Loading...
ST1002-CS110914(3/9/2012) Keith Marvin - RE: Accessible Parking Requirements Page 1 From: "Greg Yancey" <gregyancey @verizon.net> To: "'Keith Marvin "' <kmarvin @coppelltx.gov> Date: 9/14/2011 7:34 PM Subject: RE: Accessible Parking Requirements Sounds great, thanks Gregory K. Yancey Provident Company (214) 215 -9400 v (214) 276 -1709 f gregyancey@verizon.net - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Keith Marvin [mailto:kmarvin @coppelltx.gov] Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 1:24 PM To: Greg Yancey Cc: Mindi Hurley Subject: Re: Accessible Parking Requirements Greg, Thanks for looking at this issue. This change will result in a net loss of 3 total parking spaces. If you are ok with that, I have no objection. I'll see if Matt or Gary has any concern with the change. We did award the contract to JRJ last night a City Council. I have forwarded the cost break -down to Mindi reflecting the actual bid amounts expect she will share that with you shortly. Thanks, Keith Keith Marvin, P.E. Project Engineer (972) 304 -3681 >>> "Greg Yancey" <gregyancey @verizon.net> 9/13/2011 6:44 PM >>> Hi Keith: Bill Peck and I met with Jay Heilman of Accessible Solutions today. He's a registered accessibility specialist and does all of Bill's jobs. We explained the shared parking agreement and the on -site parking behind each commercial building. Bill and I wanted to make sure he would approve of our site plans as each lot is developed. His recommendation to us was that additional HC parking be installed as (3/9/2012) Keith Marvin - RE: Accessible Parking Requirements Page 2 shown on the attached. The revised TDLR rules effective in March of 2012 will exempt any parking area of 4 spaces or less. This will effectively exempt all of the cottages from any required on -site HC spaces behind the buildings. Retail #1 & #5 will also be exempt, but all other retail /services buildings will have to meet TDLR percentages of HC parking, so there will probably be one van accessible space at the rear of every building unless we obtain an unlikely variance. I'm not sure I fully understand the reasoning of this, but he said the project looks similar to a strip mall built in multiple phases requiring a reasonable distribution of the spaces since it is not possible to place them "closest to the door" of the building. These additions exceed code, but I would prefer to do anything possible to avoid sawing out new concrete. What do you think we should do with his opinion? Thanks, Gregory K. Yancey Provident Company (214) 215 -9400 v (214) 276 -1709 f gregyancey@verizon.net (3/8/2012) Keith Marvin - RE: Accessible Parking Requirements Page 1 From: Dan Prendergast <drp @freese.com> To: Keith Marvin <kmarvin @coppelltx.gov> CC: Tricia Hatley <thh @freese.com> Date: 9/14/2011 2:54 PM Subject: RE: Accessible Parking Requirements Attachments: FNI Accessible Space Recommendations. pdf Keith, The following are a few issues that I see with adding accessible spaces to the locations shown: 1. We will need to re -grade the cross slope in the affected parking areas to 1.5% so we do not exceed 2% in any direction and reissue paving sheets with updated spot elevations. 