Mulch: Double Shredded Hardwood Mulch, partially decomposed,
dark brown. Living Earth Technologies or approved equal.
F.Organic Fertilizer: Fertilaid, Sustane, or Green Sense or equal as
recommended for required applications. Fertilizer shall be
delivered to the site in original unopened containers, each
bearing the manufacturer's guaranteed statement of analysis.
G.Commercial Fertilizer: 10-20-10 or similar analysis. Nitrogen
source to be a minimum 50% slow release organic Nitrogen
(SCU or UF) with a minimum 8% sulfur and 4% iron, plus
icronutrients.
H.Peat: Commercial sphagnum peat moss or partially decomposed
shredded pine bark or other approved organic material.
2.3 MISCELLANEOUS MATERIALS
A.Steel Edging: All steel edging shall be 3/16" thick x 4" deep x
16' long with 6 stakes per section, painted black at the factory
as manufactured by The J.D. Russell Company and under its
trade name DURAEDGE Heavy Duty Steel.
B.Staking Material for Shade Trees: refer to details.
C.Gravel: Washed native pea gravel, graded 1 inch to 1-1/2 inch.
D.Filter Fabric: 'Mirafi Mirascape' by Mirafi Construction Products
available at Lone Star Products, Inc., (469) 523-0444 or
approved equal.
E.River Rock: 'Colorado' or native river rock, 2" - 4" dia.
F.Decomposed Granite: Base material shall consist of a natural
material mix of granite aggregate not to exceed 1/8" diameter in
size and shall be composed of various stages of decomposed
earth base.
PART 3 - EXECUTION
3.1 BED PREPARATION & FERTILIZATION
A.Landscape Contractor to inspect all existing conditions and
report any deficiencies to the Owner.
B.All planting areas shall be conditioned as follows:
1.Prepare new planting beds by scraping away existing grass
and weeds as necessary. Till existing soil to a depth of six
(6") inches prior to placing compost and fertilizer. Apply
fertilizer as per Manufacturer's recommendations. Add six
(6") inches of compost and till into a depth of six (6") inches
of the topsoil. Apply organic fertilizer such as Sustane or
Green Sense at the rate of twenty (20) pounds per one
thousand (1,000) square feet.
2.All planting areas shall receive a two (2") inch layer of
specified mulch.
3.Backfill for tree pits shall be as follows: Use existing top soil
on site (use imported topsoil as needed) free from large
clumps, rocks, debris, caliche, subsoils, etc., placed in nine
(9") inch layers and watered in thoroughly.
C.Grass Areas:
1.Blocks of sod should be laid joint to joint (staggered joints)
after fertilizing the ground first. Roll grass areas to achieve
a smooth, even surface. The joints between the blocks of
sod should be filled with topsoil where they are evidently
gaped open, then watered thoroughly.
3.2 INSTALLATION
A.Maintenance of plant materials shall begin immediately after each
plant is delivered to the site and shall continue until all
construction has been satisfactorily accomplished.
B.Plant materials shall be delivered to the site only after the beds
are prepared and areas are ready for planting. All shipments of
nursery materials shall be thoroughly protected from the drying
winds during transit. All plants which cannot be planted at once,
after delivery to the site, shall be well protected against the
possibility of drying by wind and Balls of earth of B & B plants
shall be kept covered with soil or other acceptable material. All
plants remain the property of the Contractor until final
acceptance.
C.Position the trees and shrubs in their intended location as per
plan.
D.Notify the Owner's Authorized Representative for inspection and
approval of all positioning of plant materials.
E.Excavate pits with vertical sides and horizontal bottom. Tree
pits shall be large enough to permit handling and planting
without injury to balls of earth or roots and shall be of such
depth that,when planted and settled, the crown of the plant shall
bear the same relationship to the finish grade as it did to soil
surface in original place of growth.
F.Shrub and tree pits shall be no less than twenty-four (24")
inches wider than the lateral dimension of the earth ball and six
(6") inches deeper than it's vertical dimension. Remove and haul
from site all rocks and stones over three-quarter (3 4") inch in
diameter. Plants should be thoroughly moist before removing
containers.
G.Dig a wide, rough sided hole exactly the same depth as the
height of the ball, especially at the surface of the ground. The
sides of the hole should be rough and jagged, never slick or
glazed.
H.Percolation Test: Fill the hole with water. If the water level does
not percolate within 24 hours, the tree needs to move to another
location or have drainage added. Install a PVC stand pipe per
tree planting detail as approved by the Landscape Architect if the
percolation test fails.
I.Backfill only with 5 parts existing soil or sandy loam and 1 part
bed preparation. When the hole is dug in solid rock, topsoil from
the same area should not be used. Carefully settle by watering
to prevent air pockets. Remove the burlap from the top 13 of the
ball, as well as all nylon, plastic string and wire. Container trees
will usually be root bound, if so follow standard nursery practice
of ‘root scoring’.
J.Do not wrap trees.
K.Do not over prune.
L.Mulch the top of the ball. Do not plant grass all the way to the
trunk of the tree. Leave the area above the top of the ball and
mulch with at least two (2") inches of specified mulch.
M.All plant beds and trees to be mulched with a minimum settled
thickness of two (2") inches over the entire bed or pit.
N.Obstruction below ground: In the event that rock, or
underground construction work or obstructions are encountered
in any plant pit excavation work to be done under this section,
alternate locations may be selected by the Owner. Where
locations cannot be changed, the obstructions shall be removed
to a depth of not less than three (3') feet below grade and no
less than six (6") inches below the bottom of ball when plant is
properly set at the required grade. The work of this section shall
include the removal from the site of such rock or underground
obstructions encountered at the cost of the Landscape
Contractor.
O.Trees and large shrubs shall be staked as site conditions require.
Position stakes to secure trees against seasonal prevailing winds.
P.Pruning and Mulching: Pruning shall be directed by the
Landscape Architect and shall be pruned in accordance with
standard horticultural practice following Fine Pruning, Class I
pruning standards provided by the National Arborist Association.
1.Dead wood, suckers, broken and badly bruised branches
shall be removed. General tipping of the branches is not
permitted. Do not cut terminal branches.
2.Pruning shall be done with clean, sharp tools.
3.Immediately after planting operations are completed, all tree
pits shall be covered with a layer of organic material two
(2") inches in depth. This limit of the organic material for
trees shall be the diameter of the plant pit.
Q.Steel Curbing Installation:
1.Curbing shall be aligned as indicated on plans. Stake out
limits of steel curbing and obtain Owners approval prior to
installation.
2.All steel curbing shall be free of kinks and abrupt bends.
3.Top of curbing shall be 12" maximum height above final
finished grade.
4.Stakes are to be installed on the planting bed side of the
curbing, as opposed to the grass side.
5.Do not install steel edging along sidewalks or curbs.
6.Cut steel edging at 45 degree angle where edging meets
sidewalks or curbs.
3.3 CLEANUP AND ACCEPTANCE
A.Cleanup: During the work, the premises shall be kept neat and
orderly at all times. Storage areas for all materials shall be so
organized so that they, too, are neat and orderly. All trash and
debris shall be removed from the site as work progresses. Keep
paved areas clean by sweeping or hosing them at end of each
work day.
END OF SECTION
HEARTZ ROADLONDON WAY1
2
4
5
6
3
7
89
10
11
12
13
14
15
17
16
18 19
21
22
23
20
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33 34 35
36
37 38 40
41 42 43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
EXISTING TREES
TO REMAIN, TYP.
EXISTING
LANDSCAPE
TO REMAIN, TYP.
EXISTING LANDSCAPE
TO REMAIN, TYP.
EXISTING LANDSCAPE
TO REMAIN, TYP.
EXISTING LANDSCAPE
TO REMAIN, TYP.
EXISTING TREES
TO REMAIN,
TYP.
39
EXISTING TREE
TO BE REMOVED, TYP.XXXXXXTREE PROTECTION FENCING
TO REMAIN DURING
CONSTRUCTION, TYP. REFER TO
01/L1.01
EXISTING SHRUBS
TO BE REMOVED
TO 12" BELOW GRADE, TYP.
53
54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63
64
65
66
67
67
62
68
697071727374757677
78
79
X X X X X XXXXXXTREE PROTECTION FENCING
TO REMAIN DURING
CONSTRUCTION, TYP. REFER TO
01/L1.01
EXISTING TREES
TO REMAIN, TYP.
EXISTING TREES
TO REMAIN, TYP.
EXISTING LANDSCAPE
TO REMAIN, TYP.
TREE PROTECTION FENCING
TO REMAIN DURING
CONSTRUCTION, TYP. REFER TO
01/L1.01XXX XXEXISTING SHRUBS
TO BE REPLANTED
EXISTING SHRUBS
TO BE REPLANTED
EXISTING SHRUBS
TO BE REPLANTED
DATE: October 28, 2015
JOB NO. A1235
OF
SHEET NO.
WRIGHT GROUP Architects-Planners, PLLC, 2015
WRIGHT GROUP
ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, PLLC
1110 S. ELM STREET
CARROLLTON, TEXAS
7 5 0 0 6
(9 7 2) 2 4 2 - 1 0 1 5
COPPELL CLASSICAL ACADEMY140 S. HeartzCoppell, TexasResponsive Education SolutionsSTA
TE O F T E XASTCETHI
R
C
A
EPACSDNALDEE
GEISRRT422 6KORINH
A
UGA N
01/12/16
0 15 30 60
SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"
N
PLAN
L1.01
TREE PRESERVATION
TREE PRESERVATION NOTES
1.EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED DURING
CONSTRUCTION FROM TREE STRUCTURE DAMAGE AND
COMPACTION OF SOIL UNDER AND AROUND DRIP LINE
(CANOPY) OF TREE.
