Conoco-CN 880927SUBMISSION DEADLINE: 5:00 .. Monday - 8 Days Preceding C- Council Meeting
,Rev.: Effective 1/20/88_~,~, 0~
/I ~/ AGENDA REOU~.gT FORM
FOR CITY C~~MEETING: Septe 27, 1988
II. ITEM CAPTION --~ : Discussion~-, cormiderat~on-~nd approval of a proposed aRreernent
between the City of CoDDell and Conoco, Inc. for construction of Denton Tap Road across an existinm .~
six (6) inch high pressure petroleum products pipeline, and authorizing the Mayor to siln.
III. ACTION RECOMMENDED : Staff recommends approval.
IV. REP. IN ATTENDANCE A: STAFF - John Karlsruher, Project Manager, Ginn, Inc.
B: OTHER -
V. NOTIFICATION TO :
METHOD OF CONTACT :
DATE :
VI. FINANCIAL REVIEW : 1. BUDGETED ITEM : X YES NO
2. BUDGET AHOUNT : $40,000
3. ESTIMATED AMOUNT FOR THIS ITEM : $40,000
4. AMOUNT OVER OR UNDER BUDGET :
5. LOW BIDDER RECOMMENDED : YES NO
SOURCE OF FUNDING
CO'S OR BONDS FUNDS :
(Series or year authorized) :
OPERATING BUDGET' (Account Number) :
OTHER : CIPDentonTaD Improvements
APPROVED BY CITY NANAOER-:
ITEM NUHBER
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
DMEMOI
MEMO ~M~y
DATE: September 9,-1988 ~'i~
FROM: John C. Karlsruher, P.E. ~
RE: Denton Tap Road Improvements from Belt Line Road to Sandy
Lake Road - Conoco Pipeline crossing agreement - Coppell,
Texas.
In response to your request (attached) we have reviewed the
proposed agreement. Conoco has responded as asked in our letter
of May 31, 1988 letter, copy attached, which transmitted the
comments of the City Attorney on the previously proposed
agreement. Additionally , the anticipated cost of this item is
included in the approved project budget for the project as
presented to the City Council when they awarded the Construction m~_~
Contract for the project in the April 26, 1988 City Council ~
meeting.
We recommend that this item be placed on the earliest available
City Council agenda for their consideration. It is important
that the City of Coppell and L.H. Lacy Co. execute the agreement
as soon as possible in order to avoid unnecessary delays in the
construction of the project. If the City Council approves
execution of this agreement we will be happy to obtain the
original agreement from you and transmit it to L.H. Lacy Co. for
their execution. Once executed and returned by L.H. Lacy Co. we
will return it to you for the City's execution and transmittal to
Conoco.
cc: H. Wayne Ginn, P.E.
David M. Snyder, L.H. Lacy Co.
rd9988.con
i-ll~.~ Pre-iL".:'., R.'.,a,.! · Suite !00 · !_B lIS · Dalla,~. Texas 7524,%' · Ph,:nc. 214 24S-4900
conoc
Transportation Conoco Inc.
3519 Patmck Street
Lake Charles. LA 70605
August 26, 1988
CERYiFIED .MAIL
Receipt #P484488265
Mr. Alan D. Ratliff
City Manager
City of Coppell
P. O. Box 478
Coppell, Texas 75019
RE: DENTON TAP ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS ..... ~._~//....~ ....
Dear Mr. Ratliff:
We have received your letter and construction plans concerning improvements
to Denton Tap Road where it crosses the Conoco Inc. operated Con-Dor Pipe
Line Company ("Con-Dor") 6-inch high pressure petroleum products pipeline.
Conoco Inc. will permit construction across the pipeline upon the Contrac-
tor and City of Coppell ("City") agreeing to the following requirements:
1. After review with our Engineering Department, we must take exception
to your suggestion that the line will not require concrete coating.
