Loading...
ST9002-SY 891208_ THOROUGHFARE ALIGNMENT STUDY FOR SOUTHWESTERN BOULEVARD IN COPPELL, TEXAS __ Prepared for: Prentiss Properties Limited, Inc. and -- Santa Fe Pacific Realty Prepared by: -- DeShazo, Starek & Tang, Inc. 330 Union Station Dallas, Texas _ (~14) 748-67~0 J89310 - December 8, 1989 INTRODUCTION Southwestern Boulevard is a collector in west Coppell -- between Freeport Parkway and Belt Line/Denton Tap Road. Prentiss Properties is proposing a Warehouse/Office - commercial development on 328 acres generally bounded by Southwestern Blvd. to the north, Belt Line Road to the east, Cowboy Drive to the south and Freeport Parkway to the west. _ Santa Fe Pacific Realty is proposing a similar development on 225 acres located between Royal Lane, the St. Louis & - Southwestern Railroad tracks, LBJ Freeway and both sides of Freeway Parkway. These two developments, by virtue of their size and location, have a significant impact on the area thoroughfares. Conversely, the alignment and sizes of these thoroughfares have a significant impact on the site plans of - these developments. The location of the Prentiss Properties and Santa Fe Pacific developments are shown in Figure 1. PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to analyze various alignments _ of Southwestern and Gateway Blvd. utilizing predicted year 2010 traffic with the two developments in place. This will - be accomplished in the following steps: o Obtain current City of Coppell Thoroughfare Plan. o Obtain current year 2010 traffic projections. _ o Determine year 2010 base volumes utilizing existing counts, thoroughfare plan and year 2010 traffic projections. BETHEL o ~ SlL & SW RR SOUTHWESlERN BELT LINE AIRLINE · ' ;OWBOY z FIGURE 1 Proposed Prentiss Properties and Santa Fe Pacific Realty Developments -- o Add development traffic to year 2010 base link volumes. o Determine best alignment based on year 2010 link -- volumes, impact on site plan, and impact on adjacent intersections. In a companion study, roadway sizing will be based on year 2010 link volumes. In a study to follow, horizontal alignments of roadways built by the developers will be determined through standards set by the Department of Public Works. -- ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENTS Four alternative alignments for Southwestern and Gateway Blvd. are being studied. Alternative 1 is the City of _ Coppell's Thoroughfare Plan alignment, see Figure 2. The alignment first proposed by Prentiss Properties is shown in - Figure 3. Alternative 3 is a variation of the original Prentiss alignment. The difference being that as Southwestern approaches Freeport Pkwy. from Belt Line, it continues its westerly direction parallel to the RR tracks rather than veering to the southwest, see Figure 4. -- Alternative 4 is similar to the Thoroughfare Plan between Royal Ln. and Freeport Pkwy., however, east of Freeport the larger roadway ties into the minor roadway adjacent to the RR tracks, see Figure 5. -- 3 BETHEL 0 rr STL & SW RR .... BELT LINE VINE CREEK AIRLINE COWBOY LI FIGURE 2 Alternative 1 BETHEL 7 0 0 UJ 0 o: STL & SW RR ~mmmmmm ESTERN BELT LINE IIImlllllll' CREEK ~ ......... A~RLINE COWBOY uJ FIGURE 3 Alternative 2 BETHEL Q- Z 0 n- STL & SW RR llIH~lHHH~l I'll~,,ll~ ESTERN BELT LINE I~II~*%~ CREEK ~RLINE COWBOY FIGURE 4 Alternativ® 3 BETHEL O Z STL & SW RR .- . ........ illllll.llllllll IIIIII THWESTERN BELT LINE GATEWAY CREEK [llllllllllllllll °% ' - . AIRLINE COWBOY LLJ FIGURE 5 Alternative 4 PROJECTIONS -- Year 2010 peak hour traffic volume projections for the study area were developed through a four-step traffic modeling procedure: _ 1. Estimate year 2010 24-hour background or "base" volumes for the study area that assume no develop- ments on the Prentiss or Santa Fe properties. -- 2. Calculate year 2010 peak hour "base" volumes that represent ten percent of the 24-hour volumes. _ 3. Calculate year 2010 peak hour volumes that represent traffic generated by the Prentiss and Santa Fe properties. - 4. Add the "base" volumes from step #2 to the site- generated volumes in step #3 to create total year 2010 peak hour traffic volume estimates. This _ assumes full buildout of the properties in the year 2010 per the submitted site plans. Details of this procedure are described below. Year 2010 24-Hour Base Volumes Information assembled for this stage of the subarea traffic modeling procedure consisted of: o Available daily traffic counts. DeShazo, Starek & Tang performmed 24 hour machine counts on Royal Ln and _ Freeport Pkwy. south of Bethel Rd., and on Bethel Rd. east and west of Freeport Pkwy. Manual turning movement counts were performed at the intersection of Belt Line and Denton Tap Rd. from 7-9 AM and 4-6 PM to - determine morning and evening peak hour turning movement volumes. 8 -- o Population and employment estimates, by traffic survey for 1986 and 2010 prepared by the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG). o Year 2010 daily traffic volume estimates obtained from the "20-20-27" traffic model developed by the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation -- (SDHPT). o Year 2010 dily traffic volume estimates obtained from _ NCTCOG's MTAP (Multi-modal Transportation Analysis Process) traffic model. o Thoroughfare plans for the City of Coppell. - Estimated current 24 hour traffic volumes are shown in Figure 6, the Belt Line/Denton Tap peak hour turning - movement counts are shown in Figure 7 . NCTCOGts population and employment estimates for the year 2010 were used in both the SDHPT and NCTCOG traffic models. Estimates for the City _ of Coppell as submitted by NCTCOG were as follows: 1986 2010 Population 10,800 31,700 - Employment 2,100 6,800 An examination of the year 2010 traffic volume plots revealed that Prentiss and Santa Fe developments were not included in the employment forecasts. It was therefore - appropriate to treat these computer estimates as "base" year 2010 volumes that do not represent the traffic generated by the Prentiss or Santa Fe properties. This was,done in order to generate a worst-case forecast scenario. BETHEL 4000 2000 z 0 STL & SW RR ~U~HWESTERN BEL~ LINE ~0oo ~oo0 ~RLINE COWBOY FIGURE 6 Estimated Current 24 Hour Volumes ~.M. PEAK HOUR 4 145 112 ~ ~ 68 STE 287 -- 36 197 _ P.M. PEAK HOUR -- 2 67 330 BELT LINE 62 ~ -m----- 116 iOUTHWESTE! 1109 59 257  FIGURE 7 - AM and PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Counts at Belt Une/Denton Tap Intersection BETHEL F- O rr STL & SW RR .... I~O0 BELT LINE ., 2,~00 VINE CREEK 3000 lllllllllllllllllll _ltlllllllllllll · AIRLINE COWBOY FIGURE 8 Alternative 1, Year 2010 24 Hour Base Volumes BETHEL 7 STL & SW RR ~' ~ [STERN BELT LINE CREEK 11000 5500 : ~ ......... AJRLINE COWBOY FIGURE 9 Alternative 2, Year 2010 24 Hour Base Volumes BETHEL Z Q. 0 rr STL & SW RR ESTERN BELT LINE  0~;~), m m m mlmm m mmmmmmmmmmmmmm, ,,mmmmmm mmmmmmmmmml CREEK AIRLINE COWBOY FIGURE 10 Alternative 3, Year 2010 24 Hour Base Volumes BETHEL Z Z 0 o:: STL & SW RR ..... mmmmmmmmmmmmm mlmml 'HWESTERN BELT LINE .... .