The URL can be used to link to this page

TCEQ Investigation Sec 2 pg 77-173ATTACHMENT 14 SOIL BORING LOGS AND WELL COMPLETION DETAILS W &M Environmental Group, Inc. (W &M Project No. 940.002.004) WELL NUMBER MW -01 W &M Environmental Group, Inc. PAGE 1 OF 1 www.wh-m.com CLIENT City of Coppell PROJECT NAME Limited Phase II PROJECT NUMBER 940.002 PROJECT LOCATION 461 West Bethel Road, Coppell, Texas DATE STARTED 10/15/09 COMPLETED 10/15/09 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE 2" DRILLING CONTRACTOR SCI LLC GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Geoprobe AT TIME OF DRILLING — LOGGED BY BV CHECKED BY FWC AT END OF DRILLING -- NOTES AFTER DRILLING -- - Uj }o U F- W = o O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION n ° WELL DIAGRAM U o 2z a 0 Fill, light gray, sandy, dry 0.1 3.0 Clay, dark gray, calcium mottles, moist, friable CL 5 -- 5.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Clay, dark gray, calcium mottles, low plasticity, moist 8.8 CL 10 -- 10 ------------------------------ - - - - -- Clay, brown to light brown, sandy, low plasticity, moist 3.6 CL 1.3 13.5 17 feet of Clay, light brown, sandy, black staining, moist 0.010 -inch CL slotted screen 15 MW -01- 15.0 17.0 Clay, light brown, sandy, low plasticity CL 17.5 Clay, gray and light brown, sandy, low to moderate plasticity, moist, slight petroleum odor CL 20 20.0 900 Sand, dark brown, black staining, red mottles, petroleum odor, refusal at 22 feet SW - M W-01-- — •. °.° 22.0 ----- - - - - -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Bottom 800 of hole at 22.0 feet 25 WELL NUMBER MW -02 W &M Environmental Group, Inc. PAGE 1 OF 1 www.wh -m.com CLIENT City of Coppell PROJECT NAME Limited Phase II PROJECT NUMBER 940.002 PROJECT LOCATION 461 West Bethel Road, Coppell, Texas DATE STARTED 10/16/09 COMPLETED 10/16/09 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE 2" DRILLING CONTRACTOR SCI LLC GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Geoprobe �Z AT TIME OF DRILLING 15.0 ft LOGGED BY BV CHECKED BY FWC AT END OF DRILLING -- NOTES AFTER DRILLING -- - W x w r w -1 g vi = a_ O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION a g WELL DIAGRAM Uj cz O a U) 0 0.5 Fill, sandy, saturated N '\N \N Clay, dark gray, moderate plasticity 24.0 CL 5 MW — 5.0 ----------------------------- - - - - -- Clay, light gray and light brown, moderate plasticity 20.0 CL -- 9.0- ----- -------- --------------------- Clay, light brown with some gray, sandy, low to moderate plasticity, moist 10 29.5 '. CL 15 15.0 13.7 - Sand, light brown with some gray, low to moderate plasticity, moist, petroleum odor 15 feet of 0.010 -inch SP ' slotted screen 20 MW -02 _ 20_0 290 Sand, tan, low plasticity, saturated, greasy, petroleum odor, refusal at 24 feet SW 820 24.0 Bottom of hole at 24.0 feet. 25 WELL NUMBER MW -03 W &M Environmental Group, Inc. PAGE 1 OF 1 www.wh -m.com CLIENT City of Coppell PROJECT NAME Limited Phase II PROJECT NUMBER 940.002 PROJECT LOCATION 461 West Bethel Road, Coppell, Texas DATE STARTED 10/15/09 COMPLETED 10/15/09 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE 2" DRILLING CONTRACTOR SCI LLC GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Geoprobe AT TIME OF DRILLING — LOGGED BY BV CHECKED BY FWC AT END OF DRILLING -- NOTES AFTER DRILLING -- - W a. x oa W g vi = Q-0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION a Q WELL DIAGRAM 2 0 a 0 0.5 Fill material, sand and rock Clay, dark gray, iron deposits, moderate plasticity, moist 1.1 CL -- 4.0 Clay, gray and brown, low to moderate plasticity 5 1.5 CL -- 9.0 ------------------------------------ Clay, light brown and gray, moist, low to moderate plasticity, staining 10 CL 1.0 11.0 Clay, light brown and gray, moist, moderate plasticity CL 17.5 feet of 0.010 -inch 15 -- 15.0 ------------------------------ - - - - -- Clay, gray light brown, calcium mottles, low plasticity, moist, petroleum odor 1.5 slotted screen CL 19.0 Clay, light gray, calcium mottles, low plasticity, moist, petroleum odor CL W 20.0 20 MW -03- Sand, light brown, clayey, mast, petroleum odor 980.0 SC '. .' 21.5 Clay, brown,sandy, gravel mixed in, petroleum odor, refusal at 22.5 feet CL 22.5 Bottom of hole at 22.5 feet. 670.0 25 WELL NUMBER MW -04 W &M Environmental Group, Inc. PAGE 1 OF 1 www.wh -m.com CLIENT City of Coppell PROJECT NAME Limited Phase II PROJECT NUMBER 940.002 PROJECT LOCATION 461 West Bethel Road, Coppell, Texas DATE STARTED 10/15/09 COMPLETED 10/15/09 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE 2" DRILLING CONTRACTOR SCI LLC GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Geoprobe AT TIME OF DRILLING — LOGGED BY SF CHECKED BY FWC AT END OF DRILLING -- NOTES AFTER DRILLING -- - W w- g (6 o O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ° WELL DIAGRAM D 2Z o c9 a Q 0 0.5 Topsoil 1' Clay, dark gray, silty, friable MW -04 86.0 CL -- 3.0 ----------------------------------- Clay, reddish brown, sandy, friable, low plasticity, moist, roots mixed in CL 5 -- 5.0 ----------------------------- - - - - -- Clay, light gray and brown, low plasticity, moist 17.2 :. CL 8.0 Sand, light brown some gray, clayey, friable, moist CL 10 • 10.0 Sand, light brown some gray, clayey, friable, moist 4.8 CL _ 11.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Sand, tan, moist, friable 17 feet of 0.010 -inch slotted screen CL 15 -- 15 =----------------------------- - - - - -- Sand, tan, poorly grated, saturated 4.0 :. CL 18.0 ------------------------------------ Sand, tan, some small gravel, saturated, poorly graded 20 MW -04- OCL 9.3 — — ; 22.0 — - - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Sand, tan, clayey, mast, low plasticity, refusal at 23 feet CL MW -04- 23.0 3.2 Bottom of hole at 23.0 feet. 25 WELL NUMBER MW -05 W &M Environmental Group, Inc. PAGE 1 OF 2 www.wh -m.com CLIENT City of Coppell PROJECT NAME Limited Phase II PROJECT NUMBER 940.002 PROJECT LOCATION 461 West Bethel Road, Coppell, Texas DATE STARTED 3/24/ -Ge /O COMPLETED 3/24/09 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE 2" DRILLING CONTRACTOR SCI LLC GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Geoprobe -7 AT TIME OF DRILLING 14.5 ft LOGGED BY BV CHECKED BY FWC 1 AT END OF DRILLING 11.9 ft NOTES AFTER DRILLING -- - EL L U Q. w a Co 2 J MATERIAL DESCRIPTION n o WELL DIAGRAM ° ? 2 a 0 0.5 Asphalt and fill material Clay, gray, moderate plasticty 0.0 CL -- 3.5 ----------------------------------- Sandy Clay, red -brown and some orange, low plasticity, friable 5 CL 0.0 -- 6.0 ------------------------------------ Sandy Clay, gray light- brown, moist, low plasticity CL 8.0 Clayey Sand, tan -brown with gray, moist, black rock fragments mixed in 10 SW- 0.0 SC i 12.5 Silty Sand, very moist, low plasticity, saturated at 14.5 feet SM 15 - ::15.0 0.0 Sandy Clay, tan and light- orange, saturated CL 18.0 Sand, orange, fine grain well sorted sand, low plasticity, saturated 18 feet of 0.010 -inch 20 SW 0.0 slotted screen 22.0 Silty Sand, tan and light orange, low plasticity, saturated SM 24 Sand, orange, fine grained well sorted sand, low plasticity, saturated, refusal at 28 feet SW 25 (Continued Next Page) WELL NUMBER MW -05 W &M Environmental Group, Inc. PAGE 2 OF 2 www.wh -m.com CLIENT City of Coppell PROJECT NAME Limited Phase II PROJECT NUMBER 940.002 PROJECT LOCATION 461 West Bethel Road, Coppell, Texas w w a? a. 0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION n o WELL DIAGRAM QZ 0 d 25 Sand, orange, fine grained well sorted sand, low plasticity, saturated, refusal at 28 feet (continued) SW 28.0 ' 0.0 Bottom of hole at 28.0 feet. 30 35 40 45 50 BORING NUMBER SB -01 W &M Environmental Group, Inc. PAGE 1 OF 1 www.wh - m.com CLIENT City of Coppell PROJECT NAME Limited Phase II PROJECT NUMBER 940.002 PROJECT LOCATION 461 West Bethel Road, Coppell, Texas DATE STARTED 7/8/09 COMPLETED 7/8/09 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE 2" DRILLING CONTRACTOR SCI LLC GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Geoprobe AT TIME OF DRILLING — LOGGED BY SF CHECKED BY FWC AT END OF DRILLING NOTES AFTER DRILLING -- - Lu _ w � �Lu 2 a 0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION E a g 2 j Z c9 a Q 0 Asphalt surface material 0.8 Fill material, sand, light brown, large rocks Clay, dark gray, sandy, low plasticity, moist to very moist CLs SB -01- — 2. 0 ---------------------------------------- - - - - -- 6 Clay with sand, dark gray, firm, low plasticity, moist SB -01- 'CLs 899.2 4.0 Bottom of hole at 4.0 feet. 5 10 15 20 25 BORING NUMBER SB -02 W &M Environmental Group, Inc. PAGE 1 OF 1 www.wh -m.com CLIENT City of Coppell PROJECT NAME Limited Phase II PROJECT NUMBER 940.002 PROJECT LOCATION 461 West Bethel Road, Coppell, Texas DATE STARTED 7/8/09 COMPLETED 7/8/09 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE 2" DRILLING CONTRACTOR SCI LLC GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Geoprobe AT TIME OF DRILLING — LOGGED BY SF CHECKED BY FWC AT END OF DRILLING -- NOTES AFTER DRILLING -- - Uj U E _ d x v w ui 00 g V n U O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION n w o ° o 2 O a U) 0 Fill material, tan Clay, dark gray, sandy, low plasticity, moist 0.8 CL SB -02- ' 18.7 -- 3. 0 ---------------------------------------- - - - - -- 14.3 Clay, dark gray, low plasticity, firm, slightly moist CL 4.0 Bottom of hole at 4.0 feet. 12.5 5 10 15 20 25 BORING NUMBER SB -03 W &M Environmental Group, Inc. PAGE 1 OF 1 4WWwww.wh-m.com CLIENT City of Coppell PROJECT NAME Limited Phase II PROJECT NUMBER 940.002 PROJECT LOCATION 461 West Bethel Road, Coppell Texas DATE STARTED 7/8/09 COMPLETED 7/8/09 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE 2" DRILLING CONTRACTOR SCI LLC GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Geoprobe AT TIME OF DRILLING — LOGGED BY SF CHECKED BY FWC AT END OF DRILLING -- NOTES AFTER DRILLING -- - uj }u U w F uJ = Q O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION E CL a p 2Z 0 0 a Q U) 0 Asphalt surface material Fill material, tan, sandy Sand, dark brown, clayey, nodules, low plasticity, moist SW SB -03- ' SC 0.6 3. 0---------------------------- -- - - - - -- Clay, dark gray, sandy, low plasticity, moist 0.4 CL 4.0 Bottom of hole at 4.0 feet. 0.1 5 10 15 20 25 BORING NUMBER SB -04 W &M Environmental Group, Inc. PAGE 1 OF 1 www.wh - m.com CLIENT City of Coppell PROJECT NAME Limited Phase II PROJECT NUMBER 940.002 PROJECT LOCATION 461 West Bethel Road, Coppell, Texas DATE STARTED 7/8/09 COMPLETED 7/8/09 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE 2" DRILLING CONTRACTOR SCI LLC GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Geoprobe AT TIME OF DRILLING — LOGGED BY SF CHECKED BY FWC AT END OF DRILLING -- NOTES AFTER DRILLING -- - W _ Q Lu g 2 a 0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION a a �z a a 0 Fill material, light gray, large rocks, friable, dry 0.8 Clay, dark gray, sandy, iron deposits, moist CL -- 2.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.8 Clay, dark gray with orange speckles, sandy, redobmorphic features, moist CL 0.5 5 -- 5.0 ----------------------------------------------- Clay, gray, sandy, redo)amorphic modifications, low plasticity CL 0.2 -- 7.0 ---------------------------------------------- Sand, gray, clayey, calcareous nodules, friable, moist 0.2 SW- SC 10 10.0 S &04 -1 Bottom of hole at 10.0 feet. 0.8 15 20 25 BORING NUMBER SB -05 W &M Environmental Group, Inc. PAGE 1 OF 1 www.wh -m.com CLIENT City of Coppell PROJECT NAME Limited Phase II PROJECT NUMBER 940.002 PROJECT LOCATION 461 West Bethel Road, Coppell, Texas DATE STARTED 7/8/09 COMPLETED 7/8/09 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE 2" DRILLING CONTRACTOR SCI LLC GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Geoprobe AT TIME OF DRILLING — LOGGED BY SF CHECKED BY FWC AT END OF DRILLING -- NOTES AFTER DRILLING -- - Lu of U L N = a 0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION n Li p az Q Z :5 c9 a co 0 Fill material, gray, sandy gravel, dry 0.8 Clay, dark gray, sandy, calcareous nodules, low plasticity, moist CLs . 0.5 3.0 Clay, dark brown, sandy, friable, calcareous nodules, small rocks, moist CLs 0.2 5 5.0 Clay, gray, sandy, calcareous nodules, low plasticity, moist CLs 0.2 -- .7.0 Sand, gray, clayey, calcareous nodules, moist SW- 0.3 SC 9.0 SW- '. Sand, gray to light brown, clayey, calcareous nodules, friable, mast 10 SC 10.0 SB -05 -1 Bottom of hole at 10.0 feet. 0.4 15 20 25 BORING NUMBER SB -06 W &M Environmental Group, Inc. PAGE 1 OF 1 www.wh - m.com CLIENT City of Coppell PROJECT NAME Limited Phase II PROJECT NUMBER 940.002 PROJECT LOCATION 461 West Bethel Road, Coppell, Texas DATE STARTED 7/8/09 COMPLETED 7/8109 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE 2" DRILLING CONTRACTOR SCI LLC GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Geoprobe AT TIME OF DRILLING — LOGGED BY SF CHECKED BY FWC AT END OF DRILLING -- NOTES AFTER DRILLING -- - W x W ui W ui = Q O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION n a < 0 a z c� a U) 0 Topsoil with vegetation, dry 0.8 Fill material, gray, large rocks, dry Clay, dark gray, sandy, firm, redopmorphic modifications, moist, low plasticity 0.8 CLs 0.6 5 5.0 Clay, light gray and brown, sandy, calcareous nodules, slightly firm, low plasticity 0.6 CLs -- 8.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.4 Clay, light gray to brown, sandy, calcareous nodules, redopmorphic modifications, moist CLs 10 10'0 SB -06 -1 Bottom of hole at 10.0 feet. 1.5 15 20 25 BORING NUMBER SB -07 W &M Environmental Group, Inc. PAGE 1 OF 1 www.wh -m.com CLIENT City of Coppell PROJECT NAME Limited Phase II PROJECT NUMBER 940.002 PROJECT LOCATION 461 West Bethel Road, Coppell, Texas DATE STARTED 7/8/09 COMPLETED 7/8/09 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE 2" DRILLING CONTRACTOR SCI LLC GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Geoprobe AT TIME OF DRILLING — LOGGED BY SF CHECKED BY FWC AT END OF DRILLING -- NOTES AFTER DRILLING -- - W w -i g a 0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION CL a p 2Z O O a Q U) 0 " Topsoil with vegetation, gray, friable. dry 0 ' 8 Fill material, gray, large rocks Clay, dark gray, sandy, large rocks, calcareous nodules, low plasticity, moist 0.3 CLs 0.0 5 5.0 Clay, dark gray, sandy, redopmorphic modifications, calcareous nodules, firm, low plasticity, moist CLs 0.0 . 7.0 Sand, light gray to brown, clayey, calcareous nodules, friable, moist SB -07- ' ae 0.3 SC 10 10.0 Bottom of hole at 10.0 feet. 0.0 15 20 25 BORING NUMBER SB -08 W &M Environmental Group, Inc. PAGE 1 OF 1 www.wh - m.com CLIENT City of Coppell PROJECT NAME Limited Phase II PROJECT NUMBER 940.002 PROJECT LOCATION 461 West Bethel Road, Coppell, Texas DATE STARTED 7/8/09 COMPLETED 7/8/09 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE 2" DRILLING CONTRACTOR SCI LLC GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Geoprobe AT TIME OF DRILLING — LOGGED BY SF CHECKED BY FWC AT END OF DRILLING -- NOTES AFTER DRILLING -- - Lij a. W U w W W 1 = Q-0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION a a o mz (D a � a 0 " Topsoil with gravel and vegetation 1.0 Fill material, brown, sandy, friable, moist Clay, dark gray, sandy, firm, low plasticity, moist 0.0 CLs 0.0 5 -- 5.0 ----------------------------------------------- Clay, light gray, sandy, calcareous nodules, low plasticity, moist CLs -- . 6. 0 ---------------------------------------- - - - - -- 0.0 Clay, light gray to brown, sandy, calcareous nodules, firm, moist CLs 0.0 10 1 0.0 SB -08 -1 Bottom of hole at 10.0 feet. 0.0 15 20 25 BORING NUMBER SB -09 W &M Environmental Group, Inc. PAGE 1 OF 1 www.wh - m.com CLIENT City of Coppell PROJECT NAME Limited Phase 11 PROJECT NUMBER 940.002 PROJECT LOCATION 461 West Bethel Road, Coppell, Texas DATE STARTED 7/8/09 COMPLETED 7/8/09 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE 2" DRILLING CONTRACTOR SCI LLC GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Geoprobe AT TIME OF DRILLING — LOGGED BY SF CHECKED BY FWC AT END OF DRILLING -- NOTES AFTER DRILLING -- - Lu �� U a g 2 a 0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ° W CL D Z Q � a 0 Fill material, dark gray, firm 0.8 Fill material, brown, sand moist, friable Clay, dark brown, sandy, very moist, low plasticity 0.0 CLs 0.0 5 5.0 Clay, dark gray, sandy, high plasticity, very moist NN 0.0 CH 8. 0---------------------------- -- - - - - -- Clay, dark gray, sandy, calcareous nodules, moist, high plasticity 0.0 CH 10 SB 10.0 -09 -1 Bottom of hole at 10.0 feet. 0.0 15 20 25 BORING NUMBER SB -10 W &M Environmental Group, Inc. PAGE 1 OF 1 www.wh - m.com CLIENT CitV of Coppell PROJECT NAME Limited Phase II PROJECT NUMBER 940.002 PROJECT LOCATION 461 West Bethel Road, Coppell, Texas DATE STARTED 10/15/09 COMPLETED 10/15/09 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE 2" DRILLING CONTRACTOR SCI LLC GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Geoprobe AT TIME OF DRILLING — LOGGED BY SF CHECKED BY FWC AT END OF DRILLING -- NOTES AFTER DRILLING -- - W _ w �w W 00 N = a O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION En ° W 2z a Q 0 Fill, light brown, sandy clay 1.0 Clay, dark brown, sandy, low plasticity 1 4.0 0.1 CL- ML Sand, brown, friable, dry 1.3 5 SW 0.1 -- • 8. 0 ---------------------------------------- - - - - -- 0.5 Sand, light gray, clayey, dry, friable SC . 10 -- ..•. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Sand, light brown, with some clay, dry 0.5 SW- SC 12.0 SB -10 -1 Bottom of hole at 12.0 feet. 0.5 15 20 25 BORING NUMBER SB -11 W &M Environmental Group, Inc. PAGE 1 OF 1 www.wh CLIENT City of Coppell PROJECT NAME Limited Phase II PROJECT NUMBER 940.002 PROJECT LOCATION 461 West Bethel Road, Coppell Texas DATE STARTED 10/15/09 COMPLETED 10/15/09 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE 2" DRILLING CONTRACTOR SCI LLC GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Geoprobe AT TIME OF DRILLING — LOGGED BY SF CHECKED BY FWC AT END OF DRILLING -- NOTES AFTER DRILLING -- - LU a. w Lu U� Q O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION CL n C, J Z O a U) 0 Clay, light brown, sandy, some mottles CL 2.8 3.0 Sand, brown, with clay lenses, dry SW- •" 3.1 SC : 5 -- ;; 5.0 ----------------------------------------------- Sand, brown, clayey, dry SW- SC 2.0 6.5 CLS Clay, light gray, sandy, calcium mottles 7.5 Clay, light brown, sandy, calcium mottles, friable, dry CLS 9.5 10 SB 11 - 1 0CLS Clay, gray, sandy, calcium mottles, moderate plasticity 11.0 SC Sand, dark brown, clayey, friable, clay lenses ' 12.0 Bottom of hole at 12.0 feet. 2.0 15 20 25 BORING NUMBER SB -12 W &M Environmental Group, Inc. PAGE 1 OF 1 wwyt - m.com CLIENT City of Coppell PROJECT NAME Limited Phase II PROJECT NUMBER 940.002 PROJECT LOCATION 461 West Bethel Road, Coppell, Texas DATE STARTED 10/15/09 COMPLETED 10/15/09 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE 2" DRILLING CONTRACTOR SCI LLC GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD _Geoprobe AT TIME OF DRILLING — LOGGED BY SF CHECKED BY FWC AT END OF DRILLING -- NOTES AFTER DRILLING -- - Lu CL �m W e u> _(D a 0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Q. a W 0 d� 0 Q Z c9 a U) 0 Fill, dark gray, clay, low plasticity, moist 2.0 Clay, light gray, with brown, sandy 3 ' 2 CL SB -12- ' 2.4 5 -- 5.0 ----------------------------------------------- Clay, light brown with some gray, sandy SB -12- ' CL 3.5 7.0 Clay, light gray, sandy, large mottles, friable, dry CL 2.6 9.0 CL Clay, gray, sandy, small calcium mottles, friable, dry 10 SB 12 - 10L — 10 _ 0----------------- ----------------------- - - - - -- Clay, gray, sandy, friable, dry 5.0 CL 12.0 Bottom of hole at 12.0 feet. 2 $ 15 20 25 BORING NUMBER SB -13 W &M Environmental Group, Inc. PAGE 1 OF 1 www.wh -m.com CLIENT City of Coppell PROJECT NAME Limited Phase II PROJECT NUMBER 940.002 PROJECT LOCATION 461 West Bethel Road, Coppell, Texas DATE STARTED 10/15/09 COMPLETED 10/15/09 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE 2" DRILLING CONTRACTOR SCI LLC GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Geoprobe AT TIME OF DRILLING — LOGGED BY SF CHECKED BY FWC AT END OF DRILLING -- NOTES AFTER DRILLING -- - Lu L U Lu g 2 a 0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION a Q �z vii a O 0 Fill, sandy clay,small rocks 1.0 NN Clay, dark gray, some sand, moderate plasticity, iron deposits 1.6 CL SB -13- ' 0.5 5 — — CL .0 ----------------------------------------------- Clay, gray, sandy, dry, low plasticity 18.0 . 