The pipeline is currently installed inside of steel casing under
Denton Tap Road. This casing provides protection from external stress
due to traffic; it also reduces the risk of damage to the pipe during
installation of utilities, drain lines, etc. In addition, the casing
provides a means of monitoring the integrity of the pipe and provides
a conduit for pipe replacement if necessary. Extensions to the casing
is not practical due to sags in existing line and because of cathodic
protection considerations. Once the pipe is covered by the road it
will no long be accessible for maintenance, therefore, we must require
installation of tested, heavy-wall, concrete coated pipe under the
roadway.
2. The concrete coated pipe will be installed under the roadway and will
extend approximately 25 feet east and west of the construction bound-
aries. The cost for this modification, estimated to be $40,000.00 as
shown on Exhibit A, will be borne solely by the City of Coppell. We
require 100 percent of the actual cost be paid within 30 days of
receipt of an invoice after pipeline modifications are complete. The
City will be charged for actual costs for pipeline modifications,
whether higher or lower than the estimated costs.
3. Conoco Inc.'s Division Office in Lake Charles, Louisiana, must be
provided with final construction drawings for all work which will
affect the Con-Dot pipeline, including a plot plan and a profile along
the pipeline centerline showing any grade work to be done. The
current drawings do not show the extent of grade work to be done
5~r, Alan D. Rat!iff
August 26, 1988
Page 2
beyond the limits of roadway. The profile should show the vertical
distance between the Con-Dor line and any proposed grading. Upon
receip~ of updated drawings, Conoco Inc. will revise the cost estimate
to reflect any additional modifications required to the pipeline.
4. Ail utilities which cross the Con-Dor pipeline must pass underneath by
a minimum of 12 inches. Any utilities which parallel the pipeline
will maintain a minimum separation distance of 5 feet from the util-
ities outside wall to the outside of the Con-Dor line.
5. Conoco Inc. will not allow the city or its contractor to use any
material or equipment in the construction which in the opinion of the
Con-Dor inspector would hinder or impair Con-Dor's ability to safely
maintain and operate its line.
6. Con-Dor retains the right to adequately mark its pipeline with perma-
nent line markers to insure public safety and the future safe opera-
tion of the line and to meet Department of Transportation Regulation.
7. No engineering worRs, private or industrial dwellings, deep rooted
plants, fences, other similar permanent structures will be allowed
over any portion of the pipeline.
8. At any point along the pipeline where the existing grade profile will
be lowered by the removal of earth, the Con-Dor line must be lowered
to a depth which provides a minimum cover of 36 inches after final
grading.
9. Con-Dor requires a minimum of 48 hours notice prior to any excavation,
construction, or movement of equipment across its right-of-way so that
its line can be staked to minimize the possibility of accidental
damage. Additionally, Con-Dor personnel must be on site during
exposure of the pipeline and during any work around the exposed line.
10. The City shall indemnify and hold Con-Dor harmless from and against
any and all claims for injuries to person or persons or for damages to
property arising directly or indirectly from work to be performed by
the City or those under contract to the City near the Con-Dor pipe-
line.
1!. The Contractor shall indemnify and hold Con-Dor harmless from and
against any and all claims for injuries to person or persons or for
damages to property arising directly or indirectly from work to be
performed near the Con-Dor pipeline by the Contractor or its
sub-contractor.
12. The City shall assume all responsibility for any and ali damages to
the Con-Dor operated pipeline arising directly or indirectly from work
to be performed by the City, its contractors or subcontractors.
Mr. Alan D. Ratliff
August~ °6, 1988
Page 3
13. Con-Dor shall be named as additional insured without any qualifica-
tions or restrictions by the Contractor performing work near the
Con-Dor pipeline. Contractor shall maintain in effect during work
near the Con-Dor line the following insurance coverages:
Public liability insurance covering all work to be performed near the
pipeline, with bodily injury limits of not less than $100,000 as to
any one person and $300,000 as to any one accident and with property
damage limits of not less than $100,000 for each accident. Such
insurance shall include coverage for all liability assumed by Contrac-
tor working near the pipeline under contract with the City with limits
of liability not less than those set out above.
It shall be the City's obligation to see that each and every contrac-
tor and subcontractor employed by it carries and pays for the same
kinds and amounts of insurance as are required of the Contractor.
A certified copy of all insurance policies requested shall be received
at the Conoco Division office in Lake Charles with Con-Dot Pipe Line
Company named as the certificate holder prior to the commencement of
work.
