ST0301A-SP101115
Page 1 of 3
Keith Marvin - FW: Bethel Rd - Metal Beam Guard Rail Submittal
From: "Dean Dumke" <deand@JRJPaving.com>
To: "Caleb Thornhill" <bct@freese.com>, "Keith Marvin" <kmarvin@coppelltx.gov>
Date: 11/19/2010 12:08 PM
Subject: FW: Bethel Rd - Metal Beam Guard Rail Submittal
CC: "Robert Galler" <jaygaller@sbcglobal.net>
Attachments: 111910 TL2 Submittal Clarification.pdf
Caleb,
Per our discussion and your clarification to the below listed items 1-4, I will have my subcontractor install the
MBGR as per the TL2 detail that I have circled and attached to this email for items listed below as Item 1 & 4.
The others will be installed as noted below for Items 2 & 3. I am also including this email to my guard rail
personnel so that we all have the same information.
Thank you,
Dean Dumke
Sr Project Manager
#469-223-7879
JRJ PAVING, L. P.
_______________________
From: Dean Dumke
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 10:44 AM
To: 'Caleb Thornhill'
Cc: Keith Marvin; Marty Murphy; Kim Entrekin; CPL03243
Subject: RE: Bethel Rd - Metal Beam Guard Rail Submittal
Caleb,
I with all of the areas causing some difficulty, and in regards to pricing this out, I need to know what the
distances from the bridge and s retaining wall that need to be installed at each location before TAS is installed.
Need this ASAP. Guard Rail being installed on Monday.
Dean
From: Caleb Thornhill [mailto:bct@freese.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 12:01 PM
To: Dean Dumke
Cc: Keith Marvin; Marty Murphy; Kim Entrekin; CPL03243
Subject: RE: Bethel Rd - Metal Beam Guard Rail Submittal
Dean,
Here is FNI’s recommendations:
file://C:\Documents and Settings\radloo\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4CE668A1City_...1/28/2011
Page 2 of 3
1)N/E side –TL2 and Terminal Anchor Section (TAS). It’s also recommended for a delineator (TxDOT item
658-2255 INSTL DEL ASSM (D-DW) SZ 2 (WC) GND)
2)S/E side – Terminal Anchor Section (TAS) only
3)N/W side – Terminal Anchor Section (TAS) only
4)S/W side - TL2 and Terminal Anchor Section (TAS). It’s also recommended for a delineator (TxDOT item
658-2255 INSTL DEL ASSM (D-DW) SZ 2 (WC) GND)
Please annotate these changes in the red lines. Any cost implications will need to be discussed directly with the
city.
Call me with any questions.
B. Caleb Thornhill, P.E.
Freese & Nichols, Inc.
214-217-2282
From: Dean Dumke [mailto:deand@JRJPaving.com]
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 2:01 PM
To: Keith Marvin; Caleb Thornhill
Cc: Kim Entrekin; Marty Murphy
Subject: Bethel Rd - Metel Beam Guard Rail Submittal
Keith,
Attached are the TXDOT specifications for the guard rail specified for this project. Is it required to have the
specified guard rail on all four (4) corners of the bridge or on the opposite end to the bridge, in the direction of
traffic flow would a certain distance with a turn-down be sufficient. Also, there are several items that seem to
come into conflict at the designated areas and are noted as follows:
1) N/E side: 11' from the end point is a manhole that will be covered. 39' away is a high
voltage box.
2) S/E side: 28' from end point is a utility pole.
3) N/W side: 44' from the end point is an electrical box.
4) S/W side: 3' from the end point is a fire hydrant.
Some, if not all of the issues will have to be addressed prior to installation and will need a revised sheet if the
distances change from what is on the current plan.
Also, we will be pouring the end columns either Thursday or Friday this week and would like to see if the METAL
BEAM GUARD FENCE TRANSITION (TL2) is the correct connection you want at the bridge so that the bolt
pattern can be accounted for with the pour instead of having to core the holes at a later date. If you can review
and get me the “okay to proceed” on this one item, I can have my guard rail installer get with North Texas Bridge,
ASAP, in regards to the 4 locations and a template for the bolt pattern.
Thank you,
Dean Dumke
Sr Project Manager
#469-223-7879
JRJ PAVING, L. P.
_______________________
file://C:\Documents and Settings\radloo\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4CE668A1City_...1/28/2011
Page 1 of 3
Keith Marvin - RE: Bethel Rd - Metal Beam Guard Rail Submittal
From: Caleb Thornhill <bct@freese.com>
To: Dean Dumke <deand@JRJPaving.com>
Date: 11/19/2010 11:03 AM
Subject: RE: Bethel Rd - Metal Beam Guard Rail Submittal
CC:Keith Marvin <kmarvin@coppelltx.gov>, Marty Murphy <Martym@JRJPaving.com>, Kim
Entrekin <Kime@JRJPaving.com>, CPL03243 <CPL03243@freese.com>
Dean,
I’m having a little trouble understanding your email. The TL2 and TAS are standard lengths. They will connect to
the bridge railing and traffic railing. The object markers should be installed where the TAS terminates. I’m
unclear on what distances you need from the bridge and retaining wall.