2. 1 suggest that we adjust the location of the accessible spaces on West Main St and Main St to avoid adjusting light pole spacing (see attached pdf). 3. We need to include a curb cut for the future ramp on West Main St 4. We'll need to update the striping and signage plan to include the additional accessible spaces. These are all minor changes. I'll call you shortly to discuss. Thanks Dan Prendergast, E.I.T. East Transportation /Infrastructure Freese and Nichols, Inc. 1701 N. Market St., Suite 500 Dallas, Texas 75202 214- 217 -2216 www.freese.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Keith Marvin [mailto:kmarvin @coppelltx.gov] Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 1:18 PM To: Gary Sieb; Matt Steer; Dan Prendergast; Tricia Hatley Cc: Clay Phillips; Mindi Hurley Subject: Fwd: Accessible Parking Requirements Fyi... Greg and his architect are recommending the installation of 6 additional handicap accessible parking spaces. See the attached plan. This will result in a net loss of three total spaces. The cost implications are minor Let me know if you have any objections to this change. Keith Keith Marvin, P.E. Project Engineer r 24" WHITE STOP BARS (4) �THAMMOND STREET STOP � f � STQP - I I TA 1 +57.43 I STA 1+60.76 TRAVIS ST 8 SPACES 0 9', 60' TYP c I HOUSTON ST BEGIN TYPICAL CENTERLINE PATTERN "A" BEGIN TYPICAL CENTERLINE PATTERN i LOT 1 I �� 8 SPACES ® 9', 60' BLOCK D .1 f' I � I ® - 9', 6 TYP I I LOT 1 0 SPACES 0 9 , + BLOCK A 1 STOP Add 2 spaces 60' TYP 10 SPACES 0 9, 601 9 SPACES 0 9', 60' � 1 1 20 SPACES 0 9', R9 I I I WEST MAI ST R ET _ 60 TYP + • _ f v� — —•... � o 60' 1 yp S B .. I (5 8 SPACES 0 wo p o In 11 1111 1 I Ill � 9 , 0r TYP 60' TYP MT. P �, 1 • 24" WHITE STO� BAR TO CITY OF COPPELL STANDARD DETAILS AND i _ STANDARD DETAIL 23020. ETAI L "A" DEVICES" (TMUTCO), LATEST EDITION. Tip 11 SPAC S 0 9', 60' P 10 SF C y5 o v 10 S sa R9 T 1 Add 2 spaces { _ 9 SPACES C� 9', 60' TYP 10 SPACES ' 60' TYP 9', 1 60' TYP E 9- — — ST N B CK �{ A 3 SPACES 0 9', + ] 8. SPACES 0 9', 60' TYP 9 SPACE P wt MAI S R EET 60' TYP f sr �' ACES C� 9', ST �0' 0 2 +[� I I — LOT 2�' TYP ' 9 SPACES 0 9, ] BLOCK E LOT 1 B CK E I— o r /'• — I — 10 SPACES 60' TYP 7 SPAC � 9`, 90' TYP 90, —247 10 SPACES @ 9', 60 EVF 10 SPACES 0 9', 60' TYP t STA 9+60.00 HOUSTON ST END TYPICAL CENTERLINE 60' TYP II L6 S A ES 9', 1 10 SPACES 0 9', —_ I STOP TYP PATTERN "A' 24" WHITE STOP BAR I 60 TYP EAST IN STREET — — 1 � ROAD } S. COPPELL ROAD 3 SPACES 9', 99 90' TY a LO t LOT 1 1 Ly V { pp 4t00 0 < BLQ K C RI [ % R 0o xor 10 SPACES 9 , 1 STEP RETvfOVE E7 60' TYP 1, 7 SPACE 8 SPACES @ 9 Add 2 sp ace 1 SPA s s', Y O 1 a ACE SPACES 0 ', 2 w H1 GL' 60' TYP 9 +50 �- +0 — z +00 T. 0 -N �T-REE 60 60' 1 yp S B (5 REFLECTARIZED 3M SERIES 290, * n il I IlTl In 11 1111 1 I Ill YELLOW ACRYLIC DOUBLE 9 PAC 0 ', P (n ROADWAY, - 10 SPACES 0 2. TRAFFIC SIGNAGE AND MARKINGS TO CONFORM 6. FIRE LANE MARKINGS, THOUGH NOT SHOWN, TO CITY OF COPPELL STANDARD DETAILS AND SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH "TEXAS MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL STANDARD DETAIL 23020. ETAI L "A" DEVICES" (TMUTCO), LATEST