ST9301-LR051128 8908 Ambassador Row, Dallas, TX 75247
2 696 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76118
— � 7701 W Little York, Ste 600, Houston, TX 77040
4 a Corporate Phone: (214) 630 -9745
IN -PLACE DENSITY TESTING
Client: City of Coppell Report No.: 245298
Ms. Suzan Taylor Project No.: 059909
PO Box 9478
Coppell TX 75019 Date of Service: 11/12/2005
Report Date: 11/28/2005
Project: East Sandy Lake Road fi.
ST 93 -01 triv
V
7i
Services: Perform In -Place Density Test in accordance with ASTM Standards.
PROJECT DATA
CONTRACTOR: Tiseo Paving Company Standard Counts
Test Methods: ASTM D -2922 Gauge: Troxler 3430 Moisture Density
ASTM D -3017 Gauge Serial No: 24675 Current: 604 Current: 2751
Test Mode: DT Previous: 600 Previous: 2771
MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONS
Maximum Project Requirements
M/D No. Description Moisture % Density pcf Moisture Density
1 Reddish Brown Sandy Silty Clay 12.5 116.5 Optimum +4 95 min
2 Reddish Brown Clayey Sand w /trace sandstone 14.0 113.0 Optimum +4 95 min
3 Lime Treated Reddish & Medium Brown Sandy 16.0 108.0 Optimum +4 95 min
Clay w/ Limestone
FIELD DENSITY TESTS
TEST PROBE M/D MOISTURE WET DENSITY DRY DENSITY DENSITY
NO TEST LOCATION DEPTH No. ( %) (pcf) (pcf) (% max)
Backfill
1 Retaining wall, east side of box culvert, 6" 1 12.7 128.7 114.2 98
Station 43 +25, elevation 427, 1st lift
Backfill
2 Retaining wall, east side of box culvert, 6" 1 13.7 126.3 111.1 95
Station 43 +30, elevation 428, 2nd Lift
Backfill
3 Retaining wall, east side of box culvert, 6" 3 .16.0 124.8 107.6 100
Station 43 +20, elevation 429, 3rd lift
Backfill
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and reports are
for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineering Services, Ltd
07TM Page 1 of 2
aeport No.: 245298
k re ject No.: 059909 Client: City of Coppell
TEST PROBE M/D MOISTURE WET DENSITY DRY DENSITY DENSITY
NO TEST LOCATION DEPTH No. ( %) (pci) (pci) (% max)
4 Retaining wall, east side of box culvert, 6" 1 13.1 126.9 112.2 96
Station 43 +22, elevation 430, 4th lift
Backfill
5 Retaining wall, east side of box culvert, 6" 1 13.9 126.5 111.1 95
Station 43 +29, elevation 431, 5th lift
Backfill
6 Retaining wall, east side of box culvert, 6" 1 13.6 126.5 111.4 96
Station 43 +20, elevation 432, 6th lift
Backfill
7 Retaining wall, east side of box culvert, 6" 3 16.0 124.3 107.2 99
Station 43 +19, elevation 433, 7th lift
Test results on this report meet project specification.
4(
Technician: Dan Rogers Started: 11:30a Finished: 3:45pm 3..
Report Distribution: ' �`,� -I (1) City of Coppell L
(1) City of Coppell K. Scott Watson, AET
(1) Tiseo Paving CMT Operations Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and reports are
for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineering Services, Ltd.
07TM Page 2 of 2
,-,one Engineering
8908 Ambassador Row, Dallas, TX 75247
2696 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76118
6300 Rothway, Ste. 150, Houston, TX 77040
Corporate Phone: (214) 630 -9745
REPORT OF IN -PLACE DENSITY CANCELLATION
Client: City of Coppell Report No.: 245299
Ms. Suzan Taylor Project No.: 059909
PO Box 9478 Date of Service: 11/12/2005
Coppell TX 75019
Report Date: 11/28/2005
Project: East Sandy Lake Road (A 5zet
ST 93 -01 ?j
Services: In -Place Density Cancellation
Report of Cancellation
On this date a Rone Engineering Services, Ltd. representative arrived on site as
scheduled. Upon arrival, our representative was informed that testing /inspection
was cancelled for the day.
Technician Time: 8:30am - 10:00am
Rone Engineering
Technician: Dan Rogers
Report Distribution: ,
) City of Coppell `
(1) City of Coppell �.;. K. Scott Wat on, AET
(1) Tiseo Paving CMT Operations Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and reports are
for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineering Services, Ltd.
19 TH Pate 1 of 1
8908 Ambassador Row, Dallas, TX 75247
ring 2696 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76118
7701 W Little York, Ste 600, Houston, TX 77040
`n; 4 r ': Corporate Phone: (214) 630 -9745
IN -PLACE DENSITY TESTING
Client: City of Coppell Report No.: 245344
Ms. Suzan Taylor Project No.: 059909
PO Box 9478
Coppell TX 75019 Date of Service: 11/14/2005
Report Date: 11/28/2005
Project: East Sandy Lake Road
ST 93 O1
At tr)C75tOg
Services: Perform In -Place Density Test in accordance with ASTM Standards.
