Loading...
FIRM-930120REVISION REQUESTOR AND COMMUNITY OFFICIAL FORM 1. The basis for this revision request is (are): (check all that apply) ® Physical change ® Existing ❑ Proposed ❑ Improved methodology ❑ Improved data ❑ Floodway revision ® Other To Reflect "As— Built" Conditions Explain 2. Flooding Source: Grapevine Creek and two (2) Tributaries 3. Project Name/Identifier.. Creek View Addition 4. FEMA zone designations affected: x (example: A, AH, AO, Al -A30, A99, AE, V, VI-V30, VE, B, C, D, X) 5. The NFIP map panel(s) affected for all impacted communities is (are): FORM 1 Community Community Map Panel Effective No. Name County State No. No. Date EX: 480301 Katy, City Harris, Fort Bend TX 480301 0005D 02/08/83 480287 Harris County Harris TX 48201C 0220G 09/28/90 480170 Coonell.City Dallas _� 480170 0010E Pre1.12.19 6. The submitted request encompasses the following types of flooding, structures, and associated disciplines: (check all that apply) Structures ❑ Types of Floodin¢ ❑ Riverine ❑ Coastal ❑ Alluvial Fan ❑ Shallow Flooding ❑ Lakes ❑ Affected by ❑ wind/wave action ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Other (describe) Structures ❑ Channelization ❑ Levee/Floodwall ❑ Bridge /Culvert ❑ Dam ❑ Coastal ® Fill ❑ Pump Station ❑ None ❑ Other (describe) Discialines• El Water Resources ® Hydrology ® Hydraulics ❑ Sediment Transport ❑ Interior Drainage C3 Structural ❑ Geotechnical ® Land Surveying ❑ Other (describe) • Attach completed "Certification by Registered Professional and/or Land Surveyor" Form for each discipline checked. (Form 2) October 1992 Page 1 of 5 APPUCATIONIC33MFICA71ON FORI4S FOR CONDITIONAL LETTER OF SLAP REVISION. LETTER OF MAP REVISION AND PHYSICAL SLAP REVISION noodway Information • Does the affected ding source have a floodway designated he effective FIRM or FBFM? x❑ Yes ❑ No • Does the revised floodwa delineation differ from that shown on the effective FIRM or FBFM? Yes Q No If yes, give reason: Attach request to revise the floodway from community CEO or designated official. Attach copy of either a public notice distributed by the community stating the community's intent to revise the floodway or a statement by the community that it has notified all affected property owners and affected adjacent jurisdictions. Does the State have jurisdiction over the floodway or its adoption by communities participating in the NFIP? ❑ Yes (M No If yes, attach a copy of a letter notifying the appropriate State agency of the floodway revision and documentation of the approval of the revised floodway by the appropriate State agency. tricroacnmentis With floodways: IA. Does the revision request involve fill, new construction, substantial improvement, or other development in the floodway? ❑ Yes CXNo 1B. If yes, does the development cause the 100 -year water surface elevation increase at any location by more than 0.000 feet? ❑ Yes ❑ No Without floodways: 2A. Does the revision request involve fill, new construction, substantial improvement, or other development in the 100 -year floodplain? a Yes No 2B. If yes, does the cumulative effect of all development that has occurred since the effective SFHA was originally identified cause the 100 -year water surface elevation increase at any location by more than one foot (or other surcharge limit if community or state has adopted more stringent criteria)? ❑ Yes ❑x No If answer to either Items 1B or 2B is yes, please provide documentation that all requirements of Section 65.12 of the NFIP regulations have been met Revision • Having read NFIP Regulations, 44 CFA Ch. I, parts 59, 60, 61, 65, and 72, I believe that the proposed revision M is ❑ is not in compliance with the requirements of the aforementioned NFIP Regulations. Community Official Acknowledgement • Was this revision request reviewed by the community for compliance with the community's adopted floodplain management ordinances? 1E Yes ❑ No • Does this revision request have the endorsement of the community? ® Yes ❑ No If no to either of the above questions, please explain: Please note that community acknowledgement and/or notification is required for all requests as outlined in Section 65.4 (b) of the NFIP Regulations. November 1992 r ugc & va u APPLICATIOWCERTIFICATION FORMS FOR CONDITIONAL LETTER Or MAP RE%imoi . LETTER OF MAP REVISION AND PHYSICAL MAP REVLSIOS Operation and Maintenance • Does the physical cnange involve a flood control structure (e.g., levees, floodways, channelization, basins, dams)? ❑ Yes ® No If yes, please provide the following information for each of the new flood control structures: A. Inspection of the flood control project will be conducted periodically by (entitr with a maximum interval of months between inspections. B. Based on the results of scheduled periodic