ST9304-CS 881115)FIL COPY
GINN, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
November 15, 1988
Mr. Russell R. Doyle, P.E.
City Engineer
City of Coppell
P.O. Box 478
Coppell, Texas 75019
Re: Riverchase City - Developer Agreement
Dear Mr. Doyle:
As requested in your memo of November 7, 1988, copy attached, we
have consulted with the Dallas County Public Works Department who
is administering engineering and construction of the segment of
Belt Line Road which contains the bridge in question. Dallas
County had their consulting engineer re-evaluate the length of
the bridge as a part of their design, and after the results of
the evaluations were reviewed by Dallas County, the bridge was
reduced in length accordingly. To the best of our knowledge,
there were no other outside consultants involved in
determination of the final bridge lengths on behalf of the city
of Coppell or others.
Please call me if you have further questions.
Since. rely, /~
~ohn~C ~~ruher,
Senior Engineer
PoEo
cc:
H. Wayne Ginn, P.E.
File J375
17103 Preston Road · Suite 100 · LB 118 · Dallas, Texas 75248 · Phone 214/2484900
2. Requirements of Contractor. Developer shall require the contractor
to furnish a performance bond and a payment bond complying with the
requirements of the McGregor Act. The bonds shall be in favor of Developer
~nd City, it being agreed that City has an interest in the performance and
~y~ent of the Work. Developer snail require the contractor to carry
co~nprehensive general liability insurance with limits of at least $500,000 and
with City and Developer named as insureds. Upon request, Developer shall
obtain and furnish certificates evidencing such insurance coverage.
3. City to Accept the Nor'~. City will at its expense periodically
inspect the Work. Upon completion as per City specifications, City shall
promptly obtain a certificate of completion from its engineers and issue its
Certificate of Acceptance and assume ownership of the Work. Developer shall
deliver good title to the Work free of liens and encumbrances.
5. Paving Donation. The southern boundary of Riverchase is adjacent to
a strip of railroad right-of-way that is adjacent to Belt Line Road in its
existing location (i.e. the railroad right-of-way is situated between
Riverchase and Belt Line Road). Developer agrees to donate to City a sum
equal to the prorata share of the City's paving assessment for improvements to
Belt Line Road computed as if the southern boundary of property owned by
Developer within Riverchase was actually adjacent to Belt Line Road.
Developer's first installments on the donation shall be (al the sums expended
· by Developer as per Paragraph 4, and (bi the sums expended by Developer in
,~ connection with the Work that exceed Developer's prior commitments (i.e. sums
.h~P.~/ in excess of the cost of traffic signalization and 1/2 of the cost of the
~.~Z~permanent i~tersection). The bal~nr, nf~.the donation shall be paid when
~-/assessment~L_ar~due frOm other landown?_[..~)for i~pFovement of Belt Line Road.
Developer's cFonat~on snail be su~3ect to the provisions set out below.
' 6. Agreements if Belt Line Road is Relocated. The zoning ordinance for
Riverchase describes certain agreements by Developer related to the Work,
landscaping and other improvements associated with Belt Line Road in its
xisting location. City (acting through its mayor and council) has recently
dopted a resolution which in effect states that to the extent the City
Council of Coppell has authority to determine whether Belt Line Road should be
relocated, it is the determination of the council that Belt Line Road should
not be relocated. However, it is understood and agreed that the City is free
to change its position on the relocation issue.
7/07/86 --2--
OlqlF