CP 2022-03-22City Council
City of Coppell, Texas
Meeting Agenda
255 E. Parkway Boulevard
Coppell, Texas
75019-9478
2nd Floor Conference Room5:30 PMTuesday, March 22, 2022
Work Session
WES MAYS BRIANNA HINOJOSA-SMITH
Mayor Mayor Pro Tem
CLIFF LONG JOHN JUN
Place 1 Place 5
DON CARROLL BIJU MATHEW
Place 3 Place 6
KEVIN NEVELS MARK HILL
Place 4 Place 7
MIKE LAND
City Manager
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas will meet in Work
Session at 5:30 p.m.; to be held at Town Center, 255 E. Parkway Boulevard, Coppell, Texas.
As authorized by Section 551.071(2) of the Texas Government Code, this meeting may be
convened into closed Executive Session for the purpose of seeking confidential legal advice
from the City Attorney on any agenda item listed herein.
As authorized by Section 551.127, of the Texas Government Code, one or more
Councilmembers or employees may attend this meeting remotely using videoconferencing
technology.
The City of Coppell reserves the right to reconvene, recess or realign the Work Session or
called Executive Session or order of business at any time prior to adjournment.
The purpose of the meeting is to consider the following items:
Work Session (Open to the Public) 2nd Floor Conference Room
I.Call to Order
II.Citizens’ Appearance
Page 1 City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 3/18/2022
March 22, 2022City Council Meeting Agenda
III.A.Discussion regarding Value Proposition.
B.Update regarding the City’s Compensation Plan.
C.Discussion regarding the Five-Year Forecast.
D.Discussion regarding the Homestead Exemption.
E.Update regarding Utility Billing and Water/Sewer rates.
F.Discussion regarding the draft Code of Conduct.
Value Proposition Memo.pdf
Compensation/Classification Study Memo.pdf
Benchmark Orgs List.pdf
EE Heatmap.pdf
FYF Discussion Memo.pdf
Property Tax Exemptions Discussion Memo.pdf
Water/Sewer Update for Council Memo.pdf
DRAFT Ordinance adding Chapter 1A Code of Ethics.pdf
DRAFT Ordinance Amending Chapter 2.pdf
Attachments:
IV.Adjournment
________________________
Wes Mays, Mayor
CERTIFICATE
I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of
the City of Coppell, Texas on this 18th day of March, 2022, at _____________.
______________________________
Ashley Owens, City Secretary
PUBLIC NOTICE - STATEMENT FOR ADA COMPLIANCE AND OPEN CARRY LEGISLATION
The City of Coppell acknowledges its responsibility to comply with the Americans With
Disabilities Act of 1990. Thus, in order to assist individuals with disabilities who require
special services (i.e. sign interpretative services, alternative audio/visual devices, and
amanuenses) for participation in or access to the City of Coppell sponsored public programs,
services and/or meetings, the City requests that individuals make requests for these services
seventy-two (72) hours – three (3) business days ahead of the scheduled program, service,
and/or meeting. To make arrangements, contact Kori Allen, ADA Coordinator, or other
designated official at (972) 462-0022, or (TDD 1-800-RELAY, TX 1-800-735-2989).
Page 2 City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 3/18/2022
Master
City of Coppell, Texas 255 E. Parkway Boulevard
Coppell, Texas
75019-9478
File Number: 2022-6187
File ID: Type: Status: 2022-6187 Agenda Item Work Session
2Version: Reference: In Control: City Council
03/14/2022File Created:
Final Action: Work SessionFile Name:
Title: A.Discussion regarding Value Proposition.
B.Update regarding the City’s Compensation Plan.
C.Discussion regarding the Five-Year Forecast.
D.Discussion regarding the Homestead Exemption.
E.Update regarding Utility Billing and Water/Sewer rates.
F.Discussion regarding the draft Code of Conduct.
Notes:
Sponsors: Enactment Date:
Value Proposition Memo.pdf,
Compensation/Classification Study Memo.pdf,
Benchmark Orgs List.pdf, EE Heatmap.pdf, FYF
Discussion Memo.pdf, Property Tax Exemptions
Discussion Memo.pdf, Water/Sewer Update for
Council Memo.pdf, DRAFT Ordinance adding Chapter
1A Code of Ethics.pdf, DRAFT Ordinance Amending
Chapter 2.pdf
Attachments: Enactment Number:
Hearing Date: Contact:
Effective Date: Drafter:
Related Files:
History of Legislative File
Action: Result: Return
Date:
Due Date: Sent To: Date: Acting Body: Ver-
sion:
Text of Legislative File 2022-6187
Title
A.Discussion regarding Value Proposition.
B.Update regarding the City’s Compensation Plan.
C.Discussion regarding the Five-Year Forecast.
D.Discussion regarding the Homestead Exemption.
E.Update regarding Utility Billing and Water/Sewer rates.
F.Discussion regarding the draft Code of Conduct.
Page 1City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 3/18/2022
Master Continued (2022-6187)
Summary
Page 2City of Coppell, Texas Printed on 3/18/2022
MEMORANDUM
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Mike Land, City Manager
Date: March 22, 2022
Reference: Value Proposition Discussion
Introduction:
Joining us Tuesday night will be Rick Robinson with the Ramsee Consulting Group. Rick has
worked directly with the Coppell City Council on the topic of understanding and establishing
Coppell’s Value Proposition on numerous occasions throughout the years, the most recent being in
2018.
In 2012, the City Council chose the Best Total Solution Value Proposition for the City. Since that
time, the organization and Council has used the principles of Best Total Solution as a guide in
making recommendations and as part of the decision-making process.
Two recent conversations exemplifying Best Total Solution include design components association
with Duck Pond Park and Magnolia Park Trail connector.
1
MEMORANDUM
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Justin Vaughn, Interim Director of Employee Experience
Date: March 22, 2022
Reference: Vision 2040 Foundation: Maintain quality workforce to serve the community
Introduction:
The City of Coppell is conducting a Compensation/Classification Study to be completed this fiscal
year in advance of budget preparations for the 22-23 Annual Budget. The purpose of the briefing is
to present information related to the competitor/comparator list that Evergreen will use to
benchmark salaries and benefits. Evergreen, in conjunction with City staff, will be present via
Zoom to discuss methodology for the selection of the cities on the list and discuss the difference
between comparator and competitor cities.
The supplementary documents included with this agenda item are:
• List that will be used for the benchmark analysis
• Heat map showing where current City of Coppell employees live within the Metroplex
Analysis:
The city is conducting a compensation/classification study that will consist of a review of the current
employee compensation system/classification structure and evaluate its place relative to competitor
organizations within our market. We are working with Evergreen Solutions to conduct the study and
will be reviewing our classification system over the next several months.
As part of the project, we are assessing our current market comparators/competitors that will serve as
benchmarks for our salaries and benefits. Working with the Evergreen, we have developed a list of
comparator/competitor organizations based on recommend criteria.
City of Coppell Benchmark Organizations
Addison
Carrollton
Farmers Branch
Grapevine
Irving
Flower Mound
Colleyville
Keller
Frisco
Plano
Denton
McKinney
Allen
The Colony
Little Elm
MEMORANDUM
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Kim Tiehen, Director of Finance
Date: March 22, 2022
Reference: Five Year Forecast Discussion
Introduction:
An overview of the Five-Year Forecast will be presented at the March 22 Council meeting. The
purpose of the Five-Year Forecast is to engage citizens and employees of the City regarding the
City’s long-range planning. The document intends to educate citizens and employees on the City’s
future activities. It is used to communicate the story about how the City will incorporate the citizen
engagement from the 2040 strategic plan into the City’s future operations and financial decision-
making.
The Five-Year Forecast is more informal than the Budget document. As an informal planning
tool, no action to approve the Five-Year Forecast is necessary. Again, its purpose is to inform and
educate future financial decision-making.
Along with why a Five-Year Forecast is prepared, the evening’s presentation will also include:
- an overview of the document
- the process and approach used to create the document
- a high-level overview of what is included as well as various assumptions used to project
revenues and various expenditures
MEMORANDUM
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Kim Tiehen, Director of Finance
Date: March 22, 2022
Reference: Property Tax Exemptions Discussion
Introduction:
Staff will provide a presentation that will include an analysis of various increases to both the
homestead and over 65 exemptions, show the impact on the tax rate of increasing exemptions,
and the impact on the tax bill for various classifications of property owners.
The analysis provides insight that as exemptions increase, the property tax rate will also need to
increase to provide the same level of property tax revenue. The analysis is consistent with the
“Seesaw Effect” presented during the Budget Primer presentation. The Seesaw Effect showed
that as total taxable property value goes down, the tax rate increases. Adding exemptions
decreases the total taxable property value. To generate the same level of property tax revenue,
tax rates would need to increase to offset the decrease in taxable property value. (The Seesaw
Effects slide is provided for a visual reference.)
MEMORANDUM
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Kim Tiehen, Director of Finance
Date: March 22, 2022
Reference: Water and Sewer Update
Introduction:
At the March 22 Council workshop, the following Water and Sewer topics will be covered:
Utility Billing System Upgrade
The City switched to the new billing software on February 7. Both the February 15 and February 28 bills were processed
and mailed. All customers received a bill in the mail in order to test the system. Staff are processing the March 15 bills,
and customers who requested an electronic bill only should not receive their March bill in the mail.
Staff continues to process billing in test before processing in the live database. Therefore, it is taking a little longer to
generate bills. The additional time for processing bills was considered during the planning phase which is why no penalties
or water disconnections for non-payment are occurring at this time.
There are 3,662 customers signed up for the Customer Self-Serve portal and 5,190 customers signed up to pay via bank
draft.
