ST1002-CS100323(10/13/2011) Keith Marvin - Re: FW: Old Town Coppell - CPL09446 Page 1
From: Keith Marvin
To: Hatley, Tricia
Date: 3/23/2010 4:33 PM
Subject: Re: FW: Old Town Coppell - CPL09446
Thanks Trish.
>>> Tricia Hatley < thh _freese.com 3/23/2010 2:09 PM >>>
Sorry, Keith - here you go with the info.
I think we are going to be just about balanced. I wouldn't accept any more fill there. With the roadway cut
we are doing, I think we have all the material we need for the pad sites.
Trish
Trish Hatley
Freese and Nichols, Inc
From: Caleb Thornhill
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 10:06 AM
To: Tricia Hatley
Subject: Old Town Coppell - CPL09446
Here are copies of what we sent last week
I sent this out Tuesday
Meant to include this earlier with the cost estimate. The estimated additional fee will be approximately
$31,500 to design the remainder of the Old Town Coppell Infrastructure Improvements. Once you guys
have had a chance to sit down and verify the responsibilities of the City and the developer, we can sit
down and discuss which route you guys would like to take.
B. Caleb Thornhill P.E.
Project Manager
rcid:imaae001.iDaa_01 CAC9A7.36FEF3801
Freese and Nichols, Inc. < http: / /www.freese.com / >
• Main: 214 - 217 -2200
• Direct: 214 - 217 -2282
• Fax: 214 - 920 -2565
• Email: bct _ freese .com < maiIto:bct(ab-freese.com >
This electronic mail message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.
This message, together with any attachment, may contain the sender's organization's confidential and
privileged information. The recipient is hereby notified to treat the information as confidential and
privileged and to not disclose or use the information except as authorized by sender's organization. Any
unauthorized review, printing, retention, copying, disclosure, distribution, retransmission, dissemination or
other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this message in error, please immediately contact the
sender by reply email and delete all copies of the material from any computer. Thank you for your
cooperation.
(10/13/2011) Keith Marvin - Re: Old Town Coppell Page 1
From: Keith Marvin
To: Hatley, Tricia; Thornhill, Caleb
CC: Griffin, Ken; Hurley, Mindi
Date: 3/23/2010 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: Old Town Coppell
Trish,
I didn't see the drawing sent over last week. Can you send it again?
As far as the earthwork, will we need additional fill material, or are we about right?
Keith
Keith Marvin, P.E.
Project Engineer
(972) 304 -3681
>>> Tricia Hatley < thh _freese.com 3/23/2010 1:07 PM >>>
Ken, Mindi and Keith,
Just checking in with you guys to see if there have been any changes since our last meeting. We are
working on 30% plans based on the exhibit that Caleb sent over last week. Our plan is to have those
plans to you by Friday, March 26th. We'd like to have a meeting that following week to review them with
you and get your input /changes. Also, it might be good to have Yancy and the architect attend that
meeting so that they can comment on our utility plans, etc. Maybe we meet together first and then bring
them in? Whatever you guys think is fine with me. I just need the input before we plow forward with
construction plans.
If you'd like to proceed with adding in all of the infrastructure that the city is responsible for, I'd like to
have that decision by our meeting the week of the 29th. I hope that is reasonable for you guys. Or if you
already have an answer, let me know and we'll get moving on it.
Yancy sent me a note last week asking about that ROW on Burnett street. The one where the parking
extends outside of the ROW. He was asking if we need to move the ROW to be 10' off of the curb. I'm
happy to make that change now if you are okay with that. it will change the ROW area calculations. Do
you want me to send something over showing the suggested change? Or just move forward as is? it's
not something I've been too focused on since we are working on the design of the other roadways but I
know that it is important for the plat.
On the earthwork, it looks like we will be able to use all of the dirt on site (at least what was there when
we did the topo survey, not sure if more has been added). We'll have more details on that when we meet.
Call me if you want to talk about that sooner.
Anything else that is on your minds at this point?
Trish
Tricia H. Hatley, P.E., LEED AP
Freese and Nichols, Inc.
1701 N. Market Street, Suite 500
Dallas, TX 75202
214- 217 -2217
r z
HAMMOND STR ET -
g F "£ M M-
m.� z
:e 0
s; IA 0 50' 100
4 eSs p �• � i �
a o5� SCALE IN FEET
3 d V lJ g8 —
2 �
g s� W j
- n W
III � W�+ '�
g n IC _ Yn �
IC
R =20'
R =20 8' 58' ' p
%777� 22'
T P.
MAIN STREET 8" WL cn m
T ! z X
� _- I 1 � I � w -J LLJ
1. 0 R =20' R -20' 1 ml J
cf) H_ cn L L
40' 22' 94' R =20' ¢ w Q
x
m =20' MAIN S RE T
UJ
n R =zo m -- LL ROAD
r 14 O
- - 18 , n \ — G H
TYP.
� Q
r - - s R �� , �a.. R= li LEGEND O (% a
w R -20 TYP 22' 58' 18 �^ Q
2 _ I PHASE I PAVING
LL-
1 r tm=t lO' SS ESMT
- - % " W L \
I L
a WL \ MAIN STREET\ o n PHASE I SIDEWALK
18' TYP. -
r 24' PHASE 11 PAVING o 0
n R O I
PROPOSED R -2 n I - 24 ° a
z
5' / - n g" VJL BETHEL ROAD ASPHALT a z
TERI -14 ESMT. TRANSITION m u >
la
l o x a
rr
- - 8" WL - - 8_ WL 1 — f PHASE WL o
a I z o
PHASE 11 WL
_
SS 0 8" SS c
PHASE I SS o c o
--
PR OSED,
•• o c„
ESMTI 4F I I I �v-
— — — PHASE II SS
— o ,
g g� : is Kau "'
xs —H L=Lj
Q
S. GOPPELL ROAD >
1 11 > o
re ® I SHEET
SEC.
Le: Mar 15, 2010 — 11:26— User: drp File: N: \IF \Bose \Exhibits \0LD TOWN— PAVING AND UTILITIES EXHBT.dwq