Loading...
CP 2001-10-09NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING AND AGENDA OCTOBER 9, 2001 CANDY SHEEHAN, Mayor BILL YORK, Mayor Pro Tem GREG GARCIA, JAYNE PETERS, DIANA RAINES, Place 1 Place 2 Place 3 MARSHA TUNNELL, DOUG STOVER, DAVE HERRING, JIM WITT, City Manager Place 7 Place 4 Place 5 Place 6 MEETING TIME AND PLACE: Call to Order Work Session Regular Session 5:30 p.m. Immediately Following 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers 1st FI. Conf. Room Council Chambers (Open to the Public) (Open to the Public) (Open to the Public) Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas will meet in Regular Called Session on Tuesday, October 9, 2001, at 5:30 p.m. for Work Session, and Regular Session will begin at 7:00 p.m., to be held at Town Center, 255 Parkway Boulevard, Coppell, Texas. As authorized by Section 551.071(2) of the Texas Government Code, this meeting may be convened into closed Executive Session for the purpose of seeking confidential legal advice from the City Attorney on any agenda item listed herein. The City of Coppell reserves the right to reconvene, recess or realign the Work Session or called Executive Session or order of business at any time prior to adjournment. The purpose of the meeting is to consider the following items: ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION REGULAR SESSION (Open to the Public) 1. Call to order. ag100901 Page i of 6 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION WORK SESSION (Open to the Public) Convene Work Session B. C. D. E. Discussion regarding DART Tour. Discussion regarding FY 2001.2002 Budget. Discussion regarding fencing materials. Update on Dallas County Beltline Road Improvements Project. Discussion of Agenda Items. REGULAR SESSION (Open to the Public) 3. Invocation. 4. Pledge of Allegiance. Consider approval of through October 28, Mayor to sign. a Proclamation naming the week 2001 as RED RIBBON WEEK, and of October 22 authorizing the Presentation by Coppell Middle School North Student Council. Citizen's Appearances. CONSENT AGENDA 8. Consider approval of the following consent agenda items: ~"~)-t~c.~ A. Consider approval of minutes: September 25, 2001. Consider approval of an ordinance amending Section 8-1-3 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Coppell establishing 40 miles per hour as the maximum prima facie speed limit on Freeport Parkway from the south city limits to Creekview Drive, and 30 miles per hour as the maximum prima facie speed limit on Freeport Parkway from Creekview Drive to Ruby Road; and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Land Use and Development Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. S.1190, Green Pepper Asian Grill and Noodles, zoning change from PD.178R (Planned Development-178R)to PD-178R.S.U.P-1190 (PD178R, Special Use Permit. Il90), to allow the operation of an oriental restaurant and private club to be located in the Town Center West ag100901 Page 2 of 6 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION Retail Center at 171 N. Denton Tap Road, and authorizing the Mayor to sign. END OF CONSENT 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD.186R2, Duke-Freeport, zoning change request from PD-186R (Planned Development-186 Revised) to PD-186R2 (Planned Development-186R2) to allow for additional monument signage, to decrease the required parking on Lot 1, and to incorporate the tree mitigation/landscaping plan on approximately 140 acres of property located along the west side of Coppell Road, between Ruby and Bethel Roads. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. S-1192, Pizza Inn, zoning change request from C (Commercial)to C-S.U.P (Commercial, Special Use Permit-Il92), to allow the operation of an approximately 1,060 square.foot take- out/delivery restaurant located in the Coppell Crossing Shopping Center, Lot 5, at 751 MacArthur Blvd. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of the designation of a reinvestment zone pursuant to Section 312.201 of the Property Redevelopment and Tax Abatement Act. The property to be considered for Reinvestment Zone designation is that property owned by ACLP Northlake II, L.R, described as Northlake 635 Business Park, Block C, Lot 1R (8.044 acres) and located at the northwest corner of Lakeshore and Crestside Drives, Coppell, Texas. Consider approval of an Ordinance designating the ACLP Northlake II, L.R Reinvestment Zone No. 35, and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Consider approval of a Resolution approving a Tax Abatement Agreement between the City of Coppell and ACLP Northlake II, L.R, and authorizing the Mayor to sign. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of the proposed text change to amend Section 12-34-7, Table I (Plant Palette), of the Coppell Code of Ordinances (Zoning), to expand the list of allowable plantings to include drought tolerant and native plants. ag100901 Page 3 of 6 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION 15. 16. Consider approval of an Ordinance to amend Section 12-34-7, Table 1 (Plant Palette), of the Coppell Code of Ordinances (Zoning), to expand the list of allowable plantings to include drought tolerant and native plants, and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Consider approval of the Coppell Family YMCA, Site Plan Amendment, to allow the addition of approximately 17,500 square feet of building and the expansion of the parking lot to include 48 additional spaces on approximately 5.36 acres of property located at 146 Town Center Boulevard. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. PUBLIC COMMENT: To receive public comment regarding the Wynnpage Plaza South, Site Plan and Minor Plat. Consider approval of the Wynnpage Plaza South, Site Plan and Minor Plat, request to allow the development of an approximately 4,700 square.foot office building on approximately .626 of an acre of property located along the west side of Denton Tap Road, approximately 210' south of Wynnpage Drive. Consider approval of the St. Joseph Village, Lots 1-4, Block A, Final Plat, request to allow the development of a retirement community and municipal facilities on approximately 51.17 acres of property located along the south side of Sandy Lake Road, approximately 1200' east of MacArthur Boulevard. Consider approval of the Trinity Shores, Lots 1-19, Final Plat, to allow the platting of 19 single.family lots and two common areas on approximately 7.2 acres of property located along the south side of Sandy Lake Road, west of the Trinity River. Consider appointment of two members to the Keep Coppell Beautiful Committee. Necessary action resulting from Work Session. City Manager's Report. A. Riverchase walkway. B. Future work sessions. 24. Mayor and Council Reports. I ,~..- A. Report by Mayor Sheehan Coalition. regarding Dallas Regional Mobility ag100901 Page 4 of 6 ITEM # ITEM DESCRIPTION Bo Report by Mayor Sheehan regarding Metroplex Mayors. Report by Councilmember Stover regarding CMS North Student Council. Report by Councilmember Raines regarding YMCA. Report by Councilmember Garcia regarding the Senior Adult Services Mayor's Challenge Golf Tournament. Adjournment. Candy Sheehan, Mayor CERTIFICATE I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Coppell, Texas on this day of , 2001, at Libby Ball, City Secretary DETAILED INFORMATION REGARDING THIS AGENDA IS AVAILABLE AT THE WILLIAM T. COZBY PUBLIC LIBRARY AND ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE (www. ci.coppell.tx.us) UNDER PUBLIC DOCUMENTS, COUNCIL PACKETS. ag100901 Page 5 of 6 PUBLIC NOTICES STATEMENT FOR ADA COMPLIANCE The City of Coppell acknowledges its responsibility to comply with the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990. Thus, in order to assist individuals with disabilities who require special services (i.e. sign interpretative services, alternative audio/visual devices, and amanuenses) for participation in or access to the City of Coppell sponsored public programs, services and/or meetings, the City requests that individuals make requests for these services forty-eight (48) hours ahead of the scheduled program, service and/or meeting. To make arrangements, contact Vivyon V. Bowman, ADA Coordinator or other designated official at (972) 462-0022, or (TDD 1.800-RELAY, TX 1.800-735.2989). IN COMPLIANCE WITH CITY OF COPPELL ORDINANCE NO. 95724 Carrying of a concealed handgun on these premises or at any official political meeting in the City of Coppell is illegal. Es ilegal Ilevar consigo un arma de fuego oculta, adentro de este edificio, o en cualquier junta oficial de politica en la ciudad de Coppell. ag100901 Page 6 of 6 WORK SESSION B. C. D. E. Discussion regarding DART Tour. Discussion regarding FY 2001-2002 Budget. Discussion regarding fencing materials. Update on Dallas County Beltline Road Improvements Project. Discussion of Agenda Items. CITY MANAGER'S REVIEW: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES BY AMENDING ARTICLE 9-2 BY REPEALING SECTION 9-2- 1, DEFINITIONS, AND PROVIDING NEW DEFINITIONS; BY AMENDING SECTIONS 9-2-7 AND 9-2-8; BY CREATING SECTION 9-2-9 TO PROVIDE FOR INSPECTION; PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF A FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Coppell Code of Ordinances be amended by amending Chapter 9, by repealing Section 9-2-1, Definitions, and providing new definitions, to read as follows: "ARTICLE 9-2. FENCE REGULATIONS Sec. 9-2-1. Definitions. Fence shall mean any construction or hedge greater than eighteen (18") inches in height and of any material, as provided herein, the purpose of which is to provide protection from intrusion (both physical and visual), to prevent escape, mark a boundary, or provide decoration. A wall shall be considered a fence. Dikes and retaining walls for the purpose of diverting water and retaining soil are not classified as a fence. Privacy Fence shall mean upright, stakes attached in such fashion as to touch side by side. Picket Fence shall mean an alternating, upright, usually pointed, stakes. A fence made of upright stakes. Rail fence shall mean a fence constructed of vertical posts with a bar of wood, metal or other materials placed horizontally behind such posts. Ornamental fence shall mean a fence constructed of metal or wrought iron, constructed with posts and vertical or horizontal bars with the appropriate finales or ornamental caps. PAGE 1 43705 Natural fence shall mean a barrier of solid natural plan and/or tree materials which form an impermeable visual barrier. Front yard means the open, unoccupied space on a lot facing a street and extending across the front of a lot between the side yard lines. Rear yard means a space unoccupied by principal structure extending for the full width of the lot between a principal structure and the rear lot line. Side yard means an open unoccupied space on the same lot with the building, situated between the building and the side line of the lot, and extending through the street or the front line shall be deemed a side yard." SECTION 2. That the Coppell Code of Ordinances be amended by amending Chapter 9, by amending Section 9-2-7 and Section 9-2-8, and creating Section 9-2-9, to read as follows: "Sec. 9-2-7. Materials and Colors. A. Fence requirements in residential districts. All fences constructed within residential districts shall conform to the requirements and be constructed of the materials and colors as provided for herein. B. Permitted materials. All fences, as defined herein, constructed within the City shall only be constructed of the following material: wood or wood fiber; metal or wrought iron; fiberglass, polymerized resin and plastics, or combination thereof, which such composite material is designed and constructed for fencing material which is at least one- quarter (%") inch in thickness; stone, brick and/or patterned concrete; plant material from the appropriate palette, as adopted in Table 1 of Section 12-34-7 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Coppell, as amended. C. Permitted colors. All fences, as defined herein, shall be constructed to reflect the following colors: wood - shall be painted or stained of earth tone to include, but not limited to, browns, grays, or natural wood; metal - shall be pained to include, but not limited to, black, fiberglass black, gray; PAGE 2 4-3705 3. masonry o stone or concrete shall not be painted; color must be natural materials or finish. D. Maintenance. All fences shall be maintained so as to comply with the requirements of this article at all times. Sec. 9-2-8. Prohibited Fences and Materials. A. Prohibited fence. A fence electrically charged in any manner or form is prohibited. B. Prohibited materials. Materials prohibited in fences are barbed wire, razor ribbon, sheet metal, plastics or any other similar material. Exception: Barbed wire is permitted for fencing agricultural or industrial zoned property. Sec. 9-2-9. Inspection. Upon completion of installation, the owner of the premises shall request the building inspector to conduct an inspection. A certificate of acceptance or a rejection slip indicating the defects in the same will be issued." SECTION 3.. All provisions of this ordinance of the City of Coppell is an addition other ordinances or charter provisions; however, in the event this is in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance, be, then the provisions and the same are hereby, repealed, and all other provisions of the ordinances of the City of Coppell not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. Should any sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal, or invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole, or any part or provision thereof other than the part so decided to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional, and shall not affect the validity of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Coppell, Texas. SECTION 5. That this Ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage and publication, as the law and charter is such cases provide. PAGE 3 43705 DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, this ~ day of ,2001. APPROVED: By: CANDY SHEEHAN, MAYOR ATTEST: By: LIBBY BALL, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: ROBERT E. HAGER, CITY ATTORNEY (REH/cdb 10/4/01) PAGE 4 43705 ~:,]T ~-Z~4 208! !5:!8 FBi i'~ICHOL'E, JA ]k,=_-;ON D!LLA'4 '.B6% 8018 TO tB72384786:3 TOTAL PAGE,E1 ,-" ?¢:.k F COPPEIJL AGENDA REQUEST FORM CITY COUNCIL MEETING: October 9, 2001 ITEM # ITEM CAPTION: Consider approval of a Proclamation naming the week of October 22 through October 28, 2001 as RED RIBBON WEEK, and authorizing the Mayor to sign. SUBMITTED BY: Roy L.Osborne TITLE: Chief of Police STAFF COMMENTS: Along with other Metrocrest Cities, the City of Coppell, through its representatives, has participated in the Metrocrest Red Ribbon Campaign Committee's efforts to combat alcohol & drug abuse in our communities. It is our desire to present a uniformed and visible commitment toward a drug-free community, particularly, during the Texas Red Ribbon Week, October 22 - 28, 2001. The campaign will include all segments of our community: schools, churches, businesses & industry, media, and City government. Various activities are planned to focus the attention toward this effort. Members of the Police Department as well as various school and city officials will attend a Red Ribbon breakfast on October 10~ to gear up for the event. McGruff and Coppell Police Officers will make visits to the elementary schools in Coppell. Red Ribbons will be distributed and worn to promote the week and all city owned vehicles will display red ribbons. Therefore, submitted herewith is a proclamation for consideration by City Council to proclaim October 22 - 28, 2001 as RED RIBBON WEEK. BUDGET AMT $ FINANCIAL COMMENTS :~N~ AMT EST $ DIR. INITIAL,q~~2 Agenda Request ~00 FIN. REVIEW~J~ +\-BID $ CITY MANAGER REVIEW: Document Name: )rribbon T H Ill: - G: ! 1' Y · 0 If COPPELL Proclamation WHEREAS, tobacco, alcohol, and other drug use has reached epidemic stages in the United States, with the 15-24 year old age group dying at a rate which is higher than that of any other age group; and WHEREAS, in an effort to combat the continuing demand for drugs in our country, it is imperative that our community launch a visible, unified prevention education effort directed toward both youth and adult age groups; and WHEREAS, Texans' War on Drugs is sponsoring the Red Ribbon Campaign all across our State during Red Ribbon Week, October 22 through October 28, 2001, to offer Texans the opportunity to demonstrate their commitment to drug-free lifestyles; and WHEREAS, individuals and groups in business, government, law enforcement, education, religious institutions, athletic and service organizations, and others will demonstrate their commitment to drug-free, healthy lifestyles by wearing and displaying Red Ribbons during Red Ribbon Week; and WHEREAS, the Coppell Police Department desires to present a uniformed and visible commitment toward a drug-free community, particularly during the Texas Red Ribbon Week, and plan to involve all segments of our community: schools, churches, businesses and industry, media, and City employees. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Candy Sheehan, Mayor of the City of Coppell, do hereby proclaim the week of October 22 through October 28, 2001 as "Red Ribbon Week" in the City of Coppell, Dallas County, Texas. The Mayor and City Council call on all citizens to join in this worthwhile campaign toward a drug-free community. IN WITNESS THEREOF, I have set my hand and caused the seal of the City of Coppell to be affixed this day of October 2001. ATTEST: Candy Sheehan, Mayor Libby Ball, City Secretary T H E~ C~ I T Y O F' COPP-ELL AGENDA REQUEST FORM CITY COUNCIL MEETING: October 9, 2001 ITEM # ~ ITEM CAPTION: Presentation by Coppell Middle School North Student Council. SUBMITTED BY: Jim Witt TITLE: City Manager STAFF COMMENTS: BUDGET AMT. $ FINANCIAL COMMENTS:P~t(' AMT. EST. $ DIR. INITIALS: Agenda Request Form - Revised 5/00 +\-BID CITY MANAGER REVIE Document Name: !Student AGENDA REQUEST FORM CITY COLINCIL MEETING: October 9, 2001 ITEM # 7 CITIZENS' APPEARANCES ORDINANCE NO. 94665 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, ESTABLISHING RULES, TIMES AND PROCEDURES FOR CONDUCTING crrY COUNCIL MEETINGS. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, THE FOLLOWING ARE HEREBY ADOPTED AS THE RULES, TIMES AND PROCEDURES FOR CONDUCTING COUNCIL MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS: The City of Coppell Code of Ordinances is hereby amended by adding to Chapter One (1) the following new Article 1-10: ARTICLE 1-10 RULES, TIMES AND PROCEDURES FOR CONDUCTING CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS 1-10-6.2.1 CITIZENS APPEARANCE Persons wishing to speak on any matter other than an item scheduled for a public hearing on the agenda, must sign a register and list their residence address, provided by the City Secretary on a table outside the Council Chambers, and such persons may be heard only at the "Citizens Appearance" portion of a regular meeting or special meeting. Each speaker must state his or her name and address of residence. Presentations by individuals during the "Citizens Appearance" shall be limited to two (2) minutes each. An individual speaker's time may be extended for an additional two (2) minutes with the approval of a majority of the Council members present. There shall be a cumulative limit of twenty (20) minutes allotted of any regular or special Council meeting. Those persons who signed up to speak at the "Citizens Appearance" shall be called upon, in the order that they have signed the provided register. No personal attacks by any speaker shall be _~de against any member of the Council, Mayor, individual, group or corporation (Charter Article 3, S~ 3.12). CITY MANAGER'S REVIEW: ~-~I~~~~ AGENDA REQUEST FORM CITY COUNCIL MEETING: October 9, 2001 ITEM # ITEM CAPTION: Consider approval of minutes: September 25, 2001. SUBMITTED BY: Libby Ball TITLE: City Secretary STAFF COMMENTS: BUDGET AMT. $ FINANCIAL COMMENTS:4/~' AMT. EST. $ DIR. INITIALS: FIN. REVIEW~ Agenda Request Form - Revised 5/00 +k-BID $ CITY MANAGER REVIEW: Document Name: %minutes MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 The City Council of the City of Coppell met in Regular Called Tuesday, September 25, 2001, at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Town Center, 255 Parkway Boulevard, Coppell, Texas. The were present: Candy Sheehan, Mayor Bill York, Mayor Pro Tem Greg Garcia, Jayne Peters, Diana Raines Marsha Doug Stover, Dave )n Also present were City Attorney Robert Hager. City REGULAR Public) that a quorum was Fence. the Publ~) arrived during Work Session. PM TO 7:30 PM. /COMMITTEE MEMBERS IN cm09252001 Page 1 of 7 REGULAR SESSION {Open to the Public) 3. Invocation. Councilmcmber Stover lcd those present in thc invocation. 4. Pledge of ~,llegiance. Mayor sheehan led those present in the Pledge At this time a song entitled United We which and recorded by Lisa Strickland, a a September 11,2001 tragedy. of the Item 9 was considered at S. Swear in ;e membel Mayor She and C~ who }ns item. of the following consent agenda items: approval of minutes: September 11, 2001 September 18, 2001. ',onsider approval of an Ordinance amending the Code of Ordinances by amending Article 1-10, "Rules, Times and cm09252001 Page 2 of 7 Procedures for Conducting City Council Meetings;" authorizing the Mayor to sign. Ce Consider approval of an ordinance abandonin drainage easement located between Lots 20 B of the Fifth Section, North Lake authorizing the Mayor to sign. Issues Discussed: Jim Witt, City Manager, explained that Item of the City Council meetings to 7:00 time Action: Councilmember Tunnell moved revised, B carrying O No. 2001-965. carried 7-0 Peters, Raines tcilmemb, in favor of sA as C1 ~ning the on to said attack, Pres .~sident of DFW Council on to join her as she read to Council. moved to approve Resolution No. 2001-0925.1 on the United States and praising the responders authorizing the Mayor to sign. Councilmember the motion; the motion carried 7-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Councilmembers Garcia, Peters, Raines, Tunnell, Stover and in favor of the motion. cm09252001 Page 3 of 7 10. Consider approval of a resolution to temporarily allocate voluntary monthly utility donation to the .~merican Red a non-profit organization, to provide assistance to the of the terrorists attacks which occurred on Se 2001, for the months of October, November and 2001. Issues Discussed: There was discussion regarding how much donation; and whether the water bill will this fund. this )n on Action: Councilmember Tunnell moved to temporarily American Red Cros the victims of 2001, for the Mayor Pro on Se )tion. to the to 11, 2001. · 0 with 11. City of Coppeil, No. 2000-922, through September ign. to approve Ordinance No. 2001-966 No. 2000-922, the budget for through September 30, 2001, and sign. Councilmember Raines seconded the 7-0 with Mayor Pro Tem York and Peters, Raines, Tunnell, Stover and Herring motion. 12. approval of a Professional Services Agreement ~n the City of Coppell and Looney Ricks Kiss Architects, ., for the preparation of Comprehensive Planning and cm09252001 Page 4 of 7 Architectural Services for the Old Coppell Historic Area in amount not to exceed $65,000.00, and authorizing Manager to sign. Action: Councilmember Peters moved to approve Agreement between the City of Coppell and Inc., for the preparation of Comprehensive Services for the Old Coppell Historic Area $65,000.00, and authorizing the City York seconded the motion; the York and Councilmembers Herring voting in favor of the a with s, Tunnell, exceed Tem Tem and 13. Consider approval registration of 9, by providing revocation this chapter e~ of for susl and sign, local with an mo~ No. 2001-967 providers by amending Providers"; providing suspension or revocation of with this chapter; providing Dollars ($500.00) per violation, per and authorizing the Mayor to sign. :l the motion; the motion carded 7-0 with Councilmembers Garcia, Peters, Raines, erring voting in favor of the motion. 