According to the Tyler Munis implementation team, this has been one of the smoothest implementations they have
performed. Members of the Utility Billing Department, Accounting, Enterprise Solutions, Community Information Office,
and the PIER Pilots along with the Project Manager are responsible for the smooth successful implementation of the Utility
Billing system.
Kiosk
Based on feedback from Coppell’s Senior community members, a special slot was opened which allows our senior
customers to simply drop their check in the kiosk. All customers with the senior discount noted on their water bill account
were sent a mailing letting them know about the “Just for You” slot.
During the month of February, 368 customers utilized the kiosk. For the first fifteen days in March, 217 customers have
utilized the kiosk. In keeping with the fun facts: the fastest time to process a payment using the kiosk remains 33 seconds
and the longest time to process a payment remains at 11 minutes 48 seconds.
Winter Averaging Schedule
The recommended timeline for implementing winter averaging for sewer charges remains unchanged. The new system will
track water usage for November 2022 through February 2023 with the first bills reflecting the use of winter averaging in
the Spring of 2023.
The switch to winter averaging will impact sewer rates. Once Dallas Water Utilities and Trinity River Authority provide
their new rates, staff can evaluate the impact of all changes on the current rates. Rates and winter averaging will be discussed
during the Water Sewer Fund budget workshop with a recommendation to Council for consideration in November or
December 2022.
Tiered Rate Structure
Council approved the tiered rate structure on March 23, 2021, with an effective date of June 1, 2021. The intent of the tiered
rate structure is to encourage water conservation as a method to address Coppell’s impact on water sustainability for the
region and to impact Coppell’s future water needs.
The average usage by tier provided by the rate study, prior year’s usage by tier (prior to implementing the tiered rate
structure), and the usage by tier since implementing the tiered rate are shown in the chart below:
It is important to note that the rate study is based on five years of data, the 20/21 percentages are based on one year of data,
and the 21/22 (first period of implementation) is based on nine months of data. We will continue to track the impact of the
tiered rate structure on usage and provide updates during the budget workshops.
Tiers
(in gallons)
5 Yr Average
Per Rate Study
Average
6/2020 to 2/2021
Average
6/2021 to 2/2022
0-15,000 72%67%70%
15,001-25,000 14%20%19%
25,001+14%13%11%
100%100%100%
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
DRAFT 3-16-22 DISCUSSION ONLY
Page | 1 TM 128461
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. ________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS,
AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES BY AMENDING CHAPTER 1
‘ADMINISTRATION’, BY ADDING NEW CHAPTER 1A “CODE OF
ETHICS AND CONDUCT”; PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE;
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Coppell desires to add a Code of Ethics and
Conduct to the Code of Ordinance to establish rules and regulations.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF COPPELL, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That Chapter 1A, “Code of Ethics” is hereby amended by adding a new
Chapter 1A, Article 1 “Code of Ethics” to read as follows:
“CHAPTER 1A.
CODE OF ETHICS AND CONDUCT
ARTICLE I.
DECLARATION OF POLICY AND DEFINITIONS.
Sec. 1A-1-1. Statement of Purpose and Principles of Conduct.
A. Purpose. It is hereby declared to be the policy of the city that the proper operation of
democratic government requires that:
1. city officials be independent, impartial, and responsible only to the people of the
city;
2. governmental decisions and policy be made using the proper procedures of the
governmental structure;
3. except as provided in the Coppell City Charter, no city official shall have any
financial interest, direct or indirect, or engage in any business, transaction, or
professional activity; or incur any obligation of any nature that is in conflict with
the proper discharge of the city official's duties in the public interest;
4. public office not be used for personal gain; and
5. the city council at all times be maintained as a nonpartisan body.
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
DRAFT 3-16-22 DISCUSSION ONLY
Page | 2 TM 128461
B. Principles of conduct. The city council further believes that an elected or appointed
official of the city assumes a public trust and should recognize the importance of high
ethical standards within the organization they lead or support. Essential values and ethical
behaviors that an elected or appointed official should exemplify include the following:
1. Commitment beyond self.
2. Obedience and commitment to the law.
3. Commitment to the public good.
4. Respect for the value and dignity of all individuals.
5. Accountability to the public.
6. Truthfulness.
7. Fairness.
8. Responsible application of resources.
C. Application.
1. To implement the purpose and principles of conduct in this section, the city council
has determined that it is advisable to enact this code of ethics for all city officials,
and persons doing business with the city, to serve as a standard for official conduct
and as a basis for discipline.
2. This chapter is cumulative of and supplemental to all applicable provisions of the
city charter, other city ordinances, and state and federal laws and
regulations. Compliance with this chapter does not excuse or relieve any person
from any obligation imposed by the city charter, other city ordinances, or state or
federal laws or regulations.
D. No cause of action. This section is a statement of purpose and principles only. Nothing
in this section may be used to create a cause of action under this chapter.
Sec. 1A-1-2. Employees
The standards of conduct for employees of the City are governed by in the Employee Policy
and Procedure Handbook and other personnel procedures adopted by the City. All
complaints that an employee has violated these standards shall be referred to the City
Manager or Director of the City Department where the employee works.
Sec. 1A-1-3. Definitions.
In this chapter, the following words and phrases have the meanings ascribed to them in this
section, unless the context requires otherwise:
Accept. A person "accepts" an offer of employment or a business opportunity when
the person enters into a legally binding contract or any informal agreement or
understanding that the parties expect to be carried out.
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
DRAFT 3-16-22 DISCUSSION ONLY
Page | 3 TM 128461
Affiliated. Business entities are "affiliated" if one is the parent or subsidiary of the other
or if they are subsidiaries of the same parent business entity.
Before The City. Representation or appearance "before the city" means before:
1. the city council;
2. a board, commission, or other city body or city entity; or
3. a city official.
Benefit means anything reasonably regarded as monetary gain or monetary advantage,
including a personal benefit to any other person in whose welfare the beneficiary has a
direct and substantial interest.
Business Entity means a sole proprietorship, partnership, firm, corporation, holding
company, joint-stock company, receivership, trust, unincorporated association, or any
other entity recognized by law, except that the term does not include a governmental
entity.
City means the city of Coppell, Texas.
City Council Member Or Member Of The City Council means all members of the
Coppell city council, including the mayor.
Client.
1. The term "client" includes any specialized and highly personalized professional
business relationship of an individual official. The term does not include a regular
or ordinary business or vendor relationship.
2. If the official does not personally represent the client but conducts business as a
member of a primary partnership or professional corporation or conducts business
through another entity, a client of the partnership, professional corporation, or
entity is deemed to be a client of the official if:
a. the partnership, professional corporation, or entity derived two percent or more
of its annual gross income within the preceding 12 months from the client; and
b. the city official knows of the client's relationship.
Code Of Ethics or Ethics Code means this chapter.
Confidential Government Information includes:
1. all information held by the city that is not available to the public under the Texas
Open Records Act;
2. any information from a meeting closed to the public pursuant to the Texas Open
Meetings Act;
3. any information protected by attorney-client, attorney work product, or other
applicable legal privilege; and
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
DRAFT 3-16-22 DISCUSSION ONLY
Page | 4 TM 128461
4. any research, opinions, advice, recommendations, reasoning, or conclusions in a
draft document concerning city business or city policy that has not yet been released
to the public in accordance with established city procedures.
Department Director means the head of any department or office, including an office
under the city manager, that is created by the city charter or by ordinance of the city
council.
Discretionary Contract means any contract other than one that by law must be awarded
on a competitive bid basis.
Doing Business with The City means any person, either individually or on behalf of an
entity, who submits a bid or proposal, or negotiates or enters into any city contract,
whether or not the contract is required by state law to be competitively bid.
Domestic Partner means an individual who, on a continuous basis, lives in the same
household and shares the common resources of life in a close, personal, intimate,
committed relationship with a city official. A domestic partner may be of the same or
opposite gender as the official and is not married to or related by blood to the official.
Donation means a voluntary transfer of property (including the payment of money) or
the conferral of a benefit having monetary value (such as the rendition of services or
the forbearance of collection on a debt) to the city, unless consideration of equal or
greater value is received by the donor.
Employee Or City Employee means any person listed on the city of Coppell payroll as
an employee, whether part-time, full-time, permanent, or temporary.
Ex Parte Communication means any communication not made in a written document
filed with the Ethic Review Panel and not made orally during a hearing but does not
include a communication made pursuant to an inquiry duly authorized by the
commission.
Former City Official or Employee means a person who has left service as a city official
or employee.
Gift means a voluntary transfer of property (including the payment of money) or the
conferral of a benefit having monetary value (such as the rendition of services or the
forbearance of collection on a debt), unless consideration of equal or greater value is
received by the donor.
Knowingly Or with Knowledge. A person acts "knowingly" or "with knowledge"
regarding his or her conduct or to circumstances surrounding his or her conduct when
the person is aware of the nature of the conduct or that the circumstances exist or should
be reasonably certain to cause the result.
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
DRAFT 3-16-22 DISCUSSION ONLY
Page | 5 TM 128461
Official Or City Official includes the following persons:
1. City council members.
2. Municipal judges.
3. The city manager and city attorney,
4. Members of all boards, commissions, committees, and other bodies created by the
city council pursuant to city ordinance or federal or state law, including bodies that
are only advisory in nature.
5. City council appointed members of boards, commission or other council appointees
that were created by the city council.
6. For purposes of Chapter 1A only, a volunteer on committees or task forces formed
by boards or commissions.
Official Action includes:
1. any affirmative act (including the making of a formal or informal recommendation),
that is within the scope of an official's duties; and
2. any failure to act, if the official is under a duty to act.
