DR1201-LR131014 (2) OCT-18-2013 04:59 P.02
D. Texas CMT, Inc
Construction Materials Testing GEE Consultants, Inc.
and Environmental Consulting
10044'Monroe Drive • Dallas, Texas 75229 • (214) 352-6957 • Fax (214) 352-6972 • www .texascmt.com
REPORT OF IN-PLACE DENSITY AND MOISTURE OF SOIL
Density Report No.46 (213-0134) . Method:ASTM D6938 D698 Page 1 of 1
Client:City of Coppell Material Description Maximum Optimum
Dry Density Moisture
Project: Creekview Drive Roadway (Lbs./cu.ft.) Content
Improvements 2013 (Percent)
1. Reddish Brown Clay 97.7 22.9
Test Date:October 9,2013 2. Yellowish Brown Clayey Sand 120.9 12.2
(Select Fill)
Report Date:October 14,2013 3. Dark Brown Clay 99.5 22.9
4. Brown,Tan and Yellowish 97.9 23.7
Required Density(%):Min.95% Brown Clay
5. Dark Brown Clayey Sand with 116.4 12.5
Required Moisture(%): Dark Gray Shale Fragments '
Clays:OMC+0 to+4%; 6. Dark Gray Gravelly Clay with 108.2 17.1
Sand and/or Select Fill:OMC-3 to+3%; Shale Fragments .
Cem-lime Treated:OMC-2 to+3% 7. Yellowish Brown&Olive Brown 107.3 18.1
Clay witli Gravel
. 8. Light Brown Clayey Sand(Cem- 118.6 11.5 '
lime Treated)
•
9. Light Brown Clayey Sand(Cem- 113.9 14.0
lime Treated)
Test No. Material Probe Location/Elevation(and/or)Lift In-Place In-Place Percent
No. Depth Dry Density Moisture Com
(inches) _ (Lbs/Cu.Ft.) Content(%)
95 2 6 Sidewalk Subgrade,Appro • ately 200'E. 105.3 10.6 Aj 87.1** , I
of W.End
*Test results did not melazoiectsilesifteafOns.Called Rick O'Dell with City of Coppell with t:st results.
cc: Mr.Larry Davis-City of Coppell,Phone:972-304-36 ,'a Fax:972-304-3570
Mr.George Marshall-City of Coppell,Phone:972- o •.2;via E-mail:gMarshall @coppelltx.gov
Mr.Rod Lacy-The Fain Group,Phone: 817-927 ' : E-mail:r ty faingp.com
,Q I, 2' 0°
/0 1 .0 !�
Texas CMT.Inc. TBPE Firm: •�'1:' Reviewed by: -
All letters and reports arc for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed an M. not be reproduced without the full approval of Texas CMT, . The use of our name must receive
our prior written approval. Our letters and reports apply only to the sample tested and/or observed and are not necessarily indicative of the quantities of apparently identical or similar products.