14. of a Resolution approving the Bylaws and of Incorporation of the Coppell Education ~ment Corporation; and authorizing the Mayor to sign. cm09252001 Page 5 of 7 Action: Mayor Pro Tem York moved to approve Resolution No. 200 approving the Bylaws and the Articles of of Education Development Corporation; and authorizing Councilmember Peters seconded the motion; the Mayor Pro Tem York and Councilmembers Tunnell, Stover and Herring voting in favor of the 15. Comments on Finance Report Award. Presentation: Councilmember Stover awarded the G.F.O.A. Finance being 16. Necessary actio: There was no 17. Dallas/Fort Worth Implementation North Texas regarding Economic mber Peters regarding Coppell ~mber 29, 2001. Peters regarding Keep Coppell Event, Saturday, October 13, 2001. reported on the Dallas/Fort Worth International Planning and Implementation Study Partnering attended and announced that COG has information their web page. She also discussed the time line they are at. cm09252001 Page 6 of 7 Co Do Eo Councilmember Peters reported on the North Texas Conference Business Industry and Economic Development she Friday, September 14, 2001. Councilmember Peters reported on the Partnership meeting she and Councilmember ,nt Councilmember Peters announced that held Saturday, September 29, 2001 at 10:00 a.m. until 1:00 p.m. be Councilmember Peters announced the Parks and Leisure Service~ Wildflower Planting Event at 9:00 a.m. at Moore dedication held at that also and that a ;, 2001 a trail Adjournment. There being no was adjourned. Council, Mayor cm09252001 Page 7 of 7 AGENDA REQUEST FORM CITY COUNCIL MEETING: October 9, 2001 ITEM # ITEM CAPTION: Consider approval of an ordinance amending Section 8-1-3 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Coppell establishing 40 miles per hour as the maximum prima facie speed limit on Freeport Parkway from its point of intersection with I.H. 635 to its point of intersection with Creekview Drive, and 30 miles per hour as the maximum prima fade speed limit on Freeport Parkway from its point of intersection with Creekview Drive to its point of intersection with Ruby Road; and authorizing the Mayor to sign. SUBMITTED BY: Teresa Turner, E.I.T. TITLE: Graduate Engineer STAFF COMMENTS: The City has recently completed construction of Freeport Parkway from Bethel Road to Ruby Road. In accordance with the Code of Ordinances, the recognized speed limit on the new section of Freeport Parkway is 30 miles per hour. Because Freeport Parkway is in the industrial district of Coppell and was designed as a four-lane divided minor arterial, the Engineering Department is suggesting the following speed limits: 1) 40 miles per hour from the intersection with I.H. 635 north to the intersection with Creekview Drive (proposed) to be consistent with other divided streets in the industrial area and to conform to the designed speed of the roadway; 2) 30 miles per hour from the intersection with Creekview Drive (proposed) north to the intersection with Ruby Road to allow for a safe transition in speed to State Road, which is currently 30 miles per hour. Staff recommends approval of this ordinance and will be available to answer any questions at the Council meeting. BUDGET AMT. FINANCIAL COMMENTS:~ AMT EST $ DIR. INITIALS: ~ Agenda Request Form - Revised 5/00 FIN. REVIEW: +X-BID $ CITY MANAGER REVIEW: Document Name: #engl AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, AMENDING SECTION 8- 1-3 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES TO ESTABLISH 40 MIl,ES PER HOUR AS THE MAXIMUM PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT FOR FREEPORT PARKWAY FROM ITS POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH I.H. 635 TO ITS POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH CREEKVIEW DRIVE AND TO ESTABLISH 30 MILES PER HOUR AS THE MAXIMUM PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT FOR FREEPORT PARKWAY FROM ITS POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH CREEKVIEW DRIVE TO ITS POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH RUBY ROAD; PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS ($200.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Section 8-1-3 Of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Coppell, Texas be amended in part to establish the maximum prima facie speed limit for the following street to read as follows: DELETE: STREET PORTION OF STREET FREEPORT PARKWAY ALL 40 SPEED MILES PER HOUR ADD: STREET FREEPORT PARKWAY FREEPORT PARKWAY PORTION OF STREET From its point of intersection with I.H. 635 to its point of intersection with Creekview Drive From its point of intersection with Creekview Drive to its point of intersection with Ruby Road SPEED MII,ES PER HOUR 40 30 SECTION 2. That the traffic engineer is authorized and directed to erect signs necessary to give notice of the speed limit adopted herein. SECTION 3. All ordinances, or parts of ordinances, inconsistent or in conflict with provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed. ECTION 4. An offense committed before the effective date of this ordinance is governed by prior law and the provisions of the Code of Ordinances, as amended, in effect when the offense was committed and the former law is continued in effect for this purpose. SECTION 5. If any article, paragraph or subdivision, clause or provision of this ordinance shall be adjudged invalid or held unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole or any part or provision thereof, other than the part so decided to be invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 6. Any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions of this ordinance or of the Code of Ordinances, as amended hereby, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction by the Municipal Court of Coppell, Texas shall be punished by a penalty of fine not to exceed the sm-n of Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) for each offense; and each and every day such offense is continued shall constitute a new and separate offense. SECTION 7. This ordinance shall take effect immediately from and at~er the publication of its caption, as the law in such cases provides and after official traffic control devices have been erected giving notice of the speed limit established herein. DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, this the ~ ., 2001. APPROVED: day of CANDY SHEEHAN, MAYOR ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: LIBBY BALL, CITY SECRETARY ROBERT E. HAGER, CITY ATTORNEY T H £ C I 'C Y 0 F COPPP_,I IT, AGENDA REQUEST FORM CITY COUNCIL MEETING: October 9, 2001 ITEM # ITEM CAPTION: Consider approval of an Ordinance for Case No. S-1190, Green Pepper Asian Grill and Noodles, zoning change from PD- 178R (Planned Development- 178R) to PD- 178R-S.U.P- 1190 (PD 178R, Special Use Permit- 1190), to allow the operation of an oriental restaurant and private club to be located in the Town Center West Retail Center at 171 N. Denton Tap Road, and authorizing the Mayor to sign. SUBMITTED BY: TITLE: STAFF COMMENTS: Date of P&Z Meeting: Decision of P&Z Commission: Gary L. Sieb Director of Planning and Community Services N/A N/A On August 16, 2001, the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously approved this Special Use Permit. On September 18, 2001, City Council unanimously approved this zoning change. Staff recommends approval. Agenda Request Form - Revised 5/00 CITY MANAGER REVI ~S 1190o AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, AS HERETOFORE AMENDED, BY GRANTING A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM "PD-178R" (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - 178R) TO "PD178R-S.U.P.-l190" (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - 178R, SPECIAL USE PERMIT -1190) TO GRANT A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE OPERATION OF A RESTAURANT WITH PRIVATE CLUB, LOCATED IN THE TOWN CENTER WEST RETAIL CENTER, 171 NORTH DENTON TAP ROAD, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN; PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN, FLOOR PLAN, ELEVATIONS, AND SIGN PLAN, ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBITS "B", "C", "D", AND "E", RESPECTIVELY; PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL CONDITIONS; PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Commission and the governing body of the City of Coppell, Texas, in compliance with the laws of the State of Texas and pursuant to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, have given requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and after holding due hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property owners generally, and to all persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, the said governing body is of the opinion that Zoning Application No. S-1190 should be approved, and in the exercise of legislative discretion have concluded that the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map should be amended. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map of the City of Coppell, Texas, duly passed by the governing body of the City of Coppell, Texas, as heretofore amended, be and the same is hereby amended to grant a change in zoning fi-om "PD-178R" (Planned Development - 178R) to "PD178R-S.U.P.-1190" (Planned Development - 178R, Special Use Permit -1190) to grant a Special Use Permit to allow for the operation of a restaurant with private club, located in the Town Center West Retail Center, 171 North Denton Tap Road, subject to special conditions, for the property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes. 43479 SECTION 2. That the Special Use Permit approved subject to the following special conditions: (^) ¢) for a restaurant, with private club, is hereby SECTION 3. That the Site Plan, Floor Plan, Elevations, and The hours of operation shall be Sunday through Saturday fi:om 11:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. The site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plan, elevations, floor plan and sign plan, as provided in Section 3 herein. Sign Plan, attached hereto as Exhibits "B", "C", "D", and "E", respectively, and made a part hereof for all purposes, are hereby approved. SECTION 4. That the above property shall be used only in the manner and for the purpose provided for by the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, as heretofore amended, and as amended herein. SECTION 5. That the development of the property herein shall be in accordance with building regulations, zoning ordinances, and any applicable ordinances except as may be specifically altered or amended herein. SECTION 6. That all provisions of the Ordinances of the City of Coppell, Texas, in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same are hereby, repealed, and all other provisions not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 7. That should any sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole, or any part or provision thereof other than the part so decided to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, and shall not affect the validity of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as a whole. 2 43479 SECTION 8. An offense committed before the effective date of this ordinance is governed by prior law and the provisions of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, as mended, in effect when the offense was committed and the former law is continued in effect for this purpose. SECTION 9. That any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions or terms of this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as provided for in the Comprehensive zomg Ordinance of the City of Coppell, as heretofore amended, and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine not to exceed the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense; and each and every day such violation shall continue shall be deemed to constitute a separate offense. SECTION 10. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately fi:om and after its passage and the publication of its caption, as the law and charter in such cases provide. DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, this the ., 2001. APPROVED: day of CANDY SHEEHAN, MAYOR ATTEST: ROBERT E. H~GE~ITY ATTORNEY (REH/cdb 9/26/01) ~ LIBBY BALL, CITY SECRETARY 3 43479 LOT I D~OI~ BEING · ~ of ~ ~/m~ted/n ~b~ ~ W. J~k Survey, ~ No. 694/n the City of Coppell, ~ ~. Tex~ ~/i d~o be/~ p~ of, tract of 1~[ ~ de,ri'bed/n ~ ~ m Y~ W~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ Vo~ , ~ ~ of ~ ~ R~ of ~ C~. T~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ fo~o~: BBG~G ~ m ~ ~ ~ m ~~ ~ ~~ of~ w~ ~ of~ T~ R~ (a ~le ~ ~t~f-~y) ~ ~ ~ ~ of W~ To~ C~ ~ve (, ~ie ~i~ d~t~f-~y). ~ ~ ~ Vo~ ~1~, ~ ~3 of~ ~ K~ of~ ~, T~; ~~ S. 01~13~ E., 1~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ of~ T~ R~ ~ a ?:~ i~u ~ ~ for ~, ~ ~ ~ ~S ~ ~ ~ of, ~ of ~ ~ ~v~ ~ Wi~ ~~ T~. ~ ~ ~ ~ Vo~ 8~11 I, ~ 11~ of ~ ~ ~ of ~ ~, T~; ~~ S. 8~' W., ~.~ f~ 1~ ~ ~ w~ ~ of ~ T~ R~ ~d mg io~g ~~~of~d~~ ~*%'~~fg~ ~~ ~. 01'13~7' W., I~.~ ~ 1~ ~ ~d ~ ~ of~ ~~ m m a ~i' ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ of~l~' ~ ~ ~ of~8.~ f~ ~C~ fl~ ~d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ofW~ T~ ~ ~v~, ~.83 f~ m ~ ~ of~d ~e of~4'~7' ~, ~ ~5.~ ~ ~~ ~ ~d ~ ~ ~ d~ ~ ~d ~ ~ ofW~ To~ ~ ~ve, 41.98 ~ m ~ ~ of ~d ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ f~ ~ ~~ N. ~ I T4~' E., 282.78 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~d ~ ~ of W~ To~ C~ ~ve m ~ P~tof~ ~~ 1.83~ ~of~ Z ~t~[B~T "B" k'X~[BIT "C" E~IIIBIT "D-I" LI.I · ~Zz lil~l~lili T H E: C I T Y O F C-OFF-ELL AGENDA R QUEST FORM CITY COUNCIL MEETING: October 9, 2001 ITEM # ~ ITEM CAPTION: PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. PD-186R2, Duke-Freeport, zoning change request from PD-186R (Planned Development-186 Revised) to PD-186R2 (Planned Development-186R2) to allow for additional monument signage, to decrease the required parking on Lot 1, and to incorporate the tree mitigation/landscaping plan on approximately 140 acres of property located along the west side of Coppell Road, between Ruby and Bethel Roads. SUBMITTED BY: Gary L. Sieb TITLE: Director of Planning and Community Services STAFF COMMENTS: Date of P&Z Meeting: September 20, 2001 Decision of P&Z Commission: Approved (5-0) with Commissioners McGahey, Kittrell, McCaffrey, Clark and Stewart voting in favor. None opposed. Approval is recommended, subject to the following conditions: (PLEASE SEE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE) Agenda Request Form - d 5/00 CITY MANAGER REVIEW: @PD186R2 CONTINUED CONDITIONS FOR CASE NO. PD-186R2~ DUKE-FREEPORT c) (CONDITION MET) Staff recommends approval. CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT CASE NO.'_ PD-186R2, Duke-Free2ort P & Z HEARING DATE: C.C. HEARING DATE: STAFF REP.: LOCATION: September 20, 2001 October 9, 2001 Maxcie Diamond, Assistant Planning Director Along the west side of Coppell Road, between Ruby and Bethel Roads SIZE OF AREA: Approximately 143 acres of property CURRENT ZONING: PD-186R (Planned Development-186 Revised) REQUEST: PD-186R2 (Planned Development-186R2) approval. APPLICANT: Brook Barefoot Duke Realty Corporation 5495 Beltline Road, Suite 360 Dallas, Texas 75254 972-361-6714 FAX: 972-361-6800 HISTORY: TRANSPORTATION: Page 1 of 6 On September 12, 2000, City Council approved a Conceptual Planned Development District (PD-186-LI) for industrial uses to allow the development of 7 office/warehouse facilities on approximately 143 acres of property. Also approved was a final plat for this property to allow the construction of the extension of Freeport Parkrway from Bethel Road to Ruby Road. On January 9, 2001, City Council approved a Detail Plan for Tracts 4 and 4x of this PD. Part of this approval was a condition to prepare a tree mitigation plan for this PD. The construction of Freeport Parkway is nearly complete through this property as a C4D/6 four-lane divided built in a six-lane (120- Item # 7 foot) R.O.W. Bethel Road is proposed to be a C4D, (four-lane divided within a l l0-foot R.O.W.) west of Freeport Parkway. East of Freeport Parkway, Bethel Road is a C2U, two-lane undivided within 50 feet of right-of-way. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North- vacant land, mobile home park, new duplexes; LI, 2F9 South -vacant, single family; LI, SF-12 East - residential and commercial; SF-12, HO-SF-12, HO-C West -vacant LI (Light Industrial) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan shows the property as suitable for office, showroom, light industrial and warehousing uses. DISCUSSION: There are three purposes for this amendment to PD-186R: · To reduce the parking required for warehouse uses on Tract 1 from one space per 1,000- square feet to one space per 5,000-square feet; · allow for additional monument signage; and to attach a tree reparation/landscape plan to the PD. PARKING REDUCTION: The applicant has stated that the reduction in required parking for warehouse uses within Tract 1 will allow this site to be more marketable, by reducing costs and providing for additional flexibility in design. This request is similar to the request granted in PD-191, also for Dukes Reality. In support of the parking reduction in PD-191, the applicant provided various case studies illustrating that there was a significant mount of under-utilized parking lots in our industrial district. However, in PD-191, the parking requested was one space per 3,000-square feet of warehouse, and this request is for one space per 5,000-square feet of warehouse use. PD-191 was also approved with a Detail Site Plan, which provided for the assurance that if additional parking is needed, it could be provided on-site while meeting all the City's codes and ordinances. Staff could support this current request for a reduction in parking if the same safeguards are in place at the time the Detail Plan is approved. A related issue is the buffer between this industrial property and the property to the north of Ruby Road. The revised Concept Plan for Tract 1 has significantly reduced the proposed buffer between this use and the existing residential development and City-owned property to the north. The approved Concept Plan provided for a detention area, approximately 70 feet in width adjacent to Ruby Road. Adjacent to the detention area were three rows of parking (81 feet in width) which allowed for approx. 150 feet of "relief' with the landscaped areas coupled with the required parking islands and plantings, before the truck court began. The current Concept Plan deletes the detention area and provides for only 30 feet of landscaping adjacent to Ruby Road. Given this residential adjacency, staff recommends that, at a minimum, an additional landscape buffer and open space be provided along Ruby Road equal to the 70-foot buffer indicated on the Concept Plan. Staff feels that this increase in landscaping/open space would be a reasonable Page 2 of 6 Item # 7 trade-off to allow for a significant reduction in the required parking, as well as maintaining a buffer between these industrial uses, the existing residential development and proposed City facility to the north. The following conditions have been added to this PD to allow for the reduced parking and to maintain this buffer: · Limited to Lot 1 only, the parking for a warehouse use may be reduced to a ratio of one space per 5,000-square feet. In the event that the demand for parking increases due to the occupancy characteristics of the building, additional parking shall be provided, while meeting the requirements of the Landscape Ordinance in effect at the time that the Detail Plan is approved. · Along the north property line of Lot 1, adjacent to Ruby Road, a landscape buffer area, a minimum of 70-feet in width, shall be provided. SIGN REQUEST: In summary, the Sign Ordinance permits one 60-foot monument sign per lot on lots greater than two acres in size, with an additional monument sign (60-square feet) on comer lots, where both street frontages exceed 500 feet. On non-comer lots with multiple street frontages, two 40- square-foot signs are permitted. Under those criteria, this Planned Development district would be permitted six 60-sq.-fL monument signs, and two 40-square-foot signs for a total of 440- square feet of signs. This request would allow for one 60-square-foot sign for each of the proposed 7 buildings (6 lots) and allow entry feature signs at the north and south ends of Freeport Parkway. The sign at the intersection of Freeport Parkway and Ruby Road is proposed to be a 73-square-foot monument sign adjacent to the proposed detention area. At the intersection of Freeport Parkway and Bethel, two monument signs are proposed, each containing approximately 168-square feet. The sign on the west side of Freeport Parkway is proposed to be an industrial park entry sign identifying the park. The sign proposed for the east side of Freeport Parkway would also be 168- square feet; however, it is being requested to identify the individual tenants within the park. The total square footage of the signage requested for this entire PD is 761-square feet, which exceeds the overall signage permitted by 42%. Building Monument Signs Permitted Monument Signs Requested One 73-sq.-ft. entry sign 1 Two 60-sq.-fl. building signs One 60-sq.-ft. building sign 2 Two 40-sq.-ft. building signs One 60-sq.-ft. building sign 3 One 60-sq.-ft. building sign One 60-sq.-ft. building sign 4 One 60-sq.-ft. building sign One 60-sq.-fi. building sign Two 60-sq.-ft. building signs 5& 6 (1 lot) One 60-sq.-ft. building sign One 168-sq.-ft. entry sign One 60-sq.-fi. building sign 7 One 60-sq.-ft. building sign One 168-sq.-ft. entry sign Six 60-sq.-ft. building signs Seven 60-sq.-ft. building signs Two 40-sq.-ft. building signs One 78-sq.-ft. entry sign Totals Two 168-sq.-ft. entry signs 440-sq. ft. of signs 761-sq. ft. of signs Page 3 of 6 Item # 7 Although the number and size of the signs would appear excessive, consideration needs to be given to the size and location of this property, the proposed locations of the signs and the benefits to an overall, aesthetically coordinated sign package. All signs will be uniform in terms of colors, materials, logos, etc. This sign plan also regulates the placement of the signs, in that they will be limited to Freeport Parkway and Bethel Road only, with no signs on Coppell Road. The only sign proposed along Ruby Road is at the southeast comer of Ruby Road and Freeport Parkway, which is an entry-feature sign adjacent to the detention area. Finally, within this 140+ acre park, the lot sizes range in size from 10 to over 50 acres, and if subdivided into smaller lots, a significantly greater number of signs would be permitted. Staff's main concern relates to the proposed entry-feature sign at the northeast comer of Freeport Parkway and Bethel Road. This 168-square-foot sign is proposed to identify individual tenants in the industrial park. The elevation for this sign includes a potential for 12 names, with pin mounted lettering. This type of sign is similar to what is found in retail shopping centers. Staff cannot support this type of sign. If the overall sign package is approved as submitted, this park will have significantly more signage than is allowed by the sign ordinance or typically found in the industrial parks in Coppell, and therefore, would be excessive. There also is a concern about the upkeep and maintenance of this sign, as tenants change, so would the sign, and over time this could be a problem. Finally, approval of this type of signage is not a desirable precedence to set in our industrial area. Therefore, staff can only support a park identification sign on the northeast comer of Bethel Road and Freeport Parkway, if it matches the sign proposed for the northwest comer of this same intersection. The following condition has been added to this PD to address this sign plan: · Monument signs, consistent with the quantity, quality, size, materials, colors and located in the approximate locations, as indicated on this plan, will be permitted within this PD, except that the park entry monument sign at the northeast comer of Bethel Road and Freeport Parkway shall generally match the sign proposed for the northwest comer of the same intersection. TREE REPARATION AND LANDSCAPE PLANS When the Detail Plan for Tracts 4 and 4x (Building 2) was approved, it was subject to a tree reparation plan being approved. This reparation plan was required to include the provision that the trees would be replaced within two years from the time that the Certificate of Occupancy was issued for the first building. Since that time, the applicant has submitted a reparation plan and the landscape plan for the median of Freeport Parkway and two common areas to partially fulfill the required reparation. In consultation with the City Attorney, it was determined that it would be appropriate to attach the reparation plan and this first phase landscape plan to this PD Amendment, verses preparing a separate legal document. Therefore, the following conditions have been added to this Planned Development district: Adding the Tree Mitigation Plan and Landscape Plan for the medians and common areas to the PD, with the following conditions added to the Tree Mitigation Plan: Page 4 of 6 Item # 7 b) c) All trees required to be installed per the attached reparation plan shall be planted no later than 24 months from the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the first building in this PD. The landscaping in the median of Freeport Parkway shall be as shown on the attached landscape plan and shall be installed by the applicant (Dukes Reality) and maintained by the Property Owners Association. The landscaping and irrigation in the common areas shall be maintained by the Property Owners Association. The remaining trees, as required in this mitigation plan, shall be installed as specified in a) above. A private license agreement to allow for the installation, irrigation and maintenance of the landscaping in Freeport Parkway is required to be executed by the City Manager. The detailed landscape plan and irrigation plan shall be attached to this license agreement. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff is reconunending APPROVAL of the revision to PD-186R, subject to the following revisions to the conditions as noted on the site plan: 1) 2) 3) The Detail Plan for Tract 1 will provide a 70-foot landscape buffer parallel and adjacent to Ruby Road. The park entry monument sign at the northeast comer of Bethel Road and Freeport Parkway shall generally match the sign proposed for the northwest comer of the same intersection. The Tree Mitigation Plan and Landscape Plan for the medians and common areas shall be attached to and made a part of this PD, with the following conditions noted on the Tree Mitigation Plan: a) All trees required to be installed per the attached reparation plan shall be planted no later than 24 months from the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the first building in this PD. b) The landscaping in the median of Freeport Parkway shall be as shown on the attached landscape plan and shall be installed by the applicant and maintained by the Property Owners Association. c) The landscaping and irrigation in the common areas shall be maintained by the Property Owners Association. d) The remaining trees, as required in this mitigation plan, shall be installed as specified in a) above. ALTERNATIVES: 1) Recommend approval of the request. 