Official Capacity or Official Duties means acting, or actions relating to matters, within
the scope of employment or office, or under the official’s control or supervision.
Official Information includes information gathered pursuant to the power or authority
of city government.
Partner includes any partner in a general partnership, limited partnership, or joint
venture.
Perishable Food or Beverages are consumable products, such as packaged foods,
delivered fresh foods, including baked goods and edible gift baskets, sealed beverages, and
floral arrangements.
Personal Benefit means any benefit knowingly solicited, accepted, or agreed to be
accepted by another for the purpose of influencing how a city official performs or refrains
from performing an official action.
Personally Participated. The requirement of having "personally participated" in a
matter is met only if the individual in fact exercised discretion relating to the matter. The
fact that the person had responsibility for a matter does not by itself establish that the person
"personally participated" in the matter.
Relative means a spouse, domestic partner, child, stepchild, brother, sister, parent or
stepparent, or a person claimed as a dependent on the city official latest individual federal
income tax return.
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
DRAFT 3-16-22 DISCUSSION ONLY
Page | 6 TM 128461
Representation encompasses every form of communication or personal appearance in
which a person, not acting in performance of official duties, formally or informally serves
as an advocate for private interests. Lobbying and service as an expert witness, even on an
informal basis, are forms of representation. "Representation" does not include appearance
as a fact witness in litigation or other official proceedings.
Solicitation. "Solicitation" of subsequent employment or a subsequent business
opportunity includes any form of proposal or negotiation relating to employment or a
business opportunity.
ARTICLE II. CODE OF CONDUCT
Sec. 1A-2-1. Fiduciary Duty.
A city official, in the performance of that person's official duties, shall fulfill the city
official's fiduciary duty to the city.
Sec. 1A-2-2. Standards of Behavior; Standards of Civility.
A. Standards of behavior. City officials shall, when acting in the performance of their
official duties, comply with the following standards of behavior:
1. To conduct themselves and to operate with integrity and in a manner that merits the
trust and support of the public.
2. To uphold all applicable laws and regulations to protect and enhance the city's
ability to accomplish its mission.
3. To treat others with respect, doing for and to others what the official would have
done for and to him or her in similar circumstances.
4. To be a responsible steward of the taxpayer resources.
5. To take no actions that could benefit the official personally at the unwarranted
expense of the city, avoiding even the appearance of a conflict of interest, and to
exercise prudence and good judgment at all times.
6. To carefully consider the public perception of personal and professional actions and
the effect such actions could have, positively or negatively, on the city's reputation
both in the community and elsewhere.
7. To strive for personal and professional growth to improve effectiveness as an
elected or appointed official.
B. Standards of civility. City officials shall, when acting in the performance of their
official duties, comply to the following standards of civility in their interactions with
city officials, city employees, residents, and persons doing business with the city:
1. City officials shall accord the utmost respect and courtesy to each other, city
officials, city employees, residents, and persons doing business with the city.
2. City officials shall not make comments or take actions that are abusive; belligerent;
crude; derogatory; impertinent; personal attacks upon the character, integrity, or
motives of others; profane; slanderous; or threatening.
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
DRAFT 3-16-22 DISCUSSION ONLY
Page | 7 TM 128461
3. City officials shall preserve order and decorum in meetings in accordance with
Roberts Rules of Order and the applicable rules of procedure of the city council,
board, or commission.
4. City officials shall treat city employees as professionals and specifically shall not:
a. interfere with the work of city employees.
b. impair the ability of city employees to implement city council policies.
c. influence city employees in the making of recommendations or decisions.
d. criticize a city employee's performance in public.
e. berate nor admonish city employees.
5. City officials shall work through the city manager, city secretary, city attorney, and
the applicable department director to obtain information or request assistance with
projects, rather than contacting city employees directly. This provision does not
apply to professional and administrative assistants to the mayor and city council.
6. Because independent advice from boards and commissions is essential to the public
decision-making process, city council members shall not:
a. use their position to influence the deliberations or decisions of boards and
commissions.
b. demand that board or commission members vote as requested by the city
council member or threaten board or commission members with removal.
C. This paragraph does not prohibit city council members from receiving information
from or providing information to a board or commission member, working together
with board and commission members on projects, or expressing their opinions to board
and commission members.
Sec. 1A-2-3. Anti-Discrimination.
A city official shall not commit any act or engage in any conduct while acting in their
official capacity. Excluding anyone from our community based on their race, ethnicity,
color, age, religion, marital or parental status, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity and
expression, genetic characteristics, national origin, disability, military or veteran status,
political opinions or affiliations, or any other legally protected characteristic or status
diminishes us and compromises our ability to fulfill our mission. Discrimination or commit
any act or engage in any conduct, public or private, which indicate a bias, prejudice, or lack
of impartiality against others based on any of these factors, or any other legally protected
classifications, is prohibited. Discriminatory harassment and other offensive acts include
any conduct, whether verbal, visual, or physical, which affect a person’s ability to perform
official duties or would negatively reflect on the city or, that creates an abusive and hostile
work environment, or that has the purpose or effect of interfering with an employee's work
performance or development.
Sec. 1A-2-4. Retaliation Prohibited.
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
DRAFT 3-16-22 DISCUSSION ONLY
Page | 8 TM 128461
A person commits an offense if he or she retaliates, threaten, attempts to threat or coerce
against any person for filing a complaint, or for testifying, assisting, or participating in any
manner in a proceeding or hearing under this chapter.
Sec. 1A-2-5. Other Persons.
A. Violations by other persons. A city official shall not knowingly assist or induce, or
attempt to assist or induce, any person to violate any provision of this chapter.
B. Using others to engage in forbidden conduct. A city official shall not violate any
provision of this chapter through the acts of another.
C. Participation in ethics violations. No person shall intentionally or knowingly induce,
attempt to induce, conspire with, aid, or assist, or attempt to aid or assist another person
to violate any provision of this chapter.
Sec. 1A-2-6. Duty To Report.
Duty to report violations. Persons shall immediately report any conduct that the person
knows to be a violation of this chapter to the special legal counsel. Failure to report a
violation of this chapter is a violation of this chapter. Any person who knowingly fails to
report a violation of this chapter shall be subject to sanctions described in this chapter. For
purposes of this section, a report made to the special legal counsel's Fraud, Waste, or Abuse
hotline will be considered a report under this section.
Sec. 1A-2-7. Ethics Training.
A. All new city officials shall receive ethics training within 30 days after being elected,
appointed to office, or hired by the city. All current city officials shall receive ethics
training on an ongoing basis but at least every two years.
B. All city officials who are leaving city service shall receive ethics information
concerning requirements for former city officials before the city official ends their city
service.
C. The special legal counsel shall provide all lobbying registrants with ethics information
within 30 days after registration. Each registrant shall provide their individual lobbyists
with a copy of the ethics information.
D. The director of the office of procurement services shall publish on the city's website
information as to how this chapter applies to consultants or contractors and to city
officials who work with consultants or contractors.
E. This ethics training and information required by this section shall be made available in
a format and medium as determined by the chief integrity officer. The chief integrity
officer, in coordination with the city manager, city auditor, and city secretary's liaisons,
shall structure ethics training and information to ensure that participants have the
necessary knowledge to accomplish the statement of purpose in this chapter and
comply with all applicable ethics laws. City officials must demonstrate such knowledge
by passing any required ethics training.
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
DRAFT 3-16-22 DISCUSSION ONLY
Page | 9 TM 128461
F. Failure to receive ethics training, documents, or notices required by this section does
not waive that person's duty to comply with this code of ethics or waive enforcement
of this chapter.
Sec. 1A-2-8. Dissemination Of Code of Ethics.
A. Within 30 days after starting their position, every new city official must be given a
copy or a link to this chapter. The special legal counsel or the city attorney shall provide
a copy of this chapter to every city official. Each city official shall acknowledge, in
writing, that they received a copy or link to this chapter. Copies of this chapter must be
made readily available to the public.
B. The failure of any person to receive a copy of this chapter or a link to the chapter will
have no effect on that person's duty to comply with this chapter or on the enforcement
of the provisions of this chapter.
Sec. 1A-2-9. Ethics Pledge.
All city officials, before their appointment, shall sign the following ethics pledge and file
it with the city secretary:
"I have received a copy of Coppell Code of Ordinance Chapter 1A, "Code of Ethics." I
have read and understand the Code of Ethics. I understand that the Code of Ethics is binding
on me, and therefore I agree to comply with the Code of Ethics. I understand that the Code
of Ethics imposes restrictions on present city officials, former city officials, lobbyists, and
persons doing business with the city. I agree to participate in periodic ethics training. I
agree to seek advice from the City Attorney's Office when necessary to ensure compliance
with the Code of Ethics. I agree that I will not violate the code of ethics, participate in
violations of the Code of Ethics, or fail to report violations of the Code of Ethics. I
understand that violation of the Code of Ethics, participation in a violation of the Code of
Ethics, and failure to report a violation of the Code of Ethics may result in severe
consequences."
ARTICLE III.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST.
Sec. 1A-3-1 Gifts.
A. General rules.
1. A city official shall not solicit, accept, or agree to accept any gift, favor, benefit, or
service that:
a. reasonably tends to influence or reward official conduct; or
b. the city official knows is intended to influence or reward the discharge of
official duties.
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
DRAFT 3-16-22 DISCUSSION ONLY
Page | 10 TM 128461
2. A person or business entity shall not knowingly offer any gift or benefit to a city
official that:
a. reasonably tends to influence or reward official conduct; or
b. the person or business entity knows is intended to influence or reward the
discharge of official duties.
