Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Big Cedar-CS 920629
'~ 81~46 3116 G & ~ IN¢o PO2 ~ OODWIN,~ , c,vtL ENGINEERS ~ .LANN£R$ ~ 5URVE!YORS RE: Big Cedar Addition of work m order to ~t to tequmt ilmiation from the approve~ ~onstrucuon plato on O .__. -,,...--a .... a Friday wc had a mzllmlnary impecgon on thc project by .t~ ut.i~ w~~ ~ 7---/.2 -[ .._...~ -~t and ~t~ ~~m ~ ~mmit~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~. A ~ ' ' 6001 BRIDGE; STREET, SUITE 100 / FORT WORTH. T£XA$ 76112 / 817-429-A373 (METRO) 817 446 3116 G & M INCo P03 ,fun~ 29, approximately :r too wide. A drawing of the ~fa-built' ~onfiguration is attached to this letter. We request that the pavement be ~ to remain as pou~c~l. Th~ sidewalk in this arca we~ planned to b~ at thc bn~k of ~ du~ to exbtin~ tr~e~ 'l'nc wid~ted pavcmcnt section should allow skkg~k to ~maia itt tl~ risht-of-way. If there is an ©ncroachme~t, the developer is willi~ to ~rant tl~ easement neccsrmxy to solve this gmbtem. We r~atiz~ that thc impections provided thus far by the utflit~ d~partment and st~t department are not their final inml~'tions and that we still lack some additional work pt~ot to Gual a~c~ptano~ of tl~ sutMlvbion by the City. I appreciate your Maistancc in this mnttcr. If you have any queatiom or comments, please do not D. Matthew Goodwin, P.~