Loading...
Minyards Freeport Xing-CS070710r JONES & C A RT E R,iNC. ' ~~ ENGINEERS•RLANNERS•SURVEYJRS July lo, 2007 Ms. Marcie Diamond City of Coppell 255 Parkway Boulevard Coppel, TX 75019 Re: Minyard Addition Replat and Rezoning Dear Ms. Diamond: 3030 LBJ Freeway, Suite 910 TEL 972 488 3880 Dallas, Texas 75234-7747 FAX 972 488 3882 AusnN DALLFS HOUSTON THE WOODLANDS 3 .c ~ ~ a ~ '.,~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ `~ . ~ ,` ~ rte ~ ) ' `'' Revised ~~ °,; L:,. 'M' P b Z o-,.1 !.~` We received the City of Coppell DRC comments regarding the referenced project and have made the appropriate revisions and corrections. The following are our responses to the comments made on the replat, site plan, landscape plan and preliminary engineering exhibits: Re-Zoning PU Building Inspection 1. Type II-B construction housing a S-1 occupancy has a base area of 17,500 s.f. By not maintaining 60 foot yards, buildings areas will NOT be unlimited. - We revised the layout to provide 60 foot yards everytti~here. 2. Development on Lot 2 does not appear to be able to be built as drawn unless buildings built with a higher level of fire resistiveness than II-B type of constriction. - We revised the layout to provide 60 foot yards everywhere. Electric 1. Contact Jeff Curry at 972-888-1330 to discus electric service requirements. - ire have contacted Jeff Curry and will work with his department to determine the scope of the electrical system. Engineering 1. Show fire hydrants, FDC, and valve locations. - We now indicate locations for valves, FH's and fire deparbnent connections. 2. Loop the water line. - We have looped the waterline back to the existing onsite system near the south end of the development. We understand that the system may have to change in the final design to meet the City's requirements. 3. Extend sanitary sewer service to Building "D". We now show a sere service connecting to Building `D ". 4. Use stamped concrete at entrances. - We now show to use stamped concrete at all entrances to be constructed or reconstructed. 5. 5. The drainage will be evaluated further during Plan Review. - We understand that all utilities and drainage wt~ll need to be approved in the final Plan Review process. 6. The 6" domestic water meter should be in a vault and 20' x 20' utility easement. - We added an easement to be around the requested vault. 7. The detention pond calculations need to be provided. -The detention pond calculations are now provided on the Preliminary Drainage Plan. Smart Engineering. Smart Solutions.'"" www.jonescarter.com Ir JONES & C A R T E R,.N~. J ~ EPJ6INEERS•PLANNERS•SURVEYORS Fire Administration 1. Fire hydrants required at 300' intervals along fire lanes. -Fire hydrants were added along fire lanes to have 300 foot rnaximum spacing. 2. Show FDC (fire department connection) locations. FDC's must be within 50' of a fire hydrant and on the same side of the fire lane. - FDC's were added to each new building and fire hydrants moved or added to be within SO feet of the FDC. 3. Provide water as-bunts for existing property for reference. Proposed buildings should not use the existing fire pumps. - We are providing the water as-bunts under a separate cover to Tim Oates. We will work with his department and the engineering staff to provide a design to meet their requests. Planning Department A.Rectify ALL the discrepancies between the Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Plat, including, but not limited to location of lot lines, driveways, existing and proposed improvements, parking areas, lot numbers, etc. - We have coordinated the plans of each of the design tearn mid now all show common layouts, lot lines, etc. B. Are any monument signs proposed for any of the lots? If so, provide location, design, etc. - We now show monument signs at three locations o~T the Site Plan. Site Plan 1. Rectify the discrepancies within this sheet including lot numbers, etc. -This was done. 2. Lot 1 R: a. Add individual square footages of buildings o be retained within this lot, designating office vs. warehouse uses and required parking, and clearly note building(s) to be removed. We added the individual square footages and indicate the building to be removed with a cross hatch pattern. b. Dimension existing/proposed building setback from Bethel Road. -This was done. c. Is a new driveway intended to intersect with Bethel Road? Does not show on Landscape Plan. -There are to be 2 new driveways onto Bethel Road. All exhibits reflect this now. d. Southeast corner of tract - rectify the discrepancies in location and configuration of parking. - 'Phis was done. e. All new parking must comply with the landscape ordinance, including parking lot