- ' ~'i 5'6 .oo .~ ,ooo m~['~"'"" GATEWAY CREEK l'Jlllllllllllllll · 2300 ~'*'" ,..AIRLINE COWBOY FIGURE 11 Alternative 4, Year 2010 24 Hour Base Volumes BETHEL Q. Z 0 0 .j 0 u_ rr STL & SW RR ' '"~n I'~ BELT LINE 250 VINE CREEK $00 :'""'""'"'"'" AJRLINE ,_, COWBOY FIGURE 12 Alternative 1, Year 2010 PM Peak Hour Base Volumes BETHEL 2' UJ 012 STL & SW RR IIIIIII II STERN BELT UNE ~II$~IIBi$1 CREEK 1100 iiiIIIl~lllllllll 550 · ~,, ........ AIRLINE COWBOY Z FIGURE 13 Alternative 2, Year 2010 PM Peak Hour Base Volumes BETHEL z 0 " ~ STL & SW RR mmmmmmmmmmmmmmml mmmmmmmm ESTERN BELT LINE mlllllllll! 110o CREEK AIRLINE COWBOY FIGURE 14 Alternative 3, Year 2010 PM Peak Hour Base Volumes BETHEL (3_ 7 0 UJ STL & SW RR ~(~)'"?""" "..... HWESTERN BELT LINE .' GATEWAY CREEK AJRLINE COWBOY LU FIGURE 15 Alternative 4, Year 2010 PM Peak Hour Base Volumes TABLE I PRENTISS PROPERTIES SITE TRIP GENERATION PM PK HR TRAFFIC BUILDING USE AMOUNT IN OUT TOTAL 1 WAREHOUSE 140,800 52 89 141 2 WAREHOUSE 179,200 67 114 181 3 WAREHOUSE 80,000 29 49 78 4 WAREHOUSE 82,000 30 50 80 5 WAREHOUSE 175,000 65 111 177 6 WAREHOUSE 175,000 65 111 177 7 WAREHOUSE 132,000 49 83 132 8 WAREHOUSE 132,000 49 83 132 9 WAREHOUSE 133,000 49 84 133 10 WAREHOUSE 133,000 49 84 133 11 WAREHOUSE 132,000 49 83 132 12 WAREHOUSE 132,000 49 83 132 13 WAREHOUSE 156,000 58 99 157 14 WAREHOUSE 150,000 56 95 150 15 WAREHOUSE 135,360 50 85 135 16 WAREHOUSE 136,000 50 86 136 17 WAREHOUSE 194,000 73 124 197 18 WAREHOUSE 150,000 56 95 150 19 WAREHOUSE 160,000 60 101 161 20 WAREHOUSE 134,000 49 84 134 21 WAREHOUSE 135,000 50 85 135 22 WAREHOUSE 130,000 48 82 129 23 WAREHOUSE 194,000 73 124 197 24 WAREHOUSE 140,000 52 88 140 25 WAREHOUSE 122,000 45 76 121 26 WAREHOUSE 156,000 58 99 157 27 WAREHOUSE 145,000 54 91 145 28 WAREHOUSE 170,000 63 108 172 29 WAREHOUSE 105,000 38 65 103 30 WAREHOUSE 105,000 38 65 103 31 WAREHOUSE 78,000 28 48 76 32 WAREHOUSE 100,000 36 62 98 33 WAREHOUSE 112,500 41 70 111 TOTAL= 4,533,860 1,677 2,855 4,532 O1 OFFICE 231,000 63 331 394 02 OFFICE 258,000 69 363 432 03 OFFICE 107,500 33 176 209 04 OFFICE 82,000 27 140 167 05 OFFICE 143,500 42 223 266 06 OFFICE 151,700 45 234 278 07 OFFICE 168,000 48 254 303 TOTAL= 1,141,700 328 1,721 2,049 SITE TOTAL= 5,675,560 2,005 4,577 6,581 - TABLE II SANTA FE PACIFIC SITE TRIP GENERATION PM PK HR TRAFFIC PARCEL USE AMOUNT IN OUT TOTAL SF1 OFFICE 379,894 667 1523 2,190 109.2 AC WAREHOUSE 1~508,616 -- SF2 OFFICE 90,451 159 363 522 26.0 AC WAREHOUSE 359,194 SF3 OFFICE 123,500 217 495 712 35.5 AC WAREHOUSE 490,438 SF4 OFFICE 116,542 205 467 672 -- 33.5 AC WAREHOUSE 462,808 OFFICE 710,387 - WAREHOUSE 2,821,056 SITE TOTAL= 3,531,443 1,248 2,848 4,096 Manual adjustments were made to the computer estimates to - reflect traffic model errors related to large analysis zones and inadequate approach links. _ The resulting year 2010 24 hour base volumes for each alternative alignment are shown in Figures 8 through 11, - respectively. The critical design hour for commercial development is typically the p.m. peak hour. 24 hours volumes are multiplied by 10% to estimate "peak hour" volumes. The estimated year 2010 p.m. peak hour base traffic volumes for each alternative alignment are shown in Figures 12 through 15, respectively. TRIP GENERATION The site generated traffic for the proposed developments is shown in