ST0702-CS090916
(9/19/2011) Keith Marvin - Re: Revised BidPage 1
From:
Keith Marvin
To:
eburns8318@aol.com, rhp@fwwr.net, jstevens@railroadsignalinc.com, phoagl...
Date:
9/16/2009 5:45 PM
Subject:
Re: Revised Bid
Thank you.
Please send the revised proposal so we can get an agreement in the works. I plan to seek City Council
approval at the October 13th meeting.
Keith
-----Original Message-----
From: <eburns8318@aol.com>
To: Keith Marvin <KMARVIN@ci.coppell.tx.us>
To: <rhp@fwwr.net>
To: <jstevens@railroadsignalinc.com>
To: <phoagland@railroadsignalinc.com>
Sent: 9/16/2009 5:32:11 PM
Subject: Re: Revised Bid
I the interest of public safety, sure will do it
-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Marvin <kmarvin@ci.coppell.tx.us>
To: eburns8318@aol.com
Cc: D. Guido <djg@fwwr.net>
Sent: Wed, Sep 16, 2009 4:45 pm
Subject: Re: Revised Bid
Eddie,
I'm having a hard time getting this signed off on with these two items.
In order to move this project forward, are you willing to adjust them
ack down to the TxDOT project level?
Keith
Keith Marvin, P.E.
roject Engineer
972) 304-3681
>>> <eburns8318@aol.com> 9/15/2009 5:19 PM >>>
We are limited to a 10% profit on State funded projects(TXDOT) by
tate law. We do not have this restriction on other types of projects
ormal markup for any business is 15 %. Also on TXDOT projects we are
ot alowed to charge for the cost of borrowed money other projects we
re. Hope this answers your questions Eddie Burns
-----Original Message-----
rom: Keith Marvin <kmarvin@ci.coppell.tx.us>
o: Patsy Hayes <pah@fwwr.net>; Eddie Burns
eburns@railroadsignalinc.com>; Pat Hoagland
phoagland@railroadsignalinc.com>
(9/19/2011) Keith Marvin - Re: Revised BidPage 2
c: FWILSON@dart.org; D. Guido <djg@fwwr.net>; 'Ronald Preuss'
rhp@fwwr.net>
ent: Tue, Sep 15, 2009 11:36 am
ubject: RE: Revised Bid
Thanks for sending this revised bid. There are a few items that have
anged from the previous bid that we need some clarification on. The
itial bid had a Fixed Fee (profit) of 10%, and this one has increased
15%. Can you either explain the difference to our satisfaction, or
duce it to the previous level? This estimate also includes a 2% bank
ter
est expense that was not in the previous estimate. Again, please
plain, or remove this item.
believe we are now waiting on an agreement from FWWR to be approved
the City of Coppell for reimbursement for this expense plus the
ossing itself. I have tentatively scheduled this item for our
ctober
, 2009 City Council meeting. In order to make that meeting I will
ed a draft copy of the agreement for our attorney to review as soon
s
ssible.
eith Marvin, P.E.
oject Engi
eer
72) 304-3681
>>> "Pat Hoagland" <phoagland@railroadsignalinc.com> 9/14/2009 3:57 PM
>
e attached
at
atrick Hoagland
gnal Maintenance Coordinator
ilroad Signal International
8.234.1522
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
---Original Message-----
om: Keith Marvin [mailto:kmarvin@ci.coppell.tx.us]
nt: Monday, September 14, 2009 2:38 PM
: Pat Hoagland
: 'Ronald Preuss'; Eddie Burns
bject: Re: Revised Bid
received the estimate, but there was no supporting information. Can
u send me the full proposal please.
hanks,
eith
eith Marvin, P.E.
oject Engineer
72) 304-3681