PROJECT DATA
CONTRACTOR: Tiseo Paving Company Standard Counts
Test Methods: ASTM D -2922 Gauge: Troxler 3430 Moisture Density
ASTM D -3017 Gauge Serial No: 35519 Current: 683 Current: 2507
Test Mode: DT Previous: 686 Previous: 2555
MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONS
Maximum Project Requirements
M/D No. Description Moisture % Density pcf Moisture Density
1 Reddish Brown Clayey Sand w /trace sandstone 14.0 113.0 Optimum +4 95 min
FIELD DENSITY TESTS
TEST PROBE M/D MOISTURE WET DENSITY DRY DENSITY DENSITY
NO TEST LOCATION DEPTH No. ( %) (pcf) (pcf) (% max)
Retaining wall
1 3' west of box culvert, 9' below grade 6" 1 14.0 123.8 108.6 96
Retaining wall
2 7' west of box culvert, 9' below grade 6" 1 15.6 124.8 108.0 96
Retaining wall
3 4' west of box culvert, 8' below grade 6" 1 17.0 129.5 110.7 98
Retaining wall
4 8' west of box culvert, 8' below grade 6" 1 17.5 129.7 110.4 98
Retaining wall
5 2' west of box culvert, 7' below grade 6" 1 17.3 129.1 110.1 97
Retaining wall
6 9' west of box culvert, 7' below grade 6" 1 16.6 129.5 111.1 98
Retaining wall
7 4' west of box culvert, 6' below grade 6" 1 16.9 126.8 108.5 96
Retaining wall
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition. appearance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and reports are
for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineering Services, Ltd.
07TM Page 1 of 2
Deport No.: 2453
Project No.: 059909 Client: City of Coppell
TEST PROBE MID MOISTURE WET DENSITY DRY DENSITY DENSITY
NO TEST LOCATION DEPTH No. (%) (pcf) (pci) (% max)
8 8' west of box culvert, 6' below grade 6" 1 17.1 127.2 108.6 96
Retaining wall
9 2' west of box culvert, 5' below grade 6" 1 16.9 126.4 108.1 96
Retaining wall
10 9' west of box culvert, 5' below grade 6" 1 17.5 126.3 107.5 95
Retaining wall
11 8' west of box culvert, 4' below grade 6" 1 16.8 125.4 107.4 95
Retaining wall
12 10' west of box culvert, 4' below grade 6" 1 14.7 124.5 108.5 96
Retaining wall
13 3' west of box culvert, 3' below grade 6" 1 16.5 132.1 113.4 100
Retaining wall
14 7' west of box culvert, 3' below grade 6" 1 16.2 130.8 112.6 100
Test results on this report meet project specification.
■
Technician: Julio Perez Started: 8 :15am Finished: 4:15pm •if Wi ire/
Report Distribution: taw i fr'/
(1) City of Coppell I� ��.P
(1) City of Coppell . Scott Watson, AET
(1) Tiseo Paving CMT Operations Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and reports are
for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineering Services, Ltd.
07TM Page 2 of 2
. Engineering 8908 Ambassador Row, Dallas, TX 75247
2696 Gravel Drive, Fort worth, TX 76118
6300 Rothway, Ste. 150, Houston, TX 77040
� Corporate Phone: (214) 630-9745
IN -PLACE DENSITY TESTING
Client: City of Coppell Report No.: 245427
Ms. Suzan Taylor Project No.: 059909
PO Box 9478
Coppell TX 75019 Date of Service: 11/15/2005
Report Date: 11/28/2005
Project: East Sandy Lake Road ii4V it
ST 93 -01 2)7)Cj?°8
Services: Perform In -Place Density Test in accordance with ASTM Standards.
PROJECT DATA
CONTRACTOR: Tiseo Paving Company Standard Counts
Gauge: Troxler 3430
Test Methods: Moisture Density
ASTM D -2922 Y
ASTM D -3017 Gauge Serial No: 36438 Current: 724 Current: 2739
Test Mode: DT Previous: 711 Previous: 2718
MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONS
Maximum Project Requirements
M/D No. Description Moisture % Density pcf Moisture Density
1 Reddish Brown Clayey Sand w /trace sandstone 14.0 113.0 Optimum +4 95 min
2 Reddish Brown Sandy Silty Clay 12.5 116.5 Optimum +4 95 min
FIELD DENSITY TESTS
TEST PROBE MID MOISTURE WET DENSITY DRY DENSITY DENSITY
NO TEST LOCATION DEPTH No. ( %) (pcf) (pcf) (% max)
Backfill
1 Retaining wall, Station 42 +40, 8' below 6" 2 14.0 129.9 113.9 98
elevation 435.16
Backfill
2 Retaining wall, Station 42 +35, 8' below 6" 1 16.8 128.1 109.7 97
elevation 435.16
Backfill
3 Retaining wall, Station 42 +45, 7' below 6" 2 13.9 129.1 113.3 97
elevation 435.16
Backfill
4 Retaining wall, Station 42 +42, 7' below 6" 2 13.0 129.3 114.4 98
elevation 435.16
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and reports are
for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineering Services, Ltd.
