Creekview Addn PD-CS 9111140_1 TY i:
TO: Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning and Community Services
FROM: M. Shohre Daneshmand, Acting City Engineer
O R—
RE: Floodplain Development Activities/
SUBJECT: Proposed Wooden Deck
166 Bethel Road, Lot 5, Blk 'A' - Creekview Addition
150 Bethel Road; Lot 1, Blk 'A' - Creekview Addition
DATE: November 14, 1991
As per your request, I provide my general comments listed below, followed
by my recommendation on the above proposed activities.
General Comments for Any Type of Work in Floodplain Areas:
As per the Floodplain Ordinance #87390, Article 5, Page 28,
"All drawings . . . for work within floodplain management area
shall be certified by a registered engineer, architect or
surveyor ."
A floodplain development application must be filled out and be
submitted to engineering for evaluation and consideration of
approval. (See attached)
The City be furnished with a "Hold Harmless" letter to
indemnify and hold the City harmless from any damages resulting
from such activity. -. i
Encroachments are prohib" d withir�designated floodways,
including fill, unless Certified d technical data shows no
rise in 100 -year floodwater elevat-i�
Specific Comments:
The document provided to staff for review is insufficient.
The proposed deck must be above 100 -year water surface
elevation. The document submitted does not provide a sideview
of the deck to assist staff in such elevation determination.
There shall be no skirting and no enclosure, along sides of the
deck.
The area under the deck shall not be used as a storage space.
The proposed _mole____ least _ten___�1Q �_. -_feet apart, and
adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral
movement of the structure.
Memo to Gary L. Sieb
November 14, 1991
Page 2
It is important to note that Grapevine Creek adjacent to above
lots is identified as a critically eroded area. (See attached
map) Any development activities along this portion of the
Grapevine Creek is discouraged until such time that corrective
measures are taken to minimize erosion.
The foundations of the proposed pole be constructed properly
and deep enough in case of having unstable soil. Zile
In conclusion, staff has no objection to the proposed deck at 166 Bethel
Road, as long as above related comments are addressed accordingly. Please
note that the wooden deck in the back of 150 Bethel Road has already been
substantially constructed, and the provided document (blue print) for this
site was not sufficient for staff's evaluation. However, if our comments
made earlier are addressed, we have no objection to said deck at 150
Bethel Road.
MSD /bd
cc: Dales Jackson, Building Official
FLOODI
MATCH SHEET 14
Ai
Ohl- cl
I.: Ohl
W Z
iG
..T E S I C
ES N LV4
WITH FULLY DEVELOPED
'NATOP�HEQ AND EW --
CHANNLL..FLG0PLA::l AND
mmm
c
l
N A
E
0 300 600
GE
SCALE N FEET
m
al
cr
i N = ? ` 4
rn o \Q
F
'I
N.
o RETAIL
WILLIAM G. THOMPSON
S
�,--
,� � N
T- 238.064 L R"860.
.r.1� 464 48 00
cv �►
- X
\ x!29 4 6
z I T =207.1 33 L_0
7 90 404 POINT OF 1
U' BEGIN lo' UTILITY as
�, BEGINN NG EsMr
WILLIAM C. THOMPSON
L(
RETAIL
R_-42
3 1 -+18.6
25
SEW R E
r
3-57-29 E
13.90 _
c,
,<,
4
2 -1 C_
�� �'i,
.Db
;- 4
MIN. F
4874
�n
o g 120.00
(V� 7
°C o I E
io �}lO'TU
1 ZO.0
�
I Z
m
n
I
to
Z� n
U),
IZ
m
�
I
m
.
I
I
I
7-
I
�1 �
WILLIAM C. THOMPSON
L(
RETAIL
R_-42
3 1 -+18.6
25
SEW R E
r
3-57-29 E
13.90 _
c,
,<,
4
2 -1 C_
�� �'i,
.Db
;- 4
MIN. F
4874
�n
o g 120.00
(V� 7
°C o I E
io �}lO'TU
1 ZO.0
- -weR 1
ESM
SII -14_
9 6 N 88 -39 -27
E_ /
(5 ABSTRACT 301 �
:WAR A._ ROW SURVE T, I
I6 8 WI L VEY -57 -29 E 1; °
a o 1 3.90
0 N 89 -34 -47 813.70 }, 14 - A"
•�
• a R
b •j � ,� M M. F F
� rd 13 " aes 6
d•�N S WILL F •
,� c LIA K MIN. F
> ° ''a -Q THOMP y�,1- CR + 4 95.7 0 t v.9
F F �, d �4 I EN T w..s a im <r G •
487, 5 ►�s' r 'yF �. � /J' F 2 F 5 I► � ,r''
IMF' a
�
d — y.