0----------------------------- -- - - - - -- Clay, light gray, sandy, Iron deposits, dry, friable 1.3 CL Sand, light brown, clayey, calcium mottles, moist, friable 1.6 SP- 10 SB- 13 -10' SC •' 0.5 11.0 CL Clay, light gray with some brown, clacium mottles, moist, low plasticity 12.0 Bottom of hole at 12.0 feet. 0.9 15 20 25 BORING NUMBER SB -14 W &M Environmental Group, Inc. PAGE 1 OF 1 www.wh -m.com CLIENT City of Coppell PROJECT NAME Limited Phase II PROJECT NUMBER 940.002 PROJECT LOCATION 461 West Bethel Road, Coppell, Texas DATE STARTED 10/16/09 COMPLETED 10/16/09 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE 2" DRILLING CONTRACTOR SCI LLC GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Geoprobe AT TIME OF DRILLING — LOGGED BY BV CHECKED BY FWC AT END OF DRILLING -- NOTES AFTER DRILLING -- - w }� U E _ F W a g O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION CL o w Q z c7 a 0 0.5 Topsoil, sandy, saturated Clay, dark gray, small rocks mixed in, low to moderate plasticity 8.7 8.0 CL 6.0 387 5 5.0 S13-14- i. Bottom of hole at 5.0 feet. 240 10 15 20 25 BORING NUMBER SB -15 W &M Environmental Group, Inc. PAGE 1 OF 1 www.wh -m.com CLIENT City of Coppell PROJECT NAME Limited Phase II PROJECT NUMBER 940.002 PROJECT LOCATION 461 West Bethel Road, Coppell, Texas DATE STARTED 10/16/09 COMPLETED 10/16/09 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE 2" DRILLING CONTRACTOR SCI LLC GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Geoprobe AT TIME OF DRILLING — LOGGED BY BV CHECKED BY FWC AT END OF DRILLING -- NOTES AFTER DRILLING -- - w w LU vUi o J MATERIAL DESCRIPTION n CL a ¢Z C6 O a U) 0 0.5 Fill, light brown, saturated Clay, dark gray, low to moderate plasticity 35.0 20.0 SB -15- ' CL 122.3 137.6 5 5.0 Bottom of hole at 5.0 feet. 90 7 10 15 20 25 BORING NUMBER SB -16 W &M Environmental Group, Inc. PAGE 1 OF 1 www.wh -m.com CLIENT City of Coppell PROJECT NAME Limited Phase II PROJECT NUMBER 940.002 PROJECT LOCATION 461 West Bethel Road, Coppell, Texas DATE STARTED 10/16/09 COMPLETED 10/16/09 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE 2" DRILLING CONTRACTOR SCI LLC GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Geoprobe AT TIME OF DRILLING – LOGGED BY BV CHECKED BY FWC AT END OF DRILLING — NOTES PI not operational AFTER DRILLING -- LU � X U M: C w u- = Q O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION C) �Z � 0 Q 0 0.5 Fill, sand, light brown, some gravel Clay, dark gray, small rocks mixed in, low plasticity CL 5 -- 5.5 ------------------------------------------------- Clay, light brown, orange mottles, low plasticity CL 10 10.0 Sand, light brown, low plasticity SC ' .- 14.5 15 CL Clay, light brown, low plasticity —21 15.5 Sand, tan, rocks mixed in, low plasticity, moist SW 18.0 Clay, tan, moderate to high plasticity, moist CL- ML 20 20.0 Bottom of hole at 20.0 feet. 25 BORING NUMBER SB -17 W &M Environmental Group, Inc. PAGE 1 OF 1 www.wh - m.com CLIENT City of Coppell PROJECT NAME Limited Phase II PROJECT NUMBER 940.002 PROJECT LOCATION 461 West Bethel Road, Coppell Texas DATE STARTED 3/24/10 COMPLETED 3/24/10 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE 2" DRILLING CONTRACTOR SCI LLC GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Geoprobe AT TIME OF DRILLING -- LOGGED BY BV CHECKED BY FWC AT END OF DRILLING - -- NOTES AFTER DRILLING -- - Lu Lu U a _ (6 2 Q O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ° 0 2 Z J � d Q 0 topsoil and fill material 0.8 Clay, brown- black, hard, friable, low plasticity, gray rock fragments mixed in, light petroleum odor around 4 feet 0.0 CL -- 4.5 — ------------------------------------ 33.5 5 Clay, gray an lig brown little — — moistu— — — re, — small — spots of dark staining 5.4 CL 0.0 9. 0------------------------------ -- - - - - -- Clay, gray- orange, moist, low plasticity, sand and moisture increasing with depth 1.9 10 0.0 CL 0.0 14.0 Sand, red- orange, saturated, low plasticity 0.0 15 SW- SC 16.0 Bottom of hole at 16.0 feet. 0.0 20 25 BORING NUMBER SB -17 W &M Environmental Group, Inc. PAGE 1 OF 1 www.wh-m.com CLIENT City of Coppell PROJECT NAME Limited Phase II PROJECT NUMBER 940.002 PROJECT LOCATION 461 West Bethel Road, Coppell, Texas DATE STARTED 3/24/09 COMPLETED 3/24/09 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE 2" DRILLING CONTRACTOR SCI LLC GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Geoprobe AT TIME OF DRILLING — LOGGED BY BV CHECKED BY FWC AT END OF DRILLING -- NOTES AFTER DRILLING -- - x L _ w CO ui U a O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ° o a 2 a U) 0 topsoil and fill material Clay, brown - black, hard, friable, low plasticity, gray rock fragments mixed in, light petroleum odor around 4 feet 0.0 CL — 4.5 ----------------------------------------------- 33.5 5 Clay, gray and light- brown, little moisture, small spots of dark staining 5.4 CL 0.0 9. 0-------------------- -- - - - - -- Clay, gray- orange, moist, low plasticity, sand and moisture increasing with depth 1.9 10 0.0 CL 0.0 14.0 Sand, red - orange, saturated, low plasticity 0.0 15 SW- SC 16.0 Bottom of hole at 16.0 feet. 0.0 20 25 WELL NUMBER TMW -01 W &M Environmental Group, Inc. PAGE 1 OF 1 www.wh -m.com CLIENT City of Coppell PROJECT NAME Limited Phase II PROJECT NUMBER 940.002 PROJECT LOCATION 461 West Bethel Road, Coppell, Texas DATE STARTED 7/8/09 COMPLETED 7/8/09 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE 2" DRILLING CONTRACTOR SCI LLC GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Geoprobe -7 AT TIME OF DRILLING 19.3 ft LOGGED BY TJC CHECKED BY FWC 1 AT END OF DRILLING 20.0 ft NOTES AFTER DRILLING -- - W a U x W w J U Q-0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Q ° WELL DIAGRAM W �z � O a Q 0 Asphalt surface cover Fill material, tan, sandy, clayey, large white rocks, moist Clay, dark gray brown, small amount of sand, moderate plasticity, moist, very slight petroleum odor CH 5 TMW -01 5 0 Clay, gray grading to light gray, significant calcareous deposits between 5' and 9', tan 10.4 mottles and redobmorphic features between 7' and 10', moist, firm, moderate to high plasticity CH 10 MW 01 40 10_0 _ Clay, light gray with few tan mottles, sandy, some gravel, calcareous deposits, 3.7 moderate plasticity, moist, wet at 13.5'. CLs . 15 feet of 15 MW -01 95 ' .15 . 0 — Clay, light gray with tan mottles, very firm, moderate plasticity, few calcareous 9 8 0.010 -inch slotted screen deposits, moist, petroleum odor CH -- 19 - 35 ---------------------------------- Sand, gray, clayey, fine - grained, saturated, small amount of gravel between 21' and 20 MW -01 20' 122', petroleum odor 2770 SC- ' SM MW -01 " 22.0 2445 Bottom of hole at 22.0 feet. 25 WELL NUMBER TMW -02 W &M Environmental Group, Inc. PAGE 1 OF 1 www.wh -m.com CLIENT City of Coppell PROJECT NAME Limited Phase II PROJECT NUMBER 940.002 PROJECT LOCATION 461 West Bethel Road, Coppell, Texas DATE STARTED 7/8/09 COMPLETED 7/8/09 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE 2" DRILLING CONTRACTOR SCI LLC GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Geoprobe V AT TIME OF DRILLING 19.0 ft LOGGED BY SF CHECKED BY FWC 1 AT END OF DRILLING 17.0 ft NOTES AFTER DRILLING -- - W CL ai Q O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ° WELL DIAGRAM p 2Z 0 O CL a Q C0 0 Asphalt surface cover 7 Fill material, tan, sandy, clayey, large white rocks, moist Clay, dark gray brown, small amount of sand, moderate plasticity, mast, very slight petroleum odor CH 5 TMW -01 -6- - — Clay, gray grading to light gray, significant calcareous deposits between 5' and 9', tan 10.4 mottles and redopmorphic features between 7' and 10', moist, firm, moderate to high 15( plasticity CH 10 MW -01 40" .0 — 3.7 Clay, light gray with few tan mottles, sandy, some gravel, calcareous deposits, moderate plasticity, moist, wet at 13.5'. CLs . 15 MW -0145 15_0— — - -- -- -- -- — — -- - - - - -- Clay, light gray with tan mottles, very firm, moderate plasticity, few calcareous 9.8 15 feet of 0.010 -inch slotted screen N deposits, moist, petroleum odor = CH 19 3 ____ _______________________________ Sand, gray, clayey, fine - grained, saturated, small amount of gravel between 21' and 20 MW -01 20' 22', petroleum odor, refusal at 22.5 feet 2770 SC- SM MW -0122' 2445 22.5 Bottom of hole at 22.5 feet. L WELL NUMBER TMW -03 W &M Environmental Group, Inc. PAGE 1 OF 1 "nA , w.wh -m.com CLIENT City of Coppell PROJECT NAME Limited Phase II PROJECT NUMBER 940.002 PROJECT LOCATION 461 West Bethel Road, Coppell Texas DATE STARTED 7/8/09 COMPLETED 7/8/09 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE 2" DRILLING CONTRACTOR SCI LLC GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Geoprobe -7 AT TIME OF DRILLING 20.0 ft LOGGED BY SF CHECKED BY FWC 1 AT END OF DRILLING 22.0 ft NOTES AFTER DRILLING -- - Lu W U Q. W u i a = J MATERIAL DESCRIPTION n. ° WELL DIAGRAM a o 0- o az a U) 0 Asphalt surface material 1.0 Fill material, tan with large rocks Clay, very dark gray, small amount of sand, firm, moderate plasticity, slightly moist CLs 5 TMW -0 — 5.0 ----------------------------- - - - - -- Clay, dark gray, some sand, moderate plasticity, moist 1.7 CLs -- 8.0 ------------------------------------ :' SP- Sand, dark gray, some clay, calcareous deposits, slightly moist SC -- •:'9.0 ------------------------------------ SP- Sand, dark gray, silty, calcareous deposits, slightly moist 10 MW -03 SM :.' 10_0— - - - -- -- - - -- --- - - - - -- — - - -- Sand, light gray, some clay, with orange mottles, some gravel, moist, low plasticity 1.2 ' ; SP- .' SM :. -- 12.0 ------------------------------------ Sand, gray, clayey, low plasticity, moist SW- SC ::. :.. 1 5 feet t of 15 MW -03 45— ; , ; 15 ------------------------------ - - - - -- Sand, light brown, some clay, mottling, low plasticity, wet 8 :.• 0.010 -inch slotted screen SW- SC 20 MW- 0322)' • • 0 V---------- - - - - -- --------------- - -- Clay, dark gray, some sand, friable, wet 6 CL MW -03 22.0 261 - Bottom of hole at 22.0 feet. 25 0 • • Well Report: Tracking #:185564 Page I of 2 Drilling Date; STATE OF TEXAS WELL REPORT for Tracking #185564 Owner: City of Coppell Owner Well #: SB# 1,2,3 Address: 461 W. Bethel Rd. Grid #: 32 -08 -6 0- 0 4- 0 1 Hole Plug Coppell, TX 75019 1st Interval: No Data Well Tests: Well Location: 461 W. Bethel Rd. Latitude: 32° 57'09" N No Data Coppell , TX 75019 Chemical Analysis Made: No Data Well County: Dallas Longitude: 097° 00'14" W Elevation: No Data GPS Brand Used: Garmin Type of Work: New Well Proposed Use: Environmental 5066 Brush Creek Rd. Fort Worth, TX 76119 Soil Boring Drilling Date; Started: 718/2009 Completed: 7/8/2009 Diameter of Hole: No Data Drilling Method: Other: Geo Probe Borehole No Data Completion: 0- 0 4- 0 1 Hole Plug Annular Sea] Data: 1st Interval: No Data Well Tests: 2nd Interval: No Data Water Quality: 3rd Interval: No Data Surface No Data Completion: Chemical Analysis Made: No Data Water Level: Static level: No Data Artesian flow: No Data Packers: No Data Plugging Info: Casing left in well: Cement/Bentonite left in well: From (ft) To (ft) From (ft) To (ft) Cem /Bent Sacks Used 0- 0 4- 0 1 Hole Plug Type Of Pump: No Data Well Tests: No Data Water Quality: Type of Water: No Data Depth of Strata: No Data Chemical Analysis Made: No Data Did the driller knowingly penetrate any strata which contained undesirable constituents: No Certification Data: The driller certified that the driller drilled this well (or the well was drilled under the driller's direct supervision) and that each and all of the statements herein are true and correct. The driller understood that failure to complete the required items will result in the log(s) being returned for completion and resubmittal. Company Strata Core Drilling Co. Information: 5066 Brush Creek Rd. Fort Worth, TX 76119 Driller License 3121 Number: httD: //134.125.70.235/drillers- new /insertwellrenortnrint.asn ?track =l R Well Report: 'I racking #:1215564 Page 2 ot Licensed Well Roddy Qualls Driller Signature: Registered Driller Joseph Ray Apprentice Signature: Apprentice 58017 Registration Number: Comments: No Data IMPORTANT NOTICE FOR PERSONS HAVING WELLS DRILLED CONCERNING CONFIDENTIALITY TEX. OCC. CODE Title 12, Chapter 1941.251, authorizes the owner (owner or the person for whom the well was drilled) to keep information in Well Reports confidential. The Department shall hold the contents of the well log confidential and not a matter of public record if it receives, by certified mail, a written request to do so from the owner. Please include the report's Tracking number (Tracking #185564) on your written request. Texas Department of Licensing & Regulation P.O. Box 12157 Austin, TX 78711 (512) 463 -7880 DESC. & COLOR OF FORMATION MATERIAL From (ft) To (ft) Description 0 - 4" Asphalt Gravel 4" - 4' Dk Brown Clay CASING, BLANK PIPE & WELL SCREEN DATA No Data httn: // 134.125.70, 23 5 /drillers- new /insertwellrenortorint.asn ?track = 185564 7/9/2009 Well Report: Tracking #:185566 Page 1 of 2 STATE OF TEXAS WELL REPORT for Tracking #185566 Owner: City of Coppell Owner Well #: SB# 4,5,6,7,8,9 Address: 461 W. Bethel Rd. Grid #: 32 -08 -6 Borehole Coppell , TX 75019 Completion: 0 - 0 10 - 0 1 Hole Plug Well Location: 461 W. Bethel Rd. Latitude: 32 57'09" N Information: Coppell , TX 75019 Surface No Data Well County: Dallas Longitude: 097° 00' 14" W Elevation: No Data GPS Brand Used: Garmin Type of Work: New Well Proposed Use: Environmental Soil Boring Drilling Date: Started: 7/8/2009 Completed: 718/2009 Diameter of Hole: Diameter: 2 in From Surface To 10 ft Drilling Method: Other: Geo Probe Borehole No Data Completion: 0 - 0 10 - 0 1 Hole Plug Annular Seal Data: 1st Interval: No Data Well Tests: 2nd Interval: No Data Information: 3rd Interval: No Data Surface No Data Completion: 3121 Water Level: Static level: No Data Artesian flow: No Data Packers: No Data Plugging Info: Casing left in well: CemenUBentonite left in well: From (ft) To (ft) From (ft) To (ft) Cem /Bent Sacks Used 0 - 0 10 - 0 1 Hole Plug Type Of Pump: No Data Well Tests: No Data Water Quality: Type of Water: No Data httn://134.125.70. 235 /drillers- new /insertweilrenortnrint.asn 7/9/2009 Depth of Strata: No Data Chemical Analysis Made: No Data Did the driller knowingly penetrate any strata which contained undesirable constituents: No Certification Data: The driller certified that the driller drilled this well (or the well was drilled under the driller's direct supervision) and that each and all of the statements herein are true and correct. The driller understood that failure to complete the required items will result in the log(s) being returned for completion and resubmittal. Company Strata Core Drilling Co. Information: 5066 Brush Creek Rd. Fort Worth , TX 76119 Driller License 3121 Number httn://134.125.70. 235 /drillers- new /insertweilrenortnrint.asn 7/9/2009 Well Report. "Tracking #:185566 Licensed Well Roddy Qualls Driller Signature: Registered Driller Joseph Ray Apprentice Signature: Apprentice 58017 Registration Number: Comments: No Data Page 2 of 2 IMPORTANT NOTICE FOR PERSONS HAVING WELLS DRILLED CONCERNING CONFIDENTIALITY TEX. OCC. CODE Title 12, Chapter 1901.251, authorizes the owner (owner or the person for whom the well was drilled) to keep information in Well Reports confidential. The Department shall hold the contents of the well log confidential and not a matter of public record if it receives, by certified mail, a written request to do so from the owner. Please include the report's Tracking number (Tracking #185566) on your written request. Texas Department of Licensing & Regulation P.O. Box 12157 Austin, TX 78711 (512) 463 -7880 DESC. & COLOR OF FORMATION MATERIAL CASING, BLANK PIPE & WELL SCREEN DATA No Data From (ft) To (ft) Description 0 - 4" Asphalt Gravel 4" - 5' Dk Brown Clay 5 -10' Brown Silty Clay httn: // 134.125.70.23 5 /drillers- new /insertwellrenortnrint.asn 7/9/2009 Well Report: Tracking #:248832 Page 1 of 2 STATE OF TEXAS WELL REPORT for Tracking #248832 Owner: City of Coppell Owner Well #: SB- 10,11,12,13 Address: 461 W. Bethel Road Grid #: 32 -08 -6 Borehole Coppell , TX 75019 Completion: supervision) and that each and all of the statements herein are true and correct. The driller Well Location: SAME Latitude: 32 57' 17" N Company TX Surface No Data Well County: Dallas Longitude: 097 00' 23" W Elevation: No Data GPS Brand Used: Magellian Type of Work: New Well Proposed Use: Monitor Drilling Date: Started: 10/16/2009 Completed: 10116/2009 Diameter of Hole: Diameter: 2 in From Surface To 12 ft Drilling Method: Other: Direct Push Borehole Other: Bentonite Completion: supervision) and that each and all of the statements herein are true and correct. The driller Annular Seal Data: 1st Interval: No Data 2nd Interval: No Data Company 3rd Interval: No Data Surface No Data Completion: Fort Worth, TX 76119 Water Level: Static level: No Data Number: Artesian flow: No Data Packers: No Data Plugging Info: Casing or Cement/Bentonite left in well: No Data Type Of Pump: No Data Well Tests: No Data Water Quality: Type of Water: No Data Depth of Strata: No Data Chemical Analysis Made: No Data Did the driller knowingly penetrate any strata which contained undesirable constituents: No Certification Data: The driller certified that the driller drilled this well (or the well was drilled under the driller's direct supervision) and that each and all of the statements herein are true and correct. The driller understood that failure to complete the required items will result in the log(s) being returned for completion and resubmittal. Company SCI Information: 5066 Brush Creek Road Fort Worth, TX 76119 Driller License 56033 Number: Licensed Well William Fields Driller Signature: htto:H 134.125.70.23 5 /drillers- new /insertweltrenortl)rint.asn 4/5/2011 Well Report: Tracking #:248832 Page 2 of 2 Registered Driller No Data Apprentice Signature: Apprentice No Data Registration Number: Comments: No Data IMPORTANT NOTICE FOR PERSONS HAVING WELLS DRILLED CONCERNING CONFIDENTIALITY TEX. OCC. CODE Title 12, Chapter 1901.251, authorizes the owner (owner or the person for whom the well was drilled) to keep information in Well Reports confidential. The Department shall hold the contents of the well log confidential and not a matter of public record if it receives, by certified mail, a written request to do so from the owner. Please include the report's Tracking number (Tracking #248832) on your written request. Texas Department of Licensing & Regulation P.O. Box 12157 Austin, TX 78711 (512) 463 -7880 DESC. & COLOR OF FORMATION MATERIAL CASING, BLANK PIPE & WELL SCREEN DATA From (ft) To (ft) Description No Data 0 to 12' Sandy Clay lrenrn-tnrint.asn 4/5/2011 Well Report: Tracking #:248834 Page 1 of 2 STATE OF TEXAS WELL REPORT for Tracking #248834 Owner: City of Coppell Owner Well #: SB -14,15 Address: 461 W. Bethel Road Grid #: 32 -08 -6 Borehole Coppell , TX 75019 Completion: No Data Well Location: SAME Latitude: 32 57' 17" N TX Surface No Data Well County: Dallas Longitude: 097 00'23" W Elevation: No Data GPS Brand Used: Magellian Type of Work: New Well Proposed Use: Monitor Drilling Date: Started: 10/16/2009 Completed: 10/16/2009 Diameter of Hole: Diameter: 2 in From Surface To 5 ft Drilling Method: Other: Direct Push Borehole Other: Bentonite Completion: No Data Annular Seal Data: 1st Interval: No Data 2nd Interval: No Data 3rd Interval: No Data Surface No Data Completion: The driller certified that the driller drilled this well (or the well was drilled under the driller's direct Water Level: Static level: No Data Artesian flow: No Data Packers: No Data Plugging Info: Casing or Cement/Bentonite left in well: No Data Type Of Pump: No Data Well Tests: No Data Water Quality: Type of Water: No Data Depth of Strata: No Data Chemical Analysis Made: No Data Did the driller knowingly penetrate any strata which contained undesirable constituents: No Certification Data: The driller certified that the driller drilled this well (or the well was drilled under the driller's direct supervision) and that each and all of the statements herein are true and correct. The driller understood that failure to complete the required items will result in the log(s) being returned for completion and resubmittal. Company SCI Information: 5066 Brush Creek Road Fort Worth, TX 76119 Driller License 56033 Number: Licensed Well William Fields Driller Signature: httn:// 134.125.70. 