3. Except as provided in Subsection (f), a city official shall not accept cash, a cash
equivalent open loop gift card (including a Visa or Mastercard gift card), check, or
negotiable instrument from any person or representative of a person or entity who
does business with or is seeking to do business with the city. In this Paragraph
OPEN LOOP means a general-purpose charge card that can be used anywhere that
brand of card is accepted and does not include closed loop gift cards that can only
be used at a specific merchant listed on the card.
4. A city official who receives an unsolicited benefit or gift that he or she is not
allowed to accept or does not wish to accept to avoid any appearance of
impropriety, may donate the item to the city or another governmental entity that has
the authority to accept the item or to recognize tax-exempt charitable organization
formed for educational, religious, or scientific purposes. A city official who donates
an unsolicited benefit or gift may notify the special legal counsel on a form
approved by the special legal counsel that provides the city official’s name, the gift
donated, and the entity to which the city official donated the unsolicited benefit or
gift.
B. Exceptions. Subsection (a) does not include:
1. reimbursement of reasonable expenses for travel in accordance with the city's
ordinances, administrative directives, and this section;
2. a public award or reward in recognition of public service or professional
achievement, if the award or reward is reasonable in light of the occasion;
3. a loan from a lending institution made in its regular course of business on the same
terms generally available to the public;
4. a scholarship or fellowship awarded on the same terms and based on the same
criteria applied to other applicants;
5. admission, regardless of value, to an event that a city official is invited to, is offered
tickets to, or is participating in relating to their official duties or responsibilities,
including gathering information about a current or potential city supported
program;
6. tickets, meals, travel, lodging, and entertainment accepted by a city official in
accordance with this Subsections (c) and (d);
7. gifts having a nominal value (a noncash value of less than $50.00) accepted by a
city official from a resident or person or entity doing, or seeking to do, business
with the city if a city official does not receive cumulative gifts from a single source
in a calendar year of more than $50.00 or plaques, caps, key rings, mugs, tee shirts,
fresh cut flowers given at public appearances, or perishable food and beverages
infrequently given.
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
DRAFT 3-16-22 DISCUSSION ONLY
Page | 11 TM 128461
8. A ceremonial or protocol gift given to a city official on behalf of the city, provided
that any ceremonial or protocol gift given to:
a. a city official valued over $300.00 must be delivered to the city manager as a
donation to the city, or
9. Gifts from a relative or a person with whom the city official has a personal,
professional, or business relationship independent of the city official's status with
the city.
C. Honorarium, meals, travel, lodging, and entertainment.
1. A city official may not solicit, accept, or agree to accept any honorarium (cash
payment or in-kind gift, except a plaque) in consideration for services that a city
official would not have been requested to provide but for his or her official position
or duties.
2. A city official may accept meals, travel, lodging, or entertainment if:
a. city official is a guest; and
b. the donor or host is present at the meal, travel, lodging, or entertainment (meals,
lodging, travel, or entertainment from a person who does business or is seeking
to do business with the city when the donor host is not present is prohibited).
D. Tickets.
1. When receiving complimentary tickets, city officials must evaluate whether the
tickets are a gift in violation of Subsection (a).
2. City officials may receive tickets to a fundraiser or charity event that benefits a city
facility or program, subject to availability and in the sole discretion of an event
sponsor. These tickets may not be sold or transferred, except to another city official.
3. Councilmembers and board and commission members may receive complimentary
annual memberships, individual or family, to city owned facilities that are operated
or managed by a non-profit entity on behalf of the city.
4. City officials may receive tickets to city owned facilities that are operated by the
City or a licensed non-profit entity.
E. Reporting. City officials must report gifts, including tickets, meals, travel, lodging, or
entertainment in accordance with applicable state law and the city's reporting
requirements in Article VI.
F. Campaign contribution exception. The general rule stated in Subsection (a) does not
apply to a campaign contribution received and reported in compliance with the Texas
Election Code.
Sec. 1A-3-2. Personal Benefit to Others.
A. Personal benefits to others. To avoid the appearance and risk of a conflict of
interest, a city official shall not use his or her official position or office, to take or
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
DRAFT 3-16-22 DISCUSSION ONLY
Page | 12 TM 128461
refrain from taking, official action that he or she knows will result in a personal
benefit for any of the following persons or entities:
1. a relative of the city official;
2. a person with whom the city official has a financial or business relationship,
including but not limited to:
a. an outside employer business of the city official, or their relative, or
someone who works for such outside employer of business;
b. a client or substantial customer of the city official, or their relative
(SUBSTANTIAL means an amount exceeding 10 percent of the city
official, or their relative's income for the previous year);
c. a debtor or creditor of the city official, or their relative; or
d. a person or business entity with whom the city official has, directly or
indirectly, within the past 12 months,
i. engaged in negotiations pertaining to a business opportunity, or
ii. solicited an offer of employment, received, and not rejected an offer of
employment, or accepted an offer of employment.
B. Recusal and disclosure. A city official whose conduct would violate Subsection (a)
shall follow the recusal and disclosure requirements in this article.
C. Exceptions. A personal benefit does not include:
1. salaries, compensation, or employee benefits;
2. campaign or political contributions that are made and reported in accordance
with state law;
3. hospitality extended for a purpose unrelated to the official business of the city;
4. a public award or reward in recognition of public service or professional
achievement, if the award or reward is reasonable in light of the occasion;
5. gifts or other ceremonial symbols of recognition presented by representatives
of governmental bodies or political subdivisions who are acting in their official
capacities;
6. a loan from a lending institution made in its regular course of business on the
same terms generally available to the public;
7. complimentary copies of trade publications; and
8. anything of value received as a devise, bequest, or inheritance.
Sec. 1A-3-3. Miscellaneous Conflicts of Interest.
A. Special rules.
1. Acquisition of interest in impending matters. A city official shall not acquire an
interest (economic or otherwise) in any matter if the official knows that the interest
will be affected by impending official action of the city.
2. Acquisition of interest in decided matter. A city official shall not acquire an interest
(economic or otherwise) in any matter affected by an official action of the city for
a period of one year after the date of the official action.
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
DRAFT 3-16-22 DISCUSSION ONLY
Page | 13 TM 128461
3. Reciprocal favors. A city official may not enter into an agreement or understanding
with any other person that official action by the official will be rewarded or
reciprocated by the other person.
4. Benefits to previous employers. A city official may not, within 12 months of
entering city employment or service, award a contract or participate in a matter
benefiting a person or business entity that formerly employed the city official.
5. Area of notification conflict.
a. General. A city official may not take official action on, or otherwise participate
in, a matter if the city official has an ownership interest, a lease, or other
economic interest in a property within the area of notification listed in any land
use matter.
For purposes of this paragraph, ECONOMIC INTEREST includes, but is not limited to,
legal or equitable property interests in land, chattels, and intangibles, and contractual rights,
having more than de minimis value.
b. Recusal and disclosure. A city official whose conduct would violate
Subparagraph (A) of this paragraph shall adhere to the recusal and disclosure
requirements in Section 12A-24 of this chapter.
B. Board of directors of a reinvestment zone.
1. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, a member of the board of
directors of a reinvestment zone established under the Tax Increment Financing
Act, as amended, may:
a. own property within that reinvestment zone; and
b. participate in discussions and voting on matters before the board of directors
that may indirectly affect the member's property within the reinvestment zone
but must adhere to the recusal and disclosure requirements on matters before
the board of directors that may directly affect the member's property.
2. For purposes of this subsection, a matter directly affects a member's property in the
reinvestment zone if the matter involves a project in the reinvestment zone that is:
a. financed with tax increment funds; and
b. located within 200 feet of the member's property.
C. City officials serving in policymaking positions for business entities at the direction
of the city. The restrictions and requirements of this article of this chapter do not
apply to a city official serving as an officer or director or in any other policymaking
position for a business entity when taking official action on behalf of the city on
matters concerning that business entity, if the city official:
1. was appointed by the mayor, city council, or city manager to represent the city
as an officer or director or in any other policymaking position for the business
entity; and
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
DRAFT 3-16-22 DISCUSSION ONLY
Page | 14 TM 128461
2. has no substantial economic interest in the business entity or in the matter on
which the action is being taken as defined in Texas Local Government Code
Section 171.002.
Sec. 1A-3-4. Donations.
A. Purpose and procedures.
1. Donations of money, real estate, products, and services to the city allow residents
to make valuable contributions to city programs and should be encouraged. Persons
and business entities making donations should not, however, expect any reward,
reciprocal benefit, or influence.
2. Donations must be documented to ensure transparency of government, enable
measurement of the value and usefulness of the donation, and allow for audits of
donations.
3. For long-term or complex projects and projects involving professional services, an
agreement must be drafted to document the scope of goods or services to be donated
and to document which party retains ownership of intellectual property. If a
donation will lead to city expenditures, expenditures must follow the procurement
process if required by city code or state law.
B. General rule.
1. A city official shall not solicit, accept, or agree to accept any donation to the city
of money, real estate, products, or services that:
a. reasonably tends to influence or reward official conduct; or
b. the city official knows is intended to influence or reward the discharge of
official duties.
2. A person or business entity shall not knowingly offer any donation to the city of
money, real estate, products, or services that:
a. reasonably tends to influence or reward official conduct; or
b. the person or business entity knows is intended to influence or reward the
discharge of official duties.
C. Reporting. City officials receiving a donation to the city shall report the donation
in compliance with this article.
D. Exceptions. This section does not apply to gifts made to a city official in
compliance with this article. This section does not apply to exceptions to the gift
rules.
Sec. 1A-3-5. Nepotism.
A. Appointment or employment of relatives.
1. A city official shall not appoint, or take any action to influence the appointment
of, that person's relative to a quasi- judicial board or commission within the city.
