The URL can be used to link to this page

CP 2016-01-12City Council City of Coppell, Texas Meeting Agenda 255 Parkway Boulevard Coppell, Texas 75019-9478 Council Chambers5:30 PMTuesday, January 12, 2016 KAREN HUNT GARY RODEN Mayor Mayor Pro Tem CLIFF LONG NANCY YINGLING Place 1 Place 5 BRIANNA HINOJOSA-FLORES MARVIN FRANKLIN Place 2 Place 6 WES MAYS MARK HILL Place 3 Place 7 CLAY PHILLIPS City Manager Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas will meet in Regular Called Session at 5:30 p.m. for Executive Session, Work Session will follow immediately thereafter, and Regular Session will begin at 7:30 p.m., to be held at Town Center, 255 Parkway Boulevard, Coppell, Texas. As authorized by Section 551.071(2) of the Texas Government Code, this meeting may be convened into closed Executive Session for the purpose of seeking confidential legal advice from the City Attorney on any agenda item listed herein. The City of Coppell reserves the right to reconvene, recess or realign the Work Session or called Executive Session or order of business at any time prior to adjournment. The purpose of the meeting is to consider the following items: 1.Call to Order 2.Executive Session (Closed to the Public) 1st Floor Conference Room Section 551.087, Texas Government Code - Economic Development Negotiations. A.Discussion regarding economic development prospects south of Northpoint Drive and west of Royal Lane. B.Discussion regarding economic development prospects north of Canyon Road and west of Coppell Road. Page 1 City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 1/8/2016 January 12, 2016City Council Meeting Agenda Section 551.072, Texas Government Code - Deliberation regarding Real Property. C.Consideration of acquisition of property south of Bethel Road and east of Freeport Parkway. Section 551.071, Texas Government Code - Consultation with City Attorney. D.Consultation with City Attorney to seek legal advice pending litigation in cause entitled Mega Contractors, Inc. v. City of Coppell. E.Consultation with City Attorney regarding reconsideration of Agenda Items. Section 551.074, Texas Government Code - Personnel Matters. F.Discussion regarding personnel matters. 3.Work Session (Open to the Public) 1st Floor Conference Room A.Discussion regarding City-wide Stormwater Management Study. B.Discussion regarding Agenda Items. Storm Water Management Memo.pdfAttachments: Regular Session 7:30 p.m. 4.Invocation 5.Pledge of Allegiance Presentation of awards by Imaginuity Interactive.6. 7.Citizens’ Appearance 8.Consent Agenda A.Consider approval of the Minutes: December 8, 2015. Minutes.pdfAttachments: B.Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. ZC-626, Sandy Lake & Lodge, N.W.C., to rezone 0.696 acres of property from SF-12 (Single Family-12) to SF-9 (Single Family-9), located at the northwest corner of Sandy Lake Road and Lodge Road; and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Cover Memo.pdf Ordinance.pdf Exhibit A - Legal Description .pdf Attachments: C.Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. S-1195R4-TC, Verizon Page 2 City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 1/8/2016 January 12, 2016City Council Meeting Agenda Wireless, a zoning change from S-1195R3-TC (Special Use Permit-1195 Revision 3-Town Center) to S-1195R4-TC (Special Use Permit-1195 Revision 4-Town Center), to amend the Special Use Permit to allow a telecommunication tower (being relocated from Andy Brown West) and expansion to the concession/restroom facility to house telecommunication equipment on property located approximately 150 feet east of N. Denton Tap Road and approximately 1,050 feet north of Parkway Blvd. (Andy Brown Central); and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Cover Memo.pdf Ordinance.pdf Exhibit A - Legal Description.pdf Exhibit B - Site Plan .pdf Exhibit C - Detail Site Plan.pdf Exhibit D - Equipment Compound Elevations .pdf Attachments: D.Consider approval of an Ordinance for the Revocation of Ordinances No. 91500-A-393 (S-1220-TC) & No. 91500-A-555 (S-1220R-TC), to rescind these ordinances which currently permit telecommunication facilities in Andy Brown West which are being relocated to Andy Brown Central (S-1195R4-TC); and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Cover Memo.pdf Ordinance.pdf Exhibit A - Ord 91500-A-393 (11 pages).pdf Exhibit B - Ord 91500-A-555 (11 pages).pdf Attachments: E.Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. PD-133R7-HC, Liberation Coffee Company, a zoning change from PD-133R2-HC (Planned Development-133 Revision 2-Highway Commercial) to PD-133R7-HC (Planned Development-133 Revision 7-Highway Commercial), to amend the Detail Site Plan to allow a 1,386-square-foot restaurant (coffee shop) with outdoor seating to be located at 651 North Denton Tap Road, Suite 200; and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Cover Memo.pdf Ordinance.pdf Exhibit A - Legal Description.pdf Exhibit B - Site-Floor Plan .pdf Exhibit C - Parking Analysis.pdf Exhibit D - Sign Plan.pdf Attachments: F.Consider approval of a Resolution amending Resolution No. 010996.3 as amended, amending the Master Fee schedule for Water Rates, Sewer Rates and Solid Waste Collection Fees; and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Page 3 City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 1/8/2016 January 12, 2016City Council Meeting Agenda Memo Fee Resolution January 2016.pdf Master Fee Resolution 01-12-16.pdf Attachments: G.Consider approval of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, to enter into an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement on behalf of the City of Coppell, Texas with Dallas County for tax assessment and collection services; and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Memo Tax Collections - Dallas County.pdf Tax Collections with Dallas County Resolution.pdf City of Coppell ILA - Tax Collections - Dallas County.pdf Attachments: H.Consider approval to award TCPN (The Cooperative Purchasing Network) proposal Number R5081-2015-16 to Core Construction in the amount of $283,717.33; as budgeted for the remediation of foundation at Fire Station #1 located at 520 Southwestern Blvd; and authorizing the City Manager to sign any necessary documents. Fire Station #1 Foundation Memo.pdf Fire Station #1 Phase 1A Foundation Evaluation.pdf Fire Station #1 Foundation Engineering Services Contract.pdf Fire Station #1 Specifications.pdf Fire Station #1 Drawings.pdf Interior Damage Exhibits.pdf Fire Station #1 Foundation Remediation Proposal.pdf Attachments: I.Consider approval to enter into a License Agreement with Kroger Texas L.P to permit a monument sign within the City’s right-of-way; and authorizing the City Manager to sign any necessary documents. Kroger License Agreement Memo.pdf Exhibit.pdf Kroger License Agreement.pdf Attachments: J.Consider approval authorizing a purchase order for two outdoor warning sirens from sole source vendor, Federal Signal Corporation, for the Emergency Management Division of the Fire Department, in the amount of $55,280.00, as budgeted; and authorizing the City Manager to sign all necessary documents. Staff Memo.pdf Quote.pdf Sole Source Letter.pdf Current Siren Coverage Map 12.29.15.JPG Attachments: K.Consider approval of a Resolution adopting the Dallas County local hazardous mitigation strategic action plan in compliance with the Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) Hazard Mitigation Action Plan requirements; and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Page 4 City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 1/8/2016 January 12, 2016City Council Meeting Agenda Staff Memo.pdf HazMAP 2015-1728.pdf Resolution.pdf Attachments: End of Consent Agenda 9.PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD-178R3-C/S-1194R6, Zenzero, a zoning change request from PD-178R-C/S-1194R5 (Planned Development-178 Revised-Commercial/Special Use Permit 1194 Revision-5) to PD-178R3-C/S-1194R6 (Planned Development-178 Revision 3-Commercial/Special Use Permit 1194-Revision-6), to amend the Detail Site Plan to allow a 905-square-foot addition to the existing restaurant located at 171 North Denton Tap Road, Suite 600. Cover Memo.pdf Staff Report.pdf Site Plan & Elevations.pdf Floor Plan.pdf Parking Analysis.pdf Attachments: 10.PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD-186R8-LI, Duke Freeport Addition, Lot 1R, Block A, a zoning change request from PD-186R2-LI (Planned Development-186 Revision 2-Light Industrial) to PD-186R8-LI (Planned Development-186 Revision 8-Light Industrial), to attach a Detail Site Plan for a 108,148-square-foot office/warehouse building on 7.36 acres of property located at the northeast corner of Bethel Road and Freeport Parkway, and to amend the Land Use Map of the Coppell 2030 Comprehensive Master Plan from ‘Old Coppell Historic District’ to ‘Industrial Special District’. Cover Memo.pdf Staff Report.pdf Site Plan (Sheet A1.00).pdf Tree Preservation Plan (L1.01) .pdf Landscape Plan (L20.1).pdf Elevations (A6.00).pdf Attachments: 11.Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. PD-232R-C, Chicken Express, a zoning change from PD-232-C (Planned Development-232-Commercial) to PD-232R-C (Planned Development-232 Revised-Commercial), to amend the Detail Site Plan for the existing 3,348-square-foot restaurant to change the roof color to ‘Colonial Red’ with a high performance coating on property located at 136 E. Belt Line Road; and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Page 5 City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 1/8/2016 January 12, 2016City Council Meeting Agenda Cover Memo.pdf Ordinance.pdf Exhibit A - Legal Description.pdf Attachments: 12.Andrew Brown Community Park East and West - Consider approval of a Guaranteed Maximum Price Amendment to the Agreement between the City of Coppell (Owner) and Core Construction Services of Texas, Inc. (Construction Manager) for the redevelopment of Andy Brown Park East and West, in the amount of $21,183,850 and authorizing the City Manager to sign any necessary documents. 01.12.16 Council AB Parks GMP Cover Memo.pdf 01.12.16 Council ABE Site Plan May 12 2015.pdf 01.12.16 Council ABE 02 with Alternates.pdf 01.12.16 Council ABW Site Plan May 12 2015.pdf 01.12.16 Council ABW 02 with Alternates.pdf 01.12.16 Council ABEABWGMP01082016.pdf Attachments: 13.Consider approval to permit the reconsideration of citizen agenda item 21 from the City Council Meeting held on December 8, 2015. 14.City Manager Reports - Project Updates and Future Agendas 15.Mayor and Council Reports A.Report by Mayor Hunt regarding National Night Out recognition. B.Report by Councilmember Mays regarding the Clean Air Initiative Award. C.Report by Councilmember Yingling regarding the NTCOG Emergency Preparedness Planning Council. 16.Public Service Announcements concerning items of community interest with no Council action or deliberation permitted. 17.Necessary Action from Executive Session Adjournment ________________________ Karen Selbo Hunt, Mayor Page 6 City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 1/8/2016 January 12, 2016City Council Meeting Agenda CERTIFICATE I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Coppell, Texas on this 8th day of January, 2016, at _____________. ______________________________ Jean Dwinnell, Deputy City Secretary PUBLIC NOTICE - STATEMENT FOR ADA COMPLIANCE AND OPEN CARRY LEGISLATION The City of Coppell acknowledges its responsibility to comply with the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990. Thus, in order to assist individuals with disabilities who require special services (i.e. sign interpretative services, alternative audio/visual devices, and amanuenses) for participation in or access to the City of Coppell sponsored public programs, services and/or meetings, the City requests that individuals makes requests for these services forty-eight (48) hours ahead of the scheduled program, service, and/or meeting. To make arrangements, contact Vivyon V. Bowman, ADA Coordinator or other designated official at (972) 462-0022, or (TDD 1-800-RELAY, TX 1-800-735-2989). Pursuant to Section 30.06, Penal Code (trespass by license holder with a concealed handgun), a person licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code (handgun licensing law), may not enter this property with a concealed handgun. Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (trespass by license holder with an openly carried handgun), a person licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code (handgun licensing law), may not enter this property with a handgun that is carried openly. Page 7 City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 1/8/2016 Master City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard Coppell, Texas 75019-9478 File Number: 2015-2534 File ID: Type: Status: 2015-2534 Agenda Item Executive Session 1Version: Reference: In Control: Administration 12/21/2015File Created: 01/12/2016Final Action: exec session - eco dev. s. of northpoint, w. of royalFile Name: Title: Discussion regarding economic development prospects south of Northpoint Drive and west of Royal Lane. Notes: Agenda Date: 01/12/2016 Agenda Number: A. Sponsors: Enactment Date: Attachments: Enactment Number: Hearing Date: Contact: Effective Date: Drafter: History of Legislative File Action: Result: Return Date: Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver- sion: 1 01/12/2016City Council Discussed under Executive Session Action Text: Text of Legislative File 2015-2534 Title Discussion regarding economic development prospects south of Northpoint Drive and west of Royal Lane. Summary EXECUTIVE SESSION (economic development prospects): Discussion regarding economic development prospects south of Northpoint Drive and west of Royal Lane. Fiscal Impact: [Enter Fiscal Impact Statement Here] Staff Recommendation: [Enter Staff Recommendation Here] Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master Continued (2015-2534) Goal Icon: Business Prosperity Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard Coppell, Texas 75019-9478 File Number: 2016-2561 File ID: Type: Status: 2016-2561 Agenda Item Executive Session 1Version: Reference: In Control: City Secretary 01/06/2016File Created: 01/26/2016Final Action: Executive SessionFile Name: Title: Discussion regarding economic development prospects north of Canyon Road and west of Coppell Road. Notes: Agenda Date: 01/12/2016 Agenda Number: B. Sponsors: Enactment Date: Attachments: Enactment Number: Hearing Date: Contact: Effective Date: Drafter: History of Legislative File Action: Result: Return Date: Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver- sion: 1 01/12/2016City Council Discussed under Executive Session Action Text: Text of Legislative File 2016-2561 Title Discussion regarding economic development prospects north of Canyon Road and west of Coppell Road. Summary Fiscal Impact: Staff Recommendation: Goal Icon: Sustainable City Government Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master Continued (2016-2561) Business Prosperity Community Wellness and Enrichment Sense of Community Special Place to Live Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard Coppell, Texas 75019-9478 File Number: 2015-2557 File ID: Type: Status: 2015-2557 Agenda Item Executive Session 1Version: Reference: In Control: City Secretary 12/31/2015File Created: 01/26/2016Final Action: Executive SessionFile Name: Title: Consideration of acquisition of property south of Bethel Road and east of Freeport Parkway. Notes: Agenda Date: 01/12/2016 Agenda Number: C. Sponsors: Enactment Date: Attachments: Enactment Number: Hearing Date: Contact: Effective Date: Drafter: History of Legislative File Action: Result: Return Date: Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver- sion: 1 01/12/2016City Council Discussed under Executive Session Action Text: Text of Legislative File 2015-2557 Title Consideration of acquisition of property south of Bethel Road and east of Freeport Parkway. Summary Fiscal Impact: Staff Recommendation: Goal Icon: Sustainable City Government Business Prosperity Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master Continued (2015-2557) Community Wellness and Enrichment Sense of Community Special Place to Live Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard Coppell, Texas 75019-9478 File Number: 2015-2536 File ID: Type: Status: 2015-2536 Agenda Item Executive Session 1Version: Reference: In Control: City Secretary 12/23/2015File Created: 01/12/2016Final Action: Executive SessionFile Name: Title: Consultation with City Attorney to seek legal advice pending litigation in cause entitled Mega Contractors, Inc. v. City of Coppell. Notes: Agenda Date: 01/12/2016 Agenda Number: D. Sponsors: Enactment Date: Attachments: Enactment Number: Hearing Date: Contact: Effective Date: Drafter: History of Legislative File Action: Result: Return Date: Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver- sion: 1 01/12/2016City Council Discussed under Executive Session Action Text: Text of Legislative File 2015-2536 Title Consultation with City Attorney to seek legal advice pending litigation in cause entitled Mega Contractors, Inc. v. City of Coppell. Summary Fiscal Impact: Staff Recommendation: Goal Icon: Sustainable City Government Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master Continued (2015-2536) Business Prosperity Community Wellness and Enrichment Sense of Community Special Place to Live Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard Coppell, Texas 75019-9478 File Number: 2015-2539 File ID: Type: Status: 2015-2539 Agenda Item Executive Session 1Version: Reference: In Control: City Secretary 12/23/2015File Created: 01/26/2016Final Action: Executive SessionFile Name: Title: Consultation with City Attorney regarding reconsideration of Agenda Items. Notes: Agenda Date: 01/12/2016 Agenda Number: E. Sponsors: Enactment Date: Attachments: Enactment Number: Hearing Date: Contact: Effective Date: Drafter: History of Legislative File Action: Result: Return Date: Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver- sion: 1 01/12/2016City Council Discussed under Executive Session Mayor Hunt recessed the Executive Session at 6:55 p.m. and convened into Work Session. Action Text: Text of Legislative File 2015-2539 Title Consultation with City Attorney regarding reconsideration of Agenda Items. Summary Fiscal Impact: Staff Recommendation: Goal Icon: Sustainable City Government Business Prosperity Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master Continued (2015-2539) Community Wellness and Enrichment Sense of Community Special Place to Live Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard Coppell, Texas 75019-9478 File Number: 2015-2537 File ID: Type: Status: 2015-2537 Agenda Item Executive Session 1Version: Reference: In Control: City Secretary 12/23/2015File Created: 01/26/2016Final Action: Executive SessionFile Name: Title: Discussion regarding personnel matters. Notes: Agenda Date: 01/12/2016 Agenda Number: F. Sponsors: Enactment Date: Attachments: Enactment Number: Hearing Date: Contact: Effective Date: Drafter: History of Legislative File Action: Result: Return Date: Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver- sion: 1 01/12/2016City Council Discussed under Executive Session Mayor Hunt adjourned Executive Session at 9:44 p.m. Action Text: Text of Legislative File 2015-2537 Title Discussion regarding personnel matters. Summary Fiscal Impact: Staff Recommendation: Goal Icon: Sustainable City Government Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master Continued (2015-2537) Business Prosperity Community Wellness and Enrichment Sense of Community Special Place to Live Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard Coppell, Texas 75019-9478 File Number: 2015-2538 File ID: Type: Status: 2015-2538 Agenda Item Work Session 1Version: Reference: In Control: City Secretary 12/23/2015File Created: 01/26/2016Final Action: Work SessionFile Name: Title: A.Discussion regarding City-wide Stormwater Management Study. B.Discussion regarding Agenda Items. Notes: Agenda Date: 01/12/2016 Agenda Number: Sponsors: Enactment Date: Storm Water Management Memo.pdfAttachments: Enactment Number: Hearing Date: Contact: Effective Date: Drafter: History of Legislative File Action: Result: Return Date: Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver- sion: 1 01/12/2016City Council Presented in Work Session. Mayor Hunt adjourned the Work Session at 7:26 p.m. and convened into the Regular Session at 7:34 p.m. Action Text: Text of Legislative File 2015-2538 Title A.Discussion regarding City-wide Stormwater Management Study. B.Discussion regarding Agenda Items. Summary Fiscal Impact: Staff Recommendation: Goal Icon: Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master Continued (2015-2538) Sustainable City Government Business Prosperity Community Wellness and Enrichment Sense of Community Special Place to Live Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 1 MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and City Council From: Ken Griffin, P.E., Director of Engineering and Public Works Date: January 12, 2016 Reference: Discussion regarding City-wide Storm Water Management Study 2030: Sustainable City Government Business Prosperity Community Wellness and Enrichment Sense of Community Special Place to Live  Timeframe- Rainfall- May 16-17, 1989 5.53 inches June 7-13, 1989 6.29 inches May 1-4, 1990 2.87 inches  Total Drainage Complaints- 123  Outcome- Adoption of the “City-wide Storm Water Management Study” by City Council on January 29, 1991 Introduction: In May of 1989, the City experienced over 5.5 inches of rainfall during a 24 hour period. The result of the rainfall was flooding throughout Coppell. Rain continued into June 1989 creating even more flooding. Most of the creek flooding complaints were from residents along Grapevine Creek and its six tributary’s. At the time there was very little development along the other creeks in town. In May of 1990 rain again caused flooding along portions of Coppell. During the 1990 rain event, the Wellington Apartments experienced flooding. Analysis:  Timeframe- Rainfall- May 21-26, 2015 6.01 inches May 28-30, 2015 4.65 inches 2 In May of 2015, the City again experienced heavy rains that caused flooding. The only structures that experienced extensive flooding was the Wellington Apartments. However, since 1990, most of the creek areas in Coppell have been developed Upstream of Coppell, the flow of water is controlled by the Grapevine Lake and Lake Lewisville dams. During the May 2015 rain events and carrying over into June, the lakes were full to a point that water spilled over and was released which created a full flow of water in Denton Creek and the Elm Fork of the Trinity River. After the rain events, the City begun discussions with Halff Associates, Inc. to update our 1991 City- Wide Storm Water Management Study. The initial proposal was provided to the City on August 11, 2015. It included two options: 1) a complete evaluation of all creeks and our storm sewer system; and 2) a complete evaluation of creeks only. The difference in the two proposals is about $2,000,000. Since the initial proposal, the City has met with Halff and requested that the proposal be for creeks only and that it be phased. The City requested that the first phase should focus on Denton Creek. Most of our complaints from the 2015 rain events were from residents along Denton Creek. The flow in this creek is mainly controlled by the Grapevine Lake dam and the overall rainfall in the drainage basin for May 2015 was one of the highest months on record at 16.96 inches. In reviewing historical monthly rainfall totals, the only two months I found with more rainfall was April 1922 at 17.64 inches and April 1942 at 16.97 inches. Through the years, the City has worked on completing the drainage projects identified in the 1991 study. However, with the development in the City in the last 25 years, it’s time to revise the Coppell City-Wide Storm Water Management Study. Legal Review: No legal review required. Fiscal Impact: The fiscal impact of this Agenda item will be in the range of $285,000.00 to $300,000.00 for the first phase study. Recommendation: The Engineering Department recommends presenting an agenda item in the near future to begin the first phase of updating our 1991 City-Wide Storm Water Management Study. Master City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard Coppell, Texas 75019-9478 File Number: 2015-2535 File ID: Type: Status: 2015-2535 Presentation Draft 2Version: Reference: In Control: City Secretary 12/23/2015File Created: Final Action: sharons testFile Name: Title: Presentation of awards by Imaginuity Interactive. Notes: Agenda Date: 01/12/2016 Agenda Number: 6. Sponsors: Enactment Date: Attachments: Enactment Number: Hearing Date: Contact: Effective Date: Drafter: History of Legislative File Action: Result: Return Date: Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver- sion: 2 01/12/2016City Council Ms. Naomi Jones, Director of Business Development for Imaginuity Interactive, presented the 2015 Silver W3 for Best Government Website Award and the 2015 Silver Davey for Best Government Website Award for smaller businesses to the City's Community Information Officer, Sharon Logan. Action Text: Text of Legislative File 2015-2535 Title Presentation of awards by Imaginuity Interactive. Summary Fiscal Impact: Staff Recommendation: Goal Icon: Sustainable City Government Business Prosperity Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master Continued (2015-2535) Community Wellness and Enrichment Sense of Community Special Place to Live Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard Coppell, Texas 75019-9478 File Number: 2015-2541 File ID: Type: Status: 2015-2541 Agenda Item Passed 1Version: Reference: In Control: City Secretary 12/23/2015File Created: Final Action: MinutesFile Name: Title: Consider approval of the Minutes: December 8, 2015. Notes: Agenda Date: 01/12/2016 Agenda Number: A. Sponsors: Enactment Date: Minutes.pdfAttachments: Enactment Number: Hearing Date: Contact: Effective Date: Drafter: History of Legislative File Action: Result: Return Date: Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver- sion: 1 PassApproved on the Consent Agenda 01/12/2016City Council A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Councilmember Nancy Yingling, that Agenda Items A-K be approved on the Consent Agenda. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. Action Text: Text of Legislative File 2015-2541 Title Consider approval of the Minutes: December 8, 2015. Summary Fiscal Impact: Staff Recommendation: Approval recommended. Goal Icon: Sustainable City Government Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master Continued (2015-2541) Business Prosperity Community Wellness and Enrichment Sense of Community Special Place to Live Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 255 Parkway Boulevard Coppell, Texas 75019-9478City of Coppell, Texas Minutes City Council 5:30 PM Council ChambersTuesday, December 8, 2015 KAREN HUNT GARY RODEN Mayor Mayor Pro Tem CLIFF LONG NANCY YINGLING Place 1 Place 5 BRIANNA HINOJOSA-FLORES MARVIN FRANKLIN Place 2 Place 6 WES MAYS MARK HILL Place 3 Place 7 CLAY PHILLIPS City Manager Karen Hunt;Cliff Long;Brianna Hinojosa-Flores;Wes Mays;Gary Roden;Marvin Franklin;Mark Hill and Nancy Yingling Present 8 - Also present were City Manager Clay Phillips, Deputy City Managers Mario Canizares and Mike Land, City Secretary Christel Pettinos and City Attorney Robert Hager. The City Council of the City of Coppell met in Regular Called Session on Tuesday,December 8, 2015, at 5:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of Town Center, 255 Parkway Boulevard, Coppell, Texas. Call to Order1. Mayor Hunt called the meeting to order, determined that a quorum was present and convened into Executive Session at 5:37 p.m. Executive Session (Closed to the Public) 1st Floor Conference Room2. Section 551.071, Texas Government Code - Consultation with City Attorney. A.Consultation with the City Attorney seeking legal advice concerning the expenditure of public funds. Discussed under Executive Session Work Session (Open to the Public) 1st Floor Conference Room3. Page 1City of Coppell, Texas December 8, 2015City Council Minutes Mayor Hunt adjourned the Executive Session at 6:21 p.m. and convened into the Work Session at 6:24 p.m. A.Discussion regarding Andy Brown Park Phase I. B.Discussion of Agenda Items. Presented in Work Session RECEPTION FOR BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE MEMBERS IN ATRIUM FROM 6:30 PM TO 7:30 PM Mayor Hunt recessed the Work Session at 6:29 p.m. and convened into the Board and Commission Reception in the Atrium. Regular Session Invocation 7:30 p.m.4. Reverend Bill Easton wiith First United Methodist Church gave the Invocation. Pledge of Allegiance5. Mayor Hunt and the City Council led those present in the Pledge of Allegiance. 6.Swearing in of newly appointed Board/Commission/Committee members. Mayor Hunt swore in the newly appointed Board and Commission Members. Citizens’ Appearance7. Mayor Hunt advised that no one signed up to speak. Consent Agenda8. A.Consider approval of the minutes: November 10 and 16, 2015. A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gary Roden, that Agenda Items A-K be approved on the Consent Agenda. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. B.Consider approval of a Community Improvement Agreement between the City of Coppell and Coppell Community Garden Corporation in the amount of $75,000.00 and authorizing the City Manager to sign. A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gary Roden, that Agenda Items A-K be approved on the Consent Agenda. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. C.Consider approval to enter into a contract with Online Business Systems for the data conversion of the Impact Application and Page 2City of Coppell, Texas December 8, 2015City Council Minutes interface development for the Community Services Software Program (BEAM Project); for the total amount of $80,000; and authorizing the City Manager to sign any necessary documents. A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gary Roden, that Agenda Items A-K be approved on the Consent Agenda. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. D.Consider approval to amend an Ordinance of the City of Coppell, Texas, repealing Chapter 6, Article 15-7 provisions for temporary off-premises signs; and authorizing the Mayor to sign. A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gary Roden, that Agenda Items A-K be approved on the Consent Agenda. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. Enactment No: 2015-1425 E.Consider award of a professional services contract in the amount of $222,035.00 with RJN Group, Inc. for Phase 2A of the Sanitary Sewer Evaluation and assessment; as provided from available funds in the Water and Sewer fund; and authorizing the City Manager to sign any necessary documents. A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gary Roden, that Agenda Items A-K be approved on the Consent Agenda. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. F.Consider approval of a (3) three-month extension to the expiration date of December 9, 2015, for the Westhaven PH IIB, Final Plat, to permit the development of 67 residential lots and two (2) common area lots on 12.58 acres of property located south of S.H. 121, approximately 550 feet west of Magnolia Park. A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gary Roden, that Agenda Items A-K be approved on the Consent Agenda. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. G.Consider approval of the acquisition of one vehicle for the Street department, in the amount of $59,887.00 from Freedom Auto Group utilizing contract pricing through HGAC no. HT06-14; as budgeted; and authorizing the City Manager to sign any necessary documents. A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gary Roden, that Agenda Items A-K be approved on the Consent Agenda. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. H.Consider approval of the acquisition of five replacement vehicles for Parks, Street and Utility Billing departments, in the amount of $201,764.00 from Caldwell Chevrolet utilizing contract pricing through Buyboard no. 430-13; as budgeted; and authorizing the City Manager to sign any necessary documents. A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Mayor Page 3City of Coppell, Texas December 8, 2015City Council Minutes Pro Tem Gary Roden, that Agenda Items A-K be approved on the Consent Agenda. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. I.Consider approving the acquisition of three replacement and four additional vehicles for Engineering, Fire, Parks, Police and Street departments, in the amount of $246,186.50 from Silsbee Ford utilizing contract pricing through the State of Texas TPASS no. 072-A1, and Buyboard no. 430-13; as budgeted; and authorizing the City Manager to sign any necessary documents. A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gary Roden, that Agenda Items A-K be approved on the Consent Agenda. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. J.Consider approval of an Economic Development Agreement by and between the City of Coppell and Kroger Texas, L.P., and authorizing the Mayor to sign. A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gary Roden, that Agenda Items A-K be approved on the Consent Agenda. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. K.Consider approval of an Economic Development Agreement by and between the City of Coppell and Reef Coppell, LLC, and authorizing the Mayor to sign. A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gary Roden, that Agenda Items A-K be approved on the Consent Agenda. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. End of Consent Agenda 9.Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. ZC-626, Sandy Lake & Lodge, N.W.C., to rezone 0.696 acres of property from SF-12 (Single Family-12) to SF-9 (Single Family-9), located at the northwest corner of Sandy Lake Road and Lodge Road and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Presentation: Gary Sieb, Director of Planning, made a presentation to Council. Mayor Hunt opened the Public Hearing and advised that no one signed up to speak. A motion was made by Councilmember Wes Mays, seconded by Councilmember Nancy Yingling, to close the Public Hearing and approve this Agenda Item subject to the following condition: 1) Minor Amending Plat being filed prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new home on Lot 1R. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. 10.Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. S-1195R4-TC, Page 4City of Coppell, Texas December 8, 2015City Council Minutes Verizon Wireless, a zoning change from S-1195R3-TC (Special Use Permit-1195 Revision 3-Town Center) to S-1195R4-TC (Special Use Permit-1195 Revision 4-Town Center), to amend the Special Use Permit to allow a telecommunication tower (being relocated from Andy Brown West) and expansion to the concession/restroom facility to house telecommunication equipment on property located approximately 150 feet east of N. Denton Tap Road and approximately 1,050 feet north of Parkway Blvd. (Andy Brown Central) and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Presentation: Gary Sieb, Director of Planning, made a presentation to Council. Mayor Hunt opened the Public Hearing and advised that no one signed up to speak. A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Gary Roden, seconded by Councilmember Mark Hill, to close the Public Hearing and approve this Agenda Item subject to the following condition: 1) There will be additional Engineering comments as the project proceeds. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. 11.Consider approval of an Ordinance for the Revocation of Ordinances No. 91500-A-393 (S-1220-TC) & No. 91500-A-555 (S-1220R-TC), to rescind these ordinances which currently permit telecommunication facilities in Andy Brown West which are being relocated to Andy Brown Central (S-1195R4-TC), and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Presentation: Gary Sieb, Director of Planning, made a presentation to Council. Mayor Hunt opened the Public Hearing and advised that no one signed up to speak. A motion was made by Councilmember Nancy Yingling, seconded by Councilmember Cliff Long, to close the Public Hearing and approve this Agenda Item. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. 12.Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. PD-133R7-HC, Liberation Coffee Company, a zoning change from PD-133R2-HC (Planned Development-133 Revision 2-Highway Commercial) to PD-133R7-HC (Planned Development-133 Revision 7-Highway Commercial), to amend the Detail Site Plan to allow a 1,386-square-foot restaurant (coffee shop) with outdoor seating to be located at 651 North Denton Tap Road, Suite 200 and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Presentation: Gary Sieb, Director of Planning, made a presentation to Council. Mayor Hunt opened the Public Hearing and advised that no one signed up to speak. A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Page 5City of Coppell, Texas December 8, 2015City Council Minutes Councilmember Brianna Hinojosa-Flores, to close the Public Hearing and approve this Agenda Item subject to the following conditions: 1) The development shall be in accordance with the Site Plan/Floor Plan, Parking Analysis and Sign Plan; and 2) The hours of operation shall not exceed 5:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Sunday through Thursday and 5:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., Friday through Saturday. The loading and unloading of any merchandise or materials shall not be permitted between the hours of 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. daily. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. 13.Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. PD-232R-C, Chicken Express, a zoning change from PD-232-C (Planned Development-232-Commercial) to PD-232R-C (Planned Development-232 Revised-Commercial), to amend the Detail Site Plan for the existing 3,348-square-foot restaurant to change the roof color to ‘Colonial Red’ with a high performance coating on property located at 136 E. Belt Line Road and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Presentation: Gary Sieb, Director of Planning, made a presentation to Council. Wes Parnell, applicant, 51 Meadowbrook, Trophy Club, made a presentation to Council. Mayor Hunt opened the Public Hearing and advised that no one signed up to speak. A motion was made by Councilmember Mark Hill, seconded by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, to close the Public Hearing and approve this Agenda Item subject to the following conditions: 1) Approval of “Colonial Red” roof paint color in a high performance coating instead of the “Seattle Red;” and 2) A maintenance agreement shall be submitted to staff for maintenance of roof paint. It shall read – “If the new paint of the roof is not properly maintained, then the roof will be repainted to the original color “Desert Tan”. The motion passed 5-2 with Councilmembers Hinojosa-Flores and Mays voting against the item. 14.Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. PD-213R4-H, Lost Creek PH II, a zoning change from PD-213R2-H (Planned Development-213 Revision 2-Historic) to PD-213R4-H (Planned Development-213 Revision 4-Historic), to amend the Concept Plan and attach a Detail Site Plan to allow three (3) residential/retail units on 0.344 acres of property located at the south east corner of S. Coppell Road and Heath Lane and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Presentation: Gary Sieb, Director of Planning, made a presentation to Council. A motion was made by Councilmember Nancy Yingling, seconded by Mayor Page 6City of Coppell, Texas December 8, 2015City Council Minutes Pro Tem Gary Roden, that this Agenda Item be approved. The motion passed 6-1 with Councilmember Hinojosa-Flores voting against the item. Enactment No: 91500-A-681 15.PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of an Ordinance designating A Decent Establishment LLC Reinvestment Zone No. 99 pursuant to Section 312.201 of the Property Redevelopment and Tax Abatement Act, and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Presentation: Mindi Hurley, Economic Development Coordinator, read Agenda Items 15-17 into the record to be considered together. A motion was made by Councilmember Wes Mays, seconded by Councilmember Cliff Long, to close the Public Hearing for Agenda Item 15 and to approve Agenda Items 15-17. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. Enactment No: 2015-1426 16.Consider approval of a Resolution approving a Tax Abatement Agreement between the City of Coppell and A Decent Establishment LLC, and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Presentation: Mindi Hurley, Economic Development Coordinator, read Agenda Items 15-17 into the record to be considered together. A motion was made by Councilmember Wes Mays, seconded by Councilmember Cliff Long, to close the Public Hearing for Agenda Item 15 and to approve Agenda Items 15-17. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. Enactment No: 2015-1208.1 17.Consider approval of a Resolution approving a Tax Abatement Agreement between the City of Coppell and Kaluke LLC, and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Presentation: Mindi Hurley, Economic Development Coordinator, read Agenda Items 15-17 into the record to be considered together. A motion was made by Councilmember Wes Mays, seconded by Councilmember Cliff Long, to close the Public Hearing for Agenda Item 15 and to approve Agenda Items 15-17. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. Enactment No: 2015-1208.2 18.Consider approval of awarding a professional services design contract with J. Volk Consulting, Inc.; for the design of reconstruction of Freeport Parkway, north of IH 635 to W. Bethel Road; in the total amount of $726,000.00; funds available in CIP; and authorizing the City Manager to sign any necessary documents. Presentation: Ken Griffin, Director of Engineering and Public Works, made a presentation to Council. A motion was made by Councilmember Wes Mays, seconded by Councilmember Brianna Hinojosa-Flores, that this Agenda Item be approved. Page 7City of Coppell, Texas December 8, 2015City Council Minutes The motion passed by an unanimous vote. 19.Consider approval of a Resolution casting a vote for the Board of Directors for the Dallas Central Appraisal District; and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Councilmember Wes Mays made a motion to nominate Blake Clemens as the fourth member to the Dallas Central Appraisal Board of Directors. The motion failed for the lack of a second. After the motion to reconsider Agenda Item 19 passed, another motion was made by Councilmember Wes Mays, seconded by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, to nominate Blake Clemens as the fourth member of the Dallas Central Appraisal Board of Directors. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. Enactment No: 2015-1208.3 20.Consider approval of an Ordinance amending Chapter 3 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Coppell, by amending Sections 3-1-5 and 3-2-2; adjusting monthly water rates; adjusting monthly sewer rates; providing a repealing clause; providing a severability clause; and providing an effective date. Presentation: Kim Tiehen, Assistant Director of Finance, made a presentation to Council. A motion was made by Councilmember Wes Mays, seconded by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, that this Ordinance be approved adding a 15% increase in 2016 to the average annual bill. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. At this time, a motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Councilmember Brianna Hinojosa-Flores, to reconsider Agenda Item 19. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. See Agenda Item 19 for Council action. Enactment No: ORD 2015-1427 21.CITIZEN’S AGENDA REQUEST: Request for Council action to provide emergency relief and/or funding for creating structure to mitigate the imminent damage to homes and persons. Presentation: Justin Raley, 929 Parker, made a presentation to Council. Ken Griffin, Director of Engineering and Public Works, answered questions of the Council. No action was taken by the City Council. City Manager Reports - Project Updates and Future Agendas22. City Manager Clay Phillips said the CRDC projects are moving forward. The Life Safety Park has broken ground. A celebratory ceremony will be discussed after the holidays. There are no more Council meetings for 2015, but a date will Page 8City of Coppell, Texas December 8, 2015City Council Minutes need to be decided for a 2030 Inventory Planning Session before the 2016 Citizen Summit is held in February. Council will send in the names they wish to invite, in addition to the "all call" out to the community. Mayor and Council Reports23. A.Report by Mayor Hunt regarding letters to Santa. Mayor Hunt thanked the City Staff for the great tree lighting and light parade. She reminded the viewing audience that Santa's Mailbox is located in the entryway of Town Center. Children may deliver their wish list through December 20th. No postage is required. Letters with a complete name and address will receive a special return letter from Santa. Public Service Announcements concerning items of community interest with no Council action or deliberation permitted. 24. Nothing to report. Necessary Action from Executive Session25. Nothing to report. At this time, Mayor Hunt recessed the Regular Session at 9:58 p.m. and reconvened into Work Session. Mayor Hunt adjourned Work Session at 10:51 p.m. and reconvened into Regular Session. Adjournment There being no further business before the City Council, the meeting was adjourned. ________________________________ Karen Selbo Hunt, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Christel Pettinos, City Secretary Page 9City of Coppell, Texas Master City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard Coppell, Texas 75019-9478 File Number: 2015-2487 File ID: Type: Status: 2015-2487 Zoning Ordinance Passed 3Version: Reference: In Control: City Council 11/09/2015File Created: Final Action: ZC-626, ORD Sandy Lake & Lodge, NWCFile Name: Title: Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. ZC-626, Sandy Lake & Lodge, N.W.C., to rezone 0.696 acres of property from SF-12 (Single Family-12) to SF-9 (Single Family-9), located at the northwest corner of Sandy Lake Road and Lodge Road and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Notes: Agenda Date: 01/12/2016 Agenda Number: B. Sponsors: Enactment Date: 01/12/2016 Cover Memo.pdf, Ordinance.pdf, Exhibit A - Legal Description .pdf Attachments: Enactment Number: 91500-A-0682 Hearing Date: Contact: Effective Date: Drafter: History of Legislative File Action: Result: Return Date: Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver- sion: 1 PassApproved11/19/2015Planning & Zoning Commission Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master Continued (2015-2487) Marcie Diamond, Assistant Planning Director introduced this case with exhibits. She mentioned 28 notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of this request. There were no responses received in favor or in opposition. There were also 176 courtesy notices mailed to property owners within 800 feet of this request. There was one telephone call inquiring about the zoning change sign. She stated that staff is recommending approval subject to conditions which she read into the record. Rory Carrick, the property owner, 123 Lodge Road, Coppell Texas, was present to represent this case, to address questions and stated agreement with staff's recommendations. Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. No one spoke. Chairman Haas closed the Public Hearing. A motion was made by Vice Chairman Portman to recommend approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Revising the Zoning Exhibit to indicate the front yard setback line to be parallel with the corner clip (property line) at the intersection of Sandy Lake and Lodge Roads. 2. Minor Amending Plat being filed prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new home on Lot 1R (with revised front setback line). Seconded by Commissioner Robinson; motion carried (7-0). Action Text: Chair Edmund Haas, Vice Chair Glenn Portman, Commissioner Sue Blankenship, Commissioner Ed Darling, Commissioner Doug Robinson, Commissioner Vijay Sarma, and Commissioner George Williford 7Aye: 2 PassClose the Public Hearing and Approve 12/08/2015City Council Presentation: Gary Sieb, Director of Planning, made a presentation to Council. Mayor Hunt opened the Public Hearing and advised that no one signed up to speak. A motion was made by Councilmember Wes Mays, seconded by Councilmember Nancy Yingling, to close the Public Hearing and approve this Agenda Item subject to the following condition: 1) Minor Amending Plat being filed prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new home on Lot 1R. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. Action Text: Councilmember Cliff Long, Councilmember Brianna Hinojosa-Flores, Councilmember Wes Mays, Councilmember Gary Roden, Councilmember Marvin Franklin, Councilmember Mark Hill, and Mayor Pro Tem Nancy Yingling 7Aye: 3 PassApproved on the Consent Agenda 01/12/2016City Council A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Councilmember Nancy Yingling, that Agenda Items A-K be approved on the Consent Agenda. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. Action Text: Text of Legislative File 2015-2487 Title Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. ZC-626, Sandy Lake & Lodge, N.W.C., to rezone 0.696 acres of property from SF -12 (Single Family-12) to SF-9 (Single Family-9), Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master Continued (2015-2487) located at the northwest corner of Sandy Lake Road and Lodge Road and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Summary Staff Recommendation: On December 8, 2015, City Council unanimously approved this REZONING (7-0). On November 19, 2015, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval to rezone 0.696 acres of property (7-0). Commissioners Williford, Sarma, Robinson, Haas, Portman, Darling and Blankenship voted in favor; none opposed. The Planning Department recommended APPROVAL. Goal Icon: Sense of Community Special Place to Live Page 3City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 1 MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and City Council From: Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning Date: January 12, 2016 Reference: Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. ZC-626, Sandy Lake & Lodge, N.W.C., to rezone 0.696 acres of property from SF-12 (Single Family-12) to SF-9 (Single Family- 9), located at the northwest corner of Sandy Lake Road and Lodge Road. 2030: Sense of Community, Special Place to Live Introduction: This rezoning to a SF-9 District will make this property more compatible with the established zoning patterns in this area. This zoning district will allow construction of a new home on the southern portion of the property to be platted as a 9,913-square-foot lot. The existing home on the northern 20,421- square-foot lot is proposed to be retained. Analysis: On December 8, 2015 Council unanimously approved this change in zoning to SF-12 subject to the Minor Amending Plat being filed prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new home on Lot 1R. On November 19, 2015 the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended approval of ZC-626, subject to the Minor Amending Plat being filed prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new home on Lot 1R. Legal Review: The City Attorney reviewed this ordinance. Fiscal Impact: None Recommendation: The Planning Department recommends approval Attachments: 1. Ordinance 2. Exhibit “A” – Legal Description Coppell Pg 1 TM 74692 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. ________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, AS HERETOFORE AMENDED, BY GRANTING A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM SF-12 (SINGLE FAMILY-12) TO SF-9 (SINGLE FAMILY-9) ON 0.696 ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SANDY LAKE ROAD AND LODGE ROAD, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A” ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN; PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Commission and the governing body of the City of Coppell, Texas, in compliance with the laws of the State of Texas and pursuant to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, have given requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and after holding due hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property owners generally, and to all persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, the said governing body is of the opinion that Zoning Application No. ZC-626 should be approved, and in the exercise of legislative discretion have concluded that the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map should be amended. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map of the City of Coppell, Texas, duly passed by the governing body of the City of Coppell, Texas, as heretofore amended, be and the same is hereby amended by granting a change in zoning from SF-12 (Single Family-12) to SF-9 (Single Family-9) on 0.696 acres of property located at the northwest corner of Sandy Lake road and Lodge Road for the property described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes. SECTION 2. That the above property shall be used only in the manner and for the purpose provided for by the SF-9 District regulations of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, as heretofore amended, and as amended herein. Coppell Pg 2 TM 74692 SECTION 3. That the development of the property herein shall be in accordance with building regulations, zoning ordinances, and any applicable ordinances except as may be specifically altered or amended herein. SECTION 4. That all provisions of the Ordinances of the City of Coppell, Texas, in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same are hereby, repealed, and all other provisions not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 5. That should any sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole, or any part or provision thereof other than the part so decided to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, and shall not affect the validity of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as a whole. SECTION 6. An offense committed before the effective date of this ordinance is governed by prior law and the provisions of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, as amended, in effect when the offense was committed and the former law is continued in effect for this purpose. SECTION 7. That any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions or terms of this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, as heretofore amended, and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine not to exceed the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense; and each and every day such violation shall continue shall be deemed to constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage and the publication of its caption, as the law and charter in such cases provide. DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, this the _______ day of ___________________, 2016. Coppell Pg 3 TM 74692 APPROVED: _____________________________________ KAREN SELBO HUNT ATTEST: ___________________________________ CHRISTEL PETTINOS, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM: ________________________________ ROBERT E. HAGER, CITY ATTORNEY Master City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard Coppell, Texas 75019-9478 File Number: 2015-2488 File ID: Type: Status: 2015-2488 Zoning Ordinance Passed 3Version: Reference: In Control: City Council 11/09/2015File Created: Final Action: S-1195R4-TC, ORD Verizon WirelessFile Name: Title: Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. S-1195R4-TC, Verizon Wireless, a zoning change from S-1195R3-TC (Special Use Permit-1195 Revision 3-Town Center) to S-1195R4-TC (Special Use Permit-1195 Revision 4-Town Center), to amend the Special Use Permit to allow a telecommunication tower (being relocated from Andy Brown West) and expansion to the concession /restroom facility to house telecommunication equipment on property located approximately 150 feet east of N. Denton Tap Road and approximately 1,050 feet north of Parkway Blvd. (Andy Brown Central) and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Notes: Agenda Date: 01/12/2016 Agenda Number: C. Sponsors: Enactment Date: 01/12/2016 Cover Memo.pdf, Ordinance.pdf, Exhibit A - Legal Description.pdf, Exhibit B - Site Plan .pdf, Exhibit C - Detail Site Plan.pdf, Exhibit D - Equipment Compound Elevations .pdf Attachments: Enactment Number: 91500-A-0683 Hearing Date: Contact: Effective Date: Drafter: History of Legislative File Action: Result: Return Date: Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver- sion: 1 PassApproved11/19/2015Planning & Zoning Commission Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master Continued (2015-2488) Gary Sieb, Planning Director introduced this case with exhibits and elevations. He mentioned two notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of this request. No responses were returned in favor or in opposition. There were also 54 courtesy notices mailed to property owners within 800 feet of this request. Kathy Zibilich, Verizon Wireless/Griffin Harris, PLLC, 8150 N. Central Expwy Ste 1475, Dallas Texas, was present to represent this case with a presentation, to address questions and stated agreement with staff's recommendations, except she expressed concerns with access into the enclosed area. Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. The following person spoke: Jack Carpenter, 314 Stonemeade Way, Coppell Texas, asked questions and was opposed to the case as submitted. Chairman Haas closed the Public Hearing. A motion was made by Commissioner Williford to recommend approval subject to the following revised conditions: 1. Total height of the communication tower will not exceed 85 feet. 2. Access to the (not to exceed 200 square foot) equipment enclosure shall be from the south side and the door shall be a solid color to match the brick. 3. There will be additional Engineering comments as the project proceeds. Seconded by Commissioner Sarma; motion carried (7-0). Action Text: Chair Edmund Haas, Vice Chair Glenn Portman, Commissioner Sue Blankenship, Commissioner Ed Darling, Commissioner Doug Robinson, Commissioner Vijay Sarma, and Commissioner George Williford 7Aye: 2 PassClose the Public Hearing and Approve 12/08/2015City Council Presentation: Gary Sieb, Director of Planning, made a presentation to Council. Mayor Hunt opened the Public Hearing and advised that no one signed up to speak. A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Gary Roden, seconded by Councilmember Mark Hill, to close the Public Hearing and approve this Agenda Item subject to the following condition: 1) There will be additional Engineering comments as the project proceeds. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. Action Text: Councilmember Cliff Long, Councilmember Brianna Hinojosa-Flores, Councilmember Wes Mays, Councilmember Gary Roden, Councilmember Marvin Franklin, Councilmember Mark Hill, and Mayor Pro Tem Nancy Yingling 7Aye: 3 PassApproved on the Consent Agenda 01/12/2016City Council A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Councilmember Nancy Yingling, that Agenda Items A-K be approved on the Consent Agenda. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. Action Text: Text of Legislative File 2015-2488 Title Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. S-1195R4-TC, Verizon Wireless, a zoning Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master Continued (2015-2488) change from S-1195R3-TC (Special Use Permit-1195 Revision 3-Town Center) to S-1195R4-TC (Special Use Permit-1195 Revision 4-Town Center), to amend the Special Use Permit to allow a telecommunication tower (being relocated from Andy Brown West) and expansion to the concession /restroom facility to house telecommunication equipment on property located approximately 150 feet east of N. Denton Tap Road and approximately 1,050 feet north of Parkway Blvd. (Andy Brown Central) and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Summary Staff Recommendation: On December 8, 2015, City Council unanimously approved this ZONING CHANGE (7-0). On November 19, 2015, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of this ZONING CHANGE (7-0). Commissioners Williford, Sarma, Robinson, Haas, Portman, Darling and Blankenship voted in favor; none opposed. The Planning Department recommended APPROVAL. Goal Icon: Business Prosperity Page 3City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 1 MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and City Council From: Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning Date: January 12, 2016 Reference: Consider approval of an ordinance for S-1195R4-TC, to amend the Special Use Permit to allow a telecommunication tower and expansion to the concession/restroom facility to house telecommunication equipment on property located approximately 150 feet east of N. Denton Tap Road, and approximately 1,050 feet north of Parkway Boulevard. 