Loading...
DR1201-LR131104NOV -04 -2013 06:24 Construction Materials Testing and Environmental Consulting Texas CMT Inc* AL. 10044 Monroe Drive Dallas, Texas 75229 (214 P.01 Post -ii° Fax Note 7671 oat' pag s10. To RR S From a / r n T 1 T iii coMept. � G-iCar S i t T _ Co. <; L £ t� L Ca go r- Phone # 417: -34K Phone # z 14 _ 5'z- <-;I S Fax" -7�^ 3 04:3 Fax #I 2-14-3 C5 Z- 61 REPORT OF IN -PLACE DENSITY AND MOISTURE OF SOIL Report No. P- revised (213 -0135) Method: ASTM D6938 D698 Page 1 of 1 Client: The Fain Group Project: Creekview Drive Roadway Improvements 2013 Test Date: October 18, 20:13 Report Date: November 4, 2013 Required Density ( %): Min. 95% Required Moisture ( %): Clays: OMC +0 to +4 %; Sand and/or Select Fill: OMC -3 to +3% Cem -lime Treated: OMC -2 to +3% , Test results meet protect specnn:atruM. cc: Mr. Larry Davis -City of Coppell, Phone: 972 -304 -3684; via Fax: 972 -304 -3570 Mr. George Marshall - City of Coppell, Phone: 972 -304 -3562; via E -mail: gMarshall@coppelltx.gov Mr. Rod Lacy - The Fain Group, Phone: 817 - 927 -4388; via E -mail: rlacy @faingp.com I. exas t-im i , lnu. 1 D1 L' 1' as lu. _ -�. •++ 1 letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed and sbatl not be reproduced without the full approval of Texas CMT, Inc. The use o our mate must recee ow prior written approval Our letters and reports apply only to the sample tested and/or observed and are not necessarily indicative =the quantities of apparently identical or similar products. Material Description Maximum Optimum In In -Place Percent Dry Density Moisture Probe Location / Elevation (and /or) Lift (Lbs. /cu.ft.) Content No. Depth (inches) (Percent) 1. Reddish Brown Clay 97.7 22.9 2. Yellowish Brown Clayey Sand 120.9 12.2 (Select Fill) North Side Sta. 2 +00 3. Dark Brown Clay 99.5 22.9 4. Brown, Tan and Yellowish 97.9 23.7 Brown Clay 5. Dark Brown Clayey Sand with . 116.4 12.5 Dark Gray Shale Fragments 6. Dark Gray Gravelly Clay with 108.2 •. 17.1 Shale Fragments 7. Yellowisit Brown & Olive Brown 107.3 38.1 Clay with Gravel 8. Light Brown Clayey Sand (Cem- 118.6 11.5 lime Treated) 9, Light Brown Clayey Sand (Cem- 113.9 14.0 lime Treated) 10. Orange Silty Sand with 117.1 12.9 Sandstone Frags. & Occ. Gravel Test results meet protect specnn:atruM. cc: Mr. Larry Davis -City of Coppell, Phone: 972 -304 -3684; via Fax: 972 -304 -3570 Mr. George Marshall - City of Coppell, Phone: 972 -304 -3562; via E -mail: gMarshall@coppelltx.gov Mr. Rod Lacy - The Fain Group, Phone: 817 - 927 -4388; via E -mail: rlacy @faingp.com I. exas t-im i , lnu. 1 D1 L' 1' as lu. _ -�. •++ 1 letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed and sbatl not be reproduced without the full approval of Texas CMT, Inc. The use o our mate must recee ow prior written approval Our letters and reports apply only to the sample tested and/or observed and are not necessarily indicative =the quantities of apparently identical or similar products. In In -Place Percent Test No. Material Probe Location / Elevation (and /or) Lift -Place Dry Density Moisture Compactio No. Depth (inches) (Lbs /Cu.Ft.) Content ( %) %) 96 10 6 Retest of No. 95 : Sidewalk Subgrade, 111.3 12.2 5.0 North Side Sta. 2 +00 Test results meet protect specnn:atruM. cc: Mr. Larry Davis -City of Coppell, Phone: 972 -304 -3684; via Fax: 972 -304 -3570 Mr. George Marshall - City of Coppell, Phone: 972 -304 -3562; via E -mail: gMarshall@coppelltx.gov Mr. Rod Lacy - The Fain Group, Phone: 817 - 927 -4388; via E -mail: rlacy @faingp.com I. exas t-im i , lnu. 1 D1 L' 1' as lu. _ -�. •++ 1 letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed and sbatl not be reproduced without the full approval of Texas CMT, Inc. The use o our mate must recee ow prior written approval Our letters and reports apply only to the sample tested and/or observed and are not necessarily