2. A city council member shall not appoint any fellow city council member's relative
to the Ethic Review Panel or to any quasi-judicial board or commission within the
city.
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
DRAFT 3-16-22 DISCUSSION ONLY
Page | 15 TM 128461
3. A city official shall not appoint or employ, or take any action to influence the
appointment or employment of, his or her relative to any position of employment
within the city.
B. Supervision of relatives. In addition to the nepotism restrictions of Section 34-5 (d)
of the city code for employees, no city official shall be permitted to be the
immediate supervisor of his or her relative.
Sec. 1A-3-6. Confidential Information.
A. Improper access. A city official shall not use his or her position to secure official
information about any person or entity for any purpose other than the performance
of official responsibilities.
B. Improper disclosure or use. A city official shall not intentionally or knowingly
disclose any confidential government information gained by reason of the official's
position. This rule does not prohibit:
1. any disclosure that is no longer confidential government information;
2. the confidential reporting of illegal or unethical conduct to authorities
designated by law; or
3. any disclosure, not otherwise prohibited by law, in furtherance of public safety.
C. Disclosure of a closed meeting. A city official shall not knowingly disclose to a
member of the public the certified agenda, the recording, or the discussion had
within a meeting that was lawfully closed to the public, unless the disclosure is
made with lawful authority.
Sec. 1A-3-7. Representation Of Private Interests.
A. Representation before the city.
1. General rule.
a. Representation for compensation. A city official shall not represent, for
compensation, any person, group, or entity (other than themselves or the
city official's relative before the city. For purposes of this subsection,
"compensation" means money or any other thing of value that is received
or is to be received in return for or in connection with such representation.
b. Representation without compensation. A city official who is a member of
a board, commission, or body shall not represent any person, group, or
entity before:
(i) that city official's board, commission, or body;
(ii) city staff having responsibility for making recommendations to, or
taking any action on behalf of, that board, commission, or body; or
(iii) a board, commission, or body that has appellate jurisdiction over the
board, commission, or body of which the city official is a member, if
any issue relates to the official's duties.
2. Exceptions. The restrictions in this subsection do not apply to:
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
DRAFT 3-16-22 DISCUSSION ONLY
Page | 16 TM 128461
a. A person who is a city official only because that person is an appointed
member of a board, commission, or body, may represent for compensation
a person, group, or entity before the city so long as the representation is not
before the board, commission, or body that the person is a member.
b. If the representation is before a board, commission, or body, of which the
city official is a member, that is only advisory in nature.
3. Prestige of office and improper influence. In connection with the representation
of private interests before the city, a city official shall not:
a. assert the prestige of the city official's position for the purpose of advancing
private interest; or
b. state or imply that the city official can influence city action on any basis
other than the merits.
B. Representation in litigation adverse to the city.
1. Officials (other than board and commission members). A city official, other
than a person who is classified as an official only because that person is an
appointed member of a board, commission, or body, shall not represent any
person, group, or entity (other than themselves or their relative) in any litigation
to which the city is a party, if the interests of that person, group, or entity are
adverse to the interests of the city.
2. Board and commission members. A person who is a city official only because
that person is an appointed member of a board, commission, or body shall not
represent any person, group, or entity (other than themselves or their relative)
in any litigation to which the city is a party, if the interests of that person, group,
or entity are adverse to the interests of the city and the matter is substantially
related to the official's duties to the city.
3. Affiliates of officials. Subject to applicable professional ethical standards, the
restrictions stated in Subsections (b)(1) and (b)(2) do not apply to
representation by a partner or other affiliate of a city official so long as the city
official does not participate in any manner whatsoever in the partner's or
affiliate's representation.
C. Representation in municipal court. No member of the city council may engage in
the practice of law in or before the municipal court of the city or otherwise
participate as an attorney in a matter where a city official may appear as a material
witness or any matter or criminal proceeding where a city official is the reporting
agency.
Sec. 1A-3-8. Conflicting Outside Employment.
A. General rule. A city official shall not:
1. solicit, accept, or engage in concurrent outside employment that could
reasonably be expected to impair independence of judgment in, or faithful
performance of, official duties; or
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
DRAFT 3-16-22 DISCUSSION ONLY
Page | 17 TM 128461
2. personally provide services for compensation, directly or indirectly, to a person
or organization that is requesting an approval, investigation, or determination
from the body or department of which the official is a member.
B. Exception. The restrictions stated in Subsection (a) do not apply to:
1. outside employment of a city official if the employment is the official's primary
source of income; or
2. a member of a municipal management district board.
C. Other rules. The general rule stated in Subsection (a) applies in addition to all other
rules relating to outside employment of city officials, including requirements for
obtaining prior approval of outside employment as applicable.
Sec. 1A-3-9. Public Property and Resources.
A. A city official shall not use, request, or permit the use of city facilities, personnel,
equipment, or supplies for private purposes (including political purposes).
B. A city council member shall not use, request, or permit the use of city facilities,
personnel (city employees), equipment, or supplies for any campaign expenditure,
campaign contribution, political advertising, or campaign communication as
defined in Title 15, "Regulating Political Funds and Campaigns," of the Texas
Election Code, as amended, and Texas Election Commission rules, regulations, and
opinions.
C. City officials may not apply for or obtain an incentive offered by the city, including
grants, loans, tax abatements, and tax credits, unless the incentive is available to
the general public, the application is evaluated under the same criteria that apply to
the general public, and the incentive is subject to the same terms and conditions
that apply to the general public.
Sec. 1A-3-10. Political Activity.
A. City officials. In any election, except the city official's own, a city official shall not:
1. use the prestige of the city official's position with the city on behalf of a
candidate, political party, or political committee, including but not limited to:
a. an endorsement, a city official (who is a city official only because that
person is an appointed member of a board, commission, or body) is not
prohibited from lending the city official's name so long as the office held
with the city is not mentioned;
b. any election ordered by the City of Coppell on a proposition or measure, a
city council member is not prohibited from lending the city official's name
and official city title; and
2. serve as the designated campaign treasurer for a candidate under the Texas
Election Code; or
3. solicit or receive contributions for a candidate, political party, or political
committee, except that a city official is not prohibited from serving on a steering
committee to plan a program of solicitation and listing the member's name
without reference to the office held when the committee as a whole is listed.
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
DRAFT 3-16-22 DISCUSSION ONLY
Page | 18 TM 128461
B. Influencing subordinates. A city official shall not, directly, or indirectly, induce or
attempt to induce any city subordinate of the official to:
1. participate in an election campaign, contribute to a candidate or political
committee, or engage in any other political activity relating to a particular party,
candidate, or issue; or
2. refrain from engaging in any lawful political activity.
A general statement merely encouraging another person to vote does not violate this
subsection.
C. Paid campaigning. A city official shall not directly or indirectly accept anything of
value for political activity relating to an item pending on the ballot, if the official
participated in, or provided advice relating to, the exercise of discretionary
authority by a city body that contributed to the development of the ballot item.
"Anything of value" does not include a meal or other item of nominal value the city
official receives in return for providing information on an item pending on the
ballot.
D. Official vehicles. A city official shall not display or fail to remove campaign
materials on any city vehicle under his or her control.
E. Charter provisions. A city official shall comply with the provisions governing
political activity.
F. Public property and resources. Limitations on the use of public property and
resources for political purposes are imposed by Section 12A-20 of this chapter.
Sec. 1A-3-11. Prohibited Interests in Contracts.
A. Charter restrictions relating to financial interests in city contracts. A city official
shall comply with the restrictions on financial interests in city contracts in the city
charter. The restrictions on financial interests in a city contract in the city charter
do not apply to a nominee or member of a city board or commission except as
provided below.
B. Additional restrictions relating to city contracts. A city official may not, while in
the service or employment of the city, either individually or as the officer or
principal of an entity:
1. submit a bid or proposal to make any city contract, whether or not the contract
is required by state law to be competitively bid; or
2. negotiate or enter into any city contract whether or not the contract is required
by state law to be competitively bid.
C. Exceptions. The restrictions in Subsections A and B do not apply to a member of
a:
1. board or commission that is advisory only;
2. board of a nonprofit development corporation that acts as an instrumentality of
the city; or
Sec. 1A-3-12. Ex Parte Communications.
No person shall, directly or indirectly, communicate with any city official of any quasi-
judicial city board or commission as to any adjudicative matter that is, or may reasonably
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
DRAFT 3-16-22 DISCUSSION ONLY
Page | 19 TM 128461
be expected to be, pending before the board or commission, unless a full disclosure of the
communication is simultaneously made available to every other party to the matter.
Sec. 1A-3-13. Recusal And Disclosure.
A. General rule. A city official whose conduct or action on a matter would violate any
section in Articles II and III of this chapter must recuse themselves. From the time
that the conflict is recognized, the city official shall:
1. immediately refrain from further participation in the matter, including
discussions with any other persons likely to consider the matter; and
2. promptly, file with the city secretary a written statement disclosing the conflict
of interest.
3. a municipal judge shall promptly bring that person's conflict to the attention of
the administrative municipal judge;
4. the city manager, city attorney, city secretary and municipal judge(s) shall
promptly bring that person's conflict to the attention of the city council;
5. a board or commission member shall promptly disclose that member's conflict
to the board or commission of which that person is a member and shall not be
present during any discussion or voting on the matter; and
6. a city council member shall promptly disclose that member's conflict to the city
council and shall not be present during any discussion or voting on the matter.
ARTICLE IV.
FORMER CITY OFFICIALS
Sec. 1A-4-1. Continuing Confidentiality.
