ST0702-CS100503 (2)
(9/29/2011) Keith Marvin - RE: RE: Crossing AgreementPage 1
From:
"Marty Murphy" <Martym@JRJPaving.com>
To:
"Keith Marvin" <kmarvin@coppelltx.gov>
Date:
5/3/2010 3:40 PM
Subject:
RE: RE: Crossing Agreement
How do I dispute something that you have already paid? You and I both
know that I will never get the money back once you pay them. The charges
need to be sent a billing to me since we are the ones whom requested the
flagmen. This way I can resolve this within JRJ. If you are not
assessing the charges then this needs to be between the railroad and
JRJ.
-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Marvin [mailto:kmarvin@coppelltx.gov]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 3:10 PM
To: Marty Murphy
Cc: Richard Odell; Charlie Godsey; D. Guido
Subject: RE: RE: Crossing Agreement
Marty,
Unfortunately my hands are tied on this issue. Portions of these
charges are more than 120 days past due, and it has become a nuisance to
several city departments.
Disputing the days and hours worked with me is meaningless, as the city
is not the one assessing the charges. If you are correct in your
assertion that JRJ did not request flagmen, and was in fact not working
on those days, I hope you will continue to dispute these charges.
Keith Marvin, P.E.
Project Engineer
(972) 304-3681
>>> "Marty Murphy" <Martym@JRJPaving.com> 5/3/2010 12:08 PM >>>
I forwarded you the last response I had from them, last week. In the
mean time I have gone back to verify the dates they have listed on these
bills and we were not even working on all but one of these days. I do
not find it justifiable for you to deduct money form our contract that
has not been verified as of yet. I have expressed my concerns about this
bill from day one, now I am telling you we were not onsite for the days
they are charging for. this should be reason enough to not withhold
money until this is resolved. I am awaiting their response from my last
email to them.
-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Marvin [mailto:kmarvin@coppelltx.gov]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 8:23 AM
(9/29/2011) Keith Marvin - RE: RE: Crossing AgreementPage 2
To: Marty Murphy
Subject: RE: RE: Crossing Agreement
Marty,
I didn't hear anything else about these flagging charges. Have you come
to an agreement with the Railroad?
If not, I will process your current invoice less the amount owed to the
RR.
Keith
Keith Marvin, P.E.
Project Engineer
(972) 304-3681
>>> "Marty Murphy" <Martym@JRJPaving.com> 4/23/2010 10:05 AM >>>
Attached you will see that I am awaiting for them to get back with me
which has not happened to date. Per your email below you say you have
invoices for $74,377.97? I do not have a total amount that high.
-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Marvin [mailto:kmarvin@coppelltx.gov]
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 9:32 AM
To: Glenn Highland; Marty Murphy; Tery Chapman
Cc: Jerod Anderson; Ken Griffin
Subject: Fwd: RE: Crossing Agreement
Marty,
Have you had any further discussions with FWWR concerning these flagging
charges? They are now contacting our City Manager directly.
I am still holding invoice number 9 in the amount of $74,377.97. The
city does not intend to hold this invoice much longer, but we need to
have a resolution to this issue. If JRJ is not able to settle the issue
with FWWR by April 30, 2010 the city will withhold the $7,180 due from
this invoice, and process the balance for payment. The city will then
make payment to FWWR from project funds.
Please let me know by 4/30/10 whether you have come to an agreement with
the railroad.
Keith Marvin, P.E.
Project Engineer
(972) 304-3681
(9/29/2011) Keith Marvin - RE: RE: Crossing AgreementPage 3
>>> Clay Phillips 4/23/2010 8:37 AM >>>
Charles,
It is my understanding that our contractor, JRJ, is obligated to pay for
the crossing reconstruction including the expenses associated with these
invoices which apparently pay someone $640/day to monitor the site for
trains that might require the clearing of construction workers. Keith
Marvin on our staff is th eprimary contact person. I also understand
that you or representatives of FWWR are having discussions regarding
this issue with JRJ. It is the City's intention to hold the contractor
to their obligation and pay for all costs associated with the crossing
reconstruction.
Please contact Keith Marvin at kmarvin@coppelltx.gov to discuss the
details of the issue further. Feel free to contact me directly if
necessary.
Clay Phillips
City Manager
City of Coppell
(972)304-3662
cphillips@coppelltx.gov
>>> "Charles Godsey" <cpg@fwwr.net> 4/23/2010 7:24 AM >>>
I have attached all outstanding invoices. If you have any questions
please
give me a call at 817-529-7150.
Thanks
Charles Godsey
FWWR
-----Original Message-----
From: Clay Phillips [mailto:cphillips@coppelltx.gov]
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 12:13 PM
To: Charles Godsey
Subject: Re: Crossing Agreement
Charles,
I do not recall seeing an invoice regarding this issue. I will check
with
our staff and someone will get back to you very soon with an answer.
Thank
you for bringing this to my attention. Please send all future emails
intended for me tot he address below or feel free to contact me via the
phone number below.
(9/29/2011) Keith Marvin - RE: RE: Crossing AgreementPage 4
Clay Phillips
City Manager
City of Coppell
(972)304-3662
cphillips@coppelltx.gov
>>> "Charles Godsey" <cpg@fwwr.net> 4/22/2010 11:56 AM >>>
Mr. Phillips
Attached you will find crossing agreement that was sign by you on Oct
28,
2009. The agreement covers flagging cost to improve crossing at south
Coppell rd. DOT number 789747J.
This invoice is over 90 days old. Please advise when FWWR can expect
payment
on invoice number 7542 for 640.00 and invoice number 7688 for 4720.00
Thanks and if you have any question please call me 817-529-7150
Charles Godsey