Cambridge Phase 1-LR 940705 REVISED
[ G EOTECHNICAL
ENGINEERING GEE Consultants, Inc.
2540 Glenda Lane · Suite 10g · ~allas, lexas 7522~ · (214) 620-9791 · [ax (214) 620-9794
REPORT OF IN-PLACE DENSITY AND MOISTURE OF SOIl.
Method: ASTM D2922 D3017 D698 Page 1 of 3
Client: Beamer Development Company ~,~,~] oc~.~io, Max. Or/
Demity Moisture
Project: Estates of Cambridge .Manor Phase I ;Lln, CuFtj
1. Dark Gray Sandy Clay 101.I 14.2
Test Date: June 13, 1994
2. Brown Clayey. Sand 107.1 143
Report Date: July 5. 1994
3. Yellowish Bro~a and Olive Gray Clays' Sand 114.3 9.8
Required Density (%): 95% to 105%
4. Yellowish Bro~a Clayey Sand ~ith Gravel 115.2 9.3
Required Moisture (%):+3%, Opthnum +5%
5. Dark Gray Sil~' Clay 94.6 21.1
Mat Locatiotx"E~.~tion ,and 'or: 1.i~'t ln-I)lao: In-Dl~c~ Percem
No. Eh3'. Dcm iLv Moisture Corm~t,-tion
Te~t .
No. 'Ll~s/Cul:tl Co~nt t %)
Probe
4 Block A. Lot 4. 2nd lift
110 118.3 13.3 102_.'7,'
6"
2 Block A, Lot 6. 2nd lift
111 103.2 17.8 96.3
6~
2 Cambridge Manor Lane. Statio~ g?20. 3~d lift
112 107.9 17.2 1£().7
6n
3 Block g. Lot 5. 10th lift
113 109.2 17.6 95.5
6'
.~ Block B. Lot 7. 10th ]ift
114 103.4 20.3 96.5
6~
2 Block D, Lot 1.6th lift
115 114.7 15.1 107.1
6~
3 Block D, Lot 2. 6lb lift
116 120.2 13.3 105.2
6~
3 Block D. 1.ot 5.6th lift
117 115.0 15.6 100.6
2 Block D, Lot [5.6~h lift
lib lll.l 17.g 103.7
6~
Our letters and report.~ are for the exclusive usc of thc :[ient to whom the)' are addressed. The use of our name must receive our prior wn.~ten approval Our !eUers :md reporls
apply ovlly to the sample tested alad/or insoeeted. ;md are no~ necessarily mdicatls'e of the quantifies of apparently identical or similar product_s.
REVI~D
GEE Consultants, Inc.
(214) 620-9791
REPORT OF IN-PLACE DENSITY AND MOISTURE OF SOII
Method: ASTM D2922 D3017 D698 Page 2 of 3
Client: Beamer Developmw~t Company Mamrial De. scfi~io~ Mmv. Do'. Ot~mum
I~mity Moism~
Project: Estates of Cambridge Msmor Plmse I
1. Dark Gray 'Samly Clay 101.1 14.2
Test Date: June 13, 1994
2. Brown Clayey Sa~d 107.1 14.3
Report Date: July $, 1994
3. Yellowish Brown and Olive Gray Clayey Sand 114.3 9.8
Required Density (%): 95% to 105%
4. YeBowish Brown Clayey Sand with Gravel 115.2 9.3
Required Moisture (%):+3%, Optimum +$%
5. Dark Gray SHty Clay 94.6 21.1
Mat LocatiomElevation ;anfl/o~ Lift In-Place la-Place
No. DE,.' Der~ityMoisture
Teat ~LI~.CuFt~ C'ontem
.Mo.
2 Block D. Lot 13, 5th
119 104.2 17.3 97.2
2 Block D, Lot 7, 5th lift
120 113.3 16.0 105.7
6"
2 Block C. Lot 8.3rd lift
121 110.6 17.5 103.3
6-
2 Block C, Lot 6, 3rd lift
122 109.7 18.6 102.4
6~
2 Block C, Lot 4.3rd lift
123 110.4 16.6 103.1
6"
2 Block C. Lot 2. 3rd lift
124 108.0 19.7 100.8
6 n
5 Subgrade Cambridge Manor Lane. Station 19+20. 1st lift
125 100.7 23.9 106.4
5 Subgrade Cambridge Manor Lane. Station 17~00, 1st lift
126 98.9 24.7 104.5
6'~
5 Subgrade Cambridge Manor Lane, Station 15+00, 1st lift
127 96.9 26.7 102.4
6"
5 Subgrade Cambridge Manor Lane. Station 13 +00. Ist lift
128 94.5 19.3 99.8
6'
5 Subgrade Cambridge Manor Lane. Station 10-v00, 1st lift
129 100.6 23.9 106.3
6"
Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed. The use of our name must receive our prior written approval. Our leners and reports
apply ouly to the sample tested and/or insoected, and ave not necessarily indicative of the quantities of apparently identical or simdar products.
REVISED
GEE Consultants, Inc.
(214) 620-9791
REPORT OF IN-PLACE DENSITY AND MOISTURE OF SOIl,
Method: ASTM D2922 D3017 D698 Page 3 of 3
Client: Beamer Development Company Matedal ne~q~io~ M~x. Dw Op~num
Density Moisture
Project: Estate~ of Cambridge .Manor Phase I ,
1. Dark Gray Sandy Clay 101.1 14.2
Test Date: June 13, 1994
2. Brown Clayey Sand 107.1 14.3
Report Dat~: July $. 1994
3. Yellowish Brown and Olive Gray Clayey Sand 114.3 9.8
Required Density (%): 95% to 105%
4. Yellowish Brown Clayey Sand with Gravel 115.2 9.3
Required Moisture (%):±3%. Optimum ~-$%
5. Dark Gray Silty Clay 94.6 21.1
Mat LocalicawEl"vation ~and,'orl Lift In-Plac~ In-P]ac~ Pcrcmu
Teal No. Do,.- Dm~ir.y Moi~tu~
Pro~
5 Block D. Lot 10. 1st lift
130 95.5
6"
5 Block D, Lot 12. 1st lift
131 106.1 21.4 112.1
4 Block B, Lot 3.6th lit~
132 113.2 14.5 98.2
4 Block B, Lot 8, 3rd lift
133 110.8 17.5 109.6
6'
Above test results meet specification requirements
cc: Bill Anderson - Dowdy, Anderson and Associates, Inc.
Larry Davis - City of Coppell
Our letters and repor[,~ are for the exclusive use of thc client to whom Ihcy are addres?.ed. The use of our name must receive our prior written approval. Our letters and reports
apply only to the sample tested and/or inspected, and are no~ necessarily indicati,,'e of the quantities of apparently identical or similar products.