EDITION. T 1 I 60' TYP E 9- CAL RAMS ENT ST N B CK + 9 SPACES 0 9 SPACE P R A' 90' TYP 90, —247 WHIA STU EVF STA 9+60.00 HOUSTON ST END TYPICAL CENTERLINE 24 WHITE II 1 — —_ I PATTERN "A' 24" WHITE STOP BAR I STOP BAR — — 1 � ROAD - _ S. COPPELL ROAD 1, LINES SHOWN IN PLAN VIEW REPRESENTING 4. ALL RAISED PAVEMENT BUTTONS SHALL BE PAVEMENT MARKINGS REPRESENTS THE REFLECTARIZED 3M SERIES 290, 4" ROUND ALIGNMENT OF PROPOSED TRAFFIC BUTTONS YELLOW ACRYLIC DOUBLE ONLY. LINES SHALL NOT BE PAINTED ON 5. ALL THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKINGS TO REFLECTIVE BUTTON �I (3M SERIES 290) ROADWAY, BE 3M STAY MARK. 2. TRAFFIC SIGNAGE AND MARKINGS TO CONFORM 6. FIRE LANE MARKINGS, THOUGH NOT SHOWN, TO CITY OF COPPELL STANDARD DETAILS AND SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH "TEXAS MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL STANDARD DETAIL 23020. ETAI L "A" DEVICES" (TMUTCO), LATEST EDITION. (10/26/2011) Keith Marvin - Re: Accessible Parking Requirements Page 1 From: Keith Marvin To: Yancey, Greg CC: Hurley, Mindi Date: 9/14/2011 1:24 PM Subject: Re: Accessible Parking Requirements Greg, Thanks for looking at this issue. This change will result in a net loss of 3 total parking spaces. If you are ok with that, I have no objection. I'll see if Matt or Gary has any concern with the change. We did award the contract to JRJ last night a City Council. I have forwarded the cost break -down to Mindi reflecting the actual bid amounts. I expect she will share that with you shortly. Thanks, Keith Keith Marvin, P.E. Project Engineer (972) 304 -3681 >>> "Greg Yancey" < gregyancey(a - )_venzon.net > 9/13/2011 6:44 PM >>> Hi Keith: Bill Peck and I met with Jay Heilman of Accessible Solutions today. He's a registered accessibility specialist and does all of Bill's jobs. We explained the shared parking agreement and the on -site parking behind each commercial building. Bill and I wanted to make sure he would approve of our site plans as each lot is developed. His recommendation to us was that additional HC parking be installed as shown on the attached. The revised TDLR rules effective in March of 2012 will exempt any parking area of 4 spaces or less. This will effectively exempt all of the cottages from any required on -site HC spaces behind the buildings. Retail #1 & #5 will also be exempt, but all other retail /services buildings will have to meet TDLR percentages of HC parking, so there will probably be one van accessible space at the rear of every building unless we obtain an unlikely variance. I'm not sure I fully understand the reasoning of this, but he said the (10/26/2011) Keith Marvin - Re: Accessible Parking Requirements Page 2 project looks similar to a strip mall built in multiple phases requiring a reasonable distribution of the spaces since it is not possible to place them "closest to the door" of the building. These additions exceed code, but I would prefer to do anything possible to avoid sawing out new concrete. What do you think we should do with his opinion? Thanks, Gregory K. Yancey Provident Company (214) 215 -9400 v (214) 276 -1709 f gregyancey(cb-verizon. net H.AMMGND STREET __ _ > -z4" ' NI ITS s1oP BARS (4) J HA 0' <0'6_ o_'z 0 + M\nC 5 oP STREET = ° - - - -- - - — -_ SON E IN FEET I i I i I _ I STDP ]::- STA 1 +6076 �STA 1 +57.43 TRAVIS SE 8 SPACS E'i'9', 60' 1'P o} HOUSTON ST z -_ i BEGIN TYPICAL CFKTE:ZLINE PATTERN "A" HECIN TYPICAL CENTEFL E PATTrFV A - LOT 1 -8 SPACES @ 9, 60' -YF 19 SPACES @ 9', 60' TYP - I T- 3LOCK D I W �� LEGEND TYP \ \ \I LO T 1 BLOCK A W V - 0 I 0 S °ACES . 