Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
ST9902-CS130624 (3)
_ 6--r9°5 -- c Fr-4 X IN i -6 Ear r_2 I?�- Project Name Engineer: Developer: G l - Reviewed By: 4'T-2 F I 1'� _ 'lst Review Date: Comments Recieved: 700.1/04 .+ Sent to Utilites/Streets: Reviewed By Larry/Garreth: Returned to Engineer: 2nd Review Date: Comments Recieved: IZ/tZ/d I Sent to Utilites/Streets: Reviewed By Larry/Garreth: Returned to Engineer: 3rd Review IDate: Comments Recieved: 9-16-et Z- ' l=(�z--r,. • Sent to Utilites/Streets: /■ rt>E- 1,30 -� I Reviewed By Larry/Garreth: Returned to Engineer: Date: Comments Fees Paid: Water , Sewe •Roadwa Ins•ection Plans Approved: v ~ 5i-q9 ---oz- 5 # PROJECT NAME Engineer: 7-1Q F> Developer: Reviewed by: 473:1 Review Date Comments Received: ,3-67aj-,( - L S 5>r'r'S Sent to Utilities/Streets: -4- 1- L,./5.4.)pcpc 'r Reviewed by Inspectors: �p r� , ciww Returned to Engineer: 51-2-4 Review Date Comments Received: I -I 7- (Z. 11 - FL&LL 5 Sent to Utilities/Streets: Reviewed by Inspectors: NO'- Returned to Engineer: � d�Review Date Comments Received: Z.-3 - /Z --- PIA f Sent to Utilities/Streets: Z - (�7` 3Z✓acr7-S Reviewed by Inspectors: /1 Returned to Engineer: 0-10- Date Comments Plans Approved 7---4 (3 Pre-con scheduled Submitted for scanning e_ 6 -7_4- r 37 -- 4 # PROJECT NAME Engineer: T l Developer: Reviewed by: T± '.s ' Review Date Comments Received: Sent to Utilities/Streets: Reviewed by Inspectors: Returned to Engineer: 2nd Review Date Comments Received: Sent to Utilities/Streets: Reviewed by Inspectors: Returned to Engineer: 3rd Review Date Comments Received: Sent to Utilities/Streets: Reviewed by Inspectors: Returned to Engineer: Date Comments Plans Approved Pre-con scheduled Submitted for scanning • te c)6 - ©-Z r KJ, (oPt? > °� Lam!' 04,. Project Name Engineer: __ Developer: Tc >dr Reviewed By: 1st Review Date: Comments Recieved: 1-;' Op, Z e AN Sent to Utilites/Streets: Reviewed By Larry/Garreth: Returned to Engineer: 1 2nd Review Date: Comments 11 Recieved: I `—V`i I - _'r' L L, • Sent to Utilites/Streets: NO l vv/6.vv/6. • ?C M i t'['/S.Lr Reviewed By Larry/Garreth: Returned to Engineer: 3rd Review 1 Date: Comments Recieved: 1 Z-3 l-!Z Z Lilt z, r z I/7 5 a - Sent to Utilizes/Streets: f(9 F" I >VV Reviewed By Larry/Garreth: Returned to Engineer: Date: Comments Fees Paid: Water , Sewer , •Roadway , Inspection Plans Approved: -rt6)9 -O7= 5 % (# 3 PROJECT NAME Engineer: Tim P Developer: Reviewed by: 4.T- { Review Date Comments Received: Sent to Utilities/Streets: Reviewed by Inspectors: Returned to Engineer: 2nd Review Date Comments Received: Sent to Utilities/Streets: Reviewed by Inspectors: Returned to Engineer: 3rd Review Date Comments Received: Sent to Utilities/Streets: Reviewed by Inspectors: Returned to Engineer: Date Comments Plans Approved (3 Pre-con scheduled Submitted for scanning