Loading...
WA0003-CS 980219From the desk of... Ken Griffin, P.E. Director of Engineering & Public Works ATM nGig 'era Aggies" 72)304-36 79 / (Metro d 71-2251) SHIMEK, JACOBS & FINKLEA, L.L.P. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 8333 Douglas Avenue, #820 Dallas, Texas 75225-5816 Fax (214) 361-0204 Phone (214) 361-7900 ROSS L. JACOBS, P.E. RONALD V. CONWAY, P.E. JOHN W. BIRKHOFF, P.E. JOE R. CARTER, P.E. GARY C. HENDRICKS, P.E. I. C. FINFLEA, P.E. February 19, 1998 Mr. Kenneth M. Griffin, P.E. City of Coppell Post Office Box 478 Coppell, Texas 75019 Re: Supplement to Water Distribution System ') Hydraulic Model Update Dear Mr. Griffin: As you requested at our meeting on February 12, 1998, we have re-analyzed the City of Coppell's water distribution system utilizing the Cybernet hydraulic modeling software. This letter serves as a supplement to our 1997 Hydraulic Model Update report dated May 12, 1997. This supplement includes additional scenarios for the proposed hotel development to be located at Northpoint Drive and S.H. 121. These scenarios are outlined below. Existing System This scenario included running the same fire flow condition as outlined on page V-12 of The Water Distribution System Master Plan prepared for the City of Coppell by Rady and Associates, Inc., in December, 1994, and comparing results. As you may recall, the 1994 report was prepared based on computer modeling using the Kentucky Pipe (KY Pipe) software. We have recreated Table I0 of Rady's report below and added a column showing the results using the Cyberuet file Exist_97.dwg. TABLE 10 EXISTING FIRE FLOW DEFICIENCIES Node No. 101 151 152 Location Corporate Park Blvd. @ S.H. 121 Thweat Rd. at Royal Lane Thweat Rd. at Royal Lane Minimum Minimum Residual Residual Required Fire Pressure , Pressure Flow (psi)* (psi)* (gpm) Rady Report Cybernet 3,000 -168 -146 3,000 15 24 3,000 12 18 Mr. Kenneth M. Griffin, P.E, City of Coppell February 19, 1998 Page No. 2 Minimum Minimum Residual Residual Required Fire Pressure Pressure Flow (psi)* (psi)* Node No. Location (gpm) Rady Report Cybernet 153 Thweat Rd. at Royal Lane 3,000 17 24 201 Northpoint Dr. - West End 3,000 4 8 202 Northpoint Dr. @ Royal Lane 3,000 18 26 203 Gateview Blvd. - West End 3,000 13 16 205 Creekview Dr. 3,000 13 16 351 Coppell Rd. @ S.H. 121 3,000 -170 -149 352 Coppell Rd. near S.H. 121 3,000 -38 8 356 Coppell Rd. @ Corporate Park Blvd. 3,000 -26 33 401 Coppell Rd. @ Parkway Blvd. 3,000 -3 59 409 Coppell Rd. @ Minyard Dr. 3,000 0 57 413 Minyard Dr. @ Hampton Court 3,000 -2 57 420 Thweat Rd. @ Oakbend Dr. 3,000 8 38 421 Thweat Rd. @ Branchwood Trail 3,000 8 44 422 Thweat Rd. @ Coppell Rd. 3,000 9 48 559 Crestside Dr. near Lakeshore Dr. 3,000 18 14 1413 Fairway Dr. @ Belt Line Rd. 3,000 15 64 1414 Eastern End of Belt Line Rd. 3,000 -162 -128 * Fire flows simulated during maximum day demand (average hour) with elevated tank water level = 652.00 and 2 -450 horsepower pumps on at the Village Parkway Pump Station. As you can see from the table, some pressures using the Cybernet software differ somewhat from those in the Rady report. A possible explanation for these differences is that the geometry of the system in the KY Pipe model was incorrectly input into the model. When we originally converted the KY Pipe model to the Cybernet format, a number of pipes crossed the City from corner to corner, indicating mistakes in the original input data for the KY Pipe model. This data was corrected in the Cybernet model. It is our opinion that the results obtained for this supplemental report using Cybernet, closely resembles the pressures that the City would encounter at these locations under these fire flow conditions. Proposed System As requested, we ran a couple of scenarios using the Cybernet file Prop_97.dwg, but deleted the Wagon Wheel Ranch Elevated Storage Tank and the Sandy Lake Road water line improvements. The first scenario included a maximum hour demand analysis of the proposed hotel development at Northpoint Drive and S.H. 121. We calculated a total maximum hour demand for the hotel of 1,000 gpm assuming the hotel used a 6- inch meter for the hotel and a 3 -inch meter for irrigation purposes. This demand exceeds the minimum requirements of the TNRCC of 1.5 gpm per connection during the maximum hour demand condition assuming each of the 240 proposed hotel rooms is counted as a connection. We believe this is a conservative approach to predicting the hotel demand. The results of this analysis indicate that 1,000 gpm can be supplied 1:\coppe1I \97- 138'L\cort\updatel doc Mr. Kenneth M. Griffin, P.,. City of Coppell February 19, 1998 Page No. 3 to the hotel during the maximum hour demand at a pressure of approximately 32 psi. Pressures within the system range between 32 psi and 93 psi during this demand condition with 2 -450 horsepower pumps in operation at the Village Parkway Pump Station. The second scenario included a fire flow analysis of the proposed hotel development during the maximum hour demand condition. A fire flow demand of 3,500 gpm was distributed equally between junction nodes 153 and 201 as shown on the City's hydraulic map. The results of this analysis indicate a pressure of negative 58 psi ( -58 psi) at junction node 201 during this condition with 2 -450 horsepower and 2 -250 horsepower pumps in operation at the Village Parkway Pump Station. This scenario clearly indicates that this fire flow could not be supplied to the hotel under these conditions and the need for the Wagon Wheel Ranch Elevated Storage Tank and Sandy Lake Road water line. Under this same scenario, a fire flow of approximately 1,057 gpm at 35 psi can be supplied to junction node 201 or 1,182 gpm at 35 psi can be supplied to junction node 153 while maintaining a minimum pressure of 35 psi within the remainder of the water distribution system. We are available to discuss the hydraulic analysis of the City's water distribution system and this supplementary report further at your convenience. Sincerely , o / ary C. e drick , P. ` 1 : koppel1\97 -13 8U.korrlupdate I . doc