A. Improper disclosure or use. A former city official shall not use or disclose
confidential government information acquired during service as a city official. This
rule does not prohibit:
1. any disclosure that is no longer confidential government information;
2. the confidential reporting of illegal or unethical conduct to authorities
designated by law; or
3. any disclosure, not otherwise prohibited by law, in furtherance of public safety.
B. Disclosure of a closed meeting. A former city official shall not knowingly disclose
to a member of the public the certified agenda, the recording, or the discussion had
within a meeting that was lawfully closed to the public, unless the disclosure is
made with lawful authority.
Sec. 1A-4-2. Subsequent Representation.
A. Representation by a former city council member or former board or commission
member. A person who was a member of the city council, a board or commission,
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
DRAFT 3-16-22 DISCUSSION ONLY
Page | 20 TM 128461
or another city body shall not represent any person, group, or entity (other than
himself or herself or his or her relative) for a period of one year after the termination
of his or her official duties:
1. before the city council or that board, commission, or body;
2. unless the board, commission, or body of which the former city official was a
member is only advisory in nature:
a. before city staff having responsibility for making recommendations to, or
taking any action on behalf of, the city council or that board, commission,
or body; or
b. before a board, commission, or other city body that has appellate
jurisdiction over the board, commission, or body of which the former city
official was a member, if any issue relates to his or her former duties.
B. Representation before the city. A former city official shall not represent for
compensation any person, group, or entity (other than himself or herself or his or
her relative) before the city for a period of one year after termination of his or her
official duties. This subsection does not apply to a person who was classified as a
city official only because he or she was an appointed member of a board,
commission, or other city body. For purposes of this subsection, "compensation"
means money or any other thing of value that is received, or is to be received, in
return for or in connection with such representation.
C. Representation in litigation adverse to the city. A former city official shall not,
absent consent from the special legal counsel, represent any person, group, or entity
(other than himself or herself or his or her relative) in any litigation to which the
city is a party, if the interests of that person, group, or entity are adverse to the
interests of the city and the matter is one in which the former city official personally
participated prior to termination of his or her official duties or is a matter
substantially related to such a matter.
D. Statement or implication of inappropriate influence. In connection with the
representation of private interests, a former city official shall not state or imply that
he or she can influence city action on any basis other than the merits.
Sec. 1A-4-3. Discretionary Contracts.
A. Impermissible financial interest in discretionary city contract or sale. This
subsection applies only to contracts or sales made on a discretionary basis and not
to contracts or sales made on a competitive bid basis. Within one year after the
termination of official duties, a former city official shall not have any financial
interest, direct or indirect, in any discretionary contract with the city, or be
financially interested, directly or indirectly, in the sale to the city of any land,
materials, supplies, or service. Any violation of this subsection, with knowledge,
express or implied, of the person or corporation contracting with the city will render
the contract involved voidable by the city manager or city council.
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
DRAFT 3-16-22 DISCUSSION ONLY
Page | 21 TM 128461
B. Additional restrictions. A former city official may not, within one year after
leaving the service or employment of the city, either individually or as the officer
or principal of a private business entity:
1. submit a proposal, on behalf of the official or on behalf of a private business
entity, to make any discretionary city contract; or
2. negotiate or enter into any discretionary city contract.
C. Prior participation in negotiation or award of contract and disclosure
requirements. A former city official may not, within one year after the termination
of official duties, perform work on a compensated basis relating to a discretionary
contract with the city if he or she personally participated in the negotiation or
awarding of the contract. A former city official, for one year after termination of
official duties, must disclose to the city secretary immediately upon knowing that
he or she will perform work on a compensated basis relating to any discretionary
contract with the city.
D. Exceptions. The prohibitions of Subsections A, B, and C do not apply to:
1. a contract for the personal services of a former city official;
2. a member of a board or commission that is advisory only; or
3. the provision of goods, facilities, or services by the city to a former city official
pursuant to duly adopted city policies and on nonnegotiable terms generally
available to the public, including renting a recreational space.
E. Waivers. The prohibitions of Subsections A, B, and C may be waived by city
council, after a review of the specific circumstances, for a person who is considered
a former official because he or she was a member of a board or commission that is
more than advisory in nature.
ARTICLE V.
ENFORCEMENT, CULPABLE MENTAL STATE, AND PENALTIES.
Sec. 1A-5-1. General.
The remedies contained in this article are available whenever the Ethic Review Panel finds
a violation or violations of this chapter.
Sec. 1A-5-2. Violations; Penalty.
A person who violates any of the laws, ordinances, and rules under this chapter or who
fails to perform an act required of the person by any of the laws and ordinances under this
chapter may be subject to the procedures in Article VI of this chapter.
Sec. 1A-5-3. Culpable Mental State.
To commit a violation under any provision of this chapter, a person must have acted or
failed to act knowingly or with knowledge.
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
DRAFT 3-16-22 DISCUSSION ONLY
Page | 22 TM 128461
Sec. 1A-5-4. Disciplinary Action.
1. If a city council member fails to comply with this chapter or violates this
chapter, the matter must be decided by the city council in accordance with the
city charter.
2. If a member of a board or commission fails to comply with this chapter or
violates this chapter, the matter must be decided by the city council in
accordance with the city charter.
3. If the city manager, city attorney, city auditor, city secretary, or a municipal
judge fails to comply with this chapter or violates this chapter they may be
disciplined in accordance with the personnel rules and the matter must be
decided by the city council.
4. If a former city official fails to comply with this chapter or violates this chapter,
the matter must be decided by the city council.
5. If a person who is not a current or former city official fails to comply with this
chapter or violates this chapter, the matter must be decided by city council.
Sec. 1A-5-5. Sanctions.
A. In determining sanctions based on a recommendation of the Ethics Review Panel
and the Ethic Review Panel, the person or entity imposing the sanction shall take
into consideration the recommendation of the special legal counsel, the Ethic
Review Panel, and the following factors:
1. The culpability of the person charged.
2. The harm to public or private interests resulting from the violation.
3. The necessity of preserving public trust in the city.
4. Whether there is evidence of a pattern of disregard for ethical standards.
5. Whether remedial action has been taken that will mitigate the adverse effects of
the violation.
F. For the city manager, city attorney, or a municipal judge, the city council shall take
appropriate action in accordance contractual obligations and state law with any of
the following additional sanctions:
1. Referral to ethics training. The city council may require the person to attend
ethics training. When recommending a referral to ethics training, the Ethic
Review Panel shall include in the recommendation the manner and quantity of
training based on the type and severity of the violation.
2. Referral for damages or injunction. The city council may refer the violation to
the city attorney for an action to recover damages to the city or to enjoin
prohibited actions.
3. Referral for criminal prosecution. The city council may refer the violation to
the Coppell Police Department, if the city council finds that the violation
warrants criminal prosecution.
E. For a city council member, a board or commission member, a former city official,
the city council may impose any of the following sanctions:
1. Letter of notification. The city council may issue a letter of notification if the
city council finds that a violation of this chapter was clearly unintentional. A
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
DRAFT 3-16-22 DISCUSSION ONLY
Page | 23 TM 128461
letter of notification must advise the person of any steps to be taken to avoid
future violations.
2. Letter of admonition. The city council may issue a letter of admonition if the
city council finds that the violation of this chapter was minor, but where the
circumstances call for a more substantial response than a letter of notification.
3. Referral to ethics training. The city council may require a current city official
to attend ethics training. When recommending a referral to ethics training, the
Ethic Review Panel shall include in the recommendation the manner and
quantity of training based on the type and severity of the violation.
4. Reprimand. The city council may issue a reprimand if the city council finds
that a violation of this chapter was not minor and was committed intentionally
or through reckless disregard of this chapter.
5. Resolution of censure. The city council may adopt a resolution of censure if
the city council finds that a serious or repeated violation of this chapter has been
committed intentionally or through reckless disregard of this chapter and the
violation substantially threatens the public trust.
6. Voiding of prior actions. The city council may, to the extent allowed by law,
void any prior city council or city board or commission action that approved
any decision, agreement, award, or contract if the action was taken as a result
of a violation of this chapter and the interests of the city require voiding of the
prior action.
7. Suspension from office. The city council may suspend a current city official
other than a city council member from office for a period determined by the city
council if the city council finds that a serious or repeated violation of this
chapter was committed intentionally or through culpable disregard of this
chapter. Any proceedings for suspension of a current city official shall be in
compliance with the city charter and state law.
8. Removal from office. The city council may remove a current city official,
including a city council member, from office if the city council finds that a
serious or repeated violation of this chapter was committed intentionally or
through culpable disregard of this chapter and future violations are likely to
occur. Any proceedings for removal of a current city official from office shall
be in compliance with the city charter and state law. [Coppell charter does not
permit this]
9. Referral for damages or injunction. The city council may refer the violation to
the city attorney for an action to recover damages to the city or to enjoin
prohibited actions.
10. Referral for criminal prosecution. The city council may refer the violation to
the Coppell Police Department or other appropriate law enforcement agency, if
the city council finds that the violation warrants criminal prosecution.
F. For a person who is not a current or former city official (e.g., lobbyists, people
doing business with the city, resident), the city council may impose any of the
following sanctions:
1. Letter of notification. The city council may issue a letter of notification if the
city council finds that a violation of this chapter was clearly unintentional. A
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
DRAFT 3-16-22 DISCUSSION ONLY
Page | 24 TM 128461
letter of notification must advise the person of any steps to be taken to avoid
future violations.
2. Letter of admonition. The city council may issue a letter of admonition if the
city council finds that the violation of this chapter was minor, but where the
circumstances call for a more substantial response than a letter of notification.
3. Reprimand. The city council may issue a reprimand if the city council finds
that a violation of this chapter was not minor and was committed intentionally
or through reckless disregard of this chapter.
