Thoroughfare-AG 900109Rear. 4- 24 -89
r
PP�LL ^" GENDA REQUEST FORM
THE GTV W1TN A j �^>
BEr+UTIFUL FUTURE CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 9, 1990 ITEM NO. ( c�2 �
;
ITEM CAPTION: Consider a request from Prentiss Properties, Limited, regarding Park West Commerce
Center, to amend the City of Coppeirs Thoroughfare Plan for'the realignment of Gateway Boulevard
from its currentjagation to a.Jpcation more closely aligned with existing Southwestern Boulevard.
SUBMITTED EY: l✓ ` STAFF REP.: Tarylon Bowman, P&Z Coordinator
i eceor 1`s SignNift
OTHER REP.:
EVALUATION OF ITEM. DATE:
Date of Planning & Zoning, Commission Meeting: December 21, 1989
Decision of Planning & Zoing Commission: Approved (7-0) with conditions. (SEE ATTACHED MINUTES).
Please see attached staff report for further details.
BUDGET AMT.:
,COFYENTS :
i
LEGAL REVIEW BY: �+
AGENDA REQ FORM.C588DS
M E M 0
TO: Russell R. Doyle, P.E., City Engineer
FROM: Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning & Community Se�s-
SUBJECT: LETTER FROM BARTON ASCHMAN DATED DECEMBER 18, 1989
DATE: January 2, 1990
Russell, on December 18, 1989, you received a letter from Mr. Ken Marshall
regarding the Park West Commerce Center request for thoroughfare
realignment. In that correspondence, Mr. Marshall indicated that the
relocation of the six -lane divided roadway appeared satisfactory. He went
on to state that potential down- sizing of the road from six -lane to four
was more problematic and required much more detailed analysis.
He posed five questions, some of which will not be resolved until Barton
Aschman has had time to study the issue more carefully. Specifically,
questions #1- impact on other major thoroughfares, #4- justification of
impacts to Airline Drive, and #5 -where are the 10,600 plus generated
trips, require more thorough analysis.
His question regarding the thoughts of Santa Fe Pacific ((#2)', can be
.`answered by stating that Santa Fe strongly supports the--` Prentiss
proposal. .The question regarding construction costs of Southwestern
Boulevard ' #3i),4 can be addressed by suggesting that Prentiss is willing to
pay his fali� share of road improvements, just as any other developer would
be required.
In sum, then, it is my understanding that our consultant supports the
realignment of the thoroughfare, is not yet in a position to offer an
opinion regarding reduction in thoroughfare width.
GLS /RD
COPPELL PUBLIC WORKS
January 4, 1990
TO: Gary Sieb, Director of Planning & unity Services
via: Steve Goram, Director of Public Wo
FROM: Russell DoylYff, ty Engineer
RE : Letter from Barton Aschman dated 12/18/89
West Side Thoroughfare Study
Regarding your memorandum dated January 2, 1990 in reference to the
above, the gest of the memorandum is accurate. However, staff is
recommending that the full width of the roadway, whether four lane
or six lane paving, be bore by the developer.
As you are aware the West Side Thoroughfare Study has begun and our
first coordination meeting will take place within the next week. Staff
believes that a technical answer to whether a four lane or six lane
thoroughfare is needed can be provided prior to the full completion
of the study.
Should you have any questions, please contact either the Director
of Public Works or myself.
SGG /RRD /sm
21
Minutes of December 21, 1989
Planning & Zoning Commission
Page 4
Scott voting in favor of the motion, and Commissioners Tunnell
and Weaver voting against the motion.
The Commissioners recessed for a short break at this time.
PLATTING
Item 8: To consider a request from Prentis Properties, Limited,
regarding Park West Commerce Center, to amend the City of
Coppell's Thoroughfare Plan for the realignment of Gateway
Boulevard from its current location on the plans to be aligned
with Southwestern Boulevard.
(This request is to amend the City of Coppell's Thoroughfare
Plan for the realignment of Gateway Boulevard from its current
location to a location more closely aligned with existing
Southwestern Boulevard).
Director of Planning & Community Services Gary L. Sieb
introduced the item to the Commission. Mr. Sieb stated that the
Engineering division of Public Works is here to answer any
questions regarding this issue.
Michael Tucker of Prentiss Properties and Mike Starek of
DeShazo, Starek and Tang were present to represent this item
before the Commission. Mr. Tucker stated that the reason for
replatting this property is to rearrange the streets so that
they lend themselves to the development of the property as an
industrial park. He also stated that the current plan shows a
street that connects to Beltline Road, which runs through the
middle of the property and then connects to Freeport Parkway.