07TM Page 1 of 2
Report No.: 245427
Project No.: 059909 Client: City of Coppell
TEST PROBE MUD MOISTURE WET DENSITY DRY DENSITY DENSITY
NO TEST LOCATION DEPTH No. ( %) (pct) (pct) (% max)
Backfill
5 Retaining wall, Station 42 +47, 6' below 6" 1 15.1 129.0 112.1 99
elevation 435.16
Backfill
6 Retaining wall, Station 42 +50, 6' below 6" 2 14.1 132.5 116.1 100
elevation 435.16
Backfill
7 Retaining wall, Station 42 +56, 5' below 6" 2 15.8 131.2 113.3 97
elevation 435.16
Backfill
8 Retaining wall, Station 42 +32, 5' below 6" 1 16.2 130.0 111.9 99
elevation 435.16
Backfill
9 Retaining wall, Station 42 +65, 4' below 6" 1 15.4 127.1 110.1 97
elevation 435.16
Backfill
10 Retaining wall, Station 42 +70, 4' below 6" 2 13.9 127.5 111.9 96
elevation 435.16
Backfill
11 Retaining wall, Station 42 +58, 3' below 6" 2 14.5 131.5 114.8 99
elevation 435.16
Backfill
12 Retaining wall, Station 42 +63, 3' below 6" 1 15.1 129.7 112.7 100
elevation 435.16
Backfill
13 Retaining wall, Station 42 +75, 2' below 6" 2 14.3 131.3 114.9 99
elevation 435.16
Backfill
14 Retaining wall, Station 42 +68, 2' below 6" 2 13.5 130.4 114.9 99
elevation 435.16
Backfill
15 Retaining wall, Station 42 +55, l' below 6" 2 13.9 128.1 112.5 97
elevation 435.16
Backfill
16 Retaining wall, Station 42 +60, l' below 6" 2 13.6 128.5 113.1 97
elevation 435.16
Backfill
17 Retaining wall, Station 42 +78 at elevation 6" 1 14.6 129.2 112.7 100
435.16
Backfill
18 Retaining wall, Station 42 +72 at elevation 6" 1 15.8 127.7 110.3 98
435.16
Test results on this report meet project specification. i e
�
Technician: Ben Weaverling Started: 11:15a F inished: 3 :45 In /
Report Distribution: g p A Pr
(1) City of Coppell 4
(I) City of Coppell K. Scott Watson, AET
(I) Tiseo Paving CMT Operations Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and reports are
for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineering Services, Ltd.
07TM Page 2 of 2
one Engineering
8908 Ambassador Row, Dallas, TX 75247
2696 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, TX 761I8
6300 Rothway, Ste. 150, Houston, TX 77040
Corporate Phone: (214) 630 -9745
MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONS
Client: City of Coppell Report No.: 245668
Ms. Suzan Taylor Project No.: 059909
PO Box 9478
Coppell TX 75019 Date of Service: 11/17/2005
Report Date: 11/28/2005
Project: East Sandy Lake Road • 51A8
ST 93 -01 �i�-"'
Services: Obtain a sample of material from the jobsite, bring the sample back to the laboratory and perform a moisture density relationship test in
accordance with ASTM Standards.
PROJECT DATA
CONTRACTOR: Tiseo Paving Company DATE SAMPLED: 11/17/2005
TEST FOR: Wall Backfill MATERIAL PREPARATION: Moist
MATERIAL: Reddish Brown Silty Sand w/ RAMMER TYPE: Mechanical
Sandstone & Gravel SAMPLED BY: Contractors
CLASSIFICATION: Wall Backfill SAMPLE LOCATION: Sample supplied by Contractor
TEST METHOD: ASTM D -698 ASTM D -4318
Method A
REPORT OF TEST
MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY, pcf: 98.0
MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONS
104 Zero c aic voids cave
OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT, %: 1 Sp
1.0 Specific Gravit} 0
REQUIREMENTS
LIQUID LIMIT: 102
Dry
PLASTIC LIMIT: Density
(pcf)
PLASTICITY INDEX: Non - plastic 100
% PASSING #200: 1.6 Maximum 15.0 98
Test results on this report meet project 96
specifications as noted above.
7 9 11 13 15 17 19
MOISTURE CONTENT ( %)
pH = 5.88
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and reports are
for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineering Services, Ltd.
06 Page 1 of 2