235 /drillers- new /insertwellreaortarint.ast) 4/5/2011 Well Report: Tracking #:248834 Page 2 of 2 Registered Driller No Data Apprentice Signature: Apprentice No Data Registration Number: Comments: No Data IMPORTANT NOTICE FOR PERSONS HAVING WELLS DRILLED CONCERNING CONFIDENTIALITY TEX. OCC. CODE Title 12, Chapter 1901.251, authorizes the owner (owner or the person for whom the well was drilled) to keep information in Well Reports confidential. The Department shall hold the contents of the well log confidential and not a matter of public record if it receives, by certified mail, a written request to do so from the owner. Please include the report's Tracking number (Tracking #248834) on your written request. Texas Department of Licensing & Regulation P.O. Box 12157 Austin, TX 78711 (512) 463 -7880 DESC. & COLOR OF FORMATION MATERIAL CASING, BLANK PIPE & WELL SCREEN DATA From (ft) To (ft) Description No Data 0 to 5' Sandy Clay /dri l l ers- new /insertwellrenortnrint.asD 4/5/2011 Well Report: Tracking #:248831 Page 1 of 2 STATE OF TEXAS WELL REPORT for Tracking #248831 Owner: City of Coppell Owner Well #: SB -16 Address: 461 W. Bethel Road Grid #: 32 -08 -6 Borehole Coppell , TX 75019 Completion: No Data Well Location: SAME Latitude: 32° 57' 17" N TX Surface No Data Well County: Dallas Longitude: 097 00'23" W Elevation: No Data GPS Brand Used: Magellian Type of Work: New Well Proposed Use: Monitor Drilling Date: Started: 10116/2009 Completed: 10/16/2009 Diameter of Hole: Diameter: 2 in From Surface To 20 ft Drilling Method: Other: Direct Push Borehole Other: Bentonite Completion: No Data Annular Seal Data: 1st Interval: No Data 2nd Interval: No Data 3rd Interval: No Data Surface No Data Completion: The driller certified that the driller drilled this well (or the well was drilled under the driller's direct Water Level: Static level: No Data Artesian flow: No Data Packers: No Data Plugging Info: Casing or Cement/Bentonite left in well: No Data Type Of Pump: No Data Well Tests: No Data Water Quality: Type of Water: No Data Depth of Strata: No Data Chemical Analysis Made: No Data Did the driller knowingly penetrate any strata which contained undesirable constituents: No Certification Data: The driller certified that the driller drilled this well (or the well was drilled under the driller's direct supervision) and that each and all of the statements herein are true and correct. The driller understood that failure to complete the required items will result in the log(s) being returned for completion and resubmittal. Company SCI Information: 5066 Brush Creek Road Fort Worth, TX 76119 Driller License 56033 Number: Licensed Well William Fields Driller Signature. httn: //134.125.70. 235 /drillers- new /insertwellrenortorint.asb 4/5/2011 Well Report: Tracking #:248831 Page 2 of 2 Registered Driller No Data Apprentice Signature: Apprentice No Data Registration Number: Comments: No Data IMPORTANT NOTICE FOR PERSONS HAVING WELLS DRILLED CONCERNING CONFIDENTIALITY TEX. OCC. CODE Title 12, Chapter 1901.251, authorizes the owner (owner or the person for whom the well was drilled) to keep information in Well Reports confidential. The Department shall hold the contents of the well log confidential and not a matter of public record if it receives, by certified mail, a written request to do so from the owner. Please include the report's Tracking number (Tracking #248831) on your written request. Texas Department of Licensing & Regulation P.O. Box 12157 Austin, TX 78711 (512) 463 -7880 DESC. & COLOR OF FORMATION MATERIAL CASING, BLANK PIPE & WELL SCREEN DATA From (ft) To (ft) Description No Data 0 to 20' Sandy Clay httn://134.125.70.235/dril lens- new /insertwellrenortnrint.asD 4/5/2011 Well Report: Tracking #:211094 Pagel of 2 STATE OF TEXAS WELL REPORT for Tracking #211094 Owner: City of Coppell Owner Well M SB17 Address: 507 W. Bethal Grid #: 32 -08 -6 Coppell , TX From (ft) To (ft) From (ft) To (ft) Cem /Bent Sacks Used Well Location: SAME Latitude: 32 57' 16" N Well Tests: TX Water Quality: Type of Water: No Data Well County: Dallas Longitude: 097° 00'24" W Elevation: No Data GPS Brand Used: Magellan Type of Work: New Well Proposed Use: Environmental completion and resubmittal. Company Soil Boring Drilling Date: Diameter of Hole: Drilling Method: Borehole Completion: Annular Seal Data Surface Completion: Started: 3/24/2010 Completed: 312412010 Diameter: 2 in From Surface To 15 ft Other: Geoprobe Other: 20140 Sand 1 st Interval: No Data 2nd Interval: No Data 3rd Interval: No Data Surface Slab Installed Water Level: Static level: No Data Artesian flow: No Data Packers: No Data Plugging Info: The well was plugged within 48 hours. Casing left in well: Cement/Bentonite left in well: From (ft) To (ft) From (ft) To (ft) Cem /Bent Sacks Used None; 0 -2ft 1 cement, 2 -15ft 1 bentonite Type Of Pump: No Data Well Tests: No Data Water Quality: Type of Water: No Data Depth of Strata: No Data Chemical Analysis Made: No Did the driller knowingly penetrate any strata which contained undesirable constituents: No Certification Data: The driller certified that the driller drilled this well (or the well was drilled under the driller's direct supervision) and that each and all of the statements herein are true and correct. The driller understood that failure to complete the required items will result in the log(s) being returned for completion and resubmittal. Company SCI Information: 5066 Brush Creek Rd Fort Worth, TX 76119 Driller License 56033 http: // 134.125.70.23 5 /drillers- new /insertwelireportprint.asp 3/24/2010 Well Report: Tracking #:211094 Page 2 of 2 Number: Licensed Well William Fields Driller Signature: Registered Driller No Data Apprentice Signature: Apprentice No Data Registration Number: Comments: No Data IMPORTANT NOTICE FOR PERSONS HAVING WELLS DRILLED CONCERNING CONFIDENTIALITY TEX. OCC. CODE Title 12, Chapter 1901.251, authorizes the owner (owner or the person for whom the well was drilled) to keep information in Well Reports confidential. The Department shall hold the contents of the well log confidential and not a matter of public record if it receives, by certified mail, a written request to do so from the owner. Please include the report's Tracking number (Tracking #211094) on your written request. Texas Department of Licensing & Regulation P.O. Box 12157 Austin, TX 78711 (512) 463 -7880 DESC. & COLOR OF FORMATION MATERIAL CASING, BLANK PIPE & WELL SCREEN DATA From (ft) To (ft) Description No Data 0 -14ft tan clay 14 -15ft tan sand http: //134.125.70. 235 /drillers- new /insertwellreportprint.asp 3/24/2010 Well Report: rhracking #:185563 Page 1 of 2 Type of Work: New Well Proposed Use: Monitor Drilling Date: STATE OF TEXAS WELL REPORT for Tracking #185563 Owner: City of Coppell Owner Well #: TMW# 1,2,3 Address: 461 W. Bethel Rd. Grid #: 32 -08 -6 Completion: Coppell , TX 75019 Annular Seal Data: 1st Interval: No Data Well Location: 461 W. Bethel Rd. Latitude: 32 57'09" N Surface Coppell , TX 75019 Completion: 3121 Well County: Dallas Longitude: 097 00' 14" W Elevation: No Data GPS Brand Used: Garmin Type of Work: New Well Proposed Use: Monitor Drilling Date: Started: 7/8/2009 Completed: 7/8/2009 Diameter of Hole: Diameter: 2 in From Surface To 22 ft Drilling Method: Other: Goo Probe Borehole No Data Completion: From (ft) To (ft) From (ft) To (ft) Cem /Bent Sacks Used Annular Seal Data: 1st Interval: No Data Type Of Pump: 2nd Interval: No Data Well Tests: 3rd Interval: No Data Surface No Data Completion: 3121 Water Level: Static level: No Data Artesian flow: No Data Packers: No Data Plugging Info: The well was plugged within 48 hours. Casing left in well: Cement/Bentonite left in well: From (ft) To (ft) From (ft) To (ft) Cem /Bent Sacks Used 0 - 0 22 - 0 1 Hole Plug Type Of Pump: No Data Well Tests: No Data Water Quality: Type of Water: No Data http: //134.125.70. 235 /drillers- new /insertwellret)orti)rint.asp 7/9/2009 Depth of Strata: No Data Chemical Analysis Made: No Data Did the driller knowingly penetrate any strata which contained undesirable constituents: No Certification Data: The driller certified that the driller drilled this well (or the well was drilled under the driller's direct supervision) and that each and all of the statements herein are true and correct. The driller understood that failure to complete the required items will result in the log(s) being returned for completion and resubmittal. Company Strata Core Drilling Co. Information: 5066 Brush Creek Rd. Fort Worth, TX 76119 Driller License 3121 Number: http: //134.125.70. 235 /drillers- new /insertwellret)orti)rint.asp 7/9/2009 Wet I Keport: "Tacking #:IS5563 Page 2 of 2 Licensed Well Roddy Qualls Driller Signature: Registered Driller Joseph Ray Apprentice Signature: Apprentice 58017 Registration Number: Comments: No Data IMPORTANT NOTICE FOR PERSONS HAVING WELLS DRILLED CONCERNING CONFIDENTIALITY TEX. OCC. CODE Title 12, Chapter 1901.251, authorizes the owner (owner or the person for whom the well was drilled) to keep information in Well Reports confidential. The Department shall hold the contents of the well log confidential and not a matter of public record if it receives, by certified mail, a written request to do so from the owner. Please include the report's Tracking number (Tracking #185563) on your written request. Texas Department of Licensing & Regulation P.O. Box 12157 Austin, TX 78711 (512) 463 -7880 DESC. & COLOR OF FORMATION MATERIAL From (ft) To (ft) Description 0 - 4" Asphalt Gravel 4" - 5' Dk Brown Clay 5 - 15' Brown Silty Clay 15 -18' Brown Sandy Clay 18 - 22' Brownish Gray Sand CASING, BLANK PIPE & WELL SCREEN DATA Dia. New /Used Type Setting From/To 1" N PVC Screen 22 - 7.010 1 " N PVC Riser 7.0 Sch 40 httn://134.125.70. 235 /drillers- new /insertwellrenortnrint.asn 7/9/2009 Well Report: Tracking #:196528 Page l of 2 STATE OF TEXAS WELL REPORT for Tracking #196528 Owner: City of Coppell Owner Well #: MW 1,3 Address: 461 W. Bethel Road Grid #: 32 -08 -6 Borehole Coppell , TX 75019 Completion: No Data Well Location: SAME Latitude: 32 57' 17" N TX Method Used: Mix Well County: Dallas Longitude: 097 00'23" W Elevation: No Data GPS Brand Used: Magellian Type of Work: New Well Proposed Use: Monitor Drilling Date: Started: 10/15/2009 Completed: 10/16/2009 Diameter of Hole: Diameter: 7 in From Surface To 22.5 ft Drilling Method: Other: Flight Auger Borehole Other: 20/40 Sand Completion: No Data Annular Seal Data; 1st Interval: From 22.5 ft to 3 ft with 16 Sand ( #sacks and material) 2nd Interval: From 3 ft to 2 ft with 4 Bentonite ( #sacks and material) 3rd Interval: From 2 ft to 0 ft with 4 Cement ( #sacks and material) Method Used: Mix Cemented By: SCI Distance to Septic Field or other Concentrated Contamination: N6 Data Distance to Property Line: No Data Method of Verification: No Data Approved by Variance: No Data Surface Surface Slab Installed Completion: Water Level: Static level: No Data Artesian flow: No Data Packers: No Data Plugging Info: Casing or Cement/Bentonite left in well: No Data Type Of Pump: No Data Well Tests: No Data Water Quality: Type of Water: No Data Depth of Strata: No Data Chemical Analysis Made: No Data Did the driller knowingly penetrate any strata which contained undesirable constituents: No Certification Data: The driller certified that the driller drilled this well (or the well was drilled under the driller's direct supervision) and that each and all of the statements herein are true and correct. The driller understood that failure to complete the required items will result in the log(s) being returned for completion and resubmittal. Company SCI Information: 5066 Brush Creek Road http: //134.125.70. 235 /drillers- new /insertwellreportprint.asp 10/16/2009 Well Report: Tracking #: 196528 Fort Worth , TX 76119 Driller License 56033 Number: Licensed Well William Fields Driller Signature: Registered Driller No Data Apprentice Signature: Apprentice No Data Registration Number: Comments: No Data Page 2 of 2 IMPORTANT NOTICE FOR PERSONS HAVING WELLS DRILLED CONCERNING CONFIDENTIALITY TEX. OCC. CODE Title 12, Chapter 1901.251, authorizes the owner (owner or the person for whom the well was drilled) to keep information in Well Reports confidential. The Department shall hold the contents of the well log confidential and not a matter of public record if it receives, by certified mail, a written request to do so from the owner. Please include the report's Tracking number (Tracking #196528) on your written request. Texas Department of Licensing & Regulation P.O. Box 12157 Austin, TX 78711 (512) 463 -7880 DESC. & COLOR OF FORMATION MATERIAL CASING, BLANK PIPE & WELL SCREEN DATA From (ft) To (ft) Description Dia. New /Used Type Setting From/To 0 to 22.5' Sandy Clay 2" New PVC Screen 22.5' to 5'.010 2" New PVC Riser 5' to 0 s40 http: //134.125.70. 235 /drillers- new /insertwellreportprint.asp 10/16/2009 Well Report: Tracking #:196529 Page 1 of 2 STATE OF TEXAS WELL REPORT for Tracking #196529 Owner: City of Coppell Owner Well #: MW 4 Address: 461 W. Bethel Road Grid #: 32 -08 -6 Coppell , TX 75019 Well Location: SAME Latitude: 32 57' 17" N TX Well County: Dallas Longitude: 097° 00'23" W Elevation: _.. No Data GPS Brand Used: Magellian Type of Work: New Well Proposed Use: Monitor Drilling Date Diameter of Hole: Drilling Method: Borehole Completion: Annular Seal Data: Surface Completion: Water Level: Packers: Plugging Info: Type Of Pump: Well Tests: Water Quality: Started: 10/15/2009 Completed: 10/1612009 Diameter: 7 in From Surface To 20 ft Other: Flight Auger Other: 20140 Sand 1 st Interval: From 20 ft to 2 ft with 6 Sand ( #sacks and material) 2nd Interval: From 2 ft to 2 ft with 1 Bentonite ( #sacks and material) 3rd Interval: From 2 ft to 0 ft with 2 Cement ( #sacks and material) Method Used: Mix Cemented By: SCI Distance to Septic Field or other Concentrated Contamination: No Data Distance to Property Line: No Data Method of Verification: No Data Approved by Variance: No Data Surface Slab Installed Static level: No Data Artesian flow: No Data No Data Casing or Cemenf/Bentonite left in well: No Data No Data No Data Type of Water: No Data Depth of Strata: No Data Chemical Analysis Made: No Data Did the driller knowingly penetrate any strata which contained undesirable constituents: No Certification Data: The driller certified that the driller drilled this well (or the well was drilled under the driller's direct supervision) and that each and all of the statements herein are true and correct. The driller understood that failure to complete the required items will result in the log(s) being returned for completion and resubmittal. Company SCI Information: 5066 Brush Creek Road http://134.125.70. 235 /drillers- new /insertwellreportprint.asp 10/16/2009 Well Report: Tracking #:196529 Page 2 of 2 Fort Worth, TX 76119 Driller License 56033 Number: Licensed Well William Fields Driller Signature: Registered Driller No Data Apprentice Signature: Apprentice No Data Registration Number: Comments: No Data IMPORTANT NOTICE FOR PERSONS HAVING WELLS DRILLED CONCERNING CONFIDENTIALITY TEX. OCC. CODE Title 12, Chapter 1901.251, authorizes the owner (owner or the person for whom the well was drilled) to keep information in Well Reports confidential. The Department shall hold the contents of the well log confidential and not a matter of public record if it receives, by certified mail, a written request to do so from the owner. Please include the report's Tracking number (Tracking #196529) on your written request. Texas Department of Licensing & Regulation P.O. Box 12157 Austin, TX 78711 (512) 463 -7880 DESC. & COLOR OF FORMATION MATERIAL CASING, BLANK PIPE & WELL SCREEN DATA From (ft) To (ft) Description Dia. New /Used Type Setting From/To 0 to 20' Sandy Clay 2" New PVC Screen 20' to 2.5'.010 2" New PVC Riser 2.5' to 0 s40 http: //l 34.125.70.235 /drillers- new /insertwellreportt)rint.asn 10/16/2009 Well Report: racking #:196530 Page 1 of 2 STATE OF TEXAS WELL REPORT for Tracking #196530 Owner: City of Coppel! Owner Well #: MW 2 Address: 461 W. Bethel Road Grid #: 32 -08 -6 Borehole Coppell , TX 75019 Completion: Well Location: SAME Latitude: 32° 57' 17" N TX Method Used: Mix Well County: Dallas Longitude: 097 00'23" W Elevation: No Data GPS Brand Used: Magellian Type of Work: New Well Proposed Use: Monitor Drilling Date: Started: 10/15/2009 Completed: 10/16/2009 Diameter of Hole: Diameter: 7 in From Surface To 25 ft Drilling Method: Other: Flight Auger Borehole Other: 20140 Sand Completion: Annular Seal Data: 1 st Interval: From 25 ft to 8 ft with 6 Sand ( #sacks and material) 2nd Interval: From 8 ft to 2 ft with 5 Bentonite ( #sacks and material) 3rd Interval: From 2 ft to 0 ft with 2 Cement ( #sacks and material) Method Used: Mix Cemented By: SCI Distance to Septic Field or other Concentrated Contamination: No Data Distance to Property Line: No Data Method of Verification: No Data Approved by Variance: No Data Surface Surface Slab Installed Completion: Water Level: Static level: No Data Artesian flow: No Data Packers: No Data Plugging Info: Casing or Cement/Bentonite left in well: No Data Type Of Pump: No Data Well Tests: No Data Water Quality: Type of Water: No Data Depth of Strata: No Data Chemical Analysis Made: No Data Did the driller knowingly penetrate any strata which contained undesirable constituents: No Certification Data: The driller certified that the driller drilled this well (or the well was drilled under the driller's direct supervision) and that each and all of the statements herein are true and correct. The driller understood that failure to complete the required items will result in the log(s) being returned for completion and resubmittal. Company SCI Information: 5066 Brush Creels Road http://134.125.70.235 /drillers- new /insertwellreportprint.asp 10/16/2009 Well Report: Tracking #:196530 Page 2 of 2 Fort Worth, TX 76119 Driller License 56033 Number: Licensed Well William Fields Driller Signature: Registered Driller No Data Apprentice Signature: Apprentice No Data Registration Number: Comments: No Data IMPORTANT NOTICE FOR PERSONS HAVING WELLS DRILLED CONCERNING CONFIDENTIALITY TEX. OCC. CODE Title 12, Chapter 1901.251, authorizes the owner (owner or the person for whom the well was drilled) to keep information in Well Reports confidential. The Department shall hold the contents of the well log confidential and not a matter of public record if it receives, by certified mail, a written request to do so from the owner. Please include the report's Tracking number (Tracking #196530) on your written request. Texas Department of Licensing & Regulation P.O. Box 12157 Austin, TX 78711 (512) 463 -7880 DESC. & COLOR OF FORMATION MATERIAL From (ft) To (ft) Description 0 to 25' Sandy Clay CASING, BLANK PIPE & WELL SCREEN DATA Dia. New /Used Type Setting From/To 2" New PVC Screen 25' to 10'.010 2" New PVC Riser 10' to 0 s40 http: //134.125.70. 