2) Recommend disapproval of the request 3) Recommend modification of the request 4) Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date. Page 5 of 6 Item # 7 ATTACHMENTS: 1) Preliminary Site Plan 1, Sheet A. 1 2) Landscape Tabulations Plan, Sheet L1.01 3) Tree Mitigation Plan For PD 186R2 4) Landscape Plan For Freeport Parkway And Lot 2 West Pond And Lot 4x East Pond. Page 6 of 6 Item # 7 F COPPEIJ£ AGENDA REQUEST FORM CITY COUNCIL MEETING: October 9, 2001 ITEM # ITEM CAPTION: PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of Case No. S-1192, Pizza Inn, zoning change request from C (Commercial) to C-S.U.P (Commercial, Special Use Permit-1192), to allow the operation of an approximately 1,060 square-foot take- out/delivery restaurant located in the Coppell Crossing Shopping Center, Lot 5, at 751 MacArthur Blvd. SUBMITTED BY: Gary L. Sieb TITLE: Director of Planning and Community Services STAFF COMMENTS: Date of P&Z Meeting: September 20, 2001 Decision of P&Z Commission: Approved (5-0) with Commissioners McGahey, Kittrell, McCaffrey, Clark and Stewart voting in favor. None opposed. Approval is recommended, subject to the following conditions: 1) The development of this property shall be in accordance with the site plan, elevations, floor plan and sign plans. 2) The hours of operation being limited to 11 a.m. to 11 p.m., seven days a week. Staff recommends approval. DIR. INITIALS: ~~4 Agenda Request Form - Revised 5/00 FIN. REVIEW:~ CITY MANAGER REVIEW: RS 1192pi CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT CASE NO: S-1192 Pizza Inn P & Z HEARING DATE: C.C. HEARING DATE: STAFF REP.: LOCATION: SIZE OF AREA: September 20, 2001 October 9, 2001 Andrea Roy, City Planner Coppell Crossing Shopping Center, Lot 5, at 751 MacArthur Blvd. Approximately 1,060 square feet. CURRENT ZONING: C (Commercial) REQUEST: C-S.U.P.-1192 (Commercial-Special Use Permit-1192) for a pizza carry-out/delivery restaurant. APPLICANT: Imtiaz Ahmed-President Victory Management Inc. d/b/a Pizza Inn 405 Sandy Knoll Drive Coppell, TX 75019 Phone: 214-629-8921 Fax: 972-432-8174 HISTORY: There has been considerable development history on the subject property. A site plan for a 9,942-square-foot retail building and final plat for this property was denied by City Council on December 14, 1999. On March 2, 2000, the Board of Adjustment granted a variety of requests for variances and special exceptions for Lot 5, to allow reduced required setbacks and to allow less than five parking spaces in a row. On May 9, 2000, City Council approved a final plat and site plan for the subject lot (Lot 5) to allow a 5,046-square-foot retail building. Page 1 of 3 Item # 4 TRANSPORTATION: MacArthur Blvd. is a P6D, shown as a six-lane divided thoroughfare on our Thoroughfare Plan. It is currently an improved four-lane divided roadway contained within a 110-foot R.O.W. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North- mini-warehouse, PD-151 (Commercial) South -retail, C (Commercial) East - restaurant, C-S.U.P.-1157 (Commercial-S.U.P.-1157, Burger King) West - TXU electric transmission line; A (Agriculture) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan shows the property as suitable for retail uses. DISCUSSION: This request would allow an approximately 1,060-square foot Pizza Inn carry-out and delivery restaurant, occupying the west end of the building. No seating will be available, as indicated by the floor plan. The requested hours of operation are 11 a.m. to 11 p.m., seven days a week. At the request of staff, the applicant has provided a note on the floor plan, which indicates that the lights immediately adjacent to the building will remain on during the hours of operation to ensure the security of both customers and employees. The allowable signage for this building is the same approved for buildings 1 and 2 of Coppell Crossing that specifies: "ivory lettering will be used for all signs and, if necessary, a tenant may also incorporate a logo of a different color as part of the allowable signage, provided that the logo occupies less area than the ivory lettering". Per Section 29-4.3(B) of the Zoning Ordinance, attached signs for buildings and leaseholds with multiple facades, are permitted with a maximum aggregate effective area on any one facade equal to one square foot per one lineal foot of fagade width and a maximum total aggregate effective area of two square feet per lineal foot of tenant frontage. The applicant has proposed to place a 10.75-square-foot sign on the south elevation, in compliance with the permitted 16.66 square feet. The letters are proposed to be ivory. Additionally, at the request of staff, the applicant has provided a note on the sign details, which indicate that sign Page 2 of 3 Item # 4 returns will match the existing signage in the shopping center and that the raceway of the signage will match the material on which it is mounted. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff is recommending APPROVAL of S-1192, Pizza Inn, subject to the following conditions: 1) The hours of operation being limited to 11 a.m. to 11 p.m., seven days a week. 2) The development of this property shall be in accordance with the site plan, elevations, floor plan and sign plans. ALTERNATIVES: 1) Recommend approval of the request. 2) Recommend disapproval of the request 3) Recommend modification of the request 4) Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date. ATTACHMENTS: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) Site Plan Floor Plan Elevations Sign Elevations Sign Details Letter from Mockingbird Management Co. Page 3 of 3 Item # 4 k .! I I I I ? I · / I .I I o. ILl I PI-18-CL-W 9'-6" PI-24-CL-W NOTE: ~- CHANNEL LETrERS WITH WHITE FACES~ ARE ONLY TO'BE USED ON DARKCOIDRED BUILDINGS BUT ONLY WITH THE APPROVAL OF PIZZA INN LETTER DISPLAYS ARE AVAILABLE ON RACEWAYS 11'-11" PI-30-CL-W 14'-4" I PI-36-CL-W 16'-9" PI-42-CL-W PLEX-FACE CHANNEL LETTERS ~/4,,:~,-o,, NOTE: SIGN RETURNS WILL MATCH EXISTING SIGNAGE IN THE SHOPPING CENTER. RACEWAY OF THE SIGNAGE WILL MATCH THE MATERIAL ON WHICH IT IS MOUNTED. 940 24~ 2352; AU~;2~-O~ 7:56A~; PA~E 1/t 9Y: UOCK~NB~RD ~ANAGaENT; Mockingbird Management Company 4529 Mahogany Lane Coppcr Canyon, TX. 75067 940-241-2353 fax 940-241-2352 Augast 21, 2001 Andrea Roy City pb_mner City of Coppell 255 Parkway Blvd. Coppell, TX. 75019 via fax: 972-304-7092 Re: Coppell Crossing Lot 5. Dear Andrea: Please be advised that lmtiaz Ahmed owner of Pizza h~n has the attthorization of the Owner of Coppell Crossing 5 to proceed with iris application for an SUP in thc City of Coppell. Trusting tile above to be safi.qt~actory, I remain Sincerely Yours Mitchell Vexing, Pf sident Mockingbird Manage[neat Company F ¢-O??-ELL AGENDA REQUEST FORM CITY COUNCIL MEETING: October 9, 2001 ITEM # // ITEM CAPTION: PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of the designation of a reinvestment zone pursuant to Section 312.201 of the Property Redevelopment and Tax Abatement Act. The property to be considered for Reinvestment Zone designation is that property owned by ACLP Northlake II, L.P., described as Northlake 635 Business Park, Block C, Lot 1R (8.044 acres) and located at the northwest corner of Lakeshore and Crestside Drives, Coppell, Texas. SUBMITTED BY: Gary Sieb TITLE: Director of Planning STAFF COMMENTS: BUDGET AMT. FINANCIAL COMMENTS:~' AMT EST $ Agenda Request Form - Revised 5/00 FIN. REVIEW'~ +k-BID $ ~C~cTumYe?NAG~EaRmyVIE~~ SPHACLP.doc NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING OF DESIGNATION O.F REINVESTMENT ZONE A PUBLIC HEARING will be conducted by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, in the Council Chambers, Town Center, 255 Parkway Boulevard, Coppell, Texas on the 9t__h day of October, 2001, at 7:00 P.M., to consider designation of the property described as Block C, Lot iR, Northlake 635 Business Park (8.044 acres), located at the northwest corner of Lakeshore and Crestside Drives, Coppell, Texas, ACLP Northlake II, L.P., as a Reinvestment Zone under Chapter 312 of the Texas Property Tax Code. The Council will seek to determine whether the improvements sought to be made in the zone are feasible and practical and will be a benefit to the land included in the zone and to the City after the expiration of a tax abatement agreement to be entered into pursuant to Section 312.204 of the Texas Property Tax Code. At the hearing, interested persons are entitled to speak and present evidence for or against the designation. Citizens Advocate September 28, 2001 EXHIBIT "A" DESCRIPTION, of a 8.044 acre tract of land situated in the Cordelia Bowes Survey, Abstract No. 56, Dallas County, Texas; said tract including Lot 1. Block C Northlake 6.35 Business Park, an addition to the City of Coppell according to the plat recorded in Volume 85056, Page 3558 of the Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas, said tract also also including that same tract of land conveyed to TFS & SONS, LTD. By Special Warranty Deed recorded in Volume 94250, Page 4951 of the Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas; and including part of several tracts of land described in deed to ACLP Northlake L.P. as recorded in Volume 99077 Page .324 of Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas, said 8.044 acre tract being more porticulady described as follows: BEGINNING, at o 1/2-inch iron rod found at the southwest end of a right-of-way corner cllp at the intersection of the west right-of-way line of Lakeshore Drive (a 60 foot right-of-way) and the north Hght-of-way line of Crsstslde Drive (a 60 foot right-of-way); THENCE, South 5.3 degrees, 25:'minutes, 07 seconds West, along the said north right-of-way line Crestslde Drive, a distance of 109.67 feet to a 1/2-1rich Iron rod found at the beginning of a curve to the right whose center bears North 36 degrees, 36 minutes, 5;3 seconds West, a distance of .320.00 feet from said point; THENCE, southwesterly along said north right-of-way line of Crestside Drive, through a central angle of 37 degrees, 06 minutes, 55 seconds an arc distance of 207.29 feet on a chord bearing and distance of South 71 degrees. 56 minutes, .33 seconds West, 205.68 feet to a 1/2-inch Iron rod found at the end of said curve; THENCE, North 89 degrees, .30 minutes. O0 seconds West. continuing with said north right-of-way line of Crestslde Drive, a distance of 206.60 feet to a 1/2-Inch Iron rod found for corner, said point being the southwest corner of said Lot 1, Block C, and being the beginning of a curve to the right whose center bears North O0 degrees, 30 minutes East, a distance of 520.00 feet from said point; THENCE, northwestsdy along said north right-of-way line of Crestside Drive, through a central angle of 90 degrees, O0 minutes, O0 seconds an arc distance of 502.65 feet on a chord bearing and distance of South 44 degrees, .30 minutes, O0 seconds West, 452.55 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod found at the end of said curve; THENCE, North O0 degrees, 30 minutes, O0 seconds East, continuing with said east right-of-way line of Crestside Drive, o distance of 234.00 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod found for comer, said po;nt being the southwest corner of the Essex Wire Addition, recorded in Volume 87189, Page 3370 alr Deed Records of Dallas County;, THENCE, South 89 degrees, 30 minutes, O0 seconds East, departing said east righ[-of-way line of Crestside Drive, along the south Ilne of said Essex Wire Addltlon a distance of 520.00 feet to a 1/2-Inch Iron rod found for corner, said point being In the west line of a tract at' land conveyed to TFS & SONS, LTD. by Special Warranty Deed recorded In Volume 94250, Page 4931 of the Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas; THENCE, South O0 degrees, 30 minutes, O0 seconds West, a distance of 49.70 feet to a 1/2-Inch iron rod found for corner, said point being In the west line of a tract of land conveyed to TFS & SOr~S, LTD. by Special Warranty Deed recorded in Volume 94250, Page 4931 of the Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas; THENCE, South 89 degrees, 30 minutes, O0 seconds East, a distance of 320.00 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod found for corner in the said west right-of-way line of Lakeshore Drive, said point being the beginning of a curve to the left whose center bears South 89 degrees, 30 minutes, 03 seconds East, a distance of 380.00 feet from said point; THENCE, southeasterly along said west right-of-way line of Lakeshore Drive, through a central ~ngle of 37 degrees, 06 minutes, 50 seconds an arc distance of 246.15 feet on a chord bearing and distance of South 18 Degrees, 03 minutes, 28 seconds East, 241.87 feet to a 1/2-Inch Iron rod found at the end of sold curve; THENCE, South 36 degrees, .%6 minutes, 53 seconds East, along the sold west right-of-way Ilne of Lakeshore Drive, a distance of 154.24 feet to a 1/2-1nth iron rod found at the northeast end of said corner clip; THENCE:, South 08 degrees, 23 minutes, 07 seconds West, along said comer cllp, a distance of 21.21 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING, 350,390 square feet or 8.044 acres of land more or less. COPPELL TECH CENTER II T H E C I T Y 0 F C OPP-ELL AGENDA REQUEST FORM CITY COUNCIL MEETING: October 9, 2001 ITEM # ITEM CAPTION: Consider approval of an Ordinance designating the ACLP Northlake II, Reinvestment Zone No. 35, and authorizing the Mayor to sign. L.P. SUBMITTED BY: Gary Sieb TITLE: Director of Planning STAFF COMMENTS: BUDGET AMT. $ FINANCIAL COMMENTS AMT. EST. $ DIR. INITIALS: ~~ Agenda Request Form - Revised 5/00 FIN. REVIE~ +\-BID $ CITY MANAGER REVIEW: Document Name: SACLP.DOC ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, DESIGNATING REINVESTMENT ZONE NO. 35; PROVIDING ELIGIBILITY OF ~ ZONE FOR COMMERCIAL-INDUSTRIAL TAX ABATEMENT; CONTAINING FINDINGS TItAT Tl:[E AREA QUALIFIES TO BE DESIGNATED AS A REINVESTMENT ZONE AND THE IMPROVEMENTS SOUGHT ARE FEASIBLE AND PRACTICABLE AND OF BENEFIT TO Tl:lE LAND AND TItE CITY; PROVIDING A SEVERABIL1TY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, has caused notice to be published in a newspaper having general circulation in the City and has delivered such notice to the presiding officer of the goveming body of each taxing unit that includes in its boundaries real property described herein; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, has conducted a public hearing on the designation of the area described herein as a reinvestment zone; NOW, TIIEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS THAT: SECTION 1: That the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas finds that the area described herein will, if designated as a reinvestment zone, be reasonably likely to contribute to the retention or expansion of primary employment, or to attract major investment in the zone that will be of benefit to the property and contribute to the economic development of the City. The City Council further finds that the improvements sought are feasible and practicable and would be of benefit to the land to be included in the zone and to the City after the expiration of a tax abatement agreement. SECTION 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 312.201 of the Texas Tax Code, the property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes is hereby designated as a reinvestment zone and for identification is assigned the name "Re'investment Zone No. 1 41294 SECTION 3. That the property within Reinvestment Zone No. 35 is eligible for commercial- industrial tax abatement effective on January 1, 2002. SECTION 4. If any article, paragraph or subdivision, clause or provision of this ordinance shall be adjudged invalid or held unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole or any part or provision thereofi other than the part so decided to be invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 5. That all provisions of ordinances of the City of Coppell, Texas,. in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same are hereby, repealed, and all other provisions not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 6. This ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage, as the law and charter in such cases provide. DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, on the ~ day of ,2001. APPROVED: CANDY SHEEHAN, MAYOR ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: LIBBY BALL, CITY SECRETARY PETER G. SMITH, CITY ATTORNEY 0'GS/jnm) 2 41294 EXHIBIT "A" DESCRIPTION, of a 8.044. acre tract of land situated in the Cordelia Bowen Survey, Abstract No. 56, Dallas County, Texas; said tract including Lot 1, Block C Northlake 655 Business Park, an addition to the City of Coppell according to the plat recorded in Volume 85056, Page 3358 of the Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas, said tract also also including that same tract cf land conveyed to TF'S & SONS, LTD. By Special Warranty Deed recorded in Volume 94.250, Page 4.951 of the Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas; and including part of several tracts of land described in deed to ACLP Northlake L.P, ae recorded in Volume 99077 Page 524. of Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas, said 8.04.4. acre tract being more particularly described aa follows: BEGINNING, at a 1/2-inch iron rod found at the southwest end of a right-of-way corner cllp at the intereectlon of the west right-of-way line of Lakeshore Drive (a 60 foot right-of-way) and the north right-of-way line of Crestside Drive (a 60 foot right-of-way); THENCE, South 55 degrees, 25'~mlnutee, 07 seconds West, along the said north right-of-way line Crestside Drive, a distance of 109.67 feet to a 1/2-inch Iron rod found at the beginning of a curve to the right whose center bears North 56 degrees, 56 minutes, 55 seconds West, a distance of 520.00 feet from said point; THENCE, southwesteHy along said north right-of-way line of Cresteide Drive, through a central angle of 37 d~grees, 06 minutes, 55 seconds an arc distance of 207.29 feet on a chord bearing and distance of South 71 degrees, 56 minutes, .7,5 seconds West, 205.68 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod found at the end of said curve; THENCE, North 89 degrees, 50 minutes, O0 seconds West. continuing with said north right-of-way line of Crestslde Drive, a distance of 206.60 feet to a 1/2-Inch Iron rod found for corner, said point being the southwest corner of said Lot 1, Block C, and being the beginning of a curve to the right whose center bears North O0 degrees, 50 minutes East, a distance of 520.00 feet from said point; THENCE, northwesterly along said north right-of-way line of Crestslde Drive, through a central angle of 90 degrees, O0 minutes, O0 seconds an arc distance of 502.65 feet on a chord bearlng and distance of South 44 degrees, 50 minutes, O0 seconds West, 4.52.55 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod found at the end of said curve; THENCE, North O0 degrees, 50 minutes, O0 seconds East, continuing with said east right-of-way line of Crestslde Drive, a distance of 254.00 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod found for comer, said point being the southwest corner of the Essex Wire Addition, recorded in Volume 87189, Page 3570 of Deed Records of Dallas County;, THENCE, South 89 degrees. 50 minutes, O0 seconds East, departing said east right-of-way line of Crestside Drive, along the south line of said Essex Wire Addition a distance of 320.00 feet to a 1/2-Inch Iron rod found for comer. said point being in the west line of a tract of land conveyed to TFS & SONS, LTD. by Special Warranty Deed recorded In Volume 94250, Page 4951 of the Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas; THENCE, South O0 degrees, 50 mlnutes, O0 seconds West, a distance of 4.9.70 feet to o 1/2-inch iron rod found for corner, said point being In the west line of a tract of land conveyed to TFS & SONS, LTD. by Special Warranty Deed recorded in Volume 94250, Page 4951 of the Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas; THENCE, South 89 degrees, 50 minutes, O0 seconds East, a distance of 520.00 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod found for corner in the said west right-of-way line of Lokeshore Drive, said point being the beginning of a curve to the left whose center bears South 89 degrees, 50 minutes, 05 seconds East. a distance of 580.00 feet from said point; THENCE, southeasterly along said west right-of-way line of Lakeshore Drive, through a central angle of 37 degrees, 06 minutes, 50 seconds an arc distance of 24.6.15 feet on a chord bearing and distance of South 18 Degrees, 05 minutes, 28 seconds East, 241.87 feet to a 1/2-inch Iron rod found at the end of said curve; THENCE. South 56 degrees, 36 minutes, 55 seconds East, along the said west right-of-way line of Lokeshore Drive, a distance of 154.24. feet to a 1/2-Inch iron rod found at the northeast end of sold comer clip; THENCE, South 08 degrees, 25 minutes, 07 seconds West, along said comer clip, a distance of 21.21 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING, 350,590 square feet or 8.044 acres of land more or less. COPPELL TECH CENTER II T H E G I T Y0 F COt;3 i i L AGENDA REQUEST FORM CITY COUNCIL MEETING: October 9, 2001 ITEM ITEM CAPTION: Consider approval of a Resolution approving a Tax Abatement Agreement between the City of Coppell and ACLP Northlake II, L.P., and authorizing the Mayor to sign. SUBMITTED BY: Gary Sieb TITLE: Director of Planning STAFF COMMENTS: City Council is scheduled to conduct a public hearing regarding the designation of the reinvestment zone on October 9, 2001. The Coppell Economic Development Committee unanimously recommended approval of this abatement agreement request on May 2, 2001. BUDGET AMT. $ FINANCIAL COMMENTS :X~X,'~' AMT EST $ DIR. INITIALS:~ ~ Agenda Request Form - Revised 5/00 FIN. REVIEW[~ +k-BID $ CITY MANAGER REViEW~~,. Document Name: SRESACLP.doc RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF A TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS AND ACLP NORTHLAKE H, L.P.; AUTHORIZING ITS EXECUTION BY THE MAYOR; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council has been presented a proposed Tax Abatement Agreement by and between the City of Coppcll, Texas and ACLP Northlake II, L.P., a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, upon full review and consideration of the Agreement, and all matters related thereto, the City Council is of the opinion and finds that the terms and conditions thereof should be approved, and that the Mayor shOuld be authorized to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City of Coppell, Texas; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. The Agreement attached hereto having been reviewed by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, and found to be acceptable and in the best interest of the City and its citizens, be, and the same is hereby, in all things approved, and the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City of Coppell, Texas. SECTION 2. The City Council finds that the improvements proposed to be built upon the premises described in the Agreement will enhance the economic vitality of the community through a combination of new capital investment, increased sales tax revenues, and the creation of additional job oppommities. SECTION 3. The inventory, and supplies. SECTION 4. The tax abatement to be granted by the Agreement will not include improvements proposed abatement guidelines of the City of Coppell, Texas. for the premises will accomplish the tax 1 41301 SECTION 5. The City Manager delivered to the presiding officer of the governing body of each taxing unit in which the property subject to the Agreement is located, a written notice that the City of Coppell, Texas, intends to enter into the Agreement. The notice given by the City Manager included a copy of the Agreement approved by this Resolution. SECTION 6. This Resolution and the Tax Abatement Agreement are hereby approved by the affLrmative vote of the majority of the members of the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council. SECTION 7. This Resolution shall become effective immediately from and a~er its passage. DULY RESOLVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, on this the ~ day of ,2001. CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS CANDY SHEEHAN, MAYOR ATTEST: /r TER a. 0'OS/jmh) FORM: ~JI~ITY ATTORNEY LIBBY BALL, CITY SECRETARY 2 41301 STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF DALLAS § TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT This Tax Abatement Agreement (the "Agreement") is entered into by and between the City of Coppell, Texas (the "City"), duly acting herein by and through its Mayor, and ACLP Northlake II, L.P. ("Owner"), acting by and through its authorized officer. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, (the "City"), passed an Ordinance (the "Ordinance") establishing Tax Abatement Reinvestment Zone No. 35 (the "Zone"), for commercial/industrial tax abatement, as authorized by the Property Redevelopment and Tax Abatement Act, Chapter 312 of the Texas Tax Code, as amended (the "Tax Code"); and WHEREAS, the City has adopted guidelines for tax abatement (the "Tax Abatement Guidelines"); and WHEREAS, the Tax Abatement Guidelines contain appropriate guidelines and criteria governing tax abatement agreements to be entered into by the City as contemplated by the Tax Code; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted a resolution stating that it elects to be eligible to participate in tax abatement; and WHEREAS, in order to maintain and enhance the commercial and industrial economic and employment base of the Coppell area, it is in the best interests of the taxpayers for the City to enter into this Agreement in accordance with said Ordinance, the Tax Abatement Guidelines and the Tax Code; and WHEREAS, Owner's development efforts described herein will create permanent new jobs in the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the contemplated use of the Premises (hereinafter defined), the contemplated improvements to the Premises thereto in the amount set forth in this Agreement, and the other terms hereof are consistent with encouraging development of the Zone in accordance with the purposes for its creation and/or in compliance with the Tax Abatement Guidelines, the Ordinance adopted by the City, the Tax Code and all other applicable laws; and WHEREAS, the City Council fmds that the improvements sought axe feasible and practicable and would be of benefit to the Premises (hereinafter defined) to be included in the Zone and to the City after expiration of this Agreement; and WltEREAS, a copy of this Agreement has been furnished, in the manner prescribed by the Tax Code, to the presiding officers of the governing bodies of each of the taxing units in which the Premises is located; and TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT - Page 1 41297 WHEREAS, the City desires to enter into an agreement with Owner, the current owner of the Premises within the Tax Abatement Reinvestment Zone for the abatement of taxes pursuant to Chapter 312 of the Tax Code as amended; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits and promises contained herein and for good and other valuable consideration, the adequacy and receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, including the expansion of primary employment, the attraction of major investment in the Zone, which contributes to the economic development of Coppell and the enhancement of the tax base in the City, the parties agree as follows: GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. Owner is the owner of the real property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes (the "Land" hereinafter defined), which real property is located within the city limits of the City and within the Zone. 2. The Premises are not in an improvement project financed by tax increment bonds. 3. This Agreement is entered into subject to the rights of the holders of outstanding bonds of the City. 4. The Premises are not owned or leased by any member of the Coppell City Council or any member of the Coppell Planning and Zoning Commission, or any member of the governing body of any taxing units joining in or adopting this Agreement. TAX ABATEMENT AUTHORIZED 5. This Agreement is authorized by the Tax Code and in accordance with the City Tax Abatement Guidelines and Criteria, and approved by resolution of the City Council of the City authorizing the execution of this Agreement. 6. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and provided the Taxable Value for the Improvements is at least Five Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($5,500,000.00) as of January 1 of the First Year of Abatement and as of January 1 of each year thereafter this Agreement is in effect, the City hereby grants Owner an abatement of seventy-five percent (75%) of the Taxable Value of the Improvements for a period of five (5) consecutive years. The actual percentage of Taxable Value of the Improvements subject to abatement for each year this Agreement is in effect will apply only to the portion of the Taxable Value of the Improvements that exceeds the Base Year Taxable Value for the Land, the year in which this 'Agreement is executed (base year/2001). 7. The period of tax abatement herein authorized shall be for a period of five (5) years. TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT - Page 2 4 ! 297 8. During the period of tax abatement herein authorized, Owner shall be subject to all City taxation not abated, including but not limited to, sales tax and ad valorem taxation on land, inventory and supplies. DEFINITIONS 9. Wherever used in this Agreement, the following terms shall have the meanings ascribed to them: A. The "Base Year Taxable Value" shall mean the Taxable Value for the Land for the year in which the Tax Abatement Agreement is executed (2001). B. An "Event of Bankruptcy or Insolvency" shall mean the dissolution or termination of Owner's existence as a going business, insolvency, appointment of receiver for any part of Owner's property and such appointment is not terminated within ninety (90) days after such appointment is initially made, any general assignment for the benefit of creditors, or the commencement of any proceeding under any bankruptcy or insolvency laws by or against Owner and such proceeding is not dismissed within ninety (90) days after the filing thereof. C. The "First Year of Abatement" shall mean January 1 of the calendar year immediately following the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the Improvements or 2003, whichever is later. D. "Force Majeure" shall mean any contingency or cause beyond the reasonable control of Owner including, without limitation, acts of God or the public enemy, war, riot, civil commotion, insurrection, adverse weather, government or de facto governmental action (unless caused by acts or omissions of Owner), fires, explosions or floods, strikes, slowdowns or work stoppages. E. The "Improvements" shall mean the contemplated improvements to be constructed on the Premises and as further described herein. F. The "Land" shall mean the real property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes. G. The "Premises" shall mean the Land described in Exhibit "A" including the Improvements but excluding Tangible Personal Property. H. "Taxable Value" means the appraised value as certified by the Appraisal District as of January 1 of a given year. I. "Tangible Personal Property" shall mean tangible personal property, equipment and fixtures other than inventory or supplies added to the Premises subsequent to the execution of this Agreement. TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT - Page 3 41297 IMPROVEMENTS 10. Owner owns the Land and agrees to construct or cause to be constructed thereon office/warehouse facility located at 1322 Crestside Drive known as Coppell Tech Center II, containing approximately 88,179 square feet (and other ancillary facilities such as reasonably required parking and landscaping more fully described in the submittals filed by Owner with the City from time to time in order to obtain a building permit) (the "Improvements"). The cost of the Improvements after tenant finishout, excluding the Land, shall be at least Seven Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($7,500,000). Nothing in this Agreement shall obligate Owner to construct the Improvements on the Land, but said action is a condition precedent to tax abatement pursuant to this Agreement. CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS 11. As a condition precedent to the initiation of tax abatement pursuant to this Agreement, Owner will diligently and faithfially, in good and workmanlike manner, and pursue the completion of the contemplated Improvements on or before December 31, 2002, as good and valuable consideration for this Agreement, and that all construction of the Improvements will be in accordance with all applicable state and local laws, codes, and regulations, (or valid waiver thereof); provided, that Owner shall have such additional time to complete and maintain the Improvements as may be required in the event of "Force Majeure," if Owner is diligently and faithfully pursuing completion of the Improvements. 12. Owner agrees to maintain the Improvements during the term of this Agreement in accordance with ail applicable state and local laws, codes, and regulations. Owner agrees that the Improvements shall be used only as a flex building with office and light warehouse use for a period of five (5) years commencing on the date a certificate of occupancy is issued for the Improvements. 13. The City, its agents and employees shall have the right of access to the Premises during construction to inspect the Improvements at reasonable times and with reasonable notice to Owner, and in accordance with Owner's visitor access and security policies, in order to insure that the construction of the Improvements are in accordance with this Agreement and all applicable state and local laws and regulations (or valid waiver thereof). GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 14. Construction plans for the Improvements constructed on the Premises will be filed with the City, which shall be deemed to be incorporated by reference herein and made a part hereof for all purposes. 15. After completion of the Improvements, Owner shall certify in writing to the City the construction cost of the Improvements. Owner shall also annually certify to the City that it is in compliance with each term of the Agreement. TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT - Page 4 41297 16. The Premises and the Improvements constructed thereon at all times shall be used in the manner (i) that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, as amended, and (ii) that, during the period taxes are abated hereunder, is consistent with the general purposes of encouraging development or redevelopment within the Zone. 17. Owner agrees to provide to the tenants of the Improvements, the benefit of the abatement of taxes granted herein. Owner shall, upon written request, provide the City with satisfactory evidence that the benefits of this Agreement have been provided to the tenants of the Premises. DEFAULT: RECAPTURE OF TAX REVENUE 18. In the event Owner: (i) fails to complete the Improvements in accordance with this Agreement or in accordance with applicable State or local laws, codes or regulations; (ii) has delinquent ad valorem or sales taxes owed to the City with respect to the Premises (provided Owner retains its right to timely and properly protest such taxes or assessment); (iii) has any "Event of Bankruptcy or Insolvency"; or (iv) breaches any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, then Owner, after the expiration of the notice and cure periods described below, shall be in default of this Agreement. As liquidated damages in the event of such default, Owner shall, within thirty (30) days after demand, pay to the City all taxes which otherwise would have been paid to the City without benefit of a tax abatement with interest at the statutory rate for delinquent taxes as determined by Section 33.01 of the Tax Code as amended but without penalty. The parties acknowledge that actual damages in the event of default termination would be speculative and difficult to determine. The parties further agree that any abated tax, including interest as a result of this Agreement, shall be recoverable against Owner, its successors and assigns and shall constitute a tax lien on the Premises and shall become due, owing and shall be paid to the City within thirty (30) days after termination. 19. Upon breach by Owner of any obligations under this Agreement, the City shall notify Owner in writing. Owner shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of the notice in which to cure any such default. If the default cannot reasonably be cured within a thirty (30) day period, and Owner has diligently pursued such remedies as shall be reasonably necessary to cure such default, then the City may extend the period in which the violation must be cured. 20. If Owner fails to cure the default within the time provided as specified above or, as such time period may be extended, then the City at its sole option shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by written notice to Owner. 21. Upon termination of this Agreement by City, all tax abated as a result of this Agreement shall become a debt to the City as liquidated damages, and shall become due and payable not later than sixty (60) days after a notice of termination is made. The City shall have all remedies for the collection of the abated tax provided generally in the Tax Code for the collection of delinquent property tax. The City at its sole discretion has the option to provide a repayment schedule. The computation of the abated tax for the purposes of the Agreement shall be based upon the full Taxable Value of the Improvements without tax abatement for the years in which tax abatement hereunder was received by Owner with respect to the Improvements as determined by TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT - Page 5 41297 the Appraisal District, multiplied by the tax rate of the years in question, as calculated by the City Tax Assessor-Collector. The liquidated damages shall incur penalties as provided for delinquent taxes and shall commence to accrue after expiration of the sixty (60) day payment period. ANNUAL APPLICATION FOR TAX EXEMPTION; RENDITION 22. It shall be the responsibility of Owner, pursuant to the Tax Code, to file an annual exemption application form with the Chief Appraiser for each Appraisal District in which the eligible taxable property has situs. A copy of the exemption application shall be submitted to the City upon request. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS 23. This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the parties to it and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, legal representatives, successors, and assigns. This Agreement may be assigned with the written consent of the City Manager, which will not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. After any permitted assignment, all references to Owner herein shall thereafter be a reference to Owner's successor with respect to any obligations or liabilities occurring or arising after the date of such assignment. NOTICE 24. All notices required by this Agreement shall be addressed to the following, or other such other party or address as either party designates in writing, by certified mail, postage prepaid, or by hand or overnight delivery: If intended for Owner, to: ACLP Northlake II, L.P. 17300 Dallas Parkway, #2010 Dallas, Texas 75248 With copy to: Northlake II CMC, Inc. C/o CMC Commercial Realty Group 17300 Dallas Parkway, Suite 200 Dallas, Texas 75248 And with copy to: Richard O. Kopf Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr, P.C. 1445 Ross Avenue Suite 4000 Dallas, Texas 75202 TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT - Page 6 41297 If intended for City, to: Attn: City Manager City of Coppell, Texas P. O. Box 478 Coppell, Texas 75019 With copy to: Peter G. Smith Nichols, Jackson, Dillard, Hager & Smith, L.L.P. 1800 Lincoln Plaza 500 N. Akard Dallas, Texas 75201 CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZATION 25. This Agreement was authorized by resolution of the City Council approved by its Council meeting authorizing the Mayor to execute this Agreement on behalf of the City. SEVERABILITY 26. In the event any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, phrase or word herein is held invalid, illegal or unconstitutional, the balance of this Agreement shall stand, shall be enforceable and shall be read as if the parties intended at all times to delete said invalid section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, phrase or word. APPLICABLE LAW 27. This Agreement shall be construed under the laws of the State of Texas. Venue for any action under this Agreement shall be the State District Court of Dallas County, Texas. This Agreement is performable in Dallas County, Texas. COUNTERPARTS 29. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and constitute one and the same instrument. ENTIRE AGREEMENT 29. This Agreement embodies the complete agreement of the parties hereto, superseding all oral or written previous and contemporary agreements between the parties and relating to the matters in this Agreement, and except as otherwise provided herein cannot be modified without written agreement of the parties to be attached to and made a part of this Agreement. TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT - Page 7 41297 CONVENANTS RUNNING WITH THE PREMISES 30. The provisions of this Agreement are hereby declared covenants running with the Premises and are fully binding on all successors, heirs, and assigns of Owner who acquire any right, title, or interest in or to the Premises, or any part thereof. Any person who acquires any right, title, or interest in or to the Premises, or any part hereof, thereby agrees and covenants to abide by and fully perform the provisions of this Agreement with respect to the right, title or interest in such Premises. 31. County, Texas. RECORDATION OF AGREEMENT A certified copy of this Agreement shall be recorded in the Deed Records of Dallas INCORPORATION OF RECITALS 32. The determinations recited and declared in the preambles to this Agreement are hereby incorporated herein as part of this Agreement. EXHIBITS 33. All exhibits to this Agreement are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes wherever reference is made to the same. EXECUTED in duplicate originals this the __ day of ,2001. CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS By: CANDY SHEEHAN, MAYOR ATTEST: By: AGREED AS TO FORM: LIBBY BALL, CITY SECRETARY TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT - Page 8 41297 EXECUTED in duplicate originals this the~:~__ day of (.J.,t~./, 2001. ACLP NORTHLAKI~II, L.P., a Texas limited parmership By: ACLP Northlake II GP, Inc., a Texas corporation, its general partner SUE Si:tE'~TON-- EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT - Page 9 41297 CITY'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF DALLAS § This instrument was acknowledged before me on the ~ day of , 2001, by Candy Sheehan, Mayor of the City of Coppell, Texas, a Texas municipality, on behalf of said municipality. My Commission Expires: Notary Public, State of Texas TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT - Page 10 41297 OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF DALLAS § This instrument was acknowledged before me on the ~ day of F~. , 2001, by Sue Shelton being the Executive Vice President of ACLP Northlake '~I GP~. Inc., a Texas corporation, general partner of ACLP Northlake II, L.P. on behalf of said partners]~ip. '-~tary Public,'Stat~of Texas My Cornr~~lSi-r~-~-~'~'~'--~ ~ ' ~ c~m, exp.uo-,~-~ TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT - Page l 1 41297 EXHIBIT "A" DESCRIPTION, of a 8.044 acre tract of land situated in the Cordelia Bowen Survey, Abstract No. 56, Dallas County, Texas; said tract including Lot 1, Block C Northlake 635 Business Part<, an addition to the City of Coppell according to the plat recorded in Volume 85056, Page 3358 of the Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas, said I~ract also oleo including [hat same tract of land conveyed to 'rF'S & SONS, LTD. By Special Warranty Deed recorded in Volume 94250, Page 49551 of the Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas; and including part of several tracts of land described in deed to ACLP Northlake L.P. as recorded in Volume 99077 Page .324 of Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas, said 8.044 acre tract being more pcrticularly described as follows: BEGINNING, at a 1/2-inch iron rod found at the southwest end of a right-of-way corner clip at the intersection of the west right-of-way line of Lakeshore Drive (a 60 foot right-of-way) and the north right-of-way tlne of Crestslde Drive (a 60 foot right-of-way); THENCE, South 555 degrees, 255 minutes, 07 seconds West, along the said north right-of-way line Crestslde Drive, a distance of 109.67 feet to a 1/2-Inch ~ron rod found at the beginning of a curve to the right whose center bears North ,36 degrees, 556 minutes, 53 seconds West, a distance of 520.00 feet from said point; THENCE, southwesterly along said north right-of-way line of Crestside Drive, through a central angle of ,37 d~=grees, 06 minutes, 55 seconds an arc distance of 207.29 feet on a chord bearing and distance of South 71 degrees, 56 minutes, .35 seconds West, 20.3.68 feet to a 1/2-Inch Iron rod found at the end of said curve; THENCE, North 89 degrees, .30 minutes, O0 seconds West, continuing with said north right-of-way line of Crestslde Drive, a distance of 206.60 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod found for comer, sold point being the southwest corner of said Lot 1, Block C, and being the beginning of a curve to the right whose center bears North O0 degrees, .30 minutes East, a distance of 5520.00 feet from said point; THENCE, northwesterly along said north right-of-way line of Crestslde Drive, through a central angle of 90 degrees, O0 minutes, O0 seconds on arc distance of 502.65 feet on a chord bearing and distance of South 44 degrees, 550 minutes, O0 seconds West, 452.55 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod found at the end of said curve; THENCE, North O0 degrees, 550 minutes, O0 seconds East, continuing with said east right-of-way line of Crestside Drive. c distance of 2.34..00 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod found for comer, said point being the southwest corner of the Essex Wire Addition, recorded in Volume 87189. Page .3.370 of Deed Records of Dallas County;, THENCE, South 89 degrees, 550 minutes, O0 seconds East. departing said east right-of-way line of Crestside Drive, along the south line of said Essex Wlre Addition a distance of .320.00 feet to o 1/2-Inch Iron rod found for corner, said point being in the west line of a tract of land conveyed to 'iT'S & SONS, LTD. by Special Warranty Deed recorded In Volume 94250, Page 49551 of the Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas; THENCE, South O0 degrees, 50 mlnutes, O0 seconds West, o distance of 49.70 feet to a 1/2-Inch iron rod found for corner, said point being In the west line of a tract of land conveyed to TFS & SOrtS, LTD. by Special Warranty Deed recorded In Volume 94250, Page 49551 of the Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas; THENCE, South 89 degrees, 550 minutes, O0 seconds East, <3 distance of .:320.00 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod found for corner in the said west right-of-way line of Lokeshore Drive, said point being the beginning of a curve to the left whose center bears South 89 degrees, .30 minutes, 0.3 seconds East. a distance of 5580.00 feet from said point; THENCE, southeasterly along said west right-of-way line of Lakeshore Drive, through a central angle of .37 degrees, 06 minutes, 50 seconds an arc distance of 246.15 feet on a chord bearing and distance of South 18 Degrees, 0.3 minutes, 28 seconds East, 24.1.87 feet to a 1/2-inch Iron rod found at the end of said curve; THENCE, South 556 degrees, 556 minutes, 5.3 seconds East, along the sold west right-of-way llne of Lakeshore Drive, a distance of 154.24 feet to o 1/2-inch iron rod found at the northeast end of sold corner clip; THENCE, South 08 degrees, 2.3 minutes, 07 seconds West, along said corner clip, a distance of 21.21 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING, 5550,5590 square feet or 8.044 acres of land more or less. COPPELL TECH CENTER II T H E: C I T Y 0 F C-OPP-ELL AGENDA REQUEST FORM CITY COUNCIL MEETING: October 9, 2001 ITEM # __~~ ITEM CAPTION: PUBLIC HEARING: Consider approval of the proposed text change to amend Section 12-34-7, Table 1 (Plant Palette), of the Coppell Code of Ordinances (Zoning), to expand the list of allowable plantings to include drought tolerant and native plants. SUBMITTED BY: Gary L. Sieb TITLE: Director of Planning and Community Services STAFF COMMENTS: Date of P&Z Meeting: September 20, 2001 Decision of P&Z Commission: Approved (5-0) with Commissioners McGahey, Kittrell, McCaffrey, Clark and Stewart voting in favor. None opposed. Staff recommends approval. Agenda Request Form - Revised 5/00 CITY MANAGER REVIEW: ~PlantPz Revision to the Coppell Plant Palette Table 1, Section 34 of the Coppell Zoning Ordinance C.C. HE~G DATE: October 9, 2001 P & Z HEARING DATE: September 20, 2001 PARKS & RECREATION BOARD DATE: August 6, 2001 STAFF REPS.: Andrea Roy, City Planner Amanda Vanhoozier, Community Programs Coordinator John Elias, Landscape lVlanager DISCUSSION: Due to the recent extreme summer temperatures and long time periods with no precipitation, the City Council directed staff to review the City's existing Plant Palette to consider including more drought-resistant plants. In May, the Plant Palette Committee was formed including representatives from Keep Coppell Beautiful and the Planning and Zoning Commission. The departments of Planning and Parks and Leisure Services provided staff support. The Plant Palette Committee compiled a suggested revised plant palette, and surveyed numerous area nurserymen, landscape architects, and horticulturists to review and comment upon the list. A combination of staff review and the survey comments produced the attached proposed revised plant palette. Many of the proposed new plants are Native Texas Plants, while others were recommended due to their known viability in this region. The revised plant palette is intended to provide the development community with a wider variety of plantings compatible to the region, as well as expand those plantings that are native to the region and naturally more drought tolerant. The revised plant palette also includes some species that are not strictly native or drought tolerant, but round out the plant palette with additional up- to-date plantings, which are commonly used in this area. The Committee also ensured that plantings placed on the palette are available to area nurseries. The attached revised Plant Palette includes the current plant list and the plantings to be added, as well as their characteristics. It should be noted that the Plant Palette applies only to commercial development projects, which are reviewed during the site plan process and does not regulate individual residential properties. Item #12 Additionally, the revised Plant Palette was reviewed and commented upon by the Parks and Recreation Board. It is staff's understanding that there were no objections to the proposed revisions by the members of the Parks and Recreation Board. ATTACHMENTS: 1) Proposed Plant Palette Item # 12 City of Coppell Plant Palette Trees: Range: 20'-60' (AND UP) Common Name Latin Name =, Notes: Austdan Pine Pinus nigra Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum x Bur Oak Quercus macrocerpa x Cedar Elm Ulmus crassifolia x I Chinese Pistache Pistacia chinensis Chinquapin Oak Quercus muhlenbergii x Eastern Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana x Eldadca Pine (Afghan Pine) Pinus eldadce Leyland Cypress Cupressocyparis leylandi Live Oak Querc_~s virginiana x Pec~_n Carya illinoinensis x Shumard Red Oak Quercus shumardi x Sweet Gum Liquidambar styraciflua x Western Soapberry Sapindus drummondii x .o_ E Big Tooth Maple Acer grandidentatum x x Common Persimmon Diospyros virginiana x x Green Ash 'Marshall S==dless' Fraxinus pennsylvanica x Lacebark (Drake) Elm Ulmus parvifolia sempervirens x Pond Cypress Taxodium ascendens x Red Maple 'October Glory' Acer Rubrum 'October Glory' x Southem Magnolia Magnolia grandiflora x Texas Ash Fraxinus texensis x x Texas Red Oak Quercus Buckleyi x x Urbanite Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica ................. · Excellent tree. Very durable. New species, J J recently developed. City of Coppell Plant Palette Accent Trees: Range: 10'-20' Typical _> Common Name Latin Name ~ Notes: ^ristrocrat Pear Pyrus calleryana'Aristocrat' Carolina Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana Chaste Tree Vitex agnus-castus Crabapple Malus augustifolia or spp. Crapemyrtle Lagerstroemia indica Deciduous Holly Ilex decidua x Desert Willow Chilopsis lineads x Eastern Redbud Cercis canadensis x Flameleaf Sumac Rhus copallina x Foster' Holly Ilex x attenuatta 'Foster' Japanese Maple Acer palrnatum Mexican Plum Prunus mexicana x Southern Wax Myrtle Myfica cerifera Texas Sophora (Eve's Necklace) Sophora affinis x Wild Plum Prusus arnericana x Yaupon Holly Ilex vomitoria x .9 E Carolina Buckthom Thamnus caroliniana x x East Palatka' Holly !ilex x attenuata 'East Palatka' .