They are requesting that the street be realigned to the northern
boundary of the property, its terminus with Beltline Road would
be the same, and its connection to the remainder of the
Thoroughfare Plan would be exactly the same. Mr. Tucker then
stated that in order to develop this as an industrial park, they
need to lay the plan out in a rectangular shape, then install an
interior street system that will allow them to lay the lots out
in large blocks that lend themselves to large 100,000 to 150,000
square foot warehouse buildings. He then stated that there is
one such building already under construction at this site.
Mr. Tucker then introduced Mike Starek of DeShazo, Starek and
Tang. Mr. Starek's company has done a traffic analysis on this
property. Mr. Starek stated that some of the major factors
considered in this type of study are population, employment,
Minutes of December 21, 1989
Planning & Zoning Commission
Page 5
land use, economic development, safety, traffic volumes, levels
of service and cost.
Following discussion Commissioner Weaver moved to approve the
application for the realignment of Southwestern Boulevard as
submitted. Commissioner Scott seconded the motion; Commissioner
Gross then amended the motion to include that they dedicate all
the land for the road from their property. Motion carried (7 -0)
with Chairman Munsch and Commissioners Green, Gross, Redford,
Scott, Tunnell and Weaver voting in favor of the motion.
Item 9: Consider approval of a preliminary plat for Park West Commerce
Center (Gateway Park at Coppell), located at the southwest
corner of Beltline Road and Southwestern Boulevard.
P &Z Coordinator Taryon Bowman introduced the item to the
Commission. Ms. Bowman stated Park West Commerce Center had
been previously approved as Gateway Park at Coppell in 1988.
The applicant has altered the alignment of Gateway Boulevard
and; therefore, are technically presenting this as a replat.
She further stated that because they are also changing the name,
this plat must come before the Commission as a preliminary
plat. Ms. Bowman then stated that the following are staff
concerns regarding this plat:
1) Dedication of easement along the channel - staff does not
have a problem with accepting that easement; however, staff
recommends that tan Owners Association be established for
the maintenance of that creek
2) Street width of Gateway Boulevard will be addressed at a
future meeting.
Mike Tucker of Prentiss Properties, and Don Davis of Don Davis
Consulting Engineers were present to represent this item before
the Commission.
Following discussion Commissioner Gross moved to approve the
__preliminary plat for Park West Commerce Center with the
following changes: 1) Park West Parkway become Gateway;
2) Article 4 be changed so that the property owners will form a
property owner association and will maintain the property;
3) the property owners will maintain the property along
Grapevine Creek; and 4) under Article 5, duration Section 1,
should say signed by Mayor and City Council. Following
discussion Commissioner Gross withdrew the motion. Commissioner
Gross then moved to.p�Wrove_, the xeliminary plat for Park West
Commerce Center without var =cas4 and that the name be changed
>� to Gateway. Commissioner Tunnell seconded the motion; motion
darrl6d (7 -0) with Chairman Munsch and Commissioners Green,
COPPELL PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 19, 1989
TO: Taryon Bowman, P &�Z Coordinator
FROM: Russell R. Do �ity Engineer
RE: Park West Co e Center Thoroughfare Revision
Transmitted herewith is a comment letter from the City of CoppellIs
Consultants on the West of Denton Tap Road Major Thoroughfare Plan
Study. Gary Sieb has already received a copy of this from Shohre
Daneshmand when it was received via the Fax.
These comments must be distributed to the P & Z Commission and City
Council when they hear the related cases.
Additionally, the cost of Southwestern /Park West Parkway and
related bridge should be determined early on.
Please let me know if you desire any further information. Thank
you.
xc: Steve Goram, Director of Public Works
Shohre Daneshmand, Civil Engineer
REVISION.RRD
111C.
Aur
C'. i
P. 0. 13o'x 4'i
Copper
14; ; 91 -1` 00
Fax X21 G} 190`1 i' l
RE }aria ;4F ::D.�'t:=.I- C:C =I.+ E'T- `�1-i,Jrcluj_i tare Revision Request
PA `,
Dear i ^r. Do't'le—,
tit I ";,.'. _ j•7'` ::; t `; "I -, ",' r,I, , i "E'.'�'- E'k'Ed th7: request by i�lentlSS
�c„ to rr;�]_ign �authwestern Bouleval:d and
concern is the iICtpact Of
this teq Lest n 1 cur WesU °_ de `,, orcug hfarc- Plan study which we plan
to staff t irI �nllary 1:+ 30. ]:t gas with this in mind that ���e
reviewed the regU, : -s' . era: Pre: t.is�.