indicative =the quantities of apparently identical or similar products. NOV -04 -2013 06:25 P.02 �Lexas CMT Inc. Co"truction Mater" Testing GEE Conadtw*,Inc. and Environmental Consulting 10044 Monroe Drive 6 Dallas, Texas 75229 (214) 352 -6957 Fax (214) 352.6972 0 www .texascmt.com REPORT OF IN -PLACE DENSITY AND MOISTURE OF SOIL Report No. 38- revised (213 -0134) - Method: ASTM D6938 D698 Page 1 of I Client: City of Coppell Project: Creekview Drive Roadway Improvements 2013 Test Date: October 18, 2013 Report Date: November 4, 2013 Required Density ( %): Min. 95% Required Moisture ( %): Clays: OMC +O to +4 %; Sand and/or Select Fill: OMC -3 to +3 %; Cem -lime Treated: OMC -2 to +3% Test No. Material Description Maximum Optimum In -Place In -Place Dry Density Moisture No. Depth (Lbs. /cu.ft.) Content Moisture Compactio (Percent) 1. Reddish Brown Clay 97.7 22.9 2. Yellowish Brown Clayey Sand 120.9 12.2 Sidewalk Subgrade, North Side, Sta. 4 +00 (Select Fill) 11.7 3. Dark Brown Clay 995 22.9 4. Brown, Tan and Yellowish 97.9 23.7 Brown Clay 5. Dark Brown Clayey Sand with 116A 12.5 Dark Gray Shale Fragments 6. Dark Gray Gravelly Clay with 108.2 17.1 Shale Fragments 7. Yellowisb, Brown & Olive Brown 107.3 18.1 Clay with Gravel 8. Light grown Clayey Sand (Cem- 118.6 11.5 lime Treated) 9. Light Brown Clayey Sand (Cem- 113.9 14.0 lime Treated) 10. Orange Silty Sand with 117.1 12.9 Sandstone Frags. & Occ. Gravel Test No. Material Probe I Location / Elevation (and /or) Lift In -Place In -Place Percent No. Depth Dry Density Moisture Compactio (inches) I (Lbs/Cu.Ft.) Content (%) 97 10 6 Sidewalk Subgrade, North Side, Sta. 4 +00 123.0 11.7 98 10 6 Sidewalk Sub ade North Side Sta. 1 +25 107.2 13.5 91.5* * Test results did not meet project specifications. cc: Mr. Larry Davis - City of Coppell, Phone: 972 -304 -3684; via Fax: 972 - 304 -3570 Mr. George Marshall - City of Coppell, Phone: 972 -304 -3562; via E -mail: gMarshall @coppelltx.gov Mr. Rod Lacy - The Fain Group, Phone: 817- 927-4388; via E -mail: rlacy @faingp.com r� v Texas CNIT, Inc. 1,131rEt' V'I<rm• r -4toL1 tcevlewea uX; �-�- 1 letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the client to wham they are addressed and stall not be reproduced without the fill] approval of Texas CMT, Inc. The use of our name must rem, our prior written approval. Our letters and reports apply only to the sample tested and/or observed and are not necessarily indicative of the quantities of apparently identical or similar products. NOV -04 -2013 06:25 P.03 Texas CMT Inc.' Con�� Materials g GEE Consultants, Inc. and Environmental Consulting 10044 Monroe Drive Dallas, Texas 75229 (214) 352 -6957 Fax (214) 352.6972 - www.texascmt.com REPORT OF IN -PLACE DENSITY AND MOISTURE OF SOIL insity Report No. 39- revised (213 -0135) • Method: ASTM D6938 D698 Page 1 of 1 Client: The Fain Group Material Description Maximum Optimum Project: Creekview Drive Roadway Improvements 2013 Test Date: October 19, 2013 Report Date: November 4, 2013 Required Density ( %): Min. 95% Required Moisture ( %): Clays: OMC +O to +4 %; Sand and/or Select Fill: CONIC -3 to +3 %; Cem -lime Treated: OMC -2 to +3% 1. Reddish Brown Clay 2. Yellowish Brown Clayey Sand (Select Fill) 3. Dark Brown Clay 4. Brown, Tan and Yellowish Brown Clay 5. Dark Brown Clayey Sand with Dark Gray Shale Fragments 6. Dark Gray Gravelly Clay with Shale Fragments 7. YellowiskBrown & Olive Brown Clay with Gravel 8. Light Brown Clayey Sand (C em- lime Treated) 9. Light Brown Clayey Sand (Cem- lime Treated) 10. Orange Silty Sand with Sandstone Frags. & Occ. Gravel Dry Density Moisture (LbsJcu.ft.) Content (Percent) Material 97.7 22.9 Location /Elevation (and/or) Lift 120.9 12.2 In -Place 99.5 22.9 97.9 23.7 Depth 116.4 12.5 Dry Density 108.2 17.1 Compactio 107.3 18.1 118.6 11.5 113.9 14.0 Content ( %) 117.1 12.9 99 Test No. Material Probe Location /Elevation (and/or) Lift In -Place In -Place Percent No. Depth Dry Density Moisture Compactio (inches) (Lbs /Cu.Ft) Content ( %) ° 99 10 1 6 1 Retest of No. 98 112.8 13.5 96.3 Test results meet project specifications. cc: Mr. Larry Davis -City of Coppell, Phone: 972 - 304 -3684; via Fax: 972 - 304 -3570 Mr. George Marshall - City of Coppell, Phone: 972 - 304 -3562; via E -mail: gMasshall@coppelltx.gov Mr. Rod Lacy - The Fain Group, Phone: 817- 927 -4388; via E -mail: rlacy @faingp.com I letters and reports are for the exclusive use of th•e client to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced without the full approval of Texas CMT, Inc. The usf of our name mast recei our prior written approval. Our letters and report; apply only to the sample tested and/or observed and are not necessarily indicative of the quantities of apparently identical or similar products. NOV -04 -2013 06:25 P.04 TA exas CMT Inc.' C Construction Materials Testing GEE Consultants, Inc. and Environmental Consulting 10044 Monroe Drive • Dallas, Texas 75229 (214) 352 -6957 Fax (214) 352.6972 4 www.texascmt.com REPORT OF IN -PLACE DENSITY AND MOISTURE OF SOIL ansity Report No. 40- revised (213 -0134) Method: ASTM D6938 D698 Page 1 of 1 Client: The City of Coppell Material Description Maximum Optimum Dark Brown Clay 995 Dry Density Moisture Project: Creekview Drive Roadway 97.9 (LbsJcu.ft.) Content (Percent) Improvements 2013 1. Reddish Brown Clay 97.7 22.9 Test Date: October 19, 2013 2. Yellowish Brown Clayey Sand 120.9 12.2 Report Date: November 4, 2013 Required Density ( %): Min. 95% Required Moisture ( %): Clays: OMC+O to +4 %; Sand and/or Select Fill: OMC •3 to +3 %; Cem -lime Treated: OMC; -2 to +3% (Select Fill) Location / Elevation (and/or) Lift 3. Dark Brown Clay 995 22.9 4. Brown, Tan and Yellowish 97.9 23.7 6 Brown Clay 106.6 15.3* 5. Dark Brown Clayey Sand with 116.4 12.5 S. Side E. -to -W. Running Water Line, Sta. 1 +50, 2' Below Existing Grade (B.E.G.) Dark Gray Shale Fragments 14.0 103.5 6. Dark Gray Gravelly Clay with 108.2 17.1 111.8 Shale Fragments 95.5 103 7. Yellowish Brown & Olive Brown 107.3 18.1 12.5 Clay with Gravel 104 10 8. Light Brown Clayey Sand (Cem- 118.6 11.5 98.5 lime Treated) 9. Light Brown Clayey Sand (Cem- 113.9 14.0 lime Treated) 10. Orange Silty Sand with 117.1 12.9 Sandstone Frags. & Occ. Gravel Location / Elevation (and/or) Lift In -Place Dry Density (Lbs/Cu.Ft.) In -Place Moisture Content ( %) Percent Compaction ( %) Test No. Material No. Probe Depth (inches) 100 3 6 Sidewalk, North Side, Sta. 6+00 106.6 15.3* 107.1 101 10 6 S. Side E. -to -W. Running Water Line, Sta. 1 +50, 2' Below Existing Grade (B.E.G.) 121.2 14.0 103.5 102 10 6 S. Side E. -to-W. Running Water Line, Sta. 1 +53, 1' B.E.G. 111.8 13.3 95.5 103 10 6 S. Side E.-W. Water Line, Sta. 1 +60, Final 118.7 12.5 101.4 104 10 4 S. Side E.-to-W. Running Water Line, Sta. 3 +00, 15" B.E.G. 115.4 15.2 98.5 NOV -04 -2013 06:25 P.05 City of Coppell Report Date: November 4, 2013 Larry Davis of City of Coppell accepted the result as he said that the contractor would water the stauglauc before concrete placement cc: Mr. Larry Davis - City of Coppell, Phone: 972 - 304 -3684; via Fax: 972 -304 -3570 Mr. George Marshall - City of Coppell, Phone: 972 -304 -3562; via E -mail: gMarshall @coppelltx.gov Mr. Rod Lacy - The Fain Group, Phone: 817- 9274388; via E -mail: rlacy @faingp.com Texas CMT Inc. TBPE Firm: F4521 Reviewed b : 6 1 letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced without the full approval of Texas CM1, Inc. The use of our name must recei, our prior written approvaL Out letters and reports apply only to the sample tested and/or observed and are not necessarily indicative of the quantities of apparently identical or similar products. Texas CMT, Inc. Project No. 213 -0134 In -place Density Report No. P4 - ree1 f vl �ssed2 Location / Elevation (and /or) Lift In -Place Dry Density In -Place Moisture Percent Compactio Test No. Material Probe No. Depth (inches) (Lbs/Cu.Ft.) Content ( /o) ( /a) 105 4 6 S. Side E. -to -W. Running Water Line, Sta. 100.0 16.0 102.1 3 +10, Final 106 10 6 S. Side E.