Loading...
Coppell CC 1L3-CS101021 CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT CASE NO.: PD- 247 -LI, Coppell Commerce Center Addition, Lot 3, Block 4 P &Z HEARING DATE: October 21, 2010 C.C. HEARING DATE: November 9, 2010 STAFF REP.: Matt S. Steer, City Planner LOCATION: Southwest corner of South Coppell Road and Burns Street (815 South Coppell Road) SIZE OF AREA: 4.04 acres of property CURRENT ZONING: LI (Light Industrial) REQUEST: A zoning change to PD- 247 -LI (Planned Development- 247 -Light Industrial) to allow site and building modifications. APPLICANT: Owner: Architect: Dan Wheeler Mark Pross, CRP Holdings B, L.P. Pross Design Group, Inc. Two International PI, 25 Floor 5310 Harvest Hill #180 Boston, Massachusetts 02110 Dallas, Texas 75230 Email: dwheelercCr�colonyinc.com Email: mpross(cr�pdgarch.net Phone: (617) 235 -6342 Phone: (972) 759 -1400 Fax: (617) 235 -6399 Fax: (972) 759 -1405 HISTORY: The existing office /warehouse was constructed in 1975 prior to the adoption of the current Zoning Ordinance which has more stringent requirements than the one in effect at that time. In 1993, a minor plat was submitted for the subject lot, but was later withdrawn and never acted on by the Planning Commission. It was determined at that time the proposed 19,000- square -foot expansion to the warehouse facility would not constitute the need ITEM # 4 Page 1 of 4 for a plat. Later that year an application was filed for a 24,000 - square -foot addition and subsequently constructed. A minor plat/replat was eventually approved in 1999 for the subject property and the adjacent lot to the west (Lot 2) in order to adjust the common property line 33 feet to the west. TRANSPORTATION: Burns Street is a two -lane undivided roadway within 60 feet of right -of -way. South Coppell Road is a recently improved two -lane undivided collector with angled on- street parking within a 90 -foot right -of -way. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North - Old Town Addition, vacant; H (Historic) South — DART R.O.W. & Coppell Fire Administration; LI (Light Industrial) East — Villages of Old Coppell, vacant & Coppell Service Center; LI (Light Industrial) West — Office /warehouse; LI (Light Industrial) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan of May 1996, as amended, shows the property as suitable for light industrial /showroom uses. DISCUSSION: As mentioned in the HISTORY section, this office /warehouse was constructed in 1975 prior to the adoption of the current Zoning Ordinance which has more stringent requirements than the one in effect at that time. In 1993, a minor plat was submitted for the subject lot, but was later withdrawn and never acted on by the Planning Commission. It was determined at that time the proposed 19,000- square -foot expansion to the warehouse facility would not constitute the need for a plat. Later that year an application was filed for a 24,000- square -foot addition and subsequently constructed. A minor plat/replat was eventually approved in 1999 for the subject property and the adjacent lot to the west (Lot 2) in order to adjust the common property line 33 feet to the west. Because this building /site predates the current Zoning Ordinance, there are several nonconforming issues that would not be permitted within the development parameters of today. Staff has advised the applicant since mid -July that the site is nonconforming and the majority of the proposed changes could simply not be supported by staff. Originally, the proposal was to ITEM # 4 Page 2 of 4 remove the landscape island and three Live Oak trees (ten - caliper inch, 19- caliper inch & 21- caliper inch) that separated the two drives on the south side of the Burns Street right -of -way. Also proposed was the addition of four dock doors adjacent to Burns and replacement of the declining Photenia hedge on the northeast corner with Eastern Red Cedars. Although staff was in favor of the landscape change, staff could not support the proposal to eliminate the spacing between drives and removal of the three large Live Oaks. The Subdivision Ordinance requires a minimum 90 -foot spacing between drives and 40 -foot maximum width for industrial drives. The proposal would have increased the drive width to 212 feet which would well exceed the maximum allowable width and would have eliminated the required separation. The four new dock doors would have added to the unsightly appearance of the truck court abutting Burns and also could not be supported. Subsequently, the applicant hired an Architect and Landscape Architect to work with staff and propose additional changes to the site to make the request more appealing. Since the architect became involved, staffs concerns related to the driveway spacing and drive width were somewhat addressed and the proposal included facade updates to the mid -70's style exposed aggregate warehouse. At the northeast corner of the building, the facade is proposed to be covered with EIFS and manufactured stone, the existing canopies are proposed to be updated and painted, and the tilt wall banding and dock doors are also proposed to be painted. The remainder of the building is proposed to remain unpainted exposed aggregate panels. The parking area is to be restriped and the existing fire lane is proposed to be reconfigured to accommodate the new drive and the increased width of the island on the south side of Burns. The total number of parking spaces is inadequate. The required parking is calculated at one parking space per 300 square feet of office space and one parking space per 1,000 square feet of warehouse space. Ninety -two spaces are required, sixty -six are provided. Also proposed to be updated is the landscaping. To summarize, the landscape modifications proposed are the addition of 18 overstory trees (five of which are five - caliper -inch Live Oaks), 333 shrubs, 435 ground cover plants and approximately 1,980 square feet of added landscape area. The Landscape Plan also shows two Live Oaks to be removed (16- caliper -inch & 18- caliper- inch). Although the additional landscaping is considered an improvement to the site, staff believes that this is still insignificant ITEM # 4 Page 3 of 4 compared with the current requirements of today. As shown on the proposed landscape plan, a total of 63 overstory trees are required, they are providing 29 trees onsite; 7,348 square feet of landscaping is required within the parking area and they are providing 1,406 square feet; 22,895 square feet of landscape area is required for the perimeter and they are providing 16,467 square feet; 14,608 square feet of nonvehicular open space (at least 7,304 front yard) and none is provided. If approved, the requested Planned Development would essentially legalize the nonconfoming items (insufficient parking, dock doors abutting Burns and Coppell Road, insufficient landscape area and trees, and the drive approach greater than 40 feet on South Coppell Road). Staff has a great deal of concern over legalizing this particular site with the submitted plan. Staff believes the proposed screening of the truck court area is insufficient within the LI Zoning District, not to mention where this property lies in relation to the recently approved Old Town Addition plat across Burns Street and the approved Villages of Old Coppeil across South Coppell Road. The deficiency of landscape area on site could be better addressed with removal of pavement and installation of landscaping. Staff also believes the building could be better updated and has advised the applicant to look at other office /warehouses in the district for ideas. All and all, staff is recommending denial of the proposal as submitted. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff is recommending DENIAL of PD- 247 -LI, Coppell Commerce Center, Lot 3, Block 4 because the Planned Development would legalize the site as proposed and there would be no incentive to bring the site up to Coppell's current development standards at a later date. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Recommend approval of the request 2. Recommend disapproval of the request 3. Recommend modification of the request 4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date ATTACHMENTS: 1. Site Plan 2. Tree Survey 3. Landscape Plan 4. Elevations ITEM # 4 Page 4 of 4