235 /drillers- new /insertwellreDort-orint.ast) 10/16/2009 Well Report: Tracking #:211093 Page 1 of 2 STATE OF TEXAS WELL REPORT for Tracking #211093 Owner: City of Coppell Owner Well #: MW5 Address: 616 S. Coppell Rd Grid M 32 -08 -6 Borehole Coppell, TX Completion: No Data Well Location: SAME Latitude: 32 57' 18" N TX Method Used: Mix Well County: Dallas Longitude: 097 00'24" W Elevation: . ........... . . ..................... No Data GPS Brand Used: Magellan Type of Work: New Well Proposed Use: Monitor Drilling Date: Started: 3/24/2010 Water Level: Completed: 3/24/2010 Diameter of Hole: Diameter: 8.25 in From Surface To 28 ft Drilling Method: Hollow Stem Auger Borehole Other: 20140 Sand Completion: No Data Annular Seal Data: 1st Interval: From 0 ft to 2 ft with 1 Cement ( #sacks and material) Water Quality: 2nd Interval: From 2 ft to 8 ft with 2 Bentonite ( #sacks and material) 3rd Interval: From 8 ft to 28 ft with 8 Sand ( #sacks and material) Method Used: Mix Cemented By: SCI Certification Data: Distance to Septic Field or other Concentrated Contamination: No Data Distance to Property Line: No Data Method of Verification: No Data Approved by Variance: No Data Surface Surface Slab Installed Completion: Water Level: Static level: No Data Artesian flow: No Data Packers: No Data Plugging Info: Casing or Cement/Bentonite left in well: No Data Type Of Pump: No Data Well Tests: No Data Water Quality: Type of Water: No Data Depth of Strata: No Data Chemical Analysis Made: No Did the driller knowingly penetrate any strata which contained undesirable constituents: No Certification Data: The driller certified that the driller drilled this well (or the well was drilled under the driller's direct supervision) and that each and all of the statements herein are true and correct. The driller understood that failure to complete the required items will result in the log(s) being returned for completion and resubmittai. Company SCI Information: 5066 Brush Creek Rd http: // 134.125.70.23 5 /dri llers- new /insertwellreportprint. asp 3/24/2010 Well Report: Tracking # :211093 Fort Worth , TX 76119 Driller License 56033 Number: Licensed Well William Fields Driller Signature: Registered Driller No Data Apprentice Signature: Apprentice No Data Registration Number: Page 2 of 2 Comments: No Data IMPORTANT NOTICE FOR PERSONS HAVING WELLS DRILLED CONCERNING CONFIDENTIALITY TEX. OCC. CODE Title 12, Chapter 1901.251, authorizes the owner (owner or the person for whom the well was drilled) to keep information in Well Reports confidential. The Department shall hold the contents of the well log confidential and not a matter of public record if it receives, by certified mail, a written request to do so from the owner. Please include the report's Tracking number (Tracking #211093) on your written request. Texas Department of Licensing & Regulation P.O. Box 12157 Austin, TX 78711 (512) 463 -7880 DESC. & COLOR OF FORMATION MATERIAL CASING, BLANK PIPE & WELL SCREEN DATA From (ft) To (ft) Description Dia. New /used Type Setting From/To 0 -15ft tan clay tin new pvc riser 0 to10.5ft s40 15 -28ft tan sand 2in new pvc screen 10.5 to 28ft 0.010 http:/ /134.125.70.235 /drillers- new /insertweilrenortnrint.asn 3/24/2010 ATTACHMENT 15 ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY TABLES W &M Environmental Group, Inc. (W &M Project No. 940.002.004) ATTACHMENT ISA SOIL ANALYTICAL DATA SUMMARY Former Coppell Auto Center 461 West Bethel Road Coppell, Texas LAVT ID 118120 Constituent I'RRP Tier 1 PCL' PSI' Action Leve1 SB -01 -2' 7/8/2009 (mg /kg) SB -02 -3' 7/8/2009 (mg/kg) SB -034' 7/812009 (.,g/kg) SB- 04-10' 7/8/2009 (m ) SB- 05-10' 7/8/2009 (- ) SW06 -10' 7/8/2009 (-g/kg) SB- 07 -10' 7/8/2009 m SB- 08-10' 7/8/2009 (-g/kg) SB- 09 -10' 7/8/2009 (-g/kg) SB- 10-12' 10/15/2009 m SB- 11 -10' 10115/2009 (mg/kg) SB -12-6' tO/15/2009 (m SB -14-5' 10/16/2009 mg/k) SB -153' 10/16/2009 m MW- 01 -15' 10/15/2009 (-g/kg) MW- 01 -22' " 10/15/2009 m MW -02-5' 10/16/1009 (-g/ kg) MW- 02-20' " 10/16/2009 (m k) MW- 03.20' " 10/15/2009 m MW -041' 10/15/2009 (- ) MW- 04-20" 10/15/2009 m MW- 04-23' • 10/15/2009 (-g/kg) MW- 05-13' 3/24/2010 m MW- 05-28' * 3/24/2010 m TPH r CX 12 60 54(l) <62 <60 30 <58 <64 <55 <62 <67 27? <31.2 <28.4 <29.2 <28.8 <29.2 895 <28.6 37.9 249 <29.0 - <28.5 <29.9 C12-C29 200 520 <62 <60 62 (J) X58 <64 <55 <62 <67 27 _' <31.2 <28.4 <29.2 <28.8 <29.2 219 <28.6 52.8 118 <29.0 - -- - <28.5 <29.9 C29-C35 'o0 - <62 <62 <60 93 <58 <64 <55 <62 <67 1 27.2 <31.2 <28.4 <29.2 <28.8 <292 _''A <28.6 <28.7 <29.7 <29.0 - -- - <28.5 1 <29.9 BTEX Benzene 0.026 0.13 0.014 <O.0062 - -- <0.0060 - -- <0.0064 - -- - -- - -- <0.0054 <.0062 - -- <0.0058 <0.0058 <0.0058 <0.0058 <0.0057 <0.0057 0.823(0) <0.0058 <0.0059 <0.0060 <0.0057 <0.0060 Toluene 8.2 160 <0.031 <0.031 - -- <0.030 - -- <0.032 - - - -- <0.0054 <.0062 - -- <0.0058 <0.0058 <0.0058 <0.0058 <0.0057 0.0057 <0.119 0) <0.0058 <0.0059 <0.0060 <0.0057 <0.0060 Ethyl Benzene 7 6 69 1.8 0. 00 17 (J) - -- <0.0060 - -- -0.0064 - - - -- <0.0054 <,0062 - -- <0.0058 <0.0058 <0.0058 3.66(0) <0.0057 0.0553 14.6(0) <0.0058 <0.0059 <0.0060 0.0077 <0.0060 m, X lene - - - -- - -- - -- - -- - I - -- - - - -- <0.0109 1 <0.0125 - -- 0.0145 1 <0.0115 <0.0117 3.18(0) <0.01 14 0.0548 25.9(0) <0.0116 <0.0119 <0.0120 0.0274 <0.0119 0- Xylene - - - -- - - -- - -- - -- -- I - - -- <0.0054 <.0062 <0.0058 <0.0058 <0.0058 <0.0058 <0.0057 <0.0057 0.406(0) <0.0058 <0.0059 <0.0060 <0.0091 <0.0060 X lens 120 568 1 8 0.0086 (J) - -- 0 015 - -- 0 019 - - -- <0.0163 <0.0187 <0.0175 <O.O173 <0.0175 3.18 <0.0172 0.0548 26.306(0) <0.0174 <0.0178 <0.0181 0.0365 <0.0179 VOCs" MTBE u_62 3.1 0 037 002 --- 00060 <0.0064 - -- 0 0054 <.0062 -- 0.0107 0.0272 <0.0058 <0.0058 <0.0057 <0.0057 <0.0058 <0.0059 <0.0060 <0.0057 <0.0060 All Other VOCs Varies -- --- SOL,' - <SQLs - --- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - Notes: Chemical Acronyms: Samples collected by W &M and analyzed by Environmental Science Corporation and Oxidor Laboratory (MTBE) Methyl tert -butyl ether Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) - Texas Method 1005. Z Benzene, ethyl benzene, toluene, and xylenes (BTEX) - Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 8260. 'Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), EPA Method 8260 - All other VOCs were below their sample quantitation limit (SQL). 'T'exas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) Texas Risk Reduction Program (TRAP) Protective Concentration Level (PCL) for residential land use, 0.5 -acre source area, Class 1 groundwater. 5 TCEQ Petroleum Storage Tank (PST) Action Levels. Bold results indicate analytical results above the critical PCL and/or Action Level. (J) Estimated value is below the lowest calibration point. (0) Sample diluted due to matrix interferences that impaired the ability to make an accurate analytical determination. The detection limit is elevated in order to reflect the necessary dilution. ( -) No Action limit is provided by the TCEQ PST Program. ( -) Constituent not analyzed <#k# Indicates concentrations less than the laboratory SQL. * indicates sample recovered from below the water table, within the saturated zone ATTACHMENT 15B SOIL ANALYTICAL DATA SUMMARY Former Coppell Auto Center 461 West Bethel Road Coppell, Texas LPST 1D 118120 Constituent URP Tier I PC1, PST Action Leve1 SB- 04 -10' 7/8/21109 (mg/k SB- 06 -10' 7/8/20119 (mg /kg) SB -12 -4' 10/15/2009 (mg /kg) SB- 12 -10' 10/15/21109 (mg /kg) SB -13 -4' 10 /15 /2009 (mg /kg) SB- 13 -10' 10/15/2009 (mg/k SB -17 -4' 3/24/2010 (mg /kg) SB- 17 -10' 3/24/2010 (111g/kg) RCR4 Metals' Arsenic 5.9 - 32 L l (J) 2.42 20.8 163 7.21 8.59 13.7 Barium 440 - 69 73 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- Cadmium 1.5 - 0.10 (J) <0.32 - -- - -- - -- - -- I - -- Chromium 2.400 - 12 23 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- Lead 15 - 170 9.6 7.72 9.42 23.2 7.22 48.2 12.9 Mercury 0.04 - <0.24 <0.026 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- Selenium 2.3 - 1 <2.4 1 <1.3 - -- - -- - -- -- - -- - -- Silver 0.48 - <0.060 <0.64 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- Notes: Samples collected by W &M and analyzed by Environmental Science Corporation and Oxidor Laboratory 'Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Metals, EPA Method 6010d, or EPA Method 7471 (mercury). Z Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) Texas Risk Reduction Program (TRRP) Protective Concentration Level (PCL) for residential land use, 0.5 -acre source area, Class l groundwater. TCEQ Petroleum Storage Tank (PST) Action Levels. Bold results indicate analytical results above the critical PCL and /or Action Level. (J) Estimated value is below the lowest calibration point. ( -) No Action Level is provided by the TCEQ PST Program. ( - - -) Constituent not analyzed < # ## Indicates concentrations less than the laboratory SQL. ATTACHMENT 15C SOIL ANALYTICAL DATA SUMMARY Former Coppell Auto Center 461 West Bethel Road Coppell, Texas LPST ID 118120 Constituent PST Action Level SB -01 -2' 7/8/2009 (mg/kg) AHs I Anthracene 13 0.34 cenaphthene 314 0.14 cenaphthylene 543 0.037 (J) Benzo(a)anthracene 0.877 0.012 (J) Benzo(a)pyrene 0.0877 <0.041 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.877 <0.041 Benzo(g,h,i) erylene 8.24 <0.041 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 8.77 <0.041 Chrysene 7.2 <0.041 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.0877 <0.041 Fluoranthene 156 0.020 (J) Fluorene 247 0.30 Indeno(1,2,3- cd)pyrene 0.877 <0.041 N aphthalene 389 1.4 Phenanthrene 280 1.2 Pyrene 99 0.22 Notes: Samples collected by W &M and analyzed by Environmental Science Corporation I Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), EPA Method 8270C. 2 TCEQ Petroleum Storage Tank (PST) Action Levels. (J) Estimated value is below the lowest calibration point. <##### Indicates concentrations less than the laboratory SQL. TABLE 15D GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL DATA Former Coppell Auto Center 461 W. Bethel Road Coppell. Texas LPST ID 116120 Cmtstituent 'CARP Tier 1 � PCL PST Action s Levet PST Category 11 Target Cone. TJ1W -01 7/8/2009 (m L ) TMW -02 7/8/2009 (m L TNINN -03 7/8 /2009 m L MW -01 MW -02 MW -03 MW -04 MW -05 11/3/2009 (m L 3/26/2010 (m L) 6/25/2010 m L) 9/22/2010 (m L 11/2/2009 m L) 3/26!2010 (m L) 3/26/2010 Dup (ro 6!25/2010 (m L) 9!22/2010 (m /L) 9/22/2010 Dup (m L) 11/2/2009 (mg /L) 3/26/2010 (m /L) 6/25/2010 (m L) 6/25/20111 Dup (m /L) 9/22/2010 (m L) 11/2/21109 (mom /L) 3/26/2010 (ma /L) 6/25 /2010 (mg /L) 9/2212010 (m L) 3/26/2010 m L) 612512010 (m /L) 9/22/2010 (m L) TPH C6 -C12 0.98 270 360 <0,9 17.3 11.6 12.4 14.3 5.55 <5.00 - <5.00 5.47 <5.00 23.5 20.7 15.8 16.0 21.2 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 C12 -C2e 0.98 75 120 <0.9 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 - <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 C29-C15 0.98 - - <0.9 <0.9 <0.9 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 - <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 BTEX Benzene 0.005 0.005 0.0294 1.5 4.2 0.00051 (1) 0.007 <0.005 0.0055 0.0089 0.13 0.0505 0.0454 0.0414 0.0377 0.0404 0.871 1.14 1.66 1.73 1.51 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 Toluene 1 I 1 7.3 <1.3 <1.3 <0.005 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 0.005 0.0455 0.0594 0.0609 00556 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 Ethyl Benzene 0.7 0.7 3.65 4.8 9.7 0.0025 1.32 0.829 1.01 0.843 0.49 0.286 0.274 0.391 0.302 0.299 2.38 1.69 1.71 1.74 1.73 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 Xylenes 10 10 73 13 27 0.0074 1 2.47 1.13 1.73 1.53 0.34 0.165 1 0.147 0.169 0.209 0.214 4.68 2.81 2.85 2.93 2.01 <0.005 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 Afetals Arsenic 0.010 - - - - - - - 0.006 - - - - <0.005 - - - 0.006 <0.005 <0.005 - - <0.005 - Lead 0.015 - - - - - 0.010 - - - - <0.005 - - - - 0.006 0.006 <0.005 - - <0.005 VOCs' n-Butylbenzene 0.98 0.10 (J) 1.6 0.0014 0.08 0.0609 0.0772 0.0595 0.05 0.0341 0.0325 0.0389 0.0403 0.0364 1 0.0933 0.0695 0.103 0.107 0.0909 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 sec -Bu (benzene 0.98 <0.25 0.49 0.0012 0.017 0.0124 0.0152 0.013 0.023 0.0185 0.0182 0.0217 0.0276 0.0252 <0.050 0.018 <0.005 <0.005 0.0242 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 Isopropylbenzene 2.4 0.16 (J) 0.75 <0.0010 0.102 0.0562 0.07 0.0603 0.0716 0.0323 0.0306 0.0367 0.0426 0.0396 0.119 0.0894 0.122 0.123 0.118 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 p -Iso ro (toluene 2.4 - - 0.055 (J) 0.18 (J) <0.0010 0.076 0.0063 0.0076 0.0069 <0.005 -0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.050 0.0056 <0.005 <0.005 0.0072 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 MTBE 0.24 1 a 36 036 <0.25 0.79 <0.0010 0.02 0.0218 0.0234 0.0257 0.07 0.029 0.0256 0.0123 0.0142 0.0149 0.195 1.18 0.505 0.54 0.918 <0.005 <0.005 <0,005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 Naphthalene 0.49 1 46 1 46 1.6 3.9 <0.0050 0.77 0.739 0.677 0.714 0.59 0.403 0.29 0.347 0.33 0.412 0.967 0.879 0.93 1.04 0 946 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.0I0 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 n -Propylbenzene 0.98 - 0.70 (J) 3.8 0.0011 1 035 0.148 0.189 0.111 0.29 0.136 0.131 0.15 0.163 0.147 0.391 0.35 0.462 0.472 0 403 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 1,2,4 -TMB 0.24 4.9 21 0.0067 1 2.19 1.64 1.81 1.65 1 0.26 0.125 0.108 0.138 0.149 0.152 2.33 1.53 1.68 1.7 1.45 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 1,2,3 -TMB 1.2 L2 4.6 0.0017 - - -- - -- - -- - - - - -- -- - - - -- -- <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 11 1,3,5 -TMB 12 - 1.2 6.7 0.0017 0.58 0.483 0.573 0.509 0_a7 0.028 0.0238 0.(1332 0,031 1 OA 368 11.569 0.402 0.5 0.508 0.406 -0.005 <0.005 <0.005 -0.005 -0.005 -0.005 -0.005 Notes: Samples collected by W &NI and analyzed by Environmental Science Corporation. 'Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) - Texas Method 1005. 'Benzene, ethyl benzene, toluene, and xylenes (BTEX) - Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 8260. 'Volatile Organic Compounds ('VOCs), EPA Method 8260 - All other VOCs were below their respective sample quantitation limits (SQLs). ° Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) Texas Risk Reduction Program (TARP) Protective Concentration Level (PCL) for residential land use, 0.5 -acre source area, Class 1 groundwater. 'TCEQ Petroleum Storage Tank (PST) Action Levels. Bold results indicate analytical results above the critical PCL and/or Action Level. .. 1= results exceed Category U Target Concentrations <### indicates concentrations less than the laboratory SQL. (J) Estimated value is below the lowest calibration point. (MTBE) Methyl tert-butyl ether (TMB) - Trimethylbenzene ( -) No Action Level is provided by the TCEQ PST Program. n•,tsr E „r6n,,,,,r „nd a h- ATTACHMENT 15E SOIL ANALYTICAL DATA SUMMARY - CONFIRMATION SAMPLES Former Coppell Auto Center 461 West Bethel Road Coppell, Texas LPST ID 118120 Excavation Confirmation Samnles I Soil Stockpile Samples (Landfilled) Constituent TRRP Tier I PCL °W Soil ING / "'S0k — m SPLP/TCLP Action Level' m CS -01 12' -13' 7/7/2010 (mg/kg) CS -02 12' -13' 7/7/2010 (—g/k CS -03 12' -13' 7/7/2010 (—g/k CS -04 12' -13' 7/7/2010 (mg/k CS -05 15' 7/7/2010 (—g/kg) SP -01 -- 7/7/2010 (—g/k SP -02 -- 7/7/2010 (—g/kg) SP -03 -- 7/7/2010 (mg/k Petals r Arsenic 5.9/24 11.6 6.42 15.1 4.19 4.21 -- - -- 6.44 Lead 15/500 - -- I I . 3 10.8 6.14 146 4.83 -- 1 4 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) TPH C -C 65 - -- TPH not anal zed - not resent above PST Action Levels in soil borings <28.6 <28.6 TPH C12 200 - -- TPH not analyzed - not present above PSTAction Levels in soil borings 104 28.6 - -- TPH C21 - C3s 200 - -- TPH not analyzed - not p resent above PST Action Levels in soil borings 82.4 57.1 --- S PLP Metals SPLP Arsenic - -- 11.1111) <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 - -- - -- SPLP Lead - -- 0.01 S <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 0.009 <0.005 TCLP Metals TC'LP Varies - -- Class 2 Class ? Class 2 Notes: Samples collected by W &M and analyzed by Oxidor Laboratories, LLC i Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Metals, EPA Method 6020. Z TCEQ Texas Risk Reduction Program (TRAP) Background Values or Protective Concentration Level (PCL) for residential land use, 0.5 -acre source area, Class I groundwater. ow Soil 6 , s = groundwater protective PCLs or Texas background values, if less stringent T ° ' Soil c ,,,„ b = human health PCLs (residential land use) I TCEQ SPLP Action Levels ( =Tier groundwater I PCLs) Bold values indicate the critical PCL and/or Action Level, and values exceeding the PCL or Action Level (none exceeded). ( - - -) Not Applicable, or Constituent not analyzed <##k Indicates concentrations less than the laboratory SQL. WES T BETHEL RO% O I I I I I I cs -o� -- � I � _�_, I 5' Depth C ®5 115' Depth I C 1 4cs -01 Pcs - oa I I I \ L — J l \ CS -02 I I � � I I I I I � I I I I I I I LEGEND Figure 2 Approximate Site Boundary Excavation Area Coppell Auto Center Former Building 461 West Bethel Road — — — — Excavation Area Coppell, Texas 0' 12' 24' Historical components OT the UST systems are Indicated In gray. APPROXIMATE SCALE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, INC. 8/25/10 PST Facility ID 0052886 W &M Project No. 940.002 "yaw. "h -m.com 2.5 COCs in We MW -01 Coppell Auto Center 2 -1.5 1,2,4 -TM B o :r Ethyl Benzene �o c 1,3,5 -TM B a c 0 U 1 0.5 0 11/1/2009 12/1/2009 1/1/2010 2/1/2010 3/1/2010 4/1/2010 5/1/2010 6/1/2010 7/1/2010 8/1/2010 9/1/2010 0.6 0.5 0.4 J 00 G c 0 0.3 c v u c 0 u 0.2 0.1 11/1/2009 12/1/2009 1/1/2010 2/1/2010 3/1/2010 4/1/2010 5/1/2010 6/1/2010 7/1/2010 8/1/2010 9/1/2010 2.5 2 1.5 J 00 E C O a.