2030: Business Prosperity Introduction: Due to the pending redevelopment of Andrew Brown Park West, an existing telecommunication cell tower and associated equipment sited just east of the concession stand, must vacate its current leased space location. To accommodate the tower in another public lease space, staff recommended and the applicant has agreed to a location at Andrew Brown Park Central, adjacent to the current concession stand on that parcel. Analysis: On December 8, 2015 the City Council unanimously approved this SUP to allow the relocation of the telecommunication facilities. On November 19, 2015 the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended approval of S-1195R4-TC, the following conditions remain outstanding: 1. Access to the (not to exceed 200 square foot) equipment enclosure shall be from the south side and the door shall be a solid color to match the brick. 2. There will be additional Engineering comments as the project proceeds. Legal Review: The City Attorney reviewed this ordinance. Fiscal Impact: None Recommendation: The Planning Department recommends approval Attachments: 1. Ordinance 2. Exhibit “A” – Legal Description 2 3. Exhibit “B” - Site Plan 4. Exhibit “C” - Detail Site Plan 5. Exhibit “D” - Equipment Compound Elevation Coppell Pg 1 TM 74695 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. ________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, AS HERETOFORE AMENDED, BY GRANTING A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM S-1195-TC (SPECIAL USE PERMIT-1195 TOWN CENTER) TO S-1195R5-TC (SPECIAL USE PERMIT-1195 REVISION 5-TOWN CENTER), TO AMEND THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A TELECOMMUNICATION TOWER AND EXPANSION TO THE CONCESSION/RESTROOM FACILITY TO HOUSE THE TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT ON PROPERTY LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET EAST OF N. DENTON TAP ROAD AND APPROXIMATELY 1,050 FEET NORTH OF PARKWAY BLVD. (ANDY BROWN CENTRAL), AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A” ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN; PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN WITH TOWER ELEVATION, DETAIL SITE PLAN, EQUIPMENT COMPOUND ELEVATION, ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBITS “B”, “C” AND “D” PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL CONDITIONS; PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Commission and the governing body of the City of Coppell, Texas, in compliance with the laws of the State of Texas and pursuant to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, have given requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and after holding due hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property owners generally, and to all persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, the said governing body is of the opinion that Zoning Application No.S-1195R5-TC should be approved, and in the exercise of legislative discretion have concluded that the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map should be amended. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map of the City of Coppell, Texas, duly passed by the governing body of the City of Coppell, Texas, as heretofore amended, be and the same is hereby amended by granting a change in zoning from S-1195-TC (Special Use Permit- 1195 -Town Center) to S-1195R5-TC (Special Use Permit-1195 Revision 5-Town Center), to amend the Special Use Permit to allow a telecommunication tower, antenna and expansion to the Coppell Pg 2 TM 74695 concession/restroom facility building to house telecommunication equipment on property located approximately 150 feet east of N. Denton Tap Road and approximately 1,050 feet north of Parkway Blvd. (Andy Brown Central), for the property described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes. SECTION 2. That the Property will be used and developed for Town Center purposes as provided in the Code of Ordinance and to allow the construction and maintenance of an eighty (85’) foot high telecommunication tower, in accordance with to S-1195R5-TC (Special Use Permit-1195 Revision 5-Town Center), is hereby approved subject to the following special conditions and regulations: A. The development shall be in strict compliance with the Site Plan with Tower Elevation, Detail Site Plan, and Equipment Compound Elevation, as set forth in Exhibits “B”, “C” and “D”, respectively as adopted in Section 3 of this Ordinance. B. The construction and maintenance of the tower, antenna and equipment building shall not interfere with use and activities in the park. C. That all vehicle, equipment and materials for construction and maintenance shall be prohibited from use or access of the game and/or athletic fields. D. That any and all damage to the park facility or utilities, including but not limited to parking lot, landscaping, irrigation system, athletic or game fields, fencing, other city improvements, sidewalks and/or concession buildings shall be repaired solely by the telecommunication facility owner, its agents and/or contractors subject to the approval and acceptance of the City of Coppell Parks Department; any such repairs or renovation shall be at the sole expense of the telecommunication owner. Coppell Pg 3 TM 74695 . SECTION 3. That the Site Plan with Tower Elevation, Detail Site Plan, and Equipment Compound Elevation, attached hereto as Exhibits “B”, “C”, and “D”, respectively and made a part hereof for all purposes, are hereby approved. SECTION 4. That the above property shall be used only in the manner and for the purpose provided for by the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, as heretofore amended, and as amended herein. SECTION 5. That the development of the property herein shall be in accordance with building regulations, zoning ordinances, and any applicable ordinances except as may be specifically altered or amended herein. SECTION 6. That all provisions of the Ordinances of the City of Coppell, Texas, in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same are hereby, repealed, and all other provisions not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 7. That should any sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole, or any part or provision thereof other than the part so decided to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, and shall not affect the validity of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as a whole. SECTION 8. An offense committed before the effective date of this ordinance is governed by prior law and the provisions of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, as amended, in effect when the offense was committed and the former law is continued in effect for this purpose. SECTION 9. That any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions or terms of this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, as heretofore amended, and upon conviction shall be punished by a Coppell Pg 4 TM 74695 fine not to exceed the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense; and each and every day such violation shall continue shall be deemed to constitute a separate offense. SECTION 10. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage and the publication of its caption, as the law and charter in such cases provide. DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, this the _______ day of ___________________, 2016. APPROVED: _____________________________________ KAREN SELBO HUNT ATTEST: _____________________________________ CHRISTEL PETTINOS, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________________ ROBERT E. HAGER, CITY ATTORNEY (REH) Legal Description PARENT TRACT DESCRIPTION BEING a tract of land situated in the Clarinda Squires Survey, Abstract No. 1327 and the S.A.&M.G.R.R. Survey, Abstract No. 1430 in the City of Coppell, Dallas County, Texas and also being part of a tract of land as described in deed from Good Financial Corp. to M. Douglas Adkins, Trustee, as recorded in Volume 76188, Page 2355 of the Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point of intersection of the east line of Denton Tap Road (a variable width right-of-way) with the centerline of Denton Creek, said point also being the most southerly southwest corner of a tract of land as described by deed to Pure Ice and Cold Storage Co. and recorded in Volume 65694, Page 1496 of the Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas; THENCE along the said centerline of Denton Creek, and the said South line of the Pure Ice and Cold Storage Co. tract the following courses and distances: N.79°07'25"E., 147.77 feet: Thence N.18°31'25"E., 171.67 feet: Thence N.48°07'25"E., 160.00 feet; Thence S.61°52'35"E., 185.00 feet; Thence S.85°52'35"E., 600.00 feet; Thence N.88°07'25"E., 340.00 feet; Thence N.77°07'25"E., 300.00 feet; Thence N.27°07'25"E., 380.00 feet; Thence N.72°07'25"E., 180.00 feet; Thence S.55°52'35"E., 171.70 feet to a point for a corner; Thence leaving the said centerline of Denton Creek, and the south line of the Pure Ice and Cold Storage Co. tract, S.00°52'35"E., 1437.15 feet to a point for corner in a curve running in a southwesterly direction and having a central angle of 13°19'34" a radius of 2200.00 feet and a tangent bearing of S.75°26'53"W.; Thence along said curve 511.69 feet to the end of said curve; Thence N.27°52'41"W., 710.40 feet to a point for corner in a curve running in a southwesterly direction and having a central angle of 7°57'25" a radius of 3342.11 feet and a tangent bearing of S.73°49'41"W.; Thence along said curve 464.14 feet to the end of said curve; Thence S.65°52'16"W., 885.24 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right having a central angle of 18°00'54" and a radius of 600.00 feet; Thence along said curve 188.65 feet to the end of said curve, same being on the said east line of Denton Tap Road; Thence along the said east line of Denton Tap Road the following courses and distances; N.02°01'02"E., 388.26 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left having a central angle 02°53'00" and a radius of 5789.70 feet; Thence along said curve 291.36 feet to the end of said curve; Thence N.00°51'58"W., 342.88 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 53.398 acres of land. (SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED RECORDED IN VOLUME 86051, PAGE 1829, DEED RECORDS OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS.) Exhibit “A” (1 of 4) Legal Description LESSEE'S LEASE SITE DESCRIPTION A tract of land lying in and being a part of a 53.398 acre tract of land lying in the Clarinda Squires Survey, Abstract Number 1327, Dallas County, Texas, being further described in Volume 86051, Page 1829, Official Public Records of Dallas County, Texas; Said tract being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a Chiseled "X" found for the southwest corner of said 53.398 acre tract of land; Thence N 02°39'24" E on the West Parent Tract Boundary line, a distance of 388.26 feet to a point on said West line; Thence on a curve to the left with a chord bearing of N 01°32'48" E, a chord length of 224.35 feet, an arc length of 224.36 feet, and a radius of 5,789.70 feet; Thence N 89°50'04" E a distance of 212.40 feet to a Cut "X "set for the Southwest corner, on the East wall of an existing brick building, and being the Point of Beginning; Thence N 23°11'41" E a distance of 12.00 feet to a Cut "X" set for the Northwest corner and being on the East wall of an existing brick building; Thence S 66°48'19" E a distance of 16.00 feet to a 1/2" iron rod with cap set for the Northeast corner; Thence S 23°11'41" W a distance of 12.00 feet to a 1/2" iron rod set for the Southeast corner; Thence N 66°48'19" W a distance of 16.00 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 192.00 square feet, or 0.004 acres, more or less. LESSEE'S TOWER SITE DESCRIPTION A tract of land lying in and being a part of a 53.398 acre tract of land lying in the Clarinda Squires Survey, Abstract Number 1327, Dallas County, Texas, being further described in Volume 86051, Page 1829, Official Public Records of Dallas County, Texas; Said tract being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a Chiseled "X" found for the southwest corner of said 53.398 acre tract of land; Thence N 02°39'24" E on the West Parent Tract Boundary line, a distance of 388.26 feet to a point on said West; Thence on a curve to the left with a radius of 5,789.70 feet, and a chord bearing of N 02°04'26" E, with a chord length of 117.79 feet, an arc length of 117.79 feet; Thence S 88°30'32" E a distance of 138.35 feet to a 1/2" iron rod with cap set for the Southwest corner, and being the Point of Beginning; Thence N 22°56'32" E a distance of 10.00 feet to a 1/2" iron rod with cap set for the Northwest corner; Thence S 67°03'28" E a distance of 10.00 feet to a 1/2" iron rod with cap set for the Northeast corner; Thence S 22°56'32" W a distance of 10.00 feet to a 1/2" iron rod with cap set for the Southeast corner; Thence N 67°03'28" W a distance of 10.00 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 100.00 square feet, or 0.002 acres, more or less. Exhibit “A” (2 of 4) Legal Description LESSEE'S ACCESS/UTILITY EASEMENT #1 DESCRIPTION A 20.00 foot wide easement for ingress, egress and utility purposes crossing a part of a 53.398 acre tract of land lying in the Clarinda Squires Survey, Abstract Number 1327, Dallas County, Texas, being further described in Volume 86051, Page 1829, Official Public Records of Dallas County, Texas; Said easement being 10.00 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Commencing at a Chiseled "X" found for the southwest corner of said 53.398 acre tract of land; Thence N 02°39'24" E on the West Parent Tract Boundary line, a distance of 388.26 feet to a point on said West line; Thence on a curve to the left with a radius of 5,789.70 feet, and a chord bearing of N 01°56'10" E with a chord length of 145.63 feet, an arc length of 145.64 feet to the Point of Beginning; Thence N 79°05'58" E a distance of 80.26 feet to a point for a corner; Thence N 23°03'11" E a distance of 162.91 feet to a point for a corner; Thence S 67°10'51" E a distance of 52.90 feet to the point of termination on the West side of an existing brick wall; Side line of said easement to be shortened or extended such as to begin on the East Public right-of-way line of N. Denton Tap Road, and terminate on the West side of an existing brick wall. LESSEE'S ACCESS/UTILITY #2 EASEMENT DESCRIPTION A 10.00 foot wide easement for ingress, egress and utility purposes crossing a part of a 53.398 acre tract of land lying in the Clarinda Squires Survey, Abstract Number 1327, Dallas County, Texas, being further described in Volume 86051, Page 1829, Official Public Records of Dallas County, Texas; Said easement being 5.00 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Commencing at a Chiseled "X" found for the southwest corner of said 53.398 acre tract of land; Thence N 02°39'24" E on the West Parent Tract Boundary line, a distance of 388.26 feet to a point on said West line; Thence on a curve to the left a chord bearing of N 01°36'39" E, a chord length of 211.36 feet, an arc length of 211.37, and a radius of 5,789.70 feet to the Point of Beginning; Thence S 76°04'44" E a distance of 194.57 feet to the point of termination; Side line of said easement to be shortened or extended such as to begin on the East Public right-of-way line of N. Denton Tap Road, and terminate on the centerline of the 10.00 foot Lessee's Utility Easement. Exhibit “A” (3 of 4) Legal Description LESSEE'S UTILITY EASEMENT DESCRIPTION A 10.00 foot wide easement for utility purposes crossing a part of a 53.398 acre tract of land lying in the Clarinda Squires Survey, Abstract Number 1327, Dallas County, Texas, being further described in Volume 86051, Page 1829, Official Public Records of Dallas County, Texas; Said easement being 5.00 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Commencing at a Chiseled "X" found for the southwest corner of said 53.398 acre tract of land; Thence N 02°39'24" E on the West Parent Tract Boundary line, a distance of 388.26 feet to a point on said West line; Thence on a curve to the left with a chord bearing of N 02°02'19" E, a chord length of 124.94 feet, an arc length of 124.94 feet, and a radius of 5,789.70 feet to the Point of Beginning; Thence S 88°35'41" E a distance of 147.03 feet to a point for a corner; Thence N 45°04'18" E a distance of 68.69 feet to a point for a corner; Thence N 29°30'08" E a distance of 56.18 feet to the point of termination; Side line of said easement to be shortened or extended such as to begin on the North and East lines of the 0.002 acre Lessee's Tower Lease Site, and terminate on the South line of the 0.004 acre Lessee's Lease Site. Exhibit “A” (4 of 4) SITE PLAN1EN1ENSITE DRAWINGSITE ELEVATION2(210) 308-9905ARCHCOMM, LLC.1006 BeckettSan Antonio, Texas 782135*''66+6.'5*''6*+5614;#22418#.5+)0#674'5LEASINGCONSTRUCTIONLANDLORDTHIS IS AN INCOMPLETESET NOT FORCONSTRUCTION ORPERMITTING.APPROPRIATEPROFESSIONAL SEALWILL BE APPLIED TOFINAL CONSTRUCTIONSETTBPE NO. F-15659COPPELL, DALLAS COUNTY, TX N DENTON TAP RD (301559) *** COPPEL NORTH REPL ***09.01.15 ENSITE09.09.15 ENSITE09.29.15 ENSITE11.02.15 NEPA11.13.15 NEPA11.30.15 NEPA 11.13.15 NEPAEN2ENSITE DRAWING(210) 308-9905ARCHCOMM, LLC.1006 BeckettSan Antonio, Texas 782135*''66+6.'5*''6*+5614;#22418#.5+)0#674'5LEASINGCONSTRUCTIONLANDLORDTHIS IS AN INCOMPLETESET NOT FORCONSTRUCTION ORPERMITTING.APPROPRIATEPROFESSIONAL SEALWILL BE APPLIED TOFINAL CONSTRUCTIONSETTBPE NO. F-15659COPPELL, DALLAS COUNTY, TX N DENTON TAP RD (301559) *** COPPEL NORTH REPL ***SITE DETAIL PLAN 108.25.15 ENSITE09.01.15 ENSITE09.09.15 ENSITE11.02.15 NEPA11.30.15 NEPA EN3ENSITE DRAWINGEQIUPMENT COMPOUND ELEVATION2(210) 308-9905ARCHCOMM, LLC.1006 BeckettSan Antonio, Texas 782135*''66+6.'5*''6*+5614;#22418#.5+)0#674'5LEASINGCONSTRUCTIONLANDLORDTHIS IS AN INCOMPLETESET NOT FORCONSTRUCTION ORPERMITTING.APPROPRIATEPROFESSIONAL SEALWILL BE APPLIED TOFINAL CONSTRUCTIONSETTBPE NO. F-15659COPPELL, DALLAS COUNTY, TX N DENTON TAP RD (301559) *** COPPEL NORTH REPL ***09.01.15 ENSITE09.09.15 ENSITE09.29.15 ENSITE11.02.15 NEPA11.13.15 NEPA11.30.15 NEPA Master City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard Coppell, Texas 75019-9478 File Number: 2015-2489 File ID: Type: Status: 2015-2489 Zoning Ordinance Passed 3Version: Reference: In Control: City Council 11/09/2015File Created: Final Action: Revocation Ords S-1220-TC & S-1220R-TC (ORD)File Name: Title: Consider approval of an Ordinance for the Revocation of Ordinances No. 91500-A-393 (S-1220-TC) & No. 91500-A-555 (S-1220R-TC), to rescind these ordinances which currently permit telecommunication facilities in Andy Brown West which are being relocated to Andy Brown Central (S-1195R4-TC), and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Notes: Agenda Date: 01/12/2016 Agenda Number: D. Sponsors: Enactment Date: 01/12/2016 Cover Memo.pdf, Ordinance.pdf, Exhibit A - Ord 91500-A-393 (11 pages).pdf, Exhibit B - Ord 91500-A-555 (11 pages).pdf Attachments: Enactment Number: 91500-A-0684 Hearing Date: Contact: Effective Date: Drafter: History of Legislative File Action: Result: Return Date: Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver- sion: 1 PassApproved11/19/2015Planning & Zoning Commission Gary Sieb, Director of Planning introduced this case with exhibits. He stated that staff is recommending approval of the revocation of SUPs 1220-TC and 1220R-TC with the base zoning on the property to remain "TC" Town Center. Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. No one spoke. Chairman Haas closed the Public Hearing. A motion was made by Vice Chairman Portman to recommend approval of the revocation of SUP S-1220-TC & S-1220R-TC. Seconded by Commissioner Robinson motion carried (7-0). Action Text: Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master Continued (2015-2489) Chair Edmund Haas, Vice Chair Glenn Portman, Commissioner Sue Blankenship, Commissioner Ed Darling, Commissioner Doug Robinson, Commissioner Vijay Sarma, and Commissioner George Williford 7Aye: 2 PassClose the Public Hearing and Approve 12/08/2015City Council Presentation: Gary Sieb, Director of Planning, made a presentation to Council. Mayor Hunt opened the Public Hearing and advised that no one signed up to speak. A motion was made by Councilmember Nancy Yingling, seconded by Councilmember Cliff Long, to close the Public Hearing and approve this Agenda Item. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. Action Text: Councilmember Cliff Long, Councilmember Brianna Hinojosa-Flores, Councilmember Wes Mays, Councilmember Gary Roden, Councilmember Marvin Franklin, Councilmember Mark Hill, and Mayor Pro Tem Nancy Yingling 7Aye: 3 PassApproved on the Consent Agenda 01/12/2016City Council A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Councilmember Nancy Yingling, that Agenda Items A-K be approved on the Consent Agenda. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. Action Text: Text of Legislative File 2015-2489 Title Consider approval of an Ordinance for the Revocation of Ordinances No. 91500-A-393 (S-1220-TC) & No. 91500-A-555 (S-1220R-TC), to rescind these ordinances which currently permit telecommunication facilities in Andy Brown West which are being relocated to Andy Brown Central (S-1195R4-TC), and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Summary Staff Recommendation: On December 8, 2015, the City Council unanimously approved this REVOCATION OF ORDINANCES (7-0). On November 19, 2015, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the revocation of SUP’s No. S-1220-TC & No. S-1220R-TC (7-0). Commissioners Williford, Sarma, Robinson, Haas, Portman, Darling and Blankenship voted in favor; none opposed. The Planning Department recommended APPROVAL. Goal Icon: Sustainable City Government Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 1 MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and City Council From: Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning Date: January 12, 2016 Reference: Approval of an Ordinance rescinding Ord. No. 91500-A-393 (S-1220-TC) and Ord. No. 91500-A-555 (S-1220R-TC) which currently permit telecommunication facilities in Andy Brown West which are being relocated to Andy Brown Central (S-1195R4-TC). 2030: Business Prosperity Introduction: A provision of the Zoning Ordinance (Sec. 12-30-2(2)) states that if a Special Use Permit is transferred to another site—as is the case with this cell tower location--the existing SUP shall be revoked and the original zoning shall be retained on the site. Therefore, SUP’s 1220-TC and 1220R-TC are recommended for removal from the zoning map and the base zoning of TC shall remain on the property. Analysis: On December 8, 2015 City Council unanimously approved this rescinding of these two ordinances. On November 19, 2015 the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the rescinding of Ord. No. 91500-A-393 (S-1220-TC) and Ord. No. 91500-A-555 (S-1220R-TC). Legal Review: The City Attorney reviewed this ordinance. Fiscal Impact: None Recommendation: The Planning Department recommends approval. Attachments: 1. Ordinance 2. Exhibit “A” - Ord. No. 91500-A-393 (S-1220-TC) 3. Exhibit “B” - Ord. No. 91500-A-555 (S-1220R-TC) COPPELL TM 74696 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. ________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, AS HERETOFORE AMENDED, BY GRANTING A CHANGE IN ZONING TO REPEAL ORDINANCE NO. 91500-A-393 AND ORDINANCE NO. 91500-A-555 TO REVOKE SPECIAL USE PERMITS 1220 AND 1220-REVISED – TOWN CENTER (S-1220-TC AND S-1220R-TC) WHICH PERMITTED TELECOMMUNICATION FACILTIES IN ANDY BROWN WEST, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBITS “A” AND “B” ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN; PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Commission and the governing body of the City of Coppell, Texas, in compliance with the laws of the State of Texas and pursuant to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, have given requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and after holding due hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property owners generally, and to all persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, the said governing body is of the opinion that the revocation of Ordinance No. 91500-A-393 (S-1220-TC) and Ordinance No. 91500-A-555 (S-1220R-TC) should be approved, and in the exercise of legislative discretion have concluded that the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map should be amended. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map of the City of Coppell, Texas, duly passed by the governing body of the City of Coppell zoning to repeal Ordinance No. 91500-A-393 and Ordinance No. 91500-A-555 to hereby annul, repeal and revoke Special Use Permits 1220 and 1220-Revised-Town Center (S-1220-TC and S-1220R-TC), respectively which permitted telecommunication facilities in Andy Brown West attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and Exhibit “B” and made a part hereof for all purposes; SECTION 2. That the above property shall be used only in the manner and for the purpose provided for by the Town Center District in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, without such special use permits as heretofore amended, and as amended herein. COPPELL TM 74696 SECTION 3. That all provisions of the Ordinances of the City of Coppell, Texas, in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same are hereby, repealed, and all other provisions not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. That should any sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole, or any part or provision thereof other than the part so decided to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, and shall not affect the validity of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as a whole. SECTION 5. An offense committed before the effective date of this ordinance is governed by prior law and the provisions of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, as amended, in effect when the offense was committed and the former law is continued in effect for this purpose. SECTION 6. That any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions or terms of this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, as heretofore amended, and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine not to exceed the sum of Two Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense; and each and every day such violation shall continue shall be deemed to constitute a separate offense. SECTION 7. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage and the publication of its caption, as the law and charter in such cases provide. DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, this the _______ day of ___________________, 2016 APPROVED: _________________________________________ KAREN SELBO HUNT, Mayor COPPELL TM 74696 ATTEST: _________________________________________ CHRISTEL PETTINOS, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: _______________________________________ ROBERT E. HAGER, City Attorney Master City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard Coppell, Texas 75019-9478 File Number: 2015-2490 File ID: Type: Status: 2015-2490 Zoning Ordinance Passed 3Version: Reference: In Control: City Council 11/09/2015File Created: Final Action: PD-133R7-HC, ORD Liberation Coffee CompanyFile Name: Title: Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. PD-133R7-HC, Liberation Coffee Company, a zoning change from PD-133R2-HC (Planned Development-133 Revision 2-Highway Commercial) to PD-133R7-HC (Planned Development-133 Revision 7-Highway Commercial), to amend the Detail Site Plan to allow a 1,386-square-foot restaurant (coffee shop) with outdoor seating to be located at 651 North Denton Tap Road, Suite 200 and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Notes: Agenda Date: 01/12/2016 Agenda Number: E. Sponsors: Enactment Date: 01/12/2016 Cover Memo.pdf, Ordinance.pdf, Exhibit A - Legal Description.pdf, Exhibit B - Site-Floor Plan .pdf, Exhibit C - Parking Analysis.pdf, Exhibit D - Sign Plan.pdf Attachments: Enactment Number: 91500-A-0685 Hearing Date: Contact: Effective Date: Drafter: History of Legislative File Action: Result: Return Date: Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver- sion: 1 PassApproved11/19/2015Planning & Zoning Commission Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master Continued (2015-2490) Matt Steer, Sr. Planner, introduced this case with exhibits and elevations. He mentioned 17 notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of this request. Two were returned in favor and one returned in opposition. There also were 36 courtesy notices mailed to property owners within 800 feet of this request. He stated that staff is recommending approval subject to conditions which he read into the record. Brolen Jourdan, 3520 Mustang Drive, Denton Texas, was present to represent this case, to address questions and stated agreement with staff's recommendations. Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. No one spoke. Chairman Haas closed the Public Hearing. A motion was made by Commissioner Robinson to recommend approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Contact the Environmental Health Department for grease trap size requirements. 2. The development shall be in accordance with the Site Plan/Floor Plan, Parking Analysis and Sign Plan. 3. The hours of operation shall not exceed 5:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Sunday through Thursday and 5:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., Friday through Saturday. 4. Note on the Site Plan that the loading and unloading of any merchandise or materials shall not be permitted between the hours of 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. daily. 5. Revise five-gallon Boxwood shrubs to an approved shrub found on the plant palette of the Zoning Ordinance (suggest using Dwarf Burford Holly). 6. Ensure arbor roof is standing seam and label as such. Seconded by Commissioner Blankenship; motion carried (7-0). Action Text: Chair Edmund Haas, Vice Chair Glenn Portman, Commissioner Sue Blankenship, Commissioner Ed Darling, Commissioner Doug Robinson, Commissioner Vijay Sarma, and Commissioner George Williford 7Aye: 2 PassClose the Public Hearing and Approve 12/08/2015City Council Presentation: Gary Sieb, Director of Planning, made a presentation to Council. Mayor Hunt opened the Public Hearing and advised that no one signed up to speak. A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Councilmember Brianna Hinojosa-Flores, to close the Public Hearing and approve this Agenda Item subject to the following conditions: 1) The development shall be in accordance with the Site Plan/Floor Plan, Parking Analysis and Sign Plan; and 2) The hours of operation shall not exceed 5:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Sunday through Thursday and 5:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., Friday through Saturday. The loading and unloading of any merchandise or materials shall not be permitted between the hours of 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. daily. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. Action Text: Councilmember Cliff Long, Councilmember Brianna Hinojosa-Flores, Councilmember Wes Mays, Councilmember Gary Roden, Councilmember Marvin Franklin, Councilmember Mark Hill, and Mayor Pro Tem Nancy Yingling 7Aye: 3 PassApproved on the Consent Agenda 01/12/2016City Council Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master Continued (2015-2490) A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Councilmember Nancy Yingling, that Agenda Items A-K be approved on the Consent Agenda. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. Action Text: Text of Legislative File 2015-2490 Title Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. PD-133R7-HC, Liberation Coffee Company, a zoning change from PD -133R2-HC (Planned Development-133 Revision 2-Highway Commercial) to PD-133R7-HC (Planned Development-133 Revision 7-Highway Commercial), to amend the Detail Site Plan to allow a 1,386-square-foot restaurant (coffee shop) with outdoor seating to be located at 651 North Denton Tap Road, Suite 200 and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Summary Staff Recommendation: On December 8, 2015, City Council unanimously approved this ZONING CHANGE (7-0). On November 19, 2015, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of this ZONING CHANGE (7-0). Commissioners Williford, Sarma, Robinson, Haas, Portman, Darling and Blankenship voted in favor; none opposed. The Planning Department recommended APPROVAL. Goal Icon: Business Prosperity Sense of Community Page 3City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 1 MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and City Council From: Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning Date: January 12, 2016 Reference: Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. PD-133R7-HC, Liberation Coffee Company to amend the Detail Site Plan to allow a 1,386-square-foot restaurant (coffee shop) with outdoor seating to be located at 651 North Denton Tap Road, Suite 200. 2030: Business Prosperity and Sense of Community Introduction: This request is for a 1,386-square-foot Coffee Shop with a 155-square-foot front yard covered patio within the existing Magnolia Retail Center. The parking is sufficient to support a restaurant use with the current tenant mix and accounting for the future tenants to be retail uses. Analysis: On December 8 2015 the City Council unanimously approved this PD amendment for a restaurant (coffee shop). On November 19, 2015 the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended approval of PD-133R7-HC: 1. The development shall be in accordance with the Site Plan/Floor Plan, Parking Analysis and Sign Plan. 2. The hours of operation shall not exceed 5:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Sunday through Thursday and 5:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., Friday through Saturday. The loading and unloading of any merchandise or materials shall not be permitted between the hours of 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. daily. Legal Review: This item did not require City Attorney review. Fiscal Impact: None Recommendation: The Planning Department recommends approval Attachments: 1. Ordinance 2. Exhibit “A” – Legal Description 2 3. Exhibit “B” - Site Plan/Floor Plan 4. Exhibit “C” - Parking Analysis 5. Exhibit “D” - Sign Plan Coppell Pg 1 TM 74690 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. ________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, AS HERETOFORE AMENDED, BY GRANTING A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM PD-133R2-HC (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT- 133 REVISION 2-HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) TO PD-133R7-HC (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT-133 REVISION 7-HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL), TO AMEND THE DETAIL SITE PLAN TO ALLOW A 1,386-SQUARE-FOOT RESTAURANT (COFFEE SHOP) WITH OUTDOOR SEATING TO BE LOCATED AT 651 NORTH DENTON TAP ROAD, SUITE 200, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A” ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN; PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN/FLOOR PLAN, PARKING ANALYSIS AND SIGN PLAN, ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBITS “B”, “C” AND “D”; PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL CONDITIONS; PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Commission and the governing body of the City of Coppell, Texas, in compliance with the laws of the State of Texas and pursuant to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, have given requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and after holding due hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property owners generally, and to all persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, the said governing body is of the opinion that Zoning Application No. PD-133R7-HC should be approved, and in the exercise of legislative discretion have concluded that the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map should be amended. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map of the City of Coppell, Texas, duly passed by the governing body of the City of Coppell, Texas, as heretofore amended, be and the same is hereby amended by granting a change in zoning from PD-133R2-HC (Planned Development-133 Revision 2-Highway Commercial) to PD-133R7-HC (Planned Development-133 Revision 7-Highway Commercial), to amend the Detail Site Plan to allow a 1,386-square-foot restaurant (coffee shop) with outdoor seating to be located at 651 North Denton Tap Road, Suite 200, for the property described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes. Coppell Pg 2 TM 74690 SECTION 2. That the Property will be used and developed for Highway Commercial purposes as provided in the Code of Ordinances and to Plan to allow a 1,386-square-foot restaurant (coffee shop) with outdoor seating, is hereby approved subject to the following development regulations: A. That accept as amended herein, the property shall be developed in accordance with Ordinance 91500-A-255, which is incorporated herein as set forth in full and hereby republished. B. The hours of operation shall not exceed 5:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Sunday through Thursday and 5:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., Friday through Saturday. C. The loading and unloading of any supplies, merchandise or materials or any other deliveries from service vendor shall not be permitted between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. Sunday through Saturday. D. Exterior signage shall be twenty-one square foot sign as depicted on the sign plan, Exhibit D. E. Shall maintain a minimum of fifteen (15) parking spaces for this particular use in accordance with the parking analysis as contained in Exhibit C. SECTION 3. That the Site Plan/Floor Plan, Parking Analysis and Sign Plan, attached hereto as Exhibits “B”, “C”, and “D”, respectively and made a part hereof for all purposes, are hereby approved. SECTION 4. That the above property shall be used only in the manner and for the purpose provided for by the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, as heretofore amended, and as amended herein. Coppell Pg 3 TM 74690 SECTION 5. That the development of the property herein shall be in accordance with building regulations, zoning ordinances, and any applicable ordinances except as may be specifically altered or amended herein. SECTION 6. That all provisions of the Ordinances of the City of Coppell, Texas, in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same are hereby, repealed, and all other provisions not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 7. That should any sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole, or any part or provision thereof other than the part so decided to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, and shall not affect the validity of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as a whole. SECTION 8. An offense committed before the effective date of this ordinance is governed by prior law and the provisions of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, as amended, in effect when the offense was committed and the former law is continued in effect for this purpose. SECTION 9. That any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions or terms of this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, as heretofore amended, and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine not to exceed the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense; and each and every day such violation shall continue shall be deemed to constitute a separate offense. SECTION 10. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage and the publication of its caption, as the law and charter in such cases provide. DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, this the _______ day of ___________________, 2016. Coppell Pg 4 TM 74690 APPROVED: _____________________________________ KAREN SELBO HUNT ATTEST: _____________________________________ CHRISTEL PETTINOS, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________________ ROBERT E. HAGER, CITY ATTORNEY (REH) Liberation Coffee Company Hours of Operation and Parking Analysis: Monday: 5:00 am – 9 pm Tuesday: 5:00 am – 9 pm Wednesday: 5:00 am – 9 pm Thursday: 5:00 am – 9 pm Friday: 5:00 am – 10 pm Saturday: 5:00 am – 10 pm Sunday: 5:00 am – 9 pm *Operating hours will not exceed any times listed above. Parking required for current tenants -‐ Magnolia Village Tenant SF Use Ratio/per SF Parking Required Urgent Care 2,866 Medical Office 1/175 16 State Farm 1,050 Professional Office 1/300 4 Physical Therapy 1,450 Medical Office 1/175 8 Pizza Hut 965 Restaurant 1/100 10 Vacant 1,511 Retail 1/200 8 Vacant 1,798 Retail 1/200 9 Dentist 3,300 Dental Office 1/175 19 Dr. Winslow 1,246 Medical Office 1/175 7 *Proposed Coffee Shop 1,541 Restaurant 1/100 15 Total spaces required 96 *Our parcel has 100 parking spaces *Square Footage includes Patio space <-21’ wide frontage -> Size: 3’ H X 7’ W Color: White #7328 with returns matching the brick color Font: Tahoma Materials: Face is Rohm and Haas Plexiglass with aluminum returns, backs, and plates Master City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard Coppell, Texas 75019-9478 File Number: 2015-2533 File ID: Type: Status: 2015-2533 Agenda Item Passed 1Version: Reference: In Control: Finance 12/15/2015File Created: Final Action: Fee Resolution 01-12-2016File Name: Title: Consider approval of a Resolution amending Resolution No. 010996.3 as amended, amending the Master Fee schedule for Water Rates, Sewer Rates and Solid Waste Collection Fees and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Notes: Agenda Date: 01/12/2016 Agenda Number: F. Sponsors: Enactment Date: Memo Fee Resolution January 2016.pdf, Master Fee Resolution 01-12-16.pdf Attachments: Enactment Number: 2016-0112.1 Hearing Date: Contact: Effective Date: Drafter: History of Legislative File Action: Result: Return Date: Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver- sion: 1 PassApproved on the Consent Agenda 01/12/2016City Council A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Councilmember Nancy Yingling, that Agenda Items A-K be approved on the Consent Agenda. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. Action Text: Text of Legislative File 2015-2533 Title Consider approval of a Resolution amending Resolution No. 010996.3 as amended, amending the Master Fee schedule for Water Rates, Sewer Rates and Solid Waste Collection Fees and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Summary See attached memorandum. Fiscal Impact: Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master Continued (2015-2533) Staff Recommendation: The Finance Department recommends approval. Goal Icon: Sustainable City Government Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 1 MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and City Council From: Jennifer Miller, Director of Finance Date: January 12, 2016 Reference: Amending Fee Resolution 2030: Sustainable City Government – Financial Resources to Support City Services Introduction: The fees charged by the City have been reviewed and the proposed changes are being brought forward for Council’s approval. Analysis: • The Water and Sewer monthly rates are being amended to reflect the amounts presented to and passed by Council at the December 8, 2015 meeting. The base rates for both water and sewer on residential customers are increasing from $12.00 to $16.00 for the first 1,000 gallons. Rates based upon meter size, commercial, industrial, non-single family dwellings and the conservation rate are also being adjusted accordingly. The rate for all water over 1,000 gallons is increasing $.25 per 1,000 and sewer is increasing $.05 per 1,000. Senior Citizens (65 or older) are receiving a 10% discount on the rates. This increase will become effective February 1, 2016. • The current Solid Waste contract with Republic provides for an annual adjustment of 3.0%. For the residential customer, rates will increase from $14.81 per month to $15.26. The senior rate will increase from $13.33 per month to $13.72. The commercial rates will reflect the same 3.0% increase. This increase is effective January 1, 2016. Legal Review: This agenda item was reviewed by legal during the normal review of the agenda packet. Fiscal Impact: Recommendation: The Finance Department recommends approval. 1 RESOLUTION NO. __________________ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 010996.3, THE MASTER FEE SCHEDULE, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING THE WATER RATES (MONTHLY), IN PART; THE SEWER RATES (MONTHLY), IN PART; THE GARBAGE COLLECTION FEES, IN PART; AND PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, previously adopted Resolution No. 010996.3 to provide for general and special fees and charges to be assessed and collected by the City, as authorized by the Code of Ordinances and other applicable codes, ordinances, resolutions, and laws; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Coppell desires to amend certain fees as set forth therein and delete others as authorized by law; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Master Fee Schedule section entitled “Chapter 3, Coppell City Code” be amended, in part to read as follows: Sec. 3-1-5, Water Rates (Monthly) (Effective 02-01-2016) Residential First 1,000 gallons (minimum) $ 16.00 All over 1,000 gallons $2.85 per 1,000 gallons Conservation Water Rate June 1 – October 31, Billings First 1,000 gallons (minimum) $ 16.00 1,001 – 25,000 gallons $2.85 per 1,000 gallons 25,001+ $3.55 per 1,000 gallons Senior Citizen Rates (65 or older) First 1,000 gallons (minimum) $ 14.40 All over 1,000 gallons $2.56 per 1,000 gallons Conservation Water Rate June 1 – October 31, Billings First 1,000 gallons (minimum) $ 14.40 1,001 – 25,000 $2.56 per 1,000 gallons 25,001+ $3.19 per 1,000 gallons 2 Commercial Based on Meter Base Rate Below plus $2.85 per 1,000 gallons Meter Base Rate: Size Type Rate 5/8 inch meter A $ 16.00 1 inch meter B $ 21.60 1 ½ inch meter C $ 32.35 2 inch meter D $ 43.00 3 inch meter E $ 64.50 4 inch meter F $ 86.10 6 inch meter G $129.00 8 inch meter H $172.00 …” SECTION 2. That the Master Fee Schedule section entitled “Chapter 3, Coppell City Code” be amended, in part to read as follows: Sec. 3-2-2, Sewer Rates (Monthly) (Effective 02-01-2016) Residential First 1,000 gallons (minimum) $ 16.00 All over 1,000 gallons $1.85 per 1,000 gallons (maximum 14,000 gallons) Senior Citizen Rates (65 or older) First 1,000 gallons (minimum) $ 14.40 All over 1,000 gallons $1.66 per 1,000 gallons Commercial, Industrial and Non-Single Family Dwellings: First 1,000 gallons (minimum) $ 16.00 All over 1,000 gallons $1.85 per 1,000 gallons Sewer Service Only (flat rate): Customers not connected to City’s water system $ 32.65 …” 3 SECTION 3. That the Master Fee Schedule section entitled “Garbage Collection Fees” be amended, in part to read as follows: Garbage Collection Fees (Effective January 1, 2016) Solid Waste and Recycling (Includes Yard Trimmings and At Your Door HHW Fees) 1. Residential Garbage Customer $15.26 per month Senior Citizen Residential Garbage Customer $13.73 per month Public Education Fee $ 0.10 per month 2. Monthly Fees for Dumpster Services: Pickups per Week Dumpster Type and Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2 CYD $61.62 $102.59 $136.11 $169.89 $207.70 $246.01 $285.87 3 CYD $94.68 $157.63 $209.16 $261.06 $319.16 $378.02 $439.28 4 CYD $116.22 $226.41 $310.42 $393.01 $476.61 $571.98 $673.35 6 CYD $141.31 $241.71 $348.27 $443.60 $534.55 $631.09 $731.16 8 CYD $179.03 $305.30 $430.35 $546.53 $657.28 $778.61 $904.87 10 CYD $227.31 $388.46 $548.04 $683.17 $837.66 $992.51 $1,153.63 2 CYDC $312.83 $416.73 $518.48 $622.40 $726.33 $828.06 $931.98 3 CYDC $351.49 $468.25 $582.56 $699.33 $816.10 $930.41 $1,047.18 4 CYDC $392.85 $503.51 $643.37 $783.24 $923.11 $1,060.55 $1,120.36 6 CYDC $414.72 $591.10 $767.44 $942.59 $1,120.15 $1,209.95 $1,474.06 8 CYDC $473.10 $687.16 $900.01 $1,113.61 $1,264.21 $1,540.95 $1,753.81 3. Fees for Roll-off Services: Type and Size Container Rental (Per Month) Initial Delivery (One Time Collection Fee (Per Pull) Disposal Fee (Per Ton) 10 CY $154.49 $66.95 $279.81 $0.00 20 CY $154.49 $66.95 $285.51 $0.00 30 CY $154.49 $66.95 $327.03 $0.00 40 CY $154.49 $66.95 $415.04 $0.00 25 CYC $412.00 $87.55 $404.79 $0.00 30 CYC $412.00 $87.55 $413.40 $0.00 35 CYC $412.00 $87.55 $433.06 $0.00 40 CYC $412.00 $87.55 $483.97 $0.00 4 4. Monthly Fees for Commercial Hand Collect 1 to 5 Solid Waste Bags per Scheduled Collection Day $18.55 per month 6 to 10 Solid Waste Bags per Scheduled Collection Day $23.03 per month 5. Fees for Extra Pick Ups for Dumpster Services Dumpster Type and Size Fee (per Pickup) 2 CY Dumpster $29.61 3 CY Dumpster $35.54 4 CY Dumpster $47.38 6 CY Dumpster $53.30 8 CY Dumpster $59.23 10 CY Dumpster $65.15 2 CY Dumpster Compactor $118.45 3 CY Dumpster Compactor $130.30 4 CY Dumpster Compactor $148.06 6 CY Dumpster Compactor $165.83 8 CY Dumpster Compactor $177.68 2 CY Dumpster Compactor Customer Own $118.45 3 CY Dumpster Compactor Customer Own $130.30 4CY Dumpster Compactor Customer Own $148.06 6 CY Dumpster Compactor Customer Own $165.83 8 CY Dumpster Compactor Customer Own $177.68 6. Fees for Eligible Disaster Debris Services Grapple Truck $131.84 per hour per truck Rear loader $131.84 per hour per truck 7. Other Fees for Commercial and Roll-off Services Locks $ 9.48 per lock/per month Casters $ 11.85 per set/per month Permit $ 20.00 per permit Opening and Closing of Enclosures No Charge Liner $ 59.23 per Liner Container Exchange Rate $ 59.23 per container 5 8. Fees for Additional Bulky Waste Services (in excess of Base Services) White Good $29.62 Mattress/Box Springs $29.62 Furniture $29.62 Other $29.62 Per 2 CY SECTION 4. That all provisions of the resolutions of the City of Coppell, Texas, in conflict with the provisions of this Resolution, except as noted herein, be, and the same are hereby, repealed, and all other provisions not in conflict with the provisions of this Resolution shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 5. That should any word, phrase, paragraph, or section of this Resolution be held to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of this Resolution as a whole, or any part or provision thereof other than the part so decided to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, and shall not affect the validity of the Resolution as a whole. SECTION 6. That this Resolution shall become effective immediately from and after its passage as the law and charter in such cases provide. DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, this the 12th day of January, 2016. APPROVED: __________________________________ KAREN SELBO HUNT, MAYOR ATTEST: __________________________________ CHRISTEL PETTINOS, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM: __________________________________ CITY ATTORNEY Master City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard Coppell, Texas 75019-9478 File Number: 2015-2553 File ID: Type: Status: 2015-2553 Agenda Item Passed 1Version: Reference: In Control: Finance 12/30/2015File Created: Final Action: ILA Dallas County Tax CollectionsFile Name: Title: Consider approval of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, to enter into an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement on behalf of the City of Coppell, Texas with Dallas County for tax assessment and collection services; and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Notes: Agenda Date: 01/12/2016 Agenda Number: G. Sponsors: Enactment Date: Memo Tax Collections - Dallas County.pdf, Tax Collections with Dallas County Resolution.pdf, City of Coppell ILA - Tax Collections - Dallas County.pdf Attachments: Enactment Number: 2016-0112.2 Hearing Date: Contact: Effective Date: Drafter: History of Legislative File Action: Result: Return Date: Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver- sion: 1 PassApproved on the Consent Agenda 01/12/2016City Council A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Councilmember Nancy Yingling, that Agenda Items A-K be approved on the Consent Agenda. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. Action Text: Text of Legislative File 2015-2553 Title Consider approval of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, to enter into an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement on behalf of the City of Coppell, Texas with Dallas County for tax assessment and collection services; and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Summary See attached memorandum. Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master Continued (2015-2553) Fiscal Impact: The cost of this Inter-local Agreement is approximately $25,000 and will be budgeted in the Tax Division’s Other Professional Services. (01-05-06-4220). Staff Recommendation: The Finance Department recommends approval. Goal Icon: Sustainable City Government Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 1 MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and City Council From: Jennifer Miller, Director of Finance Date: January 12, 2016 Reference: Inter-local agreement with Dallas County for tax collections 2030: Sustainable City Government – Financial Resources to Support City Services Introduction: This agenda item is being presented to consider approval of an inter-local Cooperation Agreement with Dallas County for tax assessment and collection services for the City of Coppell. Analysis: • In Fiscal Year 2001-02, the City began collecting property taxes for the Coppell Independent School District. At that time, an additional tax clerk was to be added to accommodate the additional work load. September 11, 2001 occurred and all new positions were eliminated from the budget. The Tax Department continued to collect both the school and city taxes with the existing number of personnel. • As the school district grew and added additional properties such as Cypress Waters, the number of statements that were school only also increased. Beginning April 1, 2015, the City transferred collection of the school district’s taxes to Dallas County. • The Finance department experienced the retirement of a number of individuals in the last quarter of 2015. There were four (4) retirements, and of those 4, two (2) were involved in the property tax collections function for the City. Rather than replace the positions in their current capacity, it was reviewed and determined that having Dallas County collect the taxes and reclassifying the two positions associated with tax collections was a more efficient use of resources. • Rather than being positions that bill and collect property taxes, these positions will be assigned the responsibility of monitoring property taxes, but the job responsibilities will also include audits, reconciliations and investigation into sales tax, franchise taxes, and hotel/motel taxes. • As of September 15, 2015, Dallas Central Appraisal District reports that only 3 of the 31 City Jurisdictions continue to collect their own property taxes. (Coppell, Mesquite and Garland) • Rather than writing two checks and sending to two different entities, the citizens of Coppell will be able to pay all of their property taxes at one location. 2 • The reorganization coupled with the Inter-local agreement is estimated to save approximately $50,000 between the General Fund and the Water/Sewer Fund. Legal Review: The resolution was prepared by legal counsel. Fiscal Impact: The cost of this Inter-local agreement is approximately $25,000 annually. The county is currently charging (2015) $1.25 per parcel for parcels in Dallas County and $2.95 per parcel for parcels outside of Dallas County. There are approximately 15,000 parcels in Dallas County and 600 parcels in Denton County. Recommendation: The Finance Department recommends approval. 1 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO AN INTER- LOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS WITH DALLAS COUNTY FOR TAX ASSESSMENT AND COLLECTION SERVICES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Dallas County, Texas has offered to provide tax assessment and collection services for the City of Coppell, Texas for properties located in Dallas and Denton Counties, and the City Council desires to contract with Dallas County to provide such tax assessment and collection services; and WHEREAS, Section 6.24 of the Texas Property Tax Code authorizes the City of Coppell, Texas to enter into an inter-local cooperation agreement with Dallas County for tax assessment and collection services; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Mayor is authorized to execute an Inter-Local Cooperation Agreement on behalf of the City of Coppell, Texas with Dallas County, Texas for tax assessment and collection services for properties located within Dallas and Denton Counties, Texas, and any amendments or other instruments related thereto. SECTION 2. That this Resolution shall become effective immediately from and after its passage. DULY RESOLVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, on this the ____ day of ____________, 2016. APPROVED: KAREN SELBO HUNT, Mayor ATTEST: CHRISTEL PETTINOS, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________________ ROBERT E. HAGER, City Attorney (12/29/15-aa-74859) PROPERTY TAX ASSESSMENT & COLLECTION SVCS BETWEEN DALLAS COUNTY & COPPELL – 2015 1 CONTRACT FOR ASSESSMENT AND COLLECTION BETWEEN DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS AND THE CITY OF COPPELL PURPOSE: This Contract is between Dallas County, Texas, through its County Tax Assessor-Collector, and the City of Coppell (the “Taxing Unit”) and is entered into pursuant to Section 6.24 of the Texas Property Tax Code and Section 791.011 of the Texas Government Code. I. SCOPE OF SERVICES 1. SERVICES TO BE RENDERED BY TAX ASSESSOR/COLLECTOR Dallas County, through its County Tax Assessor-Collector, (collectively referred to as the “TAC”), shall assess and collect ad valorem property taxes upon all properties subject to the Taxing Unit’s taxing jurisdiction, and shall perform said services in the same manner and fashion as the TAC collects taxes due and owing County on its own taxable properties. The services rendered hereunder shall conform with all applicable and controlling laws, rules, orders, mandates, and regulations, and shall include the following: (1) receiving the Certified Appraisal Roll from the appropriate Appraisal District(s) and monthly changes thereto, (2) providing mortgage companies, property owners and/or tax representatives tax roll and payment data, (3) providing all necessary assessments of taxes as required, (4) the transmittal of tax statements via appropriate medium (5) processing property tax payments, and (6) calculations of the effective tax rates, roll back tax rates and Truth in Taxation notices for publication unless instructed otherwise. Additionally, on the Taxing Unit’s behalf, the TAC shall (1) approve and refund erroneous payments or overpayments, if provided sufficient historical information by the Taxing Unit, (2) approve or reject requests for waiver of penalties and interest for delinquent taxes owed, (3) prepare and issue tax certificates, and (4) prepare and/or provide information and reports to state agencies, auditors and other interested parties regarding assessments, collections and disbursements of ad valorem taxes. 2. ADDITIONAL SERVICES AVAILABLE TO TAXING UNIT The TAC might further perform or render additional related services when requested by t h e Taxing Unit, which additional services might result in additional costs and fees to be paid by the Taxing Unit. Before any such additional services are commenced by the TAC, said services and attendant costs and fees shall be confirmed by separate written agreement. 