Table I and II. The trip generation rates used are from the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trim Generation Manual. The proposed Prentiss Properties - development conceptual plan shows thirty three warehouse buildings averaging 140,000 s.f. each, for a total of 4,533,860 s.f of warehouse. Seven office buildings were _ shown, averaging 163,000 s.f., for a total of 1,141,700 s.f office. The total site square footage is estimated to be -- 5,675,560 s.f.. The Santa Fe Pacific development plan does not specify buildings and usage, but a similar density of warehouse and office hase been suggested, therefore the traffic generated on the Prentiss Properties site is factored down by area on each of the Santa Fe Pacific _ parcels. To account for the impact of site generated truck traffic, the warehouse volumes are increased 20%. One truck - is assumed to be equivalent to two passenger cars and warehouse traffic is assumed to be 20% trucks. This increase in average projected daily traffic coupled with the total assumed buildout of the site plans by the year 2010 represent a worst case scenario. TRIP DISTRIBUTION After performing trip generation, the trips resulting from the proposed developments are distributed to the area street system. Figure 16 shows the orientations used for distribution. Figures 17 through 20 show the development traffic on each alternative alignment, respectively. - Figures 21 through 24 show the sum of the 2010 pm base plus site traffic on each alignment, respectively. 7% 3% BETHEL 3% 7 0 I-- i-. z 0 cb LU STL & SW RR SOUTHWESTERN L.8 BELT LINE AIRLINE COWBOY · 5% FIGURE 16 Directional Distribution 35% 5% BETHEL O. Z 0 o 0 u_ o:: STL & SW RR · ' '~ ~'~ ~00 BELT LINE o° VINE CREEK 60O _.mlllllllllllllll t % !l~''" GATEWAY 132' 1312 COWBOY uJ FIGURE 17 Alternative 1, Alternative I PM Peak Hour Site Traffic BETHEL Z 7 O~ UJ rr STL & SW RR ESTERN BELT LINE IIIIIIIIIII~ CREEK 888 493 1189 i....~.1.1..., NRLINE COWBOY FIGURE 18 Altemative 2, PM Peak Hour Site Traffic BETHEL uJ STL & SW RR % 152~ 1512 COWBOY FIGURE 19 Alternative 3, PM Peak Hour Site Traffic BETHEL Z uJ a: STL & SW RR .....- .... ~-~" "~-~".."~W-~' ';~'~ ',,,E~T~,~, 8EL, L,~,E GATEWAY ;REEK ~llllllllllllll~ll . 600 '~'** ............... AIRLINE 511 '152~ COWBOY Oo i.u FIGURE 20 Alternative 4, PM Peak Hour Site Traffic BETHEL STL & SW RR ,, ~3~ ' ' '1¥~ D' BELT LINE VINE CREEK lllll~l'~l~ GATEWAY '"- .... .s.!l.. '~RUNE 1312 COWBOY z FIGURE 21 Alternative 1, Year 2010 PM Peak Hour Base + Site Traffic BETHEL O_ Z Z -J uJ 0 u_ rr STL & SW RR ES/ERN BELT LINE IIIIllllllm CREEK 1988 1043 1689 IIIl~lllllIlII 1524 1512 COWBOY FIGURE 22 Alternative 2, Year 2()10 PM Peak Hour Base + Site Traffic BETHEL Z 0 Z 0 o: STL & SW RR ESTERN BELT LINE · ~e~aa~,, ~, CREEK 1524 1512 COWBOY FIGURE 23 Alternative 3, Year 2010 PM Peak Hoa' Base + Site Traffic BETHEL o_ Z o 0 rr STL & SW RR ,IIIIIllI.IIIIi rHWESTERN 2077 198§' BELT LINE ....