> Generally drought tolerant, a nice Mexican Buckeye Ungnadia speciosa x x evergreen, good for screening and Redbud 'Forest Pansy' Cerc s canandensis x x grows well in any soil. Redbud 'Oklahoma' Cercis yexensis x x Rough-Leaf Dogwood Comus drummondii x x Rusty Blackhaw Viburnum Viburnum rufldulum x x Savannah Holly Ilex 'Savannah' .> Durable evergreen tree, provides good American Srnoketree Cotinus abovatus x x color, blooms in spring and contains Southem Magnolia 'Little Gem' Magnolia grandiflora "Little Gem" x berries in winter. Texas Redbud Cercis cenadensis var. texensis x x Texas Persimrnon Diospyros texana x x Washington Hawthorn Crataegus phaenopyrum x Weeping Yaupon Holly Ilex vornitoria 'Pendula' x City of Coppell Plant Palette Shrubs: Range: 3'-$' Typical Common Name Latin Name Abelia Abelia grandiflora Ioxwood Buxus microphylla Carissa Holly Illex cornuta 'Carissa' Dwarf Abelia Abelia grandiflora 'Compacta' )warf Burford Holly Ilex cornuta 'Burfordii Nana' Dwarf Chinese Holly Ilex cornuta 'Rotunda' Dwarf Crapemyrtle Dward Needlepoint Holly Lagerstroemia indica 'Nana' Ilex cornuta 'Needlepoint' )warf Yaupon Holly lex vomitoria 'Nana' Elaeagnus Gulfstream Nandina Indian Hawthorn Juniper Leatherleaf Mahonia Elaeagnus pungens Nandina domestica 'Gulfstream' Thapiolepsis indica Juniperus chinensis Mahonia bealei Nandina Nandina domestica Nellie R. Stevens' Holly Ilex x 'Nellie R. Stevens' Pampas Grass Cortaderia selloana Red-leafed Japenese Barberry Texas Sage TO BE REMOVED: ADDITIONS: Berberis thunbergii 'Atropurpurea' Leucophyllum frutescens Abelia 'Edward Goucher' American Beautyberry Aromatic Sumac Aucuba Chinese Fringe Flower Cleyera Compact Nandina Coralberry Dwarf Wax Myrtle Flowering Quince Oakleaf Hydrangea Red Yucca Abelia grandiflora 'Edward Goucher' Callicarpa americana Rhus aromatica xX: Aucuba japonica Loropetalum chinese 'Hines Purpleaf' x Ternstroemia gymnanthera : Nandina d. compacta Symphoricarpos orbiculatus I x Myrica pusilla x Chaenomeles japonica Hydrangea quercifolia erhthrosoa Hesperaloe parriflora Rose Glow Barberry Berberis thunbergii 'Rose Glow' Spiraea Spirea spp. Lu~lustrum lucidum varie~lata tariegated Li~iustrum Notes: Very durable evergreen shrub-grows well in any soil. Relatively drought olerant. Excellent screening shrub: with Excellent in mass plantings. Grows well in shade-ideal for courtyard% etc. Used frequently-a show plant. Provides x ! ISpringlFall color. City of Coppell Plant Palette Ground Cover: 0 Common Name Latin Name z Notes: Asian Jasmine Trachaelospermum asiaticum Bar Harbor Trailing Juniper Juniperus horizontalis 'Bar Harbo( Blue Pacific Trailing Juniper Juniperus conferta"Blue Pacific' Harbour Dwarf Nandina Nandina domestic Liriope Liriope muscari Mondograss (monkeygrass) Ophiopogon japonicus Moneywort Lysimachia nummularia Purple Wintercreeper Euonymus fortunei 'Colorata' Tam Juniper Juniperus sabina 'tamariseifolia' TO BE REMOVED: ~ ~"-,,--- ~',~"-~"," (Incorrect name-flower not ground cover) ADDITIONS: ~ ~ Notes: Arkansas Yucca Carex texensis x x Germander Teucrium chamaedrys x x Holly Fern Cyrtomium falcatum x Horseherb Calyptocarpus vialis x x Vinca Vinca Major ....... Ideal ground cover for shaded Wood Fern Dryopteris normalis x x areas i.e. courtyards, restaurants, Wood Violets Viola missouriensis x x City of Coppell Plant Palette Vines and Grasses: Common Name Latin Name ~ Notes: Boston Ivy Parthenocissus tricuspidata Carolina Jessamine Gelsemium sempervirens x Coral Honeysuckle Lonicera sempervirens x Cross Vine Anisotichus capreolata x English Ivy Hedera helix Lady Banks Rose Rosa banksiae Sweet Autumn Clematis Clematis paniculata Trumpet Vine i Campsis radicans x Fig Ivy Ficus pumila x Passion Vine Passiflora incarnata x x Virginia Creeper Parthenocissus quinquefolia x x Wisteria Wisteria sp. x GRASSES Canadian Wildrye Elymus canadensis x x Inland Seaoats Chasmanthium latifolium x x Little Bluestem :Schizachyrium scoparium x x Lovegrass Eragrostis sp. x x Miscanthus Miscanthus sinensis Relatively drought Muhly Muhlenbergia sp. x x tolerant, durable Pampas Grass Cortaderia selloana x plant. Commonly Sideoats Grama Bouteloua curtipendula x x City of Coppell Plant Palette Perennial and Annual Flowers: Common Name Latin Name ~crscps~s C_'sm_--: L:nt:n: ~ ~:!'.'13 S:M= Sp. Tu!!p: ADDITIONS: The planting of annual and perennial flowers compatible in the Coppell geographic area is permitted to provide for color and variation within landscape design. Commonly used at entry features in retail, commercial, office industrial developments. *(As shown above, the list of annuals and perennials is extensive and new spec/es are derived regularly, making it difficult to list every appropriate annual or perennial. The list of annual and perennials has been deleted and replaced with the above statement, allowing for ones' choice of plantings. The flower type is typically not noted within the Landscape Plan during the Development Review Process and is determined after approval.) T H I~ C I T Y 0 F C-OPP-EI.TL AGENDA REQUEST FORM CITY COUNCIL MEETING: October 9, 2001 ITEM # ___/~~ ITEM CAPTION: Consider approval of an Ordinance to amend Section 12-34-7, Table 1 (Plant Palette), of the Coppell Code of Ordinances (Zoning), to expand the list of allowable plantings to include drought tolerant and native plants, and authorizing the Mayor to sign. SUBMITTED BY: Gary L. Sieb TITLE: Director of Planning and Community Services STAFF COMMENTS: Date of P&Z Meeting: N/A Decision of P&Z Commission,: N/A Staff recommends approval. DIR. INITIALS:L,/F").)' FIN. l Agenda Request Form - Revised 5/00 CITY MANAGER REVIEW: @PlantPo AN ORDINANCE OF Tl:lE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 34-7, TABLE 1, AND PLANTS PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, SECTION 12- TO MODIFY TYPES OF TREES, SHRUBS LISTED IN THE PLANT PALETTE: REPEALING CLAUSE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARD ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDNG AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WItEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Commission and the governing body of the City of Coppell, Texas, in compliance with the laws of the State of Texas and pursuant to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, haven given requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and after holding due heatings and affording a full and fair heating to all property owners generally, and to all persons interested and situation in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, the said governing body is of the opinion, and in the exercise of legislative discretion have concluded that the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance should be amended. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS SECTION 1. That the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, Texas, duly passed by the governing body of the City of Coppell, Texas, as heretofore amended, be, and the same is hereby amended by amending the Code of Ordinances, Section 12-34-7, Table 1, repealing the current Table 1 and replacing with a new Table 1 in its entirety to read as follows: TABLE I PLANT PALETTE Overstory Trees: Range: 20-60' Austrian Pine Pinus nigra Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum 1 Big Tooth Maple Bur Oak Cedar Elm Chinese Pistache Chinquapin Oak Common Persimmon Eastern Red Cedar Eldarica Pine (Afghan Pine) Green Ash 'Marshall Seedless' Lacebark (Drake) Elm Leyland Cypress Live Oak Pecan Pond Cypress Red Maple 'October Glory' Shumard Red Oak Southern Magnolia Sweet Gum Texas Ash Texas Red Oak Urbanite Ash Western Soapberry Accent Trees: Range 10-20' American Smoketree Acer grandidentatum Quercus macrocarpa Ulmus crassifolia Pistacia chinensis Quercus muhlenbergii Diospyros virginiana Junipems virginiana Pinus eldarica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Ulmus parvifolia sempervirens Cupressocyparis leylandi Quercus virginiana Carya illinoinensis Taxodim ascendens Acer Rubrum 'October Glory' Quercus shumardi Magnolia grandiflora Liquidambar styraciflua Fraxinus texensis Quercus buckleyi Fraxinus pennsylvanica Sapindus dmmmondii Cotinus abovams 2 Aristrocrat Pear Carolina Buckthom Carolina Cherry Laurel Chaste Tree Crahapple Crapemyrtle Deciduous Holly Desert Willow East Palatka Holly Eastern Redbud Flameleaf Sumac Foster Holly Japanese Maple Mexican Buckeye Mexican Plum Redbud 'Forest Pansy' Redbud 'Oklahoma' Rough-Leaf Dogwood Rusty Blackhaw Viburnum Savannah Holly Southern Magnolia 'Little Gem' Southern Wax Myrtle Texas Persimmon Texas Redbud Pyrus calleryana'Aristocrat' Thanmus caroliniana Prunus caroliniana Vitex agnus-casms Malus augnstifolia or spp. Lagerstroemia indica Ilex decidua Chilopsis linearis Ilex x attenuata ~ast Palatka' Cercis canadensis Rhus copallina Ilex x attenuatta 'Foster Acer palmatum Ungnadia speciosa Pmnus mexicana Cercis canandensis Cercis yexensis Comus dmmmondii Viburnum rufidulum Ilex 'Savannah' Magnolia grandiflora 'Little Gem' Myrica cerifera Diospyros texana Cercis canadensis var. texensis 3 Texas Sophora (Eve's Necklace) Washington Hawthorn Weeping Yaupon Holly Wild Plum Yaupon Holly Shrubs: Range 3-5' Abelia Abelia ~Edward Goucher' American Beautyberry Aromatic Sumac Aucuba Boxwood Carissa Holly Chinese Fringe Flower Cleyera Compact Nandina Comlberry Dwarf Abelia Dwarf Burford Holly Dwarf Chinese Holly Dwarf Crapemyrtle Dward Needlepoint Holly Dwarf Wax Myrtle Dwarf Yaupon Holly Sophora affinis Crataegus phaenopyrum Ilex vomitoria 'Pendula' Pmsus americana Ilex vomitoria Abelia grandiflora Abelia grandiflora 'Edward Goucher' Callicarpa americana Rhus aromatica Aucuba japonica Buxus microphylla Illex cornuta 'Carissa' Loropetalum chinese 'Hines Purpleaf Temstroemia gymnanthem Nandina d. compacta Symphoricarpos orbiculatus Abelia grandiflom 'Compacta' Ilex comuta 'Burfordii Nana' Ilex comuta 'Rotunda' Lagerstroemia indica ~Nana' Ilex comuta ~eedlepoint' Myrica pusilla Ilex vomitoria 2qana' 4 Elaeagnus Flowering Quince Gulfstream Nandina Indian Hawthorn Juniper Leathefleaf Mahonia Nandina Nellie R. Stevens' Holly Oakleaf Hydrangea Pampas Grass Red-leafed Japenese Barberry Red Yucca Rose Glow Barberry Spirea Texas Sage Variegated Ligustmm Ground Cover: Range 18" Arkansas Yucca Asian Jasmine Bar Harbor Trailing Juniper Blue Pacific Trailing Juniper Germander Harbour Dwarf Nandina Holly Fern Elaeagnus pungens Chaenomeles japonica Nandina domestica 'Gulfstream' Thapiolepsis indica Juniperus chinensis Mahonia bealei Nandina domestica Ilex x 2qellie R. Stevens' Hydrangea quercifolia erhthrosoa Cortaderia selloana Berberis thunbergii 'Atropurpurea' Hesperaloe parriflom Leucophyllum frutescens Spirea spp. Leucophyllum frutescens Lugustmm lucidum variegata Carex texensis Trachaelospermum asiaticum Juniperus horizontalis 'Bar Harbor' Junipems conferta"Blue Pacific' Teucrium chamaedrys Nandina domestic Cyrtomium falcatum 5 Horseherb Liriope Mondograss (monkeygrass) Moneywort Purple Wintercreeper Tam Juniper Vinca Wood Fern Wood Violets Vines: Boston Ivy Carolina Jessamine Coral Honeysuckle Cross Vine English Ivy Fig Ivy Lady Banks Rose Passion Vine Sweet Autumn Clematis Trumpet Vine Virginia Creeper Wisteria Grasses: Canadian Wildrye Calyptocarpus vialis Liriope muscari Ophiopogon japonicus Lysimachia nummularia Euonymus fortunei 'Colomta' Junipems sabina 'tamariseifolia' Vinca Major Dryopteris normalis Viola missouriensis Parthenocissus tricuspidata Gelsemium sempervirens Lonicem sempervirens Anisotichus capreolata Hedem helix Ficus pumila Rosa banksiae Passiflora incamata Clematis paniculata Campsis radicans Parthenocissus quinquefolia Wisteria sp. Elymus canadensis 6 Inland Seaoats Little Bluestem Lovegrass Miscanthus Muhly Pampas Grass Sideoats Grama Perennial and Annual Flowers: Chasmanthium latifolium Schizachyfium scoparium Eragrostis sp. Miscanthus sinensis Muhlenbergia sp. Cortaderia selloana Bouteloua curtipendula The planting of annual and perennial flowers compatible in the Coppell geographic area is permitted to provide for color and variation within landscape design. Commonly used at entry features in retail, commercial, office industrial developments. SECTION 2. That all provisions of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Coppell, Texas, in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same are hereby, repealed, and all other provisions not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 3, That should any sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal, or invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole, or any part or provision thereof other than the part so decided to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, and shall not affect the validity of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as a whole. SECTION 4. That an offense committed before the effective date of this ordinance is governed by prior law and the provisions of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, as amended, 7 in effect when the offense was committed and the former law is continued in effect for this purpose. SECTION 5. That any person, fima, or corporation violating any of the provisions or terms of this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance for the City of Coppell, as heretofore amended, and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine not to exceed the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense; and each and every day such violation shall continue shall be deemed to constitute a separate offense. SECTION 6. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage and the publication of its caption, as the law and charter in such cases provide. DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of Coppell, Texas, this the __day of ,2001. APROVED: CANDY SHEEHAN, MAYOR ATTEST: ROJ~T E'. ~~CITY ATTORNEY LIBBY BALL, CITY SECRETARY F COPPELL AGENDA REQUEST FORM CITY COUNCIL MEETING: October 9, 2001 ITEM # ~ ITEM CAPTION: Consider approval of the Coppell Family YMCA, Site Plan Amendment, to allow the addition of approximately 17,500 square feet of building and. the expansion of the parking lot to include 48 additional spaces on approximately 5.36 acres of property located at 146 Town Center Boulevard. SUBMITTED BY: Gary L. Sieb TITLE: Director of Planning and Community Services STAFF COMMENTS: Date of P&Z Meeting: September 20, 2001 Decision of P&Z Commission: Approved (5-0) with Commissioners McGahey, Kittrell, McCaffrey, Clark and Stewart voting in favor. None opposed. Approval is recommended, subject to the following conditions: 2) Add Cedar Elm trees to fulfill the perimeter landscape requirement. ~-spae~. (CONDITION MET) 4) The extension of the fire lane needs to be established by separate instrument to be filed with the County. 5) Letter of approval from the Town Center Architectural Control Committee is required. Staff recommends approval. DIR. INITIAL~ Agenda Request Form - Revised 5/00 CITY MANAGER REVIE~~~ ~YMCAspa CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT COPPELL FAMILY YMCA, SITE PLAN AMENDMF~ P & Z HEARING DATE: C.C. HEARING DATE: September 20, 2001 October 9, 2001 STAFF REP.: Marcie Diamond, Assistant Planning Director LOCATION: Southeast comer of Town Center Boulevard and Town Center Drive SIZE OF AREA: Approximately 5.36 acres of property CURRENT ZONING: TC (Town Center) REQUEST: Site Plan Amendment to allow an additional two story, 17,500 square feet of building, revised elevations and expansion of the parking lot. APPLICANT: Owner: Coppell Family YMCA 146 Town Center Blvd. Coppell, Texas 75019 972-393-5121 FAX: 972-393-5947 Architect: Scott Wegener,Good, Fulton&Farrell 2808 Fairmont Blvd. Suite 300 Dallas, Texas 75201 214-303-1500 FAX: 214-303-1512 HISTORY: The preliminary plat for this property was approved by the City Council in December 1997. In March 1998, the Site Plan and Final Plat was approved for the construction of the first phase of the YMCA. In 1999, the City of Coppell entered into an agreement with the YMCA to allow the construction of 47 new parking spaces between the YMCA and the Police and Municipal Court building for joint use by both facilities. City Council approved the site plan for this parking lot on December 14, 1999. TRANSPORTATION: Town Center Boulevard has 28'-wide pavement within a variable width right-of-way, dedicated by separate insmanent. The right-of-way widens Page 1 of 4 Item # 11 to 66 feet at its intersection with Town Center Drive. Town Center Drive dead ends into the existing YMCA and the joint use parking lot. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North- parking lot and undeveloped land; TC South -Wendy's and Tom Thumb Shopping Center; TC East - Chaucer Estates; PD-SF-7 West - retail under construction and Comerica Bank; TC COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan shows the property as suitable for public/institutional uses. DISCUSSION: Page 2 of 4 As discussed in the HISTORY section, the site plan was approved for this property in 1998. The site plan included a two-story, 34,000 square foot building, with 120 parking spaces and also indicated future building, parking and outdoor expansion areas. The site plan approval allowed for 18,600 square feet of additional building foot print (potentially 37,200 square feet of total building area if constructed to 2 stories) located along the northern and eastern portions of the building. The current request is to allow for two, two-story building expansions, additional parking and the required extension of the fire lane. The first building expansion area is proposed to consist of a 900-square foot enlargement to the childcare area on the first floor. The second floor expansion will house an enlarged aerobics room. This will be located at the northeast corner of the building, as was anticipated as a future expansion area with the original site plan approval. The second expansion area is located along the eastern side of the building along the southern end. This 15,7.00-square-foot addition will allow for the construction of a Teen/Senior Center and locker rooms on the first floor and Fitness, Exercise, Administration and rest rooms on the second floor. All but 2,450-square feet of this area was, again, anticipated for expansion with the original site plan. While the currem proposal extends the building by 26 feet beyond one portion of the expansion area, it still maintains a 58-foot setback from eastern the property line, and is, in fact, 14 feet further from the residential properties to the east. With these expansion areas, the Coppell Family YMCA has agreed to eliminate 4,441-square feet of building footprint (8,882 square feet of total floor area) of previously approved future expansion areas. One Item// 11 Page 3 of 4 expansion area along the eastern elevation would have been approximately 46 feet from the property line. Again, the current request maintains a minimum 58-foot setback from that property line. In sum, the approval of the current request will result in a net reduction of approximately 2,000-square feet, which could have been 4,000-square feet of total building area, if two story. This site plan amendment also includes an expansion of the parking lot to the south. Again, this area was designated for parking expansion with the original site plan approval. An additional 48 parking spaces will be constructed. The landscaping is in accordance with the provisions of the Landscape Ordinance; however, it is recommended that the plant materials match the existing landscaping in the parking lot. Specifically, Bufordi Nana is being requested to fulfill the requirement of the screening hedge, however, the existing hedge is Nellie R. Stevens. This Nellie R. Stevens hedge should be continued. The existing parking lot has utilized Live Oaks in the parking lot islands. The current request calls for Shumard Oaks. Again, a continuation of the existing landscape materials is recommended. Section 12-34-8-C. 3. of the Landscape Ordinance, requires that the perimeter landscape areas contain at least one tree for each 50-linear feet, of fraction thereof. Therefore, six trees are required, three on Town Center Boulevard and three along the northern property line. Again, Cedar Elms were used to fulfill this requirement on the existing facility. Tree reparation will be required to allow for the building addition and parking lot expansion. Specifically, two 10-caliper inch and one 16-caliper inch Hackberry trees will need to be removed to accommodate these expansions. Additional Hackberry trees, less than 10 inches in caliper will also be removed, but reparation is not required for those trees. As required, the trees greater than 10-caliper inches that will be removed will be replaced, on site, with seven 3-caliper inch and four 4-caliper inch Shumard Oak trees. In sum, the 36-inch loss in Hackberry trees will be replaced with 37- caliper inches of oak trees. These replacement trees will be planted east of the expanded parking lot area. All the materials and colors proposed for the exterior of the building will match the existing materials, and they will be a combination of face brick and concrete tilt-up panels. The applicant has revised the elevations from the original submittal, including the reduction in the size of the second- story windows along the eastern elevation, as well as to actually brick in an existing window along the same elevation. In addition, similar to the northern end of the building, an external exit stairway is proposed from the second floor aerobic room. To obscure the view of these external Item# 11 stairs from the retail facility to the north, the applicant has agreed to include an architectural screening wall adjacent to these stairs, as was provided along the northern end of the building. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff recommends APPROVAL to the amendment of the site plan for the Coppell Family YMCA, subject to; 1. Revise the Landscape Plan for the parking lot expansion to utilize the same plant materials as are utilized within the existing parking lot. 2. Add Cedar Elm trees to fulfill the perimeter landscape requirement. 3. Correct the number of parking spaces under PROJECT DESCRIPTION to reflect 48 versus 51 spaces. 4. The extension of the fire lane needs to be established by separate instnunent to be filed with the County. 5. Letter of approval from the Town Center Architectural Control Committee is required. ALTERNATIVES: 1) Recommend approval of the request. 2) Recommend disapproval of the request. 3) Recommend modification of the request. 4) Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date. ATTACHMENTS 1) Site Plan/Landscape Plan/Tree Reparation Plan 2) Elevations Page 4 of 4 Item # 11 FROM : COPPELL FAMILY YMCA PROG REG FAX NO. : 9727457571 Sep. 19 2001 03:SL:~M P1 S~ptember 19, 2001 SEP 1 9 2001 Coppell Family YMCA Campaign for the 21" Century Contributor~ CORNERSTONE B#t & gathy Anderson Randolph E. & Lynn Brown Sandy & Dav~ Capps Copptll /nd~pe. ndcnt School Dia'trict Mamsatech Incorporated Parlor of Coppell Marnty. L Snow Jr. Tr#ti~. & RI-ID Medical Cemer~. FOUNDER l. ester & Bridget Carroll X & Billie If. BrOwn Charlt$ & Colleen Corian Joe & Jani¢~t ~lanigan Walter & Kathryn Foss Frio~-f~ay lncorporuwd Fro~t Bank Da~e &Sandy Dav~l & l~'~ Hangen (.'u~ & Melody Jim & Cynthia flsab#rlin Tommy & gh~rri ICmgsh:y Wilson & Elizabeth McDonald Sam & Mi.u~ I~trman Mitch& Melinda t~tttman David &Ann Rexroat Doug & I.t$1ie Robcrtt Schindler Elevator Corporation Tom & Leslie ghtrrilt Ttxa~ Sprinkdtr David & M, linda Jim & D~nr 7'raitt To: Marcie Diamond Coppell Planning Deparo,~_ l Curt Hazelbaker, Executive Director Copper Family YMCA Re: Coppdl Family YMCA Building Expansion I spoke with Craig CaPua, an attorney representing a ftnv of dg homeowners in the Chaucer Estates subdivision, yesterday rggardin~o some coil~ern$ the homeowners had. We have agreed to three of the conditions that were cxpreased. 1. We will plant a mlnlvmjm of ~ 3" ~ trtn~ on tl~ cast si& of expansion that is not included in the subtn~___~_/andscape plan. 2. We will apply a film to the windows in the aerobics room and upstairs fitness area that will give the appearance of f~osted glass from the interior and exterior of the facility. 3. We have tal~,.d to our cleaning crew about leaving lights on overnight. We asked them to clean the aerobics room and offices fa'st and to make sure they turn the light~ off when they are done. The attorney asked us to apply the window treatment on all of the second floor windows on the east si&. We are not treating the windows in the meeting rooms to allow more natural light in and to allow our members and guests to see the trees on the east and south sides of our property. We were also asked to raise the sill height of the windows on the see. omi floo~ from 5'4" to 6'. We have already reduced the amount of glass by 50% bom the orLoiaal design that was submitted. We have decided not to raise the sill height bee. au.se all of the other second floor windows are at the same height aro-,,a the building and we would like to maintain the architectural integrity of the YMCA. The plan that we have si~bmitted reduces the square footage by a net 2,000 square feet from what was approved during initial construction. The expansion we are proposing is fourteen ~et back bom the co~-x,n property line t_h~,, what was ori$inally approved. Please let me know if you have any questions. I can be reached at 972-393-5121 extension 202. 146 Town Center Blvd. · CoppeH,.TX 75019 977..-39.'!-$19.1 o ~ax: 9"/g-39.~-.qg&7 httl~:l/wxvw, ymcn.cOppeliotx.org We build strong kids, strong families, strong communities ITY COUNCIL MEETING: October 9, 2001 ITEM # _~_~ ITEM CAPTION: PUBLIC COMMENT: Minor Plat. To receive public comment regarding the Wynnpage Plaza South, Site Plan and SUBMITTED BY: Jim Witt TITLE: City Manager STAFF COMMENTS: BUDGET AMT. $ FINANCIAL COMMENTS: AMT. EST. $ +X-BID DIR. INITIALS: Agenda Request Form - Revised 5/00 FIN. REVIEW: CITY MANAGER REVIEW.. Document Name: !pubeomment~// CITY COUNCIL MEETING: October 9, 2001 ITEM # __~L~ ITEM CAPTION: Consider approval of the Wyrmpage Plaza South, Site Plan and Minor Plat, request to allow the development of an approximately 4,700 square-foot office building on approximately .626 of an acre of property located along the west side of Denton Tap Road, approximately 210' south of Wynnpage Drive. SUBMITTED BY: Gary L. Sieb TITLE: Director of Planning and Community Services STAFF COMMENTS: Date of P&Z Meeting: September 20, 2001 Decision of P&Z Commission: Approved (4-0) with Commissioners McGahey, Kittrell, McCaffrey, and Stewart voting in favor. Commissioner Clark could not participate in the discussion or vote due to Conflict of Interest (homeowner in the Wynnpage subdivision). None opposed. Approval is recommended, subject to the following conditions: SITE PLAN CONDITIONS.: 1) MINOR PLAT CONDITIONS.: 1) ....... s .............................. Staff recommeqds approval. ~,_ r rm s: F N. m mwC Agenda Request Form - Revised 5/00 (CONDITION~VIET) (coND CITY MANAGER REVIEW~ @WynpSMP CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT CASE: Wvnnoa e Plaza South, Site Plan and Minor Plat P & Z HEARING DATE: C.C. HEARING DATE: STAFF REP.: LOCATION: SIZE OF AREA: September 20, 2001 October 9, 2001 Andrea Roy, City Planner Along the west side of Denton Tap Road, approximately 210' south of Wynnpage Drive Approximately .626 of an acre of property CURRENT ZONING: C (Commercial) REQUEST: Site Plan and Minor Plat approval for the development of an approximately 4,700-square-foot office building. APPLICANT: HISTORY: TRANSPORTATION: Developer: Mark Wainscott Wainscott & Associates 4815 Keller Springs Addison, TX 75001 Phone: 972-447-9119 Fax: 972-447-9110 Surveyor: Lane's Southwest Surveying 2717 Motley Drive, Suite B Mesquite, TX 75150 Phone: 972-681-4442 The subject property was originally platted as part of the 14-lot, 25.65-acre DTC Business Center, which was filed on January 6, 1987. On March 26, 1991, City Council approved the rezoning of the residential property to the west from C (Commercial) to PD-115 SF-7 (Wynnpage single-family subdivision). As a result of the development of the Wyrmpage residential subdivision, the DTC Business Center plat was vacated on May 8, 1992. The subject site remains unplatted at the current time. Denton Tap Road is a P6D, six-lane divided concrete roadway built to standard in a 11 O-foot right-of-way. Page 1 of 4 Item # 8 SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North- vacant, C (Commercial) South - vacant, O (Office) East - retail/vacant, C (Commercial) West - Wynnpage residential subdivision, PD115-SF7 (Single Family-7) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan shows the property as suitable for mixed use, which includes office uses. DISCUSSION: Page 2 of 4 The applicant is requesting Site Plan and Minor Plat approval for the development of a one-story, 4,700-square-foot office building on approximately .626 of an acre of property. The site is situated along the west side of Denton Tap Road, in front of the Wynnpage subdivision. It is assumed that future development of a similar nature and scale will be repeated to the north. Site Plan The design of the site provides for the current proposal and additionally, lays the groundwork for future development to both the north and south. Access to the site has been provided through a curb cut on Denton Tap Road. This drive will serve as the fire lane/mutual access drive through the site, connecting to Wynnpage Drive. At the direction of the Fire Marshal, for matters of health and safety, the entire fire lane/mutual access drive will be constructed in conjunction with development of this site. While the accessibility to Wynnpage Drive has been questioned by residents in the past, a letter dated March 1, 2001, from the City (as directed by the City Attorney) has been included to confirm our position on this matter. The applicant has also provided a stubbed-out firelane/mutual access drive against the south property line. Staff has recommended that the applicant extend the stubbed-out fire lane/access drive to the southern property line, to allow for future connections to the undeveloped property to the south. Additionally, staff has included conditions regarding technical drafting errors which must be remedied prior to City Council review of the Site Plan and Minor Plat requests. The proposed building will be served by 25 parking spaces, well exceeding the 16 required spaces for a business or professional office. However, parking 'is inadequate if a medical/dental use wishes to locate within this building, as the parking requirement for a medical use would be 27 parking spaces. Otherwise, the site is in full compliance with all applicable codes and ordinances. Staff has one concern regarding the proposed placement of the dumpster, which appears to be located in a relatively visible location. On several occasions staff has recommended Item# 8 that the applicant consider alternative locations for the dumpster, but it remains unchanged. Staff recommends that the applicant again consider an alternative location for the dumpster, unless they can convey to staff that alternative placement is not feasible. If the Planning Commission has no objection to the location of the dumpster, staff would ask that the applicant ensure staff that this dumpster will serve more than one building, preventing the addition of up to two more dumpsters with future development. The proposed building will be one-story, measuring approximately 21' to the mid-point of the roof and 31' to the peak. The primary building material will be red brick, with cast stone accents along the top of windows and on columns at the water table. Windows and doors will be bronze aluminum with tinted glass. Copper colored metal vents will serve as dormers on the roof, as well as building wall accents. Staff commends the applicant's efforts to design a building similar in style and scale to other area office buildings, as well as the adjacent residential structures. Landscaping The proposed landscape plan fully provides the required interior, perimeter, and non-vehicular landscape areas and actually exceeds the overall area requirements. In order to address perimeter landscaping along the north property line, which falls within the mutual access driveway, the applicant has provided the full 10' landscape buffer along the north property line adjacent to the dumpster and along the northern row of parking. While not provided in a traditional manner, it is staff's interpretation that the design meets the spirit and intent of the Zoning Ordinance in providing a buffer and relief between properties. Staff has made one recommendation to the applicant regarding the interior landscaping; i.e., shift or relocate the proposed parking lot light pole to provide the required tree within the landscape island. Additionally, staff would ask that the applicant ensure that proper tree spacing has been observed. Staff is concerned that Y'-caliper Cedar Elm trees spaced 15' apart is too close. Minor Plat In conjunction with the Site Plan, the applicant is also requesting approval of the Minor Plat for the approximately 27,312-square foot lot. Staff has no objection to the Minor Plat, with minor corrections by the applicant with regard to the notation of the lot size and spelling errors. While only Lot 1 is being platted at this time, the fire lane must be constructed on and off-site to adequately serve the property. It has been noted that the fire lane will be recorded via separate instrument, with no objection from staff. Page 3 of 4 Item # 8 RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff is recommending APPROVAL of the Wynnpage Plaza, Site Plan and Minor Plat, subject to the following conditions: SITE PLAN CONDITIONS: 1) Extend the stubbed-out fire lane/mutual access drive to the south property line. 2) Relocate proposed dumpster to a less visible location within the site. 3) Relocate or shffi proposed light pole at the rear of the site, in order to provide the required tree within the landscape island. 4) Increase spacing between Cedar Elm trees to a minimum of 20'. 5) Remedy inconsistencies among plan sheets; ensure consistent notation of lot size. 6) Eliminate notation to an off-site monument sign on the landscape plan. MINOR PLAT CONDITIONS: 1) Remedy inconsistencies on Minor Plat, with regard to lot size. 2) Correct spelling of Wynnpage on both the vicinity map and note. ALTERNATIVES: 1) Recommend approval of the request. 2) Recommend disapproval of the request 3) Recommend modification of the request 4) Take Site Plan under advisement for reconsideration at a later date. ATTACHMENTS: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) Letter of March 1, 2001 Minor Plat Site Plan Landscape Plan Elevations Page 4 of 4 Item # 8 March 1, 2001 The Right Solution Mr. Glenn Harvey, P.E., C.P.I.M. 133 Wrenwood Coppell, TX 75019 Re: Wynnpage Drive Right of Way Dear Mr. Harvey, As indicated to you, I have received your letter of February 16, and forwarded it to our Cit~' Attorney for review. That review has now been completed, and the City's position is the land dedicated for Wynnpage Drive is public right of way, and the abutting owner on both the north and south side of that right of way is entitled to access to the street. That being the case, I can not administratively approve the landscape plan you asked us to review. If you wish to pursue the landscaping concept, a revision to Planned Development District 115 will be required. In reviewing your request, our attorney pointed out that there is dedicatory language on the plat that places no restrictions on access to Wynnpage. In addition, case law serves to support our position. Among the cases cited by our attorney: Gulf Sulphur Co. v Ryman, 221 S.W.2d 310 (Tex. Civ. App. - Galveston 1920) McCraw v. City of Dallas, 420 S.W.2d 793 (Tex. Civ App. - Dallas 1967) Chambers County v. Frost, 356 S.W.2d 470 (Tex. Civ App. - Waco 1962, writ ref'd n.r.e.) Pittman v. City of Amarillo, 598 S.W.2d 941 (Tex. Civ App.-Amarillo 1980, writ ref. n.r.e.) H. Rouw Co. v. Thompson, 194 S.W.2d 120(Tex. Civ App. - San Antonio 1985, writ ref'd.) Ellis v. Jansing, 620 S.W.2d 569 (Tex. 1981) Our attorney also cited Section 16.030 of the Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code which states in relevant part, "a person may not acquire through adverse possession the right or title to real property dedicated to the public use." As mentioned above, if you wish to pursue your landscaping concept, an application would be filed with the Planning Department. Be cautioned, however, that we would review your request with our legal opinion in mind, and require breaks in the landscaping for future access to Wynpage Drive fi.om both the north and south. 255 PARKWAY ~r PO BOX 478 'k ¢OPPELL TX 75Ol9 ',k TEL 972/462 0022 'k FAX 972/304. 36'73 I thank you for your interest in adding landscaping to your subdivision and would welcome a PD amendment request. qai'y ~. Sie~o, AICP irector of Planning and Community Services CC: Jim Witt, City Manager Bob Hagar, City Attorney file The Law Offices of GARY M. VODICKA Attorney and Counselor at Law 222 W. Las Colinas Blvd. Suite 1750 Irving, Texas 75039 (972) 501-1481 Mr. Doug Tatum 7480 Dallas Parkway Suite 110 Dallas, Texas 75287 July 27, 1999 FAX: (972) 393-4590 Via CertifiedMailRRR Z 210 081 107 Via CertifiedMailRRR Z 210 081 108 Mr. Waymon Levell, President First Southwest Properties 2331 Gus Thomasson Suite 126 Dallas, Texas 75228 RE: Final Plat of WYNNPAGE Recorded in Volume 92001, Page 2952 of the Plat Records of Dallas County, Texas; Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions for WYNNPA~E ESTATES Recorded in Volume 92072, Page 1519 of the Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas; and Ownership of Rights Declared Therein. Dear Gentlemen, I have been retained by Mr. Paul Shea, President of the Wynnpage Homeowners Association, to inquire into and address your recent allegations concerning your alleged claim that Mr. Levell, or whatever corporation or partnership he is acting as principal therefor, owns the land on each side of Wynnpage Drive, the entrance to the subdivision, and up to the brick retaining wall. As a precursory comment, this issue arose approximately two years ago. At such time, Mr. Shea stated to Mr. Levell that the homeowners association owned the land. We cursorily reviewed the Plat and the Declaration at such time and felt that he was correct. Since it has now become an issue again, Mr. Shea asked me to look into the matter more thoroughly. From a review of the Final Plat, recorded in Volume 92001, Page 2952 of the Plat Records of Dallas County, Texas, the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions for WYNNPAGE ESTATES Recorded in Volume 92072, Page 1519 of the Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas, the relevant Texas statutory and case law authorities, and physically measuring the property, it is my opinion that Wynnpage Homeowners Association owns the property in question. Once your lawyers or the lawyers at your title company look into the matter, I feel certain they will reach the same conclusion. I have enclosed under cover of this letter Exhibit "A", Exhibit "B", and Exhibit "C", a copy of the relevant portion of the Final Plat, a copy of the pertinent pages of the Declaration, and a copy of a letter dated January 26, 1994 from Wynnpage Estates, Ltd. to Mr. Shea, respectively. The copy of the Final Plat, Exhibit "A", which I have provided for you, contains the relevant portion of the surveyor's drawing along with the whole right side of the recorded Plat. In the Owner's Certificate at top right is contained the specific property description by metes and bounds, followed by more general language below. The relevant part is as follows: "THENCE in an Easterly direction along said curve to the left having a central angle of 19'14'53", a radius of 496.17 feet, and an arc length of 166.68 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found in the West line of Denton Tap Road (110 foot wide Right-of- Way); THENCE South 00*22'00" East along the West line of said Denton Tap Road, a distance of 80.00 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found at the beginning of a curve to the right whose chord gears North 77*22'32" West;" It is conspicuously clear that the land conveyed included 80 feet and includes such as it curves around to follow the contour of the road. The street Right-of-Way only contains approximately 50-54 feet, depending on where it is measured. This means that the Wynnpage Homeowners Association owns the remainder of the land, approximately 12 to 14 feet on each side of the street right-of- way. Moreover, ~when examining the instrument, this is internally consistent with the surveyor's drawing and signature which indicates 40 feet on each side of the center Wynnpage Drive and Denton Tap. The Legend on the Final Plat also references the 1/2" IRF which means "Iron Rod Found". The Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions for Wynnpage Estates, (hereinafter "Declaration"), recorded in volume 92072, Page 1519 of the Deed Records of Dallas County, Texas, Exhibit "B" contains the following pertinent provisions on Page 1. "THAT Wynnpage Estates, Ltd., a Texas Limited Partnership (the "Declarant"), is the Owner of all that certain tract of land platted and described as Wynnpage Estates (the "Addition"), an addition to the City of Coppell (the "City"), Texas, according to the plat thereof (the "Plat")... "Declarant hereby declares that all of the property described above shall be held, sold and conveyed subject to the following ..., which are for the purpose of establishing a general scheme for the development of all of the lots in the Addition and for the purpose of enhancing and protecting the value, attractiveness and desirability of said lots and which shall run with the land and be binding on all parties having or acquiring any right, title or interest in the property or any part thereof, and which shall inure to the benefit of each Owner thereof." In Article I, the definitional section, on Page 2 under subsection (e), (j), and (k) the words "Common Properties]'., "Plat", and "Properties" are defined to include the following: "(e) "Common Properties" .. and (vii) any areas of land, improvements or other property rights within the properties which are known, described or designated or which shall subsequently become known, described or designated as Common Properties intended for or devoted to the common use and enjoyment of the Owners, together with any and all improvements that are now or may hereafter be constructed thereon." "(j) "Plat" shall mean and refer to the Plat recorded in Volume 92001, Page 2952, of the plat Records of Dallas County, Texas." "(k) "Properties" shall mean and refer to all of that certain tract of land platted and described as Wynnpage Estates, an Addition to the City of Coppell, Texas according to that Plat." Under Article XI, entitled "Use of Common Properties" it is also clear that any owner is liable to the Association, and can be fined or assessed accordingly, for any damage said Owner causes to the common properties. The Wynnpage Homeowners Association has full rights of ingress and egress over the Common Properties. Most telling is Section 11.4 Maintenance of Common Properties. It reads in full as follows: "All landscaping and improvements placed or erected on the Common Properties by Declarant shall be o~naed and~intained by the Association." Consistent with its ownership and record title, the Wynnpage Homeowners Association has maintained and paid for ali landscaping to the common properties, including but not limited to, mowing, watering, trimming, planting flowers and shrubs, electric, and maintaining the brick entrance sign - Wynnpage. It is then no small surprise that Wynnpage Estates, Ltd., the grantor and transferor under the Declaration, wrote Mr. Shea the letter referenced in Exhibit "C" on January 26, 1994 advising him that effective February 1, 1994, it would no longer be maintaining the common properties and subsequently canceled the landscape maintenance contract, water service and electric service. The letter refers to the City of Coppell Utility Department (water) "So. side Wymmpage entrance" This letter alone would legally estop Wynnpage Estates, Ltd. or Mr. Levell or whatever entity he controls from claiming any ownership interest in and to the common property land, as would the Declaration. It is not only patently inconsistent but is somewhat pretentious for him or anyone acting at his direction to now claim that he or his privies own the land. When one reads and examines the Final Plat and the Declaration, we believe that no legitimate claim can be asserted that anyone other than Wynnpage Homeowners Association owns the land included in common properties or identified in the plat. Texas law provides that in construing a plat, the general rules governing the construction of deeds or other instruments granting real property are applicable. Jupe V. City of Schertz,. 604 S.W.2d 405 (Tex. Civ.App. - San Antonio 1980, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Priolo v. City of Dallas, 257 S.W.2d 947 (Tex. Civ.App. - Dallas 1953, writ ref'd n.r.e.). A description by metes and bounds, being a specific description, prevails over a general description. Law~ers Title Ins. Corp. v. McKee, 354 S.W.2d 401 (Tex. Civ.App. - Fort Worth 1962). The Texas Supreme Court is clear that where the grantor conveys specifically by metes and bounds, so that there can be no controversy about the land included and conveyed, the general description will not control the specific and particular description about which there can be no mistake. Southern Pine Lumber Co. v. Hart, 161 Tex. 357, 340 S.W.2d 775 (1960). In Southern Pine Lumber Co., supra., the Texas Supreme Court cited its prior holding, to wit: "Where a grantor conveys specifically be metes and bounds, so there can be no controversy about what land is included and really conveyed, a general description, as of all of a certain tract conveyed to him by another person, or, as in this case, all of a survey except a tract belonging to another person, cannot control; for there is a specific and particular description, about which there can be no mistake, and no necessity for involving the aid of the general description." Cullers v. Platt, 81 Tex. 258, 16 S.W. 1003" The Wynnpage Plat contained the specific metes and bounds description of the land conveyed, as quoted hereinabove in bold, and such would control over any other general language contained in the Dedication part of the Plat (the dedicatory language below the metes and bounds) or the Declaration, even assuming arguendo that your lawyers could find any general language which would indicate the contrary. Assuming arguendo you can find someone to assert a colorable claim otherwise, it would be fruitless and to no avail. If the language of a deed (in this case Plat and Declaration) leaves any doubt as to the grantor's intention, and conflicting clauses cannot be reconciled, the deed will be construed so as to convey the greatest estate that the terms of the instrument will permit. Reeves v. Towery, 621 S.W.2d 209 (Tex. Civ. App. - Corpus Christi 1981, writ ref'd n.r.e.). The deed will be construed in a light most favorable to the grantee. Reeves, supra. If a deed is susceptible of 2 constructions, the one most favorable to the grantee will be adopted. Victoria Bank & Trust Co. v. Cooley, 417 S.W.2d 814 (Tex. Civ.App. - Houston (14th Dist.) 1967, writ ref'd n.r.e.). Therefore, the grantee has the right, as against the grantor, to select the description most favorable to the grantee if the deed contains inconsistent descriptions, McBride v. Burns, 88 S.W. 294 (Tex. Civ.App. 1905, writ dism'd), or statements with respect to the quantity of land conveyed. Stan~efer v. Miller, 182 S.W. 1149 (Tex. Civ.App. - Amarillo, 1916). There is also Federal 5th Circuit authority and other Texas Supreme Court decisions, too numerous to spend time citing, which hold that the deed, instrument or document is to be construed against the one who drafted it. Mr. Shea informs me that you or your agents drafted every word of the Declaration and/or the Final Plat, and simply mailed it to him ex post facto. We did not draft one letter, let alone one word, of the Final Plat or the Declaration and were not asked our opinion or to contribute thereto in any way, shape, or form. As is probably the case, we feel certain that the documents were drafted by Mr. Levell or his attorneys or agents. We believe the evidence is clear who drafted the governing instruments. Based on the foregoing, we believe it has been established with unassailable cogency that Wynnpage Homeowners Association owns the land included in the common properties specifically identified under the metes and bounds delineated in the Final Plat. As a trial lawyer, this is the kind of matter which lends itself to quick summary judgment fodder. We would kindly request you refrain from assuming otherwise or calling Mr. Shea (or any other Wynnpage Homeowner for that matter) and asserting otherwise. Apart from the legal reasons, there are cogent policy reasons why we do not want to give you or anybody else our land. The City of Coppell prides itself on having very nice neighborhoods which are aesthetically pleasing. Preserving and maintaining the entrance to our subdivision, with its small amount of green belt area on each side of Wynnpage Drive increases the distinctiveness and aesthetic value of the subdivision. Secondly, cutting a road through our land would also add a significant traffic burden on the residents of our subdivision. Running an extra 100 to 200 cars per day through to the middle of Wynnpage Drive, west of our brick sign, would make getting into and exiting our subdivision more bothersome. Moreover, with the increased traffic on Denton Tap over the last 4 to 5 years (and more in the foreseeable future), when one travels north bound on Denton Tap and turns left into the subdivision to avoid the oncoming and often speeding cars during rush hours, to have to hit the brakes or stop immediately after turning left onto Wynnpage because of cars cutting through to the middle of Wynnpage would pose a safety hazard. Lastly, and most importantly, the City of Coppell prides itself on having good and safe neighborhoods where children play. And as has happened on all too frequent occasion, small children ride their bikes or skateboards periodically up the small sidewalk in our common property, or walk up there to play in the grass. To have 100 to 200 extra cars per day entering or exiting through a supposed easement cut through our land into Wynnpage Drive would put them at risk. A risk we cannot take. Sincerely, cc: Mr. Gary Sieb Director of Planning 255 Parkway Blvd. Coppell, Texas 75019 Via Certifie~ailRRR Z 210 081 109 EICT ~! £08! 