WA9401-CS 940218 (2)TO:
From:
Date:
MEMORANDUM
Jim Witt, City Manager
Kenneth M. Griffin, P.E., City Engineer ~
Estimated recoupment of cost associated with the extension of a water line on
East Beltline Road
February 18, 1994
I have received and reviewed the amended letter from Nicholas, Jackson, Dillard, Hagar and
Smith, L.L.P. concerning the City's ability to recoup a portion of its cost for the extension of
utilities. The letter refers the City to Chapter 402 of the Local Government Cede, which I have
included. It very similar to the paving assessment requirements. I also highlighted the following
sections:
402.061 Sec. 2A, (a) (1) & (2) pg. 474
402.062 (1), (2), 4 pg. 475
402,063 (e) pg. 476
402.065 (a) ( 1 ), (c) pg. 477
402,066 (a), (b) pg. 478
402,068 (a) pg. 479
402.069 (a) pg. 480
402,075 pg. 484
I have had to make several assumptions in trying to ascertain the amount of money that the City
could recoup.
The Lone Star Gas Substation on the southwest corner of Ledbetter and Bel~ine
would not be enhanced by the extension of the waterline, so therefore I excluded
them from the calculations.
The cost for the boring beneath Bel~ine to Mr. Thompson property on the north side
was excluded from the total cost because it is my understanding that Mr. Thompson
will not be assessed for the construction of the line, but will only pay the regular
connection fees.
e
Only property on the south side would a benefit of the extension of this water line.
Any property on the north side would be required to extend the 8" water line back
to the proposed Fairway Dr. They could then take their water service from that line.
Therefore, the north side gains a very negligible benefit from the extension of this
line.
The numbers I used to calculate the cost are as follows:
ITEM [ QUANTITY [ UNIT COST [ TOTAL COST
8" WATER PIPE 2250 L.F. $25 $56,250
12" WATER PIPE 1150 L.F. $36 $41,400
8~ VALVES 3 EACH $800 $2,400
TRENCH SAFETY 3400 L.F. $1 S3,400
PLUG PIPE I EACH $500 $500
AIR RELEASE VALVE 1 EACH $3000 $3000
TOTAL $106.950
Plus 1595 $16,050 $123,000
INCIDENTALS
Because this is an assessment policy, by ordinance the governing body of the municipality may
not assess more than 9/10's of the estimated cost of improvements against the benefitted
property. Therefore, the maximum amount of money, based on the above assumptions, that the
City could recoup would be $110,700. This number is based on my estimated cost for the
improvement. If the cost for the improvement went up or down, the percentage that the City
could recoup would still be the same.
The large unknown associated with the recoupment of the cost is that the City can only assess
up to the enhanced value to the property. Therefore, while there is an estimated maximum that
the City could recoup it is still unknown how much in actuality the City could recoup. That
amount would be based on the appraised value of the property before and after the installation
of the water line.
According to State law, the apportionment of the assessment is on a front foot basis. The total
adjacent footage is 3,400 L.F. Therefore, the total per foot cost would be approximately
$29.62.
We recently received prices on the extension of the water line associated with Valley Ranch
Baptist Church. The cost for 500 feet of water line was $14,500. This works out to
approximately $29 L.F. Typically, when a City bids a project the construction prices are
higher. However, using the assumptions above and this estimated cost, an assessment against
the property of approximately $29 does not seem to be out of line with what the developer of
the property would pay to have the water line installed.
In summary the City can recoup 90% of the cost associated with the extension of the water line
so long as that does not exceed the enhanced value of the property caused by the extension of
the water line. I have included a copy of Subsection D from Chapter 402 of the Local
Government Code. If you should have any questions please feel free to contact me at your
convenience.