3. EXCLUSIONS The scope of services contemplated hereunder does not include the administration of a rollback election. In the event of a rollback election, regardless of the outcome, all costs incurred by the TAC on behalf of the Taxing Unit shall be in addition to the collection fees set out in the attached Notice of Annual Per Parcel Cost and shall be confirmed by separate written agreement. Should the Taxing Unit adopt a rate that will trigger a rollback election, they may obtain an estimate of the costs that would be incurred, regardless of the outcome of the election. PROPERTY TAX ASSESSMENT & COLLECTION SVCS BETWEEN DALLAS COUNTY & COPPELL – 2015 2 In the event of a rollback election by the Taxing Unit, the TAC shall assume no duty or responsibility hereunder regarding (1) any matter relating to a financial or legal obligation said Taxing Unit may owe to any applicable Appraisal District; (2) the adoption of the Taxing Unit’s corrected/modified/amended tax rates, and related publications or notices pertaining thereto, or (3) any other obligation imposed by law or other controlling authority upon the Taxing Unit not specifically stated in this Agreement. II. COMPENSATION In consideration of the services provided by the TAC, the Taxing Unit shall pay the TAC for the services provided herein, the amounts reflected in the attached Notice of Annual Per Parcel Cost. The Notice of Annual Per Parcel Cost attached hereto is incorporated herein for all purposes and constitutes a part of this contractual agreement. It is expressly understood and agreed that the Notice of Annual Per Parcel Cost might be amended over time. If the Notice of Annual Per Parcel Cost is amended in the future, the remainder of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect unless specifically changed by a supplemental, amended or replacement Agreement. Before any such amendment may take effect, timely notice must be provided. To be considered timely, said notice shall be provided on or before the 1st day of March of each year, with an effective date of October 1st of the new tax year. The TAC’s compensation for performing the primary services contemplated herein shall be deducted from current collections by January 31st annually, and shall include, but not be limited to all accounts added through supplements to the tax collection system from the certified Tax Roll received from the applicable Appraisal District(s) since certification. III. COOPERATION The Taxing Unit shall provide to the TAC, without charge, copies of all records necessary to perform the duties and responsibilities contemplated under this Agreement in the format and/or medium in which they currently exist. The Taxing Unit shall provide to the TAC all accounts involved in the establishment of a new Public Improvement District (“PID”) or any additions or deletions of an existing PID. PID rates must be adopted per $100 of valuation as determined and certified by the applicable Appraisal District(s). Consistent with mandates of applicable law, the parties hereto shall assist each other in promptly complying with Public Information Requests pertaining to any aspects of this Agreement. IV. NOTICE OF APPLICABLE TAX RATES The Taxing Unit shall provide the TAC with timely notice regarding the adoption of all applicable tax rates and exemptions, as well as related directives, orders, decisions or other matters which impact the assessment and collection of ad valorem property taxes. As used herein, the phrase “timely” shall mean adopting the applicable tax rate for the Taxing Unit and providing notice to the TAC of same, no later than the 3rd Wednesday of September for each year that this Contract remains in effect. In the event that the Taxing Unit does not timely adopt its tax rate on or before the 3rd Wednesday of September and notify the TAC of same, the Taxing Unit agrees that it will bear all reasonable and additional costs incurred by the TAC as a direct or indirect result of the Taxing Unit’s failure to timely adopt its tax rate. All such costs are in addition to the collection fees set out in the attached Notice of Annual Per Parcel Cost. PROPERTY TAX ASSESSMENT & COLLECTION SVCS BETWEEN DALLAS COUNTY & COPPELL – 2015 3 V. DEPOSIT OF FUNDS All funds collected by the TAC on the Taxing Unit’s behalf shall be promptly transferred and deposited by automated clearing house (ACH) protocol into an account designated by Taxing Unit at its depository bank. If any daily collection total is less than Twenty-five Dollars ($25.00), the distribution will be withheld until the cumulative total of taxes collected on the Taxing Unit’s behalf equals at least Twenty- five Dollars ($25.00). After initiation of the aforementioned ACH transfers from the Dallas County Tax Office’s Depository Account to the Taxing Unit’s designated Depository Account, the TAC retains no responsibility, and shall have no liability, for the further management and processing of said funds. VI. REFUNDS Refunds will be made by the TAC on the Taxing Unit’s behalf only as set forth herein. The TAC will not make refunds on prior year paid accounts unless the prior year paid accounts for the past five (5) years are provided and made available to the TAC. The TAC agrees to issue refund checks on behalf of the Taxing Unit based on value changes as provided by the Appraisal District(s); should the Taxing Unit have insufficient collections to repay the Dallas County Tax Office within 15 days, then the outstanding sum must be paid in full upon notification by the Tax Office. In the event that the Taxing Unit is a party in any lawsuit regarding the collection of taxes provided for herein, which matter is resolved by settlement or final judgment requiring the Taxing Unit to refund tax payment proceeds to a taxpayer, the TAC shall be permitted to make such refund on the Taxing Unit’s behalf, and to debit such amount from tax payment proceeds currently held by the TAC on behalf of the Taxing Unit. VII. AUDIT CONTROLS The TAC shall employ and utilize appropriate internal and external audit controls to insure the accuracy and integrity of their tax collection efforts on the Taxing Unit’s behalf. The Taxing Unit reserves the right to employ its own independent audit mechanisms and controls. When requested, the TAC shall cooperate with the Taxing Unit’s independent auditors by providing necessary explanations of all reports as well as providing access to relevant databases maintained by the Dallas County Tax Office. VIII. DELINQUENT TAX COLLECTION In addition to the services provided herein, the TAC shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, make all reasonable efforts to pursue the collection of delinquent ad valorem property taxes owed to the Taxing Unit. All such efforts shall include contracting with any competent attorney to represent the TAC in enforcing the collection of delinquent taxes. To avoid duplication of efforts and unnecessary costs to the taxpayer, the TAC recommends employing the same counsel for both the TAC and the Taxing Unit. Any attorney retained for such representation shall be paid in the manner permitted by law and consistent with the contract between the TAC and the attorney. In the event the Taxing Unit utilizes different legal counsel than the one employed by the TAC, the Taxing Unit agrees to pay the additional cost, if any, that are incurred in utilizing different legal counsel. All such costs are in addition to the collection fees set out in the attached Notice of Annual Per Parcel Cost. PROPERTY TAX ASSESSMENT & COLLECTION SVCS BETWEEN DALLAS COUNTY & COPPELL – 2015 4 IX. NOTICES Notices required to be given to either party to this agreement shall be deemed delivered when either personally delivered, faxed with receipt confirmed, or when mailed via United States Mail, certified or registered, postage prepaid, and confirmed received by intended recipient. X. SUPPLEMENTAL SURETY BOND RECOMMENDED The TAC recommends that the Taxing Unit obtain additional and adequate surety bond for the TAC specifically related to all anticipated services to be performed and rendered hereunder, with all associated premiums for such bond to be paid by the Taxing Unit. XI. TERM AND DURATION OF AGREEMENT The term of this Agreement shall begin on the date of last execution by any party hereto, and continue in full force and effect, from year to year, until such time as either party, by written notice to the other, terminates the same. Notice of termination given hereunder on or before the 1st day of April of the tax year in which the party intends termination, shall be effective immediately following the 30th day of September following such notice. XII. SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY This Contract for Assessment and Collection is expressly made subject to each party’s sovereign immunities, Title 5 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code and all applicable state and federal law. The parties expressly agree that no provision of this Agreement is intended to in any way constitute a waiver of any immunities from suit or from liability that the parties have by operation of law. XIII. MISCELLANEOUSPROVISIONS This Contract for Assessment and Collection contains the entire agreement between the parties relating to the rights and obligations delegated, assumed and owed by and between the TAC and the Taxing Unit. This Contract supersedes any prior understandings and agreements between the parties, written or oral, pertaining to the same subject matters. This Contract shall be construed under and in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas, and all obligations herein shall be performed in Dallas County, Texas. This Contract is not intended to benefit any third-party beneficiaries. This Contract shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, and to their respective successors and assigns. Should one or more provisions contained herein be declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable, such declaration shall not invalidate or adversely impact other valid, legal and enforceable provisions, and the remainder of this Agreement shall remain in full effect. PROPERTY TAX ASSESSMENT & COLLECTION SVCS BETWEEN DALLAS COUNTY & COPPELL – 2015 5 AGREED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT: Karen Hunt Date Mayor, City of Coppell Clay Lewis Jenkins Date Dallas County Judge ACKNOWLEDGMENT: John R. Ames, CTA Date Dallas County Tax Assessor-Collector APPROVED AS TO FORM*: DISTRICT ATTORNEY SUSAN HAWK By: Melanie Barton Assistant District Attorney Dallas County, Texas *By law, the District Attorney’s Office may only advise or approve contracts or legal documents on behalf of its clients. It may not advise or approve a contract or legal document on behalf of other parties. Our review of this document was conducted solely from the legal perspective of our client. Our approval of this document was offered solely for the benefit of our client. Other parties should not rely on this approval, and should seek review and approval by their own respective attorney(s). PROPERTY TAX ASSESSMENT & COLLECTION SVCS BETWEEN DALLAS COUNTY & COPPELL – 2015 6 DALLAS COUNTY TAX OFFICE JOHN R. AMES, CTA TAX ASSESSOR/COLLECTOR Annual Notice of Per Parcel Cost for Ad Valorem Tax Collections August 2015 Please accept this as the annual notice of the per parcel cost of collections for your Ad Valorem taxes, per the agreed upon terms, in the Contract for Assessment and Collection with your governmental entity and the Dallas County Tax Assessor/Collector’s Office. These per parcel costs will be effective with the July 2015 certified roll and will be billed and collected by January 31, 2016. 2014 Tax Year 2015 Tax Year Parcels within Dallas County (Certified by the Dallas Central Appraisal District) $1.30 $1.25 Parcels outside of Dallas County (Certified by any other CAD besides Dallas CAD) $2.95 $2.95 Public Improvement Districts (PIDs) (As approved by the appropriate municipality) $2.75 $2.75 Please attach this notice to your original Assessment and Collection Contract as the official costs determined and agreed upon by the Dallas County Auditor’s Office, Tax Assessor’s Office and the Commissioners Court. John R. Ames, CTA Tax Assessor/Collector Master City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard Coppell, Texas 75019-9478 File Number: 2015-2532 File ID: Type: Status: 2015-2532 Agenda Item Passed 1Version: Reference: In Control: Engineering 12/10/2015File Created: Final Action: FS #1 FoundationFile Name: Title: Consider approval to award TCPN (The Cooperative Purchasing Network) proposal Number R5081-2015-16 to Core Construction in the amount of $283,717.33; as budgeted for the remediation of foundation at Fire Station #1 located at 520 Southwestern Blvd; and authorizing the City Manager to sign any necessary documents. Notes: Agenda Date: 01/12/2016 Agenda Number: H. Sponsors: Enactment Date: Fire Station #1 Foundation Memo.pdf, Fire Station #1 Phase 1A Foundation Evaluation.pdf, Fire Station #1 Foundation Engineering Services Contract.pdf, Fire Station #1 Specifications.pdf, Fire Station #1 Drawings.pdf, Interior Damage Exhibits.pdf, Fire Station #1 Foundation Remediation Proposal.pdf Attachments: Enactment Number: Hearing Date: Contact: Effective Date: Drafter: History of Legislative File Action: Result: Return Date: Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver- sion: 1 PassApproved on the Consent Agenda 01/12/2016City Council A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Councilmember Nancy Yingling, that Agenda Items A-K be approved on the Consent Agenda. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. Action Text: Text of Legislative File 2015-2532 Title Consider approval to award TCPN (The Cooperative Purchasing Network) proposal Number R5081-2015-16 to Core Construction in the amount of $283,717.33; as budgeted for the remediation of foundation at Fire Station #1 located at 520 Southwestern Blvd; and authorizing the City Manager to sign any necessary documents. Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master Continued (2015-2532) Summary Fiscal Impact: Funds have been budgeted in the Fire Department, Building Improvements account (01-04-09-5110). Staff Recommendation: The Engineering Department recommends approval. Goal Icon: Sustainable City Government Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 1 MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and City Council From: Ken Griffin, P.E., Director of Engineering and Public Works Date: January 12, 2016 Reference: Fire Station #1 Foundation Repair 2030: Sustainable City Government, Goal 3 Excellent and Well-maintained City Infrastructure and Facilities  Fire Station #1 Located at 520 Southwestern has severe foundation failures  Retained Structural Engineer WJE (Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc. to perform Foundation Evaluation (July 2015)  As a result of findings, entered into agreement with WJE to provide Specifications and construction administrative services (August 2015)  Specifications and Drawings completed for pricing (October 2015)  Core Construction provided TCPN Job Order contract for remediation in amount of $283,717.33 (December 2015) Introduction: Consider approval to award TCPN (The Cooperative Purchasing Network) proposal Number R5081- 2015-16 to Core Construction in the amount of $283,717.33; as budgeted for the remediation of foundation at Fire Station #1 located at 520 Southwestern Blvd; and authorizing the City Manager to sign any necessary documents. Analysis: Fire Station #1 located at 520 Southwestern Boulevard was built in 1996. In most recent years, the facility started showing signs of distress and foundation issues. The City performed some exterior concrete work and interior cosmetic repairs a few years ago to address the conditions, however the severity of the failure has rapidly deteriorated over the last year. Enclosed are photographs of the interior damages that are a result of the foundation failure. At the recommendation of Gallagher and Associates, the City hired a structural engineer (WJE – Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc.) to perform an evaluation and provide the City with their recommendation for permanent repairs. On July 3, 2015, WJE presented the City with their findings 2 along with options for remediation. The City reviewed their proposal and are in agreement with Option 1 – New Structural Slab on Carton Forms. In August, the City entered into an agreement with WJE to provide detailed construction specifications and drawings, as well as provide construction administration services during construction. Estimated construction costs were then included in 2015/16 General Fund anticipating these repairs. WJE presented the City with the construction specifications and drawings in October, 2015. The City sought Core Construction to provide a TCPN – (The Cooperative Purchasing Network) Job Order Contract. Core Construction is currently providing services to the City of Coppell working with Gallagher and Associates, as well as performed construction renovations for 265 and Police Department. Core Construction met with Fire Department personnel to discuss scope of work associated with the remediation services and provided their proposal. Legal Review: Agenda item did not require legal review. Fiscal Impact: The fiscal impact of this agenda item is $283,717.33; as budgeted. Recommendation: The Engineering Department recommends approval of awarding TCPN Proposal to Core Construction. COPPELL FIRE STATION NO. 1 Phase 1A Foundation Evaluation 520 Southwestern Blvd., Coppell, Texas July 3, 2015 WJE No. 2015.0152 Prepared for: City of Coppell Fire Department 265 Parkway Blvd. Coppell, Texas 75019 Prepared by: Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc. 6363 N. State Highway 161, Suite 550 Irving, Texas 75038 972.550.7777 tel | 972.550.7770 fax COPPELL FIRE STATION NO. 1 Phase 1A Foundation Evaluation 520 Southwestern Blvd., Coppell, Texas Stephen V. Grelle, EIT Michael W. Lee, P.E. July 3, 2015 WJE No. 2015.0152 Prepared for: Mr. Tim Oates Deputy Chief - Prevention City of Coppell Fire Department 265 Parkway Blvd. Coppell, Texas 75019 Prepared by: Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc. 6363 N. State Highway 161, Suite 550 Irving, Texas 75038 972.550.7777 tel | 972.550.7770 fax Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-0093 This page re-printed on July 6, 2015. TABLE OF CONTENTS Background ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Scope of Services .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Field Investigation ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Plumbing Leak Detection ....................................................................................................................... 3 Geotechnical Investigation ..................................................................................................................... 2 Discussion and Evaluation ............................................................................................................................ 3 Conceptual Recommendations ...................................................................................................................... 4 Summary and Closing ................................................................................................................................... 5 Figures Appendix A: Geotechnical Investigation Report Appendix B: Plumbing Leak Testing Report (and Repair Proposal) Appendix C: Conceptual Repair Options for Pricing COPPELL FIRE STATION NO. 1 Phase 1A Foundation Evaluation 520 Southwestern Blvd., Coppell, Texas Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc. (WJE) has completed a Phase 1A foundation evaluation of Fire Station No. 1, located at 520 Southwestern Blvd. in Coppell, Texas. This report summarizes tasks performed, findings, and conclusions. In addition, this report presents several conceptual options for remedial action. BACKGROUND The subject facility is a one-level building constructed in the mid-1990s. The superstructure (i.e., roof and load-bearing walls) is supported by piers and the floor slab is grade supported. Exterior wall construction consists of brick veneer supported by a pier-supported grade beam. Questions concerning the performance of the foundation developed following detection of sloped floors, cracked wall finishes, and other distressed conditions. In February 2015, WJE was retained by the City of Coppell to conduct a Phase 1 evaluation that included visual observations, floor levelness measurements, and development of initial opinions. Findings from Phase 1, presented in a report by WJE dated April 2, 2015, include the following:  Portions of the floor slab have experienced significant post-construction movement. The total out-of- level is approximately 4 1/2 inches. The slab movement is believed to represent settlement (not heave).  Sloped floors, cracked wall finishes, and other foundation-movement related distress are present.  The most severely sloped floor and highest concentration of distress are located in the southeast corner of the overall building (referred to as Dormitory area).  Very little movement of the perimeter grade beams has occurred as evidenced by good performance of the brick veneer.  Potential causes of the apparent settlement are improper compaction of fill placed during construction, desiccation of soil caused by tree(s), and erosion of subgrade material from a plumbing leak. Addition information regarding the building, type of distress, and findings is provided in the April 2, 2015 report. The Phase 1 report also provides recommendations for performing more detailed diagnostic tasks to aid in understanding the distressed conditions. These more detailed tasks comprise the Phase 1A evaluation. SCOPE OF SERVICES The scope of Phase 1A is generally consistent with a Level C evaluation as defined by “Guidelines for the Evaluation of Foundation Movement for Residential and Other Low-Rise Buildings” by the Foundation Performance Association and similar documents by the Texas Section of the American Society of Civil Engineers. Primary tasks included in Phase 1A are as follows:  Geotechnical investigation  Plumbing leak testing  Below-slab void detection  Development of conceptual remedial action Coppell Fire Station No. 1 Phase 1A Foundation Evaluation July 3, 2015 Page 2 The Phase 1A evaluation was limited to the south portion of the overall fire station building, which contains living quarters, offices, and administrative areas. The apparatus bay located in the north portion was not included because the Phase 1 study indicated that it was in relatively good condition. FIELD INVESTIGATION The field portion of our investigation consisted primarily of geotechnical investigation and plumbing leak detection. Both tasks were performed by firms retained by WJE. A brief description of work performed and findings is provided below. Geotechnical Investigation The geotechnical investigation was performed by Henley Johnston & Associates (HJA). The scope of the geotechnical investigation included concrete coring, soil sampling, and laboratory studies. The concrete coring and soil sampling occurred on June 1, 2015. After the concrete was cored, two soil borings were obtained by continuously sampling the soil to a depth of 15 feet using portable drilling equipment. Boring locations are shown in Figure 1. Boring No. 1 was located in the Dormitory and Boring No. 2 was located in the Dayroom. The location of Boring No. 1 was selected to represent an area with severe distress. Boring No. 2 was located in an area exhibiting no distress. Views of the coring and sampling operations are shown in Figures 2 and 3. A report by HJA dated June 29, 2015 contains test procedures, results, and other information. A copy of the HJA report is provide in Appendix A. Notable findings from the investigation are listed below. 1. Two cores through the slab were made in connection with the soil borings. A 2-inch void was observed below the slab at Boring No. 1 (Figure 4). No void was observed below the slab at Boring No. 2. 2. A supplemental core was made through the slab solely for purposes of assessing the presence of a void beneath the slab. This core was located in the Dormitory, adjacent to the south perimeter grade beam and approximately 12 feet south of Boring No. 1 (see Figure 1). We observed a 3.5-inch void below the slab (Figure 5). 3. Soils encountered directly below the slab consisted of fill material (clayey sand and sandy clay) to a depth of 6 to 8 feet below the top of slab. 4. Soils below the fill consisted of native residual clay soils that extended 10 to 12 feet below the top of slab. Soils below the residual clays consisted of native weathered to severely weathered shale through the boring termination depth of 15 feet. 5. Groundwater was observed in Boring No. 1 at a depth of 6 feet below the top of slab. No groundwater was observed at Boring No. 2. 6. Soils in Boring No. 1 were generally slightly drier than soils at corresponding depths in Boring No. 2. 7. Future soil movement related to heave are anticipated to be on the order of less-than-1-inch to 3 inches. 8. Future soil movement related to settlement are possible, but were not determined due to insufficient information regarding original construction and other factors. Coppell Fire Station No. 1 Phase 1A Foundation Evaluation July 3, 2015 Page 3 Plumbing Leak Detection Plumbing leak detection was performed by Flow Plumbing between May 27 and June 3, 2015. The primary objective of this task was to check for leaks in the below-slab utility system, and if leaks were identified, to isolate the leak location. Testing of the below-slab sanitary sewer system was conducted using the static pressure method. The system was constructed of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipes. Two leaks were identified at the locations shown in Figure 6. Testing was also performed to check for leaks in the potable water system, which enters the building from below-grade near the east entrance. Within the building footprint, the water line runs through the attic and walls. No leaks were identified in the potable water system. A report prepared by Flow Plumbing, dated June 10, 2015 summarizes test procedures and findings. A copy of the report is provided in Appendix B. DISCUSSION AND EVALUATION Findings from Phase 1A were used to supplement information obtained in Phase 1 in order to better understand the cause and significance of the floor slab movements in the building. The out-of-level floor slab in the Dormitory area is very significant and well in excess of acceptable foundation performance for similar structures in the locale. The Flow Plumbing leak testing indicated two leaks in the sanitary sewer system. However, both leaks are located on the opposite side of the building from the Dormitory area. No distress was observed in the immediate vicinity of the leaks. Although leaks were identified, the observed leak rates were not of a magnitude that they would likely have contributed a significant amount of moisture to the surrounding soils. This is because during normal use the sanitary lines are not pressurized to the extent as they were during testing. As a result, we do not believe that the identified leaks have contributed significantly to the floor slab movements and associated building distress. The HJA geotechnical investigation determined that the native soils at the site were removed during construction in a manner generally consistent with “Cut/Fill Only (Option 1)” in the original geotechnical report by ATEC Associates, Inc. (ATEC) dated May 1, 1995. At the areas represented by Boring Nos. 1 and 2, approximately 6 to 8 feet of native soil were excavated and replaced by select fill. Quality control records regarding fill placement and compaction testing have not been provided to WJE and may no longer be available from the entities involved with the original construction. As a result, the fill placement sequence and degree of original compaction is not known. The Phase 1 floor slab elevation survey by WJE indicated that approximately 4 inches of post-construction downward movement has occurred in the Dormitory area. Since about 2 inches of voiding was observed below the slab at Boring No. 1, it appears that the fill placed below the Dormitory area has settled about 6 inches following construction. Based on our review of the HJA report and subsequent conversations with HJA staff, the primary cause of the fill settlement is judged to be improper compaction during original construction. The ATEC report recommended that the fill should have been compacted to at least 95% of its maximum dry density. It is possible that the building pad was prepared in sections or strips, and that only portion below the Dormitory area was not compacted sufficiently. Insufficient compaction of fills can make a building pad susceptible to excessive long-term settlement. Coppell Fire Station No. 1 Phase 1A Foundation Evaluation July 3, 2015 Page 4 The presence of groundwater in Boring No. 1 may also be consistent with improper fill compaction. If the fill was placed in a less dense condition than elsewhere within the pad, the less dense soils would serve as a slightly better conduit for groundwater. Wetting of the less dense soils might have resulted in additional consolidation of the fill. It is also important to note that wetting of the fill soils would not be expected to cause heave (i.e., upward movement), as swell tests by HJA indicated that the fill at Boring No. 1 had essentially no swell potential. However, long-term study of groundwater levels at these two boring as well as other locations are required to better understand the relationship of groundwater to the fill settlement. Slightly drier soils at the area represented by Boring No. 1 may have also contributed to the settlement, albeit to a much lesser degree than improper compaction. The drier soils could be partially an artifact of fill placement during original construction at less-than-recommended moisture content, or may be caused by desiccation of the soil from two large trees located east of the building. However, we do not believe that soil desiccation is a significant cause of the settlement. One reason for this belief is that significant sub -slab voiding is present more than 40 feet away from the tree closest to the Dormitory. This distance is greater than customary for significant detrimental effects of a tree to be observed. The two trees were reportedly planted at the same time; yet the tree located adjacent to the Mechanical Yard (see Figure 1 for yard location) is much larger. The difference in size suggests that the larger tree has benefited from access to more moisture. While the plumbing leak testing performed by Flow identified two leaks, the scope of testing was limited to the building footprint. It is possible that leaks are present in site utilities located near the larger tree. The focus of WJE’s evaluations has been on the building superstructure and its foundation. During the course of both evaluations, we have observed evidence of differential movement in sidewalks and other flatwork surrounding the building. Evidence of significant movement was observed in the Mechanical Yard, including displaced meters, equipment, and conduit. The movement in the Mechanical Yard may have been caused by a combination of insufficient fill compaction and soil desiccation by the adjacent tree. CONCEPTUAL RECOMMENDATIONS Three conceptual remedial options are available to address the settlement-related distress in the Dormitory area of this building. Within the building, remedial work is recommended only for the Dormitory area because the remaining portions appear to be performing in a manner consistent with the age and type of the facility. A description of each remedial option is provided below, including features and limitation.  Option #1: New Structural Slab on Carton Forms. Option #1 consists of removing the existing floor slab and constructing a new pier- or micropile-supported structural slab on carton forms. The new piers (or micropiles) will extend to a depth significantly below both the select fill and the zone of expected moisture change. Thus, the new slab will be isolated from future settlement within the select fill and future heave from the underlying native soils. The new slab will be constructed to a levelness consistent with new construction. Option #1 will provide optimum future performance of the floor slab (i.e., essentially no slab movement). However, this remedial option is more costly and disruptive than the other two options listed below. Also, while future floor slab movement west of the Dormitory area is expected to be minimal, slight differential movement between the two slab systems may cause some cracking and other cosmetic distress near the interface. Coppell Fire Station No. 1 Phase 1A Foundation Evaluation July 3, 2015 Page 5  Option #2: New Slab-on-Ground. Option #2 consists of removing the existing floor slab and replacing it with a new ground-supported slab. Similar to Option #1, the new slab will be constructed to a levelness consistent with new construction. To limit future settlement of the existing fill, pressure grouting of the fill material should be considered. Some future movement of the new slab should be anticipated due to the unknown residual settlement potential of the fill combined with the possibility of heave in the underlying native soils. The amount of movement is uncertain and difficult to predict.  Option #3: Slab Lifting. Option #3 consists of injecting a flowable grout or similar material below low areas of the existing slab so that it is lifted and the degree of overall unlevelness is reduced. The material is injected by drilling numerous holes through the slab. A desirable feature of this option is that most of the existing interior finishes can remain in place during the work. Similar to Option #2, pressure grouting of the existing fill material should be considered to limit future settlement. A limitation of slab lifting is that achieving a levelness consistent with new construction may not be possible. Additionally, as with Option #2, some future movement should be anticipated. To aid in developing conceptual pricing associated with each remedial option, a narrative and marked-up original floor plans are provided in Appendix C. A preliminary version of these documents was provided to Abstract Construction on June 19, 2015. Since we cannot rule out the contribution of soil desiccation from adjacent trees as contributing to the settlement, installing a root barrier along the east and a portion of the south grade beams will provide a higher degree of assurance against future settlement. A conceptual description of a root barrier is included in Appendix C. Because the scope of our investigation did not focus on the distress in the Mechanical Yard, we do not have specific remedial recommendations to offer for this area of the facility. The condition of the equipment and associated conduits within the yard should be inspected in a timely manner to ensure that the observed movement has not resulted a life safety risk. Possible options for mitigating future damage should include reconstruction of the utilities in a manner that accommodates future differential movement between the equipment pad, exterior building wall, and interior floor slab. SUMMARY AND CLOSING The primary objective of Phase 1A was to perform field diagnostic tasks to better understand existing conditions so that conceptual recommendations for remedial measures regarding the existing distressed conditions could be developed. Based on plumbing leak testing, geotechnical investigation, and other evaluation, we have developed three conceptual remedial options. The most appropriate option should be determined after considering long-term performance objectives, available funding for remedial work, impact of remedial work on fire department operations, and other relevant factors. Coppell Fire Station No. 1 Phase 1A Foundation Evaluation July 3, 2015 Page 6 FIGURES Coppell Fire Station No. 1 Phase 1A Foundation Evaluation July 3, 2015 Page 7 Figure 1. Boring and supplemental core locations. Background image adapted from Sheet A110 of original design drawings by Phillips Swager Associates dated May 22, 1995. NORTH BORING No. 1 SUPPLEMENTAL CORE BORING No. 2 MECH. YARD Coppell Fire Station No. 1 Phase 1A Foundation Evaluation July 3, 2015 Page 8 Figure 2. Coring through slab prior to drilling soil borings (Boring No. 2 shown). Figure 3. Drilling soil borings and sampling (Boring No. 2 shown). Coppell Fire Station No. 1 Phase 1A Foundation Evaluation July 3, 2015 Page 9 Figure 4. View looking down into cored hole in slab at Boring No. 1 showing a 2-inch void below the slab. Figure 5. View looking down into cored hole in slab at Supplement Core showing a 3.5-inch void below the slab. Coppell Fire Station No. 1 Phase 1A Foundation Evaluation July 3, 2015 Page 10 Figure 6. Sanitary sewer line leaks detected by plumbing testing. Utility layout shown is schematic and not intended to necessarily represent actual layout. Background image adapted Sheet M-2 of original design drawings by R.G. German, P.E. dated May 22, 1995. LEGEND Approximate leak location NORTH APPENDIX A Geotechnical Investigation Report by Henley-Johnston & Associates Dated June 29, 2015 geotechnical and construction materials consultants June 29, 2015 Report No. 15106G Wiss, Janney, Elstner and Associates, Inc. 6363 N. State Highway 161, Suite 550 Irving, Texas 75038 Attention: Mr. Stephen Grelle Re: Geotechnical Investigation Evaluation of Floor Slab Distress Coppell Fire Station No. 1265 520 Southwestern Blvd. Coppell, Texas Gentlemen: Introduction This report presents the results of a geotechnical investigation for evaluation of floor slab distress at the Coppell Fire Station No. 1265 located at 520 Southwestern Blvd. in Coppell, Texas. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate subsurface conditions and provide recommendations for repairs and remedial efforts to limit future distress to the building. The existing structure is a single-story fire station which utilizes a ground-supported floor slab. It was understood that the perimeter of the building was pier supported. The main area of distress was noted within the sleeping quarters. The floor appears to show signs of settlement in this area. Field and Laboratory Investigation Per request of the client, subsurface conditions were evaluated by drilling two interior soil borings. Locations of the borings were dictated by the client and are presented on Plate 1. These interior borings were sampled continuously to a depth of 15 feet using portable, manually-operated drilling equipment. Samples were obtained by pushing a 3 -in. diameter “Shelby-tube” sampler into the formation. The floor slab was core d utilizing a concrete coring machine. Report No. 15106G June 29, 2015 2 All samples were transported back to the laboratory for visual classification and testing. Soils were visually classified according to the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). The “Log of Boring” illustration for each boring and a key to terms and symbols used on the logs are attached. Selected samples were tested to evaluate engineering properties, to estimate soil movement, and to confirm visual classification. Tests conducted included Atterberg Limits (ASTM D-4318), moisture content determinations (ASTM D-2216), and partial gradation (percent passing No. 200 Sieve). Absorption-pressure swell tests were conducted on selected samples to evaluate the potential for soil related heave. The strength of a selected sample was investigated by Unconfined Compression test. Results of the laboratory tests are presented on Plates 2 and 3. Surface and Subsurface Conditions In areas drilled, the concrete floor slab was cored and measured approximately 5 to 5-1/2 inches in thickness. A 2-inch void was noted directly below the floor slab in Boring No. 1 which was taken in the sleeping quarters. No voids were noted below the floor slab in Boring No. 2. Soils encountered directly below the floor slab consisted of fill over residual clays and weathered shale associated with the upper cretaceous Eagle Ford formation. The fill soils consisted primarily of clayey sands and some sandy clays. These soils were reddish- brown and light brown in appearance and extended to depths ranging from 6 to 8 feet below exiting grades. It appears these materials were placed below the floor slab as part of the pad preparation to reduce the potential heave. Residual clay soils were located directly below the fill material. These residual clays were moderately plastic, dark brown to light brown in appearance and extended to depths of 10 to 12 feet. Weathered to severely weathered shale was noted at depths of 10 to 12 feet. This weathered shale was soft (rock hardness classification), light brown and brown in appearance and continued through the termination depth of 15 f eet. Groundwater was noted in Boring No. 1 at a depth of 6 feet during drilling and post-drilling water level observations. Boring No. 2 was dry at the time of the field investigation. It should be noted that a medium-sized tree was present approximately 30 feet from the exterior wall of the sleeping quarters. Potential Vertical Movement Analysis Subsurface conditions at the site are comprised of fill and residual clay soils over weathered shale. Potential Vertical Movements related to soil at this site will be a combination of seasonal movements within the upper clays, and heave within the weathered shale. Report No. 15106G June 29, 2015 3 For clay soils, movements are associated with changes in seasonal moisture conditions. After periods of rain, the clays expand resulting in heave of overlying elements. During dry seasons, these soils shrink resulting in settlement of ground -supported features. In weathered shale, movements are associated with an increase in subsurface moisture after construction of the foundation. These movements are manifested as a gradual and sustained heave of the foundation. Potential Vertical Rise (PVR) values were evaluated using TxDOT Method 124E1 and the results of the absorption pressure-swell tests. Based on this analysis, total soil movements related to heave below the existing foundation are anticipated to be on the order of less than 1-inch to 3 inches considering the current moisture conditions of the soils at the time of drilling. Discussion A void below the floor slab was only noted in Boring No. 1 which was drilled in the sleeping quarters. The size of the void measured approximately 2 -inches. It was not visually possible to note the extent of this void. Soils noted in this area consisted of fill clayey sands that extended to a depth of 8 feet. Groundwater was also noted in this boring location at a depth of 6 feet. Based on these observations, it is our opinion that the main cause of distress in this area is due to long-term settlement of the granular fill, which has also been exacerbated with the introduction of groundwater. It was also observed that the upper few feet of the soils in Boring 1 were dry. Given the subsurface soil and moisture conditions noted in both the borings, it is possible that desiccation of the upper portion of the fill materials by the nearby tree could be a contributing factor to the movement seen to date. Recommendations It is understood the slab is to be repaired in such a manner as to limit the pot ential for future movement of the floor. There are two possible options for repair of the floor slab considering the condition of the fill below the foundation floor slab . Option 1: The first option would be to grout the void space below the concrete slab using a self-leveling compound to raise the foundation to the desired elevation . It is recommended that the foundation be cored in several areas to determine the extent of the void space. It should be understood that even with this process additional se ttlement may occur due to the condition of the fill materials. To minimize additional settlement, pressure grouting the fill material to increase soil strength should be considered. Option 2: A second option would be to replace the existing floor slab with either a ground supported foundation on piers or suspended floor coupled with a pier and beam foundation. Piers would need to be designed as either under-reamed or straight shaft piers 1 “Method for Determining the Potential Vertical Rise, PVR.” Texas Department of Transportation Method Tex-124-E, 1978. Report No. 15106G June 29, 2015 4 founded a minimum of 15 feet below existing grades into the light brown and brown severely weathered to weathered shale. Piers should be designed for an allowable end bearing of 4 kips per square foot (ksf) considering a Factor of Safety of 3 against a shear or plunging failure. For straight -shaft piers, a skin friction value of 0.9-ksf may be applied to that portion of the pier shaft below a depth of 15 feet. The weight of the concrete may be neglected when determining foundation loads. Under - reamed piers should have a minimum under-ream to shaft diameter ratio of 2:1 to allow for proper development of end bearing capacity. A maximum ratio of 3:1 should be specified to lower the potential for collapse of the under -ream during placement of concrete. Settlements of approximately ¾-inch should be anticipated for this allowable bearing capacity using both under-reamed and straight-shaft piers. Piers will be subjected to uplift forces associated with heaving of the subsu rface soils of approximately 0.6-ksf acting over the upper 5 feet of the pier shaft surface area. Resistance to uplift will be a function of the dead weight of the concrete in the pier and the weight of the soil overlying the under-ream (if any). The weight of the soil may be calculated using a truncated cone with an angle of 150 past vertical at the edge of the under-ream. A dry unit weight of 100 pounds per cubic foot should be used when evaluating the dead load of the soil. A negative skin friction of 0.7 -ksf may be used for that portion of straight shaft pier below a depth of 15 feet. Pier shaft excavations should be clean of all debris and dry prior to placement of concrete. Granular fill soils and groundwater was noted in the area of Boring No. 1 therefore the need for temporary casing should be anticipated. Concrete should be placed within four hours after each shaft is drilled. Excess concrete at the top of the pier shaft should be removed prior to placement of the exterior grade beam. This is to reduce the potential for soils to swell against the foundation. A minimum void of 6 inches should be provided below all grade beams and between the subgrade and the bottom of the concrete foundation. Each pier installation should be vertical (within acceptable tolerances), placed in proper plan location and cleaned prior to concrete placement. Reinforcing steel cages should be prefabricated in a rigid manner to allow expedient placement of both steel and concrete into the excavation. It is essential that excavation of piers and the placement of both steel and concrete be completed in a continuous operat ion. In all cases, no portion of the stratum being counted on to provide structural support should be exposed to atmospheric conditions for more than eight hours following the completion of excavation prior to the placement of concrete. Report No. 15106G June 29, 2015 5 The seal appearing on this document was authorized by James F. Phipps, P.E. 84778 on June 29, 2015. In order to confirm compliance with specifications and acceptability of the bearing stratum and pier excavation, a qualified and experienced geotechnical observer from this office should be present at all times during foundation installation. Closure We trust this report will be sufficient for your needs. If you have any questions or desire further information, please do not hesitate to call. Signed, HENLEY-JOHNSTON & Associates, Inc. Shaun P. Alimbini James F. Phipps, P.E. Project Geologist Vice President Texas Firm Registration No.: F-1238 Plate 2 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT NO. 15106G FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION COPPELL FIRE STATION NO. 1265 520 SOUTHWESTERN BLVD. COPPELL, TEXAS SUMMARY OF INDEX PROPERTIES BORING NUMBER DEPTH (ft.) LIQUID LIMIT (%) PLASTIC INDEX DUW (pcf) FINER #200 (%) MOISTURE CONTENT (%) UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION 1 0.5 – 2.0 7.1 1 2.0 – 4.0 21 14 117.3 13.7 CL 1 4.0 – 6.0 12.4 1 6.0 – 8.0 24 15 109.5 14.3 CL 1 8.0 – 10.0 21.7 1 10.0 – 12.0 19.3 1 12.0 – 14.0 48 31 102.7 22.1 CL 1 14.0 – 15.0 20.5 2 0.5 – 2.0 42.5 9.9 2 2.0 – 4.0 20 14 121.7 12.4 CL 2 4.0 – 6.0 21.4 2 6.0 – 8.0 37 25 91.0 26.5 CL 2 8.0 – 10.0 29.8 2 10.0 – 12.0 29.0 2 12.0 – 14.0 26.8 2 14.0 – 15.0 39 24 97.2 25.5 CL SUMMARY OF ABSORPTION PRESSURE-SWELL TESTS BORING NUMBER DEPTH (ft.) SWELL PRESSURE (psf) GAIN IN MOISTURE (%) PERCENT SWELL (%) MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 1 2.0 – 4.0 26.0 2.4 0.0 FILL: CLAYEY SAND, reddish-brown 1 12.0 – 14.0 8,796.0 8.9 9.9 SHALE, severely weathered 2 6.0 – 8.0 647.0 4.4 0.4 CLAY, very stiff, dark brown 2 14.0 – 15.0 854.0 2.8 0.6 SHALE, weathered Plate 3 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT NO. 15106G FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION COPPELL FIRE STATION NO. 1265 520 SOUTHWESTERN BLVD. COPPELL, TEXAS SUMMARY OF UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TESTS - SOIL BORING NUMBER DEPTH (ft.) PEAK STRESS (psi) FAILURE STRAIN (%) MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 1 6.0 – 8.0 8.8 3.9 FILL: CLAYEY SAND, reddish-brown 2 2.0 – 4.0 14.3 8.5 FILL: CLAYEY SAND, reddish-brown 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 CONCRETE (5") VOID (2") FILL: CLAYEY SAND, with calcareous particles, fine grained, reddish-brown CLAY, slightly silty, with calcareous nodules and iron staining, soft, light brown SHALE, severely weathered, with iron staining and calcareous nodules, soft, light brown TOTAL DEPTH: 15.0' LOG OF BORING PROJECT No.:15106G Foundation Investigation - Coppell Fire Station No. 1265 520 Southwestern Blvd. Coppell, Texas BORING No.:1BORING No.:1 STATION: DRILL DATE:6/1/15 SHEET:1 of 1 METHOD:Shelby Tube to 15'LOCATION:See Plate 1 GROUND ELEVATION: Ground Water During Drilling (ft.):6' Ground Water at Completion (ft.):6'DEPTH(feet)SYMBOLSAMPLESMATERIAL DESCRIPTION ELEVATION(feet)DRILLEDCORE RECOVERED1 2 3 4 5 6 POCKET PENETROMETER (tsf) INFILTRATION TEST 10 20 30 40 50 60STANDARD PENETRATION (BPF) 1 2 3 4 5 6TxDOT CPT (inches per 100 blows) 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 CONCRETE (5.5") FILL: CLAYEY SAND, with calcareous particles, fine grained, reddish-brown FILL: SANDY CLAY, with calcareous nodules, stiff, light brown CLAY, slightly silty, with calcareous nodules, very stiff, dark brown SHALE, weathered, with calcareous nodules and iron staining, soft, light brown and brown TOTAL DEPTH: 15.0' LOG OF BORING PROJECT No.:15106G Foundation Investigation - Coppell Fire Station No. 1265 520 Southwestern Blvd. Coppell, Texas BORING No.:2BORING No.:2 STATION: DRILL DATE:6/1/15 SHEET:1 of 1 METHOD:Shelby Tube to 15'LOCATION:See Plate 1 GROUND ELEVATION: Ground Water During Drilling (ft.):DRY Ground Water at Completion (ft.):DRYDEPTH(feet)SYMBOLSAMPLESMATERIAL DESCRIPTION ELEVATION(feet)DRILLEDCORE RECOVERED1 2 3 4 5 6 POCKET PENETROMETER (tsf) INFILTRATION TEST 10 20 30 40 50 60STANDARD PENETRATION (BPF) 1 2 3 4 5 6TxDOT CPT (inches per 100 blows) APPENDIX B Plumbing Leak Testing Report by Flow Plumbing (including Proposal to repair identified leaks) Dated June 10, 2015 2405 Interstate 30, Ste A Mesquite, TX 75150 www.metroplexleaklocate.com 214*388*8838 214*388*3004 Fax www.flowplumbing.com June 10, 2015 Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates Attn: Michael Lee 6363 N State Hwy 161, Ste 550 Irving, Texas 75038 Re: Service Dates - May 27, 29 & June 3, 2015 Coppell Fire Station #1 520 Southwestern Coppell, Texas 75019 Dear Mr. Lee, Testing was performed at the above referenced property. Mr. Javier Rojo, License #T-4847, performed the testing. We traced and marked where the main water line enters the property. We noted that the water system is plumbed overhead. We traced multiple drain lines and marked the lines with blue tape in the bedrooms as requested. We also traced the main drain line and marked with blue tape as well. Sewer main clean-outs were not present at the property. Access to the property’s main line was achieved by using the city’s lateral clean out. Static pressure testing of the PVC sanitary sewer system showed that a leak(s) is present in the system. The content of water loss measured was eight inches (8") in a test period of twenty (20) minutes. The system was isolated and two (2) leaks were found as listed below. We blocked the leaks off and retested the system with no leaks or water loss in a test period of twenty (20) minutes. We traced the lines and marked the leaks. We noted that we can’t guarantee the exact location of leak #2 due to electrical interference when we attempted to trace the leak. 1. Captain’s bath tie into the main line as marked for identification on tile flooring. 2. Guest bath tie into the main line as marked for identification on tile flooring. We appreciate the opportunity to serve you. Please be assured we will continually strive to earn your confidence. Feel free to call on us if you should have questions or whenever we can be of further assistance. Sincerely, Clinton Lindsey Master License No. M-39675 Examiners, P.O. Box 4200, Austin, Texas 78765 * 512-936-5200 Texas State Board of Plumbing 2405 Interstate 30, Ste A Mesquite, TX 75150 www.metroplexleaklocate.com 214*388*8838 214*388*3004 Fax www.flowplumbing.com PROPOSAL Proposal Submitted To June 10, 2015 Work To Be Performed Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates Coppell Fire Station #1 Attn: Michael Lee 520 Southwestern 6363 N State Hwy 161, Ste 550 Coppell, Texas 75019 Irving, Texas 75038 We hereby propose to furnish all material and perform all the labor necessary for Excavate, repair 2 sewer leaks with one being at the captain’s bath tie into the main line and the other being at the guest bath tie into the main line and reinstate to concrete level. Access & Egress $3,350.00 Actual Plumbing $ 250.00 TOTAL $3,600.00 If rock, concrete beams or deteriorated pipe are encountered requiring additional excavation time or an additional excavation site is required, there will be additional labor charge. All additional labor will be charged at $125.00 per hour plus travel time to and from our office which will be owed by the party signing the proposal. The proposed price does not include any finish work, i.e., sheetrock, paint, flooring, ceramic tile, etc. All repairs and material is guaranteed to be as specified and is guaranteed for a period of one (1) year. This proposed price is valid for ninety (90) days. Acknowledgment: I understand that the outlined services performed and the cost therewith associated is payable by me. Fifty percent (50%) of the cost will be due to begin the job and the remaining fifty percent (50%) will be due upon completion. Any additional charges above the contracted price will also be due at the end of each work day. All foundation penetrations or excavations above or below grade shall be done at the written direction of the homeowner, his/her agent, or the chosen engineer. Any ensuing damages occurring to post tension cables, foundation, or the structure resulting from excavation through the floor and/or beam or by back-filling procedures are not warranted by this proposal nor by MLL Enterprises, Inc. dba Flow Plumbing. MLL Enterprises, Inc. dba Flow Plumbing does not assume any responsibility for existing warranties that may be voided due to the repairs or tunnel process. This includes any termite protection warranty. Any interior and cosmetic repairs are limited to the scope of work done by MLL Enterprises, Inc. dba Flow Plumbing only. Any requested changes will be submitted in writing by the homeowner/agent and will be considered as extra and will results in additional charges over and above the amount of this proposal. Both parties agree that the work will be done pursuant to the standards and practices of the current city codes. Any alteration or deviation, such as obstructions or foundation beams deviating from the above specifications involving extra cost will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents, or delays beyond our control. Certificates of insurance available upon requests. In the event it is necessary to file suit for the enforcement of the contract, suit shall be brought in Dallas County, Texas and that homeowner/agent agrees to pay all costs of collecting or securing or attempting to collect or secure the moneys due pursuant to this contract, including a reasonable attorney’s fee. All amounts due under this contract that are not paid when due will bear interest at the lower of the maximum rate permitted by law or 18% per annum from the time at which such amounts become due. Respectfully submitted by: Clinton Lindsey, Master License Number M-39675 Texas State Board of Plumbing Examiners, P.O. Box 4200, Austin, Texas 78765 * 512-936-5200 ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL The above prices, specifications, and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outline above. _________ ________________________________ ____________________ Date Signature Driver License # & State cc: APPENDIX C Conceptual Repair Options Issued for Pricing Sheets SK-1, SK-2, and SK-3 by WJE Revised July 2, 2015 SHEET SK-1 Revised 7/2/2015 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Coppell Fire Station #1 Structural Remediation of Dormitory Area Options for Conceptual Pricing See Sheets SK-2 (architectural) and SK-3 (structural) for extent of remediation and additional information. For Options #2 and #3, consider installing a continuous root barrier or removing nearby trees. Root barrier should consist of minimum 40-mill polyethylene sheeting attached to outside faces of existing grade beams and piers to depth of 6 feet below grade. Option #1 (New Structural Slab on Carton Forms) 1. Arrange for Owner to remove furniture, fixtures, and equipment. 2. Remove existing floor finishes, wall finishes, stud framing at interior walls, and door frames. Do not remove stud framing at perimeter wall unless damaged. Temporarily relocate electrical items as required. 3. Install nine (9) 12” diameter belled piers to 15’ depth (bell diameter = 36”). Provide 75 pounds of reinforcement per pier. Alternatively, provide straight-shaft piers or micropiles with 36 kip (unfactored) capacity. 4. Remove entire existing 5” slab-on-grade. Do not damage grade beams. 5. Lower elevation of subgrade by removing the upper 7” of material. 6. Install 8” tall carton forms over entire area and cover with 10-mil vapor retarder. 7. Install 8” thick concrete flat slab reinforced with 2.2 lbs of reinforcement per square foot. Attach to perimeter grade beam with epoxied dowels spaced at 12” o.c. 8. Finish new slab level with top of adjacent existing concrete slab. 9. Install replacement finishes and other removed items. Repair damage to electrical components caused by foundation movement. Option #2 (New Slab-on-Grade) 1. Arrange for Owner to remove furniture, fixtures, and equipment. 2. Remove existing floor finishes, wall finishes, stud framing at interior walls, and door frames. Do not remove stud framing at perimeter wall unless damaged. Temporarily relocate electrical items as required. 3. Remove entire existing 5” slab-on-grade. Do not damage grade beams. 4. Treat existing soil to maximum depth of 8 feet with Hayward Baker or similar proprietary soil stabilization system (i.e., pressure grouting). 5. Compact upper layer of soil. 6. Add and compact approximately 3 inches of select fill to required grade. 7. Install 10-mil vapor retarder. 8. Install 5” thick concrete slab reinforced with 1.1 lbs of reinforcement per square foot. Attach to perimeter grade beam with epoxy dowels spaced at 12” o.c. 9. Finish new slab level with top of adjacent existing concrete slab. 10. Install replacement finishes and other removed items. Repair damage to electrical components caused by foundation movement. Option #3 (Slab Lifting) 1. Arrange for Owner to remove easily relocated furniture, fixtures, and equipment 2. Treat existing soil to maximum depth of 8 feet with Hayward Baker or similar proprietary soil stabilization system (i.e., pressure grouting). 3. Fill voids below slab and lift slab to level condition (i.e., slopes less than L/360) with urethane grout (Uretek or similar). Assume existing void below slab is uniform and approximately 3”. 4. Repair holes in slab created for soil treatment. Replace/repair damaged carpeting and other flooring. 5. Repair damage to electrical components caused by foundation movement. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOUNDATION REPAIRS FIRE STATION #1 Coppell, Texas OCTOBER 16, 2015 ISSUED FOR BIDDING ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Prepared by: WISS, JANNEY, ELSTNER ASSOCIATES, INC. 6363 N. State Highway 161, Suite 550 Irving, Texas 75038 Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-0093 WJE No. 2015.0152.0 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs 00 01 10 - 1 Table of Contents Coppell Fire Station #1 October 16, 2015 SECTION 00 01 10 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Number Section Title Pages Division 01 - General Requirements 01 33 00 Submittal Procedures 01 33 00-1 TO -3 01 40 00 Quality Requirements 01 40 00-1 TO -4 01 60 00 Product Requirements 01 60 00-1 TO -3 01 70 10 Execution of Work 01 70 00-1 TO -5 Division 02 - Existing Conditions 02 41 19 Selective Demolition 02 41 19-1 to -4 Division 03 - Concrete 03 21 00 Reinforcing Steel 03 21 00-1 to -3 03 30 00 Cast-in-Place Concrete 03 30 00-1 to -12 Division 31 - Earthwork 31 63 29 Drilled Concrete Piers 31 63 29-1 to -3 END OF SECTION NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs 01 33 00 - 1 Submittal Procedures Coppell Fire Station #1 October 16, 2015 SECTION 01 33 00 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: Administrative and procedural requirements for submitting shop drawings, product data, samples, and other submittals. 1.2 SUBMITTALS A. General: 1. Identification: Include label or title block on submittal or cover sheet, with following information. a. Project name. b. Date. c. Names of Engineer, Contractor, subcontractor, manufacturer, supplier, and firm or entity that prepared submittal, as appropriate. d. Identification information, such as number and title of appropriate Specification section, Drawing number and detail references, location(s) where product is to be installed, or other necessary information. e. Label each submittal with Specification section number followed by decimal point and then sequential number (e.g., 06 10 0.01). On resubmittals, include alphabetic suffix after another decimal point (e.g., 06 10 00.01.A). f. Provide space approximately 8 inches on or beside label or title block for Contractor’s approval stamp and action stamp of Engineer. 2. Deviations: Highlight, encircle, or otherwise specifically identify deviations from Contract Documents on submittals. B. Shop Drawings: Prepare project-specific information, drawn accurately to scale. Do not use reproductions of Contract Documents or standard printed data. 1. Preparation: Fully illustrate requirements in Contract Documents. Include following information, as applicable: a. Dimensions, including notation of those established by field measurement. b. Identification of products. c. Fabrication and installation drawings. d. Templates and patterns. e. Schedules. f. Notation of coordination requirements. g. Relationship to adjoining construction clearly indicated. h. Seal and signature of professional Engineer if specified. 2. Sheet Size: Except for templates, patterns, and similar full-size drawings, submit Shop Drawings on sheets at least 8 1/2 by 11 inches but no larger than 24 by 36 inches. 3. Submit number of prints required by Specifications. Mark up and retain one returned print as Project Record Document. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs 01 33 00 - 2 Submittal Procedures Coppell Fire Station #1 October 16, 2015 C. Product Data: Collect information into single submittal for each element of construction and type of product or equipment. 1. Clearly mark each copy of submittal to show which products and options are applicable. Delete information which is not applicable. Supplement standard information with project-specific information. 2. Include following information, as applicable: a. Manufacturer’s catalog cuts, product specifications, schematic drawings, installation instructions, and written recommendations. b. Compliance with referenced standards. c. Testing by recognized testing agency. 3. Submit number of copies required by Specifications. Mark up and retain one returned copy as Project Record Document. D. Samples: Submit physical samples to illustrate functional and aesthetic characteristics of product, for review of materials and workmanship, for compatibility with other elements, and for comparison with actual installed elements. 1. Samples shall be of sufficient size to show general visual effect. 2. Transmit samples that contain multiple, related components such as accessories together in one submittal package. 3. Identification: Attach label on unexposed side of each sample that includes generic description; product name and manufactures; and number of Specification section. 4. Samples for Initial Selection: Submit two full sets of units or sections of units from supplier’s product line, showing full range of colors, textures, and patterns available. Engineer will retain one set and return one set with options selected. 5. Samples for Verification: Submit full-size units or samples of size indicated, prepared from same material to be used for Work, cured and finished in manner specified, and physically identical with material or product proposed for use, and that show full range of color and texture variations expected. 6. Maintain approved samples at Project site, available for quality-control comparisons during construction. Samples may be used to determine final acceptance of construction associated with sample. E. Delegated Design: 1. Where required by Contract Documents, in addition to shop drawings, product data, and other required submittals, submit statement, signed and sealed by responsible design professional, for each product and system specifically assigned to Contractor to be designed or certified by design professional. a. Indicate that products and systems comply with performance and design criteria in Contract Documents. b. Include list of codes, loads, and other factors used in performing these services, and signed and sealed design calculations where required. 1.3 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURE A. Coordinate preparation and processing of submittals with performance of construction activities. 1. Coordinate each submittal with fabrication, purchasing, testing, delivery, other submittals requiring concurrent review, and related activities that require sequential activity. 2. Allow sufficient time for submittal and resubmittal review. Failure to provide sufficient time for reviews will not be basis for extension of Contract Time. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs 01 33 00 - 3 Submittal Procedures Coppell Fire Station #1 October 16, 2015 B. Review Time: 1. Allow 7 days for review of each submittal and resubmittal. 2. Allow additional time if coordination with subsequent submittals is required. Engineer will advise Contractor when submittal being processed must be delayed for coordination. 3. Time for review shall commence when Engineer receives submittal. C. Contractor Review: 1. Review each submittal, coordinate with other Work, and check for compliance with Contract Documents. Verify field dimensions and conditions. Identify variations from Contract Documents and product or system limitations that may be detrimental to successful performance of completed Work. Note corrections. 2. Before submitting to Engineer, stamp with uniform approval stamp including reviewer’s name; date of Contractor’s approval; and statement certifying that submittal has been reviewed, checked, and approved for compliance with Contract Documents. 3. Submittal Log: maintain a submittal log that lists all submitted items per specification section. Record the dates submitted, dates returned, and disposition of each item based on Engineer’s review. Submit an initial submittal log to Engineer prior to commencing work. Submit final log showing all approved materials at substantial completion. D. Transmittal: Package each submittal individually and appropriately for transmittal and handling. Transmit each submittal using CSI Form 12.1A or similar. E. Engineer Action: 1. Engineer will not review submittals that that do not bear Contractor’s approval stamp, and will return them without action to Contractor. 2. Engineer will review each submittal for conformance with design concept of Project and compliance with Contract Documents. Engineer will make marks to indicate corrections or modifications required, and mark with action stamp. Action stamp will include reviewer’s name, date of review, and required action. Contractor actions may include making corrections or modifications to submittal or resubmitting submittal, or both. F. Resubmittals: Make resubmittals in same form and number of copies as initial submittal. 1. Note date and content of previous submittal. 2. Note date and content of revision in label or title block and clearly indicate extent of revision and changes made. 3. Resubmit until Engineer indicates that no resubmittal is required. G. Distribution: Furnish copies of final submittals to jobsite file, record documents file, manufacturers, subcontractors, suppliers, fabricators, installers, public authorities having jurisdiction, and others as necessary for performance of construction activities. Show distribution on transmittal forms. H. Use only final submittals with Engineer’s action stamp, for construction. END OF SECTION NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs Quality Requirements Coppell Fire Station #1 01 40 00 - 1 October 16, 2015 SECTION 01 40 00 QUALITY REQUIREMENTS PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: Administrative and procedural requirements for quality assurance and quality control. B. Testing and inspecting services are required to verify compliance with requirements specified or indicated, and do not relieve the Contractor of responsibility for compliance with requirements of the Contract Documents. 1. Specified tests, inspections, and related actions do not limit the Contractor’s other quality assurance and quality control procedures that facilitate compliance with requirements of the Contract Documents. 2. Requirements for the Contractor to provide quality assurance and quality control services required by the Architect/Engineer, Owner, or public authorities having jurisdiction are not limited by provisions of this Section. C. Related Sections: 1. See sections in Divisions 2 through 32 for specific test and inspection requirements. 1.2 REFERENCES A. Reference Standards: Latest edition as of Specification date. 1. ASTM International: a. E329: Standard Specification for Agencies Engaged in Construction Inspection and /or Testing. 1.3 DEFINITIONS A. Quality Assurance Services: Activities, actions, and procedures performed before and during the execution of the Work to guard against defects and deficiencies and substantiate that the proposed construction will comply with requirements. B. Quality Control Services: Tests, inspections, procedures, and related actions during and after the execution of the Work to evaluate that the actual products incorporated into the Work and the completed construction comply with requirements. Services do not include contract enforcement activities performed by the Architect/Engineer. 1.4 COMPLIANCE CRITERIA A. General: If compliance with two or more standards is specified and standards establish different or conflicting requirements for minimum quantities or quality levels, comply with the most stringent requirement. B. Minimum Quantity or Quality Level: Quantity or quality level shown or specified shall be the minimum provided or performed. The actual installation may comply exactly with the minimum quantity or quality specified, or it may exceed the minimum within reasonable NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs Quality Requirements Coppell Fire Station #1 01 40 00 - 2 October 16, 2015 limits. To comply with these requirements, indicated numeric values are minimum or maximum, as appropriate, for the context of requirements. C. Refer uncertainties to the Engineer for a decision before proceeding. 1.5 SUBMITTALS A. Testing Agency Qualification Data: Provide documentation demonstrating compliance with ASTM E329 of laboratory and personnel. B. Reports: Prepare and submit certified written reports. Submit copies of reports to the Owner’s Representative, Engineer, and Contractor. Reports shall include the following: 1. Date of issue. 2. Project title and number. 3. Name, address, and telephone number of testing agency. 4. Dates and locations of samples and tests or inspections. 5. Names of individuals making tests and inspections. 6. Description of the Work and test and inspection method. 7. Identification of product and Specification section. 8. Complete test or inspection data. 9. Test and inspection results and interpretation of test results. 10. Record of temperature and weather conditions at the time of sample taking and testing and inspecting. 11. Comments or professional opinion on whether tested or inspected Work complies with requirements of the Contract Documents. 12. Name and signature of laboratory inspector. 13. Recommendations on retesting and re-inspecting. C. Permits, Licenses, and Certificates: For the Owner’s records, submit copies of permits, licenses, certifications, inspection reports, releases, jurisdictional settlements, notices, receipts for fee payments, judgments, correspondence, records, and similar documents, established for compliance with standards and regulations bearing on the performance of the Work. 1.6 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Testing Agency Qualifications: Comply with the requirements of ASTM E329, with experience and capability to conduct testing and inspecting indicated and with additional qualifications specified in individual sections. PART 2 PRODUCTS - Not Used PART 3 EXECUTION 3.1 QUALITY CONTROL A. Owner Responsibilities: Where quality control services are indicated as the Owner’s responsibility, the Owner will engage a qualified testing agency to perform these services. 1. Owner will furnish Contractor with names, addresses, and telephone numbers of testing agencies engaged and descriptions of types of testing and inspecting they are engaged to perform. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs Quality Requirements Coppell Fire Station #1 01 40 00 - 3 October 16, 2015 2. Costs for retesting and re-inspecting construction that replaces or is necessitated by work that failed to comply with the Contract Documents will be charged to the Contractor. B. Contractor Responsibilities: Tests and inspections not explicitly assigned to the Owner, and testing and inspecting requested by the Contractor and not required by the Contract Documents, are the Contractor’s responsibility. Unless otherwise indicated, provide quality control services specified and those required by public authorities having jurisdiction, whether specified or not. 1. Where services are indicated as the Contractor’s responsibility, engage a qualified testing agency to perform these services. a. Contractor shall not employ the same entity engaged by Owner, unless agreed to in writing by Owner. 2. Notify the testing agency at least 48 hours in advance of time when Work that requires testing or inspecting will be performed. 3. Where quality control services are indicated as the Contractor’s responsibility, submit a certified written report, in duplicate, of each quality control service. 4. Submit additional copies of each written report directly to public authorities having jurisdiction, when they so direct. 5. Retesting/Re-inspecting: Regardless of whether the original tests or inspections were the Contractor’s responsibility, provide quality control services, including retesting and re- inspecting, for construction that replaced Work that failed to comply with the Contract Documents. C. Testing Agency Responsibilities: Cooperate with the Engineer and Contractor in performance of duties. Provide qualified personnel to perform required tests and inspections. 1. Determine location from which test samples will be taken and in which in-situ tests are conducted. 2. Notify the Engineer and Contractor promptly of irregularities or deficiencies observed in the Work during performance of its services. 3. Conduct and interpret tests and inspections and state in each report whether tested and inspected Work complies with or deviates from requirements. 4. Submit a certified written report of each test, inspection, and similar quality control service. 5. Do not release, revoke, alter, or increase requirements of the Contract Documents or approve or accept any portion of the Work. 6. Do not perform any duties of the Contractor. D. Coordination: Coordinate the sequence of activities to accommodate the required quality assurance and quality control services with a minimum of delay and to avoid the necessity of removing and replacing construction to accommodate testing and inspecting. 1. Schedule times for tests, inspections, obtaining samples, and similar activities. 2. Notify the testing agency sufficiently in advance of operations to permit assignment of personnel. E. Associated Services: Cooperate with the Engineer and testing agencies performing required tests, inspections, and similar quality control services, and provide reasonable auxiliary services as requested. Provide the following: 1. Submittals of concrete mix designs and other materials and products necessary for the testing agency to test and evaluate field work. 2. Access to the Work. 3. Incidental labor and facilities necessary to facilitate tests and inspections. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs Quality Requirements Coppell Fire Station #1 01 40 00 - 4 October 16, 2015 4. Adequate quantities of representative samples of materials that require testing and inspecting. Assist the testing agency in obtaining samples. 5. Facilities for storage and field curing of test samples. 6. Security and protection for samples and for testing and inspecting equipment at Site. F. Repair and Protection: 1. General: On completion of testing, inspecting, sample taking, and similar services, repair damaged construction and restore substrates and finishes. a. Provide materials and comply with installation requirements specified in other sections. Restore patched areas and extend restoration into adjoining areas with durable seams that are as invisible as possible. b. Comply with cutting and patching in Section 01 70 10. 2. Protect construction exposed by or for quality control services. 3. Repair and protection are the Contractor’s responsibility, regardless of assignment of responsibility for quality control services. END OF SECTION NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs Product Requirements Coppell Fire Station #1 01 60 00 - 1 October 16, 2015 SECTION 01 60 00 PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: Administrative and procedural requirements for selection of products for use in Project, including requests for comparable products and general product delivery, storage, and handling requirements. 1.2 DEFINITIONS A. Products: Items obtained for incorporating into Work, whether purchased for Project or taken from previously purchased stock. Includes "material," "equipment," "system," and terms of similar intent. 1. Named Products: Items identified by manufacturer's product name, including make or model number or other designation shown or listed in manufacturer's published product literature, which is current as of date of Contract Documents. 2. New Products: Items that have not previously been incorporated into another project or facility. 3. Comparable Product: Product that is demonstrated and approved through submittal process to have indicated qualities related to type, function, dimension, in-service performance, physical properties, appearance, and other characteristics that equal or exceed those of specified product. 1.3 PRODUCT SELECTION PROCEDURES A. General Product Requirements: Provide products that comply with Contract Documents, are undamaged, and, unless otherwise indicated, are new at time of installation. 1. Select products compatible with other products specified or previously selected. 2. Provide products complete with accessories, trim, finish, fasteners, and other items needed for complete installation and indicated use and effect. 3. Standard Products: If available, and unless custom products or nonstandard options are specified, provide standard products of types that have been produced and used successfully in similar situations on other projects. 4. Owner reserves right to limit selection to products with warranties in conformance with requirements of Contract Documents. 5. Descriptive, performance, and reference standard requirements in Specifications establish salient characteristics of products. 6. Or Equal: For products specified by name and accompanied by term "or equal," or "or approved equal," or "or approved," comply with requirements for comparable product requests in Submittals Article to obtain approval for use of unnamed product. B. Product Selection Procedures: 1. Products: a. Where Specifications name single manufacturer and product, select named product. Comparable products or substitutions for Contractor's convenience will not be considered. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs Product Requirements Coppell Fire Station #1 01 60 00 - 2 October 16, 2015 b. Where Specifications include list of names of both manufacturers and products, select one of products listed that complies with requirements. If “or equal” products are permitted, comply with requirements for comparable product requests in Submittals Article for consideration of unnamed products that comply with requirements. c. Where Specifications name product, or refer to product indicated on Drawings, and include list of manufacturers, select specified or indicated product or comparable product by one of other named manufacturers. Drawings and Specifications indicate sizes, profiles, dimensions, and other characteristics that are based on product named. Comply with requirements for comparable product requests in Submittals Article or substitutions for convenience requests in Section 01 20 10 for consideration of unnamed product by one of other named manufacturers. d. Where Specifications specify product or method by reference or performance standards only, select product that meets or exceeds standards. 2. Manufacturer/Source: a. Where Specifications name single manufacturer or source, select product by named manufacturer or source that complies with requirements. Comparable products or substitutions for Contractor's convenience will not be considered. b. Where Specifications include list of manufacturers' or source’s names, select product by one of manufacturers or sources listed that complies with requirements. If “or equal” products are permitted, comply with requirements for comparable product requests in Submittals Article for consideration of unnamed manufacturer's or source’s product. 1.4 SUBMITTALS A. Products List: Within 14 days after date of Notice to Proceed, submit to Engineer list of products proposed for use, organized by Specification section. Include name and address of manufacturer, trade name of product, model or catalog designation, and intended use. 1. Products List does not replace requirement to submit product data, comparable product requests, or substitution requests. B. Comparable Product Requests: Submit three copies of request for consideration. Identify product, fabrication, or installation method to be replaced. Include relevant Specification section and Drawing numbers and titles. 1. Provide the following information. If the following information is not provided, Architect/Engineer may return requests without action, except to record noncompliance with these requirements. a. Detailed comparison of significant qualities of proposed product with those named in Specifications. Significant qualities include attributes such as performance, weight, size, durability, visual effect, and specific features and requirements indicated. b. Evidence that proposed product provides specified warranty. c. List of similar installations for completed projects with project names and addresses and names and addresses of architects and owners, if requested. d. Samples, if requested. e. Statement that proposed product does not require revisions to Contract Documents, that it is consistent with Contract Documents and will produce indicated results, and that it is compatible with other portions of Work. 2. If there is cost difference between specified product and proposed product, submit as substitution rather than comparable product. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs Product Requirements Coppell Fire Station #1 01 60 00 - 3 October 16, 2015 C. Engineer's Action: If necessary, Engineer will request additional information or documentation for evaluation within seven days of receipt of comparable product request. Engineer will notify Contractor of acceptance or rejection of proposed comparable product within 10 days of receipt of request, or seven days of receipt of additional information or documentation, whichever is later. 1. Acceptance or rejection of proposed comparable products shall be at sole discretion of Engineer, whose decision is final. 2. Use product specified if Architect/Engineer does not issue decision on use of proposed comparable product within time allocated. 1.5 PRODUCT DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING A. Deliver, store, and handle products using means and methods that will prevent damage, deterioration, and loss, including theft and vandalism. Comply with manufacturer's written instructions. B. Delivery: 1. Schedule delivery to minimize long-term storage at Site and to prevent overcrowding of construction spaces and disruption of normal operations of Fire Station. 2. Coordinate delivery with installation time to ensure minimum holding time for items that are flammable, hazardous, easily damaged, or sensitive to deterioration, theft, and other losses. 3. Deliver products to Site in undamaged condition in manufacturer's original sealed container or other packaging system, complete with labels and instructions for handling, storing, unpacking, protecting, and installing. 4. Inspect products on delivery to determine compliance with Contract Documents and to determine that products are undamaged and properly protected. C. Storage: 1. Comply with product manufacturer's written instructions for temperature, humidity, ventilation, and weather-protection requirements for storage. 2. Store products that are subject to weather damage under cover in weathertight enclosure above ground, with ventilation adequate to prevent condensation. 3. Protect stored products from damage and stored liquids from freezing. 4. Store products to allow for inspection and measurement of quantity or counting of units. 5. Store materials in manner that will not endanger Project structure, away from edge of Project structure. 6. Provide secure location and enclosure at Site for storage of materials and equipment by Owner's construction forces. Coordinate location with Owner’s Representative. 7. Move stored products that interfere with operations of Owner or other Contractors. PART 2 PRODUCTS - Not Used PART 3 EXECUTION - Not Used END OF SECTION NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs Execution of Work Coppell Fire Station #1 01 70 10 - 1 October 16, 2015 SECTION 01 70 10 EXECUTION OF WORK PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: General administrative and procedural requirements governing execution of Work, including the following: 1. Examination of existing conditions. 2. Preparation. 3. Installation of Work. 4. Protection of installed construction. 5. Correction of Work. 6. Progress cleaning. 1.2 PAYMENT A. Pay for cutting and patching unless requested by Engineer for Work that is not defective or nonconforming. 1.3 REFERENCES A. Reference Standards: Latest edition as of Specification date. 1. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). a. 241 - Standard for Safeguarding Construction, Alteration, and Demolition Operations. 1.4 SUBMITTALS A. Submit plan/procedures for protecting stored materials, installed work, building, and Site. B. Submit, prior to beginning Work, documentation of existing conditions, including finish surfaces, which might be misconstrued as damage caused by Work. C. Submit identification codes and inventory of materials to be salvaged or reinstalled. D. Manufacturers’ recommendations for cleaning spillage and over-application of products. 1. Proposed products and methods for cleaning where no manufacturers’ recommendations. 1.5 PROJECT CONDITIONS A. Notify Engineer of discrepancies between Drawings and existing conditions before proceeding with Work. B. Field verify all existing conditions whether or not shown on Drawings. Assume responsibility for actual location and condition of existing construction. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs Execution of Work Coppell Fire Station #1 01 70 10 - 2 October 16, 2015 1.6 WARRANTY A. Existing Warranties: Remove, replace, patch, and repair materials and surfaces cut or damaged during Contractor operations, by methods and with materials so as not to void existing warranties. PART 2 PRODUCTS 2.1 MATERIALS A. General: Comply with requirements specified in other Sections. 1. Use materials for patching identical to in-place materials. For exposed surfaces, use materials that visually match adjacent surfaces to fullest extent possible. a. If identical materials are unavailable or cannot be used, use materials that, when installed, will provide match acceptable to Architect/Engineer for visual and functional performance of in-place materials. B. Cleaning: Select cleaning materials, equipment, and methods to avoid scratching, marring, defacing, staining, or discoloring surfaces. 1. Use cleaning materials and methods recommended by manufacturer of surface to be cleaned. 2. Use cleaning materials on surfaces recommended by cleaning-material manufacturer. PART 3 EXECUTION 3.1 EXAMINATION OF EXISTING CONDITIONS A. Survey existing conditions and correlate with requirements indicated to determine extent of removal Work required. 1. Inventory and record condition of items to be removed and salvaged or reinstalled. B. Document with photographs or videotape, or both, existing conditions of adjoining construction, including finish surfaces, which might be misconstrued as damage caused by demolition or other Work activities; existing conditions that are important to construction or that deviate substantially from Contract Documents; and significant conditions that will be concealed by Work. C. Examination and Acceptance of Conditions: Before proceeding with each component of Work, examine substrates, areas, and conditions, with Installer or Applicator present where indicated, for compliance with requirements for installation tolerances and other conditions affecting performance. Record observations. 1. Verify compatibility with and suitability of substrates, including compatibility with existing finishes or primers. 2. Examine walls, floors, and roofs for suitable conditions where products and systems are to be installed. 3. Provide a written description of conditions detrimental to performance of the Work, including substrates and unacceptable installation tolerances, and recommend corrections. 4. Proceed with installation only after unsafe or unsatisfactory conditions have been corrected. Proceeding with the Work indicates acceptance of surfaces and conditions. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs Execution of Work Coppell Fire Station #1 01 70 10 - 3 October 16, 2015 D. When unanticipated structural, electrical, or mechanical elements that conflict with intended function or design are encountered, investigate and measure nature and extent of conflict. Promptly submit written report to Engineer. E. Survey existing conditions as Work progresses to detect hazards resulting from construction. F. Provide access to Work areas and perform localized demolition as necessary for inspection of concealed underlying conditions by Engineer and Owner’s Representative. 3.2 UTILITIES AND MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS A. Disconnect and seal or cap off indicated utility services and mechanical and electrical systems in Work areas. B. Where existing utility services or mechanical or electrical systems are required to be removed, relocated, or abandoned, bypass such services/systems before beginning Work to prevent interruption to occupied areas. 3.3 PREPARATION A. Field Measurements: Take field measurements as required to fit Work properly. Recheck measurements before installing each product. Where portions of Work are indicated to fit to other construction, verify dimensions of other construction by field measurements before fabrication. Coordinate fabrication schedule with construction progress to avoid delaying the Work. B. Review of Contract Documents and Field Conditions: Immediately on discovery of the need for clarification of Contract Documents caused by differing field conditions outside of the control of the Contractor, submit a request for information to Engineer. Include a detailed description of the problem encountered, with recommendations for changing the Contract Documents. Submit requests on CSI Form 13.2A, “Request for Interpretation.” 3.4 INSTALLATION OF WORK A. General: Locate Work and components of Work accurately, in correct alignment and elevation. Make vertical work plumb and make horizontal work level. B. Comply with manufacturer's written instructions and recommendations for installing products in applications indicated. C. Install products at time and under conditions that will ensure the best possible results. Maintain conditions required for product performance until Substantial Completion. D. Conduct construction operations so no part of Work is subjected to damaging operations or loading in excess of that expected during normal conditions of occupancy. E. Tools and Equipment: Do not use tools or equipment that produce harmful noise levels. F. Templates: Obtain and distribute to parties involved templates for work specified to be factory prepared and field installed. Check shop drawings of other work to confirm that adequate provisions are made for locating and installing products to comply with indicated requirements. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs Execution of Work Coppell Fire Station #1 01 70 10 - 4 October 16, 2015 G. Attachment: Provide blocking and attachment plates and anchors and fasteners of adequate size and number to securely anchor each component in place, accurately located and aligned with other portions of the Work. Where the size and type of attachments are not indicated, verify size and type required for load conditions. 1. Allow for building movement, including thermal expansion and contraction. 2. Coordinate the installation of anchorages. Furnish setting drawings, templates, and directions for installing anchorages, including sleeves, concrete inserts, anchor bolts, and items with integral anchors, that are to be embedded in concrete or masonry. Deliver such items to Site in time for installation. H. Joints: Make joints of uniform width. Where joint locations in exposed work are not indicated, arrange joints for best visual effect. Fit exposed connections together to form hairline joints. I. Hazardous Materials: Use products, cleaners, and installation materials that are not considered hazardous. Provide adequate ventilation during use of volatile or noxious materials. 3.5 PROTECTION OF INSTALLED CONSTRUCTION A. Provide final protection and maintain conditions that ensure installed Work is without damage or deterioration at the time of Substantial Completion. B. Comply with the manufacturer's written instructions for temperature and relative humidity. 3.6 CORRECTION OF WORK A. Repair or remove and replace defective construction. Restore damaged substrates and finishes. 1. Repairing includes replacing defective parts, refinishing damaged surfaces, touching up with matching materials, and properly adjusting operating equipment. B. Restore permanent facilities used during construction to their condition prior to construction. C. Remove and replace damaged surfaces that are exposed to view if surfaces cannot be repaired without visible evidence of repair. D. Repair components that do not operate properly. Remove and replace operating components that cannot be repaired. 3.7 PROGRESS CLEANING A. General: Clean Site and Work areas daily, including common areas. Enforce requirements strictly. Separate materials per disposal requirements and dispose of legally. 1. Provide containers for waste materials, debris, and rubbish. 2. Do not hold waste materials, debris, or rubbish more than seven days during normal weather or three days if temperature is expected to rise above 80 degrees F. 3. Comply with requirements in NFPA 241 for removal of combustible waste materials and debris. 4. Collect hazardous and unsanitary waste materials and debris in separate containers from other waste. Use containers intended for holding waste materials of type to be stored and mark containers appropriately. Remove from Site daily and dispose of legally. 5. Do not bury or burn waste materials, debris, or rubbish on-site. Do not discharge or wash waste materials, debris, or rubbish down sewers or into waterways. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs Execution of Work Coppell Fire Station #1 01 70 10 - 5 October 16, 2015 B. Site: Maintain Site and surrounding areas free of waste materials, debris, and rubbish from construction operations and personnel. C. Work Areas: Clean areas where Work is in progress to level of cleanliness necessary for proper execution of Work. 1. Remove liquid spills promptly. 2. Where dust would impair proper execution of Work, broom-clean or vacuum entire work area or dampen area, as appropriate. D. Installed Work: Keep installed Work clean. Clean installed surfaces according to written instructions of manufacturer or fabricator of product installed, using only cleaning materials specifically recommended. If specific cleaning materials are not recommended, use cleaning materials that are not hazardous to health or property and that will not damage exposed surfaces. E. Concealed Spaces: Remove debris from concealed spaces before enclosing space. F. Exposed Surfaces in Finished Areas: Clean exposed surfaces and protect as necessary to ensure freedom from damage and deterioration at the time of Substantial Completion. G. Handle waste materials, debris, and rubbish in a controlled manner with as few handlings as possible. Do not throw from heights. H. During handling and installation, clean and protect construction in progress and adjoining materials already in place. Apply protective covering where required to ensure protection from damage or deterioration at Substantial Completion. I. Clean and provide maintenance on completed construction as frequently as necessary through the remainder of the construction period. Adjust and lubricate operable components to ensure operability without damaging effects. J. Limiting Exposures: Supervise construction operations to assure that no part of construction, completed or in progress, is subject to harmful, dangerous, damaging, or otherwise deleterious exposure during construction period. END OF SECTION NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs 02 41 19 - 1 Selective Demolition Coppell Fire Station 31 October 16, 2015 SECTION 02 41 19 SELECTIVE DEMOLITION PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: 1. Demolition and removal of existing construction 2. Salvage and reuse of materials 3. Filling of voids beneath mechanical yard slab prior to demolition 1.2 REFERENCES A. Definitions: 1. Existing to remain: Existing items of construction that are not to be removed and that are not otherwise indicated to be removed, removed and salvaged, or removed and reinstalled. 2. Remove: Detach items from existing construction and legally dispose of off-site, unless indicated to be removed and salvaged or removed and reinstalled. 3. Remove and reinstall: Detach items from existing construction, prepare for reuse, and reinstall where indicated. 4. Remove and salvage: Detach items from existing construction and deliver to Owner ready for reuse. 1.3 COORDINATION A. Coordinate with Owner’s Representative and with other trades to ensure that adjacent areas are not adversely affected. 1.4 SUBMITTALS A. Documentation of existing conditions. B. Inventory of materials to be salvaged or reinstalled. C. Qualification Data (for Contractor to perform void filling below Mechanical Yard slab): 1. At least five (5) completed projects of similar size and scope in which void filling below concrete slabs was completed successfully. The list shall include: a. Project name and address. b. Owner, including contact information. c. Description of work. d. Total cost of work. e. Completion date. f. Project supervisor. 1.5 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Contractor Qualifications (void filling below concrete slab): NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs 02 41 19 - 2 Selective Demolition Coppell Fire Station 31 October 16, 2015 1. Retain Contractors with a minimum of ten (10) years of experience using high density polyurethane to fill voids below concrete slabs. 1.6 CHANGES IN WORK A. During rehabilitation work, existing conditions may be encountered which are not known or are at variance with Contract Documents. Such conditions may interfere with Work and may consist of damage or deterioration of substrate or surrounding materials. 1. Notify Engineer of conditions that may interfere with proper execution of Work prior to proceeding with Work. 1.7 EXISTING WARRANTIES A. Remove, replace, patch, and repair surfaces cut or damaged during Contractor operations, by methods and with materials so as not to void existing warranties. PART 2 PRODUCTS 2.1 MATERIALS A. Filling Voids Below Concrete Slabs: hydro-insensitive, high density polyurethane. 1. URETEK Star 684 by URETEK ICR 2. Approved equal. 2.2 EQUIPMENT A. Filling Voids Below Concrete Slabs: 1. Hammer drill capable of drilling 5/8” diameter holes. 2. Trailer-mounted pumping unit capable of injecting high density polyurethane between the concrete and sub-base and controlling the rise of the concrete slab. PART 3 EXECUTION 3.1 EXAMINATION A. Examine substrates and conditions with Installer or Applicator, where applicable, for compliance with requirements, installation tolerances, and other conditions affecting selective demolition Work. 1. Ensure that work done by other trades is complete and ready for selective demolition. 2. Verify that areas and conditions under which selective demolition Work is to be performed permit proper and timely completion of Work. 3. Notify Engineer in writing of conditions which may adversely affect selective demolition Work and recommend corrections. 4. Do not proceed with selective demolition Work until adverse conditions have been corrected and reviewed by Engineer. 5. Commencing selective demolition Work constitutes acceptance of Work surfaces and conditions. B. Survey existing conditions and correlate with requirements to determine extent of selective demolition Work required. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs 02 41 19 - 3 Selective Demolition Coppell Fire Station 31 October 16, 2015 1. Record observations. 2. Document with still or video photography existing conditions of adjoining construction, including finish surfaces, which might be misconstrued as damage caused by demolition. 3. Inventory and record condition of items to be removed and salvaged or reinstalled. 3.2 PROTECTION A. Take precautions to ensure safety of people, including building users, passers-by, and workmen, and animals; and protection of property, including adjacent building elements, landscaping, and motor vehicles. B. Ensure that any existing emergency exit paths are not blocked by the Work unless suitable alternate means of safe egress are provided. C. Prevent construction debris and other materials from coming into contact with pedestrians, vehicles, landscaping, buildings, and other surfaces that could be harmed by such contact. D. Protect paving and sidewalk, and adjacent building areas from mechanical damage due to scaffolding and other equipment. E. Limit access to Work areas. F. Erect temporary protective canopies, as necessary, over walkways and at points of pedestrian and vehicular access that must remain in service during Work. G. Assume responsibility for injury to persons or damage to property due to Work, and remedy at no cost to Owner. 3.3 SELECTIVE DEMOLITION A. Utility Services and Mechanical and Electrical Systems: 1. Disconnect and seal or cap off indicated utility services and mechanical and electrical systems in Work areas. 2. Where existing utility services or mechanical or electrical systems are required to be removed, relocated, or abandoned, bypass such services/systems before beginning Work to prevent interruption to occupied areas. B. Void Filling Below Mechanical Yard slab: 1. Prior to concrete demolition, completely fill voids below slab. a. Locate embedded and below-grade utilities to ensure drilling through slab will not damage utilities. b. Drill injection holes at 6 to 8 feet intervals through the concrete. Exact spacing shall be determined by Contractor. Drill holes in unobtrusive locations as practical. c. Inject high density polyurethane below slab. Completely fill voids below slab. Do not lift slab more than 1/4 inch in any location. d. Seal hole with non-shrink cementitious grout. e. Allow high density polyurethane to cure for 24 hours before concrete slab demolition. C. Demolish and remove existing construction and installations only as necessary and required for proper installation of work indicated in Contract Documents. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs 02 41 19 - 4 Selective Demolition Coppell Fire Station 31 October 16, 2015 1. Conduct removals carefully to avoid damaging existing construction and installations that will remain. a. Neatly cut openings and holes plumb, square, and true to dimensions required. b. Cut or drill from exposed or finished side into concealed surfaces to avoid marring existing finished surfaces. c. Use cutting methods least likely to damage construction to remain. d. Use hand tools or small power tools designed for sawing or grinding, not hammering and chopping, to minimize disturbance of adjacent surfaces. e. Temporarily cover openings to remain. 2. Protect construction that will remain against damage and soiling. 3. Provide and maintain shoring, bracing, and structural supports, as required to preserve stability and prevent movement, settlement, or collapse of construction or finishes to remain, and to prevent unexpected or uncontrolled movement or collapse of construction being demolished. 4. Verify compatibility with and suitability of substrates, including compatibility with existing finishes or primers. 5. Remedy damage to existing construction and installations caused by Contractor operations. D. Survey existing conditions as Work progresses to identify hazards resulting from construction. E. When unanticipated structural, electrical, or mechanical elements that conflict with intended function or design are encountered, investigate and measure nature and extent of conflict. Promptly submit written report to Engineer. F. Provide access to Work areas and perform localized demolition as necessary for inspection of concealed underlying conditions by Engineer and Owner’s Representative. G. Items to be Salvaged or Reinstalled: When permitted by Engineer or Owner: 1. Carefully remove, clean, and mark with identifying code. 2. Store in secure area and protect from damage. 3. Replace damaged items to be reinstalled with new items to match undamaged originals. 4. Reinstall in original locations after selective demolition operations are complete. 5. Items to be salvaged: a. Pack or crate, and label contents of containers. b. Store in secure area until delivery to Owner. c. Transport to Owner’s on-site storage area. d. Protect from damage during transport and storage. 3.4 DISPOSAL OF DEMOLITION MATERIALS A. Unless noted otherwise, promptly remove demolition debris from Site and dispose of legally. Do not burn. 3.5 CLEANING A. Clean adjacent surfaces and structures of dust, dirt, and debris. Return to condition existing before Work began. END OF SECTION NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs 03 21 00 - 1 Reinforcing Steel Coppell Fire Station #1 October 16, 2015 SECTION 03 21 00 REINFORCING STEEL PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: Supply, fabrication, and installation of new reinforcement. B. Related Sections: 1. Section 03 30 00 - Cast-in-Place Concrete. 2. Section 31 63 29 - Reinforcing Bars. 1.2 REFERENCES A. Reference Standards: Latest edition as of Specification date. 1. American Concrete Institute (ACI) a. ACI 117, Specifications for Tolerances for Concrete and Concrete Materials. 2. ASTM International: a. A615/A615M: Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Carbon-Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement. 3. Concrete Reinforcing Steel Institute (CRSI): a. Manual of Standard Practice. 1.3 SUBMITTALS A. Shop Drawings: Placement drawings that detail fabrication, bending, and placement. Include bar sizes, lengths, schedules, bending diagrams, and arrangements; material grades; stirrup, tie, and hoop spacing; splices and laps; mechanical connections; and supports. B. Test Reports: 1. Mill test reports for steel reinforcement, including adequate information on chemical and physical properties to demonstrate conformance with ASTM A615/A615M. C. Product Data: Adhesive for dowels. 1.4 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING A. Deliver, store, and handle reinforcement according to fabricator’s recommendations to prevent bending and damage, and in such manner as to prevent damage to materials or structure. B. Store reinforcement and accessories off ground and floors on platforms, skids, cribbing, or other supports. C. Limit stored materials on structures to safe loading capacity of structure at time materials are stored, and to avoid permanent deck deflection. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs 03 21 00 - 2 Reinforcing Steel Coppell Fire Station #1 October 16, 2015 PART 2 PRODUCTS 2.1 MATERIALS A. Reinforcing Bars: ASTM A615/A615M, Grade 60. Sizes as shown on Drawings. 2.2 REINFORCEMENT ACCESSORIES A. Bar Supports: CRSI Manual of Standard Practice; Steel wire, plastic, or precast concrete. 1. Bolsters, chairs, spacers, and other devices for spacing, supporting, and fastening reinforcing bars. 2. At interior floor slab, select bar supports suitable for use over carton forms. B. Tie Wire: 16 gauge minimum. 2.3 ADHESIVE FOR DOWELS A. Adhesive: HIT-RE 200 by Hilti. 2.4 FABRICATION A. Fabricate and detail steel reinforcement to shapes and dimensions shown on Drawings, in accordance with and within fabricating tolerances shown in CRSI Manual of Standard Practice. B. Bends and hooks shall conform to standard hook dimensions in CRSI Manual of Standard Practice unless otherwise shown on Drawings. PART 3 EXECUTION 3.1 PLACING REINFORCEMENT A. General: Comply with CRSI Manual of Standard Practice and Drawings for placement of reinforcement. B. Bar spacing, concrete cover, and bar splices shall conform to Drawings and CRSI Manual of Standard Practice. C. Accurately position, support, and secure reinforcement to prevent displacement during concrete placement. Locate and support reinforcement with bar supports to maintain specified minimum concrete cover. Wire dowels securely in place before depositing concrete. D. Comply with tolerances specified in ACI 117, unless more restrictive tolerances are indicated on Drawings. E. Unless permitted by Engineer, do not bend reinforcing bars embedded in hardened concrete. F. Bend tie wires and turn ends toward inside of concrete section, away from exposed concrete surfaces. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs 03 21 00 - 3 Reinforcing Steel Coppell Fire Station #1 October 16, 2015 G. Install dowels in existing concrete in strict accordance with adhesive manufacturer’s written instructions. H. During concrete placement, protect reinforcement from damage from transporting or pumping equipment with runways or other means. I. Before placing concrete, clean reinforcement of loose rust and mill scale, earth, ice, dust, and other foreign materials that would reduce bond to concrete. J. Allow Engineer at least 48 hours to advance notice to observe condition and placement of reinforcing prior to completing formwork and ordering concrete. 3.2 INSTALLING DOWELS INTO HARDENED CONCRETE A. General: Comply with manufacturer’s written instructions for drilling holes, installing adhesive, and inserting dowels. B. Do not cut, nick, bend, or otherwise damage embedded reinforcing within existing concrete during drilling of holes for dowels. END OF SECTION NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs 03 30 00 - 1 Cast-in-Place Concrete Coppell Fire Station #1 October 16, 2015 SECTION 03 30 00 CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: Supply and placement of cast-in-place concrete, including formwork, concrete materials, mix design, batching procedures, placement procedures, finishes, and curing, including but not limited to: 1. Replacement of slab-on-ground with new structural slab and drilled concrete piers in Dormitory area. 2. Replacement of slab-on-ground in mechanical yard with new slab-on-ground and equipment pad. B. Related Sections: 1. Section 03 21 00 - Reinforcing Steel 2. Section 31 63 29 - Drilled Concrete Piers 1.2 REFERENCES A. Reference Standards: Latest edition as of Specification date. 1. American Concrete Institute (ACI): a. 117: Specification for Tolerances for Concrete Construction and Materials. b. 301: Specifications for Structural Concrete. c. 305R: Guide to Hot Weather Concreting. d. 306R: Guide to Cold Weather Concreting. e. 347: Guide to Formwork for Concrete. 2. ASTM International: a. C31/C31M: Standard Practice for Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in the Field. b. C33/C33M: Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates. c. C39/C39M: Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens. d. C42/C42M: Standard Test Method of Obtaining and Testing Drilled Cores and Sawed Beams of Concrete. e. C94/C94M: Standard Specification for Ready-Mixed Concrete. f. C143/C143M: Standard Test Method for Slump of Hydraulic-Cement Concrete. g. C150/C150M: Standard Specification for Portland Cement. h. C171: Standard Specification for Sheet Materials for Curing Concrete. i. C172: Standard Practice for Sampling Freshly Mixed Concrete. j. C231/C231M: Standard Test Method for Air Content of Freshly Mixed Concrete by the Pressure Method. k. C260/C260M: Standard Specification for Air-Entraining Admixtures for Concrete. l. C309: Standard Specification for Liquid Membrane-Forming Compounds for Curing Concrete. m. C494/C494M: Standard Specification for Chemical Admixtures for Concrete. n. C618: Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs 03 30 00 - 2 Cast-in-Place Concrete Coppell Fire Station #1 October 16, 2015 o. C856: Standard Practice for Petrographic Examination of Hardened Concrete. p. C1064/C1064M: Standard Test Method for Temperature of Freshly Mixed Hydraulic-Cement Concrete. q. C1152/C1152M: Standard Test Method for Acid-Soluble Chloride in Mortar and Concrete. r. C1218/C1218M: Standard Test Method for Water-Soluble Chloride in Mortar and Cement. s. C1260: Standard Test Method for Potential Alkali Reactivity of Aggregates (Mortar- Bar Method). t. C1524: Standard Test Method for Water-Extractable Chloride in Aggregate (Soxhlet Method). u. E1155: Standard Test Method for Determining FF Floor Flatness and FL Floor Levelness Numbers. 1.3 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS A. Coordinate Work to ensure that adjacent areas are not adversely affected. Coordinate: 1. With Owner. 2. With other trades: a. To ensure that work done by other trades is complete and ready to for concrete Work. b. To avoid or minimize work on, or in immediate vicinity of, concrete Work in progress. c. To ensure that subsequent work will not adversely affect installed concrete. B. Pre-placement Meeting: 1. Conduct meeting at Site. 2. Review requirements for concrete Work, including: a. Construction schedule b. Availability of materials, personnel, equipment, and facilities needed to make progress and avoid delays. c. Site use, access, staging, and set-up location limitations. d. Forecast weather conditions. e. Surface preparation and substrate condition. f. Placement procedures. g. Special details. h. Minimum cure period. i. Testing and inspection requirements. j. Temporary protection and repair of damaged concrete. k. Structural loading limitations of deck. l. Government regulations. 3. Contractor’s Site superintendent, Owner’s Representative, and Engineer shall attend. 1.4 SUBMITTALS A. Product Data: Manufacturer’s literature and technical data, including VOC contents, for admixtures, curing compounds, void forms, and other products. 1. Include Material Safety Data Sheets (if applicable) for information only. B. Design Mixes: For each concrete mixture, include: 1. Proportions of materials. 2. Mill test certificates for cement and fly ash. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs 03 30 00 - 3 Cast-in-Place Concrete Coppell Fire Station #1 October 16, 2015 3. Sieve analysis for fine and coarse aggregate. 4. Test results for deleterious substances in aggregates and potential aggregate reactivity. 5. Slump during laboratory tests. 6. Air content during laboratory tests. 7. 3-, 7-, and 28-day laboratory compression test results. Minimum 3 cylinders at each test age. 8. Indicate: a. Amount of mix water to be withheld for later addition at Site. b. Range of high-range, water-reducing admixture dosage that may be added at Site without adversely affecting hardened concrete. C. Field Quality Control: Batch tickets for ready-mix concrete. D. Contractor Qualifications: Evidence that Contractor’s existing company has minimum 5 years of continuous experience in similar concrete work; list of at least 5 representative, successfully-completed projects of similar scope and size, including: 1. Project name. 2. Owner’s name. 3. Owner’s Representative name, address, and telephone number. 4. Description of work. 5. Types of concrete work. 6. Project supervisor. 7. Total cost of concrete work and total cost of project. 8. Completion date. E. Ready-Mix Supplier Qualifications as required in Paragraph 1.5.B. 1.5 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Contractor Qualifications: Experienced firm that has successfully completed concrete work similar in material, design, and extent to that indicated for Project. Must have successful construction with specified materials in local area in use for minimum of 5 years. 1. Employ foreman with minimum 5 years of experience as foreman on similar projects, who is fluent in English, to be on Site at all times during Work. Do not change foremen during course of Project except for reasons beyond control of Contractor; inform Engineer in advance of any changes. 2. Provide at least 1 individual who is certified by ACI as Finisher/Technician for type of work being performed, during concrete pours. B. Ready-Mix Supplier Qualifications: ASTM C94/C94M; Certification of Production Facilities and Delivery Vehicles by National Ready Mixed Concrete Association. 1.6 PROJECT CONDITIONS A. Comply with Owner’s limitations and restrictions for Site use and accessibility. B. Handle materials in strict accordance with safety requirements required by material manufacturers, Material Safety Data Sheets, and local, state, and federal rules and regulations. Maintain Material Safety Data Sheets with materials in storage area and available for ready reference on Site. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs 03 30 00 - 4 Cast-in-Place Concrete Coppell Fire Station #1 October 16, 2015 PART 2 PRODUCTS 2.1 FORM MATERIALS A. Void Forms: 1. Depth: as indicated on drawings to provide required void. 2. Profile: rectangular in shape and cross section. 3. Strength: capable of supporting full thickness of unhardened slab plus 20 pounds per square foot construction live load. 4. Acceptable Products: SlabVoid by SureVoid Products, Inc. B. Miscellaneous Forms: Plywood, lumber, metal, plastic, or another approved material. Provide lumber dressed on at least 2 edges and 1 side for tight fit. 1. Use panels that will provide continuous, true, and smooth concrete surfaces. 2. Furnish panels in largest practicable sizes to minimize number of joints. 3. Do not use rust-stained steel form-facing material. 