+ L Y f.. u c O u 1 0.5 0 11/1/2009 12/1/2009 1/1/2010 2/1/2010 3/1/2010 4/1/2010 5/1/2010 6/1/2010 7/1/2010 8/1/2010 9/1/2010 i ATTACHMENT 16 WATER LEVEL SUMMARY TABLE W &M Environmental Group, Inc. (W &M Project No. 940.002.004) ATTACHMENT 16 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION DATA Former Coppell Auto Center 461 West Bethel Road LPST ID# 118120 Monitoring Well Date Total Depth (Feet) Screened Interval (Feet) Corrected TOC Elevation Depth to PSH Depth to Water PSH Thickness Corrected Water Elevation MW-01 10/22/09 22 5 to 22 9016 14.95 0.00 84.41 11/06/09 15.10 0.00 84.26 03/26/10 14.41 0.00 84.95 04/27/10 j 14.80 0.00 84.56 06/25/10 16.10 0.00 83.26 09/22/10 15.44 0.00 83.92 MW -02 10/22/09 24 9 to 24 98 66 13.88 0.00 84.78 11/06/09 14.14 0.00 84.52 03/26/10 13.59 0.00 85.07 04/27/10 13.94 0.00 84.72 06/25/10 15.28 0.00 83.38 09/22/10 14.51 0.00 84.15 MW -03 10/22/09 23 5 to 23 98.70 14.20 0.00 84.50 11/06/09 14.43 0.00 84.27 03/26/10 13.85 0.00 84.85 04/27/10 14.21 0.00 84.49 06/25/10 15.57 0.00 83.13 09/22/10 14.88 0.00 83.82 MW -04 10/22/09_0 3 to 20 97.78 14.01 0.00 83.77 11/06/09 14.05 0.00 83.73 03/26/10 13.54 0.00 84.24 04/27/10 13.89 0.00 83.89 06/25/10 15.17 0.00 82.61 09/22/10 14.52 0.00 83.26 MW -05 10/22/09 28 10 to 28 96.42 Well Not Installed 11/06/09 Well Not Installed 03/26/10 10.88 0.00 85.54 04/27/10 12.25 0.00 84.17 06/25/10 13.49 0.00 82.93 09/22/10 12.71 0.00 83.71 Notes; TOC = Top of Casing 96.62 PSH = Phase - separated Hydrocarbons NAPL = Non - aqueous Phase Liquids All elevations, depths, and thicknesses are reported in feet. Top of casing elevations set in relation to assumed Site benchmark of 100.00 feet. ATTACHMENT 17 ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTS W &M Environmental Group, Inc. (W &M Project No. 940.002.004) ATTACHMENT 17A ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTS - SOIL W &M Environmental Group, Inc. (W &M Project No. 940.002.004) Environmental Science Corporation Mount Juliet, TN For: W &M Environmental Group, Inc. -'Ft Worth Coppell Auto Center Lab SaMDIeID. L411486 -01 L411486 -02 L411486 -03 L411486 -04 L411486 -05 L411486 -06 L411486 -07 L411486 -08 L411486 -09 (615) 758 -5858 1- 800 - 767 -5859 Fax(615)758 -5859 Client ID SB- 01 -2FT SB- r02 -2FT SB- 03 -2FT SB -04- l OFT SB- 05 -10FT SB- 06 -10FT SB- 07 -8FT SB- 08 -10FT SB- 09=10FT L411486 EST. 1970 1 ot69 Appendix A Laboratory Data Package Cover Page This data package consists of This signature page, the laboratory review checklist, and the following reportable data: RI Field chain -of- custody documentation; R2 Sample identification cross - reference; R3 Test reports (analytical data sheets) for each environmental sample that includes: a) Items consistent with NELAC 5.13 or ISO /IEC 17025 Section 5.10 b) dilution factors, c) preparation methods, d) cleanup methods, and e) if required for the project, tentatively identified compounds (TICS). R4 Surrogate recovery data including: a) Calculated recovery ( %R), and b) The laboratory's surrogate QC limits. R5 Test reports /summary forms for blank samples; R6 Test reports /summary forms for laboratory control samples (LCSs) including: a) LCS spiking amounts, b) Calculated %R for each analyte, and c) The laboratory's LCS QC limits. R7 Test reports for project matrix spike /matrix spike duplicates (MS/MSDs) including: a) Samples associated with the MS/MSD clearly identified, b) MS/MSD spiking amounts, c) Concentration of each MS/MSD analyte measured in the parent and spiked samples, d) Calculated %Rs and relative percent differences (RPDs), and e) The laboratory's MS/MSD QC limits R8 Laboratory analytical duplicate (if applicable) recovery and precision: a) the amount of analyte measured in the duplicate, b) the calculated RPD, and c) the laboratory's QC limits for analytical duplicates. R9 List of method quantitation limits (MQLs) for each analyte for each method and matrix; R10 Other problems or anomalies. The Exception Report for every "No" or "Not Reviewed (NR)" item in laboratory review checklist. Release Statement: I am responsible for the release of this laboratory data package. This data package has been reviewed by the laboratory and is complete and technically compliant with the requirements of the methods used, except where noted by the laboratory in the attached exception reports. By my signature below, I affirm to the best of my knowledge, all problems /anomalies, observed by the laboratory as having the potential to affect the quality of the data, have been identified by the laboratory in -the Laboratory Review Checklist, and no information or data have been knowingly withheld that would affect the quality of the data. Check, if applicable: [ ] This laboratory is an in -house laboratory controlled by the person responding to rule. The official signing the cover page of the rule- required report (for example, the APAR) in which these data are used is responsible for releasing this data package and is by signature affirming the above release statement is true. William Mock Operations Manager Environmental Science Corp. RG-3 66/TRRP- 13 December 2002 2 00 Appendix A (cont'd): Laboratory Review Checklist: Reportable Data Laboratory Name:Environmental Science LRC Date: 07/17/09 Project Name: Coppell Auto Center Laboratory Job Number:L411486 -04 and 06 Reviewer Name: ESC Representative Prep Batch Number(s): WG430718 HG # A' Description Yes No NA NR 4 ER# Chain -of- custody (C -O -C) RI 01 Did samples meet the laboratory's standard conditions of sample acceptability upon receipt? Were all departures from standard conditions described in an exception report? R2 OI Sample and quality control (QC) identification Are all field sample ID numbers cross - referenced to the laboratory ID numbers? Are all laboratory ID numbers cross - referenced to the corresponding QC data? R3 OI Test reports Were all samples prepared and analyzed within holding times? Other than those results < MQL, were all other raw values bracketed by calibration standards? I/ Were calculations checked by a peer or supervisor? ✓ Were all analyte identifications checked by a peer or supervisor? ./ Were sample quantitation limits reported for all anal tes not detected? Were all results for soil and sediment samples reported on a dry weight basis? V / Were % moisture (or solids) reported for all soil and sediment samples? If required for the project, TICS reported? ✓ R4 10 Surrogate recovery data Were Surro ates added prior to extraction? Were surrogate percent recoveries in all samples within the laboratory C limits? R5 OI Test reports/summary reports/summary forms for blank samples Were appropriate type(s) of blanks analyzed? AL Were blanks analyzed at the appropriate frequency? Were method blanks taken through the entire analytical process, including preparation and, if applicable, cleanup procedures? Were blank concentrations < MQL? R6 OI Laboratory control samples (LCS): Were all COCs included in the LCS? Was each LCS taken through the entire analytical procedure, including re and cleanup steps? Were LCSs analyzed at the required frequency? Were LCS (and LCSD, if applicable) %Rs within the laboratory QC limits? ✓ Does the detectability data document the laboratory's capability to detect the COCs at the MDL used to calculate the SQLs? Was the LCSD RPD within QC limits? R7 OI Matrix spike MS and matrix spike duplicate MSD data Were the project/method specified anal es included in the MS and MSD? Were MS /MSD analyzed at the appropriate fre uenc ? Were MS (and MSD, if applicable) %Rs within the laboratory QC limits? ✓ Were MS /MSD RPDs within laboratory QC limits? RS OI Analytical duplicate data Were appropriate anal ical duplicates analyzed for each matrix? AL Were analytical duplicates analyzed at the appropriate fre uenc ? Were RPDs or relative standard deviations within the laboratory QC limits? R9 01 Method quantitation limits (MQLs): Are the MQLs for each method analyte included in the laboratory data package? Do the MQLs correspond to the concentration of the lowest non -zero calibration standard? Are unadjusted MQLs included in the laboratory data package? R10 OI Other problems/anomalies Are all known problems/anomalies/special conditions noted in this LRC and ER? Were all necessary corrective actions performed for the reported data? Was applicable and available technology used to lower the SQL minimize the matrix interference affects on the sample results? 1. Items identified by the letter "R" must be included in the laboratory data package submitted in the TRRP - required report(s). Items identified by the letter "S" should be retained and made available upon request for the appropriate retention period. 2. = organic analyses; I = inorganic analyses (and general chemistry, when applicable); 3. NA = Not applicable; 4. NR = Not reviewed; 5. ER# = Exception Report identification number (an Exception Report should be completed for an item if "NR" or "No" is checked). RG-3 66/TRRP- 13 December 2002 3 of 89 Appendix A (cont'd): Laboratory Review Checklist: Reportable Data Laboratory Name:Environmental Science LRC Date: 07/17/09 Project Name: Coppell Auto Center Laboratory Job Number: L41 1486 -01 Reviewer Name: ESC Representative Prep Batch Number(s): WG430721 TS # A' Description Yes No NAI NR ER# Chain -of- custody (C -O -C) Rl OI Did samples meet the laboratory's standard conditions of sample acceptability upon receipt? Were all departures from standard conditions described in an exception report? R2 OI Sample and quality control (QC) identification Are all field sample ID numbers cross - referenced to the laboratory ID numbers? Are all laboratory ID numbers cross - referenced to the corresponding QC data? R3 01 Test reports Were all samples prepared and analyzed within holding times? Other than those results < MQL, were all other raw values bracketed by calibration standards? Were calculations checked by a peer or supervisor? Were all analyte identifications checked by a peer or supervisor? Were sample quantitation limits reported for all anal es not detected? Were all results for soil and sediment samples reported on a dry weight basis? Were % moisture (or solids) reported for all soil and sediment samples? If required for the project, TICs reported? R4 O Surro ate recovery data Were surrogates added prior to extraction? Were surrogate percent recoveries in all samples within the laboratory C limits? R5 OI Test reports/summary reports/summary forms for blank samples Were appropriate type(s) of blanks analyzed? Were blanks analyzed at the appropriate frequency? Were method blanks taken through the entire analytical process, including preparation and, if applicable, cleanup procedures? Were blank concentrations < MQL? R6 OI Laboratory control samples (LCS): Were all COCs included in the LCS? Was each LCS taken through the entire analytical procedure, including prep and cleanup steps? Were LCSs analyzed at the required frequency? Were LCS (and LCSD, if applicable) %Rs within the laboratory QC limits? Does the delectability data document the laboratory's capability to detect the COCs at the MDL used to calculate the SQLs? Was the LCSD RPD within QC limits? R7 OI Matrix spike MS and matrix spike duplicate MSD data Were the project/method specified anal es included in the MS and MSD? Were MS /MSD analyzed at the appropriate frequency? Were MS (and MSD, if applicable) %Rs within the laboratory QC limits? ✓ Were MS /MSD RPDs within laboratory QC limits? Rg OI Analytical duplicate data Were appropriate anal ical duplicates analyzed for each matrix? Were analytical duplicates analyzed at the appropriate frequency? Were RPDs or relative standard deviations within the laboratory QC limits? R9 OI Method quantitation limits (MQLs): Are the MQLs for each method analyte included in the laboratory data package? Do the MQLs correspond to the concentration of the lowest non -zero calibration standard? Are unadjusted MQLs included in the laboratory data package? RIO OI Other problems/anomalies Are all known problems/anomalies/special conditions noted in this LRC and ER? Were all necessary corrective actions erfonned for the reported data? Was applicable and available technology used to lower the SQL minimize the matrix interference affects on the sample results? 1. Items identified by the letter "R" must be included in the laboratory data package submitted in the TRRP - required report(s). Items identified by the letter "S" should be retained and made available upon request for the appropriate retention period. 2. = organic analyses; I = inorganic analyses (and general chemistry, when applicable); 3. NA = Not applicable; 4. NR = Not reviewed; 5. ER# = Exception Report identification number (an Exception Report should be completed for an item if "NR" or "No" is checked). RG-3 66/TRRP- 13 December 2002 4 of 89 Appendix A (cont'd): Laboratory Review Checklist: Reportable Data Laboratory Name:Environmental Science LRC Date: 07/17/09 Project Name: Coppell Auto Center Laboratory Job Number: L411486-02, -08, -03, -05, -09, -06, -04, and -07 Reviewer Name: ESC Representative Prep Batch Number(s): WG430722 TS # A Z Description Yes No NA NR ER# Chain-of- custody (C -O -C) RI OI Did samples meet the laboratory's standard conditions of sample acceptability upon receipt? Were all departures from standard conditions described in an exception report? R2 OI Sample and quality control (QC) identification Are all field sample ID numbers cross - referenced to the laboratory ID numbers? Are all laboratory ID numbers cross - referenced to the corresponding QC data? R3 10I Test reports Were all samples prepared and analyzed within holding times? Other than those results < MQL, were all other raw values bracketed by calibration standards? AL Were calculations checked by a peer or supervisor? Were all analyte identifications checked by a peer or supervisor? ./ Were sample quantitation limits reported for all anal es not detected? Were all results for soil and sediment samples reported on a dry weight basis? Were % moisture (or solids) reported for all soil and sediment samples? If required for the project, TICs reported? R4 O Surro ate recovery data Were surrogates added prior to extraction? Were surrogate percent recoveries in all samples within the laboratory C limits? R5 OI Test reports/summary forms for blank samples Were appropriate type(s) of blanks analyzed? Were blanks analyzed at the appropriate fre uenc ? Were method blanks taken through the entire analytical process, including preparation and, if applicable, cleanup procedures? Were blank concentrations < MQL? R6 OI Laboratory control samples (LCS): Were all COCs included in the LCS? Was each LCS taken through the entire analytical procedure, including re and cleanup steps? Were LCSs analyzed at the required frequency? AL Were LCS (and LCSD, if applicable) %Rs within the laboratory QC limits? ✓ Does the delectability data document the laboratory's capability to detect the COCs at the MDL used to calculate the SQLs? V Was the LCSD RPD within QC limits? R7 101 JMatrix spike MS and matrix spike duplicate MSD data Were the project/method specified anal es included in the MS and MSD? Were MS /MSD analyzed at the appropriate fre uenc ? Were MS (and MSD, if applicable) %Rs within the laboratory QC limits? Were MS/MSD RPDs within laboratory QC limits? R8 01 Analytical duplicate data Were appro riate analytical duplicates analyzed for each matrix? Were analytical duplicates analyzed at the appropriate fre uenc ? Were RPDs or relative standard deviations within the laboratory QC limits? R9 OI Method quantitation limits (MQLs): Are the MQLs for each method analyte included in the laboratory data package? Do the MQLs correspond to the concentration of the lowest non -zero calibration standard? Are unadjusted MQLs included in the laboratory data package? RIO OI Other problems/anomalies Are all known problems/anomalies/special conditions noted in this LRC and ER? Were all necessary corrective actions performed for the reported data? AL Was applicable and available technology used to lower the SQL minimize the matrix interference affects on the sample results? 1. Items identified by the letter °R" must be included in the laboratory data package submitted in the TRRP - required report(s). Items identified by the letter "S" should be retained and made available upon request for the appropriate retention period. 2. = organic analyses; I = inorganic analyses (and general chemistry, when applicable); 3. NA = Not applicable; 4. NR = Not reviewed; 5. ER# = Exception Report identification number (an Exception Report should be completed for an item if "NR" or "No" is checked). RG- 366 /TRRP -13 December 2002 5 of 89 Appendix A (cont'd): Laboratory Review Checklist: Reportable Data Laboratory Name:Environmental Science LRC Date: 07/17/09 Project Name: Coppell Auto Center Laboratory Job Number:L411486 -03, -05, -06, -07, -08, -02, -09, -04, and -01 Reviewer Name: ESC Representative Prep Batch Number(s): WG430757 TPHTX # A Z Description Yes No NA' INR 4 ER# Chain-of- custody (C -O -C) RI OI Did samples meet the laboratory's standard conditions of sample acceptability upon receipt? Were all departures from standard conditions described in an exception report? R2 OI Sample and quality control (QC) identification Are all field sample ID numbers cross - referenced to the laboratory ID numbers? Are all laboratory ID numbers cross - referenced to the corresponding QC data? R3 OI Test reports Were all samples prepared and analyzed within holding times? Other than those results < MQL, were all other raw values bracketed by calibration standards? Were calculations checked by a peer or supervisor? Were all analyte identifications checked by a peer or supervisor? Were sample quantitation limits reported for all anal es not detected? Were all results for soil and sediment samples reported on a dry weight basis? Were % moisture (or solids) reported for all soil and sediment samples? If required for the project, TICs reported'? R4 O Surro ate recovery data Were surrogates added prior to extraction? Were surrogate percent recoveries in all samples within the laboratory C limits? R5 OI Test reports/summary reports/summary forms for blank samples Were appropriate type(s) of blanks analyzed? Were blanks analyzed at the appropriate frequency? Were method blanks taken through the entire analytical process, including preparation and, if applicable, cleanup procedures? Were blank concentrations < MQL? R6 OI Laboratory control samples (LCS): Were all COCs included in the LCS? Was each LCS taken through the entire analytical procedure, including re and cleanup steps? Were LCSs analyzed at the required frequency? Were LCS (and LCSD, if applicable) %Rs within the laboratory QC limits? Does the delectability data document the laboratory's capability to detect the COCs at the MDL used to calculate the SQLs? Was the LCSD RPD within QC limits? R7 OI Matrix spike MS and matrix spike duplicate (MSD) data Were the project/method specified anal es included in the MS and MSD? Were MS /MSD analyzed at the appropriate fre uenc ? Were MS (and MSD, if applicable) %Rs within the laboratory QC limits? Were MS /MSD RPDs within laboratory QC limits? R8 OI Analytical duplicate data Were appropriate anal ical duplicates analyzed for each matrix? Were analytical duplicates analyzed at the appropriate frequency? Were RPDs or relative standard deviations within the laboratory QC limits? R9 01 Method quantitation limits (MQLs): Are the MQLs for each method anal to included in the laboratory data package? Do the MQLs correspond to the concentration of the lowest non -zero calibration standard? Are unadjusted MQLs included in the laboratory data package? R10 OI Other problems/anomalies Are all known problems/anomalies/special conditions noted in this LRC and ER? Were all necessary corrective actions performed for the reported data? Was applicable and available technology used to lower the SQL minimize the matrix interference affects on the sample results? Items identified by the letter "R" must be included in the laboratory data package submitted in the TRRP- required report(s). Items identified by the letter "S" should be retained and made available upon request for the appropriate retention period. = organic analyses; I = inorganic analyses (and general chemistry, when applicable); NA = Not applicable; NR = Not reviewed; ER# = Exception Report identification number (an Exception Report should be completed for an item if "NR" or "No" is checked). RG-3 66/TRRP- 13 December 2002 6 of 89 Appendix A (cont'd): Laboratory Review