Prent .i_;;:a retained DeShazo, Starek & Ta ng,
inc. t.) p= 'gV�LiI a i.i .FiI1 aV "l c; analysis for the realignment of
Sr_,ut%'1;r5 ern. ,'t;is an:�.iyi.s, submitted December. 14, 1989, compared
'four l.te i :.dt _'V� ?:'Iti: en i:t l,_iding the align -mei 'i_ presented In
your exist, nq Tir; -roue. irate plan. DS &T concluded that alternative
2 wc_),_,Id ;a].]o,N' fir L11e crraatE>st development. potential of the
i i']�� r]. i1 a. L�:'= aI1Ct pl Uv]�F iOr tt1E }lest moveIllent of traffic
F'ro:rl the, S{:- nopoint_ C) :1i 7- t ?E:i;� i_i '; StllC1y, we believe alternative 2
i s an acceptably: ali�;,i :�el�t in ttii.,_> area %end does not significantly
�truct froKl t le i.::Te:Itt o1: the existing Thoroughfare Plan
n 7�f: tf? 7_? 1. i?v 'SocT`S report, We have c] fE?�f
CltaF�i�tiU'13, i- i.LI['.£12'.
o Wh«t is t:r,e impact on the other major thoroughfares in
tip is section o the City (Bethel Road, Belt amine Road,
Derlton real. Road) ? ;
o. How does Santa Fe Pacific, Wilo owns the next tract to the
We'St., feed about ait<<rnative 2 ?;
C) who will ?gay for i.he construction of Southwestern
Are t.ze irldicatt�d impacts to Airline Road justified?;
and,
a Wt;re are aJ_�. of the 10,600 -plus trips that will be
generate , }y Prentiss and Santa Fe Pacific? The graphics
do not. :show all of these.
Mr. husoel! R. Puylp. P.E.
City OE COPPAL
Page 2
we wili n-2 no pre51.om it the city approves this request for the
rcaliSnmem of Southwestern Boulevard. However, the above
questions should be addr2ssed prior to approval. We do believe
that the finni sizing of this thoroughfare should be based an the
results of our study, Once this inforration will be the latest and
mosc mccuraLe.
if you have any further questions, please call.
sincerely,
D -l"TES, 1N, .
Kennoth Marshall,
Senior Awswcia�,�,
COP.PELL PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 15, 1989
TO: Taryon Bowman, P & Z Coordinator
FROM: Russell R. Doyle, City Enginee
ce Center Re uest� Major
RE: Park West Commerce Q
Thoroughfare Revision: Gateway Boulevard
Technical Review and Comment
Attached, please find a copy of a letter of request from Prentiss
Properties Limited, Inc. dated December 14, 1989. In this letter
the applicant is requesting an amendment to the Coppell's
Thoroughfare Plan for the realignment of Gateway Boulevard. This
request combines Gateway and Southwestern Boulevards.
We have asked DeShazo, Starek and Tang to provide you with 20
copies of the realignment study reports, in addition to the one
copy attached to this memo.
We have the following comments and /or recommendation for your
department and the City of Coppell's Policy Bodies to consider.
This memo is a part of a P & Z Commission agenda packet prepared
by this office for the December 21, 1989 Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting.
While it appears that, the applicants Transportation /Traffic
Consultant has demonstrated justification for their client's
desired alignment and roadway classification (ie. roadway sizing),
there are some areas needing to be addressed on at least two
levels. The first is on the technical level regarding predicted
traffic volumes at full development and aesthetic /quality of life
issues regarding landscaping and width of medians, etc. Realignment
only is being considered at this time.
The City of Coppell has just engaged a Transportation and Traffic
Consultant on Thursday, December 7, 1989, who as you know will be
providing a recommendation on the West Side Commercial Landowners
Associations request for realigning the thoroughfares west of
Denton tap Road and north of Bethel Road connecting to the SH 121
freeway facility. The study will also take into account the recent
change in Freeport Parkway and the changes in the SH 121
interchanges and ramps.
The study will conduct, independent traffic modeling since the
available data (predicted traffic volumes) does not specifically
provide volumes for the City of Coppell's Internal Thoroughfare
System. That is, the available projected traffic volumes from the
Texas State Highway Department and /or North Central Texas Council
of Governments concentrate on the freeway facilities encompassing
the City of Coppell.