4. For Smooth-Form Finish: Use form-facing material capable of producing smooth, uniform texture on concrete. Do not use form-facing materials with raised grain, torn surfaces, worn edges, dents, or other defects that will impair texture of concrete surface. C. Accessories: 1. Form-Release Agent: Commercially formulated form-release agent that will not bond with, stain, or adversely affect concrete surface and will not impair subsequent treatments of concrete surface. a. Formulate form-release agent with rust inhibitor for steel form-facing materials. 2.2 CONCRETE MATERIALS A. Source Limitations: Obtain each type or class of cementitious material of same brand from same manufacturer’s plant, each aggregate from 1 source, and admixtures through 1 source from single manufacturer. B. Portland Cement: ASTM C150/C150M, Type I. Use only 1 brand and type of cement for Project. C. Fly Ash: ASTM C618, Class F or C. D. Silica Fume: ASTM C1240. E. Aggregates: ASTM C33/C33M; from single source with documented record of at least 10 years of satisfactory service using similar aggregates and cementitious materials in similar applications and service conditions. 1. Coarse Aggregates: 1 inch maximum size. 2. Alkali Reactivity: Coarse and fine aggregates shall have expansion indicative of innocuous behavior; that is, less than 0.10 percent expansion after 16 days; with tested according to ASTM C1260, or mitigating measures shall be included in concrete mix. a. Provide ASTM C1260 test results for aggregates proposed for use, performed within last year. b. If reported expansion is 0.10% or more at 16 days after casting, use mitigation measures shown to render innocuous results when tested according to ASTM C1260 or provide coarse and fine aggregates from remote source, with expansion indicative NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs 03 30 00 - 5 Cast-in-Place Concrete Coppell Fire Station #1 October 16, 2015 of innocuous behavior with tested according to ASTM C1260. ASTM C1293 procedure may be substituted for ASTM C1260. F. Water: Potable. 2.3 ADMIXTURES: A. General: Admixtures certified by manufacturer to contain no more than 0.1 percent chloride ions and to be compatible with other admixtures and cementitious materials. Do not use admixtures containing calcium chloride. 1. Air-Entraining Admixture: ASTM C260/C260M. 2. Water-Reducing Admixture: ASTM C494/C494M, Type A. 3. High-Range, Water-Reducing Admixture: ASTM C494/C494M, Type F. 4. Water-Reducing and Accelerating Admixture: ASTM C494/C494M, Type E. 5. Water-Reducing and Retarding Admixture: ASTM C494/C494M, Type D. 2.4 CURING MATERIALS A. Moisture-Retaining Cover: ASTM C171, white burlap-polyethylene sheet. B. Water: Potable. C. Membrane-Forming Curing Compound: ASTM C309, Type 1 VOCs less than 350 g/L and legal limits. Wax-based and silicate materials shall not be used. 1. Verify compatibility with Owner’s flooring adhesive manufacturer prior to ordering. Do not use if curing compound will inhibit bonding of flooring to slab. 2.5 CONCRETE MIXES A. Prepare design mixes for each type and strength of concrete determined by either laboratory trial mixes or field-test data, according to ACI 301. 1. Use qualified independent testing agency for preparing and reporting proposed mix designs for laboratory trial mix basis. B. Proportion normal-weight concrete mix as follows: 1. 28-day Compressive Strength: As indicated on Drawings. 2. Maximum Water-Cementitious Materials Ratio, by weight: 0.45. 3. Slump: 3 to 5 inches maximum. a. With High-Range, Water-Reducing Admixture: 1) 2- to 4-inch slump prior to adding admixture. 2) 8 inches maximum slump after admixture is added. 4. Air Content: Add air-entraining admixture at manufacturer's prescribed rate to result in concrete at point of placement having air content of 4.5 to 7.5 percent, unless otherwise indicated. 5. Admixtures: Use admixtures according to manufacturer's written instructions. a. Use water-reducing admixture. Alternately use high-range, water-reducing admixture (superplasticizer), as required, for placement and workability. b. Use retarding admixture when required by high temperatures, low humidity, or other adverse placement conditions. 6. No chlorides shall be intentionally introduced into concrete mix. a. In hardened concrete, limit acid-soluble chloride ion content to 0.10 percent by weight of cement when tested according to ASTM C1152/C1152M, or water-soluble NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs 03 30 00 - 6 Cast-in-Place Concrete Coppell Fire Station #1 October 16, 2015 chloride ion content to 0.08 percent by weight of cement when tested according to ASTM C1218/C1218M. b. If hardened concrete exceeds chloride ion limits above, limit water-extractable chloride ion content to 0.08 percent by weight of cement when tested according to ASTM C1524. c. Provide test results necessary to demonstrate concrete or aggregates do not exceed chloride ion limits, unless waived by Architect/Engineer. 2.6 SEALANT MATERIALS A. Sealant (for cove joints, routing and sealing cracks, and other applications for sealing concrete-to-concrete or concrete-to-masonry joints): MasterSeal NP 1 or NP 2 by BASF Construction Chemicals. 1. Color: as selected by Owner. B. Primer: Use manufacturer’s recommended primer unless otherwise directed by manufacturer’s representative in writing. C. Backer Rod: Closed-cell polyethylene. D. Bond Breaker Tape: As recommended by sealant manufacturer. PART 3 EXECUTION 3.1 EXAMINATION A. Examine substrates and conditions for compliance with requirements and other conditions affecting installation or performance of concrete Work. 1. Ensure that work done by other trades is complete and ready for concrete Work. 2. Verify that areas and conditions under which concrete Work is to be performed permit proper and timely completion of Work. 3. Notify Engineer in writing of conditions which may adversely affect installation or performance of concrete Work and recommend corrections. 4. Do not proceed with concrete Work until adverse conditions have been corrected and reviewed by Engineer. 5. Commencing concrete Work constitutes acceptance of Work surfaces and conditions. 3.2 PROTECTION A. Take precautions to ensure safety of people, including building users, passers-by, and workmen, and animals, and protection of property, including adjacent building elements, landscaping, and motor vehicles. B. Prevent construction debris and other materials from coming into contact with pedestrians, motor vehicles, landscaping, buildings, and other surfaces that could be harmed by such contact. C. Protect paving and sidewalk, and adjacent building areas from mechanical damage due to scaffolding and other equipment. D. Limit access to Work areas. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs 03 30 00 - 7 Cast-in-Place Concrete Coppell Fire Station #1 October 16, 2015 E. Erect temporary protective canopies, as necessary, over walkways and at points of pedestrian and vehicular access that must remain in service during Work. F. Assume responsibility for injury to persons or damage to property due to Work, and remedy at no cost to Owner. 3.3 FORMWORK (VOID FORMS) A. Store void forms and accessories in accordance with manufacturer’s recommendations. B. Prepare ground surface on an even plane. Do not provide capillary break below the void form. C. Install slab void forms and accessories in accordance with manufacturer’s recommendations. Use specially shaped and fabricated sections to fit tightly against piers. D. Place a protective layer of cover board over void forms to distribute loads, bridge small gaps, and protect them from puncture and other damage during concrete placement. E. Protect void forms from moisture. Replace wet or damaged pieces before placing concrete. F. Maintain moisture and humidity levels beneath the slab after the concrete sets. 3.4 EXISTING CONCRETE SURFACES A. Prepare all existing concrete surfaces against which new concrete is to be cast to a minimum profile of CSP 4 as defined by ICRI Technical Guideline No. 310.2R-2013, unless more stringent requirements are shown on Drawings. 3.5 CONCRETE MIXING A. Ready-Mixed Concrete: Measure, batch, mix, and deliver concrete according to ASTM C94/C94M, and furnish batch ticket information. 1. Deliver concrete to Site and discharge within 90 minutes or before 300 revolutions of mixer drum, whichever comes first, after introduction of mix water. When air temperature is between 85 and 90 degrees F, reduce mixing and delivery time to 75 minutes; when air temperature is above 90 degrees F, reduce mixing and delivery time to 60 minutes. Due to nature of Work, trucks with short loads may be required. Concrete that exceeds specified time limit will be rejected. 2. Do not add water-reducing or high-range, water-reducing admixture indiscriminately to increase slump. 3. Introduce high-range, water-reducing admixture at Site with additional mixing per manufacturer’s recommendations. 4. Reject concrete that arrives at Site with slump exceeding maximum specified slump. 3.6 CONCRETE PLACEMENT A. Remove laitance and other surface contaminants from concrete surfaces by sandblast or wire- brush cleaning. B. Provide Engineer at least 48 hours advance notice to observe forms, screed rails or guides, concrete surfaces, reinforcement, and dowels. C. Before placing concrete, verify following: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs 03 30 00 - 8 Cast-in-Place Concrete Coppell Fire Station #1 October 16, 2015 1. Installation of formwork, reinforcement, and embedded items is complete. 2. Concrete surfaces and forms are clean of frost, ice, mud, debris, and water. 3. Forms are thoroughly wetted or oiled. 4. Reinforcement is securely tied in place and thoroughly cleaned of ice and other coatings that may reduce or destroy bond with concrete. 5. Required inspections have been performed. 6. Equipment for mixing and transporting concrete is clean. 7. Vibrators are operational. D. Before sampling for testing and placing concrete, water may be added at Site, up to amount allowed in design mix. 1. Do not add water after adding high-range, water-reducing admixture. E. Convey concrete from mixer to place of deposit in manner such that no segregation or loss of materials occurs. F. Deposit concrete: 1. Place concrete as near as possible to its final position to avoid segregation due to re-handling or flowing. 2. Do not allow concrete to fall vertical distance greater than 4 feet from point of discharge to point of deposit. 3. Do not allow concrete to disturb or displace reinforcing bars, floor drains, or other embedments. 4. Place concrete at rate so that concrete is plastic and flows readily into corners of forms and into spaces around reinforcing bars. 5. Place concrete continuously until member or section is completed, with no cold joints. 6. Dispose of concrete that has partially set prior to placement or that has been contaminated by foreign material. G. Consolidate concrete with mechanical vibrating equipment, so that concrete is thoroughly worked around reinforcement and other embedded items and into corners. 1. Use internal vibrators with minimum speed of 7,000 vibrations per minute and that are sufficiently narrow to fit into spaces between reinforcing bars, formwork, and existing concrete. Have extra vibrators at Site in case vibrator does not work. 2. Do not use vibrators to transport concrete. 3. Insert and withdraw vibrators vertically at uniformly spaced locations no farther apart than visible effectiveness of vibrator, to rapidly penetrate place layer and at least 6 inches into preceding layer. Do not insert vibrators into lower concrete layers that have begun to lose plasticity. 4. At each insertion, limit duration of vibration to time necessary to consolidate concrete without causing mix constituents to segregate. 5. For slabs and curbs: a. Strike-off surface and consolidate concrete with vibrating screed, to correct elevation. b. Slope surfaces uniformly to drains where required. c. Before excess bleed water appears on surface, use bull float, darby, or modified highway straightedge to form uniform, planar, open-textured surface. Do not further disturb surface before starting finishing operations. H. Cold-Weather Placement: Protect concrete from physical damage or reduced strength due to frost, freezing, or low temperatures. Comply with ACI 306R and as follows. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs 03 30 00 - 9 Cast-in-Place Concrete Coppell Fire Station #1 October 16, 2015 1. When air temperature has fallen or is expected to fall below 40 degrees F, uniformly heat water and aggregates before mixing to obtain concrete mixture temperature of not less than 50 degrees F and not more than 80 degrees F at point of placement. Mix water and aggregates together before adding cement. Do not add cement if temperature of water/aggregate mixture exceeds 70 degrees F. 2. Do not use frozen materials or materials containing ice or snow. 3. Do not use calcium chloride, salt, or other materials containing antifreeze agents or chemical accelerators, unless otherwise specified and approved in mix design. I. Hot-Weather Placement: Protect concrete Work from physical damage or reduced strength due to rapid evaporation or overheating of concrete. Refer to Fig. 2.1.5 in ACI 305R for hot- weather conditions that may adversely affect concrete placement, finishing, and curing. Do not allow temperature of concrete at time of placement to exceed 90 degrees F. When hot-weather conditions exist, use 1 or more of following procedures: 1. Place concrete at night or early in morning. 2. Cool ingredients before mixing to maintain concrete temperature below 90 degrees F at time of placement. Chilled mixing water or chopped ice may be used to control temperature; include water equivalent of ice in mixing water quantity. Use liquid nitrogen to cool concrete at Contractor's option. 3. Cover steel reinforcement with water-soaked burlap so steel temperature will not exceed ambient air temperature immediately before embedding in concrete. 4. Fog-spray forms, steel reinforcement, and subgrade just before placing concrete. Keep subgrade moisture uniform without standing water, soft spots, or dry areas. 5. Provide windbreaks or sunshades, or both. 3.7 FINISHING SLABS A. After the concrete has slightly stiffened, finish surfaces as indicated below: 1. Concrete with exterior exposure: Float and Broom Finish. 2. Concrete with interior exposure: Trowel Finish. B. Float Finish: 1. Consolidate the surface with a power-driven float, or by hand floating if the area is small or inaccessible to a power-driven float, to create a uniform, smooth, granular texture. 2. Troweling machines with float blades or pans slipped over trowel blades may be used; trowel machines with normal trowel blades or combination blades shall not be used. 3. If possible, restraighten the surface with a modified highway straightedge to cut down high spots and fill low spots. 4. Hand finish to remove mortar buildup. C. Float and Broom Finish: After applying the float finish, slightly roughen the surface with a medium-broom finish, perpendicular to traffic flow. D. Trowel Finish: 1. After applying the float finish, consolidate the concrete by hand or power-driven trowel. 2. Continue troweling passes and restraighten with a modified highway straightedge as necessary, until the surface is free of trowel marks and uniform in texture and appearance. 3. Grind smooth any surface defects that would telegraph through applied coatings or floor coverings. 4. Finish the surface so that 90 percent of the measured gaps between the concrete surface and an unleveled, freestanding, 10-foot-long straightedge, resting on two high spots and NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs 03 30 00 - 10 Cast-in-Place Concrete Coppell Fire Station #1 October 16, 2015 placed anywhere on the surface, do not exceed 3/8 inch, measured in accordance with ACI 117. E. Trowel and Broom Finish: After applying trowel finish, slightly roughen surface with fine- broom finish. F. Hot-Weather Conditions: Fog the surface with water if hot, dry, or windy conditions cause moisture loss approaching 0.2 pounds per square foot per hour before or during finishing operations. 3.8 CONCRETE CURING A. General: Protect freshly placed concrete from premature drying and excessive cold or hot temperatures. Maintain concrete above 55 degrees F and in moist condition for at least 7 days after placing. B. Unformed Top Surfaces: Begin curing immediately after finishing concrete. Use moisture- retaining cover. 1. Place cover in widest practicable width, with sides and ends lapped at least 12 inches. 2. Seal sides and ends of cover by holding down with soil, concrete pieces, or some other weight, or by using waterproof tape or adhesive. 3. Immediately repair holes or tears in cover during curing period using cover material and waterproof tape. 4. Re-wet concrete surface at least twice daily as necessary. C. Unformed Vertical and Overhead Surfaces: Apply curing compound uniformly in continuous operation by power spray or roller according to manufacturer's written instructions and recommended coverage rate. Recoat areas subjected to heavy rainfall within 3 hours after initial application. Maintain continuity of coating and repair damage during curing period. D. Protect concrete from falling below 55 degrees F with insulating blankets or heated enclosures. 3.9 CONCRETE SURFACE REPAIRS A. Defective Concrete: Repair defective areas designated by Engineer. Remove and replace concrete that cannot be repaired to Engineer's satisfaction. B. Surface defects on exposed surfaces include: 1. Voids, such as spalls, air bubbles, honeycomb, rock pockets, and form-tie holes, more than 1/2 inch in any dimension in solid concrete but not less than 1 inch deep. 2. Crazing and cracks in excess of 0.01 inch wide, or that penetrate to reinforcement or completely through section. 3. Fins and other projections exceeding 1/2 inch. 4. High or low spots that create areas of standing water that are at least 1/2 inch deep. 5. Color and texture irregularities, and stains and other discolorations that cannot be removed by cleaning. C. Repair defects that affect concrete's durability and structural performance as determined and specified by Engineer. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs 03 30 00 - 11 Cast-in-Place Concrete Coppell Fire Station #1 October 16, 2015 D. After concrete has gained sufficient strength to be unaffected by grinding, grind off fins, other projections, and high areas. 3.10 SEALANT A. Install sealant in strict accordance with manufacturer’s written instructions. 3.11 FIELD QUALITY CONTROL A. Submit batch tickets for ready-mix concrete. B. Testing Agency: Owner will engage qualified independent testing and inspecting agency to sample materials and perform tests during concrete placement. C. Provide: 1. Access to Work. 2. Materials for sampling. 3. Site facilities for sampling, testing, and storage of materials. 4. Incidental labor. D. Testing Services: Sampling and testing of composite samples of fresh concrete shall be performed according to following requirements: 1. Testing Frequency: Obtain 1 composite sample of each concrete mix for each day's pour exceeding 5 cubic yards, plus 1 composite sample for each additional 10 cubic yards. 2. Take samples from transport vehicle or mixer during discharge according to ASTM C172. Take samples at other locations if directed by Architect/Engineer. 3. Slump: ASTM C143/C143M; 1 test for each composite sample, but not less than 1 test for each day's pour of each concrete mix. Perform additional tests when concrete consistency appears to change. If high-range, water-reducing admixture is used, perform 1 test prior to adding admixture. 4. Air Content: ASTM C231/C231M; 1 test for each composite sample, but not less than 1 test for each day's pour of each concrete mix. 5. Concrete Temperature: ASTM C1064/C1064M; 1 test for each composite sample; and 1 test hourly when air temperature is 40 degrees F and below or 80 degrees F and above. 6. Compression Test Specimens: ASTM C31/C31M. a. Cast 4 standard cylinder specimens for each composite sample, immediately after sample is taken. Store specimens at Site for at least 16 hours at temperature of 60 to 80 degrees F. Provide temperature-controlled box or other enclosure if necessary. After at least 16 hours, but not more than 30 hours, transport specimens to laboratory and air cure at 73 degrees F, 50 percent relative humidity. b. If requested by Engineer, take 4 additional cylinder specimens and field cure in vicinity of area that they represent and in same manner as that portion of structure. 7. Compressive-Strength Tests: ASTM C39/C39M. a. Test 1 set of 2 laboratory-cured specimens at 7 days and 1 set of 2 specimens at 28 days. b. Test 1 set of 2 field-cured specimens at 7 days and 1 set of 2 specimens at 28 days. c. Compressive-strength test shall be average compressive strength from set of 2 specimens obtained from same composite sample and tested at age indicated. 8. Test results shall be reported in writing to Owner’s Representative, Engineer, concrete supplier, and Contractor within 48 hours of testing. Reports of compressive-strength tests shall contain: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs 03 30 00 - 12 Cast-in-Place Concrete Coppell Fire Station #1 October 16, 2015 a. Name of concrete testing and inspecting agency. b. Project identification name. c. Date of concrete placement. d. Specific location of concrete batch in Work. e. Concrete mix number, design compressive strength at 28 days, design slump range, and design air content range. f. Specimen number, cylinder size, dates of compression tests, compressive breaking strengths and types of break for 7- and 28-day tests, and measured slump, air content, and air and concrete temperatures. g. Statement that indicates whether test results are in conformance with Specifications. 9. Concrete strength is satisfactory if average of every 3 consecutive 28-day compressive- strength tests equals or exceeds specified 28-day compressive strength and no test value is more than 500 pounds per square inch less than specified 28-day strength. 10. If any 7-day compressive-strength test result is less than 75 percent of specified 28-day compressive strength, submit revised mix design data for concrete that will conform to Specifications. 11. When compressive-strength test of field-cured specimens is less than 85 percent of companion laboratory-cured cylinders, evaluate operations and provide corrective procedures for protecting and curing in-place concrete. Pay cost of sampling and testing non-conforming field-cured specimens. Owner will pay cost of sampling and testing conforming field-cured specimens. 12. Non-Conforming Concrete: a. If tests indicate that concrete is not in conformance with Specification, remove and replace non-conforming concrete or perform for additional testing, acceptable to Engineer, to verify conformance with Specification, at no cost to Owner. b. Procure core samples in accordance with ASTM C42/C42M. c. If tests indicate that slump, air entrainment, or other requirements have not been met, examine core samples petrographically, according to ASTM C856, to evaluate hardened concrete characteristics. d. If compressive-strength tests do not meet acceptance requirements, procure 3 core samples from each portion of structure represented by unsatisfactory tests, and test in compression. Strength of concrete in area represented by core tests is satisfactory if average of 3 compressive strength tests equals or exceeds 85 percent of specified 28-day compressive strength and no compressive-strength test value is less than 75 percent of specified 28-day compressive strength. If strength acceptance criteria are not met, remove and replace non-conforming concrete areas at no cost to Owner. e. Perform additional inspection and testing and inspecting, at no cost to Owner, to determine compliance of replaced or additional work with specified requirements. 3.12 CLEANING A. After completing concrete Work: 1. Clean soiling from adjacent surfaces. Exercise care to avoid scratching or damage to surfaces. 2. Repair surfaces stained, marred, or otherwise damaged during concrete Work. 3. Clean up debris and surplus materials and remove from Site. END OF SECTION NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Foundation Repairs 31 63 29 - 1 Drilled Concrete Piers Coppell Fire Station #1 October 15, 2015 SECTION 31 63 29 DRILLED CONCRETE PIERS PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: 1. Dry-installed drilled piers. 1.02 UNIT PRICES A. Drilled Piers: Actual net volume of drilled piers in place and approved. 1. Base bids on indicated number of drilled piers and, for each pier, the design length from top elevation to bottom of shaft and the diameter of shaft. 2. Unit prices include labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals required for excavation, trimming, shoring, casings, dewatering, reinforcement, concrete fill, testing and inspecting, and other items for complete drilled-pier installation. B. Rock Measurement: Volume of rock actually removed, measured in original position, but not to exceed outside dimensions of drilled piers cast against rock. Unit prices for rock excavation include replacement with approved materials. 1.03 PRE-INSTALLATION MEETINGS A. Pre-installation Conference: Conduct conference at location indicated by Owner. 1.04 SUBMITTALS A. Product Data: For each type of proprietary product. B. Design Mixtures: For each concrete mixture. C. Shop Drawings: For concrete reinforcement. D. Field quality-control reports. E. Record Drawings. 1.05 FIELD CONDITIONS A. Project-Site Information: A geotechnical report dated June 29, 2015 has been prepared by Henley Johnston & Associates for this Project and is available for information only. The opinions expressed in this report are those of geotechnical engineer and represent interpretations of subsoil conditions, tests, and results of analyses conducted by geotechnical engineer. Owner is not responsible for interpretations or conclusions drawn from this data. 1. Make additional test borings and conduct other exploratory operations necessary for drilled piers. Foundation Repairs 31 63 29 - 2 Drilled Concrete Piers Coppell Fire Station #1 October 16, 2015 B. Before excavating, lay out each drilled pier to lines and levels required. Record actual measurements of each drilled pier's location, shaft diameter, bottom and top elevations, deviations from specified tolerances, and other specified data. 1. Record and maintain information pertinent to each drilled pier and indicate on Record Drawings. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS A. Drilled-Pier Standard: ACI 336.1 except as modified in this Section. 2.02 STEEL REINFORCEMENT A. Refer to Specification Section 03 21 00: Reinforcing Steel. 2.03 CONCRETE MATERIALS A. Refer to Specification Section 03 30 00: Cast-in-Place Concrete unless noted otherwise below. B. Normal-Weight Aggregate: ASTM C 33/C 33M, graded, 3/4-inch nominal maximum coarse- aggregate size. 2.04 CONCRETE MIXTURES AND MIXING A. Refer to Specification Section 03 30 00: Cast-in-Place Concrete. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 EXCAVATION A. Excavate shafts for drilled piers to indicated elevations. Remove loose material from bottom of excavation. B. Notify Engineer immediately if specified equipment is incapable of drilling to specified depth. C. Notify and allow testing and inspecting agency to test and inspect bottom of excavation. If unsuitable bearing stratum is encountered, make adjustments to drilled piers as determined by Engineer. 1. Do not excavate shafts deeper than elevations indicated unless approved by Engineer. 2. Payment for additional authorized excavation is according to Contract provisions for changes in the Work. D. Probe with auger to a depth below bearing elevation, equal to diameter of the bearing area of drilled pier. Determine whether voids, clay seams, or solution channels exist. E. Temporary Casings: Install watertight steel casings of sufficient length and thickness to prevent water seepage into shaft; to withstand compressive, displacement, and withdrawal stresses; and to maintain stability of shaft walls. Foundation Repairs 31 63 29 - 3 Drilled Concrete Piers Coppell Fire Station #1 October 16, 2015 1. Remove temporary casings, maintained in plumb position, during concrete placement and before initial set of concrete, or leave temporary casings in place. F. Tolerances: Construct drilled piers to remain within ACI 336.1 tolerances. 3.02 INSTALLATION A. Install steel casings of minimum wall thickness indicated and of diameter not less than diameter of drilled pier. B. Comply with recommendations in CRSI's "Manual of Standard Practice" for fabricating, placing, and supporting reinforcement. C. Place concrete in continuous operation and without segregation immediately after inspection and approval of shaft by a qualified testing agency. D. Place concrete to fall vertically down the center of drilled pier without striking sides of shaft or steel reinforcement. E. Coordinate withdrawal of temporary casings with concrete placement to maintain at least a 60- inch head of concrete above bottom of casing. Vibrate top 60 inchesof concrete after withdrawal of temporary casing. 3.03 FIELD QUALITY CONTROL A. Testing Agency: Owner will engage a qualified testing agency to perform tests and inspections. B. Drilled-Pier Tests and Inspections: For each drilled pier, before concrete placement. 1. Soil Testing: Bottom elevations, bearing capacities, and lengths of drilled piers indicated have been estimated from available soil data. Actual elevations and drilled-pier lengths and bearing capacities are determined by testing and inspecting agency. Final evaluations and approval of data are determined by Engineer. C. Concrete Tests and Inspections: refer to Specification Section 03 30 00. 3.04 DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS AND WASTE MATERIALS A. Disposal: Remove surplus satisfactory soil and waste material, including unsatisfactory soil, trash, and debris, and legally dispose of it off Owner's property. END OF SECTION Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc.6363 N. State Highway 161, Suite 550Irving, Texas 75038972.550.7777 tel | 972.550.7770 faxwww.wje.comConsultants1A122334455667788BCDEFABCDEFProjectClientDescriptionMarkDateProject No.DateDrawnCheckedScaleSheet TitleSheet No.Headquarters & Laboratories: Northbrook, IllinoisAtlanta | Austin | Boston | Chicago | Cleveland | Dallas | Denver | DetroitHonolulu | Houston | Los Angeles | Minneapolis | New Haven | New YorkPrinceton | San Francisco | Seattle | Washington, D.C. Copyright 2015. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced in any form or by any means withoutpermission from Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc. (WJE). WJE disclaims any responsibility for its unauthorized use.Plotted: 10/16/2015 5:02 PM by Grelle, Stephen File Name: p:\2015\2015.0xxx\2015.0152.0 - fire station #1 - coppell (mwl)\drawings (wje)\Support\Sheets\R1 FOUNDATIONFLOOR PLAN.dwg ENGINEERSARCHITECTSMATERIALS SCIENTISTSTHIS SHEET PLOTS FULL SIZEAT 24x36 (INCHES)01/2"1"2"R1FOUNDATION PLAN(DEMOLITION)SVG / MWLAs Noted10/16/2015SRB10/16/2015-2015.0152.0FOR BIDDINGCITY OF COPPELL265 PARKWAY BLVDCOPPELL, TX 75019FIRE STATION NO. 1FOUNDATION REPAIR520 SOUTHWESTERN BLVDCOPPELL, TX 75019 1SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"FOUNDATION PLAN (DEMOLITION)NREMOVE (E)SLAB-ON-GRADE(E) SLAB-ON-GRADE TOREMAIN (EXCEPT AS NOTED)Registered Texas Engineering Firm F-0093 (E) GRADE BMR21R22TYPNOTES:1.(E) = EXISTING2.PRIOR TO SLAB DEMOLITION, FILL VOID BELOW ENTIREEXISTING SLAB AND ALLOW FILL MATERIAL TO CURE.3.PRIOR TO EXCAVATION BY MACHINE OR DRILLING FORNEW PIERS, USE NON-DESTRUCTIVE TECHNIQUES TOLOCATE BELOW-GRADE UTILITIES AT ALL AREAS OF SLAB.USE HAND EXCAVATION TO DETERMINE EXACT LOCATIONWHERE UTILITIES ARE SUSPECTED WITHIN 3 FEET OF ANEW PIER, OR IN ANY AREA WHERE MACHINE EXCAVATIONIS TO BE USED.R23R25R24BUILDING CODE AND DESIGN CRITERIA1.APPLICABLE CODE:a.2012 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE2.LIVE LOAD:a.DORMITORY AREA: 50 PSF + 15 PSF PARTITION (65 PSF TOTAL)3.FOUNDATION:a.GEOTECHNICAL REPORT NO. 15106G BY HENLEY-JOHNSON & ASSOC., DATED 6/29/15.GENERAL NOTES1.THIS PROJECT ("WORK") CONSISTS OF REMOVAL OF EXISTING SLABS FROM THE INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR OF AN EXISTING BUILDING OPERATING FACILITY,AND REPLACEMENT WITH NEW STRUCTURAL SLABS, AND ALL INCIDENTAL WORK.2.WORK INCIDENTAL TO SLAB REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT INCLUDES SELECTIVE DEMOLITION AND OR REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING ARCHITECTURALFINISHES, COMPONENTS, AND SYSTEMS; MEP COMPONENTS AND SYSTEMS; AND FURNITURE, FIXTURES AND EQUIPMENT. ALL ITEMS REMOVED TOACCOMPLISH THE SLAB WORK SHALL BE RESTORE TO MATCH THE PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONDITION, QUALITY, APPEARANCE, AND FUNCTIONALITY, UNLESSOTHERWISE ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER.3.THE COMPLETE SCOPE OF WORK IS DESCRIBED IN THESE DRAWINGS AND ACCOMPANYING SPECIFICATIONS. THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARECOMPLIMENTARY AND ARE INTENDED TO BE USED AS A WHOLE. PORTIONS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS ARE REPEATED IN THESE NOTES FOR CONVENIENCE.4.FIELD VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS SHOWN ON WJE DRAWINGS. NOTIFY ENGINEER PROMPTLY OF ERRORS, INCONSISTENCIES IN DRAWINGS AND NOTES, OR IFCLARIFICATION IS REQUIRED.5.PLANS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE BASED ON ORIGINAL DESIGN DRAWINGS DATED 1995. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN COPY OF ORIGINAL DRAWINGS TOBECOME FAMILIAR WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS. WJE HAS NOT VERIFIED ALL CONDITIONS AND DOES NOT REPRESENT THAT DRAWINGS ACCURATELYDEPICT ALL CONDITIONS THAT MAY BE ENCOUNTERED.6.COMPLY WITH AND PERFORM ALL WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, RULES, AND STANDARDS OF AUTHORITIES HAVINGJURISDICTION. CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR JOBSITE SAFETY AND MEANS AND METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION.7.OCCASIONAL PRESENCE OF ENGINEER, OWNER, OR TESTING AGENCY ON SITE DOES NOT RELIEVE CONTRACTOR OF RESPONSIBILITY TO PERFORM WORKIN COMPLIANCE WITH DRAWINGS AND OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.8.IF UNANTICIPATED CONDITIONS ARE ENCOUNTERED THAT CONFLICT WITH INFORMATION IN THE DRAWINGS, OR IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION ISCONTAINED IN THE DRAWINGS FOR CONTRACTOR TO REASONABLY INTERPRET THE DESIGN INTENT, SUBMIT A REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI) TOENGINEER. BEGIN NO WORK FOR WHICH AN RFI HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, BUT NOT RESPONDED TO. ALLOW 3 BUSINESS DAYS FOR ENGINEER'S RESPONSE.MATERIALS1.CONCRETE SHALL ATTAIN A 28-DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AS FOLLOWS:a.DRILLED PIERS:3000 PSIb.SLAB-ON-CARTON FORMS:4000 PSIc.MECHANICAL YARD SLAB-ON-GRADE:3000 PSI2.CONCRETE SHALL CONTAIN NORMAL-WEIGHT AGGREGATE COMPLYING WITH ASTM C33 AND HAVING A NOMINAL TOP SIZE OF 3/4 INCH. CONCRETE SHALLCONTAIN AIR ENTRAINMENT ONLY FOR EXTERIOR CONCRETE. DO NOT ADD AIR ENTRAINMENT FOR INTERIOR CONCRETE.3.REINFORCING STEEL SHALL COMPLY WITH ASTM A615, GRADE 60. SPLICES ARE PROHIBITED IN SLAB. SPLICES 30" LONG ARE ALLOWED IN PIERS.4.CONCRETE WORK FOR SLABS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 301. CONCRETE WORK FOR PIERS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 336.1.VOID FILLING BELOW SLAB1.SEE SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 02 41 19.SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING1.SPECIAL INSPECTIONS SHALL BE PERFORMED BY AN APPROVED AGENCY AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 17 OF IBC 2012. AGENCY SHALL BERETAINED BY OWNER.2.TESTING WILL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS AND FREQUENCYa.DRILLED PIERS (CONTINUOUSLY)b.REINFORCING STEEL (PRIOR TO CONCRETE PLACEMENT)3.CONTRACTOR SHALL COOPERATE WITH TESTING AGENCY AND PROVIDE ACCESS TO AREAS OF INSPECTION AND SAMPLES OF MATERIALS.REMOVE (E) CONDENSER PAD TOSURFACE OF SLAB-ON-GRADE;REMOVE & REINSTALL CONDENSER INLOCATION SPEC'D BY OWNER(E) CONDENSER & PAD TOREMAIN(E) GENERATOR ANDPAD TO REMAIN([%(//3,(572 %(/2:GRADE, TYP.REMOVE PORTION OF (E)SLAB-ON-GRADE AFTERFILLING VOID BELOW SLAB;SEE NOTE 2APPROX. LOCATION OF (E)BELOW-GRADE UTILITIES;SEE NOTE 3FOR BIDDING (E) NON-LOADBRG WALLMECH.YARDDORMITORYMAINENTRYAPPARATUS BAY(E) LOADBRG WALL(E) PIER SUPPORTEDSCREEN WALL TO REMAIN (E) BRICK VENEER TOREMAINREMOVE (E) SLAB-ON-GRADETO FACE OF GRADE BM(E) GRADE BM, DO NOTDAMAGE(E) COMPACTED BACK-FILLEXCAVATE SOIL BELOWSLAB(E) LOAD-BEARING STUDWALL TO REMAINF.F. @ GRADE BMDO NOT DAMAGE LEDGE1'-2"REMOVE (E) SLAB-ON-GRADETO FACE OF GRADE BM(E) GRADE BM; DO NOTDAMAGE(E) SLAB TO REMAINEXCAVATE SOIL BELOWSLABNOTE:1.SEE 1/R2 FOR ADDITIONALINFORMATION.NOT IN SCOPEDORMITORY AREA(E) LOAD-BEARINGSTUD WALL TOREMAIN7", F.V. PRIORTO SLAB DEMO(E) BRICK / CMU SCREENWALL TO REMAINREMOVE (E) CONC. SLAB(E) GRADE BM TOREMAINREMOVE (E) SEALANT FROMFACE OF GRADE BMFILL VOID BELOW SLABPRIOR TO DEMO(E) GAS/ELEC. UTILITY; DONOT DAMAGE; COORDINATETEMPORARY SUPPORT OFGAS METER W/ OWNERFACE OF WALL BEYOND(E) GRADE BEAM, DO NOTDAMAGE(E) BRICK VENEER TOREMAINREMOVE (E) SLAB-ON-GRADETO FACE OF GRADE BEAM(E) LOAD-BEARING STUDWALL TO REMAINREMOVE (E) CONC. SLABREMOVE (E) SEALANT FROMFACE OF WALL; IF DOWELSARE PRESENT BETWEENSLAB & WALL, CUT DOWELSFLUSH W/ FACE OF WALL1'-6"(E) CONDUIT OR OTHERUTILITY; DO NOT DAMAGEDURING DEMO(E) SLAB TO REMAINFILL VOID BELOW SLABPRIOR TO DEMOREMOVE (E) MECH.YARD SLAB(E) PARKING LOT PAVINGTO REMAINNOTIFY ENGINEER IFEXCESSIVE VOIDING EXISTSBELOW PARKING LOT PAVINGFILL VOID BELOW SLABPRIOR TO DEMO; NOTE THATVOID FILLING BELOWPAVEMENT MAY BE REQ'DFACE OF WALLBEYONDWiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc.6363 N. State Highway 161, Suite 550Irving, Texas 75038972.550.7777 tel | 972.550.7770 faxwww.wje.comConsultants1A122334455667788BCDEFABCDEFProjectClientDescriptionMarkDateProject No.DateDrawnCheckedScaleSheet TitleSheet No.Headquarters & Laboratories: Northbrook, IllinoisAtlanta | Austin | Boston | Chicago | Cleveland | Dallas | Denver | DetroitHonolulu | Houston | Los Angeles | Minneapolis | New Haven | New YorkPrinceton | San Francisco | Seattle | Washington, D.C. Copyright 2015. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced in any form or by any means withoutpermission from Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc. (WJE). WJE disclaims any responsibility for its unauthorized use.Plotted: 10/16/2015 5:02 PM by Grelle, Stephen File Name: p:\2015\2015.0xxx\2015.0152.0 - fire station #1 - coppell (mwl)\drawings (wje)\Support\Sheets\R2 REPAIRDETAILS.dwg ENGINEERSARCHITECTSMATERIALS SCIENTISTSTHIS SHEET PLOTS FULL SIZEAT 24x36 (INCHES)01/2"1"2"R2REPAIR DETAILSSVG / MWLAs Noted10/16/2015SRB10/16/20152015.0152.0FOR BIDDINGCITY OF COPPELL265 PARKWAY BLVDCOPPELL, TX 75019FIRE STATION NO. 1FOUNDATION REPAIR520 SOUTHWESTERN BLVDCOPPELL, TX 75019 Registered Texas Engineering Firm F-00931SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"SLAB DEMOLITION AT EXTERIOR WALL2SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"SLAB DEMOLITION AT INTERIOR GRADE BEAM3SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"SLAB DEMOLITION AT MECHANICAL YARD4SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"SECTION THRU WALL AT MECHANICAL YARD5SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"SECTION 2"6"MATCH ELEV.@ TOP OF (E)GRADE BEAMVOID CARTONS#3 TIES @ 10"O.C. W/ 3@ 3" O.C. AT TOP(4) #5 VERTS.SLAB REINFORCEMENTOMITTED FOR CLARITY3'-6"1'-6"1" MAX.3"CLR.22'-0"TOP OFPIER#5 DOWELS (1 OF 4);TOP OF HOOK 112" MAX.CLR BELOW TOP OFSLAB3,(5LOCATE 2 BOTT. BARSEA. DIRECTION INSIDEPIER CAGE6"VOID CARTONNORTH-SOUTHBARS112" CLR.EAST-WESTBARS3 4" CLR. 8"F.F.4"13,(5#3 TIES(4) #5 VERTS.4"(N) SLAB(E) GRADE BEAM,DO NOT DAMAGE(E) COMPACTEDBACK-FILL8"VOID CARTON(E) STUD WALLTO REMAIN1"4"EMBED(N) #4 DOWEL x 1'-6" LG@ 12" O.C.REMOVE CONC.TO PROVIDESQUARE LEDGE3'-0" PIERPIER REINFORCEMENTOMITTED FOR CLARITY(N) SLAB8"VOID CARTON(E) LOAD-BEARINGSTUD WALL TOREMAIN1'-6"(N) ASPHALT IMPREGNATEDFIBERBOARD ENTIREPERIMETER(E) SLAB-ON-GRADE4"ROUGHEN SURFACETO MIN. CSP-7(E) BRICK FACADE#3 CONT. (1 of 3); DOWELINTO (E) PAVEMENT @NORTH-ENDS ONLYVOID FILLING MAT'L(PLACED PRIOR TOSLAB DEMO)(E) CONDUIT OR OTHERUTILITY; PROVIDE ISOLATIONJOINT AS SHOWN IN 7/R3(N) SLAB-ON-GRADE;THICKNESS TO MATCH (E)SLAB-ON-GRADE (NOT LESSTHAN 4")(N) SEALANT COVE JOINT#3 DOWELS @ 12" O.C.SECTION A - A(N) OR (E)SLAB-ON-GRADE(N) FIBERBOARD(E) CONDUIT OR OTHERUTILITY(E) WALL, IFPRESENT(N) 12" THICKSEALANTFILL GAP W/SAND34" TYP.(E) CONDUIT OROTHER UTILITY(GROUPED W/OTHERS)-A-ATYP.3 4" TYP.(E) CONDUIT OROTHER UTILITY(ISOLATED)(N) ASPHALTIMPREGNATEDFIBERBOARD6"MECH. YARDPARKING LOT(N) #3 CONT.112" RADIUS11239&:((3#2&WHERE CURB NOT INCONTACT W/ GENERATORPADROUGHEN (E) SURFACE (MIN.CSP-7)(N) #3 DOWELED INTOSLAB @ 8" O.C.6"(N) CONC. CURBNON-CORROSIVE FILTER SCREENDESIGNED FOR EXTERIOR USE(SELECT SUCH THAT AGGREGATEFILL WILL NOT PASS); ATTACH TOCURBAGGREGATE FILL(BY OTHERS)ROUT & SEAL JOINT PRIORTO PLACEMENT OF CURB3/8" MIN.5/8" MAX.3/8"(N) SEALANT IN ROUTEDCRACK; REMOVE EXCESSSEALANT FROM SURFACEAFTER TOOLING(E) CRACK(N) BOND BREAKER TAPESURFACE OFCONC.Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc.6363 N. State Highway 161, Suite 550Irving, Texas 75038972.550.7777 tel | 972.550.7770 faxwww.wje.comConsultants1A122334455667788BCDEFABCDEFProjectClientDescriptionMarkDateProject No.DateDrawnCheckedScaleSheet TitleSheet No.Headquarters & Laboratories: Northbrook, IllinoisAtlanta | Austin | Boston | Chicago | Cleveland | Dallas | Denver | DetroitHonolulu | Houston | Los Angeles | Minneapolis | New Haven | New YorkPrinceton | San Francisco | Seattle | Washington, D.C. Copyright 2015. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced in any form or by any means withoutpermission from Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc. (WJE). WJE disclaims any responsibility for its unauthorized use.Plotted: 10/16/2015 5:02 PM by Grelle, Stephen File Name: p:\2015\2015.0xxx\2015.0152.0 - fire station #1 - coppell (mwl)\drawings (wje)\Support\Sheets\R3 ENLARGEDPLAN.dwg ENGINEERSARCHITECTSMATERIALS SCIENTISTSTHIS SHEET PLOTS FULL SIZEAT 24x36 (INCHES)01/2"1"2"R3ENLARGEDFOUNDATION PLANSVG / MWLAs Noted10/16/2015SRB10/16/2015-2015.0152.0FOR BIDDINGCITY OF COPPELL265 PARKWAY BLVDCOPPELL, TX 75019FIRE STATION NO. 1FOUNDATION REPAIR520 SOUTHWESTERN BLVDCOPPELL, TX 750191SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"REPLACEMENT SLAB AND NEW FOUNDATION PLANNRegistered Texas Engineering Firm F-009329'-0"25'-6"123ABCTYP. SLAB REINF.;#4 @ 12" O.C.E.W. CONT.TOP & BOTT. (HOOK ALLTOP BARS @ END)1 OF 9 (N) PIERS;SEE 2/R3([%(//PIER, TYP.(N) SLAB-ON-GRADEIN-FILL2SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"TYPICAL DETAIL AT NEW PIER3SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"TYPICAL SLAB-ON-CARTON FORM DETAIL4SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"TYPICAL DETAIL AT NEW PIER5SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"TYPICAL SLAB CONNECTION TO GRADE BEAM(N) CURBR35MECHANICAL YARD NOTES:1.ROUT AND SEAL ALL CRACKS WIDER THAN 0.010" ATAREAS OF MECHANICAL YARD SLAB-ON-GRADE TOREMAIN. REFER TO DETAIL 9/R3.2.PROVIDE ISOLATION BY CHIPPING, DRILLING,CORING, CUTTING, ETC., SIMILAR TO DETAIL 7/R3 ATALL CONDUIT / UTILITY PENETRATIONS IN AREAS OFMECHANICAL YARD SLAB-ON-GRADE TO REMAIN.DO NOT DAMAGE UTILITIES.6SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"SLAB IN-FILL AT MECHANICAL YARD7SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"TYP. ISOLATION AT CONDUIT OR OTHER UTILITY8SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"CURB AT NORTH END OF MECH. YARD9SCALE: 6" = 1'-0"ROUT AND SEAL CRACK(N) 34"x34" COVESEALANT, TYP.(E) GENERATOR PAD(E) GENERATOR PADR34DOWELS TOGRADE BEAM;SEE 5/R3FACE OF GRADEBEAM BELOW, TYP.R38R35R35EQ.EQ.EQ.EQ. Final EstimateMatt LetlowCORE TXR5081 - 2015-16 TCPN Texas JOC CORE - 2015-2016 - 1/31/2015 to 1/31/2016FS 1 Dorm Renovations - TX COC 0014Matt LetlowEstimator: Matt LetlowFS 1 Dorm RenovationsDemolish and remove existing slab on gradeReplace with a structrural slab as designedInstall 1 each divder wall between firefighter dorms and BC officeInstall divider walls between individual bedsIncludes barn door style sliding doorsInstall 3 each cabinets and under bed storage for each sleeping area Install new carpet flooringPaint for new work onlyRepair plumbing leaks at two areasPad for relocated AC unitPad for new AC unitRemoval of concrete where shown at enclosed mechanical yard.Bring existing mechanical yard to grade with decomposed granite over existing concrete. (includes curb)Includes Emergency Remote workExcludes: Any HVAC work, Engineering, Permit costs, or any unforseen and unknown existing conditions.Certified Proposal Number 5081-TX-8687Project Scope:Division Summary (MF04)01 - General Requirements $76,895.09 26 - Electrical02 - Existing Conditions $1,053.00 27 - Communications03 - Concrete $15,149.50 28 - Electronic Safety and Security04 - Masonry31 - Earthwork $26,127.6805 - Metals32 - Exterior Improvements06 - Wood, Plastics, and Composites33 - Utilities07 - Thermal and Moisture Protection34 - Transportation08 - Openings35 - Waterway and Marine Transportation09 - Finishes41 - Material Processing and Handling Equipment10 - Specialties44 - Pollution Control Equipment11 - Equipment46 - Water and Wastewater Equipment12 - Furnishings48 - Electric Power Generation13 - Special ConstructionAlternates $6,059.8014 - Conveying EquipmentTrades $140,488.8021 - Fire SuppressionAssemblies22 - PlumbingFMR23 - Heating, Ventilating, and Air-Conditioning (HVAC)MF04 Total (Without totalling components) $265,773.87Totalling ComponentsPriced Line Items $265,773.87 Owner's Contingency (w/GC Markup) $35,840.00RSMeans DALLAS, TX CCI 2015Q2, 85.30% $(39,676.60) Contractors Contingency (with GC Markup) $6,819.002015-16 TCPN JOC TX Standard (-6.0000%) $(13,813.94) Bond $4,135.00Emergency Remote $24,640.00Page 1 of 5 FS 1 Dorm Renovations - TX COC 0014Printed 17 DEC 2015 1:47PM v2.626 Final EstimateEstimator: Matt LetlowFS 1 Dorm RenovationsDivision Summary and Totaling Components Continued...Material, Labor, and Equipment Totals (No Totalling Components) $28,669.96 $233,466.16 $3,637.75Labor:Equipment:Other: $0.00Laborhours: 2,337.60Green Line Items: $0.000Material:Grand Total $283,717.33Page 2 of 5 FS 1 Dorm Renovations - TX COC 0014Printed 17 DEC 2015 1:47PM v2.626 Final EstimateEstimator: Matt LetlowFS 1 Dorm RenovationsItemQuantityUnit CostDescriptionUMTotalBook01 - General Requirements 1 01-21-53-50-0550-L Factors, cost adjustments, add to construction costs for particular job requirements, cut and patch to match existing construction, add, maximumCosts 75,000.0000 9.0000% $6,750.00RSM15FAC L, O&P 2 01-21-53-50-0550-M Factors, cost adjustments, add to construction costs for particular job requirements, cut and patch to match existing construction, add, maximumCosts 75,000.0000 5.0000% $3,750.00RSM15FAC M, O&P 3 01-21-53-50-0850-L Factors, cost adjustments, add to construction costs for particular job requirements, dust protection, add, maximumCosts 25,000.0000 11.0000% $2,750.00RSM15FAC L, O&P 4 01-21-53-50-0850-M Factors, cost adjustments, add to construction costs for particular job requirements, dust protection, add, maximumCosts 25,000.0000 4.0000% $1,000.00RSM15FAC M, O&P 5 01-21-53-50-1450-L Factors, cost adjustments, add to construction costs for particular job requirements, material handling and storage limitation, add, maximumCosts 25,000.0000 7.0000% $1,750.00RSM15FAC L, O&P 6 01-21-53-50-1450-M Factors, cost adjustments, add to construction costs for particular job requirements, material handling and storage limitation, add, maximumCosts 25,000.0000 6.0000% $1,500.00RSM15FAC M, O&P 7 01-21-53-50-1750-L Factors, cost adjustments, add to construction costs for particular job requirements, protection of existing work, add, maximumCosts 25,000.0000 7.0000% $1,750.00RSM15FAC L, O&P 8 01-21-53-50-1750-M Factors, cost adjustments, add to construction costs for particular job requirements, protection of existing work, add, maximumCosts 25,000.0000 5.0000% $1,250.00RSM15FAC M, O&P 9 01-31-13-20-0160 Field personnel, general purpose laborer, average Week 8.8465 $2,475.00 $21,895.09RSM15FAC L, O&PDaily cleanup and coordination with FD 10 01-31-13-20-0260 Field personnel, superintendent, averageWeek 10.0000 $3,450.00 $34,500.00RSM15FAC L, O&PProject Requirement01 - General Requirements Total $76,895.0902 - Existing Conditions 11 02-41-19-20-0100 Selective demolition, dump charges, typical urban city, tipping fees only, building construction materialsTon 13.0000 $81.00 $1,053.00RSM15FAC M, O&P02 - Existing Conditions Total $1,053.0003 - Concrete 12 03-30-53-40-5300 Concrete in place, including forms, 4 uses, Grade 60 rebar, portland cement Type I, placement and finishing unless otherwise indicated, lift slab in place above the foundation, concrete 4000 psi and columns, under 10,000 S.F. per floorS.F. 739.0000 $20.50 $15,149.50RSM15FAC M, L, E, O&P03 - Concrete Total $15,149.5031 - EarthworkPage 3 of 5 FS 1 Dorm Renovations - TX COC 0014Printed 17 DEC 2015 1:47PM v2.626 Final EstimateEstimator: Matt LetlowFS 1 Dorm Renovations31 - EarthworkItemQuantityUnit CostDescriptionUMTotalBook 13 31-63-29-13-1340 Uncased drilled concrete piers, priced using 200 piles, excluding pile caps or mobilization, casing or reinforcing, cast in place friction pile, end bearing, fluted, constant diameter, 4000 PSI concrete, 12" diameter, 7 gaugeV.L.F. 270.0000 $45.00 $12,150.00RSM15FAC M, L, E, O&P9*30 = 270.00 14 31-63-29-13-1340-1500 Cast in place, adds, for reinforcing steel, add (Modified using 31-63-29-20-1500) Lb. 2,078.0000 $1.06 $2,202.68RSM15FAC M, O&P2078 = 2,078.00 15 31-63-29-13-1340-1700 Cast in place, adds, for ball or pedestal end, add (Modified using 31-63-29-20-1700)C.Y. 15.0000 $785.00 $11,775.00RSM15FAC M, L, E, O&P12*1.25 = 15.0031 - Earthwork Total $26,127.68Alternates 16 03-30-53-40-5300 Demo - Concrete in place, including forms, 4 uses, Grade 60 rebar, portland cement Type I, placement and finishing unless otherwise indicated, lift slab in place above the foundation, concrete 4000 psi and columns, under 10,000 S.F. per floorS.F. 739.0000 $8.20 $6,059.80CUSTOM L, O&PLabor Adjustment: 75% of $10.93 = $8.20------------------------------Using O&P PricingBare Costs: (M:$8.20 L:$6.55 E:$0.50 O:1,500.00 LH:0.139)O&P Labor Calc = O&P Total - (Bare Material + 10.000%) - (Bare Equipment + 10.000%)$20.50 - $9.02 - $0.55 = $10.93Labor w/CCI = $10.93 * 100.000% = $10.93Alternates Total $6,059.80Trades 17 BRIC Bricklayers - 2015 RSMeans Facilities O&P Rate Hour 48.0000 $75.10 $3,604.80Trades L, O&P3 men x 2 days to patch and repair opening3*2*8 = 48.00 18 CARP Carpenters - 2015 RSMeans Facilities O&P Rate Hour 192.0000 $76.95 $14,774.40Trades L, O&P6 men x 4 days, install cabinets (and relocate existing)6*8*4 = 192.00 19 CLAB Common Building Laborers - 2015 RSMeans Facilities O&P Rate Hour 0.0000 $61.65Trades L, O&P 20 ELEC Electricians - 2015 RSMeans Facilities O&P Rate Hour 80.0000 $84.70 $6,776.00Trades L, O&PElectricians to make safe, demo, re-install existing. No new adds2 men x 1 week total for project2*40 = 80.00Page 4 of 5 FS 1 Dorm Renovations - TX COC 0014Printed 17 DEC 2015 1:47PM v2.626 Final EstimateEstimator: Matt LetlowFS 1 Dorm RenovationsTradesItemQuantityUnit CostDescriptionUMTotalBook 21 PLUM Plumbers - 2015 RSMeans Facilities O&P Rate Hour 120.0000 $91.55 $10,986.00Trades L, O&PPlumbing repairs5*3*8 = 120.00 22 PORD Painters, Ordinary - 2015 RSMeans Facilities O&P Rate Hour 200.0000 $64.85 $12,970.00Trades L, O&P4 men x 1.5 weeks4*50 = 200.00 23 SPRI Sprinkler Installers - 2015 RSMeans Facilities O&P Rate Hour 32.0000 $87.75 $2,808.00Trades L, O&P2*16 = 32.00 24 WRCK Wrecking - 2015 RSMeans Facilities O&P Rate Hour 1,344.0000 $65.90 $88,569.60Trades L, O&PDemolition of interior8 men x 4 days+Added concrete men to install inside building and finish10 men x 4 days+8 men x 12 days to frame inside and hange drywall and ceilings(8*4*8)+(10*4*8)+(8*12*8) = 1,344.00Trades Total $140,488.80Estimate Grand Total 283,717.33Page 5 of 5 FS 1 Dorm Renovations - TX COC 0014Printed 17 DEC 2015 1:47PM v2.626 Master City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard Coppell, Texas 75019-9478 File Number: 2015-2558 File ID: Type: Status: 2015-2558 Agenda Item Passed 1Version: Reference: In Control: Engineering 01/04/2016File Created: Final Action: License Agreement - KrogerFile Name: Title: Consider approval to enter into a License Agreement with Kroger Texas L.P to permit a monument sign within the City’s right-of-way; and authorizing the City Manager to sign any necessary documents. Notes: Agenda Date: 01/12/2016 Agenda Number: I. Sponsors: Enactment Date: Kroger License Agreement Memo.pdf, Exhibit.pdf, Kroger License Agreement.pdf Attachments: Enactment Number: Hearing Date: Contact: Effective Date: Drafter: History of Legislative File Action: Result: Return Date: Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver- sion: 1 Approved on the Consent Agenda 01/12/2016City Council A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Councilmember Nancy Yingling, that Agenda Items A-K be approved on the Consent Agenda. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. Action Text: Text of Legislative File 2015-2558 Title Consider approval to enter into a License Agreement with Kroger Texas L.P to permit a monument sign within the City’s right-of-way; and authorizing the City Manager to sign any necessary documents. Summary Fiscal Impact: [Enter Fiscal Impact Statement Here] Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master Continued (2015-2558) Staff Recommendation: The Engineering Department recommends approval. Goal Icon: Sustainable City Government Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 1 MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and City Council From: Kenneth M. Griffin, P.E., Director of Engineering and Public Works Date: January 12, 2016 Reference: This License Agreement will allow a monument sign in the city right of way at 777 Freeport Parkway for Kroger Texas, L.P. 2030: Business Prosperity, Goal 1 Retention & Attraction of Businesses that generate revenues for the City Introduction: This agenda item is being presented for approval to enter into a License Agreement with Kroger Texas, L.P. to allow use of a monument sign in the City’s right of way; and authorizing the City Manager to sign and execute any necessary documents. Analysis: There is an existing sign at 777 Freeport Parkway, which is the old Minyard Distribution Center and has since changed ownerships several times. The sign has been in the City right of way since the original development from the late 1980’s. Kroger has moved its regional office to this location and is wanting to update the monument sign. There has never been a license agreement established for this sign. Legal Review: Agenda was sent to the City Attorney for review. Fiscal Impact: There is no fiscal impact associated with this agreement. Recommendation: The Engineering Department recommends approval of this license agreement. Proposed Krogers SignLicense AgreementCreated in ACAD20151 INCH = 1 MILE0W:\GIS\Projects\Exhibit Location Maps\ACAD\EXHIBITS 2016.dwg\KROGERS SIGN LOCCreated on: January 6, 2016 by Kevin Rubalcaba1/21/2 1 1 INCH = FT.010010050Proposed Krogers SignLicense AgreementCreated in ACAD2015W:\GIS\Projects\Exhibit Location Maps\ACAD\EXHIBITS 2016.dwg\KROGERS SIGNCreated on: January 6, 2016 by Kevin Rubalcaba2/2EXISTING CITY OF COPPELLRIGHT OF WAY ____________________________________ Right-of-way Use Agreement - Page 1 STATE OF TEXAS § § LICENSE AGREEMENT COUNTY OF DALLAS § THIS AGREEMENT (“AGREEMENT”) is made by and between the City of Coppell, Texas (“CITY”), acting by and through its authorized representatives, and Kroger Texas L.P. (“LICENSEE”). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, LICENSEE desires to maintain, repair and/or replace a monument sign within the right of way of Freeport Parkway (the “IMPROVEMENTS”), WHEREAS, the right of way is more particularly described in Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein as if set forth in full (the “PROPERTY”); and WHEREAS, LICENSEE has requested the CITY allow the use and occupancy of the right of way for the IMPROVEMENTS; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants contained herein and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Purpose: The CITY hereby grants LICENSEE a revocable license for the purpose of maintaining, repairing and/or replacing the IMPROVEMENTS (the “PERMITTED IMPROVEMENTS”) within the right of way of the CITY. 2. Term: The term of this License shall be perpetual, subject, however, to termination by the CITY as provided herein. 3. Non-Exclusive: This License is nonexclusive and is subject to the following: a) to any existing utility, drainage or communications facilities located in, on, under or upon the PROPERTY; b) to all vested rights presently owned by any utility or communication company, public or private, for the use of the PROPERTY for facilities presently located within the PROPERTY; and c) to any existing lease, license, or other interest in the PROPERTY granted by the CITY to any individual, corporation or other entity, public or private. 4. Environmental Protection: LICENSEE shall not use or direct the use of the PROPERTY for any purpose that may be in violation of any laws pertaining to the health of the environment, including without limitation, the comprehensive environmental response, compensation and liability act of 1980 (“CERCLA”), the resource conservation and recovery act of 1976 (“RCRA”), the Texas Water Code, and the Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act. LICENSEE warrants that in its use of the PROPERTY LICENSEE will not dispose of or release any hazardous substance or solid waste on or to the PROPERTY, and that LICENSEE will take all steps necessary to ensure that no such hazardous substance or solid waste will ever be discharged onto the PROPERTY or adjoining property by LICENSEE. The terms “hazardous substance waste” shall have the meaning specified in CERCLA, and the term solid ____________________________________ Right-of-way Use Agreement - Page 2 waste and disposal (or dispose) shall have the meaning specified in the RCRA; provided, however, that in the event either CERCLA or RCRA is amended so as to broaden the meaning of any term defined thereby, such broader meaning shall apply subsequent to the effective date of such amendment; and provided further, at the extent that the laws of the State of Texas establish a meaning for hazardous substance, release, solid waste, or disposal which is broader than that specified in the CERCLA or RCRA, such broader meaning shall apply. LICENSEE shall indemnify and hold the CITY harmless against all costs, environmental clean up of the PROPERTY resulting from LICENSEE’S use of the PROPERTY under this License in violation of this AGREEMENT, as proven in a court of competent jurisdiction. 5. Mechanic’s liens not permitted: LICENSEE shall fully pay all labor and materials used in, on or about the PROPERTY, and will not permit or suffer any mechanic’s or material man’s liens of any nature to be affixed against the PROPERTY by reason of any work done or materials furnished to the PROPERTY at LICENSEE’S instance or request. 6. Future CITY use: This License is made expressly subject and subordinate to the right of the CITY to use the PROPERTY for any public purpose whatsoever. In the event that the CITY shall, at any time subsequent to the date of this AGREEMENT, at its sole discretion, determine that the relocation or removal of the PERMITTED IMPROVEMENTS shall be necessary or convenient for CITY’S use of the PROPERTY, LICENSEE shall at its sole cost and expense make or cause to be made such modifications or relocate the PERMITTED IMPROVEMENTS so as not to interfere with the CITY’S or CITY’S assigns’ use of the PROPERTY. A minimum of thirty (30) days written notice for the exercise of the above action shall be given by the CITY to LICENSEE, and LICENSEE shall promptly commence to make the required changes and complete them as quickly as possible, or reimburse the CITY for the reasonable cost of making such required changes. 7. Duration of License: This License shall terminate and be of no further force and effect in the event LICENSEE shall discontinue or abandon the use of the PERMITTED IMPROVEMENTS, or in the event LICENSEE shall remove the PERMITTED IMPROVEMENTS from the PROPERTY, or upon termination by the CITY in accordance with this AGREEMENT, whichever event first occurs; or, in the event that the CITY abandons the PROPERTY, then this AGREEMENT shall be of no further effect. 