Loading...
ST8201-CS 881116GINN, INC. November 16, 1988 Mr. David M. Snyder, P.E. L. H. Lacy Co. P.O. Box 541297 Dallas, Texas 75354-1297 CONSULTING ENGINEER i. Re: Denton Tap Road Improvements from Belt Line Road to Sandy Lake Road, Coppell, Texas. Dear Mr. Snyder: This letter is in response to your letters of October 28, November 7, 8, and 11, copies of which are attached. Since all of these letters deal with items related to the construction of the subject project I felt it expedient to deal with them together. In regards to your October 28, 1988 letter concerning installation of an additional 8" water valve in the existing water line just south of Braewood; it is my understanding from conversations with you and Randy Fleming that this will allow you to isolate the water line to perform the necessary lowerings to avoid conflicts with Storm Sewer line "B" without interrupting service to McDonalds and other businesses. Under the circumstances we will allow you to include this item under Field Change No. 5. We will allow you to reduce the number of supports for the Sanitary Sewer Aerial Crossing extension at Grapevine Creek as Field Change No. 6. We agree with your supporting documentation of November 7, 1988 that the costs of additional utility work you have had to perform more than offset the cost savings associated with reducing the total number of piers for the crossing from 6 to 4. Therefore, in light of the foregoing and the fact that the revised structure will be more resistant to trash accumulations during flooding, we feel that a reduction in the price for this item is not warranted. We are consulting with our Landscape Architect regarding your proposal of November 8, 1988 to revise the layout of the median irrigation connections. If the Landscape Architect is in agreement with your proposal, we will be happy to issue a Notice of Field Change to cover the reduced scope of work. 17103 Preston Road · Suite 100 · LB 118 · Dallas, Texas 75248 · Phone 214/248-4900 In response to your November 8, 1988 letter asking for clarification of the details and drawings depicting the Irrigation Connections which are currently a part of this project, we offer the following: The Irrigation Connections shown on the Drainage Plan and Profile sheets are labeled incorrectly. The details shown on sheet 96 of 102 differ somewhat in minor ways, but both clearly show that 2" type K copper pipe must be used with a schedule 40 PVC sleeve. The methods of connection to existing water mains are also clearly shown. In order to avoid further confusion, the detail labeled "PVC SLEEVE FOR MEDIAN IRRIGATION" shall be used for the Irrigation Connections on this project. Your letter of November 11, 1988, concerning the Storm Sewer Lateral for the Storm Sewer Inlet at Station 90+00 is not very explicit with regard to the situation you would like us to address. Therefore I have been in contact with our Resident Project Representative, Mr. Randy Fleming. In my conversation with Mr. Fleming he informed me that you are proposing to avoid a standard water line lowering, for which there are provisions in the Contract. Mr. Fleming has explained that under the scenario you meant to propose in your letter, that a revision of the Storm Sewer Lateral grades to match the existing 24" pipe, and avoid the conflict with the 8" water line, would leave only 3" clearance from the bottom of the 24" Storm Sewer Lateral to the top of the 8" water line. Based on the information I have received regarding this issue, I suggest you proceed at once in accordance with the provisions contained in the Contract and lower the existing 8" water line to resolve the conflict with the Storm Sewer Lateral. We appreciate your cooperation and will be happy to answer any further questions you may have. Sincerely-, John C. Karlsruher, P.E. Project Engineer enclosures cc' Russell R. DoYle, P.E. H. Wayne Ginn, P.E. Randy Fleming J378 (j3781hln.15)