Creekview North-CS 890418TO:
CITY OF COPPELL
255 PARKWAY BLVD.
P. 0. BOX 478
COPPELL, TEXAS 75019
(214) 462-0022
Nathan D. Maier Consulting
Engineers, Inc.
Three North Park ~300
8800 N. Central Expressway
Dallas, TX 75231
Ap~l 18/89 ' [ ~k View N~h Add~ti~
A~E~ION:
Pet~ Sta~
RE:
WE ARE SENDING YOU [x ] Attached
[ ] Mark Up Plans
[ ] Copy of Minutes
] Under Separate Cover via
[ ] Plans
[ ] Copy of Letter
the following items:
[ ] Prints
[ ] Specifications
[ ] Change order [ ]
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
REMARKS:
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
[ ] For Your Use
[ ] As Requested
[ ] For Review & Comment
[ ] Returned for Corrections
[ ] Resubmit__Copies for Approval
[ ] Return Corrected Prints
2 Mylars- 10 Executed Final Plats
[x ] Approved as Noted
[ ] Approved as Submitted
[ ] Note & Reply To:
[ ] Note & Forward To:
[ ] Submit Copies for Distribution
[ ] Return Markup Plans with Corrections
Please find attached procedures for filing an executed final Plat. If you have any
questions, please contact the Engineering Department at (214) 462-0022.
TO:
CITY OF COPPELL
255 PARKWAY BLVD.
P. O. BOX 478
COPPELL, TEXAS 75019
(214) 462-0022
DATE: I PROJECT:
ATTENTION:
WE ARE SENDING YOU ~)~. Attached [ ] Under Separate Cover via
[ ] Mark Up Plans [ ] Plans
[ ] Copy of Minutes [ ] Copy of Letter
[ ] Change order [ ]
the following items:
[ ] Prints
[ ] Specifications
CO~iES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
~)~] For Your Use ~ ~o~ ~~/[ ] Approved as Noted
~><] As Requested
[ ] Approved as Submitted
[ ] For Review & Comment
[ ] Note & Reply mo:
[ ] Returned for Corrections
[ ] Note & Forward To:
REMARKS:
[ ] Resubmit
[ ] Return
Copies for Approval
Corrected Prints
[ ] Submit Copies for Distribution
[ ] Return Harkup Plans vith Corrections
:OPY TO: ~g O~
GINN, INC.
Consulting Engineer~
17103 Preston Road
Suite 100. LB-118
DALLAS, TEXAS 75248
(214) 248-4900
TO
WE ARE SENDING YOU yAtb
[] Shop drawings
[] Under serrate ~ver vma
[] Prints
RE:
[] Plans [] Samples
the following items:
[] Specifications
Copy of letter [] Change order []
cOpIES DATE NO.
DESCRIPTION
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
[] For approval
//~ For your use
As 'requested
[] For review and comment
[] FOR BIDS DUE
[] Approved as submitted
[] Approved as noted
[] Returned for corrections
19
[] Resubmit
[] Submit
[] Return
copies for approval
copies for distribution
corrected prints
__ [] PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
COPY TO
PflOOUCT240-3 ~k~..,GgeM~ k 0147]
/ SIGNED: .
If enc/osures are not es noted, kindly notify us at once.
6330 Belt Line Road Suite C
February 27, 1989
Garland, Texas 75043
Mr. Kevin E...Peiffer, P.E,
GINN, INC.
17103 Preston Rd. Suite 100
Dallas, TExas 75248
RE: CREEKVIEW NORTH ADDITI
Coppell, Texas
Dear Mr. Peiffer,
(214) 226-2967 ~3~-~ ~
~1 3280
This is your notification that the fill placed on the site and
within the proposed 'street R.O.W. will be placed in a manner to
prevent the trench depth from exceeding five (5') feet. This will
be accomplished by coordination between the excavation contractor
and the utility contractor. If at any time trench depth for
installation for any water, sanitary sewer and storm drainage
facilities exceed five (5') feet in depth a trench safety plan
is to be furnished to the City of Coppell prior to construction
of those facilities. If you have any questions, please contact
ou~~c~ at your convenience-
/ .
DON A. TIPTON, INC.
cc: Hs. ~udy Troth Parsons
Boney Construction Company-Excavation ~nd Paving Contractor
Cra~ford ~tility Company-~tilLtY Contractor
GINN, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
February 2~/.~ 9
Mr. Russ/1 Doyle,
city of/Coppell
P.O. B/x 478
Coppetl, TX 75019
Re:
Creekview North Addition
Coppell, TX
Dear Mr. Doyle:
We have reviewed the construction plans for the above referenced
project and offer the following comments.
Per paragraph 3 of our attached review letter of 11/23/88,
please note that the applicant has not included trench
safety plans in their construction plan sets, therefore, all
utilities will need to be installed while the trenches are
less than 5 feet deep. This is not to imply, however, as
waiving any city cover requirements.
The trench depth note on the utility plans should not
provide the contractor any options. You may want to have
the wordage revised, or just have Public Works monitor
compliance with the State laws, HB 662 and 665 since the
project is small in size.
3. The floodplain development permit is ready for the
~ Floodplain Administrator's signature on the final plat.
Please call if you have any questions.
S incer~.~ ~/
Kevin Peiffer/~. E.
KP/dsp
cc: File 89305
17103
~reston Road · Suite 100 · LB 118 · D,"._,' .........