Below are questions and /or issues the applicant should address
before the P & Z and City Council when they consider this requested
Thoroughfare Realignment. These are in no particular order except
as they occurred in reviewing the submitted realignment study.
Thoroughfare Alignment Study for Southwestern Blvd. /Gateway Blvd.
1. The property owners contiguous and /or accessing Southwestern
Blvd. should be notified of the request for the City Council
meeting.
2. Alternative 4 does not accomplish the current Major
Thoroughfare Plans connecting a major direct through
Thoroughfare from Denton Tap Road to Royal Lane Extension /IH
635.
3. Traffic Counts were taken on Royal Lane and Freeport
Boulevard. These two roadways, as well as Gateway Blvd. and
Southwestern Blvd., are not completely open to traffic. When
they are built, they would generate traffic to the roadways
under consideration.
4. If the Prentiss and Santa Fe development were not included in
the employment forecasts, were other areas in the vicinity not
left out. if so, there is more traffic generated to be
accommodated on the thoroughfares under consideration?
5. Is the 20$ trucks assumption an industry standard and if so,
provide the source (page 21).
6. Are the Trip Distribution percentages an industry Standard and
if so, provide source, etc (page 21).
Alignment characteristics (page 21). The salient characteristics
will be listed here and discussed below.
Alternative 1, Existing Thoroughfare Plan
1. Connects Denton Tap Road and Royal Lane /IH 635.
2. Allows high speeds.
3. Impairs ability to fully develop the Tract
4. Costly/ Needs two bridges across Grapevine Creek
5. Interior site truck traffic will impede through traffic
6. Gateway Blvd. capacity reduced
Alternative 2
1. Direct through movement from Royal to Belt Line
2. Only one Grapevine Creek crossing / More economical
3. Buffer for different land uses
4. Better utilization of land
Alternative 3
1. Most direct route Belt Line to Royal Lane
2. One creek crossing
3. Buffer between land uses
4. Added railroad crossing
Alternative 4
1. Least capacity provided /through movement obstructed
2. Inefficient for Land Development
3. Numerous rail spur crossings
Discussion
The report concluded Alternatives 3 and 4 least desirable.
Alternative 2 is more desirable over Alternate 1, which is the
current Major Thoroughfare Plan. Therefore, we should then
critically examine Alternative 2 to assure that it is a viable or
"best" traffic alternative.
Conclusion /Regommendation
After the above questions and issues are addressed, with no
resulting adverse impact on the capacity or loading of the proposed
thoroughfare, it appears that the request on the Prentiss
Properties Limited, Inc. Tract only is acceptable. However, if
that request is dependent upon changes on the tract to the west
then that landowner should be a party in the decision - making.
Please let make know if you need any further information, comments
and /or recommendations. We will attend the December 21, 1989
Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Thank you.
RRD /SMD /bb
xc: Steve Goram, Director of Public Works
Shohre Daheshmand, Civil Engineer
Mike Starek, DeShazo, Starek & Tang
1..
v
v'
December 14, 1989
Mr. Russe 1 Doyle
City of oppeil
P.O. Bo 478
Coppell /, Texas 75019
i
Re: Revision to City Thoroughfare Plan
Dear Russell:
In conjunction with our replatting of the Park West Commerce
Center we are requesting that the City's thoroughfare be revised
to change the alignment of Gateway Boulevard to that shown in
the accompanying land plan.
The current Thoroughfare alignment makes it impossible to
develop the area north of Airline Drive as an industrial park.
The resulting lot configuration has depths that are unworkable
for industrial buildings.
The present thoroughfare alignment of Gateway Boulevard also
precludes bringing rail service into the park. We believe that
the ability to offer rail service is important to attract top
quality tenants to the park.
The requested realignment permits the eastern and western
terminus of the road to remain unchanged thus preserving the
travel line shown on the existing thoroughfare plan. The
realignment is extremely important to our ability to develop the
property as a first class industrial park.
Yours truly,
Michael R. Tucker
Vice President
MRT /pg
xc: Paisley Bcney
Allen Ratliff
Gary Seib
hl\ 1. V "I -I %I uiKI I w. (:r:N IIA(
hil "'11— I'mil'i lml.> h%11*11.1), Isc. 1(),i I.HJ Ilu 1 \U 1hi.i.\•, Ti \,\. 7.-, 231 211 1111 -MM