inspections, appropriate maintenance of the flood control facilities will be-conducted by (entity) to ensure the integrity and degree of flood protection of the structure. C. A formal plan of operation, including documentation of the flood warning system, specific actions and assignments of responsibility by individual name or title, and provisions for testing the plan at intervals not less than one year, ❑ has ❑ has not been prepared for the flood control structure. D. The community is willing to assume responsibility for ❑ performing ❑ overseeing compliance with the maintenance and operation plans of the (Name) flood control structure. If not performed promptly by an owner other than the community, the community will provide the necessary services without cost to the Federal government. Attach operation and maintenance plans Kequestea Kesponse from r-zmA • After examining the pertinent NFIP regulations and reviewing the document entitled "Appeals, Revisions, and Amendments to Flood Insurance Maps: A Guide for Community Officials," dated January 1990, this request is for a: a. CLOMR A letter from FEMA commenting on whether a proposed project, if built as proposed, would justify a map revision (LOMR or PMR), or proposed hydrology changes (see 44 CFR Ch. 1, Parts 60, 65, and 72). fib. LOMR A letter from FEMA officially revising the current NFIP map to show changes to floodplains, floodways, or flood elevations. LOMRs typically depict decreased flood hazards. (See 44 CFR Ch. 1, Parts 60 and 65.) c. PMR A reprinted NFIP map incorporating changes to floodplains, floodways, or flood elevations. Because of the time and cost involved to change, reprint, and redistribute an NFIP map, a PMR is usually processed when a revision reflects increased flood hazards or large -scope changes. (See 44 CFR Ch. I, Parts 60 and 65.) d. Other: Describe October 1992 Page 3 of 5 APPLICATIONICERTIFICATION FOWLS FOR CONDITIONAL LETTER OF MAP REVISION. LETTER OF MAP REVISION AND PHYSICAL MAP REVISION Forms Included Form 2 entitled "Certification By Registered Professional Engineer And/Or Land Surveyor" must be submitted. The following forms should be included with this request if (check the included forms): • Hydrologic analysis for riverine flooding differs from that used to develop FIRM • Hydraulic analysis for riverine flooding differs from that used to develop FIRM • The request is based solely on updated topographic information • The request involves any type of channel modification • The request involves new bridge or culvert or revised analysis of an existing bridge or culvert • The request involves a new or revised levee/floodwall system • The request involves analysis of coastal flooding ❑ Hydrologic Analysis Form (Form 3) ❑ Riverine Hydraulic Analysis (Form 4) ® Riverine/Coastal Mapping (Form 5) ❑ Channelization (Form 6) ❑ Bridge/Culvert Form (Form') ❑ Levee/Floodwall System Analysis (Form 8) ❑ Coastal Analysis Form (Form 9) • The request involves coastal structures credited as providing ❑ Coastal Structures Form protection from the 100 -year flood (Form 10) • The request involves an existing, proposed, or modified dam ❑ Dam Form (Form 11) • This request involves structures credited as providing ❑ Alluvial Fan Flooding Form protection from the 100 -year flood on an alluvial fan (Form 12) Initial • The minimum initial review fee for the appropriate request category has been included. Q Yes ❑ No If yes, the amount submitted is 3 760.00 or • This request is for a project that is for public benefit and is intended to reduce the flood hazard to existing development in identified flood hazard areas as opposed to planned floodplain development. ❑ Yes ❑x No November 1992 Page 4 of 5 APPLICATIOWCERTIFICATION FORKS FOR CONDITIONAL LETTER OF HAP REVISION. LETTER Or HAY REVISION AND PHYSICAL KAP REVISION Note: I understand that I..y signature indicates that all information submitted in support of this request is correct. ignature of Revision Requ stor Ervin A. Meyer, P.E. Printed Name and Title of Revision Requestor Nathan D. Maier Consulting Engineers, Company Name Inc. Date / /i //9 --? Note: Signature indicates that the community understands, from the revision requestor, the impacts of the revision on flooding conditions in the (coommunity. I / v! . ature of Com unity Official Printed Name and Title of.Communi y official City of Coppell Community Name Date I • -10-9-3 Attach letters from all affected jurisdictions acknowledging revision request and approving changes to floodway, if applicable. Note: Although a photograph of physical changes is not required, it maybe helpful for FEMA's review. October 1992 Page S of S APPLICATION/CERTIFICATION FORMS FOR CONDITIONAL LETTER OF HAP REVISION. LETTER OF YAP REVISION AND PHYSICAL MAP REVISION