14. The City of Coppell shall indemnify and hold Con-Dor harmless from and
against any and all claims for damage to Denton Tap Road and associ-
ated water and drainage lines arising directly or indirectly from work
being performed by Con-Dor or its Contractors on the Con-Dor pipeline.
To initiate work on the pipeline modifications to accommodate the proposed
construction, please have a copy of this letter executed by an officer of
the Contractor and the City of Coppell and return to me along with final
construction drawings.
Enclosed for your information are copies of the API Brochure, "What You
Should Know About Petroleum Pipeline Safety". Please pass these along to
the Contractor and Project Inspector.
Should you have any questions, please call me at (318) 491-5913.
Sincerely, J
Director-Access & Regulations
CAR/138/165:gr
Enclosures
Mr. Alan D. Ratliff
August 26, 1988
Page 4
cc: Ann Kartsotis
Jim Rau
Joe Bob Anderson
Steve Marsee
Scott Williams
Mr. John Karlsruh
Ginn, Inc.
17103 Preston Road, Suite 100, Box 118
Dallas, Texas 75202
>fr. Alan D. Ratliff
August 26, 1988
Page 5
ACCEP%ED AND AGREED TO:
Contractor:
Attest:
Company:
Signature:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone:
City of Coppell:
Attest:
Signature:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone
Mr. Alan D. Ratliff
August 26, 1988
Page 6
EXHIBIT A
DENTON TAP ROAD
CONCRETE COATED PIPE INSTALLATION
COST ESTIMATE
Description Estimated Cost
Construction Materials $ 5,500
Construction Contract 25,000
Engineering, Supervision and Overhead 9,500
TOTAL $40,000
May 31, 1988
Mr. Clyde A. Rhodes
Director - Access and Regulations
Concoco Inc.
1909 Southwood Drive
Lake Charles, IA 70605
Re: Denton Tap Road Improvements From Belt Line Road to Sandy
Lake Road, Coppell, Texas
Dear Mr. Rhodes:
This letter is in response to your letter of December 11, 1987,
which contains Conoco's requirements for construction of the
above captioned road improvements across your 6 - inch high
pressure petroleum products pipeline, and an agreement pertaining
to same. The City of Coppell's legal counsel has reviewed the
letter and has made some suggestions which may help to further
clarify the elements of the proposed agreement.
It is suggested that Conoco state specifically what work it will
perform, and what its responsibilities will be in regards to that
work, separately from the work and responsibilities of the City.
As currently written, our legal counsel had difficulty in
determining who was responsible for what.
In regards to the listed requirements of your December 11, 1987
letter we have no objections to items 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10,
11, 12, and 13. The elements of item 1 need to be scheduled
through the City of Coppell, and item 3 is covered by the
drawings transmitted herewith.
Referring to item 2 of your letter, we would like to modify the
terms of payment as you and previously discussed. Instead of
paying 100 % of the estimated cost for lowering your facilities
60 days prior to construction; the City would prefer to reimburse
Conoco Inc. the cost of the work within 30 days of receipt of an
invoice for the work. If you will recall, this is the procedure
we used for the Moore Rd. Improvements project about two years
ago.
Item 5 is a little too vague for the City to agree to. Perhaps a
more specific statement explaining which materials and equipment
commonly used in road and utility construction would be
considered a hindrance or impairment to safe operation and
maintenance of your facilities will help to clarify this item.
Item 14 is not acceptable to the City of Coppell in that it
requires the City to indemnify Con-Dor and its Contractors from
any and all claims arising directly or indirectly out of work
being performed now as well as in the future on the Con-Dor
pipeline. The City of Coppell feels that it would be more
appropriate that the reference to "all future work" be discarded
and that Conoco's contractors be required to carry the necessary
liability insurance and be responsible for any damages that they
may cause.
We greatly appreciate your efforts in this effort to achieve an
equitable agreement between the City of Coppell and Conoco, Inc.
in order to allow the city to improve Denton Tap Road to provide
a safe crossing of your facilities and the adjacent railroad.
