ST7301-CS 791121 (2)HOGAN & RASOR,
Engineers · [~lanners · Consultants
November 21, 1979
Hr. James R. Ellum, III
Town Administrator
City of Coppell
Post Office Box q78
Coppell, Texas 75019
RE: Paving and Drainage Improvements on
Esters Road - Coppeil, Texas
Dear Hr. Ellum.'
At the very beginning of the above referenced project, the City
had requested cost estimates based on a hO-foot and hq-foot face
to face paving width, 6-inch and 8-inch reinforced concrete pave-
merit section, and 6-inches of lime stabilized subgrade. This we
did, and I believe that a decision was never made as to which
paving width and pavement thickness would be used. Therefore,
we recommend and are basing our paving design on a paving section
having a hq-foot face to face paving width, 8-inch 3,000 lb. re-
inforced concrete pavement and 6-inches of lime stabilized sub-
grade (6~ lime). We feel that this pavement section would stand
up very well to the heavy loads experienced in an industrial area.
If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please
feel free to call.
Very truly yours,
HOGAN & RASOR, I NC,
Eduardo Ho Pe~a
2933 F:lapublic Bank Tower Dallas, Texas 75201