Call me when you get a chance to discuss.
B. Caleb Thornhill, P.E.
Freese & Nichols, Inc.
214-217-2282
From: Dean Dumke [mailto:deand@JRJPaving.com]
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 10:44 AM
To: Caleb Thornhill
Cc: Keith Marvin; Marty Murphy; Kim Entrekin; CPL03243
Subject: RE: Bethel Rd - Metal Beam Guard Rail Submittal
Caleb,
I with all of the areas causing some difficulty, and in regards to pricing this out, I need to know what the
distances from the bridge and s retaining wall that need to be installed at each location before TAS is installed.
Need this ASAP. Guard Rail being installed on Monday.
Dean
From: Caleb Thornhill [mailto:bct@freese.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 12:01 PM
To: Dean Dumke
Cc: Keith Marvin; Marty Murphy; Kim Entrekin; CPL03243
Subject: RE: Bethel Rd - Metal Beam Guard Rail Submittal
Dean,
Here is FNI’s recommendations:
1)N/E side –TL2 and Terminal Anchor Section (TAS). It’s also recommended for a delineator (TxDOT item
658-2255 INSTL DEL ASSM (D-DW) SZ 2 (WC) GND)
file://C:\Documents and Settings\radloo\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4CE65977City_...1/28/2011
Page 2 of 3
2)S/E side – Terminal Anchor Section (TAS) only
3)N/W side – Terminal Anchor Section (TAS) only
4)S/W side - TL2 and Terminal Anchor Section (TAS). It’s also recommended for a delineator (TxDOT item
658-2255 INSTL DEL ASSM (D-DW) SZ 2 (WC) GND)
Please annotate these changes in the red lines. Any cost implications will need to be discussed directly with the
city.
Call me with any questions.
B. Caleb Thornhill, P.E.
Freese & Nichols, Inc.
214-217-2282
From: Dean Dumke [mailto:deand@JRJPaving.com]
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 2:01 PM
To: Keith Marvin; Caleb Thornhill
Cc: Kim Entrekin; Marty Murphy
Subject: Bethel Rd - Metel Beam Guard Rail Submittal
Keith,
Attached are the TXDOT specifications for the guard rail specified for this project. Is it required to have the
specified guard rail on all four (4) corners of the bridge or on the opposite end to the bridge, in the direction of
traffic flow would a certain distance with a turn-down be sufficient. Also, there are several items that seem to
come into conflict at the designated areas and are noted as follows:
1) N/E side: 11' from the end point is a manhole that will be covered. 39' away is a high
voltage box.
2) S/E side: 28' from end point is a utility pole.
3) N/W side: 44' from the end point is an electrical box.
4) S/W side: 3' from the end point is a fire hydrant.
Some, if not all of the issues will have to be addressed prior to installation and will need a revised sheet if the
distances change from what is on the current plan.
Also, we will be pouring the end columns either Thursday or Friday this week and would like to see if the METAL
BEAM GUARD FENCE TRANSITION (TL2) is the correct connection you want at the bridge so that the bolt
pattern can be accounted for with the pour instead of having to core the holes at a later date. If you can review
and get me the “okay to proceed” on this one item, I can have my guard rail installer get with North Texas Bridge,
ASAP, in regards to the 4 locations and a template for the bolt pattern.
Thank you,
Dean Dumke
Sr Project Manager
#469-223-7879
JRJ PAVING, L. P.
_______________________
Please consider the environment before printing this message.
file://C:\Documents and Settings\radloo\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4CE65977City_...1/28/2011
Page 1 of 2
Keith Marvin - RE: Bethel Rd - Metal Beam Guard Rail Submittal
From: Caleb Thornhill <bct@freese.com>
To: Dean Dumke <deand@JRJPaving.com>
Date: 11/16/2010 12:05 PM
Subject: RE: Bethel Rd - Metal Beam Guard Rail Submittal
CC:Keith Marvin <kmarvin@coppelltx.gov>, Marty Murphy <Martym@JRJPaving.com>, Kim
Entrekin <Kime@JRJPaving.com>, CPL03243 <CPL03243@freese.com>
Dean,
Here is FNI’s recommendations:
1)N/E side –TL2 and Terminal Anchor Section (TAS). It’s also recommended for a delineator (TxDOT item
658-2255 INSTL DEL ASSM (D-DW) SZ 2 (WC) GND)
2)S/E side – Terminal Anchor Section (TAS) only
3)N/W side – Terminal Anchor Section (TAS) only
4)S/W side - TL2 and Terminal Anchor Section (TAS). It’s also recommended for a delineator (TxDOT item
658-2255 INSTL DEL ASSM (D-DW) SZ 2 (WC) GND)
Please annotate these changes in the red lines. Any cost implications will need to be discussed directly with the
city.