The construction of the road improvements will begin within the
next two weeks or so, but the construction in the area of your
facilities and the railroad crossing is not expected to begin
within the next two months. Please review this information and
respond as soon as possible. Please call us if you have any
questions.
Sincerely,
z.L"/.
John C. Karlsruher, P.E.
Project Engineer
cc: Alan D. Ratliff, City Manager
H. Wayne Ginn, P.E., Acting City Engineer
Lawrence W. Jackson, City Attorney
File 378
.,~ [~l\]'\x/ } ~ I!}~J~J SAIA.INGEIt, NICIIOI.S, JACI(S()N.
/~/ "mmerly Saner..lack. 8nlling~tr & Nichols}
~[~lt. s.t [..q~. Attorneys ~ (~OllllSt'Jor~ ill I.nw I'IIES'IIIN CI:N'I'~;]I OFFICE
~os~ ......... ~t .... l)allas. Texas 75201
.os, ~, ~; ,.t ~,. ..... 121 .l) 954-3333
.o~, ~ ..... t. Facsimile {21.1) 954-333-1
............... May 16, 1988
-..Mr. John C. l(arlsruher ' Ginn, lne.
17103 Preston Road
Suite 100, I,!1 118
Dallas, Texas 75248
Re: Coppell-Conoeo Agreement
Our File ~o. 212
Dear John:
I have reviewed Conoeo's letter which was proposed as an agreement between
the City and Conoco to permit the City to construct across Conoeo's six-inch high
pressure petroleum pipeline.
Although it is not clearly stated in the proposed agreement received from Conoco,
it is my understanding that Conoeo's pipeline will probably have to be lowered and
certain City utilities will be installed near the pipeline. I also understand that the work
to be done on the pipeline itself will be done by Conoco at the City's expense with
the City utilities being placed in the area by the City's contractors. "
it appears that paragraphs i, 2, 3, 8, and 14 concern the work to be done by
Conoco on their pipeline, and the remaining paragraphs deal with the City's placement
of utilities within the general area of the pipeline by its contractors.
The agreement on its face gives the impression that the City is going to be doing
all of the work including the lowering and work on the pipeline.
I note that Conoco has estimated the cost of work on the pipeline to be $40,000,
which will be borne solely by the City of Coppell, however, in paragraph 3, they have
agreed to revise the cost estimates upon reeeipt of updated drawings.
I have no problem with paragraph 10 which is the City's agreement to indemnify
and hold harmless Conoco for damages arising directly or indirectly from work to be
performe¢~'by the City or those under contract to the City near the Con-l)or pipeline.
Paragraph 11 requires that the City will have to obtain a similar indemnification
agreement from its contractors who work on the project and require the contractor to
maintain the liability insurance as provided for in paragraph 13. I have no problem
with the City's indemnification agreement, provided the contractors also are required
to so indemnify and maintain the public liability insurance.
Mr. John C. I<arlsruher
Page 2
May 16, 1988
It is my opinion that the indemnification provision in pargraph 14 of the proposed
agreement is quite broad in favor of Conoco in that it provides that the City shall
indemnify Conoco against any damage to Denton Tap Road and the City's utility lines
arising out of the work being performed by Conoco or its contractors on the Conoco
pipeline and states that "This indemnification shall apply to all future work," I think
that the provision concerning the indemnification applying to all future work should be
eliminated, and Conoeo's contractors should be required to carry liability insurance and
be responsible for any damage they ~night cause.
I hope this letter can give you some assistance in arriving at a final agreement
with Conoco. If you have any questions, please give me a call.
Very truly yours,
SALIANGEII, NIC[IOI.S, JACKSON,
LWJ/sb
ee: Mr. Alan I). ihttliff
City Manager
City of Coppell
P. O. Box 478
Coppell, Texas 75019
Ginn, hie. File No. 335
Transportation Department Conoco Inc.
1909 Southwood Drive
Lake Charles, LA 70605
(3~8) 49~-5855
December 11, 1987
CERTIFIED MAIL
Receipt #P251233296
Mr. John Karlsruh
Ginn, Inc.
17103 Preston Road, Suite 100, Box 118
Dallas, Texas 75202
RE: DENTON TAP ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS
Dear Mr'. Karlsruh:
We have received your letter and construction plans concerning improvements
to Denton Tap Road where it crosses the Conoco Inc. operated Con-Dor Pipe
Line Company ("Con-Dor") 6-inch high pressure petroleum products pipeline.
Conoco Inc. will permit construction across the pipeline upon the Contrac-
tor and City of Coppell ("City") agreeing to the following requirements:
1. After review with our Engineering Department, we must take exception
to your suggestion that the line will not require concrete coating.
The pipeline is currently installed inside of steel casing under
Denton Tap Road. This casing provides protection from external stress
due to traffic; it also reduces the risk of damage to the pipe during
installation of utilities, drain lines, etc. In addition, the casing
provides a means of monitoring the integrity of the pipe and provides
a conduit for pipe replacement if necessary. Extensions to the casing
is not practical due to sags in existing line and because of cathodic
protection considerations. Once the pipe is covered by the road, it
will no long be accessible for maintenance, therefore, we must require
installation of tested, heavy wall, concrete coated pipe under the
roadway.
2. The concrete coated pipe will be installed under the roadway and will
extend approximately 25 feet east and west of the construction
boundaries. The cost for this modification, estimated to be
$40,000.00 as shown on Exhibit A, will be borne solely by the City of
Coppell. We require 100 percent of the cost estimate be paid 60 days
prior to construction. The City will be charged for actual costs for
construction, whether higher or lower than the estimated costs.
3. Conoco Inc.'s Division Office in Lake Charles, Louisiana, must be
provided with final construction drawings for all work which will
affect the Con-Dor pipeline, including a plot plan and a profile along
the pipeline centerline showing any grade work to be done. The
current drawings do not show the extent of grade work to be done
beyond the limits of roadway. The profile should show the vertical
distance between the Con-Dor line and any proposed grading. Upon
receipt of updated drawings, Conoco Inc. will revise the cost estimate
for any additional modifications if necessary.
Mr. John Karlsruh
December 11, 1987
Page 2
4. All utilities which cross the Con-Dor pipeline must pass underneath by
a minimum of 12 inches. Any utilities which parallel the pipeline
will maintain a minimum separatio~ distance of 5 feet from the util-
ities outside wall to the outside of the Con-Dor line.
5. The City will allow no material or equipment to be used in the
construction which would hinder or impair Con-Dor's ability to safely
maintain and operate its line.
6. Con-Dor retains the right to adequately mark its pipeline with perma-
nent line markers to insure public safety and the future safe opera-
tion of the line and to meet Department of Transportation Regulation.
7. No engineering works, private or industrial dwellings, deep rooted
plants, fences, other similar permanent structures will be allowed
over any portion of the pipeline.
8. At any point along the pipeline where the existing grade profile will
be lowered by the removal of earth, the Con-Dor line must be lowered
to a depth which provides a minimum cover of 36 inches after final
grading.
9. Con-Dor requires a minimum of 48 hours notice prior to any excavation,
construction, or movement of equipment across its right-of-way so that
its line can be staked to minimize the possibility of accidental
damage. Additionally, Con-Dor personnel must be on site during
exposure of the pipeline and during any work around the exposed line.
10. The City shall indemnify and hold Con-Dor harmless from and against
any and all claims for injuries to person or persons or for damages to
property arising directly or indirectly from work to be performed by
the City or those under contract to the City near the £on-Dor pipe-
line.
11. The Contractor shall indemnify and hold Con-Dor harmless from and
against any and all claims for injuries to person or persons or for
damages to property arising directly or indirectly from work ~o be
performed near the ¢on-Dor pipeline by the Contractor or its
sub-contractor.
12. The City shall assume all responsibility for any and all damages to
the Con-Dor operated pipeline arising directly or indirectly from work
to be performed by the City, its contractors or subcontractors.
13. Con-Dor shall be named as additional insured without any qualifica-
tions or restrictions by the Contractor performing work near the
Con-Dor pipeline. Contractor shall maintain in effect during work
near the Con-Dor line the following insurance coverages:
Mr. John Karlsruh
December 11, 1987
Page 3
Public liability insurance covering all work to be performed near the
pipeline, with bodily injury limits of not less than' $100,000 as to
any one person and $300,000 as to any one accident and with property
damage limits of not less than $100,000 for each accident. Such
insurance shall include coverage for all liability assumed by Contrac-
tor working near the pipeline under contract with the City with limits
of liability not less than those set out above.
It shall be the City's obligation to see that each and every contrac-
tor and subcontractor employed by it carries and pays for the same
kinds and amounts of insurance as are required of the Contractor.
A certified copy of all insurance policies requested shall be received
at the Conoco Division office in Lake Charles with Con-Dor Pipe Line
Company named as the certificate holder prior to the commencement of
work.
14. The City of Coppell shall indemnify and hold Con-Dor harmless from and
against any and all claims for damage to Denton Tap Road and associ-
ated water and drainage lines arising directly or indirectly from work
being performed by Con-Dor or its Contractors on the Con-Dor pipeline.
This indemnification shall apply to all future work.
To initiate work on the pipeline modifications to accommodate the proposed
construction, please have a copy of this letter executed by an officer of
the Contractor and the City of Coppell and return to me along with final
construction drawings and a check in the amount of the cost estimate.
Enclosed for your information are copies of the API Brochure, "What You
Should Know About Petroleum Pipeline Safety" Please pass these along to
the Contractor and Project Inspector.
Should you have any questions, please call me at (318) 491-5913.
Sincerely,
Z' ~ '"?"> ''~
Cl~e A. Rhodes
Director-Access & Regulations
CAR/136/220:gr
Enclosures
cc: Ann Kartsotis Jim Rau
Joe Bob Anderson
Steve Marsee
Neil Stockholm
Mr. John Karlsruh
December 11, 1987
Page 4
ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:
Contractor:
Attest:
Company:
Signature:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone:
City of Coppell:
Attest:
Signature:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone
Mr. John Karl sruh
December 11, 1987
Page 5
[XHIBIT A
DENTON TAP ROAD
CONCRETE COATED PIPE INSTALLATION
COST ESTIMATE
Description Estimated Cost
Construction Materials $ 5,500
Construction Contract 25,000
Engineering, Supervision and Overhead 9,500
TOTAL $40,000
of ~'.~ Council ;o ~it this type of request to th,-~urrent applicant
on!v, as opposed t~ broad over-all approval of th~ above stated type
use. Mo action was taken by the Council on this item.
Item 22: Discussion and consideration of approval of an ordinance
amending the sign code in its entirety and authorizing the
Mayor to sign.
Chief Building Inspector Dale Jackson made the presentation to the
· iouncil. Ms. Flo Staley presented a petition supporting the changes
made to the Sign Ordinance which is filed as a permanent part of the
City records. Following further discussion Councilman Pettijohn moved
to approve Ordinance 88-405 amending the sign code with a correction to
Sec. 10-5-3 (C) changing i.e. to read e.~. and authorized the Mayor to
si~n. Councilman Morton seconded the motion; motion carried 6-0 with
Ccuncilmen Wilkerson, Pettijohn, Morton, Smotbermon, Cowman and Wolfe
voting in favor of the motion.
Item 23: Discussion and consideration of approval of the Bylaws
~overning the Park Board.
Mr. Edmund Reeve, Park Board Chairman was present to discuss the above
stated item with the Council. Following further discussion Councilman
Smothermon moved to approve the bylaws governing the Park Board.
Councilman Morton seconded; motion carried 6-0 with 'Councilmen
Wilkerson, Pettijohn, Morton, Smothermon, Cowman and Wolfe voting in
favor of the motion.
Item 24: Discussion and consideration of approval Change Order No.
Two (2~ in the amount of $46,687.60; No. Three (3) in the
amount of $22,267.59; and No. Four (4) in the amount of
~Sill,922.04) for Beltline Road (X/S) Capital Improvements
project and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
Mr. Yevin Peiffer representing City Engineer Wayne Ginn's office was
present to discuss the above stated item with the Council. Following
further discussion Councilman Smothermon moved to approve Change Order
No. Two (2) in the amount of $46,687.60; No. Three (3) in the amount of
~22,267.59; and No. Four CA) in the amount of $111,922.04) for Beltline
~oad (X/S) Capital improvements project and authorized the Mayor to
sign. Councilman Wolfe seconded the motion; motion carried 6-0 with
Councilmen Wiikerson, Pettijohn, Morton, Smothermon, Cowman and Wolfe
voting in favor of the motion.