4. Resolution of censure. The city council may adopt a resolution of censure if
the city council finds that a serious or repeated violation of this chapter has been
committed intentionally or through reckless disregard of this chapter and the
violation substantially threatens the public trust.
5. Disqualification from contracting. The city council may, to the extent allowed
by law, prohibit the person from entering into contracts with the city or from
lobbying before the city on behalf of clients. The scope and duration of the
disqualification shall be determined by the city council.
6. Voiding of prior actions. The city council may, to the extent allowed by law,
void any prior city council or city board or commission action that approved
any decision, agreement, award, or contract if the action was taken as a result
of a violation of this chapter and the interests of the city require voiding of the
prior action.
7. Referral for damages or injunction. The city council may refer the violation to
the city attorney for an action to recover damages to the city or to enjoin
prohibited actions.
8. Referral for criminal prosecution. The city council may refer the violation to
the Coppell Police Department, if the city council finds that the violation
warrants criminal prosecution.
Sec. 1A-5-6. Prosecution For Perjury.
Any person who knowingly files or makes a false sworn statement under this chapter is subject
to criminal prosecution for perjury under the laws of the State of Texas.
Sec. 1A-5-7. Interference With An Investigation.
A person commits an offense if the person interferes with any investigation of an alleged
violation of this chapter in any manner, including seeking to persuade or coerce others to
withhold their cooperation.
Sec. 1A-5-8. Disqualification From Contracting.
A. Any person who has been found by the Ethic Review Panel to have intentionally or
knowingly violated any provision of this chapter may be prohibited by the city
council from entering into any contract with the city for a period of two years.
B. It is a violation of this chapter:
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
DRAFT 3-16-22 DISCUSSION ONLY
Page | 25 TM 128461
1. for a person debarred from entering into a contract with the city to enter or
attempt to enter into a contract with the city during the period of disqualification
from contracting; or
2. for a city official to knowingly assist in a violation of Subsection (B)(1).
C. Nothing in this section prohibits any person from receiving a city service or benefit,
or from using a city facility, according to the same terms generally available to the
public.
D. A business entity may be disqualified from contracting with the city based on the
conduct of the entity's employee or agent if the conduct occurred within the scope
of employment or agency with the entity.
Sec. 1A-5-9. Vexatious Complainants.
A. Definition. A vexatious complainant is someone who persistently files ethics
complaints without having sufficient grounds for doing so. Vexatious complainants file
complaints that are meant:
1. to abuse the investigative process of the special legal counsel; or
2. to harass, annoy, cause delay or detriment to a person subject to a complaint; or
3. for a political or other wrongful purpose.
B. Report and recommendation of the special legal counsel. If the special legal counsel
has probable cause to suspect a person of being a vexatious complainant, the special
legal counsel shall submit a report to the Ethic Review Panel detailing the facts
supporting the special legal counsel's position.
C. Effect of order to show cause. Once the special legal counsel has submitted a vexatious
complainant report to the Ethic Review Panel, the special legal counsel shall not accept
or process another complaint from the complainant until the commission has
determined whether the complainant is a vexatious complainant.
D. Notification. The special legal counsel shall promptly forward a copy of the report to
the complainant with instructions detailing the response and hearing procedures.
E. Response. The complainant shall have the opportunity to submit a sworn response,
together with such other information he or she believes is relevant. The response must
be submitted to the special legal counsel within 10 days after the date that the
complainant was sent the special legal counsel's report. Copies of all information
provided to the special legal counsel by the complainant or the person charged in the
complaint must be distributed to the Ethic Review Panel within 10 days after the special
legal counsel receives the information.
F. Format of evidence. If a complainant submits evidence in an electronic, mechanical,
or other format that the special legal counsel cannot duplicate or display, the special
legal counsel shall request the complainant provide the evidence in a format that the
special legal counsel can duplicate or display. If the complainant fails to provide the
evidence to the special legal counsel in a format that the special legal counsel can
duplicate or display within seven days after the special legal counsel has made a
request, then the evidence may not be presented to or considered by the Ethic Review
Panel when making its determination.
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
DRAFT 3-16-22 DISCUSSION ONLY
Page | 26 TM 128461
G. Evidentiary hearing. The Ethic Review Panel shall hold a hearing to determine whether
the complaint is a frivolous complaint. Not less than 10 days before the hearing, the
special legal counsel shall, by certified mail or personal service, give written notice to
the complainant of the date, time, and place of the hearing. If the complainant consents
in writing, the special legal counsel may give written notice by facsimile, email, or
first-class U.S. mail.
H. Ex Parte communications. It is a violation of this section for:
1. the complainant or any person acting on their behalf to engage or attempt to
engage, directly or indirectly, in any ex parte communication about the subject
matter of an evidentiary hearing under this section with any member of the Ethic
Review Panel; or
2. a member of the Ethic Review Panel to:
a. knowingly entertain an ex parte communication prohibited by Subsection
(h)(1); or
b. knowingly communicate, directly or indirectly, with any person, other than
a member of the commission, its staff, or its legal counsel, about any issue
of fact or law relating to an evidentiary hearing under this section.
I. Hearing rules. Unless otherwise provided in this section, the rules for hearings in
Section 12A-52 apply to hearings conducted in accordance with this section.
J. Rights of the complainant. The complainant has the right to attend the hearing, the
right to make a statement, the right to present and cross-examine witnesses, and the
right to be represented by legal counsel or another advisor.
K. Standard of review. In determining whether a complaint is a vexatious complainant,
the Ethic Review Panel may consider the special legal counsel's report and additional
evidence of:
1. the timing of the complaints with respect to when the facts supporting the
alleged violations became known or should have become known to the
complainant;
2. the nature and type of any publicity surrounding the filing of the complaints;
3. the existence and nature of any relationship between the persons charged in the
complaints and the complainant before the complaints were filed;
4. whether the complainant knew or reasonably should have known that the
allegations in the complaints were groundless; and
5. the complainant's motives in filing the complaints, including whether or not the
complaints were meant:
a. to abuse the investigative process of the special legal counsel; or
b. to harass, annoy, cause delay or detriment to a person subject to a complaint;
or
c. for a political or other wrongful purpose.
L. Determination. A determination that a complainant is a vexatious complainant may be
made only upon an affirmative vote of three-fifths of all commission members present
and voting. Otherwise, the complainant is not deemed a vexatious complainant. A
finding that a complainant is vexatious must be supported by clear and convincing
evidence. "Clear and convincing evidence" means that measure or degree of proof that
produces in a person's mind a firm belief or conviction as to the truth of the allegations
sought to be established. The commission's determination that a complainant is not a
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
DRAFT 3-16-22 DISCUSSION ONLY
Page | 27 TM 128461
vexatious complainant does not affect the prior decision of the special legal counsel to
dismiss the complainant's prior complaints.
M. Sanction for being deemed a vexatious complainant.
1. If a claimant is determined to be a vexatious complainant, the Ethic Review
Panel may prohibit the complainant from filing another complaint alleging one
or more violations of this chapter for up to:
a. two years after the date of the panel's determination that the complaint is a
vexatious complainant, if the commission had not determined within the
preceding five years that the complaint was a vexatious complainant; or
b. four years after the date of the commission's determination that the
complaint is a vexatious complainant, if the commission had determined
within the preceding five years that the complaint was a vexatious
complainant.
2. When determining whether and for how long to prohibit a complainant who has
been deemed a vexatious complainant from filing another complaint under this
chapter, the Ethic Review Panel shall consider the following factors:
a. The seriousness of the potential consequences to the persons charged in the
groundless complaints and the extent and gravity of the abuse, harassment,
and delay resulting from the filing of groundless complaints.
b. The sanction necessary to deter future violations, including number of
groundless complaints filed whether there are any mitigating circumstances.
c. Any other matters that justice may require.
3. If the Ethic Review Panel prohibits the complainant from filing another
complaint for a specific amount of time under Subsection (m)(1), the special
legal counsel shall not accept or process another complaint alleging one or more
violations of this chapter from the complainant during the time that the
complainant is prohibited from filing a complaint.
4. The special legal counsel may notify the appropriate regulatory or supervisory
agency of the findings and determination of the Ethic Review Panel, including
referring its findings and determination to a criminal investigation agency or
prosecution entity for investigation of a violation of a state or federal law.
N. Written decision. If the Ethic Review Panel determines that a complainant is a
vexatious complainant and imposes a sanction, it shall make all reasonable efforts to
issue a written decision within 15 days after the hearing. The commission shall state
its findings in the written decision.
O. Notification. Within 10 days after issuing a written decision, the Ethic Review Panel
shall forward copies of the findings and decision to the complainant, the city attorney,
the city secretary, the city council, and any member of the commission who did not
participate in the disposition of the matter. The city secretary shall make copies of the
findings and decision available to the public as authorized by law.
ARTICLE VI.
PROCEDURES
Sec. 1A-6-1. - Complaint procedure.
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
DRAFT 3-16-22 DISCUSSION ONLY
Page | 28 TM 128461
A. All complaints that an officer has violated the code of conduct outlined in this article
shall be made in writing, sworn to before a notary public, and filed with the city
secretary.
B. Such complaints shall describe in detail the act or acts complained of and which of the
following specific section(s) of this chapter alleged to have been violated.
C. A general complaint lacking in detail or failing to identify one or more of the
aforementioned sections will not be considered sufficient to invoke the procedures set
forth herein and anonymous complaints shall not be considered.
D. Complaints relating to an officer shall thereafter immediately be referred for legal
review to the office of Special Legal Counsel who shall initially review the complaint
to determine if the complaint contains sufficient detail and alleges a violation of the
code of conduct as set forth in this article.
