ST9902-CS140404 (5)
Halie Hernandez
From:Christina Lawson <kinglp7@hotmail.com>
Sent:Friday, April 04, 2014 3:09 PM
To:Keith Marvin
Subject:sprinkler system, easement on oak trail, drainage
Keith,
SPRINKLER SYSTEM;
I am watching men repair the sprinkler system again, along Sandy Lake (not in the easement, off of the 101
private drive) - in a private area, not under construction.
When is the system as promised going to be moved into 101 property? When they take up the cement on
the 101 sandy lake access drive, and the sidewalk, they will again flood with city water from my meter, and the
entire system will need to stay down. Metal tubes have also been thrown, hitting other heads. The verizon
boxes (both) are haphazard at best.
101 TRESPASS
101 Trespass is again happening from high school students, as no frontage barriers have been placed in
construction in the front of oak trail property. The barrier along sandy lake - i paid for...not the construction
crew, ask walter.
_____________________
REMOVAL OF DRIVE WAY, WHICH WAS CAPITAL INVESTMENT UNDER CITY PERMIT OF 101 OAK TRAIL
Promised drive replacement of 101 Oak Trail....????
Now, the construction people have "taken" 101 PRIVATE drive, instead of the envisioned cement
REPLACEMENT OF DRIVE, THE 101 DRIVE HAS BEEN REMOVED FOR THE BENEFIT OF A TWO LANE WIDENING
OF OAK TRAIL.
THIS IS NOT WHAT YOU HAVE REPEATEDLY SHOWED IN PLANS AND DISCUSSION...
_______________________
UNDER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT - PLEASE SEND ME THE EASEMENT AGREEMENT FROM FORMER
OWNERS WHICH ALLOWS REMOVAL OF 101 CAPITAL INVESTEMENT CEMENT DRIVEWAY FOR A TWO LANE
WIDENING OF OAK TRAIL.
THE DRIVE WENT FROM THE PROPERTY THROUGH THE EASEMENT, UP TO THE ASPHALT OF OAK TRAIL, TO
JOG THE MEMORY
_______________________
THANK YOU,
Christina Lawson
1
2