ST9902-CS140415
Halie Hernandez
From:Christina Lawson <kinglp7@hotmail.com>
Sent:Tuesday, April 15, 2014 12:53 PM
To:Keith Marvin
Attachments:101 20140315 DEED 002.jpg; 101 20140315 DEED 001.jpg
Keith,
I spent two hours with attorney Ken Harter last night regarding the city "utility easement dedication"
agreement. Ken is a good guy, fair and thought an email for you asking city attorney and getting answer in
writing is next step. "Why utility easement is property taking by city for road improvement" without
payment. With legal opinion, Ken as a ligitating attorney will call city attorney. Then, and only then, will final
decision be made to move forward on this injustice. A civil engineer does not have the right, nor a
construction company which will be involved, to take citizen's property (drive) nor land, at will.
Interesting that this utility easement instrument was not used for the taking of easement land for the
"widening of sandy lake road", but this instrument is being used for the "taking of 101 oak trail property" for
the widening of the "Sandy Lake Road ingress and egress to Oak Trail", without notification to homeowners,
involved.
as acting engineer of the Sandy Lake Road project, I would suggest you discuss this subject with the city
attorney, in greater detail....regarding "payment for taking"...or file an imminent domain lawsuit, which will be
defendant and a lawsuit by my person shall be forthcoming, if I do not hear from you by May 1, 2014.
No,
a. I did not sign off of the taking of 101 Oak Trail property, ingress and egress widening of property;
b. I did not agree to the drainage plan of Oak Trail ingress and egress, I was told to wait and see.
c. I also, did not agree EVER, for the multiple down times of internet, multiple wiring of 101 property for city
contractors continually taking out both Verizon boxes and
d. causing 101 Oak Trail sprinkler system continual leakage and repair, which has taken my time, invasion of
property and some months of spiked usage, now documented....had the system been moved into boundary(s)
as promised. It is a closed loop system, and again this year, cannot put out grass seed because system is
continually down.
Your choice, I am attaching Deed which shall be recorded. And the case has enough merit for legal review for
a judge to make a decision. The city cannot call their own rules, and I regret that I listened to verbal promises,
ever. I really should know better. This is the first for private property and the flooding was and will
continue...no promises ever brought by city persons ever stood.
Christina Lawson
101 Oak Trail
Coppell Tx 75019
1
This message (including any attachments) is intended solely for the specific individual(s) or entity(ies) named
above, and may contain legally privileged and confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient,
please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message and then delete it. Any disclosure, copying,
or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, by other than the intended recipient, is
strictly prohibited. Thank you for your ethics.
2