2.IF ANY ROOT STRUCTURE IS DAMAGED DURING ADJACENT
EXCAVATION / CONSTRUCTION, NOTIFY OWNER'S
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY. IT IS
RECOMMENDED THAT A LICENSED ARBORIST BE SECURED
FOR THE TREATMENT OF ANY POSSIBLE TREE WOUNDS.
3.NO DISTURBANCE OF THE SOIL GREATER THAN 4" SHALL BE
LOCATED CLOSER TO THE TREE TRUNK THAN 1/2 THE
DISTANCE OF THE DRIP LINE TO THE TREE TRUNK. A
MINIMUM OF 75% OF THE DRIP LINE AND ROOT ZONE SHALL
BE PRESERVED AT NATURAL GRADE.
4.ANY FINE GRADING DONE WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONES
OF THE PROTECTED TREES MUST BE DONE WITH LIGHT
MACHINERY SUCH AS A BOBCAT OR LIGHT TRACTOR. NO
EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT WITH TRACKS IS ALLOWED
WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE OF THE TREES.
5.NO MATERIALS INTENDED FOR USE IN CONSTRUCTION OR
WASTE MATERIALS ACCUMULATED DUE TO EXCAVATION OR
DEMOLITION SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE
DRIP LINE OF ANY TREE.
6.NO EQUIPMENT MAY BE CLEANED OR TOXIC SOLUTIONS, OR
OTHER LIQUID CHEMICALS, SHALL BE DEPOSITED WITHIN THE
LIMITS OF THE DRIP LINE OF A TREE, INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO: PAINT, OIL, SOLVENTS, ASPHALT, CONCRETE,
MORTAR, PRIMERS, ETC.
7.NO SIGNS, WIRES OR OTHER ATTACHMENTS, OTHER THAN
THOSE OF A PROTECTIVE NATURE, SHALL BE ATTACHED TO
ANY TREE.
8.NO VEHICULAR / CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT TRAFFIC OR
PARKING IS ALLOWED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE DRIP LINE
OF TREES.
9.BORING OF UTILITIES MAY BE PERMITTED UNDER PROTECTED
TREES IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES. THE MINIMUM LENGTH
OF THE BORE SHALL BE THE WIDTH OF THE TREE'S CANOPY
AND SHALL BE A MINIMUM DEPTH OF FORTY-EIGHT (48")
INCHES.
10.IRRIGATION TRENCHING WHICH MUST BE DONE WITHIN THE
CRITICAL ROOT ZONE OF A TREE SHALL BE DUG BY HAND
AND ENTER THE AREA IN A RADIAL MANNER.
11.ALL TREES TO BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE SHALL BE
FLAGGED BY THE CONTRACTOR WITH BRIGHT RED VINYL
TAPE (3" WIDTH) WRAPPED AROUND THE MAIN TRUNK AT A
HEIGHT OF FOUR (4') FEET ABOVE GRADE. FLAGGING SHALL
BE APPROVED BY OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
PRIOR TO ANY TREE REMOVAL. CONTRACTOR SHALL
CONTACT OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE WITH 72
HOURS NOTICE TO SCHEDULE ON-SITE MEETING.
12.ALL TREES TO REMAIN, AS NOTED ON DRAWINGS, SHALL
HAVE PROTECTIVE FENCING LOCATED AT THE TREE'S DRIP
LINE. THE PROTECTIVE FENCING MAY BE COMPRISED OF
SNOW FENCING, ORANGE VINYL CONSTRUCTION FENCING,
CHAIN LINK FENCE OR OTHER SIMILAR FENCING WITH A FOUR
(4') FOOT APPROXIMATE HEIGHT. THE PROTECTIVE FENCING
SHALL BE LOCATED AS INDICATED ON THE TREE PROTECTION
DETAIL.
13.WHEN A LOW HANGING LIMB IS BROKEN DURING THE
COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
NOTIFY THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
IMMEDIATELY. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE SHALL THE
CONTRACTOR PRUNE ANY PORTION OF THE DAMAGED TREE
WITHOUT THE PRIOR APPROVAL BY THE OWNER'S
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.
EXISTING GRADE TO
REMAIN UNDISTURBED
METAL T-POST AT
EACH OF FOUR CORNERS
SNOW FENCE, ORANGE VINYL
CONSTRUCTION FENCE, OR
CHAINLINK FENCE
REFER TO PLAN FOR
EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN
4'-0" MIN.3'-0"LIMITS OF DRIPLINE
01 TREE PROTECTIVE FENCING
NOT TO SCALE
X
EXISTING TREE
TO BE REMOVED
TREE PROTECTION FENCING
TO REMAIN DURING CONSTRUCTION
REFER TO 01/L1.01
EXISTING TREE
TO REMAIN
EXISTING TREE LEGEND
EXISTING SHRUBS
TO BE REPLANTED
EXISTING SHRUBS
TO BE REMOVED
TO 12" BELOW GRADE, TYP.
Master
City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard
Coppell, Texas
75019-9478
File Number: 2016-2582
File ID: Type: Status: 2016-2582 Zoning Ordinance Passed
3Version: Reference: In Control: City Council
01/13/2016File Created:
03/08/2016Final Action: PD-221R3R-HC, ORD Point West - Sun Holdings
(Revised)
File Name:
Title: Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. PD-221R3R-HC, Point
West - Sun Holdings, a zoning change from PD -221R3-HC (Planned
Development-221 Revision 3-Highway Commercial) to PD-221R3R-HC
(Planned Development -221 Revision 3 Revised-Highway Commercial), to
allow revised permitted uses, lotting patterns, circulation, signage and two
retail/restaurant buildings on property located at the northwest corner of
IH-635 and S. Belt Line Road and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
Notes:
Agenda Date: 03/08/2016
Agenda Number: 10.
Sponsors: Enactment Date: 03/08/2016
Cover Memo.pdf, Contemporary Design - Elevations,
Perspectives, Birds Eye View and and Color
Board.pdf, Ordinance.pdf, Exhibit A - Legal
Description.pdf, Exhibit B - Concept Site Plan.pdf,
Exhibit C- Concept Site Plan Buildings.pdf, Exhibit D -
Concept Landscape Plan.pdf, Exhibit E - Detail Site
Plan.pdf, Exhibit F - Detail Landscape Plan (2
pages).pdf, Exhibit G - Elevations (2 pages).pdf,
Exhibit H - Perspective View.pdf
Attachments: Enactment Number: 91500-A-690
Hearing Date: Contact:
Effective Date: Drafter:
History of Legislative File
Action: Result: Return
Date:
Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver-
sion:
1 PassApproved01/21/2016Planning & Zoning
Commission
Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017
Master Continued (2016-2582)
Marcie Diamond, Assistant Director of Planning, mentioned the history of this case from the October
15th meeting. She presented the revisions to this PD with exhibits, color board and elevations. She
mentioned five notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of this request. There were no
notices returned opposed or in favor. There were also two courtesy notices mailed to property
owners within 800 feet of this request. She stated that staff is recommending approval with
conditions which she read into the record.
Greg Guerin, East Star Designs, Fourney Texas, was present to represent this case, to address
questions and stated agreement with staff's recommendations. Lauren Glesby from Sun Holdings
addressed questions from the Commission concerning the timing of construction of the private
drives providing connections to Belt Line Road and Point West Blvd.
Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in favor or
opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. No one spoke.
Chairman Haas closed the Public Hearing.
After much discussion, Chairman Haas made a motion to recommend approval per statf's
recommendation with revisions to Condition 2a involving the phasing for construction of the streets
as follows:
That the full section of Street A be constructed between Belt Line Road and Point West Blvd; the full
section of Street C be constructed with development on Lot 2 from Belt Line Road to the first
driveway.
Commissioner Darling seconded, then Commissioner Robinson amended the motion to add the
condition that the remaining part of Street C and the full section of Street B be constructed upon the
issuance of the building permit for development on Lot 1 or 8.
Vice Chairman Portman seconded with additions to the revisions as stated:
To require the Property Owners Association document be submitted for approval by staff and the
Commission prior to the detail site plan of the next building lot to be constructed.
All of the property owners included in the subdivision concept plan to contribute to the funding of
the POA so that there are available funds for maintenance of the plaza area.
Marcie Diamond, then suggested to the Commission that a appropriate time to review the POA
document would be at plat approval and this be a condition upon the issuance fo the final plat.
Chairman Haas, then motioned all in favor; none voted in favor. Chairman Haas then motioned all
opposed; Commissioners Williford, Sarma, Robinson, Haas, Portman, Darling and Blankenship
voted in opposition; motion fails.
Chairman Haas revised the final motion to recommend approval subject to:
1. The following PD Conditions are included on the plans for the entire 17.4 acres:
a. A Detail Site Plan (either PD amendment or SUP depending on the use) shall be required prior
to development within this tract. The Detail Site Plan shall meet all development
code requirements unless specifically varied at that time. Detail Site Plans shall also include
elevation facades to assure architectural compatibility and compliance with the HC
District regulations.
b. This property will be replatted to provide building sites, easements and fire lanes prior to any
development.
c. A 35-foot tall monument sign on Lot 5 shall be permitted.
d. The HC District requires 60-foot front yard, 30-foot side yard and 20-foot rear yard setbacks.
The exceptions are interior side yards of Lots 2, 3, 5 & 6 which are 10 feet for patio areas.
*e. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit for buildings on Lots 2 or 3, Private Street A, with a
minimum paving width of 32 feet, shall be constructed to full width between Belt Line Road
and Point West Blvd, Private Street C shall also be constructed to full width between Belt Line Road
and the driveway to Lot 2.
