Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Cambridge Phase 1-LR 941004 (5)
G EOTECHNICAL E GEE Consultants, Inc. 2540 Glenda Lane · Suite 108 · Dallas, lexas 75229 · {214'~ 620-9791 · [ax i.214i 620-9794 REPORT OF IN-PLACE DENSITY AND MOISTURE OF SOIL Density Report No. 46 Method: ASTM D2922 D3017 D698 Page 1 of Client: Beamer Development Company Material Desk. ion Max. DR' Optimum Density Moisture Project: Estates of Cambridge Manor Phase I (Lbs/CuFt) Content (%) Test Date: October 3. I994 1. Cement Treated Brossa Sand 106.3 17.7 .;.n Dark Gray Clay. (Lime Treated) 94.2 22.2 Repoa Date: October 4. 1994 3. Cement Treated Brown Sand 97.9 19.2 4. Brahma Clay (Lime Treated) 91.8 25.0 Required Density (%): .Minimam 95% Required Moisture (%):=2.5% Mat Locaticnt.'Elevafion ~and 'or! Lh't ba-Pla~e ln-Plaoe Pemem No. DE..' Eh:miryMoistu~ Come.ion T.st i'Ll~. C~.uct } Content ( gc I No. pre~ 4 Cambridge Manor Lane, Station 5 ~-00 294 91.3 23.5 99.5 6" Lime treated subgrade 2 Cambridge Manor Lane. Station 8+ 13 295 97.3 20.4 103.3 6~ Lime treated subgrade 4 Cambridge Manor Lane, Station I 1-55 296 90.5 24. l 98.6 6~ Lime treated subgrade 4 Cambridge Manor Lane, Station 14+50 297 92.6 '~"" la0 a 6" Lime treated subgrade 2 Cambridge Manor Lane. Station 17+65 "" oq 9 298 90.3 __.6 · ~. 6" Lime treated subgrade ~ Castle Creek Drive. Station [ + 10 299 89,8 22.5 95.3 6" Lime treated subgrade 2 Castle Creek Drive, Station 4+50 300 91..~ '~ 21.7 96.7 6~ Lime treated subgrade GEE Consultants, Inc. Dallas, Texas (214) 620-9791 REPORT OF h-N-PLACE DENSITY AND MOISTLrRE OF SOIL Density Report No. 46 Method: ASTM D2922 D3017 D698 Page I of 1 Client: Beamer Development Company Mate.qal Description Max. Dry Optimum Density Moisture Project: Estates of Cambridge Manor Phase I (Lbs/CuFt) Contem (%) Test Date: October 3, 1994 I. Cement Treated Bro~sa Sand 106.3 17.7 2. Dark Gray Clay (Lime Treated) 94.2 22.2 Report Date: October 4, 1994 3. Cement Treated Brown Sand 97.9 19.2 4. Brown Clay (Lime Treated) 91.8 25.0 Required Density (%): Minimum 95% Required Moisture (%):.ff. 2.5% Mat Locatio~z-E'~vation ;and.'orl LiR In-Place In-Plac~ Percent No. Dry Density Moisture Cc,~r~a. c~ion Tc~t (LI~:rJuFo Content No. Prob~ 2 Castle Creek Drive, Station 74-45 301 93.8 21.4 99.5 6 ~ Lime treated subgrade 2 Kings Canyon Court, Station 2~-50 302 95.1 20.1 100.9 6' Lime treated subgrade All tests meet the project specifications cc: Bill Anderson - Dowdy. Anderson and Associates. Inc. Larry Davis - City of Coppell