ST0501-LR120525 MAY-25-2012 01:39 P.07
0 • C
ATA
Texas CMT, Inca
Construction Materials Testing GEE COnSU ltants/Inc.
and Environmental Consulting
10044 Monroe Drive • Dallas, Texas 75229 • (214) 352-6957 • Fax (214) 352-6972 • www .texascmt.com
REPORT OF CONCRETE MIX OBSERVATION
Report Date: May 25, 2012 Date Concrete Placed: May 10, 2012 Standard 65/12"Cylinders
Client: City of Coppell Cylinder Cross-sectional Area:28.27 Square Inches
Project: Deforest Road Reconstruction • Concrete Report No.: 25
Contractor: California Construction Project No.: ST-05-01
Concrete Supplier and Plant: Redi-Mix Concrete/P259
Location of Placement: Stem Wall from 18+89 to 19+21
MATERIALS Source/ SSD Batch Wts. OBSERVATION DATA
Description (Lbs/CuYd)
Mix Number: 10L11602 Time Sample Batched: 11:26 AM
Cement: Time Sampled: 12:32 PM
Fly Ash: Sample Location: Sta. 19+00
Truck/Ticket No: 1257/25469679
Coarse Aggregate: Temperature:
Intermediate Aggregate: Ambient Range: 82°F
Fine Aggregate: Concrete Range: 83°F
Admixtures: Slump Range(inches): 7.0
Weather Conditions: Cloudy
1 Time Started: 11:00 AM •
2 Time Completed: 2:30 PM
Added Water: 0 Gallons Sample Air Content(%): 2.4
Total Cubic Yards Placed: 10
Required Strength(Lbs./sq.in.): 3,600
Specimen Measured Age Date Total Load Compressiv trength Remarks
Number Slump(in.) (Days) Tested (Lbs.) (Lb q.In.)
DFR97 7 5/17/12 127,780 4,520
DFR 98 28 6/7/12
7.0
DFR 99 28 6/7/12
DFR 100 H Hold
Test Methods Utilized Fracture Regular Cylinders Made By: MR
ASTM C-31, C-39, C-143 (Unless Noted Otherwise)
Remarks and/or Distribution:
cc: Mr. Larry Davis - City of Coppell, Phone: 972-304-3684; via Fax: 972-304-3570
Mr. George Marshall -City of Coppell, Phone: 972-304-3562; via E-mail: gMarshall @coppelltx.gov
Mr. Dan DeGroot-Burgess&Niple, Inc., Phone: 972-620-1255; via E-mail: Dan.DeGroot @BurgessNiple.com
Mr. Robert Caudill- Tiseo Paving Company, Phone: 972-289-0723; via E-mail: rCaudill@TiseoPaving.com
Mr. Walter Mitchell - Tiseo Paving Company, via E-mail: barnobas @yahoo.com
Mr. Bobby Bounds - California Construction, Phone: 972-670-0368; via E-mail: Bobby @CalConTex.com
Texas CMT, Inc. TBPE Firm: F-4521 Reviewed b di d 0 I
All letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced without the full a.. .val of Texas CMT,Inc. The use of our name must receive
our prior written approval. Our letters and reports apply only to the sample tested and/or observed and are not necessarily indicativ.of the quantities of apparently identical or similar products.
MAY-25-2012 01:40 P.11
C
Texas CMT, Inc.
AW
Construction Materials Testing GEE Consultants, Inc.
and Environmental Consulting
10044 Monroe Drive • Dallas, Texas 75229 • (214) 352-6957 • Fax (2 4) 352-6972 • www .texascmt.com
REINFORCING STEEL PLACEMENT REPORT
Report Date: May 25,2012 Test Date: May 10,2012
Client: City of Coppell Reinforcing Steel Report No. 23
Project: Deforest Road Reconstruction,Coppell,Texas Project Number: 211-0125
Identification: Reinforcing Steel Observation City of Coppell Project Number: ST-05-01
Method of Test: Visual Observation Page: 1 of 1
Results:
On May 10, 2012 reinforcing steel was observed at the following locations:
• Stem wall, S. Side, from (approximately) station 19+21 to 18+89
The following discrepancies were noted and called to the attention of Manuel, a representative of
California Construction.
1. Weep hole set too low.
The above discrepancies were corrected as noted prior to concreting.
Technician: RG
cc: Mr.Larry Davis -City of Coppell, Phone: 972-304-3684; via Fax: 972-304-3570
Mr. George Marshall -City of Coppell, Phone: 972-304-3562; via E-mail: gMarshall @coppelltx.gov
Mr. Dan DeGroot - Burgess & Niple, Inc., Phone: 972-620-1255; via E-mail: Dan.DeGroot @BurgessNiple.com
Mr. Robert Caudill - Tiseo Paving Company,Phone: 972-289-0723;via E-mail: rCaudill @TiseoPaving.com
Mr. Walter Mitchell- Tiseo Paving Company, via E-mail: bamobas @yahoo.com
Mr. Bobby Bounds- California Construction, Phone: 972-670-0368; via E-mail: Bobby @CalConTex.com
t, •Texas CMT, Inc. TBPE Firm: F-4521 Reviewed b • ,
All letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced without the full appro✓al of Texas CMT,Inc. The use o our name must receive
our prior written approval. Our letters and reports apply only to the sample tested and/or observed and are not necessarily indicative of'he quantities of apparently identical or similar products.
MAY-25-2012 01:40 P. 12
Texas CMT, Inc.
Construction Materials Testing GEE Consultants, Inc.
and Environmental Consulting
10044 Monroe Drive • DalIas, Texas 75229 • (214) 352-6957 • Fax (214) 352-6972 • www .texascmt.com
REINFORCING STEEL PLACEMENT REPORT
•
Report Date: May 25,2012 Test Date: May 15,2012
Client: City of Coppell Reinforcing Steel Report No. 24
Project: Deforest Road Reconstruction,Coppell,Texas Project Number: 211-0125
Identification: Reinforcing Steel Observation City of Coppell Project Number: ST-05-01
Method of Test: Visual Observation Page: 1 of 1
Results:
On May 15, 2012 reinforcing steel was observed at the following locations:
•
• Stem wall, S. Side, from (approximately) station 13+73 to 14+37
•
There were no discrepancies..
Technician: RG
cc: Mr. Larry Davis - City of Coppell, Phone: 972-304-3684; via Fax: 972-304-3570
Mr. George Marshall - City of Coppell, Phone: 972-304-3562; via E-mail: gMarshall @coppelltx.gov
Mr. Dan DeGroot - Burgess & Niple, Inc.. Phone: 972-620-1255; via E-mail: Dan.DeGroot @BurgessNiple.com
Mr. Robert Caudill- Tiseo Paving Company, Phone: 972-289-0723; via E-mail: rCaudill@TiseoPaving.corn
Mr. Walter Mitchell - Tiseo Paving Company, via E-mail: bannobas @yahoo.com
Mr. Bobby Bounds -California Construction, Phone: 972-670-0368; via E-mail: Bobby @CalConTex.com
Texas CMT, Inc. TBPE Firm: F-4521 Reviewed b
All letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced without the full approval of Texas CMT, nc. e use o our name must rec-Me
our prior written approval. Our letters and reports apply only to the sample tested and/or observed and are not necessarily indicative of the quantities of apparently identical or similar products.