Checklist: Reportable Data Laboratory Name:Environmental Science LRC Date: 07/17/09 Project Name: Coppell Auto Center Laboratory Job Number:L411486 -04 and 06 Reviewer Name: ESC Representative Prep Batch Number(s): WG430873 AGICP # A' Description Yes No NA NR 4 ER# Chain -of- custody (C -O -C) RI OI Did samples meet the laboratory's standard conditions of sample acceptability upon receipt? Were all departures from standard conditions described in an exception report? R2 OI Sample and quality control (QQ (QC identification Are all field sample ID numbers cross - referenced to the laboratory ID numbers? Are all laboratory ID numbers cross - referenced to the corresponding QC data? R3 OI Test reports Were all samples prepared and analyzed within holding times? Other than those results < MQL, were all other raw values bracketed by calibration standards? Were calculations checked by a peer or supervisor? Were all analyte identifications checked by a peer or supervisor? V Were sample quantitation limits reported for all anal es not detected? Were all results for soil and sediment samples reported on a dry weight basis? ✓ Were % moisture (or solids) reported for all soil and sediment samples? If required for the project, TICs reported? R4 O Surro ate recovery data Were surrogates added prior to extraction? Were surrogate percent recoveries in all samples within the laboratory C limits? R5 OI Test reports/summary reports/summary forms for blank samples Were appropriate type(s) of blanks analyzed? Were blanks analyzed at the appropriate frequency? Were method blanks taken through the entire analytical process, including preparation and, if applicable, cleanup procedures? Were blank concentrations < MQL? R6 OI Laboratory control samples (LCS): Were all COCs included in the LCS? Was each LCS taken through the entire analytical procedure, including prep and cleanup steps? Were LCSs analyzed at the required frequency? Were LCS (and LCSD, if applicable) %Rs within the laboratory QC limits? Does the delectability data document the laboratory's capability to detect the COCs at the MDL used to calculate the SQLs? Was the LCSD RPD within QC limits? R7 OI Matrix spike MS and matrix spike duplicate MSD data Were the project/method specified anal es included in the MS and MSD? Were MS /MSD analyzed at the appropriate fre uenc ? Were MS (and MSD, if applicable) %Rs within the laboratory QC limits? Were MS/MSD RPDs within laboratory QC limits? R8 1 01 Analytical duplicate data Were appropriate anal ical duplicates analyzed for each matrix? Were analytical duplicates analyzed at the appropriate frequency? Were RPDs or relative standard deviations within the laboratory QC limits? R9 OI Method quantitation limits (MQLs): Are the MQLs for each method anal to included in the laboratory data package? Do the MQLs correspond to the concentration of the lowest non -zero calibration standard? Are unadjusted MQLs included in the laboratory data package? R10 01 Other problems/anomalies Are all known problems/anomalies/special conditions noted in this LRC and ER? Were all necessary corrective actions performed for the reported data? Was applicable and available technology used to lower the SQL minimize the matrix interference affects on the sample results? 1. Items identified by the letter "R" must be included in the laboratory data package submitted in the TRRP- required report(s). Items identified by the letter "S" should be retained and made available upon request for the appropriate retention period. 2. = organic analyses; I = inorganic analyses (and general chemistry, when applicable); 3. NA = Not applicable; 4. NR = Not reviewed; 5. ER# = Exception Report identification number (an Exception Report should be completed for an item if "NR" or "No" is checked). RG- 366 /TRRP -13 December 2002 7 of 89 Appendix A (cont'd): Laboratory Review Checklist: Reportable Data Laboratory Name:Environmental Science LRC Date: 07/17/09 Project Name: Coppell Auto Center Laboratory Job Number:L41 1486 -02 Reviewer Name: ESC Representative Prep Batch Number(s): WG431272 V8260BTEXM # A' Description Yes No NA NR ER# Chain -of- custody (C -O -C) RI OI Did samples meet the laboratory's standard conditions of sample acceptability upon receipt? Were all departures from standard conditions described in an exception report? R2 OI Sample and quality control C) identification Are all field sample ID numbers cross - referenced to the laboratory ID numbers? Are all laboratory ID numbers cross - referenced to the corresponding QC data? R3 OI Test reports Were all samples prepared and analyzed within holding times? Other than those results < MQL, were all other raw values bracketed by calibration standards? Were calculations checked by a peer or supervisor? Were all anal to identifications checked by a peer or supervisor? Were sample quantitation limits reported for all anal es not detected? Were all results for soil and sediment samples reported on a d weight basis? Were % moisture (or solids) reported for all soil and sediment samples? If required for the project, TICs reported? R4 O Surro ate recovery data Were surrogates added prior to extraction? Were surrogate percent recoveries in all samples within the laboratory C limits? R5 OI Test reports/summary reports/summary forms for blank samples Were appropriate type(s) of blanks analyzed? AL Were blanks analyzed at the appropriate frequency? Were method blanks taken through the entire analytical process, including preparation and, if applicable, cleanup procedures? Were blank concentrations < MQL? R6 JOI Laboratory control samples (LCS): Were all COCs included in the LCS? Was each LCS taken through the entire analytical procedure, including prep and cleanup steps? Were LCSs analyzed at the required frequency? Were LCS (and LCSD, if applicable) %Rs within the laboratory QC limits? Does the delectability data document the laboratory's capability to detect the COCs at the MDL used to calculate the SQLs? Was the LCSD RPD within QC limits? R7 OI Matrix spike MS and matrix spike duplicate MSD data Were the project /method specified anal es included in the MS and MSD? Were MS /MSD analyzed at the appropriate fre uenc ? Were MS (and MSD, if applicable) %Rs within the laboratory QC limits? Were MS /MSD RPDs within laboratory QC limits? R8 OI Analytical duplicate data Were appropriate anal ical duplicates analyzed for each matrix? Were analytical duplicates analyzed at the appropriate frequency? Were RPDs or relative standard deviations within the laboratory QC limits? R9 OI Method quantitation limits (MQLs): Are the MQLs for each method anal to included in the laboratory data package? Do the MQLs correspond to the concentration of the lowest non -zero calibration standard? Are unadjusted MQLs included in the laboratory data package? R10 OI Other problems/anomalies Are all known problems/anomalies/special conditions noted in this LRC and ER? Were all necessary corrective actions performed for the reported data? Was applicable and available technology used to lower the SQL minimize the matrix interference affects on the sample results? 1. Items identified by the letter "R" must be included in the laboratory data package submitted in the TRRP- required report(s). Items identified by the letter "S" should be retained and made available upon request for the appropriate retention period. 2. = organic analyses; I = inorganic analyses (and general chemistry, when applicable); 3. NA = Not applicable; 4. NR = Not reviewed; 5. ER# = Exception Report identification number (an Exception Report should be completed for an item if "NR" or "No" is checked). RG-3 66/TRRP- 13 December 2002 8 of 69 Appendix A (cont'd): Laboratory Review Checklist: Reportable Data Laboratory Name:Environmental Science LRC Date: 07/17/09 Project Name: Coppell Auto Center Laboratory Job Number: L41 1486 -04 Reviewer Name: ESC Representative Prep Batch Number(s): WG431385 V8260 # A' Description Yes No NA' NR 4 ER# Chain -of- custody (C -O -C) RI OI Did samples meet the laboratory's standard conditions of sample acceptability upon receipt? Were all departures from standard conditions described in an exception report? R2 OI Sample and quality control (QC) identification Are all field sample ID numbers cross - referenced to the laboratory ID numbers? Are all laboratory ID numbers cross - referenced to the corresponding QC data? R3 OI Test reports Were all samples prepared and analyzed within holding times? Other than those results < MQL, were all other raw values bracketed by calibration standards? Were calculations checked by a peer or supervisor? Were all analyte identifications checked by a peer or supervisor? ./ Were sample quantitation limits reported for all anal es not detected? Were all results for soil and sediment samples reported on a dry weight basis? Were % moisture (or solids) reported for all soil and sediment samples? If required for the project, TICs reported? R4 O Surrogate recovery data Were surrogates added prior to extraction? Were surrogate percent recoveries in all samples within the laboratory C limits? JL R5 OI Test reports/summary reports/summary forms for blank samples Were appropriate type(s) of blanks analyzed? Were blanks analyzed at the appropriate frequency? Were method blanks taken through the entire analytical process, including preparation and, if ap licable, cleanup procedures? Were blank concentrations < MQL? R6 OI Laboratory control samples (LCS): Were all COCs included in the LCS? Was each LCS taken through the entire analytical procedure, including prep and cleanup steps? Were LCSs analyzed at the required frequency? Were LCS (and LCSD, if applicable) %Rs within the laboratory QC limits? Does the delectability data document the laboratory's capability to detect the COCs at the MDL used to calculate the SQLs? Was the LCSD RPD within QC limits? R7 OI Matrix spike MS and matrix spike duplicate MSD data Were the project /methodspecified anal es included in the MS and MSD? Were MS /MSD analyzed at the appropriate frequency? Were MS (and MSD, if applicable) %Rs within the laboratory QC limits? Were MS/MSD RPDs within laboratory QC limits? R8 0I Analytical duplicate data Were appropriate anal ical duplicates analyzed for each matrix? Were analytical duplicates analyzed at the appropriate frequency? Were RPDs or relative standard deviations within the laboratory QC limits? R9 OI Method quantitation limits (MQLs): Are the MQLs for each method analyte included in the laboratory data package? Do the MQLs correspond to the concentration of the lowest non -zero calibration standard? Are unadjusted MQLs included in the laboratory data package? R10 OI Other problems/anomalies Are all known problems/anomalies/special conditions noted in this LRC and ER? Were all necessary corrective actions performed for the reported data? Was applicable and available technology used to lower the SQL minimize the matrix interference affects on the sample results? I . Items identified by the letter "R" must be included in the laboratory data package submitted in the TRRP- required report(s). Items identified by the letter "S" should be retained and made available upon request for the appropriate retention period. 2. = organic analyses; I = inorganic analyses (and general chemistry, when applicable); 3. NA = Not applicable; 4. NR = Not reviewed; 5. ER# = Exception Report identification number (an Exception Report should be completed for an item if "NR" or "No" is checked). RG-3 66/TRRP- 13 December 2002 9 of 89 Appendix A (cont'd): Laboratory Review Checklist: Reportable Data Laboratory Name:Environmental Science LRC Date: 07/17/09 Project Name: Coppell Auto Center Laboratory Job Number:L41 1486 -06 Reviewer Name: ESC Representative Prep Batch Number(s): WG431498 V8260 # A' Description Yes No NA NR 1 ER # Chain-of- custody (C -O -C) Rl OI Did samples meet the laboratory's standard conditions of sample acceptability upon receipt? Were all departures from standard conditions described in an exception report? R2 OI Sample and quality control QC) identification Are all field sample ID numbers cross - referenced to the laboratory ID numbers? Are all laboratory ID numbers cross - referenced to the corresponding QC data? R3 OI Test reports Were all samples prepared and analyzed within holding times? Other than those results < MQL, were all other raw values bracketed by calibration standards? V / Were calculations checked by a peer or supervisor? V 1 Were all analyte identifications checked by a peer or supervisor? Were sample quantitation limits reported for all anal tes not detected? Were all results for soil and sediment samples reported on a dry weight basis? V / Were % moisture (or solids) reported for all soil and sediment samples? If required for the project, TICs reported? R4 10 Surrogate recovery data Were surrogates added prior to extraction? Were surrogate percent recoveries in all samples within the laboratory C limits? R5 OI Test reports/summary reports/summary forms for blank samples Were appropriate type(s) of blanks anal zed? Were blanks analyzed at the appropriate fre uenc ? Were method blanks taken through the entire analytical process, including preparation and, if applicable, cleanup procedures? Were blank concentrations < MQL? R6 OI Laboratory control samples (LCS): Were all COCs included in the LCS? Was each LCS taken through the entire analytical procedure, including re and cleanup steps? Were LCSs analyzed at the required frequency? Were LCS (and LCSD, if applicable) %Rs within the laboratory QC limits? Does the detectability data document the laboratory's capability to detect the COCs at the MDL used to calculate the SQLs? Was the LCSD RPD within QC limits? R7 OI Matrix spike MS and matrix spike duplicate MSD data Were the project/method specified anal tes included in the MS and MSD? Were MS /MSD analyzed at the appropriate fre uenc ? JL Were MS (and MSD, if applicable) %Rs within the laboratory QC limits? t Were MS/MSD RPDs within laboratory QC limits? R8 OI Analytical duplicate data Were appropriate anal ical duplicates analyzed for each matrix? Were analytical duplicates analyzed at the appropriate frequency? Were RPDs or relative standard deviations within the laboratory QC limits? R9 OI Method quantitation limits (MQLs): Are the MQLs for each method analyte included in the laboratory data package? Do the MQLs correspond to the concentration of the lowest non -zero calibration standard? Are unadjusted MQLs included in the laboratory data package? RIO OI Other problems/anomalies Are all known problems/anomalies/special conditions noted in this LRC and ER? Were all necessary corrective actions performed for the reported data? Was applicable and available technology used to lower the SQL minimize the matrix interference affects on the sample results? Items identified by the letter `R" must be included in the laboratory data package submitted in the TRRP- required reporus). Items identified by the letter °S" should be retained and made available upon request for the appropriate retention period. = organic analyses; I = inorganic analyses (and general chemistry, when applicable); NA = Not applicable; NR = Not reviewed; ER# = Exception Report identification number (an Exception Report should be completed for an item if "NR" or "No" is checked). RG-3 66/TRRP- 13 December 2002 10 of 49 Appendix A (cont'd): Laboratory Review Checklist: Exception Reports Laboratory Nam • Environmental Science Corp. LRC Date: 7/17/2009 Project Name: Collpell Auto Center Laboratory Job Number: L411486 Reviewer Name: ESC Representative Pre Batch Numbers: WG431498 V8260 Sample(s) SB -06 -LOFT were analyzed for Volatile Organic ER #: Description I The matrix spike or matrix spike duplicate recoveries were over the laboratory control limits for 1,1,2 - Trichloroethane, 1,1,2 - Trichloro- 1,2,2 - trifluoroethane, 1,1- Dichloroethene, 1,2,3 - Trichlorobenzene, 1,2,4 - Trichlorobenzene, 1,2- Dichlorobenzene, 1,3- Dichlorobenzene, 1,4- Dichlorobenzene, 4- Chlorotoluene, Chlorobenzene, Chlorodibromomethane, Ethylbenzene, Hexachloro -1,3- butadiene, Isopropylbenzene, n- Butylbenzene, n- Propylbenzene, p- Isopropyltoluene, sec - Butylbenzene, Styrene, and Tetrachloroethene. 11 of 69 Appendix A (cont'd): Laboratory Review Checklist: Reportable Data Laboratory Name:Environmental Science LRC Date: 07/17/09 Project Name: Coppell Auto Center Laboratory Job Number:L411486 -01 Reviewer Name: ESC Representative Prep Batch Number(s): WG431545 V8260BTEXM # A' Descri tion Yes No NA' NR ER #' Chain -of- custody (C -O -C) R1 OI Did samples meet the laboratory's standard conditions of sample acceptability upon receipt? Were all departures from standard conditions described in an exception report? R2 01 Sample and quality control (QC) identification Are all field sample ID numbers cross - referenced to the laboratory ID numbers? Are all laboratory ID numbers cross - referenced to the corresponding QC data? R3 OI Test reports Were all samples prepared and analyzed within holding times? Other than those results < MQL, were all other raw values bracketed by calibration standards? Were calculations checked by a peer or supervisor? Were all analyte identifications checked by a peer or supervisor? Were sample quantitation limits reported for all anal es not detected? Were all results for soil and sediment samples reported on a dry weight basis? Were % moisture (or solids) reported for all soil and sediment samples? If required for the project, TICS reported? R4 O Surro ate recovery data Were surrogates added prior to extraction? Were surrogate percent recoveries in all samples within the laboratory QC limits? R5 OI Test reports/summary reports/summary forms for blank samples Were appropriate type(s) ) of blanks analyzed? Were blanks analyzed at the appropriate frequency? Were method blanks taken through the entire analytical process, including preparation and, if applicable, cleanup procedures? Were blank concentrations < MQL? R6 OI Laboratory control samples (LCS): Were all COCs included in the LCS? Was each LCS taken through the entire analytical procedure, including prep and cleanup steps? Were LCSs analyzed at the required frequency? Were LCS (and LCSD, if applicable) %Rs within the laboratory QC limits? Does the detectability data document the laboratory's capability to detect the COCs at the MDL used to calculate the SQLs? Was the LCSD RPD within QC limits? ✓ R7 01 Matrix spike MS and matrix spike duplicate MSD data Were the project/method specified anal es included in the MS and MSD? Were MS /MSD analyzed at the appropriate fre uenc ? Were MS (and MSD, if applicable) %Rs within the laboratory QC limits? Were MS/MSD RPDs within laboratory QC limits? RS 01 Anal tical duplicate data Were appropriate anal ical duplicates analyzed for each matrix? Were analytical duplicates analyzed at the appropriate frequency? Were RPDs or relative standard deviations within the laboratory QC limits? R9 Of Method quantitation limits (MQLs): Are the MQLs for each method analyte included in the laboratory data package? Do the MQLs correspond to the concentration of the lowest non -zero calibration standard? Are unad MQLs included in the laboratory data package? RIO OI Other problems/anomalies Are all known problems/anomalies/special conditions noted in this LRC and ER? Were all necessary corrective actions performed for the reported data? Was applicable and available technology used to lower the SQL minimize the matrix interference affects on the sample results? I . Items identified by the letter "R" must be included in the laboratory data package submitted in the TRRP - required report(s). Items identified by the letter "S" should be retained and made available upon request for the appropriate retention period. 