8. Compliance with laws: LICENSEE agrees to abide by and be governed by all laws, ordinances and regulations of any and all governmental entities having jurisdiction over LICENSEE. 9. Indemnification: LICENSEE shall defend, protect and keep the CITY forever harmless and indemnified against and from any penalty, or any damage, or charge, imposed for any violation of any law, ordinance, rule or regulation arising out of the use of the PROPERTY by LICENSEE, whether occasioned by the neglect of Licensee, agents, contractors or assigns, or those invitees of LICENSEE. LICENSEE shall at all times defend, protect and indemnify, and it is the intention of the parties hereto that LICENSEE hold the CITY harmless against and from any and all loss, cost, damage, or expense, including attorney’s fee, arising out of or from any accident or other occurrence on or about the PROPERTY causing personal injury, death or property damage resulting from the use of the PROPERTY by LICENSEE, its agents and ____________________________________ Right-of-way Use Agreement - Page 3 invitees, except when caused by the willful misconduct or negligence of the CITY, its officers, employees or agents, and only then to the extent or the proportion of any default or conduct determined against the CITY for its willful misconduct or negligence. LICENSEE shall at all times defend, protect, indemnify and hold the CITY harmless against and from any and all loss, cost, damage, or expense, including attorney’s fees arising out of or from any and all claims or causes of action resulting from any failure of LICENSEE, its officers, employees, agents, contractors, or assigns, in any respect to comply with and perform all the requirements and provisions hereof. 10. Action upon termination: At such time as this License may be terminated or canceled for any reason whatsoever, LICENSEE, upon request by the CITY, shall remove all PERMITTED IMPROVEMENTS and appurtenances owned by it, situated in, under or attached to the PROPERTY, and shall restore such PROPERTY to substantially the condition of the PROPERTY prior to LICENSEE’S encroachment at LICENSEE’S sole expense. 11. Termination: This AGREEMENT may be terminated in any of the following ways: a. Written agreement of both parties; b. By the CITY giving LICENSEE thirty (30) days prior written notice; c. By the CITY upon failure of LICENSEE to perform its obligations as set forth in this AGREEMENT, after thirty (30) days prior written notice to LICENSEE and opportunity to cure; d. By the CITY abandoning any interest in the PROPERTY. 12. Notice: When notice is permitted or required by this AGREEMENT, it shall be in writing and shall be deemed delivered in person or when placed, postage prepaid in the United State mail, certified return receipt requested, and addressed to the parties at the address set forth opposite their signature. Either party may designate from time to time another and different address for receipt of notice by giving notice of such change of address to the other party. 13. Attorney’s Fees: Any party to this AGREEMENT, who is the prevailing party in any legal proceeding against any other party brought under or with relation to this AGREEMENT shall be entitled to recover court cost and reasonable attorney’s fees from the non-prevailing party. 14. Governing Law: This AGREEMENT is governed by the laws of the State of Texas; and venue for any action shall be in Dallas County, Texas. 15. Binding Effect: This AGREEMENT shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the executing parties and their respective heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns. 16. Entire Agreement: This AGREEMENT embodies the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes all prior agreements, understandings, if any, relating to the PROPERTY and the matters addressed herein, and may be amended or supplemented only by written instrument executed by the party against whom enforcement is sought. 17. Recitals: The recitals to this AGREEMENT are incorporated herein by reference. ____________________________________ Right-of-way Use Agreement - Page 4 18. Legal Construction: The provisions of this AGREEMENT are hereby declared covenants running with the PROPERTY and are fully binding on all successors, heirs, and assigns of LICENSEE who acquire any right, title, or interest in or to the PROPERTY or any part thereof. Any person who acquires any right, title, or interest in or to the PROPERTY, or any part hereof, thereby agrees and covenants to abide by and fully perform the provisions of this AGREEMENT with respect to said right, title or interest in the PROPERTY. 19. Successor Owner Obligations: Notwithstanding the above, if and when LICENSEE assigns all of its right, title or interest in the PROPERTY to a successor owner (“SUCCESSOR OWNER”), LICENSEE will only have obligations hereunder to the CITY relating only to the period of time during which LICENSEE held fee simple title to the PROPERTY, according to the Dallas County real property records. Similarly, each SUCCESSOR OWNER of the PROPERTY will only be responsible for its obligations hereunder to the CITY relating only to the period of time during which the SUCCESSOR OWNER held fee simple title to the PROPERTY, according to the Dallas County real property records. ____________________________________ Right-of-way Use Agreement - Page 5 EXECUTED this _______ day of ____________, 2016. CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS By: ________________________________ CLAY PHILLIPS, CITY MANAGER ATTEST: By: ________________________________ CHRISTEL PETTINOS, CITY SECRETARY Kroger Texas L.P, an Ohio limited partnership By: KRGP Inc., an Ohio corporation, its sole general partner By: ________________________ Name: Rick J. Landrum Title: Vice President ____________________________________ Right-of-way Use Agreement - Page 6 LICENSEE’S ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF OHIO § § COUNTY OF HAMILTON § BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority a Notary Public in and for the State of Ohio, on this day personally appeared Rick J. Landrum, known to me to be the person and officer whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that the same was the act of the said, and that he executed the same as the act of said for the purpose and consideration therein expressed and in the capacity therein. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the _________ day of January, 2016. ___________________________________ Notary Public, State of Ohio My Commission Expires: _________________________ ____________________________________ Right-of-way Use Agreement - Page 7 CITY’S ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF DALLAS § This instrument was acknowledged before me on the _____ day of _______________, 2016, by Clay Phillips, City Manager of the City of Coppell, Texas, a Texas municipality, on behalf of said municipality. ___________________________________ Notary Public, State of Texas My Commission Expires: _________________________ Master City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard Coppell, Texas 75019-9478 File Number: 2015-2525 File ID: Type: Status: 2015-2525 Agenda Item Passed 1Version: Reference: In Control: Fire 12/04/2015File Created: Final Action: Outdoor Warning SirensFile Name: Title: Consider approval authorizing a purchase order for two outdoor warning sirens from sole source vendor, Federal Signal Corporation, for the Emergency Management Division of the Fire Department, in the amount of $55,280.00, as budgeted; and authorizing the City Manager to sign all necessary documents. Notes: Agenda Date: 01/12/2016 Agenda Number: J. Sponsors: Enactment Date: Staff Memo.pdf, Quote.pdf, Sole Source Letter.pdf, Current Siren Coverage Map 12.29.15.JPG Attachments: Enactment Number: Hearing Date: Contact: Effective Date: Drafter: History of Legislative File Action: Result: Return Date: Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver- sion: 1 PassApproved on the Consent Agenda 01/12/2016City Council A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Councilmember Nancy Yingling, that Agenda Items A-K be approved on the Consent Agenda. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. Action Text: Text of Legislative File 2015-2525 Title Consider approval authorizing a purchase order for two outdoor warning sirens from sole source vendor, Federal Signal Corporation, for the Emergency Management Division of the Fire Department, in the amount of $55,280.00, as budgeted; and authorizing the City Manager to sign all necessary documents. Summary Please see staff memo. Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master Continued (2015-2525) Fiscal Impact: The fiscal impact of this agenda item is $55,280.00 total ($27,640.00 each siren). Funds have been budgeted in Emergency Management account 01-04-10-5040 for the purchase. Staff Recommendation: The Fire Department recommends approval. Goal Icon: Sustainable City Government Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 1 MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and City Council From: Kevin Richardson, Fire Department Date: January 12, 2016 Reference: Purchase of Outdoor Warning Sirens 2030: Sustainable City Government Introduction: Outdoor sirens remain an integral component of any overall emergency warning and public alerting strategy. The City of Coppell currently employs fifteen outdoor warning sirens as a part of the warning capability to alert citizens of threatening weather and other conditions. The current siren coverage fails to meet a level necessary to ensure that it is audible above background noise levels for persons outdoors throughout the city. As a result, budgetary funding has been approved for purchasing two outdoor warning sirens during this budget year. Analysis: Effective and comprehensive emergency notification systems demand multiple methods or communication “layers” for issuing warnings and alerts. Outdoor sirens clearly fulfill a vital role by ensuring the ability to reach people who are not within range of radio and television broadcast alerts, or who either do not have mobile phones or lack access to cellular service. The goal coverage for the outdoor warning sirens is an estimated 80 db. The existing siren coverage is approximately 70 db which does not provide adequate elevation above ambient outdoor background noise. It will require a number of additional sirens to attain an 80 db coverage to the majority of the city, based on computer generated sound propagation maps. Legal Review: Agenda item did not require legal review. 2 Fiscal Impact: The fiscal impact of this agenda item is $55,280.00 total ($27,640.00 each). Funds have been budgeted in Emergency Management account 01-04-10-5040 for the purchase. Recommendation: The Fire Department recommends approval. Quotation No.: ANS 111915161615 Reference quote no. on your order November 19, 2015 Item No.Qty. Federal Model/ Part No.Description Unit Price Total Coppell, Texas Project (2) MOD5020B Sirens (Solar / VHF / Galvanized Poles) 1 2 MOD5020B MODULATOR SIREN, 2000W, OMNI DIR $11,153.00 $22,306.00 2 2 UVTD DIGITAL, 2-WAY, NO RADIO $4,607.00 $9,214.00 3 10 UV400 AMPLIFIER - 400W $589.00 $5,890.00 4 2 AMB-P ANTENNA MOUNTING BRACKET, POLE $117.00 $234.00 5 2 PVS220W-24 SOLAR POWER OPTION, UV $3,268.00 $6,536.00 6 2 TK-PO-GALDBPOL2 ONLY FOR MOD1004-6048, 4-DSA3, 4-DSA4, 4-DSA5, 4-DSA6 $4,450.00 $8,900.00 7 1 ES-FREIGHT SHIPPING FEES $2,200.00 $2,200.00 Note:Quotation does not include Antennas, batteries or installation Total Weight:Total:$55,280.00 Accepted By: Signature: Title: Upon receipt of your order and acceptance by Federal Signal Corporation, the equipment herein will be supplied at the quoted prices below. Delivery schedule cannot be established until radio information is supplied, if applicable. Purchase order MUST be made out to: Federal Signal Corporation, Alerting & Notification Systems, 2645 Federal Signal Drive, University Park, IL 60484 Prices are firm for 90 days from the date of quotation unless shown otherwise. Upon acceptance, prices are firm for 6 months. This quotation is expressly subject to acceptance by Buyer of all Terms stated in the attached Terms document, and any exception to or modification of such Terms shall not be binding on Seller unless expressly accepted in writing by an authorized agent or Officer of Seller. Any order submitted to Seller on the basis set forth above, in whole or in part, shall constitute an acceptance by Buyer of the Terms. Any such order shall be subject to acceptance by Seller in its discretion. If the total price for the items set forth above exceeds $50,000 then this quotation IS ONLY VALID if countersigned below by a Regional Manager of the Safety & Security Systems Group, Federal Signal Corporation. Installation is not included unless specifically quoted as a line item above. Adverse Site Conditions, including rock, caving soil conditions, contaminated soil, poor site access availability, and other circumstances which result in more than 2 hours to install a pole, will result in a $385.00 per hour fee, plus equipment. Trenching is additional. Power Clause, bringing power to the equipment is the responsibility of the purchaser. Permit Clause, any special permits, licenses or fees will be additional. See attached Delivery:6-8 Weeks (poles 10-12 Weeks)Proposed By:Chris Lopez Freight Terms:FOB - University Park, IL (Factory)Company:Federal Signal Corporation Terms:Equipment - Net 30 Days upon Shipment Address:2645 Federal Signal Drive Services - Net 30 Days, as completed City,State, Zip:University Park, IL 60484 Country:USA Work Phone 805-509-5094 Signature: Fax: Approved By: Contact Name:Brad Simpkins Customer:City of Coppell Address:500 Southwestern Blvd City:Coppell State:TX Zip:75019 Country:USA E-mail:bsimpkins@coppelltx.gov Office Phone:(972) 304-3507 Mobile Phone: Page 1 of 1 Federal Signal - 2645 Federal Signal Drive, University Park, IL 60466 - 800-548-7229 - fax: 708-534-4865 City of Coppell December 4, 2015 Brad Simpkins Emergency Management 500 Southwestern Pkwy Coppell, Texas 75019 Dear Mr. Simpkins, Please find below information regarding a sole-source justification for Federal Signal Corporation. Federal Signal Corporation is the sole manufacturer of the MOD5020 Modulator Electronic Siren, the UVTD Ultra voice Controller and the FSCDWARE Control Software. These components work in conjunction to provide the highest quality and capability of producing intense warning signals and excellent voice reproduction over a large area. The Digital Commander Software is a proprietary component, and will only operate with Federal Signal control equipment. Federal Signal Corporation, a public-traded, $1.2 Billion Public Safety Company listed on the New York Stock Exchange (FSS), has an extensive management team with an unequalled diversity of technical and operational background ranging from software developers, emergency managers, medical management specialists and communications infrastructure experts. The size and scope of our organization insures the resources are available to support this important public Safety system upgrade. D H Marketing is the sole authorized sales representative for Federal Signal Outdoor Warning equipment in the State of Texas, and processes all sales orders and quotations for Federal Signal in this state. We appreciate your consideration, and look forward to working with the City of Coppell on your siren system upgrade and expansion project. Sincerely, Scott Hollingsworth Texas Sales Representative Federal Signal Corporation D H Marketing shollingsworth70@gmail.com (800) 966-3357 x 703 (512) 633-8505 - Cellular Master City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard Coppell, Texas 75019-9478 File Number: 2015-2544 File ID: Type: Status: 2015-2544 Agenda Item Passed 1Version: Reference: In Control: Fire 12/29/2015File Created: Final Action: Hazard Mitigation PlanFile Name: Title: Consider approval of a Resolution adopting the Dallas County local hazardous mitigation strategic action plan in compliance with the Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) Hazard Mitigation Action Plan requirements; and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Notes: Agenda Date: 01/12/2016 Agenda Number: K. Sponsors: Enactment Date: Staff Memo.pdf, HazMAP 2015-1728.pdf, Resolution.pdf Attachments: Enactment Number: 2016-0112.3 Hearing Date: Contact: Effective Date: Drafter: History of Legislative File Action: Result: Return Date: Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver- sion: 1 Approved on the Consent Agenda 01/12/2016City Council A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Councilmember Nancy Yingling, that Agenda Items A-K be approved on the Consent Agenda. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. Action Text: Text of Legislative File 2015-2544 Title Consider approval of a Resolution adopting the Dallas County local hazardous mitigation strategic action plan in compliance with the Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) Hazard Mitigation Action Plan requirements; and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Summary Please see staff memo. Fiscal Impact: Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master Continued (2015-2544) There is no fiscal impact of this agenda item. Staff Recommendation: The Fire Department recommends approval. Goal Icon: Sustainable City Government Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 1 MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and City Council From: Kevin Richardson, Fire Department Date: January 12, 2016 Reference: Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 2030: Sustainable City Government Introduction: The City of Coppell currently participates in the Dallas County Local Mitigation Strategy (DaLMS) in an effort to satisfy legislatively mandated Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) requirements. The Dallas County Local Mitigation Strategy details potential hazards that have historically impacted the area and have a potential to impact the area in the future. The document also details past, current, and future projects that have or could be implemented by the City of Coppell and other jurisdictions to mitigate the effects of disasters on the community and its citizens. Analysis: The City of Coppell adopted the Dallas Area Local Mitigation Strategy by resolution # 2009-0127.3 on January 27, 2009. FEMA requires that local governments have a FEMA-approved hazard mitigation plan as a condition for receiving Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) project grants through the HMA grant programs. The HMA grant programs include the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, Pre-Disaster Mitigation program, and the Flood Mitigation Assistance program. FEMA requires that local governments must update their hazard mitigation plans and re-submit them for FEMA approval every five years to maintain eligibility for grant assistance. The City of Coppell has worked with Dallas County to make updates to the DaLMS which were submitted to FEMA for review. FEMA has concluded the review and the plan has been found to be approvable pending adoption by all the participating jurisdictions. The deadline for resolutions to adopt the plan is February 19, 2016. 2 Legal Review: Agenda item did not require legal review. Fiscal Impact: There is no fiscal impact of this agenda item. Recommendation: The Fire Department recommends approval. Recommended by: Clay Lewis Jenkins Originating Department: County Judge COURT ORDER 2015-1728 Adoption of the 2015 Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan On a motion made by Commissioner John Wiley Price, District 3, and seconded by Commissioner Dr. Theresa M. Daniel, District 1, the following order was passed and adopted by the Commissioners Court of Dallas County, State of Texas: BRIEFING DATE: 12/15/2015 FUNDING SOURCE: N/A Be it resolved and ordered that the Dallas County Commissioners Court does hereby approve adoption of the 2015 Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. Done in open court December 15, 2015, by the following vote: IN FAVOR: Honorable Clay Lewis Jenkins, County Judge Commissioner Dr. Theresa M. Daniel, District 1 Commissioner Mike Cantrell, District 2 Commissioner John Wiley Price, District 3 Commissioner Dr. Elba Garcia, District 4 OPPOSED: None ABSTAINED: None ABSENT: None RECOMMENDED BY: County Judge PREPARED BY: Lauren Mish APPROVED BY DEPT HEAD: Clay Lewis Jenkins COMMISSIONERS COURT BRIEFING DATE: 12/15/2015 SUBMITTING DEPARTMENT: Homeland Security THROUGH: County Judge SUBJECT: Adoption of the 2015 Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan BACKGROUND: Both the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) require local communities to adopt a Hazard Mitigation Plan in order to be eligible for pre - disaster and post-disaster federal funding for mitigation purposes. These Hazard Mitigation Plans are to be approved at least every five years for jurisdictions to maintain eligibility for funding. The 2015 Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan (HazMAP) is an extension of the Dallas County Emergency Management Plan and is a record of the county’s potential hazards, risks and strategies to reducing the long-term consequences of natural hazards. The HazMAP outlines mitigation goals, identifies risk reduction strategies for hazards that threaten the County, and discusses the ongoing risk reduction strategies to be undertaken. On January 6, 2009, Dallas County Commissioners Court adopted the 2008 Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan through Court Order 2009 -0045. This plan was developed in partnership with the North Central Texas Council of Governments and 11 other jurisdictions that were participants in the plan. The 2015 Dallas County HazMAP is a multi -jurisdictional plan and is a culmination of almost three years of planning and developme nt. The planning process was led by the Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (HSEM) and involved 22 jurisdictions and agencies, 11 more jurisdictions than were in the 2008 Dallas County HazMAP. The planning process was partly funded throu gh Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) grant - PDMC- PL-06-TX-2012-032, and was administered through an agreement between Dallas County and the North Central Texas Council of Governments. The 2015 Dallas County HazMAP was reviewed by FEMA and was found to be App rovable Pending Adoption (APA). Attached is the APA letter issued by the Texas Division of Emergency Management (TDEM). As the Dallas County HazMAP is quite large (1694 pages) and contains many data-intensive maps, an Executive Summary has been submitted with this brief. A CD copy of the entire plan can be provided upon request. It can also be accessed online via the Dallas County Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Management web page at: http://www.dallascounty.org/department/osem/documents/2015_12_01_Dallas_County_HazMA P_APA_Copy.pdf Once the Court approves the adoption of the 2015 Dallas County HazMAP, the formal adoption renders the County eligible for pre-disaster and post-disaster federal funding for mitigation purposes. OPERATIONAL IMPACT: Hazard mitigation activities are not only a response to an event and a known hazard, but are also an active search for ways to prevent and reduce the impact from newly discovered hazards. The mitigation process is long-term in nature and, therefore, is an on-going element of the emergency management program that directly influences preparedness, response, and recovery requirements. Mitigation activities can be initiated at any time, but are c lassified as either pre-event or post-event actions. These actions are not mutually exclusive and will be merged into a coordinated, continuous mitigation process. 1.) Pre-Event Mitigation: Activities that take place prior to the occurrence of an emergenc y situation. This timeframe provides a more relaxed atmosphere for the development and implementation of long-term, multi-hazard oriented mitigation measures. This time frame is preferred and is the most appropriate for reducing risks and potential damages . 2.) Post-Event Mitigation: Activities that take place after an emergency situation has occurred and already adversely affect Dallas County. These activities are a response and are too late to prevent or reduce impacts already suffered. Heightened hazard awareness and a desire for a speedy recovery provide an emphasis for conducting mitigation activities during this time frame. Mitigation opportunities can be identified and implemented which can be very effective in reducing potential damages from future events. FINANCIAL IMPACT: An approved Dallas County HazMAP may render the County eligible for pre -disaster and post- disaster federal funding for mitigation purposes such as the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, Pre-Disaster Mitigation Grant Program, and the Emergency Management Performance Grant. LEGAL IMPACT: N/A PROJECT SCHEDULE: FEMA has concluded the review of the HazMAP and the plan is found to be approvable pending adoption by the Commissioners Court and the participating city councils. The Court Orders/resolutions are then filed with the Texas Division of Emergency Management and the plan is marked as approved and complete. M/WBE PARTICIPATION: N/A STRATEGIC PLAN COMPLIANCE: Recommendations included in this briefing are consistent with the Dallas County Strategic Plan, “Vision 3: Dallas County is safe, secure, & prepared.” Dallas County is diligently working to coordinate, implement, and expand the capabilities to reduce long-term consequences of the hazards we face. RECOMMENDATION: Approve adoption of the 2015 Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 5805 N LAMAR BLVD  BOX 4087  AUSTIN, TEXAS 78773-0001 512/424-2000 www.dps.texas.gov STEVEN C. McCRAW COMMISSION DIRECTOR A. CYNTHIA LEON, CHAIR DAVID G. BAKER MANNY FLORES ROBERT J. BODISCH, SR. FAITH JOHNSON DEPUTY DIRECTORS STEVEN P. MACH RANDY WATSON EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER COURTESY  SERVICE  PROTECTION November 30, 2015 The Honorable Clay Lewis Jenkins Judge, County of Dallas 411 Elm Street Dallas, Texas 75202 RE: Approvable Pending Adoption of the County of Dallas Hazard Mitigation Plan, PDM-12. Dear Judge Jenkins, Congratulations! FEMA has concluded the review of the Dallas County, Texas, local mitigation action plan, and the plan is found to be approvable pending adoption. In order for this plan to receive final FEMA approval, the jurisdiction(s) must adopt this plan and submit the complete adoption package to the state within 90 days. The plan update timeline will begin on the date of the FEMA approval letter. Please mail us the complete adoption package in the form of a CD containing the following: • The final plan formatted as a single document - Plan must be dated to match the date of the first adoption - Remove track changes, strikethroughs and highlights • All signed resolutions as a separate single document The previous review tool may contain recommendations to be applied to your next update. DO NOT make any further changes to your plan until it has been approved. The following participating governments are included in Attachment A with this letter. If you have any questions concerning this procedure, please do not hesitate to contact me at Mitchell.Osburn@dps.texas.gov or 512-337-0043. We commend you for your commitment to mitigation. Respectfully, Mitchell A. Osburn Mitigation Plans Administrator Texas Division of Emergency Management Texas Homeland Security Texas Department of Public Safety cc: Sara Haak, TDEM District Coordinator Melanie Devine, North Central Texas Council of Governments Enclosures: Attachment A EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER COURTESY  SERVICE  PROTECTION Attachment A Dallas County, Texas Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Participants Below is the list of participating governments included in the November 25, 2015 review of the referenced Hazard Mitigation plan: 1. Dallas County 2. Town of Addison 3. City of Balch Springs 4. City of Carrollton 5. City of Cedar Hill 6. City of Cockrell Hill 7. City of Coppell 8. City of Dallas 9. City of DeSoto 10. City of Duncanville 11. City of Farmers Branch 12. City of Glenn Heights 13. Town of Highland Park 14. City of Irving 15. City of Lancaster 16. City of Richardson 17. City of Rowlett 18. City of Sachse 19. City of Seagoville 20. Town of Sunnyvale 21. City of University Park 22. City of Wilmer MO/rm Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan (HazMAP) November 2015 Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan | Executive Summary i Executive Summary Mitigation is commonly defined as sustained actions taken to reduce or eliminate long -term risk to people and property from hazards and their effects. Hazard mitigation planning is a process in which hazards are identified and profiled, people and facilities at risk are assessed for threat and vulnerability, and mitigation actions are developed. A mitigation plan states the aspirations and specific courses of action that a community intends to follow to reduce vulnerability and exposure to future hazard events. These plans are formulated through a systematic process centered on the participation of citizens, businesses, public officials, and other community stakeholders. This plan is an update of the Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Plan (HazMAP) that was adopted in January 2009. The plan has been developed to comply with the requirements of the Federal Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 and subsequent updat es. The Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Working Group, comprising of representatives of each participating jurisdiction, led the development of the update and contributed significant staff time towards the developments. Update development support was also provided through the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) grant, administered by the Texas Division of Emergency Management (TDEM) and sub-guaranteed by the North Central Council of Governments (NCTCOG). Coordination and final compilation of the update was provided by the Dallas County Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (HSEM). This mitigation plan is a planning document, not a regulatory document. The objectives of the plan update remain the same as those of the previous plan that was adopted in 2009, which is to reduce the negative impacts of future disasters on the communities of Dallas County. These include:  To save lives and reduce injuries.  Minimize damage to buildings and infrastructure (especially critical facilities).  Minimize economic losses Participating jurisdictions in this plan update expanded from 11 to 22 jurisdictions and are as follows: Participating Jurisdictions Dallas County (Unincorporated) City of Glenn Heights Town of Addison Town of Highland Park City of Balch Springs City of Irving City of Carrollton City of Lancaster City of Cedar Hill City of Richardson City of Cockrell Hill City of Rowlett City of Coppell City of Sachse City of Dallas City of Seagoville Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan | Executive Summary ii Participating Jurisdictions City of DeSoto Town of Sunnyvale City of Duncanville City of University Park City of Farmers Branch City of Wilmer Non-Participating Jurisdictions That Adopted a Stand-alone Plan City of Garland City of Hutchins City of Grand Prairie City of Mesquite This plan update shows that communities in Dallas County continue to be subject to a number of natural hazards. The hazards addressed in this plan include severe storms, high winds, hail, lightning, flooding, tornadoes, winter storms, extreme heat, drought, dam or levee failure, wildfire and earthquakes. Other hazards discussed that do not affect Dallas County include expansive soils, coastal erosion, hurricane/tropical storms, and land subsidence. While most of the hazards identified have occurred in Dallas County, flooding, severe storms, drought and tornadoes stand out as the predominant hazard risks. The historical occurrences, location, extent, probability and vulnerability of these hazards have been documented in this update. Also discussed in this update are the local policies and capabilities that participating jurisdictions have and/or would like to implement to mitigate some of the effects of the hazards identified if sufficient resources were available. No significant changes have been made to the hazards identified in the plan. The Mitigation Strategy is the heart of the plan and outlines various action items that, given sufficient funding, could be implemented to address the risks of the hazards identified. Several of the action items identified are on-going or have been deferred from previous actions items that were discussed in the 2009 plan. These action items are designed to mitigate the effects of natural disasters and include programs such as upgrading of infrastructure to expanding public outreach and education programs. In this respect, the strategy of the plan has remained intact as to that of the previously adopted plan. The programs or action items identified in the plan update have been prioritized by the lo cal jurisdictions and represent a local approach to addressing local hazards that is most relevant to the local jurisdictions. The main changes in this plan update from the initial mitigation plan that was adopted in 2009 are in the formatting and structuring of the content. The contents of this plan update are designed and organized to be more reader-friendly and as functional as possible. For instance, the number of sections has changed from four to nine. The Summary of Plan section below provides a breakdown of what is covered in each section. The hazards have remained the same as those discussed in the 2009 plan and so have the mitigation strategies. We have discussed four new hazards, which do not affect Dallas County, so as to match the plan with the State of Texas Mitigation Plan. These hazards include hurricanes, land subsidence, coastal erosion and expansive soils. Most the changes are in the format and structure of the plan. Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan | Summary of Plan iii One notable structural change is that the plan is comprised of two main parts, a base section and a jurisdiction-specific annex section. The base section of the plan discusses the plan for Dallas County. Section 5 in particular discusses the hazard, the extent and impact of the hazards, the historical occurrences of the hazards identified, the probability of future occurrences, and the results of the vulnerability and risk assessment process. The section captures events that have taken place in all participating jurisdictions as applicable. The jurisdiction-specific annexes or sub-plans section provides a focused and strategic approach to discussing specific hazard risks that are unique to each participating jurisdiction. The jurisdictional annexes build off of the base plan that addressed the natural hazards commo n throughout Dallas County. It provides a closer look at the capabilities, critical facilities, land use/development trends and vulnerabilities of a particular jurisdiction. Summary of Plan Sections 1 and 2 of the plan provide the background of the plan and provide a profile for the planning area and introduce the jurisdictions participating in the plan update. They also outline the scope, purpose, and authority of the plan. Section 3 provides a profile of the Dallas County planning area. It discusses geographic elements that include location, size, physical features, population and demographic information, governmental structures, and the basic economic aspects of Dallas County. Section 4 documents the planning process. It addresses Element A of the Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool. It identifies the various stakeholders in the planning process as well as discusses public participation in the plan. It provides an overview of the hazards, time line for the plan, and mitigation strategies, as well as the process of identification and risk assessment methodologies utilized. Section 5 presents information on individual hazards. For each hazard, the plan presents a description of the hazard, the hazard extent, a history of historical hazard events , the probability of future occurrences, and the results of the vulnerability and risk assessment process. Section 6 presents the mitigation goals and objectives. Section 7 provides the previous mitigation action items submitted in the 2009 HazMAP and a current analysis for each action. The section also addresses all of the newly developed mitigation actions for HazMAP update. Section 8 identifies plan maintenance procedures including plan incorporation and implementation. Section 9 provides the jurisdictional annexes that provide specific information of how each jurisdiction conducted its planning process and includes specific risk and vulnerability assessments of the specific or unique hazard not addressed in Section 5 of this plan update. The following is a brief discussion of what has been included in each of the sections of the update plan. Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan | Summary of Plan iv Section 1 and 2: Introduction and Scope Purpose and Authority of Plan In 2009, Dallas County and 10 other participating jurisdictions within Dallas County adopted the Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan (HazMAP) after it was approved by FEMA. The mitigation planning regulation of the Disaster Mitigation Act requires that mitigation plans be reviewed and revised within five (5) years of appro val to maintain eligibility for mitigation grant funding. Dallas County began the planning process to renew the HazMAP in March 2013, and updated each section of the original plan, this time involving 22 of the 26 cities within Dallas County. Plan Scope: The focus of the Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan (HazMAP) update is to mitigate relevant hazards as determined using the Dallas County HazMAP adopted in 2009 (formerly referred to as DaLMS) and the Dallas County Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (HIRA) Matrix. Each participating jurisdiction reviewed the 2009 HazMAP and completed the HIRA to determine the risk levels of the most common hazards that affect Dallas County; hazards that are ranked in percentages using a formula provided in the HIRA tool. Purpose: The plan update is an opportunity for Dallas County and participating jurisdictions to evaluate successful mitigation actions and explore opportunities to avoid future disaster loss. The purpose of the plan is to:  Assess previous mitigation projects and develop unique mitigation strategies to meet future development and risks;  Encourage improvements in floodplain management, participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), and qualifying for FEMA’s Community R ating System, thereby reducing flood insurance premiums for citizens;  Devise solutions to strengthen emergency management by addressing prevalent risk of natural and man‐caused hazards; and  Develop and implement a comprehensive hazard mitigation plan updat e for Dallas County as a whole. Authority: The plan update will comply with all requirements promulgated by the Texas Division of Emergency Management (TDEM) and all applicable provisions of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, Section 104 of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000) (P.L. 106‐390), and the Bunning‐Bereuter‐Blumenauer Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2004 (P.L. 108 –264). It will also comply with FEMA’s February 26, 2002 Interim Final Rule (“the Rule”) at 44 CFR, Part 201, which specifies the criteria for approval of mitigation plans required in Section 322 of the DMA 2000 and standards found in FEMA’s “Local Multi‐Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance” (released July 1, 2008). The updated plan will be developed in accordance with FEMA’s Community Rating System (CRS) Floodplain Management Plan standards and policies. Section 4: Planning Process Dallas County Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (HSEM) took the lead in updating the Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan (HazMAP). The Dallas County HazMAP Working Group was formed and comprised of at least one representative from each participating jurisdiction in Dallas County. The table below lists the participating jurisdictions in the Dallas County HazMAP Update. Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan | Summary of Plan v Participating Jurisdiction Name Title Dallas County (Unincorporated) Michael Gaciri Hazard Mitigation Specialist Town of Addison John O’Neal Fire Chief/EMC City of Balch Springs David Haas Emergency Management Coordinator City of Carrollton Elliot Reep Emergency Management Coordinator City of Cedar Hill John Ballard Fire Chief/EMC City of Cockrell Hill Bret Haney Assistant City Administrator City of Coppell Brad Simpkins Emergency Management Coordinator City of Dallas Nicholas LaGrassa Emergency Management Specialist City of DeSoto Jerry Duffield Fire Chief City of Duncanville Sam Rhode Emergency Management Coordinator City of Farmers Branch Ashleigh Feryan Emergency Management Specialist City of Glenn Heights Jeremy Tennant Public Safety Director Town of Highland Park Rick Pyle Assistant Police Chief City of Irving Jason Carriere Emergency Management Coordinator City of Lancaster Thomas Griffith Fire Chief/EMC City of Richardson Alisha Gimbel Preparedness and Mitigation Coordinator City of Rowlett Ed Balderas Fire Chief/EMC City of Sachse Rick Coleman Fire Chief/EMC City of Seagoville Todd Gilcrease Fire Chief/EMC City of Sunnyvale Richard Adkins Fire Fighter / EMT City of University Park Randy Howell Fire Chief/EMC City of Wilmer Mark Hamilton Fire Chief/EMC The updated plan had several new participating jurisdictions from the original mitigation plan adopted in 2009. As stated earlier, participating jurisdictions increased from 11 to 22. In order to help participating jurisdictions meet the planning update requirements, Dallas County HSEM proposed that each participating jurisdiction form a Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (HMPT) that would coordinate the hazard mitigation update planning process at the jurisdictional level. The HMPT actively participated in developing the plan in the following way:  Reviewed and analyzed each section of the 2009 plan Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan | Summary of Plan vi  Determined changes that were to be documented and the process the team took to make these decisions  Assessed and identified specific hazards within the respective jurisdictions  Identified goals and mitigation action items to the specific hazards identifi ed within each respective jurisdiction  Conducted a capabilities assessment for their jurisdiction  Provided opportunity for public participation within their jurisdiction  Reviewed and provided input to the drafts developed in the HazMAP Each jurisdiction then appointed a representative to the Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Planning Working Group. The purpose of the Working Group was to facilitate a collaborative planning process for all participating jurisdictions. The Working Group performed the following tasks in updating the plan:  Established plan development, goals, and objectives  Established a time line for completion of the plan  Ensured that the plan meets the requirements of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000  Solicited and encouraged the participation of the public in the plan development process  Assisted in the gathering information for inclusion in the plan  Organized and coordinated the public involvement process  Gathered all pertinent information to be included in the plan  Assisted in completing a draft plan for review Kickoff meetings were held on March 11, 2013, April 30, 2013, and May 1, 2013. Other working meetings were held on May 29, 2013, June 7, 2013, and July 24, 2013. The purpose of these meetings was to provide overall guidance to the planning process, review the existing hazard mitigation planning materials, update risk assessment, and discuss mitigation strategies. This plan was developed as a county-wide hazard mitigation plan focusing on collaboration to implement mitigation strategies throughout the county, while maintaining accountability within each participating city to identify and track specific mitigation actions. Public Participation An important requirement of mitigation planning is public participation and stakeholder involvement. Input from individual citizens and the community as a whole provides the planning team with a greater understanding of local concerns and increases the likelihood of successfully implemented mitigation actions. Public involvement in the devel opment of the update was sought at separate periods in the planning process: (1) the beginning of the planning process, (2) the drafting stage and (3) between completion of the final draft and plan approval and adoption. Public input was sought using three methods: (1) open public meetings, (2) survey instruments and (3) making copies of draft Plan deliverables available for public review on the participating jurisdiction websites, public offices and public libraries. In addition to the option to have open public meetings, Dallas County provided an opportunity for citizens and stakeholders to provide input and comment through the use of an online public hazard survey. This online survey was designed to obtain data and information from residents from all of Dallas County and the participating jurisdictions. The public were directed to the online survey through various public outreach methods that Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan | Summary of Plan vii included flyers, Facebook, Twitter, newspaper clippings, and public notices on websites and in public areas such as city hall and public libraries. The survey was available in both English and Spanish and was open from April 2013 through October 2013. A total of 527 responses were submitted, which provided valuable input for the participating jurisdictions to further consider in developing the plan update. A summary of the survey findings is provided in Appendix A. Meeting Summaries Below is a list of meetings that the Dallas County HazMAP Working Group held and a summary of the purpose for each meeting. Date Discussion/Purpose of Meeting March 11, 2013 Web Conference Meeting Introduction of the mitigation planning requirements to participating jurisdictions A detailed overview of the mitigation planning process was provided as well as he expectations of the participating jurisdictions April 30, 2013 Kickoff Meeting - Southern Jurisdictions - Dallas County HazMAP Working Group A detailed overview the planning process and planning requirements was discussed. Planning resources were provided to assist in mitigation planning, these included data sources and reference materials and websites, data collections templates, and the proposed timeline for submitting the data collection templates (deliverable). The proposed timeline schedule also included the activities that were to be covered at each of the meetings May 1, 2013 Kickoff Meeting - Northern Jurisdictions - Dallas County HazMAP Working Group A detailed overview the planning process and planning requirements was discussed. Planning resources were provided to assist in mitigation planning, these included data sources and reference materials and websites, data collections templates, and the proposed timeline for submitting the data collection templates (deliverable). The proposed timeline schedule also included the activities that were to be covered at each of the meetings July 24, 2013 2nd Meeting of the Dallas County HazMAP Working Group Analyzed completed Hazard Identification Risk Assessment (HIRA) Matrix sheets; Reviewed the information provided in the public survey; Conducted a County wide hazard analysis and vulnerability assessment. Developed mitigation goals for Dallas County Provided additional resources to assist the HMPTs to conduct capabilities assessments, develop mitigation action items using the resources from FEMA October 2 2013 Web Conference Meeting Reviewed jurisdictional deliverables including the completed HIRA Matrices, specific hazard analysis and vulnerabilities for each jurisdiction Provided guidance for public input and comment February 3, 2014 Web Conference Meeting Reviewed action items Reviewed public input information on the hazards identified Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan | Summary of Plan viii Date Discussion/Purpose of Meeting Conducted analysis of the public data received Determined and updated action items identified based on the review and analysis conducted Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan | Summary of Plan ix February 2013 November 2013 Feb-13 - Mar-13 Dallas County prepares: · HazMAP Presentation · Meeting Schedules · Meeting Annoucnements · Meeting Descriptions · Meeting Packets · Data Assessment Mar-13 - Apr-13 DC HazMAP Group Kick off Meeting #1 Each Jurisdiction forms HMPT · Assign HMPT Coordinator · Assess Vulnerabilities · Identify Hazards · Complete Meeting Packets Apr-13 - May-13 1st Public Input Solicited Receive public input on hazard analysis May-13 - Jun-13 Dallas County develops Hazard Assessment using information provided from Current Plan, HMPT and other sources Jun-13 - Jul-13 DC HazMAP Group Meeting # 2 · Discuss Initial Deliverables · Hazard Analysis Jul-13 - Aug-13 HMPT Meet to: · Determine Action Items · Determine new action items · Based on analysis Aug-13 - Sep-13 Mid-Point Delivery Due to DC · Action Items Packet · Hazard Impact Assessments Sep-13 - Oct-13 DC HazMAP Group Meeting #3 Dallas County present final draft of Updated Plan for comment Oct-13 - Nov-13 2nd Public Input Allow the public to review updated HazMAP and provide in-put Nov-13 Submit Final Draft To NCTCOG/TDEM Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) Grant - PDMC-PL-06-TX-2012-032 2008 Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan (HazMAP) Update Timeline Writing and Revising Dallas County HazMAP Proposed Project Schedule - Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan (HazMAP) Update Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan | Summary of Plan x Appendix DC A-1: Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (HIRA) Matrix Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (HIRA) Date: ___________________________ Hazard Probability Frequency Severity Risk Factor People Property Environment Potential Damage Total Vulnerability (P/F)*S=RF People + Property + Environment =Potential Damage (PD) RF/PD=V Severe Storms: High Winds Hail Lightning Winter Storms Tornado Flooding Pandemic/Public Health Emergency Extreme Temperatures/Heat Hazardous Materials Incidents Nuclear /Radiological Wildfire Utility Failure Energy/Fuel Shortage Terrorist Attack Urban Fire Earthquake Levee/Dam Failure Drought Aircraft Accident Stream Bank Erosion Chemical/Biological/ Nuclear/Radiological/ Explosive Attack (CBRNE) Civil Disorder Scale LOW 1 MEDIUM/MODERATE 2 HIGH 3 CATASTROPHIC 4 Scale LOW/UNLIKELY EVENT PROBABLE NEXT 10 YEARS 1 AVERAGE/OCCASIONAL EVENT POSSIBLE NEXT 5 YEARS 2 MEDIUM/MODERATE/LIKELY EVENT POSSIBLE NEXT 3 YEARS 3 HIGH/HIGHLY LIKELY EVENT POSSIBLE NEXT YEAR 4 Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan | Summary of Plan xi Instructions of How to Use the HIRA – Taken From Dallas County EMP - 2009 A. Situation Dallas County is exposed to many hazards, all of which have the potential for disrupting the community, causing casualties, and damaging or destroying public or private property. A summary of the major hazards that Dallas County may face is provided in Figure 1. These major hazards are identified as natural, man-made, and technological hazards. Figure 1: Hazard Summary identifies the probability, frequency, severity, risk factor, potential damage, and total vulnerability to people (Citizens of Dallas County), property, and the environment. In Figure 2, identifies the probability, frequency, severity, risk factor, potential damage, and total vulnerability to Dallas County employees, facilities, and business processes that will also be used during Continuity of Operations/Continuity of Government planning. Additional hazard information is provided in our Dallas County Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (HIRA), which is published separately. Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Profiling Hazards This section of the plan will provide an overview of the specific natural, technological, and man-made hazards that can affect Dallas County, including information on historical occurrences and the probability of future occurrences. The following table contains the Hazard and Risk Assessment for Dallas County. To determine the hazards that pose the greatest threat, a Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment was completed to determine impact to people, property, environment, Dallas County employees, Dallas County facilities, and Dallas County Business Processes. In the assessment, numerical values were assigned for the following factors: 1.) Frequency of Occurrence: Event probable next 10 years 1 Event possible next 5 years 2 Event possible next 3 years 3 Event possible next (1) year 4 2.) Probability: Low/Unlikely 1 Less than 1% annual probability Average/Occasional 2 Between 1 and 10% annual probability Medium/Moderate/ Likely 3 Between 10 and 100% annual probability High/Highly Likely 4 100% annual probability Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan | Summary of Plan xii 3.) Severity: Low 1 Very few injuries, if at all none Medium/Moderate 2 Minor Injuries High 3 Multiple deaths/injuries Catastrophic 4 High number of deaths/injuries The risk factor was calculated by dividing the Frequency by the Probability times the severity to determine the risk factor (P/F)*S=RF. 4.) Impact to People, Property, Environment, Dallas County Employees, Dallas County Facilities, and Dallas County Business Processes: Low 1 · Minor illness or injury to employees resulting in one day's absence · Does not violate laws · Little or minimal environmental damage Medium/Moderate 2 · Injury or illness of resulting in one or more work days lost · Mitigable environmental damage where restoration activities can be done High 3 · Results in partial permanent disability, injuries or illness of 3 employees or more · Reversible environmental damage · Violation of law/regulation Catastrophic 4 · Results in partial permanent disability, injuries or illness of 3 employees or more · Reversible environmental damage · Violation of law/regulation 5.) Potential Damage: The potential damage was calculated by adding the numerical value given to people, property, and the environment (Dallas County Employees, Dallas County Facilities, and Dallas County Businesses Processes) will equal the potential damage. (People + Property + Environment=Potential Damage (PD) or Dallas County Employees + Dallas County Facilities + Dallas County Business Processes=Potential Damage (PD) 6.) Total Vulnerability: The total vulnerability is calculated by dividing the potential damage by the risk factor to get the percentage of vulnerability for people, property, and the environment. Risk Factor (RF)/ Potential Damage (PD) = Vulnerability (V). The total vulnerability was ranked from the highest percentage to the lowest percentage. Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan | Summary of Plan xiii 7.) The descriptors in the Priority Risk Index (PRI) is used in this plan with the purpose of categorizing potential hazards for Dallas County and categorize and define each of the levels and values. It is to be used in collaboration with the HIRA Matrix PRI Category Degree of Risk Level Criteria Index Value Unlikely/Low Event Probable next 10 yrs. 1 Probability Possible/Average/Occasional Event possible in next 5 yrs. 2 Likely/Moderate Event possible in next 3 yrs. 3 Highly Likely/High Event possible next year 4 Low Very few injuries, if at all none 1 Life Impact Medium/Moderate Minor Injuries 2 Critical Multiple deaths/injuries 3 Catastrophic High number of deaths/injuries 4 Low Only minor property damage and minimal disruption of life. Temporary shutdown of critical facilities. 1 Property Impact Medium/Moderate More than 10% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one day. 2 Critical More than 25% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one week. 3 Catastrophic More than 50% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for 30 days or more. 4 Negligible Less than 1% of area affected 1 Spatial Extent Small Between 1 and 10% of area affected 2 Moderate Between 10 and 50% of area affected 3 Large Between 50 and 100% of area affected 4 Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan | Summary of Plan 14 Section 5: Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment The identification of the hazards is based on the hazards listed in the Dallas County Local Mitigation Strategy (DaLMS) Plan that was adopted in January 2009. Each jurisdiction through its Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (HMPT) reviewed the risk assessment process conducted in the previous plan as well as the Dallas County Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (HIRA) matrix. These were the primary guides in assisting the Working Team in developing the Dallas County Risk Assessment. Other references used in creating the risk assessment included the FEMA Local Mitigation Planning Handbook (March 2013) and the FEMA State and Local Mitigation Planning How-to-Guide. While several hazards impact Dallas County and its jurisdictions, they were not all evaluated the same way. This is due to the differences in data collected, risk assessment methodologies, and spatial extent of the hazards. Each jurisdi ction was also given a HIRA form as depicted above, which allowed them to reflect unique and varied risks as pertains to it. Participating jurisdictions ranked hazards in terms of the probability or frequency of occurrence and the extent or magnitude of i mpact. The assessments were also used to set priorities for mitigation based on potential dollar losses and loss of lives. The hazard identification criteria include event occurrence, future development patterns and/or proximity to hazard. Only historic events from 04/01/2007 through August 2013 have been included in this updated plan for hazards that are considered to affect the planning area equally. The original plan lists historic hazard events from 01/01/1950 through 03/31/2007. The following is a summary of natural hazards identified. 1. Flooding: The accumulation of water within a water body, which results in the overflow of excess water onto adjacent lands, usually floodplains. The floodplain is the land adjoining the channel of a river, stream, ocean, lake, or other watercourse or water body that is susceptible to flooding. Most floods fall into the following three categories: riverine flooding, coastal flooding, or shallow flooding. 2. Hail: Due to the rapidly changing climate in Texas, large scale hailstorms are especially prevalent. Hailstorm incidents have been reported throughout the North Texas region, including Dallas County, therefore establishing that all parts of the region are equally vulnerable to hailstorms. 3. High Winds: High winds are often responsible for most of the wind damage associated with a thunderstorm. These winds are often confused with Tornadoes because of similar damage and wind speeds. However, the strong and gusty winds associated with straight-line winds blow roughly in a straight line unlike the rotating winds of a tornado. Downbursts or microbursts are examples of damaging straight-line winds. A downburst is a small area of rapidly descending rain and rain-cooled air beneath a thunderstorm that produces a violent, localized downdraft covering 2.5 miles or less. 4. Lightning: Thunderstorm and lightning events are generated by atmospheric imbalance and turbulence due to the combination of the following conditions: unstable warm air rising rapidly into the atmosphere; sufficient moisture to form clouds and rain; and upward lift of air currents caused by colliding cold and warm weather fronts, sea breezes or mountains. Lightning is generated by the buildup of charged ions in a thundercloud, and the discharge of a lightning bolt interacts with the best conducting object or surface on the ground. Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan | Summary of Plan 15 5. Tornado: Dallas County lies within the region that is referred to as Tornado Alley. Tornado Alley is the term used to describe the region of the U.S. where the strongest Tornadoes occur most frequent. A tornado is a violently rotating column of air, in contact with the ground, either pendant from a cumuliform cloud or underneath a cumuliform cloud, and often (but not always) visible as a condensation funnel cloud. 