Action Text:
Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017
Master Continued (2016-2582)
*f. Private Street B and the remainder of Private Street C shall be constructed to full width prior to
the issuance of building permits for either developments on Lots 1 or 8, whichever
occurs first.
g. There shall be a consistent sign package for all attached signs.
h. Detail Site Plan for the pedestrian/art/plaza shall be submitted for Staff review.
i. Property Owners Association shall maintain all common areas, including the
pedestrian/art/plaza area and all enhanced paving surfaces.
j. Property Owners Association documents assuring the maintenance of all common areas shall
be submitted for staff review prior to the filing of the Final Plat.
k. The shared driveway between Lots 2 and 3 to Private Street B shall be deleted to increase the
landscaped area for the pedestrian/plaza area.
l. The median opening at Belt Line Road between Private Drive A and Hackberry Road will be
redesigned at the time of Detail Engineering review.
*Revised staff's recommended conditions.
2. Drafting/minor corrections:
a. Clearly label the continuation of the “Variable Width Mutual Access Easement” from the property
to the north into this property into Lot 8, on Concept Plan Sheet A-1, as illustrated on the
A-2, Concept Site Plan Buildings.
b. Site Data Table
i. Remove maximum height of 120 feet, as the building heights will be determined at the time of
Detail Site Plan approval.
ii. Correct the spelling of acres under Lot 5.
c. Add PD Conditions to Sheet A-2
d. On Sheets L1.01, L1.02 and L1.03, revise the note under the Landscaping Requirements to
read Sec 12-34 (instead of Sec 12.34-8)
Seconded by Vice Chair Portman; motion carried (7-0).
Chair Edmund Haas, Vice Chair Glenn Portman, Commissioner Sue
Blankenship, Commissioner Ed Darling, Commissioner Doug
Robinson, Commissioner Vijay Sarma, and Commissioner George
Williford
7Aye:
2 PassClose the Public
Hearing and
Approve
02/09/2016City Council
At this time, Mayor Pro Tem Roden left the meeting upon filing a Conflict of Interest Affidavit.
Presentation: Marcie Diamond, Assistant Director of Planning, made a presentation to Council.
Armando Palacios, 3318 Forest Lane, represented the applicant and answered questions of the City
Council.
A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Councilmember Nancy
Yingling, to close the Public Hearing and approve this Agenda Item as presented; and to present a
revised detailed site plan for the traditional and contemporary elevation elements. The motion
passed by an unanimous vote.
At this time, Mayor Pro Tem Roden returned to the meeting.
Action Text:
Councilmember Cliff Long, Councilmember Brianna Hinojosa-Flores,
Councilmember Wes Mays, Councilmember Marvin Franklin,
Councilmember Mark Hill, and Mayor Pro Tem Nancy Yingling
6Aye:
Councilmember Gary Roden1Excused:
3 PassApproved03/08/2016City Council
Page 3City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017
Master Continued (2016-2582)
Presentation: Marcie Diamond, Assistant Director of Planning, made a presentation to Council.
A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Councilmember Brianna
Hinojosa-Flores, that this Agenda Item be approved. The motion passed by an unanimous vote with
Mayor Pro Tem Gary Roden excused.
At this time, Mayor Pro Tem Gary Roden returned to the meeting.
Action Text:
Councilmember Cliff Long, Councilmember Brianna Hinojosa-Flores,
Councilmember Wes Mays, Councilmember Marvin Franklin, and
Councilmember Mark Hill
5Aye:
Councilmember Gary Roden1Excused:
Text of Legislative File 2016-2582
Title
Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. PD-221R3R-HC, Point West - Sun
Holdings, a zoning change from PD-221R3-HC (Planned Development-221 Revision
3-Highway Commercial) to PD-221R3R-HC (Planned Development -221 Revision 3
Revised-Highway Commercial), to allow revised permitted uses, lotting patterns, circulation,
signage and two retail /restaurant buildings on property located at the northwest corner of IH -635
and S. Belt Line Road and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
Summary
Staff Recommendation:
On February 9, 2016, City Council unanimously approved this ZONING CHANGE (7-0) with
staff’s conditions and an added condition that the applicant submit to the Planning Department
revised Detail Elevations (Sheets A-4 & A-5) for Lots 2 & 3 to reflect the design and building
materials the same or similar to the elevations presented to the Planning Commission at the
October 15th meeting.
On January 21, 2016, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of this
ZONING CHANGE (7-0). Commissioners, Williford, Sarma, Robinson, Haas, Portman, Darling
and Blankenship voted in favor; none opposed.
The Planning Department recommended APPROVAL.
Goal Icon:
Business Prosperity
Page 4City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017
1
MEMORANDUM
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning
Date: March 8, 2016
Reference: Consider approval of an Ordinance for PD-221R3R-HC, to amend the Concept Plan on
17.14 acres to allow revised permitted uses, lotting patterns, circulation, signage and the
attachment of a Detail Site Plan for two retail/restaurant buildings totaling approximately
17,000 square feet on 3.9 acres of property located at the northwest corner of IH 635 and
S. Belt Line Road.
2030: Business Prosperity, Sense of Community
Introduction:
The subject property is part of an 184-acre overall master planned area which was to provide the retail
component to support the employment areas and the full service hotel that was envisioned within this 78
acres. This Concept Plan on the 17.4 acres provides permitted uses, circulation patterns, signage package
and architectural controls to assure that the development on this parcel would complement the
surrounding developments and provide for an entry feature for this gateway into Coppell. The Detail
Plan approval on the 3.9 acres will allow the construction of the first phase of infrastructure, two retail
buildings, and a 24,000 square foot pedestrian/art/plaza area.
Analysis:
On February 9, 2016 City Council approved the Detail and Concept Plans for this PD, and requested that
the applicant re-visit the elevations and consider the more contemporary design and materials. Attached
to this memo are the revised Elevations, Perspective View, Bird’s Eye View and Picture of Color Board
of this design.
On January 21, 2016, the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended approval of this
PD request. The P&Z conditions for this Planned Development District have been incorporated on the
exhibits, and have been part of the Ordinance.
On October 15, 2015 the Planning and Zoning Commission held this case under advisement to allow the
applicant sufficient time to adequately address issues/concerns with the initial application including:
proposed uses, need for coherent architectural design, inclusion of focal points and pedestrian
connections, the provision of optimal circulation patterns and correction of various technical and drafting
errors.
Legal Review:
2
City Attorney reviewed this ordinance.
Fiscal Impact:
None
Recommendation:
The Planning Department recommends approval
Attachments:
1. Contemporary Design- Elevations, Perspective View, Bird’s Eye View and Picture of Color
Board.
2. Ordinance
3. Exhibit A – Legal Description
4. Exhibit B - Concept Plan Site Plan Parcel
5. Exhibit C - Concept Plan Site Plan Buildings
6. Exhibit D - Concept Landscape Plan
7. Exhibit E - Detail Site Plan
8. Exhibit F - Detail Landscape Plans (2 Sheets)
9. Exhibit G - Elevations (2 sheets)
10. Exhibit H - Perspective View
ST-2
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
ST-1
PEBBLE BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
ST-3
BROWNSTONE BY
ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
W-1
DARK STAINED WOOD
HORIZONTAL BOARDS
RAINSCREEN
M-2
ALUMINUM GREY
PREFINISHED