Call me with any questions.
B. Caleb Thornhill, P.E.
Freese & Nichols, Inc.
214-217-2282
From: Dean Dumke [mailto:deand@JRJPaving.com]
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 2:01 PM
To: Keith Marvin; Caleb Thornhill
Cc: Kim Entrekin; Marty Murphy
Subject: Bethel Rd - Metel Beam Guard Rail Submittal
Keith,
Attached are the TXDOT specifications for the guard rail specified for this project. Is it required to have the
specified guard rail on all four (4) corners of the bridge or on the opposite end to the bridge, in the direction of
traffic flow would a certain distance with a turn-down be sufficient. Also, there are several items that seem to
come into conflict at the designated areas and are noted as follows:
1) N/E side: 11' from the end point is a manhole that will be covered. 39' away is a high
voltage box.
2) S/E side: 28' from end point is a utility pole.
3) N/W side: 44' from the end point is an electrical box.
4) S/W side: 3' from the end point is a fire hydrant.
Some, if not all of the issues will have to be addressed prior to installation and will need a revised sheet if the
distances change from what is on the current plan.
file://C:\Documents and Settings\radloo\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4CE27378City_...1/28/2011
Page 2 of 2
Also, we will be pouring the end columns either Thursday or Friday this week and would like to see if the METAL
BEAM GUARD FENCE TRANSITION (TL2) is the correct connection you want at the bridge so that the bolt
pattern can be accounted for with the pour instead of having to core the holes at a later date. If you can review
and get me the “okay to proceed” on this one item, I can have my guard rail installer get with North Texas Bridge,
ASAP, in regards to the 4 locations and a template for the bolt pattern.
Thank you,
Dean Dumke
Sr Project Manager
#469-223-7879
JRJ PAVING, L. P.
_______________________
Please consider the environment before printing this message.
This electronic mail message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This message, together with any attachment,
may contain the sender's organization's confidential and privileged information. The recipient is hereby notified to treat the information as confidential
and privileged and to not disclose or use the information except as authorized by sender's organization. Any unauthorized review, printing, retention,
copying, disclosure, distribution, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this message in error, please immediately contact the sender by reply email and
delete all copies of the material from any computer. Thank you for your cooperation.
file://C:\Documents and Settings\radloo\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4CE27378City_...1/28/2011
Page 1 of 1
Keith Marvin - Bethel Rd - Metel Beam Guard Rail Submittal
From: "Dean Dumke" <deand@JRJPaving.com>
To: "Keith Marvin" <kmarvin@coppelltx.gov>, "Caleb Thornhill" <bct@freese.com>
Date: 11/15/2010 1:59 PM
Subject: Bethel Rd - Metel Beam Guard Rail Submittal
CC:"Kim Entrekin" <Kime@JRJPaving.com>, "Marty Murphy"
<Martym@JRJPaving.com>
Attachments: 111510 Grard Rail Submittals.pdf
Keith,
Attached are the TXDOT specifications for the guard rail specified for this project. Is it required to have the
specified guard rail on all four (4) corners of the bridge or on the opposite end to the bridge, in the direction of
traffic flow would a certain distance with a turn-down be sufficient. Also, there are several items that seem to
come into conflict at the designated areas and are noted as follows:
1) N/E side: 11' from the end point is a manhole that will be covered. 39' away is a high
voltage box.
2) S/E side: 28' from end point is a utility pole.
3) N/W side: 44' from the end point is an electrical box.
4) S/W side: 3' from the end point is a fire hydrant.
Some, if not all of the issues will have to be addressed prior to installation and will need a revised sheet if the
distances change from what is on the current plan.
Also, we will be pouring the end columns either Thursday or Friday this week and would like to see if the METAL
BEAM GUARD FENCE TRANSITION (TL2) is the correct connection you want at the bridge so that the bolt
pattern can be accounted for with the pour instead of having to core the holes at a later date. If you can review
and get me the “okay to proceed” on this one item, I can have my guard rail installer get with North Texas Bridge,
ASAP, in regards to the 4 locations and a template for the bolt pattern.
Thank you,
Dean Dumke
Sr Project Manager
#469-223-7879
JRJ PAVING, L. P.
_______________________
file://C:\Documents and Settings\radloo\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4CE13CB5City_...1/28/2011