6. Winter Storm: Winter storms in Texas, although not as numerous as in our neighbor states to the north, do occur often enough and with enough severity to be a threat to people and property. The types which Texans are most familiar with are snowstorms, blizzards, cold waves, and ice storms. Generally, the winter storm season in Texas runs from late November to mid-March, although severe winter weather has occurred as early as October and as late as May in some locations. Texas is disrupted more severely by severe winter storms than are regions that experience severe weather more frequently. The Texas Panhandle and North Central Texas around Dallas and Texarkana are most vulnerable to severe winter storms. 7. Drought: Drought is defined as the consequence of a natural reduction in the amount of precipitation expected over an extended period of time, usually a season or more in length. It is often referred to as a condition of climatic dryness that is severe enough to reduce soil moisture and water supplies below the requirements necessary to sustain normal plant, animal, and human life. Given the expanse of the land mass within Texas and the geographic location of two-thirds of the counties of the State are located either in an arid or semi-arid climate, roughly those west of a North-South line formed by Interstate Highway 35, are almost always in varying stages of drought. 8. Extreme Heat: Extreme Heat is defined as a combination of very high temperatures and exceptionally humid conditions. When persisting over a period of time, i t is called a heat wave. All of Texas is vulnerable to extreme heat, but most particular in West Texas. In addition, large metropolitan areas, such as Dallas/Fort Worth and Houston may experience extreme heat since they have an abundance of concrete. This effect is known as urban heat islands and can be dangerous to those without air conditioners. 9. Dam and Levee Failure: A dam failure is defined as a systematic failure of the dam structure resulting in the uncontrolled release of water, often resulting in floods that could exceed the 100-year flood plain boundaries. A dam failure could create mass fatalities, mass structural damage and/or a cascading potential if a populated area is located below the dam structure. 10. Wildfire: An uncontrolled fire burning in an area of vegetative fuels such as grasslands, brush, or woodlands. Heavier fuels with high continuity, steep slopes, high temperatures, low humidity, low rainfall, and high winds all work to increase the risk for people and property located within wildfire hazard areas or along the urban/wildland interface. Wildfires are part of the natural management of forest ecosystems, but most are caused by human factors. 11. Earthquake: Almost all of the earthquakes in Texas have been caused by one of two sources. The major source is relief of tectonic stress along fault lines. These are most common in the Rio Grande rift belt, the Panhandle, the Ouachita Belt, and the Coastal Plain. It has been suggested that the small earthquakes that occur in the region, such as the ones that have occurred in Dallas County, may be attributed to well injections associated with oil and gas field operations and occur in areas near large oil and gas fields. Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan | Summary of Plan 16 These 11 natural hazards have been addressed in the Risk Assessment according t o the following categories: 1. Definition and types: Description of natural hazard and different types, if applicable. 2. Location and extent: Areas with in Dallas County and participating jurisdictions where natural hazards have occurred and may occur in the future, including their severity. 3. Occurrence: Historical record of past natural hazard events were noted in the original plan. These historical events were provided by the National Climatic and Data Center for Dallas County, Texas between 01/01/1950 and 03/31/2007. This plan only includes hazard occurrences between 04/01/2007 and 08/30/2013. 4. Vulnerability: Areas subject to potential disaster from natural hazards. 5. Probability of recurrence: Potential for natural hazard to occur in the future, based on High, Medium, and Low, where High = Probable and likely in the near future (within 5 years); Medium = Possible in the near future (5 to 15 years); Low = Not likely to occur (longer than 15 years). Other hazards identified in the State of Texas Mitigation Pl an that are mentioned in this plan update but not discussed in detail in the risk assessment include: 1. Hurricane/Tropical Storm: Hurricanes and tropical storms are classified as cyclones and are developed by counter-clockwise circulation of winds around a low-pressure center in the Northern Hemisphere. Latent heat from condensation of warm water is the key energy source for these storms. 2. Expansive Soils: Soils and soft rock that tend to swell or shrink due to changes in moisture content are known as expansive soils. Expansive soils are often referred to as swelling clays because clay materials are most susceptible to swelling and shrinking. 3. Coastal Erosion: Coastal erosion is the wearing away of land and the resulting loss of beach, shoreline or dune material along a coastline. 4. Land Subsidence: According to the State of Texas Mitigation Plan, land subsidence is defined as the loss of surface elevation due to the removal of subsurface support. It can range from broad, regional lowering of the land surface, to localized collapses. Land subsidence extent is measured by the number of feet of land loss, or sinks. These natural hazards are not addressed in detail due to their no to minimal level of risk within the NCTCOG region including Dallas County. Section 6: Mitigation Strategies The mitigation strategy development for the plan update involved reviewing mitigation goals included in the 2009 HazMAP, providing analyses for past actions, and developing new mitigation actions. Based on the discussions and recommendations of Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Working Group members, the goals and objectives developed were derived from the 2009 HazMAP that was already in place. This was because most of the goals and objectives were broad enough to accommodate the strategies for mitigating the hazards identified in both the Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (HIRA) and the Capabilities Assessment conducted by each participating jurisdiction. An inclusive process was used to develop and prioritize new mitigation actions for this plan update. These included:  Review of the mitigation goals and objectives from the 2009 HazMAP.  A “menu” of optional mitigation actions was developed based on action items from the 2009 HazMAP, local and state mitigation plans, as well as federal publications such as the FEMA’s Mitigation Ideas: A Resource for Reducing Risk to Natural Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan | Summary of Plan 17 Hazards, January 2013 and the Local Mitigation Planning Handbook, March 2013. The participants reviewed the optional mitigation actions and narrowed the list down to those that were most applicable to their area of responsibility, most cost effective in reducing risk, could be implemented easily, and would be likely to receive institutional and community support.  Potential Federal and State funding sources to assist implementing proposed actions were inventoried.  Planning team members considered benefits that would result from the mitigation actions versus the cost of those projects. Detailed cost‐benefit analyses were beyond the scope of this plan. However, economic evaluation was one factor that helped team members select one mitigation action from competing actions. The following goals and objectives were identified: Goal 1: Reduce or eliminate loss of life and property damage resulting from severe weather events.  Objective 1-A: Update, enhance, and enforce building codes and ordinances to ensure structures are more disaster resistant  Objective 1-B: Maintain existing codes and ordinances that require front end mitigation of hazards  Objective 1-C: Limit development in flood plain areas Goal 2: Identify and implement hazard mitigation projects to reduce the impact of hazard events and disaster.  Objective 2-A: Identify areas where repetitive damages occur during chronic hazard events  Objective 2-B: Buy-out repetitive loss properties  Objective 2-C: Incorporate disaster resistant features in government facilities and infrastructure  Objective 2-D: Expand and coordinate Early Warning Systems currently in use Goal 3: Increase public support and understanding of hazard mitigation and disasters.  Objective 3-A: Provide public education materials to residents and private sector  Objective 3-B: Encourage private sector participation in future mitigation efforts  Objective 3-C: Encourage public participation in future mitigation efforts  Objective 3-D: Heighten public awareness for natural and man-made hazards Goal 4: Reduce losses and repetitive damages for chronic hazard events while promoting insurance coverage for catastrophic hazards.  Objective 4-A: Increase participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and Community Rating System (CRS) Goal 5: Continue to build capacity for hazard mitigation in Dallas County.  Objective 5-A: Continue partnerships within the region to enhance mitigation planning efforts  Objective 5-B: Identify federal and state programs that provide financial assistance to help attract funds for mitigation projects and programs  Objective 5-C: Promote land use for public recreation Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan | Summary of Plan 18 Section 7: Action Items Jurisdictions that participated in the 2009 HazMAP reviewed the previous actions and determined whether the actions had been completed, should be deferred as an ongoing activity, or should be deleted from the plan. Any actions th at are marked as “deferred” or ongoing have been carried over and included in the updated plan. For the jurisdictions that were joining in the updated plan, each was given the opportunity to review the action items identified and were asked to determine which action item they could include as part of their jurisdictional plan. It was recommended that jurisdictions use the STAPLE+E criteria recommended by FEMA for determining the priority of action items identified. The STAPLE+E criteria recommends that jurisdictions look at the Social, Technical, Administrative, Political, Legal, Economic, Environmental factors necessary for implementing an action item. However, each participating jurisdiction was free to use any methodology that was best suited to their needs in determining the priority of action items to include in this plan. New action items were placed in the respective jurisdictions annex section of the update plan. Action items selected were developed along local capabilities and resources. These included:  Local Planning and Regulations  Structure and Infrastructure Projects  Public Education and Awareness Programs  Technical and Administrative  Financial Section 8: Plan Maintenance Dallas County HSEM and each participating jurisdiction through the Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan (HazMAP) Working Group will be responsible for ensuring that this plan is monitored on an ongoing basis. Dallas County HSEM will be available to assist participating jurisdictions in facilitating reviews of the mitigation actions set forth in this plan and discuss progress. Each jurisdiction will be responsible for developing a list of items to be updated in future revisions of this plan. The following are the activities that will be involved in the plan maintenance procedures:  Monitoring and evaluating the plan  Updating the plan  Incorporating the plan into other planning mechanisms  Continued public involvement Section 9: Jurisdictional Annexes In the jurisdictional annexes we have a discussion on each of the 22 participating jurisdictions’ planning and regulatory, administrative and technical, financ ial capacity, and educational and outreach capabilities, to carry out hazard mitigation activities. These capabilities were evaluated and attention was given to state, regional or local plans, regulations and development requirements. These included, but were not limited to, local plans, zoning laws, sub-division and site-specific regulations, building codes, flood insurance programs, natural resources and conservation statutes. This section was previously included in Chapter 2 of the original plan and dev eloped into a standalone section of this updated plan to provide a better content flow. Dallas County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan | Summary of Plan 19 Next in the Approval and Adoption Process Adoption/Court Orders are filed with TDEM and plan is marked as approved and complete Plan is pushed back to jurisdiction for approval by Commissioners Court/City/Town Councils If Plan meets requirements an Approved Pending Adoption (APA) Letter is awarded FEMA reviews and comments as needed; if plan needs revisions pushed back to DC through TDEM TDEM reviews Plan and comments as needed; if no changes needed plan is forwarded to FEMA Revised Coordinating Draft is forwarded to NCTCOG for submission to TDEM The Coordinating Draft is distributed to participating jurisdictions for review Draft is developed by HSEM with the assistance of NCTCOG Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2016-0112.3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS ADOPTING THE DALLAS COUNTY LOCAL MITIGATION STRATEGY FOR THE PURPOSE OF MEETING COMPLIANCE GOALS OF THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION (FEMA) HAZARD MITIGATION ACTION PLAN (HAZMAP) REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN. WHEREAS, the City of Coppell, has previously participated in the Dallas County Local Mitigation Strategy (DaLMS) in an effort to satisfy legislatively mandated Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) requirements. WHEREAS, the Dallas County Local Mitigation Strategy has been prepared in accordance with FEMA requirements at 44 C.F.R. 201.6; and, WHEREAS, the City of Coppell is a local unit of government that has afforded the citizens an opportunity to comment and provide input in the Plan and the actions in the Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Coppell has reviewed the Plan and affirms that the Plan will be updated in accordance to the plan maintenance process described; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City of Coppell hereby adopts the Dallas County Local Mitigation Strategy containing the necessary components to comply with the FEMA HAZMAP requirements, and resolves to execute the actions in the Plan subject to available funding. SECTION 2. That the Mayor is also hereby authorized to sign the resolution that will be presented to FEMA. DULY PASSED and approved by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, on this the 12th day of January, 2016. Page 2 of 2 APPROVED: __________________________________ KAREN SELBO HUNT, MAYOR ATTEST: ___________________________________ APPROVED AS TO FORM: CHRISTEL PETTINOS, CITY SECRETARY __________________________________ ROBERT E. HAGER, CITY ATTORNEY Master City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard Coppell, Texas 75019-9478 File Number: 2015-2528 File ID: Type: Status: 2015-2528 Zoning Ordinance Passed 4Version: Reference: In Control: City Council 12/08/2015File Created: 03/08/2016Final Action: PD-178R3-C/S-1194R6, ORD ZenzeroFile Name: Title: Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. PD-178R3-C/S-1194R6, Zenzero, a zoning change from PD-178R-C/S-1194R5 (Planned Development-178 Revised-Commercial/Special Use Permit 1194 Revision-5) to PD-178R3-C/S-1194R6 (Planned Development -178 Revision 3-Commercial/Special Use Permit 1194-Revision-6), to allow a 905-square-foot addition to the existing restaurant located at 171 North Denton Tap Road, Suite 600 and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Notes: Agenda Date: 03/08/2016 Agenda Number: B. Sponsors: Enactment Date: 03/08/2016 Cover Memo.pdf, Ordinance.pdf, Exhibit A.pdf, Exhibit B.pdf, Exhibit C.pdf Attachments: Enactment Number: 91500-A-688 Hearing Date: Contact: Effective Date: Drafter: History of Legislative File Action: Result: Return Date: Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver- sion: 1 PassApproved12/17/2015Planning & Zoning Commission Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master Continued (2015-2528) Matt Steer, Sr. Planner introduced this case with exhibits. He mentioned 16 notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of this request. There were no responses received in favor or in opposition. There were also 63 courtesy notices mailed to property owners within 800 feet of this request. He stated that staff is recommending approval. Ginger Blazek, the property owner, 171 N. Denton Tap Road, Suite 600, Coppell Texas, was present to represent this case, to address questions and stated agreement with staff's recommendations. Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. No one spoke. Chairman Haas closed the Public Hearing. A motion was made by Commissioner Darling to recommend approval. Seconded by Commissioner Williford; motion carried (7-0). Action Text: Chair Edmund Haas, Vice Chair Glenn Portman, Commissioner Sue Blankenship, Commissioner Ed Darling, Commissioner Doug Robinson, Commissioner Vijay Sarma, and Commissioner George Williford 7Aye: 2 PassApproved01/12/2016City Council Presentation: Marcie Diamond, Assistant Director of Planning, made a presentation to Council and advised that the applicant had requested this case be held open until the February 9th Council Meeting. Mayor Hunt opened the Public Hearing and advised that no one signed up to speak. A motion was made by Councilmember Brianna Hinojosa-Flores, seconded by Councilmember Wes Mays, to hold the Public Hearing open and continue it at the February 9th Council meeting. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. Action Text: Councilmember Cliff Long, Councilmember Brianna Hinojosa-Flores, Councilmember Wes Mays, Councilmember Gary Roden, Councilmember Marvin Franklin, Councilmember Mark Hill, and Mayor Pro Tem Nancy Yingling 7Aye: 3 PassClose the Public Hearing and Approve 02/09/2016City Council Presentation: Marcie Diamond, Assistant Director of Planning, made a presentation to Council. Ginger Blasek, 171 N. Denton Tap Rd., applicant, spoke to Council about her plans for the site. Mayor Hunt reminded the Council that this is a continued Public Hearing and asked for those who signed up to speak: 1) David Stonecipher, 216 Redwood Dr., spoke in support of the request. 2) Candy Sheehan, 321 Quiet Valley, spoke in favor of the request. A motion was made by Councilmember Mark Hill, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gary Roden, to close the Public Hearing and approve this Agenda Item. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. Action Text: Councilmember Cliff Long, Councilmember Brianna Hinojosa-Flores, Councilmember Wes Mays, Councilmember Gary Roden, Councilmember Marvin Franklin, Councilmember Mark Hill, and Mayor Pro Tem Nancy Yingling 7Aye: 4 PassApproved on the Consent Agenda 03/08/2016City Council A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Councilmember Cliff Long, that Agenda Items A-I were approved on the Consent Agenda. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. Action Text: Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master Continued (2015-2528) Councilmember Cliff Long, Councilmember Brianna Hinojosa-Flores, Councilmember Wes Mays, Councilmember Gary Roden, Councilmember Marvin Franklin, and Councilmember Mark Hill 6Aye: Text of Legislative File 2015-2528 Title Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. PD-178R3-C/S-1194R6, Zenzero, a zoning change from PD-178R-C/S-1194R5 (Planned Development-178 Revised-Commercial/Special Use Permit 1194 Revision-5) to PD-178R3-C/S-1194R6 (Planned Development-178 Revision 3-Commercial/Special Use Permit 1194-Revision-6), to allow a 905-square-foot addition to the existing restaurant located at 171 North Denton Tap Road, Suite 600 and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Summary Staff Recommendation: On February 9, 2016, City Council unanimously approved this ZONING CHANGE (7-0). On January 12, 2016, City Council left the public hearing open and continued this request to the February 9, 2016, Council meeting. On December 17, 2015, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of this ZONING CHANGE (7-0). Commissioners Williford, Sarma, Robinson, Haas, Portman, Darling and Blankenship voted in favor; none opposed. The Planning Department recommended APPROVAL. Goal Icon: Business Prosperity Sense of Community Page 3City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 1 MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and City Council From: Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning Date: March 8, 2016 Reference: Consider approval of an ordinance for PD-178R3-C/S-1194R6, to amend the Detail Site Plan to allow a 905-square-foot addition to the existing restaurant located at 171 North Denton Tap Road, Suite 600. 2030: Business Prosperity, Sense of Community Introduction: This is a proposal to amend the current Planned Development zoning to allow for a 900-square-foot addition. The site has a substantial amount of parking in the rear where the expansion is proposed to replace a current patio area and four parking spaces. The proposed addition will be architecturally compatible with the existing retail building. Analysis: On February 9, 2016, the City Council tabled approved this PD/SUP request, there are no outstanding conditions. On January 12, 2016, the City Council tabled this request, with the public hearing left open to the February 9th meeting, at the request of the applicant. On December 17, 2015, the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended approval of this PD/SUP request, there are no outstanding conditions. Legal Review: The City Attorney reviewed this ordinance. Fiscal Impact: None Recommendation: The Planning Department recommends approval Attachments: 1. Ordinance 2. Exhibit A – Legal Description 3. Exhibit B- Site Plan/Elevations 4. Exhibit C - Floor Plan Coppell Pg 1 TM 75671 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. ________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, AS HERETOFORE AMENDED, BY GRANTING A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM. PD-178R-C/S-1194R5 (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT-178 REVISED-COMMERCIAL/SPECIAL USE PERMIT 1194 REVISION-5) TO PD-178R3-C/S-1194R6 (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT- 178 REVISION 3-COMMERCIAL/SPECIAL USE PERMIT 1194-REVISION- 6), TO AMEND THE DETAIL SITE PLAN TO ALLOW A 905-SQUARE- FOOT ADDITION TO THE EXISTING RESTAURANT LOCATED AT 171 NORTH DENTON TAP ROAD, SUITE 600 AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A” ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN; PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN/ELEVATION PLAN, AND FLOOR PLAN, ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBITS “B”, AND “C”, PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL CONDITIONS; AND PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Commission and the governing body of the City of Coppell, Texas, in compliance with the laws of the State of Texas and pursuant to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, have given requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and after holding due hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property owners generally, and to all persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, the said governing body is of the opinion that Zoning Application No. PD-178R3-C/S-1194R6 should be approved, and in the exercise of legislative discretion have concluded that the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map should be amended. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map of the City of Coppell, Texas, duly passed by the governing body of the City of Coppell, Texas, as heretofore amended, be and the same is hereby amended by granting a change in zoning from PD-178R-C/S-1194R5 (Planned Development-178 Revised-Commercial/Special Use Permit 1194 Revision-5) to PD-178R3-C/S- 1194R6 (Planned Development-178 Revision 3-Commercial/Special Use Permit 1194-Revision-6), to amend the Detail Site Plan to allow a 905-square-foot addition to the existing restaurant located at 171 Coppell Pg 2 TM 75671 North Denton Tap Road, Suite 600, for the property described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes. SECTION 2. That the Property will be used and developed for Commercial purposes as provided in the Code of Ordinances and the Detail Site Plan to allow allow a 905-square-foot addition to the existing restaurant and the same is hereby approved subject to the following development regulations: A. That accept as amended herein, the property shall be developed in accordance with Ordinance 91500-A-278, which is incorporated herein as set forth in full and hereby republished. B. A 150 square foot landscape island shall not be required on adjacent to the north wall of the building addition shall not be required. SECTION 3. That the Site Plan/Elevations and Floor Plan attached hereto as Exhibits “B” and “C” respectively and made a part hereof for all purposes, are hereby approved as development regulations. SECTION 4. That the above property shall be used only in the manner and for the purpose provided for by the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, as heretofore amended, and as amended herein. SECTION 5. That the development of the property herein shall be in accordance with building regulations, zoning ordinances, and any applicable ordinances except as may be specifically altered or amended herein. SECTION 6. That all provisions of the Ordinances of the City of Coppell, Texas, in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same are hereby, repealed, and all other provisions not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 7. That should any sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, the same shall not affect the Coppell Pg 3 TM 75671 validity of this ordinance as a whole, or any part or provision thereof other than the part so decided to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, and shall not affect the validity of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as a whole. SECTION 8. An offense committed before the effective date of this ordinance is governed by prior law and the provisions of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, as amended, in effect when the offense was committed and the former law is continued in effect for this purpose. SECTION 9. That any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions or terms of this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, as heretofore amended, and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine not to exceed the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense; and each and every day such violation shall continue shall be deemed to constitute a separate offense. SECTION 10. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage and the publication of its caption, as the law and charter in such cases provide. DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, this the _______ day of ___________________, 2016. APPROVED: _____________________________________ KAREN SELBO HUNT ATTEST: _____________________________________ CHRISTEL PETTINOS, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________________ ROBERT E. HAGER, CITY ATTORNEY (REH) Sheet:Job Number:1585Issue Date:Revisions:12-8-15669 Airport Freeway, Suite 101Hurst, Texas 76053Phone 972-255-1515www.DLArchitecture.netDaniels & LoveladyA r c h i t e c t u r eFax 972-255-4141 A1.0 ZEN15001 12/08/15 ZENZERO KITCHEN AND BAKERY COPPELL, TEXAS 171 N. DENTON TAP ROAD, SUITE 600 COPPELL, TEXAS 75019 GINGER BLAZEK 1FLOOR PLAN 1/8"=1'-0" AREA CALCULATIONS Master City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard Coppell, Texas 75019-9478 File Number: 2015-2529 File ID: Type: Status: 2015-2529 Agenda Item Passed 4Version: Reference: In Control: City Council 12/08/2015File Created: 02/09/2016Final Action: PD-186R8-LI, ORD Duke Freeport Addition, Lot 1R, Blk A File Name: Title: Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. PD-186R8-LI, Duke Freeport Addition, Lot 1R, Block A, a zoning change from PD -186R2-LI (Planned Development-186 Revision 2-Light Industrial) to PD -186R8-LI (Planned Development-186 Revision 8-Light Industrial), to attach a Detail Site Plan for a 108,148-square-foot office/warehouse building on 7.36 acres of property located at the northeast corner of Bethel Road and Freeport Parkway, and to amend the Land Use Map of the Coppell 2030 Comprehensive Master Plan from ‘Old Coppell Historic District’ to ‘Industrial Special District’ and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Notes: Agenda Date: 02/09/2016 Agenda Number: B. Sponsors: Enactment Date: Cover Memo.pdf, Ordinance.pdf, Exhibit A - Legal Descrption.pdf, Exhibit B - Detail Site Plan.pdf, Exhibit C -Tree Preservation Plan .pdf, Exhibit D -Landscape Plan.pdf, Exhibit E - Elevations.pdf, Exhibit F - Site Lighting Plan.pdf Attachments: Enactment Number: 91500-A-687 Hearing Date: Contact: Effective Date: Drafter: History of Legislative File Action: Result: Return Date: Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver- sion: 1 PassApproved12/17/2015Planning & Zoning Commission Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master Continued (2015-2529) Gary Sieb, Director of Planning introduced this case with exhibits, elevations and color board. He mentioned 14 notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of this request. There were no responses received in favor. One returned in opposition. There were also 29 courtesy notices mailed to property owners within 800 feet of this request. He stated that staff is recommending approval subject to conditions which he read into the record. Vanessa McElroy, Development Services Manager/Duke Realty, 14241 N. Dallas Pkwy., Suite 1000, Dallas, Texas, was present to represent this case. She addressed the concerns and questions mentioned in the Work-Session which were: Number of dock doors showing on the plan exceeded the number of doors that were proposed to be used Traffic flow in and out of development, especially onto Bethel Road vs Freeport Parkway Number and types of trucks in the parking bays Placement of trees located near power lines She stated agreement with staff's recommendations. Clayton Strolle, Pacheco Koch, LLC, 7557 Rambler Road, Suite 1400, Dallas, Texas, address the Commission"s concerns with traffic flow in and out of the development, drainage and the amount of trees added to the development. Jim Morgenthaler, General Manager, Tohatsu America Corporation, 2005 Valley View Lane, Suite 200, Farmers Branch, Texas, addressed the Commission's concerns with the number of deliveries a day and the type of trucks. Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. The following person spoke: Cynthia Linder, 601 Loch Lane, Coppell Texas, was undecided and had concerns with water drainage from the development on to her property, concerns about the amount of trees being added, the start date of the development and if the screening wall will be retained or removed. Chairman Haas closed the Public Hearing. A motion was made by Vice Chairman Portman to recommend approval subject to the following conditions: 1. There will be detailed engineering comments at time of detailed submittal. 2. Insure Sheets L2.00 and L2.01 , landscape requirements match (provided Perimeter Landscaping figures do not match). 3. Parking spaces shall be a minimum 18 feet long; indicate on Site Plan number of each bank of future parking spaces. 4. The number of dock doors for this project shall be limited to 14 in the rear, six of which are active. Also, the Planning Commission recommended approval of an amendment to the Land Use Map of the Coppell 2030 Comprehensive Master Plan from ‘Old Coppell Historic District’ to ‘Industrial Special District’ (7-0). Seconded by Commissioner Robinson; motion carried (7-0). Action Text: Chair Edmund Haas, Vice Chair Glenn Portman, Commissioner Sue Blankenship, Commissioner Ed Darling, Commissioner Doug Robinson, Commissioner Vijay Sarma, and Commissioner George Williford 7Aye: 2 PassApproved01/12/2016City Council Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master Continued (2015-2529) Presentation: Marcie Diamond, Assistant Director of Planning, made a presentation to Council. Mayor Hunt opened the Public Hearing and advised that no one signed up to speak. A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gary Roden, to close the Public Hearing and approve this item. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. Action Text: Councilmember Cliff Long, Councilmember Brianna Hinojosa-Flores, Councilmember Wes Mays, Councilmember Gary Roden, Councilmember Marvin Franklin, Councilmember Mark Hill, and Mayor Pro Tem Nancy Yingling 7Aye: 4 PassApproved on the Consent Agenda 02/09/2016City Council A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gary Roden, that Consent Agenda Items A-E be approved. The motion passed by an unanimous vote. Action Text: Text of Legislative File 2015-2529 Title Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. PD-186R8-LI, Duke Freeport Addition, Lot 1R, Block A, a zoning change from PD -186R2-LI (Planned Development -186 Revision 2-Light Industrial) to PD-186R8-LI (Planned Development-186 Revision 8-Light Industrial), to attach a Detail Site Plan for a 108,148-square-foot office/warehouse building on 7.36 acres of property located at the northeast corner of Bethel Road and Freeport Parkway, and to amend the Land Use Map of the Coppell 2030 Comprehensive Master Plan from ‘Old Coppell Historic District’ to ‘Industrial Special District’ and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Summary Staff Recommendation: On January 12, 2016, City Council unanimously approved this ZONING CHANGE and the amendment to the Land Use Map of the Coppell 2030 Comprehensive Master Plan from ‘Old Coppell Historic District’ to ‘Industrial Special District’ (7-0) On December 17, 2015, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of this ZONING CHANGE (7-0). The Planning Commission also unanimously recommended approval of an amendment to the Land Use Map of the Coppell 2030 Comprehensive Master Plan from ‘Old Coppell Historic District’ to ‘Industrial Special District’ (7-0). Commissioners Williford, Sarma, Robinson, Haas, Portman, Darling and Blankenship voted in favor; none opposed. The Planning Department recommended APPROVAL. Goal Icon: Business Prosperity Page 3City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master Continued (2015-2529) Sense of Community Page 4City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 1 MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and City Council From: Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning Date: February 9, 2016 Reference: Consider approval of an Ordinance for PD-186R8-LI, to attach a Detail Site Plan for a 108,148-square-foot office/warehouse building on 7.36 acres of property located at the northeast corner of Bethel Road and Freeport Parkway and an amendment to the Land Use Map of the Coppell 2030 Comprehensive Master Plan from ‘Old Coppell Historic District’ to ‘Industrial Special District’ 2030: Business Prosperity, Sense of Community Introduction: This is a request to build a warehouse/distribution facility for Tohatsu. This company, currently located in Farmers Branch, is a distributor for Japanese-made outboard boat motors. This facility is proposed to be 90% warehouse and 10% office with 25 employees. The Site Plan indicates that 55 parking spaces will be constructed initially, with sufficient land available if additional parking is required in the future. Given residential adjacency, in addition to the existing 6 foot-tall brick screening wall, the applicant is providing a 190’ setback from the building to the residential property line, a 60’ wide landscape buffer with 4” caliper overstory trees. This facility is closed in the evenings and on weekends, and generally receives two shipments per month from Japan. Average number of trucks to and from this facility is 2- 3 per day and will be limited by PD ordinance to deliveries between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. Analysis: On January 12, 2016, the City Council unanimously approved this PD amendment request, subject to the standard condition that there will be detailed engineering comments at time of detailed submittal. On December 17, 2015 the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended approval of this PD Amendment request, subject to the standard condition that there will be detailed engineering comments at time of detailed submittal. Legal Review: This item did not require City Attorney review. Fiscal Impact: None Recommendation: The Planning Department recommends approval 2 Attachments: 1. Ordinance 2. Exhibit A- Legal Description 3. Exhibit B – Detail Site Plan 4. Exhibit C - Tree Preservation Plan 5. Exhibit D - Landscape Plan 6. Exhibit E - Building Elevations 7. Exhibit F – Site Lighting Plan Coppell/Duke Ordinance – PD186R8 Pg 1 TM 75211 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. ________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, AS HERETOFORE AMENDED, BY GRANTING A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM PD-186R2-LI (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT-186 REVISION 2-LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) TO PD-186R8- LI (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT-186 REVISION 8-LIGHT INDUSTRIAL), TO ATTACH A DETAIL SITE PLAN FOR A 108,148-SQUARE-FOOT OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDING ON 7.36 ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BETHEL ROAD AND FREEPORT PARKWAY, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A” ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN; PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE DETAL SITE PLAN, TREE PRESERVATION PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN,BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND SITE LIGHITNG PLAN, ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBITS “B”, “C”, “D”, “E” AND “F” ; PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL CONDITIONS; AND FURTHER APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE MAP OF THE COPPELL 2030 COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN FROM ‘OLD COPPELL HISTORIC DISTRICT’ TO ‘INDUSTRIAL SPECIAL DISTRICT’ ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT “G”, AND PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Commission and the governing body of the City of Coppell, Texas, in compliance with the laws of the State of Texas and pursuant to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, have given requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and after holding due hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property owners generally, and to all persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, the said governing body is of the opinion that Zoning Application No. PD-186R8-LI should be approved, and in the exercise of legislative discretion have concluded that the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map should be amended. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map of the City of Coppell, Texas, duly passed by the governing body of the City of Coppell, Texas, as heretofore amended, be and the same is hereby amended by granting a change in zoning from PD-186R2-LI (Planned Coppell/Duke Ordinance – PD186R8 Pg 2 TM 75211 Development-186 Revision 2-Light Industrial) to PD-186R8-LI (Planned Development-186 Revision 8-Light Industrial), to attach a Detail Site Plan for a 108,148-square-foot office/warehouse building on 7.36 acres of property located at the northeast corner of Bethel Road and Freeport Parkway, for the property described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes. SECTION 2. That the Property will be used and developed for Light Industrial purposes as provided in the Code of Ordinances and to Plan to allow 108,148-square-foot office/warehouse building is hereby approved subject to the following development regulations: A. That accept as amended herein, the property shall be developed in accordance with Ordinance 91500-A-307, which is incorporated herein as set forth in full and hereby republished. B. The building shall be constructed of concrete tilt-wall 4-60 Medium Texture material in SW Aesthetic White finish with SW Worldly Gray and SW Rare Gray accent colors as depicted in Exhibits “B” and “D”. C. The hours of operation shall be between 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, with no operations between close of business at 5:00 p.m. on Friday through Monday at 8:00 a.m. D. The loading and unloading of any supplies, merchandise or materials or any other deliveries shall be limited to no more than four (4) times per day between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday; and, there shall not be any deliveries between 7:00 p.m. Friday through 7:00 a.m. Monday. E. Fourteen (14) dock doors shall be permitted as shown on Exhibit “E”, “Building Elevations”, and located only on the eastern elevations of the building. However only Coppell/Duke Ordinance – PD186R8 Pg 3 TM 75211 six (6) of said doors in the loading area shall be used for loading or unloading; and, all remaining doors shall be used for ventilation of the warehouse area. F. A minimum of fifty-five (55) parking spaces shall be constructed with the initial construction. In the event that fifty-five parking spaces is not sufficient, then up to an additional seventy-four spaces shall be constructed as indicated on Exhibit “B” Detail Site Plan. G. Lighting of the truck court shall be directed toward the pavement surface and shall be in accordance with the Site Lighting Plan attached hereto as Exhibit “F” and shall meet the City Ordinance glare standards. SECTION 3. That the Detail Site Plan (Exhibit “B”), Tree Preservation Plan (Exhibit “C”), Landscape Plan (Exhibit “D”), Building Elevations (Exhibit “E”), and Site Lighting Plan, (Exhibit “F”), all attached hereto and incorporated herein, respectively, and made a part hereof for all purposes, are hereby approved. SECTION 4. That the above property shall be used only in the manner and for the purpose provided for by the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, as heretofore amended, and as amended herein. SECTION 5. That the development of the property herein shall be in accordance with building regulations, zoning ordinances, and any applicable ordinances except as may be specifically altered or amended herein. SECTION 6. That an amendment to the Land Use Map of the Coppell 2030 Comprehensive Master Plan from ‘Old Coppell Historic District’ to ‘Industrial Special District’, as illustrated in Exhibit “G” shall also be approved. Coppell/Duke Ordinance – PD186R8 Pg 4 TM 75211 SECTION 7. That all provisions of the Ordinances of the City of Coppell, Texas, in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same are hereby, repealed, and all other provisions not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 8. That should any sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole, or any part or provision thereof other than the part so decided to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, and shall not affect the validity of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as a whole. SECTION 9. An offense committed before the effective date of this ordinance is governed by prior law and the provisions of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, as amended, in effect when the offense was committed and the former law is continued in effect for this purpose. SECTION 10. That any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions or terms of this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, as heretofore amended, and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine not to exceed the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense; and each and every day such violation shall continue shall be deemed to constitute a separate offense. SECTION 11. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage and the publication of its caption, as the law and charter in such cases provide. DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, this the _______ day of ___________________, 2016. Coppell/Duke Ordinance – PD186R8 Pg 5 TM 75211 APPROVED: _____________________________________ KAREN SELBO HUNT, MAYOR ATTEST: _____________________________________ CHRISTEL PETTINOS, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________________ ROBERT E. HAGER, CITY ATTORNEY (REH/ag/75211/1-25-16) LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT “A” 24' WIDE PAINTED FIRE LANEPER CITY STANDARDS30'-0"5'-6"538'-0"7'-6"19'-0"24'-0"25'-10"24'-0"19'-0"11'-6"199'-0"130'-0"61'-10 1/2" 30'-0"321'-9 1/2"20'-2"30'-0"24'-0"56'-4" 76'-1"27'-0"(8) SP.= 81'-0"9'-0"(14) SP. @ 9'-0" = 126'-0"(14) FUTURE SP. = 125'-0"(14) SP. @ 9'-0" = 135'-0"49'-0"24'-0"31'-0"(14) SP. @ 9'-0" = 126'-0"(9) FUTURE SP. = 81'-0"42'-6"77'-6"487'-0"5'-6"30'-0"CONCRETE PAVINGREF. CIVILPROPOSED REFUSECONTAINER LOCATION(MIN. 5'-0" FROMADJACENT OPENING)12" HIGH CONCRETE CURB &GUTTER-REF. CIVIL6" HIGH CONCRETE CURB &GUTTER-REF. CIVILACCESSIBLE PARKING &CURB RAMPCONCRETE TILT WALLSCREEN PANEL (13'-0"ABV. FIN. PAVING) -PT.R30'-0"R10'-0"R30'-0"R30'-0"R54'-0"R30'-0"R30'-0"R30'-0"R30'-0"R30'-0"R30'-0"R30'-0"R30'-0"R30'-0"SITE DATA SITE AREABUILDING AREA MAIN OFFICE PACKAGING TRAINING/SUPPORT WAREHOUSETOTAL BUILDING AREACOVERAGEFLOOR AREA RATIOEXISTING ZONINGBUILDING HEIGHTBUILDING CODECONSTRUCTION TYPEOCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATIONPROPOSED USEOCCUPANT LOAD PROPOSED OFFICE (8,988 SF/100) PROPOSED WHSE. (98,653 SF/500) TOTAL OCCUPANT LOADEXITING REQUIREMENTS = 287.18 x .15PARKING REQUIRED91/300 SF OFFICE 30 SPACES1/1000 SF WHSE. 99 SPACESTOTAL 129 SPACESACCESSIBLE PARKING 3 SPACES320,713 S.F./7.13 AC.7,212 S.F.650 S.F.1,126 S.F.98,653 S.F.107,641 SF33.56%1:3.3OFFICE COMMERCIAL1 STORY +/- 41'-0" A.F.F.2012 IBCTYPE II BSTORAGE GROUP S-1OFFICE WAREHOUSE89.881197.30287.1843.07"PROVIDED129 (55 PROPOSED)(74 FUTURE)4 SPACES1. ALL DRIVE & APPROACHES SHALL MEET CITY OF COPPELLSTANDARDS.2. REFER TO PROJECT MANUAL FOR CONCRETE PAVING ANDSIDEWALK SPECIFICATIONS.3. PARKING LOT STRIPING SHALL BE 4" WIDE SPRAY APPLIEDWHITE VINYL ACRYLIC PAINT. (ALL SPACES @ 9'-0" WIDE X17'-6", TYP.)4. ALL CURB RADII SHALL BE 3'-0" UNLESS NOTEDOTHERWISE.5. REFER TO CIVIL FOR SITE GRADING INFORMATION.6. ALL CONCRETE STOOPS & ENTRANCES TO REF. 04/A8.02FOR THE SILL DETAIL.7.DOWEL STOOPS AND WALKS INTO GRADE BEAMS ATENTRANCES W/ #4'S AT 12" O.C.8. DIMENSIONS ARE TO GRID LINES, FACE OF CONCRETEPANELS AND FACE OF ROUGH OPENINGS.9.PROVIDE (1) ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL SIGN PERSTALL & (1) VAN ACCESSIBLE SIGN PER SECTION 502PARKING SPACES ON SHEET A1.07.10.REFER TO CIVIL FOR PAVING DETAILS.11.24' FIRE LANE w/6" WIDE RED STRIPE SHALL BEINSTALLED w/4" HIGH WHITE LETTERING PER CITY OF COPPELLSTANDARDS.12. FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE INSTALLED EVERY 600' ASPER IFC 2006, 508.5.1, EXCEPTION 2.GENERAL DATA 14241 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1000Dallas, TX 75254972.361.6700 972.361.6800 (fx)#DescriptionDateISSUANCESDRAWING INFORMATIONScale:Date:Checked By:Drawn By:Duke Realty Job #:A/E Job #:DRAWING / SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERProfessional Seal11-16-15Pre Submittal11-18-15Planning Submittal12-03-15DRC Submittal 12-08-15P&Z Submittal12-30-15City Council Submittal15-951DM11-16-151" = 40'-0"A1.00SITE PLANTOHATSU BUILD TO SUIT P&Z Submittal FREEPORT PARKWAY 972-980-8980DALLAS, TEXAS 7525414643 DALLAS PARKWAY, SUITE 636MEINHARDT & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS P.L.L.C.Client / Consultant 2Client / Consultant 110' TXU GAS/ELECTRICEASEMENT10' TXU GAS/ELECTRICEASEMENT*DUKE REALTY BUILD TO SUIT FOR TOHATSU OUTBOARDS*PART OF LOT 1, BLOCK A, DUKE FREEPORT ADDITION*VOLUME 2001065, PAGE 37, TEXAS DUGAN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP*CITY OF COPPELL, DALLAS COUNTY*7.362 ACRE TRACT, 320,714 S.F.*PREPARED APRIL 03, 2001PD-186R2-LISF-12PD-186R2-LIPD-186R7-LIPD-211R-HBUILDING INSPECTION:1. TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION TYPE: TYPE II-B2. FIRE PROTECTION TYPE: ESFR3. OCCUPANCY TYPE: GROUP S14: OCCUPANCY LOAD: OFFICE-100 SF/PERSON WAREHOUSE-500 SF/PERSON5. EXIT WIDTH: TOTAL OCCUPANTS X 0.15"= MINIMUM EXIT WIDTHREQUIREDFIRE DEPARTMENT1. FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE SPACED AT 300' (MAX.) ALONG FIRELANE EASEMENTS.2. FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED BETWEEN 3' AND 6' FROMFIRE LANE EASEMENT.3. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION (FDC) SHALL BE LOCATEDADJACENT (3') FROM FIRE HYDRANT.4. BUILDING SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A FIRE PUMP (BASED ONHYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS)5. ANY FUTURE GATES CROSSING FIRE LANE EASEMENTS SHALL BEEQUIPPED WITH BI-DIRECTIONAL GTT OPTICOM RECEIVERS ANDKNOX PADLOCK OVERRIDES FOR EMERGENCY ACCESS.6. USE OF ANY TRAFFIC CALMING DEVICES MUST BE APPROVED BYTHE FIRE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.F.H.F.H.F.H.F.H.F.H.FDCR20'-0"PROJECT LOCATIONDALLAS COUNTYMAPSCO 11 D*HOURS OF OPERATION WILL GENERALLY BE 8:00 AM TO5:00 PM* NO TRUCK TRAFFIC WILL OCCUR BETWEEN 7:00 PM &7:00 AM* SEALED DOCK DOORS AND VESTIBULES AREAREQUIRED AT BUILDING ENTRIESFINAL LOCATION OF (14) OVERHEAD DOOR & (6) ACTIVEDOOR POSITIONS TO BE DETERMINED & SUBMITTED FORBUILDING PERMIT REVIEW24" ARTICULATION24" ARTICUATION24" ARTICULATION24" ARTICULATION52'-0"37'-9" 23'-6"(13) FUTURE SP =117'-0"(6) FUTURE SP.(13) FUTURE SP. = 117'-0"60'-0"30'-0"40'-0"21'-1 1/2"(9) FUTURE SP.(3) FUTURE SP.15'-9"24" ARTICULATIONACCENTSTEEL STAIRREF.TRANSFORMERLOCATION(5) SP.=45'-0 1/16"7'-6 3/4"(7) FUTURE SP.18'-0"TYP. 18'-0" TYP. 18'-0"TYP. 18'-0" TYP. G:\MISC\15951-TOHATSU-Duke\CD's\951-A100 Series.dwg, 12/29/2015 9:00:27 AM, 1:1 XXXXXXX XXX XXEXISTING TREE TO REMAIN, TYP. EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED, TYP. TREE PROTECTION FENCING TO REMAIN DURING CONSTRUCTION, TYP. EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED, TYP. 14241 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1000 Dallas, TX 75254 972.361.6700 972.361.6800 (fx) #Description Date ISSUANCES DRAWING INFORMATION Scale: Date: Checked By: Drawn By: Duke Realty Job #: A/E Job #: DRAWING / SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBERSTA TE O F T E XASTCETHI R CA EPACSDNALDEE GEISRRT422 6KORINH A UGA N 12.30.15 TOHATSU BUILD TO SUIT Client / Consultant 1 FREEPORT PARKWAYCOPPELL, TEXAS15142 11.18.2015 0 20 40 80 SCALE: 1" = 40'-0" N 1" = 40'-0" KAH KAH TREE PRESERVATION PLANTREE PRESERVATION PLAN L1.01 PROJECT LOCATION DALLAS COUNTY MAPSCO 11 D VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE TREE PRESERVATION NOTES 1.EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION FROM TREE STRUCTURE DAMAGE AND COMPACTION OF SOIL UNDER AND AROUND DRIP LINE (CANOPY) OF TREE. 2.IF ANY ROOT STRUCTURE IS DAMAGED DURING ADJACENT EXCAVATION / CONSTRUCTION, NOTIFY OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT A LICENSED ARBORIST BE SECURED FOR THE TREATMENT OF ANY POSSIBLE TREE WOUNDS. 3.NO DISTURBANCE OF THE SOIL GREATER THAN 4" SHALL BE LOCATED CLOSER TO THE TREE TRUNK THAN 1/2 THE DISTANCE OF THE DRIP LINE TO THE TREE TRUNK. A MINIMUM OF 75% OF THE DRIP LINE AND ROOT ZONE SHALL BE PRESERVED AT NATURAL GRADE. 4.ANY FINE GRADING DONE WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONES OF THE PROTECTED TREES MUST BE DONE WITH LIGHT MACHINERY SUCH AS A BOBCAT OR LIGHT TRACTOR. NO EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT WITH TRACKS IS ALLOWED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE OF THE TREES. 5.NO MATERIALS INTENDED FOR USE IN CONSTRUCTION OR WASTE MATERIALS ACCUMULATED DUE TO EXCAVATION OR DEMOLITION SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE DRIP LINE OF ANY TREE. 6.NO EQUIPMENT MAY BE CLEANED OR TOXIC SOLUTIONS, OR OTHER LIQUID CHEMICALS, SHALL BE DEPOSITED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE DRIP LINE OF A TREE, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: PAINT, OIL, SOLVENTS, ASPHALT, CONCRETE, MORTAR, PRIMERS, ETC. 7.NO SIGNS, WIRES OR OTHER ATTACHMENTS, OTHER THAN THOSE OF A PROTECTIVE NATURE, SHALL BE ATTACHED TO ANY TREE. 8.NO VEHICULAR / CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT TRAFFIC OR PARKING IS ALLOWED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE DRIP LINE OF TREES. 9.BORING OF UTILITIES MAY BE PERMITTED UNDER PROTECTED TREES IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES. THE MINIMUM LENGTH OF THE BORE SHALL BE THE WIDTH OF THE TREE'S CANOPY AND SHALL BE A MINIMUM DEPTH OF FORTY-EIGHT (48") INCHES. 10.IRRIGATION TRENCHING WHICH MUST BE DONE WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE OF A TREE SHALL BE DUG BY HAND AND ENTER THE AREA IN A RADIAL MANNER. 11.ALL TREES TO BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE SHALL BE FLAGGED BY THE CONTRACTOR WITH BRIGHT RED VINYL TAPE (3" WIDTH) WRAPPED AROUND THE MAIN TRUNK AT A HEIGHT OF FOUR (4') FEET ABOVE GRADE. FLAGGING SHALL BE APPROVED BY OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO ANY TREE REMOVAL. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE WITH 72 HOURS NOTICE TO SCHEDULE ON-SITE MEETING. 12.ALL TREES TO REMAIN, AS NOTED ON DRAWINGS, SHALL HAVE PROTECTIVE FENCING LOCATED AT THE TREE'S DRIP LINE. THE PROTECTIVE FENCING MAY BE COMPRISED OF SNOW FENCING, ORANGE VINYL CONSTRUCTION FENCING, CHAIN LINK FENCE OR OTHER SIMILAR FENCING WITH A FOUR (4') FOOT APPROXIMATE HEIGHT. THE PROTECTIVE FENCING SHALL BE LOCATED AS INDICATED ON THE TREE PROTECTION DETAIL. 13.WHEN A LOW HANGING LIMB IS BROKEN DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE SHALL THE CONTRACTOR PRUNE ANY PORTION OF THE DAMAGED TREE WITHOUT THE PRIOR APPROVAL BY THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. X EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED TREE PROTECTION FENCING TO REMAIN DURING CONSTRUCTION REFER TO 01/L1.01 EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN EXISTING TREE LEGEND 4'-0" MIN.3'-0"LIMITS OF DRIPLINE 01 TREE PROTECTIVE FENCING NOT TO SCALE REFER TO PLAN FOR EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN EXISTING GRADE TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED METAL T-POST AT EACH OF FOUR CORNERS SNOW FENCE, ORANGE VINYL CONSTRUCTION FENCE, OR CHAINLINK FENCE TREE MITIGATION TABULATIONS CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS GROSS RETRIBUTION 272 cal. in. minus (-) PRESERVATION CREDIT: Trees Preserved on Site 135 cal. in. divided by (÷) Total Trees on Site 407 cal. in. equals (=) Preservation Percentage 33% times (x) Gross Retribution 272 cal. in. equals (=) PRESERVATION CREDIT -89 cal. in. minus (-) LANDSCAPE CREDIT -155 cal. in. equals (=) 62 trees, 4" cal. 62*2.5= 155 8 mitigation trees, 4" cal. in.- 32 NET RETRIBUTION 0 times (x) $100.00 x $100.00 equals (=) CONTRIBUTION TO CITY $0.00 COPPELL REFORESTATION AND NATURAL AREAS FUND (6) MITIGATION TREES (2) MITIGATION TREES EXISTING PLANTING TO REMAIN, TYP. EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN, TYP. 14241 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1000 Dallas, TX 75254 972.361.6700 972.361.6800 (fx) #Description Date ISSUANCES DRAWING INFORMATION Scale: Date: Checked By: Drawn By: Duke Realty Job #: A/E Job #: DRAWING / SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBERSTA TE O F T E XASTCETHI R CA EPACSDNALDEE GEISRRT422 6KORINH A UGA N 12.30.15 TOHATSU BUILD TO SUIT Client / Consultant 1 FREEPORT PARKWAYCOPPELL, TEXAS15142 11.18.2015 LANDSCAPE NOTES 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE ELEMENTS AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. SURVEY DATA OF EXISTING CONDITIONS WAS SUPPLIED BY OTHERS. 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY CONFLICTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE CAUTION WHEN WORKING IN THE VICINITY OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM 2% SLOPE AWAY FROM ALL STRUCTURES. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL FINE GRADE AREAS TO ACHIEVE FINAL CONTOURS AS INDICATED. LEAVE AREAS TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL 3" BELOW FINAL FINISHED GRADE IN PLANTING AREAS AND 1" BELOW FINAL FINISHED GRADE IN LAWN AREAS. 5.ALL PLANTING BEDS AND LAWN AREAS SHALL BE SEPARATED BY STEEL EDGING. NO STEEL EDGING SHALL BE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO BUILDINGS, WALKS, OR CURBS. CUT STEEL EDGING AT 45 DEGREE ANGLE WHERE IT INTERSECTS WALKS AND CURBS. 6.TOP OF MULCH SHALL BE 1/2" MINIMUM BELOW THE TOP OF WALKS AND CURBS. 7.ALL LAWN AREAS SHALL BE SOLID SOD BERMUDAGRASS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. 8.ALL REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH AN AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM WITH RAIN AND FREEZE SENSORS AND EVAPOTRANSPIRATION (ET) WEATHER-BASED CONTROLLERS AND SAID IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED BY A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL AND INSTALLED BY A LICENSED IRRIGATOR. 9.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE BID PROPOSAL LISTING UNIT PRICES FOR ALL MATERIAL PROVIDED. 10.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PERMITS. MAINTENANCE NOTES 1.THE OWNER, TENANT AND THEIR AGENT, IF ANY, SHALL BE JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF ALL LANDSCAPE. 2.ALL LANDSCAPE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A NEAT AND ORDERLY MANNER AT ALL TIMES. THIS SHALL INCLUDE MOWING, EDGING, PRUNING, FERTILIZING, WATERING, WEEDING AND OTHER SUCH ACTIVITIES COMMON TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE. 3.ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF TRASH, LITTER, WEEDS AND OTHER SUCH MATERIAL OR PLANTS NOT PART OF THIS PLAN. 4.ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A HEALTHY AND GROWING CONDITION AS IS APPROPRIATE FOR THE SEASON OF THE YEAR. 5.ALL PLANT MATERIAL WHICH DIES SHALL BE REPLACED WITH PLANT MATERIAL OF EQUAL OR BETTER VALUE. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SEPARATE BID PROPOSAL FOR ONE YEAR'S MAINTENANCE TO BEGIN AFTER FINAL ACCEPTANCE. GENERAL LAWN NOTES 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE OPERATIONS AND AVAILABILITY OF EXISTING TOPSOIL WITH ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL LEAVE LAWN AREAS 1" BELOW FINAL FINISHED GRADE PRIOR TO TOPSOIL INSTALLATION. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL FINE GRADE AREAS TO ACHIEVE FINAL CONTOURS AS INDICATED ON CIVIL PLANS. ADJUST CONTOURS TO ACHIEVE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM BUILDINGS. PROVIDE UNIFORM ROUNDING AT TOP AND BOTTOM OF SLOPES AND OTHER BREAKS IN GRADE. CORRECT IRREGULARITIES AND AREAS WHERE WATER MAY STAND. 4.ALL LAWN AREAS SHALL BE FINE GRADED, IRRIGATION TRENCHES COMPLETELY SETTLED AND FINISH GRADE APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO LAWN INSTALLATION. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL ROCKS 3/4" DIAMETER AND LARGER, DIRT CLODS, STICKS, CONCRETE SPOILS, ETC. PRIOR TO PLACING TOPSOIL AND LAWN INSTALLATION. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL LAWN AREAS UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE. THIS SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO: MOWING, WATERING, WEEDING, CULTIVATING, CLEANING AND REPLACING DEAD OR BARE AREAS TO KEEP PLANTS IN A VIGOROUS, HEALTHY CONDITION. 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE ESTABLISHMENT OF ACCEPTABLE TURF AREA AND SHALL PROVIDE REPLACEMENT FROM LOCAL SUPPLY IF NECESSARY. SOLID SOD NOTES 1.PLANT SOD BY HAND TO COVER INDICATED AREAS COMPLETELY. ENSURE EDGES OF SOD ARE TOUCHING. TOP DRESS JOINTS BY HAND WITH TOPSOIL TO FILL VOIDS. 2.ROLL GRASS AREAS TO ACHIEVE A SMOOTH, EVEN SURFACE, FREE FROM UNNATURAL UNDULATIONS. 3.WATER SOD THOROUGHLY AS SOD OPERATION PROGRESSES. 4.IF INSTALLATION OCCURS BETWEEN SEPTEMBER 1 AND MARCH 1, OVER-SEED BERMUDAGRASS SOD WITH WINTER RYEGRASS, AT A RATE OF FOUR (4) POUNDS PER ONE THOUSAND (1000) SQUARE FEET. HYDROMULCH NOTES 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL SCARIFY, RIP AND LOOSEN ALL AREAS TO BE HYDROMULCHED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 4" PRIOR TO TOPSOIL AND HYDROMULCH INSTALLATION. 