Loading...
ST1002-CS090508 (2)Page 1 of 4 Ken Griffin - RE: FW: Old Town Coppell ROW change From: "Greg Yancey" <gregyanceygverizon.net> To: "'Ken Griffin "' <kgriffingci.coppell.tx.us> Date: 5/8/2009 10:48 AM Subject: RE: FW: Old Town Coppell ROW change CC: "'Charles Cotten "' <Charles9CSECRE.com >, "'Clay Phillips "' <cphillipsgci... Attachments: Parking Plan to Ken Griffin 050809.pdf; Coppell Deli Proposed ROW 031909.pdf Ken I think where I'm off is (1) the 10' landscape buffer Planning wanted between us and the east properties and (2) on every other street inside the project the r.o.w. is 10' back of curb. (1) 1 understand that Jay's parking area would eliminate any need for the 10' landscape buffer on his new property, but do we still need it as the street continues south? I think we do given the appearance of those properties and we represented it that way to Planning. The 10' buffer was shown on the aerial overlay we looked at together. (2) the old F &N plan was 62' when we only showed head -in parking along the west side of the street. The way we arrived at that math is shown on the attached excerpt from our parking plan. This is why I could not reconcile the new F &N plan with the old considering the aerial overlay we received in the meeting. I did not understand why we were no longer putting in the 10' landscape area and why the r.o.w. was not continuing back of curb 10' like the rest of the development. The last bit of confusion Charles and I share is the understanding that Jay and /or the downtown merchants have been told that the aerial shows parking for them. We left the meeting thinking we would not be expected to pay to build Jay's parking or the spaces added on the east side of Burnett Street. We need to know how this is being treated as it relates to our net land area. Thanks, Gregory K. Yancey Provident Company (214) 215 -9400 v (214) 276 -1709 f revancev _verizon.net From: Ken Griffin [ mailto :kgriffin @ci.coppell.tx.us] Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 9:09 AM To: Greg Yancey Subject: Re: FW: Old Town Coppell ROW change Greg There is parking on both sides of the ROW. There is actually 62 feet width from Coppell Road south for 268.57 feet. The exhibit looks strange because the parking adjacent to the Deli is on the Deli property. At Coppell Road, there is 44 feet plus the 18 feet on the Deli property for a total of 62 feet. When you get south of the Deli all the parking is on city property hence the 62 feet of ROW. I've attached an exhibit to help explain this. Again, there will be parking on both sides from Coppell Road south a distance of 268.57 feet. file: / /C: \Documents and Settings \radloo \Local Settings \Temp \XPgrpwise \4A040DECCity... 11/21/2011 Page 2 of 4 Ken Griffin, P. E. Director of Engineering &Public Works 972- 304 -3680 kgriffin@ci.coppell.tx.us >>> "Greg Yancey" <gregyancey @verizon.net> 4/14/2009 11:56 AM >>> Ken I can't figure out what I'm supposed to do with the new ROW plan at the Deli. Without parking on the west side of the new street between our lot and the Deli, I don't know how I could park that lot. Can you tell me what we're supposed to plan? Gregory K. Yancey Provident Company (214) 215 -9400 v (214) 276 -1709 f greyancey @verizon.net From: Tricia Hatley [mailto:thh @freese.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 11:22 AM To: 'Greg Yancey' Subject: RE: Old Town Coppell ROW change 7 - ricia lfatley Freese and Nichols, Inc. Main: 214.920.2500 Direct. 214.217.2217 From: Greg Yancey [mailto:gregyancey @verizon.net] Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 5:07 PM To: Tricia Hatley Cc: 'Keith Marvin' Subject: RE: Old Town Coppell ROW change Hi Tricia: Perhaps I'm not fully aware of the City's direction, but attached is the aerial overlay drawing we received last Thursday. I think it's what they want. The east parking spaces denoted as .0339 acre looks correct, but I don't see the other east spaces to the south addressed on the new ROW plan. Also, the street would be 24' + 18' deep space on the west side + 10' ROW = 52' if we're constructing this like everything else in the project. Seems like the 44' ROW shown would fall short? file: / /C: \Documents and Settings \radloo \Local Settings \Temp \XPgrpwise \4A040DECCity... 11/21/2011 Page 3 of 4 Wouldn't the radius shown on the aerial require us to adjust the ROW accordingly, too? I think the City engineer was trying to allow a 10' sideyard from the adjacent (east) property + the 18' deep typical spaces. Please advise. Thanks, Gregory K. Yancey Provident Company (214) 215 -9400 v (214) 276 -1709 f greyancey @verizon.net From: Tricia Hatley [mailto:thh @freese.com] Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 2:32 PM To: Gregory K. Yancey (gregyancey @verizon.net) Subject: FW: Old Town Coppell ROW change Greg - My staff was working on a ROW change for Ken while we were talking this morning. Here is the updated property map based on the revisions we made this morning to the ROW per the City's direction. Trish From: Brett Bristow Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 2:28 PM To: Tricia Hatley Subject: Old Town Coppell ROW change Trish, Here is the Cad file and a 24 "x36" pdf of the exhibit. Let me know if you need anything else. Thanks, Brett Bristow P.E. Civil Engineer Freese and Nichols, Inc. 1701 N. Market St., Suite 500 Dallas, Texas 75202 214.217.2200 main 214.217.2225 direct 214.217.2201 fax This electronic mail message is intended exclusively for .the individual or entity "to which it is addressed. This message, "to with any attachment, may contain .the winder's organ i ti in' in i rote l and privileged information. The recipient i hereby notified "t treat .the information as confidential and privily in d "to not disclose or use .the information except as authorized by winder's organization. Any unauthorized review, rintin 4 retention, copying, disclosure, distribution, retransmission, i mein tion or other use of, or "taking my action in reliance upoin, .this information by persons or entities other .than .the intended recipient i prohibited. If you received . this message in error, please immediately int .t .the winder by reply email and delete all copies of "the material from any computers Thank you for your cooperation. NOD32 3952 (20090320) Information This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http: / /www.eset.com file: / /C: \Documents and Settings \radloo \Local Settings \Temp \XPgrpwise \4A040DECCity... 11/21/2011 Page 4 of 4 NOD32 4006 (20090414) Information This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http: / /www.eset.com NOD32 4062 (20090508) Information This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http: / /www.eset.com file: / /C: \Documents and Settings \radloo \Local Settings \Temp \XPgrpwise \4A040DECCity... 11/21/2011 18' deep angled parking _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ----------------- I head -in 109' Back of Curb ► parking -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- I 18' deep I 50'w x 74'd pad area I I 85' I Lot 85'wx 109'd back of curb typical I I I I I I I I I �-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- --� I I I I I I IR.O.W. I I I s 40'w x 74'd t 75i pad area I r I e I Lot 75'wx 109'd I I e I back of curb typical I t L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- I s I c I a I p e streetscape I R.O.W. 10' 15: 24' street 14: 10' landscape Allow turn radius for fire vehicles Allow turn radius for refuse pick -up vehicles travel End R.O.W. streetscape 1 R.O.W. 10' 10' I s head -in � -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- I t parking I I r 18' deep j 35'w x 65'd j I e pad area I e I t Lot 75'wx 95'd I s ` back of curb — — —___— — — I I c I I a ancillary garage I p al) parking area (typical) L — — — J e typ) 15: 24' street 14: 10' landscape Allow turn radius for fire vehicles Allow turn radius for refuse pick -up vehicles travel End R.O.W.