08::39 F~' Robert E. Hager E-mall: rhager~?,njd h$.com HICHOLC_, JACKSON DILLA4 965 8010 TO 9723047863 ?'---~. NICHOLS, JACKSON, DILLARD, HAGER & SMI..,, LEE Attorneys & Counselors at Law 1800 Lincoln Plaza 500 North Akax~t Dallas, Texas 75201 (214) 965-9900 Fax (214) 965-0010 E-mail NJDHS~NJDHS.com F'. hOmE,IT L. DILLAIqD. LAWlq, ENCE W. JACKSON February 28, 2001 Mr. Gary Sieb Director of Planning City of Coppell 255 Parkway Boulevard P. O. Box 478 Coppell, Texas 75019 CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATIONS RE: ~4/ynnpage Drive Right-of-way Dear Mr. Sieb: You have forwarded to us a letter wdttet~ by an attorney. Gan' M. Vodicka. for and on behalf' or' the Wynnpage Homeowners Association regarding the public right-of-way from Denton Tap Road to the beginning of the Wynnpage Subdivision. which is the shaded area depicted on Exhibit "A" attached hereto to this letter. It is our understanding that the Wynnpage Homeowners Association has placed or proposed to place landscaping within the eighty (80') foot right-of-way from Denton Tap Road to its point of entry' and continuing on to Wynnpage Drive as it enters the subdivision. The recorded plat has indicated a dedication of a public-right-of-way from Denton Tap Road with an eighty (80') foot frontage to the point of beginning of the actual subdivision itself, which narrows to a widtl~ of sixty (60') l~eet In reviewing this matter we have been asked to opine whether or not the Homeowners Association or private property owner has a right to place within the City dedicated right-of-way landscaping or otherwise obstruct access to adjacent parcels of land not owned by the Homeowners Associationt. Correspondingly, access to Denton Tap Road was contemplated to the shaded right-of-way. It appears from the records we have reviewed in this matter that neither the Homeowners Association or private property owner within Wynnpage Subdivision owns either the northern or southern lots which are adjacent the public right-of-way that runs from Denton Tap to the beginning of thc Wynnpage Subdivision. As a result thereof, those lots would access Denton Tap through Wynnpage Drive. ' The northern and southern parcels adjacent to the eight-of-way in Exhibit "A" are owned by J. Wayne LeVell of LT Real Estate Corporation. FR N IE HOLS DILLA4 965 o010 T 0 P.03/86 Mr Gary Sieb February 28,2001 Page 2 The plat and the dedicatow language thereon contain no limitations. Specifically. we quote the following from dae filed plat: "That the easements being hereby dedicated for the mutual use and accommodation for the City of Coppell and all public utilities designed to use are using the same. And any public utility in the City of Coppell shall have the right to remove all and any part of any buildings, fences, trees, shrubs, or other improvements or growth which in any way endanger or interfere with construction, maintenance, or eff~ctency of its respective systems on said easements in the City of Coppell and all public utilities shall, at all times, have the full right of ingress and egress upon said easements for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, inspecting, patrolling, maintaining, and adding to or removing all of the respective systems without the necessity at any time of procuring permission from anyone." This dedicatory language appear, in the filed plat signed by the previous owner and filed in the Dallas County Deed Records. Hence, lhe City has obtained a dedication of a public right-of-way and it enjoys stewardship by the City. Gu(/S~dl~hz~r Co. v. R.vmcm., 221 S.W.2d 310 (Tex. Civ. App.-- Galveston 1920); Mc Craw v. (;it), of Dallas. 420 S.W.2d 793 (Tex. Civ. App. --Dallas 1967, writ ref'd n.r.e.). Thus, once there has been a dedication of a street that is thc setting apart of land for public use as a public right-o/:way or easement by the people for the public related uses within the municipality Land dedicated for public use as a street may be utilized to conform to modern plans for traffic acceleration, control and access to adjacent property. When a road or street is dedicated to public use, duc governmental entity requires an easement of the street for the benefit of the public. Further, the easement held necessarily carries with it the right to use and control as much of the surl'ace Or subsurt:ace that is reasonably necessary for public access and use. Unless a dedication stmeg otherwise, the abutting landowner acquires the fee simple title subject to the public easement. In addition, it is well settled that when the owner makes a dedication and the same is accepted (that is by acceptance of the plat) the public becomes vested with all the rights that are consistent with the public use of the property. Chambers Counm. v. £rost, 356 S.W.2d 470 (Tex. Civ. App.--Waco 1962, writ ref'd n.r.e). The public rights extend to the surface that is consistent with the public use of the property and not to invade or violate the rights of others. Furthermore, the dedicator retains all rights and land that are not necessary for the enjoyment or use by the public. Hence, those portions of the depicted easement on the plat for Wynnpage Subdivision are an encumbrance or burden to the underlying fee. The public policy consideration also dictate that public determination of proper access should be under the stewardship of the public for mutual benefit. The public dedicated right-of-way is a burden or limitation, or encumbrance on O'C T Mr. Gary Sieb February 28, 2001 Page 3 FR NICHOLS JACk:SOI'I DILLA4 965 881£~ TO 97£:z-:g~47~]63 P the ownership of the underlying fee title. Cite omitted. Pittman v. City of Amarillo, 598 S.W.2d 941 (Tex. Civ. App. - Amarillo 1980, writ ref. n.r.e.). Moreover, a part)' may expressly reserve rights that ordinarily would pass to the public where there is a legitimate purpose for the reservation when it is clearly shown on the plat or dedicatory instrument. PI. Romv Co. v. Thompson, t94 S.W.2d 120 (Tex. Civ. App. -- San Antonio 1985, ,,wit ref'd). In the circumstances that are currently before us, it appears that the Wynnpage Homeowners Association desires to place landscaping and other amenities within the public right-of-way. It is our understanding that they have no license or other right granted from the City to place such items within the tight-of-way. Moreover, it appears that the owner of the northern and southern tracts which abut the right-of-way from Wynnpage to Denton Tap desires now to develop that property. Inasmuch as the public access would be impeded as a result of the placing shrubs or other landscaping items in an area which is sought to be utilized as ingress and egress from the property to a public street, the Homeowners Association are not within right to preclude that use without the express written permission of the City. To the extent that we have received a lecture from Mr. Vodicka regarding the use of the common areas and common property within the City, we are loss as to understand his "unassailable cogency of the Wynnpage Homeowners Association". It is clear in the case of Ellis v. dansing: 620 S.W.2d 569 (Tex. 1981) that a statute specifically precludes adverse possession of property dedicated to the public use. Hence, tlie tact that the City has not utilized all of the right-of-way or has failed to use the right-of-way at the current date does not indicate an abandonment or an adverse use by thc Homeowners Association. We specifically cite to you § 16.030 of the Tex. Civ. Prac.& Rem, Code which states in relevant part, "a person may not acquire through adverse possession the right or title to real property dedicated to the public use". Hence, it is our position in this case that the public right-of-way as depicted on the plat and map filed with the City regarding the dedication of the public street from Denton Tap to entryway of Wynnpage remains within the pubhc dedicated right-of-way of the City of Coppell, Texas, and as such, an adjacent property owner may have access to the public roadway from their land to the public right-of-way as it intersects their property. There is no indication on the maps and plats nor can we find that the Homeowners Association has any right, title, and/or interest to interfere or otherwise impede access to the public right-of-way. 2881 88:48 FFI r~iCHOLS DILLA4 965 OFdiO T,'i: '372:304786;3 Mr. Gary Sieb February 28, 2001 Page 4 Thank you for your ~ttention to this matter. at ),our convenience. REH/cdb If you have any questions please contact us Very truly yours, NICHOLS, JAC/K~N, DILLARD, ®CT 01 08:48 FR NICHOLS JACKSON D I LLA4 965 0010 TO EXHIBIT "A" )CK. A 62.59' 1. 14 I 1 ~ 406.1T ' L 38.12' , . mCB S 7~q911 E .' - ;~ ~.. . ! ! / I L = 166.68' . ~ 1/2'~ ~ ~'m V~U~ 81244. PAG~ 2410 ,- : ~r";-,o' --~S 00~2 O0 ~ r~,_~ i- ,.' ~, ~ '1~ ;, .. '~ I I Ic~= N ~,2 w zoo 0J,: .... - ~ ~ ~ ..... : ,-. . .... , Minu~ of FebruarF 21~ The Planning and Zo~n~ C.---~°°~nn of the City of Coppell met in pre-session a~ 7:uu p.m., and in regular session at 7:30 p.m., on Thursday, February 21, 1991, at the Coppell Town Center, 255 Parkway Boulevard, Coppell, Texas 75019. The following members were present: Vice-Chairman, Robert Green Commissioner, Charles Cotten Commissioner, Melvin Gross Commissioner, George Redford Commissioner, Marsha Tunnell Chairman Munsch and Commissioner Mayo were absent. Also present were Director of Planning and Community Services Gary L. Sieb, P&Z Coordinator Tar¥on Bowman and Administrative Secretary Linda Glidewell. Vice-Chairman Green called the meeting to order and everyone was asked to stand while Commissioner Gross gave the invocation. Item 4: Approval of Minutes of January 17, 1991 Commissioner Gross moved to approve the minutes of January i7, 1991, with a change to Item #5, it should state the vote was (4-2) not (3-2). Commissioner Cotten seconded the motion; motion carried (5-0) with Vice-Chairman Green and Commissioners Cotten, Gross, Redford and Tunnell voting in favor of the motion. Item 5: Consider request for a zoning chaa~e, Case #PD-115, from (C) Commercial to [PD-SF-7) Planned Development Single-Family-7, located approximately 1,047 feet south of Sandy Lake Road, along the west side of Denton TaR Road, at the request of Siepiela Interests, Inc. Director of Planning Gary L. Sieb introduced the item to the Commission. Mr. ~ieb stated that thi~ ~equest oontain~ 20.37 acres. The request is for a single-family detached development. Mr. Sieb further stated that he has held meetings with the developer and surrounding property owners over the past two weeks. Forty-two notices were mailed out to surrounding property owners, with two responses being returned in favor of the request and three responses being returned in opposition. Mr. Sieb stated that drainage is a big issue concerning this request; however, drainage is normally worked out during the platting process. Minutes of February 21, 1991 Planning & Zoning Commission Page 2 Mr. Jim Siepiela of Siepiela Interests was present to represent this item before the Commission and answer any questions. Mr. Siepiela stated that he also has met with some of the property owners adjoining this development. Mr. Siepiela stated that he also felt the drainage issue was one of the major concerns with this subdivision, which they will attempt to work out. At the request of the surrounding homeowners, they have agreed to go from 1650 square foot minimum house size to 1850 square foot minimum house size. Mr. Siepiela then stated that they have also agreed to build a screening fence along the western property at the time they develop the subdivision. Vice-Chairman Green then opened the public hearing and asked for persons wishing to speak in favor of the request. Those persons speaking were: J.C. Thweatt Rt. 1, Box 188, Denton Tap He then asked for persons wishing to speak in opposition to the request. Those persons speaking were: Paula Lavelle Chuck Faerber Barbara Bailey Sandy Ryder Buddy Carter 203 Fieldcrest Loop 226 Southern Belle 232 Plantation 252 Plantation 202 Carolina Court David Moore 228 Plantation Mary Evelyn Mobley 709 S. Coppell Road Becky Bedford 236 Plantation Michael Speck Noble Fortson Chris Bukaty Dan Sexton Julie Speck Mark Pinter Pat Thompson Monte Daly 222 Southern Belle 224 Plantation 244 Plantation 216 Plantation 222 Southern Belle 248 Plantation 140 Fieldcrest Loop 206 Richmond Court The public hearing was then declared closed. At this time Commissioner Cotten asked Vice-Chairman Green to clarify for the audience that the notices mailed to property owners were not from the developer, but rather from the City. The notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of the proposed zoning change. Minutes of February 21, 1991 Planning & Zoning Commission Page 3 Following discussion Commissioner Gross moved to deny Case #PD-115 without prejudice· The motion died due to the lack of a second· Commissioner Cotten then moved to approve Case #PD-115 with the following conditions: · 7,400 square foot minimum lot size · 66 foot minimum lot width 8 foot minimum side yard · 25 foot minimum front yard . 20 foot minimum rear yard · 79 lots maximum · 1,850 square foot minimum air conditioned house size · 8 foot wooden screening fence with cap on western boundary · 6 foot masonry screening fence on southern boundary (Lots 10-15) and 6 foot wooden screening fence on remainder (Lots 3-9) of lots in Block A . 6 foot minimum masonry screening fence on eastern and northeastern residential boundary · landscaping on outside of southern masonry fence along Plantation · establishment of homeowners association to maintain screening fences and all common areas · maximum one story structures on Lots 11-26, Block A alleys throughout subdivision landscaping as shown on plans Commissioner Gross seconded the motion; motion carried (5-0) with Vice-Chairman Green and Commissioners Cotten, Gross, Redford and Tunnell voting in favor of the motion. The Commission recessed for a short break at this time. Item 6: Consider request of a replat of Lot 12-R, Block A, Shadow Woods Addition, located near the southwest corner of Coppell Road and Thweatt Road, at the request of Centex Real Estate Corporation. P&Z Coordinator Taryon Bowman introduced the item to the Commission. Ms. Bowman stated that this request is for a replat of Lot 12-R of Shadow Woods Estates· The original plat was approved by the City Council in July of 1989. She further stated that the purpose of this request is to prevent a boundary dispute with the property owners to the south, of the Irby Addition· Ms. Bowman then stated that staff recommends approval of this request· P & Z HEARING DATE: C. C. HEARING DATE: CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT WYNNPAGR ADDITION - FINAL PLAT 3uly 22, 1991 August 13, 1991 LOCATION: Approximately 1,400 feet south of Sandy Lake Road, and 200 feet east of Denton Tap Road. SIZE OF AREA: 20.72 Acres. REQUEST: Approval of a final plat as submitted. APPLICANT: Siepiela Interests, Inc. (Owner) 5001LBJ Freeway, Suite 830 Dallas, Texas 75244 (214) 960-2777 Unzicker, Schnurbusch and Associates, Inc. (Engineer) REP: Kevin Kendrick 8700 Stemmons Freeway Suite 400 Dallas, Texas 75247 HISTORY: A PD, Case #PD-115, was approved by the City Council on March 26, 1991, with conditions as follows: 1) 9,000 square foot lot minimum on Block A, lots 15-27 (along the western boundary), 8,450 square foot lot minimum on Block A, lots 13 and 14, remaining lots 7,400 square foot minimum; 2) 75' minimum lot width for Block A, lots 19-27, remaining lots - 66' minimum lot width; 3) minimum side yard - 8' 4) minimum rear yard - 20' 5) minimum front yard - 25' 6) minimum size of structures - 1,850 square feet 7) maximum height of structures - 1 story on Block A, lots 13-27, remaining lots - 2 story; 8) screening - a) 8' wooden screening fence (with metal posts and caps) along the western boundary, b) 6' masonry screening fence on southern boundary (along Block A; lots 13-17), ITEM 12 c) 6' wooden screening on Block A, lots 5-12 d) 6' masonry screening fence along the eastern and northeastern residential boundary, 9) provide landscaping along the southern side of southern masonry fence, 10) establish a homeowners association to maintain screening fences and all common areas, 11) landscaping to be provided as shown on plans, 12) the preliminary and final plat must be submitted along with acceptable drainage plans 13) Maximum number of lots - 78 TRANSPORTATION: Wynn Page Drive will become the main access road into the sub-division off Denton Tap Road, and a second access will be provided on the north side of the property as the parcel to the north develops. ANALYSIS: Wynnpage Addition was first submitted as a planned development with an assortment of conditions ranging from limitations on heights of structures, to adding landscaping elements along the borders of adjoining properties. A considerable amount of effort has been put into the PD and the plat, on the part of the neighborhood groups, Planning and Zoning Commission, City Council and staff, to assist in the formation of a subdivision that will be a benefit to the community. The final plat for Wynnpage reflects all of the conditions of approval as a part of Case #PD-115. Staff recommends approval of the plat as submitted. ALTERNATIVES: 1) Approve the final plat as submitted 2) Deny the final plat ATTACHMENTS: 1) Final Plat WYNPGSTF Planning & Zoning Comission J Page 5 ., _ 4) that the developer use chemical algae prevention in maintaining the pond, as well as a fountain aeration device, 5) that there be a 25 foot building line throughout the development, and 6) that there be a Homeowners Association created, and the purchaser be notified of the Association, as a part of the contract of sale Commissioner Redford seconded the motion; motion carried (5-1) with Chairman Munsch and Commissioners Mayo, Redford, Cotten and Gross voting in favor of the motion, and Commissioner Green voting against the motion. Item 9: Consider request for approval of a~preliminar¥ olaf of Wynnpage Addition, located approximately ~UU feet north of Sandy Lake Road, along the east side of Lodge Road, at the request of Siepiela Interests. P&Z Coordinator Taryon Bowman introduced the item to the Commission. Ms. Bowman stated that this request is located on 20.377 acres of land. She also stated that the zoning for this property was approved one month ago. At the time this item went to City Council, they added additional conditions, which include: 1) 9,000 square foot lot minimum on Block A, lots 15-27 (along the western boundary), 8,450 square foot lot minimum on Block A, lots 13 and 14, remaining lots 7,400 square foot minimum; 2) 75' minimum lot width for Block A, lots 19-27, remaining lots - 66' minimum lot width; 3) minimum side yard - 8' 4) minimum rear yard - 20' 5) minimum front yard - 25' 6) minimum size of structures - 1,850 square feet 7) maximum height of structures - 1 story on Block A, lots 13-27, remaining lots - 2 story; 8) screening - a) 8' wooden screening fence (withmatal posts and caps) along the western boundary, b) 6' masonry screening fence on southern boundary (along Block A; lots 13-17), c) 6' wooden screening on Block A, lots 5-12 d} 6' masonry screening fence along the eastern and northeastern residential boundary, 9) provide landscapin~ along the southern side of southern masonry fence, Minutes of April 18, 1991 Planning & Zoning Commission Page 6 Item 10: 10) establish a homeowners association to maintain screening fences and all common areas, 11) landscaping to be provided as shown on plans, 12) the preliminary and final plat must be submitted along with acceptable drainage plans 13) Maximum number of lots - 78 Mr. Lynn Meyer of Unzicker, Schnurbusch and Associates was present to represent this item before the Commission and enswer any questions. Following discussion, Commissioner Gross moved to approve the preliminary plat of Wlampage Addition with the following conditions: 1) with the lot numbers corrected as stated by Taryon Bowman, 2) that there be minimum 9,000 square foot lots on parcels 15-27, and minimum 8,450 square foot lots on parcels 13 and 14, 3) maximum height be one story in Block A, lots I3-27, and 4) all other requirements required by City Council be adhered to Commissioner Cotten seconded the motion; motion carried (5-1) with Chairman Munsch and Commissioners Redford, Green, Cotten and Gross voting in favor of the motion, and Commissioner Mayo voting against the motion. Consider request for approval of a final plat of Pecan Ridge Estates, located at the northwest corner of Sandy Lake Road Lodge Road, at the request of Ron Fraze. and Director of Planning Gary L. $ieb introduced the item to the Commission. Mr. Sieb stated that the plats for Pecan Ridge and Pecan Valley are almost identical, and located across from one another. He stated that the staff recommendation was that staff would be in favor of this plat provided the applicant had made considerable progress in obtaining Lodge Road improvements, which was a condition of the zoning approval by Council. Mr. Sieb then stated that there is a contract that Mrs. Ihnfeldt has verbally agreed to. Therefore, staff would recommend approval of this plat. Mr. Ron Fraze of Gateway International was present to represent this item before the Commission and answer any questions. The City With A Beautiful Future P.O. Box 478 Coppell, Texas 75019 214 - 462 - 0022 July 23, 1991 Mr. Jim Siepiela Siepiela Intersts 5001LBJ Freeway Suite 830 Dallas, Texas 75244 RE: WYNNPAGE ADDITION - FINAL PLAT This letter is to inform you that your request for application of a final pl~t of the Wynnpage Addition, was recommended for~by the Coppem~T~ ~T~ing and Zoning Commission on Monday, July 22, 1.~7~-~- The tentative date scheduled for consideration by the Coppell City Council is Tuesday, August 13, 1991, at 7:00 p.m. A representative for this case must be present at the City Council meeting. Failure to represent this item may result in the denial of this application. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (214) 462-0639. Ga.ky L.,,Sieb, A.I.C.P. Director of Planning & Community Services GLS/isg xc: Taryon Paster Bowman, P&Z Coordinator File WYNPGPZ.ACT Planning and Zoning Commission \ age 4 , Mr. Lynn Meyer was present to represent this item before the Commission end enswer any questions. Following discussion, Commissioner Gross moved to approve the request for vacating the final plat of the DTC Addition. Commissioner Redford seconded the motion; motion carried (7-0) with ChairmenMunsch and Commissioners Mayo, Redford, Green, Tunnell, Cotten and Gross voting in favor of the motion. Item 12: Consider request for a final plat of W~a%npage Addition, located 1400 feet south of Sandy Lake Road end 200 feet west of Denton Tap Road, at the request of 8iepiela Interests. Director of Planning Gary L. Sieb introduced the item to the Commission. Following discussion, Commissioner Tunnel moved to approve the final plat of the Wynnpage Addition. Commissioner Cotten seconded the motion; motion carried (7-0) with Chairman Munsch and Commissioners Mayo, Redford, Green, Tunnell, Cotten and Gross voting in favor of the motion. Item 13: Consider request for a name change on a final plat from Villages of Coppell, Phase 4A, to Grand Lakes Addition, located along the west side of Allen Road end south of DeForest Road, at the request of Steve Brooks, Developer. Director of Planning Gary L. Sieb introduced the item to the Commission. Mr. Sieb stated that this item is being withdrawn at the applicants request. Commissioner Cotten moved to deny the name change of Villages of Coppell, Phase 4A. Commissioner Tunnell seconded the motion; motion carried (7-0) with Chairmen Munsch and Commissioners Mayo, Redford, Green, Tunnell, Cotten and Gross voting in favor of the motion. DISCUSSION Item 14: General discussion concerning planning and zoning issues. Director of Planning and Community Services Gary L. Sieb stated that approximately one year ago the Planning Commission was appointed as the Advisory Committee to the Impact Fee Ordinance, as mandated by State Law. State Law also stated that after six The City W' ' August 14, 1991 P.O. Box 478 Coppell, Texas 75019 214 - 462 - 0022 Mr. Jim Siepiela Siepiela Interests 5001LBJ Freeway Suite 830 Dallas, Texas 75244 RE: WYNNPAGE ADDITION - FINAL PLAT Dear Mr. Siepiela: This letter is to inform you that your request for application of a ~  of the Wynnpage Addition, was approved by the Coppell City Counc~il on st 13, 1991, with the following conditions: 1) 9,000 square foot lot minimum on Block A, lots 15-27 (along the western boundary), 8,450 square foot lot minimum on Block A, lots 13 and 14, remaining lots 7,400 square foot minimum; 2) 75' minimum lot width for Block A, lots 19-27, remaining lots - 66' minimum lot width; 3) minimum side yard 8'; 4) minimum rear yard 20'; 5) minimum front yard 25'; 6) minzmum size of structures - 1,850 square feet; 7) maximum height of structures - 1 story on Block A, lots 13-27, remaining lots - 2 story; 8) screening: a) 8' screening fence (with metal posts and caps) along the western boundary, b) 6' masonry screening fence on southern boundary (along Block A; lots 13-17), c) 6' wooden screening fence on Block A, lots 5-12, d) 6' masonry screening fence along the eastern and northeastern residential boundary 9) provide landscaping along the southern side of southern masonry fence; 10) establish a homeowners association to maintain screening fences and all common areas; 11) landscaping to be provided as shown on plans; 12) the preliminary and final plat must be submitted along with; acceptable drainage plans; and 13) maximum number of lots - 78. Your next step will be the execution of the final plat for Wynnpage Addition. Please find attached a procedures list which provides information on filing executed plats. If the final plat has not been submitted for signatures by City officials prior to February 13, the plat shall be deemed null and void, resubmittal shall be required, and current subdivision regulations shall apply. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (214) 462-0639. Sincerely~ GL~lsg xc: Taryon Bowman, P&Z Coordinator ATTACHMENT WYNPGCC.ACT Road, at the request of Siepiela Interests. Mayor Pro Tern Smothermon seconded the motion. The motion carried 6-0 with Mayor Pro Tern Smothermon and Councilmen Weaver, Morton, Cowman, Robertson and Nelson voting in favor of the motion. ITEM 11 To consider approval of a glaal_lilat for Xy_vnnnaoe ~ddifinn, located approximately 1,400 feet south of Sandy Lake Road and 200 feet west of Denton Tap Road, at the request of Siepiela Interests. Planning and Community Services Director Gary Sieb made the presentation to Council. Mayor Pro Tern Smothermon moved to approve a final plat for Wynnpage Addition, located approximately 1,400 feet south of Sandy Lake Road and 200 feet west of Denton Tap Road, with the following conditions:. 1) 9,000 square foot lot minimum on Block A, lots 15-27 (along the western boundary), 8,450 square foot lot minimum on Block A, lots 13 and 24, remaining lots 7,400 square foot minimum; 2) 75' minimum lot width for Block A, lots 19-27, remaining lots = 66' minimum foot width; 3) minimum side yard - 8'; 4) minimum rear yard - 20'; 5) minimum front yard - 25'; 6) Minimum size of structures - 1,850 square feet; 7) maximum height of structures - 1 story on Block A, lots 13-27, remaining lots - 2 story; 8) screening - a) 8' wooden screening fence (with metal posts and caps) along the western boundary, b) 6' masonry screening fence on southern boundary (along Block A; lots 13-17), c) 6' wooden screening on Block A, lots 5-12 d) 6' masonry screening fence along the eastern and northeastern residential boundary; 9) provide landscaping along the southern side of southern masonry fence; 10) establish a homeowners association to maintain screening fences and all common areas; 11) landscaping to be provided as shown on plans; 12) the preliminary and final plat must be submitted along with acceptable drainage plans 13) Maximum number of lots - 78. Councilman Morton seconded the motion. The motion carded 6-0 with Mayor Pro Tern Smothermon and Councilmen Weaver, Morton, Cowman, Robertson and Nelson voting in favor of the motion. ITEM 12 To consider approval of a preliminary plat for Chautaugua Place Addition, located along the west side of Harris Road, at the intersection of Bethel School Road, at the request of Matthews Investments Southwest. Planning and Community Services Director Gary Sieb made a presentation to Council. Councilman Morton moved to approve a preliminary plat for Chauta'xgua Place Addition, located along the west side of Harris Road, at the intersection of Bethel School Road. Mayor Pro Tem Smothermon seconded the motion. The motion carried 6-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Smothermon and Councilmen Weaver, Morton, Cowman, Robertson and Nelson voting in favor of the motion., ITEM 13 Consideration of approving a variance to the Floodplain Management Ordinance #87930, Art. 4, Sec. B, Item #11 (a), which states that the Floodplain Administrator must "assure that conditional approvals are received from FEMA before a Floodplain Development Permit is issued", for the proposed University Park Project along Stream G-l, a tributary of Grapevine Creek. Planning/uad Community Services Gat-y- Sieb made a presentation to Council. He stated that a letter dated August 5 from the consulting Engineer, Ron Morrison, recommended to Council that this variance be granted, subject to basic-"-, three conditions: (1) Council approve the variance (2) Applicant obtain all required permits as he develops this land (3) Applicant use the slope area method to determine the hundred year flood plain as opposed to the peak on peak F COPP-EI_JE AGENDA REQUEST FORM CITY COUNCIL MEETING: October 9, 2001 ITEM # _~~ ITEM CAPTION: Consider approval of the St. Joseph Village, Lots 1-4, Block A, Final Plat, request to allow the development of a retirement community and municipal facilities on approximately 51.17 acres of property located along the south side of Sandy Lake Road, approximately 1200' east of MacArthur Boulevard. SUBMITTED BY: Gary L. Sieb TITLE: Director of Planning and Community Services STAFF COMMENTS: Date of P&Z Meeting: September 20, 2001 Decision of P&Z Commission: Approved (5-0) with Commissioners McGahey, Kittrell, McCaffrey, Clark and Stewart voting in favor. None opposed. Approval is recommended, subject to the following conditions: 1) 2) An amended landscape plan being submitted the Director of Planning prior to the Certificate of Occupancy being issued for the first building within 200 feet of Sandy Lake Road or the construction of Sandy Lake Road, whichever occurs first, which provides for the relocation of the trees from the Sandy Lake Road right-of-way to elsewhere on the site, targeting the frontage of Sandy Lake Road and the adjacent drainage channel. The Director shall determine if administrative approval could be granted for the placement of these trees. ,h~ ~, (CONDITION MET) (CONDITION MET) 5) Engineering comments, as attached. 6) TXU easements, as needed, are to be provided on the Final Plat. Staff recommends approval. DIR. INITIALS: ~5- FIN. REVIEW:(~ CITY MANAGER REVIEW: Agenda Request Form -i~:vis;d 5/00 ~StJoeFP CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT CASE: ST. JOSEPH VILLAGE FINAL PLAT P & Z HEARING DATE: C.C. HEARING DATE: STAFF REP.: September 20, 2001 October 9, 2001 Maxcie Diamond, Assistant Planning Director LOCATION: SIZE OF AREA: Along the south side of Sandy Lake Road, 1,200 feet east of MacArthur Boulevard. Approximately 51.17 acres of property to be developed with 437 residences, a chapel, and ancillary uses. CURRENT ZONING: PD-114R (Planned Development-114) Residential/Rest Home/Nursing Home REQUEST: Final Plat approval APPLICANT: St. Joseph Village, Inc. Architect: Aguirre Corp. c/o Joe Dingman Michael Millican 180 Samuel Blvd. 12700 Park Central, 15th Floor Coppell, Texas, 75019 Dallas, Texas (972) 241-1272 (Joe Dingman) (972) 789-2645 Fax (972) 241-1214 Fax (972) 788-1583 HISTORY: On July 10, 200t, City Council approved a preliminary plat for this 51.17 acre tract of property, subject to several conditions which needed to be addressed on the Final Plat. On March 27, 2001, City Council approved a Planned Development district for residential/rest home and nursing home on this property. This property was rezoned from MF-1 to PD-114, SF-7 in 1992 for 139 single-family residences. That development did not occur, and today the property remains vacant. Page 1 of 4 Item # 10 TRANSPORTATION: Sandy Lake Road is proposed to be a C4D/6 4-lane divided roadway, contained within a 11 O-foot fight-of-way. Starleaf Street is proposed to be 33-feet wide through this area within a 55-foot fight-of-way. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North- scattered single family housing and vacant property; SF-12 South - MacArthur Park and vacant; LI, O and SF-7 East - TXU easemems and single-family residences; A and SF-7 West - church, school, townhouses, multi-family and shopping center; SF-7, PD-97R, MF-2, PD-182-TH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan shows the property as suitable for residential medium density (4-12 units per acre) single-family uses. DISCUSSION: Page 2 of 4 In March of this year, City Council approved the zoning for a retirement facility on this property. The preliminary plat was approved in July, which designated four lots. Lot 1, (29.63 acres) will be developed with the 437 residences, chapel and ancillary uses. Lot 2 (1.947 acres) will be the site of the City's new water facility which is being relocated from the Sandy Lake frontage. Lot 3, containing 2.12 acres, will be dedicated to the City of Coppell for parkland. Finally, Lot 4, containing 13.484 acres of flood plain land, contains TXU facilities and easements and will ultimately contain a hike-and-bike trail, pedestrian bridge and limited parking for the retirement community. This preliminary plat approval was subject the resolution of several issues prior to the approval and filing of the final plat for this property. The first issue was regarding the City of Irving's existing 54-inch water line located in the Phase Two development area, adjacent to Sandy Lake Road. As detailed in the attached letter dated September 6, 2001, the City of Irving recognizes the provision of the additional 10 feet of easement in addition to their existing 20-foot easement to protect their water line. The attached revised site plan for the Phase 2 cottages relocates the building footprints out of the easement area. The other issues outlined in the City of Irving's letter will be addressed as part of the engineering and construction process. The second major issue related to the depiction of the Sandy Lake Road R.O.W. and its impact on the proposed tree placement along Sandy Lake Road. This R.O.W. is now accurately reflected on the plat. When the Item # 10 including the plan, it will be determined if administrative approval could be granted for the placement of these trees. 2) Inclusion of a 20' pedestrian ingress and egress easement across Lot 4 for the pedestrian bridge on the plat. 3) Correction of the City's signature blocks as specified on pages 30 and 31 of the Subdivision Ordinance and as provided to the applicant and again with the DRC comments. 4) Provide required notes ~om the Floodplain Ordinance, in addition to the Floodplain signature block that is shown. 5) Engineering comments, as attached. 6) TXU easements, as needed, are to be provided on the Final Plat. ALTERNATIVES: 1) Recommend approval of the request. 2) Recommend disapproval of the request. 3) Recommend modification of the request. ATTACHMENTS 1) Engineering comments 2) Letter from the City of Irving, dated September 6, 2001 3) Final Plat 4) Site Plan for Phases I and II cottages Page 4 of 4 Item# 10 landscape plan is overlaid on the plat it appears that three-quarters of the 58 trees proposed to buffer the road from the drainage area are located within the City's R.O.W. and over the City of Dallas's 20' water line easement. This easement contains a 36" water line, which is the main source of water for the City of Coppell. The planting of trees is not recommended over this easement. Also, the planting of trees prior to the widening of Sandy Lake Road is not advisable, due to the potential disturbance of those trees during road construction. Therefore, it is recommended the 41 trees indicated on the approved landscape plan in the R.O.W and/or within the easement be relocated elsewhere on the site, preferably along the frontage on private property, or directly south of the drainage channel. There is also a potential for some tree plantings within the drainage area, subject to the approval of the Engineering Department. An amended landscape plan needs to be submitted to the Director of Planning prior to the Certificate of Occupancy being issued for the first building within 200 feet of Sandy Lake Road or the construction of Sandy Lake Road, whichever occurs first, to determine if administrative approval could be granted for the placement of these trees. As part of the preliminary plat approval, there was a note that there will be a 20' pedestrian ingress and egress easement between the River Ridge Addition and Starleaf Street, across Lot 4 of this property, to provide access to the elementary school. The alignment for this pedestrian bridge has been set, and therefore, an easement needs to be included on this final plat prior to filing it with the county. There are still several drafting errors which need to be corrected prior to the filing of the plat, and are detailed below. As of this date, TXU easements are also still needed. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff recommends APPROVAL of the Final Plat for the St. Joseph Addition, subject to the following conditions: 1) An amended landscape plan being submitted the Director of Planning prior to the Certificate of Occupancy being issued for the first building within 200 feet of Sandy Lake Road or the construction of Sandy Lake Road, whichever occurs first, which provides for the relocation of the trees from the Sandy Lake Road fight-of-way to elsewhere on the site, targeting the frontage of Sandy Lake Road and the adjacent drainage channel. By Page 3 of 4 Item# 10 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ENGINEERING COMMENTS ITEM: St. Joseph Village, Lots 1-4, Block A, Final Plat, request to allow the development of a retirement community and municipal facilities on approximately 51.17 acres of property located along the south side of Sandy Lake Road, approximately 1200' east of MacArthur Boulevard, at the request of St. Joseph Village, Incorporated. DRC DATE: August 30, 2001 and September 6, 2001 CONTACT: Kenneth M. Griffin, P.E., Director of Engineering (972-304-3679) COMMENT STATUS: or, rr Provide required notes from the Floodplain Ordinance in addition to the Floodplain Signature block that is shown. On your storm sewer plan, you are showing 9 headwalls discharging into the channel along the north side of this development. You should consider turning a parallel drainage system adjacent to the channel and only discharge twice into the channel. The introduction of headwalls into the channel will create erosion over a period of time. 8EP 1 0 2001 September 6, 2001 Mr. Gary Sieb Director of Planning and Community Services City of Coppell PO Box 9478 Coppell, TX 75019 Subject: St. Joseph Village Development Final Plat Submittal Dear Mr. Sieb: I received a final plat submittal from Mr. Mike Millican of Aguirre Corporation regarding the proposed development of the St. Joseph Village in the City of Coppell. The plat now includes an additional 10 feet of permanent easement for our 54-inch diameter water pipeline as requested on the current City of Coppell water tank site.. We appreciate the additional easement as it will provide a much needed buffer between the pipeline and the development and will help with fi~ture maintenance activities. However, there are still several issues mentioned in a previous letter that need to be resolved: Previous plans showed some of the building footprints on the northeast part of the property inside our easement. Permanent structures are not allowed within our easement. I have not seen the latest drawings and do not know if this has been addressed. We have a butterfly valve manhole and an air relief valve manhole located in the proposed Star Leaf Road right-of-way. These structures are not rated for traffic loading and can not be placed in a road as presently designed..The manholes also can not be moved unless the ei~e!ine is moved. The Ci~' would' consid~ ha'~ing t.he p~elL-,,o ~ved outside of the new ~l~velopment road (i.e. straightened.out), but not at'our expense: This would require our easement to be relocated. · We will need to review and approve the design detail for the stormwater pipe crossing of our pipeline. · Any air relief or blow off valve manholes adjacent to the proposed Star Leaf Road will need to be raised by the developer to the proposed grade. We will review and approve the design details. CITY OF IRVING PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT · ~,VATER LITILITIES DIVISION P.O. Box 152288, IRVING, TX 75015-2288 ' 3000 Rock ISLAND ROAD. IRVING, TX 75060 0'7'> '7'>1 '>?R1 . FAY ct7~ 7~1 Mr. Gary Sieb September 6, 2001 Page 2 Most of the issues listed above were included in a previous letter and have not been addressed at this time by Mr. Millican. We do not want to impede development, but we need our pipeline concerns addressed to reduce the risk of future problems. Please call me if you have any questions or need further clarification of our concerns. Sincerely, Todd W. Reck, P.E. Water Resources Planning Manager pc: Jack Angel, Director Public Works David Ryburn, Asst. Dir. Public Works, Water Utilities Doug Janeway, Real Estate Services Manager Ken Griffin, City of Coppell Michael Milliean, Aguirre Corporation '1' H E (2 I T Y · 0 F COPP-EiJf, AGENDA REQUEST FORM CITY COUNCIL MEETING: October 9, 2001 ITEM # __~__ ITEM CAPTION: Consider approval of the Trinity Shores, Lots 1-19, Final Plat. to allow the platting of 19 single-family lots and two common areas on approximately 7.2 acres of property located along the south side of Sandy Lake Road, west of the Trinity River. SUBMITTED BY: Gary L. Sieb TITLE: Director of Planning and Community Services STAFF COMMENTS: Date of P&Z Meeting: September 20, 2001 Decision of P&Z Commission: Approved (5-0) with Commissioners McGahey, Kittrell, McCaffrey, Clark and Stewart voting in favor. None opposed. Approval is recommended, subject to the following conditions: 1) 2) 3) Compliance with Engineering Department comments (attached). TXU easements being provided on the plat. Park fees of $1,285 per dwelling unit will be required. Staff recommends approval. DIR. INITIALS: ~ Agenda Request Form - Revised 5/00 FIN. REVIEW: CITY MANAGER REVIEW: ~TrinS~ CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT CASE: TRINITY SHORES~ LOTS 1-19~ AND TWO COMMON AREAS FINAL PLAT P & Z HEARING DATE: C.C. HEARING DATE: STAFF REP.: September 20, 2001 October 9, 2001 Marcie Diamond, Assistant Director of Planning LOCATION: SIZE OF AREA: Along the south side of Sandy Lake Road, west of the Trinity River. Approximately 7.31 acres of property, containing 19 residential lots and two common areas. CURRENT ZONING: PD- 190 (Planned Development- 190) REQUEST: Final Plat approval. APPLICANT: Owner Matthew Marchant Hobart Development, Inc. 2125 N. Josey Lane, Suite 100 Carrollton, Texas 75006 972-841-6127 FAX 972-446-1108 Engineer Jahvani Consulting Eng., Inc. 2125 N. Josey Lane, Suite 202B Carrollton, Texas 75006 972-446-0605 FAX 972-446-1108 HISTORY: The preliminary plat for this property was approved by the City Council on June 12, 2001, subject to several conditions, including Page 1 of 3 Item # 9 the release of the updated F.E.M.A. map indicating that most of this property is out of the 100-year flood plain. TRANSPORTATION: Sandy Lake Road is currently a two-lane asphalt road. On the Thoroughfare Plan, it is designated as a C4D/6. Initial improvement will be to a four-lane divided thoroughfare and could be expanded to six-lanes in the furore. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North- Undeveloped; A (Agriculture) South - Single-Family homes and golf course; SF-7, Eagle Point Village at Riverchase and Riverchase Golf Course West - Single-Family homes and undeveloped; SF-9, Riverview Estates and R (Retail) East - Bait Shop and out-buildings and Trinity River Flood Plain; R (Retail) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan shows the property as suitable for flood plain. However, per preliminary F.E.M.A. studies, all but the southwest comer of the property is out of the 100- year flood plain. DISCUSSION: This final plat is in conformance with the approved preliminary plat for this property, which indicated 19 single-family lots and two common areas within an "L" configuration extending from Sandy Lake Road. This subdivision is zoned PD-190, SF-9 and is in compliance with the SF-9 District requirements, as well as additional conditions specific to this PD. The Planned Development conditions include the screening and landscaping of the common areas, decorative metal fencing adjacent to the golf course area, solid fencing along the neighbors to the east, swing entry garages, waiver of the alley requirement and cul-de-sac length. The common areas will be owned and maintained by the Homeowners Association. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the Homeowners Association documents. One of the main technical issues with this plat was the delineation of the 100-year flood plain. The updated F.E.M.A maps were published last month, which indicate that all but a small comer of the subject property is located outside the 100-year flood plain, and is therefore developable. Page 2 of 3 The Engineering Department has several comments as they relate to final engineering and construction of this subdivision. These comments will Item# 9 not have a significant impact on the layout of the lots or the design of the plat as shown. They are attached hereto for informational purposes to the applicant. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff is recommending APPROVAL of the Final Plan for Trinity Shores, subject to: 1) Engineering Department comments 2) TXU easements being provided on the plat. 3) Park fees of $1,285 per dwelling unit. ALTERNATIVES: 1) Recommend approval of the request. 2) Recommend disapproval of the request 3) Recommend modification of the request ATTACHMENTS: 1) Engineering Comments 2) Final Plat Page 3 of 3 Item# 9 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ENGINEERING COMMENTS ITEM: Trinity Shores, Lots 1-19, Final Plat, to allow the platting of 19 single-family lots and two common areas on approximately 7.31 acres of property located along the south side of Sandy Lake Road, west of the Trinity River, at the request of Hobart Development, Inc. DRC DATE: August 30, 2001 and September 6, 2001 CONTACT: Kenneth M. Griffin, P.E., Director of Engineering (972-304-3679) COMMENT STATUS: 1. The proposed inlet to the west of your street connection to Sandy Lake Road is a low point inlet and cannot be relocated. This may affect the location of your street connection to Sandy Lake Road as it appears to have inadequate space for the street and the curb return in additional to the transition to the low point inlet. You should coordinate with the engineer for Sandy Lake Road project to relocate the inlet west. 2. The area to your east, labeled as the Harrington site, drains onto your site. You should make adequate accommodations for that drainage. This will be evaluated in greater detail during plan review process. 3. An off-site easement will be required for the continuation of your storm drain system between lots 11 and 12. 4. Some type of on-site drainage system will be required for lots 6, 7, 8, 9 and potentially 10 and 11 to handle the on-site water. While you are showing some systems to accommodate the drainage, your design will be reviewed in detail during plan review. Some accommodation of drainage will be needed for lots 3-6, Block A. ~-~l~Z~~ AGENDA REQUEST FORM CITY COUNCIL MEETING: October 9, 2001 ITEM # ITEM CAPTION: Consider appointment of two members to the Keep Coppell Beautiful Committee. SUBMITTED BY: Libby Ball TITLE: City Secretary STAFF COMMENTS: BUDGET AMT $ Fn~cm~ CO~m~N~S:~\~ AMT EST $ DIR. INITIALS: Agenda Request Form- Revised 5/00 FIN. REVIEW: ~ +X-BID $ '~ CITY MANAGER REVIEW: Document Name: %kcbappt. dac ~ ~-~~~~~ AGENDA REQUEST FORM CITY COUNCIL MEETING: October 9, 2001 ITEM # __~~ CITY MANAGER'S REPORT Ao Riverchase walkway. Future work sessions. CITY MANAGER'S REVIEW: FUTURE WORK SESSIONS October 23, 2001 1. Review City Emergency Management Plan November 13, 2001 1. Update Council Goals 2. Update City Entrance Monuments December 11, 2001 1. Update on City Road Construction Projects CITY COUNCIL MEETING: October 9, 2001 ITEM MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS B. C. D. E. Report by Mayor Sheehan regarding Dallas Regional Mobility Coalition. Report by Mayor Sheehan regarding Metroplex Mayors. Report by Coun¢ilmember Stover regarding CMS North Student Council. Report by Councilmember Raines regarding YMCA. Report by Councilmember Garcia regarding the Senior Adult Services Challenge Golf Tournament. Mayor's CITY MANAGER'S REVIEW: