Copperstone FS-CS 890328 (2)Mr. Jerry Parche', P.E.
Jerry P~rche' Consulting Engineers
320 Westway Place, Suite 501
Arlington, Texas 76018
Federal Emergency Management Ag Am
Washington, D.C. 20472
IN REPLY REFER
IA-RA-RS 44-72B
Case No.: 89-06-31R
RE: The February 24, 1989 letter from Mr. Russell R. Doyle, P.E., City Engineer
for the City of Coppell, to FEMA.
Dear Mr. Parche'~
This is in response to the above-mentioned letter requesting that the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) determine the effects of a proposed flood
plain modification in the following community:
City of Coppell, Dallas County, Texas (Project: Parks of Coppell)
FEMA has initiated a reimbursement procedure to allow for the recovery of
costs associated with the review of such requests, thereby reducing the
expenses to the general taxpayer. Enclosed for your information is a copy of
Part 72 of the National Flood Insurance Program regulations, by which this
policy was implemented.
We are currently reviewing your request package to determine the appropriate
processing procedure. When this initial review is completed, we will inform
you of any fee or additional information that may be required to continue the
processing of your submittal.
Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Matthew B.
Miller of our Headquarters staff in Washington, D.C., at (202) 646-3461.
Sincerely,
Chief, Risk Studies Division
Federal Insurance Administration
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Russell R. Doyle, P.E.
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
National Flood In .rance Program
Related Regulations
Revised as of October 1, 1986
Amendment No.1, June 30, 1987
PART FOR
APPROVAL OF MAP CHANGES
Sec.
72.1 Purpose of part.
72.2 Definitions.
72.3 Initial fee schedule.
72.4 Submittal/payment procedures and
FEMA response.
72.5 Exemptions.
72.6 Unfavorable response.
72.7 Resubmittals.
AOTHOSITY: 31 U.S.C. 9701; 42 U.S.C. 4001
et seq.; Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1978;
E.O. 12127.
SnoRer: 50 FR 36028, Sept. 4, 1985, unless
otherwise noted.
§ 72.1 Purpo,~e of part.
The purpose of this part is to pro-
vide administrative and cost recovery
procedures for engineering review and
processing associated with the issu-
ance of Conditional Letters of Map
Amendment (conditional LOMAs) and
Conditional Letters of Map Revision
(conditional LOMRs). Final LOMAs
and LOMRs granted to correct map
deficiencies are not subject to this re-
imbursement procedure.
§ 72.2 l)efinition,~.
(a) Except as otherwise provided in
this part. the definitions set forth in
Part 59 of this subchapter are applica-
ble to this pa. rt.
(b) For the purpose of this part. a
Conditional Letter of Map Amen'd-
ment (conditional LOMA) is FEMA's
comment on a proposed project to be
located in and affecting only that por-
tion of the area of special flood hazard
outs/de the regulatory floodway and
having no impact on the existing regu-
latory floodway or effective base flood
elevations.
(c) For the purpose,of this part. a
Conditional Letter of Map Hevision
(conditional LOMR) will be FEMA's
comment on a proposed project that
would affect the hydrologic and/or
hydraulic characteristics of a flooding
source and thus result in the modifica-
tion of the existing regulatory flood-
way or effective base flood elevations.
72--PROCEDURE AND FEES
OBTAINING CONDITIONAL
§ 72.3 Initial fee schedule.
(a) For conditional Letters of Map
Amendment. the initial fee shall be
paid by the requestor in the following
amounts:
( 1 ) Single-lot ............................................. $125
(2) Multi-lo£/subdivision ........................ $175
(b) Pot conditional Letters of Map
Revision, the initial fee shall be paid
by the requestor in the following
amounts:
(l) New bridge or culvert (no chan-
nelization ) .............................................. $350
(2) Channel modifications only ............ $400
(3) Channel modification and new
bridge or culvert ................................... $525
(4) Levees. berms, or other strllctur.
al mea.~a res ............................................ $6?5
(C) FOr projects involving combina-
tions of the above actions which are
not separately identified, the initial
fee shall be that charged for the most
expensive of the actions comprising
the combination.
§72.4 Submittal/payment procedures and
FEMA response.
(a) Initial fees shall be submitted
w/th the request for FEMA review and
processing of conditional LOMA~ and
conditional IA)MRs.
(b) Initial fees must be received by
PEMA before the review can be initi-
ated for any conditional LOMA or con-
ditional LOMR request.
(c) l~ollowing completion of FEMA
review for any conditional LOMA or
conditional LOMR, the requestor will
be billed at the prevailing private
sector labor rate (currently $25.00 per
hour) for any actual costs exceeding
the initial fee incurred during the
review.
( I ) Req uestors of conditional
LOMAs will be notified of the antici-
pated total cost ii the total cost of
processing their request will exceed
$500.
(2) Requestors of conditional
LOMI~ will be notified of the antici-
pated total cost if the total cost of
processing their request will exceed
$1,500.
(3) In the event that processing costs
exceed the limits defined in para-
graphs lc)(1) and (2) of this section,
processing of the request will be sus-
pended pending FEMA receipt of writ-
ten approval from the requestor to
proceed.
(d) The entity that applies to FEMA
through the local community for
review will be billed for the cost of the
review. The local community incurs no
financial obligation under the reim-
bursemen£ procedure set forth in this
part as a result of transmitting the
submittal to PEMA.
(e) Payment of both the initial fee
and final cost shall be by check or
money order payable to the United
~tates Treasury and must be received
by i~EMA before the conditional
LOMA or conditional LOMR will be
i&sued.
(f) Pot conditional LOMA request.s,
(1) Not/fy the requestor within 30
days a.s to the adequacy of the submit-
tal. and
(2) Within 30 days of receipt of ade-
quate information, provide comment
to the requestor on the proposed
project.
(g) For conditional LOMR requests,
FEMA shall:
(1) Notify the requestor within 60
days a.s to the adequacy of the submit-
iAI, and
(2) Within 90 days of receipt of ade-
quate information, provide comment
to the requestor on the proposed
project.
§ 72.5 Exemptions.
Pederal. State. and local govern.
ments and their agencies shall be
exemfft from fees for projects they
sponsor if the requestor certifies that
the particular project is for public
benefit and primarily intended for
flood loss reduction to existing devel-
opment in identified flood hazard
areas, as opposed to planned flood
plain development.
§72.6 Unfavorable response.
A conditional LOMA or conditional
LOMR may be denied or may contain
specific comments, concerns, or condi-
tions regarding a proposed project or
design and its impacts on flood haz-
ards in a community. A requestor is
not entitled to any refund if the letter
contains such comments, concerns, or
conditions: or if the letter is denied. A
requestor is not entitled to any refund
if the requestor is unable to obtain re-
quired authorizations, permits, financ-
ing, etc., for which the letter wa.~
sought.
§ 72.7 Resubmittais.
Any resut)l~-~.~ request more
than 90 days after FEMA notification
that a request has been denied or after
a review has been terminated due to
insufficient information or other rea-
sons will be treated a.s an original sub-
mission ~nd subject to all submittal/
payment procedures as described in
172.4, including the initial fee. The
procedure of § 72.4 including the ini-
tial fee, will also apply if the project
has been significantly altered in
design or scope other than that heres*
sary to respond to previously issued
comment~, concerns, or conditions by
FEMA.