ST8807-CS 880831GINN, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Date:
August 31, 1988
To:
From:
'Russell Doyle, P.E.
Kevin Peiffer~
Subject:
Royal Lane Extension North
Coppell, TX
As follow-up to our previous construction plan reviews and prior
meetings and discussions regarding the above subject project, we
wish to reiterate our observations for the record.
The alignment of the proposed Royal Lane extension northward has
been stated by the applicant, Connell Development Co., as being
consistent with their City approved final plat. We have not
verified whether or not this final plat was approved, signed and
filed at Dallas County, but have requested the City to locate
said plat for verification of this to the DRC (see attached).
The 'proposed alignment is not consistent with the city's
Comprehensive Master Thoroughfare plan.
The proposed alignment conflicts with the currently proposed
SH121/Sandy Lake Road interchange exit and entrance ramps.
In light of the above observations, we suggest the City pursue a
traffic study of the Northwest quadrant of the City to evaluate
what alignment would best meet the future ultimate needs of both
the City of Coppell and the regional needs in this part of Dallas
County.
we shall await your direction and instructions on this matter
prior to proceeding any further with the plan review process.
Please call ~f you should have any further questions.
Alan D. Ratliff
H. Wayne Ginn
John C. Karlsruher
File 88305
17103 Preston Road ® Suite 100 · LB 118 · Dallaa, Te. xas 75248 · Phone 214/248-.4900
opp=ovol, on the pzo~ect ot ol! times du~tng
If const~uctton hos not commenced within one yeoz
opp~ovol of the plons, zesubmtttol of plons may be ~equtzed
by the City Engtnee~ fo~ meeting current stondo~ds ond
SECTION X - FILING OF PLA1
A. Afte~ ~pp~ov~l of the Fin~l P]~t by the City Council
co~ectton of the pl~t ~s =equt=ed by the City Council, the
Planning ~nd the Engtnee=tng Dep~=tments, the Develope~
sh~]] submit filing fees ~nd the =equt~ed numbe£ of coptes
fo~ filing w~th the County Cle=k. These copies sh~ll beo=
~11 sign~tu~es of the City Officials. Afte~ signotu=e by
the City Offtct~ls~ the Develope~ completes the
p=ocess ~nd =etu=ns the =equt~ed numbe~ of filed cop~e~
the City. S~td copies sh~l show the volume ~nd p~ge of
the N~p and Pl~t Reco=ds into which the p]~t w~s filed by
the County Clerk. If th~ f~nol pl~t h~s not been
fo= stgn~tu=es b Ctt ctols w six mo_.nths ~f~e_~
~pp~ovol by the Ctty Council, the pl~t sh~11 be deemed ngll
~nd void, =esubmitt~l sh~11 be ~equl~ed, ~nd cu~e~t
SECTION X1 - SUBN]I'TALS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION
A. P=lo= to outho=lztng const=uction, the Ctty Engtnee= sh~11
be s~tisf~ed that the following conditions h~ve been met:
1. ]he Ftn~l Plot sh~11 be completed to the
~equi=ements of the City Council ot the 'time of
Subdivision O=d.
iS