11 t Mi + ps +
4' a i F / ? '4r g� 10 MIN F
MIN. FF • W • 4g6 .y
MIN FF o t 8 s MS.B `• �•s
� b 496.9
+ 4 ,a s 6L CK A 0 .
f\ MIN
�, �$�•9� �\rt; M1N FF s FF +7tJM wA '•. `. �Ir 'i\
4 874 S �pP t 37 1
MIN FF 6 MIN FF • st'� �• MIN. F F
49 0.5 MIN FF Y.7 +Nt tY 4 46.5
M
( , p rJ\ •�M x90.7 • t Jt t 38 1 1 3 E
71 ~ 'b• �� ✓ '4 — e. S +lr �i . MIN FF
r r )1:'1I 4lZN FF. '1% 66 : L IP ~• ♦` O.a - 44& 1 6 io ii �iie�oo + +a.00 1 a • : +M - r � i +_+ yt 4
•, a/ 0 8 `{ t'Q sat CV2 0 �� s w MM FF + i. ' C
• q \ `
+ 75
$ � o S ��7y /s• '.', - _ 7 e o � Wier +t + `� A . 39 ' T#
. 0. N•, o ' o ! 1 Y e T. ,` +� ts,cls • l s (N.t. 4�� IN 3F F
\ ti4 2 & 00 Al . r a +�' s w ' 7 uc 40 r ,toss o,
.3 3 1 " IS a rs. was r + .. s N-47 - 47 [ Y M Us w� -iM.;
laooe a ,27.77 Y �
u 1Q N p, 1� 71
34
io A' ` ''•I e•, _ : $ 14 +• MIN. FF
2 t
U E C Y d i -o = _ r' 22 v, CV. sA w» ♦ �b • � M` . F F. be. 0 1?
$ 4,•ru [ c Y ni 44.7+ bons 27" �•1 ♦ • �p M ^ 41 M. +�WMI
62 x �� n -n -» 4- w [� ti L s +ash is t N. F
w -uo.ov - ns Ma_ a[ _ 19 33
21 ° 20 e'�� 13 +a MIN. f �?
s g L = • ♦ .M� 42 N9.7 C �s
2 9 61 �! - M ,e COCK C +7).11 wµ 7 •7 +'pm b _ t37 N ��
Nvsr- oo b
o.4p_at 4 � 10'>'; 4 ,r , • • tO y'w " 7e .eco t r'•°° s \1 12 J • s 7s .p• x'3 I• IV 3:
:930 t+.12 i� s.ss s 1 1 D
Y
IN FF — u � I • �1 M = 10 Q r•' s
\1 1 93.4 60 Y F +125 M�� • L L ,{ C 9 111" t +a .+t �. 43 z Y
t ,,.�` Ie• os1+• [wt s +.71 4 f Z}��i +
7
MIN aa4� y $ __ - • 6 G - r 7eoo + t+ y�.'! f W •
F
r 5 te' /4� �j
4940 ^ - V C aA r T » +D+ s+ t `1 "t 45 BLVI, •J
N r4 r r 'L 1''. up r 7'3.7 7„t+ 1 �1 C. `'''► �`'�, ` `!
MIN t•I-Jial `�'V 4' �'� 5 7Y•7- 7y.f 48 + ./�
495 3 +po 75 Yt f \ : 47 Q —
I. 'Do $
� s �\ 48 er g, M �I� � 7 '� • i
)
10211N
'RO,bert&m Toofs and Spas
I I'T
COOL MM PLAN
Q'I
--------------------
'RO,bert&m Toofs and Spas
I I'T
COOL MM PLAN
Q'I
( PL"
4LI va
Poor"
16 ft0TV; DopOw ammmumd 2" below Wp of be&"
1 -1 iii! Poo-" *at* boa "WAO be 4' from 4 0 -m
SPECIAL NOT
) L
POOL TO BE ENCLOSED WITH FFNCf
MEETING CITY COOS By OWNER. ALL
GATES TO St SELF CLOSING AND SELF
LATCHING BY OWNER
MAP 100011 40
kPSGAL 005CRWrION
NLK. NU
LOT NO
TRACT NO
Nil"
"PWIT (W1
A CUSTOM S
HAVE The BRAD
boom" 150 BET
ci rf - CQPPLL
SURVEY PLAT.
TO THE LIENHOLDERS AND /OR THE OWNERS AND /OR PURCHASERS OF THE PREMISES
SURVEYED AND TO '•ICOR TITLE COMPANY:
"phis is to certir " that I have made a carefui and accurate survey of the
Property located at 166 Bethel Road in the City of Coppell, Dallas
County, Texas, described as follows:
BEING LOT 5, in BLOCK A, of CREEK VIEW ADDITION, an Addition to th;� City
of Coppell, Dallas County, Texas, according to the Plat thereof recorded
in Volume 88116, Page 3069, Plat Records of Dallas County, Texas.
5d 6 1 1
NT � /� - .'•PC'k'. iyc:r�vOAk�' n� T.y.E /DD 1 \-- FsLQ�WA �:u-". � �� ..
g .3
d
d
�rl �• �
LOT 4 M 1 o LOT r
ro 2.4 r-
28 I
�1 