METAL CANOPY
AWNING
PREFINISHED
METAL CANOPY AWNING
M-1
ALMOND
PREFINISHED
METAL FASCIA
SF-1
STORE FRONT FRAME
CHAMPAGNE ANODIZED
PLUS &
G-1
GLASS
SOLARBAN 67 CLEAR
SF-1
STORE FRONT FRAME
CHAMPAGNE ANODIZED PLUS &
G-1
GLASS
SOLARBAN 67 CLEAR
M-1
ALMOND
PREFINISHED
METAL FASCIA
METAL DOOR
PAINT TO MATCH
ADJACENT
CASTSTONE
M-2
ALUMINUM GREY
PREFINISHED
METAL CANOPY AWNING
PARAPET HEIGHT
HVAC SCREEN
PARAPET HEIGHT
HVAC SCREEN
GLASS
BREEZEWAY
WALL SCONCE LIGHT,
TYPICAL
ST-3
BROWNSTONE BY
ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
ST-2
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
W-1
DARK STAINED WOOD
HORIZONTAL BOARDS
RAINSCREEN
M-2
ALUMINUM GREY
PREFINISHED
METAL CANOPY
AWNING
35' - 0"40' - 0"ST-1
PEBBLE BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
CAST STONE
ST-1
PEBBLE BY ROCKCAST
PEBBLE
BY ROCKCAST
W/ FASTRACK CLIP SYSTEM
16 X 24 X 1 1/4
ST-2
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
CARAMEL
BY ROCKCAST
W/ FASTRACK CLIP SYSTEM
16 X 24 X 1 1/4
ST-3
BROWNSTONE BY ROCKCAST
BROWNSTONE
BY ROCKCAST
W/ FASTRACK CLIP SYSTEM
16 X 24 X 1 1/4
METAL
M-1
ALMOND
BERRIDGE
COPPING / FLASHING
M-2
ALUMINUM GREY
4-AGT-30
ALPOLIC METAL - COMPOSITE
METAL FASCIA / CANOPY AWNING
MATERIALS
STORE FRONT
SF-1
STORE FRONT FRAME
CHAMPAGNE ANODIZED PLUS
YKK AP
GLASS
G-1
GLASS
SOLARBAN 67 CLEAR
PPG
PAINT
P-1
PAINT -
PEBBLE BY ROCKCAST
P-2
PAINT-
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
P-3
PAINT-
BROWNSTONE BY ROCKCAST
WOOD
W-1
WOOD RAINSCREEN
DARK STAIN
GROUT / MORTAR TO MATCH ADJACENT
CASTSTONE
METAL DOORS TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH
ADJACENT CASTSTONE
CAST STONE (ALTERNATE)
ST-1 (ALTERNATE)
PEBBLE BY ROCKCAST
SNOWCAP
BY HERITAGE CASTSTONE
THIN ADHERED MASONRY
12 X 24 X 1 1/4"
ST-2 (ALTERNATE)
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
BUCKSKIN
BY HERITAGE CASTSTONE
THIN ADHERED MASONRY
12 X 24 X 1 1/4"
ST-3 (ALTERNATE)
BROWNSTONE BY ROCKCAST
LEATHER
BY HERITAGE CASTSTONE
THIN ADHERED MASONRY
12 X 24 X 1 1/4"
ST-1
PEBBLE BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
ST-1
PEBBLE BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
ST-2
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
P-1 PAINT GREY
METAL DOOR PAINT TO MATCH
ADJACENT CAST STONE
WALL SCONCE LIGHT
TYPICAL
ST-2
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
ST-2
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
W-1
DARK STAINED WOOD
HORIZONTAL BOARDS
RAINSCREEN
P-1
PAINT GREY
METAL DOOR
PAINT TO MATCH ADJACENT
CAST STONE
M-2
ALUMINUM GREY
PREFINISHED
METAL CANOPY AWNING
ST-2
CARMEL BY
ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
SCREENING WALL FOR
UTILITY METERS
SCREENING WALL FOR
UTILITY METERS
ST-2
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
7' - 0"7' - 0"
W-1
DARK STAINED WOOD
HORIZONTAL BOARDS
RAINSCREEN
ST-2
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
M-2
ALUMINUM GREY
PREFINISHED
METAL CANOPY
AWNING
SF-1
STORE FRONT FRAME
CHAMPAGNE ANODIZED
PLUS &
G-1
GLASS
SOLARBAN 67 CLEAR
SF-1
STORE FRONT FRAME
CHAMPAGNE ANODIZED
PLUS &
G-1
GLASS
SOLARBAN 67 CLEAR
W-1
DARK STAINED WOOD
HORIZONTAL BOARDS
RAINSCREEN
Scale
Project number
Date
Drawn by
Checked by
Greg Guerin Architect TX License # 22011
0REM.G
GNIRE
UG
A
TTS XETEFO SAREGISTE R E D AR
C
H
I
TECT22 1 1
02-24-16
EAST STAR DESIGN
P.O. BOX 53
FORNEY, TX 75126 USA
(214) 469-7176
(972) 200-7340
www.EastStarDesign.com
Architect@EastStarDesign.comEASTRTASDESING
2/24/2016 9:37:40 AM
As indicated
2/24/2016 9:37:40 AMA-4
Elevations
14020
Point West Development
Sun Holdings
GG
-
I-635 & Beltline Coppell, TX
3/32" = 1'-0"1 Front - East Elevation
3/32" = 1'-0"2 Rear - West Elevation
No. Description Date
UTILITY METER
SCREEN WALL
ST-2
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
M-2
ALUMINUM GREY
PREFINISHED
METAL
CANOPY AWNING
ST-1
PEBBLE BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
W-1
DARK STAINED WOOD
HORIZONTAL BOARDS
RAINSCREEN
ST-2
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
SF-1
STORE FRONT FRAME
CHAMPAGNE ANODIZED PLUS &
G-1
GLASS
SOLARBAN 67 CLEAR
UTILITY METER
SCREEN WALL
ST-2
CARMEL BY
ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
M-2
ALUMINUM GREY
PREFINISHED
METAL CANOPY
AWNING
ST-1
PEBBLE BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
W-1
DARK STAINED WOOD
HORIZONTAL BOARDS
RAINSCREEN
ST-2
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
SF-1
STORE FRONT FRAME
CHAMPAGNE ANODIZED PLUS &
G-1
GLASS
SOLARBAN 67 CLEAR
ST-1
PEBBLE BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
ST-2
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
M-1
ALMOND
PREFINISHED
METAL FASCIA
GLASS
WALL SCONCE
LIGHT TYPICAL
UTILITY METER
SCREEN WALL
ST-2
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
M-2
ALUMINUM GREY
PREFINISHED
METAL CANOPY
AWNING
WALL SCONCE
LIGHT TYPICAL
M-2
ALUMINUM GREY
PREFINISHED
METAL CANOPY AWNING
ST-1
PEBBLE BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
ST-2
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
M-1
ALMOND
PREFINISHED
METAL FASCIA
GLASS
UTILITY METER
SCREEN WALL40' - 0"ST-2
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
SF-1
STORE FRONT FRAME
CHAMPAGNE ANODIZED
PLUS &
G-1
GLASS
SOLARBAN 67 CLEAR
CAST STONE
ST-1
PEBBLE BY ROCKCAST
PEBBLE
BY ROCKCAST
W/ FASTRACK CLIP SYSTEM
16 X 24 X 1 1/4
ST-2
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
CARAMEL
BY ROCKCAST
W/ FASTRACK CLIP SYSTEM
16 X 24 X 1 1/4
ST-3
BROWNSTONE BY ROCKCAST
BROWNSTONE
BY ROCKCAST
W/ FASTRACK CLIP SYSTEM
16 X 24 X 1 1/4
METAL
M-1
ALMOND
BERRIDGE
COPPING / FLASHING
M-2
ALUMINUM GREY
4-AGT-30
ALPOLIC METAL - COMPOSITE
METAL FASCIA / CANOPY AWNING
MATERIALS
STORE FRONT
SF-1
STORE FRONT FRAME
CHAMPAGNE ANODIZED PLUS
YKK AP
GLASS
G-1
GLASS
SOLARBAN 67 CLEAR
PPG
PAINT
P-1
PAINT -
PEBBLE BY ROCKCAST
P-2
PAINT-
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
P-3
PAINT-
BROWNSTONE BY ROCKCAST
WOOD
W-1
WOOD RAINSCREEN
DARK STAIN
GROUT / MORTAR TO MATCH ADJACENT
CASTSTONE
METAL DOORS TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH
ADJACENT CASTSTONE
CAST STONE (ALTERNATE)
ST-1 (ALTERNATE)
PEBBLE BY ROCKCAST
SNOWCAP
BY HERITAGE CASTSTONE
THIN ADHERED MASONRY
12 X 24 X 1 1/4"
ST-2 (ALTERNATE)
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
BUCKSKIN
BY HERITAGE CASTSTONE
THIN ADHERED MASONRY
12 X 24 X 1 1/4"
ST-3 (ALTERNATE)
BROWNSTONE BY ROCKCAST
LEATHER
BY HERITAGE CASTSTONE
THIN ADHERED MASONRY
12 X 24 X 1 1/4"B-C-E
-
D
-11'-4"8.5 CMU BLOCKS WIDE15'-4"
11.5 CMU BLOCKS WIDE
1'-4"12'-8"1'-4"
8x8x16 CMU BLOCKS
#5 RE-BAR AT 32" O.C. MAX VERTICAL
REINFORCING
FILL CELLS SOLID WITH GROUT
TRUSS TYPE REINFORCING @ 16" O.C. MAX BY
HOHMANN & BARNARD WWW.H-B.COM OR
EQUAL
13'-0"
6" DIA. STEEL
PIPE
CONCRETE
FILLED
BOLLARDS
6'-0"1"6'-0"
21_
2 "
6"
COLLAR HINGES
GREASE AFTER
PAINTING
METAL DECK WELDED
TO 21/2" X 2 1/2"
TUBE STEEL FRAME
DROP ROD 8'-0"6" DIA. STEEL PIPE POST
21_
2 "
6"7'-8"4"5'-0"4'-6"4'-6"
GATE PULLPAINT METAL
GATES
DARK BRONZE
NOTE:
GATES TO REMAIN CLOSED WHEN NOT IN USE
ST-2
BROWN CAST
STONE
METAL
COPING
MEDIUM
BRONZE
15'-4"
Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
FRONT EXTERIOR ELEVATION
BScale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
REAR EXTERIOR ELEVATION
C Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
FLOOR PLAN
A
Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
SIDE EXTERIOR ELEVATION
D
ST-2
BROWN CAST
STONE
ST-2
BROWN CAST
STONE
16' - 3"
5 1/2"5 1/2"
BRICK LEDGE
WIDTH
8'-0"SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"
WALL SECTIONE
CMU BOND BEAM
8X8X16 CMU BLOCKS
#5 RE-BAR AT 32" O.C. MAX VERTICAL
REINFORCING
FILL CELLS SOLID WITH GROUT
TRUSS TYPE REINFORCING @ 16" O.C. MAX BY
HOHMANN & BARNARD WWW.H-B.COM OR EQUAL
8'-0" TOP OF
CMU
BOND BEAM
REINFORCED CONCRETE FOOTING
6" THICK
REINFORCED CONCRETE
SLAB
EPOXY PAINT OVER CMU AT INTERIOR
MEDIUM BRONZE METAL COPPING
OVER
PRESSURE TREATED 2X8 NAILER
ANCHORED
TO CMU
ST-2
BROWN CAST
STONE
AIR GAP
WEEP HOLES AT
32" O.C. MIN.