9'. �. STOP 30" 1DP Add 2 spaces eo P 10 SPACES @ 9, 60' P i µ i 9 SPACES @ 9' LE I 60' YP uaetYID - . �.- - ® _ aA un RZ 8 a S S E ER sr P WET MAI ° / P B"I EE P 'GA LOT 1^ �^ / 20 SPPCF @ THEE BOAC I I BLOCK i�. y - - J —i } c - a y, I 6 B SPACES @ 0'• FOR BE 1 MARKINGS R7 n ooa a�\ z o1 p 12'x o I DO �-1 _ �1U "gP� Y @ /., , �� •� 24" WHITE STOP HAl2f 60 TYP o EvwY R6 ^.L C] TOP 11 SPAG s @ 9', / W T�T,l 60' iYP / 10 SP ® U' U' 24" WFITE F- 1 10 5 KC S , / 6U AC " fY� rvc� R6 -1R w W STOP RAR SJ 60' TYf 24" WFI�E S,CP BARS (4) + 1 , Add 2 spaces -- w z z [n I ® -w® I 8 5+'ACES @ 9', 80. M 10 SPACES 60' TYP - o TTT 0•. - - -- _- - ___ ® F9 -1 w �G J :n \ , 60' TYP MAIN STREET CO W14 2P 3 SPACES @ 9 Z 60' TYP 3 PACES 9', 0 0 2 +0o i- �- a +o 1 _ X O W O � ° / 9 ec S 60' TYP - LOT 1 PECL STO �_� I_ ❑_ Z _ D B cK [ o SPACES ©9, _ z Q SPACES raJ 9' LOT 2 D - - c BLOCK E 7 sfnCE @ 9�, =4c =s @ 9 60' IYP \ ` \ 1 v s - Q O 160 - EAS' h- 10 S n 9 �y ® STOP � B SPAS A Es @ 9 ' w � � C7 5 / 10 SPACES @ 9', D' T"O 1 2 w 60 ,> z ST - 19 1. 6 TYP o W U� I 90 7Y 9 1 -2d-- WH4 C LC `�L hSb�Y L� s ®N91 1" O E 9 _ STOP n � i -- LO K C S 60 C TYP �i6 ' - S @ 9', z � 0 z . _a SPACES © 9 j _ Add 2 spaces I P w 110 SPA « 6O' TYP - O �.; BLOCK G .F W I 0 TY' n ° T 1 SPF 'S 9' 0 +50 2 t +OP o 2 +OD 0 L- IC fiD P - -60 P 9 B , 6 - 1VESTR t0 PAC @ ' �fiRI —� 11 6 IYP @ 9', 9 PAC @ -� C - -- u� �m � TY CAL ENT -mss 10 SPACES ® 9' ( 1 1 g J z 6 ACES a 9 .�.5 S I- T r" 60' TYP / 1 90' S_ ? CK F 9 SPACES ®9' y RDN 90' TYP J L 9 SPACES O B', _ j SEA 91600 HOU TOY S 90' 1'P P BAF�- _J 0 STOP • V T \ \ / ENT TYF'( C' N ERLINE J BAR J � I - BAR \ PAIT R.\ A LiJ a o o s -t - 24 WHITE STOP BAIT I S. COPPPLL ROAD ®� a I S. COP EL_ ROAD � � J i NOTES ` - 1 Ll l`!ES IN PLAN I EVTIVG 4 ALL RAI PAJEM NT BUTTONS SHA' L BE j 5' TYP PAVEME NT M A4ARKI�'VGS REPR PRZ _ - NTS NTS TFE REFLECTARI Z-D 3f.1 SERIES 29C. ROUND ALGNVENT OE PRCPCSED TPA FIC RUTTGNS s �� Q O Q , /_ ELLOYV ACRYLIC ON Y. I.I \' Z MARKINGS, PAV MFNT MARKINGS TO / ES SHALL NOT BE PA,N TEU ON 5. ALL M STAY HEh LC "IVC BUTTON ROAJJJAY , BE 3M STAY MARK. L , Y -� Q � ( M S SERIES 290 �" WHIT EFLELTIVE PAVEMENT MARKINGS 2 TRAFF'C SIGNAGE AND MARKING 1G 'ONFORM 6 FIRE LAN- 'GS, THOUGH NOT SHOWN, (3M S1AY MARK) 0 COPP LL SEANJARD DIFTAIL S AND SFALI. BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WI -11 E A5 MANUAL 0 N�FORM R FIG CONTROL STAVDARD D -AIL 25020. YPICAL CENTERLINE PATTERN DETAIL "A" VICES (Tb T c) IATE T DTICN OLD TOWN NOT To SCALE 3 ALL RAIS o PAVEMENT VARK RS SHALL z TYPICAL PARKING STRIPING S HEET PM -1 C,"FOkV 0 TxDOT STANDARD SI'ECIF CATIONS __ q' „iD' NOT -: PLACE SLUE, F'.RE -LITE REF -ECTOR AT PRE HYDRANT LCCATDNS. ITEN 672 AISED PAVEMENT MARKINGS IEG. ,, 100°/ SUBMITTAL 43 of 137