islands. -This wus done. Parking islands were added to have no more than 1 S consecutive parking spaces in new parking areas. f. Include parking counts on the site plan. -Parking counts now are displayed on the plan and in the summary teat. g. Is the future expansion to be included on this plan? Is there sufficient parking and landscaping to accommodate it? -The expansion is now indicated. There is enough parking provided to accommodate it. 3. Lot 2R: a. Add square footage of Buildings A, B, and C on the site plan and in the tabulations with % of office vs. warehouse. -The individual square footages of each building was added including the breakdown of the type of use. b. Need to screen Building A's loading area from Bethel Road. - A screening wall was added to screen Building A's loading area as reyuested. c. Is the parking to the south of Building B a single or double row? There is both landscaping parking shown. It is a double rotiv of parking- the landscaping patterning was removed from the Landscape Plan. r' JONES & C A R T E R, . N ~. .~ ENGINEERS•PLANNERS•SURVEVORS Keplat Electric Engineering d. Is Building C intended to be rail served. Elevations do not indicate that. If not, does this rail line need to be abandoned? - We intend to make rail service available for Building C for now. The rails are to remain. e. Where is the lot line to the east and north of Building C. -This discrepancy was rectified. f. A parking island is required every 15 (not 16) spaces. The maximum spacing is now 15 spaces. g. Driveway to Bethel Road located as shown on the plat or the site plan? To be as shown on the plat. This has been rectified on all exhibits. h. Verify parking count. -The parking count was verified and updated 4. Lot 3R: a. Is "in-fill" parking proposed north of the building? Access must be provided from the existing to the proposed parking areas. -There is to be NO "in-fi.ll parking north of the building. h. Firelane must be provided to serve this building. - A frrelane now serves this building. 5. Lot 4R: a. Indicate the buildings/improvements to be retained different from those to be removed. -Cross hatching has heen added to delineate between improvements being removed and those that are staying. b. Clearly indicate the Fire Lanes. - The fire lanes are now shaded for clarification. Contact Jeff Curry at 972-888-1330 to discus electric service requirements. - We have contacted Jeff Curry and will work with his deparhnent to determine the scope of the electrical system 2. If storm drain system is private, no drainage easement is required. -Storm sewers are to be private-therefore easements were removed. 3. Provide 20' x 20' utility easement for 6" domestic water on the north side. -This was added. 4. A property owner's association document is needed for maintenance of water, sanitary sewer and drainage. This document will be provided in the nearfutur-e. Fire Adminisn-ation Planning 1. First driveway of Bethel, west of Freeport needs to be reconfigured. The "S" is too tight for fire apparatus and vehicles that will service the property. - We have designed that driveway.for WB-50 access. We will provide exhibits with turning templates to Tirn Oates under separate cover. 2. Remove existing improvements from replat. -Existing improvements were removed from the replat. 3. Correct the numbering of the lots. All lot numbering is now consistent. 4. Indicate all required fire lanes (and spell fire lane correctly) -All required fire lanes are now shown with the correct spelling. S. Do the existing railway easements need to be abandoned? - No, they have been abandoned already. The rails on the site ai~~e private. r JONES & C A R T E R ~N~ ~ ENGINEERS•PLANNERS•SURVFVORS 6. In the title block, include "Being a Replat of Lots 1 and 2 of the Minyard Addition" - This was added to the title block of the replat. 7. Correct the name of the property owner in the Owner's Certificate. -The otil~ners nanze was corrected and is consistent throughout. 8. Correct the name of the plat in the City Secretary sil*~lature plat. TI2is was done. 9. Need to add franchise utility signature blocks as follows: .... -This franchise utility signatw~e block was added. 10. Add the Flood Plain Administrator's signature block as follows:.... -The Flood Plain Administrator's signature block was added. We've included twelve (12) full size sets of replats, site plans and landscape plans as well as two sets of the preliminary engineering exhibits, a CD of PDF files Please call or email me if you have any questions or additional comments. Sincerely, Steve B. Heniford, P.E. /~ Project Manager SBH/dsa P:~PROIECTS\D224 KTR CapitaP.002 \General\Letters\plan response 07-10-07.doc Enclosures