CONCRETE
LEDGE FOR
BRICK
Scale
Project number
Date
Drawn by
Checked by
Greg Guerin Architect TX License # 22011
0REM.G
GNIRE
UG
A
TTS XETEFO SAREGISTE R E D AR
C
H
I
TECT22 1 1
02-24-16
EAST STAR DESIGN
P.O. BOX 53
FORNEY, TX 75126 USA
(214) 469-7176
(972) 200-7340
www.EastStarDesign.com
Architect@EastStarDesign.comEASTRTASDESING
2/24/2016 9:40:34 AM
As indicated
2/24/2016 9:40:34 AMA-5
Elevations
14020
Point West Development
Sun Holdings
GG
-
I-635 & Beltline Coppell, TX
3/32" = 1'-0"1 Left-South Elevation
3/32" = 1'-0"2 Right-North Elevation
3/32" = 1'-0"3 North Courtyard Elevation
3/32" = 1'-0"4 South Courtyard Elevation
No. Description Date
Scale
Project number
Date
Drawn by
Checked by
Greg Guerin Architect TX License # 22011
0REM.G
GNIRE
UG
A
TTS XETEFO SAREGISTE R E D AR
C
H
I
TECT22 1 1
02-24-16
EAST STAR DESIGN
P.O. BOX 53
FORNEY, TX 75126 USA
(214) 469-7176
(972) 200-7340
www.EastStarDesign.com
Architect@EastStarDesign.comEASTRTASDESING
2/24/2016 10:27:39 AM
2/24/2016 10:27:39 AMA-6
Perspective
Views
14020
Point West Development
Sun Holdings
GG
-
I-635 & Beltline Coppell, TX
1 Perspective at South East Corner
2 Front Perspective View
No. Description Date
Scale
Project number
Date
Drawn by
Checked by
Greg Guerin Architect TX License # 22011
0REM.G
GNIRE
UG
A
TTS XETEFO SAREGISTE R E D AR
C
H
I
TECT22 1 1
02-23-16
EAST STAR DESIGN
P.O. BOX 53
FORNEY, TX 75126 USA
(214) 469-7176
(972) 200-7340
www.EastStarDesign.com
Architect@EastStarDesign.comEASTRTASDESING
2/23/2016 9:03:09 PM
2/23/2016 9:03:09 PMA-8
Center Right
Perspective
14020
Point West Development
Sun Holdings
GG
-
I-635 & Beltline Coppell, TX
No. Description Date
Scale
Project number
Date
Drawn by
Checked by
Greg Guerin Architect TX License # 22011
0REM.G
GNIRE
UG
A
TTS XETEFO SAREGISTE R E D AR
C
H
I
TECT22 1 1
02-23-16
EAST STAR DESIGN
P.O. BOX 53
FORNEY, TX 75126 USA
(214) 469-7176
(972) 200-7340
www.EastStarDesign.com
Architect@EastStarDesign.comEASTRTASDESING
2/23/2016 9:18:42 PM
2/23/2016 9:18:42 PMA-9
Left Corner
Perspective
14020
Point West Development
Sun Holdings
GG
-
I-635 & Beltline Coppell, TX
No. Description Date
Scale
Project number
Date
Drawn by
Checked by
Greg Guerin Architect TX License # 22011
0REM.G
GNIRE
UG
A
TTS XETEFO SAREGISTE R E D AR
C
H
I
TECT22 1 1
02-23-16
EAST STAR DESIGN
P.O. BOX 53
FORNEY, TX 75126 USA
(214) 469-7176
(972) 200-7340
www.EastStarDesign.com
Architect@EastStarDesign.comEASTRTASDESING
2/23/2016 7:19:03 PM
2/23/2016 7:19:03 PMA-7
Bird's Eye View
14020
Point West Development
Sun Holdings
GG
-
I-635 & Beltline Coppell, TX
1 Bird's Eye View
No. Description Date
Coppell PD 221R3-HC Ordinance - Page 1 TM 75673
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. ________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS,
AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP
OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, AS HERETOFORE AMENDED, BY
GRANTING A CHANGE IN ZONING PD-221R3-HC (PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT-221 REVISION 3-HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) TO PD-
221R3R-HC (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT-221 REVISION 3 REVISED-
HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL), TO AMEND THE CONCEPT PLAN ON 17.14
ACRES TO ALLOW REVISED PERMITTED USES, CIRCULATION,
SIGNAGE AND ATTACH A DETAIL SITE PLAN FOR TWO
RETAIL/RESTAURANT BUILDINGS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY
17,000 SQUARE FEET ON 3.9 ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF IH 635 AND S. BELT LINE ROAD, AND
BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A”
ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN; PROVIDING
FOR APPROVAL OF THE CONCEPT SITE PLAN, CONCEPT PLAN SITE
PLAN BUILDINGS, CONCEPT LANDSCAPE PLAN BUILDINGS, DETAIL
SITE PLAN, DETAIL LANDSCAPE PLANS, ELEVATIONS, AND
PERSPECTIVE VIEWS, ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBITS “A”
THOUGH “H”; PROVIDING FOR DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS;
PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY
OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS
($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Commission and the governing body of the City
of Coppell, Texas, in compliance with the laws of the State of Texas and pursuant to the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, have given requisite notices by publication
and otherwise, and after holding due hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property
owners generally, and to all persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity
thereof, the said governing body is of the opinion that Zoning Application No. PD-221R3R-HC should
be approved, and in the exercise of legislative discretion have concluded that the Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance and Map should be amended.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF COPPELL, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map of the City of Coppell,
Texas, duly passed by the governing body of the City of Coppell, Texas, as heretofore amended, be
and the same is hereby amended by granting a change in zoning PD-221R3-HC (Planned
Coppell PD 221R3-HC Ordinance - Page 2 TM 75673
2
Development-221 Revision 3-Highway Commercial) to PD-221R3R-HC (Planned Development-
221 Revision 3 Revised-Highway Commercial), to amend the Concept Plan on 17.14 acres to allow
revised permitted uses, lotting patterns, circulation, signage and attach a Detail Site Plan for two
retail/restaurant buildings totaling approximately 17,000 square feet on 3.9 acres of property
located at the northwest corner of IH 635 and S. Belt Line Road for the Property described in Exhibit
“A” attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes.
SECTION 2. That the Property will be used and developed in accordance with Highway
Commercial zoning regulations as provided in the Code of Ordinances, is hereby approved subject to
the following development regulations:
A. The Concept Plan for Lots 1 – 8, and common areas as attached hereto is hereby
approved subject to the development regulations as set forth and provided in this
Ordinance.
B. A Detail Site Plan for Lots 2 and 3 is hereby approved as provided herein;
Development on Lots 1, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 within the PD shall require a Detail Site
Plan approved by City Council. Detail Site Plans shall meet all development code
requirements, unless except provided as herein. Detail Site Plans with elevation
facades will be required and all buildings and structures within the Planned
Development and the buildings shall be architecturally compatible with the
elevations as depicted in Exhibit “G”.
C. This property will be replatted to provide building sites, easements and fire lanes
prior to issuance of any permits and any development.
D. A 35-foot tall monument sign shall be permitted on Lot 5 and shall substantially
conform to the Concept Plan Exhibit ”C”.
Coppell PD 221R3-HC Ordinance - Page 3 TM 75673
3
E. All lots within the Development shall have 60-foot front yards, 30-foot side yards
and 20-foot rear yard setbacks, except the side yards of Lots 2, 3, 5 & 6 which shall
be 10 (ten) feet where there is a dedicated patio area.
F. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit for buildings on Lots 2 or 3, Private Drive
A, between Belt Line Road and Point West Blvd shall be constructed to full width
and Private Drive C, shall be constructed to full width between Belt Line Road and
the driveway to Lot 2, as depicted on the Concept Plan.
G. Private Drive B and the remainder of Private Drive C, as depicted on the Concept
Plan, shall be constructed to full width prior to the issuance of building permits for
either developments on Lots 1 or 8.
H. The building signage for the development shall be consistent and complaint with
the Sign Provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended.
I. Detail Site Plan for the pedestrian/art/plaza (commons) shall be submitted and
approved for Administrative approval and such commons shall be in substantial
compliance to the Concept Plan.
J. Business Property Owners Association shall form and maintain all common areas,
including the pedestrian/art/plaza area, private driveways and any and all enhanced
paving surfaces or common landscapes. Property Owners Association documents
areas shall be submitted for administrative review and approval prior to the filing
of the Final Plat.
K. The median opening at Belt Line Road between Private Drive A and Hackberry
Road will be redesigned, and shall be approved by Engineering review for safety
and traffic movements.
Coppell PD 221R3-HC Ordinance - Page 4 TM 75673
4
SECTION 3. That the Concept Plan, Site Plan, Concept Plan Site Plan Buildings, Concept
Landscape Plan, Detail Site Plan for Lots 2 and 3, Detail Landscape Plans, Elevations, and Perspective
Views, attached hereto as Exhibits “A” through “H” .
SECTION 4. That the above property shall be used only in the manner and for the purpose
provided for by the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, as heretofore amended,
and as amended herein.
SECTION 5. That the development of the property herein shall be in accordance with
building regulations, zoning ordinances, and any applicable ordinances except as may be specifically
altered or amended herein.
SECTION 6. That all provisions of the Ordinances of the City of Coppell, Texas, in conflict
with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same are hereby, repealed, and all other provisions
not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 7. That should any sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of
this ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, the same shall not affect
the validity of this ordinance as a whole, or any part or provision thereof other than the part so decided
to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, and shall not affect the validity of the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance as a whole.
SECTION 8. An offense committed before the effective date of this ordinance is governed
by prior law and the provisions of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, as amended, in effect when
the offense was committed and the former law is continued in effect for this purpose.
SECTION 9. That any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions or terms
of this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Coppell, as heretofore amended, and upon conviction shall be punished by a
Coppell PD 221R3-HC Ordinance - Page 5 TM 75673
5
fine not to exceed the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense; and each and every
day such violation shall continue shall be deemed to constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 10. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage
and the publication of its caption, as the law and charter in such cases provide.
DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, this the _______ day of
___________________, 2016.
APPROVED:
_____________________________________
KAREN SELBO HUNT
ATTEST:
___________________________________
CHRISTEL PETTINOS, CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________
ROBERT E. HAGER, CITY ATTORNEY
TOP OF SLAB
0' - 0"
TOP OF CORNICE
35' - 0"1'-6"1'-0"CAST STONE
TRIM
CORNICE
BACK LIT CHANNEL
LETTERS
BRICK #1
RUNNING BOND
BRICK #2
HERRING BONE
CAST STONE
WATERTABLE
CAST STONE
SILL
A-1
3
CORNER OF I-635 & BELTLINE RD.
15'-0"15'-0"A-1
CONCEPT
SITE PLAN
PARCELSEASTRTASdesing
ZONING:PD-221R3R-HC
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
LOT 1 BLOCK C
DUKE LESLEY ADDITION
DIVIDEND DRIVE & POINT WEST
BOULEVARD
INST.#20070240528
D.R.D.C.T.
VACANT TRACT 757,425 SF 17.3881
AC
AS SURVEYED
JANUARY 2016
ARCHITECT
GREG GUERIN
EAST STAR DESIGN
P.O. BOX 53
FORNEY, TX 75126
(214)469-7176
GGUERIN@EASTSTARDESIGN.COM
OWNER
SUN HOLDINGS, INC
3318 FOREST LN.
DALLAS, TX
ARMANDO PALACIOS
(214) 551-0921
APALACIOS@SUNHOLDINGS.NET
FEMA MAP
AREA OF MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD
ZONE X
PANEL 48121C0725G
0REM.G
GNIRE
UG
A
T
TS XETEFO SAREGISTE R E D ARC
H
I
TECT22 1 1
A-2
CONCEPT
SITE PLAN
BUILDINGSEASTRTASdesing
ZONING:PD-221R3R-HC
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
LOT 1 BLOCK C
DUKE LESLEY ADDITION
DIVIDEND DRIVE & POINT WEST
BOULEVARD
INST.#20070240528
D.R.D.C.T.
VACANT TRACT 757,425 SF 17.3881
AC
AS SURVEYED
JANUARY 2016
ARCHITECT
GREG GUERIN
EAST STAR DESIGN
P.O. BOX 53
FORNEY, TX 75126
(214)469-7176
GGUERIN@EASTSTARDESIGN.COM
OWNER
SUN HOLDINGS, INC
3318 FOREST LN.
DALLAS, TX
ARMANDO PALACIOS
(214) 551-0921
APALACIOS@SUNHOLDINGS.NET
FEMA MAP
AREA OF MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD
ZONE X
PANEL 48121C0725G
0REM.G
GNIRE
UG
A
T
TS XETEFO SAREGISTE R E D ARC
H
I
TECT22 1 1
10'64''2'4.+0(6
10'64''2'4
.+0(6
5%4''0+0)1(
2#4-+0)
10'64''2'4
.+0(6
10'64''2'4
.+0(6
64''2'42#4-+0)
.16+5.#0&
10'64''2'4.+0(6
10'64''2'4.+0(6
.16
.16
.16
.16
.16
.16
.16
.16
2412'46;.+0'
241215'&5+6'.#0&5%#2'64''5
':+56+0)#&,#%'06.#0&5%#2'
Scale: 1" = 60'
Concept Landscape Plan
Site Location
Jurisdiction of Project
Landscaping Requirements
Irrigation Requirements
REGULATORY AUTHORITIES:
CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING & ZONING
255 PARKWAY BLVD.
PO BOX 9478
COPPELL, TX 75019
972 304-7092
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATION
ELIMINATION OF ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERS
E.O. THOMPSON STATE OFFICE BUILDING
920 COLORADO
AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701
(512) 463-3211
(512) 475-2886 (FAX)
CITY OF COPPELL LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS
ARTICLE 34. LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS
SEC. 12-34
NO EXISTING TREES ON SITE.
UNDERGROUND AUTOMATIC SPRINKLING SYSTEM PROVIDED.
SYSTEM DESIGNED AND INSTALLED ACCORDING TO TCEQ LAWS AND
REGULATIONS PROVIDING FOR 100% COVERAGE ON ALL LANDSCAPE AND TURF.
THE SYSTEM SHALL INCLUDE A FREEZE-RAIN SENSOR.('.&/#0&'5+)0567&+1521$QZ4KEJCTFUQP6GZCU2JQPG Á(CZ ÁKPHQ"HGNFOCPFGUKIPEQODrawing Key
CONCEPT LANDSCAPE PLAN
PD- 221R3R-HC
SITE
LOT 1 BLOCK C
DUKE LESLEY ADDITION
DIVIDEND DRIVE & POINT WEST
BOULEVARD
INST.#20070240528
D.R.D.C.T.
VACANT TRACT 757,425 SF 17.3881
AC
AS SURVEYED
SEPTEMBER 2015
ZONING: PD PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT
FEMA MAP
AREA OF MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD
ZONE X
PANEL 48121C0725G
OWNER & PROFESSIONALS
OWNER
SUN HOLDINGS, INC
3318 FOREST LN.
DALLAS, TX
ARMANDO PALACIOS
(214) 551-0921
APALACIOS@SUNHOLDINGS.NET
ARMANDO LOPEZ
(210)889-3084
ALOPEZ@SUNHOLDINGS.NET
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
FELDMAN DESIGN STUDIOS
PO BOX 834326
RICHARDSON, TEXAS 750803
CAROL FELDMAN
972 980-1730
CAROL@FELDMANDESIGN.COM
PROVIDE ADDRESS
NUMBER ON SIDE
OF SIGN FACING
STREET
PER FIRE
DEPARTMENT
TOP OF SLAB
0' - 0"
CAST STONE
TOP OF LOW SIGN
4' - 0"0'-8"BACK LIT CHANNEL LETTERS
CAST STONE CAP
4'X6' = 24 SQ. FT.
A-2
3
6'-0"2'-0"BELTLINE RD.
A-3
DETAIL
SITE PLANEASTRTASdesing
ZONING:PD-221R3R-HC
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
LOT 1 BLOCK C
DUKE LESLEY ADDITION
DIVIDEND DRIVE & POINT WEST
BOULEVARD
INST.#20070240528
D.R.D.C.T.
VACANT TRACT 757,425 SF 17.3881
AC
AS SURVEYED
JANUARY 2016
ARCHITECT
GREG GUERIN
EAST STAR DESIGN
P.O. BOX 53
FORNEY, TX 75126
(214)469-7176
GGUERIN@EASTSTARDESIGN.COM
OWNER
SUN HOLDINGS, INC
3318 FOREST LN.
DALLAS, TX
ARMANDO PALACIOS
(214) 551-0921
APALACIOS@SUNHOLDINGS.NET
FEMA MAP
AREA OF MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD
ZONE X
PANEL 48121C0725G
0REM.G
GNIRE
UG
A
T
TS XETEFO SAREGISTE R E D ARC
H
I
TECT22 1 1
%''./
.+0&*'+/'4/7*.;
&'5'469+..19
5*7/#4&4'&1#-
)7.(/7*.;724+)*6415'/#4;
5*7/#4&4'&1#-
724+)*6415'/#4;)7.(/7*.;
5*7/#4&4'&1#-
5*7/#4&4'&1#-
;#7210
*1..;
&'%14#6+8'2#8+0)&'%14#6+8'2#8+0)
%''./
;#7210*1..;
724+)*6415'/#4;
;#7210*1..;
)7.(/7*.;
.+0&*'+/'4/7*.;
.+0&*'+/'4/7*.;
0'..+'456'8'05
*1..;ÁÁ
.16
5(
#%4'5
4'6#+.Á4'56#74#06Á1((+%'
5*7/#4&4'&1#-
2412'46;.+0'
$'4/7ʢ()4#55
241215'&%''./
241215'&&'5'469+..19
241215'&;#7210*1..;
241215'&5*7/#4&4'&1#-
(+4'.#0'
Scale: 1" = 20'
NORTH LOT LANDSCAPE PLAN
Drawing Key
Plant List
SITE
LOT 1 BLOCK C
DUKE LESLEY ADDITION
DIVIDEND DRIVE & POINT WEST
BOULEVARD
INST.#20070240528
D.R.D.C.T.
VACANT TRACT 757,425 SF 17.3881
AC
AS SURVEYED
SEPTEMBER 2015
ZONING: PD PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT
FEMA MAP
AREA OF MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD
ZONE X
PANEL 48121C0725G
OWNER & PROFESSIONALS
OWNER
SUN HOLDINGS, INC
3318 FOREST LN.
DALLAS, TX
ARMANDO PALACIOS
(214) 551-0921
APALACIOS@SUNHOLDINGS.NET
ARMANDO LOPEZ
(210)889-3084
ALOPEZ@SUNHOLDINGS.NET
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
FELDMAN DESIGN STUDIOS
PO BOX 834326
RICHARDSON, TEXAS 750803
CAROL FELDMAN
972 980-1730
CAROL@FELDMANDESIGN.COM
Site Location
Jurisdiction of Project
Landscaping Requirements
Irrigation Requirements ('.&/#0&'5+)0567&+1521$QZ4KEJCTFUQP6GZCU2JQPG Á(CZ ÁKPHQ"HGNFOCPFGUKIPEQODETAIL LANDSCAPE PLAN - NORTH
PD- 221R3R-HC
REGULATORY AUTHORITIES:
CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING & ZONING
255 PARKWAY BLVD.
PO BOX 9478
COPPELL, TX 75019
972 304-7092
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATION
ELIMINATION OF ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERS
E.O. THOMPSON STATE OFFICE BUILDING
920 COLORADO
AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701
(512) 463-3211
(512) 475-2886 (FAX)
CITY OF COPPELL LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS
ARTICLE 34. LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS
SEC. 12-34
NO EXISTING TREES ON SITE.
UNDERGROUND AUTOMATIC SPRINKLING SYSTEM PROVIDED.
SYSTEM DESIGNED AND INSTALLED ACCORDING TO TCEQ LAWS AND
REGULATIONS PROVIDING FOR 100% COVERAGE ON ALL LANDSCAPE AND TURF.
THE SYSTEM SHALL INCLUDE A FREEZE-RAIN SENSOR.
)7.(
/7*.;
5*7/#4&4'&1#-
5*7/#4&4'&1#-
%''./.+0&*'+/'4
/7*.;
&'5'469+..19
5*7/#4&4'&1#-
5*7/#4&4'&1#-
;#7210*1..;
724+)*6415'/#4;
&'%14#
6
+
8
'
2
#
8
+
0
)&'%14#6+8'2#8+0);#7210*1..;
%''./
%''./
;#7210*1..;
0'..+'456'8'05*1..;
5*7/#4&4'&1#-
724+)*6415'/#4;
)7.(/7*.;
%''./
%''./
.+0&*'+/'4
/7*.;ÁÁ
%''./
%''./
.16
5(
#%4'5
4'6#+.Á4'56#74#06Á1((+%'
#46914-
2412'46;.+0'
$'4/7ʢ()4#55
241215'&%''./
241215'&&'5'469+..19
241215'&;#7210*1..;
241215'&5*7/#4&4'&1#-
(+4'.#0'
Scale: 1" = 20'
SOUTH LOT LANDSCAPE PLANDrawing Key
Plant List
SITE
LOT 1 BLOCK C
DUKE LESLEY ADDITION
DIVIDEND DRIVE & POINT WEST
BOULEVARD
INST.#20070240528
D.R.D.C.T.
VACANT TRACT 757,425 SF 17.3881
AC
AS SURVEYED
SEPTEMBER 2015
ZONING: PD PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT
FEMA MAP
AREA OF MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD
ZONE X
PANEL 48121C0725G
OWNER & PROFESSIONALS
OWNER
SUN HOLDINGS, INC
3318 FOREST LN.
DALLAS, TX
ARMANDO PALACIOS
(214) 551-0921
APALACIOS@SUNHOLDINGS.NET
ARMANDO LOPEZ
(210)889-3084
ALOPEZ@SUNHOLDINGS.NET
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
FELDMAN DESIGN STUDIOS
PO BOX 834326
RICHARDSON, TEXAS 750803
CAROL FELDMAN
972 980-1730
CAROL@FELDMANDESIGN.COM
Site Location ('.&/#0&'5+)0567&+1521$QZ4KEJCTFUQP6GZCU2JQPG Á(CZ ÁKPHQ"HGNFOCPFGUKIPEQODETAIL LANDSCAPE PLAN - SOUTH
PD- 221R3R-HC
Jurisdiction of Project
Landscaping Requirements
Irrigation Requirements
REGULATORY AUTHORITIES:
CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING & ZONING
255 PARKWAY BLVD.
PO BOX 9478
COPPELL, TX 75019
972 304-7092
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATION
ELIMINATION OF ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERS
E.O. THOMPSON STATE OFFICE BUILDING
920 COLORADO
AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701
(512) 463-3211
(512) 475-2886 (FAX)
CITY OF COPPELL LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS
ARTICLE 34. LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS
SEC. 12-34
NO EXISTING TREES ON SITE.
UNDERGROUND AUTOMATIC SPRINKLING SYSTEM PROVIDED.
SYSTEM DESIGNED AND INSTALLED ACCORDING TO TCEQ LAWS AND
REGULATIONS PROVIDING FOR 100% COVERAGE ON ALL LANDSCAPE AND TURF.
THE SYSTEM SHALL INCLUDE A FREEZE-RAIN SENSOR.
ST-2
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
ST-1
PEBBLE BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
ST-3
BROWNSTONE BY
ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
W-1
DARK STAINED WOOD
HORIZONTAL BOARDS
RAINSCREEN
M-2
ALUMINUM GREY
PREFINISHED
METAL CANOPY
AWNING
PREFINISHED
METAL CANOPY AWNING
M-1
ALMOND
PREFINISHED
METAL FASCIA
SF-1
STORE FRONT FRAME
CHAMPAGNE ANODIZED
PLUS &
G-1
GLASS
SOLARBAN 67 CLEAR
SF-1
STORE FRONT FRAME
CHAMPAGNE ANODIZED PLUS &
G-1
GLASS
SOLARBAN 67 CLEAR
M-1
ALMOND
PREFINISHED
METAL FASCIA
METAL DOOR
PAINT TO MATCH
ADJACENT
CASTSTONE
M-2
ALUMINUM GREY
PREFINISHED
METAL CANOPY AWNING
PARAPET HEIGHT
HVAC SCREEN
PARAPET HEIGHT
HVAC SCREEN
GLASS
BREEZEWAY
WALL SCONCE LIGHT,
TYPICAL
ST-3
BROWNSTONE BY
ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
ST-2
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
W-1
DARK STAINED WOOD
HORIZONTAL BOARDS
RAINSCREEN
M-2
ALUMINUM GREY
PREFINISHED
METAL CANOPY
AWNING
35' - 0"40' - 0"ST-1
PEBBLE BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
CAST STONE
ST-1
PEBBLE BY ROCKCAST
PEBBLE
BY ROCKCAST
W/ FASTRACK CLIP SYSTEM
16 X 24 X 1 1/4
ST-2
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
CARAMEL
BY ROCKCAST
W/ FASTRACK CLIP SYSTEM
16 X 24 X 1 1/4
ST-3
BROWNSTONE BY ROCKCAST
BROWNSTONE
BY ROCKCAST
W/ FASTRACK CLIP SYSTEM
16 X 24 X 1 1/4
METAL
M-1
ALMOND
BERRIDGE
COPPING / FLASHING
M-2
ALUMINUM GREY
4-AGT-30
ALPOLIC METAL - COMPOSITE
METAL FASCIA / CANOPY AWNING
MATERIALS
STORE FRONT
SF-1
STORE FRONT FRAME
CHAMPAGNE ANODIZED PLUS
YKK AP
GLASS
G-1
GLASS
SOLARBAN 67 CLEAR
PPG
PAINT
P-1
PAINT -
PEBBLE BY ROCKCAST
P-2
PAINT-
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
P-3
PAINT-
BROWNSTONE BY ROCKCAST
WOOD
W-1
WOOD RAINSCREEN
DARK STAIN
GROUT / MORTAR TO MATCH ADJACENT
CASTSTONE
METAL DOORS TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH
ADJACENT CASTSTONE
CAST STONE (ALTERNATE)
ST-1 (ALTERNATE)
PEBBLE BY ROCKCAST
SNOWCAP
BY HERITAGE CASTSTONE
THIN ADHERED MASONRY
12 X 24 X 1 1/4"
ST-2 (ALTERNATE)
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
BUCKSKIN
BY HERITAGE CASTSTONE
THIN ADHERED MASONRY
12 X 24 X 1 1/4"
ST-3 (ALTERNATE)
BROWNSTONE BY ROCKCAST
LEATHER
BY HERITAGE CASTSTONE
THIN ADHERED MASONRY
12 X 24 X 1 1/4"
ST-1
PEBBLE BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
ST-1
PEBBLE BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
ST-2
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
P-1 PAINT GREY
METAL DOOR PAINT TO MATCH
ADJACENT CAST STONE
WALL SCONCE LIGHT
TYPICAL
ST-2
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
ST-2
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
W-1
DARK STAINED WOOD
HORIZONTAL BOARDS
RAINSCREEN
P-1
PAINT GREY
METAL DOOR
PAINT TO MATCH ADJACENT
CAST STONE
M-2
ALUMINUM GREY
PREFINISHED
METAL CANOPY AWNING
ST-2
CARMEL BY
ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
SCREENING WALL FOR
UTILITY METERS
SCREENING WALL FOR
UTILITY METERS
ST-2
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
7' - 0"7' - 0"
W-1
DARK STAINED WOOD
HORIZONTAL BOARDS
RAINSCREEN
ST-2
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
M-2
ALUMINUM GREY
PREFINISHED
METAL CANOPY
AWNING
SF-1
STORE FRONT FRAME
CHAMPAGNE ANODIZED
PLUS &
G-1
GLASS
SOLARBAN 67 CLEAR
SF-1
STORE FRONT FRAME
CHAMPAGNE ANODIZED
PLUS &
G-1
GLASS
SOLARBAN 67 CLEAR
W-1
DARK STAINED WOOD
HORIZONTAL BOARDS
RAINSCREEN
Scale
Project number
Date
Drawn by
Checked by
Greg Guerin Architect TX License # 22011
0REM.G
GNIRE
UG
A
TTS XETEFO SAREGISTE R E D AR
C
H
I
TECT22 1 1
02-24-16
EAST STAR DESIGN
P.O. BOX 53
FORNEY, TX 75126 USA
(214) 469-7176
(972) 200-7340
www.EastStarDesign.com
Architect@EastStarDesign.comEASTRTASDESING
2/24/2016 9:37:40 AM
As indicated
2/24/2016 9:37:40 AMA-4
Elevations
14020
Point West Development
Sun Holdings
GG
-
I-635 & Beltline Coppell, TX
3/32" = 1'-0"1 Front - East Elevation
3/32" = 1'-0"2 Rear - West Elevation
No. Description Date
UTILITY METER
SCREEN WALL
ST-2
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
M-2
ALUMINUM GREY
PREFINISHED
METAL
CANOPY AWNING
ST-1
PEBBLE BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
W-1
DARK STAINED WOOD
HORIZONTAL BOARDS
RAINSCREEN
ST-2
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
SF-1
STORE FRONT FRAME
CHAMPAGNE ANODIZED PLUS &
G-1
GLASS
SOLARBAN 67 CLEAR
UTILITY METER
SCREEN WALL
ST-2
CARMEL BY
ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
M-2
ALUMINUM GREY
PREFINISHED
METAL CANOPY
AWNING
ST-1
PEBBLE BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
W-1
DARK STAINED WOOD
HORIZONTAL BOARDS
RAINSCREEN
ST-2
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
SF-1
STORE FRONT FRAME
CHAMPAGNE ANODIZED PLUS &
G-1
GLASS
SOLARBAN 67 CLEAR
ST-1
PEBBLE BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
ST-2
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
M-1
ALMOND
PREFINISHED
METAL FASCIA
GLASS
WALL SCONCE
LIGHT TYPICAL
UTILITY METER
SCREEN WALL
ST-2
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
M-2
ALUMINUM GREY
PREFINISHED
METAL CANOPY
AWNING
WALL SCONCE
LIGHT TYPICAL
M-2
ALUMINUM GREY
PREFINISHED
METAL CANOPY AWNING
ST-1
PEBBLE BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
ST-2
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
M-1
ALMOND
PREFINISHED
METAL FASCIA
GLASS
UTILITY METER
SCREEN WALL40' - 0"ST-2
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
THIN CAST STONE
SF-1
STORE FRONT FRAME
CHAMPAGNE ANODIZED
PLUS &
G-1
GLASS
SOLARBAN 67 CLEAR
CAST STONE
ST-1
PEBBLE BY ROCKCAST
PEBBLE
BY ROCKCAST
W/ FASTRACK CLIP SYSTEM
16 X 24 X 1 1/4
ST-2
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
CARAMEL
BY ROCKCAST
W/ FASTRACK CLIP SYSTEM
16 X 24 X 1 1/4
ST-3
BROWNSTONE BY ROCKCAST
BROWNSTONE
BY ROCKCAST
W/ FASTRACK CLIP SYSTEM
16 X 24 X 1 1/4
METAL
M-1
ALMOND
BERRIDGE
COPPING / FLASHING
M-2
ALUMINUM GREY
4-AGT-30
ALPOLIC METAL - COMPOSITE
METAL FASCIA / CANOPY AWNING
MATERIALS
STORE FRONT
SF-1
STORE FRONT FRAME
CHAMPAGNE ANODIZED PLUS
YKK AP
GLASS
G-1
GLASS
SOLARBAN 67 CLEAR
PPG
PAINT
P-1
PAINT -
PEBBLE BY ROCKCAST
P-2
PAINT-
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
P-3
PAINT-
BROWNSTONE BY ROCKCAST
WOOD
W-1
WOOD RAINSCREEN
DARK STAIN
GROUT / MORTAR TO MATCH ADJACENT
CASTSTONE
METAL DOORS TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH
ADJACENT CASTSTONE
CAST STONE (ALTERNATE)
ST-1 (ALTERNATE)
PEBBLE BY ROCKCAST
SNOWCAP
BY HERITAGE CASTSTONE
THIN ADHERED MASONRY
12 X 24 X 1 1/4"
ST-2 (ALTERNATE)
CARMEL BY ROCKCAST
BUCKSKIN
BY HERITAGE CASTSTONE
THIN ADHERED MASONRY
12 X 24 X 1 1/4"
ST-3 (ALTERNATE)
BROWNSTONE BY ROCKCAST
LEATHER
BY HERITAGE CASTSTONE
THIN ADHERED MASONRY
12 X 24 X 1 1/4"B-C-E
-
D
-11'-4"8.5 CMU BLOCKS WIDE15'-4"
11.5 CMU BLOCKS WIDE
1'-4"12'-8"1'-4"
8x8x16 CMU BLOCKS
#5 RE-BAR AT 32" O.C. MAX VERTICAL
REINFORCING
FILL CELLS SOLID WITH GROUT
TRUSS TYPE REINFORCING @ 16" O.C. MAX BY
HOHMANN & BARNARD WWW.H-B.COM OR
EQUAL
13'-0"
6" DIA. STEEL
PIPE
CONCRETE
FILLED
BOLLARDS
6'-0"1"6'-0"
21_
2 "
6"
COLLAR HINGES
GREASE AFTER
PAINTING
METAL DECK WELDED
TO 21/2" X 2 1/2"
TUBE STEEL FRAME
DROP ROD 8'-0"6" DIA. STEEL PIPE POST
21_
2 "
6"7'-8"4"5'-0"4'-6"4'-6"
GATE PULLPAINT METAL
GATES
DARK BRONZE
NOTE:
GATES TO REMAIN CLOSED WHEN NOT IN USE
ST-2
BROWN CAST
STONE
METAL
COPING
MEDIUM
BRONZE
15'-4"
Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
FRONT EXTERIOR ELEVATION
BScale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
REAR EXTERIOR ELEVATION
C Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
FLOOR PLAN
A
Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
SIDE EXTERIOR ELEVATION
D
ST-2
BROWN CAST
STONE
ST-2
BROWN CAST
STONE
16' - 3"
5 1/2"5 1/2"
BRICK LEDGE
WIDTH
8'-0"SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"
WALL SECTIONE
CMU BOND BEAM
8X8X16 CMU BLOCKS
#5 RE-BAR AT 32" O.C. MAX VERTICAL
REINFORCING
FILL CELLS SOLID WITH GROUT
TRUSS TYPE REINFORCING @ 16" O.C. MAX BY
HOHMANN & BARNARD WWW.H-B.COM OR EQUAL
8'-0" TOP OF
CMU
BOND BEAM
REINFORCED CONCRETE FOOTING
6" THICK
REINFORCED CONCRETE
SLAB
EPOXY PAINT OVER CMU AT INTERIOR
MEDIUM BRONZE METAL COPPING
OVER
PRESSURE TREATED 2X8 NAILER
ANCHORED
TO CMU
ST-2
BROWN CAST
STONE
AIR GAP
WEEP HOLES AT
32" O.C. MIN.
CONCRETE
LEDGE FOR
BRICK
Scale
Project number
Date
Drawn by
Checked by
Greg Guerin Architect TX License # 22011
0REM.G
GNIRE
UG
A
TTS XETEFO SAREGISTE R E D AR
C
H
I
TECT22 1 1
02-24-16
EAST STAR DESIGN
P.O. BOX 53
FORNEY, TX 75126 USA
(214) 469-7176
(972) 200-7340
www.EastStarDesign.com
Architect@EastStarDesign.comEASTRTASDESING
2/24/2016 9:40:34 AM
As indicated
2/24/2016 9:40:34 AMA-5
Elevations
14020
Point West Development
Sun Holdings
GG
-
I-635 & Beltline Coppell, TX
3/32" = 1'-0"1 Left-South Elevation
3/32" = 1'-0"2 Right-North Elevation
3/32" = 1'-0"3 North Courtyard Elevation
3/32" = 1'-0"4 South Courtyard Elevation
No. Description Date
Scale
Project number
Date
Drawn by
Checked by
Greg Guerin Architect TX License # 22011
0REM.G
GNIRE
UG
A
TTS XETEFO SAREGISTE R E D AR
C
H
I
TECT22 1 1
02-24-16
EAST STAR DESIGN
P.O. BOX 53
FORNEY, TX 75126 USA
(214) 469-7176
(972) 200-7340
www.EastStarDesign.com
Architect@EastStarDesign.comEASTRTASDESING
2/24/2016 10:27:39 AM
2/24/2016 10:27:39 AMA-6
Perspective
Views
14020
Point West Development
Sun Holdings
GG
-
I-635 & Beltline Coppell, TX
1 Perspective at South East Corner
2 Front Perspective View
No. Description Date
Master
City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard
Coppell, Texas
75019-9478
File Number: 2016-2625
File ID: Type: Status: 2016-2625 Agenda Item Read and Filed
1Version: Reference: In Control: City Secretary
02/02/2016File Created:
02/09/2016Final Action: Mayor and Council ReportsFile Name:
Title: Report by Councilmember Mays regarding a meeting with State Librarian,
Mark Smith.
Notes:
Agenda Date: 02/09/2016
Agenda Number:
Sponsors: Enactment Date:
Attachments: Enactment Number:
Hearing Date: Contact:
Effective Date: Drafter:
History of Legislative File
Action: Result: Return
Date:
Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver-
sion:
1 Read and Filed02/09/2016City Council
Councilmember Mays reported on the State Librarian, Mark Smith's, visit to Irving's new library on
January 25th. The architect used to design the library in Irving is the same one that is working on the
Cozby Library. Councilmember Mays said the discussion was about the future of libraries and that
we are headed in a good direction. He looks forward to the date of our opening.
Councilmember Yingling announced that Leadership North Texas is now accepting applications
through June 17. She also reported on the ribbon cutting at Panasonic and welcomed them to the
community.
Action Text:
Text of Legislative File 2016-2625
Title
Report by Councilmember Mays regarding a meeting with State Librarian, Mark Smith.
Summary
Fiscal Impact:
Staff Recommendation:
Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017
Master Continued (2016-2625)
Goal Icon:
Sustainable City Government
Business Prosperity
Community Wellness and Enrichment
Sense of Community
Special Place to Live
Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017