-- ..... §'d{~" : GATEWAY ;REEK %° ' .,.. AIRLINE 511 1524 1512 COWEK)Y FIGURE 24 Alternative 4, Year 2010 PM Peak Hour Base + Site Traffic _ ALIGNMENT CHARACTERISTICS Alternative 1: -- o Provides for through movement from Belt Line Rd. to Royal Ln. _ o Additional collector roadway provides interior circulation. o Horizontal alignment of Gateway is straighter and would - allow higher design speeds. o Gateway Blvd. in conjunction with Grapevine Creek - greatly impairs the ability to develop warehouse-type uses due to its close proximity to the RR tracks, and the need to provide RR access would require numerous _ crossings. o This alternative is costly because of two major crossings of Grapevine Creek. o Bethel and Gateway form one east/west corridor, and gateway and I.H. 635 form another east/west corridor. _ In the Bethel/Gateway corridor the STL & SW RR tracks form a major barrier. o As presently layed out heavy interior site truck -- traffic will load on Gateway intermixing with through traffic thereby impeding the through movement. - o The close proximity of the Gateway/Southwestern intersection to the Gateway/Belt Line intersection reduces the capacity of Gateway Blvd. Alternative 2: o Provides direct through movement from Royal Ln. to Belt - Line. o More economical in that it only has one crossing with _ Grapevine Creek. o The alignment of Southwestern provides a buffer between the existing land uses to the north and the proposed - future land uses to the south. o The location of Grapevine Creek to the southeast and -- the RR tracks to the north limit the amount of development in this area thereby increasing the through movement capacity. o The alignment of Southwestern will require only one rail spur crossing between Freeport and Belt Line, and potentially no crossings west of Freeport. o This alignment provides for better utilization of land in developing efficient site development plans. Alternative 3: _ o Provides the most direct route from Belt Line to Royal. o More economical in that it only has one crossing with Grapevine Creek. o The alignment of Southwestern provides a buffer between the existing land uses to the north and the proposed future land uses to the south. o Greatly impacts the Santa Fe tract in that it makes the development of warehouse uses extremely difficult. o The need to provide RR access would require numerous crossings to serve warehouse uses south of the _ road. Alternative 4= - o Provides least capacity of all alternatives and reduces the ability to carry through movements from Royal to Belt Line. o This type of thoroughfare plan is inefficient in terms of land development. o In Santa Fe tract numerous rail spur crossings along the northernmost collector would occur. -- CONCLUSION Due to the detriment to the Santa Fe tract, Alternatives 3 and 4 are less acceptable alternatives. They impact the ability to develop the land efficiently and encourage numerous spur rail crossings and in the case of Alternative 4, provides less roadway capacity capabilities. S~arizing the differences between Alternative 1 and 2, Alternative 2 - provides a more acceptable alignment to Alternative 1 due to the following reasons: o Provides an alignment that is more conducive to a site development plan. - o Provides more capacity to through movements by limiting the amount of local traffic, particularly truck traffic that would use this street for interior circulation. o Less costly, only requires one creek crossing. _ o Alternative 2 in conjunction with the RRtracks provides a buffer between the land uses to the north and the proposed land uses to the south. - o Has less impact on the Denton Tap/Belt Line intersection due to better distribution of interior site generated traffic between Freeport and Belt Line. _ In conclusion Alternative 2 is the more efficient alignment for Southwestern Blvd. between Royal Ln. and Belt Line Rd. - and is the route supported by Prentiss Properties and Santa Fe Pacific Realty. 35