2. = organic analyses; I = inorganic analyses (and general chemistry, when applicable); 3. NA = Not applicable; 4. NR = Not reviewed; 5. ER# = Exception Report identification number (an Exception Report should be completed for an item if "NR" or "No" is checked). RG-3 66/TRRP- 13 December 2002 12 of 89 Appendix A (cont'd): Laboratory Review Checklist: Exception Reports Laboratory Name: Environmental Science Corp. LRC Date: 7/17/2009 Pro 0 ect Name: Co ell Auto Center Laboratory o Number: L4114 Reviewer Name: ESC Representative PreD Batch Numbers: WG431545 V8260 Sample(s) SB- 01 -2FT were analyzed for Volatile Organic Compounds ER #: Description 1 The surrogate recoveries were outside the laboratory control limits for 1-411486 -01. The surrogate recoveries for the remaining samples were within method limits. TEXM 13 of 69 Appendix A (cont'd): Laboratory Review Checklist: Reportable Data Laboratory Name: E nvlron mental Science LRC Date: 07/17/09 Project Name: Coppell Auto Center Laboratory Job Number:L411486 -01 Reviewer Name: ESC Representative Prep Batch Number(s): WG431941 V8260BTEXM # A Description Yes No NA NR ER #� Chain -of- custody (C -O -C) RI OI Did samples meet the laboratory's standard conditions of sample acceptability upon receipt? Were all departures from standard conditions described in an exception report? R2 OI Sample and quality control (QC) identification Are all field sample ID numbers cross - referenced to the laboratory ID numbers? Are all laboratory ID numbers cross - referenced to the corresponding QC data? R3 OI Test reports Were all samples prepared and analyzed within holding times? Other than those results < MQL, were all other raw values bracketed by calibration standards? Were calculations checked by a peer or supervisor? Were all analyte identifications checked by a peer or supervisor? ./ Were sample quantitation limits reported for all anal tes not detected? Were all results for soil and sediment samples reported on a dry weight basis? ✓ Were % moisture (or solids) reported for all soil and sediment samples? ✓ If required for the project, TICs reported? R4 10 Surrogate recovery data Were surrogates added prior to extraction? Were surrogate percent recoveries in all samples within the laboratory QC limits? R5 OI Test reports/summary reports/summary forms for blank samples Were appropriate type(s) of blanks analyzed? Were blanks analyzed at the appropriate frequency? Were method blanks taken through the entire analytical process, including preparation and, if applicable, cleanup procedures? Were blank concentrations < MQL? R6 OI Labo atory control samples (LCS): Were all COCs included in the LCS? Was each LCS taken through the entire analytical procedure, including prep and cleanup steps? Were LCSs analyzed at the required frequency? Were LCS (and LCSD, if applicable) %Rs within the laboratory QC limits? Does the delectability data document the laboratory's capability to detect the COCs at the MDL used to calculate the SQLs? Was the LCSD RPD within QC limits? R7 OI Matrix spike MS and matrix spike duplicate MSD data Were the project /methodspecified anal es included in the MS and MSD? Were MS /MSD analyzed at the appropriate fre uenc ? Were MS (and MSD, if applicable) %Rs within the laboratory QC limits? Were MS/MSD RPDs within laboratory QC limits? R8 1 01 1 Anal tical duplicate data Were appropriate anal ical duplicates analyzed for each matrix? Were analytical duplicates analyzed at the appropriate frequency? Were RPDs or relative standard deviations within the laboratory QC limits? R9 OI Method quantitation limits (MQLs): Are the MQLs for each method anal to included in the laboratory data package? Do the MQLs correspond to the concentration of the lowest non -zero calibration standard? Are unadjusted MQLs included in the laboratory data package? R10 OI Other problems/anomalies Are all known problems/anomalies/special conditions noted in this LRC and ER? Were all necessary corrective actions performed for the reported data? Was applicable and available technology used to lower the SQL minimize the matrix interference affects on the sample results? I. Items identified by the letter "R" must be included in the laboratory data package submitted in the TRRP - required report(s). Items identified by the letter "S" should be retained and made available upon request for the appropriate retention period. 2. = organic analyses; I = inorganic analyses (and general chemistry, when applicable); 3. NA = Not applicable; 4. NR = Not reviewed; 5. ER# = Exception Report identification number (an Exception Report should be completed for an item if "NR" or "No" is checked). RG-3 66/TRRP- 13 December 2002 14 of 89 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE CORP. Teal Chiabotti W &M Environmental Group, Inc. Ft Worth 112 NW 24th St, Ste 201 Fort Worth, TX 76164 12065 Lebanon Rd. Mt. Juliet, TN 37122 (615) 758 -5858 1 -800- 767 -5859 Fax (6'5) 758 -5859 Tax I.D. 62- 0814289 F_st . 1.970 Report Summary Tuesday July 21, 2009 Report Number: L4114 8 6 Samples Received: 07/09/09 Client Project: 940.002 Description: Coppell The analytical results in this report are based upo &1ta ion su plie by you, the client, and are for your exclusive use a a questions regarding this data package, please do o to 11. Entire Report Reviewed By: r Laboratory Certification Numbers Beasley, ESC Rep 7 sen a ive A2LA - 1461 -01, AIHA - 100789, AL - 40660, CA - I -2327, CT - PH- 0197, FL - E87487 GA - 923, IN - C- TN -01, KY - 90010, KYUST - 0016, NC - ENV375,DW21704, ND - R -140 NJ - TN002, NJ NELAP - TN002, SC - 84004, IN - 2006, VA - 00109, WV - 233 AZ - 0612, MN - 047 - 999 -395, NY - 11742, WI - 998093910 Accreditation is only applicable to the test methods specified on each scope of accreditation held by ESC Lab Sciences. This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval from Environmental Science Corp. Where applicable, sampling conducted by ESC is performed per guidance provided in laboratory standard operating procedures: 060302, 060303, and 060304. 9 Samples Reported: 07/17/09 15:34 Revised: 07 /21/09 08:43 Page 1 of 16 15 of 69 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE CORP. 12065 Lebanon Rd. Mt. Juliet, TN 37122 (615) 758 -5858 1 -800- 767 -5859 Fax (615) 758 -5859 Tax T.D. 62- 0814289 Est. ] 970 Teal Chiabotti W &M Environmental Group, Inc. Ft W 112 NW 24th St, Ste 201 Fort Worth, TX 76164 REPORT OF ANALYSIS July 21,2009 ESC Sample # : L411486 -01 Date Received July 09, 2009 Description Coppell Auto Center Site ID Sample ID SB- 01 -2FT Project # 940.002 Collected By Teal Chiabotti Collection Date 07/08/09 09:45 Parameter Dry Result MDL RDL Units Q Method Date Dil. Total Solids 81.0 s 2540G 07/13/09 1 Benzene 0.014 0.0016 0.0062 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Toluene U 0.0061 0.031 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Ethylbenzene 1.8 0.011 0.062 mg /kg 8260B 07/17/09 50 Total Xylenes 1.8 0.023 0.18 mg /kg 8260B 07/17/09 50 Methyl tert -butyl ether 0.037 0.0014 0.0062 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Surrogate Recovery Toluene -d8 83.6 % Rec. J2 8260B 07/15/09 5 Dibromofluoromethane 94.7 % Rec. 8260B 07/15/09 5 4- Bromofluorobenzene 70.3 % Rec. 8260B 07/15/09 5 TNRCC Method 1005 - TPH TPH C6 - C12 54. 25. 62. mg /kg i TX 1005 07/13/09 1 TPH C12 - C28 520 25. 62. mg /kg TX 1005 07/13/09 1 TPH C28 - C35 U 25. 62. mg /kg TX 1005 07/13/09 1 TPH C6 - C35 580 25. 62. mg /kg TX 1005 07/13/09 1 Surrogate Recovery o- Terphenyl 109. `o Rec. TX 1005 07/13/09 1 Results listed are dry weight basis U = ND (Not Detected) MDL = Minimum Detection Limit = LOD RDL = Reported Detection Limit = LOQ = PQL = EQL Note: This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval from ESC. The reported analytical results relate only to the sample submitted Reported: 07/17/09 15:34 Revised: 07/21/09 08:43 Page 2 of 16 16 of 69 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE CORP. 12065 Lebanon Rd. Mt. Juliet, TN 37122 (615) 758 -5858 1- 800 - 767 -5859 Fax (615) 758 -5859 'Pax I.D. 62- 0814289 Est. 1970 Teal Chiabotti W &M Environmental Group, Inc. - Ft. W 112 NW 24th St, Ste 201 Fort Worth, TX 76164 REPORT OF ANALYSIS July 21,2009 Results listed are dry weight basis. U = ND (Not Detected) MDL = Minimum Detection Limit = LOD RLL - Reported Detection Limit = LOQ - PQL = EQL Note: This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval from ESC. The reported analytical results relate only to the sample submitted Reported: 07/17/09 15:34 Revised: 07/21/09 08:43 Page 3 of 16 17 of 69 ESC Sample # L411486 -02 Date Received July 09, 2009 Description Coppell Auto Center Site ID Sample 1D SB- 02 -2FT Project # 940.002 Collected By Teal Chiabotti Collection Date 07/08/09 09:54 Parameter Dry Result MDL RDL Units Q Method Date Dil. Total Solids 80.2 254OG 07/13/09 1 Benzene U 0.0016 0.0062 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Toluene U 0.0061 0.031 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Ethylbenzene 0.0017 0.0011 0.0062 mg /kg J 8260B 07/15/09 5 Total Xylenes 0.0086 0.0023 0.019 mg /kg J 8260B 07/15/09 5 Methyl tert -butyl ether 0.020 0.0014 0.0062 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Surrogate Recovery Toluene -d8 97.3 o Rec. 8260B 07/15/09 5 Dibromofluoromethane 94.6 � Rec. 8260B 07/15/09 5 4- Bromofluorobenzene 89.8 � Rec. 8260B 07/15/09 5 TNRCC Method 1005 - TPH TPH C6 - C12 U 25. 62. mg /kg TX 1005 07/13/09 1 TPH C12 - C28 U 25. 62. mg /kg TX 1005 07/13/09 1 TPH C28 - C35 U 25. 62. mg /kg TX 1005 07/13/09 1 TPH C6 - C35 U 25. 62. mg /kg TX 1005 07/13/09 1 Surrogate Recovery o- Terphenyl 109. o Rec. TX 1005 07/13/09 1 Results listed are dry weight basis. U = ND (Not Detected) MDL = Minimum Detection Limit = LOD RLL - Reported Detection Limit = LOQ - PQL = EQL Note: This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval from ESC. The reported analytical results relate only to the sample submitted Reported: 07/17/09 15:34 Revised: 07/21/09 08:43 Page 3 of 16 17 of 69 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE CORP. 12065 Lebanon Rd. Mt. J7liet, ' 3 7122 (615) 758 -5858 1- 800 - - %67 -5859 Fax (615) 758 -5859 ?ax 1.D. 62- 0814289 Est. 1910 Teal Chiabotti W &M Environmental Group, Inc. - Ft W 112 NW 24th St, Ste 201 Fort Worth, TX 76164 REPORT OF ANALYSIS July 21,2009 ESC Sample # : L411486 -03 Date Received July 09, 2009 Description Coppell Auto Center Site ID Sample ID SB- 03 -2FT Project # 940.002 Collected By Teal Chiabotti Collection Date 07/08/09 10:02 Parameter Dry Result MDL ROL Units Q Method Date Dil. Total Solids 83.9 2540G 07/13/09 1 TNRCC Method 1005 - TPH TPH C6 - C12 U 25. 60. mg /kg TX 1005 07/13/09 1 TPH C12 - C28 U 25. 60. mg /kg TX 1005 07/13/09 1 TPH C28 - C35 U 25. 60. mg /kg TX 1005 07/13/09 1 TPH C6 - C35 U 25. 60. mg /kg TX 1005 07/13/09 1 Surrogate Recovery o- Terphenyl 109. o Rec. TX 1005 07/13/09 1 Results listed are dry weight basis U - NO (Not Detected) MDL = Minimum Detection Limit = LOD RDL = Reported Detection Limit = LOQ - PQL - EQL Note: This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval from ESC. The reported analytical results relate only to the sample submitted Reported: 07/17/09 15:34 Revised: 07/21/09 08:43 Page 4 of 16 18 of 69 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE CORP. Teal Chiabotti W &M Environmental Group, Inc.- Ft W 112 NW 24th St, Ste 201 Fort Worth, TX 76164 Date Received July 09, 2009 Description Coppell Auto Center Sample ID SB -04 -10FT Collected By Teal Chiabotti Collection Date 07/08/09 10:31 REPORT OF ANALYSIS 12065 Lebanon Rd. Mt. Juliet, TN 37122 (615) 758 -5858 1 -800- 767 -5859 Fax (615) 758 -5859 Tax I.D. 62- 0814289 Est. 1970 July 21,2009 ESC Sample # L411486 -04 Site ID Project # 940.002 Parameter Dry Result MDL RDL Units Q Method Date Dil. Total Solids 83.9 2540G 07/13/09 1 Mercury U 0.0025 0.024 mg /kg 7471 07/12/09 1 Arsenic 32. 0.27 1.2 mg /kg 6010B 07/11/09 1 Barium 69. 0.054 0.30 mg /kg 6010B 07/11/09 1 Cadmium 0.10 0.037 0.30 mg /kg J 60103 07/11/09 1 Chromium 12. 0.098 0.60 mg /kg 6010B 07/11/09 1 Lead 170 0.096 0.30 mg /kg 6010B 07/11/09 1 Selenium U 0.65 2.4 mg /kg 0 6010B 07/13/09 2 Silver U 0.16 0.60 mg /kg 6010B 07/11/09 1 Volatile Organics Acetone U 0.12 0.30 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 Acrylonitrile U 0.010 0.060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 Benzene U 0.0016 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 Bromobenzene U 0.0011 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 Bromodichloromethane U 0.0062 0.0074 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 Bromoform U 0.0029 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 Bromomethane U 0.0064 0.030 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 n- Butylbenzene U 0.0012 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 sec - Butylbenzene U 0.0010 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 tert - Butylbenzene U 0.00093 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 Carbon tetrachloride U 0.0016 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 Chlorobenzene U 0.0012 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 Chlorodibromomethane U 0.0012 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 Chloroethane U 0.0029 0.030 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 2- Chloroethyl vinyl ether U 0.016 0.30 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 Chloroform U 0.010 0.030 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 Chloromethane U 0.0028 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 2- Chlorotoluene U 0.0012 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 4- Chlorotoluene U 0.0016 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 1,2- Dibromo -3- Chloropropane U 0.0058 0.030 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 1,2- Dibromoethane U 0.0016 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 Dibromomethane U 0.0016 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 1,2- Dichlorobenzene U 0.0012 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 1,3- Dichlorobenzene U 0.0019 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 1,4- Dichlorobenzene U 0.0011 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 Dichlorodifluoromethane U 0.0016 0.030 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 1,1- Dichloroethane U 0.0013 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 1,2- Dichloroethane U 0.0026 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 1,1- Dichloroethene U 0.0037 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 cis -1,2- Dichloroethene U 0.0036 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 Results listed are dry weight basis. U - ND (Not Detected) MDL = Minimum Detection Limit = LOD RDL - Reported Detection Limit LOQ = PQL - EQL Note: This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval from ESC. The reported analytical results relate only to the sample submitted Reported: 07/17/09 15:34 Revised: 07/21/09 08:43 Page 5 of 16 19 of 69 12065 Lebanon Rd. 0 Mt. Juliet, TN 37122 (6'_5) 758 -5858 ENVIRONMENTAL 1 -80c- 767 -5859 SCIENCE C O R P. Fax (615) 758 -5855 Tax I.D. 62- 08]4289 Est. 1970 REPORT OF ANALYSIS Teal Chiabotti July 21,2009 W &M Environmental Group, Inc.- Ft W 112 NW 24th St, Ste 201 Fort Worth, TX 76164 Date Received July 09, 2009 Description Coppell Auto Center Sample ID SB -04 -10FT Collected By Teal Chiabotti Collection Date 07/08/09 10:31 Parameter Dry Result MDL RDL ESC Sample Site ID Project # Units Q # 940.002 Method L411486 -04 Date Dil. trans- 1,2- Dichloroethene U 0.0034 0.0060 mg/kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 1,2- Dichloropropane U 0.0038 0.0060 mg/kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 1,1- Dichloropropene U 0.0017 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 1,3- Dichloropropane U 0.0014 0.0060 mg/kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 cis -1,3- Dichloropropene U 0.0013 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 trans -1,3- Dichloropropene U 0.0018 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 2,2- Dichloropropane U 0.0028 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 Di- isopropyl ether U 0.0015 0.0060 mg/kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 Ethylbenzene U 0.0011 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 Hexachloro -1,3- butadiene U 0.0018 0.0060 mg /kq 8260B 07/14/09 5 Isopropylbenzene U 0.0010 0.0060 mg /kg 82602 07/14/09 5 p- Isopropyltoluene U 0.00087 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 2- Butanone (MEK) U 0.025 0.060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 Methylene Chloride U 0.012 0.030 mg/kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 4- Methyl -2- pentanone (MIBK) U 0.0070 0.060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 Methyl tert -butyl ether U 0.0014 0.0060 mg /kg 8260E 07/14/09 5 Naphthalene U 0.012 0.030 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 n- Propylbenzene U 0.0010 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 Styrene U 0.0010 0.0060 mg/kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 1,1,1,2 - Tetrachloroethane U 0.0010 0.0060 mg /kg 82603 07/14/09 5 1,1,2,2 - Tetrachloroethane U 0.0016 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 1,1,2 - Trichloro- 1,2,2 - trifluoro U 0.0012 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 Tetrachloroethene U 0.0012 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 Toluene U 0.012 0.030 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 1,2,3 - Trichlorobenzene U 0.0012 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 1,2,4- Trichlorobenzene U 0.0012 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 1,1,1 - Trichloroethane U 0.0026 0.0060 mg /kg 8260E 07/14/09 5 1,1,2 - Trichloroethane U 0.0023 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 Trichloroethene U 0.0017 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 Trichlorofluoromethane U 0.0014 0.030 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 1,2,3 - Trichloropropane U 0.0034 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 1,2,4 - Trimethylbenzene U 0.00085 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 1,2,3 - Trimethylbenzene U 0.0010 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 1,3,5- Trimethylbenzene U 0.0011 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 Vinyl chloride U 0.0014 0.0060 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 Xylenes, Total U 0.0023 0.018 mg /kg 8260B 07/14/09 5 Surrogate Recovery Toluene -d8 96.9 % Rec. 8260B 07/14/09 5 Dibromofluoromethane 102. =o Rec. 8260B 07/14/09 5 4- Bromofluorobenzene 97.8 = Rec. 8260B 07/14/09 5 TNRCC Method 1005 - TPH TPH C6 - C12 U 25. 60. mg /kg TX 1005 07/13/09 1 Results listed are dry weight basis. U = ND (Not Detected) MLL - Minimum Detection Limit LOD RDL = Reported Detection Limit = LOQ = PQL = EQL Note: This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval from ESC. The reported analytical results relate only to the sample submitted Reported: 07 /17/09 15:34 Revised: 07/21/09 08:43 Page 6 of 16 20 of 69 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE CORP. 12065 Lebanon Rd. Mt. Juliet, TN 37122 (615) 758 -5858 1-800- 767 -5859 Fax (615) 758 -5859 :ax T.D. 62- 0814289 Est. 197C REPORT OF ANALYSIS Teal Chiabotti W &M Environmental Group, Inc. Ft W 112 NW 24th St, Ste 201 Fort Worth, TX 76164 Date Received July 09, 2009 Description Coppell Auto Center Sample ID SB -04 -10FT Collected By Teal Chiabotti Collection Date 07/08/09 10:31 Parameter Dry Result TPH C12 - C28 30. TPH C28 - C35 62. TPH C6 - C35 93. Surrogate Recovery o- Terphenyl 107. Results listed are dry weight basis. U - ND (Not Detected) July 21,2009 ESC Sample # L411486 -04 Site ID . Project # 940.002 MDL RDL Units Q Method Date Dil. 25. 