2.BERMUDAGRASS SEED SHALL BE EXTRA HULLED AND TREATED LAWN TYPE, SHALL BE DELIVERED TO THE SITE IN ITS ORIGINAL UNOPENED CONTAINER AND SHALL MEET STATE LAW REQUIREMENTS. 3.FIBER SHALL BE ONE HUNDRED PERCENT (100%) WOOD CELLULOSE FIBER, DELIVERED TO THE SITE IN ITS ORIGINAL UNOPENED CONTAINER AS MANUFACTURED BY 'CONWEB' OR EQUAL. 4.FIBER TACK SHALL BE DELIVERED TO THE SITE IN ITS ORIGINAL UNOPENED CONTAINER AND SHALL BE 'TERRO-TACK ONE', AS MANUFACTURED BY GROWERS, INC. OR EQUAL. 5.HYDROMULCH WITH BERMUDAGRASS SEED AT A RATE OF TWO (2) POUNDS PER ONE THOUSAND (1000) SQUARE FEET. 6.USE A 4'X8' BATTER BOARD AGAINST ALL BED AREAS. 7.IF INSTALLATION OCCURS BETWEEN SEPTEMBER 1 AND MAY 1, ALL HYDROMULCH AREAS TO BE WINTER RYEGRASS, AT A RATE OF FOUR (4) POUNDS PER ONE THOUSAND (1000) SQUARE FEET. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO RE-HYDROMULCH WITH BERMUDAGRASS THE FOLLOWING GROWING SEASON AS PART OF THIS CONTRACT. 8.ALL LAWN AREAS TO BE HYDROMULCHED SHALL HAVE ONE HUNDRED PERCENT (100%) COVERAGE PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE. 0 20 40 80 SCALE: 1" = 40'-0" N 1" = 40'-0" KAH KAH LANDSCAPE PLANLANDSCAPE PLAN L2.01 PROJECT LOCATION DALLAS COUNTY MAPSCO 11 D VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE LANDSCAPE TABULATIONS CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS PERIMETER LANDSCAPE 1.Street Frontage: 15' landscape buffer with one (1) tree, 3" cal., per 50 l.f. 2.Perimeter Landscape: 10' landscape buffer along property lines with one (1) tree, 3" cal., per 50 l.f. 3.30" ht. parking lot screen: hedge or berm. BETHEL ROAD: 428 l.f. Required Provided 15' landscape buffer 15' landscape buffer (9) trees, 3" cal.(9) trees, 4" cal.* 30" ht. screen 30" ht. evergreen hedge 5,609 s.f 5,609 s.f FREEPORT PARKWAY: 675 l.f. Required Provided 15' landscape buffer 15' landscape buffer (14) trees, 3" cal.(14) trees, 4" cal.* 30" ht. parking screen 30" ht. evergreen hedge 8,801 s.f 8,801 s.f. NORTH PROPERTY LINE: 531 l.f. Required Provided 10' landscape buffer 10' landscape buffer (11) trees, 3" cal.(11) trees, 4" cal.* 5,132 s.f.5,132 s.f. EAST PROPERTY LINE: 754 l.f. Required Provided 10' landscape buffer 10' landscape buffer (14) trees, 3" cal.(2) existing trees, 3"+ cal. (12) trees, 4" cal.* 6,850 s.f.6,850 s.f. INTERIOR LANDSCAPE 1.10% of gross parking area to be landscape. 2.One (1) tree per 400 s.f. of required landscape area. 3.12% of total number parking spaces shall be planting islands with trees. Parking Lot: 35,00 s.f. Parking Spaces: 57 Required Provided 3,500 (10%)5,157 s.f. (15%) (9) trees (9) trees (7) parking islands (7) parking islands NON-VEHICULAR LANDSCAPING 1.Requirements: 15% of lot not covered by buildings to be landscape open space. 50% of open space shall be in the front yard. One (1) tree per 2500 s.f. of open space. Total Lot Area (Exclusive of building): 212,637 s.f. Required Provided 31,896 s.f. (15%)53,131 (24%) 15,948 s.f. (50%)19,257 s.f. (60%) (13) trees (6) existing trees, 3"+ cal. (7) trees, 4" cal.* SUMMARY Required Provided (70) trees (8) existing trees, 3"+ cal. (62) trees, 4" cal.* *additional 1" to be counted towards mitigation plus: (8) additional mitigation trees, 4" cal. 14241 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1000 Dallas, TX 75254 972.361.6700 972.361.6800 (fx) #Description Date ISSUANCES DRAWING INFORMATION Scale: Date: Checked By: Drawn By: Duke Realty Job #: A/E Job #: DRAWING / SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBERSTA TE O F T E XASTCETHI R CA EPACSDNALDEE GEISRRT422 6KORINH A UGA N 12.30.15 TOHATSU BUILD TO SUIT Client / Consultant 1 FREEPORT PARKWAYCOPPELL, TEXAS15142 11.18.2015 PREPARED SOIL MIX PER SPECIFICATIONS; TILL 6" MINIMUM OF PREPARED SOIL MIX INTO 6" DEPTH OF EXISTING SOIL 3/16" X 4" BLACK EDGING, STAKES ON INSIDE; EDGING SHALL BE 1/2" MAXIMUM HEIGHT ABOVE FINISH GRADE TOP OF MULCH 1/2" MINIMUM BELOW TOP OF CONCRETE WALK / CURB CONCRETE WALK LAWN / FINISH GRADE NOTE: NO STEEL EDGING SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG SIDEWALKS OR CURBS ROOTBALL, DO NOT DISTURB NATIVE SOIL POCKET PLANTING NOT ALLOWED SHRUBS / GROUNDCOVER; REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN TOPDRESS MULCH PER SPECIFICATIONS; 2" MINIMUM SETTLED THICKNESS SCARIFY SIDES REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR SPACING6" A. E. C.B. I. H. F. G. D. TREE PLANTING DETAIL LEGEND AND NOTES A.TREE: TREES SHALL CONFORM WITH LATEST AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK. www.anla.org B.TREE PIT: WIDTH TO BE AT LEAST TWO (2) TIMES THE DIAMETER OF THE ROOT BALL CENTER TREE IN HOLE & REST ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL. C.ROOT BALL: REMOVE TOP 13 BURLAP AND ANY OTHER FOREIGN OBJECT; CONTAINER GROWN STOCK TO BE INSPECTED FOR GIRDLING ROOTS. D.ROOT FLARE: ENSURE THAT ROOT FLARE IS EXPOSED, FREE FROM MULCH, AND AT LEAST TWO INCHES ABOVE GRADE. TREES SHALL BE REJECTED WHEN GIRDLING ROOTS ARE PRESENT & ROOT FLARE IS NOT APPARENT. E.ROOTBALL ANCHOR RING: REFER TO MANUFACTURER'S GUIDELINES FOR SIZING. PLACE ROOTBALL ANCHOR RING ON BASE OF ROOTBALL, TRUNK SHOULD BE IN THE CENTER OF THE RING. F.'U' BRACKET. G.NAIL STAKE: REFER TO MANUFACTURER'S GUIDELINES FOR SIZING. INSTALL NAIL STAKES WITH HAMMER OR MALLET FIRMLY INTO UNDISTURBED GROUND. DRIVE NAIL STAKES FLUSH WITH "U" BRACKET ADJACENT TO ROOTBALL (DO NOT DISTURB ROOTBALL). H.BACKFILL: USE EXISTING NATIVE SOIL (no amendments) WATER THOROUGHLY TO ELIMINATE AIR POCKETS. I.MULCH: DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH 2 INCH SETTLED THICKNESS, WITH 2" HT. WATERING RING; ENSURE THAT ROOT FLARE IS EXPOSED. BELOW GROUND STAKE SHOULD NOT BE VISIBLE. J.TREE STAKES: TREE STAKE SOLUTIONS 'SAFETY STAKE' BELOW GROUND MODEL AVAILABLE FROM: Tree Stake Solutions ATTN: Jeff Tuley (903) 676-6143 jeff@treestakesolutions.com www.treestakesolutions.com K.IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN A COPY OF THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF TREE STAKES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ADHERE TO MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION GUIDELINES, SPECIFICATIONS, AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS FOR TREE STAKE INSTALLATION. 01 TREE PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 02 SHRUB / GROUNDCOVER DETAIL NOT TO SCALE SECTION 32 9300 - LANDSCAPE PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 REFERENCED DOCUMENTS A.Refer to Landscape Plans, notes, details, bidding requirements, special provisions, and schedules for additional requirements. 1.2 DESCRIPTION OF WORK A.Work included: Furnish all supervision, labor, materials, services, equipment and appliances required to complete the work covered in conjunction with the landscaping covered in these specifications and landscaping plans, including: 1. Planting (trees, shrubs and grasses) 2. Bed preparation and fertilization 3. Notification of sources 4. Water and maintenance until final acceptance 5. Guarantee 1.3 REFERENCE STANDARDS A.American Standard for Nursery Stock published by American Association of Nurserymen: 27 October 1980, Edition; by American National Standards Institute, Inc. (Z60.1) – plant material B.American Joint Committee on Horticultural Nomenclature: 1942 Edition of Standardized Plant Names. C.Texas Association of Nurserymen, Grades and Standards D.Hortis Third, 1976 - Cornell University 1.4 NOTIFICATION OF SOURCES AND SUBMITTALS A.Samples: Provide representative quantities of sandy loam soil, mulch, bed mix material, gravel and crushed stone. Samples shall be approved by Owner's Authorized Representative before use on the project. 1.5 JOB CONDITIONS A.General Contractor to complete the following punch list: Prior to Landscape Contractor initiating any portion of landscape installation, General Contractor shall leave planting bed areas three (3") inches below final finish grade of sidewalks, drives and curbs as shown on the drawings. All lawn areas to receive solid sod shall be left one (1") inch below the final finish grade of sidewalks, drives and curbs. All construction debris shall be removed prior to Landscape Contractor beginning any work. B.Storage of materials and equipment at the job site will be at the risk of the Landscape Contractor. The Owner cannot be held responsible for theft or damage. 1.6 MAINTENANCE AND GUARANTEE A.Maintenance: 1.The Landscape Contractor shall be held responsible for the maintenance of all work from the time of planting until final acceptance by the Owner. No trees, shrubs, groundcover or grass will be accepted unless they show healthy growth and satisfactory foliage conditions. 2.Maintenance shall include watering of trees and plants, cultivation, weeding spraying, edging, pruning of trees, mowing of grass, cleaning up and all other work necessary of maintenance. 3.A written notice requesting final inspection and acceptance should be submitted to the Owner at least seven (7) days prior to completion. An on-site inspection by the Owner's Authorized Representative will be completed prior to written acceptance. B.Guarantee: 1.Trees, shrubs and groundcover shall be guaranteed for a twelve (12) month period after final acceptance. The Contractor shall replace all dead materials as soon as weather permits and upon notification of the Owner. Plants, including trees, which have partially died so that shape, size, or symmetry have been damaged, shall be considered subject to replacement. In such cases, the opinion of the Owner shall be final. a.Plants used for replacement shall be of the same size and kind as those originally planted and shall be planted as originally specified. All work, including materials, labor and equipment used in replacements, shall carry a twelve (12) month guarantee. Any damage, including ruts in lawn or bed areas, incurred as a result of making replacements shall be immediately repaired. b.At the direction of the Owner, plants may be replaced at the start of the next year's planting season. In such cases, dead plants shall be removed from the premises immediately. c.When plant replacements are made, plants, soil mix, fertilizer and mulch are to be utilized as originally specified and re-inspected for full compliance with the contract requirements. All replacements are to be included under "Work" of this section. 2.The Owner agrees that for the guarantee to be effective, he will water plants at least twice a week during dry periods and cultivate beds once a month after final acceptance. 3.The above guarantee shall not apply where plants die after acceptance because of injury from storms, hail, freeze, insects, diseases, injury by humans, machines or theft. 4.Acceptance for all landscape work shall be given after final inspection by the Owner provided the job is in a complete, undamaged condition and there is a stand of grass in all lawn areas. At that time, the Owner will assume maintenance on the accepted work. C.Repairs: Any necessary repairs under the Guarantee must be made within ten (10) days after receiving notice, weather permitting. In the event the Landscape Contractor does not make repairs accordingly, the Owner, without further notice to Contractor, may provide materials and men to make such repairs at the expense to the Landscape Contractor. 1.7 QUALITY ASSURANCE A.General: Comply with applicable federal, state, county and local regulations governing landscape materials and work. B.Personnel: Employ only experienced personnel who are familiar with the required work. Provide full time supervision by a qualified foreman acceptable to Landscape Architect. C.Selection of Plant Material: 1.Make contact with suppliers immediately upon obtaining notice of contract acceptance to select and book materials. Develop a program of maintenance (pruning and fertilization) which will ensure the purchased materials will meet and / or exceed project specifications. 2.Substitutions: Do not make plant material substitutions. If the specified landscape material is not obtainable, submit proof of non-availability to Landscape Architect, together with proposal for use of equivalent material. At the time bids are submitted, the Contractor is assumed to have located the materials necessary to complete the job as specified. 3.Landscape Architect will provide a key identifying each tree location on site. Written verification will be required to document material selection, source and delivery schedules to site. 4.Measurements: Measure trees with branches and trunks or canes in their normal position. Do not prune to obtain required sizes. Take caliper measurements six inches above ground for trees up to and including 4" caliper size, and twelve inches above ground for larger sizes. Measure main body of all plant material of height and spread dimensions, do not measure from branch or root tip-to-tip. 5.Owner's Authorized Representative shall inspect all plant material with requirements for genus, species, cultivar / variety size and quality. 6.Owner's Authorized Representative retains the right to further inspect all plant material upon arrival to the site and during installation for size and condition of root balls and root systems, limbs, branching habit, insects, injuries and latent defects. 7.Owner's Authorized Representative may reject unsatisfactory or defective material at any time during the process work. Remove rejected materials immediately from the site and replace with acceptable material at no additional cost to the Owner. Plants damaged in transit or at job site shall be rejected. 1.8 PRODUCT DELIVERY, STORAGE AND HANDLING A.Preparation: 1.Balled and Burlapped (B&B) Plants: Dig and prepare shipment in a manner that will not damage roots, branches, shape and future development. 2.Container Grown Plants: Deliver plants in rigid container to hold ball shape and protect root mass. B.Delivery: 1.Deliver packaged materials in sealed containers showing weight, analysis and name of manufacturer. Protect materials from deterioration during delivery and while stored on site. 2.Deliver only plant materials that can be planted in one day unless adequate storage and watering facilities are available on job site. 3.Protect root balls by heeling in with sawdust or other approved moisture retaining material if not planted within 24 hours of delivery. 4.Protect plants during delivery to prevent damage to root balls or desiccation of leaves. Keep plants moist at all times. Cover all materials during transport. 5.Notify Owner's Authorized Representative of delivery schedule 72 hours in advance job site. 6.Remove rejected plant material immediately from job site. 7.To avoid damage or stress, do not lift, move, adjust to plumb, or otherwise manipulate plants by trunk or stems. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.1 PLANTS A.General: Well-formed No. 1 grade or better nursery grown stock. Listed plant heights are from tops of root balls to nominal tops of plants. Plant spread refers to nominal outer width of the plant, not to the outer leaf tips. Plants will be individually approved by the Owner's Authorized Representative and his decision as to their acceptability shall be final. B.Quantities: The drawings and specifications are complimentary. Anything called for on one and not the other is as binding as if shown and called for on both. The plant schedule is an aid to bidders only. Confirm all quantities on plan. C.Quality and size: Plant materials shall conform to the size given on the plan, and shall be healthy, symmetrical, well-shaped, full branched and well rooted. The plants shall be free from injurious insects, diseases, injuries to the bark or roots, broken branches, objectionable disfigurements, insect eggs and larvae, and are to be of specimen quality. D.Approval: All plants which are found unsuitable in growth, or are in any unhealthy, badly shaped or undersized condition will be rejected by the Owner's Authorized Representative either before or after planting and shall be removed at the expense of the Landscape Contractor and replaced with acceptable plant as specified at no additional cost to the Owner. E.Trees shall be healthy, full-branched, well-shaped, and shall meet the minimum trunk and diameter requirements of the plant schedule. Balls shall be firm, neat, slightly tapered and well wrapped in burlap. Any tree loose in the ball or with a broken root ball at time of planting will be rejected. Balls shall be ten (10") inches in diameter for each one (1") inch of trunk diameter, measured six (6") inches above ball. (Nomenclature confirms to the customary nursery usage. For clarification, the term "multi-trunk" defines a plant having three (3) or more trunks of nearly equal diameter.) F.Pruning: All pruning of trees and shrubs, as directed by the Landscape Architect prior to final acceptance, shall be executed by the Landscape Contractor at no additional cost to the Owner. 2.2 SOIL PREPARATION MATERIALS A.Sandy Loam: 1.Friable, fertile, dark, loamy soil, free of clay lumps, subsoil, stones and other extraneous material and reasonably free of weeds and foreign grasses. Loam containing Dallasgrass or Nutgrass shall be rejected. 2.Physical properties as follows: a.Clay – between 7-27 percent b.Silt – between 15-25 percent c.Sand – less than 52 percent 3.Organic matter shall be 3%-10% of total dry weight. 4.If requested, Landscape Contractor shall provide a certified soil analysis conducted by an approved soil testing laboratory verifying that sandy loam meets the above requirements. B.Organic Material: Compost with a mixture of 80% vegetative matter and 20% animal waste. Ingredients should be a mix of course and fine textured material. C.Premixed Bedding Soil as supplied by Vital Earth Resources, Gladewater, Texas; Professional Bedding Soil as supplied by Living Earth Technology, Dallas, Texas or Acid Gro Municipal Mix as supplied by Soil Building Systems, Dallas, Texas or approved equal. D.Sharp Sand: Sharp sand must be free of seeds, soil particles and weeds. E.Mulch: Double Shredded Hardwood Mulch, partially decomposed, dark brown. Living Earth Technologies or approved equal. F.Organic Fertilizer: Fertilaid, Sustane, or Green Sense or equal as recommended for required applications. Fertilizer shall be delivered to the site in original unopened containers, each bearing the manufacturer's guaranteed statement of analysis. G.Commercial Fertilizer: 10-20-10 or similar analysis. Nitrogen source to be a minimum 50% slow release organic Nitrogen (SCU or UF) with a minimum 8% sulfur and 4% iron, plus icronutrients. H.Peat: Commercial sphagnum peat moss or partially decomposed shredded pine bark or other approved organic material. 2.3 MISCELLANEOUS MATERIALS A.Steel Edging: All steel edging shall be 3/16" thick x 4" deep x 16' long with 6 stakes per section, painted black at the factory as manufactured by The J.D. Russell Company and under its trade name DURAEDGE Heavy Duty Steel. B.Staking Material for Shade Trees: refer to details. C.Gravel: Washed native pea gravel, graded 1 inch to 1-1/2 inch. D.Filter Fabric: 'Mirafi Mirascape' by Mirafi Construction Products available at Lone Star Products, Inc., (469) 523-0444 or approved equal. E.River Rock: 'Colorado' or native river rock, 2" - 4" dia. F.Decomposed Granite: Base material shall consist of a natural material mix of granite aggregate not to exceed 1/8" diameter in size and shall be composed of various stages of decomposed earth base. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.1 BED PREPARATION & FERTILIZATION A.Landscape Contractor to inspect all existing conditions and report any deficiencies to the Owner. B.All planting areas shall be conditioned as follows: 1.Prepare new planting beds by scraping away existing grass and weeds as necessary. Till existing soil to a depth of six (6") inches prior to placing compost and fertilizer. Apply fertilizer as per Manufacturer's recommendations. Add six (6") inches of compost and till into a depth of six (6") inches of the topsoil. Apply organic fertilizer such as Sustane or Green Sense at the rate of twenty (20) pounds per one thousand (1,000) square feet. 2.All planting areas shall receive a two (2") inch layer of specified mulch. 3.Backfill for tree pits shall be as follows: Use existing top soil on site (use imported topsoil as needed) free from large clumps, rocks, debris, caliche, subsoils, etc., placed in nine (9") inch layers and watered in thoroughly. C.Grass Areas: 1.Blocks of sod should be laid joint to joint (staggered joints) after fertilizing the ground first. Roll grass areas to achieve a smooth, even surface. The joints between the blocks of sod should be filled with topsoil where they are evidently gaped open, then watered thoroughly. 3.2 INSTALLATION A.Maintenance of plant materials shall begin immediately after each plant is delivered to the site and shall continue until all construction has been satisfactorily accomplished. B.Plant materials shall be delivered to the site only after the beds are prepared and areas are ready for planting. All shipments of nursery materials shall be thoroughly protected from the drying winds during transit. All plants which cannot be planted at once, after delivery to the site, shall be well protected against the possibility of drying by wind and Balls of earth of B & B plants shall be kept covered with soil or other acceptable material. All plants remain the property of the Contractor until final acceptance. C.Position the trees and shrubs in their intended location as per plan. D.Notify the Owner's Authorized Representative for inspection and approval of all positioning of plant materials. E.Excavate pits with vertical sides and horizontal bottom. Tree pits shall be large enough to permit handling and planting without injury to balls of earth or roots and shall be of such depth that,when planted and settled, the crown of the plant shall bear the same relationship to the finish grade as it did to soil surface in original place of growth. F.Shrub and tree pits shall be no less than twenty-four (24") inches wider than the lateral dimension of the earth ball and six (6") inches deeper than it's vertical dimension. Remove and haul from site all rocks and stones over three-quarter (3 4") inch in diameter. Plants should be thoroughly moist before removing containers. G.Dig a wide, rough sided hole exactly the same depth as the height of the ball, especially at the surface of the ground. The sides of the hole should be rough and jagged, never slick or glazed. H.Percolation Test: Fill the hole with water. If the water level does not percolate within 24 hours, the tree needs to move to another location or have drainage added. Install a PVC stand pipe per tree planting detail as approved by the Landscape Architect if the percolation test fails. I.Backfill only with 5 parts existing soil or sandy loam and 1 part bed preparation. When the hole is dug in solid rock, topsoil from the same area should not be used. Carefully settle by watering to prevent air pockets. Remove the burlap from the top 13 of the ball, as well as all nylon, plastic string and wire. Container trees will usually be root bound, if so follow standard nursery practice of ‘root scoring’. J.Do not wrap trees. K.Do not over prune. L.Mulch the top of the ball. Do not plant grass all the way to the trunk of the tree. Leave the area above the top of the ball and mulch with at least two (2") inches of specified mulch. M.All plant beds and trees to be mulched with a minimum settled thickness of two (2") inches over the entire bed or pit. N.Obstruction below ground: In the event that rock, or underground construction work or obstructions are encountered in any plant pit excavation work to be done under this section, alternate locations may be selected by the Owner. Where locations cannot be changed, the obstructions shall be removed to a depth of not less than three (3') feet below grade and no less than six (6") inches below the bottom of ball when plant is properly set at the required grade. The work of this section shall include the removal from the site of such rock or underground obstructions encountered at the cost of the Landscape Contractor. O.Trees and large shrubs shall be staked as site conditions require. Position stakes to secure trees against seasonal prevailing winds. P.Pruning and Mulching: Pruning shall be directed by the Landscape Architect and shall be pruned in accordance with standard horticultural practice following Fine Pruning, Class I pruning standards provided by the National Arborist Association. 1.Dead wood, suckers, broken and badly bruised branches shall be removed. General tipping of the branches is not permitted. Do not cut terminal branches. 2.Pruning shall be done with clean, sharp tools. 3.Immediately after planting operations are completed, all tree pits shall be covered with a layer of organic material two (2") inches in depth. This limit of the organic material for trees shall be the diameter of the plant pit. Q.Steel Curbing Installation: 1.Curbing shall be aligned as indicated on plans. Stake out limits of steel curbing and obtain Owners approval prior to installation. 2.All steel curbing shall be free of kinks and abrupt bends. 3.Top of curbing shall be 12" maximum height above final finished grade. 4.Stakes are to be installed on the planting bed side of the curbing, as opposed to the grass side. 5.Do not install steel edging along sidewalks or curbs. 6.Cut steel edging at 45 degree angle where edging meets sidewalks or curbs. 3.3 CLEANUP AND ACCEPTANCE A.Cleanup: During the work, the premises shall be kept neat and orderly at all times. Storage areas for all materials shall be so organized so that they, too, are neat and orderly. All trash and debris shall be removed from the site as work progresses. Keep paved areas clean by sweeping or hosing them at end of each work day. END OF SECTION KAH KAH LANDSCAPE SPECS AND DETAILSLANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS L2.02 BDFGCHAEJKL1234534251EFBCHGADJKL41'-0" 14'-0"5'-0"2'-0" 36'-0"32'-0"14241 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1000Dallas, TX 75254972.361.6700 972.361.6800 (fx)#DescriptionDateISSUANCESDRAWING INFORMATIONScale:Date:Checked By:Drawn By:Duke Realty Job #:A/E Job #:DRAWING / SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERProfessional Seal11-16-15Pre Submittal11-18-15Planning Submittal12-03-15DRC Submittal 12-08-15P&Z Submittal12-30-15City Council Submittal15-951DM11-16-151" = 20'-0"A6.00OVERALL ELEVATIONSTOHATSU BUILD TO SUIT COPPELL, TEXAS FREEPORT PARKWAY 972-980-8980DALLAS, TEXAS 7525414643 DALLAS PARKWAY, SUITE 636MEINHARDT & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS P.L.L.C.Client / Consultant 2Client / Consultant 110'-0" 41'-0"14'-0"10'-0"5'-0"2'-0" 34'-0" 36'-0" 9'-0" 34'-0" 36'-0"SMOOTHFINISHCONCRETETILT WALLHOLLOW METALACCESS DOOR-PT.PRE-FIN. METALCANOPY SYSTEMLINE OF ROOFPROFILE BEYOND34" DEEP CONTINUOUSPANEL REVEALS(TYP.) - PT.RECESSED ALUM. & GLASSSTOREFRONT SYSTEMSMOOTH FINISHCONCRETE TILT WALLPAINTED ACCENTSMOOTH FINISHCONCRETE TILT WALLPRE-FIN. METALCANOPY SYSTEM34" DEEP CONTINUOUSPANEL REVEALS(TYP.) - PT.RECESSED ALUM. & GLASSSTOREFRONT SYSTEMSMOOTH FINISHCONCRETE TILT WALLPAINTED ACCENT24" PANEL ARTICULATIONOFFSETSMOOTH FINISHCONCRETE TILT WALLSCREEN PANEL (T.O.P.13'-0" ABV. FINISHEDPAVING)-PT.34" DEEP CONTINUOUSPANEL REVEALS(TYP.) - PT.SMOOTH FINISHCONCRETE TILT WALLLINE OF ROOFBEYONDSMOOTH FINISHCONCRETE TILT WALLPAINTED ACCENT34" DEEP CONTINUOUSPANEL REVEALS(TYP.) - PT.SMOOTH FINISHCONCRETE TILT WALLLINE OF ROOFBEYONDEMERGENCY OVERFLOWROOF SCUPPERS ADJACENTTO ROOF DRAINSPRE-FINISHED HI LIFT OVERHEADSECTIONAL DOOR W/ DOCKBUMPERS-TYP.HOLLOW METALDOOR & STEELSTAIR-PT. TYP.RECESSED ALUM. & GLASSSTOREFRONT SYSTEM24" PANELARTICULATIONOFFSET24" PANELARTICULATIONOFFSET24" PANELARTICULATIONOFFSETFIXED SUPPLY INTAKELOUVER AS REQ'D.SECURITY WALLMOUNTED CUT-OFFLIGHTING (MNT.22'-6"A.F.F.) TYPICAL24" PANELARTICULATIONOFFSET13'-0"24" PANELARTICULATIONOFFSET13'-0"22'-6"24" PANELARTICULATIONOFFSET(6)RECESSED DOCKLEVELERS (LOCATIONSTO BE DETERMINED)FINAL LOCATIONS OF (14) OVERHEAD DOORSAND (6) ACTIVE DOCK POSITIONS TO BEDETERMINED AND SUBMITTED FOR BUILDINGPERMIT REVIEWG:\MISC\15951-TOHATSU-Duke\CD's\951-A600 Articulation Series.dwg, 12/29/2015 8:51:36 AM, 1:1 Designer Date Scale Drawing No. IKDec 07 2015 SHOWN1 of 1 TOHATSUPlan ViewScale 1" = 30'LUMINAIRE SCHEDULESymbolLabelQtyFileLumensLLFWattsCatalog NumberDescriptionLampA18TWH_400M.ies380001.00456B96O7AZ_(42TRT).ies32001.0048TWH 400MGENERAL PURPOSEBUILDING MOUNTEDLUMINAIRE, 400W MH,W/ CLEAR LAMP.ONE 400 WATT CLEARED28 PULSE STARTMETAL HALIDE INHORIZONTAL POSITION6O7AZ (42TRT)6" OPEN DOWNLIGHTWITH SPECULARREFLECTOR.ONE 42-WATT TRIPLETUBE COMPACTFLUORESCENT,VERTICAL BASE UPPOSITION.STATISTICSDescription SymbolAvgMaxMinMax/MinAvg/MinCalc Zone #22.3 fc7.4 fc0.2 fc37.0:111.5:11.72.12.52.63.22.82.82.82.82.82.82.83.32.82.82.82.82.82.82.83.22.71.62.02.73.63.33.83.43.93.22.73.23.93.43.93.43.93.22.73.23.93.43.93.44.23.22.52.11.61.10.80.60.40.30.30.20.21.41.82.74.06.26.16.96.16.03.83.13.86.06.16.96.16.03.83.13.86.06.26.96.37.95.53.32.41.81.30.90.70.50.40.30.20.21.82.23.25.66.45.45.65.25.03.82.83.85.05.25.65.25.03.82.83.85.05.35.75.68.27.74.82.92.11.41.00.70.50.40.30.20.21.42.12.74.16.17.26.84.82.92.01.41.00.70.50.40.30.20.20.21.01.42.13.05.57.76.05.94.63.02.31.51.10.80.50.40.30.20.20.20.81.11.62.53.15.37.65.95.84.63.02.31.51.10.80.60.40.30.20.20.20.91.21.72.53.25.47.15.75.94.52.82.01.41.10.80.60.40.30.20.20.20.60.81.11.52.23.05.35.93.64.53.52.61.91.41.10.80.60.40.30.20.20.20.60.81.21.52.12.83.94.52.42.62.12.11.81.41.10.80.60.40.30.30.20.20.60.91.11.51.92.12.22.61.11.31.91.91.61.31.00.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.60.81.11.41.71.91.81.31.21.41.91.91.61.31.00.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.60.81.11.41.71.81.81.32.42.62.12.11.81.41.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.11.51.92.12.12.53.64.63.52.62.01.41.10.80.60.40.30.30.20.20.20.60.91.21.52.12.73.74.35.75.94.42.82.01.41.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.60.91.11.52.23.05.35.45.85.74.63.02.31.61.20.90.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.21.72.53.15.15.15.85.74.63.02.31.61.20.90.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.21.72.63.25.25.25.65.84.52.82.01.41.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.21.52.23.05.35.43.64.53.52.62.01.51.10.80.60.50.30.30.20.20.20.60.91.21.62.12.83.94.52.42.62.12.11.81.41.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.21.51.92.12.22.61.21.41.91.91.71.31.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.11.41.71.91.81.31.21.41.91.91.71.31.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.11.41.71.91.81.32.42.62.12.11.81.41.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.21.51.92.12.12.53.74.63.52.62.01.51.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.60.91.21.62.12.73.74.35.75.94.52.82.01.41.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.21.52.23.05.35.45.85.74.63.02.31.61.20.90.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.21.72.53.25.15.15.85.74.63.02.31.61.20.90.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.31.72.63.25.25.25.65.84.52.82.01.41.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.21.52.23.05.35.43.64.53.52.62.01.51.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.60.91.21.62.12.83.94.52.42.62.12.11.81.41.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.21.51.92.12.22.61.21.41.91.91.71.31.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.11.41.71.91.81.31.21.41.91.91.71.31.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.11.41.71.91.81.32.42.62.12.11.81.41.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.21.51.92.12.12.53.74.63.52.62.01.51.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.21.62.12.73.74.35.75.94.52.82.01.41.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.21.52.23.05.35.45.85.74.63.02.31.61.20.90.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.21.72.53.25.15.15.85.74.63.02.31.61.20.90.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.31.72.63.25.25.25.65.84.52.82.01.41.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.21.52.23.05.35.43.64.53.52.62.01.51.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.60.91.21.62.12.83.94.52.42.62.12.11.81.41.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.21.51.92.12.22.61.21.41.91.91.71.31.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.11.41.71.91.81.31.21.41.91.91.71.31.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.11.41.71.91.81.32.42.62.12.11.81.41.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.70.91.21.51.92.12.12.53.74.63.52.62.01.51.10.80.60.50.30.30.20.20.20.60.91.21.62.12.73.74.35.75.94.42.82.01.41.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.60.91.21.52.23.05.35.45.85.74.63.02.31.61.20.90.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.91.21.72.53.25.15.15.85.74.63.02.31.61.20.90.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.91.21.72.63.25.25.25.65.84.42.82.01.41.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.20.91.21.52.23.05.35.43.64.53.52.62.01.51.10.80.60.40.30.30.20.20.20.91.21.52.12.83.94.52.42.62.12.11.81.41.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.21.21.51.92.12.22.61.11.31.91.91.61.31.00.80.60.50.40.30.20.21.11.41.71.91.81.31.21.41.91.91.61.31.00.80.60.50.40.30.20.21.11.41.71.91.81.32.42.62.12.11.81.41.10.80.60.40.30.30.20.21.11.51.92.12.12.73.74.63.52.62.01.41.10.80.60.40.30.20.20.21.21.52.12.73.85.55.75.94.52.82.01.41.10.80.60.40.30.20.20.21.52.23.05.57.75.95.84.63.02.31.51.10.80.60.40.30.20.20.21.72.53.15.47.76.05.94.63.02.31.51.10.80.50.40.30.20.20.21.72.63.35.77.87.97.25.03.02.11.41.00.70.50.40.30.20.20.21.62.43.46.69.010.89.25.73.82.83.74.95.55.75.55.03.82.93.95.05.25.75.68.27.74.82.92.11.41.00.70.50.40.30.20.22.33.25.27.78.57.07.96.76.14.03.13.95.96.27.26.36.14.13.03.45.65.66.65.87.55.23.22.51.81.30.90.70.50.40.30.20.22.12.73.34.75.13.74.43.74.23.32.73.34.23.74.43.74.23.32.73.13.63.23.63.23.93.12.52.11.61.10.80.60.40.30.30.20.21.62.12.62.93.12.83.32.83.02.82.82.83.02.93.42.93.02.82.72.72.72.63.12.62.62.32.11.61.20.90.70.50.40.30.20.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.111.111.1 Master City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard Coppell, Texas 75019-9478 File Number: 2015-2491 File ID: Type: Status: 2015-2491 Zoning Ordinance Passed 3Version: Reference: In Control: City Council 11/09/2015File Created: 01/12/2016Final Action: PD-232R-C, ORD Chicken ExpressFile Name: Title: Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. PD-232R-C, Chicken Express , a zoning change from PD-232-C (Planned Development-232-Commercial) to PD-232R-C (Planned Development-232 Revised-Commercial), to amend the Detail Site Plan for the existing 3,348-square-foot restaurant to change the roof color to ‘Colonial Red’ with a high performance coating on property located at 136 E. Belt Line Road and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Notes: Agenda Date: 01/12/2016 Agenda Number: 11. Sponsors: Enactment Date: 01/12/2016 Cover Memo.pdf, Ordinance.pdf, Exhibit A - Legal Description.pdf Attachments: Enactment Number: 91500-A-0686 Hearing Date: Contact: Effective Date: Drafter: History of Legislative File Action: Result: Return Date: Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver- sion: 1 PassApproved11/19/2015Planning & Zoning Commission Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master Continued (2015-2491) Matt Steer, Sr. Planner, introduced this case with exhibits and a color swatch card. He mentioned nine notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of this request. None were returned in favor and none returned in opposition. There were also 43 courtesy notices mailed to property owners within 800 feet of this request. He stated that staff is recommending denial. Wes Parnell, W. Parnell V LLC, 51 Meadowbrook, Trophy Club Texas, was present to represent this case, to address questions and was not in agreement with staff's recommendations to deny the 'Seatle Red' roof color. The applicant mentioned the maroon-colored roof of the Neighborhood Credit Union. The applicant and the Commission were in agreement with the maroon color. Chairman Haas opened the Public Hearing, asking for people who wanted to speak either in favor or opposition or wanted to comment on this request to come forward. No one spoke. Chairman Haas closed the Public Hearing. A motion was made by Commissioner Robinson to recommend approval subject to the following conditions: 1. The originally requested color “Seattle Red” was denied. 2. Approval of a maroon-colored roof the same as the Neighborhood Credit Union’s maroon-colored roof. 3. Ensure all roofs/awnings are painted the same color. Seconded by Commissioner Sarma; motion carried (7-0). Action Text: Chair Edmund Haas, Vice Chair Glenn Portman, Commissioner Sue Blankenship, Commissioner Ed Darling, Commissioner Doug Robinson, Commissioner Vijay Sarma, and Commissioner George Williford 7Aye: 2 PassClose the Public Hearing and Approve 12/08/2015City Council Presentation: Gary Sieb, Director of Planning, made a presentation to Council. Wes Parnell, applicant, 51 Meadowbrook, Trophy Club, made a presentation to Council. Mayor Hunt opened the Public Hearing and advised that no one signed up to speak. A motion was made by Councilmember Mark Hill, seconded by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, to close the Public Hearing and approve this Agenda Item subject to the following conditions: 1) Approval of “Colonial Red” roof paint color in a high performance coating instead of the “Seattle Red;” and 2) A maintenance agreement shall be submitted to staff for maintenance of roof paint. It shall read – “If the new paint of the roof is not properly maintained, then the roof will be repainted to the original color “Desert Tan”. The motion passed 5-2 with Councilmembers Hinojosa-Flores and Mays voting against the item. Action Text: Councilmember Cliff Long, Councilmember Gary Roden, Councilmember Marvin Franklin, Councilmember Mark Hill, and Mayor Pro Tem Nancy Yingling 5Aye: Councilmember Brianna Hinojosa-Flores, and Councilmember Wes Mays 2Nay: 3 PassApproved01/12/2016City Council Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master Continued (2015-2491) Presentation: Marcie Diamond, Assistant Director of Planning, made a presentation to Council and recommended approval. A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Councilmember Nancy Yingling, to approve this item. The vote on the motion was 5-2, with Councilmembers Brianna Hinojosa-Flores and Wes Mays voting in opposition. The motion carried. Action Text: Councilmember Cliff Long, Councilmember Gary Roden, Councilmember Marvin Franklin, Councilmember Mark Hill, and Mayor Pro Tem Nancy Yingling 5Aye: Councilmember Brianna Hinojosa-Flores, and Councilmember Wes Mays 2Nay: Text of Legislative File 2015-2491 Title Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. PD-232R-C, Chicken Express, a zoning change from PD-232-C (Planned Development-232-Commercial) to PD-232R-C (Planned Development-232 Revised-Commercial), to amend the Detail Site Plan for the existing 3,348-square-foot restaurant to change the roof color to ‘Colonial Red’ with a high performance coating on property located at 136 E. Belt Line Road and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Summary Staff Recommendation: On December 8, 2015, City Council approved this ZONING CHANGE (5-2), with the added condition: 1.A maintenance agreement shall be submitted to staff for maintenance of roof paint which shall include, “If the new paint of the roof is not properly maintained, then the roof will be repainted to the original color “Desert Tan”. On November 19, 2015, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended DENIAL of the originally requested “Seattle Red” and APPROVAL of a deep maroon color (7-0). The Planning Commission also recommended that all roofs /awnings be painted the same color . Commissioners Williford, Sarma, Robinson, Haas, Portman, Darling and Blankenship voted in favor; none opposed. The Planning Department recommended DENIAL. Goal Icon: Business Prosperity Sense of Community Page 3City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 1 MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and City Council From: Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning Date: January 12, 2016 Reference: Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. PD-232R-C to amend the Detail Site Plan for the existing 3,348-square-foot Chicken Express restaurant to change the roof color on property located at 136 E. Belt Line Road. 2030: Business Prosperity, Sense of Community Introduction: The applicant originally requested to change the color of the roof from “Desert Tan to “Seattle Red” Analysis: On December 8, 2015 the City Council with a vote of 5-2 approved a change in roof color to “Colonial Red”, subject to various conditions which have been included in the ordinance. On November 19, 2015, the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended Denial of the originally requested “Seattle Red”, and Approval of a deep maroon color roof. Further, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that all roofs/awnings be painted the same color. Legal Review: The City Attorney reviewed this request. Fiscal Impact: None Recommendation: The Planning Department recommends approval. Attachments: 1. Ordinance 2. Exhibit “A” – Legal Description Coppell ZORD from PD 232-C to PD 232R-C for Chicken Express Pg 1 TM 74877 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. ________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, AS HERETOFORE AMENDED, BY GRANTING A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM PD-232-C (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT-232-COMMERCIAL) TO PD-232R-C (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT-232 REVISED-COMMERCIAL), TO AMEND THE DETAIL SITE PLAN FOR THE EXISTING 3,348-SQUARE-FOOT RESTAURANT TO CHANGE THE ROOF COLOR ON 1.1 ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 136 E. BELT LINE ROAD, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A” ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN; PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL CONDITIONS; PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Commission and the governing body of the City of Coppell, Texas, in compliance with the laws of the State of Texas and pursuant to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, have given requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and after holding due hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property owners generally, and to all persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, the said governing body is of the opinion that Zoning Application No. PD-232-C should be approved, and in the exercise of legislative discretion have concluded that the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map should be amended. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map of the City of Coppell, Texas, duly passed by the governing body of the City of Coppell, Texas, as heretofore amended, be and the same is hereby amended by granting a change in zoning from PD-232-C (Planned Development-232-Commercial) to PD-232R-C (Planned Development-232 Revised-Commercial), to amend the Detail Site Plan for the existing 3,348-square-foot restaurant to change the roof color on 1.1 acres of property located at 136 E. Belt Line Road for the property described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes. Coppell ZORD from PD 232-C to PD 232R-C for Chicken Express Pg 2 TM 74877 SECTION 2. That the Property will be used and developed for Commercial purposes as provided in the Code of Ordinance and the Revised Site Plan which allows a change in roof color for the existing 3,348-square-foot restaurant with drive-in service, is hereby approved subject to the following development regulations: A. That accept as amended herein, the property shall be developed in accordance with Ordinance 91500-A-489, which is incorporated herein as set forth in full and hereby republished. B. The roof may be repainted from “Desert Tan” to “Colonial Red”. C. The paint shall have a high performance coating, D. If the new paint of the roof is not properly maintained, then the roof will be repainted to the original color, “Desert Tan”. SECTION 3. That the above property shall be used only in the manner and for the purpose provided for by the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, as heretofore amended, and as amended herein. SECTION 4. That the development of the property herein shall be in accordance with building regulations, zoning ordinances, and any applicable ordinances except as may be specifically altered or amended herein. SECTION 5. That all provisions of the Ordinances of the City of Coppell, Texas, in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same are hereby, repealed, and all other provisions not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 6. That should any sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole, or any part or provision thereof other than the part so decided Coppell ZORD from PD 232-C to PD 232R-C for Chicken Express Pg 3 TM 74877 to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, and shall not affect the validity of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as a whole. SECTION 7. An offense committed before the effective date of this ordinance is governed by prior law and the provisions of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, as amended, in effect when the offense was committed and the former law is continued in effect for this purpose. SECTION 8. That any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions or terms of this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, as heretofore amended, and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine not to exceed the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense; and each and every day such violation shall continue shall be deemed to constitute a separate offense. SECTION 9. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage and the publication of its caption, as the law and charter in such cases provide. DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, this the _______ day of ___________________, 2016. APPROVED: _____________________________________ KAREN SELBO HUNT ATTEST: ___________________________________ CHRISTEL PETTINOS, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM: ________________________________ ROBERT E. HAGER, CITY ATTORNEY Master City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard Coppell, Texas 75019-9478 File Number: 2015-2560 File ID: Type: Status: 2015-2560 Agenda Item Passed 1Version: Reference: In Control: Administration 01/04/2016File Created: 01/12/2016Final Action: AB Park RedevelopmentFile Name: Title: Andrew Brown Community Park East and West - Consider approval of a Guaranteed Maximum Price Amendment to the Agreement between the City of Coppell (Owner) and Core Construction Services of Texas, Inc. (Construction Manager) for the redevelopment of Andy Brown Park East and West, in the amount of $21,183,850 and authorizing the City Manager to sign any necessary documents. Notes: Agenda Date: 01/12/2016 Agenda Number: 12. Sponsors: Enactment Date: 01.12.16 Council AB Parks GMP Cover Memo.pdf, 01.12.16 Council ABE Site Plan May 12 2015.pdf, 01.12.16 Council ABE 02 with Alternates.pdf, 01.12.16 Council ABW Site Plan May 12 2015.pdf, 01.12.16 Council ABW 02 with Alternates.pdf, 01.12.16 Council ABEABWGMP01082016.pdf Attachments: Enactment Number: Hearing Date: Contact: Effective Date: Drafter: History of Legislative File Action: Result: Return Date: Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver- sion: 1 PassApproved01/12/2016City Council Presentation: Mike Land, Deputy City Manager, made a presentation to Council. A motion was made by Councilmember Wes Mays, seconded by Councilmember Cliff Long, to approve this item. The motion passed by an unamimous vote. Action Text: Councilmember Cliff Long, Councilmember Brianna Hinojosa-Flores, Councilmember Wes Mays, Councilmember Gary Roden, Councilmember Marvin Franklin, Councilmember Mark Hill, and Mayor Pro Tem Nancy Yingling 7Aye: Text of Legislative File 2015-2560 Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master Continued (2015-2560) Title Andrew Brown Community Park East and West - Consider approval of a Guaranteed Maximum Price Amendment to the Agreement between the City of Coppell (Owner) and Core Construction Services of Texas, Inc. (Construction Manager) for the redevelopment of Andy Brown Park East and West, in the amount of $21,183,850 and authorizing the City Manager to sign any necessary documents. Summary See attached memo. Fiscal Impact: [Enter Fiscal Impact Statement Here] Staff Recommendation: The Parks and Recreation Department recommends approval. Goal Icon: Sustainable City Government Community Wellness and Enrichment Sense of Community Special Place to Live Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and City Council From: Mike Land, Deputy City Manager Date: January 12, 2016 Reference: Andrew Brown Community Park East and West – Consider approval of a Guaranteed Maximum Price Amendment to the Agreement between the City of Coppell (Owner) and Core Construction Services of Texas, Inc. (Construction Manager) for the redevelopment of Andy Brown Park East and West, in the amount of $21,183,850 and authorizing the City Manager to sign. 2030: Sense of Community - Goal #2: Successful Community Events and Festivals. Special Place to Live - Goal #2: Beautiful Green City. Community Wellness and Enrichment - Goal #1: Community Gathering Places. Goal #2: Recreation Programs and Services for All Generations. Goal #3: Expand Cultural Arts Amenities and Opportunities. Goal #4: Resident’s Wellness and Longevity. Goal #6: Multi-Use Trail System Connecting the City. Sustainable City Government - Goal #1: Excellent City Services with High Level of Customer Satisfaction. Goal #2: “Green” City Operations and Facilities. Goal #3: Excellent and Well Maintained Infrastructure and Facilities. General Information:  Bids received on October 14, 2015  Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) - $21,183,850.00 (with all 11 alternates included)  Schedule for completion – June 5, 2017  Project Cost Summary Sheet – Exhibit A  The 11 add alternates total $3,666,510.00 and are included in the Guaranteed Maximum Price stated above. Introduction: This action item is to approve the Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) Amendment to the Agreement between the City of Coppell and CORE for the redevelopment of Andy Brown Park East and West, and authorizing the City Manager to sign any necessary documents. History: In 2012 a master plan for the Andy Brown Park System was completed by Dunaway Associates and approved by the City Council on January 22, 2013. The process for completing the master plan included multiple public meetings, public input, input from the Parks and Recreation Board and City Council. At that time the estimated cost for the redevelopment of the entire AB Park system was $26.6 million. AB West - $10.3 million AB Central - $2.8 million AB East - $9.4 million Moore Rd. - $4.1 million Total - $26.6 million As the City moved into 2013, discussions moved on to the next phase of the project entailing the re-authorization of the CRDC sales tax for the purposes of funding multiple community enhancements including the redevelopment of the Andy Brown Park System. With the successful result of the election the City re-engaged the community through another series of public meetings, and work sessions in 2014 and 2015. These meetings focused on refining the details of the master plan, translating the desires of the community into actual attributes that addressed the needs of specific users such as the sports associations, avid trail users, the public in general, and the City in meeting the goals established in the City’s 2030 plan for Community Gathering Places. Specifically, the Parks and Recreation Board and sports associations had direct input into the updated Master Plan approved by Council on September 9, 2014. With the updated Master Plan in place, work began on the final design leading up to the Planning and Zoning Board’s and City Council’s approval of the attached ABE and ABW site plans on May 12, 2015. There are several additions/modifications in the 2015 plan as a result of these meetings that were not part of the original master plan developed in 2012. These additions/modifications include in Andy Brown West replacing one of the two separate smaller pavilions with one park restroom, concession and storage building serving the needs of park users outside of the softball complex. Sand volleyball courts and basketball courts were also added. For Andy Brown East, there is the addition of a smaller group pavilion and power for vendors to accommodate their needs during community events. These items total $1,257,625 in construction cost not originally contemplated for in the 2012 Master Plan. Analysis: On October 14, 2015 CORE, the Construction Manager for this project opened bids. Prior to and since the bid opening, CORE, Gallagher Construction, the City’s Project Manager, and Dunaway, the architects on the project, continued their Value Engineering process to arrive at the GMP being considered. The following attachments to the GMP are provided:  Exhibit A – Cost Summary with Alternates  Exhibit B – Unit Pricing and Allowances  Exhibit C – Qualifications  Exhibit D – Contract Document List  Exhibit E – Project Schedule Substantial Completion is scheduled for June 5, 2017. The Park’s grand unveiling will be July 3, 2017. The following items and their corresponding allowances are included in the overall budget though they are not included in the GMP:  Technology – $75,000  FF&E - $310,000  Additional City Contingency - $410,743 There are 11 Alternate Items being recommended (and included in the GMP) totaling $3,666,510.00. Colored graphics of ABE and ABW highlighting the additions are attached. These items are: 1E Add Group Pavilion (Allowance item) - $250,000 2E Add Boardwalk Overlook - $661,709 3E Add Bridge - $297,843 4E Add Performance Pavilion - $784,834 5E 1. Add Vendor Power at SE Quadrant - $36,540 2. Add Vendor Power at SW Quadrant - $33,686 3. Add Vendor Power at NW Quadrant - $24,902 4. Add Vendor Power at NE Quadrant - $29,764 1W Add 3,690' of 10" Wide Concrete Sidewalk - $258,025 2W Add Entry Monument and Associated Retaining Wall - $88,936 3W Add Field Lighting at Practice Soccer Field - $207,138 4W Add Park Restroom, Concessions and Storage - $845,784 5W Stamped Concrete in lieu of standard concrete Crosswalk Roundabout Pavement - $124,512 6W Add Enhanced Pedestrian Pavement - $22,838 Approval of these 11 alternates brings the GMP to $21,183,850.00. Legal Review: The City’s legal counsel has reviewed the Guaranteed Maximum Price amendment. Fiscal Impact: Funding for the GMP and Add Alternates for Andy Brown Park East and West is budgeted in the CRDC. The breakdown of the available funds will be as follows: CRDC Bond Funds $17,335,750 CRDC Interest $1,000,000 CRDC Cash $2,248,100 Tree Preservation Fund $600,000 Total $21,183,850 Taking into account the scale of the redevelopment of the Andy Brown Park system the re are additional park improvements to be considered by future City Council’s for construction at some undetermined later date. Based on the current and future commitments of CRDC funding it is financially possible that all of the projects proposed in future phases of the Andy Brown Park system could be funded and completed during the next five to six years. Recommendation: The City Manager’s Office recommends the City Council approve of the Guaranteed Maximum Price Amendment to the Agreement between the City of Coppell (Owner) and Core Construction Services of Texas, Inc. (Construction Manager) for the redevelopment of Andy Brown Park East and West with the acceptance of add Alternates No. 1E through Alternate 5E and add Alternate No. 1W through Alternate 6W resulting in a GMP of $21,183,850.00 and authorize the City Manager to sign any necessary documents. It is anticipated that approval of this item will also be requested from the CRDC during their meeting scheduled for Wednesday January 13, 2016. Andrew Brown WEST 1 3 4 2 5 6 ALTERNATE BID ITEMS 1.10’ WIDE CONCRETE TRAIL 2.ENTRY MONUMENT 3.PRACTICE SOCCER FIELD LIGHTING 4.PARK RESTROOM/CONCESSION 5.CROSSWALK & ROUNDABOUT PAVEMENT 6.ENHANCED PEDESTRIAN PAVEMENT Master City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard Coppell, Texas 75019-9478 File Number: 2016-2562 File ID: Type: Status: 2016-2562 Agenda Item Failed 1Version: Reference: In Control: City Secretary 01/07/2016File Created: 01/12/2016Final Action: ReconsiderationFile Name: Title: Consider approval to permit the reconsideration of citizen agenda item 21 from the City Council Meeting held on December 8, 2015. Notes: Agenda Date: 01/12/2016 Agenda Number: 13. Sponsors: Enactment Date: Attachments: Enactment Number: Hearing Date: Contact: Effective Date: Drafter: History of Legislative File Action: Result: Return Date: Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver- sion: 1 FailDenied01/12/2016City Council Mayor Hunt explained this item to the Council and audience members. A motion was made by Councilmember Marvin Franklin, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gary Roden, to approve the reconsideration of citizen agenda item 21 from the City Council Meeting held on December 8, 2015. The motion failed by an unanimous vote. Action Text: Councilmember Cliff Long, Councilmember Brianna Hinojosa-Flores, Councilmember Wes Mays, Councilmember Gary Roden, Councilmember Marvin Franklin, Councilmember Mark Hill, and Mayor Pro Tem Nancy Yingling 7Nay: Text of Legislative File 2016-2562 Title Consider approval to permit the reconsideration of citizen agenda item 21 from the City Council Meeting held on December 8, 2015. Summary Fiscal Impact: Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master Continued (2016-2562) Staff Recommendation: Goal Icon: Sustainable City Government Business Prosperity Community Wellness and Enrichment Sense of Community Special Place to Live Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master City of Coppell, Texas 255 Parkway Boulevard Coppell, Texas 75019-9478 File Number: 2015-2540 File ID: Type: Status: 2015-2540 Agenda Item Board Reports 1Version: Reference: In Control: City Secretary 12/23/2015File Created: 01/12/2016Final Action: Mayor and Council ReportsFile Name: Title: A.Report by Mayor Hunt regarding National Night Out recognition. B.Report by Councilmember Mays regarding the Clean Air Initiative Award. C.Report by Councilmember Yingling regarding the NTCOG Emergency Preparedness Planning Council. Notes: Agenda Date: 01/12/2016 Agenda Number: Sponsors: Enactment Date: Attachments: Enactment Number: Hearing Date: Contact: Effective Date: Drafter: History of Legislative File Action: Result: Return Date: Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver- sion: 1 01/12/2016City Council A. Mayor Hunt advised that the City of Coppell has received First Place in the State and Third Place in the Country for our National Night Out activities. She expressed her excitement for receiving this recognition. B. Councilmember Wes Mays advised that he had attended a Fuel/Emissions Program at the North Central Texas Council of Governments. The City received the Bronze award for the Clean Air Initiative Program. There were two Silver awards given and no Gold awards. He further advised that the City has eliminated twenty-two million pounds of pollutants. C. Councilmember Nancy Yingling advised that there would be no report regarding the North Texas Council of Governments Emergency Preparedness Planning Council meeting, as the presentor had a flat tire and did not make the meeting. She did, however, report that the Committee discussed the attack on the Dallas Police Headquarters and how cities are using social media to disperse information in these situations. Councilmember Yingling also reported that she sits on an annual break-out committee for the Homeland Security Grant Program from the Office of the Governor, and that they will be requesting $1.8 Million for the region, with 25% of the funds to be allocated to law enforcement. Finally, Councilmember Yingling announced the 2016 TESSA Conference, a national storm weather conference open to the public, will be held on March 5th at the Colleyville Center. Action Text: Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017 Master Continued (2015-2540) Text of Legislative File 2015-2540 Title A.Report by Mayor Hunt regarding National Night Out recognition. B.Report by Councilmember Mays regarding the Clean Air Initiative Award. C.Report by Councilmember Yingling regarding the NTCOG Emergency Preparedness Planning Council. Summary Fiscal Impact: Staff Recommendation: Goal Icon: Sustainable City Government Business Prosperity Community Wellness and Enrichment Sense of Community Special Place to Live Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 12/21/2017