E. Standard of review. In determining whether a complaint is a vexatious complainant,
the Ethic Review Panel may consider the special legal counsel's report and additional
evidence of:
6. the timing of the complaints with respect to when the facts supporting the
alleged violations became known or should have become known to the
complainant;
7. the nature and type of any publicity surrounding the filing of the complaints;
8. the existence and nature of any relationship between the persons charged in the
complaints and the complainant before the complaints were filed;
9. whether the complainant knew or reasonably should have known that the
allegations in the complaints were groundless; and
10. the complainant's motives in filing the complaints, including whether or not the
complaints were meant:
d. to abuse the investigative process of the special legal counsel; or
e. to harass, annoy, cause delay or detriment to a person subject to a complaint;
or
f. for a political or other wrongful purpose.
F. After legal review counsel shall provide a written report to the city council as soon as
possible but not later than 30 days after the day of assignment unless an extension is
granted by a majority of the eligible councilmembers.
(1) The special counsel may contact the complainant, interview witnesses and examine
any documents necessary for the report. The special counsel may contact the city
attorney or city secretary as necessary for assistance.
(2) When the special counsel receives a vague complaint or one lacking in detail, the
special counsel shall contact the complainant to request a written clarification. If
the complainant fails to provide the special counsel with written clarification, or if
after written clarification is provided, it is the opinion of the special counsel that
the complaint is insufficient in detail and/or fails to allege a prima facie violation
of the code of conduct, the matter shall be considered concluded and a report shall
be submitted in accordance with the procedural guidelines for special counsel.
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
DRAFT 3-16-22 DISCUSSION ONLY
Page | 29 TM 128461
(3) If the special counsel determines that a criminal violation may exist, the special
counsel shall refer the matter to the appropriate law enforcement agency. If the
special counsel determines that the complaint alleges a violation of the code of
conduct by a city official and sufficient evidence exists for a prima facie case, the
report shall be referred to the Ethic Review which shall be convened in accordance
with procedures as set forth in Article 2-10 of the Code of Ordinances. A hearing
shall be held by the conduct review board to review the referred complaint.
Sec. 1A-6-2. Hearings and Procedures
All hearings of the Conduct Review Panel shall be conducted in accordance with the
administrative procedures for the Ethic Review Panel as adopted by the City Council, and
as follows:
A. The Conduct Review Panel shall have all of the powers of investigation including
subpoena power as are given to the city council by reason of the City Charter. The
panel may request, and if necessary, subpoena, witnesses, books, records or any
documents which relate to the allegations or complaint. The chairperson shall issue
any subpoenas requested for relevant and necessary witnesses or other evidence.
The refusal of the chairperson to issue any subpoena may be reconsidered by the
conduct review panel.
B. An officer or person subject to a compliant shall have the right to be represented by
counsel, to call, examine and cross-examine witnesses and present evidence.
C. The Conduct Review Panel shall review the complaint referred by the special
counsel and receive evidence from the officer, or any other person, as the panel
deems necessary. Hearings of the panel are closed to the public pursuant to Section
551.074 of the Texas Government Code. The panel may convene into closed
session to deliberate the evidence and seek legal advice but shall vote and announce
its decision in open session.
D. The panel, upon completion of any hearing, shall render a decision in writing to the
city attorney and the officer involved within 20 days, either determining no
violation occurred, or setting forth requirements for voluntary compliance. In the
event that voluntary compliance is not obtainable, recommendation for action
consistent this article.
E. The chairperson, on behalf of the panel, shall direct the presentation of evidence
and examine witnesses as necessary to bring out all the facts relating to the referred
complaint. The chairperson shall preserve order, determine the time and location
for any hearings, recess or adjourn the panel, as necessary, and administer oaths to
witnesses.
F. The city attorney shall serve as a legal advisor to the panel on legal and procedural
matters but shall not be a voting member.
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
DRAFT 3-16-22 DISCUSSION ONLY
Page | 30 TM 128461
G. The city secretary or designated representative shall give timely notice of the time
and place for hearings of the panel to all participants, including the affected official,
panel members, city attorney, the complainant, and any witnesses as applicable.
The city secretary shall prepare and keep minutes of the hearings of the panel in
accordance with applicable state law. The city secretary shall ensure that the site
for the hearing is adequate and in good order.
Sec. 1A-6-3. - Limitations.
A person must bring a complaint that an officer has violated the code of conduct
outlined in this article not later than two years after the day the complained of act or acts
occurred.”
SECTION 2. That the provisions of this ordinance shall only apply to the terms which begin
after the effective date of this ordinance.
SECTION 3. That all provisions of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Coppell, Texas,
in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same are hereby, repealed, and all other
provisions not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 4. That should any word, phrase, paragraph, section or phrase of this ordinance
or of the Code of Ordinances, as amended hereby, be held to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid,
the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole, or any part or provision thereof
other than the part so decided to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, and shall not affect the validity
of the Code of Ordinances as a whole.
SECTION 5. An offense committed before the effective date of this ordinance is governed
by prior law and the provisions of the Code of Ordinances, as amended, in effect when the offense
was committed and the former law is continued in effect for this purpose.
SECTION 6. That this ordinance shall take effect after its passage.
DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, this the _______ day of
___________________, 2022.
APPROVED:
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
DRAFT 3-16-22 DISCUSSION ONLY
Page | 31 TM 128461
WES MAYS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
ASHLEY OWENS, CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________
ROBERT E. HAGER, CITY ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
DRAFT 3-16-22 DISCUSSION ONLY
Page | 1
TM 127717
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. ________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS,
AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES BY AMENDING CHAPTER 2
‘BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS’ BY ADDING NEW ARTICLE 2-10
‘SPECIAL LEGAL COUNSEL/ETHICS REVIEW PANEL’ TO ESTABLISH
AN ETHICS REVIEW PANEL; PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE;
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish Panel of qualified persons to administer
as special counsel and panel members under Article 1-13; and,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF COPPELL, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That Chapter 2, “Boards and Commissions” of the Code of Ordinances is
hereby amended by adding a new Article 2-10 “Special Legal Counsel / Ethics Review Panel” to
read as follows:
“CHAPTER 2 – BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
ARTICLE 2-1 – LIBRARY BOARD
. . . . .
ARTICLE 2-10 - SPECIAL LEGAL COUNSEL/ETHICS REVIEW PANEL
Sec. 2-10-1.- Special Ethics Legal Counsel
The special ethics legal counsel shall be appointed to serve at the pleasure of the City
Council and shall be a resident of the city and licensed in good standing to practice
law in the State of Texas; and shall not be in arrears in the payment of taxes or other
liability to the city or have been a party to or represented any party to any litigation
involving and/or with adverse interests to the city. The special counsel shall be
selected to act on any complaint under Article 9-13 on a rotation basis from a list of
such attorneys established by the city council for these purposes; said attorney(s) shall
have all the powers of investigation as are given to the city council by reason of the
City Charter when discharging their duties under said article.
Page | 2
TM 127717
A request for participation of who is a resident of the City and is a registered voter to
serve on the Special Legal Counsel under this article and qualified to serve as special
counsel, shall be placed on the city website, official newspaper or through social
media. Applications for such participation shall be filed with the city secretary at the
same time the city council seeks applicants for boards and commissions. Applicants
shall be interviewed in the manner adopted by the city for the interviewing of such
applicants.
Sec. 2-10-2. –Ethics Review Panel
City Council shall appoint three (3) to nine (9) persons to be eligible for selection to
an Ethics Review Panel to hearing complaints under Article 1-13 of the Coppell Code
of Ordinance.
No citizen who is in arrears in the payment of any taxes or other liability due the city
or who has been a party to litigation involving and/or with adverse interests to the city
is eligible to serve on the Ethics Review Panel. The mayor, or the mayor pro tem in
the mayor's absence, shall serve as the chairperson. In the event the complaint
concerns the mayor or mayor pro tem, such person or persons shall be replaced by a
member of the city council drawn by lot. In the event the mayor and mayor pro tem
are replaced, the senior councilmember(s) shall serve as the chairperson and/or vice
chairpersons.
A request for participation of who is a resident of the City and is a registered voter to
serve on the Special Legal Counsel under this article and qualified to serve as special
counsel, shall be placed on the city website, official newspaper or through social
media. Applications for such participation shall be filed with the city secretary at the
same time the city council seeks applicants for boards and commissions. Applicants
shall be interviewed in the manner adopted by the city for the interviewing of such
applicants.
Sec. 2-10-3. – Ethics Review Panel
The Ethics Review Panel shall hear any compliant under Article 1A and shall be
comprised of the mayor, the mayor pro tem, and three (3) members of Ethics Review
Panel selected by random lot to serve on the ethics review panel and shall conduct
those responsibilities as set forth in said article.
SECTION 2. That the provisions of this ordinance shall only apply to the terms which
begin after the effective date of this ordinance.
Page | 3
TM 127717
SECTION 3. That all provisions of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Coppell, Texas,
in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same are hereby, repealed, and all other
provisions not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 4. That should any word, phrase, paragraph, section or phrase of this ordinance
or of the Code of Ordinances, as amended hereby, be held to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid,
the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole, or any part or provision thereof
other than the part so decided to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, and shall not affect the
validity of the Code of Ordinances as a whole.
SECTION 5. An offense committed before the effective date of this ordinance is governed
by prior law and the provisions of the Code of Ordinances, as amended, in effect when the offense
was committed and the former law is continued in effect for this purpose.
SECTION 6. That this ordinance shall take effect after its passage.
DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, this the _______ day of
___________________, 2022.
APPROVED:
WES MAYS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
ASHLEY OWENS, CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________
ROBERT E. HAGER, CITY ATTORNEY