-to-W. Running Water Line, Sta. 120.9 10.7 103.2 4 +50, Final Larry Davis of City of Coppell accepted the result as he said that the contractor would water the stauglauc before concrete placement cc: Mr. Larry Davis - City of Coppell, Phone: 972 - 304 -3684; via Fax: 972 -304 -3570 Mr. George Marshall - City of Coppell, Phone: 972 -304 -3562; via E -mail: gMarshall @coppelltx.gov Mr. Rod Lacy - The Fain Group, Phone: 817- 9274388; via E -mail: rlacy @faingp.com Texas CMT Inc. TBPE Firm: F4521 Reviewed b : 6 1 letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced without the full approval of Texas CM1, Inc. The use of our name must recei, our prior written approvaL Out letters and reports apply only to the sample tested and/or observed and are not necessarily indicative of the quantities of apparently identical or similar products. Texas CMT, Inc. Project No. 213 -0134 In -place Density Report No. P4 - ree1 f vl �ssed2 NOV -04 -2013 06:26 P.06 C Texas CMT Inc.- Construction Materials Testing GEE C Inc. and Environmental Consulting 10044 Monroe Drive Dallas, Texas 75229 (214) 352.6957 Fax (214) 352 -6972 www.texascmt.com REPORT OF IN -PLACE DENSITY AND MOISTURE OF SOIL Report No. 41- revised (213 -0134) Method; ASTM D6938 D698 - Paee 1 of 1 Client: The City of Coppell Project: Creekview Drive Roadway Improvements 2013 Test Date: October 22, 2013 Report Date: November 4, 2013 Required Density ( %): Min. 95% Required Moisture ( %): Clays: OMC +O to +4 %; Sand and/or Select Fill: OMC -3 to +3 %; Cem -lime Treated: OMC -2 to +3% Test No. Material Description Maximum Optimum In -Place In -Place Dry Density Moisture No. Depth (LbsJcu.fL) Content Moisture Compaction (Percent) 1. Reddish Brown Clay 97.7 22.9 2. Yellowish Brown Clayey Sand 120.9 12.2 Sidewalk Footing, North Side, 50' W. of (Select Fill) 18.0* 95.6 3. Dark Brown Clay 99.5 22.9 4. Brown, Tan and Yellowish 97.9 23.7 2 Brown Clay Sidewalk Footing, North Side, 55'W. of 116.5 5. Dark Brown Clayey Sand with 116.4 12.5 Dark Gray Shale Fragments 6. Dark Gray Gravelly Clay with' 108.2 17.1 Sidewalk Footing, North Side, 120'W. of Shale Fragments 14.8 97.3 7. Yellowish Brown & Olive Brown 10.7.3 ,, 18.1 Clay with Gravel S. Light Brown Clayey Sand (Cem- 118.6 '11.5 lime Treated) 9. Light Brown Clayey Sand (Cem- 113.9 14.0 lime Treated) 10. Orange Silty Sand with 117.1 12.9 Sandstone Frags. & Occ. Gravel Test No. Material Probe Location / Elevation (and /or) Lift In -Place In -Place Percent No. Depth Dry Density Moisture Compaction (inches) (Lbs /Cu.FL) Content ( %) (%) 107 2 8 Sidewalk Footing, North Side, 50' W. of 115.6 18.0* 95.6 Stone Drain Inlet, Subgrade 108 2 8 Sidewalk Footing, North Side, 55'W. of 116.5 15.8* 96.4 Storm Drain Inlet, Subgrade 109 2 8 Sidewalk Footing, North Side, 120'W. of 117.6 14.8 97.3 Storm Drain Inlet, Subgrade Recommended acceptance to Larry Davis of City of Coppell cc: Mr. Larry Davis -City of Coppell, Phone: 972 - 304 -3684; via Fax: 972 - 304 -3570 Mr. George Marshall - City of Coppell, Phone: 972 - 304 -3562; via E -mail: gMarshall @coppelltx.gov W. Rod Lacy - The Fain Group, Phone: 817- 927 -4388; via E -mail: rlacy @faingp.com Texas CMT,Inc. TBPE Firm: F -4521 Reviewed bv: I letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced without the full approval of Texas CMT, Inc. The use of our name must recei, our prior written approval. Our letters and reports apply only to the sample tested and/or observed and are not necessarily indicative of the quantities of apparently identical or similar products. TOTAL P.O6