Item 25: Discussion and consideration of awarding a contract for
con~truction of th~ Denton Tap Road Improvements ~rom Beltline
Road to Sandy Lake Road and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
Mr. John Karlsruher representing City Engineer Wayne Ginn's office was
present to discuss the above stated item with the Council. Following
~urther discussion Councilman Cowman moved to award the contract, for
construction of Denton Tap Road improvements from Beltline Road to Sandy
!.ake Road, to L.H. Lacy Company in the amount of $3,388,580.00 with
decorative bridge rails and authorized the Mayor to sign. Councilman
l.'olfe sec,~,!ed the motion; motion carried 4-2 with Councilmen Wilkerson,
9mothermc:~. Co~an and lColfe voting in favor of the motion and
Councilmen Fetti~ohn and Morton voting against the motion.
item 2~: iscussion and consideration of awarding a contract for
.'nstruction of the Denton Tap Road Improvements from Sandy
aka Road to Denton Creek and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
Mr. Jo~n '-'~rlsruher representing City Engineer Wayne Ginn's office was
present ~. discuss the above stated item with the Council. Eollowing
further c~.:cussion Councilman Cowman moved to award the contract, for
constructi,':~ of Denton Tap Road improvements from Sandy Lake Road to
Denton Cr~.=k, to L.H. Lacy Company in the amount of $1,803,363.03 with
decorative bridge rails and authorized the Mayor to sign. Councilman
Wi!kerson seconded the motion; motion carried 4-2 with Councilmen
Wilkerson, Ymothermon, Cowman and Wolfe voting in favor of the motion
and Councilmen Pe~tijohn and Morton voting against the motion.
Item 27: -iscussion and consideration of an agreement with St. Louis
~uthwestern Railway Company to provide the City of Coppell
with a license to cross the railroad property to serve
reekview Estates with:
an 8" waterline
an 8" sanitarv sewer
A. City /~ttornev Lawrenceo=c~son~ '~ made the presentation to the Council
on the ab.~':e stated item 27A. Eollowing further discussion Councilman
Smotherrcn moved to approve the agreement with St. Louis Southwestern
Railway ,7.'-~--anv to provide the City of Coppell with a license to cross
the raii~-: property to serve Craekview Estates with an ~" waterline.
Cou~ci!~.~. Co~a;~ seconded; motion carried 6-0 with Councilmen
.,~.~rson, ?e~ti.~ohn,. Morton, Smothermon, Cowman and Wolfe voting in
favor of ~ e moticn.
B. Cit-' .ttornev i.awrence Jackson made the presentation to the Council
on the a~,>-'e stated ~tem 27F. Following further discussion Councilman
Smothermc.. ;noved to approve the agreement with St. Louis Southwestern
qailwav C."~anv to provide the City of Coppell with a license to cross
the railr~c property to serve Creekview Estates with an 8" sanitary
sewer. C:~ur. ci!man Co~an seconded; motion carried 6-0 with Councilmen
lCi!kerso~, }-ettijohn, Mcrton, Smothermon, Co%~an and Wolfe voting in
favor of t..c motion.
CO);SENT A~z'[~'-2A
Item 25A:' iscusslon and recommendation for rejection of Bid -raffic Sign and Signalization Materials Contract.
2~: ...onsider approval of charges to the City Council budget in
'.'.e amount of $34.50.
Councilman'. .'orton moved to approve consent agenda, Items 28A and 28B as
submitted. Councilman Smothermon seconded the motion; motion carried
6-0 with ~' u;;cilmen Wilkerson, Pettijohn, Morton, Smothermon, Cowm. an and
Wolfe vot~'z ~ favor of the motion.
='.'=~"~-,'=... . .. '-~c~o,'.. (Closed to the ~ublic~