60. mg /kg J TX 1005 07/13/09 1 25. 60. mg /kg TX 1005 07/13/09 1 25. 60. mg /kg TX 1005 07/13/09 1 Rec. TX 1005 07/13/09 1 MDL = Minimum Detection Limit = LOD RDL Reported Detection Limit = LOQ - PQL = EQL Note: This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval from ESC. The reported analytical results relate only to the sample submitted Reported: 07/17/09 15:34 Revised: 07/21/09 08:43 Page 7 of 16 21 of 69 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE CORP. Teal Chiabotti W &M Environmental Group, Inc.- Ft W 112 NW 24th St, Ste 201 Fort Worth, TX 76164 REPORT OF ANALYSIS July 21,2009 12065 Lebanon Rd. Mt. Joliet, TN 37122 (6151 758 -5858 1 -800- 767 -5859 Fax (615) 758 -5859 Tax I.D. 62- 0814289 Est. 197C ESC Sample # : L411486 -05 Date Received July 09, 2009 Description Ccppell Auto Center Site ID Sample ID SB -05 -10FT Project # 940.002 Collected By Teal Chiabotti Collection Date 07/08/09 10:31 Parameter Dry Result MDL RDL Units Q Method Date Dil. Total Solids 86.5 2540G 07/13/09 1 TNRCC Method 1005 - TPH TPH C6 - C12 U 25. 58. mg /kg TX 1005 07/13/09 1 TPH C12 - C28 U 25. 58. mg /kg TX 1005 07/13/09 1 TPH C28 - C35 U 25. 58. mg /kg TX 1005 07/13/09 1 TPH C6 - C35 U 25. 58. mg /kg TX 1005 07/13/09 1 Surrogate Recovery c- Terphenyl 111. Rec. TX 1005 07/13/09 1 Results listed are dry weight basis U - ND (Not Detected) MDL = Minimum Detection Limit = LOD RDL = Reported Detection Limit LOQ - PQL - EQL Note: This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval from ESC. The reported analytical results relate only to the sample submitted Reported: 07/17/09 15:34 Revised: 07/21/09 08:44 Page 8 of 16 22 of 69 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE CORP. Teal Chiabotti W &M Environmental Group, Inc. - Ft W 112 NW 24th St, Ste 201 Fort Worth, TX 76164 Date Received July 09, 2009 Description Coppell Auto Center Sample ID SB -06 -LOFT Collected By Teal Chiabotti Collection Date 07/08/09 11:09 REPORT OF ANALYSIS 12065 Lebanon Rd. Mt. :uliet, TN 37122 (615) 758 -5858 1- 800 - 767 -5859 Fax (615) 758 -5859 Tax :.D. 62- 0814289 Est. 1970 July 21,2009 ESC Sample # L411486 -06 Site ID . Project # 940.002 Parameter Dry Result MDL RDL Units Q Method Date Dil. Total Solids 77.8 2540G 07/13/09 1 Mercury U 0.0025 0.026 mg /kg 7471 07/12/09 1 Arsenic 1.1 0.27 1.3 mg /kg J 6010B 07/11/09 1 Barium 73. 0.054 0.32 mg /kg 6010B 07/11/09 1 Cadmium U 0.037 0.32 mg /kg 6010B 07/11/09 1 Chromium 23. 0.098 0.64 mg /kg 6010B 07/11/09 1 Lead 9.6 0.096 0.32 mg /kg 6010B 07/11/09 1 Selenium U 0.33 1.3 mg /kg 6010B 07/11/09 1 Silver U 0.16 0.64 mg /kg 6010B 07/11/09 1 Volatile Organics Acetone U 0.12 0.32 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Acrylonitrile U 0.010 0.064 mg /kg 82603 07/15/09 5 Benzene U 0.0016 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Bromobenzene U 0.0011 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Bromodichloromethane U 0.0062 0.0080 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Bromoform U 0.0029 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Bromomethane U 0.0064 0.032 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 n- Butylbenzene U 0.0012 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 sec - Butylbenzene U 0.0010 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 tert - Butylbenzene U 0.00093 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Carbon tetrachloride U 0.0016 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Chlorobenzene U 0.0012 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Chlorodibromomethane U 0.0012 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Chloroethane U 0.0029 0.032 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 2- Chloroethyl vinyl ether U 0.016 0.32 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Chloroform U 0.010 0.032 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Chloromethane U 0.0028 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 2- Chlorotoluene U 0.0012 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 4- Chlorotoluene U 0.0016 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 1,2- Dibromo -3- Chloropropane U 0.0058 0.032 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 1,2- Dibromoethane U 0.0016 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Dibromomethane U 0.0016 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 1,2- Dichlorobenzene U 0.0012 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 1,3- Dichlorobenzene U 0.0019 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 1,4- Dichlorobenzene U 0.0011 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Dichlorodifluoromethane U 0.0016 0.032 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 1,1- Dichloroethane U 0.0013 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 1,2- Dichloroethane U 0.0026 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 1,1- Dichloroethene U 0.0037 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 cis- 1,2- Dichloroethene U 0.0036 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Results listed are dry weight basis. U - ND (Not Detected) MDL = Minimum Detection Limit = LOD RDL = Reported Detection Limit = LOQ = PQL - EQL Note: This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval from ESC. The reported analytical results relate only to the sample submitted Reported: 07/17/09 15:34 Revised: 07/21/09 08:44 Page 9 of 16 23 of 69 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE CORP. Teal Chiabotti W &M Environmental Group, Inc. - Ft W 112 NW 24th St, Ste 201 Fort Worth, TX 76164 Date Received July 09, 2009 Description Coppell Auto Center Sample ID Collected By Collection Date SB- 06 -10FT Teal Chiabotti 07/08/09 11:09 REPORT OF ANALYSIS 12065 Lebanon Rd. Mt. Juliet, TN 37122 (615) 758 -5858 1- 800- 767 -5859 Fax (61S) 758 -5859 Tax I.D. 62- 0814289 Est. 1970 July 21,2009 ESC Sample # L411486 -06 Site ID . Project # 940.002 Parameter Dry Result MDL RDL Units Q Method Date Dil trans- 1,2- Dichloroethene U 0.0034 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 1,2- Dichloropropane U 0.0038 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 1,1- Dichloropropene U 0.0017 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 1,3- Dichloropropane U 0.0014 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 cis -1,3- Dichloropropene U 0.0013 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 trans -1,3- Dichloropropene U 0.0018 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 2,2- Dichloropropane U 0.0028 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Di- isopropyl ether U 0.0015 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Ethylbenzene U 0.0011 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Hexachlorc -1,3- butadiene U 0.0018 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Isopropylbenzene U 0.0010 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 p- Isopropyltoluene U 0.00087 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 2- Butanone (MEK) U 0.025 0.064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Methylene Chloride U 0.012 0.032 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 4- Methyl -2- pentanone (MIBK) U 0.0070 0.064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Methyl tert -butyl ether U 0.0014 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Naphthalene U 0.012 0.032 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 n- Propylbenzene U 0.0010 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Styrene U 0.0010 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 1,1,1,2 - Tetrachloroethane U 0.0010 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 1,1,2,2 - Tetrachloroethane U 0.0016 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 1,1,2- Trichloro- 1,2,2 - trifluoro U 0.0012 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Tetrachloroethene U 0.0012 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Toluene U 0.012 0.032 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 1,2,3 - Trichlorobenzene U 0.0012 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 1,2,4 - Trichlorobenzene U 0.0012 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 1,1,1 - Trichloroethane U 0.0026 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 1,1,2 - Trichloroethane U 0.0023 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Trichloroethene U 0.0017 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Trichlorofluoromethane U 0.0014 0.032 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 1,2,3- Trichloropropane U 0.0034 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 1,2,4 - Trimethylbenzene U 0.00085 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 1,2,3 - Trimethylbenzene U 0.0010 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 1,3,5 - Trimethylbenzene U 0.0011 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Vinyl chloride U 0.0014 0.0064 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Xylenes, Total U 0.0023 0.019 mg /kg 8260B 07/15/09 5 Surrogate Recovery Toluene -d8 92.2 o Rec. 8260B 07/15/09 5 Dibromofluoromethane 88.8 % Rec. 8260B 07/15/09 5 4- Bromoflaorobenzene 102. s Rec. 8260B 07/15/09 5 TNRCC Method 1005 - TPH TPH C6 - C12 U 25. 64, mg /kg TX 1005 07/13/09 1 Results listed are dry weight basis. U - ND (Not Detected) MDL = Minimum Detection Limit = LOD RDL - Reported Detection Limit LOQ - PQL - EQL Note: This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval from ESC. The reported analytical results relate only to the sample submitted Reported: 07 /17/09 15:34 Revised: 07/21/09 08:44 Page 10 of 16 24 of 69 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE CORP. 12065 Lebanon Rd. Mt. Jjliet, TN 37122 (6_5) 758 -5858 1 -800- 767 -5859 Fax (615) 758 -5859 Tax 1-D. 62- 0814289 Teal Chiaborti W &M Environmental Group, Inc.- Ft W 112 NW 24th St, Ste 201 Fort Worth, TX 76164 REPORT OF ANALYSIS July 21,2009 Est. 1970 Results listed are dry weight basis U - ND (Not Detected) MDL - Minimum Detection Limit = LOD RDL = Reported Detection Limit - LOQ = PQL = EQL Note: This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval from ESC. The reported analytical results relate only to the sample submitted Reported: 07/17/09 15:34 Revised: 07/21/09 08:44 Page 11 of 16 25 of 69 ESC Sample # L411486 -06 Date Received July 09, 2009 Description Coppell Auto Center Site ID Sample ID SB -06 -10FT Project # 940.002 Collected By Teal Chiabo�ti Collection Date 07/08/09 11:09 Parameter Dry Result MDL RDL Units Q Method Date Dil. TPH C12 - C28 U 25. 64. mg /kg TX 1005 07/13/09 1 TPH C28 - C35 U 25. 64. mg /kg TX 1005 07/13/09 1 TPH C6 - C35 U 25. 64. mg /kg TX 1005 07/13/09 1 Surrogate Recovery o- Terphenyl 109. Rec. TX 1005 07/13/09 1 Results listed are dry weight basis U - ND (Not Detected) MDL - Minimum Detection Limit = LOD RDL = Reported Detection Limit - LOQ = PQL = EQL Note: This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval from ESC. The reported analytical results relate only to the sample submitted Reported: 07/17/09 15:34 Revised: 07/21/09 08:44 Page 11 of 16 25 of 69 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE CORP. 12065 Lebanon Rd. Mt. Juliet, TN 37122 (6i5) 758 -5858 1- 800 -767 -5859 Fax (615) 758 -5859 Tax I.D. 62- 0814289 Est. 1970 Teal Chiabotti W &M Environmental Group, Inc.- Ft W 112 NW 24th St, Ste 201 Fort Worth, TX 76164 Date Received July 09, 2009 Description Coppell Auto Center Sample ID SB- 07 -8FT Collected By Teal Chiabotti Collection Date 07/08/09 11:19 Parameter Dr Total Solids TNRCC Method 1005 - TPH TPH C6 - C12 TPH C12 - C28 TPH C28 - C35 TPH C6 - C35 Surrogate Recovery o- Terphenyl Results listed are dry weight basis U - ND (Not Detected) REPORT OF ANALYSIS July 21,2009 ESC Sample # L411486 -C7 Site ID Project # 940.002 Result MDL RDL Units Q Method Date Dil 90.5 0 254OG 07/13/09 1 U 25. 55. mg /kg TX 1005 07/13/09 1 U 25. 55. mg /kg TX 1005 07/13/09 1 U 25. 55. mg /kg TX 1005 07/13/09 1 U 25. 55. mg /kg TX 1005 07/13/09 1 112. % Rec. TX 1005 07/13/09 1 MDL - Minimum Detection Limit = LOD RDL = Reported Detection Limit = LOQ = PQL = EQL Note: This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval from ESC. The reported analytical results relate only to the sample submitted Reported: 07/17/09 15:34 Revised: 07/21/09 08:44 Page 12 of 16 26 of 69 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE CORP. 12065 Lebanon Rd. Mt. Juldet, TN 37122 (615) 758 -5858 1 -80C- 767 -5859 Fax (615) 758 -5859 Tax I.D. 62- 0814289 Est. 1970 Teal Chiabotti W &M Environmental Group, Inc.- Ft W 112 NW 24th St, Ste 201 Fort Worth, TX 76164 REPORT OF ANALYSIS July 21,2009 Results listed are dry weight basis. U = ND (Not Detected) MDL - Minimum Detection Limit = LOD RDL - Reported Detection Limit LOQ = PQL = EQL Note: This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval from ESC. The reported analytical results relate only to the sample submitted Reported: 07/17/09 15:34 Revised: 07/21/09 08:44 Page 13 of 16 27 of 69 ESC Sample # L411486 -08 Date Received July 09, 2009 Description Coppell Auto Center Site ID Sample ID SB- 08 -10FT Project # 940.002 Collected By Teal Chiabotti Collection Date 07/08/09 11:43 Parameter Dry Result MDL RDL Units Q Method Date Dil. Total Solids 80.3 s 254OG 07/13/09 1 TNRCC Method 1005 - TPH TPH C6 - C12 U 25. 62. mg /kg TX 1005 07/13/09 1 TPH C12 - C28 U 25. 62. mg /kg TX 1005 07/13/09 1 TPH C28 - C35 U 25. 62. mg /kg TX 1005 07/13/09 1 TPH C6 - C35 U 25. 62. mg /kg TX 1005 07/13/09 1 Surrogate Recovery o- Terphenyl 111. Res. TX 1005 07/13/09 1 Results listed are dry weight basis. U = ND (Not Detected) MDL - Minimum Detection Limit = LOD RDL - Reported Detection Limit LOQ = PQL = EQL Note: This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval from ESC. The reported analytical results relate only to the sample submitted Reported: 07/17/09 15:34 Revised: 07/21/09 08:44 Page 13 of 16 27 of 69 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE CORP. Teal Chiabotti W &M Environmental Group, Inc. - Ft W 112 NW 24th St, Ste 201 Fort Worth, TX 76164 REPORT OF ANALYSIS 12065 Lebanon Rd. Mt. Jaliet, TN 37122 (615) 758 -5858 1- 800 - 767 -5859 Fax (615) 758 -5859 Tax L.D. 62- 0819289 Est. ] 970 July 21,2009 Results listed are dry weight basis U = Nil (Not Detected) MDL = Minimum Detection Limit = LOD RDL = Reported Detection Limit = LOQ - PQL = EQL Note: This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval from ESC. The reported analytical results relate only to the sample submitted Reported: 07/17/09 15:34 Revised: 07/21/09 08:44 Page 14 of 16 28 of 69 ESC Sample # L411486 -09 Date Received July 09, 2009 Description Coppell Auto Center Site ID Sample ID S13-09 -10FT Project # 940.002 Collected By Teal Chiabotti Collection Date 07/08/09 11:59 Parameter Dry Result MDL RDL Units Q Method Date Dil. Total Solids 74.8 2540G 07/13/09 1 TNRCC Method 1005 - TPH TPH C6 - C12 U 25. 67. mg /kg TX 1005 07/13/09 1 TPH C12 - C28 U 25. 67. mg /kg TX 1005 07/13/09 1 TPH C28 - C35 U 25. 67. mg /kg TX 1005 07/13/09 1 TPH C6 - C35 U 25. 67. mg /kg TX 1005 07/13/09 1 Surrogate Recovery c- Terphenyl 111. % Rec. TX 1005 07/13/09 1 Results listed are dry weight basis U = Nil (Not Detected) MDL = Minimum Detection Limit = LOD RDL = Reported Detection Limit = LOQ - PQL = EQL Note: This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval from ESC. The reported analytical results relate only to the sample submitted Reported: 07/17/09 15:34 Revised: 07/21/09 08:44 Page 14 of 16 28 of 69 Attachment A List of Analytes with QC Qualifiers Sample Number Work Group Sample Type Analyte Run 1D Qualifier L411486 -01 WG430757 SAMP TPH C6 - C12 R816386 J WG431545 SAMP Toluene -d8 R820406 J2 L411486 -02 WG431272 SAMP Ethylbenzene R818408 J WG431272 SAMP Total Xylenes R818408 J L411486 -04 WG430757 SAMP TPH C12 - C28 8816386 J WG430873 SAMP Cadmium 8816186 J WG430873 SAMP Selenium R816186 0 L411486 -06 WG430873 SAMP Arsenic R816186 J Page 15 of 16 29 of 69 Attachment B Explanation of QC Qualifier Codes Qualifier Meaning J (EPA) - Estimated value below the lowest calibration point. Confidence correlates with concentration. J2 Surrogate recovery limits have been exceeded; values are outside lower control limits O (ESC) Sample diluted due to matrix interferences that impaired the ability to make an accurate analytical determination. The detection limit is elevated in order to reflect the necessary dilution. Qualifier Report Information ESC utilizes sample and result qualifiers as set forth by the EPA Contract Laboratory Program and as required by most certifying bodies including NELAC. In addition to the EPA qualifiers adopted by ESC, we have implemented ESC qualifiers to provide more information pertaining to our analytical results. Each qualifier is designated in the qualifier explanation as either EPA or ESC. Data qualifiers are intended to provide the ESC client with more detailed information concerning the potential bias of reported data. Because of the wide range of constituents and variety of matrices incorporated by most EPA methods,it is common for some compounds to fall outside of established ranges. These exceptions are evaluated and all reported data is valid and useable unless qualified as 'R' (Rejected). Definitions Accuracy - The relationship of the observed value of a known sample to the true value of a known sample. Represented by percent recovery and relevant to samples such as: control samples, matrix spike recoveries, surrogate recoveries, etc. Precision - The agreement between a set of samples or between duplicate samples. Relates to how close together the results are and is represented by Relative Percent Differrence. Surrogate - Organic compounds that are similar in chemical composition, extraction, and chromotography to analytes of interest. The surrogates are used to determine the probable response of the group of analytes that are chem- ically related to the surrogate compound. Surrogates are added to the sample and carried through all stages of preparation and analyses. TIC - Tentatively Identified Compound: Compounds detected in samples that are not target compounds, internal standards, system monitoring compounds, or surrogates. Page 16 of 16 30 of 69 Summary of Remarks For Samples Printed 07/21/09 at 08:44:04 TSR Signing Reports: 134 R5 - Desired TAT Sample: L411486 -01 Account: WMENVFTX Received: Refer to P289199 Sample: L411486 -02 Account: WMENVFTX Received: Sample: L411486 -03 Account: WMENVFTX Received: Sample: L411486 -04 Account: WMENVFTX Received: Sample: L411486 -05 Account: WMENVFTX Received: Sample: L411486 -06 Account: WMENVFTX Received: Sample: L411486 -07 Account: WMENVFTX Received: Sample: L411486 -08 Account: WMENVFTX Received: Sample: L411486 -09 Account: WMENVFTX Received: 07/09/09 09:00 Due Date: 07/09/09 09:00 Due Date: 07/09/09 09:00 Due Date: 07/09/09 09:00 Due Date: 07/09/09 09:00 Due Date: 07/09/09 09:00 Due Date: 07/09/09 09:00 Due Date: 07/09/09 09:00 Due Date: 07/09/09 09:00 Due Date: 07/16/09 00:00 RPT Date: 07/16/09 00:00 RPT Date: 07/16/09 00:00 RPT Date: 07/16/09 00:00 RPT Date: 07/16/09 00:00 RPT Date: 07/16/09 00:00 RPT Date: 07/16/09 00:00 RPT Date: 07/16/09 00:00 RPT Date: 07/16/09 00:00 RPT Date: 07/17/09 15:34 07/17/09 15:34 07/17/09 15:34 07/17/09 15:34 07/17/09 15:34 07/17/09 15:34 07/17/09 15:34 07/17/09 15:34 07/17/09 15:34 31 of 69